On the agenda: Yerington meeting — data center (Aug 24)

YERINGTON CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AUGUST 24TH 2026
5:30 P.M.
Yerington City Hall 14 E. Goldfield Ave. Yerington, NV 89447
The Yerington City Council will conduct a public meeting on the 24th day of August, 2026, beginning at
5:30 p.m. at 14 East Goldfield Ave. Yerington, NV 89447
Join Zoom Meeting

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/9040866690?pwd=Dc89jDEAUumicWChLj1oV5quXjYkqS.1&omn=84421433874

Meeting ID: 904 086 6690 / Passcode: 2026COY (case sensitive)

Mobile: 1 (669) 900-6833 / 1 (719) 359-4580

Please call Yerington City Hall at (775) 463-3511 if you have any questions accessing the meeting.
Written public comments may be mailed to the City Clerk’s office at 14 E. Goldfield Ave. Yerington,
Nevada 89447 or emailed to [email protected]. Be sure to type PUBLIC COMMENT in the subject
line. Comments must be received the business day prior to the date of the meeting by 4:00 p.m. for the
comments to be included in the meeting.
City Council meetings are open to the public and may be attended in person or via virtual Zoom, if
available. Virtual public comment may be given if you are attending the virtual Zoom meeting by “raising
your hand” virtually at the appropriate times to notify staff of your desire to speak.
AGENDA:
Action may be taken only on those items denoted “For Possible Action.”
1. Call to order, roll call and Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Public Comment: Any matter pertinent to the City of Yerington should be shared under this item.
Items appearing in the Consent Agenda (item 4) should be discussed at this time. Comments related
to an item appearing on the agenda will be heard when that agenda item is called. No action may
be taken on a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been included
specifically on an agenda as an item upon which action will be taken.
3. For Possible Action: Review and approval of the agenda.

1

a. NOTICE RE: NRS 237: When the City Council approves this agenda, it also approves a
motion ratifying staff action taken pursuant to NRS 237.030 et seq. with respect to items on
this agenda and determines that each matter on this agenda for which a Business Impact
Statement has been prepared does impose a direct and significant economic burden on a
business or directly restrict the formation, operation or expansion of a business, and each
matter which is on this agenda for which a Business Impact Statement has not been prepared
does not impose a direct and significant economic impact on a business or directly restrict
the formation, operation or expansion of a business.
4. Consent Agenda (Action Will be Taken on All Items): All matter listed under the consent agenda
are considered routine, and may be acted upon by the City Council with one action, and without an
extensive hearing. Any member of the Council or any citizen may request that an item be taken from
the consent agenda, discussed, and acted upon separately during this meeting.
4.a For Possible Action: Discussion and approval of bills previously submitted for payment
as follows:
Checks #42216 through #42263 totaling $288,286.77
4.b For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Approval of minutes from the
July 27th, 2026 regular meeting.
4.c For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Approval of minutes from the
August 10th, 2026 regular meeting.
4.d For Possible Action: Approval of New, Renewal and Name Change Business License
Applications
A. Chad M. Kay dba High Voltage Electric, LLC, Electrical Contractor, 9 E. Freeport Blvd
Sparks, NV 89431-Renewal
B. Austin Harris dba Summit Overhead Door, LLC, Overhead Doors Contractor, 96 Glen
Carran Circle #103 Sparks, NV 89431-New
C. Lawrence LaFleur dba Lawrence LaFleur, Landscape Contractor, 319 Kay Way
Yerington, NV 89447-New
Regular Agenda – (Action will be taken on all items unless otherwise noted)
5. For Possible Action: Public Hearing regarding the property located at 119 S. West St., Yerington,
NV, (APN 001-185-04), regarding a complaint of nuisance on property, to determine whether or not
a nuisance exists, and if one does exist, order the person responsible for such nuisance to abate the
same, as prescribed in Title 4, Chapter 2, Section 6(b).
6. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of the City of Yerington 2025 Master Plan, Chapter
5, titled Economic Development. (Requested by Mayor John J. Garry)
7. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of the Comprehensive Economic Development
Strategy (CEDS) for 2025-2030 prepared in June 2026.

2

8. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of Resolution 2026-12, a resolution amending the
City of Yerington Fee Schedule as it pertains to various line items.
9. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of a proposed Street Closure Policy (City Manager
Jerry Bryant)
10. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of a proposed Salary and Classification Policy for
City Employees not covered by contract. (City Manager Jerry Bryant)
11. For Discussion Only: Review and Discussion of a proposed Procurement Procedures Policy (City
Manager Jerry Bryant)
12. Agenda Requests: A Councilmember or appointed department head may request an item be
considered on a future agenda either by making an oral request at a Council meeting or submitting
the request in writing to the City Manager at least 30 days prior to the meeting for which the item is
requested to be placed on the agenda.
13. Public Comment: Any matter pertinent to the City of Yerington should be shared under this item.
No action may be taken on a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has
been included specifically on an agenda as an item upon which action will be taken.
14. Department and Elected Official Reports - No action will be taken, reports with possible
comments and discussion only, as follows:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.

City Attorney Report
Chief of Police Report
Public Works Director Report
City Manager Report
City Clerk Report
Council Comments
Mayor Comments

15. Adjournment.
NOTICE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: Members of the public who are disabled and require
special assistance or accommodations at the meeting are requested to notify city staff at (775)463-3511 in
advance so that reasonable arrangements may be made.
If you wish to file a Civil Rights program complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html, or
at any USDA office, or call (866) 632-9992 to request the form. You may also write a letter containing all
of the information requested in the form. Mail your completed complaint form or letter to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; or fax to (202) 690-7442 or email at [email protected].
NOTICE:
1.

Agenda items listed above may be taken out of order.
3

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Two or more agenda items may be combined.
Agenda items may be removed from agenda or delayed at any time.
Any restrictions on public comment must be set out herein.
Public comment is limited to three (3) minutes per person.
Public comment that pertains to an item appearing on the agenda will be heard at the time of the
agenda item being called. Public comment at the time of an agenda item must pertain to the specific
agenda item being discussed.
Public comment cannot be restricted based on viewpoint. Section 7.05 of the Nevada Open Meeting
Law Manual indicates that a public body’s restrictions on public comment must be neutral as to the
viewpoint expressed, but the public body may prohibit content if the content of the comments is a
topic that is not relevant to, or within the authority of, the public body, or if the content of the
comments is willfully disruptive of the meeting by being irrelevant, repetitious, slanderous,
offensive, inflammatory, irrational, or amounting to personal attacks or interfering with the rights of
other speakers. See AG File No. 00-047 (April 27, 2001).

Supporting documentation for the items on the agenda is available to members of the public at
www.yerington.net, by request at the City Manager’s Office (14 E. Goldfield Ave., Yerington, NV), by
phone (775)463-3511, or by email requests to [email protected].
I, Jerry Bryant, do hereby certify that the foregoing agenda was duly posted at Yerington City Hall located
at 14 East Goldfield Avenue, online at the Nevada State Department of Administration web site at
notice.nv.gov and the City of Yerington website at www.yerington.net by the 19th day of August 2026, in
compliance with NRS 241.020.
_________________________________________
Jerry Bryant, City Manager
Date
City of Yerington

4

08/19/2026

4a

4b

Yerington City Council Meeting
July 27, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. – City Hall

The regular meeting of the Yerington City Council was held in the Council Chambers at 10:00 a.m.
with the following present:
Mayor Pro Tem Martin
Council Members Nick Beaton, Omar Lopez and Matt Galvin
City Attorney Charles Zumpft
City Manager Jerry Bryant
City Clerk Stacy Stevenson
Public Works Director Paul Shapiro
Absent: Mayor Garry
Guests: Jim DeChambeau, Robin Biggs, Shawn Heusser, Nevada Rural Housing Authority, Sean
Mantucca, SB Energy, Leo Solari, Leah Wilkinson (via Zoom)
1. Call to order, roll call and Pledge of Allegiance.
The meeting was called to order within the James Sanford Community Center and roll call was report
by Mayor Pro Tem Martin.
2. Public Comment
Mayor ProTem Martin asked for comments:
Jim DeChambeau stated that everyone needs to speak closer to the microphone and would like item
number 6 explained to him. City Manager Bryant stated that it will be discussed in detail when we
get to item number 6.
Robin Biggs stated that she would like roll call to be taken.
3. Agenda Approval
Mayor Pro Tem Martin stated the agenda would be approved as presented unless there were any
objections or corrections. Interim City Manager Bryant asked that item #7 be heard before item #6. Item
#10 will be tabled for a future meeting. Councilman Galvin made a motion to approve the agenda with
corrections, seconded by Councilman Lopez and the agenda was approved unanimously. Mayor Pro
Tem Martin asked for comments and no comments were made at this time.
1

4. Consent Agenda
Mayor Pro Tem Martin stated that the consent agenda would be approved as presented unless there
were any objections or corrections. Mayor Pro Tem Martin stated no objections were made at this
time. Councilman Beaton made a motion to approved the agenda as presented, seconded by
Councilman Lopez. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for comments, no comments were made at this
time and the consent agenda was approved unanimously.
4.a For Possible Action: Discussion and approval of bills previously submitted for payment
as follows:
Checks #42086 through #42150 totaling $609,075.37
4.b For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Approval of minutes from the
July 13th, 2026 regular meeting.
4.c For Possible Action: Approval of New, Renewal and Name Change Business License
Applications. Items A-L
Regular Agenda
5. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to approve Resolution No. 2026-10; a
Resolution of the City Council of Yerington, Nevada Providing for the Transfer of the City’s
2026 Private Activity Bond Volume Cap to the Nevada Rural Housing Authority in the amount
of $234,757.13; and Other Matters Related Thereto.
Shawn Heusser, Director of Finance for Nevada Rural Housing Authority stated that they truly
appreciate the relationship with the city. Over the past 50 years Nevada Rural Housing Authority
has helped over 11,000 homebuyers throughout rural Nevada with $2.5 million of mortgage lending.
Each year they help over 1300 renters with renter’s assistance program. Specifically for Yerington
in the past 20 years we’ve helped with $11.7 million in mortgages with 63 homebuyers, $250,000
in down payment assistance. Last year, the city of Yerington had 2 home buyers that Nevada Rural
Housing were able to help. Any family earning less than 140k a year with a proper credit score
qualifies. They also offer $20,000 for down payment assistance or mortgage payments. Mr. Heusser
thanked the City of Yerington for the partnership this makes it great for rural Nevada. City Attorney
Zumpft stated that section four on the resolution needs a revision regarding the contact information.
Councilman Beaton made a motion to amend section four in Resolution No. 2026-10 to replace the
words Robert Switzer with Jerry Bryant. In addition to replace the address in section for from 102
South Main Street to 14 E. Goldfield Avenue, seconded by Councilman Lopez. Mayor Pro Tem
Martin asked for comments, no comments were made at this time and the motion was approved
unanimously.
6. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to approve an application for a 12-month
extension request for a Temporary Water Right Diversion to the Nevada State Engineer, to
serve as backup supply to the proposed wells under applications 94749 and 94750. Water
under this application will be utilized for construction needs for the Libra Solar Project,
including dust suppression and soil compaction.
City Manager Bryant stated that this is for approval to sign off on the application. Libra is pulling
water from the hydrant on Cremetti and Mackenzie. No request for an increase amount of water.
2

This is allowing them to pull water from the hydrant. Proposed use from December 6, 2026 until
December 5, 2027. It is to be utilized as a back up supply. Up to 500 acre feet of water. Councilman
Galvin asked if it has impacted the city and City Manager Bryant confirmed that it has not impacted
our water table at all. Councilman Galvin asked why is Libra resources somewhere else after being
caught getting water from a private land owner. Sean Mantucca anticipates maybe 150-200 acre feet
from each well. The water they’re pulling from the hydrants now is not enough water. The city
hydrant well was good for one year and they are asking for one more year. They will be pulling a
significant less amount of water from the City hydrant. Not having enough water is impacted their
construction schedule. After the cease and desist order, they stopped pulling water from that
location. Councilman Galvin wanted to confirm that they stopped pulling water from the source.
Councilman Lopez wants to know about the roads. Is there a plan to fix the roads that Libra solar
has ruined? City Manager Bryant stated that McKenzie has taken the brunt of all this with that road
needing repairs. NDOT has improved the roads recently. The county wants to wait until the project
is done before fixing the roads. The county commissioners approved this project. That road has
needed to be done for years. Before Solar even began using them. Councilman Galvin stated the city
does need to do their part and get the roads fixed. They’ve estimated to use 500 acre feet a year.
Public Works Director, Paul Shapiro stated there were a few points brought up that he wants to
clarify. He monitors the water very closely. They check this every day. By leasing the water rights
allows us to put more money back into the City’s water fund. Helps us keep the costs down for our
consumers. Tank are on an automated system. Have no seen a huge drop on anything. Water is still
good. Councilman Lopez made a motion to approve item number 6 as presented, seconded by
Councilman Beaton. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for comments. Jim DeChambeau asked how
many wells and how many tanks does the city have. Public Works Director Paul Shapiro stated that
we have 4. We had a control box that was overheating and they immediately fixed it. Robin Biggs
stated when you’re talking you need to say people’s names. Who is monitoring it? Where are Libra
Solar’s wells located? This is on Native American land. She stated she wants to see everyone on
Zoom and that the city is not following open meeting law. Leo Solari asked can we go up and look
at the wells and see what’s going on. Are we going to continue to give Libra Solar water? Why do
you want to push this through. He stated that he lives on Mckenzie and it is already bad. They don’t
need to be on McKenzie or Pursel. Leah Wilkinson stated once construction is completed how much
water does Libra Solar need? Libra is paving the Walker River Road and this has improved the road
to Walker River Nevada State Park. If you have any questions read the paper. Councilman Galvin
stated that for wells on site, the state Engineer is going to give permission. The City has nothing to
do with that. Councilman Beaton stated that we are only approving the application. City Manager
Bryant stated that the final determination is up to State Engineer. State Engineer has final say on
where the water goes. The impact of Walker Lake? Mineral County is the one that approved this
project not us. We have an agreement that is a lease. Not a sale. We are leasing 8% in water to Libra.
The deal with Libra solar keeps the water and sewer payments down for the customer. Sean
Manooke stated that the usage after construction should be 5%. The wells are not dry. Libra solar
had the wells drilled. No more comments were made and item number 6 was approved unanimously.
7. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a Reversion to Acreage
application regarding APN 001-311-02 & 001-491-08(located near Main St. and Bell St. in
Yerington). This application was filed by Greg Chico, PLS on behalf of YMV Development,
LLC. This item was recommended for approval by the Yerington Planning Commission at
their June 24, 2026 meeting.
City Manager Bryant stated that that the request before you are a reversal to acreage request. The
property owner is present and available for questions should the council have any. This is fairly a
3

