On the agenda: Carver meeting — data center (Jun 15)

CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
June 15, 2026 | 7:00 PM
Carver City Hall, 316 Broadway, Carver
MN 55315?

Courtney Johnson, Mayor
Kristy Conrade, Council Member
Kayla Pascoe, Council Member
Erik Perschmann, Council Member
Laurie Sayre, Council Member

Community members may attend this meeting in person or by streaming on
YouTube.com/@cityofcarver.
All community members wishing to address the City Council on a specific topic related to
business of the City of Carver, on matters not listed on the Regular Meeting Agenda, may
do so under "Community Comment."
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.02, one or more members of the City Council may
participate in this meeting via interactive technology.
~ Our Mission ~
With a foundation of community, integrity, and stewardship we are committed to
serving current and future residents, businesses, and organizations in the City of
Carver.

1. MAYOR CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
Documents:
THE CARVER WAY.PDF

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVE THE AGENDA
4. COMMUNITY COMMENT
Presenters are welcome to address the City Council, for matters relevant
to the City of Carver’s authority, for up to five minutes on matters not
listed on tonight’s meeting Agenda. Specific requests for information
may not be immediately available, in which case follow-up will occur with
the presenter sometime after the meeting. The City Council should not
be expected to immediately act on requests, however, they will follow up
accordingly and may schedule items for future consideration.
5. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
5.1. Employee Service Awards*

5. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
5.1. Employee Service Awards*
Courtney Johnson, Mayor
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. CONSENT AGENDA
All agenda items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered routine
business and will be considered for approval by one motion. There will
be no separate discussion of items unless requested to be removed by a
Council Member. If removed the item will be considered immediately
following the adoption of the Consent Agenda.
7.1. Approve Minutes – June 1, 2026 – Work Session
Documents:
7.1 - WORK SESSION MINUTES - JUNE 1, 2026.PDF

7.2. Approve Minutes – June 1, 2026 – Regular Meeting
Documents:
7.2 - REGULAR MEETING MINUTES - JUNE 1, 2026.PDF

7.3. Claims
Documents:
7.3 - 061526 CLAIMS LISTING.PDF

7.4. Adopt Resolution 129-26 Accepting A Donation From The Carver Lions
Club In The Amount Of $13,000 For Fireworks At Steamboat Days
Documents:
7.4 - RESOLUTION 129-26 - CARVER LIONS DONATION
FIREWORKS.PDF

7.5. Southwest Growth Area AUAR
Documents:
7.5 - SOUTHWEST GROWTH AREA AUAR.PDF

7.6. Approve The Quote From Loffler In The Amount Of $67,465.15 For The
Full Network Upgrade Project And Authorize Staff To Proceed With
Implementation
Documents:
7.6 - NETWORK UPGRADE WITH LOFFLER.PDF

7.7. Accept The Sensus Software-As-A-Service Agreement For The
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project

Documents:
7.6 - NETWORK UPGRADE WITH LOFFLER.PDF

7.7. Accept The Sensus Software-As-A-Service Agreement For The
Advanced Metering Infrastructure Project
Documents:
7.7 - SENSUS SAAS AGREEMENT FOR AMI.PDF

8. BUSINESS ITEMS
9. COMMUNICATIONS
9.1. Monthly Reports
Documents:
9.1 - MONTHLY REPORTS - MAY 2026.PDF

10. ADJOURNMENT
* Indicates no supporting information in the Council Packet

We are a prepared
and dedicated group
that utilizes resources
effectively.
We are focused on
solutions to support a
shared vision.

We listen with
respect and
compassion while
engaging in open
dialogue.

THE
CARVER
WAY
Our team works
together for a
better Carver!

CITY COUNCIL
WORK SESSION MINUTES
JUNE 1, 2026 | 5:30 PM
Carver City Hall, 316 Broadway, Carver, MN 55315

6/1/2026 - Minutes

T
F
A
R

1. Mayor Call The Meeting To Order

Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Councilmembers Pascoe, Perschmann,
and Sayre were present. Councilmember Conrade participated via interactive technology pursuant
to Minn. Stat. 13D.02. Also present: City Manager Mareck, Director of Public Services and
Engineering Simmons, Finance Director Tschudi, and Deputy Clerk Good.
2. 10 Year Utilities Infrastructure Plan

Director of Public Services and Engineering Simmons presented the updates to the City's
Infrastructure Plan, which was included in the Council Packet.
3. 2027 Budget Preview

As part of the preview for the 2027 budget process, City Manager Mareck presented an overview
of the 2027 proposed General Fund Budget. Detailed information regarding this preview was
included in the Council Packet.
4. Water Rate Tier Discussion

D

The City Council had previously requested a review of the tiered rate system for water users, with a
conceptual fourth tier being added to promote additional conservation and reduce the impact to
peak demand. Due to time constraints, a continuation of this discussion was carried over to the
Regular Meeting. During the discussion at the Regular Meeting, the City Council provided
feedback and this topic will be brought back with additional details.
5. City Manager's Report*

Due to time constraints, this item was carried over to the Regular Meeting.
6. City Council Requests*
Due to time constraints, this item was carried over to the Regular Meeting.
7. Adjourn
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PERSCHMANN TO ADJOURN. SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER SAYRE. ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS CONRADE,
PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND MAYOR JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED. (6:52
PM)

___________________________________________
Brenda Good, Deputy Clerk
_________________________________________________

PM)

___________________________________________
Brenda Good, Deputy Clerk
_________________________________________________
Courtney Johnson, Mayor

Approved by the City Council June 15, 2026

D

T
F
A
R

CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING and
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
MINUTES
JUNE 1, 2026 | 7:00 PM
Carver City Hall, 316 Broadway, Carver MN 55315

6/1/2026 - Minutes

T
F
A
R

1. MAYOR CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER

Mayor Johnson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Councilmembers Pascoe, Perschmann, and
Sayre were present. Councilmember Conrade participated via interactive technology pursuant to
Minn. Stat. 13D.02. Also present: City Manager Mareck, Director of Public Services and
Engineering Simmons, City Attorney Anderson, and Deputy Clerk Good.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVE THE AGENDA

MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PASCOE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER PERSCHMANN. ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
CONRADE, PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND MAYOR JOHSON. MOTION
CARRIED.
4. COMMUNITY COMMENT

Tim Shanahan, (725 Debbie Lane, Carver) was in attendance on behalf of his neighbor (Jacob
Lenz), who is requesting the City reconsider the policy related to licensing golf carts on City streets.
The City Council listened to the request and said they would discuss this topic at the end of tonight's
meeting, during the Communications/Council Updates portion of the meeting. Mr. Lenz arrived after
the community comment portion was closed, but both Mr. Shanahan and Mr. Lenz stayed to listen to
the Council discussion at the end of the meeting.

D

5. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS
5.1. Employee Service Awards*

This item will be rescheduled to a future meeting.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PERSCHMANN TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CONRADE. ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS CONRADE, PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND MAYOR
JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED.
7.1. Approve Minutes - May 18, 2026 - Work Session
7.2. Approve Minutes - May 18, 2026 - Regular Meeting
7.3. Claims

7.1. Approve Minutes - May 18, 2026 - Work Session
7.2. Approve Minutes - May 18, 2026 - Regular Meeting
7.3. Claims
8. BUSINESS ITEMS
9. COMMUNICATIONS
Items carried over from the Work Session:
WS 4 - Water Rate Tier Discussion

T
F
A
R

During the Work Session, City Manager Mareck led a discussion related to water rate tiers. The City
Council had previously requested a review of the tiered rate system for water users, with a
conceptual fourth tier being added to promote additional conservation. Staff will do some additional
research and bring this topic back for further discussion.
WS 5 - City Manager Mareck provided an update on the following items:

1. The implementation of a mobile app was identified as a strategic plan initiative in 2025.
Deputy Clerk Good provided an update regarding the recent implementation of the City's
mobile app, which is now available on both the Google Play Store and iPhone App Store. The
app is titled "City of Carver" and is available as a free download. Marketing of the app will
begin this week.
2. Director of Public Services and Engineering Simmons led a discussion regarding the
prairie grasses in the medians of Jonathan Carver Parkway. A spring maintenance mowing
will occur this week, and seeding of additional wildflowers will also take place this spring.
Community Comment Discussion

During the Community Comment portion of this meeting, a request was made to reconsider the
City's policy regarding licensing golf carts. After further discussion, City Staff was asked to conduct
additional research related to this topic and bring this item back to a future meeting for further
review.

D

The City Council provided the following updates:
Mayor Johnson

Les Schwab hosted their Ribbon Cutting on May 22.
l She participated in the Memorial Day activities at Mount Hope Cemetery.
l She was invited to be a guest speaker at East Union Church on Sunday.
l The Community Market opens tomorrow. It is held at Carver Station and runs every Tuesday
from 3 to 6 p.m.
l A Ribbon Cutting will be held at Creekside Park on Wednesday.
l

10. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER PERSCHMANN TO ADJOURN. SECONDED BY
COUNCILMEMBER SAYRE. ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS CONRADE,
PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND MAYOR JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED. (8:20
PM)

11. CARVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
11.1. Call Meeting To Order

11. CARVER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
11.1. Call Meeting To Order
Chair Johnson called the meeting of the Economic Development Authority to order at 8:20 p.m.
Members Pascoe, Perschmann, and Sayre, and Mayor Johnson were in attendance. Member
Conrade participated remotely. Also present: City Manager Mareck, Director of Public Services
and Engineering Simmons, City Attorney Anderson, and Deputy Clerk Good.
11.2. Minutes - April 6, 2026 - Carver Economic Development Authority

T
F
A
R

MOTION BY MEMBER PASCOE TO APPROVE THE APRIL 6, 2026, CARVER ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES. SECONDED BY MEMBER PERSCHMANN. ROLL
CALL VOTE. AYES: MEMBERS CONRADE, PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND
CHAIR JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED.
11.3. Downtown Restoration Loan Program - 200 Broadway

City Manager Mareck shared the details of a tuck-pointing project that Gregg and Meg Witt will
be doing at 200 Broadway Street. The applicants are requesting $3,250 in Downtown
Restoration Forgivable Loan funds for this project. The information was included in the Council
Packet.
MOTION BY CHAIR JOHNSON TO AWARD $3,250 IN DOWNTOWN RESTORATION
FORGIVEABLE LOAN FUNDS TO GREGG AND MEG WITT FOR A TUCK-POINTING
PROJECT AT 200 BROADWAY STREET NORTH. SECONDED BY MEMBER
PERSCHMANN. ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES: MEMBERS CONRADE, PASCOE,
PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE, AND CHAIR JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED.
11.4. Adjournment

D

MOTION BY MEMBER PERSCHMANN TO ADJOURN. SECONDED BY MEMBER PASCOE.
ROLL CALL VOTE. AYES: MEMBERS CONRADE, PASCOE, PERSCHMANN, AND SAYRE,
AND CHAIR JOHNSON. MOTION CARRIED. (8:24 PM)

___________________________________________
Brenda Good, Deputy Clerk
Approved by the City Council June 15, 2026

_________________________________________________
Courtney Johnson, Mayor

CLAIMS LISTING
To be Approved June 15, 2026

Prepaid Checks
Current Checks
EFT & ACH Payments

Payroll(s)

9477-9526
5312-5324
Subtotal:

$0
$138,603.28
$83,306.46
$221,909.74
$85,911.30

6/12/26
Total:

$307,821.24

RESOLUTION 129-26
CITY OF CARVER
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING ACCEPTANCE AND
APPRECIATION FOR DONATION FROM THE CARVER LIONS CLUB
WHEREAS, Melvin Jones founded Lions Clubs in 1917, in Chicago, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, Lions Clubs' mission is to empower volunteers to serve their communities, meet
humanitarian needs, encourage peace, and promote international understanding through Lions
Clubs; and
WHEREAS, the residents and businesses of Carver are grateful for the volunteerism,
community spirit, and resources shared by the Carver Lions Club; and
WHEREAS, the Carver Lions Club has graciously donated $13,000 to the City of Carver
to be used to purchase fireworks during Steamboat Days.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Carver City Council accepts the
$13,000 donation into the General Fund as identified and thanks the Carver Lions Club for their
generous donation to the City of Carver.
Adopted by the Carver City Council of the City of Carver on this 15th day of June, 2026.

_____________________________
Courtney Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Vicky Sons-Eiden, City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MEETING DATE:

June 15, 2026

SUBMITTED BY:

Erin Smith, Community Development Director

SUBJECT:

Alternate Urban Areawide Review – Southwest Growth Area

REQUEST FOR ACTION
A motion to adopt Resolution 131-26 approving the final Alternate Urban Areawide Review for the
Southwest Growth Area.
OVERVIEW
An Alternate Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was required for the southwest growth area, which
includes the residential project, Summerfield, due to project size. In partnership with Summergate, the
developer of Summerfield, the AUAR was drafted for a larger area than what is contemplated as part of
their project to allow for appropriate planning for land use, transportation, utilities, etc.
An AUAR is an environmental review under the same umbrella of an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW) but an AUAR contemplates multiple development scenarios and how they might
impact both the natural and built environment. Staff and the development team have been working
through the AUAR process since April 2025.
Throughout the process, several reviews were held for comments from both the public and other agencies.
Comments were received throughout the process and have been addressed with the final version of the
AUAR. Comments and responses can be found in Appendix K in the AUAR document.
Action before the City Council will conclude City review of the AUAR. Summergate and other
developers that may be within the AUAR area in the future will continue through typical City applications
including annexation and the platting process.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
N/A.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution 131-26 approving the final AUAR for the Southwest Growth Area.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1. Southwest Growth Area Housing Development – Final AUAR
2. Resolution 131-26

City of Carver
Southwest Growth Area Housing Development
Final
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
May 2026
Completed by:
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
12224 Nicollet Avenue
Burnsville, MN 55337

Table of Contents
1.

Project Title ....................................................................................................................................... 1

2.

Proposer ............................................................................................................................................ 1

3.

RGU .................................................................................................................................................... 1

4.

Reason for Preparation ..................................................................................................................... 1

5.

Project Location ................................................................................................................................. 1

6.

Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 3

7.

Climate Adaptation and Resilience.................................................................................................... 5

8.

Cover Types ..................................................................................................................................... 11

9.

Permits and Approvals .................................................................................................................... 13

10.

Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 15

11.

Geology, Soils, and Topography/Landforms ................................................................................... 19

12.

Water Resources ............................................................................................................................. 26

13.

Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes................................................................................. 40

14.

Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) ................ 46

15.

Historic Properties ........................................................................................................................... 54

16.

Visual ............................................................................................................................................... 58

17.

Air .................................................................................................................................................... 59

18.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint ..................................................................... 60

19.

Noise ................................................................................................................................................ 69

20.

Transportation ................................................................................................................................. 70

21.

Cumulative Potential Effects ........................................................................................................... 75

22.

Other Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................................... 76

23.

Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................................................ 77

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page i

Appendices
Appendix A: Figures
Figure 1: Project Location & Aerial Imagery
Figure 2: Project Location & USGS Topography
Figure 3a: Scenario 1 – Low Density
Figure 3b: Scenario 2 - High Density
Figure 3c: Scenario 3 – No Build
Figure 4: Existing Land Cover Types
Figure 5: Existing Land Use
Figure 6: Existing Zoning
Figure 7: Soils
Figure 8: Water Resources
Figure 9: Potentially Contaminated Sites
Appendix B: Proposed Level II Wetland Delineation Boundaries & Waterway Classifications & Wetland
Buffers
Appendix C: Contamination Hazards
Appendix D: MnDNR Natural Heritage Determination Letter and Project Report
Appendix E: USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation
Appendix F: USFWS Determination Key for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee
Appendix G: Greenhouse Gas Calculations
Appendix H: Traffic Impact Study
Appendix I: Water Resources Figures
Appendix J: Preliminary Phasing Plan
Appendix K: Draft AUAR Comments and Responses

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page ii

1. Project Title
Southwest Growth Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)

2. Proposer
Proposer: Summergate Homes
Contact Person: Casey Wollschlager
Title: Chief Operating Officer
Address: 17305 Cedar Avenue
City, State, ZIP: Lakeville, MN 55044
Phone: 952-898-3461
Email: [email protected]

3. RGU
RGU: City of Carver
Contact Person: Erin Smith, AICP
Title: Community Development Director, City of Carver
Address: 316 Broadway Street
City, State, ZIP: Carver, MN 55315
Phone: 952-448-8743
Email: [email protected]

4. Reason for Preparation
AUAR Guidance: Not applicable to an AUAR.

5. Project Location
County: Carver
City/Township: Dahlgren Township
PLS Location (¼, ¼, Section, Township, Range): Township 115N, Range 24W, Sections 23-26, 35
Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Lower Minnesota River
Tax Parcel Numbers:
Table 1: Parcels Within the AUAR Study Area
Parcel ID
40230100*

Parcel Acreage1
31.59

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Parcel ID
40950010

Parcel Acreage1
1.49

Page 1

Parcel Acreage1
Parcel ID
Parcel Acreage1
8.89
40352700
4.83
119.97
41000010
4.20
40.79
41000011
4.73
53.73
41000020
4.24
1.00
41000030
4.68
38.63
41000040
4.53
61.61
41000050
4.25
61.78
41000060
4.68
77.83
41000070
4.16
2.00
41010010
3.50
2.24
41010020
3.32
2.30
43750010
4.86
4.93
43750020
4.46
0.81
43750030
4.83
113.38
43750040
5.95
39.02
44050010
8.70
40.09
44050020
40.00
38.09
44050030
28.60
10.01
45500010
3.25
45.89
45500020
2.51
1.89
45500030
2.53
121.34
45500040
1.28
39.29
45500050
2.51
34.01
45500060
1.39
0.95
47000010
5.01
55.15
47000020
5.01
42.80
47000030
5.01
46.36
47000040
5.01
9.01
47000050
5.01
0.61
47000060
5.09
13.90
47000070
5.15
17.91
47000080
8.11
1.53
47000100
39.77
46.90
40950010
1.49
3.11
* Parcel is partially within the AUAR Study Area.
1 The acreages of the parcels does not include road ROW which accounts for
the difference in the total parcel acreage and the total AUAR Study Area
acreage.
Parcel ID
40230110
40230400
40230410
40230510
40230600
40230712
40230716
40230720
40230800
40243800
40250100
40250300
40251200
40251300
40260100
40260110
40260300*
40260330
40260400
40260410
40260500
40260600
40260610
40260620
40260700
40260800
40260900
40350110*
40350200
40350300
40350420*
40350600
40351100
40351110
40351111

At a minimum, attach each of the following to the AUAR:
•

US Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (Figure 2)

•

Map depicting the boundaries of the AUAR and any subdistricts used in the AUAR analysis
(Figure 1 and Figure 2)

•

List of data sources, models, and other resources (from the Item-by-Item Guidance: Climate
Adaptation and Resilience or other) used for information about current Minnesota climate

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 2

trends and how climate change is anticipated to affect the general location of the project
during the life of the project (Section 7)
•

Cover type map as required for Item 8 (Figure 4)

•

Land use and planning and zoning maps as required in conjunction with Item 10 (Figure 5 and
Figure 6)

6. Project Description
AUAR Guidance: Instead of the information called for on the EAW form, the description section of an
AUAR should include the following elements for each major development scenario included:
•

Anticipated types and intensity (density) of residential and commercial/warehouse/light
industrial development throughout the AUAR Study Area.

•

Infrastructure planned to serve development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.).
Roadways intended primarily to serve as adjoining land uses within an AUAR Study Area are
normally expected to be reviewed as part of an AUAR. More “arterial” types of roadways that
would cross an AUAR Study Area are an optional inclusion in the AUAR analysis; if they are
included, a more intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes, is
necessary.

•

Information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of
the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule.

The AUAR Study Area encompasses an area of approximately 1,503 acres on 70 parcels just west of
Jonathan Carver Parkway, south of Dahlgren Road, north of 154th Street, and east of County Road 43 in
Dahlgren Township, Carver County, Minnesota (Figure 1, Appendix A). The AUAR Study Area is
envisioned as an opportunity to enhance a strategic planning approach to future development for the
City of Carver.
The AUAR Study Area is within the City of Carver future growth area according to the city’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan and in an Emerging Suburban Edge according to the Carver County 2040
Comprehensive Plan.
Three scenarios proposed for evaluation within the AUAR Study Area are outlined in Table 2, Table 3,
and Table 4 and shown on Figures 3a, 3b, and 3c in Appendix A.
Scenario 1
Scenario 1 is consistent with the current City of Carver Comprehensive Plan housing units per acre
requirements. This Scenario currently includes an estimated 4,143 housing units built on approximately
1,503 acres with an overall blended density of 2.8 units per acre. Scenario 1 includes the development of
low-density residential, medium-density residential, high-density residential, active adult residential,
mixed use, church, and parks and open space. This scenario is consistent with the current
Comprehensive Plan residential densities. Table 2 provides the acreages, units, and the units per acre for
each land use category in Scenario 1.
Construction is anticipated to begin in 2026 (Figure 3, Appendix A).

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 3

Table 2: City of Carver Comprehensive Plan - Scenario 1
AUAR Study Area
Acres

Land Use

Scenario 1
Units

Scenario 1 Density
(units/acre)

Active Adult Residential
121
403
3.3
Low Density Residential
839
2,765
3.3
Medium Density Residential
45
215
4.8
High Density Residential
34
384
11.3
Mixed Use
46
376
8.2
Church
7
N/A
N/A
Community Park
50
N/A
N/A
Active Adult Private Amenity
8
N/A
N/A
NBHD Park
11
N/A
N/A
Open Space1
341
N/A
N/A
Total
1,503
4,143
2.8
1
The Open Space includes existing rights-of-ways, bluffs, floodplains, wetlands, creek
buffers, stormwater management areas, and tree preservation areas.

Scenario 2
Scenario 2 is consistent with the City of Carver Future Comprehensive Plan residential densities. Like
Scenario 1, Scenario 2 includes development of low-density residential, medium-density residential,
high-density residential, active adult residential, mixed use, church, and parks and open space. However,
Scenario 2 consists of higher densities of housing units per acre with an estimated 7,885 housing units
built on 1,503 acres for an overall blended density of 5.2 units per acre. Table 3 provides the acreages,
units, and the units per acre for each land use category in Scenario 2.
Both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 contain approximately 341 acres of preserved open space, 61 acres of
parks, and 8 acres of active adult amenity center.
Construction is anticipated to begin in 2026 (Figure 3, Appendix A).

Table 3: City of Carver Future Comprehensive Plan - Scenario 2
Land Use

AUAR Study Area
Acres

Scenario
2 Units

Scenario 2 Density
(units/acre)

839
45
34
121
46
7
50
8
11
341
1,503

3,950
516
1,152
575
1,692
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
7,885

4.1
8.1
22.6
4.0
22.5
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2

Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Active Adult Residential
Mixed Use
Church
Community Park
Active Adult Private Amenity
NBHD Park
Open Space
Total

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 4

AUAR Study Area
Acres

Land Use

Scenario
2 Units

Scenario 2 Density
(units/acre)

1

The Open Space includes existing rights-of-ways, bluffs, floodplains, wetlands, creek
buffers, stormwater management areas, and tree preservation areas.

Scenario 3
Scenario 3 focuses on future land use/land development as outlined in the City of Carver 2040
Comprehensive Plan and is considered the Future No Build scenario. Scenario 3 maintains the current
agricultural, low-density residential, and medium-density residential uses. Under Scenario 3, no new
municipal infrastructure (water, sewer, stormwater) would be constructed beyond routine
maintenance. However, minor roadway improvements may occur independently of development,
including safety upgrades or resurfacing. Scenario 3 maintains existing agricultural and rural residential
uses and does not require staging of utilities or roadway expansions.
There are existing residential areas within the AUAR Study Area, but the current number of units is
estimated in Table 4, along with the acreages, units, and the units per acre for each land use category in
Scenario 3.
Table 4: City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan – Scenario 3
Land Use

368
908
48

Scenario 3
Estimated
Units
9
2,724
240

179

5

1,503

2,978

AUAR Study Area
Acres

Agriculture
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
Area Not Included in Future Land
Use Plan1
Total

Scenario 3 Density
(units/acre)
0.025
3
5
0.025

1

This area is designated as Agricultural Area in the Carver County Comprehensive Plan. This area has
a basic residential density of one unit per 40 acres.

The intent of the AUAR is to identify the worst-case potential impacts and identify mitigation strategies
to address the impacts. The proposed development would include new municipal infrastructure,
including water service, sewer, stormwater, streets, and other utilities. These additions will either
extend current infrastructure or enhance existing systems to accommodate the new development.

7. Climate Adaptation and Resilience
A. Describe the climate trends in the general location of the project (see guidance: Climate
Adaptation and Resilience) and how climate change is anticipated to affect that location during
the life of the project.
According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ Climate Trends, “Minnesota’s climate
is already changing rapidly and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Temperatures are
increasing, especially in winter, and larger, more frequent extreme precipitation events are
occurring. Substantial warming during winter and at night, increased precipitation, and heavier
downpours already have already affected our natural resources and how we interact with and use
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 5

them. The decades ahead will bring even warmer winters and nights, and even larger rainfalls, along
with the likelihood of increased summer heat and the potential for longer dry spells.1” Climate
trends for Carver County parallel the statewide overall trends for temperature and precipitation,
indicating Minnesota’s climate is becoming warmer and wetter. Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2, below,
generated from the Minnesota Climate Explorer2 in January 2026, show the average annual
temperatures and precipitation for Carver County, Minnesota from 1895 to 2024. From 1980 to
2024, Carver County experienced an average increase of 0.44 degrees Fahrenheit per decade and an
average precipitation increase of 0.21 inches per decade.

Exhibit 1 - Average Temperature for Carver County, January-December, 1895-2024
Minnesota Climate Explorer. January 2026

1 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Climate Change and Minnesota. “Climate Trends.”

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/climate_change_info/climate-trends.html. Accessed January 2026.
2 Minnesota Climate Explorer. Historical. “Projected Temperature and Precipitation Plot Data for Carver County.”
https://climate-explorer.dnr.state.mn.us/main/historical. Accessed January 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 6

Exhibit 2 - Precipitation for Carver County, January-December, 1895-2024
Minnesota Climate Explorer. January 2026

The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI)3 utilizes temperature and precipitation data to estimate
relative soil moisture conditions and serves as an indicator of long-term drought conditions. The
index ranges from -5 to +5, indicating dry and wet conditions, respectively. PDSI values are reported
on a monthly basis. Exhibit 3 shows historic PDSI values for the month of June from 1895 to 2024 for
Carver County, which indicates an increase of 0.79 per decade. Generally, the PDSI historical data
indicate that the region is experiencing a trending-wetter climate.
Projected climate trends4 indicate that temperatures within the County will continue to increase.
Exhibit 4 illustrates projected temperatures for the County. Several climate models are shown in the
projected temperature analysis. The model mean, shown in blue, illustrates the average of all
models included in the analysis. Exhibit 4 shows the modeled present condition, mid-century (20402059) at Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 4.5, late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 4.5, and
late-century (2080-2099) at RCP 8.5. RCP is a greenhouse gas concentration scenario used by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in the Fifth Assessment Report. RCP 4.5 is an
intermediate scenario in which emissions decline after peaking around 2040, and RCP 8.5 represents
a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue rising through the 21st century. Under the RCP
4.5 scenario, the annual temperature is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled
present mean of 44.87°F (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 48.42°F and a
late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 50.85°F. Under the RCP 8.5 worst-case scenario, the
County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean temperature of 54.62°F.
Projected climate trends indicate that temperatures within the County will continue to increase.

3 Minnesota Climate Explorer. Historical. “Projected PDSI Plot Data for Carver County.” https://climate-

explorer.dnr.state.mn.us/main/historical. Accessed January 2026.
4 Minnesota Climate Explorer. Projected (Future). “Projected Temperature Plot Data for Carver County.” https://climateexplorer.dnr.state.mn.us/main/historical. Accessed January 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 7

Exhibit 3 - Historical PDSI Values for Carver County, June, 1895-2024
Minnesota Climate Explorer. January 2026.

Exhibit 4 - Projected Temperatures in Carver County
Minnesota Climate Explorer. January 2026.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 8

Exhibit 5 presents projected average annual precipitation5 for Carver County. Under the RCP 4.5
scenario, the annual precipitation is anticipated to increase within the County from a modeled
present mean of 30.64 inches (1980-1999) to a mid-century (2040-2059) model mean of 31.12
inches and a late-century (2080-2099) model mean of 31.74 inches. Under the RCP 8.5 worstcase scenario, the County would experience a late-century (2080-2099) model mean
precipitation of 35.20 inches. RCP 4.5 is an intermediate scenario in which emissions decline
after peaking around 2040, and RCP 8.5 is a worst-case scenario in which emissions continue to
rise through the 21st century.

Exhibit 5 - Projected Precipitation in Carver County
Minnesota Climate Explorer. January 2026.

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Resilience Analysis and
Planning Tool6 , which illustrates the U.S. communities most at risk for 18 types of natural
hazards, overall, Carver County, Minnesota, is rated relatively low compared to the rest of the
U.S. This rating is based on a relatively low expected annual loss rating, a very low social
vulnerability rating, and a very high community resilience rating.
The Social Vulnerability for each type of hazard is rated very low, which means social groups in
Carver County, Minnesota, have a very low susceptibility to the adverse impacts of natural
hazards when compared to the rest of the U.S. The Community Resilience for each type of
hazard is rated very high, which means communities in Carver County, Minnesota, have a very
high ability to prepare for anticipated natural hazards, adapt to changing conditions, and
withstand and recover rapidly from disruptions compared to the rest of the U.S. The expected
loss each year due to natural hazards in Carver County, Minnesota, is relatively low.
B. For each resource category in the table below, describe the project’s proposed activities and how
the project’s design will interact with those climate trends. Describe proposed adaptations to

5 Minnesota Climate Explorer. Projected (Future). “Projected Precipitation Plot Data for Carver County.” https://climate-

explorer.dnr.state.mn.us/main/historical. Accessed January 2026.
6 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Resilience Analysis & Planning Tool (RAPT), Accessed December 2025,
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/0a317e8998534c30a9b2d3861c814d42/
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 9

address the project effects identified.
Table 5: Climate Considerations and Adaptions

Resource Category

Climate Considerations

Project Information

Adaptations

Project Design

The design and
material choices in
building architecture,
along with site
planning, can influence
the surrounding
environment. This
includes altering
climate zones, affecting
temperature patterns,
and increasing the
likelihood of prolonged
heat waves.

Climate change risks and
vulnerabilities identified
include higher rainfall
events which may result
in more localized flooding
due to planned
impervious surface;
certain building
construction materials
such as dark roofing
materials, as well as
increased impervious
surfaces, absorb heat
during the day and
radiate it at night, which
increases the urban heat
island effect and
amplifies the warming
temperatures of climate
change.

•

Promote increasing
vegetation by
maintaining
approximately 296
acres of preserved
open space and 65
acres of parks.

•

Encourage the use of
light-colored roofing
materials and
pavement to
minimize heat
absorption.

•

Promote enhancing
building design for
energy efficiency and
green roofs for
insulation and heat
reduction.

•

Consider
incorporation of low
input fescue grass
species in greenspace
areas.

•

Consider
incorporating waterefficient design and
native plants for
landscaping.

•

Consider cluster-style
developments to
reduce the amount of
impervious surface
and minimize
developmental
encroachment on
sensitive ecological
areas.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 10

Resource Category

Climate Considerations

Project Information

Adaptations

Land Use

No critical facilities are
proposed, including
those essential for
public health and
safety, those storing
hazardous materials, or
those housing
occupants with limited
mobility.

Climate change risks and
vulnerabilities identified
include: higher rainfall
events which may result
in more localized flooding
due to planned
impervious surface; and
conversion of agricultural
land to industrial
development increases
impervious surface.

•

Design stormwater
BMPs to meet local,
state, and federal
requirements and use
effective drainage
systems.

•

In certain
circumstance,
promote the use of
permeable materials
for paving to reduce
runoff.

•

Encourage the
development of
green infrastructure
like green roofs and
rain gardens.

Increased freeze-thaw
cycles as a result of
changing climate trends.

•

General reduction of
salt or chloride use
within the proposed
development area.

Water resources is
addressed in detail in
Item 12.

•

Water resources is
addressed in detail in
Item 12.

No hazardous waste is
expected to be
generated, used, or
stored throughout the life
of the Project. Any waste
generated during
construction will be
stored in marked
containers in accordance
with applicable laws and
subsequently disposed of
at licensed facilities.
Address in Item 14

N/A

Water Resources

Water Resources is
addressed in detail in
Item 12.

Contamination/
Hazardous
Materials/ Wastes

Current climate trends
in Minnesota and
anticipated climate
changes in the Project's
vicinity may affect the
environmental impact
of generating, using,
and storing hazardous
waste and materials.

Fish, wildlife, plant
communities, and
sensitive
ecological
resources (rare
features)

Addressed in Item 14

Addressed in Item 14

8. Cover Types
AUAR Guidance: The following information should be provided:
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 11

•

•

A cover type map, at least at the scale of a USGS topographic map, depicting:
o

Wetlands (identified by Circular 39 type)

o

Watercourses (rivers, streams, creeks, ditches)

o

Lakes (identify public waters status and shoreland management classification)

o

Woodlands (break down by classes where possible)

o

Grassland (identify native and old field)

o

Cropland

o

Current development

An overlay map showing anticipated development in relation to the cover types. This map should
also depict any “protection areas,” existing or proposed, that will preserve sensitive cover types.
Separate maps for each major development scenario should be generally provided.

The approximately 1,503-acre AUAR Study Area is primarily comprised of agricultural land and forest
land (Figure 4). The AUAR Study Area also contains small portions of impervious surfaces, developed
areas, and grasslands. Table 6 shows the existing land cover acres (scenario 3) as well as estimates for
the other scenarios. Scenario 1 reflects development consistent with the current City of Carver
Comprehensive Plan and results in moderate increases in impervious surface as agricultural land
transitions to residential and mixed-use development. Scenario 2 represents a higher-density future
plan scenario and results in greater impervious coverage due to more intensive residential and mixeduse development. Scenario 3 assumes no development and land cover remains largely unchanged, with
the study area continuing to be primarily agricultural with existing natural features preserved.
Table 6: Cover Types

7

Land Cover Type

Scenario 3 Existing
Acreage (No Build)7

Scenario 1 Estimated
Acres

Scenario 2 Estimated
Acres

5-10% Impervious

63

70

55

11-25% Impervious

45

90

65

26-50% Impervious

26

160

120

51-75% Impervious

13

170

240

76-100% Impervious

25

215

360

Short Grasses

8

12

10

Agricultural Land

981

230

120

Tree Plantation

27

20

18

Forest

184

170

160

Tall Grasses

118

300

250

Wetland Emergent Veg.

7

7

7

See Existing Land Cover figure in Appendix A.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 12

Land Cover Type

Scenario 3 Existing
Acreage (No Build)7

Scenario 1 Estimated
Acres

Scenario 2 Estimated
Acres

Dry Tall Grasses

6

59

98

Total

1,503

1,503

1,503

Under Scenario 3, existing land cover remains unchanged and reflects current conditions shown on the
Existing Land Cover figure (Appendix A). The study area is dominated by agricultural land, forested
areas, and tall grass cover, with impervious surfaces limited primarily to existing roadways and scattered
developed parcels. Wetlands and emergent vegetation remain intact and unchanged, and impervious
cover remains relatively low across the site.
Scenario 1 introduces substantial residential and mixed-use development while maintaining a moderate
overall density. Large portions of agricultural land are converted to low and medium density residential
uses, resulting in an estimated increase in 26 to 50 percent and 51 to 75 percent impervious cover
classes. High density residential and mixed-use areas contribute to estimated additional 76 to 100
percent impervious cover, likely near neighborhood centers and along collector roadways. Open space
requirements preserve wetlands, floodplains, and some forested areas, and tall grass and dry tall grass
acreage likely increases as agricultural land transitions to stormwater management areas, buffers, and
managed open space.
Scenario 2 reflects a more intense development pattern with significantly higher residential densities
and expanded mixed use areas. This results in an estimated greater shift toward the highest impervious
cover categories, particularly the 51 to 75 percent and 76 to 100 percent classes. Agricultural land is
further reduced compared to Scenario 1, while preserved open space remains generally consistent in
overall acreage. Forest and wetland areas experience minimal change due to planned preservation, but
tall grass and dry tall grass areas are estimated to increase as remaining open space is managed for
stormwater treatment, buffers, and passive use areas associated with higher density development.

9. Permits and Approvals
AUAR Guidance: A listing of major approvals (including any comprehensive plan amendments and zoning
amendments) and public financial assistance and infrastructure likely to be required by the anticipated
types of development projects should be given for each major development scenario. This list will help
orient reviewers to the framework that will protect environmental resources. The list can also serve as a
starting point for the development of the implementation aspects of the mitigation plan to be developed
as part of the AUAR.
Table 7: Permits and Approvals
Unit of Government

Type of Application/Permit

Status

FEDERAL AGENCIES
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Section 404 Permit

To be applied for

STATE AGENCIES
Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

To be applied for

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System Stormwater Permit for Construction
Activities

To be applied for

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 13

Unit of Government

Minnesota Department of Health

Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources

Minnesota Department of
Transportation

Minnesota Department of Labor
Industry

Type of Application/Permit

Status

Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit

To be applied for

Construction Contingency Plan and Response
Action Plan approval

To be applied for

Notice of Intent of Demolition

To be applied for

Industrial Wastewater Permit

To be applied for

Significant Industrial User Permit

To be applied for

Construction Stormwater Permit

To be applied for

Fuel Storage Tank

To be applied for

Air Permit

To be applied for

Discharge Permit

To be applied for

Water Treatment Plant

To be applied for

Watermain Extension Permit

To be applied for

Well Permit

To be applied for

Temporary Groundwater Appropriation Permit
for Construction Dewatering

To be applied for, if needed

Water Appropriation Permit

To be applied for, if needed

Public Waters Work Permit

To be applied for, if needed

Utility Crossing License

To be applied for

Miscellaneous Work on Trunk Highway Right of
Way

To be applied for

Access/Driveway Permit

To be applied for

Utility Accommodation Permit

To be applied for

Drainage Permit

To be applied for

Plumbing Review

To be applied for

Electrical Permit

To be applied for

LOCAL AGENCIES
Carver County

Right-of-Way Permit

To be applied for

Carver County Delegated Well Program Well
Sealing and Construction Permit

To be applied for

Carver County Soil and Water
Conservation District (SWCD)

Carver County SWCD Approval

To be applied for

Carver County Water
Management Organization
(CCWMO)

CCWMO Approval

To be applied for

City of Carver

Preliminary/Final Plat

To be applied for

Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA)*

Active

Comprehensive Plan Amendment*

To be applied for

Zoning Map and Text Amendment

To be applied for

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 14

Unit of Government

Type of Application/Permit

Status

Site Plan Approval

To be applied for

Building Permit

To be applied for

Excavation and Grading Permit

To be applied for

Domestic & Wastewater

To be applied for

Planned Unit Development

To be applied for

Conditional Use Permit

To be applied for

AUAR Approval

To be applied for

*A Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) will be required for portions of the Study Area that are located outside of the Orderly Annexation
Agreement (OAA) to address land use consistency within the area covered by the OAA and to establish a land use for the area outside of
the OAA after its annexation.

10.Land Use
A. Describe:
1.

Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including
parks, trails, and prime or unique farmlands.
The AUAR Study Area encompasses an area totaling approximately 1,503 acres on 70
parcels adjacent to the City of Carver, Carver County, Minnesota (shown on Figure 1).
The AUAR Study Area is bounded by County Road 43 to the west, County Road 40 to the
east, and 154th Street to the south. The northern boundary of the AUAR Study Area is
located approximately one mile south of Highway 212.
The majority of the AUAR Study Area is located in Dahlgren Township, outside of the
City of Carver city limits. This area is currently subject to Carver County land use and
zoning regulations. As shown in Figure 5, the AUAR Study Area is primarily comprised of
agricultural and undeveloped land on large parcels. Some industrial, institutional, and
single-family residential land uses are also identified on smaller parcels that are
interspersed throughout the AUAR Study Area.
Portions of the AUAR Study Area are considered Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide
Importance, or Prime Farmland if Drained (Table 4).
No existing parks or trails are identified within the AUAR Study Area. However, an
existing segment of the Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail is located approximately
0.1-miles northeast of the AUAR Study Area, at the intersection of Jonathan Carver
Parkway and Carver Bluffs Parkway. The Minnesota River Bluffs Regional Trail is
managed by Carver County. The Project Proposer and the City of Carver will seek to
coordinate with Carver County to develop local trail connections as part of the Proposed
Project.

