On the agenda: Trenton meeting — data center (Aug 20)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 20th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.

Floyd Croucher

Ray Nichols

Ryan Perry
Mayor
Austin Proffitt Ken Roark

Vice Mayor

Council Member

Council Member

Council Member

Marci Butts

Sharon Montgomery

Council Member

Council Member

CALL TO ORDER
PRAYER

1. TBD
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATIONS

1. Officer Ricky Carl Grantz Swearing In Ceremony
2. Trenton Fire Department Ceremonial Pinning for Mike Jones and Andrew Korb
APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. Minutes of the August 3rd, 2026, Special Council Meeting
2. Minutes of the August 6th, 2026, Council Work Session
3. Minutes of the August 6th, 2026, Regular Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA

1. A MOTION, AUTHORIZING, THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH VICKERS DEMOLITION, INC. FOR THE DEMOLITION AND
REMOVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 301 EAST STATE
STREET, TRENTON, OHIO IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY-NINE THOUSAND AND
FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($59,500.00) AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.
2. A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT
WITH NORMAC COMPANY, LLC FOR PAVING SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
CITY OF TRENTON’S 2026 LOCAL PAVING PROGRAM IN AN AMOUNT OF NINE
HUNDRED THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ELEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY-ONE
CENTS ($900,511.81), AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL
DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 20th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
3. A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH W.G. STANG FOR THE 2026 WATER SERVICE
REPLACEMENTS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY-ONE
THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FOUR DOLLARS AND NINETY-TWO
CENTS ($981,124.92), AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
SIGN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.
4. A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ASSEMBLE A “LIVE-FIRE
TRAINING PROP” ON THE FIRE STATION GROUNDS LOCATED AT 300 N MIAMI
ST FOR THE COST OF APPROXIMATELY $250,000 (TWO HUNDRED FIFTY
THOUSAND DOLLARS) PLUS A 20% CONTINGENCY.
5. A MOTION, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH CAPITAL ELECTRIC LINE BUILDERS. FOR THE STATE
STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF SIXTY-TWO
THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND THIRTY-SIX
CENTS ($62,955.36) AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN
ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.
CORRESPONDENCE

1. Minutes of the May 11th Planning Commission Meeting
2. Minutes of the July 1st, Planning Commission Meeting
3. Minutes of the June 9th, Parks and Recreation Board Meeting
4. July Financial Snapshot
AUDIENCE OF PUBLIC
UNFINISHED BUSINESS

1. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY AND
IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 5721 KENNEL ROAD, CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO,
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Second Reading)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
NEW BUSINESS
LEGISLATION

1. AN ORDINANCE THAT THE CITY OF TRENTON WILL PICK UP THE
STATUTORILY REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION TO THE OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TRENTON
PURSUANT TO IRC SECTION 414(H)(2). (First Reading)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 20th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
REPORTS
AUDIENCE OF COUNCIL
ADJOURNMENT

City of Trenton
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 3rd, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.

Floyd Croucher Ray Nichols

Ryan Perry
Mayor
Austin Proffitt Ken Roark

Vice Mayor

Council Member

Council Member

Marci Butts

Council Member Council Member

Sharon Montgomery
Council Member

CALL TO ORDER
PRAYER

1. Councilwoman Montgomery
ROLL CALL
Present: Perry, Proffitt, Croucher, Nichols, Butts, Roark, Montgomery
Absent:

(7)
(0)

EXECUTIVE SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH AN ATTORNEY FOR THE PUBLIC BODY CONCERNING DISPUTES
INVOLVING THE PUBLIC BODY THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF PENDING OR IMMINENT
COURT ACTION.
Motion – To Go To Executive Session
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher____ 2nd Ms. Butts_ Time 6:32 P.M.
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

Motion – The Executive Session Meeting Be Adjourned
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Mr. Proffitt____ 2nd Ms. Butts_ Time 8:04 P.M.
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 3rd, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
LEGISLATION

Motion –Motion to read Items 1 and 2 By Title Only
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Mr. Nichols_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
a.

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

Mr. Ziepfel addressed Mayor and Council regarding Ordinance 20-2026 and Ordinance
21-2026, both of which related to a citizen petition delivered to the Clerk of Council on
July 8, 2026, requesting the addition of a new Section 9.06 to the City Charter to
prohibit the construction of a defined data center. He explained that the immediate
issue before Council was whether the petition contained the required number of valid
signatures to trigger submission of the proposed charter amendment to the voters. Mr.
Ziepfel stated that the two ordinances were mutually exclusive. Ordinance 20-2026
interpreted the Charter requirement of “10% of the electors” to mean 10% of those
eligible to vote at the last municipal election, which would require 820 valid signatures;
because the Board of Elections verified 336 signatures, the petition would be
insufficient under that interpretation. Ordinance 21-2026 interpreted the threshold
based on the number of ballots actually cast at the last municipal election, which was
1,277 votes, requiring 128 valid signatures; under that interpretation, the 336 verified
signatures would be sufficient and Council would direct certification of the issue to the
November 3 ballot. Mr. Ziepfel explained that Council could not pass both ordinances
because they reached conflicting conclusions. He also reviewed the timeline for the
petition, stating that the Clerk of Council received and secured the petition, submitted it
to the Board of Elections for signature review, and that the Board reported 336 valid
signatures. He stated that Council was responsible for determining whether the petition
was sufficient and, if so, providing by ordinance for submission to the ballot by the
August 5 deadline. Mr. Ziepfel also discussed the legal question regarding the meaning
of “electors,” including the City Charter, Article XVIII, Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution,
Ohio Revised Code definitions distinguishing an elector from a voter, and prior Ohio
Supreme Court case law. He noted that the November 2025 election included 8,197
eligible electors in Trenton, with 1,277 ballots cast, and stated that 113 of the 336
verified petition signers had voted in that election. Mr. Ziepfel further stated that 464
total signatures had been submitted, with 336 verified by the Board of Elections. He
concluded by explaining that, after Council deliberated and voted on the threshold issue,
he could then discuss the substance of the proposed charter amendment.

City of Trenton
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 3rd, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
1. AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THAT THE PETITION FOR SUBMISSION OF A PROPOSED
CHARTER AMENDMENT TO THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO, DOES NOT
CONTAIN THE NUMBER OF VALID SIGNATURES REQUIRED BY SECTION 9.03 OF THE
CHARTER, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (First Reading, Suspend Rules)
a. Councilwoman Butts made a motion to table Item 1 indefinitely.
Motion –Motion to table Item 1 indefinitely.
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Ms. Butts _______ 2nd Mr. Roark_
YAYS: Proffitt, Butts, Roark
NAYS: Nichols, Croucher, Montgomery, Perry
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(3)
(4)
(0)
(0)

Motion –Motion to Suspend The Rules and Vote On The Ordinance
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Mr. Nichols_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

Motion – To Approve The Ordinance
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Ms. Butts_
YAYS: Nichols, Croucher, Montgomery, Perry
NAYS: Proffitt, Butts, Roark
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(4)
(3)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 3rd, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
2. AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR SUBMISSION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
ADDING ARTICLE IX, SECTION 9.06 TO THE ELECTORS AT A SPECIAL ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026. DIRECTING CERTIFICATION TO THE BUTLER COUNTY
BOARD OF ELECTIONS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (First Reading, Suspend
Rules)
Motion –Motion to table Item 2 indefinitely.
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Mr. Nichols_
YAYS: Nichols, Croucher, Montgomery, Perry
NAYS: Proffitt, Butts, Roark
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(4)
(3)
(0)
(0)

REPORTS
Law Director – Nick Ziepfel
a. Following Council’s vote, Mr. Ziepfel discussed the substance of the proposed
charter amendment, stating that he had not addressed the merits before the
vote because Council’s threshold decision was limited to the definition of
“electors” under Section 9.03 of the City Charter. He explained that, in his view,
the proposed amendment contained four key components: a Citywide ban
regardless of zoning classification, a prohibition on construction or modification
of a data center, regulation based on energy use, and self-executing
enforcement language. Mr. Ziepfel stated that constitutionality would ultimately
be decided by a reviewing court if the measure were placed on the ballot and
approved. He noted that the proposed amendment did not include a
grandfathering provision, which could create an argument that it was intended
to reach projects the City had already approved. Mr. Ziepfel then discussed
potential legal concerns, including whether the amendment could be viewed as
an improper referendum disguised as a charter amendment, referencing the
Center for Powell Crossing case, where a court looked at the practical effect of a
charter amendment and invalidated it when it functioned as a referendum
against previously approved administrative action. He also discussed potential
vagueness concerns related to the proposed 25-megawatt threshold, including
questions about how “peak load” or “monthly demand” would be measured or
applied. Mr. Ziepfel further stated that there may be due process or equal
protection concerns if one specific use is singled out among otherwise permitted
uses without a clear rational basis. He also discussed potential utility-regulation
preemption issues, stating that state law and PUCO regulation may occupy the
field of energy regulation, which could limit a charter municipality’s ability to
regulate based on electric use. Mr. Ziepfel also referenced litigation involving
Thor Equities and the City of Urbana, explaining that the case involved a
proposed data center, a moratorium, alleged vested development rights, and
claims for damages and lost profits. He stated that these issues were being
provided as context for evaluating the proposed charter amendment and
potential future litigation. Mayor then asked whether Prologis had already

City of Trenton
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 3rd, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
secured its electric capacity, and Mr. Ziepfel confirmed that it had. Mayor asked
whether AWS had done the same, and Mr. Ziepfel stated that he believed so,
although the City is not a party to those agreements. He stated that the electric
capacity had been secured or allocated for Amazon and that those agreements
do not involve the City.
AUDIENCE OF COUNCIL

Mr. Roark – No Reports.
Ms. Butts – No Reports.
Mr. Proffitt- No Reports.
Ms. Montgomery- No Reports.
Mr. Nichols – No Reports.
Vice Mayor Croucher – No Reports.
Mayor Perry – No Reports.

ADJOURNMENT

Motion - That the meeting be adjourned.
(Roll Call Vote) 1st_____ Ms. Butts____ 2nd Vice Mayor Croucher_ Time 9:00 P.M.
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City Council Work Session Agenda MINUTES
August 6th, 2026
6:30 pm
1. Clerk of Council, Stanislav Beresford
a. Discuss New Business
i. A motion to appoint Dale Perry to serve on the Trenton Volunteer
Firefighter Dependent’s Fund Board As A Resident Appointee For A
Term Ending December 31, 2026.
1. Mr. Beresford addressed Mayor and Council and stated that
Council had before it a motion to appoint Dale Perry to serve on
the Trenton Volunteer Firefighter Dependent Fund Board. He
stated that there was a recent vacancy on the board and that
Mr. Perry had agreed to step up and serve. Mayor asked how
many applications had been received for the vacancy, noting
that Mr. Perry has served on several boards and Council in the
past. Mr. Beresford stated that the City had received zero
applications and that the vacancy had been posted for a couple
of months. Mayor clarified that the position had been posted for
a couple of months with no applicants, and Mr. Beresford
confirmed that was correct.
2. Law Director, Nick Ziepfel
a. Discuss Legislation
i. An Ordinance Authorizing The Purchase Of Real Property And
Improvements Located At 5721 Kennel Road, City of Trenton, Ohio, and
declaring an emergency. (First Reading)
1. Mr. Ziepfel addressed Mayor and Council regarding legislation
authorizing the purchase of real property improvements located
at 5721 Kennel Road. He stated that the property is
approximately 2.6 acres and that the City is interested in
purchasing it for public safety initiatives, including the potential
future construction of a second fire station, with several
qualifiers still involved. Mr. Ziepfel stated that the ordinance was
before Council for its first reading and that there was no request
to suspend the required two readings. He explained that the
ordinance is drafted for adoption by emergency, and that at the
second reading on August 20, staff would request that it be
adopted as an emergency measure so the City could proceed to
closing shortly thereafter. He stated that the seller had agreed to
wait until that time. Mayor asked whether the property is
currently located outside the City, and Mr. Ziepfel stated that he
did not believe it is currently within the City, although it is
contiguous to the City. Mayor then asked City Manager Nichols

whether, because of the City’s recent zoning updates, the
property could be brought in under a municipal or similar zoning
classification. City Manager Nichols stated that it would be
brought in as Public Institutional, consistent with the City’s
expressed interest in using the property for a second fire station
or other public safety purpose.
3. City Manager, Marcos Nichols
a. Project Updates
i. City Manager Nichols presented updated imagery for the proposed
Trenton Veterans Memorial (Please see renderings of the memorial
below these minutes), showing the memorial located in front of the City
building near the street. He stated that he believed the image reflected
Council’s previous feedback, but that the design could be modified if
Council preferred the memorial to be located closer to the City building.
Discussion followed regarding the preferred location, with it noted that
the prior discussion was to place the memorial more toward the
northwest corner of the grassy area near the street. Council expressed
concern that the location shown in the image could be vulnerable to
vehicles traveling along Edgewood Drive near the Police Department,
while also noting that the memorial should remain accessible and
avoid requiring veterans to walk up a hill to reach it. City Manager
Nichols stated that he would take Council’s feedback and make the
appropriate adjustments. He also noted that the back wall design had
changed from brick to a cleaner white wall because the previous brick
wall concept was tied to the memorial being built into a hillside, which
is not the case at the proposed location. He stated that the design
includes two black pillars on either side of the back wall to support the
wings of the memorial and noted that the added cost would be
negligible. City Manager Nichols stated that he would reach back out,
make further modifications, and bring an updated design back to
Council. He then provided project updates, beginning with Trenton
Square. He stated that the parking lot is scheduled for the first week of
August, block masons are installing interior walls and exterior brick,
exterior concrete column pours are scheduled for the following week,
and the building remains on track to be dried in by early September.
He stated that the City is moving forward with Basin No. 3. Regarding
the collector roads, he stated that curb has been installed, base and
intermediate asphalt have been installed, electric and gas conduits are
in place, Duke Energy is on site pulling electrical service for the
development, and the electric service and transformer have been
installed at the City building. He stated that gas installation is
scheduled to begin in October, street lights should be installed along
Edgewood Drive, and grading is underway for City sidewalks and ADA
ramps, with sidewalk installation expected to begin the following week.
Regarding off-site improvements, City Manager Nichols stated that the

traffic light poles have been delivered and should be installed in the
coming weeks. Once those are installed, stop bars and temporary paint
on Edgewood Drive going north will follow. He stated that the City
received the $50,000 ODNR grant reimbursement for the splash pad
and noted that approximately one million gallons of water had been
used during roughly the first month the splash pad had been open.
Regarding the elevated water tower, he stated that the tower is at 155
feet, the final pedestal pour has been completed, the concrete dome
has been poured, and the tank structure will follow. City Manager
Nichols stated that the local paving bid opening had occurred and that
legislation for the project will come before Council at the August 20
meeting. He stated that the ODOT urban paving project has started
base repairs and ADA upgrades along State Street. He also stated that
the OPWC waterline project is scheduled for bid opening the following
week and will then be brought to Council, and that the EV charging
station project is scheduled for bid opening at the end of August before
coming to Council. Finally, regarding the baby box project, City Manager
Nichols stated that the $16,000 invoice for the baby box itself had
been processed and that staff is reviewing what would be needed for
construction on the north wall and implementation of the baby box.
b. Executive Session Request
i. Conference with an attorney for the public body concerning disputes
involving the public body that are subject of pending or imminent court
action.
ii. To Consider confidential information that is directly related to a request
for economic development assistance under any provision identified in
Ohio Revised Code 121.22(G)(8), or that involves public infrastructure
improvements or the extension of utility services that are directly related
to an economic development project, as necessary to protect the
interests of the applicant or the possible investment or expenditure of
public funds to be made in connection with the economic development
project and to confer with legal counsel. (AWS and Township Discussion)

Motion – The Work Session Meeting Be Adjourned
(Roll Call Vote) 1st____ Mr. Roark _______ 2nd Mr. Nichols_ Time: 6:39 PM
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Montgomery, Nichols, Proffitt, Roark, Butts
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
a.

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

Council motioned unanimously to move to executive session.

