On the agenda: Johnson City SIGNED RESOLUTION NO. 20261015-1 FOR LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES.pdf — data center (Oct 15)
Past ⚠ Agenda Watch Johnson City, Texas · Thursday, October 15, 2026 — 2 weeks ago
About this record
The published agenda for the October 15, 2026 meeting contains: "data center". The meeting has passed. The agenda stays here as a permanent public record.
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.
The agenda, word for word
Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived October 17, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗
bere Blanco-Pedernales Groundwater Conservation District
agent A 601 West Main Street, Johnson City, TX 78636 | (830) 868-9196
RESOLUTION NO. 20261015-1
RESOLUTION ADOPTING LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE 90TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE
WHEREAS, the Blanco-Pedernales Groundwater Conservation District ("BPGCD") is an
independent political subdivision authorized under Chapter 36 of the Texas Water Code to
manage groundwater resources in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the legislative priorities adopted herein reflect a philosophy of local governance
strengthened by state support, whereby the State empowers and defends Groundwater
Conservation Districts rather than displacing them; and
WHEREAS, groundwater is managed most effectively by locally elected boards, accountable to
the communities they serve, whose familiarity with local aquifer conditions, land uses, and
community values lends legitimacy to difficult permitting decisions, while state-run, one-size-
fits-all management cannot accommodate the diverse hydrology and priorities of Texas's
regions; and
WHEREAS, replacing local districts with centralized, state-run management would be viewed by
rural communities as yet another state-imposed initiative disregarding local voices, joining
other recent intrusions such as unregulated data center development and 765-kV transmission
lines, and shifting groundwater decisions away from the people they affect; and
WHEREAS, uniform standards fail Texas hydrology, as recharge rates, subsidence risks, and
saltwater intrusion differ fundamentally among the state's aquifers, and coordination
challenges such as conflicting Desired Future Conditions on shared aquifers call for
strengthening the GMA process rather than abolishing the local districts that make it work; and
WHEREAS, any statutory codification of the reasonableness of groundwater regulations must
preserve the flexibility of Groundwater Conservation Districts to adopt rules suited to local
aquifer conditions and must not prescribe uniform regulatory standards; and
WHEREAS, the myriad groundwater rules adopted by districts across the state were built to
provide flexibility for differing aquifer conditions and community circumstances, and the
Reso 015-1
resulting diversity among districts fosters the discovery and refinement of rules best suited to
local conditions, as districts may look to one another's experience in crafting their own
regulatory approaches; and
WHEREAS, litigation asserting that reasonable groundwater regulations constitute
unconstitutional takings threatens to chill BPGCD's ability to fulfill its statutory mission, and
codifying that reasonable regulations serving public interests are not takings would reduce
litigation risk and regulatory uncertainty; and
WHEREAS, Groundwater Conservation Districts face increasing legal challenges in exercising
their regulatory authority, and without adequate statutory protections, the financial burden of
defending such litigation could divert resources from core mission activities, making state legal
defense by the Attorney General essential to preserving local resources for groundwater
management; and
WHEREAS, concentrated, high-volume withdrawals associated with data centers and other high
water-use projects place disproportionate pressure on local aquifers within Priority
Groundwater Management Areas, warranting confirmation of GCD authority to require
cumulative impact assessments, metering, and public reporting, and to impose mitigation fees
and temporary moratoria; and
WHEREAS, enduring groundwater policy must rest on both sound science and fair treatment of
landowners, and any new groundwater legislation should respect private property rights while
advancing long-term management of the state's groundwater resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Blanco-Pedernales
Groundwater Conservation District that the following Legislative Priorities are hereby adopted
for the 90th Texas Legislature:
(1) Local Board Management — oppose any consolidation of Groundwater Conservation
Districts that would diminish local management of the aquifer;
(2) Clarify Takings — codify that reasonable groundwater regulations serving public interests
are not unconstitutional takings, reducing litigation risk;
(3) State Legal Defense — authorize the Attorney General to represent GCDs in takings and
regulatory challenges, reducing costly litigation exposure for local districts;
(4) Regulate High-Water-Demand Projects — affirm GCD authority to require cumulative
groundwater impact assessments, metering, and public reporting for data centers and other
high water-use projects, and to impose mitigation fees and temporary moratoria in Priority
Groundwater Management Areas; and
(5) Balance Conservation with Property Rights — ensure any new groundwater legislation
respects private property rights while advancing long-term management goals;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board authorizes and directs the General Manager and
General Counsel to advocate these priorities on BPGCD's behalf before the Texas Legislature
and its committees during the 90th Regular Session; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
ADOPTED this 15th day of October 2026, by the Board of Directors of the Blanco-Pedernales
Groundwater Conservation District.
\ WL.
Jikimy Klepac, Board President
Date: October 15, 2026
Greg Stevens, Board Secretary
Date: October 15, 2026
The government’s own published record — read it yourself, then decide what to do about it.
The facilities, the coverage, and the local record for this community.
Not yet recorded. The record stays open — outcomes are added as minutes and vote results are published.
Provenance
Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.
- Agenda Watch · Oct 17, 2026
Permanent ID DKT-2026-004344 — this record is never deleted.
Record history
Every change to this record, logged as it happened.
- Oct 17, 2026 Filed on the Docket
- Oct 17, 2026 Full document archived — public record
← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.