On the agenda: Pacific meeting — data center (Jul 21)

Public Notice posted in accordance
RSMO. 610 as amended
By:
Kimberly Barfield
City Clerk

Posted: Date/Time Posted: Thursday, July 16 2026

4:00 PM

CITY OF PACIFIC
300 HOVEN
BOARD OF ALDERMEN AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
7:00 P.M.
This meeting is open to the public.

The meeting will be streamed live on the City of Pacific YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/@cityofpacific768
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Prayer – Pastor David Lange
5. Approve Agenda
6. Approve minutes
a. Approve the minutes from the regular meeting, July 7, 2026
7. Mayors Report
a. Approve Karla Stewart to Planning & Zoning Commission.
b. Approve Dan McClain to Meramec Valley Historical Museum & Genealogy Society.
8.

Public Hearing
Text Amendment-Zoning and Annexations. An amendment to Section 400.160 and Section 400.260
of the Zoning Code to ensure that any property outside the city limits will be zoned upon annexation
and to further ensure that rezoning of property outside the city limits does not occur prior to
annexation of such property.
Moratorium. Consideration of a twelve-month moratorium on acceptance of applications for any
permit or approval relating to the development, zoning, permitting, or use of property for data
centers of all sizes to allow sufficient time for proper land use studies, effective community
engagement, comprehensive plan update if necessary, and preparation of appropriate zoning
amendments and regulations.
Text Amendment Short Term Vacation Rentals. Amendment to several sections of Chapter 400 to
eliminate the use of "short term vacation rentals" as a conditional use in the NU "nonurban" District
and all Residential Zoning Districts. (P&Z sent to workshop on 7/14/26)

9. Public Participation

10. New Bills

a. Bill No. 5330 An Ordinance amending sections 400.160 and 400.260 of the Zoning Code relating
to timing of zoning decisions for land proposed for annexation. (1st reading, Public Hearing)
b. Bill No. 5331 An Ordinance instituting a twelve-month interim stay of acceptance of applications
for any permit or approval relating to the development, zoning, permitting, or use of property
for data centers of all sizes to allow sufficient time for a proper land use study, effective
community engagement, comprehensive plan update if necessary, and consideration of any
appropriate zoning test amendments or other actions. (1st reading, Public Hearing)
11. Consideration of Bills Previously Introduced
a. Bill No. 5325 An Ordinance approving a Conditional Use Permit for TM Performance Sales LLC to
operate an automobile dealership and sales on an approximate .58-acre parcel along S. First St.
in the C-1 downtown commercial district. (2nd reading)
12. New Business
a. Resolution No. 2026-15 A Resolution opposing truck size or weight increases.
13. Old Business
a. Bill No. 5298 An Ordinance approving a Subdivision Plat for the subdivision of the lot located at
1722 Highway N into two parcels and authorizing city officials to acknowledge the city’s approval
of the plat for recording. (2nd reading-Sage) Tabled 1-6-26, petitioner requested this remain on
the table until May 5, 2026. Updated request is until June 7, 2026. 5-5-26 meeting Board asked
applicant to attend 5-19-26 meeting. Board tabled until 7-21-26.
14. City Administrator Report
15. Chief’s Report
16. Public Works Commissioner
17. City Attorney Report
18. Operations Committee report
19. Administrative Committee report
20. Planning and Zoning Commission report
21. Park Board report
22. Tourism Commission report
23. Meramec Valley Historical Society report
24. Jeffrey White Memorial Skatepark Project committee report
25. Miscellaneous
a. Approve list of bills.
26. Reports of City officials
a. Alderman Hoven
b. Alderman Lesh

c.
d.
e.
f.

Alderman Nickelson
Alderman Cleeve
Alderman Gass
Alderman Bruns

27. Adjourn
The Board of Aldermen will consider and act upon the matters listed above and such others as may be
presented at the meeting and determined to be appropriate for discussion at that time. The City of Pacific
is working to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act mandates. Individuals who require an
accommodation to attend a meeting should contact City Hall (271-0500) at least twenty-four hours in
advance.

MEMORANDUM FROM CITY ADMINISTRATOR

To:

Board of Aldermen

RE:

Tuesday, July 21st, 2026 Board of Alderman Meeting

Following are my notes pertaining to items on the agenda as well as some FYIs.
1.

The agenda includes three public hearings as required by code. These public hearings were held at
Planning & Zoning on 7-14-26.
a. Zoning and annexation – there were speakers on this topic. This draft legislation was created
by Attorney Karr, and recommended for approval from P & Z.
b. Moratorium – there were speakers for this topic. The draft legislation was created by Attorney
Karr was in the packet and presented for discussion. The city’s new attorney (Joe Bond) was
present. During discussion of the text amendment, Attorney Bond noted he did not draft this
legislation. The Commission requested to see his draft, which he refers to as an Interim Stay of
Acceptance. After presentation the Commission received additional public comments. The
new draft was discussed and the Commission voted to accept the new draft and this is the
recommendation to the Board of Aldermen. This is presented in the Board packet referenced
at the top “Rec. from Planning & Zoning”. The original version is also included in the packet for
reference.
c. Short Term Vacation – during the meeting three owners spoke regarding the benefits of shortterm rentals. This draft legislation was created by Attorney Karr. After discussion, it was
approved to have a workshop including the owners of the short-term rentals. This is scheduled
for their next meeting on 7-28-26.

2. 4th St – this project is moving along. It looks like we will go out for bid in September and begin
construction in late fall. There is a chance we might be able to start construction next spring. The
wording would have to be put in the contract to do that. If MoDOT approves the plan as submitted we
will have to add an addendum prior to bidding. A detour has been established.
3. 1st St – this project will start this month. A detour route has been established. This is included with the
packet.

1

CITY OF

P acific
July 7, 2026 * RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CITY OF PACIFIC
REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN
300 HOVEN
PACIFIC, MISSOURI
________________________________________________________________________

T

he meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Kelley. The meeting was held at City
Hall. The public was able to attend in person.

A roll call was taken with the following results:
Present at Roll Call:

Also present:

Alderman Nickelson
Alderman Cleeve
Alderman Gass
Alderman Bruns
Alderman Hoven
Alderman Lesh
Administrator Litterell
Attorney Karr
Chief Huntington
Engineer Girondo
City Clerk Barfield

Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was done.
Prayer
There was no prayer this evening.
Approve Agenda
Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman Bruns to approve the agenda.
Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Cleeve asked about the two bills with the
second reading. Mayor Kelley thought it was important to have them approved this evening as
they were cost saving. Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Lesh to
1

2

remove Bills No. 5326 and 5327. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Cleeve
asked if there was an emergency that we needed to hear them twice. Alderman Bruns stated she
has been here since July, and three times there has been two readings at the same meeting.
Alderman Hoven did not think it had happened since he was elected. Alderman Bruns continued
that our budget is tight, and why spend more money. They are required to have 30 days’ notice
after this is passed as it is. Mayor Kelley stated the current attorney’s firm stated they would
waive the 30-day notice if the city wanted. She continued that these changes are cost effective
and the best thing to do to save money. Alderman Lesh stated the second reading could be done
for emergencies. He stated that he called one of the firms that was interviewed and they were
not aware of the Planning & Zoning officer role. Mayor Kelley disagreed, the firms were
interviewed, and she is asking for two readings tonight. Alderman Bruns called for the vote. A
roll call vote was taken on removing Bill No. 5326 and Bill No. 5327 for the second reading,
with the following results: Ayes: Alderman Cleeve, Alderman Hoven, Alderman Lesh.
Nays: Alderman Nickelson, Alderman Gass, Alderman Bruns. Mayor Kelley stated with a
tie vote of 3-3, she would be voting “nay”. These items will be left on the agenda for the
second reading.
Approval of Minutes
a. Approve minutes from June 16, 2026
Motion made by Alderman Bruns, seconded by Alderman Cleeve to approve the minutes of
the meeting on June 16, 2026. Mayor Kelley asked for any further discussion. A voice vote
was taken with an affirmative result to approve the minutes. Nays: none. Abstain: none.
Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
b. Approve minutes from closed session on June 22, 2026
Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Gass to approve the minutes
from June 22, 2026. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an
affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the
motion carried.
Mayors Report
a. Oath of Office – Zachary Cadenbach, Police Officer
Chief Huntington stated Officer Cadenbach graduated from the academy ranking first in his class
overall. An oath of office was taken.
b. Certificate of Recognition – McKenna Lay
Alderman Nickelson stated McKenna Lay is being recognized for her exceptional athleticism,
unmatched teamwork and dedication setting a new State Record in Javelin. She was presented
with a certificate.