Motion – That executive session be adjourned, and the meeting be adjourned.
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Ms. Montgomery 2nd Mr. Roark_ Time: 7:26 PM
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Montgomery, Nichols, Proffitt, Roark, Butts
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

*Agenda is subject to change

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

9"

60'-10 11/16"

2'-0"

10"

10 3/4"

9"

1'-8"

8'-0"

6'-1"

8'-0"

10"

7'-6"

SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

SCALE: 3/4" = 1'-0"

10"

4'-0"

SIDE ELEVATION

FRONT ELEVATION

8'-0"

3'- 5/16"

2'-4 11/16"
5'-0"

1'-8"

2'-0"

3'-0"

1'-10"

7'-6"

2'-0"
5'-0"

2'- 11/16"

8"

8'-0"

7'-

0"

4'-0"

6'8"

51

/4"

3'-6"

51

1'-8"

/4"

4'-0"

1'-6"

43'-4"

5'-0"

5'-0"

8"

6'-

0"

5'-0"

4'1'6"

3'-8"

1'-2"

2'-6"

12'-0"

4'-0"

1'-6"

8"

/8"

77

5'-

14'-0"

2'-6"

1'7

11
/16
"

22'-0"

WEIGHT

Trenton Vetrans Memorial
Civic Memorial

CUSTOMER

MATERIAL

American Black

DEALER

Enter Dealer Adress

FINISH

Polished

DATE

DRAWN BY

ORDER #

SHEET SIZE

7/28/2026 BFA

24 x 36 (D)

DRAWING #

1 3
of

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY

ALL IMAGES ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SHOULD BE USED FOR GUIDANCE ONLY. STONE IS A NATURAL
PRODUCT AND THEREFORE HAS VARIATIONS THAT OCCUR NATURALLY. WHILE EVERY ATTEMPT HAS
BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE A TRUE AND ACCURATE IMAGE OF THE DESIGN, IMAGES OF THE STONE,
BRONZE, AND ART GLASS MAY NOT 100% ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE FINISHED PRODUCT

REV

07/01/2026

WEIGHT

114,136 lbs

DEALER

Enter Dealer Adress

Trenton Vetrans Memorial
Civic Memorial
CUSTOMER

MATERIAL

American Black

FINISH

Polished

DATE

DRAWN BY

ORDER #

SHEET SIZE

7/28/2026

BFA

11 x 17 (B)

DRAWING #

2 3
of

CUSTOMER Trenton Vetrans Memorial

DEALER

CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY

DATE

7/28/2026

DRAWN BY
MATERIAL

BFA

American Black

ALL IMAGES ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SHOULD BE USED FOR GUIDANCE ONLY. STONE IS A NATURAL PRODUCT AND THEREFORE HAS
VARIATIONS THAT OCCUR NATURALLY. WHILE EVERY ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO PROVIDE A TRUE AND ACCURATE IMAGE OF FINISH
THE DESIGN, IMAGES OF THE STONE, BRONZE, AND ART GLASS MAY NOT 100% ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE FINISHED PRODUCT

Polished

ORDER #
SHEET SIZE

8.5 x 11 (A)

DRAWING #

3 of 3

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.

Floyd Croucher Ray Nichols

Ryan Perry
Mayor
Austin Proffitt Ken Roark

Vice Mayor

Council Member

Council Member

Marci Butts

Council Member Council Member

Sharon Montgomery
Council Member

CALL TO ORDER
PRAYER

1. Pastor Keith Risner
ROLL CALL
Present: Perry, Proffitt, Croucher, Nichols, Butts, Roark, Montgomery
Absent:

(7)
(0)

PRESENTATIONS

1. Matthew Mesisklis Development and Annexation Presentation
a. Mr. Mesisklis provided a brief overview of the TIFF-related issues connected to
the proposed AWS data center project, noting that a full presentation would be
included in the meeting record. He stated that Madison Township had begun the
process for TIFF legislation involving properties related to the potential
annexation area, and that draft language from St. Clair Township appeared
consistent with Madison’s approach. Mr. Mesisklis explained that the townships
are acting in what they believe to be the best interests of their residents, just as
Council is tasked with acting in the best interests of the City. He stated that
stopping annexation or banning data centers within City limits would not
necessarily stop the proposed AWS development, because the unannexed
properties are already zoned heavy industrial under county and township zoning.
He explained that the practical question is whether the project would occur
under township or City governance, how revenues would be distributed, and
what standards would apply. Mr. Mesisklis summarized the differences between
a 10-year, 75% TIFF and a 30-year, 100% TIFF, noting that the township
proposal would divert a significant portion of new property tax revenue for
township infrastructure purposes and would reduce the amount received by
Edgewood Schools and Butler Tech during the TIFF period. He stated that
Trenton’s proposed approach would use a 30-year, 100% TIFF structure while
still providing the schools their full share, and that Trenton had also discussed
sharing a portion of revenue with Madison and St. Clair Townships. Mr. Mesisklis
further stated that annexation would allow the City to require public water and
sanitary sewer connections, collect tap fees, apply City stormwater, buffering,
landscaping, setback, noise, police, fire, and development standards, and
require applicable payroll and net profits tax filings. He concluded that, based on
the information available, the township TIFF activity indicates that the townships
are preparing to accommodate the AWS project, and that the policy question is
which governance framework provides greater public benefits, infrastructure
investment, and protections. Mayor thanked Mr. Mesisklis and stated that this
was the first time the City could share more concrete information publicly, now

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
that certain township actions had become public. (The Entire Presentation Can
Be Viewed Below These Minutes)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. Minutes of the July 23rd Council Work Session
2. Minutes of the July 23rd Regular Council Meeting
Motion –To Approve The Minutes of the July 23rd Council Work Session and Regular Council Meeting
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Mr. Nichols 2nd Vice Mayor Croucher_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

CONSENT AGENDA
CORRESPONDENCE

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
AUDIENCE OF PUBLIC
Mayor explained the rules for the Audience of the Public portion of the meeting. He stated that,
in order to keep meetings to a reasonable length and preserve decorum, speakers should not
personally attack members of the public or Council, and that comments should be addressed to
Council as a whole rather than to individual members. Mayor stated that public comment is
open to all, but Trenton taxpayers and individuals who sign up using their legal names will be
given priority to speak. He explained that the person at the lectern has the floor during their
allotted time and that no one else should speak during that time. After a speaker has finished,
Council or staff may answer questions if they wish. Mayor stated that while there is no set time
limit, speakers should be respectful of the time so that everyone has an opportunity to speak.
He also stated that Council and staff will not answer theoretical questions, and that if litigation is
mentioned, the matter will be directed to Mr. Ziepfel and no comment will be made by staff.
Mayor stated that he would ask Council whether they wished to respond after each speaker had
concluded. Mayor also noted that several residents had requested that foul language be kept to
a minimum. He stated that while he cannot prohibit foul language during the proceedings due to
First Amendment rights, he respectfully asked that it be limited.
Amy Humbert – Ms. Humbert addressed Mayor and Council and first thanked Council, Mayor,
City Manager Nichols, and Mr. Ziepfel for upholding her First Amendment right to free speech,
stating that the meeting rules of decorum do not override those rights. She then stated that she
had been at the splash pad earlier that day with her grandchildren and asked the City to
consider banning electric bikes and electric scooters from the park area, explaining that her
grandchildren were almost struck by two riders on the path. Ms. Humbert also asked that the
City consider more frequent monitoring of the park. She then addressed the ongoing charter
petition and data center issue, stating that she believes Council is spending time, effort, and
money fighting citizens who are using the democratic process because residents feel they are
not being heard. Ms. Humbert stated that, after hearing Mr. Mesisklis’ presentation, she felt
Council’s focus was on future business revenue rather than current residents, and she argued
that the City should use its existing income wisely rather than relying on revenue from a
company that has not yet come to the City. She also raised concerns about the cumulative noise
impact of multiple data center buildings, stating that even if one building meets a sound
standard, many buildings together could still create significant noise. Ms. Humbert stated that
the Board of Elections approved the petition signatures and that the County Prosecutor relied on
an Ohio Supreme Court ruling regarding the number of signatures required. She stated that the
petitioners collected 334 signatures, which she argued exceeded the required number, and that
the issue would now be decided by the Ohio Supreme Court because the City had been served
that day. Ms. Humbert also questioned the appointment of Dale Perry to the Trenton Volunteer
Firefighter Dependent Fund Board, stating that she did not recall seeing the position posted and
expressing concern about potential nepotism because he is Mayor Perry’s father and a former
mayor. She asked whether the position is paid or receives any benefits and also raised concerns
about family members serving or working in City government. Ms. Humbert further stated that
she believes it is ironic for the City to use public funds to fight citizens it is supposed to
represent and stated that Council could rescind its decision and approve the petition to avoid
additional legal costs. She also referenced discussion from a recent special meeting about
potential legal issues from Prologis if the project is stopped, and stated that this gave her
concern that a preemptive deal had already been made. Ms. Humbert concluded by stating that
residents had been asked to come to meetings upset and that she hoped Council understood
residents are furious. Mayor responded by explaining his vote on the petition issue. He stated
that he reviewed the Charter and noted that the term “elector” is used in several places. Mayor

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
stated that, in his view, the issue came down to whether the required number was 800
signatures or 128 signatures, and that he reviewed the petition names to determine how many
signers had voted in the last election. He stated that the petition still fell short under that
interpretation and that the only way the number worked was by using one definition of “elector”
to calculate the required number and another definition for those signing the petition. Mayor
stated that he did not find that consistent, and that if enough signers on the petition had voted
in the last election to meet the 128-signature threshold, he would have voted to place it on the
ballot. Mr. Beresford stated that the Firefighter Dependent Fund Board vacancy had been
posted for more than two months and was publicly available on the City’s Facebook page and
website. It was also stated that board positions are not paid, except that there may be one
grandfathered member of the Personnel Board who receives a small stipend, but no new board
members receive that compensation. Mr. Beresford stated that the only board or committee
currently accepting applications is the zoning committee that Council recently decided to move
forward with, though other boards may be discussed at a future meeting. Mayor then addressed
the financial issue, stating that the point of the presentation was to show that having the
development within City limits would be better for the school district, surrounding communities,
and Trenton residents than having it occur outside the City. Mayor stated that based on
township actions, steps are already being taken legislatively to allow the development to
proceed, and that the same project would be located in the same fields regardless of where the
“Welcome to Trenton” sign is located. He referenced discussions regarding tax revenue, sewer
lines, and the Gormans’ prior comments about contractors digging on Duke property for
potential electric infrastructure, stating that no one from Trenton knew about or approved that
activity. Mayor stated that, like the townships, the City has a duty to act in the best interest of its
citizens. He acknowledged that the project may not be agreeable to everyone and that some
residents may be afraid of it, but stated that the practical question is whether the project pays
taxes to Trenton or pays less taxes to the county and townships based on the actions being
taken by the townships.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
Lorie Blankenship, 811 South First Street – Ms. Blankenship addressed Mayor and Council and
first commented on electric bikes and electric scooters, stating that she lives on First Street near
a hill and has observed children riding them quickly without helmets, which she described as
dangerous. She then addressed the Supreme Court complaint filed that day regarding the
charter petition, stating that the complaint centers on the City’s interpretation of “electors”
compared to what she stated has been the definition under Ohio case law for the past 30 years.
Ms. Blankenship stated that the petitioners obtained signatures that were verified by the Board
of Elections and that they were told the issue had been reviewed with the County Prosecutor.
She expressed concern that the City would spend taxpayer dollars to fight residents who signed
the petition because they wanted the opportunity to vote. Ms. Blankenship suggested that the
three members who voted against the first ordinance at the prior special meeting consider
making a motion to rescind the ordinance that was passed and then make a motion to approve
the ordinance that had been tabled indefinitely, allowing Council to vote again and potentially
avoid additional legal expenses. She also stated that she attended the County Commissioners’
meeting earlier that week, where the annexation petition was read into the record and described
as being for an additional 18 data center buildings. Ms. Blankenship stated that residents had
previously asked at Council meetings what was planned for the property and were told the City
did not know, and she stated that there was a strong reaction from those present at the
Commissioners’ meeting when the number of proposed buildings was read. She expressed
concern that residents do not yet know the impact of the first proposed buildings, and that
adding additional buildings could increase impacts related to noise, particularly because she
stated generators are exempted from the sound ordinance. Ms. Blankenship stated that while
she appreciated Mr. Mesisklis’ presentation and the time he took to explain the financial issues,
she remains concerned that previous presentations and projections related to the data center
have changed over time. She concluded by asking Council to reconsider the ordinances and
allow another vote rather than continuing to spend taxpayer money on litigation.
Jake Davis – Mr. Davis addressed Mayor and Council regarding transparency and the City’s role
in the Proeschel Farms acquisition and related data center discussions. He stated that his
comments over the past three months have focused on transparency and that he began
reviewing the issue not because he opposed economic development, but because he wanted to
understand how decisions that could permanently shape Trenton’s future were being made. Mr.
Davis stated that, after reviewing ordinances, purchase agreements, Council actions, emails,
and public records, he has struggled to reconcile those records with his original understanding
that many of the decisions were occurring primarily at the county level. He stated that the City’s
own records appear to show the City authorizing actions, directing officials, participating in
acquisitions, and actively moving the project forward. Mr. Davis asked what discretion the City
had during the early stages of the project, what options were available, when the City could have
altered course, and what legal, contractual, financial, or policy considerations led to the
decisions made. He stated that while he understands the City’s position regarding jobs,
investment, and economic growth, that explains a policy objective but not the decision-making
process. Mr. Davis also stated that the recent decision regarding the citizen petition for a charter
amendment reinforced the importance of transparency, because many residents feel they have
less influence over decisions that will shape the community. He concluded by stating that public
trust is built by helping citizens understand how an outcome was reached, not by asking them to
simply accept the outcome. Mayor Perry responded that the Prologis matter was approached like
other economic development opportunities the City has handled, including Carvana and Shape
Corp. Mayor stated that the City signed an initial purchase agreement months before learning
more about the larger project, and that he first learned about the broader deal from a property
seller at another community’s council meeting who stated that they knew the end user because

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
they were under contract with them. Mayor stated that after some time passed, the City was
brought into discussions in executive session, and the property owners later asked that the
property be annexed into the City. Mayor stated that the first project was treated like any other
business opportunity, while the second project was already in motion when the City was
approached about annexation. City Manager Nichols further clarified that the City’s purchase of
the Proeschel Farm was intended to extend the industrial park and was not specifically for the
purpose of a data center. He stated that, similar to when the City sold 119 acres to Carvana and
then acquired approximately 200 acres across the street to continue growing the industrial park,
the City later worked with REDI Cincinnati and JobsOhio to market the remaining acreage to
businesses and industry for economic development, which he stated the City has been doing for
many years.
John Glenn, 3191 Wayne Madison Road – Mr. Glenn addressed Mayor and Council and asked
whether the City could have withdrawn from the purchase agreement after learning who the
potential end user was, comparing the situation to a private real estate transaction where a
buyer may have a period of time to reconsider. He questioned why the City did not seek
additional public input once it became aware of the potential use of the property. Mr. Glenn
stated that he believes Council is not listening to residents and is pursuing its own agenda
despite public opposition. He also referenced the recent vote regarding the citizen petition and
stated that, although he was unable to attend because of work, residents had made their
position clear. Mr. Glenn stated that Council members work for the public and that residents
have the ability to hold elected officials politically accountable. He expressed frustration with
comments he stated had been made and stated that he intends to continue attending meetings
and speaking against Council’s actions.
Steve Wallace – Mr. Wallace addressed Mayor and Council and stated that he is a member of
the W.A.T.E.R. group and one of the sponsors listed on the proposed charter amendment
petition. Mr. Wallace provided background regarding his service as a Navy veteran during Desert
Shield and Desert Storm, including his work in communications support and security-related
duties, and stated that his military service and family history have shaped his views on integrity,
the Constitution, and public accountability. Mr. Wallace then discussed his involvement in
gathering petition signatures, stating that on July 1 he received permission from a local business
to set up a table and chairs to collect signatures for the petition. He stated that another resident
assisted him that day despite the heat and that he believed the activity was lawful and within his
rights. Mr. Wallace then raised concerns regarding a Council member’s later visit to that
business, stating that he was told the Council member asked who had given permission for the
petitioners to set up in the parking lot and who had been present collecting signatures. Mr.
Wallace stated that he viewed those questions as inappropriate and believed they implied
wrongdoing, even though he maintained that no law had been violated. He also alleged that the
same Council member had made a comment to the business regarding the potential impact on
business and had gone to Barn-N-Bunk regarding petition activity. Mr. Wallace stated that he
believed such conduct was improper for a Council member and questioned why a Council
member would involve himself in lawful petition activity on private property. Councilman Nichols
responded and identified himself as the Council member who had asked the question at the
local business. He stated that he has visited the business many times as a customer and has
answered questions from employees about City issues on multiple occasions. Councilman
Nichols stated that he simply asked whether the petition group had permission to set up on the
property because, in his view, if the group had permission there was no issue, but if a group set
up without permission it could affect the business. He stated that he did not threaten or
intimidate anyone and that he answered several questions from the employee, including

