The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-001020

On the agenda: Bluffdale meeting — Data Center (May 27)

Past ⚠ Agenda Watch Bluffdale, Utah · Wednesday, May 27, 2026 — 4 months ago

About this record

The published agenda for this May 27 meeting contains: "Data Center", "data center". The meeting has passed; the record and its outcome live here permanently.

WhenWednesday, May 27, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.

WhereBluffdale, Utah

Money$15,000,000 was at stake

On the record“Data Center”“data center”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived August 19, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

211 pages · scroll to read

Page 1 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY

CITY COUNCIL
MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.

Mayor Natalie Hall
Councilmember Steve Austin
Councilmember Wendy Aston
Councilmember Greg Wilding
Councilmember Mackey Smith
Councilmember Alan Lord

Notice is hereby given that the Bluffdale City Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at Bluffdale City Hall,
2222 West 14400 South, Bluffdale, Utah. The meeting will begin at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. This meeting
will also be broadcast live to the public at: www.bluffdale.gov. The public may comment at the meeting or by emailing
comments to [email protected] by 4:00 PM the day of the meeting. Emailed comments will be
submitted to the City Council but will not be read at the meeting. Notice is further given that access to this meeting by the
City Council may be by electronic means.
In the event the meeting is disrupted in any way that the City in its sole discretion deems inappropriate, the City reserves the
right to immediately remove the individual(s) from the meeting and, if needed, end virtual access to the meeting. Reasons
for removing an individual or ending virtual access to the meeting include but are not limited to the posting of offensive
pictures, remarks, or making offensive statements, disrespectful statements or actions, and any other action deemed
inappropriate.

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING 6:00 P.M.
1.

Call to Order: (Roll Call, Invocation, Pledge of Allegiance*).

Minute and Agenda Approval:

2.1

May 13, 2026 , City Council Meeting Minutes.

2.2

Approval of this meeting’s agenda.

Presentation Items:
3.1

Recognition of Riverton High School Student Body Officer, President Seth Christensen. (Presenter,
Mayor Hall)

3.2

Promotion of Fire Captains, Alec Moyer, Jaren Franchina and Scott Byrne. (Staff Presenter, Fire Chief
Matt Evans) Oath of Office administered by Caitlyn Tubbs.

3.3

Presentation by Budget Review Committee. (Presenter, Japheth McGee, Chair)

3.4

Salt Lake County Budget, Services and Priorities. (Presenter, Aimee Winder Newton, Salt Lake County
Chair and Suzanne Harrison, Council Member)

Public Comment: (This is a time and place for any person who wishes to comment on items not scheduled on the
agenda for public hearing. Any person or group wishing to comment on any item not otherwise scheduled for public
hearing on the agenda may address the City Council at this point by stepping to the microphone and giving his or her
name for the record or by emailing [email protected]. Comments should be limited to not more
than three (3) minutes unless additional time is authorized by the Chair. Groups wishing to comment will be asked to
appoint a spokesperson. Items brought forward to the attention of the City Council will be turned over to staff to
provide a response outside of the City Council meeting.)

Consent Agenda: (These items are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by a single
motion. If discussion is desired on any particular consent item, that item may be removed from the consent agenda
and considered separately. No public comment will be permitted.)

5.1
6.

Resolution 2026-23- Reappointing board members to Healthy Bluffdale Coalition Board

Action or Discussion Items; Items Continued from Previous Meeting: (These items are considered by the
City Council individually. No public comment will be permitted.)

City Council Meeting – May 27, 2026

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 211

6.1

Resolution 2026-24- Consideration for adoption of a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of
not more than $15,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Water Revenue Bonds Series 2026, and
related matters. (Bruce Kartchner, Matt Dugdale).

6.2

Budget Discussion. (Staff Presenter, Stephanie Thayer)

6.3

Internal Control Risk Assessment Discussion. (Staff Presenters, Stephanie Thayer and Bruce Kartchner)

Public Hearing Items: (Public comments must abide by the requirements listed above).
7.1

Ordinance 2026-04- Adopting Impact Fee Facility Plan and Impact Fee Analysis. (Staff Presenter, Dan
Tracer and Guest Presenter, Cami Hamilton, EFG Consulting)

7.2

Ordinance 2026-05- Proposed Text Amendment to Chapter 3.40 of the Bluffdale City Code to update
the City’s regulations on seasonal fireworks sales and to Section 11.180.020 of the Bluffdale City Code
to allow outdoor fireworks sales as an allowed temporary use. (Staff Presenter, Caitlyn Tubbs)

Staff Reports, Additional Council Discussion, and Calendaring Items:

Closed Meetings - if any: (This meeting will be closed to the public for one of the stated purposes found in Utah Code
§ 52-4-205(1), which is usually for one of the following purposes: discussion of the character, professional competence,
or physical or mental health of an individual; discuss collective bargaining; discuss pending or reasonably imminent
litigation; discuss the purchase, exchange, sale, or lease of real property, including water rights or water shares).

10.

Adjournment.
CERTIFICATE OF POSTING

I hereby certify that the foregoing notice and agenda is posted at the Bluffdale City Hall, on the City’s website
(www.bluffdale.gov) and posted on the Utah State Public Notice website (www.pmn.utah.gov).
Published and posted on May 22, 2026.

Tami Timothy
City Recorder
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, individuals needing assistance or other services or accommodation
for this meeting should contact Bluffdale City Hall at least 24 hours in advance of this meeting at 801-254-2200. TTY 7-1-1.
*Contact the City Recorder if you desire to give the Invocation or lead the Pledge of Allegiance.

City Council Meeting – May 27, 2026

Page 2 of 2

Page 3 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35

Present:

faced with the Home Occupation Code, as well as the opportunity to make changes to address

those issues. Violations often end up in Administrative Code Enforcement (“ACE”) Court, and he

wanted to ensure that that was a reasonable response. He was interested in the discussion because

there seemed to be a disparity in how residents are treated. The City appeared to have been heavy

handed with some violations while others got by on a technicality. He wanted to talk about specific

City Council:

Greg Wilding, Mayor Pro Tempore
Wendy Aston
Steve Austin
Alan Lord
Mackey Smith (via telephone)

Staff:

Bruce Kartchner, City Manager
Fred Donaldson, City Attorney
Stephanie Thayer, Administrative Services Director
Tami Timothy, City Recorder
Caitlyn Tubbs, Planning Manager
Ellen Oakman, Associate City Planner
Matt Evans, Fire Chief
Shane Paddock, Public Works Director
Merrill Terry, Finance Manager

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
1.

Call to Order.

Mayor Pro Tempore Greg Wilding called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.
All members of the City Council were present with the exception of Mayor Hall, who was excused.
City Manager, Bruce Kartchner reported that Item 2.2 could be discussed during Staff reports if
Item 2.1 ran long.
2.

Discussion/Presentation Items.
2.1

Home Occupation Business Licensing Discussion.
Donaldson and Caitlyn Tubbs)

(Staff Presenters, Fred

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding stated that there had been a lot of discussion about challenges citizens

Page 4 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

instances and provide Staff with direction to make the Home Occupation Code easier for citizens

to comply with.

3
4

Council Member Aston stated that the large lots in Bluffdale are amazing, but they also create

some issues. Some people would rather run a business on their lot than have animals. The City

Council supports home occupations, but not commercial operations being run out of a home. Some

home occupations were not allowed by the current code, but also did not pose a nuisance to

neighbors or problems for the City. The Home Occupation Code may need to be expanded in

those areas. For example, you cannot have a farm stand in Bluffdale, but she believes that residents

of western Bluffdale would love that option. If they live in the home, they should be able to sell

fruits, vegetables, or plants from their home. That could be allowed with a Conditional Use Permit

(“CUP”), but they cost $400, which is probably more than a farm stand would bring in. She did

not think that the Home Occupation Code needed to be completely rewritten, but it could be added

to.

15
16

Council Member Austin stated that the current code was too stringent. His wife just went through

the process to start a home occupation, and he was surprised at some of the requirements. He

believes that limiting home occupations can stifle potentially profitable businesses that could be

very beneficial to both Bluffdale and its residents. He had heard from multiple residents with home

businesses that they were initially told by the City that the use was approved, but they were now

being told that they were in violation. If that were the case, the original approval should be

honored, and Staff should be trained to correctly portray code requirements. Any changes should

be consistent across the board to ensure that the message is the same for everyone.

24
25

Mr. Kartchner reported that there may be differences based on the size of a property or site-specific

information, but agreed that requirements should be consistent within each specific group.

27
28

Council Member Lord stated that it is not easy to interpret rules. Some things can be a nuisance

in one part of the City and not others. It can be hard to define what a nuisance is, but it must be

clearly written so that citizens understand. A towing business on his street was storing vehicles in

Page 5 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

their backyard, but they now only park the tow trucks there. That does not bother him because

they are no longer creating a nuisance by parking other cars at their home. There are a number of

larger properties with a shop in the backyard and a paved driveway. Their employees do not park

on the street, and the properties look nice. The cost of doing business is high, and it can be a real

advantage to business owners if they can use their property for that purpose. He did not want the

City to be viewed as having a heavy hand in regulating those businesses, and he would not want

to see them pushed out. However, other businesses can be a real nuisance to neighbors. He would

rather be too lax than too strict.

9
10

Council Member Aston stated that she had reviewed home occupation codes in other cities in the

Salt Lake Valley, and Bluffdale was quite lenient in comparison. Two tow trucks may be fine, but

what if there were 10? The City needed to specify the acceptable amount of “X” and then consider

how it can be misused. They also needed to be cautious and consider when a business is no longer

a home business but instead a commercial operation.

15
16

Council Member Austin stated that the Council should consider how the changes would impact

families in Bluffdale.

18
19

Council Member Smith agreed that there should be a line, but he was in favor of leniency for

people who have lived and operated a business in Bluffdale for decades but have recently realized

they are out of compliance. He would like to do what they can to help those residents continue

operating their business as long as it does not create a public nuisance.

23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding reviewed Bluffdale City Municipal Code § 3.80.020, Definitions.
BUSINESS VEHICLE:
A business vehicle is any of the following:
i.

A vehicle or trailer that is primarily used for a home occupation business.

ii.

A vehicle or trailer that has the home occupation business advertised on it.

Page 6 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

iii.

2
3
4
5
6
7

A vehicle or trailer located at the home occupation property for business purposes that is
in public view from a public right-of-way for more than four hours.

A business vehicle is not:
i.

A vehicle or trailer owned by the home occupation business; and

ii.

Stored at the home occupation business location.

8
9

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding stated that someone who operates an accounting business may own a

company truck and trailer, and asked if the above meant that they were not business vehicles. City

Attorney, Fred Donaldson, clarified that the intent of the provision was to specify that if a vehicle

is neither used by the home occupation business nor advertises the home occupation business, it

would not be considered a business vehicle. The homeowner can also own a vehicle that is not

used for business purposes and does not have a business logo on it.

15
16

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding stated that in the above scenario, the resident may own one vehicle with

company advertising and two that have no advertising, but all three are owned by the home

occupation business. Would they only have one business vehicle? Mr. Donaldson reported that

there would only be one business vehicle unless the two vehicles without advertising were used

for business purposes. Council Member Austin stated that the confusion may be cleared up by

adding the word “owner” to state “A vehicle or trailer owned by the home occupation business

owner.” Mr. Donaldson clarified that the business can own a vehicle that the business owner is

allowed to use or that is not used for business purposes. However, the language may need to be

modified to state the intent more clearly.

25
26

Council Member Lord stated that his brother-in-law purchased a vehicle in his company’s name,

but he is an attorney and does not have a home business. He asked if it would be considered a

business vehicle. Mr. Donaldson stated that it is not a business vehicle unless it is used for business

purposes. Mr. Kartchner stated that the IRS would classify it as a business vehicle. The business

is not in his home, and residents have the ability to bring business vehicles home. If he stores four

vehicles at his home, that is a storage issue, and the question is if he is now running a storage
4

Page 7 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

business that stores business assets. An underlying question of any city’s home occupation code

is, what is a home occupation business.

3
4

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked if storage is regulated under § 11.160.030: Commercial Vehicles

in Residential Zones. Mr. Donaldson clarified that the referenced section regulates heavy vehicles

with a gross weight of 26,000 pounds or more. The example would be regulated as Open Storage.

7
8

Mr. Kartchner stated that some uses touch on the Home Occupation Code, but the resident does

not think of it that way because their business is elsewhere. For example, a semi-truck business

had been operating across from the church on 14400 South for several years. The business was

actually in Riverton, but the trucks were stored and maintained at a home in Bluffdale. Code

Enforcement was addressing the issue, but it was an example of people trying to skirt the law by

claiming that the business was registered at another location. Mayor Pro Tem Wilding remarked

that the business probably fell under several different sections of code, including Open Storage,

which is not compatible with residential use.

16
17

Mr. Donaldson reported that § 3.80.050: Minor and Major Home Occupation Table specified the

number of business vehicles and trailers allowed. Up to one business vehicle or trailer was allowed

for Minor Home Occupations and two for Major Home Occupations. Mr. Kartchner added that an

additional vehicle could potentially be allowed with a special exception.

21
22
23
24

Mr. Donaldson stated that the City has the following three types of Home Occupations:
•

Minor Home Occupations

•

Major Home Occupations

•

Major Home Occupations with up to two exceptions (per § 3.80.060: Special Exception

Table).

28
29

Mr. Kartchner reported that, per State code, the City cannot charge Minor Home Occupations for

a license. Planning Manager, Caitlyn Tubbs, added that the Major and Minor Home Occupation

categories were originally created to comply with that requirement. Minor occupations were those

Page 8 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

that had no discernible impact on the exterior of the home, and those licenses were issued at the

counter. Any other home business required a more extensive review and an additional fee. An

example of a Minor Home Occupation would be a home accounting service that holds all meetings

over Zoom.

5
6

Council Member Lord asked if the property size should be considered. Council Member Aston

agreed and asked if a two-acre lot should allow different uses from a one-acre lot. Mr. Donaldson

reported that it was not currently contemplated, but he and Ms. Tubbs had discussed the option of

having different rules based on lot size or zoning category. Mr. Kartchner remarked that it is a

complex issue, as the impact to the business owner must be weighed against the impact to the

neighbors. A balance must be maintained so the home occupation does not negatively impact

neighbors but allows the business owner to thrive.

13
14

Council Member Aston stated that she was on the Council when the semi-truck business was

initially brought to the City’s attention. Noise, dust, etc., from the business was extremely invasive

to its neighbors. Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked if the noise ordinance was strict enough to address

those types of issues. Mr. Kartchner reported that it sets quiet time between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00

a.m. Council Member Aston remarked that the business was operating all day and night, and an

employee had to be paid to monitor the noise level at night. Council Member Austin stated that

noise could be an issue at any time. Mr. Donaldson reported that a maximum of 60 decibels was

specified in code. Mayor Pro Tem Wilding noted that a motor vehicle is 60 decibels. Mr.

Kartchner stated that because of the way decibels are measured, noise may be loud enough to have

a negative impact but not break the law.

24
25

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked for input on specific items that may need to be changed. For

example, § 3.80.070.B.6 prohibits storage, service, repair, sales, or rental of an ambulance, tow

truck, recreational vehicle, watercraft, automobile, ATV, or other motorized vehicles. Some

citizens had asked about storing WaveRunners, ATVs, or vehicles they rent out on places like Toro

in their backyard or garage. Mr. Kartchner stated that Ms. Tubbs had created a presentation on the

item that may be helpful to the discussion.
6

Page 9 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2

Mr. Donaldson reported that, per the Home Occupation Code, the property’s primary use is

intended to be residential, and the home occupation is a secondary or accessory use. If the primary

use of the property is a business, that is not appropriate for a residential zone. Council Member

Austin stated that the City needs to ensure that the business owner lives at the residence. Mr.

Donaldson indicated that there was once an issue with a person who operated their home

occupation on one property and then purchased a second home solely for the business, but claimed

they resided at both properties. The City investigated and determined that they did not reside at

the second property.

10
11

Ms. Tubbs reviewed the presentation showing different types of home occupations and their

potential impacts.

•

A stereotypical Minor Home Occupation is a home office for a piano teacher, accountant,

etc. They may have a nameplate on the exterior, but otherwise, neighbors would not know

it is anything other than a home.

•

A pumpkin patch may have additional vehicles or longer hours, but it is only a seasonal
use.

•

Other home occupations may have one company vehicle or some onsite material storage.

•

Major Home Occupations would have more vehicles, equipment, or additional storage.

•

Heavier use brings questions about whether the use is still accessory to the residence.

21
22

Council Member Aston stated that a neighbor had turned their residential property into a

commercial operation. The primary purpose of a residential property is to be a home. She was in

favor of making things more comfortable for home occupations, but the City needed to ensure that

residents were protected first.

26
27

The presentation also included lists of general provisions for all home occupations, prohibited

home occupations, and tables that had been reviewed earlier in the meeting.

Page 10 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

Mr. Kartchner reported that one challenge with home occupations was that some state and federal

regulations can fly under the radar. For example, retail uses should have a sales tax number to

ensure that they are collecting sales tax. The City did not want to enforce those regulations, but a

provision of the Home Occupation Code was that the business must operate within them. Staff

was working to identify ways of verifying compliance, such as requiring a sales tax number for

retailers to ensure that a retail home occupation is registered with the State.

7
8

Council Member Austin suggested that the current tables be reviewed for additional discussion.

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding agreed and indicated that he would like to consider loosening some

restrictions and tightening others.

Occupations but ensuring that they are properly screened and do not park on public roads.

12
13

Council Member Aston stated that she liked the idea of moving away from a “one size fits all”

approach to lot sizes. There were many larger lots that could tolerate more uses without being a

nuisance to neighbors. Council Member Austin pointed out that the neighbors typically also have

larger lots.

17
18

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding recommended that the City Council email their ideas to Mr. Kartchner,

who could then discuss them with Staff and prepare recommendations for review at a future

meeting. After further discussion, it was decided that Ms. Tubbs would convert the tables to a

spreadsheet for easier review and comment.

For example, allowing more vehicles for Minor Home

22
23
24
25
26

Mr. Kartchner reported that over the past three weeks, he had spoken with multiple organizations

regarding water conservation and the current drought. He attended a Jordan Valley Water

Conservancy District (“JVWCD”) meeting where they indicated that they have 30,000 acre feet of

water available to allocate to new development across agencies. They may be able to develop

more water by acquiring water rights from irrigation companies, but that was the total amount

currently available for development. Additionally, they reported that water usage was increasing

2.2

Water Use Conservation & Pricing Discussion.
Kartchner)

(Staff Presenter, Bruce

Page 11 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

even though development was not. Bluffdale utilized 20% more water than contracted in 2025,

which was concerning, as the JVWCD was considering mandating a 10% decrease from the

contract. The City is unique in that it has a number of unregulated, unmetered homes using

irrigation water.

5
6

Mr. Kartchner asked the City Council to consider whether additional landscape restrictions should

be implemented. For example, allowing a maximum of 10% turf. Other cities were offering

conversion grants like Flip Your Strip, and South Jordan’s program had been so successful that

they were seeing a change in water usage due to the efforts. Equipment grants can be offered for

devices that track moisture content and create an irrigation schedule based on need. At the JVWCD

meeting, they also discussed potentially prohibiting turf on commercial properties.

12
13

Bluffdale currently has a tiered culinary water rate schedule. Normal and moderate drought

conditions did not affect rates, but severe drought increased the rate, with additional increases for

extreme or critical drought conditions. Some cities were also increasing their Tier 4 base rate to

over $7. That may feel punitive, but it was an effort to encourage conservation. The Council could

consider adopting a resolution authorizing rate changes to be invoked in severe, extreme, or critical

drought states, but he neither advocated for nor discouraged that action.

19
20

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked if the fee table calculations were monthly. Mr. Kartchner

confirmed that the water rate is based on monthly usage. Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked about the

impact on the City of using 20% more water than the contracted amount. Mr. Kartchner reported

that a penalty rate applies. Mayor Pro Tem Wilding asked if the additional cost was covered by

high water users being moved to higher tiers. Mr. Kartchner reported that it would be covered if

the City invoked severe and higher drought condition water rates.

26
27

Council Member Lord stated that the City was not in a severe drought, so higher fees would not

currently be charged. Mr. Kartchner confirmed that the City Council would have to pass a

resolution indicating that the City is in a severe drought, which would authorize Staff to change

the rates. Current conditions were normal to moderate. JVWCD did not say that the area was in

Page 12 of 211

DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

a severe, critical, or extreme drought, which he found surprising, as they were considering a 10%

decrease in usage that would typically indicate severe or higher drought conditions. Staff would

be following up with them to obtain more information and react accordingly.

4
5

In normal to moderate conditions, Bluffdale used 20% more water than contracted in 2025. Mr.

Kartchner found that curious because the City had normal usage the previous year. Council

Member Lord asked if the increase could be traced to residential or commercial users. Mr.

Kartchner reported that the increase was across the board. Council Member Aston asked if it may

have been due to a system upgrade. Mr. Kartchner stated that most of the City’s efforts had

lowered culinary water usage by increasing irrigation water use.

11
12

Mr. Kartchner reported that all the City’s water comes from the same source, and some residents

water their yards based on their right to one acre-foot of irrigation water. They technically have a

right to that water if it is available, but the area is in a situation where overwatering may result in

a culinary water shortage in the long-term.

considered, although it had been included in the newsletter and website. The Council would also

need to discuss future development water needs at a future time.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

How to better get that message out should be

Mayor Pro Tem Wilding suggested that the item be discussed further during Staff reports.
3.

Discussion.

None.
4.

Adjournment.

Council Member Austin moved to ADJOURN the City Council Work Session. Council

Member Aston seconded the motion. The motion passed with the unanimous consent of the

Council.

30
31

The Work Session adjourned at 5:58 PM.

Page 13 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

Present:

Member Aston seconded the motion. The motion passed with the unanimous consent of the

Council.

City Council:

Natalie Hall, Mayor
Wendy Aston
Steve Austin
Alan Lord
Mackey Smith (via telephone)
Greg Wilding

Staff:

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
1.

Call to Order.

Mayor Hall called the meeting to order at 6:01 PM.
All members of the City Council were present.
Maddie Clements offered the invocation and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2.

Minutes and Agenda Approval.
2.1

April 8, 2026, City Council Meeting Minutes.

2.2

Approval of this Meeting’s Agenda.

Council Member Auston moved to APPROVE the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council

Page 14 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

2025 Annual Report. They won “Best of State” for the 17th time. Division Director, Talia Butler,

spoke at the recent Best Friends Animal Society Conference to highlight their achievement of being

no kill for 12 years. Salt Lake County Animal Services is one of the only municipal shelters in the

nation that has been able to achieve that honor and uphold the no-kill mission.

12
13

In 2025, Animal control officers responded to over 19,000 calls for service. The shelter’s team of

volunteers provided 7,500 hours of service for the area’s pets. Over 2,800 pets were adopted or sent

to rescue groups, and 4,000 pets were sterilized. The Pet Assistance on Wheels (“PAWS”) program

is offered countywide. The in-house clinic primarily services shelter pets but does offer programs

like Feline Fix for pets in the community.

18
19
20
21

Presentation Items.
3.1

Presentation and Discussion Regarding the Salt Lake County Animal Services
2025 Annual Report for the City of Bluffdale. (Presenter Carrie Naylor,
Community Liaison Coordinator, SLCO Animal Services)

Salt Lake County Animal Services Community Liaison Coordinator, Carrie Naylor, presented the

In 2025, 6,278 animals were brought into the shelter. Of those:
•

2,600 were adopted.

•

410 were transferred to rescue organizations.

•

2,819 were returned to their owners.

•

The live release rate was 95%, of which:

o 1,311 animals were fostered.

o 410 animals were rescued.

27
28
29
30

Bluffdale’s specific 2025 numbers were:
•

o 169 were officer impounds.

32
33
34

238 total animals, primarily cats and dogs.
o 40 were brought directly to the shelter.

•

494 calls for service from Bluffdale residents, primarily animal impound requests and citizen
inquiries.
12

Page 15 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

•

336 total animal licenses were issued, including one dangerous dog permit.

•

The Bluffdale Urban Wildlife Program provided 20 consultations and trapped 34 raccoons

3
4
5
6
7

and 23 striped skunks.
Events included:
•

The SPAYghetti and No Balls Gala has a live auction, raffle prizes, live entertainment, a pet

psychic, and puppies and kittens available for adoption. The 2025 theme was “Casino Night”.

No date or theme had been set for the 2026 event.

•

Petapalooza is the shelter’s largest annual adoption event. It was a two-day event with over

50 vendors, live entertainment, food trucks, and free microchips. Animals from all local

animal control agencies and rescue groups were featured, and 127 pets found homes.

•

The PAWS mobile clinic had been funded through 2026, but they hoped to continue it into

the future. It travels throughout Salt Lake County, providing free sterilizations, vaccinations,

and microchips to residents. It is a very popular program that fills up quickly.

interested in booking an appointment or learning more could email [email protected].

17
18

Council Member Austin stated that there were a lot more than 336 dogs in Bluffdale. Ms. Naylor

reported that the national average is 20% of dogs are licensed. They are always trying to increase

licensing compliance through education efforts. A new membership program will include the annual

license, vaccines, swag, and the potential to earn a free dental cleaning after a number of years. They

also have online licensing to make the process easier.

23
24

Council Member Austin asked if there was a way to better advertise the free clinics, as now residents

had to know about the program and check the calendar. Ms. Naylor stated that the PAWS program

only has a handful of vaccine appointments per clinic, which fill up quickly. Emailing is the best way

to schedule an appointment. They have monthly licensing events that do not include vaccines. The

Humane Society also has a low-cost walk-in clinic.

29
30

Mayor Hall stated that there is traditionally an annual vaccine clinic at City Hall. Ms. Naylor stated

that there was currently only one veterinarian on staff, so they had difficulty scheduling those events

without affecting shelter pets, but she would put in a request to schedule a 2026 event.
13

Anyone

Page 16 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2

Council Member Lord asked about the percentage of dogs that are registered online versus in person.

Ms. Naylor stated that more licenses are issued in person as the shelter is already interacting with the

pet owner. Licensing avoids a violation and helps get the animal home faster. A large percentage of

the community also obtains licenses online, and that system sends yearly reminders. Council Member

Lord asked if the feature was advertised. Mayor Hall stated that a link to online licensing is on the

City website. Salt Lake County Animal Services sends information to the City monthly that is then

included in the newsletter and website.

9
10

Council Member Austin stated that when he has found it challenging to re-register his pet when it

gets a three-year rabies vaccine, because he does not always have that information available in years

two and three. It would be helpful for the County website to retain information on three-year

vaccinations. Ms. Naylor reported that the online system should save that information, and proof

should only be required every three years. However, she would follow up with their information

technology team to ensure that it is working properly.

16
17

Mayor Hall expressed her appreciation for everything Salt Lake County Animal Services does for the

City

19
20
21
22
23
24

Ms. Tubbs introduced Josh Narvaez of the Salt Lake County Housing Trust Fund and reported that

May is National Affordable Housing Month. The presentation represented part two of a project that

the City developed in partnership with the Salt Lake County Housing Trust Fund under their 2023

interlocal agreement. Part one was the development of the Accessory Dwelling Unit (“ADU”)

Toolkit, and part two was an ADU Loan Program that would be available to all Bluffdale homeowners

interested in developing an ADU on their property.

30
31

Utah requires that cities provide for the development of moderate-income housing as part of their

General Plan. The requirements include a menu of items from which cities must choose three,

3.2

Presentation and Discussion Regarding the Bluffdale ADU Loan Program (Staff
Presenter, Caitlyn Tubbs, Guest Presenter, Josh Narvaez, Salt Lake County
Housing Trust Fund)

Page 17 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

including items like monetary support and rezoning to support moderate-income housing needs.

Bluffdale chose to accommodate ADUs.

3
4

Mr. Kartchner reported that Bluffdale had had three different redevelopment agencies (“RDA”) over

the past 25 years. The last RDA would end in 2026, but monies would continue to be spent for the

next few years. A requirement for each project area is that 20% of funds must be used to support

moderate-income housing. For example, one project area allocated 20% of collected funds to the

Bluffs Apartments. Unlike other RDA money that must be spent within the project area, the 20%

designated for moderate-income housing can be spent anywhere in the state. The Council recently

approved use of some RDA funds to encourage moderate-income apartments in the City. As a result,

a portion of a new apartment complex would be restricted to moderate-income housing. The City

also had the opportunity to partner with the County, and the evening’s presentation was for the next

step in that use of funds. Staff and the Council would discuss how the remaining monies were spent.

If a suitable use was not found within the City, it could be donated to the Olene Walker Housing Fund.

15
16

Ms. Tubbs reported that although monies could be used across the state, it was their preference to

keep the money in Bluffdale. To aid in that goal, the Salt Lake County Housing Trust Fund

recommended creation of an ADU Loan Program to support residents interested in developing an

ADU. Staff would be working with the County to coordinate social media outreach for the program.

20
21

If a Bluffdale homeowner is interested in developing an ADU on their property, the program provides

an opportunity for them to receive up to $150,000 toward its design, permitting, and construction.

The program has a $200 loan processing loan fee, and the loan term is 15 years. Borrowers will be

encouraged to rent to those making 80% area median income (“AMI”) or less by offering lower

interest rates for those residents. Rates are 1% for property owners willing to rent to tenants at 50%

AMI or below, 2% for 60% to 80% AMI, and 3% for 80% AMI or above. Repayment begins one

year after a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. Rental requirements are protected by a deed restriction

for 15 years or until the loan is fully paid off.

29
30
31
32

Loan forgiveness is available if the ADU is rented at the following levels for the full 15-year term:
•

80% AMI: 10% forgiveness
15

Page 18 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

•

60% AMI: 15% forgiveness

•

50% AMI or lower: 25% forgiveness

3
4

Deed-restricted ADUs will receive priority consideration and funding, and the program is open to all

Bluffdale property owners who are eligible to construct an ADU on their property.

6
7
8
9

Requirements include:
•

The property must be owner-occupied and comply with all existing ADU requirements.

•

Proof of homeowners' insurance is required.

•

Deed-restricted ADUs will be inspected every three years to ensure that life safety standards

are maintained.

13
14

Ms. Tubbs reported that the program would incentivize development in Bluffdale, and the City was

grateful for its continued partnership with the Salt Lake County Housing Trust Fund.

16
17

Mayor Hall asked if the item needed a City Council vote. Ms. Tubbs clarified that the Council had

already allocated the funding, and the purpose of the presentation was to inform them of how the

money was being utilized. The next step would be to determine the community’s interest in the

program. If it were popular, it would continue. If not, the funds could be reinvested in another

program.

22
23

Mayor Hall asked about program management. Mr. Narvaez confirmed that Salt Lake County would

manage the program and ensure compliance, but Bluffdale staff would perform some items like

permits and inspections.

26
27

Mayor Hall asked if the County would help educate the public on the program. Mr. Narvaez stated

that the ADU Toolkit released in 2025 was the educational portion of the agreement. The ADU Loan

Program is an attainable housing fund of approximately $2.5 million to help Bluffdale meet its

moderate-income housing goals. Mayor Hall asked how the public would be made aware of the

program. Ms. Tubbs reported that the City and Salt Lake County Housing Trust Fund would be

coordinating social media posts and newsletter articles. It would also be posted on the City website.

Page 19 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

Residents who inquire about an ADU would be told about the program. Ms. Tubbs reported that most

printed copies of the ADU Toolkit were given to people who visited City Hall regarding their new

home and ended up submitting an application for an ADU as well.

4
5

Council Member Wilding asked if the loans had a loan-to-value requirement. Ms. Tubbs confirmed

that there was no requirement. Council Member Wilding stated that the current median income for a

family of four in Salt Lake County was approximately $98,000. If someone took advantage of the

program for a $150,000 loan and rented to a tenant who was at or below 50% AMI, they would be

eligible for a 1% interest rate and $37,500 in loan forgiveness. It was an amazing opportunity.

10
11

Mayor Hall stated that the program would work for multiple tenants at or below the income level; it

did not have to be the tenant for 15 years.

13
14

Council Member Aston stated that when the Council discussed the 20% funds, they wanted to ensure

that the money was spent in Bluffdale, and this program was a good fit for the area. She asked if loan

payments would be used to fund more loans. Mr. Narvaez stated that the idea was for a revolving

loan fund, so the program is self-sustaining until the City meets its housing policy goals or the contract

term ends. At the end of the interlocal agreement in 2028, they will discuss additional housing goals.

Mr. Kartchner indicated that the agreement could also be extended or modified at that time. If the

ADU Loan Program were successful, the City Council could also discuss additional funding.

21
22

Council Member Aston asked when the program would begin. Ms. Tubbs reported that they would

begin taking applications as soon as possible.

24
25

Council Member Aston asked how tenant income would be verified. Mr. Narvaez stated that the

application includes a checklist outlining the property owner’s responsibilities, and income would

primarily be verified via pay stubs, not tax returns. The property owner will be required to forward

tenant income verification to the County.

29
30

Council Member Lord asked if there was a maximum income level to apply for the loan. Mr. Narvaez

stated that the goal was to encourage rental to tenants who are at or below 80% AMI, but there were

no income restrictions for the property owner.
17

Page 20 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2

Council Member Aston asked if construction costs were verified during the loan process. Mr. Narvaez

stated that the property owner must pay all invoices and submit them for reimbursement. Council

Member Aston asked if there would be multiple reimbursements or if reimbursement occurs once the

project is completed. Mr. Narvaez reported that that was the borrower’s choice, but he anticipated

multiple reimbursements rather than one lump sum.

7
8

Mayor Hall asked if the County had any similar programs. Mr. Narvaez stated that, to his knowledge,

this would be their first ADU loan program. However, they consulted with other nonprofits about the

program. Mayor Hall stated that the City Council would like to interview the first person who utilizes

the program to build an ADU.

12
13

Council Member Austin asked what would happen if the property owner could not find a tenant that

met the income requirements specified when the loan was approved, if the property would need to

remain vacant until a suitable tenant was found, or if the interest rate would be increased. Mr. Narvaez

stated that the interest rate would be readjusted. If a qualifying tenant was found or the tenant’s

income changed, the interest rate would then be readjusted to the appropriate level based on their

income. Adjustments were not retroactive.

19
20

Council Member Austin asked how it could be a revolving program with loan forgiveness, as it

seemed that would deplete the fund. Mr. Narvaez agreed that forgiveness would deplete the fund.

The intention was to meet a current housing goal. It was also possible to amend the program to add

more money at a later time.

24
25

Council Member Austin remarked that someone could utilize the program to obtain a 3% interest rate

and then only rent to tenants with an income above 80% AMI, meaning they obtained a better interest

rate with no tenant restrictions. Mr. Narvaez agreed that this could happen but indicated that the goal

was to meet a housing policy need based on current zoning, which is primarily single-family in

Bluffdale. The City’s ADU ordinance was updated in 2019, and they wanted to build on that

momentum to both encourage ADUs and fund them short-term. Council Member Lord pointed out

that the borrower would not be eligible for forgiveness, so in that case, at least more of the allocated

funds would be returned.
18

Page 21 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Consent Agenda
5.1

Resolution 2026-22- Consideration and Vote on a Resolution Appointing
individuals to the City of Bluffdale Budget Review Committee. Pursuant to
Bluffdale Code 2.80.010(B), Members shall be appointed by the Mayor, with the
Advice and Consent of the City Council.

Council Member Aston moved to APPROVE the Consent Agenda. Council Member Wilding
seconded the motion. The motion passed with the unanimous consent of the Council.
6.

Action or Discussion Items; Continued from Previous Meeting.
6.1

Budget Discussion. (Staff Presenter, Stephanie Thayer).

Mayor Hall reported that the budget would be discussed at every Council meeting until the Final

Budget was passed in June.

18
19

Administrative Services Director, Stephanie Thayer, reported that the Tentative Budget was adopted

on April 8, 2026, and estimates would continue to be revised until the Final Budget was adopted in

June. She then provided a summary of recent changes.

22
23

General Fund

•

Revenues:

o Property taxes increased by $100,000.

o Business license fees increased by $5,000.

o State surcharges decreased by $5,000.

28
29

o Reappropriated fund balance reduced by $165,000.
•

o Utah Retirement System rates decreased slightly for Tier 1 employees, which affected

most departments.

o Medical insurance premiums came in at 5% lower the estimate, for a total increase of

9% instead of almost 15%.

34
35

Expenditures:

o Total decrease of $65,000 in expected expenditures.
•

The total projected reappropriated fund balance was now $391,275.
20

Page 22 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2
3

Community Events
•

4
5

o Reappropriated fund balance of $3,100.
•

is sponsored, and the expenditures should be covered by fund balance.
Water Operations Fund
•

11
12

Expenditures
o Santa and the Lights budget increased by $3,5000 as the event was growing. The event

7
8
9

Revenues

Revenues
o Water sales estimate decreased by $118,000 based on actual trends.

•

Expenditures

o Employee benefits costs decreased by $35,000 as indicated above.

o Water purchased decreased by $70,000 based on actual trends.

15
16
17

Fire and Police Protection Fund
•

o Public Safety Fee decreased by $19,000. The estimated fee increase was now $7.

19
20

Revenues
o General Fund transfer updated to $100,000 based on updated estimates.

•

Expenditures
o Employee benefits costs decreased by $19,000 as indicated above.

22
23

Ms. Thayer reported that the meeting packet included a copy of the revised budget with full line item

details.

25
26

Council Member Lord asked why the Public Safety Fee would not be reduced rather than the

reappropriated fund balance. Ms. Thayer reported that the transfer from the General Fund had been

reduced. The purpose of the Public Safety Fee is to cover ongoing services, and increasing the transfer

would utilize one-time monies to cover increased Police contract costs. Council Member Lord stated

that if the total budget had been reduced so that the City did not need to dip into its reserves, he was

of the opinion that General Fund monies should be used instead of increasing the fee. Ms. Thayer
21

Page 23 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

stated that State law requires the General Fund balance to be between 5% and 35%, and with the

changes, it was only at 16%. However, it was a Council policy decision.

3
4

Mr. Kartchner stated that there was already a planned use of General Fund balance, which would

reduce the reserve account. He asked if the City Council wanted Staff to increase use of reserves,

which was the City’s rainy day fund, and use one-time monies to subsidize public safety and other

costs. The Tentative Budget indicated a use of fund balance of approximately $400,000. At the

Council’s direction, that amount could be transferred from the General Fund in order to reduce the

Public Safety Fee. However, there were long-term ramifications of using those one-time monies.

10
11

Council Member Lord stated that, to his understanding, the fee was being increased to cover the offset.

Mayor Hall pointed out that Ms. Thayer indicated in her presentation that there would still be a

transfer from the General Fund, and the fee had decreased. Ms. Thayer confirmed that it would

decrease by $19,000 due to the decrease in employee benefit costs, but not the full $100,00. The Fire

and Police Protection Fund was set up to be paid through property taxes and any monies that were

available for transfer from the General Fund, and any increase in service costs was tied to the Public

Safety Fee.