straight forward matter. They own two parcels by Bell Street and they’re trying to merge them into
one and the intent behind this is to open a new mobile home park on that one parcel because a mobile
home park can only operate as one with a special use permit. There was no concern from city staff
on making these two parcels one. There are some city easements that run through the eastern parcel.
We’ll most likely abandon those easements, because we really don’t have a need for them. The were
claimed during the water rehabilitation project and not even utilized so we’ll probably abondon those
and allow it to move free and design new easements when we have the new map in place.
Councilman Lopez made a motion to approve item number 7 as presented, seconded by Councilman
Beaton. Mayor Pro-Tem Martin asked for comments, no comments were made and the motion
carries unanimously.
8. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a request from the Yerington
Municipal Court to modify the panel of Municipal Judge Pro-Tems and establish their
compensation rate for daily pretrial release and arraignments.
City Manager Bryant stated that this item is to simply add a few more names to our Judge Pro Tems
list. It also establishes an hourly rate for the in-custody hearing that we now have 7 days per week.
Some of you may recall a couple years ago, we went to an in-custody process where we have to give
somebody a chance for bail within 24 hours and this establishes an hourly rate should we need to
use it during the vacancies of our current judge. Councilman Beaton stated that the only question he
had on this was what is the difference between the approved rate and the additional half-hour rate
and asked if City Manager could go into a little more detail on the differences. City Manager Bryant
stated that he just broke it down. It’s a prorated amount basically. He stated that we just broke down
the math and that’s. What we did is he took it a step further here, because you’re in custody hearings.
We have to check it daily to see if we have anybody in custody. Routinely, for the City of Yerington,
it’s rare. One, maybe two a month that we have an in-custody. It may fluctuate, but typically it’s one
to two a month. If somebody is filling in for a judge, they do have to take 10 to 15 minutes everyday
to see if we have an in-custody and if we do, then there’s a hearing at noon, and they have to stay
on that hearing until they get to them. They’ll hear Fernley Court, Dayton Court, Lyon County. They
have to wait in that rotation to be heard. If somebody is filling in for our judge, and we happen to
have one, this just establishes an hourly rate for them to get compensated for filling in. Councilman
Lopez asked if the ones in color are the ones being added to the rotation. City Manager Bryant stated
that that is correct. The ones in red are the ones being added. Councilman Beaton added that there’s
some really, really, really good people being added to this list. He knows several of them personally
and they’re very, very, very thorough and well-established in the judicial system. Councilman Lopez
made a motion to accept item number 8 as presented, seconded by Councilman Beaton. Mayor Pro
Tem Martin asked for comments, no comments were made and the motion carries unanimously.
9. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a Letter of Support from the
City of Yerington urging the Nevada State Legislature to declare the Onion as the official
Nevada State Vegetable.
City Manager Bryant stated that this item is for approval on a letter of support to advocate to the
Nevada Legislature to make the onion the Nevada State vegetable. This is an effort to increase
tourism and the economic impacts here in Mason Valley. This came to us from the Chamber of
Commerce of Yerington and Katrina Schultz, President of the Chamber of Commerce, who is in
attendance. I’ll step aside and let her take it a little bit further. I’d like to let the council know that
we did also teach out to our onion partners in Mason Valley including Peri & Sons, Snyder’s and
4

David Little. They are all in support of this. Katrina Schultz stated that this is a little bit more
lighthearted compared to some of the other conversations you have had to have in terms of economic
development. I’ve spoke with Travis Crowder with the Boys and Girls Club and the initiative is to
bring the kids on. This would be something of a civic engagement, education. The legislative piece
for this is to help grow agritourism within our city and county. Right now we are the harvest capitol
with no harvest festival. How do we build on that? It’s an industry that contributes 280 million
dollars in direct funds to the Nevada overall budget. It’s the largest employer for our county right
now and I think it’s a really good effort to show and promote that. My ask is just a letter of support
to keep going on with that. I’ve been working with former Assemblyman Tom Roberts on this. I’m
also working with Miranda Hoover who is going to lobby this for us if it makes it to the floor. Bobby
B. Onion was created on a whiteboard when I worked for the Department of Agriculture. I graphic
designed him and then came to Yerington, Hawthorne and Schurz two years ago. Councilman Lopez
stated that he thinks this is awesome. He was walking around with his button on and everybody
wanted one. We should give our buttons to advertise this because we don’t have a current state
vegetable. Councilman Beaton stated that this is super cool initiative. The one thing I would ask is
that as we look at that Harvest Festival is finding a way to get the many things that are going on,
kind of more under an umbrella, rather than creating a whole new event because we have a lot of
those here. There’s no reason to be bored in Yerington and Mason Valley. Councilman Lopez made
a motion to accept item number 9 as presented, seconded by Councilman Beaton. Mayor Pro Tem
Martin asked for public comment. Mr. DeChambeau stated that onions are grown in a very
minuscule part of Nevada. There’s a whole lot of Nevada that doesn’t see onions. I kind of think it’s
silly. Ms. Biggs stated that she thinks there should be a distinction if it’s going to be a yellow onion,
red onion, or white onion. Ms. Schulz stated that she understand that it doesn’t grow everywhere,
however, it is the largest edible human consumption crop in the entire state, not just here. Ms. Leah
Wilkinson stated that our tall water tower would be the perfect canvas for a giant onion. Also, in
relation to this with the onion not being throughout the state, our job is to advocate for our town and
community. With that being the last public comment, motion carries unanimously.
10. For Presentation Only: Review and Discussion of the City of Yerington 2025 Master Plan,
Chapter 5, titled Economic Development. (Requested by Mayor John J. Garry)
Tabled
11. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve an expenditure of $29,740.00
from RTC funds to repair damaged streets and sidewalks on Pizen Switch Rd. This item was
heard and approved by the RTC Board on July 9, 2026.
City Manager Bryant stated that this item is to get approval from the Council to proceed with repairs
over on Pizen Switch Road. There are three areas in particular that we’re trying to repair. The first
one would be the exit from the Raley’s parking lot as you come down out of there. There’s three
different section in there. They’d be handled more or less in this order. One first priority is the one
exiting the Raley’s parking lot onto Pizen Switch. The second one would be the repair of the street
and sidewalk by the car wash. The third one would be repairing the Grand Canyon next to Subway
so this would essentially be repairing those three items. We would be utilizing RTC funds to do so.
I know that streets are always a topic of concern because we have a lot of streets in disrepair and we
would like everyone to know that we are aware of it and trying our best to manage them
appropriately. If there are other streets people would like to advocate for make sure that they’re on
our radar. We’re happy to take those suggestions. Councilman Lopez asked if we get three bids or
5

just one bid. City Manager Bryant stated that we only got the one bid and that is because, typically,
that threshold’s a little bit higher to where you have to go out to bid. Desert Engineering would be
the awarded bidder on this project and they can start in August. We felt it was a justifiable bid
amount for the significance of the repair including the sidewalk repairs by the car wash. Councilman
Beaton stated that Chico and his crew have been so busy with everything, but that’s good to know
that next month they can start. City Manager Bryant stated that if pending approval from the Council
that we are tentatively on their schedule for August to begin the repairs. Councilman Galvin stated
that City Manager Bryant stated threshold is most of the time higher than that and asked what that
threshold is. City Manager Bryant stated that off the top of his head its around $35k or $30k,
somewhere there that you have to go out for bids. So as long as it’s under that, we’re good. We’re
already under that and it’s already been approved by the county is the purse holder of those RTC
funds. They county has already signed off on us using it, but again, it needs a second approval from
Council to make sure we’re all on the same page with how those funds are being allocated.
Councilman Galvin made a motion to approve item number 11 as presented, seconded by
Councilman Lopez. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for comments. Ms. Biggs stated that the city needs
to get the company that did the water and sewer replacement project to pay for the repairs. No more
comments were made and motion carries unanimously.
12. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a Lease for Hangar #315 at
the Yerington Municipal Airport between the City of Yerington and Richard Wolf.
City Manager Bryant stated that this is a fairly routine matter. This is a lease renewal of a hangar
over at our airport. We have implemented a CPI increase on the rate and have it back before you for
renewal for 3 years with an option to a mutual agreement for an additional two years on the
agreement. Councilman Beaton stated that the only question he has was the discrepancy in square
footage rates between this agreement and item number thirteen. City Manager Bryant stated that he
will go ahead and talk about item number thirteen. Item number thirteen you’ll notice it’s about
twice the square footage. Item thirteen is much bigger, but it’s a lower square footage rate and that’s
because we’re working with the gentleman on item thirteen to actually work on an FBO for his
hangar as well because he has twice the space and it’s a longer term to help development of that
FBO. We desperately need an FBO at our airport and we’re in discussion with about three people to
try to develop one. When you have a fixed-base operator out of your airport operating or offering
additional services to pilots it draws more people into your town. So, when we get to item thirteen,
again, speaking out a little out of turn here. On item thirteen it’s because we’re incentivizing an FBO
operation and that rate is actually closer to a lot of airport hangars that the larger the square footage,
the lower the square foot rate. For example, the largest hangar we have at the airport is about 4,500
square feet and it pays pretty close to what the rate is on item thirteen. Councilman Lopez asked if
all of the hangars are owned by somebody or does the city own some? City Manager Bryant stated
that the city owns a good portion of them. There are a few privately owned. Councilman Lopez
asked if they have to live in the city or can anybody own them. City Manager Bryant stated that they
don’t have to live in the city and anybody can lease or rent one that goes before the council here for
approval before they actually sign it. We’re going through and trying to audit our list annually to
make sure that they’re all current and up to date, that they have insurance and that there’s a plane in
it. They can’t have yard sales. They are prohibited. You can only use a hangar for FAA activities.
Councilman Beaton made a motion to accept number twelve as presented, seconded by Councilman
Lopez. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for comments. Mr. DeChambeau asked what the dollar amount
on these leases are. City Manager Bryant stated that this one is roughly 1,200 square foot hangar
and it’s $0.80 per square foot which is industry or right around industry standard for that size hangar.
On the next item, it’s a 2,000 square foot hanger at about $0.25 per square foot. Ms. Biggs asked to
6

see the Zoom screen. City Manager Bryant stated that we are under no legal requirement to show
who is on Zoom. Ms. Biggs is welcome to log on on her device and see them if she wants. Just as
I’m not required to go around the room and introduce her to everybody here in this room. I’m under
no requirement to show who is on Zoom. No more comments were made and the motion carries
unanimously.
13. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a Lease for Hangar #208 at
the Yerington Municipal Airport between the City of Yerington and Jason Haley.
City Manager Bryant stated that this item is very similar to the one before, but as Councilman Beaton
mentioned this is about twice the size and square feet of the last one. The square footage is a little
bit less as we’re working with Mr. Haley towards on FBO. That’s why you’ll also see an extensive
time increase as well. If you’re going to invest your time and money into a hangar to develop the
business you want more time to do it. You don’t want to be told to get out in two years. That’s what
we have before you for approval today. Councilman Beaton made a motion to accept item number
thirteen as presented, seconded by Councilman Galvin. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for public
comments. Ms. Biggs stated she wants to see Zoom. City Attorney Zumpft stated that in Nevada,
interested persons can attend meeting of governing bodies unanimously. They don’t have to sign in
on the clipboards when they walk in. They don’t have to identify who they are at the meeting and
that applies for people who are attending online. There is a requirement under the Open Meeting
Law that if members of the body participate remotely or electronically that the audience at the
meeting has to be able to see. No more comments were made and motion carries unanimously.
14. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to approve the City of Yerington’s FY
2025-2026 Debt Management Policy.
City Manager Bryant stated that this is an annual time we review our Debt Management Policy. It’s
a time to sit back and review how much debt we have; how much debt are we allowed to be assessed
and then we submit these figures over to the state and the state reviews it. Along with it, we also
include a capital improvement project list. In review of our Debt Management Policy the updated
numbers are such. Our assessed valuation from the state based on property tax is $172 million. We
are allowed to basically take on a debt of up to 20% of that assessed valuation. That would put us at
a maximum on $34,444,495.00. The council is very much aware that we have an outstanding debt
of $30,765,236.00 with a population of 3,549, that’s a per capita expense of $8,668.00. We took on
a significant chunk with the water and sewer project. My personal recommendation is that we do
not take on additional debt until this is paid significantly down. We need to first and foremost seek
grants. We need to try to utilize our own cash or any other revenues before we seek any additional
loans or debt. We also included our 5-year Capital Improvement Project. It has to exceed
$100,000.00 to be considered a capital improvement. Any projects under that valuation you will not
see on this list. Things like RTC. That was roughly $30,000.00. It won’t appear on here because it’s
under the threshold of capital improvement. We have four different funds that our capital
improvements are pulling from. General fund, special revenue, water and sewer. Looking at our
general fund, we do not have the Safe Streets for All grant that we submitted for next year, and that
is on here because it would require that we pull $123,000.00 out of our RTC which is part of the
general fund. When we look down at the special revenue fund this is where a lot of your grant
revenue comes in. We have things like the taxiway and AWAS project. The AWAS project, because
we’re using grant funds appears in the special revenue. The taxiway project that we previously
7

approved is listed on here. AWAS has $336,000.00 this next year of which $16,000.00 is our match
here on site. $319,000.00 of that is FAA awarded grants. Then we have the taxiway project this next
year for $278,000.00. $13,000.00 of which is our match here locally and $264,000.00 is grants. Then
we go on to the rest of the projects throughout the five years. Looking at our water and sewer fund,
we have no projects lined out this year that exceed the $100,000.00 cap. There are some projects
that we’re looking at for this next year such as odor control, sewer liner and the sewer pond liner
research. With that, we do have the likelihood that we’ll be awarded the federal finding that we’ve
been working with Porter Group on. Those are listed on here because they would be paid for out of
these enterprise accounts. The water rehab, which is to focus on the tanks for the next five years,
rehabilitating all of our water tanks is a $3.3 million project of which we would be awarded $2.7
million in grants and our match there is $675,000.00. The cash flow by which was actually made
possible by the Libra water lease. Then we have the wastewater rehab project which includes the
liner rehab. Then some lift station repairs and motor control. That total project is roughly
$602,000.00, of which, is approved by the Feds. Would be $482,000.00 with a $120,000 local match.
Looking at our amortization schedule for that water and sewer project, we are paying that until 2064.
Councilman Beaton state that the only way the city could take on new additional debt over the next
40 years would be to grow our valuation to be able to grow the amount that we’re able to take on
safely. City Manager Bryant stated that is correct. We would need to increase our assessed valuation
to increase what that ability even is. Until our revenues reach a better sustainable level, I would be
very cautious. Sometimes that bad positioning of being in debt with little revenue coming in may
actually help us with particular grants that we’re seeking because we’re in a bad position. I’m not
saying I like where we’re at, but when you realize you’re in a bad spot sometimes you do try use
that to get improvements along the way. Councilman Galvin made a motion to approve item number
14 as presented, seconded by Councilman Beaton. Mayor Pro Tem Martin asked for comments, no
comments were made and the motion carries unanimously.
15. Agenda Requests: A Councilmember or appointed department head may request an item be
considered on a future agenda either by making an oral request at a Council meeting or
submitting the request in writing to the City Manager at least 30 days prior to the meeting for
which the item is requested to be placed on the agenda.
Councilman Galvin stated that he has a couple things. There’s been a lot of concerns with moving
these meetings to the evenings. I would not be opposed to having some of the meetings moved until
later in the evening. I also would like to mention that the summer curfew within Yerington is 10:00
pm which for the summer months is early. We have parks with lights on them for a reason. I think
we need to amend that to 12:00 am during the summer months. I mentioned seeking certain monies
for certain roadways and who makes the list, who prioritizes the list and what roads are getting done
first. I think sitting down and looking at that list and prioritizing what needs to be done ahead of
other things. Councilman Beaton stated that with the school year starting that it would be neat to
have some of our local school administrators come in for a little presentation on what they have
planned this year as well as how drop-offs and pickups are looking with all the improvements have
been fixed and all of the new parking rules.
16. Public Comment:
Ms. Wilkinson stated that regarding the access time for City Council meetings, many residents that
she has spoken to would be satisfied watching the meetings at their leisure on a youtube channel.
8

City Manager Bryant stated that the city has been researching other options for the public to view the
meetings.
17. Department and Elected Official Reports
A.