2.

Planned land use as identified in comprehensive plans (if available) and any other
applicable plan for land use, water, or resource management by a local, regional,
state, or federal agency.
City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 15

The majority of the AUAR Study Area is located in Dahlgren Township, outside of the
City of Carver city limits. This area is currently subject to Carver County zoning
regulations. The Project will require annexation, preliminary and final plat, and rezoning.
The City of Carver and Dahlgren Township entered into an orderly annexation
agreement in 2009. The Orderly Annexation Agreement (OAA) defines the future growth
area for the City – this future growth area is known as the Ultimate Growth Boundary.
The majority of the AUAR Study Area is located within the Ultimate Growth Boundary.
The City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan lists future land use for the majority of the
AUAR Study Area as Agriculture, Low-Density Residential, or Medium-Density
Residential. Following annexation, all proposed new development, redevelopment, or
change in zoning is required to be consistent with the City of Carver 2040
Comprehensive Plan, or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be required.
Upon annexation, zoning will be amended to implement the land use designations
identified under each AUAR development scenario, including residential, mixed-use,
park, open space, and institutional uses. Rezoning will be completed in coordination
with annexation to ensure consistency with the City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan
or through amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
For portions of the AUAR Study Area that are located outside of the OAA, a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment(s) will be required to address land use consistency
within the area covered by the OAA and to establish a land use for the area outside of
the OAA after its annexation, and for those areas outside of the 2030 MUSA, to bring
these areas into the desired Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) staging.
Carver County 2040 Comprehensive Plan
The Carver County Collaborative 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the AUAR Study
Area as “Emerging Suburban Edge” Thrive MSP 2040 Community Designation. This
designation represents areas that are transitioning from rural to developed, with
significant amounts of land remaining for future development.
Additionally, the Carver County 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the AUAR area as a
Transition Policy Area, which are defined as areas that will likely be urbanized within the
next 20 years. The County will manage these areas to ensure that they are available for
urban development when needed and that development can occur in an economic and
orderly fashion.
3.

Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and
scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc.
AUAR Guidance: Water-related land use management districts should be delineated on
appropriate maps, and the land use restrictions applicable in those districts should be
described. If any variances or deviations from these restrictions within the AUAR area
are envisioned, this should be discussed.
Existing Zoning
The majority of the AUAR Study Area is located in Dahlgren Township, outside of the
City of Carver city limits. This area is currently subject to Carver County zoning
regulations. Existing zoning within the AUAR Study Area is governed by Carver County

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 16

zoning regulations, including the Transition Area overlay district. Upon annexation into
the City of Carver, zoning districts will be applied to implement the planned land uses
identified in the AUAR development scenarios. Anticipated zoning changes include the
establishment of residential, mixed-use, park and open space, and institutional zoning
districts consistent with the City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Any required
zoning map or text amendments will occur concurrently with annexation and plat
approvals.
As shown on Figure 6, the AUAR Study Area contains Shoreland Overlay Districts.
Development within or adjacent to Shoreland Overlay Districts are required to comply
with applicable Carver County and/or City of Carver shoreland regulations—however,
once the AUAR Study Area is annexed for development, Carver County will no longer
manage shoreland regulation compliance. Proposed development scenarios avoid
placement of structures within shoreland areas associated with Carver Creek, and these
areas are planned to remain as open space. Shoreland setbacks, vegetative buffers, and
floodplain protections will be maintained, and any infrastructure crossings will be
designed to meet applicable shoreland, floodplain, and watershed management
requirements.
FEMA National Flood Hazard
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
was reviewed for the study area. As shown on Figure 8, FEMA 100-year floodplains and
500-year floodplains are identified within the AUAR Study Area.
Lower Minnesota River Watershed
The AUAR Study Area is located within the Lower Minnesota River watershed, which is
administered by the Carver County Water Management Organization (CCWMO). The
CCWMO covers 320 square miles, includes 35 lakes larger than 10 acres, and 365 miles
of stream. The AUAR Study Area is subject to the CCWMO Watershed Management
Plan. All development scenarios will be required to meet CCWMO standards for
stormwater management, water quality treatment, rate control, volume control, and
floodplain protection. Proposed stormwater systems, including regional stormwater
basins, infiltration practices, and preserved riparian corridors, are intended to be
compatible with the goals and requirements of the CCWMO Watershed Management
Plan.
Other Special Districts and Zoning Overlays
Several parcels within the AUAR Study Area are enrolled within the Metropolitan
Agricultural Preserves Program, which encourages the use and improvement of the
metropolitan area’s agricultural lands for producing food and other agricultural
commodities. It establishes a local planning process to designate agricultural areas as a
long-term land use and provides benefits to maintain viable, productive farm
operations.
There are no other special districts or zoning overlays within the AUAR Study Area.
4.

If any critical facilities (i.e., facilities necessary for public health and safety, those
storing hazardous materials, or those housing occupants who may be insufficiently
mobile) are proposed in floodplain areas and other areas identified as at risk for

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 17

localized flooding, describe the risk potential considering changing precipitation and
event intensity.
No critical facilities are proposed as part of the Project. No critical facilities are proposed
within FEMA-designated floodplain areas. Portions of the AUAR Study Area include
mapped 100-year and 500-year floodplains associated with Carver Creek. Development
scenarios generally avoid floodplain areas, which are planned to remain as open space.
Where infrastructure crossings or adjacent development may occur, design will comply
with applicable floodplain regulations and include compensatory storage, stormwater
management, and erosion control measures. These measures will account for changing
precipitation patterns and increased storm intensity associated with climate change.
B. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a
above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects.
AUAR Guidance: The extent of conversion of existing farmlands anticipated in the AUAR should be
described. If any farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should be discussed.
The proposed development under each AUAR scenario has been evaluated within the context of
applicable local, regional, and state comprehensive plans and land management documents.
Scenarios 1 and 2 are generally consistent with the City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan land use
framework and the Carver County 2040 Comprehensive Plan designation of Emerging Suburban
Edge. Scenario 3 reflects continuation of existing agricultural and low-density residential uses.
Implementation of Scenarios 1 or 2 may require amendments to the City of Carver Comprehensive
Plan to address land use guidance, infrastructure staging, or growth forecasts, as well as annexation
and rezoning of the AUAR Study Area.
The proposed development scenarios are anticipated to be compatible with existing and planned
land uses within and adjacent to the AUAR Study Area. Surrounding areas are characterized by
agricultural land, rural residential uses, and planned urban expansion areas. Proposed land uses
transition from lower-density residential near existing rural development to higher-density
residential and mixed-use areas consistent with planned urban growth. Parks and open space areas
within the AUAR provide buffering and connectivity. If Scenario 1 exceeds the citywide growth
forecast for 2050, Comprehensive Plan amendments for land use guidance and forecast adjustments
will be required.
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 will result in conversion of agricultural land, including areas
designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Prime Farmland if Drained,
to residential, mixed-use, and infrastructure uses. Scenario 3 would maintain existing agricultural
uses with minimal conversion. Under Scenarios 1 and 2, approximately 341 acres of open space,
including floodplains, wetlands, buffers, and stormwater management areas, will be preserved,
which partially offsets farmland conversion and maintains ecological and hydrologic functions.
Potential impacts associated with development in or near existing floodplains have been evaluated.
Development scenarios largely avoid floodplain areas, which are preserved as open space. Where
infrastructure crossings or adjacent development are necessary, mitigation measures such as
compensatory storage, stormwater detention, and compliance with floodplain regulations will be
implemented to minimize impacts to floodplain functions and downstream flooding risks.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 18

C. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential
incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above.
The proposed development scenarios are anticipated to be compatible with planned future land
uses within and adjacent to the AUAR Study Area. Measures incorporated to mitigate potential land
use incompatibilities include preservation of open space and floodplain areas, provision of parks and
green infrastructure, phased development and infrastructure staging, adherence to comprehensive
plan policies, and compliance with zoning, shoreland, watershed, and floodplain regulations. These
measures are intended to reduce conflicts with adjacent land uses, protect environmental
resources, and ensure orderly urban growth within the AUAR Study Area.

11. Geology, Soils, and Topography/Landforms
A. Geology – Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible
geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers,
or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the
project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to
address effects to geologic features.
AUAR Guidance: A map should be included to show any groundwater hazards identified.
The AUAR Study Area is primarily located in the Richfield Terrace surficial geology in the Pleistocene
quaternary. This sediment is identified by its composition of sand and gravelly sand. Bedrock within
the AUAR Study Area is mapped as the St. Lawrence Formation and Lone Rock Formation, both of
which are part of the Upper Cambrian series. The St. Lawrence Formation features tan, white, or
light gray very fine-grained sandstone and siltstone in its upper part, transitioning to light gray to
green shale and finely crystalline dolostone below, with increasing glauconite content toward the
base. Typically, 40 to 50 feet (12 to 15 meters) thick, it is widely distributed across flat subcrop areas
in Carver County, which may be due to its resistant, high dolomite content. The Lone Rock
Formation consists mainly of gray-yellow-green to yellowish-green, very fine- to fine-grained, silty,
feldspathic, and glauconitic sandstone, with common grayish-green shale partings and abundant
pink-orange to dark red dolostone in the lower section. At 118 to 150 feet (36 to 48 meters) thick, it
subcrops throughout Carver County along buried bedrock valleys and adjacent flat plateaus,
featuring a sharp basal contact that may include interbedded medium- to coarse-grained quartzose
sandstone from the underlying Wonewoc Sandstone.8
According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR), Pollution Sensitivity of
Near-Surface Materials, a majority of the AUAR Study Area has a pollution sensitivity of High, with
smaller areas in the northwestern portion having Moderate (along Carver Creek) and Low.9

8 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648.

Accessed February 2026.
9 MNDNR. 2018. Pollution Sensitivity of Near-Surface Materials. Shapefile. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/geos-hydrogeologyatlas-hg02. Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 19

The MNDNR Karst Feature Inventory10 and the University of Minnesota Natural Resources Research
Institute’s Minnesota Natural Resource Atlas11 do not show any known Karst Features mapped in
the AUAR Study Area.
The AUAR Study Area is located within the East-Central aquifer province. This province is
characterized by surficial and buried sand and gravel aquifers underlain by thick and extensive
Paleozoic and Precambrian aquifers.12 Depth to the water table within the AUAR Study Area ranges
from less than 10 feet to more than 50 feet.13 Shallow groundwater areas are generally associated
with known wetlands or water features within the AUAR Study Area. There are no known shallow
limestone formations, shallow aquifers, or other geologic conditions within the AUAR Study Area.
Depth to bedrock generally ranges from 101 to 500 feet below ground surface.
Nearly the entire county is underlain by Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks. The uppermost
bedrock across Carver County is mostly sedimentary rock units of Paleozoic age that are
characterized by relatively thin (less than 200 feet) but widespread layers dominated by sandstone,
shale, or dolostone.14 Depth to bedrock generally ranges from 101 to 400 feet below ground surface
in the AUAR Study Area.
According to C-21, Plate 2, Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota,15 bedrock in the AUAR Study
Area is a mix of Jordan Sandstone (Cj), St. Lawrence Formation (Csl), and Lone Rock Formation (Clr),
which includes two members: the Reno and Tomah Members and the Birkmose Member. Jordan
Sandstone is composed of medium to coarse-grained, well-rounded, generally friable quartzose
sandstone; and very fine-grained, feldspathic sandstone with shale and siltstone lenses. The Jordan
Sandstone commonly has dark brown iron and manganese oxide staining and cement where it is the
uppermost bedrock formation. The formation is 80 to 100 feet thick when uneroded. The St.
Lawrence Formation is about 40 to 50 feet thick. There is dominantly tan, white, or light gray, very
fine-grained sandstone and siltstone in the upper part of the formation and light gray to green shale
and light gray, finely crystalline dolostone in the lower part of the formation. The contact between
the St. Lawrence Formation and underlying Lone Rock Formation is transitional, and rock types
characteristic of both formations may be interbedded across the contact.
The Lone Rock Formation is principally gray-yellowish-green to light olive-gray, fine grained, silty,
feldspathic, and glauconitic sandstone that has poor to moderate cementation. The Reno and
Tomah Members in the upper portion of the formation is shaley and dolomitic. The lower portion,
the Birkmose Member, is characterized by thin to medium beds of pink/orange to dark red
dolostone and is more glauconitic. The Lone Rock Formation is 118 to 150 feet thick. It subcrops

10 MNDNR. Karst Feature Inventory. Shapefile.

https://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=9df792d8f86546f2aafc98b3e31adb62. Accessed
February 2026.
11 Minnesota Natural Resource Atlas. Karst Feature Inventory Points. https://mnatlas.org/gis-tool/?id=k_0279. Accessed
February 2026.
12 MNDNR. Minnesota Groundwater Provinces, 2021.
https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/mapping/provinces/2021-provinces.pdf. Accessed February 2026.
13 Minnesota Natural Resource Atlas. Water Table-Depth. https://mnatlas.org/gis-tool/?id=k_0279. Accessed February 2026.
14 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648.
Accessed February 2026.
15 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648.
Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 20

throughout Carver County mostly along buried bedrock valleys and adjacent to them on the flat
buried plateaus.16
These bedrock formations pose varying limitations for development: the porous Jordan Sandstone
may lead to instability or groundwater infiltration, while the variable St. Lawrence Formation and
Lone Rock Formation can complicate excavation and foundation design. To mitigate these risks,
BMPs such as pre-construction geotechnical investigations, controlled blasting, groundwater
management systems, and erosion control measures may be implemented.
Scenarios 1 and 2, characterized by higher-density development, may require a more integrated
approach to aquifer protection due to the increased impervious surface area and limited space for
traditional stormwater infrastructure. Urban BMPs such as green roofs, underground stormwater
storage, and tree trenches could be incorporated to manage runoff and improve water quality. In
areas where infiltration is not advisable, such as those with shallow bedrock or karst-prone geology,
alternative stormwater strategies could be used.
Scenario 3, the scenario based on the City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan,17 emphasizes the
preservation of agricultural land and low-density development, which may inherently reduce the
risk of aquifer contamination by limiting impervious surface expansion and maintaining natural
infiltration. While this scenario is expected to result in minimal land disturbance, the city could still
promote agricultural BMPs, such as conservation tillage, nutrient management, and vegetative
buffers, to help protect groundwater quality. These practices may reduce nutrient and sediment
runoff and support aquifer recharge. Continued monitoring of groundwater quality and coordination
with the Carver County Water Management Organization might also be beneficial to ensure that any
future development aligns with long-term aquifer protection goals.
Project-specific mitigation measures may include deep foundation systems, stormwater infiltration
controls to protect sensitive aquifers, and avoidance or minimization of disturbance in mapped
wetland areas.
B. Soils and Topography – Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and
descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions
relating to erosion potential, soil stability, or other soil limitations, such as steep slopes or highly
permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss
impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities)
related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to
address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections, or other measures.
Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to
Item 11.b.ii.
AUAR Guidance: The number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be moved
need not be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for development of
the area should be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In discussing mitigation

16 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648.

Accessed February 2026.
17 City of Carver. 2020. 2040 Comprehensive Plan. https://www.cityofcarver.com/202/Comprehensive-Plan
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 21

measures, both the standard requirements of the local ordinances and any special measures that
would be added for AUAR purposes should be included. A standard soils map for the area should be
included.
According to the Web Soil Survey, a total of 41 soil types make up the AUAR Study Area. These soils
and their qualities are included in Table 8 below (also shown in Figure 7, Appendix A). Table 8
includes the hydrologic soil groups, which indicates runoff potential and infiltration rates, classified
in four different groups. Additionally, ratings for farmland classification, percent hydric classification,
wind erodibility group, and K-factor are all included in the table.

Table 8: Soil Types Within the AUAR Study Area
Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol

Percent
of AUAR
Study
Area

Wind
KErodibility
Factor
Group

FB

19.06

5

0.15

17.17

3

0.2

8.97

6

0.1

8.76

6

0.24

6.11

6

0.28

5.56

6

0.32

3.68

2

0.17

3.45

3

0.15

FA
AE
RW

RB

BA
KM
DA

TB
FC2
DB

AA

Acres in
Farmland
Percent Hydrologic AUAR
Classification Hydric Group
Study
Area
Rasset sandy loam, 6 to
Not prime
0
A
286.35
12 percent slopes
farmland
All areas are
Kasota sandy loam, 0 to 2
prime
0
B
258.02
percent slopes
farmland
Hawick loamy sand, 20 to Not prime
0
A
134.73
40 percent slopes
farmland
Prime
Biscay clay loam, 0 to 2
farmland if
100
C/D
131.68
percent slopes
drained
All areas are
Wadena loam, 2 to 6
prime
0
B
91.77
percent slopes
farmland
All areas are
Richwood silt loam
prime
0
B
83.55
farmland
Sparta loamy sand, 2 to 6 Not prime
0
A
55.28
percent slopes
farmland
Dakota and Rasset sandy Farmland of
loams, 0 to 2 percent
statewide
0
B
51.86
slopes
importance
Wadena loam, 6 to 12
Farmland of
percent slopes,
statewide
0
B
49.78
moderately eroded
importance
Dickman sandy loam, 6 to Not prime
0
A
44.32
12 percent slopes, eroded farmland
All areas are
Terril loam, 2 to 6
prime
8
B
31.37
percent slopes
farmland
All areas are
Fairhaven silt loam, 2 to 6
prime
0
B
25.95
percent slopes
farmland

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

3.31

0.28

2.95

6

0.2

2.09

4L

0.28

1.73

6

0.28

Page 22

Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol

Acres in
Farmland
Percent Hydrologic AUAR
Classification Hydric Group
Study
Area

Percent
of AUAR
Study
Area

Wind
KErodibility
Factor
Group

RC

Estherville-Hawick sandy
loams, 12 to 18 percent
slopes

Not prime
farmland

0

A

24.56

1.63

6

0.15

IC2

Kilkenny-Lester loams, 2
to 6 percent slopes

All areas are
prime
farmland

0

C/D

19.53

1.30

6

0.24

HC2

Estherville-Hawick sandy
loams, 6 to 12 percent
slopes, eroded

Not prime
farmland

0

A

18.33

1.22

3

0.15

KC2

Lester loam, 6 to 10
percent slopes

5

C

16.24

1.08

6

0.28

90

C/D

15.38

1.02

3

0.24

0

B

15.25

1.01

2

0.2

0

A

12.64

0.84

2

0.17

40

B

12.48

0.83

6

0.24

5

A

11.94

0.79

3

0.2

1

B

11.22

0.75

6

0.28

0

B

11.05

0.74

6

0.24

1

A

10.80

0.72

6

0.2

100

C/D

10.43

0.69

3

0.28

0

A

9.45

0.63

3

0.15

100

B/D

9.07

0.60

6

0.28

0

B

8.45

0.56

3

0.15

PD

LD
WA
CW

KB

IA

PS

LC

IB2

BB2

PB

EB

Farmland of
statewide
importance
Prime
Hamel loam, 0 to 2
farmland if
percent slopes
drained
All areas are
Kasota sandy loam, 2 to 6
prime
percent slopes, eroded
farmland
Sparta loamy sand, 6 to
Not prime
12 percent slopes
farmland
Minneiska-Kalmarville
Not prime
complex, frequently
farmland
flooded
Farmland of
Dickman sandy loam, 0 to
statewide
2 percent slopes
importance
All areas are
Wadena loam, 0 to 2
prime
percent slopes
farmland
Farmland of
Lester-Kilkenny loams, 6
statewide
to 12 percent slopes
importance
Farmland of
Estherville sandy loam, 2
statewide
to 6 percent slopes
importance
Prime
Cordova-Webster
farmland if
complex
drained
Farmland of
Rasset sandy loam, 0 to 6
statewide
percent slopes
importance
Prime
Talcot silty clay loam
farmland if
drained
Dakota and Rasset sandy Farmland of
loams, 2 to 6 percent
statewide
slopes
importance

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 23

Map
Unit
Map Unit Name
Symbol

Percent
of AUAR
Study
Area

Wind
KErodibility
Factor
Group

AB2

0.38

6

0.28

0.34

3

0.24

0.33

3

0.15

0.32

3

0.2

0.26

6

0.24

0.24

6

0.28

0.22

2

0.28

0.21

6

0.32

0.19

3

0.16

6

0.32

0.09

3

0.28

0.01

6

0.28

0.01

2

0.17

WB
TT

KD2
WC2
BY
HM
PC
KC
HD

EA

KF
KD

Acres in
Farmland
Percent Hydrologic AUAR
Classification Hydric Group
Study
Area
All areas are
Fairhaven silt loam, 0 to 2
prime
0
B
5.65
percent slopes
farmland
Lester-Kilkenny complex, Not prime
0
C
5.12
22 to 40 percent slopes
farmland
Farmland of
Estherville sandy loam, 0
statewide
5
A
4.98
to 2 percent slopes
importance
Farmland of
Dickman sandy loam, 2 to
statewide
5
A
4.80
6 percent slopes
importance
Lester-Kilkenny loams, 12 Not prime
0
B
3.95
to 18 percent slopes
farmland
All areas are
Kasota loam, 0 to 2
prime
0
C
3.53
percent slopes
farmland
Lester loam, 10 to 16
Not prime
2
C
3.25
percent slopes
farmland
Lester-Kilkenny complex,
Not prime
10 to 16 percent slopes,
5
C
3.18
farmland
moderately eroded
Klossner muck, sandy
Not prime
100
A/D
2.85
substratum
farmland
Lester-Kilkenny complex, Farmland of
6 to 10 percent slopes,
statewide
5
C
2.35
moderately eroded
importance
Farmland of
Fairhaven silt loam, 6 to
statewide
0
B
1.36
12 percent slopes, eroded
importance
All areas are
Kasota loam, 2 to 6
prime
0
C
0.13
percent slopes, eroded
farmland
Sparta loamy sand, 12 to Not prime
0
A
0.11
18 percent slopes
farmland

Hydrologic Groups:
A = high infiltration rate, low runoff potential; B = moderate infiltration rate; C = slow infiltration rate; and D = very slow infiltration rate, high
runoff potential.
A wind erodibility group (WEG) consists of soils that have similar properties affecting their susceptibility to wind erosion in cultivated areas.
The soils assigned to group 1 are the most susceptible to wind erosion, and those assigned to group 8 are the least susceptible.
K Factor indicates the susceptibility of a soil to sheet and rill erosion by water. Values of K range from 0.02 to 0.69. Other factors being equal,
the higher the value, the more susceptibility the soil is to erosion. K Factor does not apply to organic horizons and is not reported for those
layers.

Topography in the AUAR Study Area is generally flat, with elevations ranging from 740 to 922 feet
above mean sea level. There are some areas in the northern and west-central portions of the AUAR
Study Area that have steeper slopes. These steeper sloped areas are associated with Carver Creek
and Dahlgren Lake. The majority of the agricultural land within the AUAR Study Area is relatively flat
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 24

and would not require significant grading to develop the site. The steeper areas near Carver Creek
and Dahlgren Lake will be left largely unchanged in all proposed scenarios. Therefore, minimal
grading will be necessary.
According to the C-21, Plate 5,18 Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota, elevation of the
bedrock surface (topography) in the AUAR Study Area ranges from approximately 451 to 700 feet
above sea level.
Scenario 1 – The low-density scenario will involve some grading and soil disturbance. The AUAR
Study Area is relatively flat and would require minimal grading. Many of the soils mapped within the
AUAR Study Area have a moderate erosion potential. Erosion and sediment control measures will
likely be necessary during construction. BMPs such as phased grading, temporary stabilization, and
bioswales may be used to help manage runoff and maintain soil stability across the large open
footprint.
Scenario 2 – The higher-density development scenario will have a similar level of grading to Scenario
1. Erosion and sediment control measures, including BMPs, would be similar in both Scenario 1 and
Scenario 2.
Scenario 3 – The no-build scenario aligns with the future land uses defined in the City of Carver 2040
Comprehensive Plan and poses the least disruption to existing soil profiles and topography.
Maintaining soil health may be completed through conservation tillage, cover cropping, and runoff
buffers will be important to support long term agricultural productivity and prevent erosion on
sloped fields.
In 2000, the Metropolitan Council, the Department of Natural Resources, and the Minnesota
Geological Survey collaborated on an aggregate resource inventory of the seven-county
metropolitan area. The inventory identified and categorized likely areas of dolostone deposits, and
sand and gravel deposits.
Significant sand and gravel deposits exist in the entire southern portion of the existing City of Carver
as well as the portion of Dahlgren Township included within the Comprehensive Plan; however, a
large portion of these deposits do not meet current industry standards. There are two generalized
areas of natural aggregate that meet industry standards, located generally adjacent to Carver Creek
and also contained with the land area situated between CR 40 and CR 11. Mining in the area located
near Carver Creek would negatively impact the bluff, ravine, and forest resources in the area. One
former gravel pit is mapped within the AUAR Study Area and is located east of Carver Creek and
west of Mount Carmel Road.19 No scenario contemplates mining operations. Development of the
AUAR Study Area under Scenarios 1 and 2 will not impact current gravel mining operations at the
Wm. Mueller & Sons - Carver Pit, located northeast of the AUAR Study Area.
While areas that will be developed will require some grading, this soil will be managed and utilized
as fill elsewhere in the AUAR Study Area where feasible. Each development scenario may use a

18 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota.

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648. Accessed February 2026.
19 MNDNR. 2023. Aggregate Resource Mapping Program. Shapefile. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/geos-aggregate-mapping.
Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 25

combination of short-term and long-term erosion control measures, such as silt fences, sediment
basins, temporary seeding, and permanent vegetation, to minimize soil loss during earthmoving
activities and adapt to seasonal conditions, while complying with applicable permit requirements
and best management practices. Soil erosion and sediment control BMPs will be utilized during
construction and operations of the Project in accordance with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP) and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge
Permit.
An erosion control and grading plan with BMPs consistent with MPCA and city requirements will also
be developed and implemented prior to development of the Project.

12. Water Resources
AUAR Guidance: The information called for on the EAW form should be supplied for any of the
infrastructure associated with the AUAR development scenarios, and for any development expected to
physically impact any water resources. Where it is uncertain whether water resources will be impacted
depending on the exact design of future development, the AUAR should cover the possible impacts
through a “worst case scenario” or else prevent impacts through the provisions of the mitigation plan.
A. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site below.
1.

Surface Water – lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial
ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake,
wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource
value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the
current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within one mile of the project.
Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any.
Development of the AUAR Study Area will add more impervious surfaces, increasing
runoff that carries pollutants like chemicals, oil, and salt into lakes and rivers. These
hard surfaces also reduce groundwater recharge and may impact local water resources.
As an MS4 city, the City must also comply with the Minnesota Small Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems General Permit and maintain a snow and ice management policy
to mitigate salt runoff impacts. Incorporating low-salt design solutions in the AUAR
Study Area can further protect water quality and lower maintenance costs. Low-salt
design strategies may include the use of permeable pavement to avoid melt water
surface pooling, strategic roadway design to avoid low spots where vehicles frequently
brake (reducing salt accumulation and application), and orienting roads to take
advantage of wind and sun exposure, which helps naturally reduce roadway icing. These
measures collectively decrease the need for deicing salt and support overall stormwater
and environmental management goals.
Surface Waters
A review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) found a total of 37 features within the AUAR Study Area. According to the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), a total of seven flowline
features and three waterbody features are present within the AUAR Study Area.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 26

There are no Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) wildlife lakes,
migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lakes, state designated trout streams or lakes, lakes
of biological significance, or outstanding resource value waters present within or within
the vicinity of the AUAR Study Area.
DNR Public Waters
According to the Minnesota DNR’s Public Waters Inventory (PWI), one public
watercourse, Carver Creek (M-055-022) is present within the AUAR Study Area. No
public water basins are present within the AUAR Study Area.
Two public watercourses, Carver Creek and Bevens Creek (M-055-027), and three public
water wetlands are present within one mile of the AUAR Study Area. The closest public
water wetland (Public Water Basin ID: 10004000) is located approximately 125 feet from
the southeastern corner of the AUAR Study Area. All DNR PWI features identified within,
or within one mile of, the AUAR Study Area are listed in Table 9 and shown in Figure 8,
Appendix A.

Table 9: DNR Public Waters Within and Within One Mile of AUAR Study Area
Public Waters within AUAR Study Area
Feature Name Feature
NWI Classification
(ID Number)
Type
Carver Creek
Stream
Riverine (R2UBH)
(M-055-022)
Public Waters within One Mile of AUAR Study Area
Feature Name Feature
NWI Classification
(ID Number)
Type
Carver Creek
Stream
Riverine (R2UBH)
(M-055-022)
Bevens Creek
Stream
Riverine (R2UBH)
(M-055-027)
Unnamed
Freshwater Emergent Wetland (PEM1A, PEM1C,
Wetland
(10022800)
PEM1F); Freshwater Pond (PUBFx, PUBHx)
Unnamed
Freshwater Emergent Wetland (PEM1A, PEM1C);
Wetland
(10004000)
Freshwater Pond (PUBHx)
Unnamed
Lake (L2ABH), Freshwater Emergent Wetland (PEM1C,
Wetland
(10022700)
PEM1F), Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland (PSS1C)

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Special Designation

Length (Miles)

Public Watercourse

2.08

Special Designation

Distance (Miles) from
AUAR Study Area

Public Watercourse

NA

Public Watercourse

0.91

Public Water Wetland

0.34

Public Water Wetland

0.02

Public Water Wetland

0.92

Page 27

MN Buffer Law requires perennial vegetative buffers up to 50 feet along public waters
(lakes, rivers, and streams), and buffers of 16.5 feet along public ditches. Buffers help
filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment, and are an important conservation
practice for helping keep water clean. As a public watercourse, the Buffer Law applies to
Carver Creek (M-055-022). Carver Creek is currently buffered by more than 50 feet
along its course within the AUAR Study Area. Development will not result in vegetation
being removed within the 50-foot buffer under any Scenario. There are no public
ditches or public water wetlands within the AUAR Study Area.20
Field Delineated Aquatic Resources
A field delineation was conducted between August 19-25, 2025, within a 679.5-acre
Field Delineation Area subset of the 1,503-acre AUAR Study Area (Appendix B). The field
delineation identified nine wetland features and three watercourse features within the
Delineation Area. The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) approved the delineation and
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) Notice of Decisions (NOD) were issued by
the Carver County Water Management Organization (WMO) on November 5, 6, and 12,
2025. Field delineated features are listed in Table 10 and shown in Figure 8 in Appendix
A. Additional field delineations of the non-delineated portions of the AUAR Study Area
are anticipated to be completed and approved prior to starting construction activities.

Table 10: Field Delineated Features Summary

WB-A-01
WB-B-01
WB-C-01
WB-C-02
WB-C-03
WB-D-01
WB-E-01
WB-G-01A
WB-G-01B
WB-G-02
Total*

Area
(Acres)
0.073
0.097
0.22
0.011
0.051
0.3
4.78
3.8
2.4
0.52
12.25

Circular
39
Type 2
Type 7
Type 3
Type 1
Type 1
Type 1
Type 2
Type 2
Type 7
Type 7

Waterway
ID

Area
(Acres)

Length
(Linear Feet)

Flow Regime

WC-E/G-01

2.89

4,052

Perennial

WC-G-01A
WC-G-01B
Total*

0.04
0.04
2.99

289
303
4,644

Intermittent
Intermittent

Wetland ID

Cowardin
Classification
PEM1B
PFO1B
PEM1C
PEM1Af
PEM1Af
PEM1Af
PEM1B
PEM1B
PFO1B
PFO1B

Eggers and Reed
Community
Fresh Wet Meadow
Hardwood Swamp
Shallow Marsh
Seasonally Flooded Basin
Seasonally Flooded Basin
Seasonally Flooded Basin
Fresh Wet Meadow
Fresh Wet Meadow
Hardwood Swamp
Hardwood Swamp

HGM
Mineral Flat
Slope
Depressional
Depressional
Depressional
Depressional
Riverine
Riverine
Mineral Flat
Depressional

Notice of Decision
Attained
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/05/2025
Yes, 11/06/2025
Yes, 11/12/2025
Yes, 11/12/2025
Yes, 11/12/2025

County
Parcel ID
040260110
047000100
040230510
040230510
040230510
040260300
040260100
040230400
040230400
040230400

Notice of Decision Attained County Parcel ID
Yes, 11/06/2025 and
11/12/2025
Yes, 11/12/2025
Yes, 11/12/2025

040260100
040230400
040230400
040230400

Wetland Classes: PEM1A- Palustrine, Emergent Vegetation, Persistent, Temporarily Flooded; PEM1B- Palustrine, Emergent Vegetation,
Saturated; PEM1C- Palustrine, Emergent Vegetation, Seasonally Flooded; PFO1B- Palustrine, Forested Deciduous, Saturated.
Special Modifiers: f – Farmed.

20 MNDNR. Buffer Map Viewing Application. https://buffers-viewer.dnr.state.mn.us/. Accessed February 2026.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 28

MPCA 303d Impaired Waters
A review of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s 303d impaired waters list (2024)
and geospatial data found two impaired waters within the AUAR Study Area. Carver
Creek (AUID: 07020012-806) is listed as impaired for aquatic life due to benthic
macroinvertebrates and fish bioassessments, nutrients (phosphorus), and turbidity.
Carver Creek and an unnamed tributary of Carver Creek (AUID: 07020012-526) are also
listed as impaired for aquatic recreation due to fecal coliform.
Within one mile, the aforementioned waters are listed as impaired, as well as Bevens
Creek (AUID: 07020012-514). Bevens Creek is listed as impaired for aquatic life due to
benthic macroinvertebrates and fish bioassessments, chlorpyrifos, and turbidity, as well
as impaired for aquatic recreation due to fecal coliform. Table 11 identifies impaired
waters within one mile of the AUAR Study Area.
Multiple Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) projects are in place for the Lower
Minnesota River Watershed. All impaired waters referenced in this section are included
in the three-part Lower Minnesota River Watershed TMDL report, which addresses the
following water quality parameters: E. coli, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), eutrophication
(phosphorus), and chloride.21 Carver Creek and Bevens Creek each have TMDL projects
in place addressing turbidity and are also included in a TMDL project addressing fecal
coliform.22, 23, 24
Table 11: Impaired Waters within One Mile of AUAR Study Area
Waterbody Name

AUID

Impairments

Pollutant or Stressor

TMDL ID Code

Within AUAR Study Area
Carver Creek

07020012-806

Aquatic life and
recreation

Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish
Bioassessments, Nutrients (Phosphorus),
and Turbidity, Fecal Coliform

wc-iw7-49e
wq-iw7-34e
wq-iw7-04e

Unnamed

07020012-526

Aquatic recreation

Fecal Coliform

wc-iw7-49e

Aquatic life and
recreation

Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish
Bioassessments, Chlorpyrifos, Turbidity,
and E. coli (-514)

wc-iw7-49e
wq-iw7-33e
wq-iw7-04e

Within One Mile of AUAR Study Area
Bevens Creek

07020012-514

Floodplains and Shoreland Areas
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
Panels 27019C0331D and 27019C0218D (effective December 21, 2018) indicates that

21 MPCA. 2020. Lower Minnesota River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report. Part I—Southern and Western

Watersheds. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/watershed-information/lower-minnesota-river
22 MPCA. 2012. Carver Creek Turbidity TMDL. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw7-34e.pdf
23 MPCA 2012. Bevens Creek Turbidity TMDL. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw7-33e.pdf
24 MPCA. 2007. Carver County Bacterial TMDL Report. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/wq-iw7-04e.pdf
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 29

one area of 100-year (Zone A) floodplain (one percent annual chance of flooding) is
present within the AUAR Study Area. The 100-year floodplain is associated with Carver
Creek, which flows north through the northwestern portion of the AUAR Study Area.
The remainder of the AUAR Study Area is located within Zone X, or an area of minimal
flood hazard.
According to the Carver County Zoning Map,25 designated shoreland associated with
Carver Creek is present within the AUAR Study Area. Carver County defines shoreland as
land located 1,000 feet from the ordinary high-water level of a lake, pond or flowage;
and 300 feet from a river or stream as designated on the Carver County Zoning Map or
the landward extent of a floodplain as designated by the Carver County Code of
Ordinances, whichever is greater.26 Designated shoreland areas associated with Carver
Creek generally align with the 100-year floodplain, except in areas where the floodplain
extends less than 300 feet from the stream edge.

2.

Groundwater – aquifers, springs, and seeps. Include 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if
project is within a MDH well protection area; and 3) identification of any onsite
and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs, if available. If there are
no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this.
According to the Geologic Atlas of Carver County,27 the depth to groundwater within
most of the AUAR Study Area is between 10 and 50 feet but varies from 0 feet below
ground surface to 125 feet. Areas with groundwater between 0 to 10 feet are generally
focused around Carver Creek. This water level data is taken from LiDAR data, water well
data, and elevation of surface water bodies.
The Minnesota Well Index (MWI) identified 39 water wells within the AUAR Study Area.
Information on these wells is available in Table 12 and Figure 8 in Appendix A. The
majority of these wells are located at existing homes and would not be disturbed by
development. Scenario 3 would not disturb any existing wells, while Scenarios 1 and 2
may require removal or modification of some of the existing wells. Numerous wells are
located within one mile of the AUAR Study Area. If necessary, wells within the AUAR
Study Area would be removed and sealed per MPCA and Minnesota Department of
Health sealing requirements.
According to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Source Water Protection
Map, the AUAR Study Area is not located within a MDH Wellhead Protection Area (WPA)
or Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA).

25 Carver County. 2024. Carver County Zoning Map, Ordinance 108-2024.

https://www.carvercountymn.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/27168/638693545191370000
26 Carver County. 2024. Code of Ordinances. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/carvercounty/latest/carverco_mn/0-0-03098
27 University of Minnesota Geological Survey. Geologic Atlas of Carver County, Minnesota. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/59648.
Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 30

Table 12: Wells within AUAR Study Area
Well ID

Use Type

Status

Depth (ft)

122132
122136
122830
122841
122941
122942
122950
125953
130787
174308
187287
190051
208956
401101
453892
464524
484868
495504
543710
543746
559643
573104
591041
601580
618591
633585
647707
647731
647735
655045
657151
681625
681626
703303
718303
729362
731554
736199
807932

Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Domestic
Test
Test
Domestic
Domestic

Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active
Active

318
180
186
278
139
196
211
217
174
251
182
182
251
245
180
180
186
226
226
256
244
205
266
231
285
195
125
235
150
245
177
175
137
173
215
500
320
270
201

B. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate
the effects below.
1.

Wastewater – For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities, and
composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic, and industrial wastewaters projected
or treated at the site.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 31

AUAR Guidance: Observe the following points of guidance in an AUAR:

a)

•

Only domestic wastewater should be considered in an AUAR—industrial
wastewater would be coming from industrial uses that are excluded from review
through an AUAR process

•

Wastewater flows should be estimated by land use subareas of the AUAR area;
the basis of flow estimates should be explained

•

The major sewer system features should be shown on a map and the expected
flows should be identified

•

If not explained under Item 6, the expected staging of the sewer system
construction should be described

•

The relationship of the sewer system extension to the RGU’s comprehensive
sewer plan and (for metro area AUARs) to Metropolitan Council regional systems
plans, including MUSA expansions, should be discussed. For non-metro area
AUARs, the AUAR must discuss the capacity of the RGU’s wastewater treatment
system compared to the flows from the AUAR area; any necessary improvements
should be described.