18
19

Council Member Lord stated that the City was currently looking at a $556,000 use of fund balance

and asked if the increased fee would offset that amount. Ms. Thayer clarified that there would still

be a deficit of $556,000 in the General Fund, but the Public Safety Fee was part of the Fire and Police

Protection Fund.

23
24

Mr. Kartchner reported that property tax revenues were increasing because the Eastern Bluffdale

Economic Development Area (“EDA”) had ended. What was previously booked as management

revenue from the EDA was now showing as property taxes. It was not an actual increase in property

tax revenue. The normal General Fund transfer was reduced to reflect that shift in income. The

established Public Safety Fee had only been changed based on the cost savings from employee

benefits.

30
31

Council Member Lord asked if the fee could be reduced if more revenue was found. Mr. Kartchner

stated that the City Council always had the option to increase the use of fund balance, but he was
22

Page 24 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

uncomfortable with that option, as reserves are typically saved for transitional periods and economic

downturns.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Public Hearing Items.
7.1

Ordinance 2026-03 to Update the City Code as follows: - Chapter 11.220.070.A
to Add Provisions for Gas Station Electronic Display Signs. A new section will be
added to allow electronic display signs for gas stations with a minimum display
interval of three (3) seconds. - Chapter 11.220.030 — to add a new definition for
“Gas Station Electronic Display Sign” to address this specific type of sign. Yesco,
Applicant. (Staff Presenter, Ellen Oakman)

Associated City Planner, Ellen Oakman, presented the Staff Report. Yesco, LLC, on behalf of

Maverik, Inc., had requested a Text Amendment to allow electronic display signs specific only to gas

station monument signs. The proposed new definition and sign category generally mirrored existing

language for static electronic numeric display signs, with the primary difference being the allowance

of a three-second display interval rather than the 12-hour interval allowed for static signs.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

The proposed definition to Bluffdale City Code § 11.220.030: Definitions was as follows:
GAS STATION ELECTRONIC DISPLAY SIGNS:
An electronic message center sign that:
•

Is incorporated into a monument sign and occupies less than 50% of the sign face;

•

Changes display no more frequently than once every three seconds;

•

Does not scroll, flash, blink, emit sound, or include animated copy or graphics.

28
29

A new subsection would also be added under 11.220.070(A): Permanent On-Premise Signs, for Gas

Station Electronic Display Signs. They would only be allowed in non-residential zones.

31
32

The proposed gas station electronic display signs would be limited to gas station monument signs and

have a minimum three-second display interval. Brightness and operational standards would mirror

those of static electronic numbering signs. Electronic message centers have a minimum eight-second

display interval, but brightness is measured with different standards.

36
23

Page 25 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

Ms. Oakman reported that the Planning Commission reviewed the item and forwarded a positive

recommendation of approval.

3
4
5
6

Mayor Hall opened the public hearing.
Aaron Cain spoke on behalf of Yesco and Maverik. Most gas stations offer different pricing

depending on how gas is purchased, and Maverik has created a Nitro program with special pricing.

The ability to display the two different price levels was essential in being able to present correct

pricing to the public. A video was then displayed showing the subtle change in prices on their

electronic display signs. Maverik was making this change at all locations across the country.

11
12
13
14

There were no further comments. The public hearing was closed.
Council Member Aston moved to APPROVE Ordinance 2026-03. Council Member Austin

seconded the motion. Vote on Motion: Council Member Austin-Yes, Council Member Aston-

Yes, Council Member Wilding-Yes, Council Member Lord-Yes. The motion passed with the

unanimous consent of the Council.

18
19
20
21

Staff Reports, Additional Council Discussion, and Calendaring Items.

City Manager, Bruce Kartchner, continued the Work Session discussion on water usage. He had

directed Parks Department staff to use water judiciously while maintaining healthy grass and

plantings. In his opinion, homeowners may let their lawns die, but the City should have grassy places

where the community can come together for activities. The City had saved a lot of water over time

by changing to better irrigation controls that water based on moisture content rather than on a set

schedule. Much of Bluffdale’s irrigation water was Utah Data Center reuse water or from a

subterranean well. The City was trying to minimize its impact as much as possible.

28
29

There were three splashpads in Bluffdale, all of which were currently push-button activated.

However, the City could program the water to only cycle every five to 15 minutes. Other cities were

also restricting their splash pads’ hours of use. Instead of operating from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., for

example, the hours may be reduced to 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Mr. Kartchner recommended

Page 26 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

considering those types of restrictions to limit water use. One City splashpad drains into a tank, and

that water is reused for irrigation water. The other two drain into the canal.

3
4

Mayor Hall asked the Council to reach out to Staff to discuss the options. With the push buttons, the

splashpads are only in use when children are present. Mr. Kartchner stated that he would likely add

a small, five-minute delay as children sometimes repeatedly press the button. Mayor Hall stated that

it was possible parents did not bring their children to the splashpad until after lunch, but it is often a

family activity in the evening, and she did not want to restrict evening hours.

9
10

Council Member Aston stated that during the summer, families go somewhere immediately after

breakfast. It gets hot early. She did not have an issue with delaying the opening to 10:00 a.m.

12
13

Council Member Lord asked if hours could be based on temperature. Children are less likely to use

a splashpad when it is colder, although some will use it despite the weather. He liked the idea of

restricted hours, but a 12:00 p.m. opening time was too late.

16
17

Mr. Kartchner stated that the splashpads were not separately metered, but Staff intended to install

separate meters so the actual impact could be determined.

19
20

Mr. Kartchner apologized to residents for any anxiety caused by the flyer on backflow prevention.

The State Legislature passed a law prohibiting cross-connections with irrigation systems, which was

an issue both statewide and in Bluffdale. For example, in his neighborhood, all irrigation lines were

owned and operated by the HOA, but they were located in the homes’ backyards. Residents connect

their irrigation to the closest pipes, and they often have a culinary connection in the front yard so that

they can switch if necessary. His house was originally designed in that manner, which creates the

potential for an illegal cross-connection.

27
28

Homes with irrigation systems connected to culinary water must have an above-ground backflow

prevention device. Prior to the new law, they were installed below ground in green boxes that look

like other irrigation boxes. State law requires the devices to be tested yearly. Citizens had been asked

to conduct that testing over the years, but compliance was low, and the City did not have the resources

to force compliance. A Water Department employee had now been assigned to ensure compliance
25

Page 27 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

with State laws because a cross-connection and contamination of the City’s culinary water system

would be devastating. He urged residents to comply with the requirement, have their system tested

appropriately, and inform the City of the results. In cases like his, where there are two separate

systems and the irrigation system cannot be connected to culinary water, a backflow preventer is not

required.

6
7

Mayor Hall stated that an adjacent city was under a boil order due to second water contaminating their

drinking water. One person affected the entire city. Drinking water does need to be protected.

9
10

Mayor Hall asked if the City had information online regarding how to install irrigation lines. Mr.

Kartchner reported that there had been a lot of calls with similar questions, and responses were

delayed due to the higher-than-expected call volume. One reason there were so many calls was that

the City website did not have adequate documentation on the topic. Staff hoped to finish updating

the website with frequently asked questions and other information by the following week. He asked

for feedback on improving the documentation, as they intended to update the website regularly to

reflect commonly asked questions and current community needs.

17
18

Council Member Lord asked for clarification on cross-connections. He had a separate line for

secondary water with a physical hose connection to the sprinkler system. If he wanted to use culinary

water in his sprinklers, he would need to physically disconnect it from secondary and connect it to

culinary water. Was that a cross-connection? Mr. Kartchner clarified that Council Member Lord’s

system is sometimes referred to as a swing valve. A cross-connection is when you have the ability to

connect your irrigation system to both irrigation and culinary water simultaneously, which creates the

possibility of backflow and requires a prevention device. Council Member Aston stated that often,

residents will use secondary water for their lawn sprinklers and culinary water to drip-irrigate planter

beds. They are different systems and require a backflow preventer.

27
28

Council Member Lord asked about the average cost to inspect backflow devices. Mr. Kartchner

reported that the cost is approximately $60. Council Member Lord asked how residents can find a

company to test their device. Public Works Director, Shane Paddock, reported that the website will

include a link to the Utah Division of Water Quality, which maintains a list of 450 testing companies.
26

Page 28 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

If a home has both secondary and culinary water available for irrigation, a backflow device is required.

If they only have culinary water, one is also required. If they do not have the ability to use culinary

water in their irrigation system, it is not required.

4
5

Council Member Lord stated that in his daughter’s neighborhood in Florida, all backflow devices

must be tagged after testing, so the test date is easy to determine. Mr. Kartchner stated that Utah did

not require a tag, but a certificate is issued at the time of testing.

8
9

Mr. Kartchner asked for the City Council’s feedback on what the City should do to help residents

conserve water moving forward, as there was a dramatic need to use less. Washington County had

grown dramatically, but its water usage had not grown at the same rate due to its waterwise

landscaping requirements. They have large park and recreation fields with green grass, but individual

homes have other types of landscaping than turf. At the Council’s direction, Staff could begin

working on similar requirements.

15
16

Mayor Hall suggested reducing the amount of sod allowed in commercial zones. Trees and bushes

are beautiful and use less water. Mr. Kartchner recommended prohibiting sod in commercial

applications. Council Member Aston stated that her favorite example was Mountain View Village.

It is beautifully landscaped and has no sod. She was in favor of modifying the commercial code with

that as a benchmark.

21
22

Mr. Kartchner stated that Tahoma 31 bermudagrass was becoming more widely available and uses

50% less water than other grasses. Once established, it can also go long periods without water. As

new parks are constructed in the City, they could become the standard. Mayor Hall recommended

testing it in a detention pond first. Mr. Kartchner clarified that it would be a consideration for new

construction and would be tested, but it was used extensively across the south. However, it does

spread and must be contained.

28
29

Mr. Kartchner asked if the City should consider modifying water rates. Mayor Hall asked if JVWCD

had changed their rates. Mr. Kartchner stated that they had not announced a severe drought yet, so

standard rates were in place. However, the City could unilaterally change to a different rate structure.

Other cities were increasing their normal rates, and one was increasing Tier 4 to $7 per 1,000 gallons.
27

Page 29 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1
2

Staff was directed to begin working on modifying commercial landscaping requirements, but water

remains steady.

4
5

Council Member Austin asked if a business use that needs sod for its operations would be required to

use artificial turf or be granted an exception. Mr. Kartchner reported that it should be a consideration

in code. Council Member Austin stated that most businesses would welcome not having to maintain

sod, but some businesses may need it.

9
10

Council Member Wilding asked about encouraging businesses to remove existing sod. Mr. Kartchner

stated that waterwise landscaping should be encouraged citywide. It may be beneficial to set aside

grant money in the Water Fund for a program similar to JVWCD’s “Flip Your Strip” to help cover

costs. “Flip Your Strip” only offers $2 per foot and does not cover the cost of plants, irrigation, etc.,

but it is an incentive.

15
16

Mr. Kartchner indicated that as a community becomes more aware of conservation and water usage

decreases, revenues also drop, but the cost of maintaining the infrastructure does not change.

Purchasing water is a small portion of the system’s expenses. As conservation increases, the rate per

1,000 gallons must also increase.

20
21

Mr. Kartchner reported that the 14400 South project was moving forward. The pilons for the thrust

wall were being installed, and they were restructuring the side wall to ensure that it supports the crane.

The lower section on the west side of the railroad tracks had been built up almost to the level of the

box culvert, and the slope was in place. If the Council was interested, he could arrange a tour with

City Engineer, Michael Fazio.

26
27

Work was also progressing on the Crump Hollow Trail and was expected to be completed in the

summer. It will include a bridge over the canal. They would also be trimming or removing trees

along the trail, and the area would continue to be developed as funds became available. Mayor Hall

thanked Staff for the alert that went out on the project earlier in the day. The Cinch Way Trail

overpass connecting to the County trail was also in process.

32
28

Page 30 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
1

The Utah Department of Transportation ("UDOT") would be performing work on Porter Rockwell

Boulevard that would require lane closures. The City had requested that UDOT delay the project

until 14400 South had reopened.

4
5

Bids had been received for the Plat K pickleball park in Independence, and they were moving forward

with installing the parking lot and extending the trail across the Rocky Mountain Power easement.

7
8

Council Member Aston stated that she had received a call about semi-trucks driving through non-

truck-route neighborhoods and asked if truck routes were posted. Mr. Kartchner stated that they had

been posted, but he would need to research the specific neighborhood. Council Member Aston would

follow up with him after the meeting.

12
13

Mayor Hall reported that Love Where You Live would be held on Tuesday, May 20 at 6:00 p.m. Staff

and the Council should arrive at 5:30 p.m. A lot of partners were participating this year, and annual

stickers were available. The Council would be welcoming residents and handing out passports.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34

Closed Meeting.

There was no Closed Meeting.
10.

Adjournment.

Council Member Aston moved to ADJOURN.

Council Member Austin seconded the

motion. The motion passed with the unanimous consent of the Council.
The Regular Business Meeting adjourned at 7:53 PM.

_________________________________
Tami Timothy, UCC
City Recorder
Approved: _________________________

Page 31 of 211

Budget Committee Report - May 2026
Welcome to the first report of the Bluffdale Budget Review Committee!
Who are the members of the Budget Review Committee? Members of the Budget Review Committee are
volunteers from the community. Each of the members has a background in various aspects of finance:
personal finance, corporate finance, and municipal finance. Members are selected by the Mayor with the
consent of the City Council. Importantly, the members are not paid City staff.
What is the purpose of the Budget Review Committee? The City Council created the Budget Review
Committee as an attempt to increase transparency with residents. We hold meetings that are open to the
public and noticed on the public notice website (though as a volunteer committee the meetings are irregularly
timed). City staff provides copies of preliminary budgets to the committee and the committee works with City
staff to help increase the presentation and transparency of the budget. The committee is also working with
City staff to produce helpful resources explaining facts about the City and general governmental budgeting
that may be unfamiliar to residents.
What is the Budget Committee Report? This report is an attempt to take major funds, departments, or
operations of the City and compare those to other peer or nearby Utah cities in a way that helps residents feel
like they understand Bluffdale and the way it operates.
"You didn't do this or you ignored that!" This is not meant to be comprehensive in any way, shape, or form! If
you would like us to look at something or think we have made a glaring error, please reach out or attend one
of our meetings. City staff have been incredibly helpful as we have asked poked and prodded at the budget.
They have explained things that we have seen, they have adjusted how they present items in the budget, and
they have adopted many suggestions made by the Committee.
Please understand, many things cities report are very specific to those cities. These metrics are not absolute
in that not all organizations define and capture the data in the same way. We are grateful to each of the
cities who provided data to the Committee.
If you have any questions or requests, please reach out to the Budget Review Committee! You can send any
requests or questions to the Budget Review Committee by emailing the chair of the Committee, Japheth
McGee at [email protected]. We would also recommend that you reach out to City Staff or elected

Bluffdale Quick Facts
Median Household Income
Pop under 18
Total households
Avg people per household

Median
Household
Income
Pop under 18
Total
households
Avg people per
household

129,531
42.8%
5,714
3.29

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

119,422

128,910

117,043

133,142

89,905

128,802

104,844

89,816

103,380

26.3%

35.7%

29.5%

39.5%

37.0%

53.2%

45.1%

43.6%

37.6%

12,568

16,981

11,872

3,677

6,826

12,031

12,359

10,986

4,723

2.6

2.87

2.61

3.55

3.35

4.02

3.59

3.25

3.06

Page 32 of 211

Total Population: Bluffdale and Peer Cities
60,000

60,000

50,000

50,000
40,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

0
2016

2017

Bluffdale

2018

2019

Cottonwood Heights

2020

2021

Draper

2022

2023

Holladay

2024

Mapleton

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

Payson

Saratoga Springs

Springville

Vineyard

2022

2023

2024

Spanish Fork

Percent of Population Under 18
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Median Household Income
140,000
130,000
120,000
110,000
100,000
90,000
80,000
70,000
60,000
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Page 33 of 211

Unrestricted Cash: General Fund and Capital Projects Fund
66,504,249
55,121,905

33,763,710

32,914,294
23,238,003

21,495,421

19,886,693

Springville

Vineyard

14,808,390

10,738,764

9,262,694

Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Unrestricted General and Capital Projects Fund Cash: Percent of General Fund Revenues
160%
140%
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Unrestricted Cash: Redevelopment Agency Fund
49,472,514

7,827,577
2,147,362
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

4,159,966
Holladay

2,819,391
Mapleton

Payson

* Mapleton and Spanish Fork have no unrestricted RDA funds, all of Vineyard's 22,065,775 RDA funds are restricted.

2,823,295

1,115,389
Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Page 34 of 211

General Fund Revenues: Total
60,000,000
50,000,000
40,000,000
30,000,000
20,000,000
10,000,000
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Springville

Vineyard

*Bluffdale contains the revenues from the Public Safety Special Levy Fund

General Fund Revenues: Per Capita
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

*Bluffdale - $871.71, Springville - $873.21, Vineyard - $880.91, Mapleton - 853.23

General Fund Expenditures: Per Capita
1,000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

*Bluffdale includes the Public Safety Special Levy Fund, all figures exclude debt service and capital outlay as some cities include that in other funds

General Fund "General Government" Expenditures: Per Capita
300
250
200
150
100
50
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Page 35 of 211

Full-time Equivalent Employees
City FTEs - Overall

Bluffdale grew from 4.41 City full-time equivalent employees ("FTEs") per
1,000 residents in 2021 to 5.22 in 2024. This largely represents filling
positions the City had already authorized in 2021 but had trouble filling.

City FTE Comparison
8.00
6.00

Spanish Fork and Springville had more than 6 FTEs per 1,000 residents,
Cottonwood Heights had significantly fewer at just under 3. Likely
explanations are related to the number of services the cities perform or
outsource to local districts. For example, Spanish Fork maintains a city fiber
network, electric system, water, and sewer in addition to typical city
services like, police, fire, and parks. Cottonwood Heights on the other hand
participates in special service districts for water, sewer, fire, and even
parks and recreation.

4.00
2.00
2021

2022

2023

2024

Bluffdale

Cottonwood Heights

Draper

Saratoga Springs

Spanish Fork

Springville

Vineyard

City FTEs - Police and Fire

Balancing investment in police and fire staffing requires weighing
cost efficiency, call volume and severity, and response times.
Bluffdale operates under a law enforcement services agreement
with the Saratoga Springs Police Department, a model designed to
provide greater resource flexibility while maintaining a cost-efficient
approach to policing.
Bluffdale’s incoming calls per FTE reflect this approach. Among the
cities analyzed, Bluffdale ranks near the top in workload per officer,
indicating a high level of personnel utilization. Consistent with this,
Bluffdale’s cost per incoming call is the second lowest in the group
and increased at an average rate of approximately 5.5% from 2021
to 2025.

Yearly Fire Dept Calls
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000

Incoming Calls per Police FTE
1,000
800
600
400
200
2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Spanish Fork

Saratoga Springs

Draper

Springville

Police FTE
Bluffdale
Cottonwood
Spanish Fork
Saratoga Springs
Draper
Springville

2021
15
48
41
48
63
36

Police FTEs
2022
2023
15
15
49
49
42
42
55
47
63
70
39
40

2024
17
49
42
55
71
41

2025
17
52
44
64
73
41

Fire FTE
Bluffdale
Draper
Saratoga Springs
Spanish Fork
Springville

2021
25
34
38

2022
27
37
46

2024
29
38
48

2025
27
40
52

1500
1000
500
0
2021

2022
Bluffdale

Spanish Fork

2023

2024
Saratoga Springs

2025
Vineyard

2023
28
38
39

Page 36 of 211

Police Department Data
Public Safety Expenditures: Per Capita
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Bluffdale

Cottonwood

Draper

Holladay

Mapleton

Payson

Saratoga

Spanish fork

Springville

Vineyard

Number of Citations

Arrests in Bluffdale were relatively high in comparison to cities of similar size.
Spanish Fork with just over twice as many residents had nearly 3 times as many
arrests.

6,000
4,000

Yearly Police calls

2,000

30,000

2021

25,000

2022

2023

Bluffdale

Draper

2024

Mapleton

2025

Spanish Fork

20,000

Number of Arrests

15,000
800
10,000

600
400

5,000

200

0
2021

Bluffdale

2022

2023

2024

Mapleton

Saratoga Springs

Spanish Fork

2025

2021

Springville

2022
Bluffdale

2023
Cottonwood Heights

2024
Draper

2025
Mapleton

Parks
Park Acreage
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2020

Parks FTE
50
40
30
20
10
0
2021

2021

2022
Bluffdale

2023

2022

2024

Vineyard

Bluffdale had a dramatic increase in parks space over the prior five years. Even
fast growing Vineyard did not add park acreage at the same rate as Bluffdale.
Parks cost per FTE represents a combination of the cost of an FTE and the total
costs to service parks with the number of FTEs at the City. Bluffdale has nearly
the same number of parks employees as Vineyard but triple the park acreage!
Employees in Bluffdale are being asked to service more parks space per
employee.

2023

2024

Bluffdale

Draper

Saratoga Springs

Spanish Fork

Springville

Vineyard

Parks Cost per FTE
160,000
140,000
120,000
100,000
80,000
60,000

Bluffdale
Saratoga
Spanish Fork
Vineyard

2021
93,799
68,004
78,723
71,631

Parks Cost per FTE
2022
94,914
81,765
97,578
136,875

40,000

2023
107,285
90,923
90,723
53,085

2024
124,560
105,395
104,640
69,486

20,000
2021
Bluffdale

2022

2023

Saratoga

Spanish Fork

2024
Vineyard

Page 37 of 211

Streets
Road Lane Miles
Spanish Fork has nearly 169 road lane miles compared to
Bluffdale's 71. For every 2 road lane miles in Bluffdale, Spanish
Fork has 5. Both cities have roughly the same number of
employees servicing those road lane miles.

200
180
160
140
120
100

Bluffdale
Spanish Fork

Street FTE per Road Lane Mile
2022
2023
9.89
11.09
9.03
9.39

80
60

2024
8.37
8.89

40
2020

2021

2022

2023

Bluffdale

Draper

Spanish Fork

Payson

Mapleton

Saratoga Springs

2024

Springville

Cost per mile
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
2020

2021
Bluffdale

Bluffdale
Springville
Payson
Mapleton
Saratoga Springs

Draper

2020
9,037
9,377
4,898
6,621
7,295

2022
Spanish Fork

2021
8,711
8,431
6,990
9,236
6,259

2023

Springville

2022
10,453
11,205
5,215
5,750
4,392

Payson

Mapleton

2023
10,007
10,639
8,993
7,186
7,179

2024
Saratoga

2024
10,136
27,619
11,567
5,829
7,666

Page 38 of 211

S A LT L A K E C O U N T Y G O V E R N M E N T
Understanding the purpose, structure, and
funding for county programs and services.

Page 39 of 211

H I S TO RY O F S A LT L A K E C O U N T Y
ESTABLISHED CITIES

1990's WAVE OF INCORPORATIONS

COMMUNITY PRESERVATION PROJECT

Evolved many times since 1850

Wanted input on planning, zoning & services

Resulted in 23 incorporated cities

• Salt Lake City (1850)
• Sandy (1893)
• Murray (1902)
• Midvale (1909)
• South Jordan (1935)
• South Salt Lake (1938)
• West Jordan (1941)
• Riverton (1948)
• Town of Alta (1970)
• Draper (1978)
• Bluffdale (1978)
• West Valley City (1980)

• Taylorsville (1996)
• Herriman (1999)
• Holladay (1999)
• Cottonwood Heights

• Millcreek (2016)
• Kearns (May 2024)
• Magna (May 2024)
• White City (May 2024)

(2005)
• Town of Brighton (2020)

• Emigration Canyon (May 2024)
• Town of Copperton (May 2024)
** H.B. 330 (2024) now requires all
“islands” to annex or incorporate
by July 2027

Page 40 of 211

W I L L WA L L - T O - WA L L C I T I E S R E D U C E T H E
NEED FOR THE COUNTY?
Counties are political subdivisions of the state

per Utah Constitution Article XI, Section 1.
Counties deliver state-mandated services.
State law differentiates the roles of cities
and counties.
3

Cities handle municipal services—counties
focus on regional functions.
Consolidation into cities reduces duplication

and allows counties to maximize efficiency
across jurisdictions.

Page 41 of 211

EXAMPLES OF SERVICES THE COUNTY PROVIDES
Jail and other criminal justice services, prosecution
and indigent defense.

CULTURE & THE ARTS
Administers grants and manages cultural facilities:
Abravanel Hall, Capitol Theater, Eccles Theater, etc.

ELECTIONS

CONVENTIONS & TOURISM

Runs the general election by statute. Contracts
with municipalities for municipal elections.

County-owned convention centers bring in out-of-state
conventions that generate sales tax.

HEALTH DEPARTMENT

REGIONAL PARKS & RECREATION

Provides immunizations, saftey protocols for
restaurants and businesses, clean up homeless
camps and other unsafe environments.

Maintains regional parks, trails, and open spaces. Operates
recreation centers and sports complexes.

CRIMINAL JUSTICE / PUBLIC SAFETY

LIBRARY SERVICES
AGING & ADULT SERVICES
Provides Meals on Wheels and runs senior centers.

Salt Lake County Library system serves most of the county,
with access to Salt Lake City and Murray libraries.

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATION

Manages mental health/substance abuse services.
Partners with providers. Designated by the state to
be mental health & substance abuse authority.

Collects property tax for all entities, most of which are not
part of Salt Lake County, and distributes funds.

Page 42 of 211

C I T I E S C A N ’ T D O W H AT T H E C O U N T Y D O E S

Multiple jails? Multiple health departments?
Multiple clerk’s offices?

Salt Lake County delivers regional services on a
scale best served by county government.
Duplicating these services would be expensive,
inefficient, and create confusion across city
boundaries.

Page 43 of 211

M AY O R - C O U N C I L F O R M O F G O V E R N M E N T
Clear separation of powers, administration and oversight.

M AY O R
Jenny Wilson

Page 44 of 211

INDEPENDENT ELECTED OFFICIALS
Operate independently within their constitutional and statutory authority but in coordination with the Mayor and Council.
ASSESSOR

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

SURVEYOR

Chris Stavros

Sim Gill

Bradley Park

Establishes the fair market value

Responsible for legal work,

Provides quality surveying and

of real and personal property

including prosecution of all

mapping services to protect,

ensuring assessments are

felony criminal matters in

preserve, and perpetuate

accurate, fair, and compliant

Salt Lake County as well as

property boundary rig hts.

with Utah law.

civil government litigation.

AUDITOR

RECORDER

TREASURER

Chris Harding

Rashelle Hobbs

Financial integrity through

Maintains public land

Sheila Srivastava

audits, annual financial report,

records, relating to real

certifying property tax rates,

estate, liens, mining, and

and ensuring compliance with

subdivision plats, to ensure

budgeting and fiscal policies.

transparency in real estate
transactions.

Collects, safeguards, and
disburses county funds,
including property tax
payments, and manages the
county’s investments.

CLERK

SHERIFF

Justice Court Judge

Lannie Chapman

Rosie Rivera

Oversees elections,

Runs the jail operations,

Shauna Graves Robertson

marriage licenses,

manages search and rescue

passports, and maintains

teams, and law enforcement

official records for the

for the unincorporated areas

County Council.

including the canyons.

The Salt Lake County Justice
Court handles small claims,
misdemeanors, and traffic cases

**This w ill dissolve June 2027.

Page 45 of 211

W H AT I S T H E E S T I M AT E D 2 0 2 5
S A LT L A K E C O U N T Y B U D G E T ?

TOTAL BUDGET

$2 Billion (Approx.)

NET COUNTY BUDGET

$1.5 Billion (Approx.)

While this reflects the total amount

The net budget represents total revenues

adopted, only a portion of it falls under

minus “pass through” taxes. This is the

the County Council’s discretion--some

portion that falls under the County

are “pass through” taxes.

Council’s discretion.
June 3, 2025 Budget Presentation

Page 46 of 211

WHAT ARE PASS THROUGH TAXES?
• Appear in the budget for transparency, but
don’t impact county operations.
• County is middleman. Receives funds and

forwards to other agencies.

2025 Mayor’s Proposed June Budget
PASS THROUGH TAXES

RDA Property Tax
Property Tax-RDA- Pass Thru

33,616,073

Transportation sales tax
Mass Transit Pass Thru to UTA, cities & state

455,735,500

• Not truly county funds.

New Sales Tax for Public Safety &
Public Transportation (aka 5th 5th)
0.15% beginning July 1, 2025 ~$29M
5,854,588

• Examples: Cities, service providers, federal

Visitor Promotion
Sandy Soccer Stadium Transient Room Tax
State & General-Tax Administration
Multi County Pass Thru Revenue

3,099,840

or state grants, UTA.
• Council has NO DISCRETION over how
these funds are used.

Grand Total

$498,306,001

Page 47 of 211

SPECIAL REVENUE

GENERAL FUND

ENTERPRISE FUNDS

• Source: County controlled
funds from taxes or fees.

• Source: Primarily property taxes,
sales tax, etc.

• Source: Fees charged to users
through paid services—not
taxes.

• Libraries, TRCC, Behavioral
Health, etc.

• Core government services—public
safety, elections, public heath, and
administration.

• These funds operate like
businesses.

• HIGHLY RESTRICTED USE

• Most flexible.
• Council has some discretion
over use but can only fund
certain things within certain
funds.

• Only fund the council has full
discretion.

• Golf Courses, Landfill, Public
Works
• Council has limited
discretion over how this is
used.

Page 48 of 211

W H AT I S T H E C O U N T Y ’ S L A R G E S T
RESPONSIBILITY?

PUBLIC SAFETY
Public Safety accounts for the largest portion of the
budget. More than 74% of the county’s general
fund is allocated to public safety including law
enforcement, corrections, and prosecution.

Criminal Justice Breakdown 1/24/2025

Page 49 of 211

H O W P R O P E R T Y TA X E S W O R K I N U TA H

State law limits property tax revenue
increases to only “new growth” (e.g., new
construction or additions).
Inflation in property values does not
increase revenue—rates are adjusted
downward to keep revenue flat.
Population growth increases demand for
county services.
This creates a budget gap, averaging
about 1% or $5M per year.
Purchasing Power Erosion Due to Inflation

Page 50 of 211

D E C L I N I N G T R E N D I N P R O P E R T Y TA X R AT E S
Countywide and Assessing & Collecting
Excluding Bond Debt Service and Judgment Levies

'13

'14

'15

'16

'17

'18

'19

'20

'21

'22

'23

'24

'25

'26*

* Projected rate based on projected taxable value with new growth. Advertised rate for 2026 is .001519.

Page 51 of 211

What portion of property taxes goes to the county?

Page 52 of 211

When my property values go up, does my property tax automatically go up?

No - it does not. Utah’s system is designed so that rising property
values alone do not automatically raise your property tax bill. Each
year, the County Auditor calculates a certified tax rate for every
taxing entity (county, city, school district, etc.). That rate is adjusted
downward so the entity collects the same total revenue as the prior
year—plus new-growth revenue from new construction.

Page 53 of 211

HOW HAS THE COUNTY RESPONDED?

The Council has consistently exercised

As part of its commitment to fiscal

fiscal discipline, cut spending while

responsibility, the Council has regular

preserving Salt Lake County’s top tier

stress testing in each agency to

AAA bond rating—the highest

identify financial needs and manage

available.

spending.

Page 54 of 211

PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS
OVERVIEW
• Not a single new bed has been built since 2001, even as the
county’s population has grown by nearly 300,000 and is expected
to grow to 1.4 million by 2040.
• Approximately one-fifth of the jail’s beds are in Oxbow, a
failing facility that urgently needs to be replaced.
• At the same time, homelessness and mental illness have
increased, and our jail has become the state’s default mental
health provider.
• Over the past ten years, the average person booked into the jail
has been booked seven times prior, driving up costs while
leaving underlying needs unmet.

Page 55 of 211

PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS

JAIL REMAINS AT CAPACITY

Although beds have
increased after opening
Oxbow’s third pod, the
jail continues to
operate at or near
capacity every day.

Reopening the third pod
at Oxbow added 184
individuals, placing
additional pressure on
aging infrastructure
and maintenance
systems.

Increased enforcement
due to SLC Public Safety
Plan has meant an
increase in bookings
and individuals with
multiple charges is
placing greater demands
on judicial processing.

Page 56 of 211

PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS

GOALS:

Rebuild capacity from Oxbow Jail (552 beds) at main facility
Add new beds to meet growth and safety demands
Expand mental health treatment from 88 → 160 beds
Create a stepdown unit (100 beds) for re-entry support
Look at a lower-security facility to save on costs to provide mental health,
substance use, job training and wraparound services for low-level
offenders in order to reduce recidivism.

Page 57 of 211

CITY OF BLUFFDALE, UTAH
RESOLUTION 2026-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUFFDALE, UTAH, APPOINTING
MEMBERS TO THE HEALTHY BLUFFDALE COALITION BOARD.
WHEREAS, Bluﬀdale City (the “City”) has established the Healthy Bluﬀdale Coalition to
actively promote healthy lifestyles by creating and promoting physical and mental health
related initiatives, programs, events, articles, and publications within the city ; and
WHEREAS, upon the advice and consent of the Bluﬀdale City Council (the “City
Council”), the Mayor appoints members to the commission; and
WHEREAS, the City council gives its advice and consent to the Mayor for the
appointment of the individuals listed below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUFFDALE, UTAH:
Section 1.
Appointment. The Mayor hereby appoints the following individuals to
the Healthy Bluﬀdale Coalition:
NAME
Jona Stapley

TERM ENDS
05/31/2029

Section 2. Eﬀective Date. This Resolution shall become eﬀective immediately upon passage.
PASSED AND APPROVED: May, 27, 2026.
______________________________________
Mayor
ATTEST:

_____________________________________
City Recorder
Voting by the Council:
Yes
Councilmember Aston
Councilmember Austin
Councilmember Wilding

_____
_____
_____

No
_____
_____
_____

Page 58 of 211

Councilmember Smith
Councilmember Lord
Mayor Hall (tie only)

_____
_____
_____

Page 59 of 211

Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:

Mayor and City Council
Stephanie Thayer, Administrative Services Director
May 26, 2026
Parameters Resolution for Water Revenue Bonds

This memorandum is to explain the parameters resolution that authorizes the issuance and
sale of not more than $15 million in Water Revenue Bonds needed to finance improvements
to the City’s water system. Those improvements include a new water tank and pump station
and an effluent water project. The water tank and pump station project will help provide
adequate water pressure and fire flows in our Zone 2 areas more cost effectively than we
currently can. The effluent water project will help provide additional water resources as water
supply becomes a growing concern.
In personal finances and business finances debt should be avoided, but for municipal uses
bonds can be more equitable. Bonds ensure those who will use the water system in the future
also share in paying for it, while allowing the improvements to be built today. The City was
also awarded some federal funding in the amount of $750,000 that will be used.
The repayment of the bonds will be done mostly through revenues generated by the Water
Operating Fund, which is an enterprise fund (a fund that acts like a business) that is separate
from the general fund, and some will be paid back by the Water Impact Fee restricted fund.

Page 60 of 211

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH (THE
“ISSUER”), AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT MORE THAN
$15,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF WATER REVENUE BONDS,
SERIES 2026 (THE “SERIES 2026 BONDS”) (TO BE ISSUED IN ONE OR MORE
SERIES AND WITH SUCH OTHER SERIES OR TITLE AS MAY BE DETERMINED);
FIXING THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE SERIES 2026
BONDS, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF YEARS OVER WHICH THE SERIES 2026
BONDS MAY MATURE, THE MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE WHICH THE SERIES
2026 BONDS MAY BEAR, AND THE MAXIMUM DISCOUNT FROM PAR AT WHICH
THE SERIES 2026 BONDS MAY BE SOLD; DELEGATING TO CERTAIN OFFICERS
OF THE ISSUER THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS AND
PROVISIONS OF THE SERIES 2026 BONDS WITHIN THE PARAMETERS SET
FORTH HEREIN; AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED; PROVIDING FOR THE RUNNING OF A
CONTEST PERIOD AND SETTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING DATE; AUTHORIZING
AND APPROVING A SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, A BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF ALL OTHER ACTIONS
NECESSARY TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED BY THIS RESOLUTION; AND RELATED MATTERS.
WHEREAS, the City Council (the “Council”) of Bluffdale City, Utah (the “Issuer”) desires
to (a) finance all or a portion of improvements to the City’s water system including, but not
limited to a new water tank, and related improvements (collectively, the “Project”), (b) fund
any required debt service reserve fund, if necessary, and (c) pay costs of issuance of the Series
2026 Bonds herein described; and
WHEREAS, to accomplish the purposes set forth in the preceding recital, and subject to
the limitations set forth herein, the Issuer desires to issue the Series 2026 Bonds (to be issued
from time to time as one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as
may be determined by the Issuer), pursuant to (a) the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11,
Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, (the “Act”) (b) this Resolution, and (c) a
General Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 2011, as heretofore amended and supplemented
(the “General Indenture”) between the Issuer and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National
Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), and a Supplemental Indenture of Trust to be entered
into in connection with the Series 2026 Bonds (the “Supplemental Indenture,” and together
with the General Indenture, the “Indenture”) in substantially the form presented to the
meeting at which this Resolution was adopted and which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and
WHEREAS, the Act provides that prior to issuing bonds, an issuing entity must (a) give
notice of its intent to issue such bonds and (b) hold a public hearing to receive input from the

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

Page 61 of 211

public with respect to (i) the issuance of the bonds and (ii) the potential economic impact that
the improvement, facility or property for which the bonds pay all or part of the cost will have
on the private sector; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to post a Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued
in compliance with the Act with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 11-14-316, and 11-14-318 of the Act, the Notice of
Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued shall (a) constitute the notice of intent to issue bonds,
(b) constitute notice of a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to the
Series 2026 Bonds and (c) initiates a 30-day contestability period in which any person of
interest may contest the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to approve and authorize a Bond Purchase Agreement
(the “Bond Purchase Agreement”), to be entered into between the Issuer and the purchaser
selected by the Issuer for the Series 2026 Bonds (the “Purchaser”), in substantially the form
attached hereto as Exhibit C; and
WHEREAS, in order to allow the Issuer, in the consultation with the Issuer’s Municipal
Advisor, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated (the “Municipal Advisor”) flexibility in setting
the pricing date of the Series 2026 Bonds, the Council desires to grant to any one of the Mayor
or the Mayor Pro Tem or the City Manager (each, a “Designated Officer” and collectively, the
“Designated Officers”) the authority to select the Purchaser, to approve the final interest rates,
principal amounts, terms, maturities, redemption features, and purchase price at which the
Series 2026 Bonds shall be sold, to determine whether the Series 2026 Bonds should be sold
and method of sale, and to make any changes with respect thereto from those terms which
were before the Council at the time of adoption of this Resolution, provided such terms do not
exceed the parameters set forth for such terms in this Resolution (the “Parameters”);
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Bluffdale City, Utah, as
follows:
Section 1.
For the purpose of (a) financing the Project, (b) funding any required debt
service reserve fund, if necessary, and (c) paying costs of issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds, the
Issuer hereby authorizes the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds which shall be designated
“Bluffdale City, Utah Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2026” (to be issued from time to time as one
or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the
Issuer) in the initial aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $15,000,000. The Series 2026
Bonds shall mature in not more than twenty-five (25) years from their date or dates, shall be
sold at a price not less than ninety-eight percent (98%) of the total principal amount thereof,
shall bear interest at a rate or rates not to exceed six and a half percent (6.50%) per annum, and
shall be approved by the Designated Officers in consultation with the Issuer’s Municipal
Advisor, all within the Parameters set forth herein.