City Attorney Zumpft stated he has nothing to report.

B.

Chief of Police Clanton stated that the Sheriff’s office did a great job with
NITC this weekend. Everything went well.

C.

Public Works Director Shapiro thank Scott Draper for all the help with the
water issues at Veteran’s Park. Thanked the High School for the kids helping
out. Public Works is finishing up the pot hole repairs. If anyone has any water
questions please don’t hesitate to reach out to him.

D.

City Manager Bryant stated he has nothing to report.

E.

City Clerk stated she has nothing to report.

F.

Council Comments:
Councilman Beaton thanked all the organizations and community for a great
Night in the Country.
Councilman Galvin stated that Night in the Country was a great event. He
wanted to mention that the Boys and Girls Club and his wife are putting a flag
football program together.
Councilman Lopez stated he has nothing to report.
Mayor Pro Tem Martin apologized for the last meeting. He was driving from
Las Vegas where they did lose in the state tournament, but they did give it a
valiant effort.

18. Adjournment.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:50 pm.

9

4c

Yerington City Council Meeting
August 10, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. – City Hall
The regular meeting of the Yerington City Council was held in the Council Chambers at 10:00 a.m.
with the following present:
Mayor John Garry
Council Members Nick Beaton (via Zoom), Omar Lopez and Shane Martin
City Attorney Charles Zumpft
City Manager Jerry Bryant
City Clerk Stacy Stevenson
Public Works Director Paul Shapiro
Chief of Police Shawn Clanton
Absent: Councilman Galvin
Guests: Robin Biggs

AGENDA:
Action may be taken only on those items denoted “For Possible Action.”
1. Call to order, roll call and Pledge of Allegiance.
2. Public Comment:
Robin Biggs: Hudbay has given money to help with a lot in the community. They are having an
open house next Tuesday 6-8 pm at SV Community Hall. You have been told you are illegally
sending water to the Libra Solar project. They drive like Australians. You need to quit sending
Libra solar water immediately. Everything needs to go through Homeland Security.
3. For Possible Action: Review and approval of the agenda.
4. Consent Agenda (Action Will be Taken on All Items):
4.a For Possible Action: Discussion and approval of bills previously submitted for payment
1

as follows:

Checks #42151 through #422214 totaling $242,565.94

4.b For Possible Action: Approval of New, Renewal and Name Change Business License
Applications
A. Johnnie Stolz dba Omboli Interiors, Inc., Construction, 4200 Rewana Way #505 Reno,
NV 89502-New
B. Dakota Woolener dba First Electric and Automation, Electrical Contractor, 109 E. Fourth St
Winnemucca, NV 89445-New
C. Rocio Pasaran-Aguilar dba Mexi Munchies, Mobile Food Truck, 106 S. Center St Yerington, NV
89447-New
D. Miguel Perez dba Joy Jumpers, LLC, Bounce House Rentals, 6033 Westwind Way Fallon, NV
89406-New
E. Gary McClenahan dba J.W. McClenahan Co., Plumbing Contractor, 1610 Marietta Way Sparks,
NV 89431-New
F. Leonel De La Trinidad dba H & D Construction, LLC, 1201 Terminal Way Ste 102 Reno, NV
89502-New
G. Zachary Allan dba Robert Allen Polls & Spas, Inc., Pool Construction, 1090 Kietzke Ln Reno, NV
89502-New
H. Wallace Van Allen dba Van Allen Plumbing, Plumbing Contractor, 190 W. 5 Ave Sun Valley,
NV 89433-New
I. Cody Ogburn dba COEH Corp. dba Budget Blinds, Install Window Coverings, 6550 Longley Ln
#115 Reno, NV 89511-Renewal
J. Roberto & Sonia Villanueva dba AR Electric, LLC, Electrical Contractor, 1362 US Hwy 395 Ste.
102-96 Gardnerville, NV 89410-New
th

Councilman Lopez made a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Second by
Councilman Martin. Mayor Garry offered public comment, none was given. Item passed
unanimously.
Regular Agenda
5. Recognition of Accomplishments: The City of Yerington recognizes employee Gavin Draper for
outstanding dedication, hard work and exceptional service to our community.
City Manager Bryant started by thanking Gavin Draper for his years of work for the City of
Yerington. Gavin Draper is leaving Yerington to pursue his education a Montana Tech University.
Executive Director of the Yerington Main Street Committee, Melanie Young-Pinkerton, also spoke
stating that Gavin Draper is appreciated and his impact on Main Street beautification projects was
monumental. Public Works Director Paul Shapiro also stated that he would miss having Gavin
around and that he worked very hard for this city. A presentation of recognition was made.
Councilman Lopez stated Gavin Draper is an inspiration and that he is appreciated.
6. For Presentation Only: Leadership of the local public schools (Yerington High School, Yerington
Intermediate School and Yerington Elementary School) have been invited to introduce themselves
and present objectives for the upcoming school year. Representing each school are: Kathy Bomba2

Edgerton (Principal, Y.H.S.), Scott Gillespie (Principal, Y.I.S.) and Rich Fortier (Principal, Y.E.S.).
(Requested by Councilman Galvin)
Dr. Kathy Bomba-Edgerton, Principal of Yerington High School spoke first. Dr. Bomba-Edgerton
stated this is her 8th year at Yerington. She has previous experience as a reading specialist, and as an
administrator for athletics. She stated Open House for all schools coming up on August 18, 2026.
YHS has several new teachers this year. They came here for the small environment. Dr. BombaEdgerton gave a “Shout out” to Gavin Draper and stated “you should ask him about karaoke.” Please
stop by the school to see all the great things coming.
Tony Wilson, Vice Principal at Yerington Intermediate School presented next. A lot of great things
happening at the school. YIS started woodshop last year. They are working to expose students to
technical jobs. Please come to our school so we can show you all the great things happening. Becky
Neville will be helping with CTE.
Rich Fortier, Principal of Yerington Elementary School spoke third. He is from Wisconsin. Married
with 5 kids. He stated “Yerington fell into my lap. Waiting to see my first rattlesnake. Would love
to come back here and update the city. Impressed with the staff commitment.” He comes from a
rural town and loves it here. Any questions please stop by and come see me.
Dr. Stacy Cooper- School Superintendent, presented last. Dr. Cooper wanted to share we have the
highest rate for kids doing technical school. A lot of students are taking college courses while going
to high school still. 3 goals are:
1. Decrease chronic absenteeism by 12%. This is an epidemic nationwide since Covid. 2. Improve
our math and reading scores by 2.5%. We are looking forward to that this year. 3. Hope to
maintain a CT program.
Mayor: We as city official enjoy recognizing the youth of our community. Please bring any kids to
be recognized for achievements. Omar-thanks for coming out.
At this time City Manager Bryant requested that we come back to agenda item number 7, due to the
possibility of losing zoom connection with Councilman Beaton. The Mayor agreed.
7. For Presentation Only: Recognition of the Yerington Animal Shelter, on behalf of Best Friends
Animal Society. Presented by Public Works Director Paul Shapiro.
Public Works Director Paul Shapiro presented this item, stating it is the second consecutive year
that the Yerington Animal Shelter was presented with this award by Best Friends Animal Society.
It recognizes our shelter for achieving a 90% or better save rate with animals. While our shelter is
not truly a “no-kill” shelter by ordinance, our staff and volunteers work diligently to find successful
outcomes for all animals in our care. While not all can be saved, often due to health-related issues,
our staff and volunteers work extremely hard to save them. This reflects the hard work of our staff,
especially Ron Durst, who also works hard to resolve the prominent stray cat issue in our
community. Mr. Durst spends many hours of his own time rescuing, transporting and releasing feral
cats after they have been treated, spayed and neutered to help naturally and humanely reduce the
population.
8. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Adopt Resolution 2026-11 authorizing the
transfer of $6,427.00 for FY2026-2027 from Management/City Hall to Animal Control, within the
General Fund, as authorized by NRS 354.598005.
3

Manager Bryant presented this item, stating that every weekend Public Works staff is paid overtime
to manage the operations at the animal shelter. Additionally, there were budgeted funds for a part
time employee at City Hall, that are no longer intended to be utilized. This transfer, if approved,
would shift those part time employee funds to the animal shelter to allow the hire of a part time
employee to manage the day to day cleaning, reducing the overtime expense incurred and free up
Public Works staff to address other matters. Councilman Martin made a motion to approve as
presented, second by Councilman Lopez. Mayor Garry requested public comment at this time, none
was given. Item passed unanimously.
9. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a Special Use Permit application
submitted by Dolsen-Stevens Family Trust on behalf of Yerington Mobile Village, LLC.
Application pertains to APN 001-311-01 (528 S. Main St.). This item was recommended for
conditional approval by the Yerington Planning Commission on July 22, 2026.
City Manager Bryant presented this item stating that City Ordinance Title 9, Chapter 4, Section 6
requires that all Mobile Home Parks must operate with an approved Special Use Permit. Yerington
Mobile Village is not in compliance and this item is to resolve that and bring them into compliance.
The property owner is present, should the council have any questions for them, or if they wish to
speak on the matter. Manager Bryant presented the conditions the planning commission
recommended from their July 22, 2026 meeting. This would be subject to annual renewal.
They would operate 42 units, including the office. Councilman Martin made a motion to approve
with the conditions presented by the Yerington Planning Commission, Councilman Lopez seconds.
Public Comment was requested, none was given. Item passed unanimously. The conditions were
as follows:

4

10. For Possible Action: Discussion and Possible Action to Approve a salary increase of 2.5%
($2,825.60 annually) for Public Works Director Paul Shapiro, for above target performance as
reflected on his annual performance review.
City Manager Bryant presented this item, stating that according to our current city ordinances, Title
1, Chapter 6, Section 1(a) it is required to bring these matters before the council. Bryant stated that
Mr. Shapiro has received an above target score on his annual performance review and this is a
budgeted item. Councilman Lopez stated that he sees Mr. Shapiro works hard for this city. He then
asked when it would be effective. Bryant stated the next full pay period after approval, August 17,
2026. Councilman Lopez made a motion to approve this item, second by Councilman Martin.
Public Comment was offered, none was made. Motion passed unanimously.
11. Agenda Requests: A Councilmember or appointed department head may request an item be
considered on a future agenda either by making an oral request at a Council meeting or submitting
the request in writing to the City Manager at least 30 days prior to the meeting for which the item is
requested to be placed on the agenda.
No requests were made.
12. Public Comment:
Robin Biggs: publicly take the opportunity to apologize to Nick Beaton for mentioning his name.
On August 6 at the county commissioner meeting one of the items were about the data center. Ms.
Biggs did not agree with the way the county meeting was operated.
Councilman Beaton shared his email address again to offer better communication.
13. Department and Elected Official Reports - No action will be taken, reports with possible
comments and discussion only, as follows:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.

City Attorney Report
Chief of Police Report
Public Works Director Report
City Manager Report
City Clerk Report
Council Comments
Mayor Comments

14. Adjournment.
Being no further business this meeting was adjourned.

5

4d

5

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE YERINGTON CITY COUNCIL DECLARING A NUISANCE TO EXIST
AT 119 S. WEST ST., YERINGTON, NV 89447, AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT THEREOF
WHEREAS, the City Clerk has received a written complaint alleging the existence of a public nuisance was
filed regarding real property located within the municipal boundaries of the City of Yerington at 119 S. West
St., Yerington, NV 89447 (APN 001-185-04); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Yerington City Code 4-2-4, an investigation of said property was conducted by the
City Manager, confirming the existence of conditions constituting a nuisance under Yerington City Code 4-2-1;
and
WHEREAS, proper notice of the alleged nuisance was provided to the property owner of record and/or
occupant in accordance with Yerington City Code 4-2-5; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was scheduled and held before the Yerington City Council pursuant to Yerington
City Code 4-2-6, at which time the City Council received proofs and testimony regarding the conditions
existing at the property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE YERINGTON CITY COUNCIL:
1. DECLARATION OF NUISANCE: The City Council hereby finds and determines, based on the
evidence presented, that a public nuisance exists upon the real property located at 119 S. West St.,
Yerington, NV 89447.
2. ORDER TO ABATE: The owner, occupant, or person in charge or control of the subject property is
hereby ordered to abate and remove said nuisance in its entirety within five (5) calendar days from the
date of service of this Order/Resolution, as prescribed in Yerington City Code 4-2-6 and 4-2-7.
3. CITY ABATEMENT UPON FAILURE TO COMPLY: Pursuant to Yerington City Code 4-2-7, if
the owner, occupant, or person in charge of the property fails to comply with this order this Order is not
complied with within five (5) calendar days after service, the City Council shall cause the process of
abatement and removal of the nuisance to commence. The owner, occupant, or person in charge of the
property shall not interfere with the abatement process.
4. RIGHT OF ENTRY TO ABATE: City Employees or contractors and their employees shall be
permitted entrance to the property for the purpose of abating the nuisance. Persons interfering with the
abatement process may be subject to penalties, including civil or criminal prosecution.
5. ASSESSMENT OF COSTS: All costs and expenses incurred by the City in abating and removing the
nuisance shall be charged to the property owner and levied as a special assessment against the real
property pursuant to Yerington City Code 4-2-10.
6. DISPOSAL OF REFUSE: The persons abating the nuisance may remove and dispose of all refuse,
rubbish, garbage, and personal property forthwith, all at owner expense.
PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this ____ day of __________, 2026.
CITY OF YERINGTON, NEVADA
By: __________________________
John J. Garry, Mayor

