On the agenda: Centerville Planning Commission Meeting — data center (Oct 14)

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CENTERVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL HOLD A
REGULAR MEETING AT 7:00 PM ON OCTOBER 14, 2026 AT CENTERVILLE CITY HALL, 250 NORTH
MAIN STREET, CENTERVILLE, UTAH.
Centerville City Planning Commission meetings are open to the public, unless otherwise closed for reasons allowed by law. Centerville
City Planning Commission meetings may be conducted via electronic means pursuant to Utah Code § 52-4-207. In compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations due to a disability may contact the City Recorder at
(801) 295-3477, at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting. The Commission reserves the right to modify the sequence of agenda
items in order to facilitate special needs or provide greater efficiency.

The full agenda packet and backup materials can be found on the Centerville City website at:
https://centervilleutah.gov/129/Agendas-Minutes

A.

B.

CALL TO ORDER
1.

ROLL CALL

2.

LEGISLATIVE PRAYER OR THOUGHT - Commissioner Paul Mendenhall

3.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

BUSINESS ITEMS
Business action or discussion items to be considered by the Planning Commission.
1.

Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit - Spark Sugar Co - 487 West 1420 North (Gallup
Circle) - Home Based Bakery operating under the Home Consumption and Homemade Food
Act - Sara Bamford - Administrative Decision
Consider Conditional Use Permit for Spark Sugar Co located at approximately 487 West 1420
North for a Home Based Bakery business operating under the Home Consumption and
Homemade Food Act.

2.

Public Hearing - Standards and Specifications Amendments - Centerville Details and Drawings
- Legislative Decision
Consider proposed amendments to the Details and Drawings as forth in the Centerville
Standards and Specifications (see attached Resolution 2026-29 and proposed amendment
documentation).

C.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORS REPORT
1.

D.

MINUTES
Minutes of prior meetings may be reviewed and accepted. Minutes review and approval shall comply
with the Centerville City Minutes Approval Policy.
1.

E.

Community Development Director's Report

Minutes Review and Approval - September 23, 2026
Consideration of Planning Commission meeting minutes from October 14, 2026.

ADJOURNMENT

Agenda - Page 1
Page 1 of 86

CERTIFICATE OF POSTING
I hereby certify that this notice and agenda was posted at Centerville City Hall, published on the Utah Public
Notice Website, and provided to a newspaper or media correspondent in accordance with the requirements of
the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, including, but not limited to, provisions of Utah Code § 52-4-202.
Jennifer Robison
Centerville City Recorder

Agenda - Page 2
Page 2 of 86

PLANNING
COMMISSION
Staff Report
10/14/2026
Item No. 1.
Title: Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit - Spark Sugar Co - 487 West 1420 North (Gallup Circle) - Home
Based Bakery operating under the Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act - Sara Bamford Administrative Decision
Initiated By: Sara Bamford, Applicant
Staff Representative: Sydney DeWees, Assistant Planner

SUBJECT:
Consider Conditional Use Permit for Spark Sugar Co located at approximately 487 West 1420 North for a
Home Based Bakery business operating under the Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act.
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider approval of a conditional use permit for a home occupation bakery business operating under the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act.

BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Mrs. Sara Bamford, has submitted a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a home
occupation to conduct a “home consumption and homemade food” bakery in the Residential Low zone of
Centerville. This business will focus on preparing and selling directly to consumers shelf-stable baked goods
and chocolate confections. There is also an aspect of providing catering options off site and selling goods
directly to the consumer. The business will permit customers to come to the property only for scheduled pickup in a way that is “reasonable and consistent with residential norms” from 8 AM and 8 PM, as the applicant
states in their document submittals. The applicant has provided information that goes into more detail about
their proposed business operations, as included in the meeting packet.
Per CZC 12.62.040, any use not listed (family childcare facility; medical service; personal care service;
personal instruction service; and office, general) may be established as a home occupation in an agricultural or
residential zone subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to the requirements of CZC
12.21.100 and the development standards of CZC 12.62.070. Accordingly, this request has been reviewed
under the criteria applicable to Residential Low zoning districts. Mrs. Bamford has communicated with staff via
email to verify questions pertaining to permits needing to be obtained and application clarification.
A public hearing was advertised for this proposed conditional use permit for a home occupation bakery
business request. A public hearing notice was posted in accordance with State and City Code requirements.
No commentary was provided prior to the date of completion of this packet.

250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 3 of 86

ATTACHMENTS:
1.
9.14.2026 Staff Findings and Report - Cond Use - Spark Sugar Co
2.
Exhibit A - Application [reduced]
3.
Exhibit A - Application 9.29.26 - Comp review
4.
Exhibit B - Property Owner Affidavit
5.
Exhibit C - Map of Property Lines and Use within 100 ft of Property
6.
Exhibit D - Spark Sugar Co Label 1
7.
Exhibit D - Spark Sugar Co Label 2
8.
Exhibit E - 12.32 RL standards
9.
Exhibit F - 12.21.100 Conditional Use Permit
10. Exhibit G - General Plan Neighborhood 4
11. Exhibit H - USDA Email - Two Utah Laws
12. Exhibit I - 4-5a-102 Definitions
13. Exhibit J - 4-5a-104 Home Producer Direct Sales- Exempt from Regulations
14. Exhibit K Basic-Labeling-Guidelines-for-Home-Consumption-and-Homemade-Foods

250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 4 of 86

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
655 North 1250 West, Centerville, Utah 84014
(801) 292-8232
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA: ITEM 1
APPLICANT/ BUSINESS OWNER:

SARA BAMFORD
(801) 755-8432
HTTPS://SPARKSUGARCO.COM/CONTACT/

PROPERTY OWNER(S):

SARA BAMFORD
(801) 755-8432
HTTPS://SPARKSUGARCO.COM/CONTACT/
CHRIS BAMFORD
(801) 664-4500

PROPERTY LOCATION:

487 GALLOP CIRCLE
CENTERVILLE UT 84014

OCCUPATION LICENSE:

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; HOME
OCCUPATION; HOME CONSUMPTION AND
HOMEMADE FOOD ACT BAKERY

ZONING:

RESIDENTIAL LOW (R-L)

RECOMMENDATION:

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT REQUEST FOR A HOME OCCUPATION

BACKGROUND
The applicant, Mrs. Sara Bamford, has submitted a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a
home occupation to conduct a “home consumption and homemade food” bakery in the Residential Low
zone of Centerville. This business will focus on preparing and selling directly to consumers shelf-stable
baked goods and chocolate confections. There is also an aspect of providing catering options off site and
selling goods directly to the consumer. The business will permit customers to come to the property only
for scheduled pick-up in a way that is “reasonable and consistent with residential norms” from 8 AM and

Page 5 of 86

8 PM, as the applicant states in their document submittals. The applicant has provided information that
goes into more detail about their proposed business operations, as included in the meeting packet.
Per CZC 12.62.040, any use not listed (family childcare facility; medical service; personal care service;
personal instruction service; and office, general) may be established as a home occupation in an agricultural
or residential zone subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to the requirements of CZC
12.21.100 and the development standards of CZC 12.62.070. Accordingly, this request has been reviewed
under the criteria applicable to Residential Low zoning districts. Mrs. Bamford has communicated with
staff via email to verify questions pertaining to permits needing to be obtained and application clarification.
A public hearing was advertised for this proposed conditional use permit for a home occupation bakery
business request. A public hearing notice was posted in accordance with State and City Code requirements.
No commentary was provided prior to the date of completion of this packet.

2|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 6 of 86

CODE REQUIREMENTS REVIEW & ANALYSIS
For Home Occupation Application to be approved, there are a list of requirements that need to be met
per CZC 12.62.070:
The development standards of CZC 12.62.050 shall apply to any home occupation established as a
conditional use unless expressly modified by a conditional use permit, except as provided in the
following Subsections:
a) Employees. A home occupation shall have no employees other than persons who reside on
the premises where the home occupation is conducted.
Response: The applicant, Mrs. Bamford, lives at the location of the proposed home occupation, 487
Gallop Circle. Sara has confirmed that she and her Husband, Mr. Chris Bamford, will be the only
employees.
b) Neighborhood Disturbance. A home occupation shall not alter the residential character of
the premises or unreasonably disturb the peace and quiet of the neighborhood, including
radio and television reception, by reason of color, construction, design, lighting, materials,
noises, sounds, or vibrations, or excessive traffic.
Response: The applicant has relayed to staff how each aspect outlined in this section of the Code will
not be impacted by her business operation. All matters will be done internally with no structural
changes being proposed. If the Home Occupation gets approved and at any point structural changes
will need to be made, the City staff will have documentation of this applicant’s approval. This will
remind staff that before any building permit application is approved for the additions, the Planning
Commission would need to re-evaluate the Conditional Use Permit to verify that this structural
alteration will not impact the neighborhood.
While it is expected that some customer traffic will be generated, the imagery of the property
demonstrates a two-car garage driveway for a quick pick-up location. Staff believe this is sufficient
enough to keep parking limited to their property and off Gallup Circle (1420 N) or Pony Expressway
3|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 7 of 86

(550 W) and should not impact the traffic flow within the cul-de-sac. Mrs. Bamford also intends to
operate on a scheduled pick-up basis, ensuring that visits are spread out and not concentrated in a
way that would create traffic congestion. Staff finds this approach to be reasonable and does not
anticipate adverse impacts from the proposed new traffic. Due to the applicant’s proactive approach,
staff is comfortable allowing the applicant to determine a suitable number of pickups based on their
property’s layout and capacity.
The applicant is permitted to install one sign in the front yard, provided it is located outside of the
public right-of-way, does not exceed 5 feet in height, and is no larger than 16 square feet in area. The
applicant has not submitted a sign design at this time, and they have noted that no sign is intended.
c) Promotional Meetings. Promotional meetings for the purpose of selling merchandise, taking
orders, or training shall not be held more than one time per month.
Response: The applicant has not indicated that there is a plan to have monthly meetings with external
companies, therefore this should not be a concern. Being said, the Planning Commission may inquire
more about this detail if desired.
d) Utility Demand. A home occupation shall not cause a demand for public utilities in excess of
that necessarily and customarily provided for residential uses.
Response: The applicant did not propose any additional build-out plans or concepts. The applicant
asked, in the future, if they chose to expand their business, operate under Cottage Food Laws vs the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act, and needed a second kitchen, would the city allow for
this to occur.
Staff informed the applicant that if they choose to operate under the Cottage Food Law, they will
need a CUP Amendment. The CUP permit will be tied to the original approval of the home
occupation operating under the Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act. They will not need to
update the business permit, just the CUP.
The CUP Amendment will trigger a review of zoning code and additional staff to review for
additional service capacity needs, if there is no anticipated future impact on city infrastructure, and if
they still meet the Home Occupation Criteria. Having this trigger an additional CUP Amenement will
ensure that the home occupation still meets the intent of allowing for home occupations in
Centerville.
For a Conditional Use Application to be approved there are a list of requirements that need to be met
per CZC 12.21.100 (e)(3):
1. Will the proposed use be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing
or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity;
Response: No. Staff’s primary concern related to the proposed use is the potential increase in traffic,
and whether the Homeowner’s Association would have any conditions preventing the home
occupation business to occur. Staff has verified that there is no Homeowners Association still in
operation for the Willow Farms Estates Subdivision. When staff went to post the notice on site, there
were a few cars parked along Pony Expressway (550 W), and none parked in Gallup Circle (1420 N).
4|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 8 of 86

If, during busy seasons, such as the holidays, there is an increase in vehicular traffic, the Home
Occupation should not allow for pick-ups to park along Pony Expressway and should indicate such to
their customers when communicating about pick-up details. Other potential impacts were evaluated
and determined to be negligible, including odors, noise, lighting, waste generation, screening
requirements, public infrastructure capacity, existing code compliance, consistency with the General
Plan for the area, and neighborhood sentiment.
2. Is the proposed use of the particular location necessary or desirable to provide a service or
facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community;
Response: Yes. While a bakery may not typically be located within a residential area, as evidenced
multiple times, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact the health, safety, or welfare
of surrounding residents. The applicant has indicated that this is a small-scale business endeavor, and
that securing a commercial space would not be financially feasible. Although the use may not be
strictly necessary at this location, it is considered a reasonable and desirable way to support local
entrepreneurship and align with Centerville’s community-oriented character.
3. Does the proposed use comply with regulations and conditions specified in this Title for such use?
Response: Yes. The Code requires the Planning Commission to review specific factors when
evaluating Conditional Use Permit (CUP) applications:
CZC 12.21.100(e)(5): The following factors must be considered when determining whether to
approve, approve with conditions, or deny a CUP application:
1. The suitability of the specific property for the proposed use;
2. The development or lack of development adjacent to the proposed site and the harmony of the
proposed use with existing uses in the vicinity;
3. Whether the proposed use may be injurious to potential or existing development in the
vicinity;
4. The economic impact of the proposed use on the surrounding area;
5. The aesthetic impact of the proposed use on the surrounding area;
6. The present and future requirements for transportation, traffic, water, sewer, and other
utilities for the site and surrounding area;
7. The safeguards proposed or provided to ensure adequate utilities, transportation access,
drainage, parking, loading space, lighting, screening, landscaping, open space, fire
protection, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation;
8. The safeguards provided or proposed to prevent noxious or offensive emissions such as
noise, glare, dust, pollutants, and odors;
9. The safeguards proposed or provided to minimize other adverse effects on persons or
property in the area; and
10. The impact of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of the City, the area, and
persons owning or leasing property in the vicinity.
Response: Staff has reviewed all relevant factors and addressed them throughout this report. The
proposed business is expected to have a low impact on the surrounding community. It is the
applicant’s responsibility to meet the Utah State Code requirements found within the Home
Consumption and Homemade Food Act, as found on the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food’s
website (see exhibits I, J, and K). Staff contacted the Environmental Health Division and clarified
5|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 9 of 86

affirmatively that the Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act standards are reviewed and
verified by the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food (UDAF). The Davis County Health
Department has no specific requirements for home-based food production, but permits are needed for
sales at farmers’ markets or other events.
4. The proposed use will comply with applicable provisions of the General Plan.
Response: It will. The business’ property is located in the Residential Low (R-L) zoned area and is in
Neighborhood 4 in the General Plan (see exhibit G). The General Plan does not specifically mention
home occupation uses in this area, nor does it in any specific area of the General Plan. With this
being a grey area that the General Plan does not identify, the overarching goals of the General Plan
can be applied.
The home occupation aligns with the goals and objectives of this area, including providing support
for small locally owned businesses, preserving residential character, and encouraging low-impact
economic activity within residential areas. As noted before, this bakery business will not generate too
much traffic, alter the appearance of the property, disrupt the integrity of the neighborhood, or
increase stress on the public infrastructure. This service, in turn, could further provide economic
support for local residents to have an additional option to shop locally and create a healthy
relationship between the small business owner’s and members of the City.
SUMMARY
Based on these findings, staff recommends approval of this application. Should any business operations
and/or activities deviate from the conditions listed in this report, then the Conditional Use Permit should be
revoked per CZC 12.21.100(i).

POTENTIAL MOTIONS
Based on the information provided by the Planning Staff and following discussion by the
Planning Commission, the Commission may make a motion to approve this request, approve
with modifications per the discussion, table the matter to a later date, or deny the proposed
request. The Commission should provide appropriate findings of facts for any presented
decision. Sample motions for the Planning Commission’s convenience are located below.
#1 – APPROVE
“I hereby make a motion for the Planning Commission to APPROVE the Conditional Use Permit request
from Sara Bamford for a home occupation business use to operate a home-based bakery in following the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act, as located on parcel 02-108-0025, known as 487 West
1420 North, for the business ‘Spark Sugar Co. LLC’. This home occupation use is subject to the
following conditions of approval:
1. This Conditional Use Permit approval shall not be transferred to another similar user
unless approved by the City.
2. The business operator shall obey all applicable local, state, and federal rules and
6|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 10 of 86

regulations concerning Conditional Use Permits.
3. Any changes to this business model will require a new review of the Conditional Use Permit by
the Planning Commission.
4. Should any business operations and/or activities deviate from the conditions of approval for this
home occupation, the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked per CZC 12.21.100(i).
(Any additional conditions that may be provided by the Planning Commission)
Suggested Reasons for Action (Findings) include:
A. The Planning Commission finds that the application complies with the approval
standards for a Conditional Use Permit as listed under CZC 12.21.100(e).
B. The Planning Commission finds that the application complies with the development
standards for a home occupation listed under CZC 12.62.050 and the development
standards for a conditional use home occupation listed under CZC 12.62.070.
C. The Planning Commission finds that the application complies with the standards and
regulations for Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act.
D. Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that with the implementation of the conditions listed
in the staff report, this application will have little to no impact on the health, safety, and general
welfare of the community and should be approved.”
(Add any additional findings for action discussed and agreed upon by the Planning Commission)
#2 – TABLE
“I hereby make a motion for the Planning Commission to TABLE the Conditional Use Permit request
from Sara Bamford for a home occupation business use to operate a home-based bakery in following the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act, as located on parcel 02-108-0025, known as 487 West
1420 North, for the business ‘Spark Sugar Co. LLC’, until such a time as _________________.”
# 3 – DENY
“I hereby make a motion for the Planning Commission to DENY the Conditional Use Permit request from
Sara Bamford for a home occupation business use to operate a home-based bakery in following the Home
Consumption and Homemade Food Act, as located on parcel 02-108-0025, known as 487 West 1420
North, for the business ‘Spark Sugar Co. LLC’, with the following reasons for action
(findings):_______________.”
Suggested Reasons for Action (Findings) include:
A. The Planning Commission finds that the application does not comply with the approval
standards for a Conditional Use Permit as listed under CZC 12.21.100(e).
B. The Planning Commission finds that the application does not comply with the development
7|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 11 of 86

standards for a home occupation listed under CZC 12.62.050 and the development
standards for a conditional use home occupation listed under CZC 12.62.070.
C. The Planning Commission finds that the application does not comply with the standards and
regulations for Home Consumption and Homemade Food Act.
D. Therefore, the Planning Commission finds that with the implementation of the conditions listed
in the staff report, this application may have identified impacts on the health, safety, and general
welfare of the community and should be denied.”
(Add any additional findings for action discussed and agreed upon by the Planning Commission)

8|Page
October 14th, 2026

Page 12 of 86

Centerville City, UT - Community
Development

Printed: 09/29/2026
Permit/License #

Spark Sugar Co. – Home
Occupation

9829359
Reference Number

09/28/2026 - 09/27/2027
Conditional Use Permit

0e0f8e50-b259-11f1-87c3-2bb2c9238228
Status

Active

General
Application Status

Under Review

Application Review Status
Pre-Review

Accepted

Compliance Check

Reviewed

Date Submitted

09/16/2026

Planning Commission Reviewing
Scheduled for October 14th, 2026 at 7:00 PM.
Located at the Centerville City Hall.
Final-Review

Not Reviewed

Fees

Payments

New Conditional Use Permit Fee

$300.00

09/28/2026

Subtotal

$300.00

Total Paid

Amount Paid

$300.00

Total Due

Online

$300.00
$300.00

$0.00

Application Form Data
(Empty fields are not included)
Applicant First Name

Sara
Applicant Last Name

Bamford
Company Name

Spark Sugar Co. LLC
Email
Page 13 of 86

[email protected]
Phone

(801) 755-8432
Preferred form of contact

Email
Property Owner Name

Phone

Email

Chris Bamford

(801) 664-4500

[email protected]

Project Address (Street)

487 Gallop Circle
Parcel ID of Subject Property(s)

02-108-0025
Acreage

0.3
Zone

Residential - Low (R-L)
Is the property located in the Hillside Overlay Zone?

No
Is the property located in the historic district?

No
Is the property part of a Planned Development Overlay or Planned Unit Development?

No
Is the property part of a Community Development Authority?

No
Is the project PART of a planned center?

No
Does the project contain lands which are reserved in private ownership for community use, including common
areas

No
Are you adjacent to a UDOT right of way?

No
Please upload a notarized signature of the primary property owner.

 Property Owner Affidavit_signed_9.16.26.pdf

Page 14 of 86

Is there any agreements with adjacent property owners?

No
Application Name

Spark Sugar Co. – Home Occupation
Conditional Use Permit Type

New Conditional Use
Is your use "conditionally permitted" in the table of use?

Yes
Description of Conditional Use Permit Request:

Spark Sugar Co. LLC is a small home-based bakery proposed to operate within an existing singlefamily residence. Baked goods are prepared (indoors) with sales occurring primarily through off-site
events and prearranged orders. The residence will remain residential in character and appearance,
with no retail storefront, exterior product display, or outdoor business activity.
The home occupation will remain incidental and secondary to the residential use of the property.
Business activity will be conducted indoors and maintain normal residential traffic and parking
conditions, avoid excessive noise, odors, lighting, or other nuisances, and maintain utility demand
consistent with residential use.
Is the use align with the General Plan for the area?

Yes
Is the proposed use of the particular location is necessary or desirable to provide a service/ facility to the
neighborhood and the community?

Yes
What safeguards are being provided to insure adequate utilities, transportation access, drainage, parking,
loading space, lighting, screening, landscaping, open space, fire protection, and pedestrian and vehicular
circulation?

The proposed home occupation will use the existing residential utilities, driveway, parking, drainage,
lighting, landscaping, and access serving the residence. No changes to public utilities, drainage,
street access, landscaping, or pedestrian circulation are proposed or required. Business activity will
remain indoors, and no additional parking areas, loading areas, exterior lighting, or exterior
structures are proposed. Any customer pickup or delivery activity will use the existing paved
driveway and will remain at a level consistent with normal residential use. The residence will
continue to comply with applicable building and fire-safety requirements.
What safeguards are provided or proposed to prevent noxious or offensive omissions such as noise, glare, dust,
pollutants and odor from the proposed facility or use?

All food preparation and business activity will occur indoors using residential-compatible equipment.
The operation does not involve industrial processes, hazardous materials, outdoor production,
excessive lighting, or activities that generate dust, smoke, vibration, or unusual noise. Bakingrelated odors are limited to ordinary food preparation within the residence. No exterior speakers,
machinery, product displays, or other sources of neighborhood disturbance are proposed.

Page 15 of 86

What safeguards are provided or proposed to minimize other adverse effects from the proposed facility or use
on persons or property in the area?

The business will remain subordinate to the residential use of the property and will not alter the
exterior residential appearance of the home. There will be no retail storefront, exterior product
display, outdoor business activity, or business-related use of the yard. Customer and delivery activity
will be limited so that traffic and parking remain consistent with normal residential conditions.
Business operations will be managed to avoid unreasonable noise, lighting, odors, or other impacts
on neighboring properties. No adverse effects on persons or property in the area are expected due
to the nature of the proposed home occupation.
Is signage a part of this request?

No
Other Documentation for Application

 Centerville City Zoning Map_9.16.26_487 Gallop Circle.png

Signature
I agree that the facts stated in this application are true, and upon changes I will provide notification as needed.