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
explaining that a special meeting had been scheduled on a Saturday because that was when the
most Council members were available. Councilman Nichols also denied approaching anyone at
Barn-N-Bunk regarding petition activity and stated that he had not spoken with anyone there
about that issue. During the exchange, there was back-and-forth between Mr. Wallace and
Councilman Nichols, and Mayor directed both parties to stop the back-and-forth.
Donna Lefevre – Ms. LeFevre addressed Mayor and Council and stated that she would be brief.
She stated that residents have seen Council move quickly when it is something Council wants,
including hiring attorneys, moving agendas forward quickly, and spending taxpayer money
defending its decisions. Ms. LeFevre asked Council to imagine what the community could
accomplish if local government and residents worked together to create a town everyone would
love to be part of and be proud of. She concluded by asking why Council cannot fight as hard for
its constituents as it fights against them.
Chad, Clara Drive - Chad, of Clara Drive, addressed Mayor and Council and stated that he was
disappointed with Council’s vote at the recent special meeting regarding the citizen petition. He
stated that he had signed the petition and felt that Council rejected it based on a technicality,
even though residents were seeking the ability to vote on the issue. He questioned why Council
would not place the matter on the ballot if it believes the data center is in the best interest of
residents, and expressed concern that taxpayer dollars may now be used to litigate against
residents who signed the petition. Chad stated that he has lost faith in Council and does not
believe residents are being heard. He also stated that he does not view the proposed data
center as the same as any other business because of the potential infrastructure impacts and
costs, including concerns related to electric service, substations, water infrastructure, and the
timing of the water tower project. He stated that the process feels underhanded to him as a
citizen and expressed concern about a lack of transparency, including discussions occurring in
meetings or settings where residents do not hear all of the details. Mayor responded by stating
that the substation being built behind Duke Energy is being fully funded by Prologis, and that any
AWS electric infrastructure would be paid for by AWS before being turned over to Duke Energy.
Mayor also stated that, based on his understanding, sewer infrastructure through the County
would be fully paid for by the developer while maintaining existing capacity. Mayor referenced
recent ratepayer protection discussions and stated that, although certain commitments may
currently be pledges rather than binding law, he would like any agreement with AWS to include
enforceable language requiring AWS to pay 100% of its electric costs, water costs, and any
related infrastructure upgrades so residents do not bear those costs. Mayor stated that he does
not believe residents should pay any burden associated with the project and that any agreement
should protect residents from rate increases caused by the development. Mr. Mesisklis clarified
that the City has not historically discounted connection fees, including for Shape Corp, though
the City did install sewer infrastructure on City-owned property before those developments were
built. Discussion also included state-level utility policy considerations for large users, including
capacity charges, and Mayor referenced broader federal and state discussions regarding data
centers, power, and taxation.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
Gary Embry 2029 Wayne Madsion Road – Mr. Embry addressed Mayor and Council and first
commended Mr. Mesisklis for keeping Council and residents informed regarding the financial
aspects of the proposed development. Mr. Embry stated that, in his view, the data center issue
has divided the community over the past several months and that the discussion has become
confrontational. He stated that while he understands money is necessary for many City needs,
he is concerned that the discussion has focused heavily on financial benefits while residents
near the proposed annexation areas will be directly impacted. Mr. Embry stated that he and his
wife have lived on their property in Woodsdale for 27 years and that both proposed annexation
areas could affect their home. He stated that he has attended meetings in St. Clair Township,
Madison Township, Columbus, and New Albany, including visiting New Albany during the day and
at night to observe existing data center impacts. Mr. Embry stated that he remains concerned
about traffic and road improvements, noting that roads he observed in New Albany still
appeared to be country roads and that landscaping did not appear sufficient to screen the
facilities. He also stated that a neighboring property owner had been approached about selling
several acres without being told the reason, and he questioned whether future road
improvements on Wayne Madison Road could impact Woodsdale residents or require a new
road through or around their neighborhood. Mr. Embry stated that Woodsdale residents do not
have a vote in Trenton because they do not live within the City, but may still be impacted by the
development and annexation. He asked what benefit Woodsdale residents would receive if
Trenton were extended around their area. Mayor responded that the purpose of the presentation
was not solely about money, but to show that plans are being made by surrounding jurisdictions
and that the project may still move forward even if Trenton does not annex the property. Mayor
stated that the actions being taken by the townships indicate they are preparing for the
development, and that the practical issue is whether the development occurs within the City of
Trenton or outside of it.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
Erika Updike (Liberty Township) – Ms. Updike a Liberty Township resident who stated she lives
within four miles of the proposed data center properties, addressed Mayor and Council
regarding the proposed development and annexation. Ms. Updike stated that she believes much
of the information relied upon by Council may have been developed before residents in the
town, county, and state became aware of the issue and began pushing back. She stated that
residents were not participating in earlier meetings because they did not know the full scope of
what was being planned, and that this lack of early public awareness does not reflect
transparency. Ms. Updike objected to the use of the term “improvement,” stating that, in her
view, improvement does not mean destroying the environment, dividing a city, or accepting
corporate money in exchange for impacts to the land. She expressed concern that large
companies would not be meaningfully deterred by fines or local enforcement once they have
acquired the land and begun development. Ms. Updike also raised concerns regarding potential
roadway impacts through Woodsdale, including effects on homeowners and historic properties.
She stated that, as the City continues purchasing property, it now owns historic properties and
has a responsibility to protect them for the good of the community. She also questioned the
long-term school funding benefits and whether increased development could drive away younger
families, reducing the future tax base. Ms. Updike then discussed the proposed wetlands
project, stating that while she appreciates the concept and potential funding, she believes key
details were omitted, including the proximity of generators and pollution that could negatively
affect the environmental benefits of the project. She questioned whether residents would want
to use a park or birdwatch near generator infrastructure. Ms. Updike also discussed her interest
in local history and historic properties, including family connections to Revolutionary War
veterans and early local families. She stated that part of the Rapier property may have historic
significance, including ties to early Cincinnati history and possible burial sites or unmarked
graves, and stated that she expects additional pushback related to those concerns. Ms. Updike
concluded by stating that free speech includes profanity, even if some people find it
objectionable. Mayor responded that profanity is protected under free speech, as stated at the
beginning of the meeting, even if some people do not like it.

Barry Blankenship (Via Online) - As we all know by now we are going to get at least 4 data center
buildings with a total of 112 generators. Those generators will consume nearly 187 gallons of
diesel per hour. This will be in the amount of 20,944 gallons to run them. If they have to run for
a full 24 hour time period all 112 generators would consume 502,656 gallons. Where is this
much fuel going to be stored? How are we going to get this much fuel transported into the
facility? This is nearly 500 tankers coming in and out of our city in 1 day’s time. What kind of fire
hazard or environmental, safety, and health hazard will this create? It has been told that our
fire department will not be able to fight a fire if something goes wrong at the facility , what kind
of evacuation plan do we have to assure the safety of our community ? Can our roadways
handle that much traffic ? Now factor in that our city wants to add another 18 buildings on the
annexed land. This will create a disaster that your names will be forever remembered for
destroying our community. Don’t be mad at the citizens for being frustrated with the decisions
you chose for us even with you knowing we do not want this for our community. No you should
not be threatened as it has been told you have. Please have thicker skin to take the heat when
we are upset with you. You chose a life in politics, it’s up to you how you handle the good with
the bad. As we have told you before, we will not be silenced, we will not go away, we will always
be paying attention to what goes on in our city. The days of trust and not coming to meetings are
over.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
Tim Sloneker 404 Clara Dr (Via Online) - I understand why you approved the first data center.
You believed it was the right move for Trenton’s future—jobs, revenue, and progress. I can
respect that you thought it was best for the city at the time. But this new move is not that. Now
the people have spoken through the process the law provides. We gathered the signatures. The
Board of Elections reviewed them and certified that they are sufficient. Under the Ohio
Constitution, that means this amendment must go to the voters. you may be prepared to declare
the petition insufficient and deny us that vote. If so, please understand that this is no longer
about whether you think data centers are good or bad. This is about the Ohio Constitution, the
Trenton Charter and your oath of office. When citizens do their part and the Board of Elections
validates the signatures, reaching for technical arguments to block the ballot starts looking less
like careful review and more like departing from the trust you’ve been given by the voters you
represent. Now, we are at a real fork in the road as a community. You, City Council members,
must follow the Ohio Constitution and your oath of office. This initiative could still fail on the
ballot, but you must give the people the chance to vote and let the community decide. I expect to
see political gamesmanship from big government, but I did not expect it from the Trenton City
Council. Trenton is supposed to be a "small town with a big heart." (Those that are interested to
submit a question to City Council may find the form here
https://forms.cloud.microsoft/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=cCfQs7f02USaVVw8wOvosfJf4NYH
tD5GiervB9vrRs1UMVdRWjFTSVlHQUxBUkFSRkY2UDZDNDQxNC4u&route=shorturl please note
the form opens 4:30 when the agenda is posted and closed 8am during the day of council)

UNFINISHED BUSINESS

Motion –Motion to read Items 1 through 4 Under Unfinished Business By Title Only
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Ms. Butts_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
1. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF SERVICES THE CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO,
WILL PROVIDE TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO OF
601.589 +/- ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN ST. CLAIR TOWNSHIP AND MADISION
TOWNSHIP, BUTLER COUNTY, OHIO, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Second
Reading)
Motion – The Resolution Be Adopted
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher 2nd Ms. Montgomery_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN: Butts
ABSENT:

(6)
(0)
(1)
(0)

2. A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO
CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE SO ANNEXED PURSUANT TO AN ANNEXATION
PETITION FILED WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BUTLER COUNTY,
OHIO, AS PROVIDED FOR IN OHIO REVISED CODE SECTION 709.024, AND DECLARING
AN EMERGENCY. (Second Reading)
Motion –The Resolution Be Approved
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Ms. Butts 2nd Mr. Proffitt_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Montgomery, Nichols
NAYS: Butts, Proffitt, Roark
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(4)
(3)
(0)
(0)

3. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF TRENTON CLASSIFICATION SCALE AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Second Reading)
Motion –The Resolution Be Approved
(Roll Call Vote) 1st_____ Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Ms. Montgomery_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
4. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A PETITION
FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE TRENTON SQUARE COMMUNITY AUTHORITY ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TRENTON AS THE SOLE “PROXIMATE CITY” WITHIN THE
MEANING OF SECTION 349.01 (M) OF THE OHIO REVISED CODE, AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY. (Second Reading)
Motion –The Resolution Be Approved
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Ms. Montgomery_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. None.

NEW BUSINESS

1. A MOTION TO APPOINT DALE PERRY TO SERVE ON THE TRENTON VOLUNTEER
FIREFIGHTER DEPENDENT’S FUND BOARD AS A RESIDENT APPOINTEE FOR A TERM
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2026.
a. Mr. Beresford stated that Mr. Perry was the only application received for the
Trenton Volunteer Firefighter Dependent Fund Board vacancy and that Mr. Perry
had reached out approximately one week prior. He stated that the application
period had been open since June 3 and that the vacancy had been posted

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
online for approximately two months. It was clarified that the position is
voluntary, unpaid, and limited to Trenton residents. Mayor Perry then stated
that, as he had mentioned previously when several board positions were
discussed, he has made his board positions available for others to apply. He
stated that he believes he is currently only serving on the CIC and requested
that his CIC board position be posted again for anyone who may be interested,
noting that the last time it was posted there were no applicants.
Motion – Motion To Appoint
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Mr. Nichols_
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
LEGISLATION

Motion –Motion to Read Item 1 under legislation by title only
(Roll Call Vote) 1st______Vice Mayor Croucher_______ 2nd Mr. Nichols
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

1. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY AND
IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 5721 KENNEL ROAD, CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (First Reading)
REPORTS

Clerk of Council Stanislav Beresford – Mr. Beresford reported on the Hometown Hero
Banner Program, stating that there has been significant interest in the program and that
Duke Energy has approved the poles for the next round of banners. He stated that
applications will open on September 1 and close on September 25. Mr. Beresford noted
that the last batch of Hometown Hero banners was installed around January, and that the
City expects a similar timeline for this round. He also stated that staff discussed the light
poles being installed at Trenton Square, but that those poles need to be finalized and
settled before banners can be placed there. He stated that the City expects to add
Hometown Hero banners to Trenton Square in a future batch, likely about a year from now,
so residents who are unable to participate in the current round may have another
opportunity at that time. Mayor asked how many banners may be available at Trenton
Square, and Mr. Beresford stated that he did not have that number available but would
provide a report to Council at the next meeting.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
AUDIENCE OF COUNCIL

Mr. Roark – Mr. Roark explained his vote regarding the citizen petition and stated that he
believed the matter should have been placed on the ballot for residents to decide. He stated
that, after hearing that a court decision had been split three to two regarding the
interpretation of electors as those who voted in the last election, that was sufficient for him
to believe the issue should go before the voters. Mr. Roark stated that allowing the vote would
also show whether those supporting the petition were speaking for the broader City of
Trenton. He emphasized that the main issue for him was allowing the people to vote. Mr.
Roark also stated that he has seen comments on Trenton Talk referring to him as a politician,
but that he does not view himself that way. He stated that he is 65 years old, has been married
to the same woman for 46 years, has children and grandchildren, and has operated his own
business for 33 years. Mr. Roark stated that he became involved because he loves the City
and wants to do what he can for Trenton and its residents.
Ms. Butts – Ms. Butts stated that she agreed the citizen petition should have been allowed to
go to a vote, stating that residents were asking for the opportunity to have a say. She then
asked procedurally whether it would be permissible for Council to make a motion to rescind
the prior action and vote again. Mayor stated that the question would be for Mr. Ziepfel. Mr.
Ziepfel stated that he understood the question, but that even if Council were able to take that
action, the deadline to file the matter had already passed and such action would not modify
the filing deadline. Ms. Butts then stated that, at that point, the City would have to move
forward with spending taxpayer money to address the matter legally
Mr. Proffitt- No Reports.
Ms. Montgomery- Ms. Montgomery stated that she has a roof over her head that God has
provided for her and that she will continue doing what she believes God called her to do five
years ago, which was to run for City Council. She stated that she was called to do it again, that
she did so, and that she is here and is not going anywhere.
Mr. Nichols – Mr. Nichols clarified his earlier comments regarding his visit to a local business
where petition signatures had been collected. He stated that when he was asked whether he
would have questioned a business about any group setting up on its property, he responded
that his concern was specific to political activity because businesses can sometimes be
placed in a difficult position when political issues are involved. Councilman Nichols stated
that he had no issue with anyone setting up where they have permission, and that his only
intent was to confirm whether permission had been granted. He stated that if permission had
not been granted, his intent would have been to contact representatives of the group and ask
that they ensure they have property owner permission before setting up at a business.
Councilman Nichols also stated that he has visited the business many times as a customer,
has answered questions from employees about City matters, and believed the conversation
worked both ways. He also denied approaching Barn-N-Bunk or Tom Theobald regarding
petition activity and stated that he tries not to involve businesses in political disputes.
Councilman Nichols then addressed comments that Council does not care about residents,
stating that a significant part of Council’s discussions regarding the data center projects has
involved ensuring that the schools benefit as well as the City. He stated that Council is thinking

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
about residents in different ways and that he does not believe Council is ignoring them. During
the discussion, there was some back-and-forth from the audience, and Mayor directed the
discussion to stop. Councilman Nichols also explained his vote at the recent special meeting,
stating that he took an oath to defend the City Charter. He stated that the Charter refers to
10% of the electors of the City and references Article XVIII, Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution,
which he stated also refers to electors of the City. He stated that there is another section of
the Ohio Constitution that refers to those who voted in the last election, but that the City
Charter does not reference that provision. Councilman Nichols stated that, in his view,
defining electors only as those who voted in the last election would create inconsistencies,
including when considering who would be permitted to vote on other ballot issues. He stated
that this was why he voted the way he did. Councilman Nichols concluded on a lighter note
by stating that he had picked up 20 pounds of popcorn for the upcoming Movie in the Park
and encouraged residents to attend and enjoy the event.
Vice Mayor Croucher - Vice Mayor Croucher stated that it would be a busy weekend in the City
of Trenton and reminded residents that Movies in the Park would be held Saturday at dusk.
He encouraged residents to attend the movie and, weather permitting, to visit and enjoy the
splash pad. Vice Mayor Croucher then recognized Shape Corporation for recently achieving a
historic milestone, stating that parts manufactured by Shape traveled to space aboard
SpaceX Starship during a flight test on July 23 at approximately 6:45 p.m. On behalf of
Council, he congratulated the Shape Corporation team for its hard work, dedication, and role
in advancing the manufacturing industry, stating that it is something to be proud of for parts
manufactured in Trenton to travel into space. Vice Mayor Croucher also thanked Pastor Keith
for attending and offering the prayer before the meeting. Vice Mayor Croucher then requested
that a video clip be played regarding data centers, community investment, job creation, and
ratepayer protection. During the video, audience comments occurred, and Mayor stated that
it was Vice Mayor Croucher’s report time and that Council members had not previously chosen
to limit their own speaking time when time limits were discussed. Following discussion, Mayor
asked Council whether it wished to limit Council member comments to three minutes as well.
Council discussed limiting both Council and public comments to three minutes. Mayor stated
that, as presiding officer, he would control meeting decorum going forward by applying a
three-minute speaking limit to both Council members and public speakers, and he directed
Mr. Beresford to obtain a timer that could be displayed so everyone could see the remaining
speaking time.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.
Mayor Perry – Mayor Perry stated that Council had been placed in a difficult position because
the City was approached regarding annexation of property that was already being discussed
for a data center. He stated that the property owner had informed the City, before many of
the public meetings occurred, that he had entered into a purchase agreement for the property
and had even shared the price per acre. Mayor stated that the City was then approached
about annexing the property, and that the City began the annexation process while negotiating
with the townships and county for an extended period of time. He stated that Council had
been kept informed of those negotiations and that it was known negotiations were occurring.
Mayor stated that the townships now appear to be preparing for the development to occur
without the City of Trenton, and that the issue before the City is whether data centers are
located just outside Trenton in the townships or within the City. Mayor compared the situation
to Miller Brewery, stating that if Miller had asked to annex into Trenton before construction
and Council had refused because of public concerns, the facility would still have been built
outside the City while continuing to impact Trenton roads and residents without generating
City tax revenue. He stated that Miller has significant truck traffic, uses Trenton roads, does
not pay City income tax, and pumps water directly from the aquifer, and that those impacts
occurred regardless of whether the facility was within Trenton. Mayor stated that, in his view,
if a prior Council had the opportunity to annex Miller and chose not to, knowing the facility
would still be built nearby, that would have been the wrong decision. He stated that the same
concern applies to the proposed data center development because, based on township
actions, the development may still occur outside City limits, while the schools could receive
substantially less revenue, infrastructure benefits may not come to Trenton, and the
developer could potentially drill wells or avoid certain City requirements. Mayor stated that if
the property is developed outside the City, there may be no guarantee that all infrastructure
upgrades will be paid for in the same way the City intends to require through annexation.
Mayor asked whether the townships could use TIFF money to improve infrastructure needed
for the development. Mr. Mesisklis stated that the traditional TIFF approach generally involves
issuing debt upfront, using bond proceeds to fund infrastructure improvements, and then
repaying that debt over the TIFF collection period through service payments. He explained
that the townships would not have the TIFF revenue immediately and would likely need to go
to the bond market, where banks, retirement funds, or other investors could purchase the
debt. Mayor stated that he understands residents’ concerns about data centers, AI, and how
quickly technology is changing, and that he does not dismiss those concerns. However, he
stated that whether the project is located within Trenton or in the townships, those concerns
would still exist because the facility would be in the same general location. Mayor stated that,
in his view, the main difference would be where the revenue goes and what jurisdictional
standards apply, and he acknowledged that this is a difficult and disheartening reality for
residents who oppose the project.

