On the agenda: Eugene meeting — colocation (Jan 27)

AGENDA
Phone: 541-682-5377

www.eugene-or.gov/pc

Meeting Location Hybrid: Commissioners In-Person (Sloat Room) / Public Access Virtual (Zoom)
The Eugene Planning Commission welcomes your interest in these agenda items. Meetings
will continue to be held remotely using virtual meeting technology until further notice.
Information about online or other options for access and participation is available on the last
page of this agenda.
For the hearing impaired, assistive-listening devices or an interpreter can be provided with
72-hour notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation may also be provided
with 72-hour notice. These services may not be available during the Planning Commission
meetingbased on service availability but may occur as a follow-up service. To arrange for
these services, contact the Planning Division at 541-682-5699.

Tuesday, January 27, 2026 – Regular Meeting 5:30 pm – 7:30 pm
Commissioners: Ken Beeson; Diane Behling (Vice Chair); Tiffany Edwards; Dan Isaacson;
Jason Lear (Chair); Chris Ramey; Kathleen Yang.
The Commission will begin the meeting with the City’s Land Acknowledgement statement:
Since time immemorial the Kalapuya people have been the Indigenous stewards
to our region, building dynamic communities, maintaining balance with wildlife,
and enacting sustainable land practices. This land acknowledgement is a way of
resisting the erasure of Indigenous histories and to honor Native communities by
inviting truth and reconciliation. Following treaties between 1851 and 1855,
Kalapuya people were dispossessed of their Indigenous homeland by the United
States government and forcibly removed to the Coast Reservation in Western
Oregon. As we consider the impacts of colonization, we also acknowledge the
strength and resiliency of displaced Indigenous people. The City of Eugene is built
within the traditional homelands known as Kalapuya Ilihi. Kalapuya descendants
are citizens of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon
and the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians of Oregon, they continue to
make contributions in our communities here and across the lands. We express
our respect for the inherent political sovereignty of all federally recognized Tribal
Nations and Indigenous people who live in the State of Oregon and across the
nation. Therefore, the Planning Commission recognizes that what we do today
will affect the many generations who will come after us.
A. Public Comment
The planning commission reserves 10 minutes at the beginning of this meeting for public
comment. The public may comment on any matter, except for items scheduled for public
hearing or public hearing items for which the record has already closed. Generally, the
time limit for public comment is three minutes; however, the planning commission reserves
the option to reduce the time allowed for each speaker based on the number of people
requesting to speak.
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 1 of 104

B. Work Session: Urban Growth Strategies Update: Community Advisory Panel
Perspectives
Staff: Leah Rausch, 541-682-5476, [email protected]
C. Items From Commission and Staff
1. Other Items from Commission
2. Other Items from Staff
3. Learning: How are we doing

How To Access the Meeting
To watch a webcast of the meeting live, visit:
https://www.eugene-or.gov/2109/Planning-Commission-Webcasts
To be able to participate in Public Comment join using one of the two following options:
1. Join on your computer, tablet or smartphone: https://eugene-or-gov.zoom.us/j/86525188211
When prompted, sign up to speak by clicking once on the “raise hand” icon.
2. Join on your phone: Dial +1 877-853-5257 (Toll Free) and enter the Webinar ID: 865 2518 8211
When prompted, sign up to speak by dialing *9 (Star-9).
International numbers available: https://eugene-or-gov.zoom.us/u/kb2Du7X6gt

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 2 of 104

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
January 27, 2026
To:

Eugene Planning Commission

From:

Terri Harding, Principal Planner
Leah Rausch, Senior Planner
Stuart Warren, Associate Planner

Subject:

Work Session: Urban Growth Strategies Community Advisory Panel Roundtable
Discussion

ACTION REQUESTED
No action is requested from the Commission. This work session is intended to be a roundtable
discussion with members of the Urban Growth Strategies Community Advisory Panel.
Commissioners are encouraged to engage in conversation with members of the panel on their
experience, lessons learned, and key takeaways.

BACKGROUND
In 2024, Eugene initiated a multi-year urban growth boundary analysis and collaborative effort
that integrates state-required urban growth planning, equitable community engagement, and
Council-directed policy work, which has been given the umbrella project name of Urban Growth
Strategies. Urban Growth Strategies builds off the Envision Eugene Community Vision to
identify the tools, actions, policies, and land needed for housing, jobs, and other urban uses in
Eugene for the next twenty years. Staff provided updates to the Commission on this topic at six
meetings in 2025; on February 11, June 17, July 8, August 12, October 28, and December 9.
Urban Growth Strategies includes several phases:
1. Community Engagement: Identify the needs and priorities of community members
for housing, jobs, and access to community assets in Eugene.
2. Policy Development: Integrate the results of community engagement and technical
analysis to create and update the policies in the Envision Eugene Comprehensive
Plan, guiding land use planning in Eugene.
3. Housing and Jobs Needs and Actions: Take actions to address identified needs,
especially related to housing production, affordability, and choice.
4. Land Supply Studies: Complete a technical analysis of land needed for jobs, housing,
and other urban uses (such as parks, schools, and infrastructure).
A general project timeline for Urban Growth Strategies is included as Attachment A, and
additional background information on the Urban Growth Strategies project is available on the
project webpage.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 3 of 104

This meeting will continue the discussion on community engagement to identify community
needs and priorities for housing, jobs, and access to community assets like parks and open
spaces, grocery stores, and schools. Throughout 2025, a group of diverse community members
advised staff on components of Urban Growth Strategies including:
• Equity Atlas: Selected Stories from Eugene’s History of Displacement
• Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan
• Fair Housing Issues
• Housing Actions
At this work session, staff will provide a brief overview of the Community Advisory Panel, key
takeaways, and lessons learned, then facilitate an informal conversation between the Planning
Commission and panel members.

COMMUNITY ADVISORY PANEL
The Urban Growth Strategies Community Engagement Plan serves as a guide to engaging
community members throughout the project. The Plan outlines engagement goals and
opportunities, how people can effectively participate and stay informed, and emphasizes the
City’s commitment to equitable community engagement. The Plan is designed to reach a broad
spectrum of community members and includes focused outreach to engage those most
impacted by policies, actions, and regulatory changes, people with relevant experience, and
subject-matter experts. The Plan was presented to the Planning Commission for review and
approval at their February 13, 2024, work session.
To align with the City’s goal and the state’s mandate to center the voices and experiences of
people from underserved community groups in decision-making, the Community Engagement
Plan included social engagements, interviews, and outreach events designed to gather input
from members of underserved community groups. Additionally, staff and consultants convened
a Community Advisory Panel composed of 13 community members who represent Black,
Indigenous, Latino/Latina, Asian, Pacific Islander, and other communities of color as well as a
range of abilities and gender identities. Consistent with the recommendations in the City’s
Community Engagement Guide and Equity Panel Guidance1, Panel members were compensated
for their time, diversity of perspectives, and lived experiences. Their lived experiences range
from personal to professional, housing insecure to homeowner, from high-school student to
retiree, and a range of transportation users. The panel met eight times between March and its
conclusion in October 2025. This work is supported by state grant funding awarded to assist the
City in meeting new state requirements for equitable engagement and fair housing analysis.
This panel worked collaboratively with staff on the following objectives:

1

The City of Eugene’s Community Engagement Guide and Equity Panel Guidance are internal, living documents
intended to offer helpful suggestions for planning and carrying out community engagement activities, with a focus
on cultural responsiveness. They are based on the City’s Vision: to be a welcoming and safe community for
everyone.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 4 of 104

•

Establishing a baseline understanding of Urban Growth Strategies, including barriers to
housing that will serve the range of needs in Eugene for the next 20 years, and the
breadth of policy topics to be addressed in comprehensive plan updates, including
community health, housing, community engagement, and compact development.

•

Employing an equity lens to advise staff including advising on how projects and policies
may benefit and burden people from underserved communities and how to make
technical information accessible to the broader community.

•

Connecting with community networks to expand the reach of the project into
underserved communities; creating ways for community members to impact project
outcomes as the work reaches decision makers in 2026-2027.

•

Supporting ongoing communication between the panel and staff regarding proposals
and upcoming decisions by the City of Eugene Planning Commission and City Council
related to Urban Growth Strategies and housing planning.

The Community Advisory Panel is one of the many ways that the City is committed to equitable
community engagement. The Panel Guidelines, included as Attachment B, provide more
detailed information about the panel meeting process, including a meeting schedule, topics
discussed, and City and panelist commitments.
Local consultants, Julie Fischer (Fischer Consulting) and Aimée Okotie-Oyekan (Aiyé
Collaborative) were instrumental in convening, facilitating, and supporting the Community
Advisory Panel. They also advised staff on meeting content, cultural considerations, agenda
setting, meeting planning and facilitation, and managed communications with the panel. The
consultants were also responsible for administering an exit survey.
Individual meeting summaries, included as Attachment C, contain an overview of the meeting
with key takeaways. Meeting summaries were shared with the panel for their review and input,
then posted on the Urban Growth Strategies Project Library. Key takeaways from the panel
were also included in the 2025 Community Engagement Summary and are discussed in the
following section of this Agenda Item Summary.
Over the past several months, staff have been incorporating feedback from the panel and other
community engagement activities into components of the Urban Growth Strategies project, as
appropriate. Specifically, panel feedback informed the Equity Atlas, draft goals and policies for
the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan, and draft housing actions.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
This section contains a simplified summary of key takeaways from the panel as they relate to
Urban Growth Strategies components. Attachment C contains the summaries and detailed
notes from each meeting. The following key takeaways are organized by theme.
Home is more than a physical space. Home was described as a place where panel members felt
safe and comfortable, with access to goods and services. Panel members emphasized the

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 5 of 104

importance of a housing supply that meets the diverse needs of the community, including cost,
location, and other qualities like family sized units, access to open space and transportation
infrastructure, and designed to be accessible for people of all abilities. Panel members generally
supported removing barriers to housing but were skeptical of reducing open space
requirements for multi-unit housing.
Learn from the past. The panel generally supported the City’s work to better understand the
history of discriminatory policies and practices in housing, land use, and dispossession through
the Equity Atlas research. The panel emphasized the importance of learning from the past to
ensure that similar harms are not inflicted in the future. They advised that the Equity Atlas
needs to contain an element of storytelling, suggested additions and changes to project
content, and noted that it should be a living document.
Build relationships and trust. Panel members emphasized that the City has not always been a
good partner to members of underserved communities. Panel members advised that the City
could improve relationships and trust through community engagement and investing in
underserved communities. Panel members suggested that staff be considerate of cultural
differences, collaborative, and clear about how input will be used in planning and adoption
processes.
Access to goods and services. Panel members appreciated the City’s efforts to plan for better
access to goods and services throughout Eugene. Mixed use centers were perceived as a
potential tool for developing neighborhood identity and should include cultural considerations.
The panel advised staff to consider how centers feel, not just look, to make them more
welcoming spaces for members of underserved communities. Centers should include a diverse
range of housing and businesses that serve all income levels, public art, and spaces for
community gathering.

PANEL EXPERIENCE
During the panel’s eighth and final meeting, panelists provided feedback to staff and
consultants about their experience as a panel member, including areas of success and areas for
future improvement. Panelists were also asked to complete an exit survey. The full summary of
the exit survey is included as Attachment D.
In general, panelists felt that areas of success were:
•

Recruitment of a panel composed of a diverse, welcoming, intelligent, and collaborative
group of people.

•

Thoughtfully planned logistics supported panel members feeling engaged and valued.

•

The panel process balanced educating the panel, hearing diverse perspectives, and
mindfully managed limited meeting time.

•

Panelists wish to remain engaged in the project in some capacity.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 6 of 104

A few areas for future improvement expressed by panelists were:
•

More meeting time to spend on in-depth discussion.

•

The hybrid meeting format needs improvements.

•

Improved communications, like more succinct emails.

•

Varying meeting formats, locations, group discussion sizes, and ensuring that the same
voices are not dominating the space.

ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION
During the January 27 Planning Commission meeting, four panel members and one consultant
are expected to join the Planning Commission for an informal conversation. Planning
Commissioners are encouraged to ask questions about their experience, lessons learned, and
key takeaways.
NEXT STEPS
Next steps for community engagement for the Urban Growth Strategies project include
upcoming Planning Commission meetings on February 10 and 24, 2026. In the latter half of
2026, community members will have the opportunity to provide public comments on
components of the Urban Growth Strategies project as part of the public hearing process.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Urban Growth Strategies Project Timeline
B. 2025 Community Advisory Panel Guidelines
C. 2025 Community Advisory Panel Meeting Summaries
D. 2025 Community Advisory Panel Exit Report
FOR MORE INFORMATION
For more information regarding Urban Growth Strategies visit the project webpage or contact
staff directly:
Terri Harding, Principal Planner, Project Manager
Telephone: 541-682-5635
Staff E-Mail: [email protected]
Leah Rausch, Senior Planner
Telephone: 541-682-5476
Staff E-Mail: [email protected]
Stuart Warren, Associate Planner
Telephone: 541-682-5561
Staff E-Mail: [email protected]

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 7 of 104

Project Timeline
Attachment A
Comprehensive Plan Phase II

Comprehensive Plan Map

Housing & Jobs Actions

Housing Planning

Buildable Lands Inventory

Land Supply Studies

Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)

Community Engagement
Growth Monitoring

January 2025
2026

2025
Comprehensive
Plan Policies

Adoption

Parcel-Specific
Land Use
Designation Map

Adoption

Actions Pt. 1

Adoption

Local Housing
Need

2027

Housing, Jobs, and
Other Urban Land Needs

2029

Transportation System Plan
Major Update

Pt. 2

Housing Production Strategy

Residential &
Employment Lands
(2026-2046)

2028

2030

Adoption

Adoption

Adoption

Adoption

Implementation & Monitoring of Actions (through 2035)

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 8 of 104

Adoption

UGB Expansion Analysis
Natural Resource Studies, Infrastructure Needs Analysis,
Determine Locations and Land Use Designations
Ongoing Community Engagement and Annual Summaries
Ongoing Monitoring, Annual Reports, and System Updates

Adoption

Attachment B
Project Purpose
Urban Growth Strategies is a project to identify the tools,
actions, policies, and land needed for the next 20 years to
support housing and living wage jobs for Eugene community
members. Urban Growth Strategies includes four key phases:
•
•
•
•

Understand the needs and priorities of community members related to housing, jobs,
and access to community services, resources, and facilities that benefit residents.
Take actions to address identified needs, especially related to housing production,
affordability, and choice.
Study the land needed for jobs, housing, and other urban uses (such as parks, schools,
and infrastructure).
Integrate the results of community engagement and technical analysis to create and
update the policies and maps that guide land use planning in Eugene.