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

Page 62 of 211

Section 2.
The Supplemental Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement, in
substantially the forms presented at this meeting and attached hereto as Exhibits B and C
respectively, are hereby authorized, approved, and confirmed. The Mayor and the City
Recorder (or designee, collectively, the “City Recorder”) are hereby authorized to execute and
deliver the Supplemental Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement, in substantially the
forms and with substantially the content as the forms presented at this meeting for and on
behalf of the Issuer, with final terms as may be established by the Designated Officers, in
consultation with the Municipal Advisor, within the Parameters set forth herein, and with such
alterations, changes or additions as may be necessary or as may be authorized by Section 4
hereof. The Designated Officers are each hereby authorized to select the Purchaser, to specify
and agree as to the final principal amounts, terms, discounts, maturities, interest rates,
redemption features, and purchase price with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds for and on
behalf of the Issuer, provided that such terms are within the Parameters set by this Resolution.
The execution of the Bond Purchase Agreement shall demonstrate the approval of the
Designated Officers.
Section 3.
The Designated Officers or other appropriate officials of the Issuer are
authorized to make any alterations, changes, deletions, or additions to the Supplemental
Indenture, the Series 2026 Bonds, the Bond Purchase Agreement, or any other document
herein authorized and approved which may be necessary to conform the same to the final
terms of the Series 2026 Bonds (within the Parameters set by this Resolution), to correct errors
or omissions therein, to complete the same, to remove ambiguities therefrom, or to conform
the same to other provisions of said instruments, to the provisions of this Resolution or any
resolution adopted by the Council or the provisions of the laws of the State of Utah or the
United States. The execution thereof by the Mayor on behalf of the Issuer shall conclusively
establish such necessity, appropriateness, and approval with respect to all such additions,
modifications, deletions, and changes incorporated therein.
Section 4.
The form, terms, and provisions of the Series 2026 Bonds and the
provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange,
redemption, and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture. The Mayor and City Recorder
are hereby authorized and directed to execute and seal the Series 2026 Bonds and to deliver
said Series 2026 Bonds to the Trustee for authentication. The signatures of the Mayor and the
City Recorder may be by facsimile or manual execution. The Series 2026 Bonds shall recite that
the Series 2026 Bonds are issued under the authority of the Constitution of the State of Utah,
the Act, and other applicable law.
Section 5.
The Designated Officers or other appropriate officials of the Issuer are
hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Trustee the written order of the
Issuer for authentication and delivery of the Series 2026 Bonds in accordance with the
provisions of the Indenture.

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

Page 63 of 211

Section 6.
Upon their issuance, the Series 2026 Bonds will constitute special limited
obligations of the Issuer payable solely from and to the extent of the sources set forth in the
Series 2026 Bonds and the Indenture. No provision of this Resolution, the Indenture, the Series
2026 Bonds, or any other instrument, shall be construed as creating a general obligation of the
Issuer, or of creating a general obligation of the State of Utah or any political subdivision
thereof, or as incurring or creating a charge upon the general credit of the Issuer or its taxing
powers.
Section 7.
The Designated Officers or other appropriate officials of the Issuer, and
each of them, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver for and on behalf of
the Issuer any or all additional certificates, documents and other papers (including, without
limitation, any reserve instrument guaranty agreements permitted by the Indenture) and to
perform all other acts they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to implement and carry
out the matters authorized in this Resolution and the documents authorized and approved
herein.
Section 8.
In accordance with the provisions of the Act, the Issuer directs its officers
and staff to cause a “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued” (the “Notice”), to be
published in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Issuer shall hold a public
hearing on June 24, 2026 to receive input from the public with respect to the issuance of the
Series 2026 Bonds and the potential economic impact that the improvements to be financed
with the proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds will have on the private sector, which hearing date
shall not be less than fourteen (14) days after the Notice is published (a) as a Class A notice
under Section 63G-30-102 Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (“Utah Code”) (i) on the
Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63A-16-601, Utah Code, (ii) on the Issuer’s
official website, and (iii) in a public location within the Issuer’s principal offices that is
reasonably likely to be seen by residents of the Issuer, and (b) as required in Section 45-1-101,
Utah Code. The City Recorder shall cause a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits
hereto) to be kept on file in the office of the Issuer Recorder, for public examination during the
regular business hours of the Issuer until at least thirty (30) days from and after the initial date
of publication thereof.
Section 9.
The Issuer hereby reserves the right to opt not to issue the Series 2026
Bonds for any reason, including without limitation, consideration of the opinions expressed at
the public hearing.
Section 10. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of
such conflict, hereby repealed and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its approval and adoption.
Section 11. Upon the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds and their deliverance to the
Trustee, this Resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until the principal of, premium, if any,

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

Page 64 of 211

and interest on the Series 2026 Bonds are deemed to have been duly discharged in accordance
with the terms and provisions of the Indenture.

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

Page 65 of 211

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED:

May 27, 2026.

______________________________
Mayor Natalie Hall
ATTEST:

[seal]

___________________________________
City Recorder
Voting by the Council:

Councilmember Aston
Councilmember Austin
Councilmember Lord
Councilmember Smith
Councilmember Wilding
Mayor Hall (tie only)

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

YES

ABSTAIN

_____ _____ _____
_____ _____ _____
_____ _____ _____
_____ _____ _____
_____ _____ _____
_____ _____ _____

ABSENT
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____

Page 66 of 211

EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government
Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), that on
May 27, 2026, the City Council (the “Council”) of Bluffdale City, Utah (the “Issuer”), adopted a
resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized the issuance of the Issuer’s Water Revenue
Bonds, Series 2026 (the “Series 2026 Bonds”) (to be issued in one or more series and with such
other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the Issuer) and called a public hearing
to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds and (b)
any potential economic impact that the project described herein to be financed with the proceeds
of the Series 2026 Bonds may have on the private sector.
PURPOSE, TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING
The Issuer shall hold a public hearing on June 24, 2026, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. at 2222
W. 14400 So., Bluffdale, Utah. The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with
respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds and (b) any potential economic impact that
the project to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds may have on the private
sector. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate.
PURPOSE FOR ISSUING THE SERIES 2026 BONDS
The Series 2026 Bonds will be issued for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of
improvements to the Issuer’s water system (the “System”) including, but not limited to a water
tank, and related improvements (collectively, the “Project”), (b) funding any required debt service
reserve fund, and (c) paying costs of issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds.
REVENUES TO BE PLEDGED
The Series 2026 Bonds are special limited obligations of the Issuer payable from the net
revenues of the System (the “Net Revenues”).
PARAMETERS OF THE SERIES 2026 BONDS
The Issuer intends to issue the Series 2026 Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not
more than Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000), to mature in not more than twenty-five (25) years
from their date or dates, to be sold at a price not less than ninety-eight percent (98%) of the total
principal amount thereof, and bearing interest at a rate or rates not to exceed six and a half percent
(6.50%) per annum. The Series 2026 Bonds are to be issued and sold by the Issuer pursuant to the
Resolution, including as part of said Resolution, a General Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1,
2011, as heretofore amended and supplemented (the “General Indenture”) and a Supplemental
Indenture of Trust (the “Supplemental Indenture” and collectively with the General Indenture, the
“Indenture”) which Supplemental Indenture was before the Council and in substantially final form
at the time of the adoption of the Resolution and said Supplemented Indenture is to be executed
by the Council in such form and with such changes thereto as shall be approved by the Mayor or

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

A-1

Page 67 of 211

Mayor pro tem; provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity, and discount of
the Series 2026 Bonds will not exceed the maximums set forth above. The Issuer reserves the
right to not issue the Series 2026 Bonds for any reason and at any time up to the issuance of the
Series 2026 Bonds.
OUTSTANDING BONDS SECURED BY NET REVENUES
The Issuer currently has $7,453,000 of bonds outstanding secured by the Net Revenues.
OTHER OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE ISSUER
Additional Information regarding all of the Issuer’s outstanding bonds may be found in the
Issuer’s
audited
financial
report
(the
“Financial
Report”)
at:
https://reporting.auditor.utah.gov/searchreport. For additional information more recent than as of
the date of the Financial Report please contact the City Manager at (801) 254-2200.
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST
Based on an estimate of the current interest rate and financing plan, the estimated total debt
service cost of the Series 2026 Bonds, if held until maturity is $26,607,171.
A copy of the Resolution and the Indenture are on file in the office of the Bluffdale City
Recorder, 2222 W. 14400 So., Bluffdale, Utah, where they may be examined during regular
business hours of the City Recorder from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. for a period of at least thirty (30)
days from and after the date of publication of this notice.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of
the publication of this notice is provided by law during which any person in interest shall have the
right to contest the legality of the Resolution, the Indenture (only as it relates to the Series 2026
Bonds), or the Series 2026 Bonds, or any provision made for the security and payment of the Series
2026 Bonds, and that after such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity,
formality, or legality thereof for any cause whatsoever.
DATED this May 27, 2026.
/s/ Tami Timothy
City Recorder

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

A-2

Page 68 of 211

EXHIBIT B
SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

B-1

Page 69 of 211

EXHIBIT C
FORM OF BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

4918-6277-5212, v. 3

C-1

Page 70 of 211

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST
Dated as of [__________ 1, 2026]
by and between
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH
and
U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
(SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)

Supplementing the General Indenture of Trust
Dated as of May 1, 2011

Page 71 of 211

Table of Contents
Page
ARTICLE I. SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE; DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1
Section 1.2
Section 1.3
Section 1.4

Supplemental Indenture ...............................................................................3
Definitions....................................................................................................3
Amendments to General Indenture. .............................................................3
Additional Definitions. ................................................................................4

ARTICLE II. ISSUANCE OF THE SERIES 2026 BONDS
Section 2.1
Principal Amount, Designation and Series ..................................................6
Section 2.2
Date, Maturities and Interest ........................................................................6
Section 2.3
Optional Redemption ...................................................................................7
Section 2.4
Execution of Bonds ......................................................................................7
Section 2.5
Delivery of Bonds ........................................................................................7
Section 2.6
Designation of Registrar ..............................................................................7
Section 2.7
Designation of Paying Agent .......................................................................7
Section 2.8
Loss of Tax-Exempt Status. .........................................................................7
Section 2.9
Presentation and Surrender of the Series 2026 Bonds .................................8
Section 2.10 Partially Redeemed Fully Registered Bonds ...............................................8
Section 2.11 Limited Obligation .......................................................................................8
Section 2.12 Perfection of Security Interest. ....................................................................8
Section 2.13 Series 2026 Bonds as Additional Bonds. .....................................................8
ARTICLE III. APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS AND FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS
Section 3.1
Section 3.2
Section 3.3
Section 3.4

Application of Proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds ......................................9
Creation of Series 2026 Accounts................................................................9
No Debt Service Reserve Requirement for the Series 2026 Bonds .............9
Payment of Costs of Issuance ......................................................................9

ARTICLE IV. MISCELLANEOUS
Section 4.1
Section 4.2
Section 4.3
Section 4.4
Section 4.5
Section 4.6
Section 4.7
Section 4.8
Section 4.9
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B

Confirmation of General Indenture ............................................................10
Confirmation of Sale of Series 2026 Bonds ..............................................10
Consent and Effective Date of Amendments. ............................................10
Reports to Purchaser ..................................................................................10
Events of Default .......................................................................................10
Certified Mail .............................................................................................11
Severability ................................................................................................11
Amendments ..............................................................................................11
Counterparts ...............................................................................................11
(FORM OF SERIES 2026 BOND) ......................................................... A-1
COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST ..........................B-1

Page 72 of 211

EXHIBIT C

CERTIFICATE OF LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED
BOND ......................................................................................................C-1

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 73 of 211

FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST
This Fifth Supplemental Indenture of Trust, dated as of [__________ 1, 2026], by and
between Bluffdale City, Utah, a political subdivision and body politic duly organized and existing
under the Constitution and laws of the State of Utah (the “Issuer”) and U.S. Bank Trust Company,
National Association (successor in interest to U.S. Bank National Association), a national bank
duly organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, authorized by law to
accept and execute trusts and having its principal office in Salt Lake City, Utah (the “Trustee”);
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the Issuer has entered into a General Indenture of Trust, dated as of May 1,
2011, as previously supplemented (the “General Indenture”) with the Trustee; and
WHEREAS in order to (i) finance improvements to the Issuer’s water system (he
“System”) including but not limited to a new water tank (the “Series 2026 Project”) and (ii) pay
the costs of issuance of the bonds herein authorized, the Issuer has determined to issue its Water
Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 in the aggregate principal amount of $[PAR] (the “Series 2026
Bonds”); and
WHEREAS, the Series 2026 Bonds are authorized, issued and secured under the General
Indenture, as supplemented and amended by this Fifth Supplemental Indenture of Trust (the “Fifth
Supplemental Indenture,” and collectively with the General Indenture, the “Indenture”); and
WHEREAS, Section 9.2 of the General Indenture provides that the General Indenture may
be amended with the consent of the Registered Owners of 66-2/3% in aggregate Principal amount
of the Bonds then Outstanding and by their purchase of the Series 2026 Bonds, the owners thereof
(the “Series 2026 Bondholders”) are deemed to have consented to such amendment and are
sufficient for such amendments to be effective; and
WHEREAS, the execution and delivery of the Series 2026 Bonds and of this Fifth
Supplemental Indenture have in all respects been duly authorized and all things necessary to make
the Series 2026 Bonds, when executed by the Issuer and authenticated by the Trustee, the valid
and binding legal obligations of the Issuer and to make this Fifth Supplemental Indenture a valid
and binding agreement have been done;
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS FIFTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE OF TRUST
WITNESSETH, that to secure the Series 2026 Bonds and all Additional Bonds issued and
Outstanding under the Indenture, the payment of the principal or redemption price thereof and
interest thereon, the rights of the Registered Owners of the Series 2026 Bonds, to secure the
Security Instrument Issuers of Security Instruments for any Bonds, and of all Reserve Instrument
Providers of Reserve Instruments for any Bonds, and the performance of all of the covenants
contained in such Series 2026 Bonds and herein, and for and in consideration of the mutual
covenants herein contained and of the purchase of such Series 2026 Bonds by the Registered
Owners thereof from time to time and the issuance of Reserve Instruments by the Reserve
Instrument Providers, and of the acceptance by the Trustee of the trusts hereby created, and
intending to be legally bound hereby, the Issuer has executed and delivered this Fifth Supplemental
Indenture of Trust, and by these presents does, in confirmation of the General Indenture, as

Page 74 of 211

amended and supplemented, hereby sell, assign, transfer, set over and pledge unto U.S. Bank Trust
Company, National Association, as Trustee, its successors in trusts and its assigns forever, to the
extent provided in the General Indenture, as amended and supplemented, all right, title and interest
of the Issuer in and to (i) the Net Revenues (as defined in the General Indenture), (ii) all moneys
in funds and accounts held by the Trustee under the General Indenture and hereunder (except the
Rebate Fund), and (iii) all other rights granted under the General Indenture and hereinafter granted
for the further securing of such Series 2026 Bonds.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME unto the Trustee and its successors in trust hereby
created and its and their assigns forever;
IN TRUST, NEVERTHELESS, FIRST, for the equal and ratable benefit and security of
all present and future Registered Owners of Bonds and Security Instrument Issuers of Security
Instrument for any Bonds without preference, priority, or distinction as to lien or otherwise (except
as otherwise specifically provided), of any one Bond over any other Bond, and SECOND, for the
equal and proportionate benefit, security and protection of all Reserve Instrument Providers,
without privilege, priority or distinction as to the lien or otherwise of any Reserve Instrument
Repayment Obligation over any of the others by reason of time of issuance, delivery or expiration
thereof or otherwise for any cause whatsoever.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 75 of 211

ARTICLE I.
SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE; DEFINITIONS
Section 1.1 Supplemental Indenture.
This Fifth Supplemental Indenture is
supplemental to and is executed in accordance with and pursuant to Articles II and IX of the
General Indenture.
Section 1.2 Definitions. Unless the context clearly requires otherwise and except as
otherwise defined in Section 1.3 hereof, all terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in
Article I of the General Indenture and Article I of this Fifth Supplemental Indenture.
Section 1.3

Amendments to General Indenture.

(a)
Pursuant to Section 9.2 of the General Indenture, the definition of “System” in
Section 1.1 of the General Indenture shall be amended to read as follows:
“System” means, collectively, the Issuer’s culinary water, secondary/irrigation
water
and enterprise facilities, together with any additions, repairs, renewals,
replacements, expansions, extensions, and improvements to said System, or any part
thereof, hereafter acquired or constructed, and together with all lands, easements, interests
in land, licenses, and rights of way of the Issuer and all other works, property, structures,
equipment of the Issuer, and contract rights and other tangible and intangible assets of the
Issuer now or hereafter owned or used in connection with, or related to said System.
(b)
Pursuant to Section 9.2 of the General Indenture, Section 2.13(c) of the General
Indenture shall be amended to read as follows:
(c)
In the case of Additional Bonds issued to finance a Series 2026 Project, the
Issuer shall have delivered to the Trustee a certificate from an Authorized Representative
or a Qualified Engineer:
(i)
setting forth the Estimated Net Revenues as herein described
(assuming, if applicable, the completion of the Series 2026 Project, or any portion
thereof, financed with proceeds of the Additional Bonds) either:
(A) for each of the two Bond Fund Years succeeding the latest
estimated date of completion of the Series 2026 Project, or any portion
thereof, if proceeds of the Additional Bonds are used to fund interest during
the construction period, or
(B) if (A) is not the case, for the then current Bond Fund Year and
each succeeding Bond Fund Year to and including the second Bond Fund
Year succeeding the latest estimated date of completion of the Series 2026
Project, or any portion thereof; and
(ii)
verifying that the Estimated Net Revenues, less any Direct
Payments, as shown in (i) above for each of such Bond Fund Years are not less than

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 76 of 211

125% of the Aggregate Annual Debt Service Requirement for each of such Bond
Fund Years with respect to all of the Bonds and Additional Bonds which would
then be Outstanding (and taking into account any principal reductions resulting
from regularly scheduled principal or sinking fund redemption payments) and the
Additional Bonds so proposed to be issued.
For purposes of this Section 2.13(c), “Estimated Net Revenues” shall be determined
as follows:
(A)
The total Net Revenues of the System for any Year in the
twenty-four (24) months immediately preceding the authentication and
delivery of the Additional Bonds shall first be determined. For purposes of
these calculations, Revenues may be adjusted to give full effect to rate
increases implemented prior to the issuance of the Additional Bonds.
(B)
Next, the additional Net Revenues, if any, resulting from the
Series 2026 Project, or any portion thereof, financed with the proceeds of
the Additional Bonds must be estimated by the Qualified Engineer for the
applicable Bond Fund Years as determined in Section 2.13(c)(i)(A) or (B)
above.
(C)
The Estimated Net Revenues will be the sum of the Net
Revenues as calculated in (A) above, less any Direct Payments, plus 90%
of the estimated additional Net Revenues as calculated in (B) above.
Section 1.4 Additional Definitions. Defined terms used in the recitals to this Fifth
Supplemental Indenture shall have the meanings given to such terms therein. In addition, for
purposes of the General Indenture and this Fifth Supplemental Indenture, the following terms shall,
unless the context clearly requires otherwise, have the meanings as follows:
“Dated Date” means, with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds, the date of their initial
delivery.
“Default Rate” means eighteen percent (18%) per annum.
“Interest Payment Date” means, with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds, each [April 1] and
[October 1], commencing [April 1, 20__].
“Purchaser” means, with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds, [Purchaser Name].
“Series 2026 Bonds” means the Issuer’s Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2026, herein
authorized.
“Series 2026 Cost of Issuance Account” means the account established under this Fifth
Supplemental Indenture and held in trust by the Trustee, into which a portion of the proceeds of
the Series 2026 Bonds shall be deposited as provided herein.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 77 of 211

“Series 2026 Debt Service Reserve Requirement” means [$0] with respect to the Series
2026 Bonds.
“Series 2026 Project” means improvements to the Issuer’s System, including, but not
limited to, a new water tank.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 78 of 211

ARTICLE II.
ISSUANCE OF THE SERIES 2026 BONDS
Section 2.1 Principal Amount, Designation and Series. The Series 2026 Bonds are
hereby authorized for issuance under the Indenture for the purpose of providing funds to (i) finance
the Series 2026 Project and (ii) pay the costs of issuance incurred in connection with the Series
2026 Bonds. The Series 2026 Bonds shall be limited to $[PAR] in aggregate principal amount,
shall be issued in fully registered form, in denominations of $1,000 or any integral multiple thereof,
shall be in substantially the form and contain substantially the terms contained in Exhibit A
attached hereto and made a part hereof, and shall bear interest at the rates and be payable as to
principal or redemption price as specified herein. The Series 2026 Bonds shall be designated as
and shall be distinguished from the Bonds of all other series by the title, “Water Revenue Bonds,
Series 2026.”
Section 2.2 Date, Maturities and Interest. The Series 2026 Bonds shall be dated as of
the Dated Date, shall mature on [October 1] in the years and in the amounts set forth below and
shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding their date of authentication
thereof unless authenticated as of an Interest Payment Date, in which event such Bonds shall bear
interest from such date, or unless such Bonds are authenticated prior to the first Interest Payment
Date, in which event such Bonds shall bear interest from and including their Dated Date, payable
on each Interest Payment Date at the rates per annum as set forth below:
Maturity Date
([October 1])

Principal Amount

Interest Rate

2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
Principal and interest payments which are not made within 15 days of when they are due
will bear interest at the Default Rate from and after such due date until paid in full. Interest on the
Series 2026 Bonds shall be computed on the basis of a year of 360-day year of twelve thirty-day
months.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 79 of 211

Principal and premium, if any, shall be due and payable at maturity or prior redemption
upon surrender of the Series 2026 Bond at the designated corporate trust office of Trustee and
Paying Agent or its successors, or alternatively the Bondholder shall provide the Trustee with a
written certificate (at no cost or expense to the Bondholder and in substantially the form attached
hereto as Exhibit C) that the Series 2026 Bond has been lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed.
Interest on the Series 2026 Bonds shall be payable by wire, or check via certified mail, to the
Registered Owner at its address as it appears on the registration books of the Paying Agent, who
shall also act as the Registrar for the Issuer, or at such other address as is furnished to the Paying
Agent in writing by such Registered Owner. Interest hereon shall be deemed to be paid by the
Paying Agent when wired or mailed via certified mail to the Registered Owner. Both principal
and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
Section 2.3
Optional Redemption. [The Series 2026 Bonds are subject to redemption
prior to maturity on any date, in whole or in part, at the option of the Issuer, in chronological order
of maturity, upon not less than thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days’ prior notice at a
redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Series 2026 Bonds to be redeemed
plus accrued interest, including any default interest, thereon to the date of redemption.]
Section 2.4 Execution of Bonds. Any of the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or City Manager
are hereby authorized to execute by facsimile or manual signature the Series 2026 Bonds and the
City Recorder to countersign by facsimile or manual signature the Series 2026 Bonds and to have
imprinted, engraved, lithographed, stamped or otherwise placed on the Series 2026 Bonds a
facsimile of the official seal of the Issuer, and the Trustee shall manually authenticate the Series
2026 Bonds.
Section 2.5 Delivery of Bonds. The Series 2026 Bonds when executed, registered and
authenticated as provided herein and by law, shall be delivered by the Issuer to the Purchaser, upon
payment of the purchase price thereof.
Section 2.6 Designation of Registrar. U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association,
170 South Main Street, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah is hereby designated as Registrar for the
Series 2026 Bonds, acceptance of which appointment shall be evidenced by a written acceptance
from the Registrar.
Section 2.7 Designation of Paying Agent. U.S. Bank Trust Company, National
Association, 170 South Main Street, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah, is hereby designated as
Paying Agent for the Series 2026 Bonds, acceptance of which appointment shall be evidenced by
a written acceptance from the Paying Agent.
Section 2.8 Loss of Tax-Exempt Status. In the event that an action or inaction of the
Issuer directly causes the interest payable with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds to be includable
in gross income of the Owners thereof for federal and State income tax purposes pursuant to a
final, non-appealable ruling, the Issuer shall make the Owners of the Series 2026 Bonds whole by
paying interest on the Series 2026 Bonds at a tax-equivalent (i.e. taxable) interest rate determined
by the Owners of such Bonds in a commercially reasonable manner.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 80 of 211

Section 2.9 Presentation and Surrender of the Series 2026 Bonds. As an alternative to
the presentation and surrender by the Registered Owner of each of the Series 2026 Bonds for
payment, exchange or transfer, the Registered Owner shall provide the Trustee with a written
certificate (at no cost or expense to the Purchaser and in substantially the form attached hereto as
Exhibit C) that the Series 2026 Bond has been lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed.
Section 2.10 Partially Redeemed Fully Registered Bonds. As an alternative to the
surrender by the Registered Owner of each of the Series 2026 Bonds and issuance of a new Series
2026 Bond in the event that any Series 2026 Bond shall be redeemed in part only (pursuant to
Section 2.9 of the General Indenture), the Registered Owner shall make a notation of such partial
redemption on each of the Series 2026 Bonds that are redeemed in part only.
Section 2.11 Limited Obligation. The Series 2026 Bonds, together with interest thereon,
shall be limited obligations of the Issuer payable solely from the Net Revenues (except to the extent
paid out of moneys attributable to the Series 2026 Bond proceeds or other funds created hereunder
or under the Indenture or the income from the temporary investment thereof).
Section 2.12 Perfection of Security Interest.
(a)
The Indenture creates a valid and binding pledge and assignment of security
interest in all of the Net Revenues pledged under the Indenture in favor of the Trustee as
security for payment of the Series 2026 Bonds, enforceable by the Trustee in accordance
with the terms thereof.
(b)
Under the laws of the State, such pledge and assignment and security
interest is automatically perfected by Section 11-14-501, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as
amended, and is and shall have priority as against all parties having claims of any kind in
tort, contract, or otherwise hereafter imposed on the Net Revenues.
Section 2.13 Series 2026 Bonds as Additional Bonds. The Series 2026 Bonds are issued
as Additional Bonds under the Indenture. The Issuer hereby certifies that the requirements set
forth in Section 2.13 of the General Indenture have been and will be complied with in connection
with the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 81 of 211

ARTICLE III.
APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS AND FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS
Section 3.1 Application of Proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds. The Issuer shall deposit
with the Trustee the proceeds from the sale of the Series 2026 Bonds and the Trustee shall deposit
such proceeds as follows:
(a)

$[_____] into the Series 2026 Construction Account; and

(b)
the remaining amount shall be deposited into the Series 2026 Cost of
Issuance Account to be held by the Trustee under this Fifth Supplemental Indenture and to
be used to pay costs of issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds.
Section 3.2 Creation of Series 2026 Accounts. There is hereby established with the
Trustee a Series 2026 Construction Account in the Construction Fund and a Series 2026 Cost of
Issuance Account.
Section 3.3 No Debt Service Reserve Requirement for the Series 2026 Bonds. There is
no debt service reserve requirement for the Series 2026 Bonds.
Section 3.4 Payment of Costs of Issuance. Costs of issuance shall be paid by the Trustee
from the Series 2026 Cost of Issuance Account upon receipt from the Issuer of an executed Cost
of Issuance Disbursement Request in substantially the form of Exhibit B attached hereto. Any
unexpended balance remaining in the Series 2026 Cost of Issuance Account thirty (30) days after
delivery of the Series 2026 Bonds shall be paid to the Bond Fund.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 82 of 211

ARTICLE IV.
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 4.1 Confirmation of General Indenture. As supplemented by this Fifth
Supplemental Indenture, and except as provided herein, the General Indenture is in all respects
ratified and confirmed, and the General Indenture, and this Fifth Supplemental Indenture shall be
read, taken and construed as one and the same instrument so that all of the rights, remedies, terms,
conditions, covenants and agreements of the General Indenture shall apply and remain in full force
and effect with respect to this Fifth Supplemental Indenture, and to any revenues, receipts and
moneys to be derived therefrom.
Section 4.2 Confirmation of Sale of Series 2026 Bonds. The sale of the Series 2026
Bonds to the Purchaser at a price of $[PAR] is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.
Section 4.3 Consent and Effective Date of Amendments. By purchase of the Series
2026 Bonds, the Series 2026 Bondholders are deemed to have consented to the amendments to the
General Indenture contained herein. As such, pursuant to Section 9.2 of the Indenture, the
Registered Owners of 66-2/3% of the Outstanding Bonds have consented to the amendments set
forth herein and the amendments contained in this Fifth Supplemental Indenture become effective
upon the execution of this Fifth Supplemental Indenture.
Section 4.4 Reports to Purchaser. [For as long as the Series 2026 Bonds remain
Outstanding of which the Purchaser is the Registered Owner, the Issuer agrees to forward to the
Purchaser any annual budget reports within 30 days after adoption and audited financial reports
(including any amendments or revisions of the same) within 180 days after the end of each fiscal
year of the Issuer, provided, however that if there are circumstances beyond the Issuer’s reasonable
control, the Issuer shall be in compliance with this section if audited financial reports are made
available within 210 days of the end of each fiscal year. Such budget and audited financial reports
shall include the System.]
Section 4.5 Events of Default. So long as the Series 2026 Bonds are the only
Outstanding Bonds under the General Indenture and the Purchaser is the Registered Owner, and
such Registered Owner acts in a commercially reasonable manner: (a) the Registered Owner of
the Series 2026 Bonds shall have the right to declare, to waive and to deem as cured, an Event of
Default (as defined under the General Indenture) of any nature or type, including, but not limited
to, financial, non-financial, monetary, non-monetary, payment, technical, non-technical or
otherwise, with respect only to the Series 2026 Bonds and (b) the Trustee may not waive or deem
as cured, with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds, an Event of Default of any nature or type,
including, but not limited to, financial, non-financial, monetary, non-monetary, payment,
technical, non-technical or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the Registered Owner
of the Series 2026 Bonds and (c) the occurrence of an Event of Default of any nature or type,
including, but not limited to, financial, non-financial, monetary, non-monetary, payment,
technical, non-technical or otherwise shall cause the Series 2026 Bonds to bear interest at the
Default Rate, as defined in this Fifth Supplemental Indenture, until such Event of Default is cured
to the satisfaction and consent of the Registered Owner of the Series 2026 Bonds.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 83 of 211

Section 4.6 Certified Mail. For as long as the Series 2026 Bonds remain Outstanding
of which the Purchaser is the Registered Owner, any mailing to the Registered Owners of Series
2026 Bonds set forth or required by the Indenture of the Trustee shall be made by certified mail.
Section 4.7 Severability. If any provision of this Fifth Supplemental Indenture shall be
held or deemed to be or shall, in fact, be inoperative or unenforceable as applied in any particular
case in any jurisdiction or in all jurisdictions, or in all cases because it conflicts with any other
provision or provisions hereof or any constitution or statute or rule of public policy, or for any
other reason, such circumstances shall not have the effect of rendering the provision in question
inoperative or unenforceable in any other case or circumstance, or of rendering any other provision
or provisions herein contained invalid, inoperative, or unenforceable to any extent whatever. The
invalidity of any one or more phrases, sentences, clauses, or sections in this Fifth Supplemental
Indenture contained, shall not affect the remaining portions of this Fifth Supplemental Indenture,
or any part thereof.
Section 4.8 Amendments. So long as the Purchaser is the Owner of 100% of the Series
2026 Bonds, no change, revision, addition or deletion may be made to this Fifth Supplemental
Indenture without the prior written approval of the Purchaser; such consent to not be unreasonably
withheld.
Section 4.9 Counterparts This Fifth Supplemental Indenture may be simultaneously
executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute
but one and the same instrument.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Page 84 of 211

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and the Trustee have caused this Fifth Supplemental
Indenture of Trust to be executed as of the date first written above.
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH
(SEAL)

By:

Mayor

COUNTERSIGN:

By:

City Recorder
U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

By:
Title:

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

S-1

Page 85 of 211

EXHIBIT A
(FORM OF SERIES 2026 BOND)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE OF UTAH
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH
WATER REVENUE BOND
SERIES 2026
THIS BOND HAS BEEN DESIGNATED BY THE ISSUER FOR PURPOSES OF THE
EXCEPTION CONTAINED IN SECTION 265(b)(3) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
OF 1986, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE DEDUCTIBILITY OF A FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION’S INTEREST EXPENSE ALLOCABLE TO TAX-EXEMPT INTEREST
Number R - __________
Interest Rate

$_________
Maturity Date

Original Issue Date

Registered Owner: [PURCHASER NAME]
Principal Amount:

DOLLARS

Bluffdale City, Utah (“Issuer”), a political subdivision and body politic duly organized and
existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Utah, for value received, hereby
acknowledges itself to be indebted and promises to pay to the Registered Owner named above or
registered assigns, out of the special fund hereinbelow designated and not otherwise, the Principal
Amount specified above on the Maturity Date specified above with interest thereon until paid at
the Interest Rate specified above per annum, payable semiannually on [April 1] and [October 1]
of each year commencing [April 1, 20__] (each an “Interest Payment Date”) until said Principal
Amount is paid in full. Principal and premium, if any, shall be payable upon surrender of this
Bond at the principal offices of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, Corporate Trust
Department, 170 South Main Street, Suite 600, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 (“Trustee” and “Paying
Agent”) or its successors, or alternatively the Bondholder shall provide the Trustee with a written
certificate (at no cost or expense to the Bondholder and in substantially the form attached to the
Fifth Supplemental Indenture as Exhibit C) that the Series 2026 Bond has been lost, stolen,
mutilated or destroyed. Interest on this Bond shall be payable by wire or check or draft mailed via
certified mail to the Registered Owner hereof at its address as it appears on the registration books
of the Paying Agent, who shall also act as the Registrar for the Issuer, or at such other address as
is furnished to the Paying Agent in writing by such Registered Owner. Interest hereon shall be
deemed to be paid by the Paying Agent when wired or sent certified mail. Both principal and
interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America.
This Bond is one of an issue of Bonds of the Issuer designated as the “Water Revenue
Bonds, Series 2026 (the “Series 2026 Bonds”) in the aggregate principal amount of $[PAR], of

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-1

Page 86 of 211

like tenor and effect, except as to date of maturity and interest rate, numbered R-1 and upwards,
issued by the Issuer pursuant to a General Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 2011, as previously
supplemented and amended (the “General Indenture”), and as further supplemented and amended
by a Fifth Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of [__________ 1, 2026] (collectively with
the General Indenture, the “Indenture”) and a resolution adopted on May 27, 2026 (the “Bond
Resolution”), for the purpose of (i) finance improvements to the Issuer’s water system including
but not limited to a new water tank and (ii) paying certain issuance expenses, all in full conformity
with the Constitution and laws of the State of Utah. Both principal of and interest on this Bond
and the issue of which it is a part are payable solely from a special fund designated “Bluffdale
City, Utah Water Revenue Bond Fund” (the “Bond Fund”), into which fund, to the extent necessary
to assure prompt payment of the principal of and interest on the issue of which this is one and on
all series of bonds issued on a lien parity with this Bond shall be paid the Net Revenues (as defined
in the Indenture) derived and to be derived from the Issuer’s System all as more fully described
and provided in the Indenture.
The Series 2026 Bonds shall be payable only from the Net Revenues and shall not
constitute a general indebtedness or pledge of the full faith and credit of the Issuer, within the
meaning of any constitutional or statutory provision or limitation of indebtedness.
As provided in the Indenture, additional bonds, notes and other obligations of the Issuer
may be issued and secured on an equal lien parity with the Series 2026 Bonds, from time to time
in one or more series, in various principal amounts, may mature at different times, may bear
interest at different rates and may otherwise vary as provided in the Indenture, and the aggregate
principal amount of such bonds, notes and other obligations issued and to be issued under the
Indenture is not limited.
Reference is hereby made to the Indenture, copies of which are on file with the Trustee, for
the provisions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of the rights, duties and
obligations of the Issuer, the Trustee and the Registered Owners of the Series 2026 Bonds, the
terms upon which the Series 2026 Bonds are issued and secured, and upon which the Indenture
may be modified and amended, to all of which the Registered Owner of this Bond assents by the
acceptance of this Bond.
Except as otherwise provided herein and unless the context indicates otherwise, words and
phrases used herein shall have the same meanings as such words and phrases in the Indenture.
Interest on the Series 2026 Bonds authenticated prior to the first Interest Payment Date
shall accrue from and including the Dated Date specified above. Interest on the Series 2026 Bonds
authenticated on or subsequent to the first Interest Payment Date shall accrue from the Interest
Payment Date next preceding their date of authentication, or if authenticated on an Interest
Payment Date as of that date; provided, however, that if interest on the Series 2026 Bonds shall be
in default, interest shall accrue at the Default Rate (as defined in the Indenture) from the date to
which interest has been paid in full, or unless no interest shall have been paid on such Bonds, in
the event such Bonds shall bear interest from and including their Dated Date.
The Series 2026 Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as provided in the
Indenture.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-2

Page 87 of 211

The Series 2026 Bonds are issued as fully registered Bonds. Subject to the limitations and
upon payment of the charges provided in the Indenture, registered Bonds may be exchanged for a
like aggregate principal amount of registered Bonds of other authorized denominations of the same
series and the same maturity.
This Series 2026 Bond is transferable by the registered holder hereof in person or by his
attorney duly authorized in writing at the principal corporate trust offices of U.S. Bank Trust
Company, National Association (the “Registrar”) in Salt Lake City, Utah, but only in the manner,
subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges provided in the Indenture and upon
surrender and cancellation of this Bond, or alternatively, the Bondholder shall provide the Trustee
with a written certificate (at no cost or expense to the Bondholder and in substantially the form
attached to the Fifth Supplemental Indenture as Exhibit C) that the Series 2026 Bond has been lost,
stolen, mutilated or destroyed Upon such transfer a new registered Bond or Bonds of the same
series and the same maturity and of authorized denomination or denominations for the same
aggregate principal amount will be issued to the transferee in exchange therefor.
The Issuer and the Paying Agent may deem and treat the Registered Holder hereof as the
absolute owner hereof (whether or not this Series 2026 Bond shall be overdue) for the purpose of
receiving payment of or on account of principal hereof, premium, if any, and interest due hereon
and for all other purposes, and neither Issuer nor Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to
the contrary.
This Series 2026 Bond is issued under and pursuant to the Local Government Bonding Act,
Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, and this Series 2026 Bond does not
constitute a general obligation indebtedness of the Issuer within the meaning of any state
constitutional or statutory limitation. The issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds shall not, directly,
indirectly or contingently, obligate the Issuer or any agency, instrumentality or political
subdivision thereof to levy any form of taxation therefor or to make any appropriation for their
payment.
The Issuer covenants and agrees that it will cause to be collected and accounted for
sufficient Net Revenues as will at all times be sufficient to pay promptly the principal of and
interest on this Bond and the issue of which it forms a part and to make all payments required to
be made into the Bond Fund, and to carry out all the requirements of the Indenture.
It is hereby declared and represented that all acts, conditions and things required to exist,
happen and be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Series 2026 Bond have existed,
have happened and have been performed in regular and due time, form and manner as required by
law, that the amount of this Series 2026 Bond, together with the issue of which it forms a part,
does not exceed any limitation prescribed by the Constitution or statutes of the State of Utah, that
the Net Revenues of the Issuer have been pledged and that an amount therefrom will be set aside
into a special fund by the Issuer sufficient for the prompt payment of the principal of and interest
on this Series 2026 Bond and the issue of which it forms a part, as authorized for issue under the
Indenture, and that the Net Revenues of the Issuer will not have been pledged, hypothecated or
anticipated in any way other than by the issue of the Bonds of which this Series 2026 Bond is one
and all bonds issued on a parity with this Series 2026 Bond.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-3

Page 88 of 211

This Series 2026 Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose nor be
entitled to any security or benefit under the Indenture until the Certificate of Authentication on this
Series 2026 Bond shall have been manually signed by the Trustee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer has caused this Series 2026 Bond to be signed by the
manual or facsimile signature of its Mayor and countersigned by the manual or facsimile signature
of its City Recorder under its corporate seal or a facsimile thereof.