ATTEST:
By: __________________________
Stacy Stevenson, City Clerk

Jerry Bryant <[email protected]>

Re: 119 S. West St.
1 message
Jerry Bryant <[email protected]>
To: Joshua Dini <[email protected]>

Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 8:33 AM

Good morning,
I'm happy to clarify the difference between the 7-day and 14-day notice periods.
You have 7 days from when you receive the notice of violation OR 14 days from the date it was mailed (August 4).
During that 7- or 14-day period, you must commence abatement and agree upon a reasonable date for
completion(agreement with my office). Is there a specific date by which you can complete the abatement of the property?
In particular, the items along the outside of the fence must be removed immediately (if they have not already been
removed by the time of this email).
If you feel that completion is not possible within that timeframe, you may also request a public hearing before the City
Council during that 7 or 14-day period to ask for their review of the circumstances.
If you prefer a public hearing, I must receive that notice from you no later than 7 days after you receive the violation
notice. Based on your response, that would give us 7-Days from August 8.
If you request the hearing by August 15, I can place it on the agenda for August 24, 5:30 p.m.
Otherwise, you and I must agree on a specific date by which you assure us abatement will be complete. Any date
arrangement we make at this point is binding and failure to meet that deadline may result in further action.
How would you like to proceed?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 5:37 PM Joshua Dini <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes I am working on it as much as I can being how almost every court in town has warrants on me within a week. I
hired a friend to start the cleanup. Unfortunately having warrants I have lost my job of 8 years so it's tough right now.
Selling 2 trucks this week so I can afford a trash container. The notice I received said 7 days, but since the e-mail
counts as mail I'm assuming I really have the 14 days as stated on the letter by the 18 th their will be good progress. I
really feel like this whole town is railroading me to steal my land. Notices along with warrants within the same week
crazy?. I don't think you have seen or heard about the positions Im willing to stand against when it comes to
government overstepping their authority. And I sure hope this isn't a conspiracy against my rights under the color of
law. US code 241 and 242. Which is what it looks like jerry, AND with all of the corruption news about the city
yerington, tyranny from p.d. and the sheriff department lately it sure does fit the narrative for sure. You may want to talk
to the people who tried all this before you took your appointed position.You won't need to clean my yard for me. I'm
working on it, but I'll defend my property and my God given rights and freedom with my life. And your code (not law)
inforcers do not intimidate me and most know I am willing to lay my life down over this. I pray it won't come to that. I
don't want to be a matter. Just thought I would let you know. But I am cleaning it up and will make sure nobody can see
within my fence untill the task is complete.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, 3:42 PM Jerry Bryant <[email protected]> wrote:
See Attached.
--

Respectfully,

Jerry Bryant
City Manager
14 E. Goldfield Ave
Yerington, NV 89447
(775) 463-3511
--

Respectfully,

Jerry Bryant
City Manager
14 E. Goldfield Ave

6

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

5.0

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

5.1

Introduction

The economic landscape of Yerington has experienced significant shifts over the past few
decades. Historically known for its mining industry, as well as agriculture and ranching,
Yerington’s economy has undergone a transition to a more diversified economic base including
manufacturing, retail services, and recreation/entertainment. Agriculture remains a cornerstone
of the local economy, with ranching and farming providing livelihoods and contributing to the
area's economic stability. Small businesses in Yerington contribute to the local economy by
providing essential services and goods and fostering a close-knit community atmosphere.
However, the city faces challenges typical of rural areas, such as limited economic diversification
and relatively lower levels of investment compared to urbanized areas of Nevada such as Carson
City and Reno. To build on Yerington’s economic foundation and encourage economic growth,
the Economic Development Element offers a multifaceted strategy to diversify the economic base
by helping grow small businesses, addressing shortcomings in existing infrastructure, investing
in the human capital component of the community, and capitalizing on existing industries.
A recent development that could drastically impact the economic landscape of Yerington is the
Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center (TRIC), which continues to expand. Located just a short drive north
from Yerington in Storey County, the TRIC holds significant potential for advancing the City’s
economic development goals. By leveraging its strategic location and existing infrastructure,
Yerington’s proximity to the TRIC could help attract new businesses and industries. As companies
seek to expand their operations, Yerington could serve as a location for housing for employees
who travel to/from the TRIC, as well as an area for potential expansion of services. Economic
spillover from the TRIC’s growth could lead to increased investments in infrastructure, housing,
and education within Yerington.
High on the priority list of economic development planning for rural communities should be the
support, retention, and expansion of locally owned and operated business/industrial enterprises.
According to a study conducted by the Chamber of Commerce of the United States, approximately
82 percent of the economic growth of an average American community results from the creation
and expansion of locally owned and operated businesses. In Nevada, approximately 90 percent
of new firms employ 20 or fewer employees. That size firm could easily fit into and grow with the
Yerington community. Small businesses play a crucial role in the local economy and community
fabric. As a city with a tight-knit population, these businesses not only provide essential goods
and services but also serve as the backbone of the local economy. They offer unique products
and personalized services that large chains often cannot match, fostering a sense of local pride
and character. By supporting small businesses, residents contribute to a vibrant community
atmosphere that enhances the overall quality of life in Yerington.
Moreover, small businesses in Yerington are instrumental in job creation and economic stability.
They often hire local residents, contributing to lower unemployment rates and helping to retain
the area's talent. These businesses also frequently engage in community initiatives and support
local events, strengthening social bonds and encouraging a spirit of collaboration. As a result,
small businesses are not just economic entities but are integral to the social and cultural vitality
of Yerington, making them indispensable to the city’s growth and sustainability. Supporting and
retaining existing businesses should be at the forefront of Yerington’s economic development.

Page 33

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Source: DOWL, 2024

Figure 8: Downtown Yerington

Economic development efforts in Yerington should be tailored to the City’s capacity to influence
the local economy. The City has a vital role in providing a business-friendly atmosphere. Specific
actions the City can take include:
ƒ

Tailor its zoning regulations to reduce barriers for business development

ƒ

Provide streamlined development review

ƒ

Identify infrastructure needs and investing in infrastructure and utilities to reduce
development costs for businesses

ƒ

Support development of a range of housing types, strong schools

ƒ

Promote the city’s historic and cultural resources

ƒ

Revitalize downtown and supporting redevelopment efforts
Page 34

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

ƒ

Support the development of occupational training programs and workforce development
initiatives.

Yerington’s economy is characterized by its historical ties to mining, a strong agricultural sector,
and a growing focus on tourism and local business development. The City’s efforts to diversify its
economic base, improve infrastructure, and enhance workforce skills are pivotal for driving
sustainable growth. While there are challenges to address, including the need for population
growth and economic diversification, Yerington is making strides towards building a resilient and
prosperous economic future.

5.2

Summary of Current Conditions and Trends

In support of the 2024 update to the Master Plan, the City completed a socioeconomic economic
baseline indicator study (Appendix 1). The following discussion highlights key trends from the
socioeconomic report that inform the economic development strategies in Section 4.3 and the
goals and action strategies in Section 4.4. These employment trends underscore the dynamic
nature of Yerington's economy and the evolving demands within different sectors. As Yerington
continues to evolve, understanding these trends will be crucial for shaping strategies that support
sustainable economic growth and address the community's needs.

5.2.1 Employment/Unemployment
Employment as measured by full-time employed individuals rose gradually in Yerington between
2012 and 2022, increasing by 10.8%. Total employed individuals, however, including both fulltime and part-time decreased slightly by 4.5%. Following trends in Lyon County and Nevada (see
Figure 9), the unemployment rate decreased significantly from 16.4% in 2012 coming out of the
2009-2011 recession to 5.1% in 2022. The notable increase in full-time employment combined
with the steady decline of the unemployment rate suggests a positive shift in job stability within
the town.

Page 35

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Figure 9: Unemployment Rates in Yerington, Lyon County, and Nevada, 2012-2022

5.2.2 Labor Force
Yerington experienced a significant decrease in the labor force participation rate from
approximately 54 percent to 42 percent, from 2012 to 2022 (Table 7), whereas Lyon County
experienced a slight increase and Nevada as a whole experienced a small decrease during this
period. Yerington’s decreasing labor force participation rate began in 2020 with the COVID-19
pandemic. This decline in labor rate could be explained by a multitude of factors. The aging
population of Yerington signals that a larger proportion of residents may be retiring, reducing the
overall labor force participation rate.
Table 7: Labor Force Participation Rates in Yerington, Lyon County, and Nevada,
2012-2022
Labor Force
Yerington Labor
Force Participation
Rate
Lyon County Labor
Force Participation
Rate
Nevada Labor
Force Participation
Rate

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

53.6%

55.1%

46.8%

53.3%

40.1%

41.9%

57.1%

57.5%

55.2%

56.2%

56.2%

58.9%

65.1%

63.7%

63.3%

63.6%

63.4%

63.3%

Page 36

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

5.2.3 Income
Income levels in Yerington for households (both family and non-family households), is significantly
less than those of the county and state, with incomes between $10,000 and $30,000 less (Figure
10). Overall, incomes in Yerington lag behind those of Lyon County and Nevada and have grown
more slowly indicating a lack of resilience to economic shocks and economic concentration across
a few main sectors. Trends in median incomes could indicate fewer high-paying job opportunities
and a less diverse job market when compared to Lyon County and Nevada – limited job prospects
or lower demand for skilled labor can contribute to a slower growth in income for families,
particularly when the community experiences a stagnation in population growth. Two bright spots
are non-family household incomes which grew as quickly as Lyon County and Nevada from 20122022, possibly reflecting the in-migration of retirees into the community and increases in per
capita income, which grew by 40 percent, equaling Nevada, but less than the 73 percent increase
for Lyon County. These trends highlight significant disparities in income growth compared to Lyon
County and the state of Nevada. The overall slower growth in median income, particularly for
family households, raises concerns about the availability of high-paying jobs and economic
opportunities in the City. These trends underscore the need for targeted economic development
strategies to boost job diversity and income growth in Yerington.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey

Figure 10: Median Household Income in Yerington, Lyon County, and Nevada, 2012-2022

Page 37

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

5.2.4 Industry Sectors and Employers
Retail, agriculture, mining, finance and insurance, and health and education are the largest
sectors in Yerington’s economy. The health care, education, arts, and transportation sectors all
lost employment from 2012-2022. Retail, finance/insurance and real estate, agriculture and
mining all saw increases over the same time period. Significant changes across industry sectors
reflect broader economic and consumer trends, with retail and finance/insurance sectors
expanding markedly, whereas the arts, entertainment, and transportation sectors have declined.
These shifts highlight the town's adaptation to changing economic conditions and consumer
preferences, underscoring a transition towards industries with more robust growth potential,
suggesting areas for future development and investment. Figure 11 depicts more detailed
breakdown of employment by industry sector.

5.2.4.1

Natural Resources and Mining

Agriculture and mining jobs experienced an upward trend during the past two decades, with
approximately 127 employees that worked in the agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining
industry in 2022. The top agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining employers in the City
include Peri and Sons, Nevada Copper Inc., Snyder Family Farms, and Nevada Fresh Pak. Two
annexations to include large swaths of vacant land, currently considered for agricultural and
mining uses, occurred since the 2005 master plan. This vacant agricultural and industrial land
presents an opportunity to develop in the future to urbanized uses.

5.2.4.2

Retail

Private wage and salaried workers make up approximately 74.4% of the total employed
population in Yerington. Among that population, retail employees comprised approximately 35.5%
of the private wage and salary workforce. Retail has experienced a substantial increase in the
composition of the total workforce population, jumping from 5.7% in 2012, to 26.4% in 2022. The
top retail employers in Yerington are Raley’s and True Value Hardware, with a variety of other
national, regional, and local companies making up the remainder of retail employers.

5.2.4.3

Government Services

Some of the top employers in the city are the various government entities including the City of
Yerington, Lyon County, and the Lyon County Sheriff’s Department. As of 2022, approximately
23.3% of the employed population are classified as government workers. This figure experienced
a sharp decline from 32.5% of the employed population in 2020, perhaps as a result of the COVID19 pandemic impacting the availability of government jobs during a period of economic downturn.
Government services can be expected to remain a top employer for Yerington and will fluctuate
with the growth of the surrounding community. As the city grows or shrinks, so too will the amount
of government employees.

5.2.4.4

Health Care and Social Assistance Support Occupations

Approximately 10.57% of employment in Yerington is within the Health Care and Social
Assistance industry. This is higher than the County’s (9.31%) and the State’s (9.43%) percentage
of employment within this sector. It should be noted that this data was retrieved from the United
States Census Bureau (USCB) ACS 5-year Estimates. Because these are estimates, a margin of
error is included with the provided data (USCB 2022).

Page 38

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

The top health care and social assistance service employer in 2021 in the City was the South
Lyon Medical Center, which employs between 100 and 249 employees (Nevadaworkforce.com).
Other smaller health care and social assistance employers in the City include Smith Valley
Physician’s Office, Home Health Services of Nevada Inc., Lincare Inc., and Just Like Home
retirement home.

5.2.4.5

Recreation/Tourism/Hospitality

Business and jobs related to the tourism industry forecast a downward trend for Yerington. The
city’s most significant assets for drawing visitors in include its’ recreation, culture, and history.
Recreationalists use Yerington as a base while visiting the Walker River State Recreation Area
and enjoy the Yerington Trails for off-roading. The city’s small-town roots draw historians and
culturalists to its’ historic downtown for the Lyon County museum and Yerington Theater for the
Arts & Jeanne Dini Cultural Center (Travel Nevada 2024). The top visitor industry and tourism
services locations in Yerington include Pioneer Crossing Casino, Dini’s Lucky Club, Dotty’s, Lyon
County Museum, and Jeanne Dini Cultural Center. Tourism has been identified by stakeholders
throughout the region as an industry with growth potential.

Page 39

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey

Figure 11: Employment by Industry Sector, 2012-2022

Page 40

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

5.3

Economic Development Strategies

The City of Yerington has collaborated with regional and local stakeholders to identify various
economic development goals, and the strategies to achieve those goals. In an effort to get
feedback from the community, local residents have been queried to voice their opinions on the
current conditions of the local economy, and brainstorm ways to foster sustainable economic
growth. Active public and private engagement were a major component in developing strategies
and goals and serves as the backbone of this master plan. Based on the feedback received,
multiple opportunity areas were identified as noted below:
ƒ

Agriculture/food processing and producing – With a strong agricultural presence already
established, efforts should be made to attract new food processing and producing
businesses to the city. Furthermore, as one of the largest producers of white onions in
the country, there are potential agri-tourism events such as an onion festival that could
be held to attract both locals and tourists.