For more information about Urban Growth Strategies, visit the project webpage and Engage Eugene
https://engage.eugene-or.gov/urban-growth-strategies.

Panel Objectives
The Advisory Panel works collaboratively with staff on the following objectives:
•

•

•
•
•

Establish a baseline understanding of Urban Growth Strategies, including barriers to
housing that will serve the range of needs in Eugene for the next 20 years, and the
breadth of policy topics to be addressed in comprehensive plan updates, including
community health, housing, community engagement, and compact development.
Employ an equity lens to advise staff through the next year of the project, including
advising on how projects and policies may benefit and burden people from underserved
communities and how to make technical information accessible to the broader
community.
Connect with community networks to expand the reach of the project into
underserved communities.
Create ways for community members to impact project outcomes as the work reaches
decision makers in 2026-2027.
Support ongoing communication between the Panel and staff regarding proposals
and upcoming decisions by the City of Eugene Planning Commission and City Council.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 9 of 104

Commitment
The expected Panel time commitment is seven 2-hour meetings with 8-15 participants per meeting
between March and October of 2025, and about seven hours for meeting preparation/follow up. The
Panel meets in-person, with an online option for people who are unable to attend due to physical
limitations or other factors. Meetings are designed to be welcoming and accessible, and include
meals, childcare, and transportation as requested.
The City of Eugene Office of Equity and Community Engagement describes the following benefits of
an Advisory Panel:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Building trust and relationships between City staff and community members and
providing opportunities for new leaders to emerge.
Sharing information to achieve mutual equity goals and aligning community visions.
Integrating panel feedback into City programs and projects, strengthening networks,
and creating a space for community stories to fill in missing data.
Offering transparency in local government processes and educating communities on
effective engagement.
Supporting underserved communities, which face significant climate, social, and
economic challenges, by using their insights to guide more equitable outcomes.
Fostering long-term relationships, providing valuable lived experiences, and building
community capacity through information sharing.

Process and Schedule (check monthly for updates to date/time/location/topics)
Location
Topic
Date
(Hybrid, Zoom
Option)
Meeting #1 – Orientation, Project Introduction and Group
Guidelines: This meeting will focus on introductions of
panelists, facilitators, and staff, as well as establishing group
guidelines and discussing the panel process and outcomes.

3/19/25,
5:30-7:30pm

Black Cultural
Initiative, 1695
Jefferson St.
Eugene

Meeting #2 – Historic and Current Context of Discrimination
in Housing and Land Use: During this meeting, the panel will
review and provide feedback on a draft inventory of
discriminatory actions related to housing and land use, and
how the legacy of these actions shows up in Eugene’s current
context (population and built environment).

4/9/25,

Eugene Public
Library,

Meeting #3 – City Goals and Policies: Community
Engagement and Community Health: This meeting will
introduce Eugene’s Comprehensive Plan, which guides the
City’s land use planning for future growth inside the urban

5/14/25,
5:30-7:30pm

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

5:30-7:30pm

100 W 10th
Ave, Eugene

Eugene Public
Library,

Page 10 of 104

growth boundary. The panel will provide feedback on draft goals
and policies in the community engagement and community
health chapters.

100 W 10th
Ave, Eugene

Meeting #4 – City Goals and Policies: Housing and Compact
Development: This meeting will continue the discussion on
Eugene’s Comprehensive Plan. The panel will provide feedback
on draft goals and policies in the housing and compact
development chapters.

5/21/25,
5:30-7:30 pm

Campbell
Community
Center, 155
High Street,
Eugene

Meeting #5 – Fair Housing Issues: Based on past actions,
current context, and community needs and priorities, the panel
will discuss the most pressing local fair housing issues.

6/11/25,
5:30-7:30 pm

Eugene Public
Library,

Optional meeting added after Meeting #2 at the request of
Panelists:

7/30/25,
5:30-7:30

Black Cultural
Initiative, 1695
Jefferson St.
Eugene

Meeting #7 – Housing Actions: Staff will provide a short
overview of Eugene’s current programs and policies to address
local housing needs. The panel will discuss and provide
feedback on new actions to address fair housing issues and
Eugene’s local housing needs.

9/10/25,
5:30-7:30 pm

Eugene Public
Library,

Meeting #8 – Wrap-up and Closing the Feedback Loop: This
meeting will focus on celebrating and closing the work of the
Advisory Panel, including debriefing the process, providing
feedback to the City and facilitators on the process, and
discussing future engagement in the project, including the City
Council adoption process.

10/8/25,
5:30-7:30 pm

100 W 10th
Ave, Eugene

Meeting #6 - Equity Atlas: A more in-depth presentation and
discussion of the Equity Atlas: Selected Stories from Eugene’s
History of Displacement online StoryMap.

100 W 10th
Ave, Eugene
Eugene Public
Library,
100 W 10th
Ave, Eugene

Participants
Panel participants provide insights into lived experience, advocacy priorities, and nonprofit/service/public sector goals, activities and plans. Participants are encouraged to attend all 7
meetings. The overall goal is consistency, so the project team does not plan to add new members
unless attendance is regularly below eight participants or the group is missing key voices.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 11 of 104

Roles
•

•

•

Panelists: Prepare for and actively participate in meetings to advise and make
recommendations to staff. Work includes providing recommendations on content and
reviewing meeting summaries. Panelists may communicate with their networks to gather
views on relevant topics and bring ideas back to the group. Panelists are empowered to
share their individual views publicly and can speak on behalf of the group with full group
understanding, communication, and consensus.
Aimée Okotie-Oyekan and Julie Fischer: Provide meeting agendas, logistics,
communications and facilitation. Julie and Aimée will:
o Provide transparent communication between the panel members and the City
o Create a warm, welcoming, and safe container for conversation
o Utilize involvement tools and strategies that are equitable, accessible, and
impactful
o Provide empathetic and clear facilitation
Leah Rausch, Stuart Warren, Terri Harding, and other City of Eugene staff: Provide
content to the Panel and respond to Panel input, advice, and recommendations. Staff
provide most meeting materials, presentations, and communicate Panel outcomes to City
of Eugene elected and appointed officials and staff at a range of organizational levels
including leadership, as well as the press and media. Staff commitments include:
o Integrate panelist voices and perspectives into City Council proposals
o Summarize the themes and priorities heard during meetings
o Proactive communication and listening
o Follow-up after the Panel
o Opportunities for more engagement, sharing with networks
o Accessible and easily understandable materials
o Dynamic and adaptable to changing needs and priorities

Decisions
The Panel is advisory to City staff, providing recommendations on the content presented at each
meeting. City staff draft and submit reports and recommendations to the appointed and elected
bodies, including the Sustainability Commission, Planning Commission, City Council, and Board of
County Commissioners. If specific recommendations from the Panel are needed, the Panel strives
to make group decisions using consensus. For the purpose of this group, consensus is defined as a
decision that everyone can live with. Group members who do not agree with a proposal will share
their concerns and work to provide solutions to address their concerns. If the group cannot reach
consensus, the group will generate a “minority” report which will articulate the majority proposed
agreement and the minority’s points of disagreement in order to inform decision-makers.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 12 of 104

Meeting Process Commitments
1. Take space, make space:
One mic, one voice.
Be aware of time.
Practice deep and active listening.

2. Support a judgement free environment:
Together, we know a lot. Alone we don’t know everything.
Be open, curious and respectful
Lean into discomfort/conflict. It’s how we grow.
Celebrate multiple ways of knowing; multiple truths can exist at once.
Speak from your own experience -- Use I statements and avoid generalizations.

3. Do your best:
Relinquish perfection. Allow for mistakes and give grace.
State your needs, practice self-care, establish healthy boundaries.
Make information accessible to all; avoid jargon and acronyms when possible.
Uphold what’s confidential: what we learned leaves here, what was said stays here.

Communication Guidelines
•
•
•
•

Communication Connectors: We take responsibility for being communication connectors
between the many organizations and individuals we are connected to.
Verify Information and resolve issues: We approach each other first to verify information or
resolve issues before passing on information or concerns to others.
Keep it Real: We are as transparent and candid as possible with each other and maintain
respectful communication.
Confidentiality: Personal stories stay within the group unless they are documented in a
meeting summary that is approved by the group. When working with information that is not
yet developed enough to be shared out broadly, we avoid sharing sensitive information
outside of the group and/or notify the group when sharing sensitive information.

Stipends and Reimbursements
A stipend of up to $200 per meeting is available to each participant who attends, acknowledging an
average of 1 hour prep/follow up and 2 hours of attendance per meeting. We track participation and
issue stipends via check after Meeting #5 (end of June 2025), and again after the last meeting in
October of 2025. In addition, reach out to Julie Fischer or Aimée Okotie-Oyekan if you plan to
submit expenses for transportation – this can also be reimbursed along with the stipend.

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 13 of 104

Confidentiality and Disclosures
As advisors to City staff, panel participants are not required to disclose personal information to the
public. Panel meetings are not public meetings, and as such participants may choose to share their
names and affiliations or keep them private. Staff meeting summaries will not disclose participants’
personal details.
Meeting Agendas, Materials and Summaries
The project team develops the agenda and participants receive it a week before the meeting. While
some materials are shared ahead, other information is presented at the meeting. Meetings are not
recorded or publicly posted; staff take notes, share draft summaries with participants, and the
group provides input and approves final summaries. Agendas include time for eating dinner,
connecting, and sharing events/activities/ideas as well as structured project input.
Project Team Contacts
Contact Name, Pronouns

Contact Information

Role

Leah Rausch (she/her)

[email protected]

Overall project content

Senior Planner, City of Eugene

(541) 682-5476

Housing content

Stuart Warren (he/him)

[email protected]

Comprehensive Plan content

Associate Planner, City of Eugene

(541) 682-5561

Terri Harding (she/her)

[email protected]

Principal Planner, City of Eugene

(541) 682-5635

Aimée Okotie-Oyekan (she/they)

[email protected]

Environmental, Community
Planning and Creative Consulting

(770) 912-6039

Julie Fischer (she/her)

[email protected]

Fischer Public Involvement

(541) 556-6654

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

UGS Project Manager &
Leadership Liaison

Facilitation, communications,
and logistics

Process, support for facilitation,
communication, and logistics

Page 14 of 104

List of Terms
Equity: The term “equity” refers to fairness and justice, and “equality” means providing the same to
all. Equity means recognizing that we do not all start from the same place and we acknowledge and
make adjustments to imbalances. The process is ongoing, requiring us to identify and overcome
intentional and unintentional barriers arising from bias or systemic structures. (source:
https://www.naceweb.org/about-us/equity-definition)

Underserved communities: Underserved and underrepresented groups include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Black, Indigenous, Native American, Latino/Latina, Asian, Pacific Islander and other
ethnicities/communities of color
Refugees, immigrants, and non-English speakers
LGBTQIA+: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex, asexual, and
the + includes other identities
Low-income communities and unhoused individuals
People experiencing disabilities
Youth
Seniors who also meet one or more of the above categories

Planning - Planning is elected leaders' most effective tool for managing growth, navigating change,
and making tough decisions facing communities, like where to invest in transportation, housing,
and parks. Powered by community planners' data-driven insights, expertise, and sense of residents'
needs, the planning process helps communities define their goals and a path to achieving them. A
plan is a roadmap that helps leaders make informed decisions about what residents — and the
local economy — need to thrive. (source: https://www.planning.org/aboutplanning/)

Comprehensive Plan - A document that guides a city in its land use planning for future growth
within the city’s urban growth boundary (source: https://www.eugeneor.gov/DocumentCenter/View/71354/Envision-Eugene-Comp-Plan---August-2023)

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 15 of 104

Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) - a line drawn on planning maps surrounding each Oregon city to
designate where a city expects to grow over a 20-year period. This growth can occur with new
houses, industrial facilities, businesses, or public facilities such as parks and utilities. Restrictions
in areas outside of a UGB protect farm and forest resource land and prohibit urban development.
Generally speaking, it’s where the city ends and the farms and forests begin. (source:
https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/UP/Pages/UGBs-and-UrbanRural-Reserves.aspx)

Climate Friendly Area - A climate-friendly area (CFA) is a neighborhood where people can meet
most of their daily needs without having to drive. They are urban mixed-use areas that contain, or
are planned to contain, a mixture of housing, jobs, businesses, and services. These areas are
served, or planned for service, by high quality pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infrastructure to
provide frequent and convenient connections to key destinations within the city and region (source:
https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/CL/Documents/Designation_of_Climate_Friendly_Areas_Overview.pdf
)

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 16 of 104

Attachment C

Meeting
Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #1
March 19, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | The People’s Collective
To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City is convening a community Advisory
Panel that will meet over seven meetings between March and October 2025. The first panel meeting
included 14 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Meeting Notes
To begin the meeting content, facilitators reviewed the panel structure, logistics, and guidelines.
Panelist shared some additional needs, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Caffeine.
Need to stand up occasionally.
Pre-hearing aids, some difficulty hearing – talk loudly.
Having captions on Zoom is helpful.
Not so spicy food.
May need more time to process – more inclined to email thought than to actively
participate.
Appreciate supporting a minority owned business for dinner.
Seems an aging, disabled population not fully represented by panelist sample. Consider
adding panelist with a mobility disability. (written comment)

Facilitators also sought feedback from the group on whether they want to name this panel an
“equity” panel. What is accurate and comfortable?
•
•
•

Community advisory panel.
Perspectives panel.
Hearing/using voices.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 5
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 17 of 104

Next, City staff provided an overview of urban growth planning and started an overview of the Urban
Growth Strategies project. Staff asked participants to reflect on “what do you think of when you
hear urban planning?” Comments included:
•
•
•

•
•
•

•

•

•
•
•

•

•

Irate community members
Redlining
How River Road is so isolated from the rest of Eugene
o Some places are cookie cutter, others are not
o Over time, regulations apply
o Unpaved alley – but isn’t the City’s responsibility to repair it
o Things are totally patchwork
Older, 100-year-old homes that need lots of renovation or need to be brought up to code to
make them better places to live. Many have been hodge-podged together.
Who gets to build cities, developers, increasing wealth disparities
o Optimistic about what it could do for walkability, community spaces
Foundational to livability
o Does the city grow and thrive or become desolate? There are ghost towns around the
country. Depends on resources and opportunities available, but also decisions that
planners make, even though they don’t have a crystal ball, there are issues that can
often be dealt with at the first hour instead of 11th hour.
o Think about the Ferry Street Bridge area. Lane county had planner in charge who was an
alcoholic, which might explain that area.
We live with these decisions for a long time.
o What is the process to make things better? How do we improve traffic? How can we rethink things? What were they thinking when they made this decision?
Can increase quality of life.
o Lots of different groups that can benefit. Children. Elders. The City has to be everything
to a lot of people, can’t be for one certain group.
o Think about cars and bicycles and trade-offs. Even the best people are anti-bicycle or
anti-transit.
One area in Eugene that wanted to be a walking community, didn’t want the city to pave it,
but then couldn’t get a firetruck up the road. Safety has to be considered.
Tradeoffs.
Plans to change new development with less parking and more infrastructure but that
happens to be around the university and the market district, so it’s for a certain group of
Eugenians. It’s not super helpful to make blanket rules, things are nuanced.
All of the really beautiful old houses that are actually businesses.
o There are certain areas that have fewer single-family homes.
o Different character in different parts of the city.
Weird loopholes. End of Rexius trail – developers changing things. Regulations or
protections from state vs. city are confusing.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 5
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 18 of 104