(SEAL)

(facsimile or manual signature)
Mayor

COUNTERSIGN:

(facsimile or manual signature)
City Recorder

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-4

Page 89 of 211

CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Bond is one of the Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 of Bluffdale City, Utah.
U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, As Trustee

By:
Date of Authentication:

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-5

(Manual Signature)
Authorized Officer

Page 90 of 211

ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ________________________________________,
undersigned, hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto:

the

(Social Security or Other Identifying Number of Assignee)

(Please Print or Typewrite Name and Address of Assignee)

the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints
________________________ attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for
registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises.
DATED:

Signature:
NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must
correspond with the name as it appears on the face of
this Bond in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement or any change whatever.
Signature Guaranteed:

NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an
“eligible guarantor institution” that is a member of or
a participant in a “signature guarantee program”
(e.g., the Securities Transfer Agents Medallion
Program, the Stock Exchange Medallion Program or
the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Medallion
Signature Program).

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-6

Page 91 of 211

ABBREVIATIONS
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of the within Bond,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations.
TEN COM
TEN ENT
JT TEN

–
–
–

as tenants in common
as tenants by the entireties
as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT

(Cust.)

Custodian for

(Minor)

under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act of

(State)

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

A-7

Page 92 of 211

EXHIBIT B
COST OF ISSUANCE DISBURSEMENT REQUEST
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association
Corporate Trust Department
170 South Main Street, Suite 600
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture of Trust dated as of
[__________ 1, 2026], you are hereby authorized to pay to the following costs of issuance from
the Series 2026 Cost of Issuance Account:
[See Attached Schedule]

MAYOR
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH

COSTS OF ISSUANCE
Payee

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

Purpose

B-1

Amount

Page 93 of 211

EXHIBIT C
CERTIFICATE OF LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED BOND
The undersigned, on behalf of ________________ (the “Bondholder”), in connection with
Bluffdale City, Utah Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 (the “Series 2026 Bonds”) hereby
certifies and covenants on behalf of the Bondholder as follows:
1.

One or more of the Series 2026 Bonds has been lost, stolen, mutilated or destroyed.

2.
The Bondholder hereby represents and warrants, as follows: (a) the Series 2026
Bonds have not been endorsed for transfer at any time prior to the date hereof; (b) the Bondholder
has not sold or otherwise conveyed the Series 2026 Bonds; and (c) no one other than the
Bondholder has or could have any interest in the Series 2026 Bonds.
3.
In the unlikely event that anyone were to present the original Series 2026 Bonds as
having been obtained for value from the Bondholder and provides sufficient evidence of such to
the Trustee and the same is verified by Bondholder, the Bondholder agrees to defend and hold
harmless Bluffdale City, Utah and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, for any losses
that either party incurs regarding the replacement or exchange of the Series 2026 Bonds.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands as of _______________,
__________.
_____________________________
By:
Title:

4907-7225-6172, v. 2

C-1

Page 94 of 211

BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT
$[PAR]
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH
WATER REVENUE BONDS
SERIES 2026
[__________, 20__]

Bluffdale City
2222 West 14400 South
Bluffdale, UT 84065
The undersigned, [Purchaser Name], its successors and assigns, (collectively, the
“Purchaser”), offers to purchase from Bluffdale City, Utah (the “Issuer”), all (but not less than all)
of the $[PAR] Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2026 of the Issuer (the “Bonds”) for the par amount
thereof with delivery and payment at the offices of Gilmore & Bell, P.C. in Salt Lake City, Utah,
based upon the covenants, representations, and warranties set forth below.
1.
Upon the terms and conditions and upon the basis of the representations set forth
herein, the Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase from the Issuer, and the Issuer hereby agrees to
sell and deliver to the Purchaser, the Bonds. Exhibit A, which is hereby incorporated by reference
into this Purchase Agreement (the “Purchaser Agreement”) contains a brief description of the
Bonds, the manner of their issuance, the purchase price to be paid, and the expected date of delivery
and payment therefor (the “Closing”).
2.
You represent and covenant to the Purchaser that (a) you have and will have at the
Closing the power and authority to: (i) adopt the Resolution dated May 27, 2026 (the
“Resolution”), (ii) execute and enter into the General Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 2011,
as previously supplemented, and as further supplemented and amended by a Fifth Supplemental
Indenture of Trust dated as of [_____] 1, 2026 (together the “Indenture”), each between you and
U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), (iii) enter into and
perform this Purchase Agreement, and (iv) deliver and sell the Bonds to the Purchaser; (b) this
Purchase Agreement, the Indenture, and the Bonds do not and will not conflict with or create a
breach or default under any existing law, regulation, order, or agreement to which the Issuer is
subject; (c) other than the Resolution, no governmental approval or authorization is required in
connection with the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Resolution and the Bonds are and
shall be at the time of the Closing legal, valid, and binding obligations of the Issuer enforceable in
accordance with their respective terms, subject only to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, or other
similar laws generally affecting creditors’ rights; and (d) there is no action, suit, proceeding,
inquiry, or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, public board, or body, pending
or, to the knowledge of the Issuer, threatened against or affecting the Issuer or affecting the
corporate existence of the Issuer or the titles of its officers to their respective offices or seeking to
prohibit, restrain, or enjoin the sale, issuance, or delivery of the Bonds or in any way contesting or
affecting the transactions contemplated hereby or the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, the

4937-9208-9516

Page 95 of 211

Indenture, the Resolution, or this Purchase Agreement, or contesting the powers of the Issuer or
any authority for the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds, or the adoption, execution, and
delivery of the Resolution, the Indenture or this Purchase Agreement.
3.

As conditions to the Purchaser's obligations hereunder:

(a)
From June 30, 2025 to the date of Closing, there shall not have been any (i)
material adverse change in the financial condition or general affairs of the Issuer and its
System (as defined in the Indenture); (ii) event, court decision, proposed law, or rule which
may have the effect of changing the federal income tax incidents of the Bonds or the interest
thereon or the contemplated transaction; or (iii) international or national crisis, suspension
of stock exchange trading, or banking moratorium materially affecting in an adverse way,
in the Purchaser’s opinion, the market price of the Bonds.
(b)

At the Closing, the Issuer will deliver or make available to the Purchaser:
(i)

The Bonds, in definitive form, duly executed and registered;

(ii)

The Indenture in final form, duly executed and delivered;

(iii) A certificate from authorized officers of the Issuer, in form and
substance acceptable to the Purchaser, to the effect that the representations and
information of the Issuer contained in this Purchase Agreement are true and correct
when made and as of the Closing as if made as of the time of the Closing;
(iv)
The approving opinion of Gilmore & Bell, P.C., Bond Counsel to
the Issuer, satisfactory to the Purchaser dated the date of Closing, relating to the
legality and validity of the Bonds and the excludability of interest on the Bonds
from gross income of the holders thereof for federal and State of Utah income tax
purposes; and
(v)
Such additional certificates, instruments, and other documents as the
Purchaser may deem necessary with respect to the issuance and sale of the Bonds,
all in form and substance satisfactory to the Purchaser.
4.
The Issuer will pay the cost of the fees and disbursements of counsel to the Issuer,
and of Bond Counsel, Trustee fees, Municipal Advisor’s fees and the cost of preparing and printing
the Bonds. The Purchaser’s counsel fees will be paid as a cost of issuance.
5.
The Purchaser represents and warrants that it is not currently engaged in a boycott
of the State of Israel or an economic boycott of a boycotted company, as such terms are defined in
the immediately succeeding two sentences. As currently defined in Section 63G-27-102(5) of the
Utah Code, “economic boycott” means an action targeting a “boycotted company” with the
intention of penalizing or inflicting economic harm to such company. Furthermore, as currently
defined in Section 63G-27-102(3) of the Utah Code “boycotted company” means a company that
(1) engages in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacture of fossil
fuel-based energy, timber, mining, or agriculture, (2) engages in, facilitates, or supports the
manufacture, distribution, sale, or use of firearms, (3) does not meet or commit to meet

4937-9208-9516, v. 2

Page 96 of 211

environmental standards, including standards for eliminating, reducing, offsetting, or disclosing
greenhouse gas-emissions, beyond applicable state and federal law requirements or (4) does not
facilitate or commit to facilitate access to abortion or sex characteristic surgical procedures. The
Purchaser covenants and agrees not to engage in a boycott of the State of Israel or an economic
boycott of a boycotted company for the duration of any contractual arrangement with the Issuer,
including this Purchase Agreement.
6.
This Purchase Agreement is intended to benefit only the parties hereto, and the
Issuer’s representations and warranties shall survive any investigation made by or for the
Purchaser, delivery, and payment for the Bonds, and the termination of this Purchase Agreement.
7.

This Purchase Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Utah.

8.
This Purchase Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which
shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. This
Purchase Agreement shall become effective upon the execution by the parties hereto.

4937-9208-9516, v. 2

Page 97 of 211

Sincerely,
[PURCHASER NAME]

By:

Accepted on behalf of
BLUFFDALE CITY, UTAH

By: ________________________________
Mayor

ATTEST AND COUNTERSIGN:

By: ________________________________
City Recorder

(SEAL)

4937-9208-9516

S-1
BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Page 98 of 211

EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF BONDS
1.

Issue Size:

$[PAR]

Purchase Price:

$[PAR]

Purchaser’s Counsel Fee:

$[_____]

Accrued Interest:

$[-0-]

Interest Payment Dates:

[April 1] and [October 1], beginning [_____]

Dated Date:

Date of delivery

Form:

Registered Bonds

Closing Date:

[__________, 20__] or as otherwise agreed upon

Redemption: [The Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity on any date, in whole
or in part, at the option of the Issuer, in chronological order of maturity, upon not less than
thirty (30) nor more than sixty (60) days’ prior notice at a redemption price equal to 100%
of the principal amount of the Bonds to be redeemed plus accrued interest, including any
default interest, thereon to the date of redemption.]
MATURITY SCHEDULE
Maturity Date
([October 1])
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041

4937-9208-9516

Principal Amount
$

A-1

Interest Rate
%

Page 99 of 211

Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:

Mayor and City Council
Stephanie Thayer, Administrative Services Director
May 20, 2026
FY2027 Budget Discussion

This memorandum is to provide an update on some minor adjustments that have occurred
since the last FY2027 budget discussion. Within the General Fund, expenditures were adjusted
by increasing Engineering books, subscriptions, and memberships by $2,500 to align with
actual spending trends. In the Capital Projects Fund, additional expenditures include
increasing $30,000 for miscellaneous traffic calming measures to continue ongoing efforts,
and adding $90,000 for a Battalion Chief vehicle associated with a new personnel request in
the Fire Department. For the Fire and Police Protection Fund, revenues from the Public Safety
Fee are proposed to increase by another $185,000 to support the ongoing costs associated
with a requested change in service level to add a full-time Battalion Chief position and related
personnel costs.
Additional details are provided in the included summary and updated budget document. If
you have any questions or would like further information on any budget item, we’re happy to
provide that.

Page 100 of 211

SUMMARY OF CHANGES:

AMOUNT

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
ENGINEERING

FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION FUND
REVENUES
PUBLIC SAFETY FEE
EXPENDITURES
SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

2,500 INCREASE TO OFFSET REVISIONS IN ESTIMATES BELOW

2,500 BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS ADJUSTED TO ACTUAL

16%

CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
REVENUES
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE
EXPENDITURES
MISC. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
FIRE DEPT BC TRUCK

NOTES

393,775 ***APPROPRIATION OF FUND BALANCE - NEW AMOUNT

120,000 INCREASE TO OFFSET CHANGES BELOW
30,000 REQUEST TO CONTINUE EFFORTS-SAME AMOUNT AS PY $50K
90,000 VEHICLE FOR ADD'L BATTALION CHIEF REQUESTED BELOW

185,000 INCREASE TO FUND THE ONGOING CHANGE IN SERVICE LEVEL COST
122,000 REQUEST TO ADD A FULL-TIME BATTALION CHIEF POSITION
63,000 IN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT

Page 101 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

GENERAL FUND REVENUES
10-31-11000
10-31-31000
10-31-71000
10-31-76000
10-31-81000
10-31-91000
10-31-92000

TAXES
CURRENT YEAR PROPERTY TAXES-SL
GENERAL SALES & USE TAXES
FEE IN LIEU & PERS. PROP. TAX
CABLE TV
FRANCHISE TAXES
TELECOM TAX
ROOM TAX

10-31-_____

TOTAL TAXES

10-32-11000
10-32-21100
10-32-21700
10-32-26100
10-32-29500
10-32-29810

LICENSE & PERMITS
BUSINESS LICENSES
BUILDING PERMITS
STATE SURCHARGES
ENCROACHMENTS & LAND DISTURB.
DEVELOPMENT FEES
MAPS & COPIES

10-32-_____

TOTAL LICENSES & PERMITS

10-33-58000

INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES
LIQUOR FUND ALLOTMENT

10-33-_____

TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL

10-34-11000
10-34-12000
10-34-33000
10-34-36000
10-34-43000
10-34-44000
10-34-72300
10-34-83000

CHARGES FOR SERVICE
GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES
INSPECTION FEES
STREET LIGHTING CHARGES
STORM WATER CHARGES
GARBAGE COLLECTION
GREEN WASTE COLLECTION
SALE OF ASSETS
BURIAL FEES

10-34-_____

TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE

10-35-10000
10-35-10001
10-35-12000

FINES AND FORFEITURES
COURT FINES
MISCELLANEOUS
ACE FINES

10-35-_____

TOTAL FINES AND FORFEITURES

10-36-11000
10-36-20200
10-36-20300
10-36-32000
10-36-91000

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES
INTEREST INCOME
FACILITIES RENTAL
RECREATION
YOUTH COUNCIL
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

10-36-_____

TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES

10-39-10000
10-39-15000
10-39-15100

CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE
ADMIN FEE BLUFFDALE EDA
ADMIN FEE GATEWAY RDA

10-39-_____

TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND TRANSFERS
TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES

2,014,351
5,103,596
51,835
2,157,547
124,295
13,906

2,246,566 $
5,100,000
200,000
80,000
2,200,000
110,000
12,000

3,293,725 $
3,389,742
47,928
1,863,124
82,192
10,731

3,300,000
5,200,000
58,000
2,200,000
125,000
13,000

9,465,530
-

9,948,566
-

8,687,442
-

10,896,000
-

11,319,000

81,623
795,907
4,780
81,921
32,015
14

75,000
1,130,000
10,000
75,000
35,000
-

75,692
561,284
3,558
310,734
47,150
28

80,000
674,000
5,000
310,800
47,200
-

80,000
1,030,000
5,000
200,000
35,000
-

996,260
-

1,325,000
-

998,446
-

1,117,000
-

1,350,000

24,335

25,000

22,263

25,000

24,335
-

25,000
-

22,263
-

25,000
-

25,000

5,092
39,926
423,554
480,681
1,387,259
137,799
32,692
7,950

1,000
75,000
475,000
658,000
1,470,000
136,000
10,000
5,000

4,893
85,183
355,030
488,091
1,246,481
117,064
31,315
7,025

4,900
102,000
475,000
658,000
1,470,000
136,000
31,315
8,000

1,000
40,000
480,000
658,000
1,544,000
140,000
10,000
5,000

2,514,953
-

2,830,000
-

2,335,082
-

2,885,215
-

2,878,000

307,663
20,350
-

320,000
8,000
30,000

408,807
16,030
8,500

408,807
19,000
10,000

400,000
20,000
10,000

328,013
-

358,000
-

433,337
-

437,807
-

430,000

271,682
6,271
69,694
133,662

325,000
6,000
100,000
1,000
555,000

413,220
8,230
58,074
2,737
311,599

325,000
10,000
75,000
2,737
374,000

250,000
6,000
100,000
1,000
220,000

481,309
-

987,000
-

793,860
-

786,737
-

577,000

680,000
61,249

266,164
832,000
77,500

398,947
64,580

398,947
66,458

391,275
77,500

2,500
-

393,775
77,500

741,249
14,551,649
-

1,175,664
16,649,230
-

463,527
13,733,957
-

465,405
16,613,164

3,200,000
5,300,000
200,000
80,000
2,400,000
125,000
14,000

468,775
17,047,775
-

2,500
2,500

3,200,000
5,300,000
200,000
80,000
2,400,000
125,000
14,000

471,275
17,050,275
-

Page 102 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
10-411-_____
10-413-_____
10-414-_____
10-415-_____
10-416-_____
10-418-_____
10-419-_____
10-421-_____
10-424-_____
10-425-_____
10-441-_____
10-442-_____
10-445-_____
10-451-_____
10-456-_____
10-901-_____

CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR
ADMINISTRATION
LEGAL
FACILITIES
PLANNING
RISK MANAGEMENT
COURT
BUILDING
ANIMAL CONTROL / CODE ENFORCEMENT
STREETS
SANITATION
ENGINEERING
PARKS & RECREATION
RECREATION & CULTURE
TRANSFERS, LOANS & RESERVES

142,991
37,159
1,423,810
262,100
661,771
379,531
163,790
310,616
466,943
320,179
1,082,172
1,103,789
605,810
1,809,722
12,500
6,968,436

166,500
60,500
1,637,500
391,000
756,700
407,000
204,500
355,800
503,280
339,050
1,255,200
1,344,000
913,150
2,051,900
25,500
6,237,650

134,561
40,039
1,326,630
233,247
614,336
325,703
175,459
307,509
328,744
321,624
951,499
892,342
670,883
1,583,559
12,225
5,016,580

160,000
57,000
1,667,500
344,000
784,700
407,000
204,500
353,300
498,522
339,050
1,255,200
1,344,000
913,150
2,017,431
25,000
6,242,811

154,500
65,500
1,618,000
351,500
1,418,125
406,500
203,000
364,500
392,500
356,650
1,199,500
1,423,000
833,150
1,925,500
13,000
6,322,850

2,500
-

154,500
65,500
1,618,000
351,500
1,418,125
406,500
203,000
364,500
392,500
356,650
1,199,500
1,423,000
835,650
1,925,500
13,000
6,322,850

16,649,230
-

12,934,941
799,016

16,613,164
-

17,047,775
-

2,500
-

15,751,319 $
(1,199,671) $

17,050,275
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Increase Fund Bal./(Appropriation of Fund Bal.)
Ending Fund Balance $

4,302,449 $
(1,199,671)
3,102,778 $

3,102,778
3,102,778

3,107,939 $
(391,275)
2,716,664 $

- $
(2,500)
(2,500) $

3,107,939
(393,775)
2,714,164

10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

3,102,778
799,016
3,901,794

$
$

3,102,778
5,161
3,107,939

$
$

CITY COUNCIL
10-411-12000
10-411-13000
10-411-21000
10-411-23000
10-411-24000
10-411-31000
10-411-32000
10-411-61000

PART TIME SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
YOUTH COUNCIL
MISCELLANEOUS

84,699
20,131
167
5,518
2,621
12,870
14,486
2,500

93,000
22,000
3,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
15,000
8,500

80,712
18,425
847
4,854
2,332
14,760
11,078
1,553

93,000
22,000
3,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
15,000
2,000

89,000
21,000
1,500
5,000
3,000
15,000
15,000
5,000

10-411-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

142,991
-

166,500
-

134,561
-

160,000
-

154,500
-

MAYOR
10-413-12000
10-413-13000
10-413-21000
10-413-23000
10-413-24000
10-413-28000
10-413-31000
10-413-61000

PART TIME SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS

24,000
4,594
60
1,271
584
780
5,870

24,000
18,000
2,500
3,000
5,000
1,000
1,000
6,000

20,000
13,862
1,141
2,598
585
1,853

24,000
18,000
3,000
5,000
1,000
6,000

24,000
31,000
2,000
1,000
1,000
500
6,000

10-413-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

37,159
-

60,500
-

40,039
-

57,000
-

65,500
-

ADMINISTRATION
10-414-11000
10-414-13000
10-414-21000
10-414-22000
10-414-23000
10-414-24000
10-414-28000
10-414-31000
10-414-32000
10-414-61000
10-414-62000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICES
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
HISTORICAL PRESERV. COMMITTEE
MISCELLANEOUS
PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTION

691,034
246,650
2,960
24,452
16,428
35,070
2,080
280,309
160
124,668
-

800,000
267,000
33,900
20,000
15,000
50,000
2,600
288,000
1,000
100,000
60,000

613,437
212,049
20,867
12,432
9,907
29,987
1,465
257,876
128,119
40,491

800,000
267,000
33,900
20,000
15,000
50,000
2,600
288,000
1,000
130,000
60,000

804,000
279,000
20,000
15,000
15,000
45,000
3,000
306,000
1,000
130,000
-

10-414-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

1,423,810
-

1,637,500
-

1,326,630
-

1,667,500
-

1,618,000
-

Page 103 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

LEGAL
10-415-11000
10-415-13000
10-415-21000
10-415-23000
10-415-24000
10-415-28000
10-415-31000
10-415-31500
10-415-32000
10-415-61000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
APPEALS AND VARIANCE HEARINGS
ACE PROGRAM
MISCELLANEOUS

164,961
58,477
9,596
1,834
250
780
25,689
513

175,000
60,000
6,000
10,500
2,500
1,500
64,500
10,000
60,000
1,000

137,752
50,149
4,009
2,351
311
650
18,725
8,447
10,541
311

175,000
60,000
6,000
10,500
2,500
1,500
64,500
10,000
13,000
1,000

191,000
62,000
5,000
4,500
2,000
1,000
50,000
10,000
25,000
1,000

10-415-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

262,100
-

391,000
-

233,247
-

344,000
-

351,500
-

15,000
90,000
100,000
30,000
20,000
15,000
50,000
25,000
2,500
500
1,070,125

FACILITIES
10-416-25000
10-416-26100
10-416-27100
10-416-27200
10-416-27300
10-416-27400
10-416-27500
10-416-28000
10-416-31000
10-416-61000
10-416-99000

SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINT.
UTILITIES
UTILITIES-CITY HALL
UTILITIES-FIRE NO.2
UTILITIES-FIRE NO.1
UTILITIES-PUBLIC WORKS
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS
LEASE PAYMENT TO LBA

10-416-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

6,662
67,492
104,505
28,540
17,743
23,211
1,917
411,700

28,000
90,000
80,000
30,000
21,000
20,000
30,000
30,000
2,500
500
424,700

4,687
62,482
77,322
23,344
14,369
10,653
48,042
19,527
353,910

28,000
90,000
80,000
30,000
21,000
20,000
58,000
30,000
2,500
500
424,700

15,000
90,000
100,000
30,000
20,000
15,000
50,000
25,000
2,500
500
1,070,125

661,771
-

756,700
-

614,336
-

784,700
-

1,418,125
-

272,000
95,000
2,500
1,000
5,000
2,000
1,000
25,000
3,000

406,500
-

PLANNING
10-418-11000
10-418-13000
10-418-21000
10-418-22000
10-418-23000
10-418-24000
10-418-28000
10-418-31000
10-418-61000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICES
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS

252,719
90,912
2,217
731
8,403
309
715
21,739
1,786

268,000
97,000
3,000
2,500
8,000
4,000
1,500
20,000
3,000

213,434
84,221
1,095
3,426
931
585
21,533
478

268,000
97,000
3,000
2,500
8,000
4,000
1,500
20,000
3,000

272,000
95,000
2,500
1,000
5,000
2,000
1,000
25,000
3,000

10-418-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

379,531
-

407,000
-

325,703
-

407,000
-

406,500
-

RISK MANAGEMENT
10-419-31500
10-419-51000

EMPLOYEE DRUG TESTING
INSURANCE - GEN LIAB &PROPERTY

1,997
161,793

4,500
200,000

1,739
173,719

4,500
200,000

3,000
200,000

10-419-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

163,790
-

204,500
-

175,459
-

204,500
-

203,000
-

Page 104 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

COURT
10-421-11000
10-421-13000
10-421-21000
10-421-23000
10-421-24000
10-421-25000
10-421-26000
10-421-31000
10-421-61000
10-421-74000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
STATE SURCHARGES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT

141,828
36,592
2,396
3,781
16
107,370
18,158
476
-

148,000
54,000
1,000
2,000
10,000
2,500
120,000
17,000
1,300
-

126,823
45,553
2,139
5,994
119,029
7,660
311
-

148,000
54,000
1,000
2,000
10,000
120,000
17,000
1,300
-

155,000
56,000
500
4,000
5,000
120,000
20,000
1,000
3,000

10-421-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

310,616
-

355,800
-

307,509
-

353,300
-

364,500
-

BUILDING
10-424-11000
10-424-13000
10-424-21000
10-424-23000
10-424-24000
10-424-27000
10-424-28000
10-424-31000
10-424-61000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS

244,006
100,162
466
2,044
846
597
520
117,485
817

272,000
121,000
1,500
5,000
4,000
4,000
780
80,000
15,000

210,908
97,990
585
1,150
156
1,242
715
10,309
5,689

272,000
121,000
1,500
5,000
4,000
1,242
780
80,000
13,000

222,000
92,000
1,500
5,000
2,000
4,000
1,000
50,000
15,000

10-424-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

466,943
-

503,280
-

328,744
-

498,522
-

392,500
-

ANIMAL CONTROL / CODE ENFORCEMENT
10-425-11000
10-425-13000
10-425-21000
10-425-23000
10-425-24000
10-425-25000
10-425-27000
10-425-28000
10-425-31000
10-425-61000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
MISCELLANEOUS

58,771
26,345
983
525
190
4,312
573
228,233
248

63,000
27,000
300
1,500
750
2,000
5,000
1,000
238,000
500

53,647
23,962
75
899
197
93
4,171
357
238,080
143

63,000
27,000
300
1,500
750
2,000
5,000
1,000
238,000
500

65,000
27,000
300
1,600
750
500
5,000
1,000
255,000
500

10-425-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

320,179
-

339,050
-

321,624
-

339,050
-

356,650
-

STREETS
10-441-11000
10-441-13000
10-441-21000
10-441-22000
10-441-23000
10-441-24000
10-441-25000
10-441-27000
10-441-28000
10-441-29000
10-441-31000
10-441-48100
10-441-61000
10-441-74000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
PUBLIC NOTICES
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
STREET LIGHTING
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT

525,222
248,426
3,437
17,091
1,218
124,694
3,737
141,921
6,187
6,995
1,547
1,698

645,000
333,000
3,500
300
10,000
7,000
5,000
95,000
5,400
120,000
15,000
9,000
2,000
5,000

469,153
228,944
1,487
685
1,973
106,842
3,196
125,794
5,000
3,260
1,746
3,420

645,000
333,000
3,500
300
10,000
7,000
5,000
95,000
5,400
120,000
15,000
9,000
2,000
5,000

631,000
288,000
3,500
9,500
5,000
3,500
100,000
4,500
130,000
10,000
7,500
2,000
5,000

10-441-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

1,082,172
-

1,255,200
-

951,499
-

1,255,200
-

1,199,500
-

Page 105 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

SANITATION
10-442-31000

PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL

1,103,789

1,344,000

892,342 $

1,344,000 $

1,423,000

10-442-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

1,103,789
-

1,344,000
-

892,342
-

1,344,000
-

1,423,000
-

ENGINEERING
10-445-11000
10-445-13000
10-445-21000
10-445-23000
10-445-23200
10-445-24000
10-445-25000
10-445-27000
10-445-28000
10-445-31000
10-445-32000
10-445-61000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
DEVELOPMENT INSPECTIONS
MISCELLANEOUS

388,892
161,999
16,040
5,423
557
11,326
785
9,752
5,160
2,355
3,067
455

580,000
251,000
14,000
12,000
650
12,000
2,000
10,000
5,000
10,000
15,000
1,500

439,831
182,332
15,940
6,353
272
9,452
1,538
4,439
4,260
3,472
2,374
619

580,000
251,000
14,000
12,000
650
12,000
2,000
10,000
5,000
10,000
15,000
1,500

556,000
220,000
14,000
11,500
650
6,000
1,000
8,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
1,000

2,500
-

556,000
220,000
16,500
11,500
650
6,000
1,000
8,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
1,000

10-445-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

605,810
-

913,150
-

670,883
-

913,150
-

833,150
-

2,500

835,650
-

PARKS & RECREATION
10-451-11000
10-451-13000
10-451-21000
10-451-23000
10-451-24000
10-451-25000
10-451-26100
10-451-27000
10-451-28000
10-451-31000
10-451-45400
10-451-48100
10-451-61000
10-451-63000
10-451-64000
10-451-74000

SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS & GROUNDS MAINT.
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
WATER
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
MISCELLANEOUS
OTHER EVENTS
OTHER RECREATION
EQUIPMENT

829,679
280,476
3,278
7,449
2,516
732
257,200
67,484
2,099
148,959
129,996
6,839
1,283
800
60,934
9,998

911,000
342,000
8,000
12,500
5,000
5,000
271,000
60,000
3,000
185,400
130,000
8,000
2,000
70,000
39,000

700,950
271,158
515
8,252
1,531
1,630
187,796
53,105
1,082
156,271
108,330
4,274
1,981
50,945
35,739

911,000
342,000
8,000
12,500
1,531
5,000
271,000
60,000
3,000
185,400
130,000
8,000
2,000
70,000
8,000

902,000
330,000
6,000
6,000
3,000
2,000
250,000
50,000
2,500
170,000
130,000
7,000
2,000
60,000
5,000

10-451-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

1,809,722
-

2,051,900
-

1,583,559
-

2,017,431
-

1,925,500
-

RECREATION & CULTURE
10-456-65000
10-456-66000

FLOAT
SENIOR CENTER FEE

2,500
10,000

15,500
10,000

12,225
-

15,000
10,000

3,000
10,000

10-456-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

12,500
-

25,500
-

12,225
-

25,000
-

13,000
-

TRANSFERS, LOANS & RESERVES
10-901-10000
10-901-11000
10-901-16000
10-901-17000
10-901-18000

CONTRIBUTION CAPITAL PROJ FUND
$
CONTRIBUTION TO FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION FUND
CONTRIBUTION TO EVENTS
CONTRIBUTION TO BAAB
CONTRIBUTION TO MISS BLUFFDALE

1,600,000 $
5,347,186
15,000
6,250

6,176,400
40,000
15,000
6,250

4,955,330
40,000
15,000
6,250

6,176,400
40,000
15,000
6,250

6,261,600
40,000
15,000
6,250

10-901-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

6,968,436
-

6,237,650
-

5,016,580
-

6,242,811
-

6,322,850
-

Page 106 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

CLASS C ROADS
11-30-11050
11-30-11100
11-33-51000
11-39-31000

REVENUES
HWY TRANSIT TAX
INTEREST INCOME
CLASS "C" ROAD FUND ALLOTMENT
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

11 TOTAL REVENUES

11-402-43000
11-402-48000
11-402-54000
11-402-74000
11-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
ROAD MAINTENANCE AND STREET REPAIR
14400 S RECONSTR & UTILITIES
PUBLIC INFRASTR. REPAIRS/MAINT
EQUIPMENT
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
11 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Duplicated Rollover Costs
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

476,525
131,629
987,458
-

709,979
98,724
900,000
163,497

472,377
96,502
637,500
-

709,979
98,724
1,000,000
63,497

731,000
100,000
1,000,000
-

1,595,612
-

1,872,200
-

1,206,379
-

1,872,200
-

1,831,000
-

609,233
1,016,414
176,734
243,633
-

500,000
500,000
270,000
602,200
-

405,617
440,084
118,149
595,380
-

500,000
500,000
270,000
602,200
-

1,000,000
270,000
251,000
310,000

2,046,013
(450,401) $

1,872,200
$

1,559,230
(352,851) $

1,872,200
-

1,831,000
-

2,958,246

2,507,845 $

2,507,845

(352,851)
2,154,994 $

2,507,845 $
$
(63,497)
2,444,348 $

2,444,348
310,000
2,754,348

(450,401)
2,507,845 $

$
$

2,444,348
310,000
2,754,348

Page 107 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

COMMUNITY EVENTS
13-36-10000
13-36-11000
13-36-12000
13-36-15000
13-36-16000
13-36-17000
13-36-18000
13-36-19000
13-36-21000
13-36-61000
13-39-10000
13-39-12000

REVENUES
SPONSORS
TOURNAMENTS
RACE
VENDORS
CONTESTS
ATTRACTIONS
TRADING POST
CONCESSIONS
SENIOR DINNER
MISCELLANEOUS
CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

13 TOTAL REVENUES

13-400-31000
13-400-41000
13-400-41100
13-400-41200
13-400-41300
13-400-41400
13-400-41500
13-400-41600
13-400-41700
13-400-41800
13-400-41900
13-400-42000
13-400-43000
13-400-45000
13-400-46000
13-400-48000
13-400-49000
13-400-50100
13-400-50200
13-400-50300
13-400-50400
13-400-50500
13-400-50600
13-400-61000
13-600-10000
13-600-11000
13-900-10000

49,550
2,799
1,380
840
3,772
1,067
1,552
1,600
-

45,000
800
100
8,000
1,500
40,000
44,600

29,550
1,185
682
8,735
1,819
3,823
40,000
-

45,000
1,185
682
60,000
8,735
1,819
3,823
40,000
-

45,000
800
100
85,000
8,000
1,500
40,000
3,100

62,559
-

140,000
-

85,793
-

161,243
-

183,500
-

2,121
13,563
23,346
1,835
2,773
4,667
337
383
21,595
744
550
17,446
321
354
3,302
119
2,771
6,471
7,842
-

3,000
18,000
25,000
3,000
11,500
2,000
800
15,000
1,000
1,000
25,000
1,000
1,300
3,500
1,000
3,500
5,500
1,400
2,000
3,000
8,000
2,500
2,000
-

5,187
4,239
26,499
2,304
5,052
2,207
361
5,025
500
703
9,608
282
330
1,634
4,613
1,592
900
509
316
11,884
-

5,187
18,000
65,000
2,304
5,052
2,207
361
15,000
500
703
25,000
282
330
1,634
4,613
1,592
900
509
3,000
11,884
-

3,000
18,000
65,000
3,000
11,500
2,000
800
15,000
1,000
1,000
25,000
1,000
1,300
3,500
1,000
7,000
5,500
1,400
2,000
3,000
8,000
2,500
2,000
-

140,000
-

83,743
2,050

164,057
(2,814) $

183,500
-

110,540
(47,981) $

183,500
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

98,473 $
(47,981)
50,493 $

50,493
50,493

50,493 $
(2,814)
47,679 $

47,679 $
(3,100)
44,579 $

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
ADVERTISING
ATTRACTIONS
TRADING POST
AWARDS & APPRECIATION
CONCESSIONS
GAME SHOWS & CONTESTS
YOUTH NIGHT
RENTALS
SHOWS
FAMILY NIGHT
RACE
BUCKAROO
CONCERT & ENTERTAINMENT
PARADE
TOURNAMENTS
SENIOR DINNER
TRUNK OR TREAT
SANTA & LIGHTS
MOVIES IN PARK
HORSE EVENTS
GET TO THE RIVER
LOVE WHERE YOU LIVE
MISCELLANEOUS
BUILDINGS
GAME BOOTHS
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
13 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

$
$

50,493
2,050
52,543

$
$

47,679
(3,100)
44,579

Page 108 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

BLUFFDALE ARTS ADVISORY BOARD
14-35-10000
14-36-10000
14-36-12000
14-36-13000
14-36-15000
14-36-16000
14-36-31000
14-36-61000
14-39-10000
14-39-12000

REVENUES
ZAP TAX
TICKET SALES
CONCESSION SALES
SHOW MERCHANDISE SALES
DONATIONS
ART CLASSES
RENTALS
MISCELLANEOUS
CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

14 TOTAL REVENUES

14-400-10000
14-400-13000
14-400-14000
14-400-15000
14-400-16000
14-400-20000
14-400-21000
14-400-31000
14-400-22000
14-400-61000
14-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
ADVERTISING
COSTUMES, PROPS & SET
FACILITIES
MUSIC & SCRIPT
SHIRTS, PINS AND OTHER MERCH
CONCESSIONS
ARTS EVENTS
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
COSTUME SHOP
MISCELLANEOUS
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
14 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