2

3

Public Hearing
a. A Public Hearing of the Board of Aldermen to hear comments on a Map Amendment
(rezoning) for 1854 Old Gray Summit Road, 587 Katie, Lane, 573 Katie Lane, and 584
Katie Lane, Parcel numbers 19-1-11.0-3-004-012.000, 19-1-11.0-3-002-12.100, 19-111.0-3-004-012.200, 19-1-11.0-3-000-013.100. Applicant is seeking to rezone all parcels
from the current NU Non-Urban and “Y” Zoning to R-1B single family residential.
(Continued from 4-21-26, continued to 5-5-26 until 7-7-26.)
Mayor Kelley stated the applicant has asked for a 60-day extension. City Clerk Barfield read the
public hearing into the record. Mayor Kelley opened the public hearing for comments.
Kevin Doyle, stated he was not opposed to development, but wants it done responsible. This is
to rezone from R1E to R1H. This will create more traffic. Planning & Zoning has rejected this
twice already. He submitted a petition from Summit Hills and Orchard Estates residents that he
read into the record. He asked the Board to reject this Bill.
Robin Pritchett, stated her mom lives at 1874 Old Gray Summit Road, and she echoed what
Kevin said. This will destroy the area. She submitted a letter of protest to this development.
Dennis O’Malley, stated he is adjacent to the property to the east. He agrees with what was said
before. The rezoning question is before you tonight. The proposal restricts future urban
development. This has been going on for some time. Moving forward with this is not the kind
of progress he wants in an urban development, and he asked them to vote no.
There being no more speakers, the public hearing was closed.
Public Participation
Jeannie Bandermann, stated for Red Cedar the month of June had 3,413 visitors. Since January
there has been 12,165 items sold, with a revenue of $ 12,790.33. The quilt squares will be on
display until September 15th, and the open house is Sunday from 12 noon to 2 pm. There will be
an ice-cream truck there along with some of the quilters. She thanked everyone who came out
for the parade. The MG Club of St. Louis will be at Red Cedar on July 11th from 10 am to 1 pm.
The Big Boy Train will be at the Station Plaza on Monday, July 20th from 11:30 to 11:45 am.
Heather Filley, stated she understood the difficulty on balancing a budget. The City of Pacific
must be treated as a business. In a business the employees are the most important investment
that we can make. The budget has a 1% increase in it for employees, which is disappointing.
Some employees are covered under Memorandum’s of Understanding, and generally negotiate a
3% increase. This 3% increase would cost the city $ 62,000 for all employees. She thanked
Alderman Nickelson, Alderman Cleeve and Alderman Hoven for recognizing the importance of
this. She also suggested revisiting the idea of performance reviews. Next, she spoke to the two
readings of Bill No. 5326 and Bill No. 5327. While she understood there was no ruling on this,
it was surprising to see this on the agenda twice, as these are significant decisions. Transparency
3

4

matters, and the public should be able to see the RFQ’s and why the firms were selected. This
could have been done for the public in a report from the mayor or city administrator. She
noticed the operating number general fund is starting at is a deficit. She wanted to see the city
look for meaningful ways to show employees are valued.
Dana Bowers, stated she was worried Pacific was going to get caught flat footed. Pacific is still a
real part of Beltline. If they don’t get what they want Beltline will be back. The moratorium
doesn’t protect us from their application. We need experienced legal council with strong rules
wrote for us. Please don’t rely on Franklin County regulations. There are two many gaps. She
asked that trusted council review the status, not just the city attorney. She was not here to beat
anybody up, this is just very complicated. Pacific is not a fallback route, please protect us. We
don’t want Beltline or anyone else.
Twila Ashworth, stated she was hearing rumors about aldermen and the attorney meeting. She
asked for the status of the moratorium. We are against this. Data centers belong in
industrialized zones. The reason the other mayor is out is because the city attorney gave her
wrong advice about the NDA, and now she’s out of office. It is time for a different law firm.
There is failure here.
Jessica Nicodemo, stated we need to ban NDAs, and protect our energy and water needs. People
need to know if they do come, how much they will be using. Is there a cap on it or can we put
one in place? She is following a girl in Catawba County and they are going through eminent
domain due to a data center needing high voltage power lines through her property. She also
read about another system that was closed loop, but had a bacteria in it. Please move on the
moratorium.
New Bills
a. Bill No. 5325 An Ordinance approving a Conditional Use Permit for TM Performance
Sales LLC to operate an automobile dealership and sales on an approximate .58-acre
parcel along S. First St. in the C-1 downtown commercial district. (1st reading)
Mayor Kelley asked for a sponsor. Alderman Gass stated he would sponsor the Bill. As posted
pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5325 by title only for the first
reading. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. There were no comments.
b. Bill No. 5326 An Ordinance appointing a City Attorney and authorizing the mayor to
execute a contract for legal services. (1st reading)
Mayor Kelley asked for a sponsor. Alderman Bruns stated she would sponsor the Bill. As
posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5326 by title only for the first
reading. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. There were no comments.
c. Bill No. 5327 An Ordinance authorizing and accepting a Master Services Agreement
with Shive Hattery Architecture and Engineering for professional services relating to
4

5

engineered plan review, design review and consulting services. (1st reading)
Mayor Kelley asked for a sponsor. Alderman Bruns stated she would sponsor the Bill. As
posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5327 by title only for the first
reading. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. There were no comments.
Consideration of Bills previously introduced
a. Bill No. 5326 An Ordinance appointing a City Attorney and authorizing the mayor to
execute a contract for legal services. (2nd reading)
As posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5326 by title only for the
second reading. Motion made by Alderman Bruns, seconded by Alderman Nickelson to
approve Bill No. 5326. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Lesh stated the
current attorney fee is $ 250 an hour. Administrator Litterell stated the new contract is $ 165 an
hour for city services. Cunningham, Vogel & Rost is out of Sunset Hills. They specialize in
municipal law. The city went out for Request for Qualifications. A roll call vote was taken
with the following results: Ayes: Alderman Nickelson, Alderman Gass, Alderman Bruns,
Alderman Hoven. Nays: Alderman Cleeve, Alderman Lesh. Mayor Kelley declared the
motion carried 4-2, and Bill No. 5326 becomes Ord. No. 3497.
b. Bill No. 5327 An Ordinance authorizing and accepting a Master Services Agreement
with Shive Hattery Architecture and Engineering for professional services relating to
engineered plan review, design review and consulting services. (2nd reading)
As posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5327 by title only for the
second reading. Motion made by Alderman Bruns, seconded by Alderman Gass to approve
Bill No. 5327. Administrator Litterell stated the point of contact will be Leslie, and she was in
the audience. Alderman Lesh asked about the additional services. Administrator Litterell stated
this is for engineering, zoning and inspections. Leslie Sawyer, Shive Hattery stated she has flood
plain experience also. Alderman Lesh stated there was not a lot of information in the packet.
Ms. Sawyer stated she has been a city engineer for many years, also working for the City of
Chesterfield. She does not do inspections, but they have staff in the firm that does. All of the
resumes are in the packet. Planning & Zoning is handled by Dave Panos. It was asked if
Attorney Karr has reviewed the agreement, and she has not. Alderman Hoven reviewed the fee
schedule that was presented. Administrator Litterell stated that GBA is at $ 274 an hour. Shive
Hattery is at $ 207 an hour, civil engineering is at $ 245 an hour, and project coordinator is at
$ 113 an hour. Alderman Lesh asked about their experience with data centers. Ms. Sawyer
stated they are currently doing surveying work for one in New Florence. They also have another
office that has experience with data centers. Mayor Kelley thought this firm would have more
availability for the residents. She has taken calls about delays on permits. Alderman Cleeve
thought this was being rushed, and it was not that much of a savings. There was discussion
about what the current staff was inspecting. Alderman Lesh stated he thought a lot of them were
on board with being efficient, but thought they should think about if this firm has enough
experience with data centers, and time to review the contract by the attorney. He really thought a
building commission in house was needed. Administrator Litterell stated this position has been
5

6

advertised for. The ad has been refreshed. Alderman Bruns asked to call for the vote.
Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Lesh to have the attorney
review the contract and if there were any critical items found, the contract comes back to
the Board; if it proceeds. This would be an amendment to the motion. Alderman Bruns asked
that the vote be called for. A roll call vote was taken on the amendment: Ayes: Alderman
Cleeve, Alderman Gass, Alderman Bruns, Alderman Hoven, Alderman Lesh, Alderman
Nickelson. Nays: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
A roll call vote was taken on the main motion: Ayes: Alderman Gass, Alderman Bruns,
Alderman Nickelson. Nay: Alderman Hoven, Alderman Cleeve. Abstain: Alderman Lesh
due to lack of information. Mayor Kelley stated the motion failed.
Old Business
a. Bill No. 5313 An Ordinance rezoning certain parcels totaling approximately 7.89 acres
located at 1854 Old Gray Summit Road, 587 Katie Lane, 573 Katie Lane, and 584 Katie
Lane from NU Non-Urban and “Y” Zoning Districts to R-1B Single Family Residential
District and changing the city’s zoning map accordingly. (Board tabled 7-7-26 along with
continued Public Hearing)
As posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Bill No. 5313 by title only for the
second reading. Mayor Kelley stated there was an e-mail received from one of the owners
requesting a 60-day extension. Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman
Cleeve to remove Bill No. 5313 from the table. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A
voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain: none.
Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman Gass to postpone this until
September 15, 2026. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Bruns stated this was
tabled before, and these people do not want it. This should be voted on. If they want to come
back and start the process over, they can. Motion made by Alderman Bruns to vote on Bill
No. 5313. Alderman Lesh stated there is no other information on this, he suggested a process of
the applicant has to show up in front of them. Alderman Hoven stated out of respect to the
applicant and the circumstances he thought the request should be postponed. Alderman Lesh
reminded the Board this was a question of zoning. A voice vote was taken on the
postponement. Mayor Kelley declared the motion failed 4-2. Motion made by Alderman
Lesh, seconded by Alderman Cleeve to approve Bill No. 5313. Mayor Kelley asked for any
discussion. Alderman Hoven stated he hated for the applicant to pay the fees again. Alderman
Cleeve thought the fees could be waived due to the circumstance. Alderman Hoven did not want
the city to make things difficult. Discussion followed. A voice vote was taken with a failed
result, 5-1. Mayor Kelley declared the motion failed, and the Bill is not approved.
b.

Resolution No. 2026-11 A Resolution authorizing execution of a contract agreement by
and between the City of Pacific and the Pacific Partnership Inc. pertaining to a publicprivate effort to revitalize the city’s central business district and downtown core area and
rodeo event procedures.

As posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Resolution No. 2026-11 by title
6

7

only. Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Nickelson to remove
Resolution No. 2026-11 from the table. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote
was taken with an affirmative result. Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by
Alderman Nickelson to approve Resolution No. 2026-11. Mayor Kelley asked for any
discussion. Alderman Lesh stated he still believed the paragraph regarding the façade money is
in conflict and belongs in another part of the document. Motion made by Alderman Lesh,
seconded by Alderman Bruns to strike the whole paragraph, C1, and add a disclaimer of
the last sentence under a section that is appropriate, maybe paragraph 2 or 3. Mayor
Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result.
As posted pursuant to the ordinance, City Clerk Barfield read Amended Resolution No. 2026-11
by title only. Motion made by Alderman Nickelson, seconded by Alderman Cleeve to
approve Amended Resolution No. 2026-11. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice
vote was taken with an affirmative result.
City Administrator report
a.