Layers of regulations. And the gaps.
Some of the old subdivision plats don’t keep up with, for instance, alleyways. Alleys were
originally 12 feet but now people are putting in Airbnbs in their garages off the alleys and
people are parking there, which means homeowners can’t get out. It’s a whole new use that
is happening. Old codes not keeping up with new use.
• Public planning and process – tool for liberation and tool for discrimination, depending on
how it gets used.
• How do state, county, and city work together? Do they supersede each other?
o The state is often directing a framework, push and pull between state directives and
local control.
• Outside of our UGB – county. Does the City work with the county to say, where are we going
to grow next? What does that look like?
• Neighborhood associations – who has liability if accidents on a private road? Article about
roads in Santa Clara area.
• Will UGS replace Envision Eugene?
o In some ways. We’ll still have the Envision Eugene comprehensive plan, but we’ll adopt
new studies that refresh it.
o Urban Growth Strategies is the community engagement and analysis, but City is keeping
the Envision Eugene vision and comprehensive plan.
Concern that people continue to think downtown is too dangerous (written comment)
Concern that people don’t want to give up single-family homes because of nostalgia but also
significant property values (written comment)
Disability justice, cultural justice, aging justice (written comment)

•
•

•
•
•

Finally, staff prompted the panelists to discuss a big picture question - If you had a magic wand,
how does Eugene look or feel different 20 years from now?
•
•
•

•

•

Want to bring back the electric cars that used to go from Lorane to Junction City and Portland.
They’re on the maps. It was clean and efficient energy.
Don’t want to see Eugene just growing up, want to see sprawl but with intentional communities
created and transportation goes to every community. All accessible.
Transportation to airport. From airport to center hub. If you come in at 2am to the airport, that
should be a part of the loop for the whole city. Get anywhere any time you want. Aren’t limited to
getting where you need to get.
Connected communities. Having all your basic needs in a nearby radius. Don’t always have to
go across town. Urban sprawl in Texas you have to have a car – don’t want to see sprawl so
much that you can’t get around by walking or needs met nearby. Healthcare. Food. Places to
build community. Third spaces. Places to hang out where you don’t have to be a customer.
The EmGo program was launched before Covid and that was connected to LTD with an app and
you could request cars in designated areas downtown. Could request pick up and drop off
within their certain area. Had talked about expanding near campus. Not sure what led to them
stopping, but something like that is really cool. More affordable housing for non-students. Can

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 5
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 19 of 104

•

•

•

•

•

be really difficult for working class people to get into housing, particularly with income
requirements and deposits. Students get thought of first when it comes to housing. Programs or
grants/assistance that focus on marginalized communities to open businesses. Assisting
business owners from marginalized communities. A lot of businesses close. Difficulty of
opening businesses downtown. Seeing marginalized businesses losing businesses. No more
queer bar in Eugene.
Focus on environmental perspective. Canopy cover. Development, but thinking about trees or
fauna in the environment. Maintaining space for that. Insects, pollinators, butterflies. Keeping
them in the area. Thinking of different micro-climates in Eugene, like marshlands, are
developing and can we maintain integrity in those areas. Regulating chemicals. Regenerative
landscaping and farming. Instead of taking nutrients in environments being developed, creating
systems that can help people grow lush groundcover or other native plants – intelligently.
Thinking about those things, planting fruit trees. Maintaining and restoring areas that have fruit
trees. Thinking about how we can create policy that allows us to build in these environments
but innovate ways we can protect nature and how we interact with it. In Indonesia, there are
trees growing within the home, internal courtyards, outside on the inside. Playing around with
design. Making that possible.
Third spaces. From high school student point of view/teen – find themselves walking around a
lot but not having a space to go without buying things. The library is great, but not always quiet
and study rooms are only an hour. We have a lot of walkability in Eugene but I live near River
Road and the sidewalk is small and has cracks – in the future, cool to see a lot more walkability.
Eugene is bike friendly, but like the grounding activity of being able to walk. Safety - in more
areas that downtown/centralized. The native plants – like how many trees there are in Oregon.
Have seen cities more urbanized and it’s easy to lose track of nature around them, not losing
that. Keeping Oregon true to itself. Everything that was here before also incorporated into the
future.
Live at Ketanji Court – a community-oriented building space. Family building, lots of children.
Have to accommodate kids, but there’s only a big parking lot for them to play. Creative. Would
be nice to see recreation centers or safe spaces in downtown area where kids can safely be.
Maybe that could include spaces for homework and study groups. Free. Knowing you can
attend without financial or cost barriers.
Affordable healthcare and care for children – daycare, childcare, not enough support for
parents. Parents need a break, being a parent is a job. Having more of those spaces, as well as
courtyards. Live in an alley, always cars and people parking and have to walk a while to get dog
to go to the bathroom in a grassy area. More indoor recreation areas because of the weather.
The Y and more places like that should be valued. Theres a lot of single-family housing and not
enough spaces people can just go.
Community spaces can’t be emphasized enough. Thinking about community spaces that were
important when they first moved here, the Y comes to mind – worked there, so it was free for
them. But not free for the public. Would want safe accessible sidewalks everywhere. Would like
to start a family in the next 5 years so in 20 years their kids would be in high school and would

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 5
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 20 of 104

•

•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

want them to feel like it’s a nice place to live and would maybe want to stay or have safe
comfortable places to be and feel like they could get a good job here.
Multi-generational spaces. Have lived through multiple generations and now thinking they don’t
have a space, not sure they want to be in the old people space, but want to be around younger
people. Want to see generations incorporated, elders are honored in their community and so
are young people and it’s a special multi-generational thing that people are missing out on.
Visions of more vibrant downtown. Dense. Where children and elders can be. Mixed feelings
about downtown not being safe now, but there’s a lot of economic forces that push families to
go outside of the downtown area. Because of urban planning, its not even a choice. Families
have to be on the outskirts. Have multi-generational places downtown but also streets that
don’t have cars at all, can walk and ride bikes and get to places and not everything has to be
super dense, but feels like downtown can be a lot more dense than it is right now. For every foot
of street you build, it costs x-times more -with utilities, asphalt, the more you spread out the
more it costs you vs. to build up. As taxpayer, fine subsidizing – but does it make sense to do
that for someone who lives 10 miles away.
More affordable housing, dense housing for people and families (elders and children). (written
comment)
Fewer cars, more transit, more bike infrastructure (great for elders and children who can’t
drive). (written comment)
Easy access to farmer’s markets, groceries downtown. (written comment)
Mature vegetation. (written comment)
Better landlord education – to follow tenant laws. (written comment)
More affordable housing for non-students. (written comment)
Community programs like EMGO / Late Buses and EmX. (written comment)
Programs for marginalized communities to start/open businesses. (written comment)
Congregation spaces for marginalized communities. (written comment)
Publicly available fruit trees, gardens, and natural grown food. (written comment)
Multiple amphitheater type housing structures of three levels with clustered services to
maintain housing, flooded with sunlight, airy, greenery, water flow runoff and catchment, no
specific downtown centers but diluted with habitation. (written comment)

To end the meeting, facilitators reminded the panelists of the location and timing of the next
meeting. Future meetings will provide more opportunities for information sharing and networking
between panelists. Panelists are encouraged to bring information about events.
•
•
•

April 5th LCC powwow.
April 6th next downtown Native American Market.
Communities of Color and Allies Network 3rd Thursdays.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 5
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 21 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #2
April 9, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | Downtown
Library

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over seven meetings between March and October 2025. The second panel
meeting included 12 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and
interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was a research and communications project called the “Equity Atlas.”
The Equity Atlas seeks to better understand Eugene’s history of discriminatory policies and actions
that have led to systematic and long-lasting inequities in housing, land use, and displacement,
particularly affecting communities of color.
To begin the meeting, City staff introduced the Equity Atlas project and presented on the
background, origin, and a few highlights from historical research.
The first part of the presentation focused on the project’s background and how City staff expect the
project to inform aspects of Urban Growth Strategies, including goals, policies, and actions related
to community engagement, community health, compact development, and housing.
Staff then presented six events and actions from their research that have led to systematic and long
lasting inequities. After the presentation was over, the panel split into two small groups for
discussion.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways and next steps, as
interpreted by City staff include:
•

•

This work was generally supported by the panel. Panel members expressed excitement
and interest in the City working to better understand the historic and current discriminatory
policies and actions that have shaped Eugene’s housing, land use, and
segregation/integration context.
The Equity Atlas needs to contain story telling components from community members
who experienced the harms described in the Atlas. This should be included since the

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 22 of 104

•
•

•

•

written record may represent dominant narratives that are skewed towards better
representing certain perspectives over others. These stories should come from a variety of
sources and will help the City and broader community better understand events and
actions from different perspectives that may be less biased than some of the current
resources available.
Many panel members have lived experience with past and current injustice, some have
worked professionally to document and share these experiences.
The Equity Atlas needs to be a living document. It documents an experience that needs to
be told with the people who have lived past and current injustices. It is not a product that
should be owned and managed by the City, but one that needs to be archived, shared, and
cared for by the community.
The Equity Atlas should prioritize telling Eugene’s harmful past over emphasizing the
strength and resilience of underserved communities to ensure that these mistakes are
not made in the future. It also needs to be shared with people who have privilege and likely
don’t understand that their privilege results from this past. Panel members expressed how
important it was for “people with Black Lives Matter signs in their yards to fully understand
this history.”
The panel would like to review the StoryMap before the City circulates it to the broader
community. This takeaway was communicated by a few panel members during Meeting 3.

Next Steps
Based on the panel’s advice, City staff are proposing the following next steps for the Equity Atlas:
•
•

•
•

•

City staff will follow up with panel members to offer the opportunity to be interviewed to
help record stories and lived experiences.
City staff will develop an internal strategy to share this history with other City departments
and divisions to help other staff understand this history. Staff will also develop a plan for
sharing this information more broadly in the community, including where the Atlas could be
archived and expanded upon.
The Equity Atlas will remain on the Planning Division’s workplan as an ongoing item. It is not
necessarily a project that can ever be completed. It should be a living document.
The City will work to share the stories of those who have not had a voice in the past. Staff
will be critical of available resources and seek to better understand who is telling the story
and strive to find voices to corroborate or provide a different perspective.
City staff will share the StoryMap with the panel before circulating it with the broader
community.

Meeting Notes
Questions and discussion from panelists included:

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 23 of 104

•
•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•

•

•
•

•

Where will the data/information [from the Equity Atlas] live? And has staff considered long
term archiving at the special collections at the University of Oregon?
Why has this story not been told?
o It is important not to wait 100 years to tell this story
o There are bones in the closet, why was this story not news at the time?
How is the Equity Atlas connected to the “Black and African American Context Statement”?
Have staff considered how other Oregon cities might be interested in this work? And
considered the best ways to share the process with them?
“Who is behind this?” – needs to be considered and panelists recommended including
faces and written comments in order to create more of a living document.
o Story collection is important (to balance the impact of voices/perspectives)
o How something is framed matters
o Personal/family stories are important healing work
Recommendation: members of the panel could present/introduce the document with video
or writing.
How about primary data, maybe including that as well? Collecting information and stories
from people as well as the secondary data you’ve already collected.
Has the information been difficult to find? Why?
One panelist who is a filmmaker offered access to a large hard drive of materials that
includes voices, faces, black female, headed to college, and other stories of African
American experience.
“No darkies after dark” – Concern about how much [of this history] is lost or hidden. Don’t
use the past events as a “beating stick,” instead use them to learn from the past and move
forward to the future.
One panelist used to work for Lane County Land Management where they worked with plats
and subdivisions, a lot of them had “no colored” – it is written in the plats, still.
Framing and media bias are rampant issues that distort how people understand current
events. That’s definitely relevant. Reframing history – get the full idea from people, not the
media. If you read articles, they might downplay actions that happened. Example, Palestine
in the media. Downplay of stories, need to combat that. Lots of responsibility.
10 years ago, DiversiTV (Lane Community College), my husband did that program,
interviewed community members, they talked about this old history
o Interview of community members
o List of programs

Small Group Discussion
The first question posed to the small groups was: “What would you like the Eugene community to
understand about the history of housing, land use, and displacement?” Responses from
panelists included:
Group 1:

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 24 of 104

•

•
•
•

Start with the displacement of indigenous people, depiction and story of Kalapuya housing.
Many people think they lived in tipis and this is not true. Provide examples of housing here to
dispel misconceptions.
Emphasize the impacts of settlers moving West. With land donation claims, settlers were
getting opportunity from someone else’s land.
Mention how the government gave bounties on killing Indians in Oregon. People don’t talk
about this story. It incentivized genocide.
Tell the story of people from the edge, those who are not centered in many narratives.
Getting the voices of others in the process who have not told their own story.