11,700
54,415
1,081
5,095
6,443
8,018
300
15,000
-

11,000
55,000
1,000
2,000
2,000
5,000
15,000
3,200

14,900
38,147
655
3,320
1,524
558
15,250
350
15,000
-

14,900
65,000
1,000
4,000
2,000
500
15,250
350
15,000
-

11,000
55,000
1,000
2,000
2,000
500
8,000
15,000
3,100

102,052
-

94,200
-

89,704
-

118,000
-

97,600
-

8,897
35,282
6,560
14,678
1,637
1,641
1,010
15,002
16,359
-

3,600
30,000
9,000
18,000
1,500
1,500
6,500
9,600
5,000
9,500
-

3,070
17,203
3,425
22,790
3,351
429
2,997
7,210
1,771
8,730
-

4,000
30,000
9,000
27,000
4,000
1,500
6,500
9,600
5,000
9,500
11,900

5,000
30,000
9,000
20,000
1,500
1,500
6,500
9,600
5,000
9,500
-

101,065
986 $

94,200
-

70,975
18,730

118,000
-

97,600
-

18,978
986
19,964

19,964
19,964

1,180
2,313
500
6,250
-

950
2,000
5,000
1,500
6,250
300

19,964
18,730
38,694

3,106
2,059
2,125
6,250
-

19,964
11,900
31,863

$
$

31,863 $
(3,100)
28,763 $

2,000
2,500
2,500
1,000
6,250
-

31,863
(3,100)
28,763

MISS BLUFFDALE PAGEANT
15-36-10000
15-36-11000
15-36-12000
15-36-13000
15-39-10000
15-39-20000

REVENUES
APPLICATION FEES
TICKET SALES
FUND RAISING
SPONSORS
CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

15 TOTAL REVENUES

15-400-41000
15-400-44000
15-400-45000
15-400-61000
15-900-10000

3,100
2,000
1,000
6,250
900

2,000
2,500
2,500
1,000
6,250
-

10,243
-

16,000
-

13,540
-

13,250
-

14,250
-

6,250
3,970
2,095
-

6,250
8,000
1,000
750
-

2,000
3,045
824
-

6,250
5,000
2,000
-

6,250
6,000
2,000
-

16,000
-

5,868
7,672

13,250
-

14,250
-

12,315
(2,072) $

14,250
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

5,975 $
(2,072)
3,903 $

3,903
3,903

3,903 $
(900)
3,003 $

3,003
3,003

EXPENDITURES
SCHOLARSHIPS
PAGEANT
FUNDRAISING
MISCELLANEOUS
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

$
$

3,903
7,672
11,575

$
$

3,003
3,003

Page 109 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

RODEO FUND
16-36-10000
16-36-12000
16-36-14000
16-36-15000
16-36-16000
16-36-17000
16-36-22000
16-36-61000
16-39-10000
16-39-12000

REVENUES
TICKET SALES
SPONSORS
VENDORS
MUTTON BUSTIN
FEES
MERCHANDISE SALES
RODEO QUEEN
MISCELLANEOUS
CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

16 TOTAL REVENUES

16-400-10000
16-400-12000
16-400-13000
16-400-15000
16-400-16000
16-400-17000
16-400-18000
16-400-22000
16-400-61000
16-400-91000
16-900-10000

14,500
150
1
-

100,000
7,500
150
1,150
1,000
2,500
500
500
-

104,609
7,500
250
1,160
334
611
-

104,609
7,500
250
1,160
334
500
611
-

90,000
10,000
250
1,000
1,000
500
500
500
-

14,651
-

113,300
-

114,464
-

114,964
-

103,750
-

4,376
500
2,891
26,673
2,544
3,900
-

9,000
32,000
6,000
14,000
500
12,000
3,000
3,000
30,000
3,800
-

8,298
31,100
800
13,821
117
11,782
2,821
2,534
20,975
-

9,000
32,000
6,000
14,000
500
12,000
3,000
3,000
30,000
5,464
-

9,000
25,000
6,000
15,000
500
12,000
12,000
3,000
20,000
1,250
-

113,300
-

92,248
22,215

114,964
-

103,750
-

40,884
(26,234) $

103,750
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

162,470 $
(26,234)
136,236 $

136,236
136,236

96,400
-

104,500
-

EXPENDITURES
ADVERTISING
STOCK
ENTERTAINMENT
RENTALS
AWARDS
BRANDED MERCHANDISE
GRAND OPENING & FIREWORKS
RODEO QUEEN
MISCELLANEOUS
RESERVES
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

136,236
22,215
158,452

97,475
-

136,236
5,464
141,700

$
$

141,700
1,250
142,950

HEALTHY BLUFFDALE COALITION
18-36-10000
18-39-12000

REVENUES
GRANT
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

18 TOTAL REVENUES

18-400-12000
18-400-13000
18-400-23000
18-400-24000
18-400-31000
18-400-32000
18-400-61000
18-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
PERSONNEL COSTS
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
TRAVEL
SUPPLIES & MATERIALS
CONTRACT SERVICES
MARKETING & RECRUITMENT
MISCELLANEOUS
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

104,500
-

96,400
8,280

96,400
-

104,500
-

97,475
-

104,500
-

104,680
-

37,200
3,496
13,506
15,818
2,500
4,653
2,600
-

48,300
5,000
16,000
29,800
5,400
-

27,840
2,626
2,571
22,667
3,074
-

42,300
4,400
16,000
29,800
5,400
-

48,480
5,000
16,000
29,800
5,400
-

79,773
16,627 $

104,500
-

58,778
38,697

97,900
6,600

104,680
-

3,270
16,627
19,897

19,897
19,897

$
$

19,897
38,697
58,594

$
$

19,897
6,600
26,497

$
$

26,497 $
(8,280)
18,217 $

$
$

26,497
(8,280)
18,217

Page 110 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

EASTERN BLUFFDALE EDA
23-36-10000
23-36-12000
23-39-20000

REVENUES
INTEREST INCOME
PROPERTY TAXES
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

23 TOTAL REVENUES

23-400-31000
23-400-41200
23-400-41300
23-400-43000
23-400-43500
23-400-46000
23-400-46100
23-400-46500
23-400-57000
23-400-59500
23-400-60000
23-400-44500
23-400-87600
23-400-45500
23-400-XXXXX
23-400-XXXXX
23-900-10000
23-900-11000

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
FREEDOM POINT WAY EXT
HERITAGE CREST COLLECTOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMM GARDEN
INFRASTRUCTURE & INCENTIVES
14730 SOUTH
JVWCD PIPELINE PROP. @WESTGATE
14600 S STORM DRAIN EAST NOELL
SIGNAGE AND BRANDING
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
RISING STAR WAY INTERSECTION UPGRADES
14600 S RAILROAD CROSSING
BLUFFDALE BLVD CORRIDOR STUDY DETAILED
FUTURE BETTERMENTS ON 14600 SOUTH
UTA FRONTRUNNER STATION CONNECTION
GF ADMINISTRATION CHARGES
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
23 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance
Less: Restricted Low-Income Housing
Net Funds available for projects

1,697,047
9,462,927
-

900,000 $
10,400,000
21,712,000

1,141,991 $
1,581,764.00
-

1,141,991
1,581,764
21,712,000

900,000
4,300,000

11,159,974
-

33,012,000
-

2,723,755
-

24,435,755
-

5,200,000
-

4,370
1,751,162
273,700
5,400
801,376
29,202
247,126
680,000
-

200,000
530,000
200,000
2,700,000
120,000
2,000,000
500,000
650,000
4,500,000
100,000
500,000
30,000
20,000,000
150,000
832,000
-

4,370
523,816
631
412
2,646
111,700
3,062,890
25,009
15,251,039
398,947
-

200,000
530,000
50,000
120,000
2,000,000
500,000
650,000
4,100,000
100,000
500,000
30,000
20,000,000
150,000
398,947
-

50,000
150,000
4,600,000
400,000
-

3,792,336
7,367,639 $

33,012,000
-

19,381,460
(16,657,706) $

29,328,947
(4,893,193) $

5,200,000
-

32,306,209
7,367,639
39,673,847

39,673,847
39,673,847

39,673,847 $
(16,657,706)
23,016,142

39,673,847 $
(26,605,193)
13,068,655
(7,114,047)
5,954,608 $

13,068,655 $
(4,300,000)
8,768,655
(2,514,047)
6,254,608 $

32,892
829,157
-

65,000
1,050,000
-

13,068,655
(4,300,000)
8,768,655
(2,514,047)
6,254,608

GATEWAY RDA
24-36-10000
24-36-12000
24-39-10000

REVENUES
INTEREST INCOME
PROPERTY TAXES
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

24 TOTAL REVENUES

24-400-43000
24-400-44000
24-400-46000
24-900-10000
24-900-11000
24-900-20000

EXPENDITURES
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
REDWOOD ROAD MITIGATION
INFRASTRUCTURE & INCENTIVES
GF ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
CONTRIBUTION TO SID FUND
24 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

27,337
832,784
-

65,000
1,050,000
-

32,892
829,157
-

65,000
1,050,000
-

860,121
-

1,115,000
-

862,049
-

1,115,000
-

116,530
188,264
61,249
-

210,000
21,000
806,500
77,500
-

64,580
-

16,583
779,008
66,458
-

210,000
21,000
806,500
77,500
-

1,115,000
-

64,580
797,469

862,049
-

1,115,000
-

366,043
494,078 $

361,786
494,078
855,864

$
$

855,864
855,864

$
$

855,864
797,469
1,653,334

$
$

855,864
855,864

$
$

855,864
855,864

Page 111 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

JORDAN NARROWS EDA
25-36-10000
25-36-12000
25-39-12000

REVENUES
INTEREST INCOME
PROPERTY TAXES JORDAN NARROWS
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

25 TOTAL REVENUES

25-400-43000
25-400-46000
25-400-54000
25-400-29000
25-400-47500
25-400-XXXXX
25-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
INFRASTRUCTURE & INCENTIVES
DAY RANCH PARK &TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PLAT K PARKING LOT AND TRAIL
CINCH WAY PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
TRAILS CINCH WAY SOUTH, CANAL, DOG PARK, ETC
GF ADMINISTRATION CHARGES
25 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance
Less: Restricted Low-Income Housing
Net Funds available for projects

396,547
-

400,000
2,535,735

252,081
-

400,000
4,489,080

396,547
-

2,935,735
-

252,081
-

4,889,080
-

2,580,405
3,417
39,946
234,270
-

1,485,735
550,000
100,000
800,000
-

1,084
126,846
-

1,485,735
550,000
100,000
126,846
-

1,089,080
1,800,000
2,000,000
-

2,858,038
(2,461,491) $

2,935,735
-

127,930
124,151

2,262,581
(2,010,500) $

4,889,080
-

10,501,660 $
(2,461,491)
8,040,169

8,040,169 $
8,040,169

8,040,169 $
(2,010,500)
6,029,669
(1,485,775)
4,543,894 $

6,029,669 $
(4,489,080)
1,540,589
(1,485,775)
54,814

50,000
69,000
1,955,000

510,000
50,000
850,000

8,040,169 $
124,151
8,164,320
$

6,029,669
(4,489,080)
1,540,589
(1,485,775)
54,814

PARK IMPACT FEES
40-36-10000
40-36-20000
40-39-10000

REVENUES
IMPACT FEES - PARKS
INTEREST INCOME
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

40 TOTAL REVENUES

40-400-12000
40-400-18000
40-400-21500
40-400-25000
40-400-28000
40-400-29000
40-400-30000
40-400-31000
40-400-50000
40-400-64000

EXPENDITURES
PARK PURCHASES & IMPROVEMENTS
RODEO/ARENA IMPROVEMENTS
PARKS BUILDING ADDITION
DAY RANCH PARK
PARK MONUMENT SIGNS
PLAT K IMPROVEMENTS
MAIN PARK ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
UPDATE TO IFFP
PARKS REFUND
40 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Duplicated/Rollover Costs
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

97,500
101,846
-

123,000
50,000
2,176,000

26,000
57,764
-

510,000
50,000
850,000

199,346
-

2,349,000
-

83,764
-

2,074,000
-

1,410,000
-

1,025
40,390
101,680
-

35,000
500,000
1,500,000
10,000
15,000
100,000
160,000
17,000
12,000
-

205
422,846
63,489
1,155
5,018
4,644
-

35,000
500,000
1,500,000
10,000
17,000
12,000
-

50,000
500,000
500,000
15,000
180,000
160,000
5,000
-

143,095
56,251 $

2,349,000
$

497,356
(413,592) $

2,074,000
-

1,410,000
-

1,967,252

2,023,503 $

2,023,503

56,251
2,023,503

2,023,503 $

(413,592)
1,609,911 $

(1,955,000)
68,503 $

68,503 $
1,000,000
(850,000)
218,503 $

68,503
1,000,000
(850,000)
218,503

Page 112 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

PUBLIC SAFETY IMPACT FEES
41-36-10000
41-36-20000
41-39-10000

REVENUES
IMPACT FEES - PUBLIC SAFETY
INTEREST INCOME
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

41 TOTAL REVENUES

41-400-31000
41-400-39000
41-400-40500
41-400-41000
41-400-42000
41-400-50000
41-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
FIRE ENGINE
PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG (LAND)
DEBT SERVICE INTEREST
DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL
UPDATE TO IFFP
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
41 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

184,102
128,874
-

490,000
100,000
1,547,500

120,253
61,342
-

100,000
73,600
1,813,900

632,000
50,000
-

312,976
-

2,137,500
-

181,595
-

1,987,500
-

682,000
-

23,709
-

500
1,975,000
10,000
140,000
12,000
-

1,643,760
4,644
-

1,975,000
12,000
-

500
681,500

23,709
289,266 $

2,137,500
-

1,987,000
500

682,000
-

1,648,404
(1,466,809) $

682,000
-

2,890,588 $
2,890,588 $

2,890,588 $
(1,466,809)
1,423,779 $

2,890,588 $
(1,813,400)
1,077,188 $

1,077,188
681,500
1,758,688

426,165
3,811
-

500,000 $
50,000
802,000

1,377,000
50,000
-

2,601,322
289,266
2,890,588

1,324,872
329,575
32,609
-

1,077,188
681,500
1,758,688

ROADS & BRIDGES IMPACT FEES
42-36-10000
42-36-15000
42-36-20000
42-39-10000

REVENUES
IMPACT FEES - ROADS & BRIDGES
REIMBURSEMENTS
INTEREST INCOME
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

42 TOTAL REVENUES

42-400-50000
42-400-57500
42-400-58100
42-400-60000
42-400-61500
42-400-62000
42-400-80700
42-400-80750
42-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
UPDATE TO IFFP
1780 WEST CONNECTOR
14600 S 1690 W TO SPRINGVIEW
13900 S FROM 2700 TO 2950 WEST
IMPACT FEE - REFUNDS
THE RANCH REIMB.
TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
42 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Duplicated Rollover Costs
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

1,009,000
50,000
353,000

1,377,000
50,000
-

1,687,055
-

1,412,000
-

429,976
-

1,352,000
-

1,427,000
-

2,422,966
116,751
373,312
8,125
16,000
-

12,000
200,000
100,000
110,000
960,000
30,000
-

11,994
139,665
83,765
109,890
958,350
17,569
-

12,000
140,000
100,000
110,000
960,000
30,000
-

200,000
1,227,000

2,937,154
(1,250,099) $

1,412,000
$

1,321,234
(891,259) $

1,352,000
-

1,427,000
-

1,558,720

308,622

(1,250,099)
308,622 $

308,622 $

(891,259)
(582,637) $

(802,000)
(493,378) $

(493,378) $
1,227,000
733,622 $

(493,378)
1,227,000
733,622

Page 113 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

STORM DRAIN IMPACT FEES
44-36-10000
44-36-20000
44-39-10000

REVENUES
IMPACT FEES - STORM DRAIN
INTEREST INCOME
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

44 TOTAL REVENUES

44-400-42000
44-400-50000
44-400-55000
44-400-87800
44-400-57000
44-900-10000

EXPENDITURES
STORM DRAIN REFUND
REFUND INDEPENDENCE
UPDATE TO IFFP
14400 S RECONSTRUCTION & UTILITES
BLUFFDALE SOUTH SYSTEM
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
44 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

156,801
68,683
-

15,000
65,000
1,582,000

23,212
42,946
-

28,000
42,946
-

52,000
65,000
-

225,484
-

1,662,000
-

66,158
-

70,946
-

117,000
-

63,240
15,424
-

12,000
50,000
1,600,000
-

4,644
642
-

12,000
50,000
-

117,000

78,664
146,820 $

1,662,000
-

5,285
60,873

62,000
8,946

117,000
-

1,619,574 $
1,619,574 $

1,619,574
117,000
1,736,574

1,472,754
146,820
1,619,574

$
$

1,619,574 $
1,619,574 $

1,619,574 $
60,873
1,680,447 $

1,619,574
117,000
1,736,574

Page 114 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

CAPITAL PROJECTS
45-30-12000
45-33-90004
45-34-11333
45-34-12000
45-34-12200
45-34-49400
45-34-15000
45-34-51800
45-39-19500
45-38-11100
45-39-19000
45-39-31000
45-33-90005

REVENUES
SALE OF ASSETS
GRANTS
FIRST CLASS ROAD FUNDS
CORRIDOR PRESERVATION FUNDS
SALT LAKE COUNTY
SVSD-14400S RECONST.&UTILITIES
STATE OF UTAH TRANSPORTATION
THE POINT PROJECT REIMB.
BOND ISSUANCE/UDOT LOAN
INTEREST INCOME
CONTRIBUTION GENERAL FUND
TRANSFER FROM LBA
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

45 TOTAL REVENUES

45-404-31000
45-404-51800
45-404-59500
45-404-67300
45-404-67400
45-404-67500
45-404-78030
45-404-78300
45-404-79910
45-404-80000
45-404-80500
45-404-80600
45-404-80800
45-404-80900
45-404-85800
45-404-87600
45-404-87800
45-404-87850
45-404-87950
45-404-88200
45-404-88300
45-404-72000
45-404-72100
45-404-72400
45-404-80750
45-404-72500
45-404-47500
45-404-85200
45-404-85300
45-404-72700
45-404-72800
45-404-74500
45-404-74600
45-404-74800
45-404-65400
45-404-65500
45-404-65600
45-404-65700
45-404-65800
45-404-65900
45-404-66900
45-404-85100
45-404-XXXXX
45-404-XXXXX
45-404-XXXXX
45-404-XXXXX
45-404-XXXXX
45-900-90000

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
14600 S STORM DRAIN EAST NOELL
SIGNAGE AND BRANDING
PRB - NO PARKING SIGNS
MISC. TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES
13800 S & 3600 W ROUNDABOUT/TRAFFIC SIGNAL
RODEO ARENA
COMPUTER REPLACEMENTS
CAMERA SYSTEM/IT EQUIPMENT
STREET LIGHTING LED CONVERSION
ROSE CREEK TRAIL CONNECTOR
ROSE CREEK CORRIDOR STUDY
CITY-WIDE FIBER INSPECTIONS
ENGINEERING CONCRETE EQUIPMENT
ROAD MAINTENANCE
14600 S RAILROAD CROSSNG
14400 S RECONSTR & UTILITIES
14400S RECONST.&UTILITIES-SVSD
14600 S CORRIDOR STUDY-RR/I-15
ROADS: 14600S 1690W SPRINGVIEW
ROADS: SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RESURFACE VINTAGE PICKLEBALL
STREETS:3500 DUMP TRUCK
ROSE CREEK TRAIL-REDWOOD/2700W
ACTIVE TRANSP. MASTER PLAN
MIX STATION STORMW POND OUTFAL
CINCH WAY PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
COUNTRY CLASSIC STORM TIE-IN
ZONE 2 WEST ACCESS ROAD
FIRE TRUCK - TYPE 6
UPGRADE RADIOS - FD/ACOE
POLICE VEHICLES
PD EVIDENCE ROOM EXPANSION
POLICE DEPT REMODEL
PARKS: MAINT PICKUP TRUCK
PARKS:AERATOR MACHINE
PALLET RACKING FOR PARKS BLDG
STREETS:SNOW PLOW SALTER STAND
STREETS: HOOK TRUCK BINS
STREETS:ENCLOSED CONST TRAILER
STREETS: MATERIALS MAINT. SHOP
STREETS: SIGN POST INSTALLER
FIRE DEPT BC TRUCK
RODEO GROUNDS IRRIGATION TAILWATER
PARRY FARMS PARK RESTORATION
CRUMP HOLLOW TRAIL CONNECTION
FIRE STATION NO.93
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
45 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

1,134,596 $
24,720
500,000
2,147,455
141,616
4,011,872
442,301
1,600,000
600,000
-

2,800,000
50,000
500,000
12,000,000
5,075,000
30,000,000
200,000
4,390,619

10,602,561
-

$
2,802,960
1,730,263
12,000,000
3,507,648
332,045
-

1,600,000 $
2,802,960
1,730,263
12,000,000
4,475,000
30,000,000
200,000
-

1,400,000
15,400,000
500,000
600,000
200,000
50,390,000

55,015,619
-

22,966,242
-

55,401,549
-

68,490,000
-

120,000

68,610,000
-

45,000
339
2,127
3,082,017
32,645
5,544
3,011
7,433
23,355
17,000
27,868
7,525,732
997,776
5,389,780
3,064
95,725
21,627
120,401
30,030
13,254
-

45,000
5,075,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
600,000
50,000
20,000
259,619
10,000
1,500,000
40,000,000
500,000
500,000
50,000
11,000
60,000
400,000
3,200,000
2,000,000
4,000
175,000
200,000
55,000
36,000
16,000
20,000
10,000
15,000
10,000
4,000
-

37,500
4,471,984
9,750
20,956
304,714
11,994
6,342
639,097
1,420,441
368,054
7,987
10,655
15,501
92,739
1,187,768
3,703
110,084
54,537
34,500
3,662
19,782
10,850
12,141
10,682
-

45,000
4,475,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
600,000
50,000
20,000
259,619
10,000
1,500,000
7,000,000
441,700
9,600
50,000
11,000
60,000
50,000
100,000
1,187,768
4,000
175,000
55,000
36,000
16,000
20,000
10,000
15,000
10,000
4,000
-

45,000
600,000
250,000
20,000
20,000
500,000
50,000,000
500,000
600,000
3,200,000

45,000
600,000
250,000
50,000
20,000
500,000
50,000,000
500,000
600,000
3,200,000

270,000
200,000
60,000
25,000
200,000
12,000,000
-

30,000
90,000
-

17,443,727
(6,841,166) $

55,015,619
-

8,865,422
14,100,820

16,404,687
38,996,862

68,490,000
-

120,000
-

68,610,000
-

13,620,903

6,779,737 $

6,779,737

14,100,820
20,880,557

38,996,862
45,776,599 $
(5,000,000)
40,776,599 $

120,000

1,400,000
15,400,000
500,000
600,000
200,000
50,510,000

270,000
200,000
90,000
60,000
25,000
200,000
12,000,000
-

787
Beginning Fund Balance $
Duplicated Rollover Costs
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $
Restricted Fund Balance
Unrestricted Fund Balance

(6,841,166)
6,779,737 $

$
$

45,776,599 $
13,250,000
(50,390,000)
8,636,599 $
8,636,599

- $
(120,000)
(120,000) $
$

45,776,599
13,250,000
(50,510,000)
8,516,599
8,516,599

Page 115 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

WATER OPERATIONS FUND
51-37-10000
51-37-20000
51-37-21001
51-37-22000
51-37-24001
51-37-25001
51-37-31011
51-37-91030
51-37-91040
51-38-91010
51-38-91030
51-39-72300
51-39-31000
51-39-20000
51-39-22000

REVENUES
CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL
CONNECTION FEES
WATER SALES
SECONDARY WATER SALES
HYDRANT METER RENTAL/WATER USE
WATER SHARE ASSESSMENTS
RE-CONNECT CHRG ON WATER
MISCELLANEOUS
DEVELOPERS CONTRI BUTION NOP
INTEREST INCOME
WATER GRANT
SALE OF ASSETS
TRANSFER FROM LBA
WATER TANK BOND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

51 TOTAL REVENUES

51-511-11000
51-511-13000
51-511-21000
51-511-23000
51-511-23200
51-511-24000
51-511-25000
51-511-26100
51-511-27000
51-511-27100
51-511-28000
51-511-31000
51-511-44000
51-511-45400
51-511-48500
51-511-48600
51-511-54830
51-511-61000
51-511-62000
51-511-71000
51-511-74000
51-511-74650
51-511-74800
51-511-86000
51-511-87100
51-511-87200
51-511-87800
51-900-91100
51-511-80000
51-511-XXXXX
51-511-XXXXX
51-511-XXXXX
51-511-XXXXX
51-511-XXXXX
51-900-92000

EXPENSES
SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
BUILDING & GROUNDS MAINT.
SHOP CHARGES
UTILITIES
TELEPHONE
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
WATER RIGHTS
WATER PURCHASED
DEBT SERVICE
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
DEPRECIATION
MISCELLANEOUS
IRRIGATION WATER ASSESSMENT
SHALLOW WATER/TEST WELLS
EQUIPMENT
WATER DEFICIENCIES PROJECT
GIS MAPS MAINTENANCE
ZONE 2 WEST STORAG &PUMP STATN
WATER MODELING
PI-SEWER EFFLUENT WATER REUSE
14400 S RECONSTR & UTILITIES
NON-OPERATING FUNDS TRANSFER
3200 W WATER & PI IMPROVEMENTS
ROCK HOLLOW FIRE HYDRANT TIE-OVER
SECONDARY METER INSTALL 3200 W
METERING OF SECONDARY WATER SOURCES
LEASE PAYMENT TO LBA
LOAN PAYMENT ON TANK
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
51 TOTAL EXPENSES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Avail. Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Avail. Fund Balance $

1,049,479.0 $
45,780
7,826,622
125,165
160,681
39,486
6,380
111,322
251,011
848,439
4,600,000
-

164,000
7,832,000
95,000
65,000
35,000
3,000
50,000
50,000
400,000
40,000
3,946,000

23,620
6,453,780
91,174
88,117
38,379
9,000
133,562
265,884
-

15,064,366
-

12,680,000
-

7,103,515
-

9,003,700
-

20,888,000
-

1,838,647
595,356
6,203
8,557
6,577
44,291
16,534
56,311
13,536
8,367
14,523
162,023
2,196,608
116,365
387,752
1,893,000
21,201
90,564
47,861
782,146
-

1,758,000
787,000
4,500
22,000
13,000
60,000
4,500
65,000
45,000
65,000
10,000
55,000
1,450,000
1,811,000
600,000
480,000
8,000
100,000
50,000
117,000
260,000
80,000
3,000,000
35,000
50,000
500,000
1,250,000
-

1,434,507
627,038
3,207
14,651
3,151
52,724
1,573
52,824
47,230
26,206
8,031
32,401
5,909
1,637,046
656,587
327,724
27,354
82,390
85,838
37,303
24,091
404
22,087
642
41,555
-

1,721,400
752,400
3,800
17,600
3,800
63,300
1,900
63,400
56,700
31,400
9,600
38,900
1,450,000
1,964,000
788,000
393,300
32,800
98,900
103,000
44,800
28,900
35,000
50,000
800
1,250,000
-

1,855,000
795,000
5,000
15,000
7,500
60,000
5,000
50,000
55,000
50,000
10,000
55,000
300,000
2,052,000
600,000
480,000
20,000
100,000
50,000
140,000
260,000
50,000
5,000,000
35,000
2,000,000
450,000
90,000
100,000
50,000
642,875
5,505,625

8,306,421
6,757,945

12,680,000
- $

5,252,473
1,851,042

9,003,700
-

20,888,000
-

(3,767,755) $
6,757,945
2,990,190 $

2,990,190 $
2,990,190 $

2,990,190 $
1,851,042
4,841,232 $

2,990,190 $
(479,100)
2,511,090 $

2,511,090
5,505,625
8,016,715

28,300
7,745,000
109,400
105,700
46,100
10,800
160,300
319,000
479,100

146,000
8,094,000
95,000
65,000
35,000
3,000
50,000
400,000
12,000,000
-

$
$

146,000
8,094,000
95,000
65,000
35,000
3,000
50,000
400,000
12,000,000
-

2,511,090
5,505,625
8,016,715

Page 116 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

WATER IMPACT FEES
52-36-10000
52-36-20000
52-36-XXXXX
52-39-10000

REVENUES
IMPACT FEES - WATER
INTEREST INCOME
BOND
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

52 TOTAL REVENUES

52-400-31000
52-400-42000
52-400-44000
52-400-50000
52-400-55000
52-400-61000
52-400-61500
52-400-86000
52-400-XXXXX
52-901-12000

341,556
78,880
-

505,000
50,000
2,052,000

175,928
60,528
-

100,000
50,000
422,900

548,000
50,000
2,000,000
-

420,436
-

2,607,000
-

236,456
-

572,900
-

2,598,000
-

359,966
-

200,000
12,000
35,000
360,000
2,000,000
-

2,750
4,644
721
-

200,000
12,000
360,000
900
-

200,000
2,000,000
398,000

2,607,000
-

8,115
228,341

572,900
-

2,598,000
-

359,966
60,470

2,598,000
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

1,207,322
60,470
1,267,792

1,267,792 $
228,341
1,496,132 $

1,267,792 $
(422,900)
844,892 $

844,892
398,000
1,242,892

411,700
17,862,692
382,101
-

353,910
64,982
32,000
-

424,700 $
30,000
32,000
-

1,713,000
50,000
-

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
WATER REFUND
WELL & WATER SHARES
BOND ISSUE COSTS
UPDATE TO IFFP
WATER MASTER PLANNING & MODEL
IMPACT FEE - REFUNDS
ZONE 2 WEST STORAG &PUMP STATN
15000 S DRINKING WATER PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
52 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

1,267,792 $
1,267,792 $

844,892
398,000
1,242,892

LOCAL BUILDING AUTHORITY
31-36-11000
31-36-10000
31-36-20000
31-36-12000
31-36-61000
31-39-10000

REVENUES
LEASE PAYMENTS
BOND PROCEEDS
INTEREST INCOME
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG DOWN PAYMENT
MISC. REVENUE
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

31 TOTAL REVENUES

31-400-31000
31-400-40000
31-400-40100
31-400-42000
31-400-51000
31-400-52000
31-900-20000
31-901-10000
31-901-12000

EXPENDITURES
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
DEBT SERVICE INTEREST
DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL
PUBLIC WORKS BLDG
INSURANCE - GEN LIAB &PROPERTY
COST OF ISSUANCE
TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECTS
TRANSFER TO WATER FUND
INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE
31 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

Beginning Fund Balance $
Duplicated Rollover Costs
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

424,700
30,000
1,000,000
2,755,000

1,713,000
50,000
-

18,656,492
-

4,209,700
-

450,892
-

486,700
-

1,763,000
-

619,132
175,000
9,545,636
13,788
243,159
600,000
4,600,000
-

2,000
1,007,700
670,000
2,500,000
30,000
-

1,007,688
670,000
994,638
31,979
-

2,000
1,007,700
670,000
994,638
31,979
-

2,000
976,000
700,000
35,000
50,000

15,796,715
2,859,777

4,209,700
-

2,706,317
(2,219,617) $

1,763,000
-

2,704,305
(2,253,412) $

1,763,000
-

(263,322) $

2,596,455 $

2,596,455

376,838

2,859,777
2,596,455

2,596,455

(2,253,412)
343,042 $

(2,219,617)
376,838 $

50,000
426,838

Page 117 of 211

ACCOUNT
NUMBER

ACCOUNT
TITLE

06/30/2025
PRIOR YR ACTUAL

06/30/2026
CURRENT YR BUDGET

04/30/2026
ACTUAL TO DATE

06/30/2026
PROJECTION

BUDGET FY2027
Previous
Change

BUDGET FY2027
PROPOSED

FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION FUND
60-36-10000
60-36-12000
60-36-14000
60-36-13000
60-36-30000
60-36-61000
60-39-11000
60-39-12000
60-39-10000

REVENUES
GRANTS
WILDLAND FIRE FEES
PUBLIC SAFETY FEE
AMBULANCE CHARGES
INTEREST INCOME
MISC. REVENUE
GF TRANSFER - PROPERTY TAXES
GENERAL FUND TRANSFER - OTHER
REAPPROPRIATE FUND BALANCE

60 TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS

6,614,358
$

60 TOTAL EXPENDITURES
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)

3,500
265,405
555,943
312,458
59,367
70,500
2,412,186
2,935,000
-

Beginning Fund Balance $
Add'l Reserves/(Appropriation of Fund Balance)
Ending Fund Balance $

2,807,824
3,386,654

6,194,478
419,880

(55,722) $
419,880
364,158 $

22,500
200,000
750,000
200,000
6,000
2,446,566
3,729,834
-

8,485
366,013
559,134
211,379
2,065
2,998,813
1,956,517
-

22,500
366,013
671,000
200,000
6,000
2,065
2,998,813
3,177,587
-

22,500
300,000
1,270,000
200,000
6,000
3,400,000
2,861,600
-

7,354,900
-

6,102,406
-

7,443,978
-

8,060,100
-

3,447,900 $
3,907,000

3,012,297 $
3,840,935

3,698,304 $
3,907,000

3,628,100
4,432,000

7,354,900
- $

6,853,233
(750,827) $

7,605,304
(161,326) $

8,060,100
-

364,158
364,158

364,158 $
(750,827)
(386,669) $

364,158 $
(161,326)
202,832 $

202,832
202,832

185,000
-

185,000

185,000
-

8,245,100
$

185,000
$

22,500
300,000
1,455,000
200,000
6,000
3,400,000
2,861,600
-

$
-

3,813,100
4,432,000

8,245,100
-

202,832
202,832

FIRE DEPARTMENT
60-422-11000
60-422-12000
60-422-13000
60-422-21000
60-422-23000
60-422-24000
60-422-25000
60-422-26000
60-422-27000
60-422-28000
60-422-30000
60-422-31000
60-422-32000
60-422-33000
60-422-34000
60-422-35000
60-422-48100
60-422-61000
60-422-74000

SALARIES AND WAGES
PART TIME SALARIES AND WAGES
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
BOOKS, SUB., & MEMBERSHIPS
EDUCATION, TRAINING & TRAVEL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
UNIFORMS
SHOP CHARGES
TELEPHONE
VECC
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
CERT
EMERGENCY PREPARATION
WILDLAND FIRE SERVICES
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
HEALTH AND SAFETY
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT

542,693
1,300,034
401,494
1,226
7,827
3,100
63,600
20,866
61,001
17,478
13,422
84,056
4,058
12,569
201,389
5,258
34,884
3,125
29,742

822,900
1,380,100
575,000
2,600
12,000
4,000
72,000
45,000
90,000
24,000
36,000
70,000
5,000
13,800
180,000
22,500
30,000
3,000
60,000

732,067
1,090,550
473,519
2,275
8,038
3,497
66,776
29,941
68,459
12,844
53,391
46,513
760
6,880
357,913
5,151
25,273
2,811
25,637

878,000
1,380,100
575,000
2,600
12,000
4,000
72,000
45,000
90,000
24,000
53,391
70,000
5,000
13,800
357,913
22,500
30,000
3,000
60,000

883,000
1,453,000
592,000
2,600
10,000
4,000
65,000
35,000
60,000
20,000
40,000
70,000
5,000
8,000
270,000
17,500
40,000
3,000
50,000

122,000
63,000
-

1,005,000
1,453,000
655,000
2,600
10,000
4,000
65,000
35,000
60,000
20,000
40,000
70,000
5,000
8,000
270,000
17,500
40,000
3,000
50,000

60-422-_____
10-420-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

2,807,824
-

3,447,900
-

3,012,297
-

3,698,304
-

3,628,100
-

185,000

3,813,100
-

LAW ENFORCEMENT
60-423-24000
60-423-25000
60-423-27000
60-423-28000
60-423-29000
60-423-31000
60-423-31400
60-423-74000

OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE
SHOP CHARGES
TECHNOLOGY
D.A.R.E. PROGRAM
PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT

9,046
9,456
142,017
7,600
4,000
7,788
2,929,866
276,882

15,000
10,000
150,000
8,000
4,000
3,460,000
260,000

6,306
5,362
92,803
162
3,456,056
280,246

15,000
10,000
150,000
8,000
4,000
3,460,000
260,000

15,000
10,000
150,000
8,000
4,000
3,980,000
265,000

60-423-_____

TOTAL EXPENDITURES

3,386,654
-

3,907,000
-

3,840,935
-

3,907,000
-

4,432,000
-

Page 118 of 211

Memo
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:

Mayor and City Council
Stephanie Thayer, Administrative Services Director
May 20, 2026
Internal Control Risk Assessment

This memorandum is to provide an overview of the Internal Control Risk Assessment for the
2026 fiscal year. For background, the Office of the State Auditor developed a form with a fivelevel assessment score that is intended to communicate the entity’s risk of undetected fraud,
abuse, or noncompliance. The levels are based upon points assigned to each of the
recommended measures. Since some measures are more effective than others, the most
effective measures are assigned the most points. As more measures are adopted the score
improves. The higher the score, the lower the risk.
This Fraud Risk Assessment form is completed by City Staff and presented to the City Council
annually. Internal controls and separation of duties are key parts of the assessment. Our score
remained the same as last year with a self-assessed score of 365 out of 395 total; the City
continues to be at a very low risk level measured on this scale.

Page 119 of 211

Fraud Risk Assessment
Continued
*Total Points Earned: ____/395
*Risk Level: Very Low
365
> 355

Low
316-355

Moderate
276-315

High
200-275

Very High
< 200

Yes
1. Does the entity have adequate basic separation of duties or mitigating controls as
outlined in the attached Basic Separation of Duties Questionnaire?
2. Does the entity have governing body adopted written policies in the following areas:

Pts
200

a. Conflict of interest?

b. Procurement?

c. Ethical behavior?

d. Reporting fraud and abuse?
e. Travel?

f. Credit/Purchasing cards (where applicable)?

5
5

g. Personal use of entity assets?

h. IT and computer security?

i. Cash receipting and deposits?

3. Does the entity have a licensed or certified (CPA, CGFM, CMA, CIA, CFE, CGAP,
CPFO) expert as part of its management team?
a. Do any members of the management team have at least a bachelor's degree in
accounting?
4. Are employees and elected officials required to annually commit in writing to abide by a
statement of ethical behavior?
5. Have all governing body members completed entity specific (District Board Member
Training for local/special service districts & interlocal entities, Introductory Training for
Municipal Officials for cities & towns, etc.) online training (training.auditor.utah.gov)
within four years of term appointment/election date?
6. Regardless of license or formal education, does at least one member of the
management team receive at least 40 hours of formal training related to accounting,
budgeting, or other financial areas each year?
7. Does the entity have or promote a fraud hotline?

X
20

X
X

8. Does the entity have a formal internal audit function?
9. Does the entity have a formal audit committee?

20
20

Bluffdale City
*Entity Name: _________________________________________________________________
5/18/2026
6/30/2026
*Completed for Fiscal Year Ending: ________________
*Completion Date: ________________
Stephanie Thayer
*CAO Name: __________________________
*CFO Name: ____________________________
Bruce K artchner

*CAO Signature: _______________________ *CFO Signature: _________________________
*Required

Utah State Capitol Complex, East Office Building, Suite E310 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2310 • Tel: (801) 538-1025 • auditor.utah.gov

Page 120 of 211

Basic Separation of Duties
See the following page for instructions and definitions.
Yes
1. Does the entity have a board chair, clerk, and treasurer who are three
separate people?

2. Are all the people who are able to receive cash or check payments different
from all of the people who are able to make general ledger entries?

3. Are all the people who are able to collect cash or check payments different
from all the people who are able to adjust customer accounts? If no customer
accounts, check “N/A”.