Electronically Signed

Sara Jane Bamford - 09/16/2026 11:31 pm

Page 16 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
655 North 1250 West, Centerville, Utah 84014
(801) 292-8232

STAFF MEMORANDUM
To: Sara Bamford, Applicant & Property Owner
Chris Bamford, Property Owner
From: Sydney DeWees, City Planner
Subject: Spark Sugar Co. LLC – Conditional Use Permit –
Completeness Review
Background: The application requests a conditional use permit to operate a home-based bakery
at 487 W 1420 N, parcel number: 02-108-0025 within an existing single-family residence. The
property is part of the Willow Farm Estates Plat H. The business will operate under the Home
Consumption and Homemade Food Act, be entirely indoors, limited appointment-only customer
pickups from 8 AM- 8 PM, no exterior modifications, signage, or structural changes, ensuring it
remains compatible with the residential neighborhood. The proposal aligns with the city's
General Plan, includes safeguards to prevent noise, odors, traffic, and other adverse impacts, and
complies with all relevant regulations to maintain neighborhood character and safety.
Application Received:
Application Reviewed:
Additional Application Review:
Application Approval:

9.16.26
9.22.26
9.29.26
9.29.26

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRMENTS (CZC 12.21.100 (d)(1))
Item
The name, address, email and telephone
number of the applicant and the
applicant's agent, if any;
The address and parcel identification of
the subject property;

Status

Comments

Sara Bamford
[email protected]
(801) 755-8432
https://sparksugarco.com/contact/
487 WEST 1420 NORTH
02-108-0025

Page 17 of 86

The zone, zone boundaries and present
use of the subject property;

R-L
Willow Farm Estates Plat H
No HOA in operation
Home based bakery operating under the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food
Act.
300.00 Fee paid 9.28.26

A description of the proposed
conditional use;
Fees Paid
Applicant's name;

A plot plan showing the following;
N/A

Site address;
Property boundaries and
dimensions;
Layout of existing and proposed
buildings, parking, landscaping,
and utilities; and
Adjoining property lines and uses
within 100 feet of the subject
property.
Traffic impact analysis, if required by
the City Engineer, Zoning Administrator,
or the Planning Commission;
A statement by the applicant
demonstrating how the conditional use
permit request meets the approval
standards of 12.21.100 Subsection (e)
Such other and further information or
documentation as the Zoning
Administrator or Planning Commission
may reasonably deem necessary for
proper consideration and determination
of whether the application meets the
requirements of this Section and
applicable provisions of the Zoning
Code.

-

N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A

Labels meet Utah State Code 4-5a-104
subsection 3 “Except as provided in
Subsection (6), food or food products sold
under this section shall be labeled with: (a)
the producer's name and address; (b) a
disclosure statement indicating that the
product is: (i) not for resale; and (ii)
processed and prepared without state or
local inspection; and (c) a statement listing
whether the food or food product contains,
or was prepared in a location that also
handles, common allergens including milk,
soy, wheat, eggs, peanuts or tree nuts, fish,
or shellfish."

Page 18 of 86

_____________________ Sydney DeWees, City Planner

Page 19 of 86

Page 20 of 86

Page 21 of 86

TRADITIONAL
GINGERBREAD
COOKIE
The purchase of this cookie
makes someone’s life
a little bit sweeter.
Not for Resale
Contains or was prepared in a location that
also handles milk, soy, wheat, eggs, peanuts,
tree nuts, fish, shellfish, and sesame.
Processed and prepared without
state or local inspection.
Produced by Spark Sugar Co.
487 Gallop Circle,
Centerville UT, 84014
@SparkSugarCo Page 22 of 86

Experience the velvety richness of our 34%
Belgian milk chocolate bar — a treat so
smooth and decadent, it’s worth savoring.

The sweetness of life comes
from spreading our spark.
Contains/was prepared
in a location handling
milk, soy, wheat, eggs,
peanuts, tree nuts, fish,
shellfish, and sesame.
Processed and
prepared without
state or local
inspection.
Not for Resale
487 Gallop Circle,
Centerville UT 84014

MILK BAR

Page 23 of 86

12.32 Residential Zones
12.32.010 Purpose
12.32.020 Scope
12.32.030 Definitions
12.32.040 Uses Allowed
12.32.050 Development Standards
12.32.055 Additional Development Standards For R-M And R-H Zones
12.32.060 Regulations Of General Applicability
12.32.070 Regulations For Specific Uses
12.32.080 Special Regulations
12.32.090 Waiver Of Strict Compliance
12.32.300 Table Of Development Standards In Residential Zones
12.32.010 Purpose
The purpose of the residential zones is set forth in CZC 12.30.020.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.020 Scope
The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to any real property located in a residential zone as shown on
the Zoning Map. No building, structure or real property shall be used and no building or structure shall
hereafter be erected, structurally or substantially altered, or enlarged except as set forth in this Chapter.
Such requirements shall not be construed to prohibit or limit other applicable provisions of this Title, the
Centerville Municipal Code, or other laws.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.030 Definitions
Certain words and phrases in this Chapter, including uses, are defined in CZC 12.12 (Definitions).
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.040 Uses Allowed
(a) Permitted and Conditional Uses. Permitted and conditional uses allowed in residential zones
shall be as set forth in the Table of Uses in CZC 12.36 (Table of Uses). Permitted and
conditional uses are indicated by "P" or "C", respectively. Uses not permitted are indicated by
"N".
(b) Accessory Uses. Permitted and conditional uses set forth on the Table of Uses shall be
deemed to include accessory uses and activities that are necessarily and customarily
associated with and incidental and subordinate to such uses.
(1) Accessory uses shall be subject to the same regulations that apply to permitted and
conditional uses in the same zone except as otherwise expressly provided in this Title.
(2) No accessory use, building, or structure shall be allowed on a lot or parcel unless a
permitted or conditional use has been and is currently established.
(3) Accessory uses in residential zones shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
Page 24 of 86

(A) Garage sales, subject to applicable standards of CZC 12.56 (Temporary Uses);
(B) Garages and off-street parking areas, subject to applicable standards of CZC
12.52 (Off-Street Parking and Loading);
(C) Hobby activities when conducted by an occupant of the premises solely for
personal enjoyment, amusement, or recreation and which do not conflict with any
applicable provision of the Centerville Municipal Code;
(D) Home occupations, subject to applicable standards of CZC 12.62 (Home
Occupations);
(E) Household pets (See animal control ordinances regarding legal limits);
(F) Nurseries and greenhouses, when used for non-commercial purposes;
(G) Playhouses, patios, porches, gazebos, and incidental storage buildings;
(H) Swimming pools and hot tubs for use by residents and their guests; and
(I) Animals and fowl for recreational and family food production (for chickens and
rabbits only) in accordance with and subject to the provisions of CZC 12.55.240
(c) Prohibited Uses. Any use not shown on the Table of Uses shall be prohibited unless the Zoning
Administrator determines the use is substantially the same as a permitted or conditional use in
accordance with CZC 12.21.190.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.050 Development Standards
Development standards within residential zones are set forth in Section 12.32.300.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.055 Additional Development Standards For R-M And R-H Zones
Notwithstanding the Regulations of General Applicability in CZC 12.32.060 and the Table of
Development Standards in CZC 12.32.300, all residential development within the R-M and R-H Zones
shall comply with the following development standards.
(a) Architectural Design Standards. All primary buildings within the R-M and R-H Zones shall be
designed by a licensed, professional architect and all drawings submitted for approval or permit
shall bear the architect’s stamp for the State of Utah.
(b) Exterior Design Standards. All sides of primary buildings within the R-M and R-H Zones shall receive
design consideration with particular attention given to areas exposed to public view.

(1) All primary buildings within a development project shall possess an overall building architectural
theme, including, but not limited to, exterior building materials, textures, colors and signage.

(2) The apparent mass of primary buildings or structures shall be minimized through design,
articulation, and use of materials. An open design is desired that visually and physically breaks
up the mass and footprint of buildings. Approaches such as the use of vertical and horizontal
planes, roof pitches, roof lines, windows, reveals, and alcoves shall be used to create façade
variation, shadows, corners, and architectural interest. Articulation approaches should not
Page 25 of 86

appear to be applied randomly or merely a surface treatment. In addition, the use of any multiple
articulation approaches shall be coordinated to affect a complementary building design.

(3) Natural or natural-appearing materials, such as stone, cultured stone, brick, and wood,
shall be the design gestures used in the architectural design of all primary buildings.
Wood siding, cement fiber board siding, and other similar appearing materials shall be
the other main materials used in the design of all residential buildings. Substantial or
prominent use of synthetic stucco, and unnatural appearing materials, such as metal,
vinyl, and plastics are to be used sparingly. Use of such secondary and/or accent
materials shall not exceed 20% of the building or structure’s exterior.
(4) The Planning Commission shall review and approve architectural design of buildings
within the R-M and R-H Zones in accordance with the provisions set forth herein during
conditional use permit and/or site plan review.
(c) Landscaping and Open Space. All residential developments within the R-M and R-H Zones, except for
single-family developments, shall comply with the landscaping regulations of CZC 12.51 (Landscaping
and Screening), and more specifically, the regulations of CZC 12.51.070(g) regarding multi-family
developments. Additionally, landscaping and open spaces shall be designed in a manner to meet the
residential needs for active and passive spaces for residents and visitors, such as private spaces, entry
features, small centralized gathering areas, and buffering adjacent land uses. Furthermore, such areas
shall be designed with the amenities or features that complement the various expected residents, both
day and evening hours, and beyond the default design of a tot lot, playground, or clubhouse.

(d) Use of Public and Private Roadways. All dwellings within residential developments in R-M and R-H
Zones shall be accessed from a public roadway, unless otherwise approved as part of a planned
development or condominium (See, CZC 12.55.150). Approved access from a private right-of-way shall
meet the following standards:

(1) Access to and from a public street may be in the form of private right-of-way or a driveway, as
defined or required by this Title.

(2) Two points of ingress/egress from a public right-of-way shall be established for any
development greater than 20 dwellings, irrespective of the allowed gross density.
(3) When a private right-of-way is utilized, the private right-of-way pavement (i.e. travel lanes) shall
be at least 27-feet and the constructed cross-section with curb and gutter of the roadway shall be
built to City Specifications.

(4) Access using a private right-of-way shall be constructed with a sufficient width to provide onstreet parking for visitors at a ratio of at least 0.5 stalls per dwelling. An exception may be
provided to this ratio if visitor parking is provided by separate parking area or parking lot as part
of a site plan approved by the City.

(5) A sidewalk system shall be provided on both sides of any private right-of-way. An
exception may be provided to this requirement if an alternate integrated development
pathway system connecting to the public right-of-way and serving the dwellings is
provided to satisfy the requirement for sidewalks, as part of a site plan approved by the
City.
(6) A private right-of-way shall be perpetually maintained by the developer or an owner’s
association. Such perpetual care and maintenance obligations shall be addressed with
covenant, conditions, and restrictions, for the development approved by the City and
recorded against the property.
(7) A private right-of-way design shall also comply with all applicable Fire Code regulations.

Page 26 of 86

(e) Residential Development Style Limitations for R-M Zone. The residential development style for
residential development within the R-M Zone shall be limited to single-family dwellings, twin homes,
duplexes, or townhomes in tri-plex, four-plex, and six-plex formats that mimic a typical neighborhood
style street on public or private roadways (as described in Subsection (d)). Higher density design
formats such as stacked flats or apartment style buildings or buildings constructed with associated
vehicular parking lot style facilities are prohibited in the R-M Zone.

HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2017-28 on 11/21/2017

12.32.060 Regulations Of General Applicability
The use and development of real property in residential zones shall conform to regulations of general
applicability as set forth in the following Chapters of this Title.
(a) CZC 12.50 (Existing Conditions Inventory)
(b) CZC 12.51 (Landscaping and Screening)
(c) CZC 12.52 (Off-Street Parking and Loading)
(d) CZC 12.53 (Sensitive Lands)
(e) CZC 12.54 (Signs)
(f) CZC 12.55 (Supplementary Development Standards)
(g) CZC 12.56 (Temporary Uses)
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.070 Regulations For Specific Uses
To the extent that use and development of real property includes any matter encompassed by a
regulation for a specific use as set forth in CZC 12.60 to CZC 12.69 of this Title, such regulation shall
apply in addition to the requirements of this Chapter and shall prevail over any conflicting provision of
this Chapter.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.080 Special Regulations
(a) No Animals without Residential Use. When a zone permits the keeping of animals on a lot or
parcel, such lot or parcel shall simultaneously be occupied by a developed residential use.
(b) Increased Height. Notwithstanding the height limitations set forth in CZC 12.32.300, a greater
building height may be allowed in residential zones pursuant to a conditional use permit;
provided, however, that such greater height shall not exceed 10% of the otherwise applicable
height limit.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.090 Waiver Of Strict Compliance
Page 27 of 86

(a) Waivers Authorized. Notwithstanding the hard surfacing limitations set forth in Section
12.32.300, the Planning Commission may approve a greater amount of hard surfacing on a lot
or parcel that does not contain a dwelling use, in conjunction with a landscaping waiver as
outlined in CZC 12.51.050, if required.
(1) A waiver may be allowed, provided that a minimum 15-foot landscaped buffer, as
outlined in CZC 12.51.070(b), shall be maintained along all interior and rear lot lines.
(b) Application. A person desiring a waiver from requirements of this Chapter, with regards to hard
surfacing requirements, shall, in conjunction with an applicable development application, submit
a written request which describes the proposed waiver, provides grounds justifying the waiver,
and shows how the intent of this Chapter will be met by the proposed waiver.
(c) Findings Required. The Planning Commission may authorize a waiver from the requirements of
hard surfacing limitation set forth in Section 12.32.300, to the extent authorized herein, only if it
finds the waiver:
(1) Preserves the intent of this Chapter and the provisions for which a waiver is authorized.
(2) The granting of a waiver will not result in an adverse impact on the surrounding
properties; and
(3)

(A) The strict application of the provision in question is unreasonable or unnecessary
for the specific use, design or site proposal given the nature of the proposal or
alternate measures proposed by the applicant; or
(B) The property has extraordinary or exceptional physical conditions that do not
generally exist on nearby property in the same zone and such conditions will not
allow strict compliance with the provisions of this Chapter.

HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

12.32.300 Table Of Development Standards In Residential Zones
The Development Standards for Residential Zones is set forth in the following Table.
Development
Standard

Zones
R-L

R-M

R-H

Distance between
buildings

6 feet

6 feet

6 feet

Maximum height, main
building 1

35 feet

35 feet

35 feet

Maximum height,
accessory building

20 feet

20 feet

20 feet

Building Standards

Lot and Parcel Standards
Minimum area

None

10,000 sq ft

1 acre

Minimum frontage

40 feet

60 feet

60 feet
Page 28 of 86

Minimum width, interior
lot

60 feet

60 feet

100 feet

Minimum width, corner
lot

70 feet

70 feet

110 feet

25 feet

25 feet

25 feet

20 feet

20 feet

20 feet

Accessory building
(one-story) - 400 square 3 feet
feet or less 4, 5

3 feet

3 feet

Accessory building Greater than 400
square feet and up to
the maximum height
allowed by the
applicable zone 4, 5

5 feet

5 feet

Main building 5

8 feet
Minimum total width of
both sides yards: 18
feet

8 feet
Minimum total width of
both sides yards: 18
feet

12 feet

Accessory building

Not permitted

Not permitted

Setback Standards - Front Yard
Any building 2
Setback Standards Rear Yard
Main building 3

5 feet

Setback Standards - Interior Side Yard

Setback Standards - Street Side Yard 6
Main building

20 feet

18 feet

20 feet

Main building on corner
lot abutting side yard of
another lot or parcel

20 feet

18 feet

20 feet

Accessory building

Not permitted

Not permitted

Not permitted

Animal units permitted

None

None

None

Buffer landscaping
requirements

See CZC 12.51.070(b)

See CZC 12.51.070(b)

See CZC 12.51.070(b)

Buildable area,
minimum

2,000 square feet

2,000 square feet

3,000 square feet

Buildable area
minimum, range of
length/width ratio

Between 2:1 and 1:2

Between 2:1 and 1:2

Between 2:1 and 1:2

Gross density,
maximum, permitted
use

4 units per acre

6 units per acre

8 units per acre

Site Standards

Page 29 of 86

Gross density,
maximum, conditional
use

Not applicable

Not applicable

12 units per acre

Hard surfacing,
maximum total of lot or
parcel

60%

60%

60%

Hard surfacing,
maximum total of front,
rear, and side yards

50%

50%

50%

Outside storage

Not permitted

Not permitted

Not permitted

1. Except as otherwise permitted by CZC 12.32.080(b) and CZC 12.55.120.
2. Except as modified by the provisions of CZC 12.55.130(h).
3. Flexibility for setbacks may be provided for multiple-family dwelling unit in R-M and R-H Zones
in accordance with and subject to the provisions of CZC 12.55.130(l).
4. Setback is measured from any interior and/or rear lot line.
5. Subject to compliance with applicable Construction Codes.
6. Flexibility for setbacks may be provided for multiple-family dwelling unit in R-M and R-H Zones
in accordance with and subject to the provisions of CZC 12.55.130(l).
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016
Amended by Ord. 2017-04 on 3/7/2017
Amended by Ord. 2017-28 on 11/21/2017
Amended by Ord. 2019-12 on 7/2/2019

Page 30 of 86

12.21.100 Conditional Use Permit
(a) Purpose. This Section sets forth procedures for considering and approving conditional use
permits.
(b) Authority. The Planning Commission is authorized to issue conditional use permits as provided
in this Section.
(c) Initiation. A property owner may request a conditional use permit as provided in this Section. An
agent of a property owner shall provide a notarized authorization.
(d) Procedure. An application for a conditional use permit shall be considered and processed as
provided in this Section.
(1) A complete application shall be submitted to the office of the Zoning Administrator in a
form established by the Zoning Administrator along with any fees and deposits set forth
in the City Fee Schedule. The application shall include at least the following information:
(A) The name, address, email and telephone number of the applicant and the
applicant's agent, if any;
(B) The address and parcel identification of the subject property;
(C) The zone, zone boundaries and present use of the subject property;
(D) A description of the proposed conditional use;
(E) A plot plan showing the following;
(i) Applicant's name;
(ii) Site address;
(iii) Property boundaries and dimensions;
(iv) Layout of existing and proposed buildings, parking, landscaping, and
utilities; and
(v) Adjoining property lines and uses within 100 feet of the subject property.
(F) Traffic impact analysis, if required by the City Engineer, Zoning Administrator, or
the Planning Commission;
(G) A statement by the applicant demonstrating how the conditional use permit
request meets the approval standards of Subsection (e);
(H) Such other and further information or documentation as the Zoning Administrator
or Planning Commission may reasonably deem necessary for proper
consideration and determination of whether the application meets the
requirements of this Section and applicable provisions of the Zoning Code.
(2) After the application is determined to be complete in accordance with CZC 12.21.040(e),
the Zoning Administrator shall prepare a staff report analyzing the application.
(3) The Planning Commission shall schedule and hold a public hearing on the proposed
conditional use permit application. Public notice of the public hearing and the public
meeting shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of CZC 12.21.050. After due
consideration the Planning Commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny
the application pursuant to the standards set forth in Subsection (e).

Page 31 of 86

(4) A conditional use shall be approved if reasonable conditions are proposed, or can be
imposed, to mitigate the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects of the proposed use
in accordance with applicable standards. If the reasonably anticipated detrimental effects
of the proposed conditional use cannot be substantially mitigated by the proposal or the
imposition of reasonable conditions to achieve compliance with applicable standards, the
conditional use may be denied. Any conditions of approval shall be limited to conditions
needed to conform the conditional use permit to approval standards.
(5) After the Planning Commission makes a decision, the Zoning Administrator shall give the
applicant written notice of the decision.
(6) A record of all conditional use permits shall be maintained in the office of the Zoning
Administrator.
(e) Approval Standards. The following standards shall apply to the issuance of a conditional use
permit.
(1) A conditional use permit may be issued only when the proposed conditional use is
allowed by the zone where the conditional use will be located, or by another provision of
this Title.
(2) Conditions may be imposed as necessary to prevent or minimize adverse effects upon
other property or improvements in the vicinity of a conditional use, upon the City as a
whole, or upon public facilities and services. Such conditions may include, but are not
limited to, conditions concerning use, construction, character, location, landscaping,
screening, parking, hours of operation, and other matters relating to the purposes and
objectives of this Title. Such conditions shall be expressly set forth in the approval
authorizing a conditional use permit.
(3) No conditional use permit shall be authorized unless the evidence presented
establishes:
(A) The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare
of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity;
(B) The proposed use of the particular location is necessary or desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the
neighborhood and the community;
(C) The proposed use will comply with regulations and conditions specified in this
Title for such use; and
(D) The proposed use will comply with applicable provisions of the General Plan.
(4) The Planning Commission may request additional information as may be reasonably
needed to determine whether the requirements of this Subsection can be met.
(5) The following factors should be reviewed and considered in determining whether a
conditional use permit application should be approved, approved with conditions, or
denied:
(A) The suitability of the specific property for the proposed use;
(B) The development or lack of development adjacent to the proposed site and the
harmony of the proposed use with existing uses in the vicinity;
(C) Whether or not the proposed use or facility may be injurious to potential or
existing development in the vicinity;
Page 32 of 86

(D) The economic impact of the proposed facility or use on the surrounding area;
(E) The aesthetic impact of the proposed facility or use on the surrounding area;
(F) The present and future requirements for transportation, traffic, water, sewer, and
other utilities, for the proposed site and surrounding area;
(G) The safeguards proposed or provided to insure adequate utilities, transportation
access, drainage, parking, loading space, lighting, screening, landscaping, open
space, fire protection, and pedestrian and vehicular circulation;
(H) The safeguards provided or proposed to prevent noxious or offensive omissions
such as noise, glare, dust, pollutants and odor from the proposed facility or use;
(I) The safeguards provided or proposed to minimize other adverse effects from the
proposed facility or use on persons or property in the area; and
(J) The impact of the proposed facility or use on the health, safety, and welfare of the
City, the area, and persons owning or leasing property in the area.
(f) Appeal. Any person adversely affected by a final decision of the Planning Commission regarding
the transfer, issuance, revocation or denial of a conditional use permit may appeal that decision
to the Board of Adjustment as provided in CZC 12.21.200.
(g) Effect of Approval. A conditional use permit shall not relieve an applicant from obtaining any
other authorization or permit required under this Title or any other applicable provisions of the
Centerville Municipal Code.
(1) A conditional use permit may be transferred so long as the use conducted thereunder
conforms to the terms of the permit.
(2) Unless otherwise specified by the Planning Commission and subject to the provisions
relating to amendment, revocation or expiration of a conditional use permit, a conditional
use permit shall be of indefinite duration and shall run with the land.
(h) Amendment. The procedure for amending a conditional use permit shall be the same as the
original procedure set forth in this Section.
(i) Revocation. A conditional use permit may be revoked as provided in CZC 12.23.070.
(1) In addition to the grounds set forth in CZC 12.23.070, any of the following shall be
grounds for revocation of a conditional use permit:
(A) The use for which a permit was granted has ceased for one year or more;
(B) The holder or user of a permit has failed to comply with the conditions of approval
or any city, state, or federal law governing the conduct of the use;
(C) The holder or user of the permit has failed to construct or maintain the site as
shown on the approved site plan or map; or
(D) The operation of the use or the character of the site has been found to be a
nuisance or a public nuisance by a court of competent jurisdiction in any civil or
criminal proceeding.
(2) No conditional use permit shall be revoked against the wishes of the holder or user of
the permit without first giving such person an opportunity to appear before the Planning
Commission and show cause as to why the permit should not be amended or revoked.
Revocation of a permit shall not limit the City's ability to initiate or complete other legal
proceedings against the holder or user of the permit.
Page 33 of 86

(j) Expiration. A conditional use permit shall expire and have no further force or effect if the
building, activity, construction or occupancy authorized by the permit is not commenced within
180 days after approval, is not substantially completed within two years, or is abandoned.
HISTORY
Adopted by Ord. 2016-20 on 7/15/2016

Page 34 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY GENERAL PLAN
2.