ƒ

Fernley, NV inland port – As the inland port in Fernley, Nevada, continues to be
developed, the whole region may benefit from expanded distribution and manufacturing
opportunities. Due to its close proximity to Fernley, Yerington is strategically positioned
to capitalize on this potential growth, and effectively and efficiently ship goods produced
in the City elsewhere.

ƒ

Railways – existing rail infrastructure could help attract developers who would benefit
from being strategically positioned along rail transportation routes. The City should take
inventory of sites adjacent to existing rail lines to identify rail-dependent economic
development opportunities and support marketing efforts to promote the development of
rail-dependent development opportunities.

ƒ

The Fort Churchill NV energy corridor currently has available capacity for users requiring
less than 15 megawatts of power in the region. The City should identify areas from which
power can be reasonably provided and promote available electrical power capacity to
users seeking to locate in the region.

ƒ

As the TRIC continues to grow, there may be opportunities to attract satellite offices
and/or supportive uses to help serve the established businesses. Due to its close
proximity to the TRIC, Yerington is strategically positioned to capitalize on an influx of
both people and business.

ƒ

The existing Yerington Airport has the potential to expand and attract aviation
training/classes to the region.

ƒ

Downtown expansion/revitalization – build up the downtown area to be an attractive
place to live, work, and play. Invest in open space and beautification efforts to create an
enticing environment in which people want to spend time.

ƒ

Redevelop golf course – either renovate and reopen the golf course, or redevelop the
land to a needed use (housing, manufacturing, agriculture, etc.)

ƒ

Proximity to public lands and regional attractions – the Walker River State Recreation
Area falls within the City and provides a wide range of outdoor activities including hiking,
fishing, and kayaking. There is also a wide range of off-roading areas found within and
surrounding Yerington. To capitalize on these incredible natural resources, tourism
related development such as motels/hotels, restaurants, and equipment rentals should
be further explored.

Page 41

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Coinciding with those opportunities are the constraints found within Yerington. Those constraints
were identified as follows:
ƒ

Housing – there is a lack of available housing in the City. In order to attract employers,
the City needs to have a variety of housing types available for potential workers.

ƒ

Power – currently, demand exceeds the current supply of power. Increased investment
in energy infrastructure will be needed to support new businesses and developments.

ƒ

Workforce – in order to attract new employers, the available workforce must have the
necessary skills to fill those job opportunities. Increased investment in workforce
development will be instrumental in attracting employers, as well as helping to retain
working age individuals. Furthermore, an increase in the number of working age
individuals will be necessary to meet the future demand of potential new businesses.
Yerington will need to be an attractive place to both live and work for new residents.

Capitalizing on these opportunities while finding solutions and workarounds for the identified
constraints are crucial to the economic success of Yerington. Identifying and planning for future
growth requires effective collaboration between the community, government, and developers.
Guiding principles for Yerington’s economic development will focus on:
ƒ

Diversifying the economy;

ƒ

Leveraging natural resources and agriculture;

ƒ

Enhancing local infrastructure;

ƒ

Promoting the City’s historic and cultural resources to increase tourism;

ƒ

Encouraging the development of open space, parks, and other recreational amenities;

ƒ

Revitalizing the downtown area;

ƒ

Promoting a collaborative approach to economic development;

ƒ

Supporting redevelopment efforts;

ƒ

Utilizing existing technology to identify growth areas and infrastructure needs;

ƒ

Promoting environmental stewardship;

ƒ

Investment in “human capital” (e.g., workforce development programs, education,
recreation opportunities, local arts)

ƒ

Incentivize and encourage a range of housing opportunities – affordable housing,
multifamily housing, single family dwellings, single-occupancy rooms, etc.

One strategy that was consistently mentioned throughout all stakeholder engagements, is the
need for investment in the “human capital” component of the City. Human capital reflects the
economic value of a worker’s experience and skills, encompassing the education, training, health,
and abilities that individuals bring to the workforce. Investment in human capital plays a crucial
role in the productivity and performance of the local economy. This investment should be at the
forefront of all future development and growth within Yerington and should focus on increased
access to education and training opportunities, health care (both physical and mental), and
recreational activities. A healthy community is a prosperous community, and Yerington’s success
depends on the success of its residents. The City should focus on fostering connections with local
colleges and employers to encourage the investment and development of workforce development
programs. Furthermore, continued investment in public spaces and beautification of the

Page 42

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

community will help to create a welcoming environment that is attractive and creates a sense of
place in which local residents want to live, work, and play.

5.4

Goals and Action Strategies

As a smaller, rural community, the City of Yerington has a unique economic profile which provides
a range of economic development and employment opportunities. Historically, Yerington has
derived its economic success from its ability to provide resource jobs in agriculture and mining,
and recreation for both local residents and tourists based on rich natural resources. To maintain
and bolster the economic vitality of Yerington, the City recognizes the importance of revitalizing
and developing the downtown area, attracting new keystone employers, enhancing existing
infrastructure, and expanding available housing for both residents and tourists. The low cost of
living in Yerington and its proximity to employment hubs such as the TRIC can be an attractive
feature for both businesses looking to reduce overhead costs and individuals seeking affordable
living.
Yerington faces challenges in attracting large-scale businesses and developing the needed
infrastructure to accommodate the influx of resident’s keystone employers bring. The city’s growth
potential hinges on its ability to provide infrastructure to create attractive development
opportunities for both businesses and housing. It is essential to establish community economic
development objectives and then implement action strategies to attain its goals.
Goal 1:

Maintain and Enhance Established Employers and Local Businesses

1a)

Provide resources and incentives for small businesses to thrive (e.g., grants, tax
incentives, etc.).

1b)

Support and promote agribusiness development by identifying land and
infrastructure needed to serve these uses and planning events to celebrate the areas
agriculture.

1c)

Collaborate with local businesses and organizations to co-develop and fund
community projects such as improved local infrastructure, festivals and events, and
beautification efforts to create a more attractive environment.

Goal 2:

Attract a Keystone Employer

2a)

Identify businesses that complement existing economic engines and resources in
the region (e.g., food manufacturing, data centers, etc.) and identify and promote
their location in the community.

2b)

Engage local stakeholders to identify the employment needs of the community.

2c)

Update zoning and development standards that remove barriers for development of
large-scale businesses.

Goal 3:
3a)

Identify Priority Buildable Lands and Promote Real Estate Development
Survey existing properties and create an inventory of available lands, including
vacant lots, underutilized properties, and parcels with redevelopment potential.

Page 43

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

3b)

Conduct a development feasibility study for identified employment sites to assess
permitted uses and development standards that should be changed.

3c)

Use Geographic Information System (GIS) services to map and analyze existing land
conditions, infrastructure availability, and proximity to key services.

3d)

Incentivize mixed-use development, particularly in the downtown area.

3e)

Evaluate land that has been annexed that is undevelopable or that has insufficient
public infrastructure and consider alternative uses for these sites such as recreation
and open space uses that may be supportive of other city economic development
objectives.

3f)

Consider and facilitate zone changes that support employment expansion within the
city.

3g)

Offer incentives for developers to build high-quality, energy-efficient housing.

Goal 4:

Expand and Promote Tourism Opportunities

4a)

Market attractions related to the city’s environment, history, and recreational
opportunities.

4b)

Enhance and develop local parks, open spaces, trails, etc. to draw more tourism and
provide amenities to local residents.

4c)

Promote events and festivals related to the history and agricultural heritage of
Yerington.

4d)

Collaborate with the State of Nevada, the federal government, and local developers
to develop campgrounds or outdoor recreation areas around existing off-roading
destinations within the City limits.

4e)

Encourage the expansion of temporary overnight accommodations such as park
camping sites and RV ready spaces.

4f)

Collaborate with the Walker River State Park to promote recreational and cultural
activities in Yerington.

4g)

Work with Yerington’s Main Street committee to promote local artists, art
organizations, and related cultural institutions.

Goal 5:

Evaluate and Update City Zoning Standards

5a)

Review existing zoning standards and identify criteria that limit or discourage
development in priority economic development areas.

5b)

Ensure that lands are appropriately zoned for the intended type of development.

Page 44

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Goal 6:

Promote Downtown Revitalization

6a)

Establish incentives such as density bonuses, expanded range of permitted uses,
reduced parking requirements, etc.

6b)

Encourage the development of housing in and around downtown by identifying
opportunity sites, ensuring infrastructure exists to serve them, and removing
regulatory barriers to their development.

6c)

Invest in beautification projects to develop open spaces or parks which attract local
residents to spend more time in the downtown area.

6d)

Continue partnership with “Downtown America/Main Street” to assist in the core
development of the downtown area.

6e)

Work with NDOT to pursue downtown streetscape and road cross-section
improvements that encourage pedestrian activity and enhance the aesthetics of the
downtown environment.

Goal 7:

Promote Redevelopment

7a)

Explore loan and grant opportunities to assist with the cost of redevelopment (EPA,
Department of Education, etc.)

7b)

Explore the redevelopment of closed golf courses into subdivisions or other uses to
support the community’s housing and business needs.

Goal 8:

Expand and Enhance Local Infrastructure

8a)

Identify and prioritize key road improvements to attract employers to priority
employment sites.

8b)

Coordinate with local power companies to help facilitate power access to future
businesses.

8c)

Review existing water and sewer infrastructure improvement needs to serve priority
employment areas and identify critical infrastructure improvements.

8d)

Update Public Facilities Master Plan to identify key corridors and areas of utility
expansion in coordination with Nevada energy.

8e)

Identify and promote buildable lands along existing rail corridors.

Goal 9:

Develop Workforce Skills

9a)

Partner with educational institutions like community colleges and training programs
to ensure residents have the skills necessary for future job opportunities.

9b)

Collaborate with local secondary and higher education programs for aviation training
at the airport.

Page 45

City of Yerington MASTER PLAN | October 2025

Goal 10: Strengthen Regional Partnerships
10a) Collaborate with local economic development groups to promote and develop the
economic assets of the community.
10b) Explore opportunities for expansion to provide housing for TRIC commuter
employees.
Goal 11: Develop Overnight Lodging and Permanent Housing to Accommodate New
Employers and Tourism Activity
11a) Encourage the development and expansion of lodging to accommodate visitors.
11b) Encourage the development of new housing to attract potential employees.
11c) Examine short-term rental regulations and allowances for additional overnight
lodging in the community.
11d) Encourage the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).
11e) Work with the Nevada Housing Association for affordable housing investment
opportunities.

Page 46

7

COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
Yerington, Nevada (Lyon County, ZIP 89447)

2025–2030

Prepared in Partnership with:
University of Nevada Extension | Western Nevada Development District
Northern Nevada Development Authority | Lyon County

Data Sources: Lightcast Q1 2026 | U.S. Census Bureau | USGS | WNDD | City of Yerington
June 2026

Executive Summary
This Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) for Yerington, Nevada (Lyon County, ZIP
89447) establishes a data-driven framework for sustainable regional economic growth through 2030.
Developed in alignment with U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) requirements, this plan
synthesizes Lightcast Q1 2026 labor market intelligence, U.S. Census data, and regional stakeholder
priorities to chart a clear strategic course for Yerington’s economy.
Yerington is a small, rural city of approximately 9,456 residents (ZIP 89447) serving as the county seat of
Lyon County. The area’s economy is anchored by agriculture, mining, government, and construction—
industries that reflect both the community’s heritage and its emerging opportunities in critical minerals
and sustainable land use.
The region faces meaningful challenges: a below-national-average job growth rate, an aging workforce
with nearly half the population aged 55 or older, below-average median household income, and
constrained water resources in the Walker Basin. However, it also sits at the intersection of significant
opportunity—particularly the pending restart of the Pumpkin Hollow copper mine by Kinterra
Capital/Southwest Critical Materials, growing government and accommodation sectors, and strong
demand for construction and agriculture workers.
Key Findings at a Glance
9,456
Population (2025)
Projected +143 by 2030

3,356
Total Jobs (2025)
+5.7% since 2020

$79.0K
Avg. Earnings/Job
$9.5K below national avg.

Five Strategic Goals
•
•
•
•
•

Diversify and strengthen the economic base by leveraging the Pumpkin Hollow copper mine
restart and supporting value-added agriculture.
Develop and retain workforce talent through targeted education, vocational training, and career
pathway programs.
Improve infrastructure and connectivity including broadband, transportation, and water system
sustainability.
Support small business development, entrepreneurship, and downtown Yerington revitalization.
Enhance quality of place through housing affordability, recreational amenities, and community
health services.

Section 1: Regional Profile & Background
1.1 Geographic Overview
Yerington is the county seat of Lyon County, Nevada, located approximately 65 miles southeast of Reno
in the Mason Valley. The city sits at the confluence of the East and West Walker Rivers, at an elevation
of approximately 4,377 feet. The surrounding agricultural valley is bounded by the Singatse Mountains
to the east and the Wassuk Range to the west. Yerington is located at the intersection of US 95A and
Nevada State Route 208, making it a regional hub for the southern Lyon County communities.
The area encompasses Lyon County’s industrial park in Yerington, which joins two other industrial parks
in Dayton and Fernley as anchors of Lyon County’s business attraction strategy. The county is part of the
Carson City Metropolitan Statistical Area, providing connections to broader regional labor markets and
infrastructure networks.
1.2 History and Community Identity
Yerington was founded in 1871, originally known as Pizen Switch, and was incorporated as a city on
March 17, 1907. It became the Lyon County seat in 1911. The city is named after Henry M. Yerington,
superintendent of the Virginia and Truckee Railroad from 1868 to 1910. The area’s economy has
historically been shaped by agriculture (particularly alfalfa, onions, and livestock), copper mining, and
public services.
The Yerington Paiute Tribe of the Yerington Colony and Campbell Ranch, whose people (Numu) have
lived in the Smith and Mason Valleys since approximately 1000 A.D., represents an important cultural
and economic stakeholder in the region. The tribe maintains a presence in the community and
participates in regional planning processes.
The community has a strong identity tied to its agricultural heritage and small-town character.
Yerington’s livability score of 74/100 ranks it in the 88th percentile nationally, with particular strengths
in crime prevention (rated A+) and housing affordability (rated A-).
1.3 Governance and Regional Partners
Yerington operates under a Council-Manager form of municipal government. Key regional economic
development partners include:
•

•
•
•
•

Western Nevada Development District (WNDD): The federally designated Economic
Development District covering Lyon County, which produces and updates the regional CEDS and
coordinates EDA funding access. Yerington is one of seven cities represented on the WNDD
board.
Northern Nevada Development Authority (NNDA): Provides business recruitment, retention, and
expansion services across the region.
University of Nevada Extension: Provides agricultural, community development, and economic
research support, including the Lightcast data underpinning this report.
Western Nevada College: Operates service centers in Fernley and Yerington, providing
workforce and continuing education.
Walker River Irrigation District (WRID): Manages water delivery across approximately 235,000
acres including 80,000 irrigated acres in Smith and Mason Valleys.