4. Are all the people who have access to blank checks different from those who
are authorized signers?

5. Does someone other than the clerk and treasurer reconcile all bank accounts
OR are original bank statements reviewed by a person other than the clerk to
detect unauthorized disbursements?

6. Does someone other than the clerk review periodic reports of all general
ledger accounts to identify unauthorized payments recorded in those
accounts?

7. Are original credit/purchase card statements received directly from the card
company by someone other than the card holder? If no credit/purchase cards,
check “N/A”.

8. Does someone other than the credit/purchase card holder ensure that all card
purchases are supported with receipts or other supporting documentation? If
no credit/purchase cards, check “N/A”.

9. Does someone who is not a subordinate of the credit/purchase card holder
review all card purchases for appropriateness (including the chief
administrative officer and board members if they have a card)? If no
credit/purchase cards, check “N/A”.

10. Does the person who authorizes payment for goods or services, who is not
the clerk, verify the receipt of goods or services?

11. Does someone authorize payroll payments who is separate from the person
who prepares payroll payments? If no W-2 employees, check “N/A”.

12. Does someone review all payroll payments who is separate from the person
who prepares payroll payments? If no W-2 employees, check “N/A”.

MC*

N/A

* MC = Mitigating Control

Utah State Capitol Complex, East Office Building, Suite E310 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2310 • Tel: (801) 538-1025 • auditor.utah.gov

Page 121 of 211

Memo
Date: May 21, 2026
From: Dan Tracer, Assistant City Engineer
To:

Mayor Natalie Hall
Bruce Kartchner, City Manager
City Council

CC:
RE:

Adoption of New Impact Fee Facility Plan

Utah Law 11-36a - Impact Fees Act, allows municipalities to assess an impact fee on new
development to cover the cost of new infrastructure needed by them. To do this, the city must
adopt an Impact Fee Facilities Plans that identifies the improvements needed to serve new
development. The costs of these facilities are added up and divided by the projected growth over
the next 10 years resulting in the Impact Fee to be charged to each development.
Existing deficiencies cannot be funded using impact fees and only projects that will be built within
the next 10 years can be included in the calculations.
The City of Bluffdale regularly updates our Impact Fee Facility Plan with the emergence of new
projects or substantial developments. The last major revision was in early 2024. Since then, we
have completed several projects, identified the need for new projects, and revised the growth
projections based on current trends.
One major change with this revision is the removal of the Storm Water Impact Fee. We have
completed most of the projects previously funded by Impact Fees. There is a regional pond needed
near Redwood Rd and Porter Rockwell Blvd, but that is expected to happen outside of the 10 year
window for fee calculations.
All other Impact Fees have increased with this update. The level of service for each category has not
change, but the projected amount of new growth to pay for those projects has decreased.
We recommend that the Impact Fees be adopted as presented.

Dan Tracer, P.E. – Assistant City Engineer
City of Bluffdale
Att: Impact Fee Facility Plan
Impact Fee Facility Plan Presentation
1 of 1

Page 122 of 211

Impact Fee Analysis

Water, Parks,
Public Safety, &
Transportation
May 2026

Page 123 of 211

“Impact fee” means a payment of money
imposed upon new development activity as a
condition of development approval to mitigate
the impact of the new development on public
infrastructure.
11-36a-102(8)(a)

Impact Fee
Purpose

• Fee is only charged to new growth to pay for
projects needed by growth.
• Existing deficiencies and maintenance cannot
be funded with Impact Fees.
• The level of service for each category remains
constant. Impact fees cannot be charged to
increase the level of service currently
provided.

Page 124 of 211

Impact Fees can be charged to the following:

Impact Fees

• New Home
• New connection to City infrastructure
• Not a remodel
• Proposed charging for detached ADUs as
multi-family units.
Bluffdale reviews and updates impact fees
every few years and does minor revisions
more often as needed.

Page 125 of 211

Demand (Growth)

Level of Service

Impact Fee
Methodology

Excess Capacity

New Facilities

Funding

Impact Fee

Page 126 of 211

➢Staff/Consultants Reviewed Land Use
➢What will develop in the next 10 years?

Demand
Analysis

ERCs
Residential
Commercial
Total

2025

10 Year
2035 Growth

5,936 7,106
252
415
6,188 7,521

➢Add 19,273 new daily trips for
transportation
➢Assumes current zoning

1,170
163
1,333

Page 127 of 211

Level of
Service

Parks
Investment ($) / Residential ERU
$9,900

Page 128 of 211

Level of
Service

Public Safety
Square Feet of Building Space / ERU
4.61 SF
Commercial – Equipment ($) /
Commercial ERU
$3,621

Page 129 of 211

Level of
Service

Transportation
Service Level C
High-density flow in which speed and freedom to
maneuver are severely restricted and comfort and
convenience have declined even though flow
remains stable.

Page 130 of 211

Level of
Service

Storm Water Fee Eliminated
- Most of the projects that qualify for impact fee
funding have either already been funded with
impact fees or the City plans to use other sources;
and
- Most properties retain their own water.

Page 131 of 211

Culinary and Pressurized Water

Level of
Service

Page 132 of 211

Existing
Capacity
Parks & Public Safety
No Excess Capacity in these
facilities

Page 133 of 211

Existing
Capacity

Water
$5.1m of Excess Capacity

Equity Buy In
Zone 1W Tank (15000 S.)
Zone 1W Transmission
Debt Cost of 2020B Water Revenue Bonds
Zone 2 West Storage Property Acquisition
Impact Fee Fund Balance
Total

Remaining
$2,939,559
2,467,032
725,112
384,230
(1,368,809)
$5,147,124

Page 134 of 211

Existing
Capacity

Transportation
$1.8m of Excess Capacity

Equity Buy In
Loumis Parkway
2700 West, 14400 South to Bangerter Hwy
14400 South, 2200 West to Redwood Rd YTD
14600 South, 1690 West to Redwood Rd
1780 West (behind Maverik) and Redwood
Connection
13900 S Connection - 2700 West to 2950 West
Total

Remaining

148,875
42,771
284,388

595,435
749,863
$ 1,821,332

Page 135 of 211

New Facilities
Parks

$81.8m of potential New
Parks/Trails

Page 136 of 211

New Facilities
Public Safety

Facilities

Equipment

New 18,000 SF Facility

$590k Fire Truck within the next
several years

$12m within 10 years

Remodel basement of City Hall
for Police (4,000 sq ft)
$1m within 10 years

Page 137 of 211

New Roads
Future Facilities

New Facilities
Transportation

14600 South, Redwood Road to Spring View
Pkwy
14600 South, Spring View Pkwy to Noelle Nelson
Dr - Bridge and Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, Noell Nelson Dr to 800 West Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, 800 West to I-15
Extension of Bringhurst Blvd to the South (Major
Collector) - 700 feet
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan Narrows Rd
Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West to 2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South to 13800 South
Transportation Master Plan
Master Plan Update for Active Transportation
and Transportation
Intersection: Porter Rockwell Boulevard &
Rising Star Lane
Intersection: SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Road
Intersection: 14600 S & 1690 W
Total

Inflated Cost

10 Year
Growth

Other
Sources

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost

$22,021,418

15%

$3,303,213

65,991,253

2,992,966

269,366.95

24,333,058

1,824,979

15%

273,746.90

7,543,248
3,284,963
2,068,310
4,379,950
60,833

15%
0%
0%
0%
100%

1,131,487.20
60,832.65

182,498

100%

182,497.94

488,121

2,068,310
486,661
$137,726,569

76%
82%

486,661
$91,299,094

1,581,649
399,062
$7,201,855

Page 138 of 211

Tanks, Transmission, Ponds, Source

New Facilities
Water

Future Facilities

Zone 2 West Storage
14600 S Waterline
Upsize
Zone 3W Booster
Pump Station
15000 South PS
Modifications
Interest/Issuance
Costs for Bonds
Total

Remaining
Cost (after
other
Sources)

Deficiency

New
Growth

10,026,432

60.0%

40.0%

6,015,859

4,010,573

1,265,319

44.0%

56.0%

556,740

708,579

2,704,000

0.0%

100.0%

2,704,000

324,480

0.0%

100.0%

324,480

3,912,550

100.0%

$18,232,781

Deficiency

New Growth

3,912,550
$6,572,600

$11,660,181

Page 139 of 211

Single Family Residential

Impact Fee

Proposed
2026

Change
%

Impact Fee

2023

Parks

$7,597

$9,900

$2,303

30%

Public Safety

$2,039

$2,724

$685

34%

Transportation

$3,822

$4,256

$434

11%

Water

$4,184

$11,500

$7,316

175%

$578

($578)

(100%)

Total Single Family

$18,220

$28,381

$10,161

56%

Total Multi-Family
(75% of SF)

$13,665

$21,286

$7,621

56%

Storm Drain

Change

Page 140 of 211

Retail Example
Impact Fee

Impact Fee

2023

Proposed
Change
2026

Change

Public Safety
(per 9,000 sq ft)

$4,558

$6,345

$1,787

39%

Transportation
(per 1,000 sq ft)

$10,964

$15,295

$4,331

40%

Water
(3/4 inch meter)

$4,184

$11,500

$7,316

175%

$578

($578)

(100%)

$33,141 $12,857

63%

Storm Drain
Total Retail (1 ERU)

$20,284

Page 141 of 211

Single Family - Comparison
14,000

12,000

10,000

8,000

Comparables
Water

6,000

4,000

2,000

Water

Proposed 2026

Current

Herriman

Lehi

Riverton

Draper

South Jordan

Sandy

Eagle Mountain

American Fork

Saratoga Springs

Page 142 of 211

Single Family - Comparison
12,000

10,000

8,000

Comparables
Parks

6,000

4,000

2,000

Parks

Proposed 2026

Current

Herriman

Lehi

Riverton

Draper

South Jordan

Sandy

Eagle Mountain

American Fork

Saratoga Springs

Page 143 of 211

Single Family - Comparison
6,000

5,000

4,000

Comparables
Transportation

3,000

2,000

1,000

Transportation

Proposed 2026

Current

Herriman

Lehi

Riverton

Draper

South Jordan

Sandy

Eagle Mountain

American Fork

Saratoga Springs

Page 144 of 211

Single Family – Comparison
3,000

2,500

2,000

Comparables
Public Safety

1,500

1,000

500

Public Safety

Proposed 2026

Current

Herriman

Lehi

Riverton

Draper

South Jordan

Sandy

Eagle Mountain

American Fork

Saratoga Springs

Page 145 of 211

Comparables
Bluffdale
Proposed
2026
Current Herriman

Single Family (.25 acre lot; 3/4" connection)
South
Eagle
Riverton
Draper
Jordan
Sandy
Mountain

Lehi

American
Fork

Saratoga
Springs

Water

11,500

4,184

6,932

6,803

7,732

2,097

3,108

5,105

2,445

5,442

9,429

Parks

9,900

7,597

3,551

2,773

4,234

4,162

5,420

6,988

3,690

3,856

5,627

Transportation

4,256

3,822

3,849

1,163

2,653

1,152

1,806

4,853

3,548

1,016

Public Safety

2,724

2,039

733

296

355

173

567

481

756

467

Total

28,381 17,642

15,064

11,036

14,974

7,584

10,901

12,574

11,030

13,602

16,539

Page 146 of 211

Set Public Hearing
Notice Public Hearing
(10 days prior)
Make IFFP/IFA Available
to Public (10 days prior)

Next Steps

Utah Public Notice & City Websites
City Office

City Office
City Website

Public Library (If available)

Hold Public Hearing

Consider Ordinance for Adoption

New Impact Fees in Effect (90 Days)

Page 147 of 211

Impact Fee Facility Plan
Impact Fee Analysis
Parks & Recreation
Public Safety
Transportation
Water

May 2026
Prepared by
The City of Bluffdale
EFG Consulting LLC
METHODS Consulting

Page 148 of 211

TABLE OF CONTENTS
____________________________________________________________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................ii
List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... iii
1 Certification ....................................................................................................................................1
Impact Fee Facility Plan Certification............................................................................................... 1
Impact Fee Analysis Certification ..................................................................................................... 1
Caveats ............................................................................................................................................. 2
2 Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................3
Service Area ..................................................................................................................................... 3
Demand Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 3
Level of Service ................................................................................................................................ 3
Excess Capacity to Meet Demand at LOS ........................................................................................ 4
Future Facilities Analysis .................................................................................................................. 5
Funding of Future Facilities .............................................................................................................. 6
Maximum Allowable Impact Fees .................................................................................................... 6
Staff Recommendation .................................................................................................................... 6
3 Demand Analysis ............................................................................................................................8
4 Parks & Recreation IFFP & IFA .........................................................................................................9
Service Area & Demand ................................................................................................................... 9
Current Level of Service ................................................................................................................... 9
Excess Capacity, Future Facilities, & funding Plan ........................................................................... 9
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee & Staff Recommendation.......................................................... 10
5 Public Safety IFFP & IFA ................................................................................................................. 11
Service Area & Demand ................................................................................................................. 11
Current Level of Service ................................................................................................................. 11
Excess Capacity, Future Facilities, & funding Plan ......................................................................... 12
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee & Staff Recommendation.......................................................... 12
6 Transportation IFFP & IFA.............................................................................................................. 13
Service Area & Demand ................................................................................................................. 13
Current Level of Service ................................................................................................................. 14
Excess Capacity .............................................................................................................................. 17
Future Facilities & Funding Plan .................................................................................................... 18
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee & Staff Recommendation.......................................................... 22
7 Water IFFP & IFA ........................................................................................................................... 24
Service Area & Demand ................................................................................................................. 24
Current Level of Service ................................................................................................................. 24
Excess Capacity, Future Facilities, & funding Plan ......................................................................... 25
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee & Staff Recommendation.......................................................... 26
8 Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 13
A: Parks & Recreation Value .......................................................................................................... 13
B: Transportation Impact Fee Calculations .................................................................................... 14
C: Other Impact Fee Calculations................................................................................................... 17

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 149 of 211

1
CERTIFICATION
IMPACT FEE FACILITY PLAN CERTIFICATION
Bluffdale City (City) and EFG Consulting (EFG) certify that the attached impact fee facilities plan:
1. includes only the costs of public facilities that are:
a. allowed under the Impact Fees Act; and
b. actually incurred; or
c. projected to be incurred or encumbered within six years after the day on which each
impact fee is paid;
2. does not include:
a. costs of operation and maintenance of public facilities;
b. costs for qualifying public facilities that will raise the level of service for the facilities,
through impact fees, above the level of service that is supported by existing residents; or
c. an expense for overhead, unless the expense is calculated pursuant to a methodology
that is consistent with generally accepted cost accounting practices and the
methodological standards set forth by the federal Office of Management and Budget for
federal grant reimbursement; and,
3. complies in each and every relevant respect with the Impact Fees Act.
IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS CERTIFICATION
City and EFG certify that the attached impact fee analysis:
1. includes only the costs of public facilities that are:
a. allowed under the Impact Fees Act; and
b. actually incurred; or
c. projected to be incurred or encumbered within six years after the day on which each
impact fee is paid;
2. does not include:
a. costs of operation and maintenance of public facilities;
b. costs for qualifying public facilities that will raise the level of service for the facilities,
through impact fees, above the level of service that is supported by existing residents;
c. an expense for overhead, unless the expense is calculated pursuant to a methodology
that is consistent with generally accepted cost accounting practices and the
methodological standards set forth by the federal Office of Management and Budget for
federal grant reimbursement;
3. offsets costs with grants or other alternate sources of payment; and,
4. complies in each and every relevant respect with the Impact Fees Act.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 150 of 211

CAVEATS
EFG joins in these certifications with the following caveats:
1. all of the recommendations for implementations of the IFFP made in the IFFP documents or in the
IFA documents are followed by the City staff and elected officials.
2. if all or a substantial portion of the IFFP or IFA are modified or amended by the City, this
certification is no longer valid.
3. all information provided to our team is assumed to be correct, complete, and accurate. This
includes information provided by the City as well as outside sources.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 151 of 211

2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this IFFP and IFA is to fulfill the requirements of Utah Code Title 11 Chapter 36a (Impact
Fee Act) to enable the City to enact impact fees within the City for the following utilities: Parks &
Recreation, Public Safety, Transportation, and Water. The City previously charged a Storm Drain impact
fee. However, it has been removed in this impact fee update because most of the projects that qualify
for impact fee funding have either already been funded with impact fees or the City plans to use other
sources. Also, most properties retain their own water with minimal impact on the system. The following
is a summary of the IFFP inputs. The IFFP and IFA will identify the maximum allowable impact fee. The
City Council may choose to adopt a fee lower than the maximum but not higher.
SERVICE AREA
The Service Area for each of the four impact fees is the entire City.
DEMAND ANALYSIS
The City estimated demand over the next ten years by identifying the areas which are most likely to
develop. Unit counts were assigned to each area based upon current and anticipated land use. Units
were then converted to Equivalent Residential Units or Connections (ERU or ERC). One ERU is one single
family home. Apartments, townhomes, and detached ADUs are considered multi-family homes and
would be equivalent to 0.75 ERUs. Commercial ERU’s are defined as 9,000 square feet. Currently the City
has 6,188 ERCs and is projected to add 1,333 ERCs/ERUs in the next ten years. Of that number, 1,170 are
projected to be residential units and 163 are projected to be non-residential. In addition, this growth
pattern is projected to add 19,273 new daily traffic trips.
For more detailed methodology see Section 3: Demand Analysis.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The Impact Fee Act (Act) requires that the City identify the current level of service (LOS) for each utility.
The following is a summary of the LOS for each utility. Greater detail can be found Sections 4-8.
▪
▪

▪
▪

Parks & Recreation: Investment ($) / Residential ERU: $9,900
Public Safety:
o Facility (Residential and Commercial): Square Feet of Building Space / ERU: 4.61 SF
o Equipment (Commercial): Equipment ($) / Commercial ERU: $3,621
Transportation: Service Level C and above for roads
Water

Category
Source
2026 IFFP & IFA

Requirement
Peak Day Demand
Average Annual Demand

Value
1,810 gpd/ERC (1.257 gpm/ERC)
658 gpd/ERC (0.738 ac-ft/ERC)
3

Page 152 of 211

Category

Requirement
Equalization Storage
Storage
Fire Suppression Storage
Peak Instantaneous Demand
Minimum Fire Flow
Maximum Pressure (City Preference)
Distribution Maximum Pressure Fluctuation (City Preference)
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Day
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Instantaneous
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Day + Fire Flow

Value
716 gal/ERC
0.96 MG
3,726 gpd/ERC (2.59 gpm/ERC)
1,500 gpm
130 psi
30 psi
40 psi
30 psi
20 psi

Table 1. Water LOS

EXCESS CAPACITY TO MEET DEMAND AT LOS
There is currently no excess capacity in Parks & Recreation and Public Safety. Parks & Recreation and
Public Safety are both currently at the LOS.
Water has excess capacity in the following improvements that will be utilized to meet demand along with
other future water projects. The remaining value represents the original value paid minus impact fees
paid.
Equity Buy In
Zone 1W Tank (15000 S.)
Zone 1W Transmission
Debt Cost of 2020B Water Revenue Bonds
Zone 2 West Storage Property Acquisition
Impact Fee Fund Balance
Total

Remaining for New
Growth
$ 2,939,559
2,467,032
725,112
384,230
(1,368,809)
$ 5,147,124

Table 2. Water Excess Capacity

Transportation has excess capacity in the following roads that will be utilized to meet demand along with
other road projects. The remaining value represents the original value collected by the City minus impact
fees paid.
Equity Buy In
Remaining
$148,875
Loumis Parkway
$42,771
2700 West, 14400 South to Bangerter Hwy
$284,388
14600 South, 1690 West to Redwood Rd
1780 West (behind Maverik) and Redwood
$595,435
Connection
13900 S Connection - 2700 West to 2950
$749,863
West
$1,821,332
Total
Table 3. Transportation Excess Capacity

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 153 of 211

FUTURE FACILITIES ANALYSIS
Based upon the demand at the current LOS and considering the excess capacity available in the current
systems, the following future facilities will be required to meet demand over the next 10 years:
▪
▪

▪

Parks & Recreation: $13.2m in new parks, trail and recreation improvements
Public Safety:
o Facility: New 18,000 square feet facility estimated at $12m, and remodel of 4,000 sq ft of
City Hall basement for police estimated at $1m
o Equipment: 1 Fire Trucks at $590,207
Transportation: Over the next 10 years, $137m in new facilities will need to be built. $7.2m will
service new growth within 10 years and be funded by the City.
Future Facilities

14600 South, Redwood Road to Spring
View Pkwy
14600 South, Spring View Pkwy to Noell
Nelson Dr - Bridge and Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, Noell Nelson Dr to 800
West - Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, 800 West to I-15
Extension of Bringhurst Blvd to the South
(Major Collector) - 700 feet
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan Narrows Rd
Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West to 2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South to 13800 South
Transportation Master Plan
Master Plan Update for Active
Transportation and Transportation
Intersection: Porter Rockwell Boulevard
& Rising Star Lane
Intersection: SR-68 & Jordan Narrows
Road
Intersection: 14600 S & 1690 W
Total

Cost

Inflated Cost

10 Year
Growth

Other
Sources

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost

$18,100,000

$22,021,418

15%

$3,303,213

54,240,000

65,991,253

2,460,000

2,992,966

269,366.95

20,000,000

24,333,058

1,500,000

1,824,979

15%

273,746.90

6,200,000
2,700,000
1,700,000
3,600,000
50,000

7,543,248
3,284,963
2,068,310
4,379,950
60,833

15%
0%
0%
0%
100%

- 1,131,487.20
60,832.65

150,000

182,498

100%

182,497.94

401,200

488,121

1,700,000

2,068,310

76%

486,661

1,581,649

400,000
$113,201,200

486,661
$137,726,569

82%

$91,299,094

399,062
$7,201,855

Table 4. Transportation New Projects

▪

Water: The water utility will construct $18.2m in new facilities over the next 10 years. $6.6m of
those will cure current deficiencies in the system. $11.7m will provide service to new growth.

Future Facilities
Zone 2 West Storage
2026 IFFP & IFA

Total Cost
$10,026,432
5

Deficiency
60.0%

New
Growth
40.0%

Deficiency
$6,015,859

New Growth
$4,010,573

Page 154 of 211

Future Facilities

Total Cost

14600 S Waterline Upsize
Zone 3W Booster Pump Station
15000 South PS Modifications
Interest/Issuance Costs for Bonds
Total

1,265,319
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550
$18,232,781

New
Growth
56.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%

Deficiency
44.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

Deficiency

New Growth

556,740
$6,572,600

708,579
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550
$11,660,181

Table 5. Water New Projects

FUNDING OF FUTURE FACILITIES
The City has plans to issue debt for future water facilities. The interest carry cost has been included in the
calculation of the impact fees. The City has been successful in receiving any grant funds for projects and
will continue to seek these funds in the future. Should grant funds be received which will fund any of the
projects in this report, the City will revisit the impact fee to ensure compliance with the Act. Currently,
the City anticipates meeting the LOS for each system by funding new projects with cash. Impact fees are
a critical component of generated that proportional cash to fund or repay future projects.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEES
The following are the maximum allowable impact fees for each utility.
▪
▪

▪

Parks & Recreation: $9,900/Residential ERU (single-family detached), & $7,425/multi-family
residential (attached residential units and ADUs)
Public Safety:
o $2,724/Residential ERU
o $6,345/Commercial ERU (per 9,000 sq ft)
Transportation: $468.18/Daily Trip
o $4,256/Single Family Residential
o See Section 7 for other land use types
Water: $11,500/ERU

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The staff recommends that impact fee be charged at the maximum amount as described above and
outlined below.
Impact Fee
Parks
Public Safety (Residential)
Transportation (Single Family)
Water
Total Single Family

Current
$7,597
2,039
3,822
4,184
$17,642

Proposed 2026
$9,900
2,724
4,256
11,500
$28,381

Change
2,303
685
434
7,316
$10,739

Table 6. Impact Fee Single Family Residential Table with Staff Recommendations

2026 IFFP & IFA

Change
30%
34%
11%
175%
61%

Page 155 of 211

Impact Fee
Public Safety (per 9,000 sq ft)
Transportation (per 1,000 sq ft)
Water (3/4 inch meter)
Total Retail

Current
$4,558
10,964
4,184
$19,706

Proposed 2026
$6,345
15,295
11,500
$33,141

Change
$1,787
4,331
7,316
$13,435

Table 7. Impact Fee Retail Example Table with Staff Recommendations

2026 IFFP & IFA

Change
39%
40%
175%
68%

Page 156 of 211

3
DEMAND ANALYSIS
The demand over the next ten years was estimated by the City using Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) data to
identify how many additional households developed as well as new commercial square footage that will
be developed in the next ten years. Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) are specialized geographic units used by
planners to model travel behavior, forecast traffic volumes, and analyze commuting patterns. Built from
Census Bureau data (blocks, tracts), they represent distinct areas with homogeneous land use—such as
residential or commercial districts—and act as the foundational spatial unit for transportation planning
models. The table below provides a summary of the ERCs estimated for commercial and residential. One
ERU is one single family home. Apartments, townhomes, and detached ADUs are considered multi-family
homes and would be equivalent to 0.75 ERUs. This analysis determined there would be 1,333 new
ERC/ERUs (1,170 residential and 163 non-residential) and 19,273 new daily trips. One commercial
ERC/ERU is equivalent to 9,000 sf.

ERCs
Residential
Commercial
Total

2025
5,936
252
6,188

2035
7,106
415
7,521

Table 8. New Units

2026 IFFP & IFA

10 Year Growth
1,170
163
1,333

Page 157 of 211

4
PARKS & RECREATION IFFP & IFA
Bluffdale City provides park and recreation facilities to its citizens. This section will describe the following
items in accordance with the Act for Parks & Recreation:
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

service area,
demand within the service area,
the current level of service,
excess capacity in the current system to meet demand,
future facilities required to meet demand,
funding plans for future facilities,
the maximum allowable impact fee new residential growth would pay to cover the proportionate
share of excess capacity and new facilities, and
the staff recommendation for impact fees to be charged.

SERVICE AREA & DEMAND
The service area for the Parks & Recreation impact fee is the entire City. The projected demand within
the service area is 1,333 new residential units or ERUs over the next 10 years. Parks & Recreation impact
fees are only charged to residential units.
CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
The unit of measurement for the LOS is investment per residential unit or ERU. The LOS for Parks &
Recreation was calculated through an inventory of all current Parks & Recreation facilities including the
monetary value of these facilities. The value of these facilities is currently $58,768,050. Calculation details
can be found in Appendix A: Parks and Recreation Values. This total value was then divided by the current
number of residential ERUs in the City which is 5,936. The current LOS for Parks & Recreation is $9,900 of
investment per ERU (single-family). Multi-family residential is equivalent to 0.75 ERUs, thus the multifamily residential fee would be $7,425.
EXCESS CAPACITY, FUTURE FACILITIES, & FUNDING PLAN
Because the LOS for Parks & Recreation uses the value of all current facilities, there is no excess capacity
in the system.
In order to maintain the LOS of $9,900/ERU with an additional 1,333 ERUs within the service area, the City
would be required to invest $13.2m in new facilities. The City will utilize taxes, fees, impact fees, grants
and may use bonds to construct future facilities. Although debt may be used, the City has not assumed
any interest expense in this calculation. The City may choose to reduce the impact fee which will reduce
the need for this level of investment.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 158 of 211

The City anticipates using the collected impact fees to fund the following facilities. These facilities are
shown in the City’s Master Plan and include long term projects through 2050.
Project

Probable Costs
$32,187,500
200,000
49,127,500
280,000
$81,795,000

Park Needs
Recreation Needs
Trail Needs
Other Studies
Total

Table 9: Future Park Projects (Bluffdale Parks Master Plan 2025, Table 6.8)

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE & STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The maximum allowable impact fee that can be charged to new residential growth is $9,900 per ERU
(single-family) and $7,425 (multi-family). Commercial ERUs cannot be charged a Parks & Recreation
impact fee. Impact fee credits can be received for installing future facilities that meet the LOS. City staff
recommends to the City Council that the maximum allowable fee be charged.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 159 of 211

5
PUBLIC SAFETY IFFP & IFA
Bluffdale City provides public safety services to the City including fire and police protection. This section
will describe the following items in accordance with the Act for Public Safety:
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

service area,
demand within the service area,
the current level of service,
excess capacity in the current system to meet demand,
future facilities required to meet demand,
funding plans for future facilities,
the maximum allowable impact fee new growth would pay to cover the proportionate share of
excess capacity and new facilities, and
the staff recommendation for impact fees to be charged.

SERVICE AREA & DEMAND
The service area for the Public Safety impact fee is the entire City. The projected demand within the
service area is 1,333 new ERCs over the next 10 years of which 163 are non-residential and 1,170 are
residential.
The Facility portion of the impact fee is charged to all ERUs. The Equipment portion is only charged to
commercial ERUs.
CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
The unit of measurement for the facility LOS is square feet of facility space per ERU. The equipment LOS
is investment in equipment per commercial ERU. The current facility LOS is 4.61 square feet per ERU. The
table below provides the calculation.
Historic Projects
Station 1 – Station 91
Station 1 Expansion
Station 2 – Station 92
Total
2019 ERUs
LOS - SF/ERU
ERUs Added thru 2035
Needed New Space (SF)
Bringhurst Public Safety Bldg

2026 IFFP & IFA

Year
Built
2003
2019
2019

Cost
2,110,000
280,151
4,899,546

Total SQ
FT
12,900

SQ FT
Utilized
12,900
Included above
12,821
12,821

7,289,697

25,721

$12,000,000

18,000

25,721
5,579
4.61
1,333
6,146

Page 160 of 211

Historic Projects
Remodel Basement of City
Hall for Police
Total New Space
Facility Impact Fee

Year
Built

Cost

Total SQ
FT

$1,000,000

4,000

$13,000,000

22,000

SQ FT
Utilized

$2,724
Table 10. Public Safety Facility LOS

Rolling stock can only be charged to commercial ERUs and only if the rolling stock is above $500,000. The
table below provides a summary of the LOS for the Equipment LOS.
Added ERUs thru 2035
Future Equipment
Fire Truck (2027)
Total Equipment
Equipment Level of Service/ERU

163
$590,207
$590,207
$3,621

Table 11. Public Safety Equipment LOS

EXCESS CAPACITY, FUTURE FACILITIES, & FUNDING PLAN
Because the LOS for Public Safety uses the value of all current facilities, there is no excess capacity in the
system.
The City plans to build an additional fire station in the near future to maintain the facility LOS of 4.61 per
ERU. This new station is expected to be 18,000 square feet and cost approximately $12m. The City also
plans to remodel approximately 4,000 sq ft of the City Hall basement to accommodate police. The cost
of this remodel is estimated at $1m. Based on the existing LOS, the new fire station and the basement
remodel will serve 4,772 ERUs. With an additional 1,333 ERUs within the service area in 10 years, the new
station should serve growth beyond the next 10 years. In order to provide rolling stock for commercial,
the City will buy one fire truck at $590k in the next several years.
The City would utilize taxes, fees, impact fees, grants and may use bonds or equipment leases to construct
and/or acquire future facilities and/or equipment. Although debt may be used, the City has not assumed
any interest expense in this calculation.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE & STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The maximum allowable impact fee that can be charged for future facilities is $2,724 per ERU.a The
maximum allowable impact fee that can be charged to commercial ERUs for equipment is an additional
$3,621. Commercial ERUs would thus pay $6,345 per ERU.
City staff recommends charging the maximum allowable impact fee for public safety.

Apartment complexes are considered residential and not commercial for purposes of this impact fee.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 161 of 211

6
TRANSPORTATION IFFP & IFA
Bluffdale City owns transportation facilities within the City to provide service to its constituents. The State
and County also own transportation facilities. These non-city owned facilities are considered in meeting
the demands of the system. However, funding of these facilities are not included in this analysis. This
section will describe the following items in accordance with the Act for Transportation:
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

service area,
demand within the service area,
the current level of service,
excess capacity in the current system to meet demand,
future facilities required to meet demand,
funding plans for future facilities,
the maximum allowable impact fee new growth would pay to cover the proportionate share of
excess capacity and new facilities, and
the staff recommendation for impact fees to be charged.

SERVICE AREA & DEMAND
The service area for the Transportation impact fee is the entire City. The projected demand within the
service area is 1,333 new ERUs which will generate 19,273 new daily trips between 2025 and 2035.
Specific details on inputs into the Transportation impact fees are provided below.
TRIPS
The unit of demand for transportation impact is the vehicle trip. A vehicle trip is defined by the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) as a “single or one-direction vehicle movement with either the origin or
the destination (exiting or entering) inside a study site”. The total traffic impact of a new development
can be determined by the sum of the total number of vehicle trips generated by a development in a typical
weekday. This trip generation number or impact can be estimated for an individual development using
the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th ed. (2025). ITE’s trip data is based on data collection at numerous
sites over several decades.
An additional consideration is that certain developments generate pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are stops
taken on the way from one development to another. An example of this is someone stopping at a gas
station on the way home from work. The pass-by trip is still counted at the gas station access. However,
the pass-by trip was completed by a vehicle already on the road due to other developments.
Pass-by trips do not add additional traffic to the roadway and, therefore, do not create additional impact.
Many land-use types in the ITE Trip Generation Manual have a suggested reduction for pass-by trips where
applicable. In each case, the trip reduction rate will be applied to the trip generation rate used in the IFA.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 162 of 211

CUT-THROUGH TRIPS
Trips that do not have an origin or destination within Bluffdale City need to be removed from the impact
fee calculation. For example, if the driver of a vehicle starts a trip in Lehi, travels through Bluffdale, and
ends that trip in Riverton, this trip adds traffic to a Bluffdale roadway. However, the cost of the
incremental congestion it adds to Bluffdale City roadways cannot be recovered through impact fees.
The travel demand model developed specifically for the Bluffdale Transportation Master Plan was used to
determine cut-through percentages on Bluffdale City roadways. A “select link” analysis was performed to
determine cut-through percentages. This analysis examines a specific roadway link and traces the origins
and destinations of every vehicle trip on that link. All vehicle trips that had both an origin and destination
outside of Bluffdale City were totaled, then divided by the total link volume to obtain the cut-through
percentage. This analysis was performed on roadways within Bluffdale City that have a planned
improvement project that is impact fee eligible.
Roadways within Bluffdale City were found to have cut-through rates ranging from 0 to 18%. Roadways
that will connect adjacent municipalities or regional roadways, such as 14600 South, had higher cutthrough rates due to connectivity to other jurisdictions.
EXISTING OVERCAPACITY
If a project is identified for a roadway that is already operating with volumes in excess of the acceptable
capacity, the volume of existing traffic that is above capacity is accounted for in calculating the percent of
project cost that is eligible for inclusion in the impact fee. The volume of existing traffic that exceeds
existing capacity is subtracted from the volume of future traffic that exceeds existing capacity when
determining the amount of new development-related traffic projected to use the newly created roadway
capacity.
INTERSECTION PROJECTS
If trips resulting from new growth require an intersection to be upgraded, the full cost of the intersection
is impact fee eligible. If it weren’t for new development, the existing intersection configuration would be
adequate. Thus, excess capacity is not accounted for with intersection projects.
CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
BACKGROUND
Level of Service (LOS) is a term that describes the operating performance of an intersection or roadway.
LOS is measured quantitatively and reported on a scale from A to F, with A representing the best
performance and F the worst.
The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th ed. (2022) methodology was used in this analysis to remain
consistent with “state of the practice” professional standards. The capacity of roadway segments is
determined based on the number of lanes and/or functional classification of the roadway. The roadway
LOS is then determined by comparing the actual traffic volumes with the capacity. As noted in the
Bluffdale TMP (2020), Bluffdale City “has adopted a LOS C for all municipal roads and streets” (not
2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 163 of 211

including intersections), and “LOS D is the threshold for state roads in urbanized areas”. For local and
collector roads, LOS D – F are considered failing and are evaluated for mitigation measures to bring the
level of service up to an acceptable level. For arterial roads, LOS E – F are considered failing and are
evaluated for mitigation measures to bring the level of service up to an acceptable level. Table 12
summarizes the maximum acceptable daily capacities (LOS D and C) for arterial and collector roadway
segments used in the Bluffdale TMP (2020).

Table 12. Planning level roadway level of service thresholds

The proposed LOS provides a standard of evaluation for roadway conditions. This standard will determine
whether or not a roadway will need improvements. According to Utah State Code Title 11, Chapter 36a,
Section 302:
“(b) A proposed level of service may diminish or equal the existing level of service.
(c) A proposed level of service may:
(i) exceed the existing level of service if, independent of the use of impact fees, the
political subdivision or private entity provides, implements, and maintains the means to
increase the existing level of service for existing demand within six years of the date on
which new growth is charged for the proposed level of service; or
(ii) establish a new public facility if, independent of the use of impact fees, the political
subdivision or private entity provides, implements, and maintains the means to increase
the existing level of service for existing demand within six years of the date on which new
growth is charged for the proposed level of service.”
As noted in the Bluffdale TMP (2020), the proposed LOS threshold for Bluffdale is LOS C and D. Therefore,
improvements are recommended and eligible for impact fees for roadways that are projected to operate
at LOS D (for municipal roads), E, or F in the future. It should also be noted that UDOT has many roads
within the City. Per UDOT policy, they use service level D. The City cannot control UDOT’s LOS.
EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Existing roadway conditions were determined by using data collected by Bluffdale City, METHODS, the
Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), the Wasatch Front Regional Council (WFRC) Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP) (2023 – 2050), and other previous studies. The traffic volumes from the travel
demand model were compared with each roadway capacity to identify the LOS of each segment.
The existing LOS of major roadways in Bluffdale City is shown in Figure 1. As shown, most of the major
City-owned roadways are currently operating at an acceptable LOS (C or better) other than:
2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 164 of 211

•

14600 South; 1690 West to 1000 West

Figure 1. Existing (2025) Roadway LOS and ADT

FUTURE ROADWAY CONDITIONS
Future traffic volumes were projected using the travel demand model. METHODS used the latest model
from WFRC, which is the local metropolitan planning organization (MPO), and refined it to better reflect
conditions in Bluffdale and the surrounding areas. The existing traffic volumes and data from planned
developments and land uses were used to adjust the model to estimate future traffic volumes. The model
was developed to estimate future volumes in 2035, assuming a no-build condition, meaning that no City
roadway improvements were assumed. A no-build scenario is intended to show what the roadway
network would be like in the future if no action is taken to improve the City roadway network. The future
(2035) no-build LOS is shown in Figure 2. As shown in the bullet below, there is one segment of Cityowned roadway that is anticipated to deteriorate to LOS D (for municipal roads), E, or F. In addition, there
are several new roads that will be needed to accommodate future development.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 165 of 211

•

14600 South; 1000 West to UDOT jurisdiction (800 West)

Figure 2. Future (2035) No Build LOS and ADT

EXCESS CAPACITY
The traffic modeling shows that City-owned facilities have excess capacity. The original cost of these roads
minus impact fee payments made to construct the roads is provided in the table below. These facilities
will be utilized as part of the system to meet the future demand. See Table 7A in Appendix B for details
on how the impact fee eligible portion of each buy-in project was determined.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 166 of 211

Equity Buy In
Loumis Parkway
2700 West, 14400 South to Bangerter Hwy
14400 South, 2200 West to Redwood Rd YTD
14600 South, 1690 West to Redwood Rd
1780 West (behind Maverik) and Redwood Connection
13900 S Connection - 2700 West to 2950 West
Total

Remaining
$ 676,705
611,018
1,824,616
1,421,942
2,706,523
3,408,466
$10,649,270

Impact Fee Eligible
Cost
$ 148,875
42,771
284,388
595,435
749,863
$1,821,332

Table 13. Transportation Excess Capacity

FUTURE FACILITIES & FUNDING PLAN
Bluffdale will need to construct the facilities listed below to meet future demand of current residents as
well as new growth.
FUTURE PROJECTS
Poor levels of service on roadways are generally mitigated by building new roads or adding travel lanes.
In some cases, additional lanes can be gained by re-striping the existing pavement width. This can be
accomplished by eliminating on-street parking, creating narrower travel lanes, or adding two-way leftturn lanes where they don’t currently exist. Improvements can also be made at intersections to improve
LOS by adding turn lanes or by changing the intersection type or the intersection control. At signalized
intersections, methods to improve intersection LOS include additional left- and right-turn lanes and signaltiming improvements.
The existing and future (2035) no-build scenarios were used as a basis to predict the necessary projects
to include in the IFFP. For the purposes of this IFFP, only projects that are planned to be completed by
2035 will be considered. Table 14 and Table 15 show City projects expected to be constructed by 2035 to
meet the demands placed on the roadway network by new development. These projects are included in
the IFFP analysis. UDOT projects will be funded entirely with state funds and are therefore not eligible for
impact fee expenditure and are not included in this analysis. Projects planned to be completed by 2035
are shown in Figure 3.
The Impact Fees Act allows for the inclusion of a time price differential to ensure the future value of costs
incurred at a later date are accurately calculated to include the costs of construction inflation. This Impact
Fee Analysis (IFA) includes an inflation component to reflect the future cost of facilities.b The impact fee
analysis should be updated regularly to account for changes in cost estimates over time.