SECTION 12-480

Commercial Policies
No commercial uses currently exist in northeast Centerville, and none are anticipated.
a.

3.

No commercial development shall be located in any area of northeast Centerville.
In particular, no commercial development shall be permitted north of Parrish
Lane on Main Street so that residential character of this area may be maintained.

Community Facilities
a.

Parks
While the greatest concentration of school-aged children lives in northeast
Centerville, not one City park is located here. The current need for a park in this
neighborhood is great, and will increase as new development occurs. Centerville
City shall pursue the acquisition and development of property for a City park in
northeast Centerville as its top parks priority. The Rockwood gravel pit or the
Ford property on upper Ricks Creek would be good locations for such a park.

b.

Water
City water service to this neighborhood needs to be upgraded in the near future.
As new development occurs, this situation will be even more critical. Centerville
City should pursue the development of new water sources and storage in this
area to improve water availability and pressure. To preserve scarce culinary
water, all new developments should be required to supply secondary water for
maintenance of landscaping and outdoor use. This will necessitate the
acquisition and development of ground water sources. Until additional water
supplies are available, future residential development in this neighborhood must
be carefully considered for impact on the City water system.

SECTION 12-480-5.

NEIGHBORHOOD 4, NORTHWEST. 11

Overview
The Northwest Neighborhood is located between Lund Lane, Main Street, Parrish Lane, and I-15.
Most of the Northwest Neighborhood has already been developed, and consists of a variety of
uses, including: single-family residential, multi-family residential of various densities and types,
commercial, and professional office. The only substantial undeveloped areas are near Lund
Lane, on the northern boundary of the City, and the Pineae Nurseries, near Parrish Lane.
Issue: Future land-uses and transitions between different land uses.
Perhaps the two most significant issues in the Northwest Neighborhood are future land-use
patterns and transitions (buffers) between different land uses. The existing land-use patterns
indicate a mix of commercial, residential of varying types and densities, and professional office in
the area between Parrish Lane and Chase Lane. From Chase Lane to Jennings Lane, the uses
change to primarily residential of medium to low-density. North of Jennings Lane is almost
exclusively low-density residential, with the exception of Greenfields, an older, medium-density
residential development on Frontage Road.
$

11

Goal: Establish appropriate land-use patterns and land-use transitions.

Amended by Ord. No. 2003-11, April 1, 2003
12480-15

03/08/2017

Page 35 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY GENERAL PLAN

SECTION 12-480

"

Policy: Only compatible land-uses shall be allowed adjacent to each other, as
outlined in the Land-use Hierarchy Standards section of this ordinance.

"

Policy: Land-use types and densities shall be set forth in the General Plan
Land-use Map, when adopted.

"

Policy: All future developments must have appropriate landscaping/design
transitions, as outlined in the Transition Design Standards section of this
ordinance. (To be created; essentially a set of design guidelines/standards to
facilitate transitions between different uses, intensities of operation, and
residential densities.)

Issue: Semi-rural Residential areas.
A couple of areas north of Jennings Lane have developed over time as semi-rural residential, with
characteristics such as ½ to 1 acre lots, and the keeping of some domestic farm animals. These
areas don’t qualify as true rural residential, which typically requires a minimum of 5 acres per
dwelling. Historical planning practices show that 1 acre zoning is not advisable because it is too
small for true agricultural, too big for purely residential purposes, and too small to subdivide when
the current owners no longer want to maintain the property and/or move.
•

•

Goal: Preserve existing areas of semi-rural residential for current property owners.
"

Policy: Amend zone text to create a zone or set of standards that regulates the
keeping of domesticated farm animals in residential areas.

"

Policy: Amend zone text to create overlay or other designation establishing a
boundary for areas to be preserved as semi-rural residential.

Goal: Preserve viability of area for potential future development.
"

Policy: Require all new lots to have frontage equivalent to twice that required in
the R-1-10 Zone.

"

Policy: Anticipate future ordinances allowing accessory dwelling units and/or
small PUDs in these areas.

Issue: Frontage Road, 400 West, and Main Street.
Frontage Road has been designed and built as a collector road for residential areas in the south
Farmington/north Centerville area, but occasionally functions as an arterial when accidents occur
on I-15. 400 West is a residential collector for the interior of the Northwest Neighborhood. Main
Street is a minor arterial that provides a connection to both Bountiful and Farmington.
•

Goal: Preserve the viability of Frontage Road.
"

Policy: No future development shall front or have direct access onto the
Frontage Road.

"

Policy: All roads (both public and private), connecting to Frontage Road shall
meet the minimum city standard for a public residential street, including
parkstrips and sidewalks.

12480-16

05/15/2018

Page 36 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY GENERAL PLAN
"

•

SECTION 12-480

Policy: All future development along Frontage Road shall be buffered according
to City landscaping standards the criteria set forth in the Transition Design
Standards section of this ordinance.

Goal: Preserve viability of area for potential future development.
o

Policy: Require all new lots to have frontage equivalent to twice that required in
the R-1-10 Zone.

o

Policy: Anticipate future ordinances allowing accessory dwelling units and/or
small PUDs in these areas.

Issue: Commercial development
In the past, commercial development in the Northwest Neighborhood has been limited to areas
immediately adjacent to Parrish Lane.
•

Goal: Establish an appropriate boundary for commercial uses.

•

o

Policy: High to very high-intensity commercial uses must be located within 500
feet of Parrish Lane.

o

Policy: Medium intensity commercial uses, such as small professional offices,
must be located within 1000 feet of Parrish Lane.

Goal: Preserve and enhance commercial activity along Parrish Lane.
o

Policy: Establish a “gateway” feature into the city near the I-15 interchange.

o

Policy: Actively work to reduce direct access onto Parrish Lane and require all
new development to occur in commercial centers with shared access and
signalized intersections.

o

Policy: Actively work to improve the appearance and function of existing strip
commercial development and discourage new strip commercial projects reduce
strip commercial development and disallow any new strip commercial projects.

o

Policy: Actively encourage a reduction in the number of freestanding signs
along Parrish Lane. Encourage businesses to co-locate and/or use monument
signs.

o

Policy: Actively encourage all businesses to bring their landscaping into
conformance with current landscaping standards.

Residential Densities/Development 12
Residential densities shall be based primarily on their proximity to public services. Higher
residential densities should be located in areas adjacent to basic, high-intensity facilities/services.
Densities should naturally decrease as the distance increases away from these facilities/services.
Multi-family projects, PUDs, developments with private roads, and other similar types of projects
are permitted only on parcels 3 acres or larger. The maximum density allowed on a residential
property is as follows:
•

12

The base density for all of Centerville will be a maximum of 4 units/acre.

Amended by Ord. No. 2012-23, August 7, 2012

12480-17

03/08/2017

Page 37 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY GENERAL PLAN

SECTION 12-480

o

Areas within ½ mile radius of a gas station with mini-mart may be allowed up to
an additional 4 units/acre; and

o

Areas within ¼ mile radius of a full-service grocery store may be allowed up to an
additional 4 units/acre; and

o

Areas within ¼ mile radius of a light rail or commuter rail station may be allowed
up to an additional 4 units/acre.

The maximum allowed density in any area shall not exceed 12 units/acre.
Land Use Hierarchy Standards
Only uses in the same category or in an adjacent category may be located next to each other. At
least 100 feet of separation must occur before a use in a subsequent category may be employed.
For example, a Very High Intensity use can not be located next to a Medium Intensity use unless
there is a High Intensity use between them creating at least 100 feet of separation.
Very High Intensity
•

Commercial uses with over 50,000 sq ft total floor area

•

Any commercial site greater than 3 acres

•

Any use involving repair or maintenance of a vehicle

•

Any commercial use with a drive through

•

Any use frequently open for operation after midnight or before 7 a.m.

•

Any heavy industrial use; public or private

•
•

Office/warehouse uses with outdoor storage
Commercial uses with outdoor sales and/or storage

•

Homeless shelters, substance abuse facilities

High Intensity
•

Commercial uses with 10,000 to 50,000 sq ft total floor area

•

Any commercial use with a 1 to 3 acre site

•

All restaurants without a drive through

•

Gasoline station without repair facility and/or carwash

•

Any light industrial use

•

Office/warehouse without outdoor storage

•

Professional office – greater than 4,000 total sq ft

•

Hospitals, clinics, treatment centers

•

Residential uses greater than 8 units/acre
12480-18

05/15/2018

Page 38 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY GENERAL PLAN

SECTION 12-480

•

Mixed-use developments with greater than 10,000 sq ft floor area/acre

•

Public and private recreational facilities/gyms

Medium Intensity
•

Commercial uses on sites smaller than 1 acre

•

Professional office – less than 4,000 total sq ft

•

Mixed-use developments with less than 10,000 sq ft floor area/acre

•

Temples, synagogues, or similar structures greater than 10,000 sq ft

•

Residential uses between 4 and 8 units/acre

Low Intensity
•

Residential uses less than 4 units/acre

Uses appropriate at all levels of intensity
•

Public utility structures of less than 900 sq ft.

•

Parks

•

Churches/religious facilities with less than 10,000 sq ft total floor area

•

Structures approved for historical preservation

•

Existing, non-conforming uses

12480-19

03/08/2017

Page 39 of 86

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

Rebecca Nielsen
Sydney DeWees
Two Utah Laws
Tuesday, February 24, 2026 3:39:16 PM

You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important

Since 2018, there have been two separate laws that govern the production of food in a
residential kitchen: the Cottage Food Statute, and the Home Consumption and Homemade
Food Act. There are several differences between them in terms of limitations on foods and
limitations on methods and locations of sale.
The Cottage Food Statute, which has been in effect since 2007, requires a business to register
with the Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, just like a commercial business would. It
allows the production of "non-potentially hazardous foods", also known as "shelf-stable"
foods, in a residential kitchen within the operator's home. Any food that requires refrigeration
or other temperature control for safety cannot be produced under the Cottage Food Statute.
Cottage Foods can be sold anywhere in the state of Utah, either retail or wholesale (through a
store), with the exception that restaurants cannot use Cottage Foods as ingredients in their
menu. Cottage Foods follow the Federal food labeling regulations, with the addition of the
words "Home Produced" on the front label.
The Home Consumption and Homemade Foods Act was signed into law in 2018. This law
allows food production in a residence without requiring the operator to be registered with the
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food. The range of foods that can be prepared is much
wider, only prohibiting products containing meat or raw, unpasteurized dairy products.
However, these foods can ONLY be sold directly to the end consumer, and the sale must be
conducted in person at a pre-arranged location. The food must be packaged and bear warning
statements that read, "This product was processed and prepared without state or local
inspection," and "Not for resale." In order for such products to be sold at a place like
a farmer's market, the market must designate a specific portion of the market for
these "unregistered" producers and mark that section off with signs stating, "The
homemade food and food products sold by producers in this section have not been
certified, licensed, regulated, or inspected by state or local authorities." Most farmer's
markets so far have declined to incorporate such a section in their markets, usually
due to liability concerns.
Rebecca Nielsen | Cottage Food and Labeling Specialist
385.799.0281 MOBILE (MON-FRI 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM)
UTAH DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD

How was your experience with the Utah Department of
Agriculture and Food? Tell us about your experience through this
2-minute survey!
Follow this link to the survey:
Take the Survey
Or copy and paste the URL below into your internet browser:
https://utconcierge.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cUTRcsmWFFj4rjg

Page 40 of 86

Page 41 of 86

Utah Code

Effective 5/3/2023
4-5a-102 Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter:
(1)
(a) "Commercial establishment" means a wholesale or retail business that displays, sells,
manufactures, processes, packs, holds, or stores food, drugs, devices, or cosmetics.
(b) "Commercial establishment" does not include a:
(i) direct-to-sale location; or
(ii) direct-to-sale farmers market.
(2) "Direct-to-sale farmers market" means a public or private facility or area where producers
gather on a regular basis to sell directly to an informed final consumer fresh food, locally grown
products, and other food items that have not been certified, licensed, regulated, or inspected by
state or local authorities.
(3) "Direct-to-sale location" means a farm, ranch, direct-to-sale farmers market, home, office,
or any location agreed upon by both a producer and the informed final consumer where a
producer sells a food or food product to an informed final consumer.
(4) "Home consumption" means the use or ingestion of homemade food or a homemade food
product within a private home by a family member, an employee, or a nonpaying guest.
(5) "Homemade food product" means a food product that is prepared in a private home kitchen
that can be used, or prepared for use, as food or nonalcoholic drink, subject to the limitation
described in Subsection 4-5a-105(1).
(6) "Informed final consumer" means an individual who:
(a) purchases the product directly from the producer;
(b) does not resell the product; and
(c) has been informed that the product is not certified, licensed, regulated, or inspected by the
state.
(7) "Minor-operated business" means a business that is operated by an individual who is:
(a) under 18 years old; and
(b) not regularly engaged in selling items.
(8) "Minor producer" means a producer that is:
(a) an individual; and
(b) under 18 years old.
(9) "Producer" means a person who harvests or produces homemade food or a homemade food
product.
Amended by Chapter 362, 2023 General Session

Page 1
Page 42 of 86

Utah Code

Effective 5/3/2023
4-5a-104 Home producer direct sales -- Exempt from regulation.
(1) A producer is exempt from state, county, or city licensing, permitting, certification, inspection,
packaging, and labeling requirements, except as described in this section, related to the
preparation, serving, use, consumption, or storage of food and food products if:
(a) the producer complies with the requirements of this chapter; and
(b) the homemade food or homemade food product is:
(i) produced and sold within the state;
(ii) sold directly to an informed final consumer;
(iii) for personal or home consumption; and
(iv) not exempted under Subsection 4-5a-105(1).
(2) Notwithstanding Subsection (1), a producer shall comply with business license requirements
pursuant to Section 10-1-203.
(3) Except as provided in Subsection (6), food or food products sold under this section shall be
labeled with:
(a) the producer's name and address;
(b) a disclosure statement indicating that the product is:
(i) not for resale; and
(ii) processed and prepared without state or local inspection; and
(c) a statement listing whether the food or food product contains, or was prepared in a location
that also handles, common allergens including milk, soy, wheat, eggs, peanuts or tree nuts,
fish, or shellfish.
(4)
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (4)(b), homemade food or a homemade food product that is
exempt from certain regulations as described in this chapter may not be sold to, or used by, a
restaurant or commercial establishment.
(b) A producer may sell a raw, unprocessed fruit or vegetable to a restaurant or commercial
establishment.
(5) A producer selling homemade food or homemade food products exempt under this section shall
inform the final consumer that the food or food product is not certified, licensed, regulated, or
inspected by the state or any county or city.
(6) The requirements described in Subsection (3) do not apply to a direct sale by a home producer
comprising only minor producers.
Amended by Chapter 362, 2023 General Session

Page 1
Page 43 of 86

Basic Labeling Guidelines for the Home Consumption
and Homemade Food Act (HCHFA)
INFORMATION REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE ON LABELS OF FOOD PRODUCED UNDER HCHFA
1. A statement indicating that the product is “not for resale” (Utah Code 4-5a-104)
2. A statement indicating that the product has been “processed and prepared without state or local
inspection” (Utah Code 4-5a-104)
3. A statement listing whether the food contains, or was prepared in a location that handles,
common allergens. (Utah Code 4-5a-104)
4.The producer's name and address (Utah Code 4-5a-104)

Example Label for HCHFA
Chocolate Chip Walnut Cookie
1

NOT FOR RESALE

PROCESSED AND PREPARED WITHOUT
2
STATE OR LOCAL INSPECTION

3

CONTAINS WHEAT, EGG, MILK, SOY, AND WALNUTS

4

SAMPLE COOKIE COMPANY 350 N REDWOOD RD,
SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84117

1. NOT FOR RESALE DISCLAIMER
All foods sold under the Home Consumption and Homemade
Food act must include a disclaimer stating that the food is NOT
FOR RESALE. This means that foods made under HCHFA can
not be sold to retail stores or to restaurants and must be sold
to the final end consumer for their personal consumption.

2. DISCLAIMER THAT THE FOOD HAS BEEN PREPARED
WITHOUT INSPECTION
All foods sold under the Home Consumption and Homemade
Food act must include a disclaimer indicating that the food has
been prepared without the benefit of state or local inspection.

3. ALLERGEN INFORMATION
All of the major allergens (milk, egg, fish, shellfish, tree nuts,
wheat, peanuts, soybeans, sesame) in the product must be
declared. The statement must list ALL of the allergens present
in the food or in the food preparation location.

REMINDERS ABOUT SELLING
PRODUCTS UNDER THE HCHFA
Products may only be sold within Utah
Products must be sold in-person, directly
to the final end consumer
Products are not for resale (products
cannot be sold to retail stores or
restaurants)
If selling at a farmers market, the only
locations where products made under the
Home Consumption and Homemade Food
Act can be displayed and offered for sale
is at a direct-to-sale farmers market or in a
section specifically labeled to be offering
items that are uninspected

4. CONTACT INFORMATION
The business name and address (street address, city, state &
zip code) of the food producer.

Page 44 of 86

PLANNING
COMMISSION
Staff Report
10/14/2026
Item No. 2.
Title:
Public Hearing - Standards and Specifications Amendments - Centerville Details and Drawings - Legislative
Decision
Initiated By: Kevin Campbell, City Engineer, Mike Eggett, Community Development Director
Staff Representative: Sydney DeWees, Assistant Planner, Lisa Romney, City Attorney

SUBJECT:
Consider proposed amendments to the Details and Drawings as forth in the Centerville Standards and
Specifications (see attached Resolution 2026-29 and proposed amendment documentation).
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of proposed amendments to the Details and Drawings as set further in the Centerville
Standards and Specifications (Resolution 2026-29), subject to further Details and Drawings refinement by the
City Engineer.

BACKGROUND:
Kevin Campbell (ESI Engineering) has been working at length with his team, Public Works Department, and
Community Development Department staff to complete proposed updates to the Details and Drawings section
of the Centerville Standards and Specifications. Per Utah State Code 10-20-102, engineering standards and
specifications for public improvements are considered land use regulations by definition and, as such, must be
reviewed and receive a recommendation from the Planning Commission for future Council consideration. Also,
as a land use regulation update, the proposed Details and Drawings amendments are required to be reviewed
following a public hearing process, then recommendation consideration by the Planning Commission.
On September 23, 2026, the Planning Commission discussed the presented Details and Drawings
amendments, and offered suggestions for amendment consideration. The three identified concerns were: 1) a
potential need to include a standard roundabout drawing sheet; 2) potential inclusion of a detail drawing for a
concrete retaining wall (instead of a block retaining wall); and 3) correction of potential sizing discrepancies
between note (8) on Sheet 21 (page 24 on the pdf attachment) and the illustrations of representation A and
representation B on Sheet 21. Further, there was guidance by the Planning Commission to review the notes
on Sheet 21 to make certain there are no discrepancies in presented information. Staff indicated that this
information would be shared with the City Engineer during an upcoming Development Review Committee
meeting. Following this discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to set a public hearing for their
Commission meeting on August 14, 2026.
Since that Planning Commission meeting, the comments and concerns provided by the Commission have
been shared with the City Engineer. Following discussion with the City Engineer, the Engineer agreed to work
250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 45 of 86

on these identified comments and concerns, with a plan to then provide staff with an updated version of the
Details and Drawings amendments documents. Further, the City Attorney clarified to the City Engineer that
there are four different types of potential subdivision plat formats for recording and requested that the Engineer
update the Details and Drawings to better reflect these different subdivision plat formats exemplars within the
Details and Drawings document. The City Engineer agreed to these changes and let staff know that these
amendments would take a bit more time. Therefore, an updated version of the Details and Drawings document
was not available for inclusion in the Planning Commission packet in time for the August 14th meeting.
A public hearing notice was provided for this item in conformance with City and State requirements. No
comments were provided prior to the completion of the packet. Any additional comments provided prior to the
meeting will be shared with the Planning Commission by City staff.

ATTACHMENTS:
1.
10.14.2026 PC Staff Report Details and Drawings Amend
2.
Standard Specifications-Details and Drawings-Res 2026-09
3.
STANDARD DETAILS 2026
4.
Pub Hear Notice - Construction Detail & Drawings

250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 46 of 86

Centerville City Planning Commission

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
655 North 1250 West ● Centerville, Utah 84014 ● (801) 292-8232 ● Fax: (801) 292-8251

STAFF REPORT – PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM 2 – CENTERVILLE DETAILS AND DRAWINGS AMENDMENT

PETITIONER: CITY OF CENTERVILLE
APPLICATION: DETAILS AND DRAWINGS
AMENDMENT
RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF DETAILS
AND DRAWINGS AMENDMENT
PROPOSAL TO CITY COUNCIL,
SUBJECT TO FINAL CITY ENGINEER
AMENDMENT PLAN DIRECTION BY
PLANNING COMMISSION
BACKGROUND
Kevin Campbell (ESI Engineering) has been working at length with his team, Public Works
Department, and Community Development Department staff to complete proposed updates to the
Details and Drawings section of the Centerville Standards and Specifications. Per Utah State
Code 10-20-102, engineering standards and specifications for public improvements are
considered land use regulations by definition and, as such, must be reviewed and receive a
recommendation from the Planning Commission for future Council consideration. Also, as a
land use regulation update, the proposed Details and Drawings amendments are required to be
reviewed following a public hearing process, then recommendation consideration by the
Planning Commission.
On September 23, 2026, the Planning Commission discussed the presented Details and Drawings
amendments, and offered suggestions for amendment consideration. The three identified
concerns were: 1) a potential need to include a standard roundabout drawing sheet; 2) potential
inclusion of a detail drawing for a concrete retaining wall (instead of a block retaining wall); and
3) correction of potential sizing discrepancies between note (8) on Sheet 21 (page 24 on the pdf
attachment) and the illustrations of representation A and representation B on Sheet 21. Further,
there was guidance by the Planning Commission to review the notes on Sheet 21 to make certain

October 14, 2026

Page 1 of 4

Page 47 of 86

Centerville City Planning Commission

there are no discrepancies in presented information. Staff indicated that this information would
be shared with the City Engineer during an upcoming Development Review Committee
meeting. Following this discussion, the Planning Commission agreed to set a public hearing for
their Commission meeting on August 14, 2026.
Since that Planning Commission meeting, the comments and concerns provided by the
Commission have been shared with the City Engineer. Following discussion with the City
Engineer, the Engineer agreed to work on these identified comments and concerns, with a plan to
then provide staff with an updated version of the Details and Drawings amendments
documents. Further, the City Attorney clarified to the City Engineer that there are four different
types of potential subdivision plat formats for recording and requested that the Engineer update
the Details and Drawings to better reflect these different subdivision plat formats exemplars
within the Details and Drawings document. The City Engineer agreed to these changes and let
staff know that these amendments would take a bit more time. Therefore, an updated version of
the Details and Drawings document was not available for inclusion in the Planning Commission
packet in time for the August 14th meeting.
A public hearing notice was provided for this item in conformance with City and State
requirements. No comments were provided prior to the completion of the packet. Any
additional comments provided prior to the meeting will be shared with the Planning Commission
by City staff.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND COMMENTS
Per the adopted Standards and Specifications portion of the City Municipal Code, the Standards
and Specifications are for clearly delineation expectations for the construction and development
of public improvements within the City. Further, the currently adopted Details and Drawings are
tools that combined with the Standards and Specifications illustrate clear expectations of how
typical construction and development of public improvements within the City should be
constructed and installed. The last time the Details and Drawings were amended was in November
2023. Since that time, processes and design standards within the construction industry and per the
Public Works/City Engineer have changed, along with further refinement that is warranted per
challenges faced by the Community Development Department. Therefore, it is a good time to
consider approving updated proposed amendments to the City’s Details and Drawings to better
reflect current expectations and standards for development within Centerville.
STAFF CONCLUSION
City staff recommends that the Planning Commission support a recommendation for approval of
the proposed amended Centerville Details and Drawings, with the guidance that the updated City
Engineer version of the proposed Details and Drawings be included in the Council packet for
October 14, 2026

Page 2 of 4

Page 48 of 86

Centerville City Planning Commission

future consideration. Following a public hearing on this matter, the Planning Commission has
options related to action that may be taken for this agenda item. The Planning Commission
could recommend approval of the amended Details and Drawings with the understanding that the
future updated version of these drawings would be the version considered to be included in the
future City Council packet. The Planning Commission could table the matter for a later date,
allowing the City Engineer to refine the amended Details and Drawings addressing noted staff
and Commission concerns, then direct that this item be brought back for Commission
recommendation at that time. The Planning Commission could recommend denial of the
proposed amended Details and Drawings if there are reasons to do such.