Group 2:
•
•

•
•

•
•
•

•

Connect this history to health, equity, environmental justice, and current injustices in
Eugene, not just housing. Don’t forget interconnectedness.
Migration patterns and figure out how long people [referring to community members of
color] stay and why they leave? Burdens to housing or community. Think about how
changing demographics impact that migration. Figure out the unique experience and what
attracts people to stay. How do we grow as a city?
Latino roots projects – lots of good oral history. Linn Steven and Gabriela Martinez (SOJC) on
UO website. Housed in special collections.
Founding Black families. The City of Eugene (COE) has elevated and highlighted some Black
voices over others so basically erased some voices while highlighting others. COE has lifted
some groups up while pushing others down. These actions contribute to displacement and
erasure of others. Don’t listen to the Register Guard, they have historically not told our
stories correctly. It’s really about all the stories so be careful about how you tell it. Need to
tell a unified story. Be aware of power imbalances amongst communities. White supremacy
has always divided and conquered. You won’t get that from the archives or documents, it is
verbal. White colonizers.
Need to depend on oral history. Most recorded history is not told from Black people or
people of color.
Be aware of powers of discernment in white supremacy
If we are talking about people that hold power in Eugene, they include business owners and
historical white families, people who are in logging, and these other industries in the Pacific
Northwest that are located in Eugene. Or people that are homeowners who are part of
neighborhood associations. You have to outreach to those communities. The desire for
them to protect their communities and keep those people out is much deeper than what is
happening currently. Whether they are being white supremist or not, they are upholding
those ideals. I see how beautiful the canopy cover is in the south hills or other areas like
that. Intertwined in zoning legacy of Eugene. Low-income folks are left out, can’t access
housing, requirements are difficult. Who gets the amenities such as bike lanes.
It’s hard that our Affordable Housing is catered to young people. It’s catered to people who
don’t have careers. It creates housing insecurity for those who are trying to make it. The

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 25 of 104

•
•
•

•
•

•
•

•

•

requirements in those spaces are to make sure that people in this community can’t access
that housing when they need it.
Decisions of where biking lanes are built play into the inequities too. I want all these
intricacies to be considered.
I want all those people who have BLM signs in their yards to be fully educated in the full
context.
We had this conversation with the COE and Lane County…keeping this information in the
archive for the COE and in cultural organizations like at the Mims House or other cultural
organizations and with the families who live here! Many of those families keep their own
archives. Disperse the information so that it’s not held centrally. We have 1,000+ people
come through the door for Black Santa. People say they have never been to such a Black
environment in Eugene. The fact of the matter is that we have never had a space for the
Black community. Need a cultural space for those communities. Create a space for
belonging. It helps with the retention of people who want to stay.
The only reason I have stayed as a transplant from Illinois is Black Cultural Initiative!
I have a question about Urban Growth Strategies, since we have been talking about land
use, housing, and power, are we going to learn about how the bidding for these large
projects is done? They are contributing to the legacy of wealth. (Answer: Community
Development handles those applications. There is always room for improvement. Part of
their mission and goal is to increase equity in the procurement process, more fair loan
process...etc.)
Some changes to land use benefit smaller developments some to large developments.
Could add an emphasis on small changes to the code that benefits smaller developers.
How has the City approached incentivizing housing in the past through Community
Development programs and initiatives? Who have they impacted, and how did they work?
Add in something to the history about how partners have been impacted.
Looking more towards the future and towards the past pre-contact. Because of how the
landscape has changed, people have lost the understanding that we live in wetlands and
how native tribes and bands would move with the seasons. Helping community feel more
connected to the land. How people would move rather than live in one house that you
always live in. The panels in the Farmers Market Pavillion have a lot of that history and can
be built into this timeline.
Eugene will probably be somewhere where coastal communities will move because of
climate migration and sea level rise. Eugene should be planning for this future now.

The second question posed to the groups was “how would you like to see the City share this
story? (Group 1 did not get to this question)
Group 2:
•

How does the document become a living document?

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 26 of 104

•
•

•

•

•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•

•
•
•

•

Everyone is invested in this project as it is everyone’s story. We are telling this story together
and not speaking on behalf or representing individual communities.
It is strange moving here and living here without knowing about these injustices or this
history. People are just living their life without knowing the history. For example, not knowing
that Hillyard was a person.
In California, cities kept a record of where every Black person lived. The police usually kept
this record. One time, as a joke, when we could not remember the address of a friend we
would say that we could ask the police.
Also in California, I would get weird reactions from inspectors for building a house as a
Black person. I had the knowledge, so I went ahead and did it. When the inspectors looked
at me weird before telling me the permitting fees, I would pull out my wallet and pay them.
Getting as many voices through this project as we can to create a living document. Involve
people in the community to tell their story.
When they were giving out property, native people would hide their identity to pass as white
(did that happen here?). Native people were not always eligible for many things.
Talking about land use: naming streets after white people tells a story whether we want it or
not. It is good to see that the River development is dedicating land to affordable housing
otherwise, all the good land will be taken by people with more money.
Also make an effort to spread the information about why/who names of streets are from.
Emphasis on stories outside of the written record (do this to not recreate history)
Cultural co-operatives brings multiple groups together to tell shared stories like the one in
the Equity Atlas.
I am not getting out in the community enough so I ask the group: what kind of signage is in
the community? Another panelist responded…
There used to be a plaque by Fern Ridge Lake that told the stories of pioneers. I had to call
the City to ask them to remove the plaque because it was misleading. “Strides for social
justice” is an app that mapped different stories/histories. The app gives you information of
areas that you are in. A panelist asked who is the app sponsored by? Answer: Not sure. We
could tell the Atlas story in this way or similar way.
My source is John Oliver, so take that with a grain of salt, historical markers are not
regulated. It would be good to regulate/vet historic markers. The City does not regulate that
kind of signage for historical accuracy/inclusion.
Thinking about models for sharing the history: Mims House placards are interesting and
engaging. Another panelist mentioned how they took the pictures for the plaque.
Limited resources: people with the most money have the best spots. Increase the scope of
benefits beyond who has the most money.
Proximity to natural parks: wealthier people end up in these places. Proximity to industrial
parks: lower income people end up in these places. Hopefully we can address that issue
through this project.
I am interested in the timeline of how the city evolved and grew.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 6 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 27 of 104

Bonus Question: How should this story balance the tone? For example, is the story focusing
only on the negative?
•
•

•

It is nice to see resilience when telling this story. But it is important to focus on the
shortcomings to not make the same mistakes.
Not wanting to erase history, so the focus works. At the same time, it is weird to be the
subject of an exhibit or display. For example, a walking exhibit of the history of immigration
in Oregon and feeling like being part of the history. Another panelist mentioned the displays
and costumes (pioneer village?) of colonization in a creepy way.
A balance of old history and balancing more recent history. Include interviews that talk
about history over time.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 7 OF 7
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 28 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #3
May 14, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | Downtown
Library

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over seven meetings between March and October 2025. The third panel
meeting included 12 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and
interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to gather panel member’s feedback on draft Comprehensive Plan
goals and policies on community engagement and community health.
City staff provided an overview of their key takeaways from the previous meeting, what a
comprehensive plan is, background on Eugene’s comprehensive plan, and highlighted specific
draft goals and policies for the community engagement and community health chapters.
After the presentation, the panel formed three small groups for discussion. Staff asked panel
members to write down the first two words that came to mind to describe each chapter. Then panel
members discussed each chapter, goals and policies that resonated with them, shared stories that
related, and identified areas they felt needed change or were missing.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways and next steps, as
interpreted by City staff, include:
•

The Meeting 2 Summary and key takeaways were supported by most panelists with the
addition of a few corrections:
o A few panelists emphasized the importance of storytelling for the Equity Atlas
indicating that it helped to humanize the story and lived experience.
o Panel members requested to see the StoryMap of the Equity Atlas before it gets
circulated in the community.

Staff note: These corrections to the Meeting 2 Summary have been included in the final summary.
•

Panel members generally found Chapter 1 and Chapter 5 goals and/or policies that
resonated with them. A number of panel members shared experiences that related directly

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 29 of 104

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

to a goal or policy, or expressed support for specific policies or related topics, such as
urban tree canopy, co-designing engagement processes and engaging young people.
The Community Engagement chapter should include a policy that provides direction
about how the City can be a better community partner. There should be a policy in
Chapter 1 that considers topics such as relationship and trust building, collaboration,
clarifying how input will be used, and the planning and adoption process outside of
engagement.
Cultural considerations need to be included. Some panel members expressed concern
that the draft goals and policies do not take into consideration cultural considerations, such
as tools for effectively engaging with Native communities.
Some panel members were concerned that people with mobility issues were not
participating on the panel and questioned whether there was enough representation in
other City processes. Panel members cited concerns about the lack of representation of
people with mobility issues in the City organization or on decision making bodies, and
whether people with mobility issues were reflected in the focus of these policies.
Focus on good decision-making rather than process. There are some mixed feelings
about policies that direct the City to undertake a lengthy process, as in Chapter 1. Process
needs to lead to good decision-making, not process for process’ sake.
The City needs to take action based on these policies. Some panel members questioned
if the City was going to be able to turn policy into action, produce outcomes, and include
their input in the outcomes of the Comprehensive Plan.
Not all neighborhoods in Eugene receive equal investment. Some panel members felt
certain neighborhoods, like West Eugene and the Bethel area, do not receive the same level
of investment as other neighborhoods (particularly South Eugene).
Community based organizations should be included in engagement efforts. Some panel
members expressed the importance of policy language in Chapter 1 focusing on not only
reaching out to individuals, but also reaching out to community-based organizations.
The City could always do more. There were a variety of suggestions of types of additional
things the City could do, such as related to warming, cooling, and respite centers,
accessible spaces, community engagement and efficiency.

Next Steps
Based on the panel’s advice, City staff are proposing the following next steps for the draft
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies on community engagement and community health:
•

•

Staff will discuss how designing for all ages and abilities positively impacts the entire
community, including people with mobility issues and others who primarily drive, in the
introduction of the Community Health chapter. Staff will also review the draft goals and
policies for areas that are lacking consideration for people with mobility issues.
In the Community Engagement chapter introduction staff will acknowledge that the City
hasn’t always been a good community partner to underserved communities and these

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 30 of 104

•

•
•

policies seek to shift that dynamic. In addition, staff will review the Community Engagement
policies for opportunities to include additional language on community partnerships and
trust.
Staff will review the Community Health chapter to make sure there is adequate emphasis
on the importance of equitable investments throughout the city, in particular prioritizing
investments in underserved areas, like the West Eugene and Bethel neighborhoods.
Staff will review the Community Engagement chapter to ensure there is policy language on
partnering with community-based organizations.
Staff will review draft goals and policies in both chapters and work with other City subject
matter experts to ensure that the draft goals and policies contain cultural considerations.

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the third meeting with the panel. It has been lightly edited for
clarity.
Meeting 2 – Equity Atlas Summary, Take-Aways, and Next Steps
•
•
•

Big picture, the take-aways are comprehensive to the discussion.
The panel would like to look at the StoryMap before it goes out to the public.
It’s important to emphasize why the storytelling aspect is important, because it humanizes
the stories instead of just providing historical context.

Clarifying Questions from the Comprehensive Plan Presentation
•

•

Why was there a house bill that separated Eugene and Springfield?
o Legislators/politicians wanted to make it happen.
o Eugene and Springfield do things differently, but we still work with Springfield
What regional policies will stay in the Metro Plan? And are they old or have they been
updated recently?
o Moving policies out of the Metro Plan and into Eugene’s Comp Plan is a process
that’s gradually happening. Some regional policies, such as around public facilities
and services will still need to have regional policies. Others that relate to Eugene
locally are the ones we’re trying to take out.

Chapter 1 – Community Engagement
•

•

When a policy says “young people” – is there an age range for that group?
o We are intentionally using young people instead of youth – really see it as people
younger than 30. It is meant to be broad.
Are adding some of the processes and procedures in this chapter going to hold up working
being done? Will buildings not get built because of the additional process?
o These policies wouldn’t apply to one single building or project. It’s more for larger
legislative processes, for example, rezoning a large area of the city.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 31 of 104

•

•

How are we going to ensure that information gathered during engagement is going to be
used for decision-making?
o At the end of the day, we can’t guarantee that it will influence decision-makers. We
as staff can gather feedback and make recommendations and bring that to City
Council – but they are ultimately the decisionmakers.
Who is the Planning Commission? How are they going to make decisions?
o They are appointed by City Council and not necessarily a representative group of the
community – though they really get into the weeds, are thoughtful, and generally
take staff recommendations.

Chapter 5 – Community Health
•

•

•
•

Under the healthy natural and built environment goal, there’s a policy missing about
lighting. Lighting is important to feel safe – can look at shape of lampposts, affect on bird
migration, etc. but lighting is needed.
Who is at the table and bringing groups together? Is it going to spelled out a little deeper? Or
is it a broad general thing?
o These policies are really high level, but there should also be enough meat there to
say that the City will have to do it.
Some City departments know how to engage with certain groups and others don’t. In her
community group, there are people who will not show up at a public meeting.
The not in this document, the word culture may be missing. . Ex: effective engagement tools
should be different for the native community—where do we get to that level of detail?

Small Group Discussion
These notes were taken by City staff during the small group discussions. They are organized by
small group and the questions asked.

Group 1
Chapter 1 – Community Engagement
What words came to mind to describe this chapter?
•
•

•

Ambitious, needed, expanding engagement, building relationship, trust, thoughtful,
intentional, y’all are listening, the cultural piece needs to be a part of this.
Engaging – but it needs to have more of an invitational aspect. How do you get people on the
outside to hear that they can be at the table? How do you call people to the table? It’s not
one size fits all.
Unconscious resistance - it’s really hard to consistently gather people. There has to be
really really compelling reason for people to engage. It’s hard to get to that every single time.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 32 of 104

•

•
•

•
•
•
•
•

•

•

People show up when they think they’re going to lose something, but getting people to show
up for pro-active situations is harder.
Hard to engage people when many people hold grudges about things that happened in the
past. Have good, bad, and indifferent stories with the City. The experience amount the
monuments project has not been what they signed up for. (BCI proposed a monument of
founding black communities in Eugene for Alton Baker Park – there’s an artist rendering, and
funding, but now stuck in bureaucracy). BCI had given the go-ahead, but then the City
decided that they were going to fall back on policy at the higher level and now there has to
be an entire process which is long and engaging and not what they had signed up for. “I just
don’t move that slow.”
The City needs to learn to be a good partner and go the distance with us. Being the
connective relationship – that went completely away.
There’s challenges that the City as a whole has really big issues with communications and
connections in the community. Don’t see how the City is working to change that. On a meta
level don’t see how that is changing because at the higher levels they can say sorry your
agreement is gone.
Suggestion: Add a policy that prioritizes relationship and trust and collaboration.
Focusing on progress.
If there’s going to be a process – Make it worthwhile. Make it work. Make it make sense.
At one point community members asked for totem poles to be placed throughout the city.
But the native community had no voice in that process. There was no one to listen.
Have had people call them to try and get projects pushed through. For example, a native
mural project that 2 white guys had created 30 years prior and it was fine, but things were
different 20 years ago, we know a lot more about cultural appropriation and how we want to
be viewed – not through a romanticized lens. “I gave my two cents, but I don’t work for the
city” – but because she has a city connection, then city people ask her things.
Mixed feelings about process. On one hand it’s there to help protect people but sometimes
they are enacted to stymie progress. When he sat on LTD board, when you’re trying to
institute change and you want to involve the public – if you have listening groups, surveys,
but then you don’t do what you hear in those processes – people will say you don’t listen. If
you’re educating, people may see it as talking down to people or taking too much time or
being too slow. But we have so many historical examples of when decisions have been
made quickly and there was no time made for public input, but then there’s huge longlasting consequences (like highways). But they had a huge effect on people’s lives,
communities destroyed. Taking away a bus route really impacts people. It’s really hard to
take things away from people. That’s a compelling reason to come out.
Role models – the City has certain statues it puts up as models of what they thing people
should be like or what people in office should look like. More people in statues or walls with
artwork as opposed to being plain and blank and inoffensive. Theres an aspect of if people
heard stories of something you can relate to (can’t relate to a white guy sitting in an office or
see that as a role model that you are going to become). Move in the direction of relating to

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 33 of 104

•

people and life experiences. Human pace vs. bureaucratic pace. That would bring more
community engagement.
Has had really good experiences with the City. First interacted with City through cultural
services. Have seen different types or processes and participation. What we are doing with
this community panel has been pretty great so far. City staff are actually listening. Have also
engaged with the Office of Sustainability – Danielle in that office has a mindset of different
cultures and community engagement. Would be good practice to talk to Cultural Services
and Sustainability departments – talk to each other on what’s working well and what is not.

