The Cancellation Tracker

The El Cerrito city council voted not to renew its contract with Flock; the cameras will be turned off on June 7. "company not negotiating in good faith." "my biggest concern is the federal government could access the data"

City council unanimously voted to cancel their existing contract. The cameras became activated without city council approval. “We don’t know where the information is going. We don’t know how it got on. it’s been plugged in and it has a light that is tracking license plates,” Menominee Mayor Casey Hoffman said.

Appleton's mayor announced that the city will stop using Flock due to community feedback and concerns over the integrity of the system.

Shoreline, WA rejected the possibility of a contract with Flock Safety due to public opposition and concerns among council members.

The Oshkosh Common Council rescinded its approval of the Flock camera contract unanimously just one day after it was initially approved. "Oshkosh Police Chief Dean Smith said Flock lied about the cameras not collecting heat maps of travelers."

Salem, IL canceled an earlier agreement for use of Flock license reader cameras due to a change in contract terms that were concerning to the Mayor.

Dane County, WI cut off funding for Flock cameras due to privacy concerns.

Bloominton, IN terminated its $50,000 contract with Flock Safety after 400+ residents protested the surveillance system.

Tompkins County, NY ended the county’s contract with Flock Safety after months of organized pushback from activists and community members.

The Dutchtown Community Improvement District ended its contract with Flock Safety amid concerns over data-sharing with ICE.

Ithica Common Council ended the city’s contract with Flock Safety due to privacy concerns.

Saranac Lake, NY canceled its contract with Flock following public outcry and concerns over privacy.

The Mountain View Police Chief decided to disable their Flock cameras after noticing their cameras had been accessed by out-of-state and federal agencies, a violation of California law.

Oxnard police suspended operation of its 19 Flock fixed-position cameras after a vendor error allowed out-of-state agencies to query its data just over 364,000 times despite the office disabling National Lookup in June 2023.

Santa Clara County has decided to stop using Flock Safety cameras in several cities due to privacy concerns.

The Windsor Town Council voted to suspend automatic license plate readers amid privacy concerns raised by residents.

Flock cameras were deactivated in Knoxville, TN following a contract lapse.

The Santa Cruz City Council voted 6-1 to terminate their contract with Flock Safety after evidence that the city's data was accessed by out-of-state agencies (ICE) roughly 4,000x.

The Los Altos Hills City Council voted to terminate their contract with Flock Safety (2:45:02) following resident concerns and a lack of evidence that the Flock system was effective at reducing crime.

Prosser disabled their Flock cameras due to the controversial issues of data collection and access.

The town of Natick canceled their Flock Safety pilot over transparency, data ownership, and mass surveillance risks, leading to cameras being slated for removal.

The Walla Walla Police Department disabled its Flock system due to data misused, following a Washington court ruling that data captured by Flock cameras were public records and could be requested by anyone.

Watertown, MA canceled its contract with Flock Safety before any cameras were installed, following questions from the public about privacy and data sharing.

Richmond's police chief shut down the city's Flock system after discoving their data was unintentionally being shared nationwide.

Cambridge ended its contract with Flock Safety following a "breach of trust" in which Flock installed new cameras without the city's knowledge following a temporary suspension by the city.

Olympia City Council moved to cover up their Flock cameras, pending deactivation over concerns of federal access and the ability to move freely.

The Eugene PD “has identified vulnerabilities” in the Flock system and no longer had confidence in the system" terminated their contract with Flock Safety.

Flagstaff City Council voted unanimously and to end their contract with Flock Safety, following failed attempts that sufficient guardrails could be put in place.

Brooklyn Park canceled their Flock contract “due to concerns over customer support and poor data sharing protocols.”

The Mountlake Terrace City Council voted unanimously to cancel their contract with Flock Safety following concerns of data access and public records implications.

The Staunton Police Chief and City Council canceled their contract with Flock Safety following a verbal attack on the city's residents by the CEO of Flock.

The San Marcos City Council voted to end their contract with Flock Safety after considering Flock's reputation and the research that surveillance does not equal safety.

The town of Warren, Rhode Island rejected a proposal to install Flock LPRs due to concerns about privacy violations.