Approve request to Land Water Conservation in the amount of $ 60,000 for overruns of
the Jeffrey White Memorial Skatepark Project.

Administrator Litterell stated he would like approval to apply for additional funding. The city
has received an invoice for 9 days of being held up in the amount of $ 40,951.00. In the contract,
it reads they are not responsible for delays. Discussion followed. Motion made by Alderman
Lesh, seconded by Alderman Cleeve to allow the administrator to apply for additional
grant funds. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Gass did not think the city
should have to pay for delays. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays:
Alderman Gass. Abstain: Alderman Bruns. Motion carried.
b.

Approve invoice from Primary Concrete LLC for the Skatepark Project in the amount of
$ 151,200.

Motion made by Alderman Nickelson, seconded by Alderman Lesh to approve the invoice
from Primary Concrete LLC in the amount of $ 151,200. Mayor Kelley asked for any
discussion. Alderman Lesh asked if the project was on target. Administrator Litterell stated it
was. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: Alderman Bruns. Mayor
Kelley declared the motion carried.
Chief’s Report
No report. Administrator Litterell stated the Blue Shield Grant was approved for $ 29,000.
City Attorney Report – no report.
Operations Committee Report – Alderman Lesh stated a tentative date is being worked on to
discuss the interceptor line and the lagoon.
7

8

Administrative Committee Report – The next meeting would be July 27, 2026 at 5:00 PM if
needed. The one item to discuss would be sponsorship procedures.
Planning & Zoning – Alderman Lesh stated there are three items coming to Planning & Zoning,
the moratorium, annexation with zoning, and short term vacation rentals. He wanted to bring up
what he did ask at the last meeting, and he has reviewed the minutes and section 400.160, and in
his opinion P&Z has 60 days to render a verdict. We have had a PUD application since 2/25.
His opinion is we need to move forward on the PUD and look at regulations for data centers.
Motion made by Alderman Lesh, seconded by Alderman Nickelson to schedule the hearing
to resume for Beltline. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Lesh stated we are
following our ordinances and simply saying it is time for staff to follow the ordinance.
Alderman Cleeve stated he has changed his opinion and believes we could ask them to proceed
and have the hearing. Alderman Hoven asked if we were interfering? Alderman Lesh stated we
are directing administration to follow section 400.160. Attorney Karr stated Section 400.160
does refer to 60 days, and the 60 days is past. That section says if P&Z don’t ask it is deemed to
be approved by them, and then would come to the Board. If you want to now say the 60 days
was running, then it comes here, but originally this was treated as a “stay” because the applicant
requested the delay. The 60 days was “told” and not a detriment to the city. If you want to ask
P&Z to schedule it, they can do that at any time, with proper notice, which means publish in the
newspaper, post signs, send letters, notify applicant and give 15-day notice. This must be republished because the public hearing was never held. The City Administrator can reach out to
Planning & Zoning to schedule this. As a reminder, the current PUD ordinance says they do not
need to annex at the same time. Rezoning can be considered and annexed at a later date, as the
PUD reads now. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain:
none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman Lesh to have Planning &
Zoning look at data center regulations. Mayor Kelley asked for discussion. Alderman Gass
asked who was going to pay for this? Alderman Lesh stated the city would be paying. Alderman
Hoven stated we may also need special council for this, but it needs to be done. A voice vote
was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain: none. Whereupon, Mayor
Kelley declared the motion carried.
Park Board Report – Alderman Hoven stated he would like to step down from Park Board due
to personal conflicts. Motion made by Alderman Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Hoven to
approve Alderman Nickelson being the Park Board representative. Alderman Lesh
reminded the Board that they needed to make nominations. Motion made by Alderman
Cleeve, seconded by Alderman Hoven to nominate Alderman Nickelson to the Park Board
as the liaison. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an
affirmative result. Nays: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
Tourism Commission Report – No report.
Meramec Valley Historical Society Report – Alderman Bruns stated their next meeting is
8

9

tomorrow at 5:00 PM.
Jeffrey White Memorial Skatepark Project Committee report – Alderman Cleeve stated we
needed to look at proceeding with an opening date.
Miscellaneous
a.

Approve appointment of Shane Mayer to the Tourism Commission, term to expire
November 2028.

Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman Gass to approve the
appointment of Shane Mayer to the Tourism Commission, term to expire November 2028.
Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Cleeve stated he would be serving under
hospitality. Alderman Lesh asked about the oath of office and the requirements. City Clerk
Barfield stated they were attached to it. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result.
Nays: none. Abstain: none. Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
b.

Approve a Special Event Permit for The Bridge Pacific, for a family concert at
Pacific Station Plaza on September 5, 2026.

Motion made by Alderman Bruns, seconded by Alderman Gass to approve the special
event permit for The Bridge Pacific, for a family concert at the Pacific Station Plaza on
September 5, 2027. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an
affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the
motion carried.
c.

Approve invoice from Daikin TM for fan coil replacement of HVAC system in the
amount of $ 11,666.50.

Motion made by Alderman Hoven, seconded by Alderman Lesh to approve the invoice
from Daikin TM for fan coil replacement for the HVAC system in the amount of $
11,666.50. Mayor Kelley asked for any discussion. Alderman Lesh stated we were told before
there are 32 units inside that eventually will need replaced. We need to remember this at budget
time. He asked which budget this will fall under. City Clerk Barfield stated it would fall under
FY26 budget. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain:
none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
d.

Approve payment to UMB Bank for the Certificates of Participation 2023 Payment
in the amount of $ 72,512.50, including transfer from Capital Improvement Sales Tax
to the Sewer Fund.

Motion made by Alderman Lesh, seconded by Alderman Cleeve to approve payment to
UMB Bank for the Certificates of Participation 2023 Payment in the amount of $ 72,512.50,
including the transfer from Capital Improvement Sales Tax to the Sewer Fund. Mayor
Kelley asked for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays:
none. Abstain: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
9

10

Report of City Officials
Alderman Hoven – stated there was a lot of over growth on Congress and Hwy N. It would be
wonderful if the citizens would help out keeping the grass mowed, but also hoped the city could
spray the weeds. Next, he apologized for a statement he made earlier regarding Planning &
Zoning and taking what they say with a grain of salt. He felt it was important to be building
affordable neighborhoods and these type need approved.
Alderman Lesh - thought there just needed to be more communication. Alderman Lesh stated he
has residents in Ward 3 reach out about the weeds also, but he thought we may need to
reorganize manpower. Alderman Lesh stated the Highlands and Brush Creek Subdivisions were
approved recently and one is with higher density than the other. He thought we just needed
balance.
Alderman Nickelson – stated he was happy to serve on the Park Board.
Alderman Cleeve – thought the 4th of July Parade was awesome. He continued the failure of
changing engineering firms for him, was due to not having enough information. He suggested
providing more information and bringing it back. Also, regarding the NDA’s he reminded
everyone that it has already been passed, that there will not be any NDAs.
Alderman Gass – made a motion to have the street department pave from 5th Street to
Walnut to the end. This was seconded by Alderman Bruns. Mayor Kelley asked for any
discussion. Alderman Gass stated he wanted the street department to do the work, not contract it
out. This is probably 16’ wide and about 250’ long. Alderman Lesh asked about the cost.
Alderman Gass was not sure. Alderman Gass stated this will probably take a couple tandem
loads. Motion made by Alderman Lesh, seconded by Alderman Bruns to amend the motion
for the city to look at doing this with staff but also find out the costs. Mayor Kelley asked
for any discussion. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. A voice vote was then
taken on the main motion, with an affirmative result. Next Alderman Gass passed out a
proposed resolution regarding truck weight limits. He would like this on the next agenda.
Discussion followed. Motion made by Alderman Lesh, seconded by Alderman Nickelson to
place this on the next agenda. A voice vote was taken with an affirmative result. Nays:
none. Abstain: none. Whereupon, Mayor Kelley declared the motion carried.
Alderman Bruns – stated she received a call from a resident on Sand Street, and the street
between Olive and Elm is falling apart. In the middle of it the street is down to gravel. The old
part of town needs to be looked at. She continued the sidewalks at Olive and Elm are blocked by
bamboo and on Columbus there are trees on the city walk. Discussion followed.

Adjournment
10

11

Motion made by Alderman Lesh, seconded by Alderman Bruns to adjourn. A voice vote
was taken with an affirmative result. Nays: none. Abstain: none. The meeting adjourned at
9:20 P.M.
__________________________________
Mayor Kelley
ATTEST:
________________________________
City Clerk

11

BILL NO. 5330

ORDINANCE NO. _____

SPONSOR:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 400.160 AND 400.260 OF THE
ZONING CODE RELATING TO TIMING OF ZONING DECISIONS FOR LAND
PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PACIFIC,
MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Subsection D of Section 400.260 of Article VI of Chapter
400 of Title IV of the Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:
[all other subsections and provisions of Section 400.260 that are not
specifically set forth below are not amended in any way and remain in full
force and effect]
TITLE IV

LAND USE

CHAPTER 400

ZONING REGULATIONS

ARTICLE VI

AMENDMENTS TO ZONING REGULATIONS

SECTION 400.260

AMENDMENTS

…
D.
Annexation. All territory that is proposed for annexation by the City
shall be zoned by the City, in accordance with the requirements applicable to
actions to zone or rezone property, contemporaneously with consideration
and action on the annexation.
…
SECTION 2.
The first paragraph of Subsection F of Section 400.160 of
Article II of Chapter 400 of Title IV of the Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows: [all other subsections and provisions of Section 400.160
that are not specifically set forth below are not amended in any way and
remain in full force and effect]
TITLE IV

LAND USE

CHAPTER 400

ZONING REGULATIONS

ARTICLE II

DISTRICT REGULATIONS

SECTION 400.160
“PUD” PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT REGULATIONS
…
F.
Procedures. A Planned District may be initiated by an application by
one (1) or more of the owners of record or owners under contract of a lot or
tract of land or their authorized representatives. The Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Board of Aldermen shall not review or approve a
Planned District outside the existing City limits unless an appropriate Petition
for Annexation is submitted at the same time and is considered and acted
upon prior to final action on the application for a planned district. Procedures
for application, review and approval of a Planned District shall be as follows:
…
SECTION 3.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after the date of its passage and approval and will apply to all petitions for
annexations and applications for planned developments submitted after the
date of this Ordinance. The provisions of this Ordinance will not apply to
applications for Planned Developments that have been filed and are currently
pending before the City.