•

If on-site systems will serve part of the AUAR, the guidance in the February 2000
edition of the EAW Guidelines on page 16 regarding item 18b under Residential
development should be followed.
If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify
any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added
water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of,
municipal wastewater infrastructure.
Wastewater from the proposed development scenarios will be discharged into
the City of Carver collection system. This will require extending the existing
gravity flow infrastructure from County Road 11/Main Street intersection to the
study area. See Sanitary Sewer figures in Appendix I.
The City of Carver pumps their wastewater to the Blue Lake Water Resource
Recovery Facility (WRRF) in Shakopee owned by the Metropolitan Council of
Environmental Services (MCES). The Blue Lake WRRF currently treats 27 million
gallons per day and has the capacity to treat 32 million gallons per day (MGD).
The existing average daily flow of wastewater is 1.116 MGD per the Carver 2040
Comprehensive Sewer Plan (for 2020). The added wastewater flow from the
proposed development was estimated from the proposed acreage of land per
land use in the AUAR. A majority of the AUAR study area is within the Southwest
District. An area of approximately 200 acres in the southwest corner of the
AUAR study area is outside of the current MUSA and outside of the sanitary
Southwest District as shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Due to existing
elevations in this area, a lift station will be required to serve that area. Table W3 of the Carver 2040 Comprehensive Sewer Plan states that Southwest District is
projected to have an average flow of 1.488 MGD. Table 13 below summarizes
the proposed added flows generated from Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 within the

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 32

AUAR and ultimate flows including the AUAR and areas within the Southwest
District 2040 Comprehensive planning area routed through the AUAR.
Table 13: Wastewater Discharges
Average Daily Flow within AUAR
- MGD

Average Daily Flow with AUAR
and Southwest District 2040
Planning Area - MGD

Scenario 1

1.760

1.959

Scenario 2

2.059

2.283

Scenario 3

1.313

1.427

Scenarios 1, 2, and 3 are projected to add 1.760, 2.059, and 1.313 MGD of
wastewater flow to the system, respectively. Thus, the Blue Lake WRRF has the
capacity to treat the added flow from this development.
Water softeners that do not use salt are recommended to reduce the amount of
chloride that travels to the WWTP.
Additional information regarding anticipated development timing is included in
Appendix J.
b)

If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment system
(SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site
conditions for such a system.
No subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS) are anticipated within the
AUAR study area for the proposed development scenario. Existing SSTS are
currently in use on existing homes and would likely remain until sewer service is
available.

c)

If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater
treatment methods, discharge points, and proposed effluent limitations to
mitigation impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from
wastewater discharges.
No wastewater discharge to surface waters is anticipated for the proposed
development scenarios.

2.

Stormwater – Describe changes in surface hydrology resulting from change of land
cover. Describe the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the project site
(major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss
environmental effects from stormwater discharges on receiving waters postconstruction, including how the project will affect runoff volume, discharge rate, and
change in pollutants. Consider the effects of current Minnesota climate trends and
anticipated changes in rainfall frequency, intensity, and amount with this discussion.
For projects requiring NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater permit coverage, state the
total number of acres that will be disturbed by the project and describe the
stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), including specific best management
practices to address soil erosion and sedimentation during and after project

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 33

construction. Discuss permanent stormwater management plans, including methods
of achieving volume reduction to restore or maintain the natural hydrology of the site
using green infrastructure practices or other stormwater management practices.
Identify any receiving waters that have construction-related water impairments or are
classified as special as defined in the Construction Stormwater permit. Describe
additional requirements for special and/or impaired waters.
AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR the following additional guidance should be followed in
addition to that in EAW Guidelines:
•

It is expected that an AUAR will have a detailed analysis of stormwater issues

•

A map of the proposed stormwater management system and of the water
bodies that will receive stormwater should be provided

•

The description of the stormwater systems would identify on-site and “regional”
detention ponding and also indicate whether the various ponds will be new
water bodies or converted existing ponds or wetlands. Where on-site ponds will
be used but have not yet been designed, the discussion should indicate the
design standards that will be followed.

•

If present in or adjoining the AUAR area, the following types of water bodies
must be given special analyses:
o

Lakes: Within the Twin Cities metro area, a nutrient budget analysis
must be prepared for any “priority lake” identified by the Metropolitan
Council. Outside of the metro area, lakes needing a nutrient budget
analysis must be determined by consultation with the MPCA and DNR
staffs.

o

Trout streams: If stormwater discharges will enter or affect a trout
stream, an evaluation of the impacts on the chemical composition and
temperature regime of the stream and the consequent impacts on the
trout population (and other species of concern) must be included.

The existing drainage patterns within the AUAR area discharge approximately 95% of
surface waters to Carver Creek from the Upper Carver Creek District and the South
Carver District. The remaining 5% of surface waters, from the Southwest Carver District,
drain to wetlands to the south. Ultimately all water makes its way to the Minnesota
River. The study area contains a minimal amount of impervious surfaces, which are
primarily limited to existing roads, farmsteads, and rural single-family developments.
The predominant land use within the area is agricultural row crops and rural residential.
The soils across the AUAR study area primarily consist of hydrologic group A/B. See
Surface Water Drainage – Existing Conditions Figure in Appendix I for existing drainage
patterns.
Stormwater runoff transports pollutants such as bacteria (from pet and wildlife waste),
sediments (from erosion and construction), and nutrients (from fertilizers and organic
debris. These contaminants contribute to water quality impairments, including high
levels of bacteria, increased turbidity, and low dissolved oxygen. Urban runoff may also
introduce trace metals, oils, and road salt, further affecting aquatic life and stream
health.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 34

As listed and described in the Surface Water section above, Carver Creek and an
unnamed tributary of Carver Creek are listed as impaired waters within the AUAR Study
Area, and Bevens Creek is listed as an impaired water within one mile of the study area.
Multiple Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) projects are in place for the Lower
Minnesota River Watershed. All impaired waters referenced in this section are included
in the three-part Lower Minnesota River Watershed TMDL report, which addresses the
following water quality parameters: E. coli, Total Suspended Solids (TSS), eutrophication
(phosphorus), and chloride.28 Carver Creek and Bevens Creek each have TMDL projects
in place addressing turbidity and are also included in a TMDL project addressing fecal
coliform.
The City of Carver, as an MS4 community, is subject to annual reporting requirements
related to TMDL implementation. The city will ensure that all future development
scenarios within the AUAR Study Area are evaluated for consistency with the waste load
allocations (WLAs) established in the impaired waters. The city will also incorporate
applicable strategies from the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS)
and the Carver County Watershed Management Plan to support pollutant load
reductions and maintain compliance with the MS4 General Permit.
All stormwater generated by future development scenarios will be treated to meet the
standards of the Carver County Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO) and
the City of Carver. BMP’s will be designed to minimize negative impacts to Carver Creek
and wetlands to the south. Practices may include stormwater basins, infiltration basins,
vegetated swales, rain gardens, permeable pavement, and other green infrastructure to
reduce sedimentation and pollutant transport. The size, type, and location of
stormwater BMP’s will vary throughout the site. Permanent above-ground stormwater
management basins are currently proposed for the site. To meet water quality
requirements, National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) basins combined with infiltration
areas are anticipated to be the most effective and feasible solution. All NURP Basins and
infiltration areas will be designed in accordance with the National Urban Runoff
Program and CCWMO guidelines. These NURP basins are expected to provide sufficient
permanent pool volume. See Surface Water Drainage – Proposed Conditions Figure in
Appendix I for potential stormwater management locations. Final stormwater plans will
be subject to review and approval by the City and CCWMO prior to each phase of
construction.
Development in the AUAR Study Area will increase impervious surfaces, resulting in
greater stormwater runoff and reduced groundwater recharge. Total impervious surface
for Scenario 1 is estimated to be 480.5 acres or 32%, Scenario 2 is estimated to be 488.7
acres or 33%, and Scenario 3 is estimated to be 395.74 acres or 26%.
Increased impervious surface coverage will lead to higher volumes and velocities of
stormwater runoff, which can exacerbate erosion, reduce groundwater recharge, and
increase pollutant loading to receiving waters. These changes may intensify sediment
transport, and nutrient delivery to Carver Creek, further stressing aquatic habitats.
Additionally, higher runoff volumes can overwhelm existing stormwater infrastructure

28 MPCA. 2020. Lower Minnesota River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report. Part I—Southern and Western

Watersheds. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/watershed-information/lower-minnesota-river
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 35

and increase the risk of localized flooding. City and CCWMO requirements limit postdevelopment stormwater discharge rates to pre-development levels, so on-site facilities
such as ponds, infiltration areas, or underground tanks are needed to manage runoff,
maintain groundwater recharge, and protect downstream resources.
Incorporating low-salt design solutions in the AUAR Study Area can further protect
water quality and lower maintenance costs. Low-salt design strategies may include the
use of permeable pavement to avoid melt water surface pooling, strategic roadway
design to avoid low spots where vehicles frequently brake (reducing salt accumulation
and application), and orienting roads to take advantage of wind and sun exposure,
which helps naturally reduce roadway icing. These measures collectively decrease the
need for deicing salt and support overall stormwater and environmental management
goals.29 Stormwater management will also consider nearby public water supply wells.
Prior to construction, a comprehensive Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
will be completed before submitting the NPDES permit application and commencing
construction. It will detail all planned temporary and permanent BMPs, maintenance
schedules, responsible parties, and phasing. During construction, erosion and sediment
control best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent impacts to
aquatic ecosystems per the City of Carver, MPCA MS4, and NPDES Standards.
If dewatering is to take place, adequate treatment must be provided so that nuisance
conditions will not result from the discharge.
3.

Water Appropriation – Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or
groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use, and
purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required.
Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply,
identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required
expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from
water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for
appropriation. Discuss how the proposed water use is resilient in the event of changes
in total precipitation, large precipitation events, drought, increased temperatures,
variable surface water flows and elevations, and longer growing seasons. Identify any
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water
appropriation. Describe contingency plans should the appropriation volume increase
beyond infrastructure capacity or water supply for the project diminish in quantity or
quality, such as reuse of water, connections with another water source, or emergency
connections.
AUAR Guidance: If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about
that appropriation and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given; if
groundwater levels would be affected, any impacts resulting on other resources should
be addressed.
A Water Appropriation Permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) would be required if permanent dewatering is determined to be necessary for

29 University of Minnesota. Minnesota Local Technical Assistance Program. “Grant offers strategies for low-salt design

planning.” https://mnltap.umn.edu/ltapnews/2025/july/low-salt. Accessed July 2025.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 36

construction within the AUAR. This permit is required for groundwater withdrawals
exceeding 10,000 gallons per day or one million gallons per year.
The City of Carver’s municipal water supply is provided through six active groundwater
wells drawing from the Mt. Simon–Hinckley and Tunnel City–Wonewoc aquifers, with
combined firm capacity of 2.1 MGD when one well is out of service. Well 7 is planned to
be constructed in 2028 and would supply the existing Water Treatment Facility 1.
Treatment is provided by the City’s Water Treatment Facility 1 (WTF1) which has a
treatment capacity of approximately 2.6 MGD. The city is planning to construct Water
Treatment Facility 2 (WTF2) along with Well 7 & Well 8 in 2031. WTF2 is planned to have
a treatment capacity of 2.0 MGD with the ability to be expanded to 4.0 MGD on
ultimate buildout. The city will be completing a study to determine where the future
water treatment plant should be located; one of the potential locations is within the
AUAR. Based on the City’s Water Supply Plan, projected maximum-day demand for
Carver is estimated at 3.06 MGD by 2030 and 4.62 MGD by 2040. Estimated water
demand for the development scenarios in the AUAR are generally included in these
system wide projections. Using estimated water consumption demands of 90 GPC/Day
the Average Day Demand for Scenario 1 is 1.03 MGD, Scenario 2 is 1.97 MGD, and
Scenario 3 is 0.74 MGD and is summarized in Table 14 below. The Maximum Day
Demand apply a 2.9 peaking factor.
Table 14: Average Day Demand
Scenario #

Average Day Demand (MGD)

Maximum Day Demand (MGD)

1

1.03

3.00

2

1.97

5.70

3

0.74

2.15

In addition to stormwater management BMPs, the City will continue to evaluate
projected water demand at full buildout to ensure that groundwater and municipal
water supply systems can sustainably support development. Water conservation
measures, such as efficient irrigation systems and potential reuse of captured
stormwater for non-potable uses, will be considered to reduce demand and improve
resilience during periods of drought or extreme heat.
Scenarios 1 and 3 can be served by the combination of existing and planned wells and
water treatment. Scenario 2 would require additional wells and treatment beyond what
is planned in the current capital improvement plan and will be regularly evaluated as
growth continues in the city.
Water service to the AUAR would be provided through extensions of the City of Carver’s
distribution system. Based on water demands, a 16-inch main or equivalent is needed to
be extended from County Road 11/Carver Bluffs Parkway to ensure adequate pressure
and fire flow for Scenario 2. Distribution system expansion will occur as development
proceeds.

4.

Surface Waters

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 37

a)

Wetlands – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland
features, such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, and
vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from
physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any
proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed, taking into
consideration how current Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate
change in the general location of the project may influence the effects.
Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered),
minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any
required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts
will occur in the same minor or major watershed and identify those probable
locations.
Impacts to wetlands within the AUAR Study Area are regulated by the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and, potentially, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA).
The Carver County Water Management Organization (WMO) is the WCA local
governmental unit (LGU).
Nine wetlands and three watercourses were delineated within the Field
Delineation Area, a subset of the AUAR Study Area. All field delineated wetlands
were reviewed and approved by the LGU. Wetlands WB-G-01-A/B, WB-G-02,
WB-E-01, and WB-A-01 are not anticipated to be impacted in either
development scenario. Wetlands WB-B-01, WB-C-01, WB-C-02, WB-C-03, and
WB-D-01 may be impacted in both development scenarios. Assuming these
features are fully impacted, impacts would total approximately 0.6-acre.
Additional field delineations of the non-delineated portions of the AUAR Study
Area are anticipated to be completed and approved prior to starting
construction activities.
If wetland impacts associated with the proposed development of the AUAR
Study Area are unavoidable, a wetland replacement plan would be required. A
replacement plan requires the Proposer to complete an alternative analysis and
consider avoidance and minimization measures of wetland impacts to the
greatest practicable extent. A replacement plan must be approved before
construction could proceed. For wetland impacts that cannot be avoided,
wetland bank credits would be purchased at a compensatory mitigation ratio of
2:1 if on-site locations are not available and/or if agencies recommend the use
of a wetland bank. Wetland bank credits would be purchased following the
siting requirements laid out in the WCA and would seek to be purchased in the
same Bank Service Area (BSA) and Major Watershed as the Project, provided
bank credits are available. The AUAR Study Area is located within BSA 9 and
Major Watershed 33, Minnesota River – Shakopee.
The USACE, LGU, and other appropriate stakeholders would be consulted during
this process. An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) from the USACE
may be required to confirm that impacted wetlands are not subject to USACE
jurisdiction. Although not anticipated, if impacted wetlands are subject to
USACE jurisdiction, a Section 404 permit would be required.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 38

Should the total impacts to USACE jurisdictional wetlands fall below 0.5-acres,
the Project impacts would likely meet the requirements of a Nationwide Permit
(NWP 29). Should impacts exceed 0.5-acres, an Individual Permit from the
USACE would be required.
Construction and erosion control BMPs such as silt fence, sediment control logs,
rock construction entrances, etc. would be used during construction to protect
wetlands from runoff and sedimentation. Stormwater management would be
designed to treat stormwater runoff and control runoff volume to minimize
impacts to water resources.
Climate trends within Minnesota predict a wetter, warmer climate, with more
intense precipitation events. Wetlands are important natural features that store
runoff from precipitation events and sequester carbon from the atmosphere.
Opportunities to minimize impacts to wetlands would be evaluated during the
development of the final design plans for the Project. In addition to maintaining
wetlands within the AUAR Study Area, proposed development would
incorporate stormwater features to mitigate the impacts of runoff on wetlands
and other water features within the AUAR Study Area.

b)

Other surface waters – Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations
to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels,
county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation,
dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal, and
riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from
physical modification of water features, taking into consideration how current
Minnesota climate trends and anticipated climate change in the general
location of the project may influence the effects. Identify measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features,
including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or
minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features.
Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any
water body, including current and projected watercraft usage.
AUAR Guidance: Water surface use need only be addressed if the AUAR area
would include or adjoin recreational water bodies.
Anticipated physical effects or alterations to other surface water features within
the AUAR Study Area are likely to occur. The identified DNR public watercourse
within the AUAR Study Area, Carver Creek (M-055-022), bisects the
northwestern portion of the AUAR Study Area. The areas surrounding Carver
Creek are proposed to remain undeveloped in all three development scenarios.
Future development proposes an extension of County Road 11 which would
cross Carver Creek and encroach into the regulated 100-year floodplain (Zone A)
associated with Carver Creek. Development within the floodplain would require
an Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Permit and compensatory
storage mitigation, per the Carver County Water Resource Management

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 39

Ordinance.30 Construction of a stream crossing is also required to conform to
the standards outlined in Chapter 153, Section 57 (Stream Crossing Standards)
of the Carver County Code of Ordinances.
Appropriate BMPs would be utilized during construction to protect surface
water features from sedimentation and runoff during construction. Stormwater
management would be designed to treat stormwater runoff and control runoff
volume to minimize impacts to water resources. Currently, there is no
watercraft usage within the AUAR Study Area. Watercraft usage is not projected
to change in either development scenario.
The combination of changing climate trends, including an increase in
precipitation and freeze-thaw events within the AUAR study area, and the
increased amount of impervious surface that is proposed under Scenarios 1 and
2, are anticipated to result in additional demand for usage of salt during winter
maintenance operations. The proposed increases in impervious surfaces for
Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 will result in greater demand for salt usage in
comparison to Scenario 3.
As an MS4 city, Carver will comply with the Minnesota Small Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer Systems General Permit and maintain a snow and ice management
policy to mitigate salt runoff impacts. The city intends to incorporate low-salt
design solutions in the AUAR Study Area to further protect water quality and
lower maintenance costs, including:
• The use of permeable pavement to avoid melt water surface pooling.
• Strategic roadway design to avoid low spots where vehicles frequently
brake (reducing salt accumulation and application).
• Orienting roads to take advantage of wind and sun exposure, which
helps naturally reduce roadway icing. These measures collectively
decrease the need for deicing salt and support overall stormwater and
environmental management goals.
These measures collectively decrease the need for deicing salt and support
overall stormwater and environmental management goals. No alterations to
other surface waters are anticipated as part of the proposed development
scenarios.

13. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes
A. Pre-Project Site Conditions – Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards
on or in close proximity to the project site, such as soil or groundwater contamination, abandoned
dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas
pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would

30 Carver County. 2022. Chapter 153 Water Resource Management.

https://www.carvercountymn.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/27809/638844734048270000
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 40

be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid,
minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental
hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan.
This AUAR includes review of the MPCA What’s in My Neighborhood sites within 0.25 mile of the
AUAR Study Area. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted for approximately
582 of the total 1,503 acres in the AUAR Study Area. These Phase I ESAs were conducted in the areas
most likely to be developed first since the reports expire after six months. Additional Phase I ESAs
will be completed for the remaining areas and will be refreshed as necessary prior to development.
The Phase I ESAs were conducted in seven parcel areas and were split into seven corresponding
reports. Of the seven reports and areas studied, one ASTM Recognized Environmental Condition
(REC) was identified. This REC was identified on PIN 040260100 in the southwestern portion of the
overall AUAR Study Area. The REC consisted of solid waste including a drum, scrap metal, and tires
dumped in a ravine. Based on the completed Phase I ESA, additional study of this REC is not
necessary.
The MPCA’s What’s in My Neighborhood online map viewer was reviewed to determine the
presence of potentially contaminated sites within the AUAR Study Area.31 The AUAR Study Area
contains four feedlots and one very small quantity generator hazardous waste site. Two of the
feedlots and the small quantity generator hazardous waste site are listed as currently active, while
the remaining two feedlots are listed as inactive. The database lists nine sites within 0.25 mile of the
AUAR Study Area. Six of these sites are feedlots, nine of which are permanently or temporarily
inactive, two are active construction stormwater sites, and one is an active air quality site. See Table
15 for a list of sites within .25 mile of the AUAR Study Area.
Table 55: MPCA What's in My Neighborhood Permitted Activities
MPCA ID(s)

Name

Status

Permitted Activity

Approximate
Location

Sites within the AUAR Study Area

86326

Steve and Janice Wellens
14015 County Road 43
Cologne, MN 55322

Temporarily
Inactive –
Registration needs
to be updated

019-64170

Larry Wellens Farm
5845 Mt Carmel Rd
Carver, MN 55315

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Transition Area.
Feedlots

Northern portion
of the AUAR Study
Area.
Transition Area.

Feedlots

North-central
portion of the
AUAR Study Area.

31 MPCA. 2026. What’s in My Neighborhood interactive mapper. Available at: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/about-

mpca/whats-in-my-neighborhood. Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 41

MPCA ID(s)

Name

Status

Permitted Activity

019-63728

James Abraham Farm
6240 Maplewood Rd
Cologne, MN 55322-9106

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Feedlots

019-64172

Jim Dircks Farm
5981 Maplewood Rd
Carver, MN 55315-9229

Active – Inspected
and determined
compliant on May
8, 2025

Feedlots

MNR000061978

Thiesfeld Residence
5610 Maplewood Rd
Carver, MN 55315-9229

Active

Hazardous Waste,
Very small quantity
generator

Approximate
Location
Transition Area.
Central portion of
the AUAR Study
Area north of
Maplewood Road.
Transition Area.
South central
portion of the
AUAR Study Area,
south of
Maplewood Road.
Eastern boundary
of the AUAR Study
Area, on
Maplewood Rd.

Sites within 0.25 mile of the AUAR Study Area
Transition Area.
019-65659

Richard Olson Farm - Sec 2
15826 County Road 40
Carver, MN 55315

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Feedlots

019-65661

Richard Olson Farm - Sec 35
15281 County Road 40
Carver, MN 55315

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Feedlots

Paul Lundquist
15125 County Road 4
Carver, MN 55315-9641

Temporarily
Inactive –
Registration needs
to be updated

Feedlots

Active

Air Quality

East of central
portion of AUAR
Study Area.

Active

Construction
Stormwater

East of central
portion of AUAR
Study Area.

019-64006

01900074

C00053118

Northern Natural Gas Co Carver
14985 County Road 40
Carver, MN 55315
Northern Lights 2019 Carver Compressor Station
14945 County Road 40
Carver, MN 55315

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Just south of
southern AUAR
Study Area
boundary.
Outside of
Transition Area /
Agricultural Zoning
District
East of southern
portion of AUAR
Study Area.
Transition Area.
East of southern
portion of AUAR
Study Area.

Page 42

MPCA ID(s)

Name

Status

Permitted Activity

019-63919

James Abraham Farm 2
14304 County Road 43
Cologne, MN 55322-9106

Permanently
Feedlots
Terminated/Inactive

Approximate
Location
Outside of
Transition Area /
Agricultural Zoning
District
West of central
AUAR Study Area.

C00038100

Carver County CSAH 43
Bridge Replacement
Address Unknow
Cologne, MN 55322

Active

019-99901

Thuening Hillcrest Stables
13487 County Road 43
Cologne, MN 55322-9163

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Feedlots

019-63447

Mark Hendrickson Farm
15590 County Road 40
Carver, MN 55315

Permanently
Terminated /
Inactive

Feedlots

Construction
Stormwater

West of central
AUAR Study Area.
Transition Area.
North of northern
AUAR Study Area
Outside of
Transition Area /
Agricultural Zoning
District
South of southern
AUAR Study Area

It is noted that there are active feedlot operations listed in Table 15 that are located in Transition
Areas between the City of Carver and Dahlgren Township. Existing feedlot operations within
Transition Areas are prohibited from expansion pursuant to Dahlgren Township policies listed in the
Carver County 2040 Comprehensive Plan. New feedlots of 30 animal units or more are prohibited
within the Transition Area. Additionally, residential home construction within City of Carver city
limits is exempt from setback requirements between new residences and existing feedlots.
An additional review of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) WIMN database32 was
conducted to identify documented potentially contaminated sites within and near the vicinity of the
AUAR Study Area. No sites were mapped in or near the AUAR Study Area.
B. Project Related Generation/Storage of Solid Wastes – Describe solid wastes generated/stored
during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss
potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid
waste including source reduction and recycling.
AUAR Guidance: Generally, only the estimated total quantity of municipal solid waste generated and
information about any recycling or source separation programs of the RGU need to be included.

32 MDA, 2025. What’s in my Neighborhood? – Agricultural.

https://mnag.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=85bade4ea512411aa32a80079246255f. Accessed February
2025
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 43

During both the construction and operational phases of each development scenario, solid waste will
be generated and managed in accordance with Carver County and Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) guidelines. Construction activities across all scenarios are expected to produce
typical construction and demolition waste, including wood, concrete, metal, packaging materials,
and other debris. Contractors will be encouraged to implement waste diversion strategies such as
on-site sorting, recycling of materials like metal and cardboard, and reuse of construction
components where feasible.
During the operational phase, municipal solid waste (MSW) will be generated by residential, mixed
use, church, and open space uses. Scenario 1 will generate moderate waste levels from its density of
residential development that is consistent with the current Carver Comprehensive Plan, while
Scenario 2 is anticipated to produce higher volumes of MSW due to its higher-density development.
Scenario 3, No Build, with its emphasis on agricultural preservation, is expected to generate the
least amount of operational waste.
Across all scenarios, waste will be managed in accordance with Carver County’s current practices. In
2025, residents of Carver County dropped off a record-breaking amount of hazardous household
waste, including 188,000 pounds of paint, along with nearly 42,000 pounds of non-processable
paint-related materials, 28,000 pounds of liquid pesticides, and over 1,500 pounds of pesticide
aerosols. Additional materials included thousands of pounds of aerosols, driveway sealer, acids,
bases, fuels, and other household hazardous waste requiring careful handling and specialized
disposal.33 Carver County runs a construction and demolition waste management service which
provides recycling and reuse opportunities at multiple locations in the county.34 Potential
environmental effects from solid waste handling include increased greenhouse gas emissions (see
Item 17), potential leachate contamination, and localized impacts such as odor and visual blight if
waste is not properly managed. To mitigate these impacts, each scenario will properly manage
waste and encourage recycling consistent with state and county regulations.
C. Project Related Use/Storage of Hazardous Materials – Describe chemicals/hazardous materials
used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage.
Indicate the number, location, and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or
other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spills or releases of
hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the
use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include
development of a spill prevention plan.
AUAR Guidance: Not required for an AUAR. Potential locations of storage tanks associated with
commercial uses in the AUAR should be identified (e.g., gasoline tanks at service stations).
During both construction and operation of the proposed development scenarios, the use and
storage of hazardous materials will be limited and managed in accordance with applicable state and

33 Carver County Water & Environment News. 2026. “Record breaking year for the Environmental Center.” Available at:

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/MNCARVER/bulletins/3ff3e8e. Accessed February 2026.
34 Carver County Environmental Services Department. 2026. “Construction & Demolition.” Available at:
https://www.carvercountymn.gov/departments/public-services/environmental-services/disposal/construction-demolition.
Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 44

federal regulations. Construction activities may involve the temporary use of fuels, lubricants,
solvents, and other chemicals typically associated with heavy equipment and building processes.
These materials will be stored in secure, labeled containers and managed in compliance with OSHA
and MPCA guidelines to minimize the risk of accidental spills or releases.
Three zip codes intersect the AUAR Project boundary - 55315, 55322, and 55318. According to the
MPCA Tank and Leak Site database, there are a total of 76 storage tank sites with 257 tanks within
these zip codes (Figure 9, Appendix A; Appendix C).35 Within the AUAR study area specifically, there
are no aboveground storage tanks or underground tanks (Table 15). Therefore, no tanks will need to
be removed or avoided during development under any scenario. There are 70 active leak sites
within the surrounding zip code areas, but none are located within 0.9 miles of the AUAR study area.
As a result, these sites are not expected to pose any environmental risk to the proposed
development. Documentation of tank locations and leak sites is provided in Figure 9, Appendix A
and Appendix C.
Future commercial uses, such as gas stations or maintenance facilities, may require the installation
of new aboveground or underground storage tanks for petroleum products. While specific locations
and sizes of these tanks are not yet determined, any such installations will be subject to MPCA
permitting and monitoring requirements.
To mitigate potential environmental effects, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be
developed and implemented for all scenarios. This plan will include best management practices such
as perimeter sediment control, inlet protection, designated fueling areas, spill response protocols,
and prompt soil stabilization. A spill prevention and response plan will also be developed to address
accidental releases of hazardous materials during both construction and operation. Spill response
plans will include notification of nearby well owners, both public and private. These measures will
help ensure that hazardous materials are managed safely and that risks to soil, groundwater, and
surface water are minimized.
D. Project Related Generation/Storage of Hazardous Wastes – Describe hazardous wastes
generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of
disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and
disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from the
generation/storage of hazardous wastes including source reduction and recycling.
AUAR Guidance: Not required for an AUAR.
Not applicable.

35 MPCA. 2026. Tank and Leak Site Search. Online database. Available at: https://webapp.pca.state.mn.us/tank-leak/sites.

Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 45

14. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources
(Rare Features)
A. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or near the site.
AUAR Guidance: The description of fish and wildlife resources should be related to the habitat types
depicted on the cover types map. Any differences in impacts between development scenarios should
be highlighted in the discussion.
The AUAR Study Area is primarily composed of cultivated crops with smaller patches of forest
(deciduous, evergreen, mixed), developed (high, low, medium, open), wetlands (emergent
herbaceous, woody), hay/pasture, and barren land. Figure 4, Appendix A illustrates land cover types
within the AUAR Study Area based on geospatial data. Figures 2 and 8, Appendix A shows the
location of Carver Creek.
The presence of forested areas, wetlands, water resources, and agricultural land within the AUAR
Study Area may provide suitable nesting, roosting, foraging, and/or travel corridor habitats for a
variety of wildlife species, including songbirds, raptors, eagles, small mammals, deer, bats, and
snakes. The wetlands and water resources within the AUAR Study Area will also provide suitable
aquatic habitat for species, such as mussels, turtles, fish, frogs, and toads.
B. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened, or special concern) species,
native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance,
and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the
license agreement number and/or correspondence number (ERDB) from which the data were
obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or
species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe results.
AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR, prior consultation with the DNR Division of Ecological Resources for
information about reports of rare plant and animal species in the vicinity is required. Include the
reference numbers called for on the EAW form in the AUAR and include the DNR’s response letter. If
such consultation indicates the need, an on-site habitat survey for rare species in the appropriate
portions of the AUAR area is required. Areas of on-site surveys should be depicted on a map, as
should any “protection zones” established as a result.
1.

State-Listed Species
A MnDNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) was submitted to the MNDNR on
July 25, 2025 (Project ID: MCE #2025-00657; Appendix D). A response letter was
received on October 21, 2025, which identified two species; the state threatened Kittentails (Synthyris bullii) and the state species of special concern Gophersnake (Pituophis
catenifer) known to be in the general vicinity of the AUAR Study Area.
Kitten-tails
According to MnDNR, Kitten-tails have been documented in Carver County. Kitten-tails
inhabit oak savannas, dry prairies, and oak woodlands preferring areas of partial shade

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 46

and upper slopes.36 Kitten-tails are typically found in soils that are sandy to gravelly and
well-drained. In addition to large areas of cultivated cropland, the AUAR Study Area
contains smaller pockets of forested areas that may provide suitable habitat for Kittentails, suggesting a high probability of occurrence. MnDNR recommended a qualified
surveyor to determine if suitable habitat exists within the activity impact area (in
compliance with MnDNR’s Rare Species Survey Process and Rare Plant Guidance) prior
to any land disturbing activities. Further coordination with MnDNR is required to
confirm/demonstrate avoidance or to document whether avoidance is feasible.
Gophersnake
According to MNDNR, Gophersnakes have been documented in Carver County, and
within the vicinity of the Study Area. Gophersnakes inhabit well-drained, loose sandy
and gravel soils within dry prairies and bluff prairies.37 Nest and hibernation sites include
small mammal burrows or rock crevices.
The AUAR Study Area contains herbaceous field edges that pay provide suitable soil and
small mammal burrows, suggesting a moderate probability of occurrence. The MnDNR
recommends the use of erosion control mesh, if any, be limited to wildlife-friendly
materials to reduce impacts to Gophersnakes.
Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance
Based on MNDNR geospatial data no native plant communities, old growth stands, sites
of biodiversity significance, or calcareous fens are located within the AUAR Study Area.
2.

Federally-Listed Species
The USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool was used to identify
federally listed species with potential to occur within the AUAR Study Area. The IPaC
identified six species; the endangered Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
and Rusty patched bumble bee (Bombus affinis); the proposed endangered Tricolored
bat (Perimyotis subflavus); the proposed threatened Monarch butterfly (Danaus
Plexippus) and Western regal fritillary (Argynnis idalia occidentalis); and the nonessential experimental population Whooping crane (Grus americana). No critical
habitats were identified within the AUAR Study Area by the IPaC (Appendix E).
Northern Long-eared Bat
During the summer, Northern long-eared bats primarily inhabit the interior of dense
forests with limited openings, restricting travel to only a few meters outside the forest
edge. Trees with loose bark, broken branches, cavities, and cracks are used for roosting.
Northern long-eared bats forage within small openings, along forest edges, treetops,
and forest-covered creeks.38 During the winter, northern long-eared bats hibernate in
caves and abandoned mines.

36 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2026. Kitten-tails (Synthyris bullii).

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=PDSCR09030
37 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2026. Gophersnake (Pituophis catenifer).
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=ARADB26020
38 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No Date. Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis).
https://www.fws.gov/species/northern-long-eared-bat-myotis-septentrionalis
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 47

According to the MNDNR,39 Northern long-eared bats have not been documented within
Carver County; however, the AUAR Study Area’s patchy forested areas may provide
suitable roosting habitat. Additionally, wetlands and water resources within the AUAR
Study Area may provide suitable forging habitat, suggesting a high probability of
occurrence. USFWS has released a voluntary environmental review process for
development projects within the range of northern long-eared bats.40 The guidance
focuses on incorporating conservation measures, such as restricting tree clearing to
outside the pup rearing season (June 1 – August 15), into Project development to
minimize impacts. If these conservation measures can be fully implemented risk of
impacts to northern long-eared bats are considered low.
Rusty Patched Bumble Bee
The rusty patched bumble bee (RPBB) occurs throughout the eastern portion of
Minnesota.41 RPBBs nest in abandoned, underground rodent cavities or under clumps of
grasses. Overwintering queens require undisturbed soil along forest edges and emerge
in the early spring.42 Due to their early emergence, RPBB requires a diversity of flowers
that ensures a consistent supply of nectar and pollen from April through September to
support the colony. Suitable habitat includes meadows and woodlands in which
adequate foraging, nesting, and overwintering habitat is available.
According to MNDNR, RPBBs have been documented in Carver County. The majority of
the AUAR Study Area is located within the High Potential Zone (HPZ; areas of high
potential occurrences of RPBBs based on known sightings and landcover) with the last
recording in 2023. The USFWS assumes presence in high potential zones unless surveys
following USFWS protocol are performed to confirm absence. Additionally, a USFWS
determination key (DKey) was ran for the RPBB and came back with a determination of
“may affect” (Appendix F).
The forested areas and herbaceous wetlands within the AUAR Study Area may provide
suitable foraging and overwintering habitat for rusty patched bumble bees, suggesting a
high probability of occurrence. MNDNR recommends following the USFWS RPBB
Voluntary Project Design Guidance43 to reduce impacts to RPBB. Additionally, the
USFWS DKey recommends further coordination with USFWS to determine best methods
to avoid or minimize potential adverse impacts (Appendix F).
Tricolored Bat
During summer months, Tricolored bats roost in live and dead leaf clusters of live or

39 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2026. Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis).

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=AMACC01150
40 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2025. Northern Long-eared Bat and Tricolored Bat Voluntary Environmental Review Process for
Development Projects. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025-04/nleb_tcb_consultation_guidance_version1.1_final_.pdf
41 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2026. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis).
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=IIHYM24020
42 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No Date. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis). https://www.fws.gov/species/rustypatched-bumble-bee-bombus-affinis
43 U.S. Fish and Wildlife. 2021. Rusty Patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis) Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Voluntary
Implementation Guidance. https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2025-04/20250418_rpbb-section-7-voluntaryconsultation-technical-assistance-ver-3.31-2.pdf
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 48

recently dead deciduous trees. In southern portions of their range, they will also roost in
Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides) and beard lichen (Usnea trichodea). Tricolored bats
may also roost in pine (Pinus spp.) needles, under bridges, and in culverts.44,45
According to the MNDNR,46 Tricolored bats have not been documented in Carver
County; however, the AUAR Study Area’s patchy forested areas may provide suitable
roosting habitat. Additionally, wetlands and water resources within the AUAR Study
Area may provide suitable forging habitat, suggesting a high probability of occurrence.
USFWS has released a voluntary environmental review process for development
projects within the range of Tricolored bats. The guidance focuses on incorporating
conservation measures, such as restricting tree clearing to outside the pup rearing
season (June 1 – August 15). However, there are currently no federal or state
protections for this species. It is under review for listing as endangered under the ESA
(87 FR 56381). If the species is reclassified as federally threatened or endangered at any
point during Project development, further assessment is warranted.
Monarch Butterfly
Monarch butterfly larvae are dependent on specific plants mostly in the genus Asclepias
(i.e., milkweed), which grow along roadsides, disturbed fields, wetlands, and robust
grasslands. Adult monarchs can be found in a wide variety of open habitats with
blooming nectar resources and wherever milkweed, their larval host plant, is present.47
The AUAR Study Area contains herbaceous wetlands, roadsides, field edges, and ditches,
all of which may support vegetation that provides suitable habitat for monarch
butterflies, suggesting a high probability of occurrence. There are currently no state or
federal protections for this species; however, it is currently under review for listing as
threatened under the ESA (89 FR 100662). No further actions are recommended at this
point. If the species is reclassified to endangered or threatened prior to Project
construction, further assessment should be considered.
Western Regal Fritillary
Western regal fritillaries lay their eggs on violet (Viola spp.) species and are a native
grassland-dependent species for reproduction. Adults forage on a variety of violet
species and other flowering plants.48
The AUAR Study Area contains herbaceous wetlands, roadsides, field edges, and ditches,
all of which may support vegetation that provides suitable habitat for Western regal
fritillary, suggesting a high probability of occurrence. There are currently no state or
federal protections for this species; however, this species is currently under review for
listing as threatened under the ESA (89 FR 63888). If the species is reclassified to

44 U.S. Fish and Wildlife. No Date. Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus). https://www.fws.gov/species/tricolored-bat-

perimyotis-subflavus
45 McCoshum, S.M., Pratt, E.L., Lent, K.C., & Boisen, E.M. 2023. Literature review of tri-colored bat natural history with
implications to management. Frontiers in Conservation Science.
46 U.S. Fish and Wildlife. No Date. Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus).
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=AMACC03020
47 U.S. Fish and Wildlife. No Date. Monarch (Danaus plexippus). https://www.fws.gov/species/monarch-danaus-plexippus
48 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No Date. Regal Fritillary (Speyeria idalia). https://www.fws.gov/species/regal-fritillary-speyeriaidalia
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 49

endangered or threatened at any point during Project development, further assessment
should be considered.
Whooping Crane
Whooping cranes utilize shallow herbaceous wetlands, riverine systems, flooded
agricultural fields, and poorly drained areas as stopover habitat during migration.49
The AUAR Study Area contains wetlands, agriculture fields, and water resources that
may provide suitable Whooping crane stopover habitat. However, non-essential
experimental populations do not receive any federal protection under the Endangered
Species Act.50 Additionally, Whooping cranes are not currently protected under
Minnesota’s Endangered Species Statute (Section 84.0895, MN Statutes 2024);
therefore, no further actions or considerations are recommended at this time.
Bald Eagle
Bald eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). The
BGEPA (16 U.S.C. 668-668d) prohibits anyone without a permit issued by the Secretary
of the Interior from the take of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagles
(Aquila chrysaetos), including their parts, nests, or eggs.
Bald eagles occur year-round in Minnesota.51 The Minnesota breeding population has
begun to expand into their former state-wide range. Bald eagles typically select nest
sites near lakes and rivers in forested areas where tall, large-diameter trees are less
than one-half mile from a water source.52
According to MNDNR,53 Bald eagles have been documented in Carver County. The AUAR
Study Area contains forested patches with trees providing potentially suitable nesting
and roosting habitat. Additionally, the Carver Creek and other water resources are
present in the AUAR Study Area and surrounding vicinity that would provide suitable
foraging habitat, suggesting a high probability of occurrence. If nests are identified in or
near the AUAR Study Area, the USFWS recommends a 660-foot-no-construction buffer
around all nests during the breeding season.
Migratory Birds
Migratory birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16
U.S.C. 703-712), which is administered by the USFWS. The IPaC contains a list of 19
migratory bird species that may occur within the AUAR Study Area or surrounding
region (Appendix G). Take of migratory birds, to include incidental and deliberate take of
eggs, occupied nests, feathers, young, and adults is prohibited by law. To date, there is
no permitting or mitigation mechanism to allow for take. The USFWS has created

49 Urbanek, R. P. and J. C. Lewis. 2020. Whooping Crane (Grus americana), version 1.0. In Birds of the World (A.F. Poole, Editor).

https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.whocra.01
50 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No Date. Listing Status. https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/status/list
51 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No Date. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=ABNKC10010
52 Buehler, D.A. 2022. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), version 2.0. In Birds of the World (P. G. Rodewald and S. G.
Mlodinow, Editors). https://birdsoftheworld.org/bow/species/baleag/2.0/introduction
53 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2026. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).
https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/rsg/profile.html?action=elementDetail&selectedElement=ABNKC10010
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 50

voluntary guidelines and best management practices to help conserve migratory birds
and reduce bird mortality related to Project activities. The USFWS Nationwide
Avoidance & Minimization Measures For Birds54 discusses the best management
practices to take to help minimize impacts to migratory birds.
C. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features, and
ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and
spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately
discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species.
1. Impacts Analysis for Federally-Listed Species
Northern Long-eared Bat and Tricolored Bat
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact suitable northern long-eared and
tricolored bat roosting and foraging habitat. Tree clearing within the AUAR Study Area
could result in impacts if conducted during the bat active season (April 1 – November
14). Additional stressors to the species during the active season include lighting, noise,
and structural activities that may disturb individuals roosting in man-made structures.
The Tricolored bat is proposed for federal listing; therefore, impacts would need to be
reassessed if and when a listing status is finalized.
Rusty Patched Bumble Bee, Monarch Butterfly, and Western Regal Fritillary
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact RPBBs, Monarch butterfly, and
Western regal fritillary suitable habitat. Herbicide and insecticide use during
development could impact these species and their foraging habitats. Additional impacts
may occur if site is not recessed with native vegetation after development. The monarch
butterfly and western regal fritillary are both proposed for federal listing; therefore,
impacts need to be reassessed if and when a listing status is finalized.
Whooping Crane
The Whooping crane population in Minnesota is considered a non-essential
experimental population; therefore, the Project is not anticipated to jeopardize the
continued existence of the Whooping Crane.
Bald Eagle
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact suitable bald eagle roosting and
nesting habitat. If a bald eagle nest or nests are present within 660 feet of the AUAR
Study Area, impacts to nesting Bald eagles may occur from development activities,
lighting, and noise.
Migratory Birds
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact suitable migratory bird nesting and
foraging habitat. Tree clearing within the AUAR Study Area could result in impacts if
conducted during the active nesting season.