POTENTIAL MOTIONS
Based on the information provided by the Planning Staff, and as heard during the public hearing,
the Planning Commission may make a motion to recommend Council approval of the proposed
Details and Drawings amendment request, recommend Council approval of this request with
suggested amendment and/or modification to be completed by the City Engineer, table the matter
to a later date, or recommend Council denial of the applicant’s request. With any of these decisions
appropriate findings of fact should be provided. Sample motions for the Planning Commission’s
convenience are located below with suggested findings of fact.
#2 – APPROVE WITH ANY PROPOSED ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS
“I hereby make a motion to recommend City Council APPROVAL of the proposed ‘Details and
Drawings’ Amendments to the Centerville Municipal Code, with the direction for the City
Engineer to update the proposed Details and Drawings reflecting Planning Commission and
City Staff requested amendments prior to bringing this matter to the City Council, based on the
following reasons for action (findings):
1. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Details and Drawings amendments are
consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan.
2. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Details and Drawings amendments do
not create detrimental or negative impacts to established zoning areas within Centerville
City.
3. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Detail and Drawings amendments are
in the best interests of Centerville City.
4. Therefore, the proposed Details and Drawings amendments to the Centerville Municipal
Code should be approved.”
#2 – APPROVE
October 14, 2026

Page 3 of 4

Page 49 of 86

Centerville City Planning Commission

“I hereby make a motion to recommend City Council APPROVAL of the proposed ‘Details and
Drawings’ Amendments to the Centerville Municipal Code, based on the following reasons for
action (findings):”
(Use findings listed above for approval. The Planning Commission may include any
additional findings that are deemed applicable.)
#3 – TABLE
“I hereby make a motion to TABLE the proposed ‘Details and Drawings’ Amendments to the
Centerville Municipal Code, until such a time as _________________.”
#4 – DENY
“I hereby make a motion to recommend City Council DENIAL of the proposed ‘Details and
Drawings’ Amendments to the Centerville Municipal Code, based on the following reasons for
action (findings):
1. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Details and Drawings amendments are
NOT consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan.
2. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Details and Drawings amendments
may create detrimental or negative impacts to established zoning areas within
Centerville City.
3. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed Details and Drawings amendments are
NOT in the best interests of Centerville City.
4. Therefore, the proposed Details and Drawings amendments to the Centerville Municipal
Code should NOT be approved.”
(Planning Commission may include any additional findings that are deemed applicable)

October 14, 2026

Page 4 of 4

Page 50 of 86

CENTERVILLE CITY
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-29
A RESOLUTION UPDATING AND AMENDING THE CENTERVILLE
CITY DETAILS AND DRAWINGS AS PART OF THE CITY STANDARDS
AND SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING ENGINEERING STANDARDS
AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND
DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE CITY
WHEREAS, Centerville City has previously established Standards and Specifications,
including Details and Drawings, regarding engineering standards and requirements for the
construction and development of public improvements within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update and amend such Details and Drawings as
recommended by the City Engineer in order to provide more current engineering standards and
requirements regarding the same; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Details and Drawings are considered land
use regulations as defined in Utah Code § 10-20-102 and are required to be adopted in accordance
with applicable provisions of the Utah Land Use and Development Act, including notice and
public hearing requirements and review and recommendation by the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the Details and Drawings as part of the
Centerville Standards and Specifications as set forth herein have been reviewed by the Planning
Commission and the City Council and all appropriate public notices have been provided and
appropriate public hearings have been held in accordance with Utah law to obtain public input
regarding the proposed revisions to land use regulations.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CENTERVILLE, UTAH, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Amendment. The City Council hereby adopts the updated and amended
Details and Drawings as part of the City Standards and Specifications as more particularly set
forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2.
Severability. If any section, clause, or portion of this Resolution is
declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not be affected thereby
and shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 3.

Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE CITY,
STATE OF UTAH, ON THIS 6th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026.
ATTEST:

CENTERVILLE CITY

______________________________
Jennifer Robison, City Recorder

By:_________________________________
Mayor Clark A. Wilkinson

Standard Specifications-Detail Drawings-2026

Page 1 of 3

September 15, 2026

Page 51 of 86

CERTIFICATE OF PASSAGE AND EFFECTIVE DATE
According to the provisions of the Utah Code § 10-3-719, as amended, resolutions may become
effective without publication or posting and may take effect on passage or at a later date as the
governing body may determine; provided, resolutions may not become effective more than three
months from the date of passage. I, the municipal recorder of Centerville City, hereby certify that
foregoing resolution was duly passed by the City Council and became effective upon passage or a
later date as the governing body directed as more particularly set forth below.
_________________________________
JENNIFER ROBISON, City Recorder

DATE: _______________

EFFECTIVE DATE: ____ day of ___________, 2026.

Standard Specifications-Detail Drawings-2026

Page 2 of 3

September 15, 2026

Page 52 of 86

EXHIBIT A
CENTERVILLE CITY
DETAILS AND DRAWINGS
Details and Drawings as part of the City Standards and Specifications for the Construction and
Development of Public Improvements within Centerville City

Standard Specifications-Detail Drawings-2026

Page 3 of 3

September 15, 2026

Page 53 of 86

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

SUBDIVISION TITLE

I,
, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD LICENSE NUMBER
, AS PRESCRIBED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY THE
AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER(S) I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND

A SUBDIVISION OF THE ____________ QUARTER OF SECTION __, T_N, R_E/W, SLB & M

SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED HEREON (RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE AT
THE DAVIS COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE AS ENTRY NO.

CENTERVILLE CITY, DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH

), AND

HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, TOGETHER

WITH EASEMENTS, HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS "
", AND THAT
THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.

NOTES:
"SIGNED SEAL"
DATE

1.

FOR ALL NEW SUBDIVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS
TO SUBDIVISIONS THAT REFERENCE THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, PLEASE

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

PROVIDE THE ROTATION FACTOR FROM THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATES TO THE UTAH NORTH

BEGINNING AT A POINT ....... TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

NAD83 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NOTING
THE BASIS OF BEARING MONUMENTS USED FOR

SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 0.00 SQ. FT. OR 0.000 ACRE(S), AND 00 LOTS
AND 00 PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREETS

THE ROTATION. IF NEW SUBDIVISIONS USE THE
DAVIS COUNTY UTAH NORTH NAD83 STATE PLANE
COORDINATES AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR
THE PLAT, PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE STATING
THIS INFORMATION.
2.

APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAT BY
CENTERVILLE CITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY
REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ADEQUACY OF
SUB-SURFACE SOIL CONDITION NOR THE
LOCATION OR DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER TABLES.

3.

VICINITY MAP

ALL SIDE AND REAR YARD EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE
TYPICAL 7' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS

OWNERS DEDICATION

N.T.S.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE OWNERS OF
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, AND HEREBY CAUSED THE SAME TO BE DIVIDED

(P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INTO LOTS, PARCELS AND STREETS, TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH TO BE
HEREAFTER KNOW AS,

AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL ROADS AND OTHER
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS
ALSO HEREBY CONVEY TO ANY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES A PERPETUAL,
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT,
THE SAME TO BE USED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITY
LINES AND FACILITIES. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS ALSO HEREBY CONVEY ANY OTHER
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT TO THE PARTIES INDICATED AND FOR THE PURPOSES
SHOWN HEREON. IN WITNESS WE / I HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HAND THE DAY
OF
A.D. 20
.

SHOW ON PLAT
1)
2)

ALL SECTION CORNERS AND STREET MONUMENTS
BASIS OF BEARING

3)
4)

ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS/OWNERS
SQUARE FOOTAGE TO NEAREST FOOT AND

(OWNER)

(OWNER)

ACRES TO NEAREST THOUSANDTH FOR ALL LOTS
5)

AND PARCELS
ADDRESSES FOR LOTS AND STREETS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

]
-S.S.

THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
OF

, 20

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

SCALE: VARIES. NOT LARGER
THAN 1" = 100'

OWNER:
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
E-MAIL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

COMMISSION NUMBER:

NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME)

NOTARY PUBLIC (SIGNATURE)

A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAH

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

MAYOR'S APPROVAL

COUNTY RECORDER
ENTRY NO.

PRESENTED TO THE MAYOR OF CENTERVILLE, UTAH
ON THIS
ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

DAY OF

A.D. 20

BY THE CENTERVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY ENGINEER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY RECORDER ATTEST:

FEE PAID

FILED FOR RECORD AND RECORDED THIS
DAY OF

THIS
DAY OF
A.D. 20
, AT WHICH
TIME THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED
MAYOR:

CITY ATTORNEY

DAY

, THERE PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME,

IN BOOK

A.D. 20

AT

OF

COUNTY RECORDER
BY:

DEPUTY

Page 54 of 86

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

SUBDIVISION TITLE

I,
, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD LICENSE NUMBER
, AS PRESCRIBED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY THE
AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER(S) I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND

A SUBDIVISION OF THE ____________ QUARTER OF SECTION __, T_N, R_E/W, SLB & M

SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED HEREON (RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE AT
THE DAVIS COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE AS ENTRY NO.

CENTERVILLE CITY, DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH

), AND

HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, TOGETHER

WITH EASEMENTS, HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS "
", AND THAT
THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.

NOTES:
"SIGNED SEAL"
DATE

1.

FOR ALL NEW SUBDIVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS
TO SUBDIVISIONS THAT REFERENCE THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, PLEASE

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

PROVIDE THE ROTATION FACTOR FROM THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATES TO THE UTAH NORTH

BEGINNING AT A POINT ....... TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

NAD83 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NOTING
THE BASIS OF BEARING MONUMENTS USED FOR

SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 0.00 SQ. FT. OR 0.000 ACRE(S), AND 00 LOTS
AND 00 PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREETS

THE ROTATION. IF NEW SUBDIVISIONS USE THE
DAVIS COUNTY UTAH NORTH NAD83 STATE PLANE
COORDINATES AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR
THE PLAT, PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE STATING
THIS INFORMATION.
2.

APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAT BY
CENTERVILLE CITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY
REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ADEQUACY OF
SUB-SURFACE SOIL CONDITION NOR THE
LOCATION OR DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER TABLES.

3.

VICINITY MAP

ALL SIDE AND REAR YARD EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE
TYPICAL 7' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS

OWNERS DEDICATION

N.T.S.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE OWNERS OF
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, AND HEREBY CAUSED THE SAME TO BE DIVIDED

(P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INTO LOTS, PARCELS AND STREETS, TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH TO BE
HEREAFTER KNOW AS,

AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL ROADS AND OTHER
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS
ALSO HEREBY CONVEY TO ANY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES A PERPETUAL,
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT,
THE SAME TO BE USED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITY
LINES AND FACILITIES. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS ALSO HEREBY CONVEY ANY OTHER
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT TO THE PARTIES INDICATED AND FOR THE PURPOSES
SHOWN HEREON. IN WITNESS WE / I HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HAND THE DAY
OF
A.D. 20
.

SHOW ON PLAT
1)
2)

ALL SECTION CORNERS AND STREET MONUMENTS
BASIS OF BEARING

3)
4)

ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS/OWNERS
SQUARE FOOTAGE TO NEAREST FOOT AND

(OWNER)

(OWNER)

ACRES TO NEAREST THOUSANDTH FOR ALL LOTS
5)

AND PARCELS
ADDRESSES FOR LOTS AND STREETS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

SCALE: VARIES. NOT LARGER
THAN 1" = 100'

]
-S.S.

THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
OF

, 20

DAY

, THERE PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME,

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

ON THIS

DAY OF

OWNER:
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
E-MAIL

A.D. 20

COMMISSION NUMBER:

NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME)

NOTARY PUBLIC (SIGNATURE)

A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAH

PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

MAYOR'S APPROVAL

COUNTY RECORDER
ENTRY NO.

PRESENTED TO THE MAYOR OF CENTERVILLE, UTAH
ON THIS
ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

DAY OF

A.D. 20

BY THE CENTERVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION

DAY OF
THIS
DAY OF
A.D. 20
, AT WHICH
TIME THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED
MAYOR:

CITY ATTORNEY

CITY ENGINEER

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY RECORDER ATTEST:

FEE PAID

FILED FOR RECORD AND RECORDED THIS

IN BOOK

A.D. 20

AT

OF

COUNTY RECORDER
BY:

DEPUTY

Page 55 of 86

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

SUBDIVISION TITLE

I,
, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD LICENSE NUMBER
, AS PRESCRIBED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY THE
AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER(S) I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND

A SUBDIVISION OF THE ____________ QUARTER OF SECTION __, T_N, R_E/W, SLB & M

SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED HEREON (RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE AT
THE DAVIS COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE AS ENTRY NO.

CENTERVILLE CITY, DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH

), AND

HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, TOGETHER

WITH EASEMENTS, HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS "
", AND THAT
THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.

NOTES:
"SIGNED SEAL"
DATE

1.

FOR ALL NEW SUBDIVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS
TO SUBDIVISIONS THAT REFERENCE THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, PLEASE

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

PROVIDE THE ROTATION FACTOR FROM THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATES TO THE UTAH NORTH

BEGINNING AT A POINT ....... TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

NAD83 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NOTING
THE BASIS OF BEARING MONUMENTS USED FOR

SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 0.00 SQ. FT. OR 0.000 ACRE(S), AND 00 LOTS
AND 00 PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREETS

THE ROTATION. IF NEW SUBDIVISIONS USE THE
DAVIS COUNTY UTAH NORTH NAD83 STATE PLANE
COORDINATES AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR
THE PLAT, PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE STATING
THIS INFORMATION.
2.

APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAT BY
CENTERVILLE CITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY
REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ADEQUACY OF
SUB-SURFACE SOIL CONDITION NOR THE
LOCATION OR DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER TABLES.

3.

VICINITY MAP

ALL SIDE AND REAR YARD EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE
TYPICAL 7' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS

OWNERS DEDICATION

N.T.S.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE OWNERS OF
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, AND HEREBY CAUSED THE SAME TO BE DIVIDED

(P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INTO LOTS, PARCELS AND STREETS, TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH TO BE
HEREAFTER KNOW AS,

AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL ROADS AND OTHER
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS
ALSO HEREBY CONVEY TO ANY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES A PERPETUAL,
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT,
THE SAME TO BE USED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITY
LINES AND FACILITIES. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS ALSO HEREBY CONVEY ANY OTHER
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT TO THE PARTIES INDICATED AND FOR THE PURPOSES
SHOWN HEREON. IN WITNESS WE / I HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HAND THE DAY
OF
A.D. 20
.

SHOW ON PLAT
1)
2)

ALL SECTION CORNERS AND STREET MONUMENTS
BASIS OF BEARING

3)
4)

ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS/OWNERS
SQUARE FOOTAGE TO NEAREST FOOT AND

(OWNER)

(OWNER)

ACRES TO NEAREST THOUSANDTH FOR ALL LOTS
5)

AND PARCELS
ADDRESSES FOR LOTS AND STREETS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

]
-S.S.

THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
OF

, 20

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

SCALE: VARIES. NOT LARGER
THAN 1" = 100'

OWNER:
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
E-MAIL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

COMMISSION NUMBER:

NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME)

NOTARY PUBLIC (SIGNATURE)

A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAH

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL

COUNTY RECORDER
ENTRY NO.

PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, UTAH
ON THIS
ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

DAY OF

A.D. 20

BY THE CENTERVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY ENGINEER

CHAIRMAN PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY RECORDER ATTEST:

FEE PAID

FILED FOR RECORD AND RECORDED THIS
DAY OF

THIS
DAY OF
A.D. 20
, AT WHICH
TIME THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED
MAYOR:

CITY ATTORNEY

DAY

, THERE PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME,

IN BOOK

A.D. 20

AT

OF

COUNTY RECORDER
BY:

DEPUTY

Page 56 of 86

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE

SUBDIVISION TITLE

I,
, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR, AND THAT I HOLD LICENSE NUMBER
, AS PRESCRIBED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF UTAH. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT BY THE
AUTHORITY OF THE OWNER(S) I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND

A SUBDIVISION OF THE ____________ QUARTER OF SECTION __, T_N, R_E/W, SLB & M

SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND DESCRIBED HEREON (RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE AT
THE DAVIS COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE AS ENTRY NO.

CENTERVILLE CITY, DAVIS COUNTY, UTAH

), AND

HAVE SUBDIVIDED SAID TRACT OF LAND INTO LOTS AND STREETS, TOGETHER

WITH EASEMENTS, HEREAFTER TO BE KNOWN AS "
", AND THAT
THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND MONUMENTED ON THE GROUND
AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.

NOTES:
"SIGNED SEAL"
DATE

1.

FOR ALL NEW SUBDIVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS
TO SUBDIVISIONS THAT REFERENCE THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, PLEASE

BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION

PROVIDE THE ROTATION FACTOR FROM THE OLD
DAVIS COUNTY COORDINATES TO THE UTAH NORTH

BEGINNING AT A POINT ....... TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

NAD83 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NOTING
THE BASIS OF BEARING MONUMENTS USED FOR

SUBDIVISION CONTAINS 0.00 SQ. FT. OR 0.000 ACRE(S), AND 00 LOTS
AND 00 PUBLIC/PRIVATE STREETS

THE ROTATION. IF NEW SUBDIVISIONS USE THE
DAVIS COUNTY UTAH NORTH NAD83 STATE PLANE
COORDINATES AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR
THE PLAT, PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE STATING
THIS INFORMATION.
2.

APPROVAL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAT BY
CENTERVILLE CITY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ANY
REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ADEQUACY OF
SUB-SURFACE SOIL CONDITION NOR THE
LOCATION OR DEPTH OF GROUNDWATER TABLES.

3.

VICINITY MAP

ALL SIDE AND REAR YARD EASEMENTS SHOWN ARE
TYPICAL 7' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS

OWNERS DEDICATION

N.T.S.

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE OWNERS OF
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, AND HEREBY CAUSED THE SAME TO BE DIVIDED

(P.U.E.) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

INTO LOTS, PARCELS AND STREETS, TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH TO BE
HEREAFTER KNOW AS,

AND DO HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE PERPETUAL USE OF THE PUBLIC ALL ROADS AND OTHER
AREAS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS INTENDED FOR PUBLIC USE. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS
ALSO HEREBY CONVEY TO ANY AND ALL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES A PERPETUAL,
NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER THE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT,
THE SAME TO BE USED FOR THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF UTILITY
LINES AND FACILITIES. THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS ALSO HEREBY CONVEY ANY OTHER
EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT TO THE PARTIES INDICATED AND FOR THE PURPOSES
SHOWN HEREON. IN WITNESS WE / I HAVE HEREUNTO SET OUR HAND THE DAY
OF
A.D. 20
.

SHOW ON PLAT
1)
2)

ALL SECTION CORNERS AND STREET MONUMENTS
BASIS OF BEARING

3)
4)

ADJACENT SUBDIVISIONS/OWNERS
SQUARE FOOTAGE TO NEAREST FOOT AND

(OWNER)

(OWNER)

ACRES TO NEAREST THOUSANDTH FOR ALL LOTS
5)

AND PARCELS
ADDRESSES FOR LOTS AND STREETS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

]
-S.S.

THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
OF

, 20

MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:

SCALE: VARIES. NOT LARGER
THAN 1" = 100'

OWNER:
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE NUMBER
E-MAIL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

COMMISSION NUMBER:

NOTARY PUBLIC (PRINT NAME)

NOTARY PUBLIC (SIGNATURE)

A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAH

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL

COUNTY RECORDER
ENTRY NO.

PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF CENTERVILLE, UTAH
ON THIS
ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

ON THIS

DAY OF

A.D. 20

DAY OF

A.D. 20

BY THE CENTERVILLE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY ENGINEER

PLANNING COMMISSION

CITY RECORDER ATTEST:

FEE PAID

FILED FOR RECORD AND RECORDED THIS
DAY OF

THIS
DAY OF
A.D. 20
, AT WHICH
TIME THIS SUBDIVISION WAS APPROVED AND ACCEPTED
MAYOR:

CITY ATTORNEY

DAY

, THERE PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME,

IN BOOK

A.D. 20

AT

OF

COUNTY RECORDER
BY:

DEPUTY

Page 57 of 86

OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY SUBDIVIDER OR LOT
OWNER TO ACCOMMODATE DRIVEWAY LOCATION OR

CULINARY WATER LINE

ON CUL-DE-SAC (SEE CUL-DE-SAC DETAIL)
NOTE: LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY CITY

15'

CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP)

Ë

SUB SURFACE DRAIN
ssd

Ë

IRRIGATION WATER LINE

SANITARY SEWER LINE

PLACE WATER LATERAL IN CENTER OF LOT UNLESS

7' WIDE P.U.E (TYP)

FIRE HYDRANT TO BE 5' PAST P.C.

Ë

PROPERTY LINE EXTENDED)

Ë

WATER VALVE (LINE UP WITH

(NORTHEAST CORNER
MAX. SPACING 400')

PEDESTRIAN RAMP (TYP)
(SEE DETAIL SHEET 6)

10'

4'
Ë

15'-0"

Ë

1'-6"

4'-6"

ssd

4'

5'

ssd

R=20' OR 30'

EXPANSION JOINT (TYP)

CULINARY WATER LINE

SURVEY MONUMENT

CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
(TYP)

CROSS DRAIN (TYP)
ssd

MSD

ssd

CLEANOUT MANHOLE

SUB SURFACE DRAIN
ssd

ssd

ssd

ssd

ssd

SANITARY SEWER LINE

MSS

5'-0"

7' WIDE P.U.E (TYP)

STORM DRAIN LINE

5'-0"

MSD

MSD
IRRIGATION WATER LINE

15'-0"

8' MIN.