Costs were inflated assuming a rate of four percent and that projects would be completed in 2030.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 167 of 211

Description

1-1

14600 South

1-2

14600 South

1-3

14600 South

1-4

14600 South
Bringhurst
Blvd

1-5

1-7

Bringhurst
Blvd
Jordan
Narrows Rd

1-9

13800 South

1-10

3600 West
Transportation
Master Plan
Master Plan
Update for
Active
Transportation
and
Transportation

1-6

1-11

1-12

Future Roadway Projects
# of Lanes
Improvement
Responsibility
Scope
Current Proposed

Location
Redwood Road to
Spring View Pkwy
Spring View Pkwy
to Noelle Nelson
Dr
Noell Nelson Dr to
800 West
800 West to I-15
Extension 700
feet to the South
Bringhurst Blvd
to Jordan Narrows
Rd
Bringhurst Blvd
to Redwood Rd
3600 West to
2950 West
14400 South to
13800 South
-

Estimated
Cost

Inflated
Cost

Bluffdale

Widening

$18,100,000

$22,021,418

Bluffdale

Widening

$54,240,000

$65,991,253

Bluffdale

Widening

$2,460,000

$2,992,966

UDOT

Widening
New
Roadway

2-4

$20,000,000

$24,333,058

$1,500,000

$1,824,979

Bluffdale
Bluffdale

New
Roadway

$6,200,000

$7,543,248

Bluffdale

Widening

$2,700,000

$3,284,963

Bluffdale

Widening

$1,700,000

$2,068,310

Bluffdale

Widening

$3,600,000

$4,379,950

Bluffdale

Master Plan

$50,000

$60,833

Bluffdale

Master Plan

$150,000

$182,498

Table 14. Bluffdale City 2035 Roadway Project List

Future Intersection Projects
Description

Location

Responsibility

1-A

Signal

Porter Rockwell Blvd & Rising
Star Ln

Developer

$401,200

$488,121

1-B

Signal

SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Rd

Bluffdale/
UDOT1

$1,700,000

$2,068,310

$400,000

$486,661

1-C
Signal
14600 S & 1690 W
Bluffdale
1. UDOT to pay for signal and Bluffdale to pay for geometric updates.
Table 15. Bluffdale City 2035 Intersection Project List

2026 IFFP & IFA

Estimated Cost

Inflated
Cost

Page 168 of 211

Figure 3. Phase 1 (2025 – 2035) Projects

PROJECT COSTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO FUTURE GROWTH
The total cost for all projects is estimated to be $137m. Only a portion of the total cost is impact fee
eligible. Some projects are expected to be partially or fully funded by developers. Funding for regional
projects can also come through other sources, such as the local metropolitan planning organization,
UDOT, or the County. The City will need to find funding to cover the portion of the projects that are not
impact fee eligible and are not fully funded by developers or outside sources. The cost due to future
growth can be shared by new development through the assessment of transportation impact fees.
The amount of each project to be funded by impact fees varies depending on the cut-through traffic,
projected traffic volumes, and capacity of each roadway.
The impact fee eligibility of each project was calculated by dividing the total new development-related
component of the future (2035) traffic volume that exceeds existing capacity by roadway capacity added
2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 169 of 211

with construction of the proposed project. This eligibility percentage was then multiplied by the project
cost to calculate the impact fee eligible cost for each project. The following formulas outline how the
impact fee eligible cost was calculated:

A summary of the costs and impact fee eligibility of each project is shown in Table 16. As shown, the total
impact fee eligible cost for planned Bluffdale City projects expected to be completed by 2035 is $7.2m.
See Table 7B and Table 7C in Appendix B for additional details on how the impact fee eligible portion of
each project was determined.
Future Facilities
14600 South, Redwood Road to Spring
View Pkwy
14600 South, Spring View Pkwy to Noelle
Nelson Dr - Bridge and Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, Noell Nelson Dr to 800
West - Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, 800 West to I-15
Extension of Bringhurst Blvd to the South
(Major Collector) - 700 feet
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan Narrows Rd
Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West to 2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South to 13800 South
Transportation Master Plan
Master Plan Update for Active
Transportation and Transportation
Intersection: Porter Rockwell Boulevard
& Rising Star Lane
Intersection: SR-68 & Jordan Narrows
Road
Intersection: 14600 S & 1690 W
Total

Cost

Inflated Cost

10 Year
Growth

$18,100,000

$22,021,418

15%

$3,303,213

54,240,000

65,991,253

2,460,000

2,992,966

269,366.95

20,000,000

24,333,058

1,500,000

1,824,979

15%

273,746.90

6,200,000
2,700,000
1,700,000
3,600,000
50,000

7,543,248
3,284,963
2,068,310
4,379,950
60,833

15%
0%
0%
0%
100%

- 1,131,487.20
60,832.65

150,000

182,498

100%

182,497.94

401,200

488,121

1,700,000

2,068,310

76%

486,661

1,581,649

400,000
$113,201,200

486,661
$137,726,569

82%

$91,299,094

399,062
$7,201,855

Table 16. Transportation New Projects

2026 IFFP & IFA

Other
Sources

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost

Page 170 of 211

The City will utilize taxes, fees, impact fees, grants and may use bonds to construct future facilities.
Although debt may be used, the City has not assumed any interest expense in this calculation. The City
may choose to reduce the impact fee which will reduce the need for this level of investment.
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE & STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The maximum allowable impact fee that can be charged to new growth is $468.18/daily trip. This fee
includes $94.50/daily trip for equity buy-in as detailed in the Equity Buy In table below. The fee also
includes $373.68/daily trip for new facilities as detailed in the Future Facilities table below.
Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
$ 148,875
42,771
284,388

Growth Trips
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273

595,435
749,863
1,821,332

Growth/Trip
$
7.72
2.22
14.76

19,273
19,273
19,273

30.89
38.91
94.50

Table 17. Transportation Equity Buy-In Impact Fee Calculation

Future Facilities
14600 South, Redwood Road to Spring View Pkwy
14600 South, Spring View Pkwy to Noelle Nelson Dr - Bridge and Widen
to 5 lanes
14600 South, Noell Nelson Dr to 800 West - Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, 800 West to I-15
Extension of Bringhurst Blvd to the South (Major Collector) - 700 feet
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan Narrows Rd
Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West to 2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South to 13800 South
Transportation Master Plan
Master Plan Update for Active Transportation and Transportation
Intersection: Porter Rockwell Boulevard & Rising Star Lane
Intersection: SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Road
Intersection: 14600 S & 1690 W
Total

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
$3,303,213

Growth
Trips
19,273

Cost/Trip
171.39

19,273

269,366.95
273,746.90
1,131,487.20
60,832.65
182,497.94
1,581,649
399,062
$7,201,855

19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273
19,273

13.98
14.20
58.71
3.16
9.47
82.07
20.71
$373.68

Table 18. Transportation New Facility Impact Fee Calculation

The table below provides estimated daily trips and impact fees per land use type. Any user may also
conduct a traffic study and apply the $468.18 daily trip to the total number of daily trips. City staff
recommends to the City Council a fee of $468.18 per daily trip.
2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 171 of 211

Impact Fee per
Daily Trip

Description

Daily Trip

Pass-through
Reduction

Impact Fee
(Daily)

Single Family Residential

$468.18

9.09

$4,256

Townhome/Multi-Family Residential

$468.18

6.57

$3,076

Retail (per 1,000 sf)

$468.18

54.45

40%

$15,295

Industrial (per 1,000 sf)

$468.18

3.60

$1,685

Office (per 1,000 sf)

$468.18

7.83

$3,666

Flex (per 1,000 sf)

$468.18

9.97

$4,668

Table 19. Transportation Total Impact Fee Calculation

The following provides a description of each land use type:
Single Family Residential: Single family detached residential units (does not include ADUs).
Townhome/Multi-Family Residential: This includes all multi-family and attached residential units
including townhomes. This also includes ADUs.
Retail: Retail land uses include retail and commercial that sell goods and services in person. Examples of
this land use include strip retail, shopping centers, big box stores, supermarkets, convenience stores,
pharmacies, banks, auto service centers, and car washes. This land use includes all retail and service land
uses defined by ITE numbers 800-999.
Restaurant: This includes all restaurants ranging from drive-throughs to sit-down restaurants and
coffee/soda shops.
Industrial: Industrial land uses include warehousing, manufacturing, self-storage, data center, and light
industrial facilities. Flex space is not included in this land use. This land use includes the land uses defined
by ITE numbers 100-199.
Office: This includes all office types including larger office parks and medical-dental offices.
Flex: ITE defines flex space as a "business park.” A business park consists of a group of flex-type or
incubator one- or two-story buildings served by a common roadway system. The tenant space is flexible
and lends itself to a variety of uses. The rear side of the building is often served by a garage door. The
space may include offices, retail and wholesale stores, restaurants, recreational areas and warehousing,
manufacturing, light industrial, or scientific research functions. A common mix is 20 to 30 percent
office/commercial and 70 to 80 percent industrial/warehousing.
For a land use type that does not fit easily into the categories in Table 18, the City may choose, at its
discretion, to assess impact fees at the rate of $468.18 per Daily Trip as determined by the accepted
development Traffic Study.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 172 of 211

7
WATER IFFP & IFA
Bluffdale City provides culinary and secondary water within the City. This section will describe the
following items in accordance with the Act for Water:
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪

service area,
demand within the service area,
the current level of service,
excess capacity in the current system to meet demand,
future facilities required to meet demand,
funding plans for future facilities,
the maximum allowable impact fee new growth would pay to cover the proportionate share of
excess capacity and new facilities, and
the staff recommendation for impact fees to be charged.

SERVICE AREA & DEMAND
The service area for the Water impact fee is the entire City. The projected demand within the service area
is 1,333 new ERCs over the next 10 years.
CURRENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
The unit of measurement for the LOS for Water can be found in the table below. Much of this LOS is
defined by Utah State Administrative Code.
Category

Requirement
Peak Day Demand
Source
Average Annual Demand
Equalization Storage
Storage
Fire Suppression Storage
Peak Instantaneous Demand
Minimum Fire Flow
Maximum Pressure (City Preference)
Distribution Maximum Pressure Fluctuation (City Preference)
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Day
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Instantaneous
Minimum Service Pressure - Peak Day + Fire Flow
Table 20. Water LOS

2026 IFFP & IFA

Value
1,810 gpd/ERC (1.257 gpm/ERC)
658 gpd/ERC (0.738 ac-ft/ERC)
716 gal/ERC
0.96 MG
3,726 gpd/ERC (2.59 gpm/ERC)
1,500 gpm
130 psi
30 psi
40 psi
30 psi
20 psi

Page 173 of 211

EXCESS CAPACITY, FUTURE FACILITIES, & FUNDING PLAN
The Water system has some excess capacity in the current system. The original value of these
improvements minus impact fee payments made to construct the roads is provided in the table below.
These facilities will be utilized as part of the system to meet the future demand.
Excess Capacity

Total Cost

Zone 1W Tank (15000 S.)
Zone 1W Transmission
15000 South PI Pump
Station
Debt Cost of 2020B
Water Revenue Bonds
Zone 2 West Storage
Property Acquisition
Impact Fee Fund Balance
Total Excess Capacity

$5,879,117
4,934,064

Other
Sources
2,939,559
2,467,032

Remaining
Deficiency New Growth
Cost
$2,939,559
0.0%
100.0%
2,467,032
0%
100%

1,880,754

100%

1,880,754

1,211,166

40%

60%

486,054

725,112

384,230

0.0%

100.0%

384,230

(1,368,809)
(1,368,809)
$12,920,522 $5,406,591 $7,513,931

0.0%

100.0%

$2,366,808

(1,368,809)
$5,147,124

Deficiency

New Growth

2,939,559
2,467,032

Table 21. Water Excess Capacity

In order to meet the LOS and then maintain that LOS with future demand in the service area, the City will
also need to construct $18.2m in new facilities over the next 10 years. $6.6m will cure current deficiencies
in the system. $11.7m will provide service to new growth.
Future Facilities

Total Cost

Zone 2 West Storage
14600 S Waterline Upsize
Zone 3W Booster Pump Station
15000 South PS Modifications
Interest/Issuance Costs for Bonds
Total

$10,026,432
1,265,319
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550
$18,232,781

Other
Remaining
New
New
Deficiency
Deficiency
Sources
Cost
Growth
Growth
- $10,026,432
60.0%
40.0% $6,015,859 $4,010,573
1,265,319
44.0%
56.0%
556,740
708,579
2,704,000
0.0% 100.0%
2,704,000
324,480
0.0% 100.0%
324,480
3,912,550
0.0% 100.0%
3,912,550
$18,232,781
$6,572,600 $11,660,181
Table 22. Water New Projects

The City will utilize user fees, impact fees, and bonds to construct future facilities. Interest expense for
the anticipated bonds has been included in the calculation above. The table below details the debt service
schedule for 2027 Water Revenue Bonds.

Period
1
2
3
4
5
2026 IFFP & IFA

Proposed Water Revenue Bonds (2027)
Principal
Coupon
Interest
220,000
4.50%
310,275
230,000
4.50%
300,375
240,000
4.50%
290,025
250,000
4.50%
279,225
265,000
4.50%
267,975
25

Debt Service
530,275
530,375
530,025
529,225
532,975

Page 174 of 211

Period
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Total

Proposed Water Revenue Bonds (2027)
Principal
Coupon
Interest
275,000
4.50%
256,050
285,000
4.50%
243,675
300,000
4.50%
230,850
315,000
4.50%
217,350
325,000
4.50%
203,175
340,000
4.50%
188,550
355,000
4.50%
173,250
375,000
4.50%
157,275
390,000
4.50%
140,400
405,000
4.50%
122,850
425,000
4.50%
104,625
445,000
4.50%
85,500
465,000
4.50%
65,475
485,000
4.50%
44,550
505,000
4.50%
22,725
6,895,000
3,704,175
Issuance Costs (2%)
134,291
Total Interest & Issuance Costs
3,912,550

Debt Service
531,050
528,675
530,850
532,350
528,175
528,550
528,250
532,275
530,400
527,850
529,625
530,500
530,475
529,550
527,725
10,599,175

Table 23. Proposed Water Revenue Bonds Debt Service Schedule

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE IMPACT FEE & STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The maximum allowable impact fee was calculated by including the costs related to excess capacity in
existing facilities as well as the costs related to future projects serving growth. These costs are divided by
the number of growth ERCs each project will serve. The tables below detail this calculation.
Excess Capacity
Zone 1W Tank (15000 S.)
Zone 1W Transmission
Debt Cost of 2020B Water Revenue
Bonds
Zone 2 West Storage Property
Acquisition
Impact Fee Fund Balance
Total Excess Capacity

New Growth
$ 2,939,559
2,467,032

Growth ERCs
3,573
3,573

Growth/ERC
$
823
690

725,112

2,139

339

384,230

1,964

196

(1,368,809)
$5,147,124

3,319

Table 24. Water Existing Facilities Impact Fee Calculation

2026 IFFP & IFA

(412)
1,635

Page 175 of 211

Future Facilities
Zone 2 West Storage
14600 S Waterline Upsize
Zone 3W Booster Pump Station
15000 South PS Modifications
Interest/Issuance Costs for Bonds
Total

New
Growth
$4,010,573
708,579
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550
$11,660,181

Growth
ERCs
Growth/ERC
786
$5,105
2,799
253
1,964
1,377
1,142
284
1,375
2,846
$9,865

Table 25. Water Future Facilities Impact Fee Calculation

Total Impact Fee
Excess Capacity
Future Facilities
Total

Growth/ERC
$
1,635
9,865
$
11,500

Table 26 Water Total Impact Fee Calculation

The maximum allowable impact fee per ERC is $11,500. The table below provides a schedule of impact
fees by meter size.
Residential (per Unit)
Single Family
Multi-Family
Commercial (Meter Size)
3/4
1
1 1/2
2
3
4

ERC Multiplier
1.00
0.75

$
$

Impact Fee
11,500
8,625

1
2.5
5
8
15
25

$
$
$
$
$
$

11,500
28,751
57,502
92,003
172,506
287,510

Table 27. Water Impact Fee by Meter Size

City staff recommends to City Council to charge the maximum allowable impact fee for Water.

2026 IFFP & IFA

Page 176 of 211

8
APPENDIX
A: PARKS & RECREATION VALUE

2026 IFFP & IFA

Appendix

Page 177 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY PARK INVENTORY
EXISTING PARKS - Prior to 2014
Plat

BH Ph.2
BH Ph.4
Mktplc A
IND D-5
PA Ph.1
K

Name
Bluffdale City Main Park - CH & FS
Parry Farms - Baseball Fields
Phillip Gates Memorial Park
Ponderosa Park
Rodeo Arena
Ten Sleep Circle Park

Bluffdale Heights Park
Bluffdale Heights Detention Park
Marketplace Park
Mount Jordan Park - IND
Palisades Park - Detention Pond
Parry Farms Park
IND Detention Pond Park

Total:
TRAILS
Porter Rockwell Trail
A/D1/E3/F/G1/G2 Independence Trails - PP East/West
Independence Trail - Power Corridor E1
IND I-3
Independence Trail - Access to Daylight Cir
IND I-1
Porter Rockwell - Park Strip Marketplace
Mktplc A
IND Detention Pond Trail
IND K
Total:

IND D-8
WA at IND
WA at IND
IND D-10
Res. at the Bluffs
IND M-2

Independence Central Pocket Park
Westgate Park - Parcel A/E Westside
Westgate Park - Parcel B Eastside
Independence Main Park
Vintage Park
Detention Park M-2 & Trail
Total:
TRAILS

Acres
Address
22.37
14400 South 2200 West
7.22
1511 West Rockhollow Drive
4.54
14400 South 970 West
1.12
3180 West Buehler Circle
9.55
14400 South 2400 West
0.44
14730 South 2700 West
45.24
PARKS & TRAILS IMPROVED - 2014 to 2016
0.46
700 West 15200 South
0.71
15074 South Rosslyn Cove
1.47
533 West Koins Way
3.69
15090 South Freedom Point Way
1.14
3400 West 13800 South
5.63
15488 South Iron Horse Blvd
4.28
Noell Nelson Drive
17.38
Acres
Address

Price per Acre
Classification
Community Park
Specialty Facility
Neighborhood Park
Pocket Park
Specialty Facility
Pocket Park

Pocket Park
Pocket Park
Pocket Park
Neighborhood Park
Open Space
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park

Classification
Trails
North Property line from PRB to NND Trails
D-5 to Heritagecrest
Trails
Daylight Circle to D-5 Park
Trails
Trails/Parkstrip
Noell Nelson Drive
Trails

3.28
1.10
0.03
0.03

4.44
PARKS & TRAILS IMPROVED - 2016 to 2019
Acres
Address
0.43
921 W Allegiance Drive
1.26
14800 South Harmon Day Drive
2.41
14881 South Harmon Day Drive
5.75
15245 S Noell Nelson Drive
5.61
14180 South Loumis Parkway
1.60
15329 S Revolutionary Way
17.06
Acres

Classification
Pocket Park
Open Space/Trail
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park/T

Sod Square Feet
650,000
$
120,000
82,000
42,500
0
18,000

20,000
30,995
63,918
160,736
49,500
91,476
186,437
Length Trails (ft)
7,164
3,295
604
1,370
1,022

Sod Square Feet
54,903
105,055
250470
129,400

7,270,250 $
2,346,500
1,475,500
364,000
3,103,750
143,000

149,500
230,750
477,750
1,199,250
370,500
1,829,750
1,391,000

Playground
Amenities

Trail

1,183,000
218,400
149,240
77,350
32,760

125,333 $
94,000

Pavillions
109,556 $
75,048
195,048
9,200

Courts
54,251 $

Bathroom
120,000 $
120,000
120,000

Parking

75,200

34,508

62,667

10,705
10,705

125,333

34,508

Trees and Other
Landscaping

359,450 $

176,000

47,242

48,000

37,600

36,400
56,411
116,331
292,540
90,090
166,486
339,315

1,066,000
357,500
9,750
9,750
-

45,266

120,000

34,918

468,849
163,892

120,000

45,188

Splash Pad

Other Amenities and
Construction Costs
$

Total Value

4,000

638,000 $
124,000
196,000
26,000
22,000

10,035,840
2,883,948
2,325,030
476,550
3,103,750
239,360

12,000
12,800
26,400
61,600

47,000
21,000
65,000
170,000

48,000

288,000
165,000

354,608
320,961
758,853
1,934,279
460,590
3,078,114
2,107,207

201,296
92,584
16,974
38,497
28,725

201,296
1,158,584
374,474
9,750
48,247
28,725

139,750
409,500
783,900
1,868,750
1,823,250
520,000

99,923
191,200
455,855
235,508
-

13,000

49,597
12,240

44,740

149,332

545,832

33,720
40,464

47,000

10,705

75,200
376,000
376,000

34,508
32,114
178,572

340,894

120,000
120,000
120,000

86,972
185,564
173,240

11,200
16,000
26,400
92,000
64,000

21,000
35,000
160,000
1,327,000
1,168,000

600,000
140,000

229,655
560,423
1,478,180
5,091,003
4,659,928
520,000

Length Trails (ft)

WA at IND

Westgate - Harmon Day Northside

0.04

1040 W Harmon Day Drive

Parkstrip

PP TWNS

Porters Point - Trail

0.10

1087 W Chimney Pass Drive

Trails

435.6

32,500

Independence Trail - Power Corridor E2
Total:

1.22
1.36

15219 S Heritagecrest Way to PRB

Trails

5314.32

396,500

IND Q

Sod & Irrigation

1,765

62,597

PARKS & TRAILS - FUTURE 2019 +
Day Ranch Central Park

19.00

Harmon Day Drive

Community Park

Dog Park

2.00

JSD Property/Woodside Parcel

Special Use Area

Bike Pump Track

1.58

Parry Farms

Special Use Area

Total Developed Acres

85.48

Totals

27,781,650

3,740,809

663,429

1,394,333

735,177

1,073,152

960,000

932,574

598,400

740,000

4,473,000

43,092,524

Total Value

43,092,524

Weighted Average Value Per Acre

504,112

Page 178 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY PARK INVENTORY
EXISTING PARKS - Prior to 2014
Price per Acre

Plat

Name

Day Ranch Park
jordan school district
Hidden
owned
Valley Dog Park
Equestrian Park
IND L/M1/M2/M3

Revolutionary Way Trail
Bluffdale Elementary Connection

Acres

Address

Classification

Sod Square Feet

18.27
2.26
9.55

15295 S Rochelle Day Drive
1225 W Harmon Day Drive
2440 W 14400 S

Community Park
Special Use Park
Special Use Park

460,020
14,723
0

Trail
Trail

0
0

3.4
0.12

14323 S 2700 W

Sod & Irrigation

$ 1,078,496.00

Trail

25,000.00

65,601.00

Playground
Amenities

Pavillions

Courts

Bathroom

Parking

Trees and Other
Landscaping

Splash Pad

$ 903,721.50

$ 731,000.00

$ 825,000.00

$ 394,953.00

$ 478,355.00

$ 874,831.00

$ 239,423.00

$ 621,368.00

$ 295,248.00

Bleachers

Other Amenities and
Construction Costs

$ 1,207,219.00

$ 8,716,114.00
$ 597,600.00
$ 917,709.00

Contract JSD = 0

$ 123,723.00

Total Cost (less grants)

14,864,493.50

687,309.00

Developer
123,723.00

7,538,546

Jordan N. EDA

2,766,960
TRCC Grant
Developer
Impact Fees

7,082,984
Impact Fees

500,000
Impact Fees

110,000

Grant/Donation

242,964

Capital Projects

300,000
In-kind

from public works dept

Page 179 of 211

B: TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS

# Project
1 Loumis Parkway
2700 West, 14400
South to Bangerter
2 Hwy
14400 South, 2200
West to Redwood Rd
3 YTD
14600 Sout, 1690 West
4 to Redwood Rd
1780 West (behind
Maverik) and Redwood
5 Connection
13900 S Connection 2700 West to 2950
6 West

Impact
'25 to
% Impact Fees
2025
'35 ADT % Pass- %
Fee
Beyond Impact Fee
Capacity growth through Existing Eligible
2035
Eligible Cost

Amount 2025
Remaining ADT

2035
ADT

676,705

Minor
7,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

54%

22%

24% $

148,875

Major
611,018 12,000 13,000 Collector

13,400

1,000

90%

2% $

42,771

13,400

22%

78% $

15,100

3,000

53%

20%

27% $

284,388

595,435

5,000

Functional
Class

$ 1,421,942

Major
3,000 Collector
Major
8,000 11,000 Collector

$ 2,706,523

2,000

Minor
4,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

22%

56% $

$ 3,408,466
$ 10,649,270

3,000

Minor
5,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

32%

22%

46% $ 749,863
$ 1,821,332

$ 1,824,616

3,000

Table 8A. Transportation Excess Capacity Buy-In

2026 IFFP & IFA

Appendix

Page 180 of 211

Table 8B. Bluffdale City 2035 Roadway Project Impact Fee Eligible Cost Summary

2026 IFFP & IFA

Appendix

11,000 15,000

8,000 13,000

2,000

150,000
$
TOTAL $110,700,000

$
$74,240,000

2. Widening cost estimates represent the cost of widening for new growth.

$ 150,000
$ 4,291,400
0%
100%
-

50,000
$
0%
100%
-

50,000

$
95%
0%
0%
5%
4,100
0
0
13,400
9,300

2,000 5,000

$ 3,600,000

$ 930,000

$ 225,000

100%

85%

95%

15%

$ 221,400

73%

$ 2,715,000

UDOT Project

65%

13,400

15%

4,100

2,000

18%

17,200

21,800

18%

9,300

13,400

4,900

2,500

21,800

13,400

9,300

900

4,500

9,300

1,000 2,000

32,300

500

2,000 3,000

15,100

10,500

32,300

$20,000,000 16,000 20,000

10,500

UDOT

% New % Impact
Impact Impact Fee
2025 ADT 35 ADT in
Fee
Capacity
Eligible
Fees
% Cutin excess Excess of New
2035
2025 2035 2025
Eligible
for
Beyond Cost (Until
Capacity through
'25
ADT ADT Capacity Capacity of '25
(until
Existing
2035)
2035
Capacity Capacity
Demand 2035)

$54,240,000 11,000 15,000

Outside
Funding

$ 1,700,000

$ 2,700,000

$ 6,200,000

$ 1,500,000

Widening

Major
Collector
Major
Collector
Minor
Collector
Minor
Collector
Minor
Collector

$ 2,460,000

Minor
Arterial
Minor
Arterial
$ 20,000,000

$ 54,240,000

$ 18,100,000

Minor
Arterial

Cost

Outside
Funding
Sources1

1. WFRC STIP (State Transportation Improvement Program), UDOT, adjacent cities, or other external funding sources

1-9

Type

14600 South, Redwood
Widening
Road to Spring View
14600 South, Spring View
Pkwy to Noelle Nelson
Dr - Bridge and Widen to
Widening
5 lanes
14600 South, Noell
Nelson Dr to 800 West Widening
Widen to 5 lanes
14600 South, 800 West to
Widening
I-15
Extension of Bringhurst
New
Blvd to the South (Major
Construction
Collector) - 700 feet
New
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan
Construction
Narrows Rd

Project

Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West
to 2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South
1-10
to 13800 South
Transportation Master
1-11
Plan
Master Plan Update for
1-12 Active Transportation
and Transportation

1-7

1-6

1-5

1-4

1-3

1-2

1-1

Functional
Class

Page 181 of 211

Table 8C. Bluffdale City 2035 Intersection Project Impact Fee Eligible Cost Summary

2026 IFFP & IFA

Appendix

Intersection

14600 S & 1690 W

Signal

Intersection Improvements

Signal

Improvement
$
$
$
$

401,200
1,700,000
400,000
2,501,200

Cost

UDOT/Bluffdale2

2. UDOT to pay for signal and Bluffdale to pay for geometric updates

RDA

Outside Funding
1
Sources

1. WFRC STIP (State Transportation Improvement Program), UDOT, adjacent cities, or other external funding sources

1-C

1-B SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Road

1-A Porter Rockwell Boulevard & Rising Star Lane

$ 401,200
$ 400,000
$
$ 801,200

Outside
Funding

Fully Outside Funded
100% $ 1,300,000
0%
82% $ 328,000
18%
$ 1,628,000

% Cut- % Impact Fee Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
Eligible
through

Page 182 of 211

C: OTHER IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS

2026 IFFP & IFA

Appendix

Page 183 of 211

Bluffdale City
Impact Fee Summary

Impact Fee
Parks
$
Public Safety (Residential)
Transportation (Single Family)
Water
Total Single Family
$
Multi-Familiy
$

2023

Proposed 2026

7,597 $
2,039
3,822
4,184
17,642 $
13,232 $

9,900 $
2,724
4,256
11,500
28,381 $
21,286 $

Change
2,303
685
434
7,316
10,739
8,054

Change

Notes

30%
34%
11%
175%
61%
61%

Maximum allowable impact fee.
Maximum allowable impact fee.

Impact Fee
Public Safety (Commercial)
Transportation (Retail)
Water
Total Retail (1 ERU)

2023
$

Proposed 2026

4,558 $
10,964
4,184
19,706 $

6,345 $
15,295
11,500
33,141 $

Change
1,787
4,331
7,316
13,435

Change
39%
40%
175%
68%

Notes

Page 184 of 211

Bluffdale City
Projected Growth
2026-2035

TAZ

Residential (units)
1603
1604
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1630
1631

8
160
64
34
31
8
49
23
318
268
207
-

710,000
175,077
37,704
65,874
109,023
30,432
338,980

Total

1,170

1,467,089

ERUc (2035)
ERU (new)
Current ERU (2025)
2022 ERUs

7,106
1,170
5,936

415
163
252

7,521
1,333
6,188

5,672

185

5,857

Commercial Conversion

Commercial
(SF)

9000 sf/ERU
9000
163

2,268

Page 185 of 211

Bluffdale City
Parks Impact Fee
Level of Service
Historic Projects
2023 Park & Trail Value
Parks & Trails Added After 2023
Total Parks & Trails

$
$
$

Cost
43,092,524
15,675,526
58,768,050

Acres
85.48 $
33.6 $
119.08 $

Residential ERUs (2025)
Impact Fee per ERU

5,936
9,900

Proposed Impact Fee/ERU
Single Family
Multi Family

$
$

Current Impact Fee/ERU
Single Family
Multi Family

10 Year ERU growth
Future 10 year park needs

Cost/Acre
504,124
466,533
493,517

$
$

1333.00992
13,197,169

9,900
7,425

7,597
5,698

Master Plan 2025
Table 6.4 - Total Probably Costs to Meet Park Needs
Item
Meeting Amenity LOS Needs & Park Standards
Develop amenitites required to meet LOS needs through 2034
Upgrades to existing parks to meet standards
Park System Inventory & Conditions Assessment
Subtotal Existing Park Upgrades and Amenities LOS

Probable Cost

Meet Park Needs by 2034
Develop 28.0 acres of parks to meet LOS and fill gaps
$
Subtotal 2034 Needs
$
Meeting Park Needs by Build-Out in 2050
Acquire and develop an additional 8.0 acres of park land to meet LOS needs and fill gaps $
Subtotal Build-Out Needs
$
Grand Total
$
Table 6.5 - Probably Costs to Meet Recreation Needs
Item
Pre-programming study for a recreation/community center
Pre-programming study for a sports complex or indoor fieldhouse
Grand Total

1,050,000
522,500
15,000
1,587,500

23,800,000
23,800,000
6,800,000
6,800,000
32,187,500

Probable Cost
150,000
50,000
$
200,000

Table 6.6 - Probable Costs to Meet Trail Needs
Item
Probable Cost
Probable costs to develop 19.4 miles of regional trails (per mile)
7,760,000
Probable costs to develop 14.9 miles of unpaved multi-use trails (per mile)
372,500
Proposed trailheads (assumes one 2-stall unisex restroom, 1 picnic shelter, kiosk/signage, paved 1,950,000
parking 20 stalls, site furnishings, 0.75 acre of land)
Proposed trail crossings
36,000,000
Safety improvements for regional trails (per miled)
3,045,000
Grand Total
$
49,127,500
Other Costs
Item
Wayfinding and signage master plan (for entire parks, recreation, and trail system)
Wayfinding and signage installation (for entire parks, recreation, and trail system)
Accessibility Strategic Action Plan (for entire parks, recreation, and trails system)
Grand Total

Probable Cost
50,000
200,000
30,000
$
280,000

Summary of Total Costs
Item
Park Needs
Recreation Needs
Trail Needs
Other Studies
Total

$
$
$
$
$

Probable Cost
32,187,500
200,000
49,127,500
280,000
81,795,000

Page 186 of 211

BLUFFDALE CITY PARK INVENTORY
EXISTING PARKS - Prior to 2014
Price per Acre

Plat

Name

Day Ranch Park
jordan school district
Hidden
owned
Valley Dog Park
Equestrian Park
IND L/M1/M2/M3

Revolutionary Way Trail
Bluffdale Elementary Connection

Acres

Address

Classification

Sod Square Feet

18.27
2.26
9.55

15295 S Rochelle Day Drive
1225 W Harmon Day Drive
2440 W 14400 S

Community Park
Special Use Park
Special Use Park

460,020
14,723
0

Trail
Trail

0
0

3.4
0.12

14323 S 2700 W

Sod & Irrigation

$ 1,078,496.00

Trail

25,000.00

65,601.00

Playground
Amenities

Pavillions

Courts

Bathroom

Parking

Trees and Other
Landscaping

Splash Pad

$ 903,721.50

$ 731,000.00

$ 825,000.00

$ 394,953.00

$ 478,355.00

$ 874,831.00

$ 239,423.00

$ 621,368.00

$ 295,248.00

Bleachers

Other Amenities and
Construction Costs

$ 1,207,219.00

$ 8,716,114.00
$ 597,600.00
$ 917,709.00

Contract JSD = 0

$ 123,723.00

Total Cost (less grants)

14,864,493.50

687,309.00

Developer
123,723.00

7,538,546

Jordan N. EDA

2,766,960
TRCC Grant
Developer
Impact Fees

7,082,984
Impact Fees

500,000
Impact Fees

110,000

Grant/Donation

242,964

Capital Projects

300,000
In-kind

from public works dept

Page 187 of 211

Bluffdale City
Public Safety Impact Fee
Level of Service - Facilities
Historic Projects
Year Built
Cost
Station 1 - Station 91
2003 $ 2,110,000
Station 1 Expansion Police
2019 $
280,151
Station 2 - Station 92
2019 $ 4,899,546
Total
$ 7,289,697
2019 ERUs
LOS - SF/ERU
ERUs Added thru 2035
Needed New Space
Bringhurst - Public Safety Building
$ 12,000,000
Remodel Basement of City Hall for Police $ 1,000,000
Total New Space
13,000,000
Facility Impact Fee

Total SQ FT
SQ FT Utilized
12,900
12,900
Included above
12,821
12,821
25,721
25,721
5,579
4.61
1,333
6,146
18,000
4,000
22,000
$
2,724

Level of Service - Equipment
Current Commercial ERCs
Added thru 2035 ERCs
Future Equipment
Fire Truck FY2027

590,207

Total Equipment
Equipment Impact Fee

$
$

590,207
3,621

Residential Impact Fee (Facility Only)

$
$
$
$

2,724
6,345
2,724
3,621

Non-Residential Impact Fee/ERC (9,000 sf)
Facility
Equipment
Current Impact Fee/ERU

252
163

Page 188 of 211

Residential
Non-Residential

$
$

2,039
4,558

Page 189 of 211

Bluffdale City
Water Impact Fee
Inflation rate
Excess Capacity
Zone 1W Tank (15000 S.)
$
Zone 1W Transmission
15000 South PI Pump Station
Debt Cost of 2020B Water Revenue Bonds
Zone 2 West Storage Property Acquisition
Impact Fee Fund Balance
Total Excess Capacity
$

Total Cost
Other Sources
5,879,117
2,939,559
4,934,064
2,467,032
1,880,754
1,211,166
384,230
(1,368,809)
12,920,522 $
5,406,591

Future Facilities
Zone 2 West Storage
14600 S Waterline Upsize
Zone 3W Booster Pump Station
15000 South PS Modifications
Interest/Issuance Costs for Bonds

Total Cost
Years to ConstructionTotal Inflated Cost
9,270,000
2 $
10,026,432
1,000,000
6 $
1,265,319
2,500,000
2 $
2,704,000
300,000
2 $
324,480
3,912,550
3,912,550

Total Future Facilities

16,982,550

Remaining
2,939,559
2,467,032
1,880,754
1,211,166
384,230
(1,368,809)
$
7,513,931