54 U.S. Fish and Wildlife. 2024. Nationwide Avoidance & Minimization Measures for Birds.

https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2024-07/nationwide_avoidance_minimization_measures_birds_0.pdf
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 51

2. Impacts Analysis for State-Listed Species
Kitten-tails
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact suitable Kitten-tails habitat.
Herbicide use and ground disturbance during the active growing season could result in
direct impact to Kitten-tails.
Gophersnake
Development under Scenarios 1 and 2 may impact suitable Gophernsake habitat.
Ground disturbance may cause direct impacts to nest and hibernation burrows or
crevices.
3. Impacts Analysis for Native Plant Communities and Sites of Biodiversity Significance
No native plant communities or other sites of biodiversity significance were mapped
within the AUAR Study Area; therefore, no impacts to these features as a result of
development under Scenarios 1 and 2 are anticipated.
4. Invasive Species
Best management practices during construction activities and operation within the
AUAR Study Area will be implemented to minimize the introduction or spread of noxious
weeds and invasive species. These practices include cleaning vehicles and equipment of
mud and dirt from other construction areas, removing seeds that attach to clothing or
equipment, minimizing soil disturbance, not moving potentially contaminated materials
between sites, and staying on designated roads/trails.
5. Stormwater
Stormwater runoff generated during construction and operations can have substantial
environmental impacts on nearby water bodies and ecosystems. As stormwater flows
over disturbed soils and impervious surfaces, it can pick up and transport pollutants
such as sediment, nutrients, chlorides, heavy metals, and hydrocarbons. These
contaminants can degrade water quality in lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands, harming
aquatic life and disrupting ecological processes. Sediment can smother fish spawning
grounds and reduce oxygen levels, while excess nutrients may lead to algal blooms and
eutrophication. Chlorides from deicing materials can be toxic to amphibians and
invertebrates, even at low concentrations. Additionally, changes in hydrology caused by
increased runoff can lead to erosion, flooding, and reduced groundwater recharge.
D. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish,
wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources.
1. Protected Species and Habitats
In order to minimize the risk of take, the following mitigation measures will be
implemented:
•

The USFWS voluntary guidance for development projects for the northern longeared bats and tricolored bats will be reviewed and applied to minimize impacts
to northern long-eared bats and tricolored bats.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 52

•

Including avoiding clearing trees during the bat pup rearing season (June 1 –
August 15).

•

The USFWS Rusty patched bumble bee Voluntary Project Design Guidance will
be reviewed and applied to minimize impacts to Rusty patched bumble bees.

•

As recommended by the USFWS DKey, further coordination with USFWS
concerning the Rusty patched bumble bee to determine best minimization
measures for Project activities.

•

A Bald eagle nest survey will be conducted prior to construction and any nest
found will be buffered at least 660 feet from Project activities.

•

USFWS Nationwide Avoidance & Minimization Measures for Birds guidance will
be reviewed and applied to minimize impacts to migratory birds.

•

Native seed mixes will be utilized in revegetation plans for landscaping open
spaces within the AUAR Study Area in order to enhance wildlife habitat and to
help prevent the establishment of invasive plants and noxious weeds.

•

Invasive species prevention measures will be implemented during construction
to prevent the movement of invasive species on trucks, heavy equipment, offhighway vehicles, and equipment and tools to reduce the likelihood of
introducing invasive species from off-site. Measures will include requiring
contractors and other working on site to arrive and leave with clean equipment
that is free of visible plants, seeds, mud, and dirt clumps. Other measures
include using weed-free seed and mulch products and avoiding the re-use of the
top six inches of stockpile materials (mulch, soil, gravel) that may contain more
weed seeds.

•

Best management practices and wildlife-friendly erosion and sediment control
devices where practicable as required by the NPDES Permit, SWPPP, and
Construction Site Stormwater Permit to prevent sediment-laden stormwater
runoff from entering wetlands and water resources to minimize impacts of
aquatic and semi-aquatic species.

•

The Tricolored bat, Monarch butterfly, and Western regal fritillary will be
further assessed if species become listed as threatened or endangered prior to
Project completion.

•

MnDNR recommends a qualified surveyor to determine if suitable habitat for
Kitten-tails exists within the activity impact area (in compliance with MnDNR’s
Rare Species Survey Process and Rare Plant Guidance) prior to any land
disturbing activities. Further coordination with MnDNR is required to
confirm/demonstrate avoidance or to document whether avoidance is feasible.

•

MnDNR recommends the use of erosion control mesh, if any, be limited to
wildlife-friendly materials to reduce impacts to Gophersnakes.

2. Tree Removal
Tree removal is recommended to be avoided during the pup-rearing season for bats, from
April 1 through November 14. Although tree removal will be required for development,
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 53

some existing trees may be preserved in areas around the perimeter of the property,
surrounding Carver Creek, and in some areas of the planned parks and open space. Prior to
construction, a tree preservation plan will be submitted and reviewed by city staff. Tree
replacement will be conducted as recommended by the city.
3. Stormwater
The proposed development scenarios include stormwater management and treatment of
all stormwater run-off within the AUAR study area.
City ordinance limits post-development stormwater discharge rates to pre-development
levels, so on-site facilities such as ponds, infiltration areas, or underground tanks are
needed to manage runoff, maintain groundwater recharge, and protect downstream
resources. Additionally, compliance with Carver County WMO policies, standards, and
criteria means integrating detention or infiltration basins and rainwater retention features
to treat water quality and ensure post-development runoff rates and volumes remain at or
below pre-development conditions.55

15. Historic Properties
A. Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in
close proximity to the site. Include 1) historic designations; 2) known artifact areas; and 3)
architectural features. Attach letter received from the Minnesota State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction
and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects
to historic properties.
AUAR Guidance: For an AUAR, contact with the State Historic Preservation Office and State
Archeologist is required to determine whether there are areas of potential impacts to these
resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the
issue in more detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified.
The background research and literature review consisted of an examination of online inventory
databases maintained by the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) and the Minnesota State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Review of information from these offices included an
examination of site maps, archaeological site forms, burial files, historic structure inventories, and
survey reports. The purpose of this review is to create an inventory of previously recorded cultural
resources, including archaeological sites, and historic architecture resources that are in the AUAR
Study Area and one-mile buffer (Buffer). The background research and literature review would
identify previous cultural resource investigations along with levels of disturbance and potential for
sites intersecting the proposed AUAR Study Area or Buffer.

55 City of Carver. 2018 (rev. 2020). Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan.

https://www.cityofcarver.com/DocumentCenter/View/1312/Surface-Water-Management-Plan-PDF?bidId=
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 54

According to the Minnesota Statewide Historic Inventory Portal (MnSHIP), the Buffer contains two
previously inventoried points, five national register (NR) Listed or Eligible points, and one NR Listed
or Eligible area. The Minnesota Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) portal public map depicts two
sites in Township 115, Range 24, Section 35, located in the southernmost portion of the Buffer.
A Phase IA cultural resources literature review was conducted by the Westwood Professional
Services cultural resources team in February 2026. The objectives of the literature review were to: 1)
document the recommended AUAR Study Area and Buffer, 2) summarize data/information of
previously recorded cultural resources and cultural resource surveys within/near the AUAR Study
Area and Buffer, and 3) determine if further cultural resource investigation is recommended. This
report meets the requirements outlined in the State Archaeologist’s Manual for Archaeological
Projects in Minnesota.
Prehistoric camp sites in this region are generally located near lakes, rivers, and other water sources
with resource procurement sites located anywhere the resource could be found. Modern land use
and ground disturbance within the AUAR Study Area and Buffer has been primarily agricultural. The
Project is in a rural setting with much of the land cultivated for agricultural crop fields, with smaller
areas that are or have been used for churches, residences, a lumber mill, a dairy, and a railroad
corridor.
Six previously recorded archaeological sites were identified within the Buffer, none of which
intersect the AUAR Study Area (Table 16). Four of the sites are alpha sites. Alpha sites are sites
identified through historic documentation or an informant’s report but have not been verified by a
professional archaeologist. These include three Ghost Town sites and a historic mill. The remaining
two sites in the AUAR Study Area are possible burial mounds. None of the previously recorded sites
will be impacted by the proposed Project.

Table 16: Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites in the AUAR Study Area and Buffer
Site ID

Site Name

Property Type

NRHP Status

Project Proximity

21CRi

Dahlgren

Ghost Town – Historical Documentation

Unevaluated

Buffer

21CRf

Bevins

Ghost Town – Historical Documentation

Unevaluated

Buffer

21CRab

East Union

Ghost Town – Historical Documentation

Unevaluated

Buffer

21CRc

Carlson Mill

Mill – Historical Documentation

Unevaluated

Buffer

21CR193

NA

Burial Mound

Unevaluated

Buffer

21CR0004

NA

Burial Mound

Unevaluated

Buffer

Additionally, 24 previously inventoried historic/architectural resources were identified within the
Study Area, five of which are located within the AUAR Study Area (Table 17). One NRHP historic
district overlaps the AUAR boundary, and three of its five individual resources are located within the
AUAR Study Area. One farmhouse in the north-central portion of the Project is Unevaluated for
Listing in the NRHP (CR-DHL-00022).

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 55

Table 67: Architecture History Resources Within the Study Area
Location

NRHP Eligibility*

Project
Proximity

CR-CVC-00160 house

1600 CR 40, Carver

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-CVC-00166 Bridge 10535

Carver Bluff Pkwy over
Carver Creek, Carver

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00005 Olson Dairy Farm

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00007 King Oscar's Settlement

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Listed NRHP district

AUAR Study
Area

CR-DHL-00008 East Union School

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

East Union Lutheran
Church

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Listed in NRHP district

CR-DHL-00015 East Union Parsonage

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

SHPO ID

CR-DHL-00014

Property Nane

Caretaker's Cottage (Rev.
Andrew Jackson Home)
Parish Hall (St. Ansgar
CR-DHL-00017
Academy)
CR-DHL-00016

AUAR Study
Area
AUAR Study
Listed in NRHP district
Area

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Listed in NRHP district Buffer

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Listed in NRHP district Buffer

CR-DHL-00020 farmhouse

6825 Dahlgren Rd, Dahlgren
Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00021 farmhouse

13450 CR 43, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00022 farmhouse

14305 CR 43, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

AUAR Study
Area

CR-DHL-00023 farmhouse

6645 CR 43, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00027 farmhouse

7350 Inwood Rd, Dahlgren
Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00031 farmhouse

13140 CR 147, Dahlgren Twp Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00033 farmhouse

14181 CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00034 farmhouse

12380 CR 41, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

15180 CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

house (United Church of
Christ Rectory)
East Union Lutheran
CR-DHL-00055
Church Cemetery
CR-DHL-00035

off CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

AUAR Study
Area
AUAR Study
Listed in NRHP district
Area

Carver Creek at CSAH 43, 2.4
Not Eligible/
miles S of JCT TH 212,
Nonextant
Dahlgren Twp

Buffer

CR-DHL-00059 house

14855 CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00060 Peter Carlson Farmstead

15125 CR 40, Dahlgren Twp

Unevaluated

Buffer

Unevaluated

Buffer

CR-DHL-00058

XX-RRDCSP005

Bridge 10501 (replaced by
10J28)

Hastings and Dakota Ry Co
/Chicago Milwaukee and
St. Paul Ry Co /Chicago
Minneapolis to Lyle, MN
Milwaukee St. Paul and
Pacific RR Co: Main Line

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 56

SHPO ID

Property Nane

Location

NRHP Eligibility*

Project
Proximity

XX-CLS-00001

Restricted Site

T 115 N R 23 W S 30, 31

Unevaluated

Buffer

Aside from the two buildings within the NRHP historic district, the remaining resources in the Buffer
are Unevaluated for the NRHP and include eight farm houses, three houses, two farmsteads, one
bridge, one schoolhouse, and one railroad corridor. One bridge previously located adjacent to the
western Project boundary is nonextant (CR-DHL-00058).
The King Oscar's Settlement historic district (CR-DHL-00007) was listed in the NRHP in 1980 as a part
of the Carver County Multiple Resource Area (MRA) nomination form and was applicable under
Criterion A (event). The district, also called East Union, is “historically significant as a well-preserved
complex of buildings associated with the first of three early Swedish settlements in Carver County.
This settlement, originally known as ‘King Oscar's Settlement,’ was first settled in 1853, only two
years after initial Euro-American settlement began in Carver County.”56 Its resources include the
East Union Lutheran Church (CR-DHL-00014), Parsonage (CR-DHL-00015), and Cemetery (CR-DHL00055) within the AUAR Study Area and the Caretaker’s Cottage (CR-DHL-00016) and Parish Hall (CRDHL-00017) set just south of the AUAR Project on the south side of County Road (CR) 40.
Immediately north of the historic district, the Parish Center containing a modern church was built in
1994.57
The USGS cemetery geospatial dataset located two cemeteries in the AUAR Study Area and Buffer,
including the previously inventoried Union Church Cemetery in the AUAR Study Area (CR-DHL00055).58
The proposed AUAR Study Area is of mixed potential for unrecorded prehistoric archaeological
resources. The highest potential will be near Carver Creek and on associated terraces of the creek.
Areas farther from water sources will be of lower potential for unrecorded prehistoric resources.
Historical maps and aerial photographs suggest that there is moderate potential for historic
archaeological resources within the AUAR Study Area. One NRHP Listed historic district containing
five individual resources overlaps the AUAR Study Area. Concept Project Plans suggest that the
parcel in the Project containing NRHP resources (King Oscar’s Settlement) will remain unchanged. It
is anticipated that the Project will have no permanent direct effects on the NRHP historic district.
Depending upon the nature of future proposed projects, archaeological and/or historic/architectural
surveys may be needed to evaluate the eligibility of and potential impacts to these resources.
Particularly, should the Project come under federal or state review, Westwood recommends a Phase
I archaeological survey at areas of proposed ground disturbance in locations of higher archaeological
potential including proximity to Carver Creek and locations of known historic farmsteads based on
historic mapping.

56 VanBrocklin Spaeth, Lynne. 1978. King Oscar’s Settlement (East Union) Historic Properties Inventory Form (NRHP

nomination). https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/80001974. Accessed February 2026.
57 East Union Lutheran Church. 2026. History. East Union Lutheran Church website. http://www.eulc.org/History. Accessed
February 2026.
58 USGS. 2024. GNIS Cemeteries. Available via Esri Federal Data.
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=e5ba509ad5884106a1f8780393559c46. Accessed February 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 57

16. Visual
A. Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual
effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from
the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects.
AUAR Guidance: Any impacts on scenic views and vistas present in the AUAR should be addressed.
This would include both direct physical impacts and impacts on visual quality or integrity. EAW
Guidelines contains a list of possible scenic resources.
If any non-routine visual impacts would occur from the anticipated development, this should be
discussed here along with appropriate mitigation.
The approximately 1,503-acre AUAR Study Area is primarily composed of cultivated or planted
vegetation, artificial surfaces, and associated developed areas, with smaller portions consisting of
herbaceous vegetation, shrubland, surface mines, and water features. Topography within the AUAR
Study Area and surrounding region is generally flat, with some areas of slightly steeper slopes
associated with Carver Creek. No scenic views or vistas are within the AUAR Study Area. The visual
character of the AUAR Study Area is expected to change as development progresses from a
predominantly agricultural and/or mining and rural landscape to a more suburban and urbanized
setting. While the area does not contain designated scenic viewsheds or visually sensitive
landscapes, the transformation in land use, including the introduction of residential developments,
will alter the visual experience for residents and visitors. These changes may be perceived as
significant, especially by those accustomed to the area's current rural character.
Notable visual effects include increased night-time lighting. Such lighting could contribute to light
pollution and disrupt the rural nighttime environment. To mitigate these impacts, the Project should
incorporate best practices for outdoor lighting design, including the use of fully shielded, downwarddirected fixtures, motion sensors, and dimming technologies. Guidance from Dark Sky
International59 can be used to inform lighting strategies that minimize glare, reduce skyglow, and
protect nocturnal wildlife. As building and site designs advance, lighting practices will be selected to
address known ecological concerns and prevent avoidable impacts to insects, wildlife, rare plants,
and adjacent natural areas. Guidance from the USFWS to minimize blue light, uplight, and backlight
will be adhered to the extent practicable. Additional mitigation measures such as vegetative buffers,
context-sensitive architectural design, and thoughtful site planning can help soften the visual
transition and maintain a cohesive aesthetic as the area develops.
Future development would conform with the City ordinances for building height, building form,
landscape screening, and lighting to avoid impacts to neighboring properties and species. No
significant visual impacts are anticipated.

59 Dark Sky. 2015 (Updated 2023). New IDA LED Lighting Practical Guide. Available at: https://darksky.org/news/the-promise-

and-challenges-of-led-lighting-a-practical-guide/
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 58

17. Air
A. Stationary Source Emissions – Describe the type, sources, quantities, and compositions of any
emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air
pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including
any sensitive receptors, human health, or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of
any methods used to assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment.
Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions.
AUAR Guidance: This item is not applicable to an AUAR. Any stationary air emissions source large
enough to merit environmental review requires individual review.
Not applicable to an AUAR.
B. Vehicle Emissions – Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss
the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g., traffic
operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or
mitigate vehicle-related emissions.
AUAR Guidance: Although the MPCA no longer issues Indirect Source Permits, traffic-related air
quality may still be an issue if the analysis in Item 18 indicates that development would cause or
worsen traffic congestion. The general guidance from the EAW form should still be followed.
Questions about the details of air quality analysis should be directed to MPCA staff.
Vehicle emissions associated with the proposed development scenarios will result from increased
traffic volumes generated by residential, mixed‑use, and supporting land uses within the AUAR
Study Area. Scenarios 1 and 2 are anticipated to generate higher levels of vehicle trips compared to
Scenario 3 due to increased population, housing density, and commercial activity, which would
contribute to increased emissions of criteria pollutants such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides,
particulate matter, and greenhouse gases.
Vehicle emissions for all scenarios are quantified in Item 18.
C. Dust and Odors – Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and
odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under
Item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby
sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate
the effects of dust and odors.
AUAR Guidance: Dust and odors need not be addressed in an AUAR, unless there is some unusual
reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part of the mitigation plan, however, any dust
control ordinances in effect.
The existing air quality in the area is good. According to the EPA’s online NEPAssist Tool, there are
no Ozone, Lead, SO2, particulate non-attainment/maintenance areas, or air emission facilities within
500 feet of the Project. There are no topographical or meteorological conditions that hinder airflow
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 59

in this area. There are no air quality permits required for the AUAR. No air quality mitigation
measures are required or proposed for this Project.
Temporary air impacts will result from equipment exhaust and dust during construction, but no
permanent air quality concerns or impacts are expected. The Project SWPPP will include provisions
to minimize construction-related air impacts from both dust and construction vehicle exhaust. Dust
control measures will include but not be limited to Project phasing, application of water, use of
mulch, and prompt soil stabilization.
The State of MN does not have any vehicle emissions test requirements; however, construction
vehicles are required to have functional noise and emission control systems in good working order.
Equipment that lacks noise and emission control measures must be repaired or removed from the
site.

18. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions/Carbon Footprint
A. GHG Quantification – For all proposed projects, provide quantification and discussion of project
GHG emissions. Include additional rows in the tables as necessary to provide project-specific
emission sources. Describe the methods used to quantify emissions. If calculation methods are
not readily available to quantify GHG emissions for a source, describe the process used to come to
that conclusion and any GHG emission sources not included in the total calculation.
1.

About Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)

Certain gases in the earth’s atmosphere, classified as greenhouse gases (GHGs), play a critical role
in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Solar radiation enters the earth’s atmosphere
from space. A portion of the radiation is absorbed by the earth’s surface, and a smaller portion of
this radiation is reflected back toward space. This absorbed radiation is then emitted from the
earth as low-frequency infrared radiation. The frequencies at which bodies emit radiation are
proportional to temperature. Because the earth has a much lower temperature than the sun, it
emits lower-frequency radiation. Most solar radiation passes through GHGs; however, infrared
radiation is absorbed by these gases. As a result, radiation that otherwise would have escaped
back into space is instead “trapped,” resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon,
known as the greenhouse effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate on earth.
The primary GHGs contributing to the greenhouse effect are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Fluorinated gases also make up a small fraction of the GHGs that
contribute to climate change. Examples of fluorinated gases include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen
trifluoride (NF3); however, it is noted that these gases are not associated with typical land use
development. Human-caused emissions of GHGs exceeding natural ambient concentrations are
believed to be responsible for intensifying the greenhouse effect and leading to a trend of
unnatural warming of the earth’s climate, known as global climate change or global warming.
Scenario Specifics:

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 60

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

•

•

5,076 housing units

Density Type

Units

Low Density Residential

Units/acre

6,078 housing units

Density Type

Units

Units/acre

2,496 2.7

Low Density Residential

3,421 3.7

Medium Density
Residential

344

7.8

Medium Density
Residential

366

8.3

High Density Residential

800

23.5

High Density Residential

768

22.6

Active Adult Residential

403

3.3

Active Adult Residential

489

3.9

Mixed Use

1,034 19.5

Mixed Use

1,034 19.5

Minnesota’s median home listing size is approximately 1,896 square feet, which provides the most
appropriate proxy for typical single‑family detached residential development in the state (St. Louis
Fed, 2025)60. Medium‑density housing, such as townhomes, duplexes, and smaller multifamily
configurations, most commonly mirrors two‑bedroom market formats. In Minnesota, the average size
for a two‑bedroom unit is 1,048 square feet (RentCafe, 2025)61. High‑density development typically
includes large number of one‑bedroom apartment units. Minnesota’s average one‑bedroom unit size
is 729 square feet, representing an appropriate assumption for dense multifamily buildings (RentCafe,
2025)62. Active adult housing frequently consists of accessible one‑bedroom layouts. Minnesota’s
senior‑oriented and general‑market one‑bedroom apartments average 703 square feet, making this a
suitable estimate for age‑restricted dwelling units (Apartments.com, 2026)63. Mixed‑use
developments typically incorporate a blend of studios, one‑bedroom, and two‑bedroom units. The
overall average apartment size across Minnesota, 892 square feet, provides the best representative
estimate for mixed‑use residential components (RentCafe, 2025)64.
To reflect the increased density in Scenario 2, unit sizes were adjusted only where higher unit counts
place pressure on available land area. The most significant change occurs in the Low‑Density
Residential category, where the number of units increases, as a result, average unit size is reduced by
12.5% to represent a shift toward more compact single‑family formats. Medium‑Density Residential
experiences only a modest rise in unit count, so a smaller 5% reduction is applied to capture slight
efficiencies in building footprints. High‑Density Residential actually decreases in total units and
therefore retains its original unit size, since no additional density pressure exists. Similarly, Active
Adult Residential and Mixed‑Use development maintain their original square‑footage assumptions

60 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. FRED Economic Data. “Housing Inventory: Median Home Size in Square Feet in Minnesota

(MEDSQUFEEMN).” https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEDSQUFEEMN. Accessed January 2026.
61 RentCafe. Minnesota Rental Market Trends. “Average Rent and Apartment Size in Minnesota.”
https://www.rentcafe.com/average-rent-market-trends/us/mn/. Accessed January 2026.
62 RentCafe. Minnesota Rental Market Trends. “Average Rent and Apartment Size in Minnesota.”
https://www.rentcafe.com/average-rent-market-trends/us/mn/. Accessed January 2026.
63 Apartments.com. Minnesota Rent Market Trends. “Average Rent and Apartment Size by City and Unit Type.”
https://www.apartments.com/rent-market-trends/mn/. Accessed January 2026.
64 RentCafe. Minnesota Rental Market Trends. “Average Rent and Apartment Size in Minnesota.”
https://www.rentcafe.com/average-rent-market-trends/us/mn/. Accessed January 2026.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 61

because these product types are driven by accessibility, layout standards, or blended unit mixes that
remain consistent across both scenarios.
Below are the estimated square footages used in the calculations.
Tables 18 and 19: Estimated Square Footages
Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Density Type

Sq. feet
per unit

Total Sq. Ft. (for
all units)

Density Type

Sq. feet
per unit

Total Sq. Ft. (for
all units

Low Density
Residential

1,896

4,731,216

Low Density
Residential

1,659

5,675,439

Medium Density
Residential

1,048

360,512

Medium Density
Residential

996

364,536

High Density
Residential

729

583,200

High Density
Residential

729

559,872

Active Adult
Residential

703

283,309

Active Adult
Residential

703

343,767

Mixed Use

892

922,328

Mixed Use

892

922,328

Assumptions and best available estimates were used for the GHG section. The GHG emissions for
the Project are calculated using the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s (EQB) Climate
Calculator (July 2025). The report from the calculator is found in (Appendix G). The methodologies
for developing a carbon footprint are described in Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s
(EQB’s) Revised EAW Guidance (June 2024).
Global climate change results from the total accumulation of GHGs in the Earth’s atmosphere, as
well as other human-caused and natural factors. The GHG composition in the Earth’s atmosphere
is changing and causing the planet’s climate to change. The proposed Project’s incremental
contribution to global GHGs cannot be translated into effects on climate change globally or
regionally.
In general, regional impacts from climate change may include the following effects: increased
mean annual air temperature (summer and winter warming); increased surface water
temperatures; later onset of winter and earlier onset of spring; precipitation may fall in fewer, but
more intense, storms; species adapted to cold climates may shift out of the Great Lakes basin into
Canada; and aspen and birch forests may be replaced by hardwood forests of oak and hickory.
Moderate climate change may increase agricultural yields and food production, with some
regional and annual variability.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 62

The Climate Calculator - The calculator was constructed using a lifecycle analysis (LCA) approach,
which quantifies environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product or Project
lifespan.65 For the purposes of this calculator, the GHG emissions impact of Project construction
and Project operation are evaluated.66 The calculator also evaluates the potential for direct and
indirect impacts, where direct emissions are emissions that are caused by Project activities that
occur on-site, and indirect emissions are emissions that occur upstream and downstream of the
Project (e.g., emissions associated with fuel production and other material inputs).
Emission sources included in the Minnesota Climate Calculator include material inputs,
transportation of material inputs, employee commuting, construction equipment, land use
change, construction waste, building energy consumption, coal production, natural gas and oil
products, industrial processes, land use change, HFC leakage, on-road vehicles, treatment of
waste on-site, treatment of wastewater on-site, treatment of waste off-site, enteric fermentation,
and manure management.
Scenarios 1 and 2 have a lifetime of 50 years and include both construction and operational
phases in their calculations. The construction phase accounts for material inputs, transportation of
those materials, employee commuting, use of construction equipment, land use changes
associated with construction, and construction-related waste. The operational phase includes
building energy consumption, on-road vehicle use, HFC leakage, and the treatment of waste offsite.
Scenario 3, the no build, only includes the on-road vehicles element of the operational phase. This
is due to the scenario not requiring any other built elements other than what currently exists.
Construction Materials - Material emissions included in the climate calculator include aluminum,
asphalt, brick, concrete, glass, insulation (residential), insulation (commercial), steel, and wood
products. Inputs for these material quantities can be found in the attached Minnesota Climate
Calculator: Project Summary Report. Emission factors for each material type are compiled from
the Embodied Carbon Calculator (EC3) Tool.67 Data from the 2017 Census Commodity Flow Survey
(CFS) on domestic shipments of goods to Minnesota by North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code category is used to develop assumptions on the average distance traveled by
material type.68
Construction Vehicles - Emissions result when employees commute to and from the Project site

65 Although the calculator follows an LCA approach, it does not meet the ISO standard for an LCA. Additionally, the results of the

calculator are not comparable to a standard GHG inventory, which typically quantifies emissions that occur during a single
calendar or fiscal year.
66 Emissions associated with project decommissioning may also be considered as part of an LCA but are not included in the
calculator at this time.
67 Building Transparency. “Embodied Carbon in Construction Calculator (EC3) Tool,” 2025.
https://www.buildingtransparency.org.
68 United States Census Bureau. “2017 Commodity Flow Survey Datasets,” 2017.
https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2017/econ/cfs/historical-datasets.html.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 63

during Project construction.69 This includes emissions from driving personal vehicles and taking
public transit. The calculator quantifies emissions from employee commuting based on estimates
of the total distance traveled, the commuter mode, and mode-specific emission factors. The data
derives from the number of employees that will commute to the construction site during each
phase of construction. The construction phases include demolition, site preparation, grading,
building construction, architectural coating, and paving. Default assumptions regarding the
number of construction days by construction phase are available in the calculator. The default
number of construction days by construction phase are based on values derived from the
California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod).70
The average commuting distance was acquired from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Local GHG Inventory Tool, which assumes an average one-way commuting distance of 13.2
miles or a round-trip distance of 26.4 miles.71 The commuting mode assumptions were derived
from EPA’s Local GHG Inventory Tool.72 More details on fuel types and energy consumption can be
found in the Climate Calculator Report.73
Emissions result from the fuel and/or electricity used by construction equipment (e.g., dozers,
excavators, loaders) during Project construction. The calculator quantifies emissions from
construction equipment based on estimates of total construction hours by equipment type,
energy consumption per hour, and equipment-specific emission factors.
The default number of construction days by construction phase are based on values derived from
CalEEMod.74 Data on the number of construction equipment by type used per day and the number
of hours each equipment type is used per day by construction phase are obtained from
CalEEMod.75 These data vary by project acreage. More details on fuel types and energy
consumption can be found in the Climate Calculator Report.76
The construction phase of the Project includes demolition, site preparation, grading, building
construction, architectural coatings, and paving and landscaping. Default durations for these
stages were used. Demolition is estimated to have 35 daily employees commuting to site. Site
preparation is estimated to have 45 employees commuting to the site, grading is estimated have
60 employees, building construction is estimated have 120 employees, architectural coatings is
estimated to have 25 employees, and paving and landscaping is estimated to have 40 employees

69 Emissions may also result from employee commuting during project operation; however, these emissions are not currently

included within the scope of the climate calculator.
70 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. “CalEEMod,” 2022. https://www.caleemod.com/.
71 EPA. “Local GHG Inventory Tool,” 2025. https://www.epa.gov/statelocalenergy/local-greenhouse-gas-inventory-tool.
72 EPA. “Local GHG Inventory Tool,” 2025. https://www.epa.gov/statelocalenergy/local-greenhouse-gas-inventory-tool.
73 https://engage.eqb.state.mn.us/26208/widgets/88814/documents/68909
74 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. “CalEEMod,” 2022. https://www.caleemod.com/.
75 The default data in CalEEMod is derived using results from a construction survey conducted by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District. The survey collected data from a set of construction projects in Southern California ranging from 0-30
acres in size. Survey results were extrapolated out to projects over 30 acres based on data trends. See Appendix D1 of the
CalEEMod user guide for more information on the methodology and survey data: California Air Pollution Control Officers
Association. “User Guide for CalEEMod Version 2022.1,” 2022. https://www.caleemod.com/user-guide.
76 https://engage.eqb.state.mn.us/26208/widgets/88814/documents/68909
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 64

commuting to the site. While custom durations were applied, default values provided by the
calculator were used for employee commuting and construction equipment to complete the
calculations.
Land Use Change - This emissions source (or sink) includes the net carbon change from the
transition of one land use type to another during Project construction. This may include clearing
land for construction or otherwise converting it to another land type. To account for lifecycle
emissions, the net carbon change calculations assume full realization of the land transition. The
calculator quantifies net carbon change from land use change based on land area pre- and postconstruction, the number of trees removed and/or added during construction (outside of forests),
and the carbon stock of each land type and tree. More details on land conversion can be found in
the Climate Calculator Report.77
Approximately 950 acres of cropland will be converted into impervious surface and
lawn/landscaping in scenario 1 and 2. There is a higher amount of lawn/landscaping in scenario 1
as it has a lower density. At this stage of the concept plan, an unknown number of trees be
removed and added, this value was left as 0.
Construction Waste - Emissions result from the transportation and treatment of waste that is
generated during construction and treated at a facility off-site. The calculator assumes that all
waste generated during construction is disposed of at a landfill. The calculator quantifies
emissions from construction waste based on the estimated quantity of waste by material type and
material-specific emission factors. Emission factors associated with the landfilling of construction
materials were obtained from EPA’s GHG Emissions Factors Hub.78 The emissions factors, which
are based on factors from EPA’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM), include emissions from the
decomposition of waste as well as the transportation of waste to the waste treatment facility.79
Default values were used to estimate construction waste based on the specified construction
materials. The majority of the waste is expected to be wood products and concrete, with
additional contributions from glass, insulation, and brick.
Operational Emissions - Emissions result from building fuel and electricity consumption during the
operational lifetime of a building. The calculator quantifies emissions from building energy
consumption based on building square footage, fuel-specific building energy intensities, and fuelspecific emission factors. The building types used in the calculator include residential, commercial,
industrial, institutional, and other. Default building energy intensities were derived from data
obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). More details on energy
consumption can be found in the Climate Calculator Report.80
The residential and commercial building categories in the calculator were used for this Project

77 https://engage.eqb.state.mn.us/26208/widgets/88814/documents/68909
78 EPA. “GHG Emission Factor Hub,” 2025. https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub.
79 The emission factors do not include avoided emissions associated with energy recovery or landfill carbon sequestration.
80 https://engage.eqb.state.mn.us/26208/widgets/88814/documents/68909

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 65

calculation. Default building energy intensities were used for electricity, natural gas, and kerosene
(fuel oil) in the calculations.
On-road vehicles - This emissions source includes emissions from on-road vehicles that are used
during the operational phase of the Project. This includes emissions generated from vehicles that
are driven on Project roadways and downstream from vehicles driven to and from the Project site
by visitors or residents. The calculator quantifies incremental on-road emissions based on
estimates of additional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and an on-road vehicle emission factor.
Emission factors for on-road vehicles were obtained from MICE3.0.81 The factors are based on
emissions generated using MOVES582 and Minnesota-specific inputs. The output from MOVES
represents tailpipe-only emissions. Therefore, MICE3.0 applies a scaling factor of 1.2894 to
account for upstream emissions.
Estimated daily vehicles in the AUAR study area were gathered using data gathered from the
transportation study. The perimeter of the AUAR is approximately 6 miles. Daily vehicles were
multiplied by 6 to equal miles per day. This value was then multiplied by 365 (days) to achieve
miles per year traveled by vehicle in the AUAR study area.

Scenario

Estimated Total Vehicles Per Day

Scenario 1 – Comprehensive Plan 51,300
Scenario 2 – Higher Density

62,405

Scenario 3 – Current, No-Build

9,850

Operational waste - The quantity of waste generated is calculated based on waste generation
rates. The default waste generation rate assumptions were acquired from a residential waste
characterization study for the City of Minneapolis,83 CalRecycle,84 and a waste characterization
study for select industry groups.85 The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) collects data
on the amount of waste treated by waste management method in Minnesota.86 These values are
used to determine the default waste disposal rates by management practice.
Waste was determined by using total households (units). Scenario 1 has 5,076 units and Scenario

81 Minnesota Department of Transportation. “Minnesota Infrastructure Carbon Estimator (MICE) Tool, version 3.0,” 2025.

(unpublished). https://www.dot.state.mn.us/project-development/subject-guidance/greenhouse-gas-analysis/process.html
82 EPA. “MOVES5: Latest Version of Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES),” 2025. Available at
https://www.epa.gov/moves/latest-version-motor-vehicle-emission-simulator-moves
83 MSW Consultants. “Residential Waste Characterization & Capture Rate Study,” 2022.
lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/RCAV2/30166/Minneapolis 2022 Final Sort Report.pdf.
84 CalRecycle. “Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates,” 2025.
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates.
85 Cascadia Consulting Group. “Targeted Statewide Waste Characterization Study: Waste Disposal and Diversion Findings for
Selected Industry Groups,” 2006. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Publications/Details/1184.
86 MPCA. “Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment (SCORE),” 2022.
https://data.pca.state.mn.us/views/SCOREreport2022/2022SCOREreport?%3Aembed=y&%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=y.
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 66

2 has 6,078 units. Default values were used for waste disposal rates.

Table 20. Emission Scopes and Types
Category
Direct Emissions

Indirect Emissions

Atmospheric Removal of
GHGs

Scope
Scope 1 Emissions
Scope 1 Emissions
Scope 1 Emissions
Scope 1 Emissions
Scope 2

Project Phase
Operations
Operations

Type of Emission
Combustion (Stationary, Area, Mobile
Sources)
Non-Combustion Process

Construction

Combustion (Mobile Sources)

Construction

Land-Use

Operations

Off-site Electricity/Steam
Production (Market-Based and
Location-Based)
Off-site Waste Management
Land -Use (CO2 removals to terrestrial
storage)

Scope 3
Scope 1 (Sinks)

Operations
Construction/Operations

Table 21. GHG Emissions

Scenario 1 – Comprehensive Plan
Emission Type

Phase

Construction
Direct - Scope 1

Material inputs
Transportation of
material inputs
Employee commuting
Construction
equipment
Atmospheric Removal of
Land use change
GHGs - Scope 1 (sinks)
(construction)
Direct - Scope 1
Construction waste
Operation
Indirect - Scope 2

Building energy
consumption
HFC leakage
On-road vehicles
Treatment of waste
off-site

Direct - Scope 1
Direct - Scope 1
Scope 3
Total

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Cumulative CO2e
Emissions
128,159.44

Annualized CO2e
Emissions
2,209.65

47,745.22

823.19

2,264.20

39.04

27,973.95

482.31

49,794.07

858.52

101.50

1.75

280.50
2,465,172.54

4.84
42,502.97

691,145.76

11,916.31

208,733.83
1,377,130.66

3,598.86
23,743.63

188,162.28

3,244.18

2,593,331.98

44,712.62

Page 67

Scenario 2 – Higher Density
Cumulative CO2e
Emissions
138,615.02

Annualized CO2e
Emissions
2,389.91

Material inputs
Transportation of
material inputs
Employee commuting
Construction
equipment
Atmospheric Removal of
Land use change
GHGs - Scope 1 (sinks)
(construction)
Direct - Scope 1
Construction waste
Operation

57,782.78
2,619.09

996.25
45.16

27,973.95
49,794.07

482.31
858.52

112.69

1.94

332.44
2,926,231.67

5.73
50,452.27

Indirect - Scope 2

786,338.90

13,557.57

239,346.82
1,675,240.53
225,305.42

4,126.67
28,883.46
3,884.58

3,064,846.69

52,842.18

Emission Type

Phase

Construction
Direct - Scope 1

Building energy
consumption
HFC leakage
On-road vehicles
Treatment of waste
off-site

Direct - Scope 1
Direct - Scope 1
Scope 3
Total

Scenario 3 – Current, No-Build
Emission Type

Phase

Operation
Direct - Scope 1
Total

On-road vehicles

Cumulative CO2e
Emissions
307,544.02

Annualized CO2e
Emissions
6,150.88

307,544.02
307,544.02

6,150.88
6,150.88

B. GHG Assessment
1.

Describe any mitigation considered to reduce the project’s GHG emissions.
Scenario 1: Over this scenario’s assumed 50-year lifespan, there will be a cumulative
total of 2,593,331.98 MTCO2e emitted without mitigations. According to the EPA’s
Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator, this is equivalent to 348,277 homes’ energy
use for one year. Annualized, this is 44,712.62 MTCO2e emitted per year.
Scenario 2: Over this scenario’s assumed 50-year lifespan, there will be a cumulative
total of 3,064,846.69 MTCO2e emitted without mitigations. According to the EPA’s
Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator, this is equivalent to 411,600 homes’ energy
use for one year. Annualized, this is 52,842.18 MTCO2e emitted per year.
Scenario 3: Over this scenario’s assumed 50-year lifespan, there will be a cumulative
total of 307,544.02 MTCO2e emitted without mitigations. According to the EPA’s
Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator, this is equivalent to 41,302 homes’ energy

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 68

use for one year. Annualized, this is 6,150.88 MTCO2e emitted per year.
For all three scenarios, at least some of these emissions may be mitigated or offset by
practices that can remove carbon from the atmosphere and sequester it.
Other mitigation measures can reduce indirect GHG emissions due to energy usage and
other activities. These mitigation efforts may include planting native grasses to facilitate
carbon uptake, establishing sustainability operations such as encouraging the use of
high-efficiency utilities to reduce electric and natural gas usage, and encouraging
efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. The majority of these
mitigation efforts will depend on municipal policy and end-user efforts and are
therefore not a part of the current Project proposal. However, during construction,
contract laborers will be encouraged to carpool and BMPs such as engine anti-idling will
be implemented to minimize additional GHG output.
2.