City of Trenton
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 6th, 2026 - 7:30 p.m.

ADJOURNMENT

Motion - That the meeting be adjourned.
(Roll Call Vote) 1st_____ Mr. Roark____ 2nd Ms. Butts_ Time 9:39 P.M.
YAYS: Perry, Croucher, Proffitt, Butts, Montgomery, Nichols, Roark
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:

(7)
(0)
(0)
(0)

Madison / St. Clair
TIF Legislation
PUBLIC INFORMATION PRESENTATION

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Reality of Economic Development
• Many residents have expressed the belief that stopping the proposed
annexation, or banning data centers within City Limits will stop the proposed
AWS development along Wayne-Madison Rd.
• Unfortunately, that is not how this situation works.
• Un-annexed farms are in County / Township M2 zoning, which is heavy industrial,
allowing Telecommunications facilities, Metal or chemical manufacturing, Gas
Generation, meat packing, tar distillation, etc.
• The evidence indicates that both jurisdictions are actively preparing for the data
center project. The difference is not whether development occurs—it is under
which jurisdiction it occurs, what taxes they pay, how the revenue is split, and
what standards they are held to.

01

MAADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

What is TIF
• TIF Stands for “Tax Increment Financing”
• Revenues on new development are redirected for
infrastructure-related purposes at the discretion of the
creating authority
• TIFs are tools used to facilitate and capitalize on incoming
developments by funding infrastructure.

• Trenton has several 30y, 100% TIFs around town, most
notably in the Industrial Park and Trenton Square
• TIFs stick to parcels based on the initiating entity, even if
jurisdiction borders change

NEW VALUE

INCREMENT

INFRASTRUCTURE

02

MAADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Types of TIF

10

YEARS

75%

CAPTURE

30

YEARS

100%

CAPTURE

• TIF redirects 75% of the incoming
property taxes on a new development for
a period of 10 years.

• TIF redirects 100% of the incoming
property taxes on a new development
for a period of 30 years

• Schools get NONE of the TIF revenue.
They get 60% of the 25% value that is not
TIF’d

• EXCEPTION: School District receives
their FULL millage rate, usually 60% of
the total tax bill.

• County and TWP levies also get their
share of the 25% un-TIF’d property

03

MAADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Madison / St. Clair Proposition
• A 10-year, 75% Tax Increment Financing (TIF) incentive
• This TIF does not compensate any local school district.
• A TIF is not enacted to prevent development. It is a
financing tool used to facilitate and support
construction by funding public infrastructure
improvements.

10
75%

YEARS

CAPTURE

• By proposing this TIF, the township demonstrates that it
is preparing to accommodate the AWS project.

04

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Trenton’s TIF Plan
• A 30-year, 100% Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
WITHOUT incentive
• Full School District Compensation (60% of total bill)
• Trenton has offered 4 mills (7% of total tax bill) to
Madison and St. Clair Twp during the full TIF Period,
even though the property would be annexed to
Trenton and served by Trenton Fire / PD

30
100%
YEARS

CAPTURE

05

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Comparison Hypothetical
•

$50m land value, $500m building value, evenly split between Madison and
St. Clair Townships
ECSD $
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331
6,513,331

Trenton Plan, 30y 100% TIF
Trenton
Madison TWP St. Clair TWP
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
3,850,117
385,000
385,000

Butler Tech
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520
371,520

2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
20416,513,331
3,850,117
385,000
385,000
371,520
2060
TOTAL
20312040 $ 65,133,311 $ 38,501,167 $ 3,850,000 $ 3,850,000 $ 3,715,198

Township Proposal, 10y 75% TIF (No Annex)
ECSD $
Trenton Madison TWP St. Clair TWP Butler Tech
2031 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2032 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2033 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2034 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2035 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2036 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2037 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2038 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2039 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
2040 $ 1,628,333
0
$ 4,498,169 $ 4,789,890 $ 92,880
$ 6,513,331 $ 2041 +
TOTAL
20312040 $ 16,283,328 $ -

$

720,686 $

894,075 $ 371,520

$ 44,981,692 $ 47,898,903 $ 928,800

For simplicity, this depicts all buildings constructed for a full 10-year capture period, from the first taxed year, and
Township plan is no annexation. If annexation occurs, the Township TIFs would stay effective on the property.
Only property taxes from the most-affected TIF’d entities are shown

*Township TIF Documents indicate total expected value of $1,317,750,000. Above only shows $550m
hypothetical
06

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Paths forward

01

02

03

AWS Built in Townships
per Township TIF

AWS Built in Trenton
per Township TIF

AWS Built in Trenton
per Trenton TIF

CONTEXT

• The 6 month County “moratorium” has already lasted 2
months, and can be repealed at any time
• ORC 519.12(j): Township Zoning amendments may be immune
from Public Referendum on Megaprojects
06A

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

No Annexation = Overall Economic Loss
• City of Trenton cannot require local labor
involvement to the project. Townships can never do
this, since they are creatures of statute.
• Construction firms not required to withhold any local
income tax, nor file/pay Net Profits tax.
• AWS not required to withhold any local income tax,
which would otherwise be shared 50/50 between
Trenton and ECSD
• AWS not required have to file / pay Net Profits tax
LOST LOCAL LEVERS

labor • income tax • net profits

07

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Benefits of Annexation
• Connection to metered public water and sanitary sewer.
• Utility tap fees to further enhance system-wide
infrastructure without rate increases.
• Prevents AWS from directly accessing the aquifer and
pursuing a wastewater discharge permit
• City-mandated stormwater fees and management standards

• Increased landscape buffers, berms, setbacks, tree-lining,
and noise standards (65db daytime, 50db nighttime)
• Coordinated planning for roads, utilities, police, fire, and
long-term growth.
• Construction entities and AWS must file and pay Payroll and
Net Profit Taxes to Trenton. AWS Payroll tax shared with
Edgewood Schools

Sustainability and Infrastructure
Benefits
utilities • standards • safety •
revenue

08

MADISON / ST. CLAIR • TAX INCREMENT FINANCING

Key Takeaways
01

02

03

Whether annexed or not, the Townships’ 10y
75% TIF indicates preparation to host AWS, and
limit economic benefits to Trenton, Edgewood
Schools, and Butler Tech.

Stopping annexation OR banning
construction within City Limits does
not stop development.
The practical choice is whether development
occurs under township or city governance, and
which framework provides greater public
benefits, infrastructure investment, and
protections.

The decision is about
governance—and the public
value it creates.

09

MOTION NO 44-2026
A MOTION, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH VICKERS DEMOLITION, INC. FOR THE DEMOLITION
AND REMOVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 301 EAST
STATE STREET, TRENTON, OHIO IN THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY-NINE
THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($59,500.00) AND FURTHER
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
RELATED THERETO.

Motioned by ___________________ authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with
Vickers Demolition, Inc., for the Demolition and Removal of the Commercial Structure Located at
301 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio located at 301 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio, in the amount of
$59,500.00 and authorizing the City Manager to sign all documents related thereto.
Seconded by: _________________________
Upon Roll Call, the Vote Resulted as follows:
AYES:__________
NAYS:__________
ABSENT:__________

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, Ohio, hereby certify that
the foregoing Motion No. 44-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the
City of Trenton, Ohio on the 20th day of August, 2026, and that at least a majority of the elected
members voted in the affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

August 20, 2026. Staff Report

City Council Meeting Staff Report
Report to:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council

Report From:

Brad Baker, Service Director

Prepared By:

Amy King, Assistant to the Service Director

Agenda Item: Motion Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement with Vickers
Demolition, Inc. for the Demolition and Removal of the Commercial Structure Located
at 301 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio
Ordinance/Resolution/Motion
Motion

Contract
Fiscal Impact
* (2025 appropriation
carried forward to 2026)

1st Reading Date:
2nd Reading Date:
3rd Reading Date:
Motion Date: August 20, 2026
Resolution Date:
Public Hearing Date:
Contract Required:
Budgeted: Yes;
2025
Expenditure:
59,500.00
Source Funds:
251-6106-53104

Strategic Goals
Connected Community
Economic Vitality
Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhoods
General Operations
Responsible Infrastructure

Additional Document(s) Attached: Yes
Please see further, more detailed information regarding the
fiscal impact in the summary section of this report.

Policy Issue

Does Trenton City Council wish to approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an
agreement with Vickers Demolition, Inc. for the Demolition and Removal of the Commercial Structure
Located at 301 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio

Policy Alternatives
City Council may choose not to authorize the City Manager to enter into this agreement, thereby
delaying or discontinuing the proposed demolition and site restoration project.

Staff Recommendation

Does Trenton City Council wish to approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an
agreement with Vickers Demolition, Inc. for the Demolition and Removal of the Commercial Structure
Located at 301 East State Street, Trenton, Ohio

August 20, 2026. Staff Report

Statutory/Policy Authority
•
•

Article III, Legislative Action, of the Charter of the City of Trenton.
ORC and the Codified Ordinances of the City of Trenton.

Fiscal Impact Summary

This project was included in the 2025 tax budget approved by Council. Although the project was
temporarily put on hold due to unforeseen delays, the funding remains available and has been
carried forward for this purpose.

Background Information

The property located at 301 East State Street consists of a one-story commercial building that most
recently operated as Whitey’s Tavern. The City has determined that demolition of the structure and
associated site improvements is necessary. The project includes complete demolition and removal of
the building, including the foundation, footings, and floor slab. The site shall be graded and restored
with seed and straw. Additional work includes clearing the tree line along the east property boundary
and demolishing and removing the existing asphalt parking lot. The contractor shall be responsible for
obtaining all required demolition permits and coordinating all inspections required by the county. All
associated permit fees and inspection costs shall be included in the proposal.
The City solicited quotes from qualified demolition contractors. Three proposals were received.
Following a review of the proposals submitted, staff determined that Vickers Demolition, Inc. provided
the lowest responsive quote. Vicker Demolition, Inc. proposed a total project cost of $59,500.00.
The City has already completed a pre-demolition asbestos inspection and universal waste inventory
through Patriot Engineering and Environmental. In accordance with all applicable regulations, any
identified asbestos-containing materials and universal wastes will be properly managed and removed
prior to demolition.

Attached Information
•
•
•

Vickers Demolition Inc., Proposal
BC Crushing & Screening, LLC Estimate (withdrew bid)
Battle Axe Construction, LLC Quote

VICKERS DEMOLITION, INC.
P.O. Box 384, Trenton, OH 45067
PH: 513-894-7034 / 866-741-6640

[email protected]
REVISED PROPOSAL / CONTRACT

August 7, 2026

City of Trenton
11 E. State Street
Trenton, Ohio 45067
Attn: Brad Baker
Vickers Demolition, Inc.’s proposal to furnish labor, equipment, material and trained personnel
necessary to adequately demolish and remove the 1 story, commercial building located at 301 E
State St., Trenton, OH for the lump sum price listed below:

DEMOLITION:

$ 54,000.00

HAZARDOUS WASTE:

$ 5,500.00

SCOPE OF WORK TO BE COMPLETED:
Vickers Demolition, Inc. will demolish and remove the building in its entirety, including the
foundation, footers and floors. All demolition debris will be hauled off to an approved C&DD
Landfill. All areas of demolition will be graded out to meet the existing contours of the
surrounding area. Grass seed and straw will be sewn. Vickers will clear-out the tree line along
the east side of the property as well as demolish and remove the asphalt parking lot. Our abovementioned price also includes the demolition permit and all inspections that are required by
Butler County.
ITEMS OF WORK NOT INCLUDED IN BID: No removal of any public sidewalks, aprons,
curbs or alleys. No removal of any septic tank, cistern or well.

301 E State St.
City of Trenton

1

This is a commercial property and as such falls under EPA regulations and is required to
have a NESHAP survey (a phase one asbestos, contaminated materials survey) completed
on it by a licensed Ohio Department of Health hazard evaluation specialist before any
demolition can begin. The cost of that survey is not included in the above-mentioned price
as we are not licensed to complete that survey. Any asbestos, contaminated, or hazardous
materials found in the survey will need to be abated by a licensed abatement contractor
before any demolition can begin. The cost of any abatement is not included in the abovementioned price.
Also, according to the EPA regulations, the demolition contractor is required to file a
Notification of Demolition Application with the EPA after the NESHAP survey and
abatement (if needed) have been completed. This application carries a mandatory ten (10)
business day waiting period from the date the application is mailed to the EPA before any
demolition can begin. Vickers Demolition, Inc. will require a copy of the NESHAP survey
and any reports generated from the abatement of any suspect material, if found. We will
need these reports to send with the EPA application. Vickers Demolition, Inc. does not
complete any of this paperwork until we have a signed contract and the necessary reports
on the building.
Insurance and Workers’ Compensation certificates furnished upon request. Vickers Demolition,
Inc.’s insurance will not be in effect until our equipment is on the job site.
All debris from the demolition will be hauled off and disposed of in a business-like manner. All
salvage becomes the property of Vickers Demolition, Inc. upon signing of contract.
Payment is due upon completion. 1-1/2% per month (18% per annum) added to accounts over
30 days. Contractee agrees to pay to Contractor all attorney fees, expenses and costs which may
be incurred by contractor in collecting past due amounts owed under the contract.

ACCEPTED BY:

___________________________________

SUBMITTED BY:

__________________________________
Alicia Neal, Office Manager

DATE: ______________________________
Please sign, date and return copy {if accepted}

301 E State St.
City of Trenton

2

MOTION NO 45-2026
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH
NORMAC COMPANY, LLC FOR PAVING SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CITY OF
TRENTON'S 2026 LOCAL PAVING PROGRAM IN AN AMOUNT OF NINE HUNDRED
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ELEVEN DOLLARS AND EIGHTY-ONE CENTS ($900,511.81),
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED
THERETO.

Motioned by _________________authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Normac
Company LLC., for paving services for the City of Trenton’s 2026 Local Paving Program, in an amount
not to exceed $900,511.81 and authorizing the City Manager to sign all documents related thereto.
Seconded by: _________________________
Upon Roll Call, the Vote Resulted as follows:
AYES:__________
NAYS:__________
ABSENT:__________

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, hereby certify that the foregoing
Motion No. 45-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the City of Trenton, Ohio on
the 20th day of August, 2026 and that at least a majority of the elected members voted in the
affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

August 20, 2026

Staff Report

City Council Meeting Staff Report
Report to:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council

Report From:

Brad Baker, Service Director

Prepared By:

Amy King, Assistant to the Service Director

Agenda Item: Motion Authorizing the City Manager to enter into a contract with Normac Company
LLC., for paving services for the City of Trenton 2026 Local Paving Program.
Ordinance/Resolution/Motion
Motion

1st Reading Date:
2nd Reading Date:
3rd Reading Date:
Motion Date: 08-18-2026
Resolution Date:
Public Hearing Date:

Strategic Goals
Connected Community
Economic Vitality
Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhoods
General Operations
Responsible Infrastructure

Contract
Fiscal Impact
Base bid:
$610,221.30
Alt. 1 :
$208,245.80
Contingency: $ 81,864.71
Total:
$900,511.81

Contract Required:
Budgeted: Yes
Expenditure:
$900,511.81
Source Funds: >>>

Additional Document(s) Attached:
Please see further, more detailed information regarding the
fiscal impact in the summary section of this report.

Source Funds:

102-6006-53109
202-6306-53109
253-1906-53109

Policy Issue
Does City Council wish to approve the motion to authorize the City Manager to enter into a contract
with Normac Company LLC., for paving services for the City of Trenton 2026 Local Paving Program?
Policy Alternative
City Council can choose to not authorize the City Manager to enter into this agreement. City Council
can select an alternate contractor, reject all bids, re-bid or simply choose not to perform paving this
year.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve the motion to authorize the City Manager to enter into a
contract with Normac Company LLC., for paving services for the City of Trenton 2026 Local Paving
Program.
Statutory/Policy Authority
• Article III, Legislative Action, of the Charter of the City of Trenton.
• Chapter 208.02 Contracting Authority and Procedures.
• Charter Section 7.04 Contracting Procedures.