Small Group Discussion: Chapter 5 – Community Health
What words came to mind to describe this chapter?
•
•
•
•

•

•

•

•

•

•

Long-term, rebalancing, merge with chapters 6 and 7, challenge, ableist.
Ableist – the chapter puts forth an idea that this is the direction health could go. Promoting
pedestrian walkways and things like that as if that’s the route everyone is going.
Rebalancing - giving greater intention to other parts of Eugene. If you pull out a map and see
parks and bike routes, they’re not in my neighborhood because I don’t live in South Eugene.
If I go west – there aren’t a lot of trees there. In South Eugene, there’s sidewalks and trees
and lights. But if you go to Bethel – where are the cute lights? Is there going to be equity in
this? Where is South Willamette West?
Andrea Ortiz (former councilor), before she passed away, lived near Roosevelt/four corners
and saw women with babies and strollers trying to get over the bridge – no pathway for them
to do that. It was finally created along the bridge – but why wasn’t it before she spoke up?
Challenge: When people hear this kind of stuff, they don’t connect it to their own benefit.
They’d rather have more efficiency – get to job, work, childcare, store - as fast as possible in
their car. But they can’t do that if there’s other types of improvements – they see that as
that’s “anti-me” – how can we educate around that?
Ableist: wish there was role models on council with health problems or things like that.
Instead of making it seem like everyone is going to be able to walk down the street.
Something that all people will experience as we get older – needing to hold someone’s hand
in the bathroom – things we’re not thinking about.
The Accessibility Committee used to be an advisory group to council in the 90s – we had
people on that committee who were in wheelchairs, blind, etc. Would bring issues to city
council and planning. When the federal building was being built, they spoke with the
architects who hadn’t been planning to include ramps or elevators in the design and they
changed their plans after the accessibility committee talked to them.
This group would benefit from someone with a mobility issue. Need more voices showing
different aspects of people.
o We did reach out, but were not successful in recruiting.
Live at Peace Village and 80% of people have a disability. The mobility aspect is not
matching what people are needing.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 6 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 34 of 104

•
•
•
•
•

•

LTD Board had a member with a mobility issue, but they’d have to leave earlier to
accommodate catching the bus but then had to leave early every meeting.
There are a lot of quality of life things that aren’t in this chapter. This chapter is trying to
encourage community building, do appreciate that.
Is community building going in the right direction – want to make sure it is. Who isn’t at the
table with us right now?
As opposed to checking a box – have council see “oh I see the reason why things are going in
this direction.”
Ch. 6 and Ch. 7 – both closely related to health and closely integrated. Shouldn’t be an “if”
that we are going to do that chapter. You could have community health but then a natural
disaster could just ruin that so fast, community health could go downhill if you’re not
thinking about natural resources and resilience. Wildfires, floodplain, etc.
The City should be creating warming centers, etc. Warming, cooling, and respite centers.
More partnerships. City shouldn’t be relying on other organizations.

Group 2:
Chapter 1/Community Engagement small group discussion:
Which goals and policies resonate with you?
•
•
•
•

Second goal – resonates. Not wasting time & transparency important – shows me how/why
a planning process is reflecting my voice
1.15 Community member compensation.Important. Are other communities doing this? It’s
nice to have the community invest in you, when you invest in the city with taxes.
1.8 d Co-design. It’s right that we play a role in crafting these policies. Having a hands-on
role. So we are reflected in the plans.
1.8 c Level of engagement – What percentage of your energy is put into the planning
process. The engagement is important. You need skin in the game to feel important/care
about a project or process.

Experiences/stories:
•

•

•

1.4 My journey to why engagement is important – Living in SF/caring about the City and
transit system as a young person. Why engaging young people is important. Helping them
make the connections/understand the process—they are interested in the ideas/where they
live, can help connect it to planning.
Involved in the LCOG Youth Transportation Council [verify name] – learned about/involved in
tactical urbanism. Created a temporary bench on Olive St. where seating was needed.
Taking matters into their own hands. Community-led—guerilla approach. Another example:
painting a crosswalk. Makes you feel empowered; making things happen in your city.
Equitable and outcome-oriented (1.6) – Plans are dormant. But planning is the action word.
Are we action-oriented? Likes to take the ideas from the plans and put them into action.
Physically see things change and come out of the ground.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 7 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 35 of 104

•
•

Likes the engagement structure of meeting together and answering specific questions. (like
this) – rather than open-ended questions. This feels more meaningful.
Likes the emphasis on making sure we have people with different backgrounds and
experiences participating and represented. Atlas will live longer than us. What can we learn
from community-based organizing like Black Lives Matter—that kind of community
outreach—for processes like this?

What’s Missing?
•

•

Feels like there’s a lot of focus on reaching out to individuals. Add more about reaching out
to nonprofits or organizations. Help build a group of nonprofits who care about projects at
the city. Build capacity/connections in city and non-profits. Ex: Fossil Free-Eugene, Beyond
Toxics.
How do you measure success? Checking in to reevaluate—1.8f; 1.12 –you can track things
over time to see if you are successful. Are we doing what we say we are doing to do?
Midcourse correction? Make sure this is emphasized.

Chapter 5/Community Health small group discussion:
General discussion (ran out of time for prompts):
•
•

•

•

•
•

It’s harder to be specific with this chapter.
Sidewalks – connectivity and accessibility is important. Make sure we have a policy on
this/equitable provision of sidewalks. Different neighborhoods have different levels of
services and infrastructure (like sidewalks). Neighborhood pressure. Make sure the city
provides good services for everyone.
5.19—Gathering places and social connectedness – feels really important. There’s a church
in town that’s been adapted to be a LGBTQ gathering space. Parks and covered areas that
can be rented – this should be easier to do. Referenced the third space conversation the
group had previously. In the policy, add “for example, cultural events.”
Similar to sidewalks is the need for good lighting throughout the city. Making sure the city
does the required work to make sure the community is safe—like landslide protection.
Telling people where they cannot build – health and safety. One of our jobs is to protect the
public from landslides.
Q: There were talks of creating a multicultural center – what happened with that? That felt
important? [I think this was Melissa’s work at OECE—I said I’d follow up to find out.]
5.21 – Emergency shelters including for natural disasters—good that’s included.

Group 3:
First two thoughts:
-The content is a bit overwhelming (a lot documents)

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 8 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 36 of 104

Which goals and policies resonate with you?
•

•

•
•

•

•
•
•
•

There are two (goal 3 chapter 1) Usually missing peoples dialogues. Its really important to
have people’s dialogues in planning. Cultivating that and making space is really great. This
relates to my experience as a caregiver for my siblings, without dialogue its difficult to
understand someone’s needs. This is really important for planning projects.
Accessible, accountable, transparent engagement processes. Might find information along
the way that you didn’t know about. You need to have a willingness to go in a different
direction.
Engaging youth! If we want to raise a generation that understands politics and decision
making, they need to be in those spaces.
EJ policy is important. Growing up, she didn’t have access to greenspaces. Eugene is the
perfect environment to provide greenspaces to people from all income levels to have
access those spaces.
Fresh air and water is a privilege, and it shouldn’t be. People should have access to those
things and a healthy tree canopy, live in places that doesn’t have smog, and has access to
clean water. It really impacts quality of life.
More accessible spaces where you can find refuge from smoke and smog.
Make them accessible – they need to be affordable or free
Bring the urban canopies to the people. Don’t make them walk across town to access it.
3rd spaces have nothing to do with city planning, they are claimed spaces made by the
people.

Do you have experiences or stories to share that connect to a draft policy or goal?
•
•

•

•

•
•

Being a caretaker really helped her understand the value of dialogue.
Levels of participation - Was part of a City panel that advising on a series of display panels,
then they didn’t hear from the City for months. Next thing she knew the panels were
installed.
Mentioned community development – and reparations – need to use the Equity Atlas to
show that something happened and that these policies are addressing those past harms.
Need to address the injustices that effects people’s daily lives – equitable access and
opportunity.
Skipping ahead to chapter two – loves compact development – CENTERS! Used to live in the
Whitaker Neighborhood. Felt connected to the neighborhood. Enjoyed the quality of life
there. Part of the community. Loves the combo of groceries’, restaurants, etc.
5.11 – accessible built environment – helps build community. Should consider how
programming impacts those spaces. Social connections help people live longer.
Having community helps make challenging aspects of life less challenging. For example,
when there is someone in the neighborhood who could be perceived as a troublemaker,
when you live there and know them, you feel less threatened. Positive influence on quality
of life to have community around you.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 9 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 37 of 104

Is there anything significant that you would like to change or is missing?
•

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•

Addressing in Ch. 1 how community sees community. What is community, how do you do
it? Community engagement is important for showing how local policy can effect
community. Highlight how these policies impact community building.
In the past, those community engagement activities felt clinical….need to create
community space while collecting data.
Yeah these are all policies and goals, they are things we have to do, but our goal is to make
people heard. Need to take the time and listen to people.
How are we planning for a community where organic community interactions can occur?
When people feel heard, they are more willing to build community, build a garden, build
housing, etc.
What about those loopholes – what are they? How will they be used by those avoiding
having to fix the problem. How do these policies impact root issues, not necessarily
systemic. What are we doing to address these underlying issues?
Need to look at the systems from different levels – institutional, cultural, social, etc.. What
is the systemic issue they are trying to address?
Community engagement, in practice, is really hard to do.
Need to develop trust in order to have healthy dialogue.
They both love the urban tree canopy policy.

URBAN GROWTH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 10 OF 10
Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026
Page 38 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #4
May 21, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | Campbell
Community Center

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over seven meetings between March and October 2025. The fourth panel
meeting included 12 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and
interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to gather panel members’ feedback on draft Comprehensive Plan
goals and policies on compact development, urban design, and housing.
City staff provided an overview of their key takeaways from the previous meeting, what a
comprehensive plan is, and highlighted specific draft goals and policies for community
engagement and community health.
After the presentation, the panel formed three small groups for discussion. Staff asked panel
members to write down the first two words that came to mind that describe each chapter. Then
panel members discussed each chapter, goals and policies that resonated with them, shared
stories that related, and identified areas they felt needed change or were missing.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways and next steps, as
interpreted by City staff include:
Panel members generally expressed support for having more goods and services and
transportation options close to where they live. Panel members discussed the benefits of being
able to access goods and services, like coffee shops, schools, grocery stores, and health care
without having to drive. Panel members appreciated the concept of being able to find everything
you need in your neighborhood, including things that bring people together. Several panel members
expressed the importance of having frequent, reliable public transportation near where they live.
Centers and neighborhoods should also include cultural considerations. Some panel members
discussed the importance of how neighborhoods, centers and places feel, not just look. There were
discussions around feeling welcome in businesses and comfortable in their neighborhoods. As

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 39 of 104

people of color, panel members in this group shared similar experiences of being treated like they
were going to steal things and were confused by other shoppers as staff because of the color of
their skin. They recommended planning for businesses that offer goods and services at a range of
prices, accessible and welcome to all. One idea was to include cultural art in the design of the built
environment; this could help them feel more welcome. There was also some discussion of the
importance of cultural hubs for helping create a sense of community for people who do not identify
with the dominant culture, and ways to foster cultural hubs so they can be successful centers.
“Centers can help with neighborhood identity development. There is a risk of every place looking
the same. Different cultures create different neighborhood identities.”- Panel member
Panel members viewed “home” as more than a physical space. Home was described as a place
where they felt safe and comfortable, with access to things like high-quality transit service, physical
space for extended family to live, and the outdoors.
“As I get older, there will likely come a time when I can’t drive and don’t want to have to wait an hour
for a bus. People can’t afford a new car or insurance and they need accessible and reliable
transportation options to get to work and make money. Having transit near housing is valuable.”
-Panel member
Some panel members emphasized the importance of moderate-income and accessible
housing. People in this income bracket were described as not making enough money to be able to
afford market-rate housing, but also make too much money to qualify for housing subsidies.
Accessible housing was also described as a need, both physically and economically accessible.
The City should look into ways to help build housing more inexpensively. There was a
discussion about whether the City could incentivize types of housing that costs less to build, help
get it sited, or work with area partners who are building this type of housing (like manufactured or
pre-fab homes).
Some panel members questioned whether some of the draft goals and policies took an
integrationist approach. This concern was not shared amongst all panelists, but is an important
consideration for staff. One panel member specifically identified mixed-income housing as having
both positive and negative impacts on someone’s ability to build community and find others that
have similar cultural identities.

Next Steps
Based on the panel’s advice, City staff are proposing the following next steps for the draft
Comprehensive Plan goals and policies on compact development, urban design, and housing:
•

Staff will continue to develop tools that promote more neighborhood serving commercial
uses in residential areas, and especially centers. Staff will consider ways to promote locally
owned and operated small businesses and developers.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 40 of 104

•

•
•
•
•

•

Staff will research ways to increase cultural considerations into policy for creating unique
centers and complete neighborhoods where cultural enclaves (or hubs) can develop and
create a sense of community and belonging.
Staff will continue to plan for housing that is more than a physical building, but something
that is connected to community, transportation options, and goods and services.
Staff will continue to coordinate with Lane Transit District in our growth planning with the
goal of incorporating regular and frequent transit service in our core commercial centers.
Staff will continue to investigate the development of actions to implement policies related
to increasing moderate income and accessible housing.
Staff will look into whether more can be done in policy or actions to incentivize the use of
less-expensive building types (like pre-fabricated/manufactured/modular homes) to help
meet housing needs
Staff will review draft goals and policies that may contribute to forced integration while
balancing the need to create more housing choice in preferable places to live, like near
parks and open spaces and centers.