Rec. from Planning & Zoning
BILL NO. 5331

ORDINANCE NO. _______

SPONSOR:
AN ORDINANCE INSTITUTING A TWELVE-MONTH INTERIM
STAY OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR ANY PERMIT
OR APPROVAL RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
PERMITTING, OR USE OF PROPERTY FOR DATA CENTERS OF
ALL SIZES TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR A PROPER
LAND USE STUDY, EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE IF NECESSARY, AND
CONSIDERATION OF ANY APPROPRIATE ZONING TEXT
AMENDMENTS OR OTHER ACTIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 89 RSMo, the City has enacted regulations and
restrictions applicable to the use of buildings, structures, and land within the
City; the height and size of buildings and other structures; the percentage of
lots that may be occupied; the density of population; the size of yards; and
other matters of zoning, land use, and construction; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of such regulations is to ensure compatibility of land
uses, ensure adequate infrastructure exists to accommodate various uses, avoid
a strain on resources, require proper construction, and, among other goals,
promote public safety and the general welfare of the community; and
WHEREAS, such regulations must be examined from time to time to ensure
that they address changing conditions and uses; and
WHEREAS, Data Centers, as defined herein, have significant impacts on
infrastructure, including demands on electrical power, water supply, and
telecommunications networks, as well as potential impacts on surrounding land
uses, natural resources, public services, and the character of the community;
and
WHEREAS, Data Centers have recently become a dominant land use issue in
the State of Missouri, especially in eastern Missouri, with numerous applications
having been submitted to numerous counties and cities using often-outdated
zoning provisions; and

Page 1 of 5

WHEREAS, good planning practice and prudent land use management practices
dictate that the City of Pacific should at a minimum undertake a comprehensive
planning effort and regulatory review to be assured that the City’s regulations
and restrictions properly address all of the possible impacts and considerations
associated with these developments; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen believes it to be in the best interest of the
City of Pacific, Missouri, and its residents to take steps necessary to conduct a
land use study and related studies and analysis, update the Pacific
Comprehensive Plan if necessary, enact zoning and code changes and
regulations, and take other appropriate actions as such relate to the
development, zoning, permitting, or use of property for Data Centers of all
sizes; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Aldermen,
as well as the residents of the City, require a reasonable amount of time and a
stable land use environment to accomplish these goals and to make the results
of their labors meaningful; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen has determined that to effectuate these
goals, it is necessary to temporarily suspend acceptance or processing of
applications relating to the establishment or expansion of Data Centers while
appropriate regulations, standards, definitions, and procedures may be
developed through a comprehensive process involving the Planning and Zoning
Commission and the Board of Aldermen; and
WHEREAS, in the case of exigent circumstances, the Board of Aldermen desires
to provide for consideration of a request by a property owner for relief from the
interim stay of acceptance in order to provide for the acceptance and processing
of an application upon demonstration of undue hardship or claim of unlawful
impact; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance and interim stay of acceptance of
applications has been considered and recommended by the Pacific Planning and
Zoning Commission and been the subject of a public hearing after due notice as
required by law; and
WHEREAS, the Pacific Board of Aldermen hereby finds, determines and
declares that adoption of the interim stay of acceptance hereinafter established
is necessary and in the best interests of the health, safety, and general welfare
of the City of Pacific and its inhabitants.

Page 2 of 5

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF
THE CITY OF PACIFIC, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section One.
The Board of Aldermen of the City of Pacific (the “Board of Aldermen”)
makes and reaffirms the findings set forth above in the Whereas Clauses and
incorporates the same by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Section Two.
The Board of Aldermen hereby directs, beginning immediately, that the
City shall not accept applications for approval of a Data Center, as defined by
the Section Three of this Ordinance, for a period up to and including July 22,
2027, while the City investigates possible revisions to the Zoning Code of the
City of Pacific, Missouri (the “Zoning Code” or “Chapter 400”). This interim stay
of acceptance shall include any permit or approval relating to the development,
zoning, permitting, or use of property for data centers of all sizes, unless
otherwise provided in Section Four of this Ordinance.
The Board of Aldermen may terminate the stay at any time by a vote of a
majority of the members present at any meeting but, in no event shall the stay
extend beyond July 22, 2027, unless the City extends the date by majority vote
of the members present at any meeting.
Section Three.
For the purposes of this Ordinance, “Data Center” shall mean a building
or portion thereof, group of buildings, or facility, or premises, whose principal
use is data processing, data management, data transmission, or data storage,
and is typically used to house computer systems, network equipment, servers,
and associated components, such as, but not limited to, air handlers, power
generators, cooling systems, backup power systems or generation operations,
battery storage, central processing units, graphical processing units, neural
networks, quantum bits, quantum processors, memory, data routing, data
storage, data warehousing, server farm, bitcoin mining, crypto processing,
virtual private networks, virtual servers, artificial intelligence training or
processing, image processing, cloud computing, email servicing, a telecom
hotel, telehouse co-location, or any other term applicable to facilities which are
used for such purposes.
For purposes of this Ordinance, “principal use” is 50% or greater of the
Page 3 of 5

square footage of the facility and shall be determined by the amount of square
footage of the building utilized for a Data Center as compared to the square
footage of the structure in active use for other permitted commercial, business,
or office space. In determining the square footage for principal use, the square
footage of any structure which is vacant or otherwise dedicated to warehouse
or storage activities shall be allocated to the square footage of that portion of
the facility proposed to be utilized as a Data Center.
Section Four.
(A) The Board of Aldermen may, upon written application of claimed
undue hardship or claim of unlawful impact from this interim stay, grant
waiver of the stay upon the applicant establishing, by clear and
convincing evidence, that the acceptance, processing, and approval of the
application for a Data Center, as defined by Section Three of this
Ordinance, will not:
(1) undermine the thorough, complete, and well-reasoned
examination of the necessity of revisions to the City of Pacific's
Zoning Code;
(2) that adequate infrastructure exists (or will exist at the
completion of the proposed project) to provide necessary City of
Pacific services to the Data Center; and
(3) that the application, if approved, would not be otherwise
detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of
Pacific or its citizens.
If the Board of Aldermen determines that such action will not undermine
the spirit and intent, it shall direct that the application be accepted for
processing or processed as the case may be.
(B) If the Board of Aldermen denies the claimed exemption based upon
review of the written application, the applicant, within ten (10) days of
such denial, may file a petition in accordance with Chapter 155 of the
Code of Ordinances of the City of Pacific, Missouri (the “City Code”). Any
such review shall follow the provisions of Chapter 155 of the City Code.
Section Five.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Board of Aldermen that
each and every part, section and subsection of this Ordinance shall be separate
and severable from each and every other part, section and subsection hereof
Page 4 of 5

and that the Board of Aldermen intends to adopt each said part, section and
subsection separately and independently of any other part, section and
subsection. In the event that any part of this Ordinance shall be determined to
be or to have been unlawful or unconstitutional, the remaining parts, sections
and subsections shall be and remain in full force and effect.
Section Six.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval.

Page 5 of 5

Original Version not recommended
BILL NO. _______

ORDINANCE NO. _______

SPONSOR:
AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING A TWELVE MONTH MORATORIUM
ON ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR ANY PERMIT OR
APPROVAL RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT, ZONING,
PERMITTING, OR USE OF PROPERTY FOR DATA CENTERS OF
ALL SIZES TO ALLOW SUFFICIENT TIME FOR A PROPER
LAND USE STUDY, EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE IF NECESSARY, AND
CONSIDERATION OF ANY APPROPRIATE ZONING TEXT
AMENDMENTS OR OTHER ACTIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 89 RSMo, the City has enacted regulations and
restrictions applicable to the use of buildings, structures, and land within the
City; the height and size of buildings and other structures; the percentage of
lots that may be occupied; the density of population; the size of yards; and
other matters of zoning, land use, and construction; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of such regulations are to ensure compatibility of land
uses, ensure adequate infrastructure exists to accommodate various uses, avoid
a strain on resources, require proper construction, and, among other goals,
promote public safety and the general welfare of the community; and
WHEREAS, such regulations must be examined from time to time to ensure
that they address changing conditions and uses; and
WHEREAS, data centers, as defined herein, have recently become a dominant
land use issue in the State of Missouri, especially in eastern Missouri, with
numerous applications having been submitted to numerous counties and cities
using often-outdated zoning provisions; and
WHEREAS, good planning practice and prudent land use management practices
dictate that the City of Pacific should at least undertake a comprehensive
planning effort and regulatory review to be assured that the City’s regulations
and restrictions properly address all of the possible impacts and considerations
associated with these developments; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Aldermen believes it to be in the best interest of the
Page 1 of 3