The Charlottesville City Council decided not to move forward with a contract with Flock Safety following the conclusion of their pilot program, due to their concerns with the system outweighing any benefits.

Lane County, Oregon suspended their contract with Flock Safety, before their 22 cameras were even installed due to public opposition.

Following Eugene's lead, Springfield terminated their contract with Flock Safety, after strong community opposition.

The Verona City Council voted not to renew their contract with Flock Safety after concerns about data access.

The Redmond city council voted unanimously to request the police department to disable their Flock cameras after growing concerns of unwanted access by federal agencies and a recent WA court ruling that ALPR data is considered public record.

Woodburn, Oregon announced they would pause the use of their Flock system following safety concerns for undocumented residents.

The Bay City Commission voted against a contract with Flock Safety following community members expressing privacy concerns.

Skamania County stopped using Flock Safety cameras after a Washington court ruled the images captured by them were public records and could be requested by anyone.

The Kent city council voted against a Flock contract due to concerns of potential abuse and discomfort with mass surveillance.

The Lynnwood Police Department paused the used of their Flock system following concerns raised by residents.

City council voted 6-1 to reject a contract with Flock Safety after an overwhelmingly negative public response, citing privacy concerns, government overreach, poor use of taxpayer money, and concerns with data sharing.

Hays County commissioners voted 3-2 to terminate their contract with Flock Safety after public concern for privacy and the risk of their personal information being exposed.

The town of Hillsborough, North Carolina terminated their contract with Flock Safety following concerns about data privacy.

The Town of Warrenton voted 5-1 to permanently block consideration of installing ALPRs in their town.

Sedro-Woolley deactivated their Flock cameras following a lawsuit resulting in Flock footage being considered public records under Washington state law.

City council voted unanimously to end their contract with Flock Safety after council members claimed they were misled and lied to about the system's data sharing features.

The City of Stanwood decided to shut off its Flock cameras pending a court judgment on whether data collected by Flock cameras are considered public records.

The City of Evanston ended its contract with Flock Safety and requested the deactivation of the cameras following an audit by the Secretary of State showing the company was violating state law by sharing Illinois data with federal agencies. Flock then reinstalled the cameras against the city's wishes, prompting a cease-and-desist by the city.

The City of Louisville deactivated its cameras after a community member found that the system was severely misrepresented in both its data sharing practices and its capabilities.

City council voted to cancel its contract with Flock Safety following a state investigation of the system's data sharing practices, which enabled violations of state law.

The Village of Scarsdale terminated its contract with Flock Safety after over 450 community members signed a petition, expressing concerns over privacy and the system's data sharing practices.

City council voted to block the renewal of Austin's contract with Flock Safety after controversial uses for the system, violations of department policy, and contract language that went against council mandates on data retention.

City council voted unanimously to reject the $66,000 contract extension with Flock Safety after public pushback and concerns over privacy, civil liberties, and sharing data with federal agencies.

City council voted against a contract with Flock Safety after community members raised concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and data sharing.

City council voted unanimously to reject a contract with Flock Safety after hearing community concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and data sharing with federal agencies.

The Seneca Police Department ended its contract with Flock license plate readers after less than 90 days, citing poor customer service and security concerns.

Bend City Council voted to deactivate and remove their Flock cameras over concerns with Flock's business practices.

The Elbert County Board of County Commissioners unanimously voted not to renew its contract with Flock Safety after concerns of government overreach.

The Pittsboro town board voted 4-1 to cancel its contract for the controversial system of license-plate readers, siding with privacy rights.

The City of Weston has removed its Flock cameras after major pushback from residents.

Sturgeon Bay will discontinue using the Flock System after overwhelming opposition was voiced by the public

The City of South Tucson, AZ canceled their contract with Flock Safety, removing the automated license plate reader cameras after months of debate over privacy and public safety.

The City of Everett shut down its entire network of Flock license plate reader cameras after a judge ruled the footage is considered public record.

The city of Ypsilanti, MI voted to ban license plate readers, citing privacy concerns.

Lake County commissioners ordered Flock to remove their cameras following their illegal and unpermitted installation, a tactic by Flock that still occurs in 2026.