August 20, 2026

Staff Report

Fiscal Impact Summary
These funds were budgeted in the 2026 Tax Budget and accounted for. Fund 202 Municipal Motor
Vehicle Fund, Fund 253 Tax Increment Equivalent, and the 102 Street Fund will be the sources for
funding the paving. The recommended contract award amount of $900,511.81 which includes
Alternate 1 and a 10% construction contingency amount. This amount is below the Engineer’s
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost of $968,389.00 and allows the City to complete the proposed
improvements while maintaining contingency funds for unforeseen construction conditions.
Background Information
The 2026 Local Paving Program consists of resurfacing and related pavement improvements on
John Street from West State Street to West Roger Drive, Brelsford Avenue from West Roger Drive to
West Aberdeen Drive. These streets were selected based on pavement condition ratings. The project
also includes improvements within Community Park, including resurfacing the parking lot, basketball
court, walking path, and the U-shaped drive behind the amphitheater. Additional work includes restriping the basketball court and the 99-space parking lot. Alternate No. 1 consists of Greenwood
Lane from North Miami Avenue to Westview Avenue, while Alternate No. 2 includes resurfacing East
Roger Drive from North Miami Avenue to East Aberdeen Drive.
Bids were solicited with the understanding that the City of Trenton reserved the right to include
Alternate No. 1 and/or Alternate No. 2 based on available funding and project budget
considerations. The Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the project was
$968,389.00. Bids were publicly opened on July 30, 2026, and three bids were received.
Following a review of the bid submissions, the City Engineer recommends awarding the contract to
Normac Company, LLC the lowest and best bidder. Normac submitted a base bid of $610,221.30
and an Alternate No. 1 bid of $208,425.80, for a total recommended contract amount of
$818,647.10. Additionally, the Engineers Recommendation Letter noted that Normac has
successfully completed similar projects for the City and is familiar with the City’s standards,
specifications, and construction requirements.
Staff also recommends establishing a construction contingency in the amount of 10 percent of the
contract value, or $81,864.71, to address unforeseen field conditions, quantity adjustments, and
other construction-related issues that may arise during project execution. Including the
recommended contingency, the total project authorization would be $900,511.81.
The City Engineer does not recommend including Alternate No. 2 in the contract award, as doing so
would increase the project cost beyond the engineer's estimate and significantly reduce the
contingency available to address unforeseen conditions during construction. Accordingly, staff
recommends awarding the contract to Normac Company, LLC for the base bid and Alternate No. 1,
together with the recommended construction contingency.
Attached Information
• City Engineer Letter of Recommendation.
• 2026 City of Trenton Local Paving Bid Tabulation.

July 31, 2026
Mr. Brad Baker, Service Director
City of Trenton
11 E. State Street
Trenton, Ohio 45067
Via email: [email protected]
RE: City of Trenton – 2026 Paving Program
Contract Award Recommendation
Dear Mr. Baker:
We have reviewed the contractor bids received July 30, 2026, for the City of Trenton’s 2026 Paving
Program and recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder to include base bid and
Alternate #1, Normac Company, LLC. Three bids were received, with base bids ranging from
$610,221.30 to $948451.00. The Bids for Alternate 1 ranged from $182,138.25 to $295,362.00. The bid
results are summarized in the attached Bid Tabulation document.
Normac’s base bid ($610,221.30) with Alternate #1 ($208,425.80) totaling $818,647.10 is under the
Engineer’s estimate listed in the Bid Documents of $968,389.00. I do not recommend the inclusion of
Alternate #2 as it would cause the bid to exceed the Engineers Estimate and not allow for reasonable
contingency. Normac has completed similar projects for the City and is familiar with Trenton
standards. Therefore, I recommend that Trenton award the contract to Normac Company, LLC.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please contact me at (513) 644-1784.
Sincerely,
THE
KLEINGERS GROUP

William Brock, PE
City Engineer
Attachment: Contractor Bid Tabulation
cc: Marcos Nichols (City of Trenton), File

BID TABULATION

Trenton 2026 Local Paving Program
Bid Opening July 30, 2026 at 10:00 am

Street:

John Street (W. State Street to W. Rodger Drive)
Normac
Amount

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

QUANTITY

UNIT

Normac Unit

JS -1

REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB

71

LF

$

70.00 $

4,970.00

$82.00

JS -2

CONSTRUCT 6’ WIDE ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK RAMP W/ DETECTABLE
WARNING AND TRUNCATED DOMES (INCL. SAWCUT AND EX. WALK
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT TO GRADE)

4

EA

$

2,250.00 $

9,000.00

$3,600.00

JS - 3

REMOVE AND REPLACE 4" SIDEWALK

1800

SF

$

20.00 $

36,000.00

JS - 4

REMOVE AND REPLACE 6" DRIVE APRON

99

SF

$

22.00 $

2,178.00

JS - 5

PARTIAL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR (ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE)
7.5" OF ODOT ITEM 301

165

SY

$

65.00 $

JS - 6

PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”

7,822

SY

$

JS- - 7

6' WIDE PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”, BUTT JOINT

65

LF

JS - 8

NON-TRACKING TACK COAT (0.075 GAL/SY)

587

JS - 9

1.5” ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 1, (448)

JS - 10
JS - 11

JRJ Amount

$7,810.00

$14,400.00 $ 3,885.00

$15,540.00

$16.00

$28,800.00 $

18.00

$32,400.00

$44.00

$4,356.00 $

25.00

$2,475.00

10,725.00

$70.00

$11,550.00

$

130.00

$21,450.00

3.95 $

30,896.90

$2.50

$19,555.00 $

4.00

$31,288.00

$

20.00 $

1,300.00

$12.00

$780.00 $

14.00

$910.00

GAL

$

2.60 $

1,526.20

$4.50

$2,641.50 $

5.00

$2,935.00

356

CY

$

202.00 $

71,912.00

$188.00

$66,928.00 $

325.00

$115,700.00

MANHOLE ADJUSTED TO GRADE

8

EA

$

25.00 $

200.00

$500.00

$4,000.00 $ 1,500.00

$12,000.00

VALVE BOX ADJUSTED TO GRADE

7

EA

$

25.00 $

175.00

$400.00

$2,800.00 $ 1,050.00

$7,350.00

$

168,883.10

$161,632.50

$249,858.00

Breslford Avenue (W. Rodger Drive to W. Aberdeen Drive)

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

UNIT

Normac Unit

Normac
Amount

BA - 1

REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB

414

LF

$

70.00 $

28,980.00

$82.00

BA - 2

CONSTRUCT 6’ WIDE ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK RAMP W/ DETECTABLE
WARNING AND TRUNCATED DOMES (INCL. SAWCUT AND EX. WALK
REMOVAL)

3

EA

$

2,250.00 $

6,750.00

$3,600.00

BA - 3

REMOVE AND REPLACE 4" SIDEWALK

776

SF

$

20.00 $

15,520.00

BA - 4

PARTIAL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR (ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE)
7.5" OF ODOT ITEM 301

200

SY

$

65.00 $

13,000.00

BA - 5

PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5” (INCL. BUTT JOINT)

8,600

SY

$

3.95 $

BA - 6

6' WIDE PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”, BUTT JOINT

65

LF

$

BA - 7

NON-TRACKING TACK COAT (0.075 GAL/SY)

720

GAL

$

BA - 8

1.5” ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 1, (448)

437

CY

BA - 9

MANHOLE ADJUSTED TO GRADE

12

EA

BA - 10

VALVE BOX ADJUSTED TO GRADE

10

EA

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

JRU Unit

$33,948.00 $

JRJ Amount

100.00

$41,400.00

$10,800.00 $ 3,885.00

$11,655.00

$16.00

$12,416.00 $

18.00

$13,968.00

$70.00

$14,000.00 $

130.00

$26,000.00

33,970.00

$2.50

$21,500.00 $

4.00

$34,400.00

20.00 $

1,300.00

$12.00

$780.00 $

14.00

$910.00

2.60 $

1,872.00

$4.50

$3,240.00 $

5.00

$3,600.00

$

202.00 $

88,274.00

$188.00

$82,156.00 $

325.00

$142,025.00

$

25.00 $

300.00

$500.00

$6,000.00 $ 1,500.00

$18,000.00

$

25.00 $

250.00

$400.00

$4,000.00 $ 1,050.00

$10,500.00

$

190,216.00

SUBTOTAL - BRESLFORD AVENUE

AREA:

JRU Unit

$5,822.00 $

110.00

SUBTOTAL - JOHN STREET

Street:

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

$188,840.00

$302,458.00

Community Park

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

CP -1

PARTIAL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR (ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE)
7.5" OF ODOT ITEM 301

CP -2

1.5" LEVELING COURSE

Normac
Amount

UNIT

Normac Unit

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

JRU Unit

JRJ Amount

270

SY

$

65.00 $

17,550.00

$70.00

$18,900.00 $

130.00

$35,100.00

590

CY

$

198.00 $

116,820.00

$122,720.00 $
$4,374.00 $

307.00
5.00

$181,130.00
$4,860.00

$90,000.00 $

325.00

$117,000.00

CP -3

NON-TRACKING TACK COAT (0.075 GAL/SY)

972

GAL

$

2.60 $

2,527.20

$208.00
$4.50

CP -4

1” ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 1, (448)

360

CY

$

208.00 $

74,880.00

$250.00

1

LUMP

$

7,160.00 $

7,160.00

$6,470.00

$6,470.00 $ 7,160.00

$7,160.00

1

LUMP

$

4,185.00 $

4,185.00

$5,525.00

$5,525.00 $ 4,185.00

$4,185.00

$

223,122.20

CP -5
CP -6

THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, PARKING LOT: REPLACE PER
EXISTING
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, BASKETBALL COURT: REPLACE
PER EXISTING

SUBTOTAL - COMMUNTIY PARK

$247,989.00

$349,435.00

MISC
ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

UNIT

Normac Unit

Normac
Amount

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

JRU Unit

JRJ Amount

MISC - 1

MOBILIZATION

1

LUMP

$ 18,000.00 $

18,000.00

$28,000.00

$28,000.00 $ 13,200.00

$13,200.00

MISC - 2

MAINTAINING TRAFFIC

1

LUMP

$ 10,000.00 $

10,000.00

$32,900.00

$32,900.00 $ 33,500.00

$33,500.00

$60,900.00

$46,700.00

SUBTOTAL MISC

$ 28,000.00

Total Base Bid

$ 610,221.30

$ 659,361.50

$ 948,451.00

Alternate #1
Street:

Greenwood Lane (N. Miami St to Westview Ave)

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

UNIT

Normac Unit

Normac
Amount

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

GL - 1

CONSTRUCT 6’ WIDE ACCESSIBLE SIDEWALK RAMP W/ DETECTABLE
WARNING & TRUNCATED DOMES (INCL. SAWCUT & EX. WALK REMOVAL)

10

EA

$

2,250.00 $

22,500.00

$3,600.00

GL - 2

PARTIAL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR (ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE)
7.5" OF ODOT ITEM 301

220

SY

$

70.00 $

15,400.00

GL - 3

PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”

10,578

SY

$

4.50 $

GL - 4

6' WIDE PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”, BUTT JOINT

70

LF

$

20.00 $

GL - 5

NON-TRACKING TACK COAT (0.075 GAL/SY)

793

GAL

$

GL - 6

1.5” ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 1, (448)

482

CY

GL - 7

MANHOLE ADJUSTED TO GRADE

6

EA

GL - 8

VALVE BOX ADJUSTED TO GRADE

10

GL - 9

THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, STOP BAR.: REPLACE PER EXISTING

75

Street:

JRJ Amount

$36,000.00 $ 4,100.00

$41,000.00

$70.00

$15,400.00 $

130.00

$28,600.00

47,601.00

$2.50

$26,445.00 $

4.00

$42,312.00

1,400.00

$12.00

$840.00 $

14.00

$980.00

2.60 $

2,061.80

$4.50

$3,568.50 $

5.00

$3,965.00

$

242.00 $

116,644.00

$188.00

$90,616.00 $

325.00

$156,650.00

$

25.00 $

150.00

$500.00

$3,000.00 $ 1,500.00

$9,000.00

EA

$

31.40 $

314.00

$400.00

$4,000.00 $ 1,050.00

$10,500.00

LF

$

31.40 $

2,355.00

$30.25

$2,268.75 $

$2,355.00

ALTERNATE #1 SUBTOTAL - GREENWOOD LANE $ 208,425.80

Alternate #2

JRU Unit

31.40

$182,138.25

$295,362.00

East Rodger (North Miami to E. Aberdeen)
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

UNIT

Normac Unit

Normac
Amount

LF
EA

$

70.00 $

17,010.00

$

22.00 $

4,356.00

$82.00
$44.00

$19,926.00 $
$8,712.00 $

110.00

198

25.00

$26,730.00
$4,950.00

PARTIAL DEPTH PAVEMENT REPAIR (ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE)
7.5" OF ODOT ITEM 301

220

SY

$

70.00 $

15,400.00

$70.00

$15,400.00 $

130.00

$28,600.00

ER - 4

PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”

10,578

SY

$

4.50 $

47,601.00

$2.50

$26,445.00 $

4.00

$42,312.00

ER - 5

6' WIDE PAVEMENT PLANING, ASPHALT CONCRETE, 1.5”, BUTT JOINT

80

LF

$

20.00 $

1,600.00

$12.00

$960.00 $

14.00

$1,120.00

ER - 6

NON-TRACKING TACK COAT (0.075 GAL/SY)

793

GAL

$

2.60 $

2,061.80

$4.50

$3,568.50 $

5.00

$3,965.00

ER - 7

1.5” ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE 1, (448), PG64-22

482

CY

$

242.00 $

116,644.00

$188.00

$90,616.00 $

325.00

$156,650.00

ITEM NO.

DESCRIPTION

ER -1

REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB

243

ER -2

REMOVE AND REPLACE 6" DRIVE APRON

ER -3

Barrett Unit Barrett Amount

JRU Unit

JRJ Amount

ER - 8

MANHOLE ADJUSTED TO GRADE

9

EA

$

25.00 $

225.00

$500.00

$4,500.00 $ 1,500.00

$13,500.00

ER - 9

VALVE BOX ADJUSTED TO GRADE

10

EA

$

25.00 $

250.00

$400.00

$4,000.00 $ 1,050.00

$10,500.00

15

LF

$

20.75 $

311.25

$30.25

$453.75 $

20.75

$311.25

1900

LF

$

3.34 $

6,346.00

$1.95

$3,705.00 $

3.34

$6,346.00

ER - 10
ER - 11

THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, STOP BAR.: REPLACE PER
EXISTING
THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING, CENTERLINE.: REPLACE PER
EXISTING

ALTERNATE #2 SUBTOTAL - E. RODGER $ 211,805.05

$178,286.25

$294,984.25

MOTION NO 46-2026
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH W. G. STANG FOR THE 2026 WATER SERVICE
REPLACEMENTS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF NINE HUNDRED EIGHTYONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FOUR DOLLARS AND NINETYTWO CENTS ($981,124.92), AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO SIGN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.

Seconded by: _________________________
Upon Roll Call, the Vote Resulted as follows:
AYES:__________
NAYS:__________
ABSENT:__________

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, Ohio, hereby certify that
the foregoing Motion No. 46-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the
City of Trenton, Ohio on the 20th day of August, 2026, and that at least a majority of the elected
members voted in the affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

August 20, 2026 Staff Report

City Council Meeting Staff Report
Report to:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council

Report From:

Brad Baker, Service Director

Prepared By:

Amy King, Assistant to the Service Director

Agenda Item: Under New Business, a Motion Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an
Agreement with W.G. Stang, LLC, for the 2026 Water Service Replacement Project.
Ordinance/Resolution/Motion
Motion

Contract
Fiscal Impact
Bid
10% Contingency
Total
OPWC Funds
Balance Owed

1st Reading Date:
2nd Reading Date:
3rd Reading Date:
Motion Date: 8/20/2026
Resolution Date:
Public Hearing Date:
Contract Required:
Budgeted: Yes

$891,931.75
+$ 89,193.18
$981,124.92
-$452,801.46
$528,323.46

Strategic Goals
Connected Community
Economic Vitality
Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhoods
General Operations
Responsible Infrastructure

Additional Document(s) Attached: Yes
)Please see further, more detailed information regarding the
fiscal impact in the summary section of this report.

Expenditure:
$981,124.92
Source Funds:

026-3105 ($528,323.46)
& 026-1100 OPWC Grant
($452,801.46)

Policy Issue
Does City Council wish to approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement
with W.G. Stang, LLC, for the 2026 Water Service Replacement Project?
Policy Alternative
City Council may choose not to approve the motion authorizing the City Manager to enter into an
agreement with W.G. Stang, LLC, for the 2026 Water Service Replacement Project.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council receive this report and approve the motion authorizing the City
Manager to enter into an agreement with W.G. Stang, LLC, for the 2026 Water Service Replacement
Project.
Statutory/Policy Authority
• Article III, Legislative Action, of the Charter of the City of Trenton.
• Chapter 208.02 Contracting Authority and Procedures
• Charter Section 7.04 Contracting Procedures

August 20, 2026 Staff Report

Fiscal Impact Summary
This project was included in the City's approved 2026 Capital Improvements Budget. The City has
secured $452,801.46 in grant funding through the Ohio Public Works Commission (OPWC) to assist
with project costs. The low bid submitted by W.G. Stang, LLC, is $891,931.75. With the addition of
the City Engineer's recommended 10% construction contingency of $89,193.18, the total project
authorization is $981,124.92. After applying the OPWC grant funding, the City's share of the project
cost is estimated to be $528,323.46.
Background Information
The City of Trenton continues to invest in improvements to its water distribution system through the
2026 Water Service Replacement Project. This project will replace aging water service lines and
related infrastructure, including valves, curb boxes, meter pits, and service connections. The work also
includes the restoration of pavement, sidewalks, driveways, curbs, and landscaping affected by
construction activities.
Bids for the project were opened on August 11, 2026, and two bids were received. W.G. Stang, LLC,
submitted the lowest bid in the amount of $891,931.75, while Ohio Dredge & Environmental
submitted a bid of $1,238,720.00.
The City Engineer reviewed the bids and determined that W.G. Stang, LLC, submitted the lowest
responsive and responsible bid. The engineer noted that the bid was below the engineer's estimate of
$936,121.50 and that W.G. Stang, LLC, has successfully completed similar projects for the City and
is familiar with City standards and requirements. Based on this review, The Kleingers Group
recommended awarding the contract to W.G. Stang, LLC.
Thank you for your consideration.