City of Pacific, Missouri, and its residents to take steps necessary to conduct a
land use study and related studies and analysis, update the Pacific
Comprehensive Plan if necessary, enact zoning and code changes and
regulations, and take other appropriate actions as such relate to the
development, zoning, permitting, or use of property for data centers of all
sizes; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Aldermen,
as well as the residents of the City, require a reasonable amount of time and a
stable land use environment to accomplish these goals and in order to make the
results of their labors meaningful; and
WHEREAS, a moratorium on new applications relating to and the development
of data centers will allow for a proper land use study, effective community
engagement, comprehensive plan update and action on any necessary new
zoning regulations to proceed in an orderly and efficient manner; and
WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance and moratorium has been
considered and recommended by the Pacific Planning and Zoning Commission
and been the subject of a public hearing after due notice as required by law;
and
WHEREAS, the Pacific Board of Aldermen hereby finds, determines and
declares that adoption of the moratorium hereinafter established is necessary
and in the best interests of the health, safety and general welfare of the City of
Pacific and its inhabitants.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF
THE CITY OF PACIFIC, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section One.
The City of Pacific hereby imposes a temporary moratorium on the
acceptance of applications for any permit or approval relating to the
development, zoning, permitting, or use of property for data centers of all
sizes. During the moratorium period the City will not accept, consider or act
upon any applications for rezoning, conditional use permits that would change
the existing actual use of property, site plans, construction plans, building
permits, right-of-way excavations, variances, and any other permit or approval,
nor any petitions for zoning ordinance text amendments, which pertain to the
development, zoning, permitting and use of property for data centers of all
sizes. Provided, however, that this delay on the processing of applications shall
Page 2 of 3

not apply to applications filed prior to the effective date of this Ordinance.
Section Two.
The moratorium hereby imposed shall continue and remain in effect for
twelve (12) months from the date of adoption of this Ordinance, at which time
it shall automatically terminate, unless the Board of Aldermen terminates this
moratorium in a shorter period of time or extends it to allow the Planning and
Zoning Commission and/or Board of Aldermen additional time to properly study
and review the City’s comprehensive plan and land use regulations and act
upon any recommendations resulting from that process.
Section Three.
For the purposes of this Ordinance, “data center” shall mean a building or
portion thereof, group of buildings, or facility whose primary use is data
processing or data storage, and is used to house computer systems, servers,
and associated components, such as but not limited to central processing units,
graphical processing units, neural networks, quantum bits, quantum
processors, memory, data routing, data storage, data warehousing, server
farm, bitcoin mining, crypto processing, virtual private networks, curtal servers,
artificial intelligence training or processing, image processing, cloud computing,
email servicing, a telecom hotel, telehouse co-location, or any other term
applicable to facilities which are used for such purposes.
Section Four.
It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Board of Aldermen that
each and every part, section and subsection of this Ordinance shall be separate
and severable from each and every other part, section and subsection hereof
and that the Board of Aldermen intends to adopt each said part, section and
subsection separately and independently of any other part, section and
subsection. In the event that any part of this Ordinance shall be determined to
be or to have been unlawful or unconstitutional, the remaining parts, sections
and subsections shall be and remain in full force and effect.
Section Five.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
and approval.

Page 3 of 3

Bill No. 5325

Ordinance No. __________

SPONSOR:
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO TM
PERFORMANCE SALES LLC TO OPERATE AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP AND
SALES ON AN APPROXIMATE 0.58 ACRE PARCEL ALONG S. FIRST STREET IN
THE C-1 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
Whereas, Applicant TM Performance Sales LLC seeks to operate an
automobile dealership and sales on a 0.58 acre parcel generally located
along S. First Street in the C-1 Downtown Commercial District; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered such
application and proposed use and recommended that the requested
conditional use permit be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF
THE CITY OF PACIFIC, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to TM
Performance Sales LLC for operation of an automobile dealership and sales
on a 0.58 acre parcel along South First Street generally described as Lot 123
and part of lots 124, 125, 126 and 127 in the original Town of Franklin of the
Franklin County Records (Franklin County Parcel ID # 19-1-12.0-4-003086.000).
Section 2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be based on the plans,
drawings, renderings, testimony, and descriptions outlined in the application
and submittals by the Applicant and such will be incorporated as part of the
conditional use permit. All operations will comply with ordinance and other
applicable law.
Section 3. The Conditional Use Permit is limited to the above-described
property and shall only be transferrable as allowed by ordinance.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the
date of its passage and approval.
Passed this ___ day of _______, 20__.
Approved this ___ day of _______, 20__.

MAYOR
_______________________
MAYOR

ATTEST:
City Clerk

16305 Swingley Ridge Road
Suite 300
Chesterfield, MO 63017

5/4/2026
City of Pacific, MO
300 Hoven Drive,
Pacific, MO 63069
SUBJECT:

Staff Report –S. 1st Street – Tyler Myers
Conditional Use Permit Application

PZ-2026-XX: Conditional Use Permit – S. 1st Street.
Existing Zoning: C-1 – Downtown Commercial District
Existing Use: Vacant
Proposed Use: Automobile Dealership/Sales
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use: Mixed Use
This is a proposed conditional use permit for the parcel located along S. 1st (Parcel ID: 19-1-12.0-4003-086.000) and currently located inside the limits of the City of Pacific. The owner has applied for a
conditional use permit of the parcel for automobile dealership/sales in a C-1 Downtown Commercial
District. This property lies along South 1st Street just south of the railroad tracks and across the street
from the Depot and Pacific Brew Haus and is currently vacant. This area of South 1st Street is located
within ZONE AE of the FEMA FIRM Map and is within the floodplain.
The requested use of the lot as an automobile dealership/sales location would be a use that is currently
provided along S. 1st Street. There is a lot for used care sales two blocks to the south. The area is
generally commercial with mostly restaurants and small businesses to the north and east. The areas to
the south are more residential and light industrial in use than those to the north. The area is currently a
mixed-use environment, which the business would fit, and matches the future land use plan.
Based on the proposed use being an automobile dealership/sales lot would fit within the mixed use
environment and would be consistent with others around South First Street. The conditional use of this
lot as an automobile dealership could be recommended for approval with discussion about if this lot is
the right use in this location. This is for an approximate 0.58 +/- acre tract of land generally located
along S. First Street being Lot 123 & North Part of Lots 124, 125, 126, & 127 of the Original Town of
Franklin (Franklin County Parcel ID: 19-1-12.0-4-003-086.000) in a C-1 Downtown Commercial District.
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
GEORGE BUTLER ASSOCIATES, INC.

Page 2 of 2

A.J. Girondo III, P.E.
Senior Associate

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-15
A RESOLTUION OPPOSING TRUCK SIZE OR WEIGHT INCREASES
WHEREAS, the City of Pacific is committed to the safety of our roads and the integrity of our
infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, Congress is pushing to allow significantly heavier truck weights, including a
proposed nationwide “pilot project” to allow 91,000 pounds, and a permanent increase for autocarrier trucks to 88,000 pounds. The current Interstate weight limit is 80,000 pounds; and
WHEREAS, in previous sessions of Congress, there has been a push to allow longer doubletrailer trucks at 91 feet in length, called “Double 33s, which are 10 feet longer than today’s twintrailers and 17 feet longer than standard single-trailer trucks; and
WHEREAS, allowing heavier or longer trucks on the National Highway System would threaten
the safety of the traveling public because heavier and longer trucks would be more difficult to
control, increase wear and tear on truck safety systems such as brakes, steering and tires, and
increase crash severity; and
WHEREAS, there were 5,070 large-truck crashes in Missouri in 2024 (FMCSA) – including
144 fatalities (NHTSA) and 2,203 people injured; and
WHEREAS, of the 24,647 bridges throughout Missouri, there are 15,467 bridges that are in
fair/poor condition classified by the Federal Highway Administration – that is over 63 percent of
bridges statewide (FHWA), and
WHEREAS, the National League of Cities has long opposed sweeping federal truck size and
weight increases due to the detrimental impact on infrastructure in municipalities and the
uncompensated nature of such proposals; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Pacific opposes any increases in
truck size or weight at the federal or state levels and encourages our elected delegations to
oppose related legislation.
___________________________________________
Debbie Kelley, Mayor
___________________________________________
Michelle Bruns, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Edward Gass, Ward 1

___________________________________________
Tyler Hoven, Ward 2
___________________________________________
Jame Cleeve, Ward 2
___________________________________________
Scott Lesh, Ward 3
___________________________________________
David Nickelson, Ward 3

The Honorable Ann Wagner
United States House of Representatives
2350 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Representative Wagner,
As the elected body for the City of Pacific, we respectfully oppose any legislation increasing
truck size and weights specifically amendments added to the Build America 250 Act. An
increase in truck size and weights will only place Pacific’s public safety and infrastructure in
harm’s way.
Two amendments added to the Build America 250 Act allow significantly heavier trucks,
including a 91,000-pound 10-year Pilot Project and a permanent increase to 88,000 pound autohauler trucks. Major roads like I-44 run east to west along the northern edge of the city and
Historic Route 66 (also known as Osage Street) runs straight through the heart of Pacific. These
roads are how men, women, and children in our community travel daily to work and school.
However, these are also the very roads that these heavier semi-trucks will be traveling as well.
It is our duty to protect and serve by advocating against legislation that could be detrimental to
our community. Currently we have problems with trucks speeding through our community and
increasing truck size and weights will only make those issues worse. In addition, like all
communities across the country we struggle to find the funding needed to maintain current and
invest in future infrastructure. This legislation will do nothing to benefit Pacific but will do
plenty to harm it and our approximately 7,500 residents.
Therefore, please find enclosed a resolution passed by the City of Pacific opposing increases to
truck size and weights on our nation’s highways. We respectfully ask that you help our
community and residents by voting against legislation increasing truck size and weights.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________________
Debbie Kelley, Mayor
___________________________________________
Michelle Bruns, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Edward Gass, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Tyler Hoven, Ward 2

___________________________________________
Jame Cleeve, Ward 2
___________________________________________
Scott Lesh, Ward 3
___________________________________________
David Nickelson, Ward 3

The Honorable Josh Hawley
United States Senate
115 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Hawley,
As the elected body for the City of Pacific, we respectfully oppose any legislation increasing
truck size and weights specifically amendments added to the Build America 250 Act. An
increase in truck size and weights will only place Pacific’s public safety and infrastructure in
harm’s way.
Two amendments added to the Build America 250 Act allow significantly heavier trucks,
including a 91,000-pound 10-year Pilot Project and a permanent increase to 88,000 pound autohauler trucks. Major roads like I-44 run east to west along the northern edge of the city and
Historic Route 66 (also known as Osage Street) runs straight through the heart of Pacific. These
roads are how men, women, and children in our community travel daily to work and school.
However, these are also the very roads that these heavier semi-trucks will be traveling as well.
It is our duty to protect and serve by advocating against legislation that could be detrimental to
our community. Currently we have problems with trucks speeding through our community and
increasing truck size and weights will only make those issues worse. In addition, like all
communities across the country we struggle to find the funding needed to maintain current and
invest in future infrastructure. This legislation will do nothing to benefit Pacific but will do
plenty to harm it and our approximately 7,500 residents.
Therefore, please find enclosed a resolution passed by the City of Pacific opposing increases to
truck size and weights on our nation’s highways. We respectfully ask that you help our
community and residents by voting against legislation increasing truck size and weights.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________________
Debbie Kelley, Mayor
___________________________________________
Michelle Bruns, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Edward Gass, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Tyler Hoven, Ward 2