Deficiency
0.0%
0%
100%
40%
0.0%
0%

Other Sources
-

New Growth
Deficiency
100.0% $
100%
0%
1,880,754
60%
486,054
100.0%
100%
$ 2,366,808

$
$
$
$
$

Remaining
10,026,432
1,265,319
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550

18,232,781

New Growth
$ 2,939,559
2,467,032
725,112
384,230
(1,368,809)
$ 5,147,124

Total ERCs
3,573
3,573
786
3,573
1,964

Deficiency
New Growth
Deficiency
60.0%
40.0% $ 6,015,859
44.0%
56.0%
556,740
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
$

6,572,600

Def ERCs
786
1,434
-

New Growth
4,010,573
708,579
2,704,000
324,480
3,912,550

Growth ERCs Growth/ERC
3,573 $
823
3,573
690
2,139
339
1,964
196
3,319
(412)
$
1,635
Total ERCs
1,964
4,998
1,964
1,142

Def ERCs Growth ERCs Growth/ERC
1,178
786 $
5,105
2,199
2,799
253
1,964
1,377
1,142
284
1,375
2,846

11,660,181

Total Impact Fee
Future Facility Impact Fee Schedule
Residential (per Unit)
Single Family
Multi-Family
Commercial (Meter Size)

* Current storage at Metro Water Tank approved by State of Utah. Last for 15 more years.
ERC Multiplier
Impact Fee
1.00 $
11,500
0.75 $
8,625
3/4
1
1 1/2
2
3
4

Current Impact Fee Schedule
Residential (per Unit)
Single Family
Multi-Family
Commercial (Meter Size)

1
2.5
5
8
15
25

ERC Multiplier

3/4
1
1 1/2
2
3
4

$
$
$
$
$
$

11,500
28,751
57,502
92,003
172,506
287,510

Impact Fee
$
4,485
$
3,363
$
$
$
$
$
$

4,485
11,211
22,423
35,876
67,268
112,113

############

2 $ 184,006.64

9,865

11,500

Page 190 of 211

Water Revenue Bonds (2020 B)
Amount Issued
$
Period

Principal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Total

8,000,000

340,000
344,000
350,000
354,000
360,000
367,000
372,000
378,000
385,000
392,000
400,000
405,000
411,000
420,000
430,000
440,000
448,000
459,000
468,000
477,000
8,000,000

Coupon
0.60%
0.65%
0.70%
0.75%
0.80%
0.85%
0.90%
0.95%
1.00%
1.05%
1.10%
1.15%
1.25%
1.35%
1.45%
1.55%
1.65%
1.75%
1.85%
1.95%

Total Project Cost
Cost to Growth

4,884,000
2,924,000

Interest Cost to Growth

725,112.49

Interest
95,570
93,432
91,089
88,536
85,769
82,769
79,535
76,066
72,345
68,362
64,104
59,575
54,678
49,274
43,322
36,794
29,688
21,976
13,631
4,651
1,211,166

60%

Debt Service
435,570
437,432
441,089
442,536
445,769
449,769
451,535
454,066
457,345
460,362
464,104
464,575
465,678
469,274
473,322
476,794
477,688
480,976
481,631
481,651
9,211,166

Page 191 of 211

Proposed
Water Revenue Bonds (2027)
Amount Issued for Impact Fees

Period

Principal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Total

6,714,573

220,000
230,000
240,000
250,000
265,000
275,000
285,000
300,000
315,000
325,000
340,000
355,000
375,000
390,000
405,000
425,000
445,000
465,000
485,000
505,000
6,895,000

Coupon
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%
4.50%

Growth Projects
Issuance Costs
Total Issuance for Growth Projects

6,714,573
134,291
6,848,864

Interest Cost to Growth
Total Issuance/Interest Costs

3,778,259
3,912,549.96

Interest
310,275
300,375
290,025
279,225
267,975
256,050
243,675
230,850
217,350
203,175
188,550
173,250
157,275
140,400
122,850
104,625
85,500
65,475
44,550
22,725
3,704,175

2%
102%

Debt Service
530,275
530,375
530,025
529,225
532,975
531,050
528,675
530,850
532,350
528,175
528,550
528,250
532,275
530,400
527,850
529,625
530,500
530,475
529,550
527,725
10,599,175

Page 192 of 211

City of Bluffdale

2023 t 2027
Water System Capital Project Program

x
x
x
x
x
X

x
x

DW - ZONE 1 WEST WATER STORAGE (15000 So)
DW - ZONE 1 WEST 15000 SOUTH 2700 W. TRANSMISSION
MAIN
DW - ZONE 2 WEST STORAGE
DW - ZONE 2 WEST TRANSMISSION MAIN
DW - ZONE 2 Connection
DW - ZONE 2 EAST WATER STORAGE AND PUMP STATION
DW - 14600 SO. WATERLINE UPSIZE 1690 W. TO SPRINGVIEW
FARMS

IF Water

FY22
Water

Total

975,000

3,013,000

3,988,000

410,000

600,000

1,010,000

DW - ZONE 3 BOOSTER PUMP STATION
DW - 15000 SOUTH PS MODIFICATIONS
15000 SOUTH PI PUMP STATION
ZONE 2 EAST DRINKING WATER TANK STUDY
ZONE 2 WEST STORAGE PROPERTY ACQUISITION (3 ACRES)
W-Master planning and modeling
Booster Pump Station City Fire Flow Improvements
Total

100,000

1,485,000

700,000

300,000

4,613,000

IF Water

FY23
Water

Total

750,000

IF Water

150,000

845,000

$
$
$

995,000
-

300,000

50,000

100,000

50,000

$
$

1,110,000
50,000

$
$
$
$
$

1,110,000
50,000

$
$
$
$
$

700,000
-

$
$

400,000
-

15,000

$
$

30,000

6,098,000

215,000

2,820,000

3,035,000

FY24
Water

Total

100,000

600,000

$
$

900,000
-

50,000

$
$
$
$
$

50,000
150,000
-

$
$
$
$

50,000
1,000,000
2,300,000

50,000

150,000

$
$
$

25,000
500,000
1,425,000

FY25
Water

IF Water

$
$
$

25,000
500,000
875,000

68,000

$ 462,000

$ 530,000

$
$

215,600
283,600

$
$

$
$
$

1,170,000
37,500
75,000

45,000

25,000
500,000
1,852,500

$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$

Total

2,340,000
212,500
425,000

650,000
255,000

25,000
500,000
4,407,500

FY26
Water

IF Water

$
$
$
$

3,510,000
250,000
500,000
-

$
$
$
$
$

650,000
300,000
-

$
$
$
$

50,000
1,000,000
6,260,000

Total

FY27
Water

IF Water

Total

IF Water
Total

Water
Total

Project
Total

975,000

3,863,000

4,838,000

9676000

$
$

410,000
1,620,000
37,500
75,000
100,000

$
$
$
$
$

600,000
3,785,000
212,500
425,000
50,000

$
$
$
$
$

1,010,000
5,405,000
250,000
500,000
150,000

2020000
10810000
500000

$
$
$
$
$

$
$

$
$
$
$
$

45,000
-

$
$
$
$
$

700,000
255,000
15,000
1,960,000
50,000

$
$
$
$
$

700,000
300,000
15,000
1,960,000
50,000

1400000
600000
30000
3920000

100,000
105,000
1,000,000
4,467,500

$
300,000
$
105,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 13,320,500

$
400,000
$
210,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 17,788,000

68,000
215,600
6,001,100

$
462,000
$
169,400
$ 18,336,900

$
530,000
$
385,000
$ 24,338,000

15,000

$
$

15,000
-

25,000

50,000

15,000

30,000

25,000

40,000

65,000

15,000

30,000

$
$
$
$

$
$
$

Pressurized Irrigation System Capital Project Program
PI - 3600 S from 14400 S to 13800 S* (13% IF Eligible)
PI - 14000 S - 2950 W to 3600 W* (56% IF Eligible)
Total

*These 2 PI projects were applied for 100% grant funding by the State Secondary Water Meter Grant Project. City will receive decision on grant application in August 2022.

169,400
631,400

385,000
915,000

300000

420000

Page 193 of 211

Description

1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
1-7
1-9
1-10

14600 South
14600 South
14600 South
14600 South
Bringhurst Blvd
Bringhurst Blvd
Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South
3600 West
Transportation
1-11 Master Plan
Master Plan Update
for Active
Transportation and
1-12 Transportation

Location
Redwood Road to Spring View Pkwy
Spring View Pkwy to Noelle Nelson Dr
Noell Nelson Dr to 800 West
800 West to I-15
Extension 700 feet to the South
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan Narrows Rd
Bringhurst Blvd to Redwood Rd
3600 West to 2950 West
14400 South to 13800 South
-

Future Roadway Projects
Improvement
Responsibility
Scope
Bluffdale
Widening
Bluffdale
Widening
Bluffdale
Widening
UDOT
Widening
Bluffdale
New Roadway
Bluffdale
New Roadway
Bluffdale
Curb & Gutter
Bluffdale
Widening
Bluffdale
Widening
Bluffdale

2-1
2-2

2700 West
Loumis Parkway

14200 South to 14400 South
14400 South to Bangerter Hwy

Description

Location

1-A

Signal

Porter Rockwell Blvd & Rising Star Ln

1-B

Signal

SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Rd

1-C

Signal

14600 S & 1690 W

# of Lanes
Current
Proposed
2
4
2
5
2
5
2-4
5+
0
3
0
3
2
2
2
3
2
3

Estimated
Cost
$18,100,000
$54,240,000
$2,460,000
$20,000,000
$1,500,000
$6,200,000
$2,700,000
$1,700,000
$3,600,000

Inflated
Cost
$22,021,418
$65,991,253
$2,992,966
$24,333,058
$1,824,979
$7,543,248
$3,284,963
$2,068,310
$4,379,950

Master Plan

$50,000

$60,833

Bluffdale
Master Plan
Phase 2 Projects (2035 - 2050)
Bluffdale
Widening
Bluffdale
Widening
Phase 3 Projects (2045 - 2050)

$150,000

$182,498

2
2

3
3

Estimated
Cost
$401,200

Inflated
Cost
$488,121

$1,700,000

$2,068,310

$400,000

$486,661

Future Intersection Projects
Responsibility

Improvement
Scope

Developer
Bluffdale/
UDOT1
Bluffdale

1. UDOT to pay for signal and Bluffdale to pay for geometric updates.

Phase 2 Projects (2035 - 2050)
Noell Nelson Drive between 14600 South
2-AIntersection Improvements
Bluffdale
and Porter Rockwell Blvd
Bluffdale

Intersection
Improvements

$3,100,000
$0
$0

Page 194 of 211

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

1-6

Project

14600 South, Redwood
Road to Spring View Pkwy
Widening
14600 South, Spring View
Pkwy to Noelle Nelson Dr Bridge and Widen to 5
lanes
Widening
14600 South, Noell Nelson
Dr to 800 West - Widen to 5
lanes
Widening
14600 South, 800 West to I15
Widening
Extension of Bringhurst
Blvd to the South (Major
New
Collector) - 700 feet
Construction
Bringhurst Blvd to Jordan
New
Narrows Rd
Construction

1-7

Jordan Narrows Rd
13800 South, 3600 West to
1-9
2950 West
3600 West, 14400 South to
1-10
13800 South
1-11

Type

Transportation Master Plan
Master Plan Update for
1-12 Active Transportation and
Transportation

Functional
Class

Cost

Outside
Inflated Cost Funding
Sources1

Minor
Arterial

$ 18,100,000

$ 22,021,418

Minor
Arterial

$ 54,240,000

65,991,253

2,992,966

Minor
Arterial
Minor
Arterial

2,460,000

2035
2025
2035
ADT Capacity Capacity

2025 ADT 35 ADT in
in excess Excess of
New
% Cutof '25
'25
Capacity through
Capacity Capacity

% New % Impact
Impact
Capacity
Fee
Fees
for
Eligible
Beyond
Existing
(until
2035
Demand
2035)

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost
(Until 2035)

Project
Reimbursable
Cost

% Reimbursable

Inflation
Assumptions

UDOT

11,000 15,000

10,500

32,300

500

4,500

21,800

18%

$ 65,991,253 11,000 15,000

10,500

32,300

500

4,500

21,800

18%

8,000 13,000

10,500

32,300

2,500

21,800

18%

$ 24,333,058 16,000 20,000

15,100

32,300

900

4,900

17,200

15%

65%

15%

65%

73%

3,303,213

269,366.95

80%

82%

17,643,398

outside funded

2,454,232

Inflation rate

20742_20822

Year Constructed

13.98

20822_20855

20910_20945

1,500,000

1,824,979

2,000

13,400

2,000

13,400

15%

85%

273,746.90

100%

1,824,979

14.20

30059_30066

6,200,000

7,543,248

2,000

13,400

2,000

13,400

15%

85%

1,131,487.20

100%

7,543,248

58.71

30059_30066

2,700,000

3,284,963

1,000

2,000

9,300

100%

3,284,963

30065_30066

1,700,000

2,068,310

2,000

3,000

9,300

13,400

4,100

95%

1,964,894

20466_20604

3,600,000

4,379,950

2,000

5,000

9,300

13,400

4,100

95%

4,160,953

20424_20466

100%

60,832.65

100%

60,833

3.16

100%

182,497.94
5,221,144
7,201,855

100%

$
$

182,498
39,119,998

9.47
270.90
373.68

50,000

60,833

$
150,000
TOTAL $ 110,700,000

182,498
$ 134,683,476

$
$ 90,324,311

$
$

1. WFRC STIP (State Transportation Improvement Program), UDOT, adjacent cities, or other external funding sources
2. Widening cost estimates represent the cost of widening for new growth.

$ 20,375,689
$ 21,902,106
$ 113,201,200

$ 137,726,569

$ 91,299,094

UDOT

20665_20742

24,333,058

UDOT Project

171.39

$ 20,000,000

Widening

2025
ADT

Major
Collector
Major
Collector
Minor
Collector
Minor
Collector
Minor
Collector

Widening

Outside
Funding

Total

Bluffdale Trips by Phase
2025
2035
New Trips
19,273
89,764
109,037
PM Peak Hour

19,273 new trips
270.90 Roadway project cost per trip

Cost Per Trip
$
270.90
$
102.77
$
94.50
$
468.18

Roadway Projects
Intersection Projects
Buy-In
Total

9.6 trips per single family home
4,495 Estimated cost per detached home

7,201,855

2030

Model Volumes
single_id

2025

2035

20424_20466
20466_20604
20530_20609
20609_20658
20653_20665
20661_30093
20665_20742
20722_20738
20742_20822
20770_30061
20788_30096
20794_30097
20822_20855
20910_20945
20945_20979
30065_30066
30092_30093
30059_30066

3000
3000
4000
3000
8000
12000
11000
5000
11000
12000
2000
0
8000
16000
29000
0
3000
0

5000
3000
4000
3000
11000
13000
15000
7000
15000
12000
4000
0
13000
20000
44000
2000
5000
2000

single_id

vol_nb25
3246 20424_20466
3301 20466_20604
3385 20530_20609
3469 20609_20658
3524 20653_20665
3537 20661_30093
3544 20665_20742
3629 20722_20738
3654 20742_20822
3686 20770_30061
3708 20788_30096
3718 20794_30097
3760 20822_20855
3882 20910_20945
3929 20945_20979
15590 30065_30066
15621 30092_30093
25472 30059_30066

vol_b35
3000
3000
4000
3000
8000
12000
11000
5000
11000
12000
2000
0
8000
16000
29000
0
3000
0

5000
3000
4000
3000
11000
13000
15000
7000
15000
12000
4000
0
13000
20000
44000
2000
5000
2000

Page 195 of 211

Intersection

1-A Porter Rockwell Boulevard & Rising Star Lane
1-B SR-68 & Jordan Narrows Road
1-C 14600 S & 1690 W

Improvement

Cost

Signal
Intersection Improvements
Signal

$
$
$
$

401,200
1,700,000
400,000
2,501,200

Inflated Cost

488,121
2,068,310
486,661
3,043,092

Outside Funding
1
Sources
RDA
UDOT/Bluffdale2

Outside
Funding
$
$
$
$

488,121
486,661
974,782

% Cut- % Impact Fee
through
Eligible
0%
18%

Impact Fee
Eligible Cost

Fully Outside Funded
RDA
100% $ 1,581,649 maybe be one int proj for signal heads and one for turn lanes
82% $
399,062
$ 1,980,711

1. WFRC STIP (State Transportation Improvement Program), UDOT, adjacent cities, or other external funding sources
2. UDOT to pay for signal and Bluffdale to pay for geometric updates

$ 1,526,418
$
Local Percent Match:

6.77%

Inflation
Assumptions
Inflation rate
Year Constructed

4%
2030

76%

19,273 new trips
102.77 Intersection cost per trip

$ 82.07
$ 20.71
$ 102.77

Page 196 of 211

# Project
1 Loumis Parkway
2700 West, 14400
South to Bangerter
2 Hwy
14400 South, 2200
West to Redwood Rd
3 YTD
14600 So, 1690 W to
4 Redwood Rd

Impact
'25 to
% Impact Fees
Functional 2025
'35 ADT % Pass- %
Fee
Beyond Impact Fee Growth
Class
Capacity growth through Existing Eligible
2035
Eligible Cost Trips

Amount 2025
Remaining ADT

2035
ADT

676,705

Minor
7,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

54%

22%

24% $

148,875

19,273

7.72

20722_20738

7.72

Major
611,018 12,000 13,000 Collector

13,400

1,000

90%

2% $

42,771

19,273

2.22

20661_30093

2.22

13,400

22%

78% $

19,273

20609_20658

15,100

3,000

53%

20%

27% $

284,388

19,273

14.76

20653_20665

$ 14.76

30.89

20788_30096

$ 30.89

38.91
94.50
155

30092_30093

$ 38.91

$ 1,824,616
$ 1,421,942

1780 West (behind
Maverik) and Redwood
5 Connection
$ 2,706,523
13900 S Connection 2700 West to 2950
6 West
$ 3,408,466
$ 10,649,270

5,000

Major
3,000 Collector
Major
8,000 11,000 Collector
3,000

2,000

Minor
4,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

22%

56% $

595,435

19,273

3,000

Minor
5,000 Collector

9,300

2,000

32%

22%

46% $ 749,863
$ 1,821,332

19,273

19,273
94.50

Growth/Trip

$
$

single_id

new trips
Buy-In cost per trip

Page 197 of 211

ORDINANCE NO. 2026-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUFFDALE, UTAH
ADOPTING AN IMPACT FEE FACILITY PLAN AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code § 11-36a-301, the City of Bluffdale (“City”)
recognizes that impact fees imposed must be based on an impact fee facilities plan adopted
to determine the public facilities required to serve growth resulting from new development
activity; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code § 11-36a-501, the City provided written public
notice of its intent to prepare or amend an impact fee facilities plan; and
WHEREAS the City has contracted with EFG Consulting, LLC and METHODS Consulting
to prepare an impact fee analysis (“IFA”) and an impact fee facilities plan (“IFFP”) to guide
future development and funding of capital facilities within the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code §§ 11-36a-502, -504, the City provided written
public notice of its intent to adopt an impact fee facilities plan and to adopt an impact fee
analysis for Parks and Recreation, Public Safety, Transportation, and Water and has complied
with the noticing requirements therein and has made a copy of the proposed IFA and IFFP,
and impact fee enactment, together with a summary designed to be understood by a lay
person, available to the public at least 10 days before a Public Hearing, and has in all other
respects complied with the notice, procedural, and substantive requirements of the Impact
Fees Act, Title 11, Chapter 36a, of the Utah Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the impact this proposed ordinance may
have on family health, stability, and formation; and
WHEREAS the City Council held a public hearing on May 27, 2026, regarding the
proposed IFA and IFFP.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUFFDALE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Adoption of Impact Fee Facilities Plan. The Bluffdale City Council hereby
adopts the impact fee facilities plan titled “Impact Fee Facility Plan, Impact Fee Analysis”
(“IFFP) (attached as Exhibit A) for future development of the City of Bluffdale pursuant to
Utah Code § 11-36a-301 for parks and recreation, public safety, transportation, and water
infrastructure.

Page 198 of 211

Section 2. Adoption of Impact Fee Analysis. The City Council hereby approves and
adopts the impact fee analysis contained in the IFFP attached hereto as Exhibit A for the
purpose of determining the maximum amount of the impact fees for parks and recreation,
public safety, transportation, and water infrastructure.
Section 3. Municipal Impact Fees Imposed. Impact fees are hereby imposed as a
condition of the issuance of a building permit or development approval by the City for any
development activity which creates additional demand and need for public facilities for parks
and recreation, public safety, transportation, and water infrastructure. The proposed fees
and analysis are set forth in the Impact Fee Analysis contained in the IFFP. The suggested
Impact Fees set forth in the IFFP as the “Staff Recommendation” on page 6-7 (attached and
incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit A) are hereby adopted as a schedule of
impact fees. Other than the adoption of the IFFP and Impact Fee Analysis and the
accompanying fees, this ordinance shall not amend the impact fee enactment contained in
Title 9, Chapter 4, of the Bluffdale City Code in any other way.
Section 4. Severability. Should any sentence, clause, part or provision of this
Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not
affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof, other than the part
declared to be invalid
Section 5. Effective Date. In compliance with Utah Code § 11-36a-401(2), this
ordinance shall take effect ninety (90) days following its adoption by the Bluffdale City
Council.
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED: May 27, 2026.

ATTEST:
_____________________________
City Recorder

____________________________________
Mayor Natalie C. Hall

Page 199 of 211

Voting by the City Council:
Councilmember Aston
Councilmember Austin
Councilmember Lord
Councilmember Smith
Councilmember Wilding
Mayor Hall (tie only)

“AYE”
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____

“NAY”
______
______
______
______
______
______

Page 200 of 211

Exhibit A
Impact Fee Facility Plan
Impact Fee Analysis
May 2026

Page 201 of 211

REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
To:
From:
Date:
Business Date:
Subject:

Applicant(s):
Staff Presentation:

Mayor and City Council
Caitlyn Tubbs, Planning Manager
May 21, 2026
May 27, 2026
The Applicant proposes amendments to Bluffdale City Code (BCC)
Chapter 3.40 “Retail Fireworks Outlets” to reflect current state-level
licensing requirements and contemporary storage methods and to allow
the seasonal sale of fireworks as a permitted temporary use in
commercial and industrial zones.
Joee Witter
Caitlyn Tubbs

RECOMMENDATION: To approve Ordinance 2026-05 for text amendments as recommended by the
Planning Commission on May 20, 2026.
BACKGROUND: The Applicant proposes amendments to Bluffdale City Code (BCC) Chapter 3.40 “Retail
Fireworks Outlets” to reflect current state-level licensing requirements and contemporary storage
methods and to allow the seasonal sale of fireworks as a permitted temporary use in commercial and
industrial zones.
The proposed amendments would update Bluffdale’s fireworks regulations by recognizing outdoor
fireworks sales as a permitted temporary use and by revising Chapter 3.40 to better align local
requirements with current Utah law and State fire and life-safety standards. The proposal would also
remove the separate salesperson license provisions, simplify the insurance requirement, update
terminology from “license assessor” to “Business License Official,” and revise storage language to
allow approved steel shipping containers for commercial storage.
Through this updated code, fireworks retailers would first need to proceed through the Temporary Use
Permit (TUP) process outlined in BCC Sections 11.180.030 and 11.180.040, including providing a
description of the proposed use and a description of the site layout. Following the TUP approval, the
retailer would be able to obtain a business license to sell their fireworks.
SB 232 Consideration - Impact to the Family:
As required by Senate Bill 232 (2026), Bluffdale must consider the impact any potential ordinance
changes could have on families prior to taking action.

Page 202 of 211

FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: Zoning text amendments are a legislative decision of the City Council,
after receiving a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Broad discretion is given to the
City’s Land Use Authorities when making land use decisions. The Planning Commission held a public
hearing on May 20, 2026, and forwarded a unanimous positive recommendation to the City Council.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION:
- Ordinance 2026-05
- Proposed redlines
- Planning Commission Staff Report dated May 20, 2026

Page 203 of 211

CITY OF BLUFFDALE, UTAH
ORDINANCE NO. 2026-05
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING BLUFFDALE CITY CODE CHAPTER 3.40 “RETAIL FIREWORKS
OUTLETS” AND SECTION 11.180.020 TO ALLOW OUTDOOR SALES OF FIREWORKS AS A
PERMITTED TEMPORARY USE AND UPDATING RETAIL FIREWORKS OUTLETS LICENSING
REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Bluffdale’s current retail fireworks sales regulations were
adopted in 1988; and
WHEREAS, an Applicant has proposed a code amendment to Bluffdale City Code
Chapter 3.40 “Retail Fireworks Outlets” and Section 11.180.020 to allow outdoor sales of
fireworks as a permitted temporary use and to update retail fireworks outlets licensing
requirements pursuant to the Utah Fireworks Act (Utah Admin Code R710-2); and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing for the proposed amendments was provided
in accordance with the Bluffdale City Code and Utah State Code; and
WHEREAS, on May 20, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
and forwarded a positive recommendation of the proposed code amendments to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the effect of the proposed code
amendments on family health, stability, and formation pursuant to Utah Code § 10-3-702.1
before enacting this Ordinance.
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed code amendments are in the
best interests of the City and its residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLUFFDALE,
UTAH AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Adoption. Ordinance 2026-05 is hereby adopted, amending the
Bluffdale City Code as shown in Exhibit A.
Section 2.
Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon publication or posting as required by law.
Section 3.
Amendment of Conflicting Ordinances. If any ordinances,
resolutions, policies, or zoning maps of the City heretofore adopted are inconsistent

Page 204 of 211

herewith they are hereby amended to comply with the provisions hereof. If they cannot be
amended to comply with the provisions hereof, they are hereby repealed.
Section 4.
Severability. If any section, part, or provision of this Ordinance is
held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and
independent provision, and such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any other
portion of this Ordinance and all sections, parts, provisions and words of this Ordinance
shall be severable.
PASSED AND APPROVED: May 27, 2026
CITY OF BLUFFDALE

_________________________________
Mayor Natalie C. Hall
ATTEST:

[seal]

___________________________________
City Recorder

Voting by the City Council:
Councilmember Aston
Councilmember Austin
Councilmember Lord
Councilmember Smith
Councilmember Wilding
Mayor Natalie Hall

Yes

Absent

____
____
____
____
____
____

(tiebreaker, if needed)

Page 205 of 211

Bluffdale Fireworks Code Changes
11.180.020 Permitted Temporary Uses
Permitted temporary uses include:
Carnivals and circuses.
Outdoor sales of fireworks.
Christmas tree sales lots.
Flower stands.
Music festivals.
Occupancy of a temporary or existing dwelling during the remodeling of an existing or
construction of new detached single-family home (allowed only in the A-5, R-1-87, R-1-43, and
R-1-10 Zones and Cluster Residential and Infill Overlays).
Political rallies.
Promotional displays.
Rummage sales.
Seasonal fruit and vegetable stands.
Snow shacks/shave ice stands.
Tents for religious services.
3.40.020 Outlet License Requirements Outdoor Sales of Fireworks Requirements
The license assessor shall issue a license permitting operation of a retail fireworks outlet sales
to any person who fulfills all of the following requirements:
1) Location: Fireworks sales shall only be permitted in areas zoned for commercial or
industrial uses.
2) Application: The applicant shall complete and sign the appropriate form on file at the city
offices or available on the city’s official website.
3) Sales requirements
a) Temporary stands, trailers and tents shall comply with the rules set forth in The Utah
Fireworks Act (Utah Admin Code R710-2)
b) Temporary stands, trailers or tents for the sale of division 1.4g common state
approved explosives shall be located at least 50 feet from other stands, trailers, tents,
LPG, flammable liquid or gas storage and dispensing units, and least 25 feet from an
approved fireworks storage container.
c) Overnight Storage

Page 206 of 211

If the stand or trailer is used for the overnight storage of division 1.4g common
state approved explosives, it shall be equipped with suitable locking devices to
prevent unauthorized entry.
ii) Tents shall not be used for overnight storage of division 1.4g common state
approved explosives unless on site security is provided.
d) No person shall be allowed to sleep in any temporary stand, trailer or tent in which
division 1.4g common state approved explosives are stored or sold.
4) Distances: The retail fireworks outlet shall be located at the following minimum distances
from the buildings or items named:
a) At last one hundred feet (100’) from any school building, healthcare institution, church
or other building used primarily for worship or ritual, gasoline filling station, or any
building or site where flammable liquid is stored or present.
b) Fifty feet (50’) from any other building.
c) One hundred feet (100’) from any other retail fireworks outlet stand.
d) Twenty feet (20’) from any boundary dividing tracts of land owned in fee by different
persons, unless the adjacent owner gives written permission to locate the stand
nearer to the boundary and an executed original of such permission is furnished to the
city.
5) Clearing Combustible Material: The site of the retail fireworks outlet shall be clear of dry
grass, weeds, trash or other combustible matter for twenty five feet (25’) in any direction
from the stand.
6) Smoking: On all sides of the stand, a sign shall be posted with letters four inches (4") high
reading "Smoking Prohibited Within 50 Feet".
7) Firefighting Equipment: The retail fireworks outlet shall have, within easy reach inside the
stand, fire extinguishers with a combined rating of at least 2A:10-B:C.
8) Clearing Combustible Material: The site of the retail fireworks outlet shall be clear of dry
grass, weeds, trash or other combustible matter for twenty-five feet (25') in any direction
from the stand.
9) Display: The fireworks held for sale must be displayed, if at all, only behind a counter or at
a place which is not accessible to customers.
10) Packaging: Fireworks shall be stored, handled, displayed and sold only in closed
packages.
11) Land Use: The retail fireworks outlet must conform to the applicable provisions of the
land use ordinances, including, but not limited to, the setback and sign requirements.
12) Heating and Light: The stand shall not be illuminated by open flame or exposed heating
elements. Heating and lighting appliances shall be approved by underwriters’
laboratories or similar authority, and shall be maintained in good condition.
13) Overnight Occupation Of Stand: No person shall sleep overnight in the stand.
14) Other Merchandise: The retail fireworks sales establishment outlet shall sell no
merchandise other than legal consumer fireworks and novelty related items.
i)

Page 207 of 211

15) Insurance: The owner or operator of the retail fireworks shall furnish to the Business
License Official a certificate showing amounts of insurance coverage, and showing the city
as an additional insured.
The owner or operator of the retail fireworks outlet shall furnish to the license assessor a
certificate showing insurance coverage in the following types and amounts, and showing
the city as an additional insured:
Type
Amount
Personal liability and public liability
$300,000.00, plus an additional
coverage
$200,000.00 per employee on duty at any
time
Property damage liability coverage
$200,000.00
Products liability coverage
$1,000,000.00
16) Inspection: The license assessor Business License Official shall inspect the retail fireworks
outlet prior to issuance of a license, but after such outlet has been made ready for
operation, and shall examine such outlet for conformity with this chapter.
17) Fee: The owner or operator of the retail fireworks outlet shall pay to the city a fee as
specified in the city fee schedule, which shall not be refundable for any reason. This fee
must be received by the city before the retail fireworks outlet is inspected by the city for
compliance with this chapter.
18) Storage: No more than two hundred (200) pounds’ gross weight of fireworks shall be
stored or held for sale at any time in the stand. No fireworks shall be kept overnight in the
stand. Inventory which cannot be kept in the stand must be kept in a one-hour fire rated
roofed room located at a place where a stand could be located under this section, or in a
steel shipping container approved for commercial storage.
19) Removal: The retail fireworks sales establishment shall be removed no later than fourteen
(14) calendar days after the last legal date of sale as defined by Utah Code.
3.40.030 Salesperson’s License
The license assessor shall issue a license permitting the licensee to sell fireworks at retail to
any person who fulfills all of the following requirements:
1. Employment: The person applying for the license ("applicant") furnishes to the license
assessor a written statement signed by the holder of a valid outlet license, which
statement recites that the applicant is employed by the signer for the purpose of selling
fireworks.
2. Age: The applicant is eighteen (18) years of age or older, as apparent from the
applicant's driver's license or birth certificate. (Ord. 7-12-88-3, 7-12-1988)
3. Examination: In a short, written examination, the applicant demonstrates that he or she
knows and understands the requirements of section 3-4-2 of this chapter.
4. Examination Form: The retail fireworks outlet examination form is on file in the city
office. (Ord. 7-12-88-3, 7-12-1988; amd. 2013 Code)

Page 208 of 211

3.40.040 Transfer Of License Prohibited
A license which has been issued to one person shall not be valid in the hands of another person.
(Ord. 7-12-88-3, 7-12-1988)
3.40.050 Other Licenses And Provisions
1. Other Licenses: Persons holding licenses issued pursuant to this chapter shall not be
required to obtain any other license under this title.
2. Incorporation: The provisions contained in other chapters of this title shall apply to this
chapter, except where consistent with the provisions of this chapter or where
inapplicable to the facts and circumstances of fireworks retailing. (Ord. 7-12-88-3, 7-121988)
3.40.060 Revocation Of License
1. Effect: A license which has been revoked is not valid for any purpose.
2. Outlet Retail License: A license issued pursuant to section 3-4-2 3.40.020 of this chapter
may be revoked for any of the following reasons:
1. Failure of the licensee to maintain the retail fireworks outlet sales establishment
in conformity with the requirements for issuance of a license.
2. Misrepresentation by the person signing the application.
3. Failure by the licensee to conform to the statements made in the application.
4. The sale by an unlicensed person of a firework which, immediately prior to sale,
was included in the inventory of the retail fireworks outlet.
5. The failure to remove the stand as follows:
1. For a retail fireworks outlet operating between June 20 and July 25, no
later than July 30.
2. For a retail fireworks outlet operated between December 20 and January
2, no later than January 7.
3. For a retail fireworks outlet operated during the Chinese New Year
season, no later than five (5) days after the date of the Chinese New Year.
3. Salesperson’s License: A license issued pursuant to section 3-4-3 of this chapter may be
revoked for any of the following reasons:
1. The revocation of the license of the retail fireworks outlet employing the
salesperson licensee.
2. Misrepresentation in applying for the license.
3. Failure to comply with the requirements of section 3-4-2 of this chapter;
provided, that the licensee was directly involved or took part in the violation.
4. Notice And Appeal Procedure: The license official shall periodically inspect all retail
fireworks outlets. If thereby grounds are discovered for revocation of a license issued
pursuant to this chapter, the license assessor shall immediately give written notice of

Page 209 of 211

license revocation to the holders of the license revoked, and shall note such revocation
in the records of the city. A person whose license has been revoked may appeal the
revocation to the city manager, who shall promptly schedule a hearing before the city
council upon receipt of such notice, and the city council may vote to affirm or reverse
the revocation of the license.
3.40.070 Penalty
1. Owner Of Outlet: The owner of a retail fireworks outlet shall be guilty of a class B
misdemeanor and, upon conviction, subject to penalty as provided in section 1-4-1 of
this code, if any person sells a firework from the inventory of such outlet when such
outlet does not hold a valid license permitting operation of a retail fireworks outlet.
2. Salespersons: Any person selling a firework at retail without a valid license permitting
him or her to sell fireworks shall be guilty of a separate class B misdemeanor and, upon
conviction, subject to penalty as provided in section 1-4-1 of this code. (Ord. 7-12-88-3,
7-12-1988; amd. 2013 Code)
3. Separate Offenses: For purposes of subsections A and B of this section, each act of
selling at a particular time and to a particular customer shall constitute a separate
offense. (Ord. 7-12-88-3, 7-12-1988)

Page 210 of 211

2222 West 14400 South  Bluffdale, Utah 84065  (801) 254-2200
Community Development Department
Planning Division
STAFF REPORT
May 20, 2026
To:
City of Bluffdale Planning Commission
Prepared By: Caitlyn Tubbs, Planning Manager
Re:

Proposed Text Amendment Regarding Seasonal Firework Sales
Application No.: 2026-16
Applicant(s):
Joee Witter
Request:
To review the proposed amendments to Bluffdale City Code Chapter 3.40 to
update the City’s regulations on seasonal fireworks sales and to Section
11.180.020 to allow outdoor fireworks sales as an allowed temporary use.

SUMMARY
The Applicant proposes amendments to Bluffdale City Code (BCC) Chapter 3.40 “Retail Fireworks
Outlets” to reflect current state-level licensing requirements and contemporary storage methods
and to allow the seasonal sale of fireworks as a permitted temporary use in commercial and
industrial zones.
ANALYSIS
The proposed amendments would update Bluffdale’s fireworks regulations by recognizing outdoor
fireworks sales as a permitted temporary use and by revising Chapter 3.40 to better align local
requirements with current Utah law and State fire and life-safety standards. The proposal would
also remove the separate salesperson license provisions, simplify the insurance requirement,
update terminology from “license assessor” to “Business License Official,” and revise storage
language to allow approved steel shipping containers for commercial storage.
Through this updated code, fireworks retailers would first need to proceed through the Temporary
Use Permit (TUP) process outlined in BCC Sections 11.180.030 and 11.180.040, including providing a
description of the proposed use and a description of the site layout. Following the TUP approval,
the retailer would be able to obtain a business license to sell their fireworks.
Application 2026-16 – Seasonal Fireworks Sales Text Amendment
May 20, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting
Page 1

Page 211 of 211

SB 232 Consideration - Impact to the Family
As required by Senate Bill 232 (2026), Bluffdale must consider the impact any potential ordinance
changes could have on families prior to taking action.
NOTICE AND PUBLIC INPUT
A notice of this public hearing was provided as required by Section 11.30.060 of the BCC. The City
did not receive any public input regarding this item prior to publishing this report.
MODEL MOTION FOR A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION
Model for a Positive Recommendation – “I move to forward a positive recommendation to the City
Council for the proposed amendment of Bluffdale City Code Chapter 3.40 and Section 11.180.020
regarding the seasonal sale of fireworks, based on the findings presented in the Staff Report dated
May 20, 2026 (and including the following additional findings):”
1.
List all findings for approval…
EXHIBITS
A: Draft redlines

Application 2026-16 – Seasonal Fireworks Sales Text Amendment
May 20, 2026, Planning Commission Meeting
Page 2

Read the agenda documentPrimary source ↗

The government’s own published record — read it yourself, then decide what to do about it.

Data centers in BluffdaleLocal report →

The facilities, the coverage, and the local record for this community.

Outcome

Not yet recorded. The record stays open — outcomes are added as minutes and vote results are published.

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

Agenda Watch · Aug 19, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-001020 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

Aug 19, 2026 Filed on the Docket
Aug 19, 2026 Full document archived — public record
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 9, 2026 Record updated
Sep 10, 2026 Record updated
Sep 10, 2026 Record updated
Sep 10, 2026 Record updated
Sep 10, 2026 Record updated
Sep 10, 2026 Record updated

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.

On the agenda: Bluffdale meeting — Data Center (May 27)

The agenda, word for word

Provenance

Record history

More on the Docket in Utah