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the third meeting with the panel. It has been lightly edited for
clarity.

Clarifying Questions
Chapter 2 - Compact Development and Urban Design
•

•

•

•

Are the centers concepts related to the activities that were at the open house at the
Farmers Market Pavillion last year?
o Yes!
When you say healthy neighborhoods with diverse housing options, does that mean a
neighborhood with a variety of different levels and types of housing so we don’t have that
upper level “gated community” type neighborhood?
o Yes! Working towards a future where neighborhoods have diverse housing options.
I have received letters from neighbors that say please don’t support affordable housing
projects in our neighborhood because it will make the price of houses in our neighborhood
go down.
The goals and policies reference “healthy neighborhoods” – but what about health care?
That helps make a complete neighborhood.

Chapter 4 – Housing
•

Are manufactured home parks going to be developed? Where are they currently allowed?
Do prefabricated homes fall under manufactured homes?

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 41 of 104

o

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

There are proposed policies to make it easier to build and site manufactured homes
because it’s “naturally occurring” affordable housing. We want to make it easier for
individual lots and parks.
o Prefabricated homes do fall under manufactured homes.
o Staff will look into where manufactured home parks are currently allowed/what
processes they need to go through to develop.
Is the City offering tax incentives?
o The City currently offers a number of incentives, like System Development Charge
(SDC) incentives for affordable housing, reduced SDCs for housing on transit
corridors, Multiple Unit Property Tax Exemptions (MUPTE), etc. These are current
incentives, and we are looking at creating more.
Does the City coordinate with the bedroom communities like Junction City and Elmira, etc.
to plan together/work towards housing goals?
o Eugene’s housing need is only for within Eugene’s UGB – those cities have housing
need numbers also determined by the state. There is some collaboration between
cities around tools, etc. but there definitely could be more.
What kind of communications does the City have in terms of communicating with citizens,
stakeholders, etc. The City has done a poor job in the past communicating, especially proactive communication, and that creates contention.
o It’s a challenge to create “news.” When we go to City Council and give them
information it sometimes is newsworthy, but it is a challenge. We do have robust
community engagement for the Urban Growth Strategies work; we are reaching out
to the community in a wide-variety of ways.
If we’re planning to build more housing – how are we going to support those people with City
services like community centers and infrastructure, etc. When the City’s looking at budget
cuts, how do we support the additional people coming to our community?
Are there policies related to the types of businesses we want to see in our neighborhoods?
Can we write policies for them to be locally owned vs. taco bell, etc.
o The City can’t prohibit specific types of businesses or require locally owned
businesses but can try to be creative and think about incentives that would
encourage local developers and businesses.
Are Crescent Village and the Riverfront examples of what we’re trying to get at with the
centers concept/policies?
o Yes! Some of these areas are already operating as centers.
Would it be one big developer coming in and developing a center?
o No, it would be putting zoning and incentives in place and then it would be
dependent on private development, which could be multiple developers or one
developer.
Curious to see what the Riverfront is going to yield in terms of low-incoming housing.
o One of the lots is currently identified for Affordable Housing.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 42 of 104

Small Group Discussion
These notes were taken by City staff during the small group discussions. They are organized by
small group and the questions asked.
Group 1:
Chapter 2 – Compact Development and Urban Design
•

•

•

•

•

•

Two words for this chapter:
o Proximity and walkability
o Walking and coffee shops
o European flavor
It seems like we’re trying to have communities and neighborhoods closer together and
closer to schools, walkable to stores and food, etc. Being able to walk to what you would
normally drive to.
You can have stores close to you but you also need to have health care – that’s something
people forget about and it’s really important. Live in Whiteaker neighborhood and go to
Churchill High School, which is nowhere near their house. Would be nice to live closer to
school so they wouldn’t have to use as much gas to get there. It does feel like Eugene and
Oregon do a good job with having close parks and water resources, etc.
They work from home most of the time, but learning that it’s not their favorite thing. It’s
isolating – they notice that when they go to a coffee shop or the office, they’re a lot more
productive. They went to a coffee shop this morning and did work on something they haven’t
been able to work on at home for weeks. But they don’t live near downtown or any coffee
shops – ended up downtown today after missing the train and went to a coffee shop that
was close by and thought, wouldn’t it be nice if there was a coffee shop close to their house
where they could sit down and work?
Envision a European flavor – having everything you want in one neighborhood. In those
areas, there’s a sense of resi-commerical areas – commercial on the bottom and residential
above. And they have grocery stores that are close enough to walk to. Don’t have to take a
cab or uber to get groceries. In the 30s and 40s neighborhoods were compacted. In
Chicago, why would you even go downtown when you can get everything in your own
neighborhood? Would like to see an upscale or modern version of that that is more
approachable and easier to navigate. Where you have everything in your neighborhood but
also, it’s easy to get to the main hub/downtown or the airport with public transportation –
still accessible to other areas. Envisioning Eugene becoming that sort of city that has
everything you need – likes that concept.
Was in Springfield last fall with their marching band and they’ve been doing a lot of
remodeling/refurbishing. They passed by what they thought was access into a building but
saw that it was actually a grocery store that was built into the building. Made them think of
Japan, where everything is vertical and there are different things/services built into the same
building – electronics on one floor, grocery, etc.
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 43 of 104

•

•
•

Thinking about how places feel – how is it when I walk in here? How is it when they see me?
They live in south Eugene and there used to be an old Payless where you could buy shoes
and lots of other things and it was a place for everybody. Now, when they walk into Market of
Choice, the white ladies start asking them questions about where things are thinking they
work there. Security guards follow them around to see if they’re going to steal anything. It’s
the people that are the problem – feeling like you’re in community. Others voiced having
similar experiences in Eugene.
It feels like artwork could be helpful – incorporating different cultural art into the built
environment, more Native American pieces, etc.
Having more places to go that aren’t just upscale. Things for every price range. Accessible.

Chapter 4 – Housing
•

•

•

•

•

•

Two words for this chapter:
o Collaboration and accessibility
o Accessibility
o Transportation
o Balcony and view
o ADUs and places where extended family can live
o Multi-story buildings
Collaboration and accessibility. Seems like the government/City can help create houses.
It’s important to address people who are in those middle income brackets - that don’t
qualify for subsidies but also can’t find housing that is affordable.
Accessibility. They’ve lived in different types of housing including manufactured homes,
rentals and seen how those experiences can affect people. Their family just bought a house
and got the keys today – excited to have a place where they can settle down. Not everyone is
able to walk or drive - creating more space for people to have housing closer to transit and
goods.
Transportation. When they first moved to Eugene they were a college student with two kids
and transit was so unreliable – needed reliable transportation that was better and frequent.
There was no parking at the UO – car got booted a few times. As they get older, there will
likely come a time when they can’t drive and don’t want to have to wait an hour for a bus.
People can’t afford a new car or insurance and they need accessible and reliable
transportation options to get to work and make my money. Having transit near housing is
valuable.
Balcony and view. Their beloved childhood bedroom had a balcony and they thought it was
the best view in the whole city in San Francisco. Dream of having a balcony again – maybe a
covered balcony in Oregon – want to be able to be outside.
ADUs and places where extended family can live. Their mom bought a house recently and
there’s a studio on the property and they’re considering adding more units like that on the
property so the whole family could live there together. It feels like that’s becoming more
common these days, especially with aging parents – keeping family and friends close.
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 6 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 44 of 104

•

Multi-story buildings. Like multi-story buildings, but that are not too intense and have
stories that feel connected to each other. They grew up in Illinois and have been traveling –
their European travels have been broadening their perspectives. The race riots happened in
Illinois in 1909 and the year after them the NAACP formed. The repercussions of that as a
kid meant there were parts of town you couldn’t go to. Lived between two churches, two
taverns, and two funeral homes – saw a lot.

Group 2:
Small group discussion (reporting out on words panelists wrote on their handouts):
Ch 2—
•
•
•
•

•

Efficiency. Also, legacy, compact, eco-friendly and connected to key centers and
institutions.
Visual –what you can see resonates with people (design is important)
Youth and elders—if planning is done correctly, it will benefit these groups
Forced integration – (Mixed income neighborhoods/centers are kind of like forced
integration.) Wondering if mixed-income housing would work well? Willamette Crossing in
Harlow, example, near Chase Gardens—does not work very well. Crescent Village is mixed
income and works well.
Centers can help with neighborhood identity development. There is a risk of every place
looking the same. Different cultures create different neighborhood identities.

Ch 4—
•
•
•
•
•

Equity—related to equitable housing affordable to all people
Resources—that help people find housing
Less unaffordable (rather than affordable—being a realist)—related to economy, efficiency
and right-sizing.
It’s the people that make the n’hood special. Want the n’hood to reflect you. How do we
make places reflect our culture and our identity?
Community –it’s important to pay attention to soft-skills too

Stories or experiences that relate to the chapters:
•
•

In Texas, cities are so spread out. Compact development is good/resonates with him and
has kept him here.
Thinking about eminent domain. It has also been done to the Latino community. The Whit
used to be more of a Latino cultural center/hub. It used to be more thriving. The
neighborhood was broken up; it would have grown more if it had a chance to survive.
Examples of cultural centers like Harlem and Koreatown—there’s a history in that place. We
talk about integration but we also have to pay attention to how integration can harm people

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 7 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 45 of 104

•
•
•
•

•

– there can be something gained and something lost by integration because you are away
from your community. One idea is an apartment complex that is affirmatively marketed to
people of color—can we do that? Historically, wealthy black people moved away to wealthy
white communities. What is gained and what is lost?
Agreement regarding the power of community.
Often times these neighborhoods form due to socioeconomic circumstances, and they are
making due out of a bad situation.
“The best place in town” is qualitative – personal preference.
College Hill – older white community. Welcomed his family when they moved there; made
them feel like they were part of the neighborhood. The people who live around you can
definitely have an impact on your perception of your neighborhood and make you feel like
you fit in.
There is a lack of cultural creativity in some neighborhoods.

Anything missing from chapters?
•

•

•

•
•
•

Would like to learn more about ways to build housing more inexpensively. Could we help
make this happen? Like pre-fabs. Other options for less expensive manufactured housing.
SVDP is producing/selling manufactured/prefab homes. [HOPE Community Corporation
(the acronym stands for Housing Options Production Enterprise]
Do you know about the pricing manipulation lawsuit (local property mgmt. companies are
being sued by the state, about algorithmic pricing being used to reduce pricing competition
among landlords)?
With the emphasis on corridors – are we still keeping the same LTD route system—spoke
and wheel? Not as good for full city coverage. But corridors looks like this same system. Is
there good coordination with the transit agency?
There is a need to create/advocate for moderate income housing—how do we do that?
The loudest ones are the ones who don’t want change. People we don’t hear from are the
ones who benefit the most—how do we change that?
There was a discussion of whether we think there will ever be autonomous vehicles in the
City. Would this be good or bad for the city/compact development/the environment/getting
people out of cars and using other modes of transportation?

Group 3:
First two words that describe these chapters:
Ch. 2 Complex and Weave
Ch. 4: Complex and Weave
Chapter 2 – Compact Development & Urban Design
• Do you have experiences or stories to share that connect to a draft policy or goal?

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 8 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 46 of 104

•

Is there anything significant that you would like to change or is missing?

If you make one action it may have other actions down the road somewhere
Really resonates with centers – not auto oriented. Eugene is rare, you don’t really need a car to get
to places. The bike culture [in Eugene] really helps. Old mall converted to a mixed-use space. Inside
the mall, no cars.
Loved living in the Whitaker neighborhood – the grain mill was horrible. During covid, you couldn’t
go places. She didn’t have to go other places. She had everything she needed right there;
restaurants, businesses, riverfront. It was a dynamic area where she didn’t have to leave. Was able
to grab the EMX and get to the other places you need to get like Target or Walmart. It was central to
west 11th and downtown. Campus was hard to get to.
River road next to emerald park townhomes – went up quick.
A center needs to have things like a natural food store, internet café, food cart garden, things that
bring people together. Reliable bus service a must.
Chapter 4– Housing
• Do you have experiences or stories to share that connect to a draft policy or goal?
• Is there anything significant that you would like to change or is missing?
These goals and policies need to consider who really needs housing regardless of the metric the
Federal Government sets.
We should build mixed use buildings along key corridors.
Lived in a duplex in a center. Made one her best friends when lived there. In the duplex, they shared
common space -with shared yard, laundry.

Post-meeting Follow Up
The following are responses to specific questions that came up during the meeting that staff would
like to provide additional information on.
Q: Where are manufactured home parks allowed?
Currently, manufactured homes parks are allowed in Eugene’s low-density (R-1) and mediumdensity (R-2) residential zones. They have to meet additional requirements that other housing types
do not (mostly regulated by State Law). Mobile home parks, however, must be a minimum of 1 acre
and are subject to the density regulations of that zone which is likely a barrier to new manufactured
homes parks as there are not many undeveloped areas of that size. If a parcel were to be found of
that size, it is likely cost prohibitive for a housing provider to develop a manufactured home park
there.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 9 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 47 of 104

There are two other paths for new mobile home parks in Eugene’s land use code:
1.) Developers/applicants can describe the park as a cottage cluster, which would allow up to
6 homes on a lot.
2.) Developers/applicants can choose to go through Site Review, which adds an additional
review process and requirements to the development – likely making a mobile home park
much more expensive to develop.
Q: How is access to health care being considered as part of complete neighborhoods?
Currently, there is one draft policy in the Community Health chapter intended to provide the policy
support for increasing equitable access to social services and health care. The draft policy is:
5.13 Access to social services and healthcare. Coordinate with public and non-profit agency
partners to enhance equitable access to affordable, quality social services and
healthcare by encouraging their colocation and siting of new social services and
healthcare services when planning for centers and key corridors.
In particular, staff are recommending that more social service and healthcare providers be
encouraged to locate in centers and key corridors, two important components of some complete
neighborhoods.
Eugene’s Land Use Code allows many types of health care related developments in a variety of
zones. Currently, clinics, laboratory, medical, dental, and x-ray facilities, meal service providers,
nursing homes, and residential treatment centers are all allowed in Community Commercial (C-2)
and Major Commercial (C-3) zones. These two commercial zones are Eugene’s “large” commercial
zones. The Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) zone only allows medical clinics and sometimes meal
service.
Hospitals are currently treated differently by Eugene’s Land Use Code, and require a different
process called a “Conditional Use Permit.” This permit requires additional review of the proposed
development to ensure that it is “reasonable compatible” with other existing developments in the
area. For example, developing a hospital in a commercial zone could create increased traffic
congestion and negatively impact other local businesses.
Q: Do you know about the pricing manipulation lawsuit (local property mgmt. companies are
being sued by the state, about algorithmic pricing being used to reduce pricing competition
among landlords)?
City staff at the meeting were unaware of details of the United States Department of Justice
antitrust lawsuit that names Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC, which owns 11 properties in the
Eugene area. Planning staff have now shared this information with Renter Protection program staff.
Follow this link to learn more about the lawsuit that named Greystar Real Estate Partners LLC.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 10 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 48 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #5
June 11, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | Eugene
Downtown Library