•

Walker Basin Conservancy: Works on water restoration and tourism development along the
Walker River Corridor.

Section 2: Economic & Demographic Analysis
2.1 Population Trends
The ZIP 89447 area (Yerington and surrounding Mason Valley) had a total population of 9,456 in 2025,
reflecting a modest 0.9% decline from 9,543 in 2020 (a loss of 86 residents). This contrasts with Nevada
statewide population growth of 14.5% over the same period, and national growth of 6.5%.
Despite recent declines, population projections are positive: the area is expected to gain 143 residents
between 2025 and 2030, reaching 9,599—a 1.5% increase. The city of Yerington proper had a population
of approximately 3,204–3,252 in 2025–2026, representing modest but consistent growth of
approximately 0.2–0.8% annually.
Year

ZIP 89447 Population

Year

ZIP 89447 Population

2020

9,543

2026

9,481 (proj.)

2021

9,319

2027

9,509 (proj.)

2022

9,300

2028

9,539 (proj.)

2023

9,285

2029

9,569 (proj.)

2024

9,449

2030

9,599 (proj.)

2025

9,456

2.2 Population Demographics
Yerington’s demographic profile presents both opportunities and challenges for economic development
planning:
Age Structure
The area has a significantly older population than national averages. The median age in Yerington is
approximately 51–55 years, compared to the national median of approximately 38 years. Notably, 4,447
residents (47% of the ZIP 89447 area) are aged 55 or older—far exceeding the national average of 2,857
for an area of comparable size. This creates substantial retirement risk for the regional labor force, as a
large share of experienced workers will exit the workforce in the coming decade.
Conversely, the millennial population (ages 25–39) stands at only 1,045—nearly half the national
average of 1,934 for comparable areas. The under-5 and 5–14 cohorts showed mixed trends between
2015 and 2025, while the 65–74 cohort grew dramatically (+99% for 70–74 year olds), consistent with
national Baby Boomer retirement trends.
Race and Ethnicity
The ZIP 89447 area has lower racial diversity than national averages: 3,006 racially diverse residents
compared to a national average of 4,019 for areas of similar size. The city of Yerington’s racial
breakdown includes approximately 67–73% White non-Hispanic, 15–20% Hispanic/Latino, 4–7% Native
American, with smaller shares of other groups. The Yerington Paiute Tribe represents a significant
Native American community presence.

American Indian/Alaska Native residents (Non-Hispanic) totaled approximately 667 in the ZIP area in
2025, down slightly from 707 in 2015. The Hispanic/Latino population, including White Hispanic
residents, represents a growing and economically important segment of the agricultural workforce.
Gender
The 2025 population was approximately 48.3% male and 51.7% female. The female population grew by
14.7% between 2015 and 2025, while the male population declined slightly (−2.5%), reflecting broader
patterns of male workforce out-migration common in rural agricultural communities.
2.3 Employment & Labor Market
Total regional employment in ZIP 89447 reached 3,356 jobs in 2025, up 5.7% from 3,174 in 2020. While
this represents positive growth, it fell short of the national employment growth rate of 10.6% by 4.9
percentage points, indicating the region has room to close a competitive gap. Jobs are projected to grow
to 3,543 by 2030.
An important distinction in the local labor market: while 3,356 jobs are located within the ZIP area (place
of work), 3,959 workers residing in the ZIP area work somewhere (place of residence). This net outflow
of approximately 600 workers indicates that a meaningful share of the local residential workforce
commutes to jobs in Carson City, Reno, Fernley, and other regional centers.
Year

Jobs (Actual/Projected)

2020

3,174

2021

3,215

2022

3,383

2023

3,426

2024

3,471

2025

3,356

2026 (proj.)

3,413

2027 (proj.)

3,459

2028 (proj.)

3,495

2029 (proj.)

3,526

2030 (proj.)

3,543

2.4 Industry Composition
The regional economy is characterized by a small but concentrated industrial base, with pronounced
specialization in agriculture and mining relative to national averages. The following table presents the
top industries by 2025 employment:

Industry

2025 Jobs

2020 Jobs

Change

Avg. Earnings

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &
Hunting

617

645

−28 (−4.3%)

$80,764

Government

519

445

+74 (+16.6%)

$80,332

Construction

381

354

+27 (+7.5%)

$79,922

Mining, Quarrying & Oil/Gas
Extraction

331

317

+15 (+4.6%)

$153,907

Health Care & Social Assistance

324

352

−27 (−7.8%)

$67,391

Retail Trade

318

285

+33 (+11.3%)

$45,069

Accommodation & Food Services

158

99

+59 (+59.8%)

$28,295

Other Services

158

126

+32 (+25.5%)

$44,767

Wholesale Trade

111

79

+32 (+41.4%)

$93,655

Finance & Insurance

50

30

+19 (+62.5%)

$83,524

Mining stands out as the highest-earning industry by far at $153,907 average annual earnings per
worker, followed by Utilities ($173,626) and Information ($104,548). Agriculture, despite being the
largest employer, pays $80,764—slightly above government ($80,332) and construction ($79,922).
Accommodation and Food Services is the fastest-growing sector in percentage terms (+59.8%) but also
the lowest-paying ($28,295 per worker).
2.5 Industry Concentration (Location Quotients)
Employment concentration, measured by location quotient (LQ), reveals where Yerington is truly
specialized relative to the national economy. An LQ above 1.0 indicates above-average concentration.
Key concentrations include:
Industry

Location Quotient
(2025)

Interpretation

Mining, Quarrying & Oil/Gas
Extraction

28.93

Extremely concentrated —
signature industry

Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing &
Hunting

16.10

Highly concentrated — regional
pillar

Utilities

2.69

Moderately concentrated

Construction

1.95

Moderately concentrated

Arts, Entertainment & Recreation

1.77

Slightly concentrated

Government

1.06

Roughly at national average

Retail Trade

1.03

At national average

2.6 Gross Regional Product

The region’s Gross Regional Product (GRP) was estimated at $659.4 million in 2025. Mining, Quarrying &
Oil/Gas Extraction leads GRP contribution at approximately $148.8 million, followed by Agriculture
($102.2 million), Wholesale Trade ($54.7 million), Government ($44.0 million), and Construction ($43.2
million). Total regional imports were approximately $1.04 billion, while exports were $905.5 million,
reflecting a regional trade deficit that highlights opportunities for import substitution through local
business development.
2.7 Business Characteristics
Yerington’s business community is dominated by small and micro enterprises. Data from
DatabaseUSA.com via Lightcast shows a total of approximately 326 businesses in the area with the
following size distribution:
Business Size

% of Total

1–4 employees

34.4%

5–9 employees

30.7%

10–19 employees

20.2%

20–49 employees

9.5%

50–99 employees

3.1%

100–249 employees

1.2%

250–499 employees

0.9%

A striking 85.3% of businesses employ fewer than 20 people, underscoring the importance of small
business support services, microenterprise financing, and business development technical assistance to
the local economy. Only 5.2% businesses employ 50 or more workers, representing the largest
employers in the area.
2.8 Workforce Characteristics
The top occupational categories by employment in 2025 are Construction & Extraction (408 jobs),
Management (383), Farming/Fishing/Forestry (332), Office & Administrative Support (281), and
Transportation & Material Moving (253). The highest-earning occupational group is Healthcare
Practitioners & Technical at a median hourly wage of $43.47, followed by Legal ($40.72), Computer &
Mathematical ($37.22), and Management ($33.60).
Among the fastest-growing occupational groups are Food Preparation & Serving (+36 jobs),
Transportation & Material Moving (+34), Educational Instruction & Library (+32), Management (+29),
and Sales & Related (+27). These growth occupations reflect the expanding government,
accommodation, and retail sectors noted in industry analysis.
The Farming, Fishing & Forestry occupation group has the highest employment concentration (LQ =
15.1), followed by Construction & Extraction (LQ = 2.7) and Management (LQ = 1.5). Notably, Computer
& Mathematical occupations, while small in number (27 jobs), grew 60% from 2020 to 2025—suggesting
emerging digital economy potential.

2.9 Income and Poverty
Median household income in the city of Yerington was approximately $44,974–$60,109 in 2023–2024
(estimates vary by source), representing significant growth from $31,151 in 2000 but remaining below
Nevada’s statewide and national medians. Average earnings per job in the ZIP area were $79,000,
roughly $9,500 below the national average of $88,500.
The poverty rate in Yerington was approximately 11.9–17.4% in 2024, with American Indian residents
experiencing higher poverty rates (22.4%). Approximately 38% of households reported median income
below $25,000, highlighting the importance of wage growth strategies alongside job creation. The cost
of living index for Yerington was 91.1 (below the national average of 100), meaning that while incomes
are lower, purchasing power is somewhat supported by lower living costs.

Section 3: Key Industry Sectors & Opportunities
3.1 Agriculture & Food Production
Agriculture remains the single largest employment sector in Yerington, with 617 jobs and an
employment concentration (LQ = 16.1) far above the national average. The Mason Valley is one of
Nevada’s most productive agricultural areas, producing alfalfa, onions, beef cattle, and specialty crops.
Major agricultural employers include Peri & Sons Farms (one of the largest onion producers in the
United States), operating in the Yerington area with a substantial Hispanic/Latino seasonal and
permanent workforce.
Challenges facing the agricultural sector include water availability from the Walker River and
groundwater, climate variability, and the aging of farm operators. USGS research has documented that
groundwater pumping levels in Mason Valley have reached levels that even major precipitation events
cannot replenish, creating long-term sustainability concerns.
Opportunities include value-added agriculture processing, agritourism, precision agriculture technology
adoption, and participation in emerging water markets facilitated by the Walker Basin Conservancy. The
University of Nevada Extension’s Walker Basin SNOWPACS water markets research project is directly
relevant to helping local agricultural producers adapt to changing water conditions.
3.2 Mining & Critical Minerals
Mining is Yerington’s highest-GRP and highest-earning industry (LQ = 28.93, $148.8M GRP, $153,907
average annual earnings). The dominant asset is the Pumpkin Hollow copper project, located
approximately 7 miles southeast of Yerington within 22,862 acres in Mason Valley.
Following the June 2024 bankruptcy of Nevada Copper Corp., the Pumpkin Hollow assets were acquired
by Southwest Critical Materials LLC, an affiliate of Kinterra Capital, in a $128 million 363 sale completed
October 2024. In September 2025, Kinterra announced plans to restart copper production within 24
months, securing $80 million in equity financing led by Lionhead. Restart plans involve completing
geological resource model updates using advanced core-scanning techniques, multi-discipline
engineering assessments, and offtake-linked financing with downstream partners.
The project hosts an estimated 1.7–5 billion pounds of copper resources across underground and openpit assets and carries fully constructed underground mine infrastructure. As the clean energy transition
accelerates global copper demand—for electric vehicles, grid infrastructure, and renewable energy
systems—Pumpkin Hollow represents a transformative economic opportunity for Yerington with
potential employment of 300+ direct jobs and substantial multiplier effects.
Strategic priorities include workforce pipeline development (particularly for mining trades, engineering,
and environmental compliance roles), ensuring community benefit agreements, and managing potential
environmental and water-use impacts.
3.3 Government & Public Services
Government is the second-largest employment sector with 519 jobs and the fastest-growing major
industry (+74 jobs, +16.6% from 2020 to 2025). Lyon County government functions are headquartered in
Yerington, and public sector employment includes county administration, K–12 education (Lyon County
School District), law enforcement, public works, and social services.

The government sector’s growth reflects both county population growth in suburban Lyon County
communities (Dayton, Fernley) and expanded service delivery for Yerington’s older population. The
sector pays $80,332 average annual earnings—competitive with construction and agriculture—and
provides stable employment with benefits.
3.4 Construction
Construction employed 381 workers in 2025 (LQ = 1.95) with average annual earnings of $79,922. The
sector grew 7.5% between 2020 and 2025, driven by residential and infrastructure development across
Lyon County. Construction is among the top occupational concentration groups (Construction &
Extraction LQ = 2.7), indicating deep local expertise.
Opportunities include residential infill development in Yerington proper, infrastructure projects tied to
mine development, and the broader Lyon County industrial park expansion. Workforce development for
construction trades is a consistent regional priority given the sector’s size and wage competitiveness.
3.5 Healthcare & Social Services
Health Care & Social Assistance employed 324 workers in 2025, though this represents a decline of 27
jobs (−7.8%) from 2020. The sector is significantly underrepresented relative to national averages (LQ =
0.71), indicating that Yerington residents likely travel to Carson City, Reno, or other centers for many
healthcare services. Banner Churchill Community Hospital in Fallon and Renown/Saint Mary’s systems in
Reno serve as referral destinations.
Given the area’s rapidly aging population (47% aged 55+) and the national retirement wave, healthcare
capacity will be an increasingly pressing issue. Gaps in primary care, behavioral health, dental services,
and elder care represent both community need and economic development opportunity. Healthcare
practitioners earn a median hourly wage of $43.47—the highest of any occupational group in the area.
3.6 Tourism & Recreation
Accommodation and Food Services grew dramatically between 2020 and 2025 (+59.8%, adding 59 jobs),
making it the fastest-growing sector by percentage. While average earnings are the lowest of all
industries ($28,295), the sector’s growth signals increasing visitor traffic and local consumer spending.
Tourism development along the Walker River Corridor is an active strategic initiative, co-led by the
Walker Basin Conservancy and Yerington Main Street Committee through the Travel Nevada 3D Tourism
Destination Plan launched in 2024–2025. Walker River State Recreation Area and the broader Mason
Valley offer significant outdoor recreation, birding, and agritourism potential. The annual Farm to Table
dinner events and other community events hosted by the Walker Basin Conservancy demonstrate
growing interest in rural experiential tourism.

Section 4: SWOT Analysis
4.1 Strengths
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Prime location in Mason Valley with productive agricultural land and water access via Walker
River.
Lyon County industrial park in Yerington providing pad-ready development sites.
No state income tax and low property taxes (Nevada business-friendly climate).
Strong employment concentration in high-value mining (LQ = 28.93) and agriculture (LQ =
16.10).
Pumpkin Hollow copper project: major permitted asset with restart underway under new
ownership.
Yerington Paiute Tribe as engaged cultural and economic partner.
Lyon County seat status providing stable government employment base.
Affordable housing market (median home $144,700–$298,000, below state average).
Low cost of living (index 91.1 vs. national 100), supporting workforce recruitment.
Strong community cohesion and high livability rating (74/100, 88th percentile nationally).
University of Nevada Extension and Western Nevada College presence supporting workforce
and research.
Growing accommodation/tourism sector signaling increased regional appeal.