___________________________________________
Jame Cleeve, Ward 2
___________________________________________
Scott Lesh, Ward 3
___________________________________________
David Nickelson, Ward 3
___________________________________________

The Honorable Eric Schmitt
United States Senate
387 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Schmitt,
As the elected body for the City of Pacific, we respectfully oppose any legislation increasing
truck size and weights specifically amendments added to the Build America 250 Act. An
increase in truck size and weights will only place Pacific’s public safety and infrastructure in
harm’s way.
Two amendments added to the Build America 250 Act allow significantly heavier trucks,
including a 91,000-pound 10-year Pilot Project and a permanent increase to 88,000 pound autohauler trucks. Major roads like I-44 run east to west along the northern edge of the city and
Historic Route 66 (also known as Osage Street) runs straight through the heart of Pacific. These
roads are how men, women, and children in our community travel daily to work and school.
However, these are also the very roads that these heavier semi-trucks will be traveling as well.
It is our duty to protect and serve by advocating against legislation that could be detrimental to
our community. Currently we have problems with trucks speeding through our community and
increasing truck size and weights will only make those issues worse. In addition, like all
communities across the country we struggle to find the funding needed to maintain current and
invest in future infrastructure. This legislation will do nothing to benefit Pacific but will do
plenty to harm it and our approximately 7,500 residents.
Therefore, please find enclosed a resolution passed by the City of Pacific opposing increases to
truck size and weights on our nation’s highways. We respectfully ask that you help our
community and residents by voting against legislation increasing truck size and weights.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________________
Debbie Kelley, Mayor
___________________________________________
Michelle Bruns, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Edward Gass, Ward 1
___________________________________________
Tyler Hoven, Ward 2

___________________________________________
Jame Cleeve, Ward 2
___________________________________________
Scott Lesh, Ward 3
___________________________________________
David Nickelson, Ward 3

Bill No. 5298
Sponsor: Kelley

Ordinance No. __________

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR THE SUBDIVISION
OF THE LOT LOCATED AT 1722 HIGHWAY N INTO TWO PARCELS AND
AUTHORIZING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE CITY’S APPROVAL
OF THE PLAT FOR RECORDING
Whereas, Applicant Gwendolyn Sage filed an application seeking to
divide the property, generally located at 1722 Highway N, into two separate
parcels; and
Whereas, the plat complies with ordinance requirements; and
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has considered such
final plat and recommended approval of same.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF
THE CITY OF PACIFIC, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board hereby approves the subdivision plat for the
subdivision of the parcel, generally located at 1722 Highway N (Franklin
County Parcel ID Number: 19-1-11.0-4-099-200.000), into two separate
parcels as shown on the plat attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The Board hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City
Clerk to acknowledge the City’s approval by executing the Plat for recording
with the Franklin County Recorder of Deeds.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval; provided, however, that the subdivision of the parcel
shall not be valid until the Plat is recorded with the Franklin County Recorder
of Deeds.
Passed this ___ day of _______, 20__.

Approved this ___ day of _______, 20__.
ATTEST:

Debra Kelley, MAYOR
_______________________
Debra Kelley, MAYOR

City Clerk

16305 Swingley Ridge Road
Suite 300
Chesterfield, MO 63017

October 20, 2025
Gwendolyn M. Sage
1722 Hwy N
Pacific, MO 63069
SUBJECT:

Sage Lot Split Plat
Subdivision Plat Review #1

Dear Ms. Sage,
GBA received a copy of the set of Lot Spilt Plat on October 1, 2025. As requested, we have reviewed
the plat and do not have any comments.
The provided subdivision plat appears to meet the criteria for subdivision plats and the ordinances and
codes of the City of Pacific. The plat is located in an R-1A Single Family Residential Zoning district and
meets the requirements of that district. The new lot will have frontage on Smith Lane.
The plat is recommended for approval and will be presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission and
the Board of Alderman for approval.
The above comments are based upon a review by GBA with regards to the compliance of the plat to
the Codes and Ordinances of the City of Pacific. Additional items may be identified as additional plans
are developed or comments are addressed. The developer and/or the designer have the responsibility
and obligation to comply with the City ordinances and for design errors that may become known at a
future date or during subsequent reviews.
Sincerely,
GEORGE BUTLER ASSOCIATES, INC.

Anthony J. (A.J.) Girondo, III, P.E.
Project Leader

SAGE ADJUSTMENT
A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION ELEVEN (11), TOWNSHIP FORTY-THREE (43) NORTH, RANGE TWO (2) EAST OF THE 5TH P.M.

EW 877
I
EV G.
N
PI . P P
B
P.

HARVEY'S ACRES
P.B. M PG. 449

±

Report 3
City of Pacific
Summary of Cash Balances and Actual and Budgeted Surplus/Deficit
As of 5/31/2026
FY 2026 Amed #4
Budgeted Fund
Projected Cash
Surplus/(Deficit) Balance 6/30/2026

Cash Balance
6/30/25
General Fund (11)
Cash - General
Cash - Court Bonds
Cash - Court Fines
Cash - Bond Escrow
Cash - Cemetery Trust
Cash - Economic Development
Cash - Perpetual Care Cem Fund
Cash - MVHM & Genealogy
Cash - Subdivision Bond Escrow
Cash - Beautification Comm Donation
Petty Cash
Investments - Cemetery Restricted

Tourism Tax (13)
Tourism Tax Fund
Rodeo Proceeds
Total Tourism Tax (13)
Contingency (14)
Cash - Contingency Fund
Contingency - Nature Cons Buyout
Cash - Pool Renovation Reserve

$245,641.07
$18,089.96
$400.00
$6,000.00
$410.00
$11,000.00
$20,000.00
$4,297.75
$15,898.30
$847.57
$3,441.89
$14,229.69
$249,082.96

$40,434.96

$16,014.09
$90,068.55
$106,082.64

$3,175,332.89

$1,747,274.99
$80,000.00
$500,000.00
$2,327,274.99

Restricted

$199,478.26
$62,506.70
$261,984.96

-$221,550.00

$2,750,780.89
$80,000.00
$2,830,780.89

Capital Improvement Sales Tax (15)
Cash - Capital Improvement Sales tax
Cash - Cap Imp Forfeited Fnd Tra

$77,736.96

$1,248,824.47
$17,330.96
$400.00
$50,381.00
$410.00
$11,000.00
$20,000.00
$4,434.55
$16,405.44
$847.57
$3,441.89
$14,229.69
$1,387,705.57

Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted
Restricted

-$171,346.00

$344,552.00

Cash Balance
5/31/26

$243,881.58
$9,600.00
$253,481.58

-$135,000.00

$118,481.58

$695,754.12
$9,600.00
$705,354.12

$102.35

$0.00

$102.35

$102.35

Viaduct CID (17)

$29,449.78

$10.00

$29,459.78

$30,387.47

Osage Commercial Area CID (18)

$869,095.08

$100,000.00

$969,095.08

$1,043,511.32

East Osage Commercial Area CID (19)

$129,824.27

-$3,992.00

$125,832.27

$139,468.57

Proposition P (22)

$112,081.33

-$27,500.00

$84,581.33

$162,959.09

Transportation Tax (Prop S) (23)

$522,918.99

$2,315,276.00

$2,838,194.99

$800,191.08

-$827,628.00

$474,560.34

$287,629.33
$1,037,943.41
$7,600.00
$124,133.62
$12,024.92
$2,131.28
$1,471,462.56

$645.00

$138,231.63

$103,220.56

$941,571.51

$1,485,308.40
$74,405.00
$0.00
$1,559,713.40

$1,784,882.40

$2,735,592.95
$153,525.42
$2,098.80
$399.39
-$0.05
$2,891,616.51

Leasehold Revenue Bond 2012 (16)

Parks & Rec (Prop P) (24)
Parks Prop P
Stormwater Prop p
Pool Reserve
Skatepark funds
ADAMS Garden
Liberty Walk
Total Parks & Rec (Prop P) (24)
City Hall / Red Cedar (25)
Water System ( 41)
Cash - Water
Cash- Water Meter Deposits
Cash in Bank
Sewer System ( 42)
Cash - Sewer unrestricted
Cash - Sewer Replacement
UMB- SRF Interest Account
UMB- SRF Principal Account
UMB- SRF State Match DSA

Totals

$197,665.61
$1,086,764.24
$510,000.00 Restricted
$0.00
$15,627.21
$2,131.28
$1,302,188.34
$137,586.63

$1,002,255.51
$74,105.00
$0.00
$1,002,255.51
$2,932,723.19
$149,008.77
$1,770.19
$131,645.02
$324,018.95
$3,066,138.40
$10,766,971.07
Note 1

Restricted
-$60,684.00

Restricted

Restricted
-$1,281,256.00
$31,527.00
Note 2

$10,798,498.07 $12,729,050.23
Note 3
Note 4

Note
1 Cash balance at the end of FY2025
2 FY2026 budgeted cash utilization-city is using cash balances to cover budgeted expenses exceeding budgeted revenues Budget Amendment #4
3 Projected amount of cash at the end of FY2026 ( Column 1- Column 2 )
4 Cash Balance as of May 31, 2026

City of Pacific
Summary of Fund Revenues and Expenses
As of 5/31/2026
2026 Budget
5/31/2026 YTD
% of
Amendment #4
Activity
Budget
General Fund (11)
Revenue
Expense

Comment
#

FY25 Budget

5/31/2025 YTD
Activity

% of
Budget

5,742,534.37
4,741,969.85
1,000,564.52

107.9%
86.3%
-583.9%

1

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

5,320,324.00
5,491,670.00
(171,346.00)