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over seven meetings between March and October 2025. The fifth panel meeting
included 12 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to provide panelists with an understanding of fair housing choice
and how it informs City housing planning, as well as discuss key issues and solutions to improve
housing choice – when Eugene households have the information, opportunity, and options to live
where they choose.
City staff provided an overview of their key takeaways from the previous meeting, provided
background on Eugene’s housing need and fair housing laws, and shared five ‘big ideas’ to address
local housing needs, especially regarding issues in housing choice.
After the presentation, the panel worked in pairs to provide feedback on strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats of the five big ideas. They also had the opportunity to suggest their own
big ideas. Throughout the meeting, panelists had the opportunity to build an ideal neighborhood
using legos and other materials. Photos of their creations are available at the end of this summary.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways as interpreted by City
staff include:
•

•

Overall: The City should continue to learn from other cities, find ways to reduce regulatory
barriers and process requirements, and allow for a wider range of housing development that
defines housing as something that is “not just what the white middle class think.” Generally,
the panelists supported an increase to the types of housing that are available in Eugene.
RVs and Tiny Homes on Wheels as Housing: Panelists appreciated the flexibility and
convenience of this housing type and the opportunity to apply landlord-tenant law. They
expressed some concern and consideration for requirements for water/sewer hook-ups,
upkeep and safety, and ensuring affordability.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 49 of 104

•

•

•

•

Mixed and/or Moderate Income Incentive(s): Panelists noted that supporting this range of
housing could be a good fit for several community groups in Eugene. Some expressed
concerns about ensuring the housing went to people who needed it, did not encourage
discrimination based on income (especially within mixed-income developments), and
questioned whether it would be accessible to groups that have been historically
marginalized and may not reach the ‘moderate’ income level. Several panelists noted the
need for transparency with the public on incentive programs – explaining how tax
exemptions support future public resources.
Encourage Accessible Housing: Panelists were generally supportive of increasing
requirements or providing incentives for more accessible housing. They noted the potential
for this need to increase over the coming years, and that building to accessible standards
can benefit everyone in the community.
Encourage More Housing In/Near Centers: Panelists were generally supportive of
encouraging a range of housing types (at a range of affordability levels) near centers. They
emphasized the importance of connecting housing to quality transportation and transit and
offering a mix of commercial and small business opportunities.
Micro Village Housing: Panelists were supportive of the concept, and wrestled with
meaningful questions about the availability of on-site supportive services, the role of a
property manager or organization, and whether this housing type should solely be focused
on serving lower income individuals.

Next Steps
As a follow-up from Meeting #2 on the Equity Atlas, staff will offer an optional, additional panel
meeting in late July to share an updated version of the resources and discuss next steps for sharing
and expanding upon the resource.
The next planned panel meeting, on September 10, 2025, will be a continuation of the discussion
on actions to improve housing choice in Eugene.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 50 of 104

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the fifth panel meeting. It has been lightly edited for clarity.

Clarifying Questions & Takeaways from Previous Meetings
•

•

•

•

•

•
•

How amenable or adaptable is the City on housing policy? Its policy is pretty conservative.
If the policy stays the same, then we can talk and dream all we want but it doesn't change
anything.
o Response: staff provided their perspective in the changing tone at the City towards
more progressive housing policies – still a lot of room to grow. Staff also clarified the
difference between federal policy, state policy, and local housing policy.
Does the new Mayor have priorities with her agenda with this?
o Response: yes! She is still shaping her priorities, but staff are excited to have a
Mayor with deep interest and experience in housing, planning, and urban design.
Other parts of Oregon there are radical things happening related to regulations and process.
Why aren’t they here?
o Response: The changes to Oregon housing planning rules, and more comprehensive
housing need projections, will force difficult decisions for decisionmakers. We don’t
have the option not to look at new solutions.
How will the different jurisdictions work with each other? Do they just coordinate within the
UGB or is it with other nearby cities as well? Partnerships seem to get more done. LCOG
used to be a connector- not sure if they still are.
o Response: staff provided background on the Eugene-Springfield separation and how
long it has taken to separate the UGBs and comprehensive planning. Now, Eugene
mostly plans within its own UGB, but there are some issues that are planned for
regionally when possible.
What happens if Eugene greatly increases housing but Springfield doesn’t, and more people
move to Eugene?
o Response: Springfield is held to the same planning requirements as Eugene, and
will be working through its housing planning concurrently. The group discussed
infrastructure costs, including for nearby cities. Springfield housing costs are
increasing, and they have slower production than Eugene, there is a high percentage
of people commuting into Eugene from outside the metro area due to housing costs.
What is the federal funding for Fair Housing of Oregon?
o Response: Likely Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
Regarding the statement of 5% is required to be accessible - OR SB444 proposes increasing
this to 10% (for multi-unit housing supported through state housing funds). What’s the
status? If life expectancy goes up will be more needed.
o Response: This legislation passed in Senate and was referred to the House Rules
committee. It is not currently scheduled for action in the House. The last day of
session will be no later than June 29.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 51 of 104

•

•

•

Hopefully there will be protections from price gauging for homes on wheels, and there are
health considerations there to address. Would there be requirements for service hook ups?
o Response: Yes, in some way. Portland has done this, but they require electrical and
sewer hook-ups, or the vehicle must be able to be pulled out to dump sewage.
Outside of inspections, how can ensure safety? Is enforcement mainly through complaints?
o Response: Yes, Eugene uses a complaint-based enforcement approach, but other
places enforce more proactively and provide more staffing for enforcement.
A panelist has several ADUs nearby off the alley they live on, and all the residents of the
ADUs park in the alley. It has caused problems for access to other houses that want to use
the alley. Can it be required to not allow parking in the alley? Area is not wide enough for
today’s vehicles.
o Response: residents are likely not actually allowed to park in the alley because it’s a
public way. That neighborhood is an older plat, so it was designed with narrower
alleys than an RV needs.

Small Group Discussion
Idea: RVs and Tiny Homes on Wheels as Housing
Strengths
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Separate from main structure
Potential for multiple units per property
Removable
Could enhance neighborhood character
Could be great for traditional-aged college students
I really love the idea of people being more easily able to attain tenant rights
Flexible and affordable living
Portable
Available spaces on property
Sanitary and electrical services addressed

Weaknesses
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

No requirements for mandate on electricity and sewer – its more expensive. Remain
flexible.
Environmental
Weather/ice/storms, nature
Upkeep, safety
Opportunity on a property to get assistance
Parking? (for cars); opportunity for bicycles?
Potential for multiple units per property

Opportunities
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 52 of 104

•
•
•
•
•
•

Convenient, available property
Allow RV parks in City limits so sewage and electrical hookups can easily be accessed
Limitation could be owning a truck to be able to move the RV/tiny home to dump waste…
what if the City or an organization dumps waste and checks on quality of the unit for safety?
Allowing single family home renters to allow a unit on wheels on the property for duration of
lease perhaps
Opportunities to share bathrooms
Making housing affordable to owners

Threats
•

Safety concerns

Online Participant Comments
•

•
•

•
•

One panelist currently lives in this situation - some need hook ups, some just need water.
Escaped the rental market and could be experiencing homelessness. After illness and an
accident, moved out and bought a camper.
People already own RVs. Lane County recently adopted an RV rental code when it is allowed
to rent out an RV with a rental agreement and appropriate utilities.
Could work, does help in transition or prefer mobile lifestyle. Regulation about “driveable” –
tiny homes should be allowed. So many regulations that make it hard for lots of people on
one property.
Should be able to stay for a year without rental increases
Hopefully there are protections against price gouging for homes on wheels

Idea: Mixed and/or Moderate-Income Housing Incentive(s)
Strengths
•
•
•
•
•
•

Established neighborhoods
Local working class folks being able to access safe, comfortable, quality housing
Could be great for building communities with common interests
Prevents concentration of poverty / homogenous socio-economic group
Could be great for ‘generations’ uninterested in single-family homes
Could be great for traditional-aged college students

Weaknesses
•
•
•

Potential of housing getting snatched by people who can afford market-rate housing or
student housing
Segregated housing creates cultural pride [concern about forced integration]
Because of the history of housing discrimination, historically disadvantaged groups may not
qualify for middle [income] housing

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 53 of 104

Opportunities
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Need to be intentional about parks
Incentives for small businesses to locate at/near here
Ares for shopping schools
Adjusting requirements
Lower move-in costs
Non-furnished housing
Focus on non-students
Income caps focused on wider range of incomes

Threats
•
•

Limited property for growth
Existing homeowner might discriminate

Online Participant Comments
•

Need to define it. It is so warped. Look at income to buying power, it changes annually. Every
few years is too slow.

Idea: Encourage Accessible Housing
Strengths
•
•
•

Love pre-approved plans. Helpful for renters, home owners, and developers. Sets
expectations for quality.
Eugene needs more accessible housing
Plus for aging adults

Weaknesses
•
•

How much revenue could these fee waivers impact? Would there be a cap of how many
waivers the City would waive annually?
I agree with preference policy in theory. But there are people who have limitations getting
diagnosed with disabilities, so policy should allow for self-reporting, rather than a doctor’s
note.

Opportunities
•
•
•

Increase 5% to 10% - as life expectancy goes up, mobility issues may increase
Acceptance of disabled people without mobility aids/devices that benefit from ADA
accommodations as well
Housing standards in general should be more accessible. The people who live there are not
the only people who use that space. Family, visitors, and people with temporary disabilities.

Threats
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 6 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 54 of 104

•

No close by transportation

Idea: More Housing in Centers
Strengths
•
•
•
•

Mixed-income housing types
Makes better/more efficient use of infrastructure (e.g., roads, electrical, sewer, etc.)
I appreciate the distinction of the different types of housing, so its not just more expensive
housing in resource-full areas
Yes to limiting auto-oriented uses in some commercial centers. Fewer drive through coffee!

Weaknesses
•
•
•

Transportation public need
Are there any negative externalities to setting minimum residential density standards?
Increasing local resources in housing hubs, like public transport running later on residential
routes

Opportunities
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Multi-generational housing
Areas to sit down, relax, and gather with your community
Would help make transit system more cost-effective
Small business opportunity
Mixed commercial – food, clothing, entertainment
Focus on growing centers – out and up
Improved transit (increase bus frequency, better sidewalks, bike lanes)
Can increase the bounds of a center – this would have positive externalities for surrounding
neighborhoods near center
More K-12 around/at centers

Threats
•
•

Safety (noise, lack of outdoor space)
Concentrated high cost housing rather than a variety of housing that different people can
access

Online Participant Comments
•

Strongly support it, advocate for it. Ensures wellbeing, provides services, culturally relevant.
Walk to grocery, visit friends, quality of life.

Idea: Micro Village Housing
Strengths

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 7 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 55 of 104

•
•
•
•

Will allow unhoused to be housed
Manufactured and pre-built and 3D printed homes are getting cheaper while quality goes up
Builds community, could focus social services
I think transitional housing that allows and encourages a bit of independence can be very
beneficial for folks working towards independent living

Weaknesses
•
•
•
•

Parking
Unintentionally (?) concentrates poverty
Parking aways from units makes accessible to inaccessible
People have problems living next to each other and sharing group facilities; navigating
personality differences. Need for organizational oversight to keep common areas clean and
functional.

Opportunities
•
•
•
•
•

To provide opportunities to create community together
300 sq ft or less may be too small for couples, have a mix; possibly up to 500 sq ft for double
occupancy and 300 sq ft or less for single occupancy
Micro villages that have themes that transcend socio-economic class
Solar energy opportunity, low cost energy
Variety of unit sizes, 300 sq ft might be small for ADA units

Threats
•
•
•
•

Not sufficiently maintain common use areas – areas of tension
Funding being cut could raise concerns
Need wrap-around services management and coordination or interpersonal dynamics
explode
Need to consider how to keep these developments healthy and safe

Online Participant Comments
•
•
•
•

•
•

Hard to have additional responsibilities, need significant support
Strength: can be temporary fix, adapt, less obligation than a larger structure
Transitional element, extremely low income, can’t show rent, minimalist, but the social
element is difficult
In Arizona, there is an RV camper community, 100K, vehicles wheels, very inexpensive, low
boundary to living in community. Lots of freedom. Could there be options to legalize
housing on wheels, if it appealed to multiple demographics, it could help create a full
community. I wish I had low entry housing.
Weakness: focus on low and extremely low income. Should address more income levels.
Current building code is difficult – might be too restrictive to manifest this

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 8 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 56 of 104

What are your big ideas?
•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

Incentives for ADUs
We need flexibility in building materials (i.e., treehouses or earth homes). Not what white
middle class Americans deem as a ‘home’.
Bring back electric tracks for rapid transit
Tax exemptions – if a guaranteed percentage of future tax income can go to community
services, it may increase community buy-in
Show in 10 years what percentage goes to each community service/area
Do we have a way to control rents? Federal money for housing developers who agree to
keep a percentage of rents affordable. You should figure out how to have stable rents. Profit
over people. Private developers are trying to make money.
Public development: could we tax ourselves to build more affordable housing.
Allow alternative building materials for housing (e.g., cobb structures, cobb insulation, hay
bale structures).

Large Group Debrief and Discussion
•

•

•
•

•

The City must relax on land use and land permitting process. In doing this, the goal would
be to get more potential for housing, more of a range of housing that we as a people
collectively think is housing, not just what the white middle class think.
Bring the electric mass transit street cars back. Used to go from Lorane to Junction City to
Salem, the rails are still there. It would allow housing to be more dispersed, it would be
great for solar fields to fuel them.
Second the mass transit idea, this came up for me in the centers concept. Yes, increase
housing in centers but centers would be better to live with more sidewalks and transit.
It’s hard because housing and transit are intertwined but there’s a generational difference,
[older] people’s long held value of single-family homes, including me- my net worth is
wrapped up in my house and there’s not a lot of incentive to demo and replace with other
types of housing. But I do have hope that younger people will want to use more transit and
change things and more housing types.
Discussed the centers idea and was asking about what happens to the folks that already
have the shops or live there.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 9 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 57 of 104

Icebreaker Photos
Take a moment to imagine beyond our existing built environment. Use the materials at your table to
build an ideal neighborhood. When complete, we will take a moment to share. Some things to
consider:
•
•
•

Who lives there and what kind of structures do they live in?
Where is it located? What amenities and infrastructure support the neighborhood?
What kinds of cultures and economies support the neighborhood?