Describe and quantify reductions from selected mitigation, if proposed to reduce the
project’s GHG emissions. Explain why the selected mitigation was preferred.
No additional on-site mitigation is planned as part of the proposed Project.

3.

Quantify the proposed project’s predicted net lifetime GHG emissions (total tons per
number of years) and how those predicted emissions may affect achievement of the
Minnesota Next Generation Energy Act goals and/or other more stringent state or
local GHG reduction goals.
As current MN Statutes require greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions control plans for large
energy facilities, the state has implemented a climate action plan to address GHG
emissions. Current goals are to reduce GHG emissions statewide to 30% below 2005
levels by 2025, and 80% below 2005 levels by 2050.
Getting to 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040 is state law in Minnesota. The
Minnesota Department of Commerce is working on a study to identify the most costeffective pathway for implementation. In 2022, Minnesota’s Climate Action Framework
set targets to reduce emissions 50 percent by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve netzero emissions by 2050. The proposed Project does not involve any large energy
facilities. BMPs will be utilized in the planning and construction phases of the Project to
remain in keeping with state and local GHG reduction goals.
Again, all calculations are estimates and all scenarios are expected to have a 50-year
lifespan. Scenario 1 will have a cumulative total of 2,593,331.98 MTCO2e emitted
without mitigations, scenario 2 will have a cumulative total of 3,064,846.69 MTCO2e
emitted without mitigations, and scenario 3 will have a cumulative total of 307,544.02
MTCO2e emitted without mitigations.

19. Noise
A. Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during
project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project
including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area; 2) nearby sensitive receptors; 3)
conformance to state noise standards; and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 69

to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise.
AUAR Guidance: Construction noise need not be addressed in an AUAR, unless there is some unusual
reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part of the mitigation plan, however, any
construction noise ordinances in effect.
If the area will include or adjoin major noise sources, a noise analysis is needed to determine if any
noise levels in excess of standards would occur, and if so, to identify appropriate mitigation
measures. With respect to traffic-generated noise, the noise analysis should be based on the traffic
analysis of Item 18.
1.

Existing Noise
The AUAR Study Area is predominantly comprised of agricultural land. Existing noise
sources within the AUAR Study Area primarily occur from roadway/traffic operations
and agricultural operations.

2.

Construction Noise
As stated in the AUAR guidelines, construction noise need not be addressed unless there
is some unusual reason to do so. No unusual circumstances have been identified that
would necessitate a detailed construction noise analysis. Construction of the proposed
Project would comply with all local, state, and federal regulations with regards to noise.

3.

Traffic Generated Noise
A sound increase of 3 dBA is barely noticeable by the human ear, a 5 dBA increase is
clearly noticeable, and a 10 dBA increase is heard as twice as loud. For example, if the
sound energy is doubled (i.e., the amount of traffic doubles), there is a 3 dBA increase in
noise, which is just barely noticeable to most people. On the other hand, if traffic
increases by a factor of 10, the resulting sound level will increase by about 10 dBA and
be heard twice as loud.
Traffic volumes in the Project area are either on roadways that do not have receivers
that are sensitive to noise, or the traffic levels attributable to the Project are well below
the amount that would generate a sound increase that could be noticeable.
The change in traffic noise levels is not anticipated to be readily perceptible.

4.

Operational Noise
The site is subject to the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards Rule 7030
‘Noise Standards.’ Noise levels should not exceed 75 dBA.

20. Transportation
A. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include 1) existing and
proposed additional parking spaces; 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated; 3)
estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence; 4) source of trip
generation rates used in the estimates; and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 70

transportation modes.
Coordination occurred between the City of Carver, Carver County, and MnDOT to establish analysis
assumptions, development scenarios, and trip generation for the Summerfield AUAR Traffic Impact
Study (TIS) (Appendix H). Trip generation was calculated using the Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, based on land‑use types and development
densities that are consistent with the City of Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Design Carver) and
the Summerfield Concept Land Use Master Plan8788
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Land Use designates the Summerfield AUAR area for long‑term
residential growth, transitioning from rural/agricultural patterns to suburban neighborhoods with
supporting mixed‑use nodes and arterial roadway access. The Summerfield program active adult,
low‑, medium‑, and high‑density residential, limited mixed‑use, parks/open space, and internal
streets aligns with the Comprehensive Plan’s land‑use vision87
Development is planned across 2026-2032 in phases, with an assumed continuation of
approximately 100 dwelling units per year through 2050, which is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan’s use of the 2040 horizon (and beyond) for long‑range infrastructure planning.
Two development scenarios bracket the potential intensity within the adopted land‑use framework:
Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. Traffic scenario details and trip tables are provided in the TIS
appendices.86
Primary vehicular access would be from County Road (CR) 40/CR 11 (Jonathan Carver Parkway) and
CR 43, with future connectivity enhanced by a Carver Creek crossing by 2050. These corridors are
identified in the Comprehensive Plan as key elements of the city’s arterial/collector network
supporting both local circulation and regional access to US 212.8687
Parking will be provided on‑site in accordance with City zoning for residential and mixed‑use
components; no shared district parking is proposed.
The TIS evaluated 2027, 2032, 2040, and 2050. Estimated average daily traffic, maximum peak‑hour
traffic, and peak timing were computed using ITE methods. Peak hours are anticipated 7:15–8:15
a.m. and 4:15–5:15 p.m., consistent with residential commute patterns contemplated by the
Comprehensive Plan.89
The Comprehensive Plan and related transportation policies recognize that CR 40, CR 11, and CR 43
function today as two‑lane facilities but will require widening, intersection upgrades, access
management, and pedestrian/bicycle facilities as growth occurs. The AUAR TIS builds on these
adopted directions by evaluating phased mitigations (turn lanes, roundabouts, corridor widenings)

87 City of Carver. (2020). Comprehensive Plan – Design Carver (2040). City of Carver.

https://www.cityofcarver.com/202/Comprehensive-Plan
88 City of Carver. (2020). Design Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 2 – Land Use. City of Carver Document Center.
https://www.cityofcarver.com/DocumentCenter/View/2052/2---Land-Use-PDF
89 City of Carver. (2020). Comprehensive Plan – Design Carver (2040). City of Carver.
https://www.cityofcarver.com/202/Comprehensive-Plan
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 71

and long‑term grade‑separated access to US 212.8890
Crash history indicates safety concerns at CR 40/CR 11 (South and North), US 212/CR 43, and CR
43/Maplewood Road. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan guidance, remedies such as geometric
upgrades, added turn lanes, modern roundabouts, and access management are appropriate
strategies to address rear‑end/angle crash patterns.89
Without improvements, 2040–2050 No‑Build operations degrade particularly along CR 11 near US
212 to LOS E/F at several locations, underscoring the need for investments that align with
Comprehensive Plan implementation. Under Build conditions, early phases load CR 11/40, while
later phases increasingly utilize CR 43 (especially after the Carver Creek crossing), reflecting the
Plan’s recognition of CR 43 as a growing parallel corridor as development extends west/north.8889
The US 212/CR 43 is identified in City planning documents and the AUAR analysis as a critical
long‑term capacity constraint. At a planning level, a future interchange is the appropriate long‑term
solution to maintain operations and regional mobility under the Comprehensive Plan’s buildout.91
The AUAR area is not currently served by fixed‑route transit, and pedestrian/bicycle networks are
limited in the near term; however, the Comprehensive Plan supports adding shared‑use paths and
on‑road bikeways as corridors like CR 40, CR 11, and CR 43 are reconstructed, improving
non‑motorized connectivity over time.8889
B. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements
necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If
the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic
impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in
the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available
at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance.
AUAR Guidance: For AUAR reviews, a detailed traffic analysis will be needed, conforming to the
MnDOT guidance as listed on the EAW form. The results of the traffic analysis must be used in the
response to Items 16 and 17.
The analysis of traffic congestion and necessary improvements for the proposed development
scenarios is supported by detailed data provided in the TIS. LOS tables are included in the TIS in
Appendix H and document traffic performance under a range of conditions, including existing
conditions, 2032 No-Build, 2040 No-Build, 2050 No-Build, and Build conditions for 2027, 2032, 2040,
and 2050 under Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. These LOS tables provide a comprehensive view of how
traffic operations are expected to evolve under each scenario, highlighting areas of concern and
identifying where mitigation measures are most needed. Trip generation summaries used in the
congestion analysis are included in Tables 19 and 20 and detailed in the appendices of the TIS.

90 City of Carver. (2020). Design Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan: Chapter 2 – Land Use. City of Carver Document Center.

https://www.cityofcarver.com/DocumentCenter/View/2052/2---Land-Use-PDF
91 City of Carver. (2020, June 1). City Council Memo and Resolution 121‑20: Approving Design Carver, the City of Carver’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan. https://carvermn.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=1&meta_id=14156
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 72

Under No-Build conditions, operations degrade over time as background traffic grows along CR
11/CR 40, CR 43, and the US 212 ramp terminals. By 2040, several intersections exhibit
approach-level deficiencies, and by 2050, multiple locations particularly along CR 11 near US 212 are
projected to operate at LOS E or F without roadway improvements. These results demonstrate that
corridor-level investments are required to maintain acceptable operations even in the absence of
the Summerfield development.
Under build conditions, early phases of Summerfield development (2026–2032) increase traffic
demand on CR 11/CR 40 and the US 212 interchange ramps, with the most significant delays
occurring at Monroe Drive, Ironwood Drive, and the US 212 ramp terminals. As development
continues and the Carver Creek crossing is constructed, a greater share of site traffic shifts to CR 43,
increasing congestion at CR 43/Maplewood Road and the US 212/CR 43 intersection. By 2040 and
2050, Scenario 1 can generally be accommodated with phased roadway and intersection
improvements, while Scenario 2 generates higher peak-hour volumes that require earlier and more
extensive mitigation to avoid failing operations.
Consistent with MnDOT access management guidance and City and County transportation planning
objectives, the TIS evaluated a phased set of roadway and intersection improvements to address
congestion, improve safety, and maintain regional mobility. Improvements evaluated in the TIS
include signal retiming along CR 11, construction of roundabouts at CR 40/CR 11 South and CR
40/CR 11 North, additional turn lanes at key access points, widening of CR 40/CR 11 and CR 43 to
four lanes, and long-term construction of a grade-separated interchange at US 212 and CR 43.
Due to CR 11/40 and CR 43 providing north/south access to US 212 to and from the development
site, the specific distribution of how entering and exiting traffic was assigned to CR 11/40 or CR 43
was analyzed. Because the existing geometrics of CR 11/40 are more developed and have higher
traffic capacity than CR 43, a higher proportion of vehicles were assigned to CR 11/40 at the
Opening Year of the development and 2032 forecast year. However, as development continues,
further addition of vehicles to CR 11/40 would reduce the remaining capacity of the roadway and
result in higher delays, causing CR 43 to be a more desirable route. Therefore, as the 2040 and 2050
design years are reached, a higher percentage of the development traffic would utilize CR 43 and
result in CR 43 being improved as a parallel route to CR 11/40. Traffic assignment on CR 11/40 vs CR
43 was performed to realistically balance the volumes and delays of traffic. The amount of traffic
assigned to each route for each design year is shown in Table 24.
Table 7: Development Trip Assignment (CR 11/40 vs CR 43)
Year

CR 11/40

CR 43

2027

70%

30%

2032

50%

50%

2040

50%

50%

2050

35%

65%

Impacts to the regional transportation system were a central focus of the analysis. US Highway 212
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 73

provides a critical east-west regional connection, and the intersection of US 212 and CR 43 is
identified as a long-term capacity constraint. Planning-level analysis indicates that construction of an
interchange at US 212 and CR 43 will be necessary to maintain acceptable operations and regional
mobility under long-term buildout conditions, particularly if higher-density development under
Scenario 2 were to occur.
C. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects.
Mitigations are necessary for the Summerfield AUAR development scenarios in 2027/2032 and
2040/2050. The major 2027/2032 mitigations include the following:
•
•
•
•
•

Retiming of signals on CR 11 (2027).
Construction of a single-lane roundabout at CR 40 and CR 11 South (2027).
Construction of a single-lane roundabout at CR 40 and CR 11 North (2032).
Right-turn lanes at CR 40 and Halsey Avenue and at CR 40 and Maplewood Road (2032).
Addition of a second northbound right-turn lane at US 212 and CR 43 with a following
eastbound acceleration lane (2032).

Future traffic studies should be done as development phases advance to articulate exact traffic
impacts based on detailed site design, and to confirm traffic control, turn-lane storage, access
spacing, and construction staging consistent with MnDOT guidance.92
The major 2040/2050 mitigations include the following, in addition to the 2027/2032 mitigations:
•
•
•
•
•

Widening of CR 40/CR 11 to four lanes between 4th Street and Halsey Avenue.
Widening of CR 43 to four lanes.
Installation of a second northbound right-turn at CR 11 and the US 212 south ramp and a
second westbound left at CR 11 and the US 212 north ramp.
Reconfiguration of the CR 40/CR 11 North and South roundabouts to 2x1 for north-south
traffic.
Construction of a grade-separated interchange at US 212 and CR 43 to provide higher
capacity and better handle large volumes.

The lower-density Summerfield Scenario 1 would need fewer improvements than the higher-density
Scenario 2 due to lower projected development and traffic growth. The mitigations listed for
2027/2032 would also accommodate the 2040/2050 design years for Scenario 1, with ongoing
monitoring and timing adjustments as phases build out.

92 Minnesota Department of Transportation. (n.d.). Access Management Resources & Manual (incl. Chapter 5).

https://dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html — See also: Chapter 5 Mn/DOT Traffic Impact Study Guidance
(PDF): https://www.mndot.org/accessmanagement/docs/pdf/manualchapters/chapter5.pdf

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 74

In addition to the City’s and County’s ongoing pedestrian and bicycle policies, the City will explore
opportunities for future transit service to the AUAR area if development occurs under Scenario 1 or
Scenario 2. Coordination with the Metropolitan Council and other transit providers will be initiated
during future planning phases to evaluate options such as bus routes, park-and-ride facilities, or
demand-responsive services. These efforts will ensure that transit access aligns with projected
growth and supports multimodal transportation goals.

21. Cumulative Potential Effects
AUAR Guidance: Because the AUAR process by its nature is intended to deal with cumulative potential
effects from all future developments within the AUAR area, it is presumed that the responses to all items
on the EAW form automatically encompass the impacts from all anticipated developments within the
AUAR area.
However, the total impact on the environment with respect to any of the items on the EAW form may
also be influenced by past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects outside of the AUAR area.
The cumulative potential effect descriptions may be provided as part of the responses to other
appropriate EAW items, or in response to this item.
A. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that
could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects.
According to Minnesota Rules, part 4410.0200, subpart 11, cumulative effects are defined as the
“effect on the environment that results from the incremental effects of a project in addition to other
projects in the environmentally relevant area that might reasonably be expected to affect the same
environmental resources, including future projects actually planned or for which a basis of
expectation has been laid, regardless of what person undertakes the other projects or what
jurisdictions have authority over the projects.”
The geographically relevant area for consideration of cumulative potential effects includes the Study
Area and surrounding lands within the City of Carver, Dahlgren Township, and adjacent developed
and developing areas of Carver County, particularly those that drain to the same surface water
systems, share transportation facilities, or rely on the same municipal utility infrastructure.
The timeframe for consideration of cumulative potential effects includes past and existing
development, as well as reasonably foreseeable future development through buildout of the City of
Carver 2040 Comprehensive Plan93 and regional growth projections extending through
approximately 2050. The AUAR is intended to evaluate long-term development scenarios and
identify worst-case potential impacts associated with full buildout of the Study Area.
B. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been

93 City of Carver. (2020). Comprehensive Plan – Design Carver (2040). City of Carver.

https://www.cityofcarver.com/202/Comprehensive-Plan
Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 75

laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic
scales and timeframes identified above.
Multiple public and private development activities are reasonably foreseeable within and near the
Study Area based on adopted comprehensive plans, zoning, and infrastructure planning documents.
These activities include residential growth within the City of Carver’s Ultimate Growth Boundary,
expansion of municipal water, wastewater, stormwater, and transportation infrastructure, and
redevelopment or intensification of adjacent lands consistent with Carver County’s Emerging
Suburban Edge designation.
Transportation improvements, including roadway extensions and upgrades to County Road 11, local
collector roads, and regional roadway connections, may occur concurrently or incrementally with
development within the Study Area. These improvements could interact cumulatively with traffic,
noise, air emissions, and surface water runoff.
Ongoing and future agricultural operations and land transitions within Dahlgren Township and
surrounding areas may also interact with development-related changes in land use, water quality,
and habitat fragmentation. Additionally, municipal infrastructure improvements planned for the City
of Carver, including water treatment capacity expansions, wastewater conveyance system upgrades,
and future expansion of municipal service areas, represent reasonably foreseeable actions that may
combine with the environmental effects of development within the Study Area.
C. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available
information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental
effects due to these cumulative effects.
Future development within the Study Area, when combined with other planned or reasonably
foreseeable development in the surrounding region, may result in cumulative effects related to
transportation systems, surface water and groundwater resources, air emissions, utilities, land use
conversion, and ecological resources. These effects are expected to occur incrementally over an
extended timeframe as development proceeds. These impacts will be addressed via the regulatory
permitting and approval processes and will be individually mitigated to ensure minimal cumulative
impacts occur.

22. Other Potential Environmental Effects
AUAR Guidance: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by Items 1
to 19, describe the effects here, discuss how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that
will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects.
A. Additional Environmental Effects
There are no other potential environmental effects that have not been addressed in preceding
sections.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 76

23. Mitigation Plan
This Mitigation Plan is submitted as part of the AUAR to provide reviewers and regulators with an understanding of the actions that are advisable,
recommended, or necessary to protect the environment and minimize potential impacts by the proposed development scenarios. The Mitigation Plan
will be revised and updated based on comments received during the AUAR comment period.
This Mitigation Plan is intended to satisfy the AUAR rules that require the preparation of a mitigation plan that specifies measures or procedures that will
be used to avoid, minimize, or mitigate the potential impacts of development within the AUAR study area. Although mitigation strategies are discussed
throughout the AUAR document, this Mitigation Plan is formally adopted by the City of Carver as the action plan to prevent potentially significant
environmental impacts.
The primary mechanism for mitigation of environmental impacts is the effective use of ordinances, rules, and regulations. The plan does not modify the
regulatory agencies’ responsibilities for implementing their respective regulatory programs nor create additional regulatory requirements. The plan
specifies the legal and institutional arrangements that will ensure that the adopted mitigation measures are implemented.
In addition to the anticipated permits and approvals listed in Section 9, the mitigation measures identified in the AUAR process are outlined in Table .
Table 8: Mitigation Plan
Resource Area

Mitigation

Land Use

Zoning map amendments, comprehensive plan amendments, and annexation will be required for development under
Scenarios 1 and 2. Any disturbed areas will be reclaimed or stabilized in accordance with City and County requirements.
The City of Carver will coordinate with Carver County and MnDOT, as applicable, on roadway improvements and access
needs.
Where infrastructure crossings or adjacent development are necessary, mitigation measures such as compensatory
storage, stormwater detention, and compliance with floodplain regulations will be implemented to minimize impacts to
floodplain functions and downstream flooding risks.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 77

Resource Area

Mitigation

Geology, Soils

The City of Carver will coordinate with the Metropolitan Council to review and, if necessary, update population and
household forecasts associated with future development scenarios to ensure consistency with regional growth planning
and infrastructure capacity.
Soil erosion and sediment control BMPs will be utilized during construction and operations of the Project in accordance
with the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Stormwater Discharge Permit. An erosion control and grading plan with BMPs consistent with MPCA and city
requirements will also be developed and implemented prior to development of the Project.
BMPs would be similar in both Scenario 1 and Scenario 2. Erosion and sediment control measures will likely be necessary
during construction. BMPs such as phased grading, temporary stabilization, and bioswales may be used to help manage
runoff and maintain soil stability across the large open footprint. For Scenario 3, maintaining soil health may be
completed through conservation tillage, cover cropping, and runoff buffers will be important to support long term
agricultural productivity and prevent erosion on sloped fields.
Project-specific mitigation measures may include deep foundation systems, stormwater infiltration controls to protect
sensitive aquifers, and avoidance or minimization of disturbance in mapped wetland areas.
No scenario contemplates mining operations. Development of the AUAR Study Area under Scenarios 1 and 2 will not
impact current gravel mining operations, located northeast of the AUAR Study Area.

Water Resources

Each development scenario may use a combination of short-term and long-term erosion control measures, such as silt
fences, sediment basins, temporary seeding, and permanent vegetation, to minimize soil loss during earthmoving
activities and adapt to seasonal conditions, while complying with applicable permit requirements and best management
practices.
Surface Water
As an MS4 city, the City must also comply with the Minnesota Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems General
Permit and maintain a snow and ice management policy to mitigate salt runoff impacts. Incorporating low-salt design
solutions in the AUAR Study Area can further protect water quality and lower maintenance costs. MN Buffer Law
requires perennial vegetative buffers up to 50 feet along public waters (lakes, rivers, and streams), and buffers of 16.5

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 78

Resource Area

Mitigation
feet along public ditches. Development will not result in vegetation being removed within the 50-foot buffer under any
Scenario.
Groundwater
Scenarios 1 and 2 may require removal or modification of some of the existing wells. If necessary, wells within the AUAR
Study Area would be removed and sealed per MPCA and Minnesota Department of Health sealing requirements.
Wastewater
Wastewater from the proposed development scenarios will be discharged into the City of Carver collection system. This
will require extending the existing gravity flow infrastructure from County Road 11/Main Street intersection to the study
area. An area of approximately 200 acres in the southwest corner of the AUAR study area is outside of the current MUSA
and outside of the sanitary Southwest District as shown in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Due to existing elevations in
this area, a lift station will be required to serve future development in this area.
Stormwater
Carver Creek and Bevens Creek each have TMDL projects in place addressing turbidity and are also included in a TMDL
project addressing fecal coliform.
The city will ensure that all future development scenarios within the AUAR Study Area are evaluated for consistency with
the waste load allocations (WLAs) established in the impaired waters. The city will also incorporate applicable strategies
from the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) and the Carver County Watershed Management Plan
to support pollutant load reductions and maintain compliance with the MS4 General Permit.
The City of Carver and Project Proposer will coordinate with Carver County and the Carver County Water Management
Organization (CCWMO) to develop an areawide stormwater management approach, including evaluation of regional
stormwater practices and opportunities to preserve or restore natural areas for volume control and water quality
treatment.
All stormwater generated by future development scenarios will be treated to meet the standards of the Carver County
Watershed Management Organization (CCWMO) and the City of Carver. BMP’s will be designed to minimize negative

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 79

Resource Area

Mitigation
impacts to Carver Creek and wetlands to the south. Practices may include stormwater basins, infiltration basins,
vegetated swales, rain gardens, permeable pavement, and other green infrastructure to reduce sedimentation and
pollutant transport. The size, type, and location of stormwater BMP’s will vary throughout the site. Permanent aboveground stormwater management basins are currently proposed for the site. To meet water quality requirements,
National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) basins combined with infiltration areas are anticipated to be the most effective
and feasible solution. All NURP Basins and infiltration areas will be designed in accordance with the National Urban
Runoff Program and CCWMO guidelines.
Stormwater management systems will be designed to safely accommodate upstream drainage patterns and flows.
Development will avoid altering flow paths in a manner that adversely impacts upstream systems unless it can be
demonstrated that the upstream system can accommodate such changes. Post-development stormwater management
will maintain existing drainage patterns and discharge points to the extent practicable. Where changes are proposed,
analyses will be conducted to demonstrate that downstream conveyance systems can accommodate increased flows,
and appropriate mitigation measures and easements will be implemented as necessary.
City and CCWMO requirements limit post-development stormwater discharge rates to pre-development levels, so on-site
facilities such as ponds, infiltration areas, or underground tanks are needed to manage runoff, maintain groundwater
recharge, and protect downstream resources.
Low-salt design strategies may include the use of permeable pavement to avoid melt water surface pooling, strategic
roadway design to avoid low spots where vehicles frequently brake (reducing salt accumulation and application), and
orienting roads to take advantage of wind and sun exposure, which helps naturally reduce roadway icing.
Prior to construction, a comprehensive Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be completed before
submitting the NPDES permit application and commencing construction. During construction, erosion and sediment
control best management practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent impacts to aquatic ecosystems per the City of
Carver, MPCA MS4, and NPDES Standards.
If dewatering is to take place, adequate treatment must be provided so that nuisance conditions will not result from the
discharge.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 80

Resource Area

Mitigation
Water Appropriation
A Water Appropriation Permit from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) would be required if
permanent dewatering is determined to be necessary for construction within the AUAR. Well 7 is planned to be
constructed in 2028 and would supply the existing Water Treatment Facility 1. The city is planning to construct Water
Treatment Facility 2 (WTF2) along with Well 7 & Well 8 in 2031. The city will be completing a study to determine where
the future water treatment plant should be located; one of the potential locations is within the AUAR.
Water Supply
Scenarios 1 and 3 can be served by the combination of existing and planned wells and water treatment. Scenario 2 would
require additional wells and treatment beyond what is planned in the current capital improvement plan and will be
regularly evaluated as growth continues in the city. Based on water demands, a 16-inch main or equivalent is needed to
be extended from County Road 11/Carver Bluffs Parkway to ensure adequate pressure and fire flow for Scenario 2.
Distribution system expansion will occur as development proceeds.
Prior to advancing higher-density development scenarios, the City of Carver will coordinate with the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) to evaluate groundwater availability, water appropriation needs, and the
potential for alternative water sources to ensure long-term sustainability of water supply.
Wetlands
Wetlands WB-B-01, WB-C-01, WB-C-02, WB-C-03, and WB-D-01 may be impacted in both development scenarios.
Assuming these features are fully impacted, impacts would total approximately 0.6-acre. Additional field delineations of
the non-delineated portions of the AUAR Study Area are anticipated to be completed and approved prior to starting
construction activities.
If wetland impacts associated with the proposed development of the AUAR Study Area are unavoidable, a wetland
replacement plan would be required. For wetland impacts that cannot be avoided, wetland bank credits would be
purchased at a compensatory mitigation ratio of 2:1 if on-site locations are not available and/or if agencies recommend
the use of a wetland bank. Wetland bank credits would be purchased following the siting requirements laid out in the
WCA and would seek to be purchased in the same Bank Service Area (BSA) and Major Watershed as the Project, provided
bank credits are available. Although not anticipated, if impacted wetlands are subject to USACE jurisdiction, a Section 404

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 81

Resource Area

Mitigation
permit would be required. Should the total impacts to USACE jurisdictional wetlands fall below 0.5-acre, the Project
impacts would likely meet the requirements of a Nationwide Permit (NWP 29). Should impacts exceed 0.5-acre, an
Individual Permit from the USACE would be required.
Construction and erosion control BMPs such as silt fence, sediment control logs, rock construction entrances, etc. would
be used during construction to protect wetlands from runoff and sedimentation. Stormwater management would be
designed to treat stormwater runoff and control runoff volume to minimize impacts to water resources.
Proposed development would incorporate stormwater features to mitigate the impacts of runoff on wetlands and other
water features within the AUAR Study Area.
Other Surface Waters
Development within the floodplain would require an Erosion and Sediment Control and Stormwater Permit and
compensatory storage mitigation, per the Carver County Water Resource Management Ordinance. Construction of a
stream crossing is also required to conform to the standards outlined in Chapter 153, Section 57 (Stream Crossing
Standards) of the Carver County Code of Ordinances. Appropriate BMPs would be utilized during construction to protect
surface water features from sedimentation and runoff during construction. Stormwater management would be designed
to treat stormwater runoff and control runoff volume to minimize impacts to water resources.
Carver will comply with the Minnesota Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems General Permit and maintain a
snow and ice management policy to mitigate salt runoff impacts. The city intends to incorporate low-salt design solutions
in the AUAR Study Area to further protect water quality and lower maintenance costs, including:
• The use of permeable pavement to avoid melt water surface pooling.
• Strategic roadway design to avoid low spots where vehicles frequently brake (reducing salt accumulation and
application).
• Orienting roads to take advantage of wind and sun exposure, which helps naturally reduce roadway icing. These
measures collectively decrease the need for deicing salt and support overall stormwater and environmental
management goals.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 82

Resource Area

Mitigation

Hazardous Materials

Phase I ESAs were conducted in the areas most likely to be developed first (582 of the total 1,503 acres) since the reports
expire after six months. Additional Phase I ESAs will be completed for the remaining areas and will be refreshed as
necessary prior to development. During both the construction and operational phases of each development scenario,
solid waste will be generated and managed in accordance with Carver County and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) guidelines.
Contractors will be encouraged to implement waste diversion strategies such as on-site sorting, recycling of materials
including metal and cardboard, and reuse of construction materials where feasible.
Across all scenarios, solid and hazardous wastes will be managed in accordance with Carver County’s current practices
and applicable Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) regulations. During both construction and operation of the
proposed development scenarios, the use and storage of hazardous materials will be limited and managed in accordance
with applicable state and federal regulations. Construction activities may involve the temporary use of fuels, lubricants,
solvents, and other chemicals typically associated with heavy equipment and building processes. These materials will be
stored in secure, labeled containers and managed in compliance with OSHA and MPCA guidelines to minimize the risk of
accidental spills or releases. Potential environmental effects from solid waste handling include increased greenhouse gas
emissions, potential leachate contamination, and localized impacts such as odor and visual blight if waste is not properly
managed. To mitigate these impacts, each scenario will properly manage waste and encourage recycling consistent with
state and county regulations.
Future commercial uses, such as gas stations or maintenance facilities, may require the installation of new aboveground
or underground storage tanks for petroleum products. While specific locations and sizes of these tanks are not yet
determined, any such installations will be subject to MPCA permitting and monitoring requirements.
A Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be developed and implemented for all development
scenarios. The SWPPP will include best management practices such as perimeter sediment controls, inlet protection,
designated fueling and material storage areas, spill response procedures, and prompt stabilization of disturbed soils. Spill
prevention and response measures will be implemented during both construction and operation to address accidental
releases of hazardous materials. These measures will help ensure that hazardous materials are managed safely and that
risks to soil, groundwater, and surface water are minimized.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 83

Resource Area

Mitigation

Fish, Wildlife, Plant
Communities

Species
The USFWS voluntary guidance for development projects for the northern long-eared bats and tricolored bats will be
reviewed and applied to minimize impacts to northern long-eared bats and tricolored bats. Including avoiding clearing
trees during the bat pup rearing season (June 1 – August 15).
The USFWS Rusty Patch Bumble Bee Voluntary Project Design Guidance will be reviewed and applied to minimize
impacts to rusty patch bumble bees. As recommended by the USFWS DKey, further coordination with USFWS concerning
the Rusty Patch Bumble Bee to determine best minimization measures for Project activities.
A bald eagle nest survey will be conducted prior to construction and any nest found will be buffered at least 660 feet
from Project activities. USFWS Nationwide Avoidance & Minimization Measures for Birds guidance will be reviewed and
applied to minimize impacts to migratory birds.
Native seed mixes will be utilized in revegetation plans for landscaping open spaces within the AUAR Study Area in order
to enhance wildlife habitat and to help prevent the establishment of invasive plants and noxious weeds.
Invasive species prevention measures will be implemented during construction to prevent the movement of invasive
species on trucks, heavy equipment, off-highway vehicles, and equipment and tools to reduce the likelihood of
introducing invasive species from off site. Measure will include requiring contractors and other working on site to arrive
and leave with clean equipment that is free of visible plants, seeds, mud, and dirt clumps. Other measures include using
weed-fee seed and mulch products and avoiding the re-use of the top six inches of stockpile materials (mulch, soil,
gravel) that may contain more weed seeds.
Best management practices and wildlife-friendly erosion and sediment control devices were practicable as required by
the NPDES Permit, SWPPP, and Construction Site Stormwater Permit to prevent sediment-laden stormwater runoff from
entering wetlands and water resources to minimize impacts of aquatic and semi-aquatic species.
The tricolored bat, monarch butterfly, and western regal fritillary will be further assessed if species become listed as
threatened or endangered prior to Project completion.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 84

Resource Area

Mitigation

Historic Properties

Tree Removal
Tree removal is recommended to be avoided during the pup rearing season for bats, from June 1 through August 15.
Prior to construction, a tree preservation plan will be submitted and reviewed by city staff. Tree replacement will be
conducted as recommended by the city.
Depending upon the nature of future proposed projects, archaeological and/or historic/architectural surveys may be
needed to evaluate the eligibility of and potential impacts to these resources. Particularly, should the Project come under
federal or state review, Westwood recommends a Phase I archaeological survey at areas of proposed ground disturbance
in locations of higher archaeological potential including proximity to Carver Creek and locations of known historic
farmsteads based on historic mapping.

Visual

Air

Archaeological and/or historic properties surveys may be required in areas of medium to high-probability landforms prior
to construction activities within the AUAR Study Area. Any future projects within the AUAR Study Area that include
Federal involvement (funding or permits) may require compliance with Section 106 regulations and processes. Any future
projects within the AUAR Study Area that involve non-federal public lands and/or state-level funding or permitting may
require compliance with Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and Minnesota Historic Sites Act regulations and processes.
Notable visual effects include increased night-time lighting. To mitigate these impacts, the Project should incorporate
best practices for outdoor lighting design, including the use of fully shielded, downward-directed fixtures, motion
sensors, and dimming technologies. Guidance from Dark Sky International can be used to inform lighting strategies that
minimize glare, reduce skyglow, and protect nocturnal wildlife.
Guidance from the USFWS to minimize blue light, uplight, and backlight will be adhered to the extent practicable.
Additional mitigation measures such as vegetative buffers, context-sensitive architectural design, and thoughtful site
planning can help soften the visual transition and maintain a cohesive aesthetic as the area develops.
The Project SWPPP will include provisions to minimize construction-related air impacts from both dust and construction
vehicle exhaust. Dust control measures will include but not be limited to Project phasing, application of water, use of
mulch, and prompt soil stabilization.
The State of MN does not have any vehicle emissions test requirements; however, construction vehicles are required to
have functional noise and emission control systems in good working order. Equipment that lacks noise and emission

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 85

Resource Area

GHG

Noise
Transportation

Mitigation
control measures must be repaired or removed from the site. Developers and contractors shall ensure compliance with
this requirement.
Mitigation measures can reduce indirect GHG emissions due to energy usage and other activities. These mitigation
efforts may include planting native grasses to facilitate carbon uptake, establishing sustainability operations such as
encouraging the use of high-efficiency natural gas water heaters to reduce electric and natural gas usage, and
encouraging efficient heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. The majority of these mitigation efforts will
depend on municipal policy and end-user efforts and are therefore not a part of the current Project proposal.
The site is subject to the State of Minnesota Pollution Control Standards Rule 7030 ‘Noise Standards.’ Noise levels should
not exceed 75 dBA.
Mitigations are necessary for the Summerfield AUAR development scenarios in 2027/2032 and 2040/2050. The lower
density Summerfield Scenario 1 would need fewer improvements than the higher density Scenario 2 due to lower
projected development and traffic growth. The mitigations listed for 2027/2032 would also accommodate the 2040/2050
design years for Scenario 1, with ongoing monitoring and timing adjustments as phases build out.
The major 2027/2032 mitigations include the following:
• Retiming of signals on CR 11 (2027).
• Construction of a single-lane roundabout at CR 40 and CR 11 South (2027).
• Construction of a single-lane roundabout at CR 40 and CR 11 North (2032).
• Right-turn lanes at CR 40 and Halsey Avenue and at CR 40 and Maplewood Road (2032).
• Addition of a second northbound right-turn lane at US 212 and CR 43 with a following eastbound
acceleration lane (2032).
Future traffic studies should be done as development phases advance to articulate exact traffic impacts based on
detailed site design, and to confirm traffic control, turn-lane storage, access spacing, and construction staging consistent
with MnDOT guidance.94

94 Minnesota Department of Transportation. (n.d.). Access Management Resources & Manual (incl. Chapter 5). https://dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html — See also:

Chapter 5 Mn/DOT Traffic Impact Study Guidance (PDF): https://www.mndot.org/accessmanagement/docs/pdf/manualchapters/chapter5.pdf

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 86

Resource Area

Mitigation
The major 2040/2050 mitigations include the following, in addition to the 2027/2032 mitigations:
• Widening of CR 40/CR 11 to four lanes between 4th Street and Halsey Avenue.
• Widening of CR 43 to four lanes.
• Installation of a second northbound right-turn at CR 11 and the US 212 south ramp and a second westbound
left at CR 11 and the US 212 north ramp.
• Reconfiguration of the CR 40/CR 11 North and South roundabouts to 2x1 for north-south traffic.
• Construction of a grade-separated interchange at US 212 and CR 43 to provide higher capacity and better
handle large volumes.
In addition to the City’s and County’s ongoing pedestrian and bicycle policies, the City will explore opportunities for
future transit service to the AUAR area if development occurs under Scenario 1 or Scenario 2. Coordination with the
Metropolitan Council and other transit providers will be initiated during future planning phases to evaluate options such
as bus routes, park-and-ride facilities, or demand-responsive services. These efforts will ensure that transit access aligns
with projected growth and supports multimodal transportation goals.

Prepared by: Bolton & Menk, Inc.
City of Carver – Southwest Growth Area – Draft AUAR

Page 87

Appendix A
Figures

Appendix B
Proposed Level II Wetland Delineation Boundaries & Waterway
Classifications & Wetland
Buffers

Appendix C
Contamination Hazards
AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST DUE TO LARGE FILE SIZE

Appendix D
MnDNR Natural Heritage Determination Letter and Project
Report

Appendix E
USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation

Appendix F
USFWS Determination Key for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee

Appendix G
Greenhouse Gas Calculations

Appendix H
Traffic Impact Study

Appendix I
Water Resources Figures

Appendix J
Preliminary Phasing Plan

Appendix K
Draft AUAR Comments and Responses

CITY OF CARVER
CARVER COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 131-26
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWAIDE
REVIEW (AUAR) FOR THE SOUTHWEST GROWTH AREA HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Carver is the Responsible Governmental Unit for the environmental
review of the Southwest Growth Area Housing Development, which includes the proposed residential
project known as Summerfield; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of
environmental review known as the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (“AUAR”) process; and
WHEREAS, the City undertook an environmental review process to determine if future
development of the southwest growth area, which includes but is not limited to the proposed
Summerfield project, has the potential for significant environmental effects and facilitated the
preparation the AUAR pursuant to state requirements; and
WHEREAS, the notice of availability of the Draft AUAR Order and Scoping Document was
published in the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board’s EQB on October 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the Scoping Document was available for review and comment as part of the
AUAR process as described in Minnesota Rules, part 4410.3610, subpart 5a; and
WHEREAS, the 30-day comment period began on October 21, 2025 and closed on
November 21, 2025; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2025, the City Council approved the AUAR Order and
Scoping Document and ordered the preparation of a Draft AUAR for the development scenarios
identified therein for review, distribution, and approval in accordance with Minnesota Rules, part
4410.3610; and
WHEREAS, the availability of the Draft AUAR was officially noticed on April 7, 2026 in
the EQB Monitor; and
WHEREAS, the City distributed the Draft AUAR and posted the contents of the Draft
AUAR on the City’s website; and
WHEREAS, comments on the Draft AUAR were received through May 7, 2026; and
WHEREAS, based on such comments, the availability of the Final AUAR was officially
noticed on May 19, 2026, in the EQB Monitor and the City distributed and posted the contents of
the Final AUAR on the City’s website; and

CA430\41\1100831.v1

WHEREAS, staff has reviewed all comments received during the comment period and
incorporated applicable changes into the Final AUAR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carver,
Minnesota, hereby approves the June 2026 Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review for the
Southwest Growth Area Housing Development.