Ë
ssd

Ë

80~-90~

UTILITY EASEMENT

Ë

Ë

STANDARD INLET BOX TYPE I
OR II (SINGLE OR DOUBLE)
(SEE SHEET 13 & 14)

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STREET INTERSECTION UTILITY
LINE LOCATION, SURVEY MONUMENT,
& VALVE BOX

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

2

SHEET
TYP.

DT-02

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 58 of 86

ALK

AT PC OF CURB RADIUS
ON UPHILL SIDE

=

RADIUS
(SEE NOTE 4)

R

R

=
3
0
'
3
T
8
O
'
T
S
O
W
T
(M
B
C
I
(M N)
IN
)

4'SI
DEW

PRO PERT
Y LI
NE

4'PA
RKST
RI
P

8'TBC TO
50' RADIUS TO PROPERTY LINE

INLET BOXES

PEDESTRIAN RAMP

SURVEY
MONUMENT

C
L OF ROAD

INLET BOXES
AT PC OF CURB RADIUS

4' SIDEWALK

R = 38' TO TBC (MIN)

R = 30' TO SW (MIN)

SURVEY
MONUMENT

400' MAX
C
L OF ROAD

4' PARKSTRIP

5.0% MAXIMUM SLOPE IN
CUL-DE-SAC IN ANY DIRECTION

34'-0"

42' RADIUS TO TBC

(SEE SHEET 6)

INLET BOXES
AT PC OF CURB RADIUS

17'-0"

50' MIN. STREET

FIRE HYDRANT

RADIUS
(SEE NOTE 4)

CLUSTER MAILBOXES
STREET LIGHT SPACING
PER PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

*45°
(TYPICAL)

NOTES:
1) CUL-DE-SAC SHOULD BE USED ONLY WHERE UNUSUAL CONDITIONS EXIST.

5) SHOW DRIVE APPROACH LOCATIONS.

2) GRADE IN CUL-DE-SAC AREA IS TO BE 1.0% MIN. 5.0% MAX.

6) SHOW SNOW LOAD LOCATIONS 25' LENGTH.

3) ALL CUL-DE-SACS MUST SLOPE TO THE ADJOINING STREET.

7) SHOW CLUSTERED MAILBOXES.

4) TBC RADIUS SHALL BE 20' WHEN BOTH STREETS ARE MINOR STREETS (50' R/W).
IN ALL OTHER SITUATIONS THE RADIUS TO THE TBC SHALL BE 30'

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
06/04/2026

CUL-DE-SAC DETAIL

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

3

SHEET
TYP.

DT-03

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 59 of 86

IF DISTANCE IS LESS THAN 50'

ROTO-MILL 2" & OVERLAY 2"
IF ROAD SURFACE IS NEWER THAN
2 YEARS OLD THE DISTANCE INCREASES
TO 100 FEET.

10'

NON-TRENCH PAVEMENT CUT

50' OR 100'

MIN.

10'
MIN.

NON-TRENCH PAVEMENT CUT

10' MIN.

10' MIN.

AREA OF EXCAVATION
NOTE:
LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE
(ROAD SURFACE OLDER THAN 2 YEARS)

1) ROAD OVERLAY WILL BE 10' MINIMUM

AREA OF EXCAVATION

FROM IMPACTED AREAS & WILL EXTEND

NOTE:

TO FULL WIDTH OF THE INTERSECTING ROAD

LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE
1)

(ROAD SURFACE NEWER THAN 2 YEARS)

INTERSECTION OVERLAY AREA

RESTORATION MUST BE A MINIMUM

2) ROTO-MILL EXISTING ROADWAY DOWN

OF 10' CURB LENGTH BY THE WIDTH

2" & DO A 2" OVERLAY ON SAID AREA.

OF EACH LANE EXCAVATED

A

MULTIPLE EXCAVATIONS & RESTORATION IN ASPHALT DETAIL

B

INTERSECTION EXCAVATION & RESTORATION DETAIL

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

IF ROAD SURFACE IS NEWER THAN
2 YEARS OLD FULL WIDTH OF ROAD
SHALL BE ROTOMILLED AND OVERLAYED

SEE NOTE BELOW
(TYP)
NON-TRENCH PAVEMENT CUT

NON-TRENCH PAVEMENT CUT

2' TYP.

15'

10' MIN.

15'

15'

10' MIN.

15'

15'

10' MIN.

AREA OF EXCAVATION

AREA OF EXCAVATION

LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE

LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE

(ROAD SURFACE OLDER THAN 2 YEARS)

(ROAD SURFACE OLDER THAN 2 YEARS)

15'

15'

2' TYP.

15'

NOTE:

1) IF ROAD SURFACE IS 2 YEARS OR NEWER.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ROTO-MILL EXISTING
LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE

LIMITS OF RESTORATION OF EQUIVALENT ROAD SURFACE

ROADWAY DOWN 2" & DO A 2" OVERLAY

(ROAD SURFACE NEWER THAN 2 YEARS)

(ROAD SURFACE NEWER THAN 2 YEARS)

ON SAID AREA.

C

LONGITUDINAL EXCAVATION & RESTORATION IN CONCRETE

D

SINGLE & DOUBLE LANE EXCAVATION & RESTORATION DETAIL

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STREET REPAIR REQUIREMENTS

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

4

SHEET
DT-04
TYP.

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 60 of 86

PROPERTY LINE

B

PAVEMENT

TYPE III SLURRY SEAL

CUL-DE-SAC
TYPE II SLURRY SEAL
3"-4" PG 58-28, DM

H

C

E

TRAFFIC LANE

D

CURB & GUTTER

PARKING LANE

F

PLANTING

1
2, 50 GYRATIONS, 15% MAX RAP

G

SLOPE 2% CURB TO WALK

SIDEWALK

SLOPE 2% MAX

PROPERTY LINE

A

RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH

CONC. SIDEWALK
4" UNTREATED BASE COURSE

STABILIZATION/SEPARATION GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC
(COMPACT SUB-GRADE PRIOR TO PLACING FABRIC)
(PER CITY ENGINEER)

8" UNTREATED BASE COURSE

12" OF IMPORT

CONC. CURB & GUTTER
6" UNTREATED BASE COURSE

GRANULAR SUBBASE

NOTE:

STREET
DESIGNATION

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

MINOR

50'

14.5'

2.5'

8'

MINOR COLLECTOR

60'

18.5'

2.5'

9'

14.5'

-

4'

4'

11'

7.5'

5'

MAJOR COLLECTOR

66'

21.5'

2.5'

4'

9'

14'

7.5'

6'

4'

MINOR ATERIAL

80'

28.5'

BUSINESS

50'

19.5'

2.5'

9'

21'

7.5'

6'

4'

2.5'

3'

12'

7.5'

3'

0'

1) THIS SECTION IS THE MINIMUM STRUCTURAL SECTION ALLOWED IN THE
CITY, UNLESS FIELD TESTS ARE MADE AND ANOTHER SECTION IS
RECOMMENDED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER & ACCEPTED BY THE
CITY ENGINEER. MINIMUM AXIAL LOAD FOUR 18,000 LBS, PER DAY.
2) MINIMUM SLOPE OF CURB & GUTTER, CROSS DRAINS, & STREETS - 0.5%
3) ASPHALT TO BE 4" THICK MINIMUM IN COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AREAS,
COLLECTOR STREETS, & ARTERIAL STREETS
4) ASPHALT TO BE 3" THICK MINIMUM IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS

A

STANDARD ROADWAY SECTION

NTS

SEE PLAN

3

3

BOTTOM OF
CONTRACTION JOINT

3

R= 4"

#4 @
24" O.C.

3

8"

UNTREATED
BASE COURSE

4' WATERWAY

3

1'-8 4" - 2'-8 4"
3"
%
5

9"

#4'S ON A DIAGONAL

8"

4"

3

4"

8"
6"

6"

1

6 2"

4'-0"

2"

1'-0"

3

1'-8 4" - 2'-8 4"

2"

7 4"

6"

A

4'-0" - 6'-0"

6 4"

CURB & GUTTER TO BE
PLACED MONOLITHICALLY
WITH WATERWAY

#4'S @ 12" O.C.
(BOTH WAYS) TYP.

4" UNTREATED BASE COURSE

30"

UNTREATED
BASE COURSE
FLOWLINE
COLD JOINT
#4 REBAR @
24" O.C.

A

5 TO 7 -#4 @ 10.5" O.C.

10"
CURB (IF APPLICABLE)
WARP

FLOWLINE

3"

9"

NOTE:
1) SIDEWALK TO BE 6" THICK AT DRIVEWAY.

CONSTRUCTION
JOINT
UNTREATED
BASE COURSE

8"

CONTRACTION JOINTS (TYP.)

4"

2MAX
1
:
1

EXPANSION JOINT

2) EXPANSION JOINT EVERY 100' FOR BOTH SIDEWALKS & CURB & GUTTERS.
VARIES

3) TWO EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED FOR CURB & GUTTER WHEN REPLACING 50' OR GREATER.
4) TEST HOLES & CORES REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF SIDEWALK PANEL TO NEAREST JOINT IN BOTH DIRECITONS.

SECTION A-A

B

SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER SECTIONS & CURB & GUTTER JOINT

C

WATERWAY SECTION & WATERWAY TRANSITION

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STREET CROSS SECTION
CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK &
WATER WAY

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

5

SHEET
TYP.

DT-05

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 61 of 86

AX

6" WIDE MONOLITHIC

4' TO 8' PARK STRIP

TRUNCATED DOME

4' MIN.

REQ'D
2
% MAX
X

5

C
L

1 8" MIN.
C
L 238" MAX

C
L

M

2" MIN. BETWEEN TRUNCATED
DOME & BACK OF CURB

A
X

UNTREATED BASE
COURSE COMPACT
TO 95% DRY DENSITY

5

%
8

AX
%M
5

6" THICK

C
L

3

X

4" THICK

2 8" MAX

A

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
24"X48" (TYP.) YELLOW IN COLOR
1 8" MIN.

M

4' TO 8' SIDEWALK (IF
MAX GRADE CANNOT
BE MET, SIDEWALK MUST
EXTEND TO 15' MINIMUM)

TRUNCATED DOME
IN SQUARE GRID PATTERN

8
% MAX

MA

%
2

10
%

A

EXPANSION JOINT (TYP.)

7
8" MIN.
3
1 8" MAX

4' TYP.
BOND BREAKER

5%
M

CURB IF NECESSARY

3
16"

4' TO 8' SIDEWALK (IF
MAX GRADE CANNOT
BE MET, SIDEWALK MUST
EXTEND TO 15' MINIMUM)

EXPANSION JOINT (TYP.)

50% TO 65% OF
BASE DIAMETER

CLEAR SPACE TO BE 4'X4'
FROM TRUNCATED DOMES

WITH 5% RUNNING SLOPE
& 2% CROSS SLOPE MAX.

IN

.

X
MA

4
'
M

%
10

4' TO 8' PARK STRIP

P
AR
W
5'

SECTION A-A
NOTES:
1) MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS TO CURB & GUTTER
AND/OR PEDESTRIAN RAMPS ARE PROHIBITED

RB
CU

A

2) ALL CROSS SLOPES TO NOT EXCEED 2% MAX

A

PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAIL, TRUNCATED DOME DETAIL & RAMP SECTION

NTS

SEE PLAN

4' TO 8' SIDEWALK (IF
MAX GRADE CANNOT
BE MET, SIDEWALK MUST
EXTEND TO 15' MINIMUM)

C

U

R

B

4' TO 8' PARK STRIP

P
R
A

NON-TRAVERSABLE SURFACE
25% MAX SLOPE

5' MAX.

DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
24"X48" (TYP.) YELLOW IN COLOR

5'
W

8% MAX

2% MAX

E

NON-TRAVERSABLE SURFACE

4' MIN.

5' MAX

2' MIN.

5
% MAX

2% TYP.
5% MAX

4' MIN.

% MAX
8

% MAX
2

ROADWAY

25% MAX SLOPE
NO LIP AT CURB CUT
DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE
24"X48" (TYP.) YELLOW IN COLOR

6' MIN. CONC. THICKNESS
4" THICK

6" THICK

UNTREATED BASE COURSE
COMPACT TO 95% DRY DENSITY

2% BLENDED TRANSITION TYPICAL
RUNNING SLOPE (5% MAX)

SECTION E-E

CLEAR SPACE TO BE 4'X4'
FROM TRUNCATED DOMES
WITH 5% RUNNING SLOPE
& 2% CROSS SLOPE MAX.

W
5'

B
NTS

P
R
A

B
R
U
C

E

CORNER PEDESTRIAN DETAIL & RAMP SECTION
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

TYPICAL PEDESTRIAN RAMP

CENTERVILLE CITY

& CORNER PEDESTRIAN RAMP

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

6

SHEET
TYP.

DT-06

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 62 of 86

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

BACK CURB
12"

EXPANSION JOINT

8"

DEPRESSION CURB

30" MIN.
TRANSITION

TBC-HIGH

LIP OF CURB

5"

B

F
L

F
L

SECTION A-A
SLOPE DOWN
NOTE METER BOXES SHALL NOT

BE PLACED OR LEFT IN DRIVEWAYS,
METER BOX LOCATION AS PER CITY
ORDINANCE (SEE STANDARDS SHT 8).
RELOCATE AT PROPERTY
OWNER'S EXPENSE

8"

AT DRIVE APPROACH

10'-0" MIN. - 30'-0" MAX

SIDEWALK MIN.
6" ABOVE FLOWLINE

DRIVE APPROACH
10:1 MAX SLOPE

DEPRESSED CURB & GUTTER

2'

2' MIN

SLOPE 2%
COLD JOINT

1"

#4 REBAR 24"

A

A

8" UNTREATED BASE
COURSE COMPACT
TO 95% DRY DENSITY

@ 24" O.C.
C
L

1
2" EXPANSION JOINT

RESIDENTIAL 6" THICK
COMMERCIAL 8" THICK

SECTION B-B

2' MIN. DISTANCE
FROM EDGE OF
DRIVE APPROACH
TO DRIVE APPROACH

30"
(DROP DOWN TYPE BOTH SIDES
SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET)

1) FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3' FROM TOP OF WING OF APPROACH.

SIGNAL SPACING
(ft)

CURB & GUTTER

B

NOTES:

MINIMUM

1

6) ALL WATER METERS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 2' FROM DRIVEWAY APPROACH.
7) MAX WIDTH IS 45'-0" FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

OFFSET

/RIGHT-OUT
SPACING (ft)

INTERSECTION
SPACING (ft)

UNSIGNALIZED
FULL ACCESS
SPACING (ft)

9) DRIVE APPROACH TO BE 25' FROM INTERSECTION MINIMUM.

A

RESIDENTIAL DRIVE APPROACH PLAN & SECTIONS

NTS

SEE PLAN

CONCRETE COLLAR TO
BE SET 1/4" BELOW
FINISH PAVEMENT

OFFSET

/RIGHT-OUT
SPACING (ft)

INTERSECTION
SPACING (ft)

CORNER
DISTANCE (ft)

MAJOR ARTERIAL

2640

1320

660

1320

N/A

N\A

N/A

100

MINOR ARTERIAL

2640

660

330

660

N/A

660

N/A

100

MAJOR COLLECTOR

1320

660

330

660

N/A

330

N/A

100

MINOR COLLECTOR

1320

300

150

150

150

150

75

50

LOCAL COMMERCIAL

1320

200

100

100

100

100

50

50

LOCAL RESIDENTIAL

1320

200

100

100

-

-

-

25

30" - 36"

FINISH PAVEMENT

8" MIN.

CONCRETE CLASS
4000 AS PER APWA
SECTION 03 30 04

PATCH ASPHALT
TO MATCH EX. ASPHALT
DEPTH +1"

SAW-CUT & PATCH ASPHALT
2' WIDER THEN NON-TRENCH
PAVEMENT CUT ON BOTH SIDES

(3) #5 BARS @24"

STD. 30" M.H. RING & COVER
(D&L SUPPLY A1180. A1181.
OR EQUAL)

FLOWABLE FILL AS PER
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS

CONCRETE COLLAR TO
BE SET 1/4" BELOW
FINISH PAVEMENT

M.H. LID TO BE MARKED
PER UTILITY OWNER &

BEDDING TO BE DETERMINED
BY UTILITY OWNER

1

SET 4" LOWER THAN CONCRETE

1 #4 REBAR RING

1" MIN.

MINIMUM RIGHT-IN

2. SPACING SHALL BE MEASURED CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE.
3. AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT SHALL OVERRIDE THE REQUIREMENTS IN THIS TABLE IF WARRANTED BY SPECIFIC TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.
4. EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ON ARTERIALS AND MAJOR COLLECTORS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED.

4) ONLY ONE DRIVE APPROACH/ACCESS ALLOWED ON COLLECTOR & ARTERIAL ROADS

3" MIN.
5" MAX

MINIMUM RIGHT-IN

N/A - NOT ALLOWED UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES
1. UDOT AND COUNTY REGULATIONS MAY IMPOSE GREATER MINIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENTS ON ROADWAYS UNDER THEIR JURISDICTION.

8) TEST HOLES & CORES IN DRIVE APPROACH REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF DRIVE APPROACH.

8" MIN.

UNSIGNALIZED
FULL ACCESS
SPACING (ft)

MINOR DRIVEWAYS*
MINIMUM

*MAJOR DRIVEWAYS CARRY 200 VEHICLES PER DAY OR MORE; MINOR DRIVEWAYS CARRY LESS THAN 200 VEHICLES PER DAY

3) MIN. CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 4,000 PSI.

RISER ASSEMBLY
D&L SUPPLY K-6313

MINIMUM

5) ADJACENT PROPERTY DRIVE APPROACHES WILL BE SEPARATED BY 2' MIN.

2) MAX WIDTH IS 30'-0", MINIMUM WIDTH IS 10'-0", & MAX WIDTH OF 2 OF LOT FRONTAGE
WITH SECOND APPROACH, WITH MAXIMUM OF 2 APPROACHES.

VALVE BOX LID AND

PUBLIC ROADWAYS/MAJOR
DRIVEWAYS*

12"

8"

PEA GRAVEL OR
SEWER ROCK
8"
MONUMENT BASE

SECTION OF BASE
EDGE OF EXCAVATION

8"

3' MIN.

1

CONCRETE COLLAR TO
BE SET 1/4" BELOW
FINISH PAVEMENT

FINISH PAVEMENT

1 #4 REBAR RING

NAME OF MONUMENT
OWNER

1 2" MIN.

GROUT RING & COVER

COMPACT FOUNDATION

X

XXXXX
X
C
L INT.

+

1
2" MIN.

CAP SECTION

8"

BRONZE OR BRASS

X

3" MIN.

BACKFILL ALL SIDES

6-28-22
L.S. XXXX
M
T
ON
UMEN

1 #4 REBAR
RING

DATE

GRADE RINGS AS REQ'D
(10" MAX.)
GROUT ALL GRADE RINGS

LICENSE

VALVE BOX LID AND
RISER ASSEMBLY
D&L SUPPLY M-8040

MONUMENT

B

MONUMENT BOX, CAP, & BASE DETAIL

C

VALVE BOX & MANHOLE COLLAR DETAIL & UTILITY POTHOLE DETAIL

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

DRIVE APPROACH

CENTERVILLE CITY

& CONCRETE COLLAR DETAILS

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

7

SHEET
TYP.

DT-07

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 63 of 86

* PARKSTRIP
PROVIDE SAFETY ZONE AS PER
CITY ORDNANCE. FIRE HYDRANT
SAFETY ZONE AND CLEARANCE
SHALL BE 3' MINIMUM

REPLACE ALL CONCRETE

W/ ROCK MULCH 4'X4' OR
4' LONG & PARK STRIP WIDTH

FIRE HYDRANT "WATEROUS" OR

"MUELLER" EPOXY INTERIOR LINED

1'-6"

FLANGE ELEVATION TO RANGE FROM
4" ABOVE TBC TO EVEN WITH TBC

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

D&L SUPPLY
STANDARD 4' SIDEWALK

ASPHALT ROAD SURFACE

L-2240 COVER

ASPHALT ROAD SURFACE

VALVE BOX W/ LID

ROAD BASE

HDPE METER BOX

1'-6"

3
4" - 21" DIA.

42" MIN.

VALVE BOX ASSEMBLY
D&L SUPPLY M-8040

3

3'-0"

PROPERTY LINE

ROAD BASE

BARREL LENGTH 4'-6"

5

8"X 4" METER TO BE
SUPPLIED & INSTALLED
BY THE CITY

38" MIN.

PROPERTY LINE

STANDARD 4' SIDEWALK

18" ± 3"

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

1" - 24" DIA.

TRACER WIRE TO
WATER METER BOX

1

1 2" - 30" DIA.

2'

TRACER WIRE

6" GATE VALVE

TEE

SEE DETAIL A SHEET 9

TO BE FLANGED

2'-6"

3

3

ONTO MAIN WATERLINE

4" OR 1"
LATERAL

4" OR 1"
LATERAL

6" PVC C900 (CLASS 150)

CORP. STOP FORD Q
OR MULLER

6" MIN.

STUB OUT TO 2' PAST PROPERTY LINE

CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK

30° ANGLE OR AS
REQUIRED BY CITY

CULINARY WATER MAIN
PVC C900 (CLASS 150)

VBHC72-18W4433Q YOKE
FORD 202B OR
202BS SADDLE

MARFI FABRIC AROUND SEWER ROCK

CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK
SEE DETAIL A SHEET 9

1 CU. YD. OF SEWER ROCK
NOTES:
1) WATER MAIN LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 42" AND MAXIMUM COVER OF 60".
2) ALL MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS SHALL BE TORQUED BETWEEN 75 - 90 FT. LBS
3) ALL BEVELED ENDS SHALL BE CUT OFF BEFORE BEING CONNECTED TO A MECHANICAL JOINT FITTING.

A

FIRE HYDRANT CONNECTION

B

TYPICAL WATER METER CONNECTION

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

3'-0"
LANDSCAPED AREA

6'-0"

SAFETY ZONE

1

1 2" POLY LATERAL

SAFETY ZONE

1'-6"

LANDSCAPED
AREA
SIDEWALK

WATER METER

SIDEWALK
CURB & GUTTER

CURB VALVE
1'-6" 2' MIN.

NOTES:
1

3

30" DIA. ADS
METER BOX 36"
DEEP WITH D&L
SUPPLY L-2324
RING & COVER

3'-0"

1 2"X 4"
REDUCER

DRIVE APPROACH

"
0
'1

METERS TO BE
INSTALLED BY
OTHERS

6'-0"

CURB & GUTTER

WATER METER

CURB & GUTTER

1

1

1) ISOLATION VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTION
BUT NO MORE THAN 500' INTERVALS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
2) ISOLATION VALVES SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTION
BUT NO MORE THAN ONE BLOCK OR 800' INTERVALS IN NON-COMMERCIAL
DISTRICTS

1

1 2"X1 2"X1 2" TEE

DRIVE APPROACH

NOTES:
SIDEWALK
1) SAFETY ZONE SHALL BE FREE & CLEAR OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS, & TREES, 6' IN EACH DIRECTION,
NOT INCLUDING DRIVEWAYS, & WALKS

3/4" LATERAL

2) CULINARY METER BOXES WILL NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH
3) CULINARY METER BOXES TO BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 2' FROM DRIVEWAY APPROACH
4) HYDRANT DRAIN SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF SANITARY SEWER OR STORM DRAINS.