Attached Information
• Engineers Recommendation Letter
• Official Project Bid Tabulation

August 12, 2026
Mr. Brad Baker, Service Director
City of Trenton
11 E. State Street
Trenton, Ohio 45067
Via email: [email protected]
RE: City of Trenton – 2026 Water Service Replacements
Contract Award Recommendation
Dear Mr. Baker:
We have reviewed the contractor bids received August 11, 2026, for the City of Trenton’s 2026 Water
Service Replacemnets and recommend that the project be awarded to the low bidder WG Stang, LLC.
Two bids were received, with bids ranging from $891,931.75 to $1,238,720.00. The bid results are
summarized in the attached Bid Tabulation document.
WG Stang’s base bid of $891,931.75 is under the Engineer’s estimate listed in the Bid Documents of
$936,121.50. WG Stang, LLC has completed similar projects for the City and is familiar with Trenton
standards. Therefore, I recommend that Trenton award the contract to WG Stang, LLC.
If you have any questions or need any further information, please contact me at (513) 644-1784.
Sincerely,
THE
KLEINGERS GROUP

William Brock, PE
City Engineer
Attachment: Contractor Bid Tabulation
cc: Marcos Nichols (City of Trenton), File

CITY OF TRENTON
2026 TRENTON WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT
CONTRACTOR:
ITEM
NO.

DESCRIPTION

ESTIMATED
QUANTITY

UNIT

STANG UNIT
COST

STANG LINE
COST

1800

LF

$2.50

$4,500.00

OHIO
DREDGE
UNIT COST

OHIO DREDGE
LINE COST

DEMOLITION
1

2
3

4
6

SAWCUT EXISTING ASPHALT
PAVEMENT FOR WATER SERVICE
TRENCH
REMOVE EXIST ASPHALT PAVEMENT
FOR WATER SERVICE TRENCH
REMOVE EXIST CONCRETE
SIDEWALK
REMOVE CURB
REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER
SAWCUT, REMOVE AND REPLACE
EXIST CONCRETE DRIVE APRON

375

SY

$10.00

$3,750.00

1,100

SF

$5.00

$5,500.00

50
25

LF
LF

$10.00
$10.00

$500.00
$250.00

1,400

SF

$20.00

$28,000.00

$3.00

$5,400.00

$27.00

$10,125.00

$4.00
$6.00
$10.00

$4,400.00
$300.00
$250.00

$14.00

$19,600.00

$500.00

$31,500.00

$60.00

$45,000.00

$50.00
$400.00

$38,250.00
$25,200.00

$1,000.00

$63,000.00

$2,500.00

$157,500.00

$320.00

$20,800.00

$100.00

$5,000.00

$100.00
$12.00
$1,000.00
$100.00
$35.00

$2,500.00
$13,200.00
$12,000.00
$10,000.00
$31,500.00

NEW WATER SERVICES
7

DISCONNECT AND RECONNECT
WATER SERVICE AT MAIN

63 EACH

$100.00

$6,300.00

8

3/4" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE
W/LSM BACKFILL

750

LF

$120.00

$90,000.00

765

LF

$90.00

$68,850.00

63 EACH

$200.00

$12,600.00

9
10

3/4" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE
W/NATIVE BACKFILL
NEW 3/4" VALVE & CURB BOX

11

INSTALL NEW METER PIT & METER
(METER PROVIDED BY CITY)

63 EACH

$1,100.00

$69,300.00

12

CONNECT EXIST HOUSE SERVICE TO
NEW WATER SERVICE

63 EACH

$100.00

$6,300.00

TRENCH REPAIR - 7" ASPHALT BASE
COURSE

65

CY

$500.00

$32,500.00

REPLACE CURB PER DETAIL 2

50

LF

$60.00

$3,000.00

25

LF

$60.00

$1,500.00

$15.00
$500.00
$200.00
$2.00

$16,500.00
$6,000.00
$20,000.00
$1,800.00

RESTORATION

13

14
15
16
17
18

REPLACE CURB AND GUTTER PER
DETAIL 2
REPLACE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
ADA WALK RAMP PER DETAIL 7
FINE GRADING, TOPSOIL
SEED AND MULCH

1,100 SF
12 EACH
100 CY
900 SY

RESURFACING
19

4-1/2" PAVEMENT PLANING

20
21
22
23

$5.00

$72,775.00

$5.00

$6,250.00

$300.00

$372,000.00

$134,540.00

$5.00
$320.00

$7,250.00
$198,400.00

$12,000.00

$2,400.00

$4,000.00

$800.00

$15.00

$1,350.00

$9.00
$250.00

$720.00
$900.00
$500.00

$40.00
$4.00
$10.00
$300.00

$3,600.00
$320.00
$1,200.00
$600.00

$10,000.00

$10,000.00

$30,000.00

$30,000.00

$50,000.00
$30,000.00

$50,000.00
$30,000.00

SY

$5.85

$85,146.75

ODOT 408 PRIME COAT (0.10 GAL/SY)

1250 GAL

$2.75

$3,437.50

3" ODOT 441 ASPHALT
INTERMEDIATE COURSE

1240

CY

$195.00

$241,800.00

1450 GAL

$2.75

$3,987.50

CY

$217.00

ODOT 407 NON TRACKING TACK
COAT
1-1/2" SURFACE COURSE

14,555

620

TRAFFIC
24

CENTER LINE

0.2 MILE

25

STOP LINE

90

26

ISLAND MARKING
CROSSWALK LINE
LANE ARROW

80 SF
120 LF
2 EACH

27
28

LF

$7.50

MISCELLANEOUS
29
30

MOBILIZATION
TRAFFIC CONTROL

1 LUMP
1 LUMP

TOTAL BID $891,931.75

$1,238,720.00

MOTION NO 47-2026
A MOTION AUTHORIZING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ASSEMBLE A “LIVE-FIRE
TRAINING PROP” ON THE FIRE STATION GROUNDS LOCATED AT 300 N MIAMI ST
FOR THE COST OF APPROXIMATELY $250,000.00 (TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS) PLUS A 20% CONTINGENCY.

Motioned by __________ authorizing the Fire Department to assemble a “Live-Fire Training Prop”
on the fire station grounds located at 300 N Miami St. for the cost of approximately $250,000.00 plus
a 20% contingency and authorize the City Manager to sign all documents related thereto.
Seconded by: _________________________
Upon Roll Call, the Vote Resulted as follows:
AYES: __________
NAYS: __________
ABSENT: __________

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, Ohio, hereby certify that the
foregoing Motion No. 47-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the City of
Trenton, Ohio on the 20th day of August, 2026 and that at least a majority of the elected members voted
in the affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

Staff Report

City Council Meeting Staff Report
Report to:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council

Report From:

Brian Sebald, Fire Chief

Agenda Item:

Live Fire Training Prop

Ordinance/Resolution/Motion
Motion

1st Reading Date: August 20,
2026
2nd Reading Date:
Motion Date:
Resolution Date:
Public Hearing Date:

Contract

Contract Required: Yes

Fiscal Impact

Budgeted: No
Expenditure: $250,000.00
Destination Fund: Fire Budget

STRATEGIC GOALS
Connected Community
Economic Vitality
Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhood
Responsible Infrastructure
General Operations
Additional Document(s)
Attached: YES
Please see further, more detailed
information regarding the fiscal impact in
the summary section of this report.

Policy Issue
Does the City Council wish to adopt: To assemble a “Live Fire Training Prop” on the fire station grounds
located at 300 N Miami St.
Policy Alternative
The City Council can choose not to approve. The fire department will not have live fire training on site
and will continue to pay to send members to other facilities.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council receive this report and approve.
Statutory/Policy Authority
• ORC and the Ordinances of the City of Trenton.
Fiscal Impact Summary
Initial numbers were around $150,000.00, but after further discussion with the city Public Works
Superintendent, it was suggested we plan on $250,000 plus a 20% contingency.
Background Information
The idea was brought to the Fire Chief by members who have attended FDTN (Fire Department Training
Network) “Live-Fire Training Camp” in Indianapolis. We then sent 2 members to the “Designing Training
Props” at FDTN to get further knowledge. The prop will be assembled with Conex boxes assembled in
various positions to create realistic conditions. We are still researching details with Brad Baker (Public
Works Superintendent) and William Brock (Engineer with Kleingers). Majority of the cost increase
appears to evolve around the cite prep and engineering depending on what we run into. Building this
prop would not only improve our training program but also help improve our City’s ISO rating.

MOTION NO 48-2026
A MOTION, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH CAPITAL ELECTRIC LINE BUILDERS. FOR THE STATE
STREET TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF SIXTY-TWO
THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-FIVE DOLLARS AND THIRTY-SIX
CENTS ($62,955.36) AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
SIGN ALL REQUIRED DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO.

Motioned by ___________________ authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with
Capital Electric Line Builders for State Street Traffic Signal Improvements – Pedestrian Push Buttons
and Vehicle detection upgrades and to sign all required documents related thereto.
Seconded by: _________________________
Upon Roll Call, the Vote Resulted as follows:
AYES:__________
NAYS:__________
ABSENT:__________

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, Ohio, hereby certify that
the foregoing Motion No. 48-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the
City of Trenton, Ohio on the 20th day of August, 2026, and that at least a majority of the elected
members voted in the affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

August 20, 2026. Staff Report

City Council Meeting Staff Report
Report to:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council

Report From:

Brad Baker, Service Director

Prepared By: Amy King, Assistant to the Service Director
Under New Business, A Motion Authorizing the City Manager to enter into an
agreement with Capital Electric Line Builders for State Street Traffic Signal
Improvements – Pedestrian Push Buttons and Vehicle detection upgrades and to sign
all required documents related thereto.
Strategic Goals
Ordinance/Resolution/Motion 1st Reading Date: 2nd Reading
Connected Community
Motion
Date: 3rd Reading Date: Motion
Economic Vitality

Agenda Item:

Date: 8/20/2026
Resolution Date:

Public Hearing Date:

Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhoods
General Operations
Responsible Infrastructure

Contract
Fiscal Impact

Contract Required:
Budgeted: No
Expenditure:
62,955.36
Source Funds: 234

Additional Document(s) Attached: Yes
Please see further, more detailed information regarding the
fiscal impact in the summary section of this report.

Policy Issue
Manager to enter into an agreement with Capital Electric Line Builders for State Street Traffic Signal
Improvements – Pedestrian Push Buttons and Vehicle detection upgrades and to sign all required
documents related thereto.
Policy Alternatives
City Council may choose not to authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Capital
Electric Line Builders for the State Street Traffic Signal Improvements. Alternatively, Council may
reject the proposal, postpone the project, or elect not to proceed with the State Street Traffic Signal
Improvements.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the proposal from Capital Electric Line Builders in the amount of
$62,955.36, approval of the sole-source procurement determination, and authorization for the City
Manager to sign all required documents necessary for the repair of pedestrian push buttons,
installation of vehicle detection equipment, and related signal timing improvements at the
intersections of State Street & Miami Avenue and State Street & First Street.

August 20, 2026. Staff Report

Statutory/Policy Authority
• Article III, Legislative Action, of the Charter of the City of Trenton.
• ORC and the Codified Ordinances of the City of Trenton.
Fiscal Impact Summary
Funding for the project will be paid from the appropriate traffic signal and roadway infrastructure
improvement funds. The total expenditure will not exceed $62,955.36. The City's Purchasing Policy
generally encourages obtaining multiple quotations for purchases of this size. However, staff is
requesting approval under a sole-source procurement exception.
Capital Electric Line Builders serves as the City's traffic signal contractor and is responsible for the
maintenance, programming, repair, and operation of the City's traffic signal system. Due to their
specialized knowledge of the existing signal infrastructure, software, communications, and
equipment, staff has determined that obtaining competitive quotations would not be practical or in
the City's best interest. Capital Electric is uniquely qualified to perform the necessary repairs,
detection upgrades, and signal timing modifications while ensuring compatibility with the City's
existing traffic signal system.
Background Information
The City has experienced ongoing issues with pedestrian push-button operation and vehicle detection
at the signalized intersections of State Street & Miami Avenue and State Street & First Street.
To improve pedestrian accessibility, traffic operations, and signal efficiency, the City requested a
quotation from Capital Electric Line Builders for repairs and equipment upgrades.
The project includes:
1.
2.
3.
4.

Repair and restore operation of pedestrian push buttons.
Install Wavetronix stop-bar vehicle detection systems at State Street & Miami Avenue.
Install Wavetronix stop-bar vehicle detection systems at State Street & First Street.
Implement and adjust traffic signal timing at both intersections following installation of the
new detection equipment.

The proposed improvements will:
•
•
•
•
•

Restore proper operation of pedestrian crossing requests.
Improve vehicle detection accuracy at signalized intersections.
Reduce unnecessary signal delay by providing more responsive traffic control, from side streets
Enhance safety and accessibility for motorists and pedestrians.
Modernize traffic signal equipment using non-intrusive radar-based detection technology.

Attached Information
•

Capital Electric Line Builders Proposal

•

Engineers Recommendation Letter

QUOTE SHEET

3150 Encrete Lane ▪ Dayton., OH 45439

│

│

Voice (937) 424-2550 ▪ Fax (937) 297-1365

To:

Brad Baker

Fax #

Company:

City Of Trenton

Phone #

# Of Pages:

2

Date:

From:

Travis Stanforth

RE:

Get ped buttons working and install Wavetronix at
State and Miami and State and First.

7/17/2026

Please find attached our quotation for this project.
The following clarifications apply to this quotation:
•

Quotation is valid for 30 days and is subject to receiving a contract with agreed terms and conditions or a Purchase
Order.

•

Capital Invoices are to be paid in full upon completion of work within 30 days of date on invoice, with no retention
withheld. Sales tax is not included. Performance bond (if required) is not included.

•

Work shall be performed during our normal work hours; premium time is excluded.

•

Maintenance of Traffic is limited to that which pertains to our work. Cost of LEO is not included.

•

Construction layout stakes are not included.

•

Concrete testing is not included. Concrete removal / restoration is not included.

•

Price assumes the existing conduit is clear and passable. If not price will need to change.

•
•
•

Please note: Capital Electric reserves the right to revise pricing if all quoted items are not awarded.
Thank you for the opportunity,
Travis Stanforth 937-478-6800
[email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The documents accompanying this transmission contain certain confidential information belonging to the sender,
which is legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entitled named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this telecopy
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this telecopy in error, please notify us immediately by telephone to arrange for the return of
the document(s) to us. Thank you.

Capital Electric Line Builders

QUOTATION

7/17/2026

Page 1

PROJ: State and Miami, State and First
LOC: Trenton
EST: Travis Stanforth

P.O. Box 1353, Dayton, OH 45401
Tel: 937-424-2550 Fax: 937-297-1365

REF
#
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 Peds working

QUANTITY
1.00

UNIT
EA

BID PRICE
UNIT
TOTAL
2,050.92
2,050.92

2 Wavetronix stop bar at State and
Miami

4.00

EA

11,494.92

45,979.68

3 Wavetronix stop bar at State and
first

1.00

EA

11,494.92

11,494.92

4 Implement and adjust timing at State
and Mami

1.00

EA

1,714.92

1,714.92

5 Implement and adjust timing at State
and first

1.00

EA

1,714.92

1,714.92

GRAND TOTAL

$62,955.36

Planning Commission
City of Trenton

Minutes: May 11, 2026

11 East State Street • Trenton, Ohio 45067 Phone:
(513) 428-0156 • www.trentonoh.gov

Call Meeting to Order:
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.

Pledge of Allegiance:
It was recited by those in attendance that chose to do so.

Roll Call:
Members present: Mr. Profitt, Mr. Leasure, Mr. Melloh, Ms. Harris
Members absent: Mr. Bishop
A motion to excuse Mr. Bishop from the meeting was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | No – None | Passes 4-0

Approval of Minutes: Meeting of April 13, 2026
A motion to approve the April 13, 2026, meeting minutes were made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0

New Business
Agenda Item 1: Planning Commission Policies and Procedures
Staff presented proposed amendments to the Planning Commission Policies and Procedures. The revisions were intended to
improve administrative consistency, clarify Commission procedures, and update meeting operations. During discussion, staff
clarified that a typographical notation previously identified related to the April 13, 2026, meeting minutes rather than the
proposed policy amendments. Staff advised the Commission that the most significant amendment was changing the regular
Planning Commission meeting starting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. for all future regularly scheduled meetings. No
additional comments or questions were raised.
A motion to approve the Planning Commission Policies and Procedures as presented was made by Ms. Harris and
seconded by Mr. Leasure.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0
Agenda Item 2: Ordinance No. 14-2026
Staff presented Ordinance No. 14-2026, which proposes amendments to the City's regulations governing the keeping of
chickens and quail. Staff explained the ordinance would increase the maximum number of chickens and quail permitted on
qualifying residential properties from six (6) to twelve (12) while maintaining the existing approval process and all other
applicable regulations. Staff noted the ordinance had previously been introduced to City Council for consideration.
The Commission had no questions regarding the proposed amendment.
A motion recommending City Council adopt Ordinance No. 14-2026 as presented was made by Ms. Harris and
seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0
Agenda Item 3: Ordinance No. 15-2026
Staff presented Ordinance No. 15-2026, which amends the City's Mobile Food Service regulations to recognize Ohio's
statewide Mobile Food Service Operation License and eliminate conflicts between the City's Codified Ordinances and current
Ohio law. Staff explained the amendment would allow the city to recognize the state-issued license while continuing to
administer local zoning requirements. The Commission had no questions regarding the proposed amendment.
A motion recommending City Council adopt Ordinance No. 15-2026 as presented was made by Ms. Harris and
seconded by Mr. Leasure.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0

Planning Commission
City of Trenton
11 East State Street • Trenton, Ohio 45067 Phone:
(513) 428-0156 • www.trentonoh.gov
Amendment to April 13, 2026, Meeting Minutes
Following approval of the April 13, 2026, meeting minutes and later in the meeting, the Commission identified a typographical
error within the approved minutes. Staff explained that the reference to "Chair and Vice Chair" in Section 7.06 of the Planning
Commission Policies and Procedures should instead reference the "Secretary," consistent with the adopted Policies and
Procedures.
A motion to rescind approval of the April 13, 2026, meeting minutes was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr.
Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0
A motion to amend the April 13, 2026, meeting minutes by replacing "Chair and Vice Chair" with "Secretary" in
the reference to Section 7.06 was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Leasure.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0
A motion to approve the amended April 13, 2026, meeting minutes was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr.
Leasure.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0

Reports by Planning Commission or City Administrators
No reports were provided by staff or Commission members.