Attest:
Brenda Good, Deputy Clerk

CA430\41\1100831.v1

Courtney Johnson, Mayor

CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MEETING DATE:

June 15, 2026

SUBMITTED BY:

Lynn Tschudi, Finance Director

SUBJECT:

Networking Equipment

REQUEST FOR ACTION
Approve the quote from Loffler in the amount of $67,465.15 for the full network upgrade project and
authorize staff to proceed with implementation.
OVERVIEW
Components of the City’s network infrastructure (firewalls, switches, and wireless access points) are
nearing end of life and have been scheduled for replacement.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
The total project cost is $67,465.15, which includes equipment, services, and implementation. Installation
services will be billed on a time-and-materials basis, meaning final costs may vary depending on actual
project conditions and effort required.
Funding for this project will be allocated between Enterprise Funds and the General Fund, based on the
location of the equipment and the distribution of labor associated with each site.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1) Loffler quote
2) Cyber Advisors quote

Prepared for:
Carver, City of - City Hall
Lynn Tschudi
[email protected]
Quote # 018757
Version 2

Church
Due to recent changes in tariffs and price fluctuations, Loffler may need to provide a new quote. If the price changes,
you will receive a new quote for your review and approval.

Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

FortiGate-40F Hardware plus 3 Year 24x7 FortiCare and FortiGuard Unified
Threat Protection (UTP) - 5 Port - 10/100/1000Base-T - Gigabit Ethernet - 5 x RJ
-45 - 3 Year Forticare and Fortiguard Unified (UTM) Protection - Wall
Mountable - TAA Compliant

$978.03

1

$978.03

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE
802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be/e/h/i/j/k/r/v 9.32 Gbit/s Wireless Access Point Indoor - 2.40 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz - 5 x Internal Antenna(s) - Internal - MIMO
Technology - Multi User MIMO - 1 x Network (RJ-45) - 5 Gigabit

$373.80

1

$373.80

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service - 3 Year - Service - Service Depot
- Exchange

$106.75

1

$106.75

Fortinet PoE Injector - 120 V AC, 230 V AC Input - 55 V DC Output - 1 x RJ-45
Input Port(s) - 1 x RJ-45 Output Port(s) - 60 W

$180.00

1

$180.00

RACKMOUNT.IT FortiRack Rackmount Kit - For Firewall - 1U Rack Height x 19"
Rack Width - Rack-mountable - Signal White

$159.95

1

$159.95

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 7 ft., Purple

$9.52

1

$9.52

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 7 ft., Red

$9.52

1

$9.52

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 7 ft., Yellow

$9.52

1

$9.52

Subtotal:

$1,827.09

City Hall
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Fortinet FortiGate FG-90G Network Security/Firewall Appliance - Content
Security - 10 Port - 10GBase-X, 1000Base-X, 10GBase-T, 5GBase-T, 2.5GBase-T,
10/100/1000Base-T - 10 Gigabit Ethernet - 27.90 Gbit/s Firewall Throughput SHA-256, AES (256-bit) - 2500

$4,969.64

1

$4,969.64

Fortinet SFP+ Network Cable - 3.28 ft SFP+ Network Cable for Network Device 10 Gbit/s

$39.60

4

$158.40

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 2 of 15

$1,572.00

2

$3,144.00

Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service - 3 Year - Service
- 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service Depot - Exchange - Parts

$449.11

2

$898.22

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE
802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be/e/h/i/j/k/r/v 9.32 Gbit/s Wireless Access Point Indoor - 2.40 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz - 5 x Internal Antenna(s) - Internal - MIMO
Technology - Multi User MIMO - 1 x Network (RJ-45) - 5 Gigabit

$373.80

8

$2,990.40

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service - 3 Year - Service - Service Depot
- Exchange

$106.75

8

$854.00

RACKMOUNT.IT Rackmount Kit - For Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 1U
Rack Height - White

$149.72

1

$149.72

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 10 ft., Purple

$12.31

8

$98.48

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 10 ft., Red

$12.31

1

$12.31

Fortinet FortiSwitch Ethernet Switch - 48 Ports - Manageable - Gigabit
Ethernet, 10 Gigabit Ethernet - 10/100/1000Base-T, 10GBase-X - 2 Layer
Supported - Modular - 895.70 W Power Consumption - 740 W PoE Budget Optical Fiber, Twisted Pair -

Subtotal:

$13,275.17

Fire Hall
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

$1,810.07

1

$1,810.07

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE
802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be/e/h/i/j/k/r/v 9.32 Gbit/s Wireless Access Point Indoor - 2.40 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz - 5 x Internal Antenna(s) - Internal - MIMO
Technology - Multi User MIMO - 1 x Network (RJ-45) - 5 Gigabit

$373.80

4

$1,495.20

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service - 3 Year - Service - Service Depot
- Exchange

$106.75

4

$427.00

$1,572.00

1

$1,572.00

$449.11

1

$449.11

Fortinet FortiGate FG-70G Network Security/Firewall Appliance - Intrusion
Prevention - 10 Port - 1000Base-T - Gigabit Ethernet - 10 Gbit/s Firewall
Throughput - AES (256-bit), SHA-256, TLS 1.3, SSL - 10 x RJ-45 - 3 Year FortiCare
Premium and FortiGuard Un

Fortinet FortiSwitch Ethernet Switch - 48 Ports - Manageable - Gigabit
Ethernet, 10 Gigabit Ethernet - 10/100/1000Base-T, 10GBase-X - 2 Layer
Supported - Modular - 895.70 W Power Consumption - 740 W PoE Budget Optical Fiber, Twisted Pair Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service - 3 Year - Service
- 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service Depot - Exchange - Parts

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 3 of 15

$156.51

1

$156.51

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Red

$7.39

1

$7.39

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Yellow

$7.39

1

$7.39

RACKMOUNT.IT Rack Shelf - For Firewall - 1U Rack Height x 19" Rack Width Rack-mountable - Signal White

Subtotal:

$5,924.67

Lift Station
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

$1,838.04

1

$1,838.04

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Red

$7.39

1

$7.39

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Yellow

$7.39

1

$7.39

Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5 Port 10/100/1000Base-T - Gigabit Ethernet - Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac AES (256-bit), SHA-256 - 200 VPN - 5 x RJ-45 - 3 Year 24x7 Forticare and
Fortiguard UTP - Wall Mountable

Subtotal:

$1,852.82

Water Tower
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5 Port 10/100/1000Base-T - Gigabit Ethernet - Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac AES (256-bit), SHA-256 - 200 VPN - 5 x RJ-45 - 3 Year 24x7 Forticare and
Fortiguard UTP - Wall Mountable

$1,838.04

1

$1,838.04

RACKMOUNT.IT FortiRack Rackmount Kit - For Firewall - 1U Rack Height x 19"
Rack Width - Rack-mountable - Signal White

$159.95

1

$159.95

StarTech 2U 19in Steel Vertical Wall Mount Equipment Rack Bracket, TAA Mount a server, network or telecommunications device vertically with this 2U
wall-mountable rack - wall mount rack - wallmount rack - vertical wall mount
rack - vertical wall mount b

$61.00

1

$61.00

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Red

$7.39

1

$7.39

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 5 ft., Yellow

$7.39

1

$7.39

Subtotal:

Quote #018757 v2

$2,073.77

Page: 4 of 15

Water Treatment
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5 Port 10/100/1000Base-T - Gigabit Ethernet - Wireless LAN IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac AES (256-bit), SHA-256 - 200 VPN - 5 x RJ-45 - 3 Year 24x7 Forticare and
Fortiguard UTP - Wall Mountable

$1,838.04

1

$1,838.04

Fortinet FortiSwitch 108F-FPOE Ethernet Switch - 8 Ports - Manageable Gigabit Ethernet - 10/100/1000Base-T, 1000Base-X - 2 Layer Supported Modular - 2 SFP Slots - 139.20 W Power Consumption - 130 W PoE Budget Optical Fiber, Twisted Pair - PoE Ports

$385.80

1

$385.80

Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service (Renewal) - 3
Year - Service - 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service Depot - Exchange - Parts

$110.16

1

$110.16

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 3 ft., Red

$6.53

1

$6.53

Category 6, UTP, RJ-45 to RJ-45, Copper Patch Cord, 3 ft., Yellow

$6.53

1

$6.53

Subtotal:

$2,347.06

Patch Cabling Products
Description
Additional Cabling/Network Room Cleanup (Budgetary)

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

$250.00

1

$250.00

This cabling budget is for the advanced network room cleanup portion at the Fire Dept and City Hall locations

Subtotal:

$250.00

Cabling Services
Description
Physical Security Cabling
Subtotal:

$3,428.57

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

$1,126.00

1

$1,126.00

EMS Licenses
Description
Fortinet FortiClient VPN/ZTNA Agent plus FortiGuard Forensics + FortiCare
24x7 - Subscription License - 1 Year

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 5 of 15

This is a 25 pack of licenses for the Fortinet VPN and are required for deployment and management

Subtotal:

$1,126.00

Statement of Work
This Statement of Work (hereinafter called the “SOW”) is issued pursuant to Loffler’s IT Solutions Group Master Services
Agreement (the “Agreement”). This SOW is subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Agreement between the parties
and is made a part thereof.
This SOW, effective as of 06/02/2026 (hereinafter called the “Date”), is entered into by and between Loffler Companies and
Carver, City of - City Hall (hereinafter called the “Client”), and is subject to the terms and conditions specified below. The
Exhibit(s) to this SOW, if any, shall be deemed to be a part hereof. In the event of any inconsistencies between the terms of the
body of this SOW and the terms of the Exhibit(s) hereto, the terms of the body of this SOW shall prevail.

Project Overview - Full Network Upgrades
The purpose of this project is to replace customer's existing Firewall, Network Switches, and WiFi Access Points with a unified
Fortinet environment at all locations

Project Goals
At the end of this project, the following goals will be achieved.
1. Existing Firewall rules to be interpreted and reviewed with the customer's IT Support organization
2. Firewall physical layout to be reviewed to plan for replacement
3. Existing LAN Network logical and physical architecture to be reviewed to plan for replacement
4. Existing WiFi Network logical and physical architecture to be reviewed to plan for replacement
5. Configure Fortinet SD-WAN for connectivity
6. Fortinet networking equipment to be implemented in place of the existing environment
7. End Users to be migrated to the new network environment
8. Legacy equipment to be removed from the environment after the migration

Assumptions, Exclusions and Prerequisites
Assumptions for this project are:
1. The Fortinet management methodology for this environment will be Standalone Fortigate
2. Patch Cables to be provided by Loffler
3. Additional cables, transceivers, and rack hardware may be required for the project at an additional cost - to be
determined during discovery
4. Global end-user affecting migrations to be conducted After Hours and applicable billing rates will be invoiced
5. Existing and new WiFi networks may not be able to run simultaneously during testing phase
6. Loffler Engineers to observe network traffic immediately following Firewall implementation. It is reasonable to expect
some level of rule changes required to fine tune security following initial cutover.
7. Network room cleanup to be performed at the Fire Hall and Water Treatment locations. Work to be performed after hours
as cabling will be replaced with correct length cables as budgeted.
8. Network room cleanup includes cable replacements, picking up the space, stowing away loose items and old equipment
9. Low Voltage vendor to install Access Points in their existing locations using current cabling. Loffler will assist as needed
to ensure APs connectivity.
10. The client VPN will utilize FortiClient IPSec with SAML authentication and MS Authenticator as the MFA method with

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 6 of 15

EMS for management
11. Loffler will utilize a train-the-trainer approach for employee education regarding MFA and other system changes that may
occur during this project
12. The Church network upgrade is optional and is separate from the City network upgrade labor
Exclusions for this project are:
1. Individual End User PC WiFi connection configurations
2. Legacy Wi-Fi security and authentication methods like WPA (version 1) cannot be utilized on modern equipment.
Additional billable project time or hardware replacement can be required if legacy devices are encountered.
Prerequisites for this project are:
1. Customer to provide current Firewall configuration files or confirm administrative access to all Firewalls in scope prior to
the start of the project
2. Customer to provide full administrative access to existing network and in-scope portal accounts
3. Users have consistent access to either a company or personal smartphone to install and utilize the Microsoft
Authenticator application
4. Loffler will have full administrative access to all workstations and Microsoft cloud services (M365 and Azure) for the
duration of the project
5. Customer must own or procure appropriate M365 licensing for all intended project outcomes once user count is finalized
6. Customer will be responsible for reviewing a generated user list to confirm which users require VPN setup

Scope of Work
1. Project Management
o Project Management resources for this project will be as follows:
 A dedicated Project Manager will be provided for this project
o Project Management will consist of
 Creating and maintaining a project plan with tasks, resource assignments and targeted completion dates
 Regular email and phone communication with project team members
 Regular status meetings with the project team
2. Planning
o Project kick-off meeting
 Introduce project team members
 Review and ratify project goals and objectives
 Discuss timeframes and deadlines
 Establish ongoing project meeting and communication schedules
o Review of current environment
 Review current configuration
 Public IP Address(es)
 SD-WAN Configuration
 NAT Rules
 Security Configuration
 Routing
 End User Remote Access
 VLAN / Subnet layout
 WiFi Production and Guest Authentication
 WiFi Access Point physical placement
 Review current revision levels and patches
 Review any existing documentation that may exist
o Gather information and materials
 Obtain credentials needed for the project

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 7 of 15

 Create or verify accounts needed to download or manage subscriptions, if applicable
 Verify equipment and/or digital licensing
o Create high level project plan
3. Design
o Design the solution
o Create a high-level Visio diagram or other design document as appropriate
o Determine any prerequisite actions that must be taken prior to implementation
o Review the project plan and design with the client to obtain approval to proceed
4. Implementation
o Build the solution according to the design
 Fortinet Portal Configuration
 Register FortiCare for all Equipment
 Firewall Initial Installation and Configuration
 SD-WAN Configuration
 Switch Initial Installation and Configuration
 WiFi Environment Initial Installation and Configuration
 Remote Access Configuration, if applicable
 WiFi Production and Guest Authentication
 Mirror current firewall rules and settings, includes Site-to-Sites and VLANs
 Configure switches and APs for FortiGate management
 Setup IPSec client VPN with SAML authentication and MS MFA with EMS
 Install/assist with VPN and configuration
 Install new equipment and cutover
 Work with Low Voltage vendor to ensure APs connectivity
 Perform advanced network room cleanup
o Test and troubleshoot as needed
 Power Supply Failover, if applicable
 ISP Failover, if applicable
5. End User Acceptance Testing
o The solution will be tested by up to 2 end users at each location
o Client will have responsibility for creating a testing scenario, administering the testing, and gathering feedback
from the end users
o Loffler will review the feedback with the Client and adjust the solution
6. Migration
o Migrate to the new solution
7. Support, Documentation, Knowledge Transfer, and Decommissioning
o Document the solution as built
o Transfer documentation and credentials to Client
o Decommission outgoing legacy equipment or services per the project plan
o This project includes up to 18 hours of support after the migration for all locations
o This project includes up to 7 hours of knowledge transfer to Client's IT Support group

Multi-factor Authentication for VPN Connections
Loffler Companies will also configure the following:
1. MFA for Firewall or appliance-based VPN
Notes and Requirements for this project phase:
1. Customer firewall will use SAML for user authentication
2. Customer must have appropriate Microsoft licensing for end user MFA

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 8 of 15

3. Conditional Access does not apply for IPSec VPN MFA. Users must enter MFA codes as prompted.
Exclusions for this project phase:
1. Firewall updates are out of scope

Deliverable Materials
Loffler Companies will provide the following deliverables:
1. High level project plan
2. Documentation of the solution as built
3. Credentials for all systems installed within the scope of the project

Loffler Companies Responsibilities
Loffler Companies has the following general responsibilities under this Agreement:
1. Loffler Companies will conduct business in a courteous and professional manner with Client.
2. Loffler Companies will perform work and services as outlined in this SOW.

Client Responsibilities
Client has the following general responsibilities under this agreement:
1. Client will conduct business in a courteous and professional manner with Loffler Companies.
2. Client will provide a safe and suitable work environment for Loffler Companies personnel.
3. Client will provide Loffler Companies access to the Client’s systems as required for the completion of the planning and
migration of data
4. Client will provide primary and secondary contacts for the purpose of decision-making in unusual circumstances, such as
major outages or compromised systems.
5. Client will provide information to Loffler Companies on access, software, licensing, documentation, and support for its
systems.
6. Client will provide all of the necessary and requested documentation, information, and knowledge capital to Loffler
Companies prior to the start of support of new systems or services related to the Work being provided or proposed to be
provided by Loffler Companies.

Change Control Procedure
The following process will be followed if a change to this SOW is required:
 A Project Change Authorization (PCA) will be the vehicle for communicating change. The PCA must describe the
change, the rationale for the change, and the effect the change will have on the project.
 The designated Project Manager of the requesting party (Loffler Companies or Client) will review the proposed change
and determine whether to submit the request to the other party.
 Both Project Managers will review the proposed change and approve it for further investigation or reject it. Loffler
Companies and Client will mutually agree upon any charges for such investigation, if any. If the investigation is
authorized, the Client Project Managers will sign the PCA, which will constitute approval for the investigation charges.
Loffler Companies will invoice Client for any such charges. The investigation will determine the effect that the
implementation of the PCA will have on SOW price, schedule and other terms and conditions of the Agreement.
 Upon completion of the investigation, both parties will review the impact of the proposed change and, if mutually agreed,

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 9 of 15

a Change Authorization will be executed.
 A written Change Authorization must be signed by both parties to authorize implementation of the investigated changes.

City Networks Project Labor
Labor shall commence on a date that is mutually agreed to by Loffler and Client and will continue until complete as specified in
the SOW.
Invoices for Time and Materials (T&M) services will be submitted weekly. Each invoice will reflect charges for the time period
being billed with cumulative figures and (if applicable) for previous periods.
Fixed fee projects will be invoiced based on the following schedule:
 The initial 50% of the fixed fee project cost will be invoiced upon project commencement
 The final 50% of the fixed fee project cost will be invoiced upon project completion
The final 50% of a fixed fee project shall be due when Client accepts such activities are complete without unreasonable
objections. No response from Client within 5-business days of notification of the project being completed by Loffler is deemed
acceptance.

Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Senior Engineer

$235.00

94

$22,090.00

Senior Engineer (After Hours)

$352.50

18

$6,345.00

$0.00

1

$0.00

$4,340.00

1

$4,340.00

$0.00

1

$0.00

Loffler Implementation and Project Management

This project will be performed on a fixed fee basis
Project Management Fixed Fee. See attached scope of work for details.
*Labor Estimate* Project Engineer labor will be performed on a Time and
Materials basis. Actual time will be invoiced. Applicable travel charges and
taxes will be invoiced.

Subtotal:

Quote #018757 v2

$32,775.00

Page: 10 of 15

Church Project Labor
Labor shall commence on a date that is mutually agreed to by Loffler and Client and will continue until complete as specified in
the SOW.
Invoices for Time and Materials (T&M) services will be submitted weekly. Each invoice will reflect charges for the time period
being billed with cumulative figures and (if applicable) for previous periods.
Fixed fee projects will be invoiced based on the following schedule:
 The initial 50% of the fixed fee project cost will be invoiced upon project commencement
 The final 50% of the fixed fee project cost will be invoiced upon project completion
The final 50% of a fixed fee project shall be due when Client accepts such activities are complete without unreasonable
objections. No response from Client within 5-business days of notification of the project being completed by Loffler is deemed
acceptance.

Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Senior Engineer

$235.00

15

$3,525.00

Project Management Fixed Fee. See attached scope of work for details.

$620.00

1

$620.00

$0.00

1

$0.00

Loffler Implementation and Project Management

*Labor Estimate* Project Engineer labor will be performed on a Time and
Materials basis. Actual time will be invoiced. Applicable travel charges and
taxes will be invoiced.

Subtotal:

Quote #018757 v2

$4,145.00

Page: 11 of 15

Full Network Upgrade
Prepared by:

Prepared for:

Quote Information:

Loffler Companies Inc

Carver, City of - City Hall

Quote #: 018757

Gina Enderlein
952-925-6800
Fax 952-925-6820
[email protected]

316 Broadway St
Carver, MN 55315-2103
Lynn Tschudi
(612) 282-1820
[email protected]

Version: 2
Delivery Date: 06/02/2026
Expiration Date: 06/17/2026

Quote Summary
Description

Amount

Church

$1,827.09

City Hall

$13,275.17

Fire Hall

$5,924.67

Lift Station

$1,852.82

Water Tower

$2,073.77

Water Treatment

$2,347.06

Patch Cabling Products

$250.00

Cabling Services

$3,428.57

EMS Licenses

$1,126.00

City Networks Project Labor

$32,775.00

Church Project Labor

$4,145.00
Subtotal:

$69,025.15

Shipping:

$400.00

Total:

$69,425.15

PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE - PRICES BASED UPON TOTAL PURCHASE - ALL PREP, INSTALL, DELIVERY, TRAINING OR CONSULTING
SERVICES TO BE BILLED AT PUBLISHED RATES FOR EACH ACTIVITY INVOLVED WE SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR WITH REGARD TO ANY LICENSED PRODUCTS. - ALL
RETURNS MUST BE APPROVED BY LOFFLER COMPANIES - MINIMUM 25% RESTOCKING FEE WITH ORIGINAL PACKAGING MAY APPLY. PARTIAL
BILLING MAY APPLY FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. - FOR ALL RACKS, SANS AND OTHER SPECIAL SHIPMENTS, THE FREIGHT
COSTS WILL BE BILLED TO THE END USER AS QUOTED OR AT ACTUAL COST INCURRED - THIS DOCUMENT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHOULD
NOT BE DISCLOSED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF LOFFLER COMPANIES, INC. ALL CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS
ARE CHARGED A 3% PROCESSING FEE. SALES TAX TO BE CALCULATED ON INVOICE.

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 12 of 15

Loffler Companies Inc

Carver, City of - City Hall

Signature:

Signature:

Name:

Nick Johnson

Name:

Title:

Program Manager - IT Solutions

Title:

Date:

06/02/2026

Date:

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 13 of 15

Standard Labor Rates
Resource Level

Regular Rate

After Hours Rate

Emergency/Holiday Rate

Monday through Friday
during business hours

Monday through Friday
outside of business hours
and on weekends

All days of the week and all
hours of the day. A customer
may request emergency
service any time.

(planned and scheduled
activities, including projects, (emergencies and Loffler
upgrades and maintenance) observed national holidays)
Engineer

$195.00

$292.50

$390.00

Senior Engineer

$235.00

$352.50

$470.00

Network Architect

$275.00

$412.50

$550.00

Business IT Consultant

$250.00

$375.00

$500.00

Senior Consultant

$295.00

$442.50

$590.00

Voice Engineer

$175.00

$265.50

$350.00

Project Manager

$155.00

$232.50

$310.00

Trainer

$145.00

$217.50

$290.00

Project Coordinator

$110.00

$165.00

$220.00

Labor rates listed above do not include applicable taxes. The start and end times for regular and after-hours rates will
be adjusted relative to the local time zone if the work is performed onsite by our resources while physically within that
time zone. A two-hour minimum applies to After Hours and Emergency/Holiday Rates.
Labor rates listed above are provided for reference and reflect Loffler’s standard rates at the time of SOW creation.
They are not guaranteed as part of this SOW and are subject to change at any time.
Regular Hours
Regular support hours are Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm
Regular project hours are Monday through Friday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
Loffler Observed National Holidays:
 New Year’s Day (January 1)
 Memorial Day (Last Monday in May)
 Independence Day (July 4)
 Labor Day (First Monday in September)
 Thanksgiving Day (Fourth Thursday in November)
 Thanksgiving Day Floater (The Friday after Thanksgiving)
 Christmas Day (December 25)

A holiday that falls on a Saturday will be observed on the preceding Friday. A holiday that falls on a Sunday will be
observed the following Monday.

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 14 of 15

Travel Charges
Note: Travel charges apply unless referencing SOW overrides these default policies
Metro Area

Metro Area (Hennepin, Anoka, Ramsey, Washington, Dakota, Scott, Carver)
Metro Area Travel to Client:

30-Minutes Billable Time

Metro Area Travel from Client:

Non-Billable

Anything outside the Twin Cities 7 County Metro Area
Outside Metro Area Travel to Client:

Actual Time Billable

Outside Metro Area Travel from Client:

Actual Time Billable

Quote #018757 v2

Page: 15 of 15

Cyber Advisors - Maple Grove Office
7550 Meridian Circle N
Suite 100
Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369-4930
(763) 465-4622

City of Carver - Fortinet
Project

City of Carver
Lynn Tschudi
[email protected]
Quote #039348
Version #1

Time and Materials SOW

Statement of Work
Prepared by: Dex Holthaus

Executive Summary
City of Carver has engaged with Cyber Advisors to upgrade and replace their networking at 6 locations.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

City Hall – 1 firewall for SDWAN Hub, 2 switches and 8 access points
Church – 1 firewall as SDWAN Spoke and 1 access point
Fire Hall - 1 firewall as SDWAN Spoke, 1 switch and 4 access points
Lift Station – 1 firewall as SDWAN Spoke
Water Tower – 1 firewall as SDWAN Spoke
Water Treatment – 1 firewall as SDWAN Spoke and 1 switch

Cyber Advisors Responsibilities
 Identify scope of project and completion date
 Serve as a contact for service delivery
 Schedule project work
 Perform the project as defined in the SOW

Customer Responsibilities
 The steps in this are provided to separate the project into logical tasks and provide a guideline for
the order in which the project will be performed.
 Project Managers and Project Engineers may change the order in which steps are performed to
meet customer requirements and project schedule.
 Any steps not explicitly stated in the Statement of Work (SOW) will require a change order to
complete.
 The customer is responsible for all licensing and billing unless explicitly stated.
 The customer is responsible for any pre-approved support call purchases.
 The customer will maintain support agreements for all 3rd party products for the duration of the work
in this SOW.
 For 3rd-party support cases, the customer is responsible for coordinating and scheduling the vendor
and Cyber Advisors' staff.
 VPN or Bomgar access will be provided for remote work.
 Unless explicitly stated in the SOW, any training & shadowing may require a change order.
QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 2/11

Time and Materials SOW
 Only 3rd-party applications specified in the SOW steps will be included for migration or upgrade.
 Microsoft Office must be a version supported by Office 365 for compatibility.
 The customer will be responsible for all Microsoft licensing.
 Enabling or configuring certain features within the statement of work may require additional licensing
costs within Office 365.
 Projects will be billed on a monthly cadence unless otherwise agreed upon.
 A 24-hour notice to reschedule any planned meeting is required to avoid a $150 rescheduling fee
per instance.
 Any dispute of any goods or services relating to this contract (directly or indirectly) must be
presented to Cyber Advisors with supporting evidence within 14 days of receipt of the final project
invoice.
 A change order will be issued before continuing work if additional expenses are necessary to
complete the services (hardware/software/supplies).
 Pricing in this SOW is valid through 90 days of quote creation.
 This SOW does not cover the health of any endpoint management system used to deploy software.

Project Scope
1. Project Preparation
1. Project Preparation
 Pre-project planning meeting with client
 Verify the scope of the project, define timelines, set up milestones and responsibilities
for all parties
 Discuss administrative requirements to complete the work
 Obtain necessary credentials
2. Project Update Meetings
 Meetings with technical staff on project updates
3. Network Design
 Review each locations network firewalls, switches and wireless
 Design meeting with client IT
2. HQ Firewall Upgrade
1. Network Preparation
 Physical review of network closet
 Obtain necessary IP address for the equipment and appliances
 Build network documentation framework for location
 Acquire existing VPN pre-shared keys from client
2. Firewall Cloud Services
 Build client support portals and add required users

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 3/11

Time and Materials SOW
 Register devices and licenses
3. Appliance Configuration
 None
4. Firewall Configuration
 Register and update firewall
 Configure (1) firewall for the proposed design
 Configure security services to best practice
1. Note: Best effort will be made to make different firewall vender settings match
 Build Remote User VPN solution with MFA via Entra
 Write and provide customer with user instructions for connecting to the VPN
 Install and Configure Fortinet SSO agent on domain controller
 Build Security Fabric
1. Azure firewall to be Hub
 Build SDVPN Overlays
1. Azure Firewall to be the Hub
5. After Hours Firewall Cutover
 Disconnect cables and remove current firewalls
 Rack new firewalls and verify connectivity and routing
1. Client IT necessary to verify client and application connectivity
6. Access Switch Configuration (1 closets)
 Unbox and update firmware on 2 switches
 Review configuration on existing switches (unmanaged)
 Label cables of importance
 Build and apply base configuration to 2 switches
 Prepare for cutover
7. Normal Hours Access Switch Cutover (1 closets)
 Remove existing switch and rack/re-patch new switch
 Test and verify network connectivity
1. Note: Client required to test application functionality
8. Access Point Configuration
 Unbox and label APs
 Power on APs and provision in the management portal
 Build configuration based on proposed designed
 Update firmware to the latest available
 Test AP settings to make sure they are working as expected\

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 4/11

Time and Materials SOW
9. Wireless Placement
 Work with <VAR or client> to hang APs in designed locations
 Work to connect the APs to the designed switch ports
 Test coverage and wireless connectivity to all APs
10. Cutover Post Support
 Update Visio diagram and Network Spreadsheet documenting the firewall configuration
 Provide up to (2) hours of solution admin training regarding the current setup
 Provide post-support from network changes
3. Spoke Firewall Upgrade – 5 Sites
1. Network Preparation
 Physical review of network closet
 Obtain necessary IP address for the equipment and appliances
 Build network documentation framework for location
 Acquire existing VPN pre-shared keys from client
2. SDWAN Configuration
 Prepare SDWAN test network
 Configure SDWAN Scripts
 Apply SDWAN configuration to Hub and Spoke firewalls
 Test configuration and adjust as needed
 Repackage firewalls for onsite shipping
3. Firewall Configuration
 Register and update firewall
 Configure (5) firewall for the proposed design
 Configure security services to best practice
1. Note: Best effort will be made to make different firewall vender settings match
 Install and Configure Fortinet SSO agent on domain controller
 Build Security Fabric
1. Join the Security Fabric
 Build SDVPN Overlays
1. Join the SDWAN Overlays
4. After Hours Firewall Cutover
 Disconnect cables and remove current firewalls
 Rack new firewalls and verify connectivity and routing
1. Client IT necessary to verify client and application connectivity
5. Access Switch Configuration (2 closets)
 Unbox and update firmware on 2 switches
QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 5/11

Time and Materials SOW
 Review configuration on existing switches (unmanaged)
 Label cables of importance
 Build and apply base configuration to 2 switches
 Prepare for cutover
6. After Hours Access Switch Cutover (2 closets)
 Remove existing switch and rack/re-patch new switch
 Test and verify network connectivity
1. Note: Client required to test application functionality
7. Access Point Configuration
 Unbox and label APs
 Power on APs and provision in the management portal
 Build configuration based on proposed designed
 Update firmware to the latest available
 Test AP settings to make sure they are working as expected\
8. Wireless Placement
 Work with <VAR or client> to hang APs in designed locations
 Work to connect the APs to the designed switch ports
 Test coverage and wireless connectivity to all APs
9. Cutover Post Support
 Update Visio diagram and Network Spreadsheet documenting the firewall configuration
 Provide post-support from network changes
4. Project Management
1. Project Management
 Pre-project meeting – verify scope, define timelines, setup milestones and
responsibilities
 Project management meetings and communication
 Post-project discussion to verify the scope completed and project hours
 Sign-off
Out of Scope
 DPI-SSL configuration is not included in this SOW
 Firewall SSO will not be configured in this SOW
 End user configuration of client VPNs is not included in this SOW
 No changes to remote site-to-site VPN connectivity will be made in this SOW
 Patch cables are not included in this SOW and we expect to use existing cables
 This proposal does not include labor or material for physical wiring
QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 6/11

Time and Materials SOW
 Proposal assumes POE switching on fully managed switches
 Customer may need to purchase additional APs which Cyber Advisors may recommend for
coverage.
 No wireless intrusion prevention is supplied or configured.
 No Radius or WPA-Enterprise configuration is provided in this SOW
 No adjustments to end-user devices are included in this SOW
 Changes to client computers is not covered in this SOW
 Items not listed in the SOW are out of scope

Total SOW Estimate:
$75,328.58
All fees, pricing, and totals set forth in this agreement exclude applicable taxes and surcharges. Actual Time hours are billed.
Contractual services required beyond the scope of this Statement of Work or any other subsequently agreed upon versions of
this Statement of Work will be negotiated through the Change Control process, professional service fees may vary according to
degree and scope of work. Time and Material Projects are subject to progress billing on a monthly basis and will be invoiced on
actual time hours. Fixed Fee Projects are billed fifty percent (50%) upfront upon signature and fifty percent (50%) upon project
completion. Additional payment terms are defined in the MSA.
Cyber Advisors reserves the right to modify the engagement via a written change order process that must be mutually agreed
upon before work is performed if the SOW is signed and executed 60 days after the date of delivery of the SOW. This change
order can include changes in steps to be performed and may include an increase or decrease in charges. Please be advised
that project cancellations requested by the customer may incur a $500 cancellation fee. A cancellation fee will not apply if the
cancellation is made within 48 hours after contract execution.
Important Notes: Travel charges extra and billed actual. The rate listed is for work performed M-F 8AM-5PM CST. Anything
outside of these hours are billed at time and a half.
CHANGE CONTROL
Throughout this Statement of Work, assumptions have been made and stated concerning the scope of the services to be
provided. Every effort has been made to anticipate the most typical and most likely situations that will be encountered. The
pricing of these services is predicated on those stated assumptions. When work is requested that is beyond the stated scope of
work, a change order will be executed that reflects the additional work and its price. When additional service is open-ended, it will
be priced at the hourly rates indicated in the Terms and Conditions, Unscheduled Work and Labor Rates section. Otherwise, it
will be priced on a bid-specific basis.
Should CLIENT require any changes, they should be submitted in writing for consideration. Any change to this project will require
a new Statement of Work or the proper sign off on a Cyber Advisors Change Control form. This will outline the changes in the
scope of work and any necessary adjustments in scheduling, and or/pricing CLIENT will provide the names of people who have
the authority to initiate Change Control. All parties are named in the Change Control Authorization section.
AUTHORIZATION
Cyber Advisors is pleased to provide this contract to City of Carver. Signature on this agreement signifies acceptance of both the
price and the standard terms. In addition to the terms listed in this agreement, the client also agrees to the terms of Cyber
Advisors’ Master Service Agreement located at: https://cyberadvisors.com/legal

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 7/11

Time and Materials SOW
Hardware
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

FortiGate-40F Hardware plus 3 Year 24x7 FortiCare and FortiGuard
Unified Threat Protection (UTP) - 5 Port - 10/100/1000Base-T - Gigabit
Ethernet - 5 x RJ-45 - 3 Year Forticare and Fortiguard Unified (UTM)
Protection - Wall Mountable - TAA Compliant

$1,285.80

1

$1,285.80

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE Wireless Access Point Indoor

$488.89

1

$488.89

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service (Renewal) - 3 Year Service - Service Depot - Exchange

$132.99

1

$132.99

Rackmount Kit for FortiGate

$150.00

1

$150.00

Fortinet FortiGate FG-90G Network Security/Firewall Appliance Content Security - 10 Port

$5,666.36

1

$5,666.36

Fortinet SFP+ Network Cable - 3.28 ft SFP+ Network Cable for
Network Device - 10 Gbit/s

$49.34

4

$197.36

Fortinet FortiSwitch Ethernet Switch - 48 Ports - Manageable Gigabit Ethernet, 10 Gigabit Ethernet - 10/100/1000Base-T, 10GBaseX - 2 Layer Supported

$1,958.55

2

$3,917.10

Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service
(Renewal) - 3 Year - Service - 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service
Depot - Exchange - Parts

$559.54

2

$1,119.08

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE Wireless Access Point Indoor

$488.89

8

$3,911.12

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service (Renewal) - 3 Year Service - Service Depot - Exchange

$132.99

8

$1,063.92

Rackmount Kit for FortiGate

$150.00

1

$150.00

$2,380.74

1

$2,380.74

Church

City Hall

Fire Hall
Fortinet FortiGate FG-70G Network Security/Firewall Appliance Intrusion Prevention - 10 Port 3 Year FortiCare Premium and
FortiGuard UTM

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 8/11

Hardware
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

Fortinet FortiAP 231K Tri Band Wi-Fi 7 IEEE Wireless Access Point Indoor

$488.89

4

$1,955.56

Fortinet FortiCare Premium - Extended Service (Renewal) - 3 Year Service - Service Depot - Exchange

$133.01

4

$532.04

$1,958.55

1

$1,958.55

Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service
(Renewal) - 3 Year - Service - 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service
Depot - Exchange - Parts

$559.54

1

$559.54

Rackmount Kit for FortiGate

$150.00

1

$150.00

$2,290.01

1

$2,290.01

$2,290.01

1

$2,290.01

$150.00

1

$150.00

Fortinet FortiSwitch 108F Ethernet Switch - 8 Ports - Manageable PoE Ports

$319.95

1

$319.95

Fortinet FortiCare Comprehensive Support - Extended Service
(Renewal) - 3 Year - Service - 24 x 7 x Next Business Day - Service
Depot - Exchange - Parts

$84.55

1

$84.55

Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5
Port - 3 Year FortiCare 24X7 Service + FortiGuard

$2,290.01

1

$2,290.01

Miscellaneous Patch Cables and Connectors

$200.00

1

$200.00

Order handling fee

$250.00

1

$250.00

Subtotal:

$33,493.58

Fortinet FortiSwitch Ethernet Switch - 48 Ports - Manageable Gigabit Ethernet, 10 Gigabit Ethernet

Lift Station
Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5
Port - 3 Year FortiCare 24X7 Service + FortiGuard
Water Tower
Fortinet FortiWifi FWF-40F Network Security/Firewall Appliance - 5
Port - 3 Year FortiCare 24X7 Service + FortiGuard
Rackmount Kit for FortiGate
Water Treatment

Miscellaneous

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 9/11

Time and Materials Service Estimate
Description

Price

Qty

Ext. Price

All services are provided on a time-and-materials basis. Any estimates are non-binding and reflect good-faith projections only.
Client acknowledges that actual fees may exceed the estimated amounts based on actual time and materials required.

Standard Networking Engineering

$225.00

175

$39,375.00

Standard Project Management

$165.00

10

$1,650.00

Expense Estimate

$810.00

1

$810.00

Subtotal:

$41,835.00

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

P. 10/11

City of Carver - Fortinet Project
Prepared by:

Prepared for:

Quote Information:

Cyber Advisors - Maple Grove Office
Dex Holthaus
763-316-0561
[email protected]

City of Carver
316 Broadway
PO Box 147
Carver, MN 55315
Lynn Tschudi
(952) 448-8744
[email protected]

Quote #: 039348
Version: 1
Delivery Date: 06/10/2026
Expiration Date: 06/30/2026

Quote Summary
Description

Amount

Hardware

$33,493.58

Time and Materials Service Estimate

$41,835.00
Total:

$75,328.58

Summary of Selected Payment Options
Description

Amount

Term Options: One Time Payment
Total of Payments

$33,493.58

Taxes, shipping, handling and other fees may apply. We reserve the right to cancel orders arising from pricing or other errors.