C

WATER SAFETY ZONE

D

DOUBLE METER SERVICE FITTINGS

E

ISOLATION VALVES

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

FIRE HYDRANT DETAIL,
WATER METER DETAIL, &
ISOLATION VALVE NOTES

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

8

SHEET
TYP.

DT-08

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 64 of 86

MINIMUM BEARING AREA IN SQ. FT
MEGALUG

SIZE OF

FITTING TO CAP

PIPE

MJ DUCTILE
IRON CAP

PLUG

BEARING AREA (TYP)
PLUG
TEE

UNION FLANGED ADAPTER

1

90° BEND

45° BEND

1

22 2°

11 4°

BEND

BEND

4"

2

3

2

2

2

6"

4

5.5

3

1.5

1

8"

6.5

9.5

5

2.75

1.5

10"

10

14

8

4.25

2.5

12"

14

20

11

5.50

3

14"

19

26.5

14.5

7.5

4

16"

24

34

18.5

9.5

6

PVC C900 PIPE

BENDS

TEE
VALVE,
DEAD END

20"

27

52

28.5

14.5

16

24"

53

74

41

21

53

BEARING AREA (TYP)
FLANGED FITTINGS

TEE

RESTRAINT SIZING IS BASED UPON A MAXIMUM OPERATING
PRESSURE OF 150 PSI AND A TEST PRESSURE OF 200 PSI, AND
A MINIMUM SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2,000 PSF. OPERATING
PRESSURES IN EXCESS OF 150 PSI OR SOILS WITH LESS THAN
2,000 POUND BEARING STRENGTH WILL REQUIRE SPECIAL DESIGN.

PLUG
CROSS

DUCTILE
IRON SPOOL

NOTES:

(TYP)

1) PIPE CAP REQUIRES THRUST BLOCK PER SCHEDULE
IF PIPE IS ACTIVE.
SIZE AS PER
TABLE

A

THRUST BLOCKING & VERTICAL REALIGNMENT DETAIL & PIPE CAP DETAIL

NTS

SEE PLAN

CONCRETE THRUST
BLOCK

2) THRUST BLOCKS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PIPE CAPS
IF LINES IS INACTIVE OR ABANDONED.

SAW-CUT AND PATCH ASPHALT
2' WIDER THAN TRENCH WIDTH
ON BOTH SIDES
NOTES:
PATCH ASPHALT TO MATCH
EX. ASPHALT DEPTH +1"

BLOW OFF & SAMPLING POINT
SHALL BE KUPFERLE, ECLIPSE #88WC-SS
OR EQUIVALENT

1) MINIMUM WATER MAIN SIZE: 8" DIAMETER.
2) WATER MAIN LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 42"
& MAXIMUM COVER OF 60".

8"

3) ALL MECHANICAL JOINT FITTINGS SHALL BE TORQUED BETWEEN 75 - 90 FT. LBS.

3.5' MIN. DEPTH

3
4" VALVE & VALVE BOX

4'X2' CONCRETE PAD

IMPORT UNTREATED BASE COURSE
COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

4"

IMPORT GRANULAR BORROW OR
NATIVE GRANULAR AS PER ENGINEER
COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

12"

4) ALL BEVELED ENDS SHALL BE CUT OFF BEFORE BEING CONNECTED TO A
MECHANICAL JOINT FITTING.

4' SIDEWALK

1
2" STAINLESS STEEL

5) CONCRETE SHALL NOT BE PLACED AROUND BOLTS & VISQUEEN SHALL BE
WRAPPED BETWEEN THE CONCRETE & THE FITTING.
6) THE CITY MAY REQUIRE THRUST BLOCK SIZES INCREASED DEPENDING ON

COUPLING
TRACER WIRE

1
2" STAINLESS STEEL NIPPLE

THE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY.
7) ALL THRUST BLOCKS MUST REST AGAINST UNDISTURBED SOIL.

TRACER WIRE
8) MIN. CONCRETE STRENGTH FOR THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE 4,000 PSI.

3"

IMPORT SAND BEDDING (1/2" MINUS)
COMPACTED TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

90° BEND &
3
1
4"X 2" REDUCER

WATERLINE PIPE

9) WHERE CORROSIVE OR CONTAMINATED AREAS ARE ENCOUNTERED, USE MATERIALS
RESISTANT TO CORROSION AND/OR CONTAMINATION.

3
4" LATERAL

CORP. STOP

NOTES:
1) DROPPING PIPE INTO TRENCH IS PROHIBITED

BRASS SADLE

2) SEE DETAIL D SHEET 9 FOR MORE INFORMATION.

B

TYPICAL CULINARY WATERLINE TRENCH SECTION

C

WATER SAMPLING STATION

D

CULINARY WATER & THRUST BLOCK NOTES

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

CULINARY WATER THRUST BLOCKING,

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

WATER SAMPLING STATION,

CENTERVILLE CITY

TRENCH SECTION DETAILS, &

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

9

SHEET
TYP.

DT-09

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

CULINARY WATER NOTES

SHEET
NO.

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 65 of 86

D&L SUPPLY STYLE F-1982
6" DRAIN (IF APPLICABLE)

PLASTIC MANHOLE STEPS

DIMENSION SCHEDULE

MARK
NO.

9
10

8
7

PIPING SCHEDULE
NO.

DESCRIPTION

10"

6"

1

FLANGED TEE

10"X10"X4"

GATE VALVE

10"

MAIN LINE SIZE
DESCRIPTION
10'

8"

A

LENGTH DIMENSION

16'

12'

12'

2

B

WIDTH DIMENSION

8'

6'

6'

3

10" DI SPOOL

1'
10"

7

6

6

10

10

C

HEIGHT DIMENSION

6.5'

6.5'

6.5'

4

PRESSURE REDUCING
VALVE

D

DEPTH OF COVER

1'

1'

1'

5

MJ REDUCER

12"X10"

E

LOCATION DIMENSION

12"

12"

10"

6

GATE VALVE

4"

FLANGED ELBOW

4"

4" DI SPOOL

5'-8"

F

BLOCKOUT WIDTH

13"

11"

9"

7

G

BLOCKOUT HEIGHT

16"

14"

12"

8

H

SECTION

3'

3'

3'

9

PRESSURE REDUCING

10

5

4" DI SPOOL

6"

1

3

1

4"

VALVE

3

4

2

2
5

NOTE:
6" DRAIN (IF APPLICABLE)

PLAN VIEW

1)

A

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE, DIMENSION SCHEDULE, & PIPING SCHEDULE

NTS

SEE PLAN

PIPING SCHEDULE BASED ON 10" WATER MAIN. PIPING AND BOX DIMENSIONS
VARY BASED ON SIZE OF WATER MAIN.

TOP OF PAVEMENT

D

D&L SUPPLY STYLE A-1181
MANHOLE RING & COVER
WITH ADAPTER RING

REBAR DESIGN & LOCATION
BY PRECAST MANUFACTURER.
DESIGN FOR H20 TRAFFIC LOADS.

1

NOTE: R= 2F
A
30" DIAMTER OPENING
E R

C

4'-6"

G

8" TYP.

A

WATER TIGHT JOINT

BY AMCOR

12"
9" TYP.

H

F

B

A

END ELEVATION
SECTION A-A

NOTE:

TOP VIEW

1)

SEE DIMENSION SCHEDULE THIS SHEET

B

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE VAULT TOP VIEW & SIDE SECTION VIEW

C

PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE VAULT END SECTION

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

PRESSURING REDUCING VALVE

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

10

SHEET
TYP.

DT-10

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 66 of 86

BACKFLOW PREVENTER DEVICE

GATE VALVE

HINGED LOCKING METAL
ENCLOSURE AS PER CITY
W/ HOT BOX TO PREVENT FREEZING

FLOW

30" DIA. HDPE METER
BOX & COVER

UNION W/ #14
NON-CORRODABLE
MESH SCREEN

FLANGED DUCTILE IRON PIPING

1" COPPER TUBING

STEEL TO COPPER

4" THICK CONCRETE PAD

DIELECTRIC UNION
1" GALVANIZED STEEL
NIPPLE & BEND

12"

6" WIDTH ALL SIDES
1

FINISH GRADE

1 2" DROP
THREADED AIR OUTLET

1" GALVANIZED STEEL RISER

18"

1" COMBO AIR & VACUUM
VALVE & AIR RELEASE VALVE

1" GATE VALVE

BELOW
FROST
DEPTH

2" GALVANIZED STEEL

SUPPORT

DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT

TO WATER METER

TO VALVE BANKS

STEEL TO COPPER
DIELECTRIC UNION
CONTINUOUS POSITIVE

CROSS SECTION

NOTES:

CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK
IF FITTING IS NEITHER FLANGED,
WELDED, NOR SCREWED

SLOPE TO OUTLET

1) CONCRETE TO CLASS 4000, PLACED & CURED PER CITY SPEC.

AIR VALVE SPOUT

2) EXCEPT MACHINED SURFACES, COAT ALL ITEMS EXPOSED
TO ATMOSPHERE WITH EPOXY PAINT.

NOTES:
1) CONCRETE TO BE CLASS 4000, PLACED & CURED PER CITY SPEC.

3) FOR ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATION, PROVIDE STANDPIPE PROTECTION.

2) PROVIDE BRASS FITTINGS & NIPPLES IF NOT SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.
DO NOT GALVANIZE MATERIALS.

4) STATE APPROVED.

3) INSTALL PER THE PLUMBING CODE, SHALL NOT BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO
FLOODING & MUST BE ACCESSIBLE

A

AIR RELEASE ASSEMBLY

B

BACKFLOW PREVENTER

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

36" MAX

1262

1

7 2 HORSE POWER PUMP
5.5 KW

TALL BOX

LOW PROFILE BOX

HEIGHT

FOOTPRINT

HEIGHT

FOOTPRINT

36"

4 SQ. FT.

24"

8 SQ. FT.

PRESSURE GAUGE

COMPOUND GAUGE

2" POLY PIPE

2" POLY PIPE
2" VALVE

2" VALVE

FLOW

FLOW

EX. PIPE
DISCHARGE

TALL BOX

6"

EX. PIPE
SUCTION

UTILITY SIZE LIMITATIONS FOR ALLOWED
UTILITY BOXES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

24" MAX

NOTES:
1) UTILITY BOX SPACING TO BE 3 PER PROPERTY MAX
(EXCLUDING AT GRATE BOXES)
2) COMBINATION OF HEIGHT & WIDTH OF BOXES MUST
FALL WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF EITHER A TALL BOX

OR LOW PROFILE BOX.
3) OLD BOXES TO BE REMOVED BY UTILITY OWNER.
4) BOXES TO BE LOCATED WITHIN 5' OF PROPERTY LINES.

LOW PROFILE BOX

C

SUPPLEMENTAL BOOSTER PUMP DETAIL

D

UTILITY SIZE LIMITS WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

5) DRY UTILITIES TO BE 30" MIN DEPTH WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

WATER SYSTEM DETAILS

CENTERVILLE CITY

& UTILITY BOX LOCATION DETAILS

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

11

SHEET
TYP.

DT-11

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 67 of 86

1" POLYETHYLENE

SDR-7 CTS LATERAL
ASTM D-2737
12"

(TYP.) COMPRESSION FITTINGS
FORD Q JOINT W/ STIFFENERS

BRASS BALL

42"

21" DIA. X 30" DP.
CORRUGATED METER
ENCLOSURE (TYP.)

GUTTER

SECONDARY

PARK

CURB &

PROPERTY LINE

STRIP

48" MIN.
60" MAX
SIDEWALK

CONTROL
VALVE BOX

PROPERTY LINE

BRONZE TAPPING SADDLE
FORD S91 SERIES FOR
12" MAINLINE SIZES OR LESSFOR MAIN SIZES LARGER THAN 12"
CONSULT IRRIGATION CO.

PARK

1" BRONZE
TAPPING SADDLE

12"X18"

STRIP

GUTTER
CURB &

MAIN LINE

IPS LATERAL

NOTED
OTHERWISE

MAIN LINE

STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

UNLESS

1" HDPE SDR-7

1

1 2" HDPE SDR-7
IPS LATERAL

VALVE WITH

SIDEWALK

PVC C900 SDR-18
265 PSI

1

1 2" BRONZE TAPPING SADDLE

PVC C900 SDR-18
265 PSI

BRASS BALL
VALVE WITH
STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE
BRONZE TAPPING SADDLE
FORD S91 SERIES FOR

1" HDPE SDR-7
IPS LATERAL

12" MAINLINE SIZES OR LESSFOR MAIN SIZES LARGER THAN
12" CONSULT DISTRICT ENGINEER

1" BALL
CURB VALVE
FORD B11-444
BRASS BALL
VALVE WITH
STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

21" DIA. X 30" DP.
CORRUGATED METER
21" RAD.
ENCLOSURE (TYP.)
MIN. (TYP)
1" POLYETHYLENE
SDR-7 CTS LATERAL
ASTM D-2737

A

NEW SINGLE & DOUBLE TYPICAL WATER METER SERVICE DETAIL

NTS

SEE PLAN

2"X2" WOOD STAKE

VALVE BOX MARKER

DFW800X.FW+T PURPLE COVER
WITH D&L L-2244 RING
or APPROVED EQUAL (TYP.)
TRACER WIRE

MAIN LINE

1" BALL VALVE
PEP X METER SWIVEL
FORD (IF AVAILABLE)

12"

MAX.

30"

18"

265 PSI

6"

PVC C900 SDR-18

12"X18" CONTROL
VALVE BOX

1" METER SENSUS iPERL

OPE
SL
N.
% MI
N2
AI
NT
MAI

BRASS BALL
VALVE WITH
STAINLESS STEEL HANDLE

1 CU. FT.
DRAIN ROCK

1" HDPE SDR-7

IPS LATERAL

2.5 CUBIC FEET WASHED
DRAIN ROCK (TYP.)

NOTE: ALL BRASS & BRONZE
FITTINGS TO BE "FORD".
ALL OTHERS TO BE APPROVED
BY IRRIGATION CO.

NOTE:
1) 1-1/2" & 1" PIPE SHALL BE PE, SDR-7 IPS, ASTM D-2737
2) VALVE BOX MARKERS MUST BE SET ADJACENT TO EVERY VALVE.
3) SERVICE PIPE SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM BURY DEPTH OF 30" YP

BRONZE TAPPING SADDLE
FORD S91 SERIES FOR
12" MAINLINE SIZES OR LESS FOR MAIN SIZES LARGER THAN
12" CONSULT IRRIGATION CO.

TO CURB STOP: 12" MINIMUM AT CONTROL VALVE BOX.
4) FITTINGS SHALL BE BRASS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.
5) ALL VALVE LIDS SHALL BE STAMPED "IRRIGATION"
6) IRRIGATION STANDARD DETAILS MAY CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
USE LATEST IRRIGATION CO. STANDARD AS PER ENGINEER.

B
NTS

PROFILE VIEW SERVICE LINE CONNECTION NOTES
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

CENTERVILLE DEUEL CREEK IRRIGATION CO.
WATER METER, TRENCH SECTION &
SERVICE LINE CONNECTION

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

12

SHEET
TYP.

DT-12

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 68 of 86

2"X2" WOOD STAKE

VALVE BOX MARKER (TYP)
REFER TO PAGE 2

1" COMPRESSION FITTINGS:
MUELLER H-15428 OR FORD
C84-44-Q. REFER TO NOTE 6

1" POLYETHYLENE SDR 9
CTS LATERAL ASTM D-2737

1" COMPRESSION
FITTING: MUELLER

1" 90° BRASS ELBOW
WHERE RADIUS <24"

12"

SDR 9 CTS LATERAL
ASTM D-2737

H-15428 OR FORD
C84-44-Q REFER TO
NOTE 6

1" THREADED

1" POLYETHYLENE
SDR 9 CTS LATERAL
ASTM D-2737

1" POLYETHYLENE

1
1 2" BRASS

FPT TEE

FORD 18" HEAVY

MAIN LINE

& GUTTER
CURB

PARK

PROPERTY

SIDEWALK

12"

SERVICE SADDLE: MUELLER
DR1S, FORD FS101, OR
ROMAC 101NS. REFER TO
NOTE 1

SECONDARY

OR APPROVED EQUAL

48" MIN.
60" MAX

MAIN LINE

& GUTTER

14"X19" PURPLE CARSON
CONTROL BABLE BOX COVER
STAMPED "WBWCD IRRIGATION"

SECONDARY

BUSHING (TYP)

CURB

STRIP

1
1 2"X1" BRASS

PARK

SIDEWALK

PROPERTY LINE

48" MIN.
60" MAX

1"X12" THREADED
BRASS NIPPLE (TYP)

SERVICE SADDLE: MULLER
DR1S, FORD FS101, OR
ROMAC 101NS. REFER TO
NOTE 1

LINE

1" FULL STAINLESS
STEEL BALL VALVE
WATTS B-6080 OR
APPROVED EQUAL

1/2" POLYETHYLENE
SDR 9 CTS LATERAL
ASTM D-2737

STRIP

BRASS NIPPLE

1" COMPRESSION FITTINGS:
MUELLER H-15428 OR FORD
C84-44-Q. REFER TO NOTE 6

WALL PITSETTER

1" BALL VALVE:

METER ENCLOSURE
REFER TO NOTE 5

WATTS B-6080 OR
APPROVED EQUAL (TYP)
1

1 2" COMPRESSION FITTINGS:
MUELLER H-15428 OR FORD
C84-66-Q. REFER TO NOTE 6

14"X19" PURPLE CARSON
CONTROL BABLE BOX COVER
STAMPED "WBWCD IRRIGATION"
OR APPROVED EQUAL

FORD 18" HEAVY WALL

PITSETTER METER
ENCLOSED REFER TO
24" RAD.
NOTE 5
MIN. (TYP)

1" COMPRESSION FITTING
(TYP): MUELLER H-15428
OR FORD C84-44-Q
REFER TO NOTE 6

1" POLYETHYLENE SDR 9
CTS LATERAL ASTM D-2737

A

SINGLE & DOUBLE WATER METER DETAILS

NTS

SEE PLAN

14"X19" PURPLE CARSON
CONTROL BABLE BOX COVER
STAMPED "WBWCD IRRIGATION"
OR APPROVED EQUAL

NOTES:
DFW12AUT-1W+T PURPLE COVER STAMPED

18"

VALVE TO REMAIN LOCKED & TAGGED
UNTIL HOMEOWNER APPLIES FOR
SERVICE WITH WBWCD - SEE NOTE 8

3) VALVE & METER ENCLOSURE LIDS SHALL BE STAMPED "WBWCD IRRIGATION"

4" METALLIC LOCATOR
TAPE (TYP)
6"

MI
N.
SL
OPE

2) METER & ENCLOSURE SHALL BE LOCATED BEHIND CURB WITHIN STREET R.O.W OR PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT IF NO CURB OR GUTTER EXISTS.

MULLER H159071N COUPLER OR
APPROVED EQUAL IF CONNECTING TO
POLY (REFER TO NOTE 6); 1" BRASS
UNION IF CONNECTING TO BRASS NIPPLE
(TYP)

5"

12"

FORD 18" HEAVY WALL
PITSETTER METER ENCLOSURE
REFER TO NOTE 5

MAI
NT
AI
N2
%

1) EQUIVALENT SADDLES ALLOWED WITH DISTRICT ENGINEER CONSULT DISTRICT ENGINEER FOR
MAINLINE PIPE SIZES GREATER THAN 12" OR FOR MAINLINE PIPE MATERIAL OTHER THAN
C900 PVC. HOT TAPPING NOT ALLOWED

"WBWCD IRRIGATION" WITH D&L L-2244 RING
OR APPROVED EQUAL

2"X2" WOOD STAKE
VALVE BOX MARKER (TYP)
REFER TO NOTE 4

4) VALVE BOX MARKERS TO BE PAINTED PURPLE AND MUST BE SET ADJACENT TO EVERY
VALVE & METER BOX.
5) METER ENCLOSURE TO BE 18" FORD HEAVY WALL PITSETTER MODEL PK488-18-C15959-007-NL
WITH NO LID & OPEN BOTTOM
6) ALL COMPRESSION-TYPE CONNECTIONS REQUIRES STAINLESS STEEL INSERT STIFFENERS.
THE TUBING SHOULD BE INSERTED INTO THE FITTING SO THAT THE END OF THE TUBING IS

1 CUBIC FT WASHED
DRAIN ROCK

1

WELL PAST THE RUBBER GASKET AND AT THE LEAST 8" FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE SOCKET.

SET PITSETTER ON 1"
MINUS GRAVEL BED

7) ALL WORK SHALL BE INSPECTED & APPROVED BY THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR PRIOR
TO BACKFILL. ALL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE.

2.5 CUBIC FT WASHED
DRAIN ROCK

WATER LATERAL PROFILE

8) UPON ACCEPTANCE, WBWCD INSPECTOR WILL CLOSE VALVE & LOCK & TAG THE SERVICE.
NEW RESIDENTIAL HOMEOWNER WILL BE REQUIRED TO APPLY FOR SERVICE VIA WEBER BASINS
WEBSITE AT SETUP.WEBERBASIN.COM IN ORDER TO HAVE METER INSTALLED & SERVICE ACTIVATED.

WATER METER PROFILE

B

WATER LATERAL CONNECTION & WATER METER PROFILES

C

WEBER BASIN DETAIL NOTES

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

WEBER BASIN WATER

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

CONSERVANCY DISTRICT

CENTERVILLE CITY

SERVICE CONNECTION,

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

13

SHEET
TYP.

DT-13

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

WATER METER, & TRENCH SECTION

SHEET
NO.

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 69 of 86

B

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

B

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

C

C
GRATE & FRAME D&L

BACK OF CURB

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

GRATE & FRAME D&L
SUPPLY-I 1803 OR 1804

A
BACK OF CURB

A

SUPPLY-I 1803 OR 1804

WARPED GUTTER

6"

6"

WARPED GUTTER

6"

B

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

B

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

1

8'-5 2"
6"

#4 DOWELS

2'

6"

INLET BOX - TYPE I SINGLE

INLET BOX - TYPE I DOUBLE
NOTE:
1) ALL CONCRETE TO BE CLASS 4000
2) ALL COLLARS TO BE GROUTED SEAL AT ALL
MANHOLES, INLET BOXES, & COMBO BOXES

SEE PLAN

GRATE & FRAME D&L
SUPPLY-I 1803 OR 1804

GRATE & FRAME D&L
SUPPLY-I 1803 OR 1804
4" MIN.

LIP OF GUTTER
RETURN TO STD.

CURB & GUTTER
VARIES

8" TO 10" AS
PER ENGINEER

12" SILT
TRAP

12" DIA. MIN.
STORM DRAIN PIPE

3 - #3

TIES MIN.

1'-6"

#4 BARS @ 1' E.W.
THROUGHOUT

12" DIA. MIN.

3'-10" MIN.

9
"

3 - #4

1'-6"

3'-10" MIN.

11"

6"

2 - #4

2"

RETURN TO STD.
CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB
& GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB
& GUTTER

1'-6"

1'-6"

12" DIA. MIN.

1'-4"
#4 DOWELS 12" O.C.
ALL AROUND

1'-4"

8"

8"

#4 DOWELS 12" O.C.
ALL AROUND

8" TO 10" AS
PER ENGINEER

3'-10" MIN.