Date of Next Meeting
June 8, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.

Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Leasure, Melloh, Harris, Profitt | Passes 4-0

END OF MAY 11, 2026, MEETING MINUTES

Certification Statement
The Planning Commission reviewed and
approved the above item(s) during a duly
noticed public meeting, conducted in
compliance with Ohio’s Open Meetings Act.”
Signature: ______________________________
Planning Commission Chair
Date: __________________________________

Vote Count
Pass (P), Fail (F), Abstain (A)
Melloh
Harris
Bishop
VC* Leisure
C* Proffitt
P F A

-

-

Planning Commission
City of Trenton
11 East State Street • Trenton, Ohio 45067 Phone:
(513) 428-0156 • www.trentonoh.gov

Minutes: July 1, 2026

Call Meeting to Order:
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order at 6:02 p.m.

Pledge of Allegiance:
It was recited by those in attendance that chose to do so.

Roll Call:
Members present: Mr. Proffitt, Mr. Melloh, Ms. Harris, Mr. Bishop
Members absent: Mr. Leasure
A motion to excuse Mr. Leasure from the meeting was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | No – None | Passes 4-0

Approval of Minutes
Staff advised the Commission that the May 11, 2026, meeting minutes had not yet been completed and would be presented
for approval at a future meeting. No action was taken.

New Business
Agenda Item 1: Trenton Square Planned Unit Development – Taco Bell Final Development Plan
Staff presented a request for approval of the Final Development Plan for a new Taco Bell restaurant within the Trenton Square
Planned Unit Development. The proposal includes construction of a 2,278-square-foot restaurant with a drive-through,
parking, landscaping, lighting, signage, utilities, stormwater improvements, and related site improvements.
Staff reviewed the proposal for compliance with the applicable Planned Unit Development requirements and the City's
Codified Ordinances. The proposed development was found to comply with applicable zoning standards, including lot size,
setbacks, building height, parking, landscaping, circulation, and overall site design. Staff further explained that detailed
engineering plans would continue to be reviewed administratively by the City's Engineer and Service Director.
Staff also presented two requested minor deviations permitted under the Planned Unit Development process:

• A monument sign measuring 52 square feet, where 50 square feet is otherwise permitted.
• Light poles measuring 22.5 feet in height, where 20 feet is otherwise permitted.
Staff explained that both deviations were minor in nature, consistent with the approved Planned Unit Development, and
appropriate under the flexibility provided by the PUD regulations. Staff further noted that the sign face itself complies with the
manufacturer's standard dimensions, with the additional area resulting from the surrounding frame.
Commission members discussed the requested deviations and received clarification regarding the City's method of measuring
monument signs and the manufacturer's standard lighting equipment. Staff also noted that the applicant had been responsive
throughout the review process and had worked cooperatively with the city to address earlier concerns regarding traffic
circulation and site layout.
Staff concluded that the proposed development is consistent with the approved General Development Plan, satisfies the
applicable site plan review criteria, and recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, including the two requested
minor deviations, subject to the conditions contained within the staff report.
A motion to approve the Taco Bell Final Development Plan, including the requested minor deviations, was made by
Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | Passes 4-0

Continues Next Page

Planning Commission
City of Trenton
11 East State Street • Trenton, Ohio 45067 Phone:
(513) 428-0156 • www.trentonoh.gov

Agenda Item 2: Trenton Square Planned Unit Development – Final Development Plans (Residential Sections)
Staff presented requests for approval of the Final Development Plans for the Single-Family, Townhome, and Duplex residential
sections of the Trenton Square Planned Unit Development.
Staff explained that the Commission had previously approved the General Development Plan in February 2025 and that City
Council subsequently approved the Planned Unit Development. The Commission's responsibility for the current review was
limited to determining whether the submitted Final Development Plans remained substantially consistent with the previously
approved General Development Plan.
Staff compared the submitted plans to the approved General Development Plan and reported that the proposed residential
product types, dwelling unit counts, overall density, roadway network, and neighborhood layout remained consistent with the
previously approved development. Staff explained that the differences reflected normal engineering refinements that occur as
projects advance from conceptual planning to construction documents and did not constitute major changes under the
Planned Unit Development regulations.
For the Single-Family section, staff reported that no changes had been made to the approved number of dwelling units and
that all applicable Planned Unit Development standards continued to be met.
For the Townhome section, staff reported that the approved dwelling unit count remained unchanged. Minor technical
adjustments resulted in slight increases in density and open space, which staff determined were not material changes to the
approved development.
For the Duplex section, staff reported that the approved dwelling unit count and overall density remained unchanged. Minor
reductions in open space resulted from final engineering refinements; however, all applicable Planned Unit Development
standards continued to be satisfied. Staff also explained that the revised plans incorporated a mountable curb system that
improves pedestrian safety while maintaining emergency vehicle access.
Commission discussion focused primarily on the proposed private streets within the duplex section. Staff explained that the
private streets had been approved as part of the original General Development Plan and would remain privately owned and
maintained by the homeowners' association. Commission members discussed future maintenance responsibilities,
homeowners' association obligations, emergency access, and the distinction between public and private streets.
Staff emphasized that these features had previously been approved during the General Development Plan process and that the
Commission's review was limited to determining whether the submitted Final Development Plans remained substantially
consistent with the approved General Development Plan.
Staff further explained that revisions made following review by the Fire Department improved emergency vehicle access while
also accommodating updated pedestrian accessibility requirements. Staff concluded that the proposed plans satisfy the
requirements of Chapter 1268 of the City's Codified Ordinances and recommended approval of all three Final Development
Plans.
Single-Family Final Development Plan
A motion to approve the Single-Family Final Development Plan for the Trenton Square Planned Unit Development
was made by Mr. Melloh and seconded by Mr. Bishop.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | Passes 4-0
Townhome Final Development Plan
A motion to approve the Townhome Final Development Plan for the Trenton Square Planned Unit Development was
made by Mr. Melloh and seconded by Mr. Bishop.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | Passes 4-0

Planning Commission
City of Trenton
11 East State Street • Trenton, Ohio 45067 Phone:
(513) 428-0156 • www.trentonoh.gov

Duplex Final Development Plan
Following additional discussion regarding private streets and the Planned Unit Development approval process, the Commission
determined that the submitted Duplex Final Development Plan remained substantially consistent with the previously approved
General Development Plan.
A motion to approve the Duplex Final Development Plan for the Trenton Square Planned Unit Development was
made by Mr. Melloh and seconded by Mr. Bishop.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | Passes 4-0

Reports by Planning Commission or City Administrators
No reports were provided by staff or Commission members.

Date of Next Meeting
July 13, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.

Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was made by Ms. Harris and seconded by Mr. Melloh.
Vote: Yes – Bishop, Harris, Melloh, Proffitt | Passes 4-0
The meeting adjourned at 6:44 p.m.

END OF JULY 1, 2026, MEETING MINUTES

Certification Statement
The Planning Commission reviewed and
approved the above item(s) during a duly
noticed public meeting, conducted in
compliance with Ohio’s Open Meetings Act.”
Signature: ______________________________
Planning Commission Chair
Date: __________________________________

Vote Count
Pass (P), Fail (F), Abstain (A)
Melloh
Harris
Bishop
VC* Leisure
C* Proffitt
P F A

-

-

CITY OF TRENTON
Parks and Recreation Board Meeting
MINUTES
MEETING PLACE: CIVIC HALL - 11 EAST STATE STREET
July 14, 2026 – 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Ms. Hale called to order the regular meeting of the City of Trenton Parks & Recreation Board on July
14, 2026, at 6:00 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Recited.
ROLL CALL
Ms. Moore conducted roll call. All regular members were present except for Mr. Wasiloski. Ms. Hale
acknowledged alternate member Ms. Fields in attendance for Mr. Wasiloski. A motion to excuse Mr.
Wasiloski was made by Ms. Butts and seconded by Ms. Lucas. All voted Yea.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A motion to approve or amend the minutes of June 9, 2026, of the Regular Parks and Recreation Board
meeting as submitted. Motion to approve the minutes of June 9, 2026, meeting was made by Ms.
Butts and seconded by Mr. Melloh. All voted Yea.
PRESENTATIONS
Ms. Lucas – Backpack & Supply Drive
Ms. Lucas shared information regarding a community initiative to collect school backpacks and supplies
for students in the Edgewood School District. The initiative is being coordinated by local community
members, churches, and the EMA, with participation in schools identifying students in need.
Collection bins have been placed at multiple locations, including the City Building and participating
churches. Supplies for students in pre-K through 2nd grade will be collected through August 6, with
backpacks being assembled on August 2 using supplies received at that time. Beginning August 6,
collections will continue for students in 3rd through 12th grade.
Ms. Lucas reported that approximately 100 students currently need assistance with backpacks and
school supplies.
AUDIENCE OF PUBLIC
Ms. Hale thanked the audience of public and welcomed anyone to address the board at this time.
No one spoke.

UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
1. Update Regarding the Veterans Memorial
City staff provided an update on fundraising efforts for the Veterans Memorial. The second quarter of
fundraising has concluded; however, the fundraising report has not yet been received. Once received,
the report will be distributed to the Board.
Staff also reported that the Veterans Memorial sign at Community Park has been removed. The sign
will be replaced at the new City Building once updated renderings are received.
2. Update Regarding the Little Free Library at Home Avenue Park & Community Park
City staff provided an update on the Little Free Libraries at Home Avenue Park and Community Park.
Both libraries were installed and became operational on Friday, June 26. Public Works and the Dearth
family were present for the installation, and photos were shared on social media. Both libraries are also
listed on the National Little Free Library website.
The libraries have already been restocked, including books donated by teachers who were cleaning
out their classrooms. The Dearth family noted that seasonal books have also been added and
expressed enthusiasm for helping maintain and restock the libraries.
Board members discussed the need for continued community participation to keep the libraries stocked.
Residents are encouraged to donate or exchange books when possible.
3. Update Regarding the Splash Pad at Community Park
City staff reported that the Community Park splash pad became operational on Thursday, July 2, during
the Let Freedom BOOM! celebration. The splash pad operates daily from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. and is
activated by pressing the designated button. The temporary fencing will be removed once the
surrounding grass has sufficiently grown.
Staff also discussed a proposal from a local shaved-ice vendor to provide occasional service at the
splash pad during the summer. The Board expressed support for trying the service on a limited basis,
with the frequency, dates, and times to be determined. Staff will coordinate with the vendor and evaluate
the arrangement.
4. Update Regarding the Wetlands Restoration Project
City staff provided an update on the Wetlands Restoration Project. The public survey remains available
at designated locations and is expected to be removed later this week. Since the previous meeting, two
virtual meetings have been held with agency stakeholders and directors, including representatives from
the Parks Board, Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), MetroParks of Butler County, the
Butler County Engineer’s Office/Storm Water District, and other project partners. Project information
has also been provided to the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI), and
information from ODNR was distributed to stakeholders. The Historical Society also provided input
regarding the historic mill race.

Two stakeholder site visits were subsequently conducted at the proposed wetlands restoration area,
with a total of 31 participants. Representatives included the previously identified agencies as well as
the Butler Soil & Water Conservation District. Staff reported that notes from the site visits are being
compiled, with stakeholder feedback and observations described as positive and helpful in evaluating
opportunities for the restoration project and enhancing the experience for park visitors and wildlife.
Ms. Dearth who participated in one of the site visits shared that the discussion with MetroParks
representatives and other environmental professionals was encouraging, particularly regarding
potential wildlife habitat, mosquito management, and preservation of portions of the property. Ms.
Dearth noted the enthusiasm and collaboration among the participating agencies and stakeholders.
NEW BUSINESS
No new business.
REPORTS BY THE BOARD OR CITY ADMINISTRATORS
Kelsey Moore, Events & Volunteer Coordinator with 2026 Event Updates on:
1. Let Freedom BOOM – Event Overview
Ms. Moore provided an overview of the Let Freedom BOOM! celebration, including event fundraising
and revenue totals. The Veterans Memorial fundraiser generated $5,234, including proceeds from raffle
baskets and tips received at the beverage booths. Funds have been submitted to the Middletown
Community Foundation for the Veterans Memorial project.
The two beverage stations generated a combined $5,457, with $4,125 from Beverage Station No. 1
and $1,332 from Beverage Station No. 2. Food truck and pop-up vendor fees totaled $1,780. Beverage
and vendor revenue will be used to offset event expenses.
The Board discussed the event and provided positive feedback regarding attendance, vendors, food
trucks, the parade, fireworks, raffle process, and overall organization. The Board noted that the misting
fans were well received due to the extreme heat and that the revised raffle ticket process was effective.
Members also discussed opportunities for improvement at future events, including clearer signage for
beverage stations, parade zones, and raffle locations; improved traffic and emergency vehicle staging;
and additional support for Public Works with trash collection and event cleanup.
The Board also discussed the conditions and supplies available in the park restrooms, including the
need for soap, hand-drying supplies, and trash receptacles. Staff will follow up with Public Works
regarding restroom improvements.
Board members commended Ms. Moore, City staff, Public Works, volunteers, and the community for
their efforts in organizing and supporting the event. The Board noted the strong attendance and positive
community response and expressed pride in the success of the Let Freedom BOOM! celebration.
2. Movies in the Park

Ms. Moore provided an update on the upcoming Movies in the Park event scheduled for Saturday,
August 8, from 6:00 to 9:00 p.m. The event will include four interactive inflatables provided by A1
Amusements, a dunk tank, a STEM activity, and coloring activities. Trenton One Church will provide a
bounce house and cotton candy, and the Nazarene Church plans to participate with a community game
or giveaway. Additional school supplies from the community school supply drive may also be distributed
at the event.
Ms. Moore reported that approximately seven volunteers will be needed to operate the activities and
assist with the event. Additional volunteers to assist with park cleanup following the event would also
be appreciated.
Staff discussed adding signage to better identify the STEM and coloring activities, as these activities
are located within a shelter and may not be easily visible as part of the event.
The Board expressed appreciation for the opportunity to provide free activities, refreshments, and
giveaways to the community and recognized the positive impact of community sponsors in supporting
these offerings.
3. Pickin’ in the Park
Ms. Moore provided an update on preparations for the upcoming Pickin' in the Park festival. Event flyers
are available, and banners are currently being prepared. Previous vendors have been given the first
opportunity to register, after which vendor registration will be opened to the broader community. Ms.
Moore also reported that the required liquor license application will be submitted the following week.
Ms. Moore discussed plans for a local organization passport activity, in which participating
organizations and businesses will share information about their history and receive a stamp for each
completed stop. Participants who complete the passport will receive a prize. The Board was asked to
provide suggestions for an affordable and event-appropriate prize, with up to approximately 100 prizes
anticipated.
DATE OF NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will be held on August 11, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. A motion to adjourn the meeting was
made by Ms. Lucas and seconded by Ms. Fields. All voted Yea.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:38 p.m.