Cyber Advisors - Maple Grove Office

City of Carver

Signature:

Signature:

Name:

Dex Holthaus

Name:

Title:

Senior Account Executive

Date:

Date:

06/10/2026

QUOTE # 039348 - V.1

Lynn Tschudi

P. 11/11

CITY COUNCIL MEMO
MEETING DATE:

June 15, 2026

SUBMITTED BY:

Lynn Tschudi, Finance Director

SUBJECT:

Sensus Saas Agreement

REQUEST FOR ACTION
Accept the Sensus Software-as-a-Service Agreement for AMI Project
OVERVIEW
The City is currently in the process of transitioning to an Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) system
to improve water utility operations, data accuracy, and customer service. As part of this transition, a
Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform is required to support meter data collection, management, and
reporting.
This agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET
N/A
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
1) Sensus Saas Agreement

Software as a Service Agreement
between
City of Carver, Minnesota
(“Customer”)
and
Sensus USA Inc.
(“Sensus”)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Software as a Service (“Agreement”) to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives as of the day and year written below. The date of the last party to sign is the “Effective Date.”
This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and continue for/until: 5 Years (“Initial Term”). At the end of the Initial
Term, this Agreement shall automatically renew for an additional term of 5 years (“Renewal Term”) unless Customer
provides written notice to Sensus of its desire to not renew the Agreement one hundred twenty (120) days before the end of
the Initial Term. The “Term” shall refer to both the Initial Term and the Renewal Term.
THE CITY OF CARVER:
By:
Its:

Courtney Johnson
Mayor

Date:

By:
Its:

SENSUS:
By:
Its:
Date:

Brent Mareck
City Manager

Date:

Contents of this Agreement:
Agreement
Exhibit A Software
Exhibit B Technical Support

1

Agreement
1. General
A. Agreement Generally. The scope of this Agreement includes Sensus providing the specified services, usage terms for Sensus’ hosted Software solution,
leased spectrum, technical support, and supporting terms and conditions for an advanced metering infrastructure solution in consideration of Customer’s
purchase and payment to Sensus’ Authorized Distributor under separate agreement by and between Customer and Sensus’ Authorized Distributor, for all such
goods and services.
2.
Software.
A.
Software as a Service (“SaaS”)
i Sensus shall provide Customer with SaaS, as defined in Exhibit A, and Technical Support during the Term and only so long as Customer is current in its
payments for such services. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Sensus will have no obligation to provide any further Services or
Technical Support.
ii Sensus will provide Technical Support for any given Release in accordance with Exhibit B for four (4) years from the date Sensus issues the Release.
Sensus will provide Engineering Support of any given release for two (2) years from the date Sensus issues the Release. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
in the event of a critical security vulnerability (in Sensus’ reasonable discretion), Customer acknowledges (i) that in order to receive particular vulnerability
or defect corrections (whether by Patch, Update or Upgrade), Customer may need to move to a more recent supported Release of the Software, and (ii)
Sensus reserves the right to discontinue supporting Releases of the Software, including in the event such Software has been identified by Sensus as end
of life. Sensus may declare Software “end of life” upon either (i) the relevant window of Technical Support or Engineering Support ending or (ii) becoming
aware of a security incident or vulnerability.
B. UCITA. To the maximum extent permitted by law, the parties agree that the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act as enacted by any state shall not
apply, in whole or in part, to this Agreement.
3.
Spectrum
A. Spectrum Lease. The parties previously entered into a spectrum manager lease on 10/21/2014 (the “Spectrum Lease”), which is hereby specifically
incorporated by reference.
4.
Equipment.
A. Purchase of Equipment. Customer shall purchase all Field Devices, and other goods (collectively, “Equipment”) from Sensus’ authorized distributor pursuant
to the terms and conditions (including any warranties on such Equipment) agreed by Customer and Sensus’ authorized distributor. This Agreement shall not
affect any terms and conditions, including any warranty terms, agreed by Customer and Sensus' authorized distributor. If Customer elects to purchase any
equipment or services directly from Sensus, or if Customer pays any fees or other costs to Sensus, then Sensus’ Terms of Sale shall apply. The “Terms of
Sale” are available at: Warranties, Terms and Policies | Xylem US, or 1-800-METER-IT
B. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES IN THIS AGREEMENT, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. SENSUS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND/OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESSED, IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING ANY MATTER IN
CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES AS TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE,
MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, SENSUS MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR PROMISE (I)
THAT ITS SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE, SOFTWARE OR OTHER SERVICES WILL OPERATE IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANY SOFTWARE, SERVICES
OR PRODUCTS PROVIDED BY THIRD PARTIES, (II) THAT THE OPERATION OF THE SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE OR ANY SENSUS SOFTWARE
WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR OR VULNERABILITY FREE, OR (III) THAT ALL DEFECTS, BUGS, ERRORS OR VULNERABILITIES CAN OR
WILL BE FIXED OR REMEDIATED. CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SENSUS DOES NOT CONTROL THE TRANSFER OF DATA OVER THE
INTERNET OR ACROSS OTHER NETWORKS, AND THE SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE MAY BE SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONS, DELAYS, AND OTHER
PROBLEMS INHERENT IN THE USE OR OPERATION OF SUCH INTERNET OR NETWORKS. SENSUS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES,
INCIDENTS, DELAYS, DELIVERY PROBLEMS, OR OTHER PROBLEMS RESULTING FROM SUCH INTERNET OR NETWORK PROBLEMS. IN NO
EVENT IS SENSUS RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR ANY ISSUES RELATED TO THE PERFORMANCE, OPERATION OR SECURITY OF THE
SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE OR ANY SENSUS SOFTWARE THAT ARISE FROM CUSTOMER’S OR ITS THIRD PARTIES’ ENVIRONMENT; FAILURE TO
IMPLEMENT PATCHES, UPDATES OR UPGRADES; SYSTEMS; CONTENT; NETWORKS; OR DEVICES. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY
STATED IN THIS AGREEMENT, CUSTOMER ASSUMES ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND RISK FOR ITS USE OF THE SOFTWARE AS A SERVICE,
SENSUS SOFTWARE AND OTHER SERVICES PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT.
5.
Services.
A. Installation of Equipment. Installation services for Field Devices, other goods, and RF Field Equipment will be as agreed between the Customer and Sensus'
authorized distributor. Sensus will not provide installation services pursuant to this Agreement. Sensus is not responsible for any problems that arise from the
installation services (e.g., faulty configuration).
B. Technical Support. Sensus shall provide Customer the technical support set forth in Exhibit B.
C. Project Management. Sensus’ authorized distributor will provide project management services to Customer. Any project management of the FlexNet System
provided by Sensus shall be subject to a separate agreement which describes the scope and pricing for such work.
D. Training. Sensus’ authorized distributor will provide Customer with training on the use of the FlexNet System. Any training provided by Sensus shall be
subject to a separate agreement which describes the scope and pricing for such work.
E. IT Systems Integration Services. Except as may otherwise be provided herein, integration of the Software into Customer’s new or existing internal IT
systems is not included in this Agreement. Any integration work shall be subject to a separate agreement which describes the scope and pricing for such work.
F.
WAN Backhaul connection services are not included in this Agreement.
6.
General Terms and Conditions.
A. Infringement Indemnity. Sensus shall indemnify and hold harmless Customer from and against any judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction or
settlement reached by Sensus from any litigation instituted against Customer in the United States by a third party to the extent alleging that the FlexNet
System as provided hereunder infringes upon the patents or copyrights of such third party, provided that Sensus shall have the right to select counsel in such
proceedings and control such proceedings and any settlement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Sensus shall have no obligation or liability under this indemnity
unless Customer cooperates fully with and assists Sensus in any such proceedings and gives Sensus written notice of any claim hereunder within fourteen
(14) days of receiving it. Further, Sensus shall have no obligation or liability hereunder if such claim is related to; (i) any change, modification or alteration
made to the FlexNet System by Customer or a third party, (ii) use of the FlexNet System in combination with any goods or services not provided by Sensus
2

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.
I.

hereunder, (iii) Customer’s failure to use the most recent version of the Software or to otherwise take any corrective action as reasonably directed by Sensus,
(iv) compliance by Sensus with any designs, specifications or instructions provided by Customer or compliance by Sensus with an industry standard, or (v) any
use of the FlexNet System other than for the Permitted Use or in a manner that exceeds the licenses and rights provided herein. In the event the FlexNet
System is adjudicated to infringe a patent or copyright of a third party and its use is enjoined, or, if in the reasonable opinion of Sensus, the FlexNet System is
likely to become the subject of an infringement claim, Sensus, at its sole discretion and expense, may at its option; (i) procure for Customer the right to
continue using the FlexNet System or (ii) modify or replace the FlexNet System so that it becomes non-infringing. THIS SECTION STATES CUSTOMER’S
SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY AND SENSUS’ ENTIRE LIABILITY AND OBLIGATION FOR ANY CLAIM OF INFRINGEMENT.
Limitation of Liability. Sensus’ aggregate liability in any and all causes of action arising under, out of or in relation to this Agreement, its negotiation,
performance, breach or termination (collectively “Causes of Action”) shall not exceed the greater of; (a) the total amount paid by Customer directly to Sensus
under this Agreement; or (b) ten thousand US dollars (USD 10,000.00). This is so whether the Causes of Action are in tort, including, without limitation,
negligence or strict liability, in contract, under statute or otherwise. As separate and independent limitations on liability, Sensus’ liability shall be limited to
direct damages. Sensus shall not be liable for; (i) any indirect, incidental, special or consequential damages; nor (ii) any revenue or profits lost by Customer or
its Affiliates, including from any End User(s), irrespective whether such lost revenue or profits is categorized as direct damages or otherwise; nor (iii) any
In/Out Costs; nor (v) damages arising from maincase or bottom plate breakage caused by freezing temperatures, water hammer conditions, or excessive
water pressure. The limitations on liability set forth in this Agreement are fundamental inducements to Sensus entering into this Agreement. They apply
unconditionally and in all respects. They are to be interpreted broadly so as to give Sensus the maximum protection permitted under law.
Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement earlier than the end of the Term if the other party commits a material breach of this Agreement and
such material breach is not cured within forty-five (45) days of written notice by the other party. Upon any expiration or termination of this Agreement, Sensus’
and Customer’s obligations hereunder shall cease and the software as a service and Spectrum Lease shall immediately cease.
Force Majeure. If Sensus becomes unable, either wholly or in part, by an event of Force Majeure, to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, the obligations
affected by the event of Force Majeure will be suspended during the continuance of that inability. The party affected by the force majeure will take reasonable
steps to mitigate the Force Majeure. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event will Sensus be liable for the consequences or impact of any
Force Majeure event.
Temporary Service Suspension. Sensus may suspend the Services without liability if: (i) Customer fails to pay Sensus or its authorized distributor when
payment is due; (ii) Sensus reasonably believes that the Services are being used in violation of the Agreement; (iii) Sensus is required by applicable law or by
a regulatory or government body to suspend Customer’s access to the Services; (iv) a Force Majeure event requires Sensus to suspend Customer’s access;
or (v) there is another event for which Sensus reasonably believes that the suspension of Services is necessary to protect the Services. Sensus will give
Customer advance notice of a suspension where reasonably possible under the circumstances. If a suspension is based on Customer’s breach of Customer’s
obligations under the Agreement, Sensus may continue to charge Customer the fees for the Services during suspension.
Intellectual Property Rights.
i. Software and Materials. No Intellectual Property is assigned to Customer hereunder. Excluding Customer Data, Sensus shall own or continue to own all
right, title, and interest in and to the Intellectual Property associated with the Software and related documentation, including any derivations and/or
derivative works (the “Sensus IP”). To the extent, if any, that any ownership interest in and to such Sensus IP does not automatically vest in Sensus by
virtue of this Agreement or otherwise, and instead vests in Customer, Customer agrees to grant and assign and hereby does grant and assign to Sensus
all right, title, and interest that Customer may have in and to such Sensus IP. Customer agrees not to reverse engineer any Sensus Products purchased
or provided hereunder.
ii. Customer Data. Notwithstanding the prior paragraph, as between Customer and Sensus, Customer remains the owner of all right, title or interest in or to
any Customer Data. “Customer Data” means solely usage data collected by the Field Devices. To avoid doubt, Customer Data does not include nonEnd User usage data collected by the Field Devices, Software, or FlexNet System, such as network and equipment status information or the like.
Customer represents to Sensus that Customer (i) has sufficient rights in all Customer Data, to hold the Customer Data and deliver it to Sensus as
required for the Services to be performed as contemplated in the Agreement, and (ii) has obtained (and is responsible for maintaining) from all
individuals, persons and third parties whose personal information is contained in the Customer Data all required consents and authorizations, and has
provided to all individuals, persons, and third parties the notices with respect to the collection, retention, disclosure and use of the Customer Data as
contemplated for the purposes of this Agreement that are required under applicable foreign, federal and state laws and regulations, including but not
limited to relevant privacy laws and regulations.
iii. Consent to Use of Customer Data. Customer hereby irrevocably grants to Sensus a world-wide royalty-free, non-exclusive, irrevocable right and license
to access, store, and use such Customer Data and any other data or information provided to Sensus, to (1) provide the Service; (2) analyze and improve
the Service; (3) analyze and improve any Sensus equipment, software, or service; or (4) for any other internal use. As used herein, “Service” means
Sensus' obligations under this Agreement, such as the Software as a Service.
iv. Access to Customer Data. Within 45 days of Customer’s written request, Sensus will provide Customer a copy of the previous 24 months of data
collected by the FlexNet System in a format of Sensus’ discretion and deliver the file to a drop location specified by Customer.
Data Privacy. Customer acknowledges and agrees that Sensus and its Affiliates (collectively, “Xylem”) may collect and process personal data for the
purposes outlined in this Agreement and in Xylem’s then-current privacy policy. Xylem’s data privacy policy is available and maintained at
https://www.xylem.com/en-us/support/privacy/ or any successor web page designated by Xylem from time-to-time. The collection and use of personal data by
Customer, including providing necessary notices and obtaining required consents from end users, is Customer’s sole responsibility. Sensus understands and
agrees that Customer is subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13 which will prevail in the event of any conflict with this Agreement.
Right to use Feedback. Customer grants Sensus a royalty-free, worldwide, irrevocable, perpetual license to use, aggregate, alter or incorporate into the
Services any suggestions, enhancement requests, recommendations or other feedback provided by Customer or its employees and agents.
Confidentiality. Except as may be required under applicable law, court order, or regulation, or to the extent permitted under or required to perform and
enforce this Agreement, both parties shall (and shall cause their employees and contractors to) keep all Confidential Information strictly confidential and shall
not disclose it to any third party. Without limiting any other obligations in this Agreement, Customer shall not provide Sensus’s Confidential Information to any
person who designs or develops software products or services that compete with Sensus’s software products and services. The Confidential Information may
be transmitted orally, in writing, electronically or otherwise observed by either party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, “Confidential Information” shall not include;
(i) any information that is in the public domain other than due to Recipient’s breach of this Agreement; (ii) any information in the possession of the Recipient
without restriction prior to disclosure by the Discloser; or (iii) any information independently developed by the Recipient without reliance on the information
disclosed hereunder by the Discloser. “Discloser” means either party that discloses Confidential Information, and “Recipient” means either party that receives
it. The receiving party will return or destroy the other party’s Confidential Information upon receiving written notice from the other party, provided that such
return or destruction does not interfere with the receiving party’s rights and obligations under this Agreement, including Sensus’ right to use Customer Data.
3

J.

K.

L.
M.

N.
O.

P.
Q.
R.

S.
T.

7.

The foregoing does not require the receiving party to search its archived electronic back-up files of its computer systems for the other party’s Confidential
Information to purge such Confidential Information from its archived files; provided, however, that the receiving party must: (i) maintain the confidentiality of
such archived Confidential Information as if this Agreement were still in effect and (ii) not use such archived Confidential Information for any purpose.
Public Record(s). Sensus acknowledges that Customer is a governmental entity and subject to the public records laws and regulations set forth in Chapter 13
of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the “Act”). Customer’s records, including this Agreement, are public records and are subject to inspection
and copying by any person unless there is an applicable exception, or the record is declared to be not public data under the Act. Customer shall notify Sensus
as soon as practicable after receiving a request under the Act for any records which would constitute Confidential Information and to the extent allowed by law,
Customer shall apply exceptions to disclosure of the Confidential Information that are applicable under the Acts. If a suit is filed by a member of the public with
respect to any such request, Customer will cooperate in any action to intervene filed by Sensus. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the
contrary, Sensus will indemnify and hold harmless City for any and all costs and attorneys’ fees awarded to a prevailing plaintiff arising out of or related to a
suit which result from Customer’s actions, taken at Sensus’ request, in compliance with this provision in protecting the Confidential Information from public
disclosure.
Compliance with Laws. Customer shall comply with all applicable country, federal, state, and local laws and regulations, as set forth at the time of
acceptance and as may be amended, changed, or supplemented. Customer shall not take any action or permit the taking of any action by a third party, which
may render Sensus liable for a violation of applicable laws.
i. Export Control Laws. Customer shall; (i) comply with all applicable U.S. and local laws and regulations governing the use, export, import, re-export,
and transfer of products, technology, and services; and (ii) obtain all required authorizations, permits, and licenses. Customer shall immediately notify
Sensus and immediately cease all activities with regards to the applicable transaction, if the Customer knows or has a reasonable suspicion that the
equipment, software, or services provided hereunder may be directed to countries in violation of any export control laws. By ordering equipment,
software or services, Customer certifies that it is not on any U.S. government export exclusion list.
ii. Anti-Corruption Laws. Customer shall comply with the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78dd-1, et seq.; laws and
regulations implementing the OECD’s Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions; the U.N.
Convention Against Corruption; the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption; and any other applicable laws and regulations relating to anticorruption in the Customer’s county or any country where performance of this Agreement, or delivery or use of equipment, software or services will
occur.
Non-Waiver of Rights. A waiver by either party of any breach of this Agreement or the failure or delay of either party to enforce any of the articles or other
provisions of this Agreement will not in any way affect, limit or waive that party’s right to enforce and compel strict compliance with the same or other articles or
provisions.
Assignment and Sub-contracting. Either party may assign, transfer or delegate this Agreement without requiring the other party’s consent; (i) to an Affiliate;
(ii) as part of a merger; or (iii) to a purchaser of all or substantially all of its assets. Apart from the foregoing, neither party may assign, transfer or delegate this
Agreement without the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Furthermore, Customer acknowledges Sensus
may use subcontractors to perform RF Field Equipment installation, the systems integration work (if applicable), or project management (if applicable), without
requiring Customer’s consent.
Amendments. No alteration, amendment, or other modification shall be binding unless in writing and signed by both Customer and by a vice president (or
higher) of Sensus.
Governing Law and Dispute Resolution. This Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware. Any and all disputes arising under, out of, or in relation to this Agreement, its negotiation, performance or termination (“Disputes”) shall first be
resolved by mediation between the parties. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE PARTIES AGREE TO A BENCH TRIAL AND THAT
THERE SHALL BE NO JURY IN ANY DISPUTES.
Survival. The provisions of this Agreement that are applicable to circumstances arising after its termination or expiration shall survive such termination or
expiration.
Severability. In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be void, unlawful or otherwise unenforceable, that provision will be severed from the
remainder of the Agreement and replaced automatically by a provision containing terms as nearly like the void, unlawful, or unenforceable provision as
possible; and the Agreement, as so modified, will continue to be in full force and effect.
Four Corners. This written Agreement, including all of its exhibits and the Spectrum Lease, represents the entire understanding between and obligations of
the parties and supersedes all prior understandings, agreements, negotiations, and proposals, whether written or oral, formal or informal between the parties.
Any additional writings shall not modify any limitations or remedies provided in the Agreement. There are no other terms or conditions, oral, written, electronic
or otherwise. There are no implied obligations. All obligations are specifically set forth in this Agreement. Further, there are no representations that induced
this Agreement that are not included in it. The ONLY operative provisions are set forth in writing in this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, no purchase order placed by or on behalf of Customer shall alter any of the terms of this Agreement. The parties agree that such documents are for
administrative purposes only, even if they have terms and conditions printed on them and even if and when they are accepted and/or processed by Sensus.
Any goods, software or services delivered or provided in anticipation of this Agreement (for e.g., as part of a pilot or because this Agreement has not yet been
signed but the parties have begun the deployment) under purchase orders placed prior to the execution of this Agreement are governed by this Agreement
upon its execution and it replaces and supersedes any such purchase orders.
Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument. Additionally, this Agreement may be executed by facsimile or electronic copies, all of which shall be considered an
original for all purposes.
Audit. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 16C.05, subd. 5, and upon reasonable notice from Customer, Sensus must permit Customer, or its duly
authorized agents, the state auditor, or legislative auditor, reasonable access to Sensus’ books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and
practices, on a mutually agreed upon date and time, applicable to the Services provided under this Agreement for a minimum of six (6) years from the
termination or expiration of this Agreement.

Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
A.

B.

C.

D.
E.

“Affiliate” of a party means any other entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with such party, where “control” of an entity means the ownership,
directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of either; (i) the shares or other equity in such entity; or (ii) the voting rights in such entity.
“Confidential Information” means any and all non-public information of either party, including all technical or performance information about either party’s products or
services, pricing information, marketing and marketing plans, Customer’s End Users’ data, FlexNet System performance, FlexNet System architecture and design,
FlexNet System software, other business and financial information of either party, and all trade secrets of either party. For the avoidance of doubt, information about the
performance, operation, specifications, or features of the Services and FlexNet System is the Confidential Information of Sensus.
“End User” means any end user of electricity, water, and/or gas (as applicable) that pays Customer for the consumption of electricity, water, and/or gas, as applicable.
“Engineering Support” means providing Patches and Updates to Software.

“Field Devices” means the SmartPoint Modules.
4

F.

G.
H.

I.

J.
K.

L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
V.
W.
X.
Y.
Z.
AA.
BB.
CC.
DD.
EE.

“FlexNet Base Station” identifies the Sensus manufactured device consisting of one transceiver, to be located on a tower that receives readings from the SmartPoint
Modules (either directly or via an R100 unit) by radio frequency and passes those readings to the RNI by TCP/IP backhaul communication. For clarity, FlexNet Base
Stations include Metro Base Stations.
“FlexNet System” is comprised of the SmartPoint Modules, RF Field Equipment, Server Hardware, software licenses, Spectrum Lease, and other equipment provided
to Customer hereunder. The FlexNet System only includes the foregoing, as provided by Sensus. The FlexNet System does not include goods, equipment, software,
licenses or rights provided by a third party or parties to this Agreement.
“Force Majeure” means an event beyond a party’s reasonable control, including, without limitation, acts of God, hurricane, flood, volcano, tsunami, tornado, storm,
tempest, mudslide, vandalism, pandemic, illegal misconduct, sabotage, interruptions in power, communications or Internet service, acts of governments or governmentbacked actors, illegal or unauthorized radio frequency interference, strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances, unavailability of component parts of any goods
provided hereunder, acts of public enemies, wars, blockades, embargoes, insurrections, riots, epidemics, earthquakes, fires, restraints or prohibitions by any court,
board, department, commission or agency of the United States or any States, any arrests and restraints, civil disturbances and explosion.
“Hosted Software” means those items listed as an Application in Exhibit A.
“In/Out Costs” means any costs and expenses incurred by Customer in transporting goods between its warehouse and its End User’s premises and any costs and
expenses incurred by Customer in installing, uninstalling and removing goods.
“Intellectual Property” means patents and patent applications, inventions (whether patentable or not), trademarks, service marks, trade dress, copyrights, trade secrets,
know-how, data rights, specifications, drawings, designs, maskwork rights, moral rights, author’s rights, and other intellectual property rights, including any derivations
and/or derivative works, as may exist now or hereafter come into existence, and all renewals and extensions thereof, regardless of whether any of such rights arise under
the laws of the United States or of any other state, country or jurisdiction, any registrations or applications thereof, and all goodwill pertinent thereto.
“LCM” identifies the load control modules.
“Licensed Software” means the Software licensed hereunder pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.
“Ongoing Fee” means the annual or monthly fees, as applicable, to be paid by Customer to Sensus’ authorized distributor during the Term of this Agreement.
“Patches” means patches or other maintenance releases of the Software that correct processing errors and other faults, vulnerabilities and defects found in the Software.
For clarity, Patches are not Updates or Upgrades.
“Permitted Use” means only for reading and analyzing data from Customer’s Field Devices in the Service Territory. The Permitted Use does not include reading third
devices not provided by Sensus or reading Field Devices outside the Service Territory.
“R100 Unit” identifies the Sensus standalone, mounted transceiver that takes the radio frequency readings from the SmartPoint Modules and relays them by radio
frequency to the relevant FlexNet Base Station or directly to the RNI by TCP/IP backhaul communication, as the case may be.
“Release” means both Updates and Upgrades.
“Remote Transceiver” identifies the Sensus standalone, mounted relay device that takes the radio frequency readings from the SmartPoint Modules and relays them
directly to the RNI by TCP/IP backhaul communication.
“RF” means Radio Frequency.
“RF Field Equipment” means, collectively, FlexNet Base Stations, R100 units (if any) and Remote Transceivers (if any).
“RNI” identifies the regional network interfaces consisting of hardware and software used to gather, store, and report data collected by the FlexNet Base Stations from
the SmartPoint Modules. The RNI hardware specifications will be provided by Sensus upon written request from Customer.
“RNI Software” identifies the Sensus proprietary software used in the RNI and any Patches, Updates, and Upgrades that are provided to Customer pursuant to the
terms of this Agreement.
“Service Territory” identifies the geographic area where Customer utilizes Sensus equipment to provide services to End Users as of the Effective Date. This area will
be described on the propagation study in the parties’ Spectrum Lease filing with the FCC.
“Server Hardware” means the RNI hardware.
“SmartPoint™ Modules” identifies the Sensus transmission devices installed on devices such as meters, distribution automation equipment and demand/response
devices located at Customer’s End Users’ premises that communicate with the relevant devices and transmit those communications by radio frequency to the relevant
piece of RF Field Equipment.
“Software” means all the Sensus proprietary software provided as a service pursuant to this Agreement, and any Patches, Updates, and Upgrades that are provided to
Customer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The Software does not include any third-party software.
“Technical Support” means the services set forth on Exhibit B.
“Updates” means releases of the Software that constitute a minor improvement in functionality.
“Upgrades” means releases of the Software which constitute a significant improvement in functionality or architecture of the Software.
“WAN Backhaul” means the communication link between FlexNet Base Stations and Remote Transceivers and RNI.

Exhibit A
Software

Software as a Service
1.
Description of Services.
This exhibit contains the details of the SaaS that Sensus shall provide to Customer if both; (i) pricing for the application of Software as a Service has been provided
to the Customer; and (ii) the Customer is current in its payments to Sensus’ authorized distributor for such application of Software as a Service.
A. Software as a Service Generally.
SaaS is a managed service in which Sensus will be responsible for the day-to-day monitoring, maintenance, management, and supporting of Customer’s
Software tenant in Sensus’ (or its subcontractor’s) data centers. In a Software as a Service solution, Sensus owns (or has third parties operate or provide on
its behalf) all components of the solution (server hardware, storage, data center, network equipment, Sensus software, and all third-party software) required to
run and operate the Applications listed below. These software applications consist of the following (each an “Application”):
• Regional Network Interface (RNI) Software
• Sensus Analytics Software
• Xylem Data Lake
The managed application systems consist of the hardware, Sensus Software, and other third-party software that is required to operate the Applications. Each
5

B.

C.

D.

Application will have a production and disaster recovery (as described below) environment Test environments are not provided unless otherwise specifically
agreed by Sensus in writing. Sensus will manage the Applications by providing 24 x 7 x 365 monitoring of the availability and performance of the Applications.
Use of Software as a Service. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Sensus shall make Software as a Service available to Customer to access and use
solely for the Permitted Use and solely for so long as Customer is current in its payments to Sensus or its authorized distributor for Software as a Service. The
Software as a Service term commences on the date that Sensus first makes Software as a Service available to Customer for use and ends upon the earlier of:
(i) the expiration or termination of the Agreement; (ii) breach by Customer of this exhibit or the Agreement; or (iii) Customer’s termination of Software as a
Service as set forth in paragraph (C) below.
Termination of an Application. Customer shall have the option at any time before the end of the Term to terminate any Application by giving Sensus one
hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice. Such notice, once delivered to Sensus, is irrevocable. Should Customer elect to terminate any Application,
Customer acknowledges that; (a) Customer shall pay all applicable fees, including any unpaid Software as a Service fees due in the current calendar year plus
a ten percent (10%) early termination fee, where such fee is calculated based on the annual Software as a Service fee due in the current calendar year; and
(b) Software as a Service for such Application shall immediately cease. If Customer elects to terminate the RNI Application in the Software as a Service
environment but the Agreement has not expired or terminated, then upon delivery of the notice to Sensus, Customer shall purchase the necessary (a) RNI
hardware from a third party and (b) RNI software license at Sensus' then-current pricing. No portion of the Software as a Service fees shall be applied to the
purchase of the RNI hardware or software license.
Software as a Service means only the following services:
i. Sensus will provide the use of required hardware and or virtual environments, located at Sensus’ or a third-party’s data center facility (as determined by
Sensus), that is necessary to operate the Application.
ii.
iii.
iv.

v.

vi.

vii.

viii.

Sensus will provide production and disaster recovery environments for Applications.
Sensus will provide Patches, Updates, and Upgrades to latest Sensus Hosted Software release.
Sensus will configure and manage the equipment (server hardware, routers, switches, firewalls, etc.) in the data centers:
a.
Network addresses and virtual private networks (VPN)
b.
Standard time source (NTP or GPS)
c.
Security access points
d.
Respond to relevant alarms and notifications.
Capacity and performance management. Sensus will:
a.
Monitor capacity and performance of the Application server and software applications 24x7x365 using KPI metrics, thresholds, and alerts to
proactively identify any potential issues related to system capacity and/or performance (i.e., database, backspool, logs, message broker storage,
etc.)
b.
If an issue is identified to have a potential impact to the system, Sensus will open an incident ticket and manage the ticket through resolution per
Exhibit B, Technical Support.
c.
Manage and maintain the performance of the server and perform any change or configuration to the server, in accordance to standard
configuration and change management policies and procedures.
d.
Manage and maintain the server storage capacity and performance of the Storage Area Network (SAN), in accordance to standard configuration
and change management policies and procedures.
e.
Exceptions may occur to the system that require Sensus to take immediate action to maintain the system capacity and performance levels, and
Sensus has authority to make changes without Customer approval as needed, in accordance to standard configuration and change management
policies and procedures.
Database management. Sensus will:
a.
Implement the data retention plan and policy and will provide the policy upon request.
b.
Monitor space and capacity requirements.
c.
Respond to database alarms and notifications.
d.
Install database software Upgrades and Patches.
e.
Perform routine database maintenance and cleanup of database to improve capacity and performance, such as rebuilding indexes, updating
indexes, consistency checks, run SQL query/agent jobs, etc.
Incident and Problem Management. Sensus will:
a.
Proactively monitor managed systems (24x7x365) for key events and thresholds to detect and identify incidents.
b.
Respond to incidents and problems that may occur to the Application(s).
c.
Maintain policies and procedures for responding to incidents and performing root cause analysis for ongoing problems.
d.
Correlate incidents and problems where applicable.
e.
Sensus personnel will use the self-service portal to document and track incidents.
f.
In the event that Sensus personnel is unable to resolve an issue, the issue will be escalated to the appropriate Subject Matter Expert (SME).
g.
Maintain responsibility for managing incident and problems through resolution (which may include workarounds) and will coordinate with
Customer’s personnel and/or any required third-party vendor to resolve the issue.
h.
Provide telephone support consistent with Exhibit B, Technical Support in the case of undetected events.
Security Management. Sensus will:
a.
Monitor the physical and cyber security of the server and Application(s) 24x7x365 to ensure system is secure, consistence with NIST security
standards.
b.
Perform intrusion prevention and detection of the data center network and firewalls and monitor logs and alerts.
c.
Conduct periodic penetration testing of the network and data center facilities.
d.
Conduct monthly vulnerability scanning by both internal staff and external vendors.
e.
Perform anti-virus and Malware patch management on systems.
f.
Install updates to virus protection software and related files (including virus signature files and similar files) on all servers from the update being
generally available from the anti-virus software provider.
g.
Respond to threats found on the system and work to eliminate any virus or malware found.
h.
Adhere to and submit certification to NERC/CIP Cyber Security standards.
i.
Monitors industry regulations/standards regarding security – NERC, FERC, NIST, OpenSG, etc. through the Sensus security team.
j.
Provide secure web portal access (SSL) to the Application(s).
6

ix.

E.

F.

Backup and Disaster Recovery Management. Sensus will:
a.
Perform daily backups of data providing one (1) year of history for auditing and restoration purposes.
b.
Back-up and store data (on tapes or other storage media as appropriate) off-site to provide protection against disasters and to meet file recovery
needs.
c.
Conduct incremental and full back-ups to capture data, and changes to data, on the Application(s).
d.
Replicate the Application(s) environments to a geographically separated data center location to provide a full disaster recovery environment for the
Application production system.
e.
Generate a report following each and any disaster measuring performance against the disaster recovery plan and identification of problem areas
and plans for resolution.
f.
Maintain a disaster recovery plan. In the event of a disaster, Sensus shall provide the services in accordance with the disaster recovery plan.
g.
In the case of a disaster and loss of access to or use of the Application, Sensus would use commercially reasonable efforts per the Recovery Time
Objectives (“RTO”) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO) specified herein to restore operations at the same location or at a backup location within
forty-eight (48) hours.
h.
The Application shall have a “RTO” of forty-eight (48) hours.
i.
The RPO shall be a full recovery of the Application(s), with an RPO of one (1) hour, using no more than a twenty-four (24) hour old backup. All
meter-related data shall be pushed from each Base Station/TGB restoring the database to real-time minus external interfaced systems from the
day prior.
j.
Data from external interfaced systems shall be recreated within a forty-eight (48) hour period with the assistance of Customer personnel and staff,
as needed.
Customer Responsibilities:
i. Coordinate and schedule any changes submitted by Sensus to the system in accordance with standard configuration and change management
procedures.
ii. Participate in all required configuration and change management procedures.
iii. Customer will log incidents related to the managed Application with Sensus personnel via email, web portal ticket entry, or phone call.
iv. Responsible for periodic processing of accounts or readings (i.e., billing files) for Customer’s billing system for billing or other analysis purposes.
v. Responsible for any field labor to troubleshoot any SmartPoint modules or smart meters in the field in populations that have been previously deployed
and accepted.
vi. First response labor to troubleshoot FlexNet Base Station, R100s, Remote Transceivers or other field network equipment.
vii. Responsible for local area network security, configuration, management, and support.
viii. Identify and research problems with meter reads and meter read performance.
ix. Create and manage user accounts, and periodically change and update account credentials with strong passwords in accordance with security best
practices.
x. Customize application configurations.
xi. Support application users.
xii. Investigate application operational issues (e.g., meter reads, reports, alarms, etc.).
xiii. Respond to alarms and notifications.
xiv. Perform firmware upgrades over-the-air, or delegate and monitor field personnel for on-site upgrades.
xv. Maintain industry standard cybersecurity controls, standards, and best practices.
xvi. Monitor for and promptly implement Patches, Updates, and Upgrades, both as provided by Sensus and other third-party software and hardware
providers.
Software as a Service does not include any of the following services:
i. Parts or labor required to repair damage to any field network equipment that is the result of a Force Majeure event.
ii. Any integration between applications, such as Harris MeterSense, would require a Professional Services contract agreement to be scoped, submitted,
and agreed in a signed writing between Sensus and all the applicable parties.
If an item is not listed in subparagraphs in item (D) above, such item is excluded from the Software as a Service and is subject to additional pricing.

7

2. Further Agreements
A. System Uptime Rate.
i. Sensus (or its contractor) shall manage and maintain the Application(s) on computers owned or controlled by Sensus (or its contractors) and shall
provide Customer access to the managed Application(s) via internet or point to point connection (i.e., Managed-Access use), according to the terms
below. Sensus endeavors to maintain an average System Uptime Rate equal to ninety-nine (99.0) per Month (as defined below). The System Uptime
Rate, cumulative across all Applications, shall be calculated as follows:

ii.

iii.

iv.

System Uptime Rate = 100 x (TMO – Total Non-Scheduled Downtime minutes in the Month)
TMO
Calculations
a.
Targeted Minutes of Operation or TMO means total minutes cumulative across all Applications in the applicable month minus the Scheduled
Downtime in the Month.
b.
Scheduled Downtime means the number of minutes during the Month, as measured by Sensus, in which access to any Application is scheduled
to be unavailable for use by Customer due to planned system maintenance. Sensus shall provide Customer notice (via email or otherwise) at
least seven (7) days in advance of commencement of the Scheduled Downtime.
c.
Non-Scheduled Downtime means the number of minutes during the Month, as measured by Sensus, in which access to any Application is
unavailable for use by Customer due to reasons other than Scheduled Downtime or the Exceptions, as defined below (e.g., due to a need for
unplanned maintenance or repair).
Exceptions. Exceptions mean the following events:
• Force Majeure;
• Emergency Work, as defined below; and
• Lack of Internet Availability, as described below.
a.
Emergency Work. In the event that Force Majeure, emergencies, security incidents, dangerous conditions or other exceptional circumstances
arise or continue during TMO, Sensus shall be entitled to take any actions that Sensus, in good faith, determines is necessary or advisable to
prevent, remedy, mitigate, or otherwise address actual or potential harm, interruption, loss, threat, security or like concern to any of the
Application(s) (“Emergency Work”). Such Emergency Work may include, but is not limited to: analysis, testing, repair, maintenance, re-setting
and other servicing of the hardware, cabling, networks, software and other devices, materials and systems through which access to and/or use of
the Application(s) by the Customer is made available (the “Managed Systems”). Sensus shall endeavor to provide advance notice of such
Emergency Work to Customer when practicable and possible.
b.
Lack of Internet Availability. Sensus shall not be responsible for any deterioration of performance attributable to latencies in the public internet
or point-to-point network connection operated by a third party. Customer expressly acknowledges and agrees that Sensus does not and cannot
control the flow of data to or from Sensus’ networks and other portions of the Internet, and that such flow depends in part on the performance of
Internet services provided or controlled by third parties, and that at times, actions or inactions of such third parties can impair or disrupt data
transmitted through, and/or Customer’s connections to, the Internet or point-to-point data connection (or portions thereof). Although Sensus will
use commercially reasonable efforts to take actions Sensus may deem appropriate to mitigate the effects of any such events, Sensus cannot
guarantee that such events will not occur. Accordingly, Sensus disclaims any and all liability resulting from or relating to such events.
System Availability. For each month that the System Uptime Rates for the production RNI falls below 99.0%, Sensus will issue Customer the following
Service Level Credits:
System Uptime Rate per calendar month
Less than 99.0% but at least 97.5%

Less than 97.5% but at least 95.0%
Less than 95.0%

B.