SINGLE INLET & DOUBLE INLET SLOPED STREET PLAN VIEWS

4"

A
NTS

1'

1'
1
8'-5 2"

8"

8"

1'-6"

8"

8"

8"

4"
4"

B
NTS

SECTION A-A

4"

3
3'-11 4"

8"

4"
4"

SECTION B-B

SECTION C-C

4"

SINGLE INLET & DOUBLE INLET SLOPED STREET SECTION VIEWS
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

SINGLE INLET &
DOUBLE INLET BOX
SLOPED STREET

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

14

SHEET
TYP.

DT-14

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 70 of 86

12"

12"
GRATE, D&L SUPPLY I-1803

#4 REBAR ON 8"
BOTH SIDES

#4 REBAR ON 8"
BOTH SIDES

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

A

A

(2) #4X18" (TYP)

C

(2) #4X18" (TYP)
BACK OF CURB

C

WARPED GUTTER

WARPED GUTTER

6"

WARPED GUTTER

6"

WARPED GUTTER

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

B

STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

B
BACK OF CURB

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

B

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

GRATE, D&L SUPPLY I-1803

B

INLET BOX - TYPE II SINGLE

INLET BOX - TYPE II DOUBLE

NOTE:

1) ALL CONCRETE TO BE CLASS 4000
2) ALL COLLARS TO BE GROUTED SEAL AT ALL

MANHOLES, INLET BOXES, & COMBO BOXES

A

SINGLE INLET & DOUBLE INLET OF LOW STREET AREA PLAN VIEWS

NTS

SEE PLAN

RETURN TO STANDARD
CURB & GUTTER
RETURN TO STANDARD
CURB & GUTTER

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

DROP FLOWLINE 2"

5' TRANSITION TO
STANDARD CURB & GUTTER

3

47-34"X17 4" GRATE

2 #3 TIES

#4 @ 1'-0" E.W.
THROUGHOUT

1'-4"

#4 BARS @
12" O.C. (E.W.)

3'- 10" MIN.

#4 DOWELS @
12" O.C. ALL
AROUND

LIP OF GUTTER

8"

8"
8"

8"

#4 DOWELS
@12" O.C. ALL
AROUND

8"

4"

8"

1'

CONCRETE COLLAR TO BE 12" MIN.

8"

12"

STORM DRAIN PIPE
(15" DIA. MIN.)

13"

#4 @ 12" O.C.
THROUGHOUT

12"

12" SILT
TRAP

5 - #4 TIES

3'-10" MIN.

11"

1'-4"

LIP OF GUTTER

1'-4"

1'
4"

4"

8"

3

3'-11 4"

8"

4"
4"

4"

#4 DOWELS @
12" O.C. ALL
AROUND

1'-4"

1'

SECTION A-A

B
NTS

SECTION B-B

SECTION C-C

SINGLE INLET & DOUBLE INLET OF LOW STREET AREA SECTION VIEWS
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
PSB
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

SINGLE INLET &
DOUBLE INLET BOX
IN LOW AREA OF STREET

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

15

SHEET
TYP.

DT-15

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 71 of 86

STD. 30" M.H. RING & COVER

12"

(D&L SUPPLY A1180, A1181
OR EQUAL)

M.H. LID TO BE MARKED

STD, 30" M.H. RING & COVER
(D&L SUPPLY A1180, A1181
OR EQUAL)

8"

PER UTILITY OWNER &
1

SET 4" LOWER THAN CONCRETE

GROUT RING & COVER

12"
1 #4 REBAR RING

GROUT RING & COVER

CONCRETE COLLAR 1' THICK 1' WIDE

(10" MAX.)

INSTALL APPROVED COLLAR W/

8"

MANHOLE COVER

GRADE RING AS REQ'D.

THERMOPLASTIC MOLDING, BOLTED

GROUT ALL GRADE RING

TO THE MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN TOP
1 #4 REBAR RING

(10" MAX.)

9"

GRADE RINGS AS REQ'D

M.H. STEPS UNIFORMLY
SPACE 1' MAX.
(D&L SUPPLY F-1981)

FINISHED PAVEMENT

INSTALL APPROVED COLLAR W/

INSTALL APPROVED COLLAR W/

THERMOPLASTIC MOLDING, BOLTED
TO THE MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN TOP

M.H. STEPS UNIFORMLY
SPACED 1' MAX.
(D&L SUPPLY F-1981)

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. ECCENTRIC

CONE WITH 30" OPENING

THERMOPLASTIC MOLDING, BOLTED
TO THE MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN TOP

VARIES

GROUT ALL GRADE RINGS

MASTIC ALL JOINTS ON
PRECAST SECTION

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. ECCENTRIC

#4 BARS @ 6" O.C. EACH WAY

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. CONC. M.H.
SECTION SET IN GROUT IN
CONC. BASE RECESS.

CONE WITH 30" OPENING
MASTIC ALL JOINTS ON

4"

PRECAST SECTION

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. CONC. M.H.
SECTION SET IN GROUT IN
CONC. BASE RECESS.

MASTIC

9"

SLOPE SHELF 1" PER FOOT
SLOPE SHELF 1" PER FOOT
4"

MASTIC

9" MIN.

& BROKEN OUT IN FIELD
CONCRETE COLLAR TO BE 12" MIN.

STORM DRAIN PIPE

PIPE BREAKOUT TO BE
SCORED BY PIPE MFGR
& BROKEN OUT IN FIELD

9" MIN.

PIPE BREAKOUT TO BE
SCORED BY PIPE MFGR.

9"

9"

#4 BARS @ 12" O.C.EACH WAY

PIPE DIAMETER
PLUS 2"

STORM DRAIN PIPE
CONCRETE COLLAR TO BE 12" MIN.

SECTION C-C

CONCRETE BASE

CONCRETE BASE

SECTION A-A

SEWER ROCK BEDDING
2" MAX SIZE

12" MIN.

12" MIN.

SEWER ROCK BEDDING
2" MAX. SIZE

SECTION B-B

A

STORM DRAIN & SUBDRAIN MANHOLE SECTION VIEWS

B

STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT BOX SECTION VIEW

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

M.H. STEPS

ECCENTRIC CONE OPENING
B

ECCENTRIC CONE OPENING

OPENING IN PIPE SCORED BY
MFGR, BREAK OUT IN FIELD
AT LOCATIONS, CUT BACK
REINFORCING MESH & GROUT
OVER BREAKOUT SURFACES

CONCRETE BASE
3"

3"

STORM DRAIN PIPE

A

A

15" PIPE MINIMUM

C

C

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. CONC.

M.H. SECTION SET IN GROUT
IN CONCRETE BASE RECESS

OPENING IN PIPE SCORED BY

STORM DRAIN PIPE

MFGR. BREAKOUT IN FIELD
AT LOCATIONS, CUT BACK
REINFORCING MESH & GROUT
OVER BREAKOUT SURFACES.

CONCRETE BASE
B

NOTES:

PRECAST 4' OR 5' DIA. CONC.
M.H. SECTION SET IN GROUT
IN CONCRETE BASE RECESS

1) USE SAME CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND STORM DRAIN
MANHOLE RING & COVER

JUNCTION MANHOLE

5'-6" SQ. FOR 4' DIA. M.H.
6'-6" SQ. FOR 5' DIA. M.H.

2) CAST-IN-PLACE BASES MAY BE PLACED WITH PRE CAST
BASES (SEE SPECS.)

LINE MANHOLE
3) ALL CONCRETE TO BE CLASS 4000

PLAN
4) ALL COLLARS TO BE GROUTED SEAL AT ALL MANHOLES,
INLET BOXES, & COMBO BOXES

C

STORM DRAIN & SUBDRAIN MANHOLE PLAN VIEWS

D

STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT BOX PLAN VIEW

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STORM DRAIN & SUBDRAIN

CENTERVILLE CITY

MANHOLES & CLEANOUT BOX

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

16

SHEET
TYP.

DT-16

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 72 of 86

A

LINE OF FOOTING

INSIDE FACE OF BOX
4"

B

B

3'

6"

2'

6"

12" CONCRETE COLLAR TO BE
CONSTRUCTED AFTER ASPHALT
HAS BEEN LAID, CONCRETE
TO BE SET TO 1 #4 BELOW
PAVEMENT LIP ALL AROUND

4'-4"

D&L SUPPLY A-1180 RING & COVER
TO BE STAMPED "STORM DRAIN"

NOTE:

5'

3

3'-11 4"

8"

8"

5'

1) ALL CONCRETE TO BE CLASS 4000

A
4) ALL COLLARS TO BE GROUTED SEAL AT ALL
MANHOLES, INLET BOXES, & COMBO BOXES
3

15'-3 4"

A

STORM DRAIN COMBO INLET BOX

NTS

SEE PLAN

7'-4"
STANDARD C&G BEYOND

#5 BARS @ 9" O.C.

3'
D&L SUPPLY-1803 FRAME & GRATE

8"

CONCRETE
COLLAR

4"

8"

8"

2"

(1) #4 REBAR RING

#5 BARS @ 9" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

8"

ASPHALT SURFACE
SLOPE 2%

2"

12"

2'-6"

1'-2"

12"

OPEN
24"
GROUT TO LEVEL
#4 BARS @ 12" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

#5 DOWELS @12" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

#5 DOWELS @ 12" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

#4 BARS @ 12" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

12"

12"

#5X30" DIAG. BAR
4 SIDES AS SHOWN

3"

9"

9"

4"

1'-6"

12" SILT
TRAP

PIPE BEYOND

1'-6"

30" DIA.
OPENING

VARIES

PRECAST CONCRETE
LEVELING RINGS

4"

8"

SECTION A-A

#4 DOWELS @12" O.C.
BOTH WAYS

8"

3

3'-11 4"

8"

(3) #5 BUNDLED BARS
AROUND OPENINGS

4"

SECTION B-B

B

COMBO INLET BOX SIDE SECTION VIEW

C

COMBO INLET BOX FRONT SECTION VIEW & TOP SLAB REINFORCEMENT

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

TYPICAL CLEANOUT BOX &
COMBINATION CLEANOUT
INLET BOX DETAILS

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

17

SHEET
TYP.

DT-17

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 73 of 86

CONCRETE TO BE
STAMPED SUB-DRAIN
2' TO 4'
REMOVE & REPLACE SIDEWALK
& CURB & GUTTER AS NEEDED

BRASS CAP STAMP W/

"D" 1" HIGH LETTER
MARK TOP OF PIPE W/ RED
PERMANENT MARK
PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

4" BELOW GRADE

CLEANOUT WYE
8"X4" TEE

CLEAN OUT

STUB 4" PVC APPROX.

5' PAST PROPERTY LINE

4" DIA. PVC

WHITE IN COLOR
SPRING LINE

1" Ø PERFORATION @ SPRING LINE
(BOTH SIDES) TOP OF PIPE &
N.
OPEMI
% SL
2
1
OOT
"PERF
4

3
4 WAY UP PIPE ( BOTH SIDES)

EVERY FOOT.

NEW
SUBDRAIN

4" DIA. PVC WHITE

MAIN LINE

IN COLOR

BED LATERALS W/
4" OF SEWER ROCK

SUB-DRAIN CLEANOUT PROFILE

8" PVC SUB-DRAIN PERFORATED PIPE

SUB-DRAIN SINGLE LATERAL

NOTE:

1) PIPE SHALL BE PVC ASTM 3034 SDR-35
2) PERFORATED PIPE TO BE PLACED IN LOCATIONS ONLY AS PER CITY ENGINEER
3) ALL COLLARS TO BE GROUTED SEAL AT ALL MANHOLES, INLET BOXES,
& COMBO BOXES
4) LATERALS MUST BE SOLID PIPE

A

SUB-DRAIN SINGLE LATERAL & PERFORATED PIPE DETAILS

NTS

SEE PLAN

SAW-CUT AND PATCH ASPHALT
2' WIDER THAN TRENCH WIDTH
ON BOTH SIDES

WIDTH VARIES

PATCH ASPHALT TO MATCH
EX. ASPHALT DEPTH +1"

TRENCH WIDTH VARIES

DRAINAGE FABRIC TO
MEET APWA STANDARDS

DEPTH VARIES

IMPORT GRANULAR BORROW
OR NATIVE GRANULAR AS PER
ENGINEER COMPACTED TO
95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

D

SEPARATION/DRAINAGE FABRIC
PLACED ON TOP OF GRAVEL

d

BACKFILL W/ IMPORT OR
NATIVE MATERIAL AS PER
ENGINEER. COMPACT TO
95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

BACKFILL W/ IMPORT OR
NATIVE MATERIAL AS PER
ENGINEER. COMPACT TO
95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

6" ALL SIDES

DEPTH VARIES

IMPORT UNTREATED
BASE COURSE COMPACTED
TO 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR

1-1/2" OR 2" SEWER ROCK

DRAINAGE FABRIC PLACED
ON TOP OF GRAVEL
1

1 2" - 2" SEWER ROCK

6" MIN.

b

STORM DRAIN TRENCH SECTION

NOTE:
8" Ø PERFORATED PVC

1) FOR SUB-DRAIN & STORM DRAIN, DAMAGED PIPE SHALL BE REPAIRED
IN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WAYS:
GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR
DRAIN ENVELOPE

SOLID SUBDRAIN PIPE SECTION

A.

OVER EXCAVATE PIPE
TRENCH MIN. 6" GRAVEL

NOTE:

B.

1) SOLID PIPE SYSTEM TO ONLY

TRENCH WIDTH CLEARANCE
FROM EDGE OF PIPE

6" ALL SIDES

TYPICAL TRENCH SECTION

REPAIRS SHALL BE DONE WITH SLIP LINING
TECHNIQUE & SHALL EXTEND PAST DAMAGED
LOCATION BY 2' MINIMUM.
PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED & REPLACED FROM
THE NEAREST MANHOLE TO THE NEAREST
JOINT BEYOND THE DAMAGED PIPE.

DEPTH OF MATERIAL BELOW PIPE

D

b

D

d (MIN.)

18" OR SMALLER

9"

27" OR SMALLER

4"

21" TO 27"

10"

30" TO 60"

6"

30" TO 48"

12"

66" OR LARGER

8"

54" OR LARGER

15"

BE USED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS
2) ALL EXTERNAL REPAIRS ARE PROHIBITED

B

SUB-DRAIN TRENCH SECTION & SUB-DRAIN CLEANOUT PROFILE

C

STORM DRAIN TRENCH SECTION

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN
DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STORM DRAIN TRENCH SECTION,
SUB-DRAIN TRENCH SECTION &
SUB-DRAIN LATERAL DETAILS

ESI ENGINEERING
CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

18

SHEET
TYP.

DT-18

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 74 of 86

LID WITH (2) MANHOLES
CITY APPROVED MANHOLE
RINGS & COVERS ONLY
3'-6"

SEDIMENT WEIR BAFFLE

10"

6"

TRACK DETAIL
THIS SHEET

2'-6"
2"

SEE BAFFLE GUIDED

3
2'-6 4"

4'-10"

OIL DAM BAFFLE

2"

1"

3

3'-4 4"

3'-6"

SEDIMENT WEIR BAFFLE

WEIR OPENING

ELEVATION VIEW

SECTION DETAIL

2'-1"

2'-9"

(INLET SIDE)

4"
3"

OU
T
FL LET
OW

1) DETAIL IS SIMILAR TO OLDCASTLE PRECAST MODEL 660 SA.

3
4"

6"

1'-1"

2) SEPARATOR CAPACITY BASED ON DIMENSIONS - 575 GALLONS.

3
3'-4 4"

3) SEPARATOR SHALL BE PRECAST ONLY & SHALL BE MANUFACTURED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT ASTM STANDARDS.

BAFFLE GUIDED

OIL DAM BAFFLE

TRACK DETAIL

ELEVATION VIEW

SEPARATOR BASE

4) SEPARATOR LID SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR H-20 HIGHWAY LOADING.

(OUTLET SIDE)

A

OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SECTION DETAILS

NTS

SEE PLAN

NOTES:

5) SEPARATOR TYPE & LOCATION REQUIRES APPROVAL BY CITY ENGINEER
BEFORE INSTALLATION.

LID W/ (2) MANHOLES
6'
1
1 2" CHAMFER (TYP.)

6"

5'-6"

OIL DAM BAFFLE

2'-10"

KNOCKOUT (TYP.)

1" (TYP.)

5'-6"

5'

1'-6"

1'

4'

3'-6"

KNOCKOUT (TYP.)

SEE BAFFLE GUIDED

SEDIMENT WEIR BAFFLE

6"

6"

OIL DAM BAFFLE

4" (TYP.)

TRACK DETAIL
THIS SHEET

SEDIMENT WEIR BAFFLE

KNOCKOUTS (EACH END)
4" (TYP.)

PLAN VIEW

B
NTS

ELEVATION VIEW

END VIEW

OIL/WATER SEPARATOR PLAN VIEW, ELEVATION VIEW, & END VIEW
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

OIL/WATER SEPARATOR DETAIL

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

19

SHEET
TYP.

DT-19

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 75 of 86

METER PEDESTAL TO BE
MILBANK CP3B "ML" SERIES
OR EQUIVALENT

16.8 (427)

0.08 GA. ALUM.
3M REFL. VINYL

LOAD CENTER FOR
STREET LIGHTS

STREET NO.

POWER DISTRIBUTION BLOCKS

SEE DETAIL NOTE 6

SEE DETAIL NOTE 7

TO STREET LIGHTS

2X2 12 GAUGE
TELESPAR POLE
W/ 30" TELESPAR ANCHOR
ON ALL STANDARD* POLES

24"

CONCRETE PAD
6" THICK

7' MIN.

3"

3.73

23.6 (600)

INCOMING SERVICE FROM
OVERHEAD SECONDARY

GALVANIZED
POZ LOC SLIP BASE

3/4"X10' COPPER
3
4" AGGREGATE

CLAD GROUND ROD

BASE COURSE
3" THICK
NOTE:

1" PVC CONDUIT FOR

3'

POL CAP-ALUMINUM
WITH STAINLESS STEEL SCREWS
(TENON OPTIONS AVAILABLESEE SPECS.)

STREET LIGHT CONDUCTORS

1) THE PUBLIC WORK DIRECTOR WILL FURNISH THE DESIGNATION
TO BE STAMPED ON THE SIGNS.

D TOP DIAMETER

2) SIGN BASES SHALL BE P3 ROUND POST WITH GALVANIZED

POZ LOC SLIP BASE FOR ABOVE GROUND BASE & SHALL BE
36" POZ LOC SLIPBASE GROUND STUB FOR ELECTRONIC
FEEDBACK SIGNS & RRFB INSTALLATION.
GALVANIZED POLES ONLY

B

STREET SIGN & STREET LIGHT METER PEDESTAL

NTS

SEE PLAN

B WALL THICKNESS
TAPERED ALUMINUM TUBE
ALLOY 6063-T6

1" PVC CONDUIT
BURIED 24" DEEP

17'

PULL BOX
(NOTE 3)

NOTE:

NEXT PULL BOX

HANDHOLE

NEXT PULL BOX

3-BOLT BASE
WITH COVER

TRANSFORMER OR
SECONDARY BOX

(3) #3 TIES
IN TOP 5"

BOX (OR PEDESTAL) WITH
DISPOSABLE LOCK & MEANS
OF DISCONNECT

12" MIN. INTO CONCRETE

4) CUSTOMERS RESPONSIBILITY

UTILITY LOGO

CUSTOMER PROVIDED JUNCTION

GROUND ROD WITH #6 B.C.

3) USE EXOTHERMIC WELD CONNECTIONS TO GROUND CASE NEUTRAL
WIRE & GREEN GROUND WIRE

HEAVY DUTY

WATERPROOF FUSED
CONNECTOR KIT

3
3 4" Ø J BOLTS EMBEDDED

1'-6"

A)PROVIDING & INSTALLING A JUNCTION BOX OR PEDESTAL,
CONDUIT, FUSING & CUSTOMER-OWNED WIRE. THE JUNCTION
BOX OR PEDESTAL MUST BE STRONG ENOUGH FOR INCIDENTAL
TRAFFIC AREAS.

PLASTIC, CAST IRON, HDPE
OR CONC. LID AS PER

CITY ENGINEER

B)COORDINATING WITH ROCKY MTN. POWER ON JUNCTION BOX
OR PEDESTAL LOCATION & ALL DIGGING WITHIN THE VICINITY
OF ROCKY MTN. POWER FACILITIES.

5' MIN.

PULL BOX
(SEE DETAIL C)

3"

1'-6" MIN.

RUN CONDUIT TO
POWER SUPPLY

15
"
PAD BOX

5) ROCKY MTN. POWER RESPONSIBILITY
A)INSTALLING & CONNECTING WIRE FROM ROCKY MTN. POWER
FACILITIES TO THE POINT OF DISCONNECT.

1" PVC CONDUIT
MIN.

1" PVC CONDUIT
MIN.

C)ENSURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR REMODELED
INSTALLATIONS CONFORM TO APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF
THE NEC STATE RULES, AS WELL AS CITY & COUNTY CODES.

"
25

1" MIN. CONDUIT

1" PVC CONDUIT

12"

2' MIN.

3' MIN. - 10' MAX.

24" MIN.

(3) #4 EQUALLY
SPACED

3" MIN.

GROUT AROUND BASE PLATE.
BASE PLATE TO BE SECURED
& FLUSH WITH FOUNDATION

1) SUBMIT BOX SHOP DRAWINGS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR REVIEW
& ACCEPTANCE
2) STREET LIGHT BASE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM STANDARDS
& MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON SOIL CONDITIONS & WIND LOADS.
CITY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR BASE DESIGN.

C BUTT DIAMETER

(4) #4 VERTICAL
REBAR

*STANDARD POLES INCLUDE, BUT ARE
NOT LIMITED TO, SPEED LIMIT, STOP,
YIELD, NO PARKING, STREET NAMES, ETC.

3
4"X10' COPPER

BURIED 24" DEEP

6) AMERICAN REVOLUTION FULL CUTOFF LED-SERIES 247CL OR
EQUIVALENT REQUIRED

CLAD GROUND ROD
7) INSTALL 200 # PULL CORD IN EACH EMPTY CONDUIT & LABEL
PLUG HOLES AFTER
INSTALLATION

SEE DETAIL NOTES 2 & 3

NOTE:

3#4"X10" COPPER

3) ALL LIGHTS FIXTURES ARE TO BE A NATURAL ALUMINUM FINISH

1) ALL LIGHTS TO BE INSTALLED 5' MIN. FROM OBSTRUCTIONS

(TREES, FIRE HYDRANTS, UTILITY BOXES, ETC.)

1" PVC CONDUIT
BURIED 24" DEEP

CLAD GROUND ROD
6" ABOVE BOTTOM

4) STREET LIGHTING TO BE SPACED EVERY 500'
2) LIGHTS MUST MEET 130 MPH WIND LOAD.

A

STREET LIGHT BASE, LIGHT FIXTURE, & CONDUITS

C

PULL BOX & DETAIL NOTES

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

STREET LIGHT &

CENTERVILLE CITY

STREET NUMBERING SIGN

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

20

SHEET
TYP.

DT-20

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 76 of 86

MAX SLOPE

3

MAX SLOPE
1

3

HEIGHT = 4' MAX.

1

12"

HEIGHT = 8' MAX.

1

2
INTERLOCK ROCKS

12"

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

4' MIN.