5,315,602.00
6,172,592.04
(856,990.04)

4,752,001.72
5,458,685.25
(706,683.53)

89.4%
88.4%
82.5%

316,959.41
465,082.81
(148,123.40)

99.0%
85.9%
66.9%

2

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

320,150.00
541,700.00
(221,550.00)

256,000.00
453,980.10
(197,980.10)

256,908.99
346,206.47
(89,297.48)

100.4%
76.3%
45.1%

700,663.68
1,204,169.58
(503,505.90)

95.3%
308.4%
-146.1%

3A

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

735,000.00
390,448.00
344,552.00

210,000.00
115,000.00
95,000.00

222,107.83
0.00
222,107.83

105.8%
0.0%
233.8%

Capital Improvement Sales Tax (15)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

613,000.00
748,000.00
(135,000.00)

583,400.21
132,000.00
451,400.21

95.2%
17.6%
-334.4%

676,000.00
885,600.00
(209,600.00)

573,704.09
748,000.00
(174,295.91)

84.9%
84.5%
83.2%

Leasehold Revenue Bond 2012 (16)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.0%
0.0%
-

114,125.00
114,125.00
0.00

115,007.82
114,906.73
101.09

100.8%
100.7%
-

10.00
0.00
10.00

937.69
0.00
937.69

9376.9%
0.0%
9376.9%

1,150.00
0.00
1,150.00

1,085.30
0.00
1,085.30

94.4%
0.0%
94.4%

Osage Commercial Area CID (18)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

220,000.00
120,000.00
100,000.00

279,879.78
96,327.07
183,552.71

127.2%
80.3%
183.6%

263,000.00
105,990.00
157,010.00

221,484.48
118,692.14
102,792.34

84.2%
112.0%
65.5%

East Osage Commercial Area CID (19)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

7,000.00
10,992.00
(3,992.00)

13,684.16
4,039.86
9,644.30

195.5%
36.8%
-241.6%

985,102.00
1,224,767.00
(239,665.00)

8,002.01
202,242.01
(194,240.00)

0.8%
16.5%
81.0%

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

387,500.00
415,000.00
(27,500.00)

397,382.33
345,833.30
51,549.03

102.6%
83.3%
-187.5%

409,500.00
403,000.00
6,500.00

351,986.72
335,833.30
16,153.42

86.0%
83.3%
248.5%

Transportation Tax (Prop S) (23)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

3,456,762.00
1,141,486.00
2,315,276.00

1,065,542.74
681,273.73
384,269.01

30.8%
59.7%
16.6%

2,876,901.00
3,410,750.42
(533,849.42)

2,888,224.71
3,119,618.86
(231,394.15)

100.4%
91.5%
43.3%

Parks & Rec (Prop P) (24)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

1,134,246.00
1,961,874.00
(827,628.00)

887,904.36
1,271,603.83
(383,699.47)

78.3%
64.8%
46.4%

1,705,600.00
1,347,679.98
357,920.02

1,396,126.71
627,044.96
769,081.75

81.9%
46.5%
214.9%

City Hall / Red Cedar (25)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

422,904.00
422,259.00
645.00

388,625.68
422,991.75
(34,366.07)

91.9%
100.2%
-5328.1%

423,259.00
423,259.00
0.00

423,259.00
422,714.04
544.96

100.0%
99.9%
0.0%

Tourism Tax (13)
Revenue
Expense

Contingency (14)
Revenue
Expense

Viaduct CID (17)
Revenue
Expense
General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

Proposition P (22)
Revenue
Expense

3B

4

5

2026 Budget
Amendment #2

5/31/2026 YTD
Activity

% of
Budget

FY25 Budget

5/31/2025 YTD
Activity

% of
Budget

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

1,389,000.00
1,449,684.00
(60,684.00)

1,389,000.04
904,224.56
484,775.48

100.0%
62.4%
-798.9%

2,018,080.00
2,553,046.98
(534,966.98)

1,400,728.69
1,159,551.60
241,177.09

69.4%
45.4%
-45.1%

General Fund Surplus ( Deficit )

1,760,419.00
3,041,675.00
(1,281,256.00)

1,601,306.56
1,878,372.07
(277,065.51)

91.0%
61.8%
21.6%

6,471,066.00
3,731,737.98
2,739,328.02

4,751,760.09
2,624,772.02
2,126,988.07

73.4%
70.3%
77.6%

All Funds Surplus ( Deficit )

15,766,315.00
15,734,788.00
31,527.00

13,367,821.01
12,147,888.41
1,219,932.60

84.8%
77.2%
3869.5%

21,725,385.00
20,941,528.50
783,856.50

17,362,388.16
15,278,267.38
2,084,120.78

79.9%
73.0%
265.9%

Water System ( 41)
Revenue
Expense

Sewer System ( 42)
Revenue
Expense

All Fund Totals
Revenue
Expense

6

*Comment #
1

See Gen Fund Statement of Revenue and Expenses. Building Maint and Community Development line items are over budget
Planning Consultant line item and major HVAC repairs are the major drivers

2

Tourism tax revenue is running above budget due to the receipt of $86,109 in past due taxes from FY2025
Transfers Out are above budget and a correction has been made in June.

3A

$815,000 transferred to General fund to decrease unrestricted deficit

3B

$9,500 1st and Osage PE MoDot Reimbursement received but unbudgeted

4

None of the $1.7 million of anticipated MODOT funds has been applied for (or spent)(Union St and 1st & Osage projects)

5

See Prop P Statement of Revenue and Expense. Storm water general expense line item over budget
Material line item is over budget
Storm water Contractual expense is over budget due to Hwy N stormwater and planning services.

6

Overall, the City's revenues are slightly below budget and expenses are running below budget as well .
Total cash balance at 5/31/26 was $12.7 million. The City plans to use cash balances to cover any budgeted deficit.

* Comments are based on the assumption that revenues and expenses should be about 92% of budget at May month end. Inflows and outflows
are not always spread equally throughout the fiscal cycle.

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
General Fund (11)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Revenues
Taxes
Licenses & permits
Fines & forfeitures
Intergovernmental
Charges for Services
Special Assessments
Miscellaneous
Projects
Escrows
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

3,899,500.00
159,100.00
96,700.00
29,065.00
20,000.00

Actual
5/31/26

Report 2

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

96.6%
125.5%
96.4%
46.8%
91.0%
54.7%
0.0%
158.7%
107.9%

3,864,200.00
300,000.00
93,500.00
1,000.00
20,100.00

3,543,525.17
100,783.20
101,101.18
64,028.21
18,042.57

91.7%
33.6%
108.1%
6402.8%
89.8%

158,798.00
0.00
0.00
957,161.00
5,320,324.00

3,767,343.00
199,685.57
93,262.16
13,596.84
18,208.10
1,955.00
86,802.16
0.00
42,381.00
1,519,300.54
5,742,534.37

204,947.00
9,255.00
0.00
822,600.00
5,315,602.00

153,282.11
0.00
167,662.45
603,576.83
4,752,001.72

74.8%
0.0%
0.0%
73.4%
89.4%

Expenses
General
Administration
Legislative
Public Safety
Court
Building Maintenance
Cemetery
Community Development
Genealogical and Historical
Transfers Out
Total Expenses and Transfers Out

437,050.00
296,553.00
48,991.00
3,693,215.00
124,101.00
324,896.00
22,730.00
418,134.00
6,000.00
120,000.00
5,491,670.00

387,398.53
241,390.84
37,608.94
3,023,814.42
111,384.84
359,633.91
18,065.00
450,343.00
2,330.37
110,000.00
4,741,969.85

88.6%
81.4%
76.8%
81.9%
89.8%
110.7%
79.5%
107.7%
38.8%
91.7%
86.3%

356,700.00
293,800.30
48,992.10
3,864,303.31
116,730.75
56,470.00
16,760.00
420,991.58
45,585.00
952,259.00
6,172,592.04

540,634.30
240,176.65
39,945.57
3,048,870.66
107,758.99
113,078.51
16,009.80
392,424.17
7,527.60
952,259.00
5,458,685.25

151.6%
81.7%
81.5%
78.9%
92.3%
200.2%
95.5%
93.2%
16.5%
100.0%
88.4%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-171,346.00

1,000,564.52

-583.9%

-856,990.04

-706,683.53

82.5%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Tourism Tax (13)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Intergovernmental
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

135,000.00
25,000.00
160,150.00
0.00
320,150.00

143,804.10
0.00
173,155.31
0.00
316,959.41

106.5%
0.0%
108.1%
0.0%
99.0%

135,000.00
0.00
121,000.00
0.00
256,000.00

144,439.41
0.00
112,469.58
0.00
256,908.99

107.0%
0.0%
93.0%
0.0%
100.4%

Expenses
Personnel
General
General- Red Cedar
Contractual
Capital Expenditure
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

129,626.00
199,270.00
49,500.00
61,000.00
7,000.00
95,304.00
541,700.00

112,280.55
120,210.69
40,806.29
51,500.00
2,459.60
137,825.68
465,082.81

86.6%
60.3%
82.4%
84.4%
35.1%
144.6%
85.9%

126,489.00
188,741.10
57,000.00
60,250.00
21,500.00
0.00
453,980.10

114,961.40
148,914.19
37,148.15
44,500.00
682.73
0.00
346,206.47

90.9%
78.9%
65.2%
73.9%
3.2%
0.0%
76.3%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-221,550.00

-148,123.40

66.9%

-197,980.10

-89,297.48

45.1%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Contingency (14)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

115,000.00
620,000.00
735,000.00

90,663.68
610,000.00
700,663.68

78.8%
98.4%
95.3%

90,000.00
120,000.00
210,000.00

102,107.83
120,000.00
222,107.83

113.5%
100.0%
105.8%

Expenses
General
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

0.00
390,448.00
390,448.00

0.00
1,204,169.58
1,204,169.58

0.0%
308.4%
308.4%

0.00
115,000.00
115,000.00

0.00
0.00
0.00

0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

344,552.00

-503,505.90

-146.1%

95,000.00

222,107.83

233.8%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Capital Improvement Sales Tax (15)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