Service Level Credit
5% of the monthly RNI SaaS Fees in which the service level default
occurred (Note: SaaS fees are pre-paid annually and for purposes
of Service Level Credits are computed on a monthly basis.)
10% of the monthly RNI SaaS Fees in which the service level
default occurred
20% of the monthly RNI SaaS Fees in which the service level
default occurred

Service Level Credits for any single month shall not exceed 20% of the RNI SaaS Fee associated with the month in which the service level default
occurred. Sensus records and data will be the sole basis for all Service Level Credit calculations and determinations, provided that such records and
data must be made available to Customer for review and agreement by Customer. To receive a Service Level Credit, Customer must issue a written
request no later than ten (10) days after the Service Level Credit accrues. Sensus will apply each valid Service Level Credit to the Customer’s invoice
within 2 billing cycles after Sensus’ receipt of Customer’s request and confirmation of the failure to meet the applicable Service Level Credit. Service
Level Credits will not be payable for failures to meet the System Uptime Rate caused by any Exceptions. No Service Level Credit will apply if Customer
is not current in its undisputed payment obligations under the Agreement. Service Level Credits are exclusive of any applicable taxes charged to
Customer or collected by Sensus. Sensus shall not refund an unused Service Level Credits or pay cash to Customer for any unused Service Level
Credits. Any unused Service Level Credits at the time the Agreement terminates will be forever forfeited. THE SERVICE LEVEL CREDITS DESCRIBED
IN THIS SECTION ARE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR SENSUS’ FAILURE TO MEET THE SYSTEM UPTIME REQUIREMENT OR ANY
DEFECTIVE SAAS PERFORMANCE. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF SERVICE LEVEL CREDITS IN ANY ANNUAL PERIOD
EXCEED 20% OF THE ANNUAL RNI SAAS FEE.
Data Center Site-Security. Although Sensus may modify such security arrangements without consent or notice to Customer, Customer acknowledges the
following are the current arrangements regarding physical access to and support of the primary hardware components of the Managed Systems:
i. The computer room(s) in which the hardware is installed is accessible only to authorized individuals.
ii. Power infrastructure includes one or more uninterruptible power supply (UPS) devices and diesel generators or other alternative power for back-up
electrical power.
iii. Air-conditioning facilities (for humidity and temperature controls) are provided in or for such computer room(s) and can be monitored and adjusted for
humidity and temperature settings and control. Such air systems are supported by redundant, back-up and/or switch-over environmental units.
iv. Such electrical and A/C systems are monitored on an ongoing basis and personnel are available to respond to system emergencies (if any) in real time.
8

3.

v. Dry pipe pre-action fire detection and suppression systems are provided.
vi. Data circuits are available via multiple providers and diverse paths, giving access redundancy.
C. Responsibilities of Customer.
i. Customer shall promptly pay all Software as a Service fees.
ii. Customer may not (i) carelessly, knowingly, intentionally or maliciously threaten, disrupt, harm, abuse or interfere with the Application(s), Managed
Systems or any of their functionality, performance, security or integrity, nor attempt to do so; (ii) impersonate any person or entity, including, but not
limited to, Sensus, a Sensus employee or another user; or (iii) forge, falsify, disguise or otherwise manipulate any identification information associated
with Customer’s access to or use of the Application(s).
iii. The provisioning, compatibility, operation, security, support, and maintenance of Customer’s hardware and software (“Customer’s Systems”) is
exclusively the responsibility of Customer. Customer is also responsible, in particular, for correctly configuring and maintaining (i) the desktop
environment used by Customer to access the Application(s) managed by Sensus; and (ii) Customer’s network router and firewall, if applicable, to allow
data to flow between the Customer’s Systems and Sensus’ Managed Systems in a secure manner via the public Internet.
iv. Upon receiving the system administrator account from Sensus, Customer shall create strong username and passwords for each of Customer’s
authorized users and complete the applicable Sensus registration process (Authorized Users). Such usernames, and passwords will allow Authorized
Users to access the Application(s). Customer shall be solely responsible for maintaining the security and confidentiality of each user ID and password
pair associated with Customer’s account, and Sensus will not be liable for any loss, damage or liability arising from Customer’s account or any user ID
and password pairs associated with Customer. Customer is fully responsible for all acts and omissions that occur through the use of Customer’s account
and any user ID and password pairs. Customer agrees (i) not to allow anyone other than the Authorized Users to have any access to, or use of
Customer’s account or any user ID and password pairs at any time; (ii) to notify Sensus immediately of any actual or suspected unauthorized use of
Customer’s account or any of such user ID and password pairs, or any other breach or suspected breach of security, restricted use or confidentiality;
and (iii) to take the Sensus-recommended steps to log out from and otherwise exit the Application(s) and Managed Systems at the end of each session.
Customer agrees that Sensus shall be entitled to rely, without inquiry, on the validity of the user accessing the Application(s) application through
Customer’s account, account ID, usernames, or passwords. Customer will ensure that its user ID and passwords are regularly (at least monthly)
changed, and that only strong user ID and password pairs are used.
v. Customer shall be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Application(s) and FlexNet System. This includes, without limitation, (i) researching
problems with meter reads and system performance, (ii) creating and managing user accounts, (iii) customizing application configurations, (iv)
supporting application users, (v) investigating application operational issues, (vi) responding to alarms and notifications, and (vii) performing over-the-air
commands (such as firmware updates or configuration changes).
D. Software Solution Components.
i. Description of Software Solutions. Sensus software consists of a core communication module and a set of applications. Some applications are
required to perform basic solution capabilities, other applications are optional and add additional capabilities and function to the overall solution. As
Customer’s business process expands and/or new Sensus offerings are made available, additional applications and functionality can dynamically be
added to the solution, provided Customer purchases such additional applications.
ii. Regional Network Interface. The Regional Network Interface (RNI) or Sensus head-end is the centralized intelligence of the FlexNet network; the RNI’s
primary objective is to transfer endpoint (such as meters) data to the Customer and the advanced feature applications. The RNI is adaptable to
Customer configurations by simultaneously supporting a wide range of FlexNet enabled endpoints; including but not limited to meters (electric, water,
gas) and other sensing devices.
iii. Xylem Data Lake. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Sensus will make the Xylem Data Lake (“XDL”) available to Customer to access and use
solely for the Permitted Use and solely for so long as Customer is current in its payments to Sensus or its authorized distributor for Software as a
Service. Sensus shall provide up to three (3) years of FlexNet System data and scan up to five hundred (500) GB per month of FlexNet System data. If
Customer exceeds the allotment of five hundred (500) GB per month of scanned data (regardless of the access method) an overage charge will be
assessed to Customer and be payable according to the terms outlined by Sensus’ authorized distributor. Sensus will also provide Customer XDL
training, which includes up to eight (8) hours of professional services consulting time.
Sensus Analytics.
Sensus Analytics is a cloud-based solution and data platform that allows storage and retrieval of raw reads and data from other sources for analysis, exportation, and
inquiry or reporting. The platform provides applications and reporting capabilities.
A.

Integration of Sensus Analytics. Sensus shall provide integration support services to Customer only to the extent specifically provided below:
i. Sensus shall provide Customer with a simple flat file specification known as VFlex for the integration of the Customer’s back-office system to the Sensus
Analytics modules. The VFlex shall contain the following types of information: Device ids, end users in the system, end user status, end user account
information, end username, and other end user details. This flat file may be delimited or fixed width. Customer shall produce this file and transmit it to the
FTP location designated by Sensus. When sent to the Sensus FTP servers, this file exchange will enable the system to become operational with the
Customer’s systems. Customer shall produce this file and transmit it to the FTP location designated by Sensus. Sensus will provide reasonable support
to explain to Customer the required vs. optional fields that are in the specification, testing and validation of the file format and content.
ii. In scope and included integration efforts: kick-off meeting to engage all required parties, mapping the Customer’s fields to the VFlex specification,
validation of expected output, and a two (2) hour system review of Sensus Analytics application and integration with the Customer’s system (conducted
remotely).
iii. Out of scope and subject to additional charges will be the transformation of data where business logic including code must be written to modify the field
content or format of the data to meet the VFlex specification.
iv. Sensus’ integration services consist of four (4) hours of assistance (remote or on-site, as determined by Sensus). If additional time is needed to
complete the integration efforts, Sensus shall invoice Customer for additional fees on an actual time and materials basis.
v. If an item is not listed in subparagraphs (i) or (ii) above, such item is excluded from the integration of Sensus Analytics Support and is
subject to additional pricing.
vi. Data Import. The Sensus Analytics Application contains adapters for the import of data from; (a) Customer’s FlexNet System; and/or (b) AutoRead
application for handheld and drive by systems, as applicable.
vii. Customer Acknowledgements.
a. Customer acknowledges that the Sensus Analytics Application provides up to fifty (50) user logins for Customer’s use.
b. Customer acknowledges and agrees the Sensus Analytics Application is based upon the actual number of End Users within Customer’s Service
Territory. Pricing may increase if Customer’s Service Territory or actual number of End Users expands.
c. Customer acknowledges and agrees that the Intellectual Property provisions of this Agreement apply in all respects to Customer’s access to and
use of the Sensus Analytics Applications.
9

d.
e.
f.
4.

Customer is responsible for validating the data analyzed by the Sensus Analytics Applications. Sensus makes no promises of improving
Customer’s operations or saving Customer money, nor is Sensus liable for any damages resulting from decisions made by Customer related to
Customer’s use of Sensus Analytics.
Customer acknowledges that data will be stored for three (3) years from upload and Sensus may delete the data after this time or upon termination
of the Agreement.
Customer acknowledges that all data related to the Sensus Analytics Applications is geographically hosted within the United States of America.
Customer accepts the geographic location of such hosting and indemnifies Sensus for any claims resulting therefrom.

Third-Party Software.
A. Sensus incorporates various third-party software in its Software, and such third-party software may change from time to time. Sensus takes reasonable efforts
to implement patches or other fixes as they become available in accordance with a particular version’s Engineering Support policy.

10

Exhibit B
Technical Support
1.

Introduction
Sensus Technical Services provides utility customers with a single point of contact for Tier 1 support of technical issues as well as any coordination of additional
resources required to resolve the issue. Requests that require specialized skills are to be forwarded to a senior support engineer or Technical Advisor within the
team for further analysis. If Technical Services has exhausted all troubleshooting efforts for the product type, the issue will escalate to the Engineering Support
Team. Occasionally, on-site troubleshooting/analysis may be required. The preferred order of on-site support is:

2.

a.

The Customer (for assistance with the easiest and lowest time-consuming activities such as power on/power off).

b.

The local distributor.

c.

Sensus employees or contracted personnel, if required to fulfill a contract commitment.

Support Categories
2.1. General questions regarding functionality, use of product, how-to, and requests for assistance on Sensus AMR, AMI, RF Network Equipment, Metering
Products, Sensus Lighting Control, and Demand Response Management System (FlexNet Home).
2.2. Proactive reporting and resolution of problems.
2.3. Reactive reporting to isolate, document, and solve reported hardware/software defects.
2.4. Responding to service requests and product changes.
2.5. Addressing customer inquiries with printed or electronic documentation, examples, or additional explanation/clarification.

3.

Support Hours
3.1.

4.

Standard Support Hours: Toll-free telephone support (1-800-638-3748 option #2) is available Monday thru Friday from 8:00 a.m. EST to 8:00 p.m. EST. Afterhours, holiday and weekend support for Severity 1 and Severity 2 issues is available by calling 1-800-638-3748, option #8.

Support Procedures
4.1. Customer identifies an issue or potential problem and calls Technical Services at 1-800-638-3748 Option #2. The Customer Service Associate or Technical
Support Engineer will submit a SalesForce ticket.
4.2. The Customer Service Associate or Technical Support Engineer will identify the caller name and utility by the assigned software serial number, city, and state
based on where the call originated. The Customer Service Associate or Technical Support Engineer will require a brief description of the problem symptoms,
or error messages depending on nature of the incident. The nature of the problem and severity levels will be mutually agreed upon by both parties (either at
the time the issue is entered or prior to upgrading or downgrading an existing issue) using the severity definitions below as a guideline. The severity level is
then captured into SalesForce for ticket creation and resolution processing. Any time during the processing of this ticket, if the severity level is changed by
Sensus, the customer will be updated.
a.

Severity Levels Description:
Sev1 Customer’s production system is down. The system is unusable resulting in total disruption of work. No workaround is available and requires
immediate attention.
Example: Network mass outage, all reading collection devices inoperable, inoperable head end software (e.g., FlexWare, Sensus MDM). Not able to
generate billing files.
Sev2 Major system feature/function failure. Operations are severely restricted; there is a major disruption of work, no acceptable work-around is
available, and failure requires immediate attention.
Examples: Examples: Network equipment failure (e.g., FlexNet Echo, FlexNet Remote, Base Station transceiver, or VGB); inoperable reading devices
(e.g., AR5500, VXU, VGB, or CommandLink); head end software application has important functionality not working and cannot create export file for
billing system operations.
Sev3 The system is usable and the issue doesn’t affect critical overall operation.
Example: Minor network equipment failure (e.g., Echo/Remote false alarms or Base Station transceiver false alarms); head end software application
operable but reports are not running properly, modification of view or some non-critical function of the software is not running.

4.3. The Customer Service Associate or Technical Support Engineer identifies whether or not the customer is on support. If the customer is not on support, the
customer is advised of the service options as well as any applicable charges that may be billed.
4.4. Calls are placed in a queue from which they are accessible to Technical Support Engineers on a first-come-first-served basis. A 1st level Customer Service
Associate may assist the customer, depending on the difficulty of the call and the representative’s technical knowledge. Technical Support Engineers (Tier 1
support) typically respond/resolve the majority of calls based on their product knowledge and experience. A call history for the particular account is
researched to note any existing pattern or if the call is a new report. This research provides the representative a basis and understanding of the account as
well as any associated problems and/or resolutions that have been communicated.
a.

Technical Services confirms that there is an issue or problem that needs further analysis to determine its cause. The following information must be
collected: a detailed description of the issue’s symptoms, details on the software/hardware product and version, a description of the environment in
which the issue arises, and a list of any corrective action already taken.

b.

Technical Services will check the internal database and product defect tracking system, to see if reports of a similar problem exist, and if any working
solutions were provided. If an existing resolution is found that will address the reported issue, it shall be communicated to the customer. Once it is
confirmed that the issue has been resolved, the ticket is closed.

c.

If there is no known defect or support that defines the behavior, Technical Services will work with the customer to reproduce the issue. If the issue can
be reproduced, either at the customer site or within support center test lab, Technical Services will escalate the ticket for further investigation / resolution.

If the issue involves units that are considered to be defective with no known reason, the representative will open a Special Investigation RMA through the
SalesForce system. If it is determined that a sample is required for further analysis, the customer will be provided with instructions that detail where to send the
product sample(s) for a root cause analysis. Once it is determined that the issue cannot be resolved by Tier 1 resources, the ticket will be escalated to Tier 2
support for confirmation/workarounds to resolve immediate issue. Technical Services will immediately contact the customer to advise of the escalation. The
11

response and escalation times are listed in Section 5. At this time, screen shots, log files, configuration files, and database backups will be created and
attached to the ticket.
5.

Response and Resolution Targets.
Sensus Technical Support will make every reasonable effort to meet the following response and resolution targets:
Severity

1

2

3

6.

Standard Target
Response

Standard Target Resolution

30 Minutes

Immediately assign trained and qualified
Services Staff to correct the error on an
expedited basis. Provide ongoing
communication on the status of a
correction (24 hours).

4 hours

1 Business Day

Assign trained and qualified Services
Staff to correct the error. Provide
communication as updates occur (48
hours).

30 business days

Resolution (one or more of the following)
•

Satisfactory workaround is provided.

•

Program patch is provided.

•

Fix incorporated into future release.

•

Fix or workaround incorporated into
SalesForce Knowledge Base.

•

Satisfactory workaround is provided.

•

Program patch is provided.

•

Fix incorporated into future release.

•

Fix or workaround incorporated into
SalesForce Knowledge Base.

•

Answer to question is provided.

•

Satisfactory workaround is provided.

•

Fix or workaround incorporated into
SalesForce Knowledge Base.

•

Fix incorporated into future release.

Problem Escalation Process.
6.1. If the normal support process does not produce the desired results, or if the severity has changed, the issue may be escalated as follows to a higher level of
authority.
6.1.1.1. Severity 1 issues are escalated by Sales or Technical Services to a Supervisor if not resolved within 2 hours; to the Manager level if not resolved
within 4 hours; to the Director level if not resolved within the same business day; and to the VP level if not resolved within 24 hours.
6.1.1.2. A customer may escalate an issue by calling 1-800-638-3748, Option 2. Please specify the SalesForce ticket number and the reason why the
issue is being escalated.
6.1.1.3. In the event that a customer is not satisfied with the level of support or continual problem with their products, they may escalate a given
SalesForce ticket to Manager of Technical Services (1-800-638-3748, Option 2).

7.

General Support Provisions and Exclusions.
7.1. Sensus provides online documentation for Sensus products, and all Sensus customers are provided access to this online database, which includes operation,
configuration and technical manuals. The customer shall provide names and email accounts to Sensus so Sensus may provide access to the product
documentation.
7.2. Specialized support from Sensus is available on a fee basis to address support issues outside the scope of this support plan or if not covered under another
specific contract or statement of work. For example: specialized systems integration services or out of warranty network equipment repair.
7.3. In the event customer submits a ticket for a version of the Software outside of the Engineering Support window and is not able to resolve the problem without
engineering resources. Sensus shall have no obligation to provide Engineering Support and Customer shall upgrade to the most current version of the
Software.
7.4. Customer acknowledges that not all problems and bugs with the Software may or can be fixed. The Software and Software as a Service (including third-party
software used in connection with the Software as a Service) may have security vulnerabilities. Sensus may address vulnerabilities with its Software through
Patches, Updates or Upgrades that it makes available from time-to-time. As between the parties, Customer has the obligation to timely implement Patches,
Updates and Upgrades.

12

MONTHLY REPORTS
May 2026
• Building Permit Activity Report
• Facility Rental Activity Report
• Financial Report
• Water Report
• Sheriff’s Office Report

Building Permit Activity - May 2026
Residential Building Units
2026

Jan

Feb

Mar

April

May

Single Family

13

5

6

7

5

36

Townhomes

0

0

0

0

0

0

Apartments

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

13

5

6

7

5

June

July

0

Aug

0

Sept

0

Oct

0

Nov

0

Residential Building Units
History by Year

2022

2023

2024

2025 (YTD)

2026 (YTD)

Single Family

61

71

80

34

36

Townhomes

48

22

4

0

0

Apartments

0

0

60

43

0

Total

109

93

144

77

36

Dec

YTD

0

0

36

Nov

Dec

YTD

Commercial Permits
2026

Jan

Feb

Mar

April

May

New Construction

0

0

1

0

0

1

Other Permits

1

3

2

3

0

9

Total

1

3

3

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

Residential Other Permits
2026

Jan

Feb

Mar

April

May

June

July

Aug

Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec

YTD

Total

56

46

66

83

71

June

July

Aug

Sept

Oct

322

Residential & Commercial • New & Other
History by Year

2022

2023

2024

2025 (YTD)

2026 (YTD)

Total

1023

989

1024

363

368
Building Permit Activity 2026.xlsx

April

June

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

Fees

Rentals

2021

0

$0

1

$0

3

$0

6

$370

4

$0

6

$440

1

$0

5

$0

6

$0

2

$0

5

$0

5

$0

44

$810

2022

3

$400

2

$0

4

$0

5

$400

7

$400

3

$0

2

$600

5

$400

2

$0

3

$400

7

$400

5

$400

48

$3,400

Fees

Fees

YTD

Rentals

December

Fees

November

Rentals

October

Fees

September

Rentals

August

Fees

July

Rentals

May

Fees

March

Rentals

February

Fees

January
Rentals

Facility Rental Activity - January- December 2026

VILLAGE HALL

2023

3

$350

4

$525

4

$0

7

$700

5

$935

2

$763

5

$800

4

$0

2

$525

4

$700

7

$1,125

9

$100

56

$6,523

2024

6

$725

2

$0

4

$575

6

$250

6

$475

4

$975

5

$405

5

$975

4

$275

3

$175

5

$350

9

$550

59

$5,730

2025

5

$525

3

$0

6

$1,000

5

$0

8

$825

8

$1,775

3

$650

7

$1,000

9

$700

9

$1,150

10

$650

9

$1,050

2026

8

$1,257

6

$220

11

$275

13

$1,680

10

$1,863

2021

9

$100

8

$90

8

$90

9

$110

12

$230

9

$90

9

$110

9

$100

9

$110

8

$215

6

$185

6

2022

5

$40

4

$30

5

$70

6

$30

7

$90

7

$170

5

$40

5

$70

6

$30

7

$265

5

$30

5

2023

5

$75

4

$60

5

$135

7

$150

5

$165

6

$270

5

$75

5

$90

3

$45

7

$120

4

$60

CHURCH BY THE RIVER

82

$9,325

48

$5,295

$30

102

$1,460

$30

67

$895

7

$165

63

$1,410

2024

5

$90

5

$210

5

$75

7

$390

6

$135

7

$255

CLOSED

5

$150

5

$135

12

$570

8

$195

7

$195

72

$2,400

2025

11

$465

5

$60

5

$75

7

$225

5

$180

10

$390

4

8

$240

7

$225

13

$480

10

$ 292.50

9

$210

90

$2,903

2026

9

$260

9

$160

12

$420

12

$335

10

$240

52

$1,415

2021

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

0

$0

1

$15

0

$0

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

2

$0

5

$15

2022

1

$0

3

$10

1

$5

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$5

1

$0

0

$0

3

$30

0

$0

1

$5

11

$55

2023

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

2

$0

1

$0

0

$0

1

$0

2

$0

1

$0

1

$0

0

$0

1

$0

9

$0

2024

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

2

$40

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

2

$0

6

$40

2025

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$20

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$0

4

$20

2026

1

$15

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

1

$15

2021

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

5

$75

11

$165

19

$285

12

$180

2

$30

3

$45

0

$0

0

$0

52

$780

2022

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

3

$45

31

$465

40

$600

52

$780

48

$720

23

$345

0

$0

0

$0

197

$2,955

19

$285

36

$540

10

$150

2

$30

0

$0

0

$0

78

$1,170

16

$240

BROADWAY ROOM

RIVERSIDE CAMPSITES

2023

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

11

$165

2024

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

0

$0

12

$180

4

$60

$60

CLOSED

2025

CLOSED

0

$0

2026

CLOSED

0

$0

May 2026
Monthly Financial Reports

PREPARED BY
Lynn Tschudi, Finance Director
1. Finance Report – May 2026
2. Southwest Transit Report – May 2026
3. Revenue/Expenditure Reports – May 2026

General Fund Revenues
May 31, 2026
Category

2026 YTD
Revenue

2026 Budget

Property Taxes $
Building Permits $
Rural Fire Contracts $
Licenses and Fees $
Grants & Aid $
Interest Earnings $
Misc Revenue $
Transfers $
Totals
$

3,117,377
626,000
158,000
32,100
326,642
24,000
30,523
4,314,642

$
$
$
$
$
$
$

194,178
85,011
21,058
2,417
14,908
43,343

$

360,915 $

2025 YTD
Revenue

% of 2026
Budget

$0
251,564
79,928
15,880
27,569
$20,685
$23,763

0.00%
31.02%
53.80%
65.60%
0.74%
62.12%
142.00%

419,389

8.36%

$
$
$
$

General Fund Revenue Comparison
$250,000

$200,000

$150,000

$100,000

$50,000

$Property
Taxes

Building
Permits

Rural Fire Licenses
Contracts and Fees

2026 YTD Revenue

Grants &
Aid

Interest
Earnings

2025 YTD Revenue

Page 1

Misc
Revenue

Transfers

General Fund Expenditures
May 31, 2026
Department

2026 Budget

Public Services $
Fire $
Police $
Administration $
Building Inspections $
Auditors/Assessor $
Engineering $
Planning $
Attorney $
Recreation $
General Government $
Totals
$

1,141,540
729,709
369,507
779,707
453,475
83,241
154,140
117,693
71,650
120,097
293,883
4,314,642

2026 YTD
Expenses

2025 YTD
Expenses

% of 2026
Budget

$ 456,895
$361,054
$ 192,458
$197,656
$ 176,039
$4,578
$ 322,759
$321,175
$ 196,119
$192,890
$
20,125
$19,775
$
55,693
$49,963
$
41,444
$35,541
$
18,774
$19,781
$
54,662
$51,789
$
88,240
$55,142
$ 1,623,208 $ 1,309,344

40.02%
26.37%
47.64%
41.39%
43.25%
24.18%
36.13%
35.21%
26.20%
45.51%
30.03%
37.62%

General Fund Expense Comparison
General Government
Recreation
Attorney
Planning
Engineering
Auditors/Assessor
Building Inspections
Administration
Police
Fire
Public Services
$0

$75,000

$150,000

$225,000

2026 YTD Expenses

Page 2

$300,000

$375,000

2025 YTD Expenses

$450,000

$525,000

Enterprise Funds
May 31, 2026
Department

2026 YTD
Revenue

2026 Budget

Water Revenue $
Sewer Revenue $
Storm Water Revenue $

Department

2025 YTD
Revenue

3,318,227 $ 1,098,929 $ 1,194,541
1,896,992 $ 683,666 $
737,823
740,223 $ 514,559 $
292,514

2026 YTD
Expenses

2026 Budget

Water Expenditures $
Sewer Expenditures $
Storm Water Expenditures $

2,814,191 $
2,102,313 $
276,858 $

842,458 $
715,489 $
56,971 $

2025 YTD
Expenses
665,365
532,691
69,386

% of 2026
Budget
33.12%
36.04%
69.51%
% of 2026
Budget
29.94%
34.03%
20.58%

Enterprise Funds 2026 Revenue & Expenses

2026 Budgeted Expenses

2026 YTD Expenses

2026 Budgeted Revenues

2026 YTD Revenue

$-

$1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000

Water

Sewer

Storm Water

Page 3

Cash and Investments
May 31, 2026
Fund Balances:

Major Capital Projects:

Street Maintenance Fund

$

66,528 Utility Infrastructure Projects

In Process

Park Dedication Fund

$

354,949 Creekside Park

Complete

Fire Equipment Fund

$

77,130 Levee Project

Started

General Capital Equipment Fund#

$

398,152 Public Services Building

Design Phase

#Outstanding 2024 Capital purchases - large plow truck attachments

Quarterly Investments by Type:

8%

Market Value
Money Market $
Municipal Securities $
CD $
Government Securities $
Savings $
$
Checking Account $

4,778,905
776,948
3,774,624
788,217
96,673
10,215,367
1,031,432

Billed Water Usage Comparison:

Page 4

47%
37%

7%

Money Market
Municipal Securities
CD

SOUTHWEST PRIME UPDATE
May 31, 2026
Total Monthly Cost of Prime Service by Month and Year
2022 $
2023 $
2024 $
2025 $
2026 $

Jan
1,660
2,850
2,820
2,718
2,868

$
$
$
$
$

Feb
1,870
2,232
2,874
3,156
2,868

$
$
$
$
$

Mar
1,790
2,886
2,670
2,922
3,708

$
$
$
$
$

Apr
1,490
2,616
2,616
2,562
3,744

$
$
$
$
$

May
1,420
3,024
3,192
2,898
4,704

$
$
$
$

Jun
1,830
3,084
2,820
2,700

Jul
$ 1,820
$ 2,772
$ 2,580
$ 2,706

$
$
$
$

Aug
1,890
3,210
2,724
2,400

Sep
$ 1,860
$ 2,370
$ 2,382
$ 2,970

Oct
$ 2,590
$ 2,628
$ 2,532
$ 2,754

Nov
$ 2,170
$ 3,076
$ 2,364
$ 2,802

Dec
$ 2,470
$ 2,766
$ 2,826
$ 2,826

Sep
186
208
203
250

Oct
259
233
215
237

Nov
217
256
201
239

Dec
247
238
241
242

Total Number of Riders for Prime Service by Month and Year
Jan
166
260
242
230
239

2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Feb
187
191
248
271
239

Mar
179
247
233
248
309

Apr
149
227
227
217
312

May
142
260
274
245
392

Jun
183
265
243
229

Jul
182
239
224
230

Aug
189
278
232
205

YTD City Prime Expense - through May
2023
2024
2025
2026
$ 13,608 $ 14,172 $ 14,256 $ 17,892

YTD % April
from 2025
26% incr

Prime Ridership
YTD Comparison
500
392

# of Riders

400
239

2025

312

309

300

239

2026

200
100
Jan

Feb

2024

Mar

Background
*The City pays $12 per passenger, per ride for 2024. Prior to 2023, the City paid $10 per passenger, per ride.
*Total budget for the Prime service in 2026 is $45,000 .

Apr

May

REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF CARVER

GL Number

Description

Fund: 101 GENERAL FUND
Account Category: Revenues
Department: 00000
101-00000-31010 TAXES REVENUE
101-00000-32100 BUSINESS LICENSES/PERMITS
101-00000-32110 LIQUOR LICENSES
101-00000-32210 BUILDING PERMITS
101-00000-32220 ADMINISTRATION FEE - B.I.
101-00000-32260 RIGHT OF WAY PERMITS
101-00000-33400 STATE GRANTS AND AIDS
101-00000-33401 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
101-00000-33423 FIRE STATE AID
101-00000-33610 COUNTY GRANTS/AID FOR HWY
101-00000-34101 FACILITY RENTALS-INDOOR
101-00000-34109 RURAL FIRE CONTRACTS
101-00000-34110 FEES
101-00000-34111 HALL RENTAL DAMAGE DEPOSIT
101-00000-34780 PARK & SHELTER FEES
101-00000-35102 POLICE FINES/ STATE AID
101-00000-36200 MISC REVENUE
101-00000-36210 INTEREST EARNINGS
101-00000-36230 CONTRIBUTIONS
Total Dept 00000
Revenues
Account Category: Expenditures
Department: 41110 COUNCIL
101-41110-41040 COUNCIL SALARIES
101-41110-41220 FICA
101-41110-41230 MNPL
101-41110-41500 WORKER S COMP (GENERAL)
101-41110-42080 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION
101-41110-43080 OTHER PROF SVCS
101-41110-43090 COMPUTER/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
101-41110-43310 TRAVEL EXP/ROOMS/MILEAGE
101-41110-43610 GENERAL LIABILITY INS
101-41110-44040 OFFICE/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
101-41110-44300 MISCELLANEOUS (GENERAL)
101-41110-44330 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
Total Dept 41110 - COUNCIL
Department: 41310 ADMINISTRATION
101-41310-41000 WAGES AND SALARIES (GENERAL)
101-41310-41030 PART TIME STAFF
101-41310-41210 PERA
101-41310-41220 FICA
101-41310-41230 MN PAID LEAVE
101-41310-41300 EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTION-HSA
101-41310-41310 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH
101-41310-41380 CAR ALLOWANCE
101-41310-41500 WORKER S COMP (GENERAL)
06/08/2026 01:28 PM

Balance As Of 05/31/2026
% Fiscal Year Completed: 41.37
2026
YTD Balance
Amended
Budget
05/31/2026

Activity For
05/31/2026

Available
Balance
05/31/2026

% Bdgt
Used

3,117,377.00
1,000.00
16,000.00
610,000.00
16,000.00
9,500.00
1,000.00
210,142.00
77,000.00
10,000.00
8,500.00
158,000.00
3,600.00
0.00
2,000.00
20,000.00
18,523.00
24,000.00
12,000.00

0.00
438.00
1,585.00
186,057.42
8,120.00
2,455.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,416.55
9,700.08
85,011.00
3,586.04
1,060.00
1,475.01
758.64
30,343.27
14,907.71
13,000.00

0.00
35.00
0.00
26,364.19
1,645.00
1,050.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,340.00
85,011.00
170.00
1,060.00
555.00
1,048.27
876.76
0.00
13,000.00

3,117,377.00
562.00
15,115.00
423,942.58
7,880.00
7,045.00
1,000.00
210,142.00
77,000.00
7,583.45
(1,200.08)
72,989.00
13.96
(695.00)
524.99
19,241.36
(11,820.27)
9,092.29
(1,000.00)

0.00
43.80
5.53
30.50
50.75
25.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.17
114.12
53.80
99.61
100.00
73.75
3.79
163.81
62.12
108.33

4,314,642.00

360,913.72

134,155.22

3,954,793.28

8.36

4,314,642.00

360,913.72

134,155.22

3,954,793.28

8.36

29,400.00
2,249.00
259.00
100.00
2,500.00
4,620.00
6,000.00
2,000.00
300.00
3,500.00
1,200.00
19,000.00

12,438.25
951.51
155.72
53.05
1,005.00
3,189.66
4,114.05
167.50
87.69
0.00
2,026.97
10,600.00

3,392.25
259.50
27.48
0.00
950.00
0.00
3,982.03
159.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

16,961.75
1,297.49
103.28
46.95
1,495.00
1,430.34
1,885.95
1,832.50
212.31
3,500.00
(826.97)
8,400.00

42.31
42.31
60.12
53.05
40.20
69.04
68.57
8.38
29.23
0.00
168.91
55.79

71,128.00

34,789.40

8,770.76

36,338.60

48.91

449,526.00
13,389.00
34,719.00
35,413.00
4,074.00
6,970.00
46,157.00
6,000.00
5,250.00

184,384.96
7,715.63
14,279.11
14,320.34
1,419.00
3,486.72
22,859.15
2,538.36
2,747.79

51,933.31
2,079.82
4,020.08
4,035.11
306.92
0.00
529.05
692.28
0.00

265,141.04
5,673.37
20,439.89
21,092.66
2,655.00
3,483.28
23,297.85
3,461.64
2,502.21

41.02
57.63
41.13
40.44
34.83
50.02
49.52
42.31
52.34

Page:

1/11

REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF CARVER

GL Number

Description

Fund: 101 GENERAL FUND
Account Category: Expenditures
Department: 41310 ADMINISTRATION
101-41310-42000 OFFICE SUPPLIES (GENERAL)
101-41310-42010 SAFETY COMPLIANCE SERVICE
101-41310-42030 PRINTED MATERIALS
101-41310-42080 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION
101-41310-43080 OTHER PROF SVCS
101-41310-43090 COMPUTER/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
101-41310-43210 TELEPHONE / INTERNET
101-41310-43220 POSTAGE
101-41310-43310 TRAVEL EXP/ROOMS/MILEAGE
101-41310-43510 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING
101-41310-43610 GENERAL LIABILITY INS
101-41310-44040 OFFICE/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
101-41310-44130 OFFICE EQUIP RENTAL
101-41310-44300 MISCELLANEOUS (GENERAL)
101-41310-44330 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
Total Dept 41310 - ADMINISTRATION
Department: 41410 ELECTIONS
101-41410-41000 WAGES AND SALARIES (GENERAL)
101-41410-41220 FICA
101-41410-43310 TRAVEL EXP/ROOMS/MILEAGE
101-41410-43510 LEGAL NOTICES PUBLISHING
101-41410-44300 MISCELLANEOUS (GENERAL)
Total Dept 41410 - ELECTIONS
Department: 41530 ACCOUNTING
101-41530-43010 AUDITING AND ACCT G SERVICES

Balance As Of 05/31/2026
% Fiscal Year Completed: 41.37
2026
YTD Balance
Amended
Budget
05/31/2026

Activity For
05/31/2026

Available
Balance
05/31/2026

% Bdgt
Used

13,500.00
1,750.00
4,815.00
12,000.00
5,500.00
9,000.00
6,022.00
1,750.00
8,000.00
4,800.00
5,350.00
6,000.00
3,300.00
5,200.00
13,000.00

3,553.85
1,256.14
1,240.53
4,382.50
2,655.00
1,851.60
2,752.84
311.05
1,159.33
762.60
1,978.13
518.07
700.37
4,245.89
6,850.49

927.53
0.00
0.00
2,290.00
725.00
390.60
795.49
11.05
746.43
639.60
0.00
0.00
124.62
298.98
0.00

9,909.76
493.86
3,267.44
6,792.50
2,845.00
7,148.40
3,269.16
1,438.95
6,064.27
4,037.40
3,371.87
5,481.93
2,599.63
943.97
5,694.51

26.59
71.78
32.14
43.40
48.27
20.57
45.71
17.77
24.20
15.89
36.97
8.63
21.22
81.85
56.20

701,485.00

287,969.45

70,545.87

411,105.59

41.05

4,500.00
344.00
400.00
350.00
1,500.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

4,500.00
344.00
400.00
350.00
1,500.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

7,094.00

0.00

0.00

7,094.00

0.00

33,000.00

20,125.00

0.00

11,950.00

63.79

Total Dept 41530 - ACCOUNTING

33,000.00

20,125.00

0.00

11,950.00

60.98

Department: 41550 ASSESSING
101-41550-43120 ASSESSING CONTRACT

50,241.00

0.00

0.00

50,241.00

0.00

Total Dept 41550 - ASSESSING

50,241.00

0.00

0.00

50,241.00

0.00

Department: 41610 CITY ATTORNEY
101-41610-43040 LEGAL FEES

71,650.00

18,774.23

0.00

46,737.97

34.77

71,650.00

18,774.23

0.00

46,737.97

26.20

Department: 41900 ENGINEERING
101-41900-42190 ROW PERMITS
101-41900-43030 *ENGINEERING FEES

8,140.00
146,000.00

985.00
54,707.66

0.00
0.00

7,155.00
91,292.34

12.10
37.47

Total Dept 41900 - ENGINEERING

154,140.00

55,692.66

0.00

98,447.34

36.13

65,975.00
4,948.00
5,047.00
581.00
100.00
658.00

27,914.27
2,057.14
2,148.78
213.60
41.75
75.00

7,612.95
561.04
586.01
47.00
16.70
0.00

38,060.73
2,890.86
2,898.22
367.40
58.25
583.00

42.31
41.58
42.58
36.76
41.75
11.40

Total Dept 41610 - CITY ATTORNEY

Department: 41910 PLANNING AND ZONING
101-41910-41000 WAGES AND SALARIES (GENERAL)
101-41910-41210 PERA
101-41910-41220 FICA
101-41910-41230 MNPL
101-41910-41310 EMPLOYER PAID HEALTH
101-41910-41500 WORKER S COMP (GENERAL)
06/08/2026 01:28 PM

Page:

2/11

REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT FOR CITY OF CARVER

GL Number

Description

Balance As Of 05/31/2026
% Fiscal Year Completed: 41.37
2026
YTD Balance
Amended
Budget
05/31/2026

Activity For
05/31/2026

Available
Balance
05/31/2026

% Bdgt
Used

Fund: 101 GENERAL FUND
Account Category: Expenditures
Department: 41910 PLANNING AND ZONING
101-41910-42010 SAFETY COMPLIANCE SERVICE
101-41910-42080 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION
101-41910-42100 OPERATING SUPPLIES
101-41910-43080 OTHER PROF SVCS
101-41910-43090 COMPUTER/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
101-41910-43210 TELEPHONE / INTERNET
101-41910-43310 TRAVEL EXP/ROOMS/MILEAGE
101-41910-43610 GENERAL LIABILITY INS
101-41910-44040 OFFICE/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT

1,234.00
4,000.00
1,500.00
27,000.00
2,000.00
900.00
1,000.00
250.00
2,500.00

1,285.44
3,329.63
291.27
1,050.00
527.36
257.60
611.95
93.89
1,546.59

0.00
450.66
44.58
0.00
237.49
89.80
611.95
0.00
0.00

(51.44)
670.37
1,207.49
25,950.00
1,472.64
642.40
388.05
156.11
953.41

104.17
83.24
19.50
3.89
26.37
28.62
61.20
37.56
61.86

Total Dept 41910 - PLANNING AND ZONING

117,693.00

41,444.27

10,258.18

76,247.49

35.21

Department: 41940 GENERAL GOVT BUILDINGS/PLANT
101-41940-42010 SAFETY COMPLIANCE SERVICE
101-41940-42170 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES
101-41940-43080 OTHER PROF SVCS
101-41940-43090 COMPUTER/SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
101-41940-43210 TELEPHONE / INTERNET
101-41940-43610 GENERAL LIABILITY INS
101-41940-43620 PROPERTY INS
101-41940-43810 ELECTRIC UTILITIES
101-41940-43830 GAS UTILITIES
101-41940-43840 REFUSE/GARBAGE DISPOSAL
101-41940-44020 BUILDING MAINT & REPAIR
101-41940-44300 PRIME BUS SERVICE
101-41940-47200 OPERATING TRANSFERS-OUT

2,700.00
8,500.00
37,270.00
54,000.00
500.00
700.00
21,700.00
21,000.00
13,300.00
30,000.00
37,500.00
45,000.00
21,713.00

1,364.84
12.13
16,508.17
26,757.04
0.00
354.63
10,896.89
5,085.68
5,751.53
1,147.58
10,917.57
9,444.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
1,808.59
9,621.37
0.00
0.00
4,533.76
1,145.09
541.58
351.84
692.53
9,444.00
0.00

1,211.38
8,487.87
20,761.83
27,242.96
500.00
345.37
10,803.11
15,914.32
7,548.47
28,852.42
26,457.88
35,556.00
21,713.00

55.13
0.14
44.29
49.55
0.00
50.66
50.22
24.22
43.24
3.83
29.45
20.99
0.00

293,883.00

88,240.06

28,138.76

205,394.61

30.03

Department: 42100 LAW ENFORCEMENT
101-42100-43040 LEGAL FEES
101-42100-43110 POLICE CONTRACT
101-42100-43150 POLICE OVERTIME
101-42100-44300 MISCELLANEOUS (GENERAL)

9,240.00
342,667.00
15,500.00
2,100.00

1,691.66
171,333.50
913.63
2,100.00

0.00
171,333.50
0.00
0.00

7,548.34
171,333.50
14,586.37
0.00

18.31
50.00
5.89
100.00

Total Dept 42100 - LAW ENFORCEMENT

369,507.00

176,038.79

171,333.50

193,468.21

47.64

Department: 42260 FIRE DEPARTMENT
101-42260-41060 EMERGENCY SERVICES
101-42260-41220 FICA
101-42260-41230 MNPL
101-42260-41250 STATE PENSION 2%
101-42260-41500 WORKER S COMP (GENERAL)
101-42260-42000 OFFICE SUPPLIES (GENERAL)
101-42260-42080 TRAINING AND INSTRUCTION
101-42260-42100 OPERATING SUPPLIES
101-42260-42120 MOTOR FUELS
101-42260-