SL
OPEAWA
Y2
%

30"

COMPACT EARTH TO 90%
ASTM D-1557 BEFORE
PLACING ROCKS.
(TYP. ALL WALLS)

B

ROCK WALL AT 1:1 & ROCK WALL LESS THAN 4' VERTICALLY

NTS

SEE PLAN

HEIGHT = 8' MAX.

1

NOTE:
2

1) STEPPED ROCK WALLS GREATER THAN 4' VERTICAL HEIGHT
2) SPECIAL INSPECTION & ENGINEERING IS REQUIRED WITH CALCULATION.
3) SOILS SLOPES SHALL BE FREE DRAINING (SANDY GRAVEL'S) WITH MINIMAL AMOUNTS OF CLAY, FABRIC

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

REQUIRED FOR ALL WALLS OVER 4' EXCEPT FOR WELL GRADED GRAVEL WITH FINES.
4) ROCKS SHALL BE ANGULAR GRANITE OR DOLOMITE STONES, EACH WHICH ARE NON-SOLUBLE, HARD & DURABLE.
5) BASE ROCKS SHALL BE BURIED TO THE DEPTHS SHOWN.
6) EARTH SHALL BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BEFORE PLACEMENT OF ROCKS.
7) THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE A SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY A LICENSED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
WHERE WATER IS ENCOUNTERED OR WHERE FINE GRAINED (CLAY) SOILS EXIST.

30"

8) BASE ROCK DIAMETERS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3'-6" EXCEPT FOR WALLS LESS THAN 4' IN HEIGHT. UPPER ROCKS
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 2' DIA.
9) STEPPED ROCK WALLS SHALL BE ENGINEERED & ARE REQUIRE TO HAVE A SPECIAL INSPECTION BY THE ENGINEER
10)

ROCK WALLS HIGHER THAN 4' SHALL HAVE MINIMUM ROCK FALL AREAS (OR LANDING AREAS), CLEAR OF ALL
BUILDINGS OF 10' WIDTH.

11)

A MINIMUM SET BACK OF 4' FROM BUILDING & STRUCTURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ABOVE OR BELOW ALL ROCK WALLS.

A

STEPPED ROCK WALLS GREATER THAN 4' VERTICALLY

C

ROCK RETAINING WALL NOTES

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

ROCK RETAINING WALL DETAILS

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

21

SHEET
TYP.

DT-21

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 77 of 86

BIORETENTION CELL DESIGN PARAMETERS
PARAMETER

MIN. VALUE

MAX. VALUE

2-FT

NO MAX.

-

NO MIN.

18-IN

-

DEPTH TO
GROUNDWATER
PONDING DEPTH

DRAWDOWN
TIME

12-HOURS

72 HOURS

INFILTRATION
RATE

0.25-IN/HR

6-IN/HR

FREEBOARD

NO MIN.

NO MAX

BIOWALE DESIGN PARAMETERS

NOTES

PARAMETER

MIN. VALUE

MAX. VALUE

LENGTH

HYDRAULIC RESIDENCE TIME

NO MAX

LONGITUDINAL SLOPE

0.50%

5%

BOTTOM WIDTH

2-FT

NO MAX

SIDE SLOPE

NO MIN.

3H:1V

FLOW VELOCITY

NO MIN.

1.0-FT/S

FLOW DEPTH

NO MIN.

2
3 VEGETATION HEIGHT

FREEBOARD

NO MIN.

NO MAX

24 TO 48 HOURS PREFERRED; DRAWDOWN TIME MAY ALSO
DEPEND ON LOCAL MOSQUITO ABATEMENT REGULATIONS
FIELD TESTING REQUIRED FOR FINAL DESIGN; INFILTRATION RATE
SHALL BE LOW TO ALLOW BIOFILTRATION PROCESS TO OCCUR
FREEBOARD PER CITY; FOR PUBLIC SAFETY, A MIN. OF 6-IN REQ'D
EMBANKMENT WHEN PONDING DEPTH GREATER THAN 6-IN

VEGETATION COVERAGE

UNDERDRAIN RECOMMENDED BELOW MINIMUM SLOPE
PER CITY REQUIREMENTS
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE SHEAR STRESS MAY ALSO DICTATE MAX. FLOW

VELOCITY

5 MIN.

FLOW DEPTHS GREATER THAN VEGETATION HEIGHT WILL BYPASS

BIOFILTRATION
PER CITY REQUIREMENTS

>65%

HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE TIME

REQUIRED FOR BIOFILTRATION SUCCESS
NO MAX

OVERFLOW (OPTIONAL)

-

MAX SIDE SLOPE PER CITY

(2H:1V MAX RECOMMENDED)

OPTIONAL VEGETATED SLOPE
CURB CUT INLET (OPTIONAL)

NOTES
-

UNDERDRAIN

PONDING

DOWNSPOUT (OPTIONAL)

PAVEMENT, SOIL OR

OBSERVATION WELL
(OPTIONAL)

2' MIN.

OTHER EDGE TREATMENT
PER SITE DESIGN

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
(OPTIONAL)

24" ENGINEERED
12" TO 24" ENGINEERED NATIVE SOIL

OR NATIVE SOIL

ALTERNATE CONFIGURATION:

CONCRETE WALL OR

6" TO 24" TOP SOIL ABOVE 6" TO 12" SAND

IMPERMEABLE LINER

12"X12" OPEN GRADED

NATIVE SOIL

CONNECTION TO
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
(OPTIONAL)

STONE MINIMUM OF 3"
ON ALL SIDES OF PIPE
(OPTIONAL)

PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN PIPE
TO OUTLET STRUCTURE (OPTIONAL)

MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM
CELL BOTTOM TO WATER
TABLE PER CITY

NOTES:

1) ENGINEERED SOIL MAY IMPROVE FILTRATION.

NOTE:
2) UNDERDRAIN RECOMMENDED FOR LONGITUDINAL SLOPES < 1%
1) CONSIDER FOREBAY OR OTHER PRETREATMENT.
3) (OPTIONAL) ITEMS SHOWN FOR USE WITH UNDERDRAIN.
2) CONSIDER UPSTREAM BYPASS FOR LARGE STORM EVENTS.
4) DIMENSIONS SHOWN MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS.

A

BIORETENTION CELL IN NATIVE OR ENGINEERED SOILS

B

BIOSWALE

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

VEGETATED STRIP DESIGN PARAMETERS

OPTIONAL 6" MIN. BENCH
& 3H:1V SIDE SLOPE
CURB CUT INLET
(OPTIONAL)

PARAMETER

MIN. VALUE

MAX. VALUE

LENGTH (FLOW DIRECTION)

15-FT

NO MAX.

NOTES

LONGITUDINAL SLOPE

NO MIN.

4H:1V

PER CITY REQUIREMENTS

FLOW VELOCITY

NO MIN.

1-FT/S

MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE SHEAR STRESS MAY ALSO DICTATE MAX. FLOW VELOCITY

FLOW DEPTH

NO MIN.

2
3VEGETATION HEIGHT

FLOW DEPTHS GREATER THAN VEGETATION HEIGHT WILL BYPASS BIOFILTRATION

FREEBOARD

NO MIN.

NO MAX.

-

OVERFLOW (FOR LARGE STORM EVENTS)
PONDING

PAVEMENT, SOIL OR OTHER
EDGE TREATMENT
PER SITE DESIGN

DOWNSPOUT
(OPTIONAL)

VEGETATION COVERAGE

>65%

PER CITY REQUIREMENTS
REQUIRED FOR BIOFILTRATION SUCCESS

TOPSOIL
6" TO 24" ENGINEERED
OR NATIVE SOIL

SHOULDER DRESSING

3" TO 6" COARSE SAND

PAVEMENT

3

CONCRETE WALL OR
IMPERMEABLE LINER

3" TO 6" OF 8"

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

6" TO 36" OPEN

MAX. SLOPE PER PERMITTEE
(4H:1V MAX. RECOMMENDED)

SURFACE

1
TO 2" PEA GRAVEL

GRADED STONE

RECEIVING DITCH, SWALE, BASIN,
OR OTHER PER SITE DESIGN

CONNECTION TO
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM

TOP SOIL

4" PERFORATED PIPE

OPTIONAL IMPERMEABLE
BOTTOM

NOTES:

MIN. LENGTH PER PERMIT

1) OVERFLOW ELEVATION MUST BE BELOW ELEVATION OF INLET
(CURB CUT, DOWNSPOUT, OR OTHER PER SITE DESIGN).

NOTE:

2) DIMENSIONS SHOWN MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS.

1) DIMENSIONS SHOWN MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS.

3) CONSIDER FOREBAY OR OTHER PRETREATMENT.

C

BIORETENTION CELL WITH UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM

D

VEGETATED STRIP

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

WATER RETENTION

CENTERVILLE CITY

& VEGETATION

STANDARD DETAILS

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

SHEET
NO.

22

SHEET
TYP.

DT-22

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 78 of 86

INFILTRATION BASIN DESIGN PARAMETERS

INFILTRATION BASIN DESIGN PARAMETERS
PARAMETER

MIN. VALUE

MIN. VALUE

WATER QUALITY VOLUME

0.1-AC-FT (4356CF)

NO MAX.

PARAMETER

MIN. VALUE

MAX. VALUE

-

DEPTH OF TRENCH

2-FT

NO MAX.

NOTES

NOTES
MAX. DEPTH DETERMINED BY CITY

FREEBOARD

1-FT

-

LONGITUDINAL TRENCH SLOPE

0%

1%

-

OVERFLOW SPILLWAY LENGTH

3-FT

-

WIDTH

2-FT

NO MAX.

-

INVERT SLOPE

0% (FLAT BASIN BOTTOM)

-

DRAWDOWN TIME

12-HOURS

72-HOURS

-

0.25-IN/HR

6-IN/HR

FIELD TESTING REQUIRED FOR FINAL DESIGN

2-FT

NO MAX.

-

INTERIOR SIDE SLOPES

NO MIN.

3H:1V

DRAWDOWN TIME

24-HOURS

72-HOURS

DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE

0.25-IN/HR

6-IN/HR

DESIGN INFILTRATION RATE

-

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER

48-HOURS RECOMMENDED

FIELD TESTING REQUIRED FOR FINAL DESIGN
PERFORATED PIPE OBSERVATION WELL

DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER

2-FT

NO MAX.

PER CITY REQUIREMENTS

(OPTIONAL)

OVERFLOW BERM
OR CURB AS NEEDED
TOP OF EMBANKMENT

(IF REQUIRED)

MAIN BAY

FOREBAY
PEA GRAVEL

EMBANKMENT WIDTH
PER CITY
INFLOW

EMERGENCY

VEGETATED STRIP

SPILLWAY

PRETREATMENT
AS NEEDED

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

SEDIMENT FOREBAY
OPEN GRADED STONE

MIN. DISTANCE FROM TRENCH BOTTOM
TO WATER TABLE PER JURISDICTION

3" TO 12" SAND LAYER

OUTLET STRUCTURE
(OPTIONAL)
MAINTENANCE ACCESS TO BOTTOM

PLAN VIEW

EMBANKMENT

B

INFILTRATION TRENCH

NTS

SEE PLAN

MAX 3H:1V
RECOMMENDED
MIN. COVER FOR STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY
(PER MANUFACTUERER'S SPECIFICATIONS)

MIN. DISTANCE FROM TRENCH BOTTOM
TO WATER TABLE PER JURISDICTION

MIN.

FEE BOARD PER JURISDICTION
EMERGENCY
SPILLWAY

TOP SURFACE WILL VARY

OUTLET STRUCTURE (OPTIONAL)

INLET

FOREBAY WALL

CATCH BASIN

OUTLET PROTECTION

IMPERMEABLE
LINER (OPTIONAL)

OUTLET PROTECTION

MIN. DISTANCE FROM BASIN BOTTOM
TO WATER TABLE PER JURISDICTION

STORAGE CHAMBER(S)

TRASH SCREEN
HOODED INLET OR
OTHER PRETREATMENT
(OPTIONAL)

R TANKS

SECTION VIEW

CONNECTION TO ISOLATION
FOR PRETREATMENT

NOTES:

(PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.)

1) DIMENSIONS SHOWN MAY VARY BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS.

2) FOREBAY CONNECTION TYPE TO MAIN BAY WILL VARY: OUTLET
PIPE; BARION WALL, NOTCHED CONCRETE WALL & OTHERS
ARE ACCEPTABLE.

NOTES:
1) CONFIG. WILL VARY.
2) IMPERMEABLE LINER AROUND UNDER GROUND
SYSTEM IF GROUND WATER CONCERNS EXIST.
3) IF IMPERMEABLE LINER IS USED, PROVIDE OUTLET

3) CONSIDER UPSTREAM BYPASS FOR LARGE STORM EVENTS.

TO PREVENT STANDING WATER.

A

INFILTRATION BASIN

C

UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION GALLERY

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

WATER INFILTRATION DETAIL

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

23

SHEET
TYP.

DT-23

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 79 of 86

2.5' WIDE LIGHT RED
COLORED STAMPED
CONCRETE BUFFER AREA

2.5' WIDE LIGHT RED
COLORED STAMPED
CONCRETE BUFFER AREA

5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK
5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK

PEDESTRIAN RAMP AS
PER CITY DETAIL
(SEE CITY TYP. PED.
RAMP DETAIL)

15' RADIUS MIN. (TYP)

PEDESTRIAN RAMP AS

PER CITY DETAIL
(SEE CITY TYP. PED.
RAMP DETAIL)

15' RADIUS MIN. (TYP)

A

2.5' CURB & GUTTER

4'

2.5' CURB & GUTTER

A

TYP. WATERWAY TRANSITION
(SEE TYPICAL CITY
WATERWAY DETAIL)

A

COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE TYPE "A"

B

COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE TYPE "B"

NTS

SEE PLAN

NTS

SEE PLAN

5' WIDE SIDEWALK

2.5' WIDE LIGHT RED
COLORED STAMPED CONCRETE

#4 @ 10.5" O.C.
(TYP)

2.5' WIDE LIGHT RED
COLORED STAMPED CONCRETE

8"

8"

#4 @ 24" O.C.

PLACE EXPANSION
JOINT FILLER & TYPE
"A" JOINT SEALANT
NOTES:

1) CONCRETE CROSSWALK OPTIONAL AS PER
CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION.

C
NTS

COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE SECTION VIEW "A-A"
SEE PLAN

DESIGN
REVISION

DATE

BY

DESCRIPTION
BWN

ESI ENGINEERING

DRAWN
PSB
CHECKED
KLC
DATE
01/14/2026

COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE DETAIL

CENTERVILLE CITY

CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - LAND SURVEY
4141 WEST 2100 SOUTH, SUITE 100

STANDARD DETAILS

SHEET
NO.

24

SHEET
TYP.

DT-24

WEST VALLEY, UTAH 84120
TEL: (801) 263-1752

PROJ.
22-091
NO.

Page 80 of 86

September 25th, 2026
Please see the following public hearing notices for October 14th, 2026
CENTERVILLE CITY
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING – CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND DRAWINGS AMENDMENT
Notice is hereby given that the Centerville City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on
Wednesday, October 14th, 2026, at 7:00pm, or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, at
the Centerville City Hall, 250 North Main Street, Centerville, Utah, regarding proposed Centerville
City Construction Details and Drawings Amendments. If you have questions regarding this
matter or would like further information, contact Centerville City Community Development, at
801.292.8232 or visit the City’s website at https://centervilleutah.gov.

Community Development Department

Page 81 of 86

PLANNING
COMMISSION
Staff Report
10/14/2026
Item No. 1.
Title: Community Development Director's Report
Initiated By:
Staff Representative:

SUBJECT:

RECOMMENDATION:

BACKGROUND:

ATTACHMENTS:

250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 82 of 86

PLANNING
COMMISSION
Staff Report
10/14/2026
Item No. 1.
Title: Minutes Review and Approval - September 23, 2026
Initiated By: Jennifer Robison, City Recorder
Staff Representative:

SUBJECT:
Consideration of Planning Commission meeting minutes from October 14, 2026.
RECOMMENDATION:

BACKGROUND:

ATTACHMENTS:
1.
09-23-26 PC DRAFT

250 North Main Street Centerville, Utah 84014

801.295.3477
Page 83 of 86

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MEETING
Wednesday, September 23, 2026
7:00 p.m.
A quorum being present at City Hall, 250 North Main Street, Centerville, Utah, the meeting
of the Centerville City Planning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Mason Kjar, Chair
LaRae Patterson
Paul Mendenhall
Gary Woodward
Layne Jenkins
Amanda Jorgensen
Michael Adamson
STAFF PRESENT
Mike Eggett, Community Development Director
Sydney DeWees, Planner
Lisa Romney, City Attorney
LEGISLATIVE THOUGHT/PRAYER

Chair Mason Kjar

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DETAILS AND
DRAWINGS AS SET FORTH IN THE CENTERVILLE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
(RESOLUTION 2026-09) AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR FUTURE
CONSIDERATION OF THESE AMENDMENTS RESPECTIVELY
Community Development Director Mike Eggett introduced the proposed amendments to
the Details and Drawings contained within the Centerville Standards and Specifications,
explaining that the City Engineer had been working for approximately one year to update the
documents to more clearly and comprehensively reflect current City practices. He clarified that
the Standards and Specifications and the Details and Drawings were separate components, with
the latter being the subject of the current discussion. Several pages were proposed to address
different plat types. Staff also discussed revisions to plat signature blocks resulting from recent
changes in state law that eliminated the City Council approval requirement for certain residential
subdivision final plats and authorized the Community Development Director to approve certain
minor plats and subdivisions. Staff anticipated that approximately four different signature block
configurations may be needed depending on the type of plat and noted that the Design Review
Committee would review the matter at its upcoming meeting, so the signature blocks presented
at the next meeting could differ from those in the current packet.
Commissioners raised several technical questions, which staff noted for follow-up with the
City Engineer:
•
•
•

Whether a standard drawing for roundabouts should be included, given that the city has
one existing roundabout and another planned on 1250 West.
Whether retaining wall details - specifically for concrete or interlocking block walls - should
be included. Staff noted this remains under active internal deliberation, and a design detail
had been previously prepared but was not ready for inclusion in the current packet.
Questions were raised regarding the consistency of Note 8 with the accompanying
drawing on the rock retaining wall sheet, specifically whether the callout on the lower block

Page 84 of 86

Centerville Planning Commission
Minutes of Meeting of September 23, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54

•

Page 2 of 3

was consistent with the note referencing upper rock diameter requirements. Staff agreed
to submit this question to the engineer.
The meaning and clarity of Note 2 on the retaining wall drawing was briefly discussed.
Staff explained that it effectively requires engineered design beyond the standard drawing,
ensuring the structure meets industry standards.

Following the discussion, the Commission directed staff to schedule a public hearing for the
next meeting. Staff confirmed they would note any updated variations in the packet if changes
result from the Design Review Committee discussion.
DEBRIEF DISCUSSION ABOUT COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CITY ORDINANCE 202620 FOR DETACHED ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND NEXT STEPS
Mr. Eggett provided a comprehensive debrief of the City Council's deliberations and
approval of Ordinance 2026-20 governing Detached Accessory Dwelling Units (DADUs). To help
facilitate the council's decision, staff presented menu options rather than a single
recommendation, which proved effective in guiding the discussion.
Lot Size Threshold: The Council reduced the minimum lot size to 8,500 square feet.
Both Detached and Internal ADUs Permitted: The Council approved allowing a single
lot to have both a detached and an internal ADU simultaneously, provided that parking
requirements and lot coverage standards are met for each use. Staff noted this may prompt a
future discussion regarding the city's lot coverage ordinance.
Utility Metering: The Council debated whether utility connections for DADUs should be
separate or shared with the primary dwelling. Given the cost implications, they ultimately decided
to allow property owners to make that determination themselves.
Corner Lot Configurations: Staff noted that the treatment of interior versus corner lots
had not been thoroughly addressed during the Planning Commission's earlier review but was
identified and resolved by the Council. New language was introduced referencing the "rear
building wall line", which is distinct from the existing definition of “building line”, to clearly delineate
which yard areas on a corner lot are eligible for a detached ADU. The Council agreed that DADUs
would not be permitted in the legitimate front yard of the primary structure but could be placed in
the secondary front yard (the side facing a corner street), the narrow interior side yard behind the
structure, or the rear yard.
Maximum Height: The Council established a maximum DADU height of 16 feet, using
the City’s existing height-calculation methodology based on the average height from the eave to
the peak. Staff had cautioned against creating a separate ground-to-peak measurement because
doing so would require a new height definition and could create additional administrative
difficulties, particularly on sloped lots.
Impact Fee Waiver: The fee waiver provision was removed from the ordinance at this
time, but it was noted that the Council was not opposed to reconsidering the concept in the future.
Mr. Eggett noted that waiving impact fees could provide the City with credit toward its moderateincome housing obligations under state law and that the impact fees associated with DADUs were
relatively modest compared with other housing strategies.
Historic District Overlay: Staff identified the interaction between the Deuel Creek
Historic District regulations and the newly adopted DADU ordinance as another issue requiring
additional review, as the current regulations could create administrative challenges when the two
sets of standards are applied together.

Page 85 of 86

Centerville Planning Commission
Minutes of Meeting of September 23, 2026
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52

Page 3 of 3

Regarding next steps, staff recommended allowing a brief trial period before initiating a
2.0 revision, suggesting that reviewing a few actual DADU applications would help identify any
practical issues or ambiguities in the current ordinance. Mr. Eggett indicated that at minimum, the
historic district issue and other substantive concerns would be brought forward regardless of
application volume. He estimated that a well-prepared version 2.0 revision would take a minimum
of three to four months.
DISCUSSION AND REPORTING OF CONCEPTS SHARED AND PRESENTED
DURING THE FALL 2026 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION – UTAH CHAPTER
CONFERENCE
Mr. Eggett reported on his attendance at the Fall 2026 American Planning Association
(APA) – Utah Chapter Conference, held September 9–10, 2026, at the Davis Conference Center
in Layton. He explained that the conference focused on economic development, water, and
housing. He summarized sessions addressing the economic importance of the Great Salt Lake,
including brine shrimp production and winter tourism; the Utah Trail Network and its competitive
grant funding, noting that the South Davis Greenway was included on the Network’s long-range
planning map; and DADU development, where lot coverage standards were identified as a
potential barrier. He noted that Centerville’s 20 percent rear-yard accessory structure limitation
and 60 percent impervious surface cap could warrant future review.
Mr. Eggett also discussed sessions on leadership, artificial intelligence, and data centers.
The leadership session encouraged participants to avoid reacting based on assumptions about
others’ intentions and to seek greater understanding of differing perspectives. The AI session
emphasized that artificial intelligence could be useful as a research tool but should be treated as
an assistant rather than a source of professional recommendations, due to the potential for
fabricated information. The data center session emphasized the importance of adequate water
supplies, clear zoning regulations, and public education, prompting brief discussion regarding
whether Centerville should proactively address data center uses through its zoning regulations.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR’S REPORT
No additional report.
MINUTES REVIEW AND APPROVAL
Minutes of the August 12, 2026, Planning Commission meeting were reviewed.
Commissioner Mendenhall moved to approve the minutes. Commissioner Jorgensen seconded
the motion, which passed unanimously (7-0).
The Commission acknowledged the departure of Commissioner Woodward, and
expressed appreciation for his service.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:06 p.m., Commissioner Patterson moved to adjourn the meeting which passed
unanimously (7-0).
________________________________
Jennifer Robison, City Recorder

______________
Date Approved

Page 86 of 86