JUL 30, 2026 - CITY OF TRENTON FINANCIAL SNAPSHOT
Fund Name

Original Budget
(2026)

YTD Spent (2026)

011 GENERAL

$

6,951,127

$

4,034,513

58% $

013 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE
023 WATER DEBT SERVICE

$

1,619,000

$

809,500

$

452,607

$

53,803

025 WATER IMPROVEMENTS
026 WATER REVENUE

$

2,576,403

$

1,337,608

027 WATER RATE STABILIZATION
028 UTILITY CREDIT MEMO
036 WATER SYSTEM RESERVE

$

8,771,300

$

3,350,710

050 UTILITY DEPOSIT TRUST

$

65,000

$

35,484

066 SEWER REVENUE

$

1,941,108

$

1,019,850

076 SEWER RESERVE

$

300,000

$

84,679

096 REFUSE REVENUE

$

1,617,848

$

737,590

102 STREET MAINTENANCE & REPAIR

$

1,302,913

$

850,091

132 PARKS & RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS

$

1,113,600

$

181,448

166 STORMWATER PHASE II

$

327,940

$

198,888

192 COUNTY MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE

$

225,000

$

-

202 MUNICIPAL MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE

$

230,000

$

110,000

218 POLICE LEVY

$

4,554,717

$

2,491,580

222 FIRE LEVY

$

1,958,637

$

1,152,655

223 FIRE LEVY - CAPITAL & DEBT

$

128,700

$

31,850

$

-

224 FIRE DEPOSIT ESCROW
226 CASH BOND DEPOSIT
234 GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
250 GENERAL STABILIZATION RESERVE
251 PROPERTY REHABILITATION

$
$

2,323,000
30,000

252 MAYOR'S COURT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
253 TAX INCREMENT EQUIVALENT

$

2,081,249

412,605

264,021

58% $

210,219

-

$

-

0% $

300,000

$

52% $
0% $

2,455,000

56% $

1,057,672

$

854,640

0% $

300,000

$

300,000

$

300,000 $2.5m Water Tap

$

-

$

-

$

23,313

68% $

3,180,015

65,000

$

39,534

61% $

263,228

53% $
28% $

1,852,200

$

1,044,061

56% $

950,006

$

910,796

20,000

$

239,795

1199% $

1,945,808

$

300,000 $210k Sewer Tap

46% $
65% $

1,360,000

$

795,249

58% $

477,607

903,000

$

554,851

61% $

565,967

16% $
61% $

453,200

$

280,118

62% $

1,599,823

315,000

$

205,549

65% $

400,582

0% $
0% $

225,000

$

190,000.00

0% $

190,000

160,000

$

94,646

59% $

87,311

55% $
59% $

4,407,800

$

2,607,138

59% $

440,206

1,538,500

$

915,193

59% $

415,349

25% $
$

128,700
-

$

75,075

$

-

58% $
0% $

43,225
-

-

$

-

0% $

33,494

$

310,216

11% $

23,416,559
948,366

-

$

-

$

1,370

4,784

-

6,000
2,500

$

$

5% $
0% $

0% $
80% $

$

1,688

68% $

122,905
2,196

57% $
0% $

1,300,000

2,314,098

$

250

$

300,000

6,017,011

-

-

2,510,348 RITA Taxes 1 month behind

$

0% $
0% $

2,912,000

$

547,766

42% $

-

$

-

0% $

Includes grant match for ODOT
$

88,298
ODOT Grant match

MVO Projects paid from 2025
$

695,113

Infrastructure projects paid from 2025

-

72,000

$

36,849

51% $

36,849

120,000

$

(73,448)

-61% $

(73,448)

5,200

$

105

0% $

14,763

53

8% $
0% $

-

$

6

-

27,300

0% $
0% $

1,019
6,293

46,800

$
$

58% $

71,567

$

143,361

35,482,856

$

20,874,801

58.8% $

43,588,959

$

6,402,555

890 EMPLOYEE TERMINATION BENEFITS

$

69,775

$

184,795

Grand Total

$

38,864,924

$

18,201,609

46.8% $

*Supplemental Budgets not reflected

-

1,373,752

$

8,863,300

0% $
38% $
55% $

0% $
265% $

*Expenses Include only 2026 budgeted items

$

0% $

-

432 FEDERAL ASSET FORFEITURE
518 UNCLAIMED MONEYS--TRUST

58% $

$

-

$

3,000

555,654

452,607

$

$

$

952,549 $

12% $
0% $

0% $

1,180,518

Notes

50%

12% $

$

CASH Policy

3,831,362

73,468

72,000

402 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST

CASH Remaining

69% $

280,907

150,000

$
$

% Received

4,767,888

$

-

256 TIF- MAGNODE INDUSTRIAL PARK

YTD Received

$

6,866,500

$

$

254 MUNICIPAL BUILDING PROJECT
255 TIF - CARVANA INDUSTRIAL PARK

Original Revenue
Estimate (2026)

% Spend

Due to County applying tax refund to Shape

MAJOR REVENUES

2025 YTD

2026 YTD

2026 Rev. Est.

INCOME TAX

$

2,593,891

$

2,038,892

$

AGO DELINQUENT TAX COLLECTIONS

$

1,831,963

$

1,350,818

$

Income Tax Net Rev + Receivable Comp

$

4,316,477

$

3,688,749

These funds have distinct revenues which they are allowed to collect, and equally-distinct
186.4%
categories of
spending that each fund can be used to provide for projects and city
operations. As good stewards of public finances, the City has policies within its various
1,200,000
88.8%
funds to maintain minimum balances based on spending trends. These policies allow
85% Trenton's operations
0.0% to remain efficient and intact even in times of crisis. Ample reserves
also contribute the City's respectable Bond rating of Aa1, which promotes access to low4,098,000 interest debt
227.7%
to complete large-scale projects without undue debt burden. Reserves also
the collection of interest revenue to further improve the City's financial security.
#REF!
2,370,000 allow for
The City holds its funds in StarOhio - Ohio's Local Goverment Investment Pool - which
1,840,000 operates as140.1%
a liquid money-market fund. The City also invests in securities such as CDs,
1,360,000 Municipal Bonds,
171.0%Treasury Bonds, and Commercial Paper for more aggressive yields with
its investment advisor, RedTree Financial. To maximize returns, funds are held in
157.1%
390,000 common with
investment advisors and then interest earnings are allocated to the City's
900,000 Capital Improvement
167.1% Fund.

3,800,000

PROPERTY TAX / PILOT / ROLLBACK

$

2,207,936

$

1,799,815

$

WATER SERVICE

$

1,307,456

$

1,313,640

$

SEWER SERVICE

$

1,032,115

$

1,033,834

$

REFUSE SERVICE

$

764,528

$

795,249

$

EMS TRANSPORT

$

254,991

$

248,297

$

INTEREST

$

660,215

$

538,661

$

GAS TAXES

$

404,858

$

408,842

$

705,000

VEHICLE REGISTRATION (STATE, CITY)

$

134,511

$

145,971

$

250,000

TOTAL - MAJOR SOURCES

$

11,192,464

$

9,674,019

$

16,913,001

Bank

Statement Balanc Month Interest

1st Financial

$

StarOhio

$

8,045,890

$

26,117

Redtree Financial

$

32,909,464

$

48,752

Argent Trust

$

16,157

$

496

TOTAL BANK STATEMENT BALANCE

$

43,677,076

$

75,366

TOTAL DEPOSITS-IN-TRANSIT

$

8,788.34

TOTAL UN-EXPENSED PAYMENTS

$

21,811.19 *See 5/3 Bills

2,705,566

TOTAL BOOK FUND BALANCE

$

43,588,959

PAYMENTS-IN TRANSIT

$

154,500.45 *See Edenred 7/31 ACHs

TOTAL MONTH-END UNCLEARED CHECKS
NET DIFFERENCE (Book over Bank)

% Difference
$

(35,784)

Audit Limit %
-0.08%

Miller-Valentine Design-Build Trenton Community and Municipal Complex

Invoice Description
Interviews with staff, facility drawings, virtual design
Facility Drawings, Staff Interviews, Site review
Department Interviews, Design Alterations
Internal Design + Securty Specifics
Internal Design + Security + Pool specifics
HVAC + Security + Furnishing design
Electrical + Jail + Furnishing Design
Electrical + Security Design
Mobilization and Permiting Prep
Mobilization and Permitting
Grading and Temp Roadway
Temp Roadway
Pad and masonry
Precast Delivery and Install
Precast Install
Construction
Total Spent as of 7/31/26
Fund 234 - Capital Improvement

$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$

Amount
99,103
322,085
74,327
486,617
347,583
208,551
208,550
69,516
69,517
703,505
1,731,971
1,752,331
2,610,802
2,631,362
1,559,060
3,398,186
16,273,066

Pay Date
2/12/2025
2/27/2025
3/25/2025
4/24/2025
5/31/2025
6/25/2025
7/31/2025
8/29/2025
9/30/2025
10/31/2025
12/19/2025
3/4/2026
3/10/2026
4/30/2026
5/12/2026
6/8, 6/24 2026

%The
Rec.City of Trenton has several funds, dedicated to various purposes of local governance.

7%

172.4%by the Ohio Auditor of State, these statements are prepared monthly
As recommended
and provided
to the public for accountability purposes
171.3%
174.8%

ORDINANCE NO 19-2026
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY AND
IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 5721 KENNEL ROAD, CITY OF TRENTON, OHIO, AND
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, the City of Trenton, Ohio (hereinafter referred to as the “City”) desires to purchase
certain real property and improvements located at 5721 Kennel Road in the City of Trenton and further
identified as Butler County Auditor Parcel Identification No. E2310-004-000-013 (hereinafter referred
to as the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has negotiated the terms and conditions of a real estate purchase
agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the owner of the Property (hereinafter referred to as the
“Seller”), whereby the City would purchase the Property for a purchase price of $315,000.00, said
Purchase Agreement being attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the City’s purchase of the Property will further its stated goals of improvement of public
safety facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Seller has expressly ordered that the City purchase the property, pursuant to the
Purchase Agreement, without further delay, and
WHEREAS, this Council finds and determines that it is necessary and in the best interest of the City
to authorize the City Manager and Finance Director to take all other actions necessary to complete the
purchase of the Property in a timely manner.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Trenton, County of
Butler, Ohio:
SECTION 1. This Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Purchase Agreement
for the purchase the Property from the Seller for a purchase price of $315,000.00, in
accordance with terms of the Purchase Agreement.
SECTION 2. This Council hereby directs the City Manager and Finance Director to take all
necessary actions to complete the purchase of the Property in a timely manner.
SECTION 3. This Council hereby ratifies all actions previously taken by the City staff related to the
purchase of Property described in this Ordinance.
SECTION 3. All formal actions of this Council related to this Ordinance and all deliberations of
Council and of any of its committees that resulted in such formal action were in
meetings open to the public in compliance with all legal requirements, including
Section 121.22 of the Revised Code.
SECTION 3. That this Ordinance is hereby declared to be an emergency measure for the reason that
it provides for the immediate preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare
and for the reason that it allows the City to further its stated goals of improvement of
public safety facilities, while accommodating the Seller’s express desire to transfer the
property without further delay, and shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

ORDINANCE NO 19-2026
PASSED
AYES
ABSENT
First Reading
Second Reading

Ryan Perry /s/
Mayor
Rules Suspended
AYES
NAYS_____
ABSENT

NAYS

ATTEST:
Stanislav Beresford /s/_________________________
CLERK OF COUNCIL

CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council for the City of Trenton, Ohio, Ohio, hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 19-2026 is a true and correct copy as passed by the Council of the City of
Trenton, Ohio on the 20th day of August, 2026 and that at least two-thirds of the elected members voted
in the affirmative on said motion.

__________________________________
Clerk of Council

Nick Ziepfel, Esq.
Fox & Ziepfel, LLC
E: [email protected]
C: 513.518.9873

July 30, 2026

VIA EMAIL: [email protected]
Tyler Minges

Tyler Minges Group – Huff Realty

812 Walnut Street
Ross, OH 45013

Re:

Letter of Intent to Purchase 5721 Kennel Road, Trenton, Ohio 45067
Butler County Parcel No. E2310-004-000-013

Dear Mr. Minges,
This Letter of Intent confirms the current intentions of the City of Trenton, Ohio ("Buyer"),

regarding Buyer's possible purchase of the real property described below from the owner or
owners of record to be identified in the Purchase and Sale Agreement (collectively, "Seller").

The purpose of this Letter of Intent is to provide a framework for the proposed transaction
and the preparation of a definitive Purchase and Sale Agreement.

1. Property: The real property commonly known as 5721 Kennel Road, Trenton, Ohio
45067, consisting of approximately 2.694 acres and identified as Butler County Parcel No.
E2310004000013, together with all improvements, fixtures, rights, and appurtenances (the
"Property").
2. Purchase Price: The purchase price for the Property shall be Three Hundred Fifteen
Thousand Dollars ($315,000.00) (the "Purchase Price"), payable in cash immediately at
Closing. The purchase will not be contingent upon Buyer obtaining financing.

3. As-Is Purchase: Buyer will acquire the Property AS IS, without any obligation of Seller
to make repairs or improvements, except that Seller must convey title as required by the Title

Contingency below.

4. Purchase and Sale Agreement: The parties presently intend to negotiate and
execute a mutually acceptable Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA") on or before August
WWW.FOXZIP.LAW

215 MAIN STREET, HAMILTON, OHIO 45013
7711 CAMARGO ROAD, SUITE 200, MADEIRA, OHIO 45243

513.341.5525

21, 2026. The PSA will incorporate the terms set forth in this Letter of Intent and will be
submitted to Trenton City Council for approval.

5. Title Contingency: Buyer's obligation to close under the PSA will be conditioned
upon Seller's ability to convey good and marketable fee-simple title by general warranty

deed, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except real estate taxes not yet due and
payable and other matters approved by Buyer in writing (the "Title Contingency").

6. Council Approval: Buyer's obligation to close under the PSA will be conditioned
upon Trenton City Council's approval of the PSA (the "Council Approval Contingency").
7. Closing: The Title Contingency and Council Approval Contingency are the sole
contingencies to Buyer's obligation to close under the PSA. Closing will occur five (5) days
after satisfaction of both contingencies, but in all events no later than August 30, 2026.
Seller will deliver exclusive possession of the Property at Closing, free of tenants and
occupants unless Buyer agrees otherwise in the PSA.
8. Closing Costs: Real estate taxes, assessments, rents (if any), utilities, and similar
items will be prorated as of Closing. Seller will pay the cost of preparing the deed,
conveyance fees, and costs to release Seller's liens. Buyer will pay the cost of recording the
deed and its inspection and survey costs.
9. Broker: Buyer has not engaged a broker, real estate agent, or finder to procure its
purchase of the Property.
10.Definitive Agreement: No proposed term is binding unless and until the PSA is

authorized by Trenton City Council, approved as to form, executed by Buyer and Seller, and

delivered. Seller's acknowledgment below confirms only the parties' present intention to

proceed on this framework.

If the foregoing accurately reflects Seller's current intentions, please have Seller
acknowledge this Letter of Intent below so that the parties may proceed with preparation of
the PSA. This Letter of Intent may be signed in counterparts and by electronic signature.

Sincerely,

Nick Ziepfel, Esq.
City Attorney

City of Trenton Ohio

WWW.FOXZIP.LAW

215 MAIN STREET SUITE B, HAMILTON, OHIO 45013
7711 CAMARGO ROAD, SUITE 200, MADEIRA, OHIO 45243

513.341.5525

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:

Seller:

Name:
Date:

WWW.FOXZIP.LAW

215 MAIN STREET SUITE B, HAMILTON, OHIO 45013

513.341.5525

ORDINANCE NO. 22-2026
AN ORDINANCE THAT THE CITY OF TRENTON WILL PICK UP THE
STATUTORILY REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION TO THE OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF TRENTON
PURSUANT TO IRC SECTION 414(h)(2).
WHEREAS, pursuant to federal and Ohio laws, the City of Trenton may offset future salary
increases and “pick up” (assume and pay) the contributions statutorily required by such elected officials
and covered employees to the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (OPERS) and such individuals
will not be required to pay federal and state income taxes on such contributions; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TRENTON,
OHIO:
SECTION 1: Effective February 6, 2025 the full amount of the statutorily required employee contributions
to OPERS shall be picked up and paid as a fringe benefit by the City of Trenton for each
person within any of the classes established in Section 2 herein. The pick-up shall be an
offset against future salary increases. This “pick up” by the City of Trenton shall be
designated as public employee contributions and shall be in lieu of contributions to OPERS
by each person within any of the classes established in Section 2 herein. No person subject
to this “pick up” shall have the option of choosing to receive the statutorily required
contribution to OPERS directly instead of having it “picked up” by the City of Trenton or
of being excluded from the “pick up”. The City of Trenton shall, in reporting and making
remittance to OPERS, report that the public employees contribution for each person subject
to this “pick up” has been made as provided by the statute. Therefore, contributions,
although designated as employee contributions, are employer-paid, and employees do not
have the option to receive the contributions directly. All contributions are paid by the
employer directly to the plan.
SECTION 2: The “pick up” by the City of Trenton provided by this ordinance shall apply to all persons
within the Classification of Clerk of Council / Public Information Officer of the City of
Trenton who are or become contributing members of OPERS.
SECTION 3: Under the fringe-benefit method of employer pick up, salary is not modified; however, the
employer will pay the employees’ statutorily required contribution to OPERS.
SECTION 4: The Finance Director and/or the Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to implement the
provisions of this ordinance to institute the “pick up” of the statutorily required
contributions to OPERS for those persons reflected in Section 2 herein so as to enable them
to have their employee contributions paid by their employer.

PASSED____________
AYES__________NAYS__________
ABSENT________________________
First Reading_________
Second Reading____________

Ryan Perry___________________
Mayor
Rules Suspended
AYES__________NAYS__________
ABSENT_____________

ATTEST:
Stanislav Beresford_____________________
Clerk of Council
CERTIFICATE
I, the undersigned Clerk of Council, hereby certify that the above Ordinance is a true and correct copy as
passed by the Council of the City of Trenton on the 3rd day of _September_, 2026 and that at least a majority
of the elected members voted in the affirmative on said motion.
__________________________________
Clerk of Council

CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT
Report To:

The Honorable Mayor Ryan Perry & Members of the City Council Report

From:

Matthew L. Mesisklis, Finance Director

Agenda Item: An Ordinance to Provide PERS pickup

Ordinance/Resolution/Motion
Resolution

1 st Reading Date: 8/20/26
2nd Reading Date: 9/3/26
Motion Date:
Ordinance Date:
Public Hearing Date:

Contract

Contract Required: No

Fiscal Impact

Budgeted: Partial
Expenditure: $4,990

Strategic GoaIs
Connected Community
Economic Vitality
Operational Excellence
Strong & Secure Neighborhood
General Operations
Responsible Infrastructure
Additional Document(s)
Attached: No
Please see further, more detailed
information regarding the fiscal impact in
the summary section of this report.

Source Funds: General

Policy Issue
Does City Council wish to adopt: PERS pickup for the Clerk of Council / Public Information Officer.
Policy Alternative
City Council can choose to not approve.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council receive this report and adopt legislation.
Statutory/Policy Authority
•

ORC and Ordinances of the City of Trenton

Fiscal Impact Summary
The $4,990 cost represents the current salary deduction the Magistrate is required to pay into OPERS
Background Information
This legislation enables the City to “pick up” the Clerk’s required OPERS pay-in as a benefit.