600,000.00
13,000.00
0.00
613,000.00

570,240.15
13,160.06
0.00
583,400.21

95.0%
101.2%
0.0%
95.2%

645,000.00
31,000.00

562,295.79
11,408.30

87.2%
36.8%

676,000.00

573,704.09

84.9%

Expenses
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

748,000.00
748,000.00

132,000.00
132,000.00

17.6%
17.6%

885,600.00
885,600.00

748,000.00
748,000.00

84.5%
84.5%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-135,000.00

451,400.21

-334.4%

-209,600.00

-174,295.91

83.2%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Viaduct CID (17)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Miscellaneous
Total Revenues &Transfers In

0.00
10.00
10.00

0.28
937.41
937.69

0.0%
9374.1%
9376.9%

200.00
950.00
1,150.00

0.11
1,085.19
1,085.30

0.0%
114.2%
94.4%

Expenses
General
Total Expense & Transfers Out

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.0%
0.0%

0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

0.0%
0.0%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

10.00

937.69

9376.9%

1,150.00

1,085.30

94.4%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Osage Commercial Area CID (18)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Grant Revenue
Miscellaneous
Total Revenues &Transfers In

200,000.00
0.00
20,000.00
220,000.00

250,457.71
0.00
29,422.07
279,879.78

125.2%
0.0%
147.1%
127.2%

240,000.00
0.00
23,000.00
263,000.00

192,070.60
0.00
29,413.88
221,484.48

80.0%
0.0%
127.9%
84.2%

Expenses
General
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

120,000.00
0.00
120,000.00

96,327.07
0.00
96,327.07

80.3%
0.0%
80.3%

105,990.00
0.00
105,990.00

118,692.14
0.00
118,692.14

112.0%
0.0%
112.0%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

100,000.00

183,552.71

183.6%

157,010.00

102,792.34

65.5%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
East Osage Commercial Area CID (19)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Grant Revenue
Miscellaneous
Projects
Total Revenues &Transfers In

0.00
0.00
7,000.00
0.00
7,000.00

0.15
0.00
4,207.38
9,476.63
13,684.16

0.0%
0.0%
60.1%
0.0%
195.5%

0.00
0.00
13,000.00
972,102.00
985,102.00

0.90
0.00
8,001.11
0.00
8,002.01

0.0%
0.0%
61.5%
0.0%
0.8%

Expenses
Personnel
General
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

0.00
10,992.00
0.00
10,992.00

0.00
4,039.86
0.00
4,039.86

0.0%
36.8%
0.0%
36.8%

0.00
1,224,767.00
0.00
1,224,767.00

0.00
202,242.01
0.00
202,242.01

0.0%
16.5%
0.0%
16.5%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-3,992.00

9,644.30

-241.6%

-239,665.00

-194,240.00

81.0%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Proposition P (22)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Miscellaneous
Total Revenues &Transfers In

381,000.00
6,500.00
387,500.00

392,400.02
4,982.31
397,382.33

103.0%
76.7%
102.6%

403,000.00
6,500.00
409,500.00

346,502.44
5,484.28
351,986.72

86.0%
84.4%
86.0%

Expenses
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

415,000.00
415,000.00

345,833.30
345,833.30

83.3%
83.3%

403,000.00
403,000.00

335,833.30
335,833.30

83.3%
83.3%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-27,500.00

51,549.03

-187.5%

6,500.00

16,153.42

248.5%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Transportation Tax (Prop S) (23)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Miscellaneous
Projects
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

968,000.00
1,738,762.00
0.00
750,000.00
3,456,762.00

995,998.72
69,544.02
0.00
0.00
1,065,542.74

102.9%
4.0%
0.0%
0.0%
30.8%

917,937.00
744,964.00
475,000.00
739,000.00
2,876,901.00

916,186.24
781,084.57
451,953.90
739,000.00
2,888,224.71

99.8%
104.8%
95.1%
100.0%
100.4%

Expenses
Personnel
General
Contractual
Capital Expenditure
Special Local Projects
Special Federal Aid Projects
Total Expense & Transfers Out

441,788.00
415,655.00
2,065.00
38,000.00
30,000.00
213,978.00
1,141,486.00

328,998.25
303,958.68
3,623.07
3,215.99
0.00
41,477.74
681,273.73

74.5%
73.1%
175.5%
8.5%
0.0%
19.4%
59.7%

465,784.43
442,879.99
1,950.00
80,000.00
1,339,987.00
1,080,149.00
3,410,750.42

353,496.70
341,328.87
6,096.25
79,197.22
968,102.34
1,371,397.48
3,119,618.86

75.9%
77.1%
312.6%
99.0%
72.2%
127.0%
91.5%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

2,315,276.00

384,269.01

16.6%

-533,849.42

-231,394.15

43.3%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Parks & Rec (Prop P) (24)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Taxes
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

600,000.00
413,959.00
120,287.00
1,134,246.00

577,826.81
189,790.55
120,287.00
887,904.36

96.3%
45.8%
100.0%
78.3%

657,000.00
386,000.00
662,600.00
1,705,600.00

567,390.46
281,136.25
547,600.00
1,396,126.71

86.4%
72.8%
82.6%
81.9%

Expenses
P & R Personnel
P & R General
P & R Contractual
P & R Capital Expenditure
P & R Transfers Out
Pool General
Pool Contractual
Storm Water General
Storm Water Contractual
Storm Water Capital
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

252,512.00
117,053.00
55,892.00
488,345.00
0.00
38,200.00
102,450.00
6,500.00
2,922.00
198,000.00
700,000.00
1,961,874.00

212,230.15
68,326.01
58,258.90
160,859.63
0.00
24,230.70
85,475.00
32,913.75
43,245.31
86,064.38
500,000.00
1,271,603.83

84.0%
58.4%
104.2%
32.9%
0.0%
63.4%
83.4%
506.4%
1480.0%
43.5%
71.4%
64.8%

245,455.00
121,099.98
47,520.00
510,600.00
0.00
73,000.00
100,565.00
0.00
169,440.00
80,000.00
0.00
1,347,679.98

248,217.00
88,693.75
47,528.90
29,312.85
0.00
78,755.27
81,840.00
8,799.65
7,012.80
36,884.74
0.00
627,044.96

101.1%
73.2%
100.0%
5.7%
0.0%
107.9%
81.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
46.5%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-827,628.00

-383,699.47

46.4%

357,920.02

769,081.75

214.9%

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
City Hall / Red Cedar (25)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

0.00
422,904.00
422,904.00

0.00
388,625.68
388,625.68

0.0%
91.9%
91.9%

0.00
423,259.00
423,259.00

0.00
423,259.00
423,259.00

0.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Expenses
General
Total Expense & Transfers Out

422,259.00
422,259.00

422,991.75
422,991.75

100.2%
100.2%

423,259.00
423,259.00

422,714.04
422,714.04

99.9%
99.9%

645.00

-34,366.07

-5328.1%

0.00

544.96

0.0%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Water System ( 41)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Revenues
Licenses & permits
Charges for Services
Miscellaneous
Transfers In
Total Revenues &Transfers In

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

2,000.00
1,285,000.00
102,000.00
0.00
1,389,000.00

1,575.00
1,254,291.69
133,133.35
0.00
1,389,000.04

78.8%
97.6%
130.5%
0.0%
100.0%

2,000.00
1,290,000.00
97,080.00
629,000.00
2,018,080.00

5,477.10
1,266,401.25
128,850.34
0.00
1,400,728.69

273.9%
98.2%
132.7%
0.0%
69.4%

351,245.64
550,110.85
0.00
2,069.99
256,125.12
1,159,551.60

69.8%
88.6%
0.0%
0.2%
97.4%
45.4%

241,177.09

-45.1%

Expenses
Personnel
General
Contractual
Capital Expenditure
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

497,308.00
534,493.00
217,083.00

385,359.93
414,672.30
0.00

77.5%
77.6%
0.0%

200,800.00
1,449,684.00

104,192.33
904,224.56

51.9%
62.4%

503,146.00
621,038.98
306,000.00
860,000.00
262,862.00
2,553,046.98

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-60,684.00

484,775.48

-798.9%

-534,966.98

Final

City of Pacific, Missouri
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
Sewer System ( 42)
Current Year
2026 Budget
Amendment # 4

Actual
5/31/26

Prior Year
% of
Budget

2025 Budget

Actual
5/31/25

% of
Budget

Revenues
Licenses & permits
Charges for Services
Miscellaneous
Projects
Total Revenues &Transfers In

1,500.00
1,746,919.00
12,000.00
0.00
1,760,419.00

1,400.00
1,515,141.32
84,765.24
0.00
1,601,306.56

93.3%
86.7%
706.4%
0.0%
91.0%

2,000.00
1,977,846.00
35,000.00
4,456,220.00
6,471,066.00

2,450.00
1,513,710.50
36,580.64
3,199,018.95
4,751,760.09

122.5%
76.5%
104.5%
71.8%
73.4%

Expenses
Personnel
General
Contractual
Capital Expenditure
Transfers Out
Total Expense & Transfers Out

497,308.00
1,384,168.00
110,000.00
849,399.00
200,800.00
3,041,675.00

385,813.72
1,237,645.22
80,503.80
70,217.00
104,192.33
1,878,372.07

77.6%
89.4%
73.2%
8.3%
51.9%
61.8%

551,906.00
1,120,112.98
115,500.00
1,052,356.00
891,863.00
3,731,737.98

351,452.30
1,420,396.80
7,790.00
589,007.78
256,125.14
2,624,772.02

63.7%
126.8%
6.7%
56.0%
28.7%
70.3%

Revenues Over (Under)Expenses

-1,281,256.00

-277,065.51

21.6%

2,739,328.02

2,126,988.07

77.6%

1ST / OSAGE TRUCK DETOUR ROUTE

2
OSAGE STREET

3

1
COLUMBUS STREET

PROJECT
WORK AREA

3

1

1

2

DETOUR

DETOUR

END
DETOUR

1

2

3