4.2 Weaknesses
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Below-national-average job growth rate (5.7% vs. 10.6% national, 2020–2025).
Severely low millennial population (1,045 vs. national average 1,934) indicating youth outmigration.
High retirement risk: 47% of population aged 55+ creating imminent workforce transition.
Median household income below state and national averages.
Poverty rate of 11.9–17.4%, with higher rates among Native American residents.
No postsecondary degree-granting institution located within Yerington.
Geographic isolation from major labor markets (65+ miles from Reno).
Limited broadband and digital infrastructure in rural areas.
Small business ecosystem: 85% of businesses employ fewer than 20 people, limiting scalability.
Healthcare capacity gaps relative to aging population needs.
No commuter transit connecting Yerington to regional employment centers.

4.3 Opportunities
•
•
•
•
•

Pumpkin Hollow mine restart: 300+ high-wage jobs, multiplier effects, and local supply chain
opportunities.
Critical minerals supply chain development (copper for EV/clean energy transition).
Walker River Corridor tourism development and agritourism expansion.
Federal infrastructure and economic development funding (EDA, USDA Rural Development,
BIL/IIJA).
Value-added agricultural processing to capture more of the food supply chain.

•
•
•
•
•
•

Remote worker attraction leveraging affordable housing and quality of life.
Water market development supporting agricultural resilience and economic flexibility.
Expansion of Western Nevada College offerings in Yerington for workforce development.
Renewable energy development (Libra Solar groundwater lease agreement active in 2025).
Native American entrepreneurship and tribal economic development initiatives.
Downtown Yerington revitalization through Main Street program expansion.

4.4 Threats
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Water scarcity: groundwater over-pumping in Mason Valley threatens long-term agricultural
viability.
Mining sector volatility: copper price fluctuations and operational challenges (as evidenced by
Nevada Copper bankruptcy).
Climate change impacts including reduced Sierra Nevada snowpack affecting Walker River flows.
Continued youth and working-age population out-migration.
Broadband and technology infrastructure gaps limiting remote work and business
competitiveness.
Regional competition from high-growth Lyon County communities (Fernley, Dayton) attracting
investment away from Yerington.
Supply chain disruptions affecting agricultural inputs and mining equipment.
Loss of experienced workers to retirement without adequate replacement pipeline.

Section 5: Strategic Goals, Objectives & Action Plans
Goal 1: Leverage Mining & Critical Minerals for Economic Growth
Capitalize on the Pumpkin Hollow copper mine restart under Kinterra Capital/Southwest Critical
Materials to create high-wage employment, stimulate local supply chain development, and position
Yerington as a center of domestic critical minerals production.
Objectives
•
•
•
•
•

Support the Pumpkin Hollow mine restart timeline and maintain productive relationships
between the city, Lyon County, and Kinterra Capital.
Develop a local supplier and contractor database to maximize local hiring and procurement.
Create mining-specific workforce training programs through Western Nevada College and
regional trade programs.
Pursue community benefit agreements that direct mine revenues toward local infrastructure
and social services.
Attract ancillary businesses (equipment suppliers, environmental services, logistics) to
Yerington’s industrial park.

Lead Partners
City of Yerington, Lyon County Economic Development, NNDA, Western Nevada College, Kinterra
Capital/Southwest Critical Materials, WNDD
Timeline
Immediate (2025–2026): Stakeholder engagement, workforce pipeline planning. Short-term (2026–
2027): Training program launch, supplier database. Medium-term (2027–2030): Full mine operations,
supply chain integration.
Goal 2: Strengthen and Diversify Agriculture
Build on Yerington’s signature agricultural strength while diversifying into value-added processing,
agritourism, and sustainable farming practices that address water constraints.
Objectives
•
•
•
•
•

Attract or develop at least one value-added agricultural processing facility (onion products,
alfalfa pellets, specialty crops) by 2028.
Partner with University of Nevada Extension on precision agriculture and water efficiency
demonstration projects.
Expand agritourism infrastructure including farm stays, U-pick operations, and agritourism
marketing.
Support water market participation and conservation easements that maintain long-term
agricultural viability.
Develop agricultural workforce housing to retain essential farm labor, particularly seasonal
Hispanic/Latino workers.

Lead Partners

Lyon County, Walker River Irrigation District, Walker Basin Conservancy, UNR Extension, USDA Rural
Development, Peri & Sons Farms and other major agricultural operators
Goal 3: Invest in Workforce Development
Close the gap between Yerington’s current workforce capacity and the skills required by growth
industries—particularly mining, construction, healthcare, and technology—while creating pathways that
retain young people and attract working-age adults.
Objectives
•
•
•
•
•

Establish a Yerington Workforce Development Center in partnership with Western Nevada
College offering certificate programs in mining technology, construction trades, healthcare
assistant, and digital skills.
Create employer-led apprenticeship programs targeting the 300+ mining jobs projected at
Pumpkin Hollow.
Develop a young professional retention program including mentorship, networking, and
homebuyer assistance for residents under 35.
Expand early childhood education capacity to support working families with children.
Partner with Yerington Paiute Tribe for culturally specific workforce development programming.

Lead Partners
Western Nevada College, Lyon County School District, Yerington Paiute Tribe, NNDA, Nevada DETR,
WorkForce Connections, WNDD
Goal 4: Improve Infrastructure & Connectivity
Address critical infrastructure gaps—broadband, transportation, water, and housing—that limit
economic competitiveness and quality of life.
Objectives
•
•
•
•
•

Complete broadband infrastructure buildout to achieve 100 Mbps+ service coverage for 95% of
businesses and households in the ZIP area by 2028, leveraging BIL/BEAD funding.
Pursue NDOT investment in US 95A corridor improvements to reduce travel time to Carson City
and Reno.
Develop a housing action plan targeting 200 new workforce housing units by 2030 (mix of forsale and rental), with emphasis on affordability.
Support Walker River water infrastructure modernization to improve irrigation efficiency and
protect long-term water security.
Evaluate feasibility of commuter transit or vanpool services connecting Yerington to regional
employment centers.

Lead Partners
City of Yerington, Lyon County, NDOT, NV Energy, Walker River Irrigation District, USDA Rural
Development, Nevada Housing Division
Goal 5: Grow Small Business, Tourism & Quality of Place

Foster a vibrant local economy and community by supporting small business formation and retention,
developing tourism assets, and enhancing the amenities and services that make Yerington an attractive
place to live and work.
Objectives
•
•
•
•
•

Establish a Yerington Small Business Development Center (SBDC) satellite office providing
technical assistance, lending connections, and business planning support.
Implement a Downtown Yerington Revitalization Plan through the Main Street Nevada program,
focusing on façade improvements, tenant attraction, and event programming.
Complete the Walker River Corridor Tourism Destination Plan and implement priority projects
(trailhead development, signage, interpretive facilities) by 2027.
Develop a healthcare capacity expansion strategy including recruitment of primary care
providers, behavioral health services, and elder care facilities.
Attract a full-service grocery and daily needs retail operator to address the retail gap.

Lead Partners
City of Yerington, Walker Basin Conservancy, Yerington Main Street Committee, Yerington Chamber of
Commerce, Nevada SBDC, Lyon County Health Department

Section 6: Implementation & Evaluation
6.1 Priority Projects (2025–2027)
The following projects are identified as highest priority for near-term funding and implementation:
Priority Project

Lead Entity

Est. Timeline

Funding Source

Pumpkin Hollow Mine
Workforce Pipeline Program

WNC + NNDA +
Kinterra

2025–2027

EDA, WIOA, NV DETR

Broadband Infrastructure
Buildout (BEAD)

Lyon County + City

2026–2028

Federal BEAD/BIL

Walker River Corridor Tourism
Plan Implementation

Walker Basin
Conservancy

2025–2026

Travel NV, USDA

Downtown Yerington
Revitalization

City + Main Street
NV

2026–2028

CDBG, Main Street NV

Workforce Housing
Development (100 units Phase
1)

City + Lyon County

2026–2029

NV Housing Div., LIHTC

Value-Added Ag Processing
Feasibility Study

Lyon County + UNR
Ext.

2025–2026

USDA Rural Dev.

Healthcare Provider
Recruitment Campaign

Lyon County Health

2025–2026

HRSA, county general fund

Small Business Development
Center Satellite

NV SBDC + City

2026

SBA, EDA

6.2 Performance Metrics
Progress on this CEDS will be measured annually using the following key performance indicators:
Metric

2025 Baseline

2030 Target

Total regional employment (ZIP
89447)

3,356

3,600+

Average earnings per job

$79,000

$85,000+

Total businesses (50+ employees)

7

12+

Median household income
(Yerington city)

$57,980

$65,000+

Poverty rate

11.9–17.4%

<10%

Broadband coverage (100 Mbps+)

Estimated <60%

95%+

New housing units permitted (5-year)

Baseline TBD

200+

Metric

2025 Baseline

2030 Target

Annual visitor spending (Walker
Corridor)

Baseline TBD

+30% growth

Pumpkin Hollow mine employment

~331 (mining sector)

600+

Millennial population (ages 25–39)

1,045

1,300+

6.3 Organizational Roles & Governance
This study is designed to be implemented through the existing regional economic development
governance structure. The City of Yerington and Lyon County serve as primary local implementation
authorities and will assess metric performance, update project priorities, and revise strategies as
needed. Stakeholder participation will be maintained through the Yerington Chamber of Commerce,
Yerington Paiute Tribe, Walker Basin Conservancy, and major employers.
6.4 Funding Landscape
Key federal and state funding programs relevant to Yerington’s CEDS implementation include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

EDA Public Works & Economic Adjustment: Infrastructure and economic recovery projects;
requires CEDS compliance for eligibility.
USDA Rural Development: Business & Industry loans, Community Facilities grants, Rural
Economic Development loans, Value-Added Producer grants.
BIL/IIJA Broadband: State BEAD program administered through Nevada Governor’s Office of
Science, Innovation and Technology.
WIOA Title I–II: Workforce development and adult education through WorkForce Connections.
SBA 7(a), 504, and Microloan programs: Small business financing.
Nevada Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): Housing and community infrastructure
administered through Nevada DHCVB.
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Administered through Nevada Housing Division for
affordable housing.
HRSA Rural Health: Healthcare workforce and facility development.
Nevada Governor’s Office of Economic Development (GOED): Site Readiness, Catalyst Fund, and
business incentive programs.

Section 7: Conclusion
Yerington, Nevada stands at a pivotal juncture. The community faces genuine structural challenges—an
aging population, below-average wage levels, youth out-migration, and water constraints—but it also
possesses extraordinary assets: world-class copper deposits on the verge of renewed production, one of
Nevada’s most productive agricultural valleys, an authentically livable small-town environment, and a
resilient community that has navigated boom-bust cycles for over a century.
The 2025–2030 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy charts a path that is both realistic
about challenges and ambitious about opportunities. The Pumpkin Hollow mine restart, led by Kinterra
Capital/Southwest Critical Materials, represents the most significant near-term economic catalyst—with
the potential to add hundreds of high-wage jobs, stimulate a local supply chain, and generate tax
revenues supporting community infrastructure. Alongside this, the diversification of agriculture,
expansion of tourism along the Walker River, investment in downtown revitalization, and targeted
workforce development programs will collectively strengthen the economic foundation.
Success will require sustained collaboration among the City of Yerington, Lyon County, the Western
Nevada Development District, the Yerington Paiute Tribe, major employers, educational institutions, and
state and federal partners. The data-driven benchmarks established in this CEDS will provide
accountability and transparency, ensuring that strategies adapt to changing conditions.
Yerington’s future is one of measured optimism: a community leveraging its unique strengths—
agricultural heritage, mineral wealth, and strong community identity—to build a more diversified,
higher-wage, and sustainable economy for all residents.

Data Sources: Lightcast Q1 2026 | U.S. Census Bureau ACS 2019–2023 | USGS Nevada Water Science
Center | Nevada Copper Corp. / Kinterra Capital press releases | Wikipedia | city-data.com |
worldpopulationreview.com | nnda.org | walkerbasin.org
Prepared June 2026

8

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YERINGTON,
NEVADA, AMENDING THE CITY OF YERINGTON FEE SCHEDULE FOR
VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, PERMITS, AND FEES.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Yerington has the authority to establish and amend fees for
municipal services, administrative requests, licensing, and permits to ensure reasonable cost recovery for city
operations; and
WHEREAS, the City staff has reviewed the current fee schedule and determined that adjustments to certain
administrative, licensing, utility, and departmental fees are necessary to reflect current operational costs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update and amend the City Fee Schedule as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Yerington, Nevada, as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YERINGTON, NEVADA:

1. Adoption of Amended Fee Schedule: The City Fee Schedule for the City of Yerington is hereby
amended as detailed below:
•
•

•
•

•

•

Administrative & Licensing Fees:
o CD/DVD/USB/Video/Audio Reproduction: $15.00
Animal Control Fees:
o Surrender of an Adult Dog(previously spayed/neutered): $50.00
o Surrender of an Adult Dog(not spayed/neutered): $75.00
o Surrender of Litter (up to 6) Under 12 weeks of Age: $100.00
o Impounding of any stray: $50.00
o Adoption: $30.00
Building Department Fees:
o Building Permit Reinstatement (after 12 mos.) Fee: $150.00
Park Fees:
o Park Reservation (per day) Fee: $50.00
o Park Reservation cleaning deposit: $150.00
o Ballfield Season Reservation Fee (12 week) Fee: $500.00
o Ballfield Daily Reservation Fee: $50.00
o Ballfield Season Cleaning Deposit Fee (12 week): $500.00
o Ballfield Daily Cleaning Deposit Fee: $150.00
Police Fees:
o Accident/Incident Report Fee: $12.00
o BodyCam and/or Video/Photo Fee: $45.00/staff hour (min. 1 hour)
Street Closure Fees:
o Event Street Closure Application Fee: $50.00
o Event Street Closure Fee(NDOT Right-of-way): $300.00
o Event Street Closure Fee Interior Streets: $100.00
o Event Street Closure Hourly Fee(NDOT Right-of-way Only): $35.00
o Event Street Closure Cleaning Deposit(NDOT Right-of-way): $300.00
o Police/Traffic Escort Fee: $75.00

o
o
o
o

Utility Street Closure Application Fee: $50.00
Utility Street Closure Fee (1st day): $250.00
Utility Street Closure Fee (additional days): $50.00
Utility Street Closure Traffic Control Detail Fee: $50.00/hour (min. 1 hour)

2. Severability: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Resolution is for any reason
held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.
3. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage and adoption on this
_____ day of ________, 2026.

PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this ____ day of __________, 2026.

CITY OF YERINGTON, NEVADA
By: __________________________
John J. Garry, Mayor

ATTEST:
By: __________________________
Stacy Stevenson, City Clerk

9

CITY OF YERINGTON

STREET CLOSURE
POLICY

Table of Contents
Policy Statement………………………………………….2
Purpose and Scope……………………………………….3
Application and Requirements………………………….3
Required Fees and Deposits……………………………..3
Review and Authority……………………………………4
Appeal Process……………………………………………4

1

Policy Statement
Having a formalized Street Closure Policy is essential for maintaining safety,
transparency, and order within the City of Yerington. Public streets are critical
infrastructure designed primarily for public transportation and emergency access.
When events, maintenance, or construction require these thoroughfares to be
restricted or closed, a clear policy ensures that public interests and safety remain
protected.
A Street Closure Policy is vital for the City of Yerington for the following key
reasons:
● Public Safety & Emergency Preparedness: It ensures that local public safety
agencies—including police, fire, and emergency medical services—are
notified in advance, allowing them to plan alternative response routes and
maintain uninterrupted emergency services.
● Traffic Flow & Community Coordination: It establishes standard procedures
for traffic control, detours, and signage, minimizing traffic congestion and
disruption for local residents and businesses.
● Liability & Risk Management: It protects the city and event organizers by
establishing clear liability standards, insurance requirements, and safety
protocols to mitigate risks associated with closing public roadways.
● Fairness & Accessibility: It provides a transparent, standardized permitting
process for community organizations, businesses, and residents, ensuring
equitable access to public space for special events while safeguarding public
accessibility.
● Interdepartmental Efficiency: It streamlines communication across city
departments—such as Public Works, Law Enforcement, and
Administration—ensuring all necessary approvals and logistics are handled
cohesively.
By implementing a clear Street Closure Policy, the City of Yerington strikes a
balance between supporting community events and economic activity while
fulfilling its primary obligation to protect public safety and convenience.

2

Purpose and Scope
This policy establishes the regulations and application process for temporary street
closures and special events on public property within the City of Yerington. This
includes, but is not limited to, community gatherings, street fairs, block parties,
parades, runs/walks, and similar events.

Application Requirements
Any individual, organization, or entity wishing to hold a special event or
temporarily close a public street must submit a completed Special Event & Street
Closure Application to City Hall at least thirty (30) days prior to the proposed
event date. Roads managed by NDOT require sixty (60) day notice.
NDOT Roads are specified as Main Street, Goldfield Ave. and Bridge St.

Required Fees & Deposits:
1. Fee Determination: All Fees referenced herein shall be established by the
Yerington City Council and stated in the City Fee Schedule.
2. Application Fee: A non-refundable processing fee must accompany the
application upon submission.
3. Event Closure Fee: A street closure for the purpose of a private or public
event applies to cover administrative overhead and basic city coordination.
4. Cleaning Deposit Fee: A refundable cleaning deposit for event closures is
required prior to permit issuance. This deposit will be refunded in full within
fourteen (14) days following the event, provided the right-of-way and public
spaces are restored to their original, clean condition without damage or
excessive litter.

3

REVIEW AND AUTHORITY
1. Administrative Review: All applications will be routed to the Chief of
Police (or his/her designated representative) for review.
2. Approval Authority: The Chief of Police or designee possesses full
authority to evaluate the public safety impact, traffic detours, police staffing
needs, and overall community welfare, and to grant approval, approval with
conditions, or denial of the application.
3. Conditions of Approval: The Chief of Police or designee may attach
reasonable conditions to any approved permit, including, but not limited to,
required traffic control measures, barricades, security personnel, or specific
operating hours.
4. Some closures, such as those of State Highways (Main Street, Goldfield
Ave., Bridge Street) may also require a permit from other agencies such as
NDOT. It is the burden of the applicant to obtain any related permits
associated with such closure prior to their event.

4. APPEALS PROCESS
1. Right to Appeal: If an application is denied by the Chief of Police or
designee, or if the applicant objects to the conditions imposed, the applicant
may submit a written notice of appeal to the City Manager within ten (10)
business days of the notice. Any appeal that cannot be resolved by the City
Manager may be submitted for review before the Council.
2. City Council Review: If not resolved by the City Manager, the appeal will
be placed on the agenda of the next regularly scheduled City Council
meeting, if requested by the applicant. The City Council retains final
authority to uphold, modify, or reverse the decision of the Chief of Police or
designee.

4

10

CITY OF YERINGTON

SALARY &
CLASSIFICATION
POLICY

Table of Contents
Policy Statement………………………………………….2
Administration of Plan.………………………………….2
Salary Plan and Placement….…………………………..2
Merit Increases & Advancement………………………..3
Compliance with CBA..…..………………………….…..3

Salary Schedule………………………………….
PENDING

1

Policy Statement
The purpose of this policy is to establish an equitable, transparent, and competitive
Position Classification and Salary Plan for all non-represented and appointed
employees of the City of Yerington. It is the policy of the City to maintain position
descriptions that accurately reflect current job duties and to set compensation
levels that ensure internal equity and external competitiveness within the relevant
labor market, subject to municipal budget limitations and standard public fiscal
controls.
Nothing in this policy is to supersede policies prescribed in the City of Yerington
Personnel Policies. Should any discrepancy exist, the established Personnel
Policies will prevail.

Administration of Classification
Position Classification: Every position within the City shall be classified based on
duties, responsibilities, minimum qualifications, and complexity. Positions with
similar levels of difficulty and responsibility shall be assigned to the same
classification and pay range.
1. Job Descriptions: The City Clerk (or designated representative) shall
maintain official, written job descriptions for each classification.
2. Reclassification Requests: Reclassification of an existing position may
occur if permanent and substantial changes in duties or responsibilities
alter the nature of the work. Reclassifications require review by the City
Manager and final approval by the City Council

2

Salary Plan Structure & Placement
The City Council shall maintain and periodically update an official Salary
Schedule establishing minimum and maximum pay range steps for each
classification. It is recommended that this be reviewed and established and
approved during the annual budget sessions.
Approval of budgeted funds and salary classifications shall satisfy requirements set
for in Yerington City Ordinance Title 1, Chapter 6, Section 1(a) as it pertains to
appointed officers.
1. New Hires: New employees shall normally be hired at Step 1 of the
designated pay range. Hiring above Step 1 requires written justification
based on exceptional qualifications or market scarcity, subject to
approval by the City Manager within budgeted funds.
2. Promotions: An employee promoted to a higher classification shall
receive a salary increase placing them at the step in the new salary range
that represents a salary increase over their pre-promotion rate.
Merit Increases and Step Advancement
For a full description of Merit Increases and Advancement policy refer to the City
of Yerington Personnel Policies.
Approved step increases will take effect at the beginning of the pay period in
which the employee’s anniversary date occurs.
Compliance with Collective Bargaining and Enforcement.
For positions subject to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the provisions of
the ratified CBA shall prevail over conflicting provisions of this policy.
Should any policy or guideline established in this policy be in conflict with Nevada
Revised Statues, provision of the Nevada Revised Statutes will prevail.
The City Manager is charged with establishing operational procedures to enforce
this policy. Failure to follow established policies and guidelines may result in
administrative disciplinary action up to and including termination, alongside
potential criminal penalties under Nevada Law.

3

11

CITY OF YERINGTON

PROCUREMENT
PROCEDURES POLICY

1. PURPOSE & OBJECTIVE
The City of Yerington establishes this policy to govern the procurement of goods, services, and public
works. The primary objectives are to ensure fair and open competition, maximize the value of taxpayer
dollars, preserve public trust, and maintain compliance with local, state, and federal laws.
2. APPLICABILITY & STATUTORY AUTHORITY
This policy applies to all departments, officers, and employees of the City involved in purchasing or
contracting. All procurement activities shall strictly adhere to the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS),
specifically NRS Chapter 332, NRS Chapter 338, and other City of Yerington Policies. In the event of a
conflict between this policy and state law, Nevada Revised Statutes shall control.
3. CORE GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Ethical Conduct & Anti-Collusion: All procurement activities must be free from self-interest,
conflicts of interest, or improper influence. In accordance with NRS 332.800 and NRS 332.820,
collusive bidding, advance disclosure of confidential evaluation data, and elected official or
evaluator financial interests in contracts are strictly prohibited.
2. Equal Opportunity: The City provides fair, open, and non-discriminatory access to all qualified
vendors and contractors responding to solicitations.
3. Fiscal Responsibility: Staff must ensure purchases are backed by adequate, budgeted funds prior
to committing public resources.
1.

4. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
No officer, employee or agent of the City shall participate in the selection, award or administration of
contracts on behalf of the City of Yerington if such participation would create a conflict of interest. A
conflict of interest may arise when an employee, officer or agent, any member of his or her
immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any
party indicated herein; an actual or foreseeable financial or other interest arising from the execution
of the contract, or enjoys or receives a tangible personal benefit from the performance of the contract;

Page 1 of 4

City officers, employees, and agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of
monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts.
Employees, officers or agents that are found to be in violation of the article(s) above will be subject to
discipline. Disciplinary action may include any or all of the following: termination of employment,
removing the appointed officer from the office, dissolving the relationship between the City and
agent. REQUIRES FURTHER DISCUSSION TO AVOID RESTRICTING APPROPRIATE
ACTION.
5. PURCHASE ORDERS
A purchase order is a written document that obligates the City to make a purchase. The City of
Yerington requires purchase orders for certain purchases to ensure compliance with budget, state
procurement statutes, and federal grant agreements and regulations. Prior to signature, the approver
of the purchase order is required to review the purchase order request to ensure that the item has
been budgeted and is within budget, is in accordance with local government purchasing
requirements in NRS 332 and 338, and is in accordance with applicable federal grant agreements
and regulations.
Purchases under $10,000.00
City Purchase Orders are not required for purchases under $10,000; however, a purchase order may
be completed if elected by staff, or if required by a vendor.
Purchases for $10,000 or more
City Purchase Orders are required for all purchases of $10,000 or more. A purchase order must be
issued prior to ordering the items or services being purchased. These purchase orders must be
approved by City Manager (or his/her designee in his/her absence).
Contracts or task orders formally approved by the City Council do not require purchase orders, but
may have one issued if requested.

6. CONTRACTS
The City of Yerington may utilize contracts and/or task orders for purchases of services and public
works projects.
Prior to signature, contracts will be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, City Manager and
City Clerk to ensure legal and risk management provisions are adequate.
Contracts and task orders at or over $15,000 annually will go to the City Council for approval or
signature, while contracts and task orders under $15,000 may go to the City Council or may be
signed by the City Manager or designee.
Notice: A short form and long form contract to protect the interest of the City of Yerington is under
review for future consideration and adoption to this section.

Page 2 of 4

7. PROCUREMENT THRESHOLDS & METHODS
Pursuant to NRS Chapter 332, purchasing methods are governed by estimated annual contract values:
Estimated
Threshold

Up to
$49,999
annually

$50,000 to
$100,000
annually

Over
$100,000
annually

Required
Procurement
Method

Authority / Requirement

Micro/Informal
Purchases

City Manager approval; competitive quotes encouraged. These
purchases require departments to perform due diligence to
purchase for the best price. Documentation of due diligence is
not required.

Informal
Solicitation
NRS 332.063

These purchases require quotes from two or more vendors. The
department should choose the lowest responsive and responsible
vendor. The department should document the quotes received and
selection of the most responsive quote and attach them to the
voucher when being paid.

Formal
Competitive
Bidding
NRS 332.065

These purchases require formal advertising and contracts are
awarded by the City Council to the lowest responsive and
responsible bidder. The City Council may also reject all bids
received. The Clerk’s Office is normally the department that
publishes the advertisement and conducts the bid opening.

The City of Yerington may make purchases by using pricing from other competitively bid governmental
contracts, such as Nevada State Purchasing, GSA, NASPRO, etc. City of Yerington may also piggyback
off of pricing used in a contract for another government, so long as these types of purchases meet the
state requirements for either informal or formal bidding.

8. PUBLIC WORKS
The City of Yerington may elect to perform its own work on a public works project under $100,000
subject to the requirements of NRS 338.1386.
Public works include any project for new construction, repair or reconstruction of a project financed in
whole or in part from public money for: public buildings, jails and prisons, public roads, public
highways, public streets and alley, public utilities, publicly owned water mains and sewers, public parks
and playgrounds, public convention facilities, and all other publicly owned works and property.

Page 3 of 4

Requirements for awarding a public works contract
1. $25,000 or less - NRS 338.13862
The City may award a contract after soliciting a bid from at least one licensed contractor.
2. $25,000 to $100,000 - NRS 338.13862
The City may award a contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder after soliciting a
bid from at least three properly licensed contractors. Preferences of 5% will be given for local
businesses owned and operated by veterans with service-connected disabilities NRS 338.13844
3. $100,000 and above - NRS 338.1385
The City must formally advertise and bid a project between $100,000, with the City Council
formally awarding the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder or the best bid
(best bid defined under NRS 338.1389 for contracts over $250,000).
4. Construction manager at risk - NRS 338.1685 to 338.16995
The City may utilize the construction manager at risk method by following the requirements in
NRS 338.1685 to 338.16995.
5. Design-Build - NRS 338.1711 to 338.173
The City may utilize the design-build construction method by following the requirements in
NRS 338.1711 to 338.173.
6. Prevailing wage
In accordance with NRS 338.080, state prevailing wage is applicable to public works projects
in excess of the exemption, which is currently $250,000.
7. Alignment of Nevada Revised Statutes
The dollar amounts set forth herein shall be deemed to adapt to dollar amounts set forth in the
referred section of the Nevada Revised Statutes as they are amended from time to time.

9. SPECIAL PROVISIONS & EXCEPTIONS
•

•

•

Sole Source & Statutory Exceptions (NRS 332.115): Solicitations may be waived for qualified
sole-source items, specialized professional services, or hardware/software not adapted to
competitive processes.
Emergency Procurements (NRS 332.112): Emergency purchases resulting from natural
disasters or sudden public health/safety threats may proceed under accelerated authorization
procedures.
Federal Methods of Procurement: The City of Yerington will use Federal Methods of
Procurement when making purchases with federal funds, such as federally awarded grants.
Should there ever be a conflict between local procurement methods established above and Federal
Methods of Procurements, the Federal Methods of Procurements will be followed.

10. POLICY ADMINISTRATION & ENFORCEMENT
The City Manager and City Clerk are charged with establishing operational procedures to enforce
this policy. Failure to follow established procurement guidelines may result in administrative
disciplinary action up to and including termination, alongside potential civil or criminal penalties
under Nevada law.

Page 4 of 4