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 10 OF 10

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 58 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #6
July 30, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm | Eugene
The People’s Collective

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over eight meetings between March and October 2025. The sixth panel meeting
included eight community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to provide an overview of the public-facing Equity Atlas: Selected
Stories from Eugene’s History of Displacement online StoryMap, as well as discuss the StoryMap
content, feedback from panelists, and next steps. StoryMap is a web-based application to share
maps and other multimedia content with the context of narrative text.
After a presentation of the project background, previous feedback from panelists, and review of the
StoryMap, the panel provided feedback and voiced ideas and preferences for next steps in sharing
the resource with the community.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways as interpreted by City
staff include:
•

•

Immediate revisions to the Equity Atlas: Selected Stories in Eugene’s History of
Displacement should include:
o Expanding the indigenous history introductory. Make sure that the Kalapuya people
don’t seem like ‘landscapers’ and emphasize both the sacred connection to the
land and the atrocities they faced.
o Add references to the Dawes Act, exclusion through the Oregon constitution,
Chinese exclusion, and filling the gap in time between Donation Land Claims and
racial covenants.
o Streamline the feedback form.
Longer-term additions to the Equity Atlas work should include:
o Multi-media storytelling, perhaps learning from existing tools and collections such
as StoryCorps and the Latino Roots Project (UO).
o Connections to ongoing, positive work in the community.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 5

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 59 of 104

More stories that connect a concept like land use planning to experiences within
communities.
Collecting Feedback: There should be a mechanism to collect feedback from the
community, possibly in partnership with panelists and community organizations.
o

•

Next Steps
On August 12, 2025, the Planning Division staff will share the StoryMap and other Equity Atlas
research with the Eugene Planning Commission. The intent of the meeting is to provide a
foundation for future housing and comprehensive planning work that the Planning Commission will
engage with over the next year.
City staff will share the revised StoryMap with the panelists and encourage them to share with their
networks, sharing any feedback back with City staff. Staff will also implement an internal and
external communications strategy in August and September to share the resource with other City
departments and the public.
The next planned panel meeting, on September 10, 2025, will be a continuation of the discussion
on actions to improve housing choice in Eugene.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 5

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 60 of 104

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the sixth panel meeting. It has been lightly edited for clarity.
•

•
•

•

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

Add more about the sacredness of the land, look at the panels at the pavilion. Native
Americans weren’t just “landscapers” or “meek”. Also, add that there were bounties on
Native Americans heads, paid money to scalp. Needs to be said because they were here for
1000s of years.
More than just donation land claims: U.S. government misled tribes with treaties, which
were formed and not ratified.
History has been “sanitized” and we need to describe the “dirty”. The largest migration of
humans in history went from Europe to the US with the idea that they were fleeing slavery,
horrible atrocities, and lack of land. They brought those experiences to this land, manifest
destiny. Brought this to US, re-enacted. Important part of the narrative. Desperation and
fear, brought to us.
Honor the sacredness of land, take into account that these folks have been occupying land
for 1000s of years. Not about laws. Humanness of the land, not just what is most valuable in
terms of money. The narrative needs that power and punch. I grew up in CA, as children, we
had to go to the missions, color in the Indians in coloring books. People need to hear about
NA being rounded up.
There is a big gap in the narrative from the 50s to 1900s – how about Chinese populations,
exclusion, marriage about property and wealth, exclusions. Some of it is in the longer form.
Show documentation, highlight “and the Caucasian race shall” highlight in the Oregon
Constitution – visceral experience. [See image emailed as a follow-up from one of the
panelists at the end of the notes.]
Regarding property ownership, native people hid their race or they would lose their property.
Question about Shelley vs. Kramer, racially restrictive covenants. Not legally enforceable,
what does that mean?
Tenant lawyer told me that it is very difficult to try a successful case of unfair housing law.
The fair housing act doesn’t actually do much because it is difficult to prove.
High property values are exclusionary in and of themselves.
It would be good to make sure people read it, and then can go into more depth over time. I
see the value of a tiered layout for the information.
For Parkview Terrace: clarifying that of the 12 households displaced, 9 were Black.
People won’t know unless we advertise. Encourage feedback! How do we gather this?
o Connecting history to current context. How do we ask for feedback? Send us an
email? We might get good and bad comments. Or use a form? Which is better?
Local land use plan section – I like the environmental hazards, and we could add more
stories about that. Concrete things like Trainsong Park, Baxter.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 5

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 61 of 104

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

I went to a meeting with Parks regarding the Suzanne Arlie trails – Native leaders and COE
staff. Bring in Native communities for ecological burns. Remember to talk about the good as
well as the bad. How we work together now.
When we look at the land that was deeded to Hilyard or Skinner, we can’t totally make it
right. How about value of land over time, with descendants, then look at value now, and in a
monetary sense…tracking what was “given” and “taken” – value of land today. Compelling
story. Why this matters. Reparations.
o As the land value system was established, then people were excluded. So, people
could not benefit.
o Reparations aren’t difficult to figure out, they just cost a lot (and then no one wants
to pay).
o PDX – program for Black families who were displaced from a specific project.
Opportunity to purchase affordable housing.
o I would like to see something done. Vinis said it is not on the table.
We are from all different parts of this community. Positive energy. Now that I see this
document, where narrative is going. Part of ourselves into this, make it the best that it can.
Needs to be something in this that offers a circular timeline – a continuum. Something
positive, new fed building ramp, etc. Local example of positivity.
StoryCorps – used to be live, and now there are animations. Love the idea of continuum.
How does this roll forward toward positive change. From rules to change. How do we level
that playing field. Going forward.
o City: We could begin to use networks that COE has been trying to build. How do we
get comments logged about the equity atlas?
o Or other past COE work (like in Parks) – it would be good to include that information
as well.
Latino Roots project: Gabrielle Martinez, create 10 min documentary with people. Students
learn, then do interviews, then do video documentaries. 5-6 cohorts. Archived in public
collections. This is a good model and something that happens regularly with established
funding.
Black Cultural Initiative is actively updating entire website. Would love to host this
information. Could manage the comments on it. Note the photo with the cross on skinners.
Currently, at the top of Skinners, the bracket that held the cross is still there, and the O
insignia is there now.
BCI ran a google poll regarding the Across the Bridge commemorative statue (it was short
and simple and asked if people supported the work). Very valuable. We could use a google
form to gather input on the equity atlas. “It went viral because our org put it out, having that
held within groups, Also is a way to educate.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 5

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 62 of 104

Example of a racially restrictive covenant shared by a panel member via email.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 5

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 63 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #7
September 8, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm
Eugene Downtown Library

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies project, the City convened a Community Advisory
Panel that will meet over eight meetings between March and October 2025. The seventh panel
meeting included 12 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and
interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, introductions
of staff and panelists, and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to discuss the benefits and burdens of Eugene’s multi-unit design
standards and inform possible changes. Staff provided a presentation on the design standards, and
how any changes fit into Eugene’s larger effort to reduce regulatory barriers to housing production
and encourage housing affordability and choice through Urban Growth Strategies. After the
presentation, the panel provided feedback and discussed possible benefits and burdens on two
concepts:
•

•

Topic One: allow housing to be located further away from the street when along a busier
street (e.g., “arterials” like W. 11th, Coburg Road, River Road, Barger, Cal Young, Irving, and
“collectors” like Polk, Wilkes)
Topic Two: reduce or remove the requirement for open space when located in dense, urban
areas (e.g., commercial centers like Barger/Echo Hollow, 29th/Willamette, Oakway Center,
and parts of W. 11th and River Road).

Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways as interpreted by City
staff include:
Topic One: Setbacks near busier streets
•

Panelists noted the importance of active, walkable, and productive setbacks and
pedestrian areas, even near busy streets. They shared good and bad examples of how multiunit buildings can interact with the public realm (including Amazon Corner, 13th and Olive,
and student-oriented developments along Franklin Blvd/Broadway). Several mentioned
they did not want to see increased setbacks used for vehicle parking or storage.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 4

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 64 of 104

•
•

Some panelists mentioned the importance of flexibility and working closely with developers
on desired outcomes without adding more complexity to regulations.
Panelists emphasized the importance of public safety, especially for people living on or near
busy streets.

Topic 2: Open space requirements
•

•
•

Panelists expressed some skepticism about reducing/removing requirements for open
space, especially if the requirements were different across neighborhoods. They shared the
importance of quality of life provided by both indoor and outdoor public space, including for
children and pets, and to mitigate the impacts of a warming climate.
Panelists considered the connectivity of housing to parks, and how proximity to parks could
interact with open space requirements.
Several panelists reinforced the importance of open space access for people with different
income levels.

Next Steps
City staff will hold work sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council this fall to discuss
proposed actions to reduce barriers to housing and jobs, encourage compact development, and
increase capacity for housing. Those work sessions will include discussions on actions the panel
has weighed in on, including micro village housing, new incentives for housing, and code changes
such as revisions to the multi-unit design standards.
After the work sessions, staff will ask City Council to initiate the code changes and new chapters of
the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan that the panel has reviewed – this is a formal step in the
land use planning process. In 2026, there will be additional work sessions, public hearings, and
opportunities to weigh in before City Council makes any final decisions.
Tentative dates for these meetings are:
•
•
•
•

October 28, 2025 at 5:30pm – Planning Commission work session
November 12, 2025 at 12:00pm – City Council work session (no public comment)
November 24, 2025 at 7:30pm – City Council meeting (includes initiation of code changes)
December 9, 2025 at 5:30pm – Planning Commission work session

The next panel meeting is the final meeting for the group, on October 8, 2025, and will focus on
opportunities for continued engagement and how to follow and inform the decision-making
process, as well as share feedback on the panel process with staff and facilitators.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 4

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 65 of 104

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the seventh panel meeting. It has been lightly edited for clarity.
Topic One: Setbacks near busier streets
•

•
•
•
•

•

•

•

•

Moving it [apartment buildings] back 10 or 20 feet might not help with noise. Panelist lives
on River Road and fence boards don’t help either, maybe a vegetative buffer. [Staff asked
about the impact of tall hedges/vegetative buffers on safety for the area/street because it
reduces ‘eyes on the street’.] Panelist noted you can't do vegetation buffer high enough to
get second story windows so it may be a moot point.
Concern about parking spaces or trailers in the lawn if you gave more of a setback. Would
need to make sure it’s not used for parking.
What are the standards for single-unit housing?
Additional regulations decrease design variability and increase architectural costs. I would
like to see more flexibility and fewer requirements.
Looking for a new residence right now, thinking that bigger setbacks would be safer for kids
or dogs or people walking, but then in San Francisco the further back from the road a home
is they use it for anything so you’d have to a fence or veg or something to discourage, or
could encourage that the area is used for stormwater.
Would there be a maximum setback? At Amazon Corner, I noticed that the development
has small setbacks such as front porches, and there are living things happening, you can
see people interacting. A blank wall to street would be different. You can see people and
activities with some setbacks.
Larger setbacks don’t necessarily result in more open space. It could be a buffer from faster
traffic. Goodpasture Island Road as an example - when panelist lived there, a car went onto
the pedestrian path and was only stopped because of a sign pole, and another car drove
into an apartment and damaged the structure.
Walkability should be number one priority for busy streets - Franklin Blvd. as an example of
where new housing has not resulted in better walking environment. Thinking about all the
housing around Whole Foods, not very walkable and is very busy, though it is near a
walkable area. Maybe add more infrastructure in that area - add more safety and entrances
of these buildings to the street.
When panelist worked in a student leasing office, thinks about students moving in - had 1520 feet of cement in front of our building to be able to pull up and be able to move in which
was really helpful. Really had move-in going on all year. But as beneficial as it was, that
same building didn’t have much open space. For students - balconies probably don’t make
sense but how does student housing fit into these standards - these developers have seen
an opportunity and lowering the standards may hurt the folks that are there. Also thinking
about the family spaces with kids running around the halls.
o Staff: Commercial, student-oriented housing is subject to the same standards as
multi-unit housing. On-campus student housing is subject to different standards.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 4

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 66 of 104

•

•

Facilitator Comments: During the EmX West 11th expansion planning, businesses were
required to build close to the property line and then the City asked to buy land back for
transit. So, it would be good to think ahead for transit expansion and changes to the road
functionality.
Facilitator Comments: Reminder to keep thinking about a future where cars are not the
dominant form of transportation.

Topic 2: Open space requirements
•

•
•

•
•

•

•

•

•

If we get rid of it [open space requirements], would we end up stuffing as many people as
possible in an area? If an area becomes more dense there may not end up being enough
open space for all residents, like when we don’t require parking and then there isn’t enough.
Panelists is looking for new housing right now - very much value covered balconies.
Concerned about the number of apartments that have no open space or green space. Know
there are tradeoffs with constructing housing fast. If there’s smaller setbacks, could they be
required to have an increase of open space to get that setback? If they do construct closer
to the road, could require them to have sound proofing. Even if it’s not the highest quality at
least have this requirement. 13th and Olive - inside the units are not so bad but no good
open space, kind of haunted feeling. If you allow a reduction due to access to a park, do we
need to look at if it is really a good park and is accessible and safe- checks and balances.
Suggest having continuous walkways interconnectivity to and in between parks.
Think we will regret taking away some of the open spaces as we get hotter. And, for people
that have money they’re going to want green space so reduced open space requirements
would potentially be dooming the multi-unit that doesn’t get it.
Allowing developers to be creative and find ways that might better achieve the goal than
what they would do if they have to meet the letter of the law. Aware that some developers
are cutting corners or cutting design just to meet the letter of the law.
Open space is a big deal. In a family building (like Ketanji Court), the only safe place for kids
to play is in hallways. As a resident, hears all the kids on all the floors. Moved from a place
that had all the amenities (courts, lawn, etc.) but that place cost way more.
Nervous about having different standards for different neighborhoods - that could create
more socioeconomic differences. Busy places should be very beautiful. Doesn’t make
sense to have reduced open space requirements near busy corridors - it's not really a
relaxing area so need dedicated open space. Suggest not making as many changes to the
open space requirements.
Prioritize quality of life.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 4

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 67 of 104

Meeting Summary
Advisory Panel Meeting #8
October 8, 2025 | 5:30 – 7:30pm
Eugene Downtown Library

To support Eugene's Urban Growth Strategies (UGS) project, the City convened a Community
Advisory Panel that met eight times between March and October 2025. The eighth panel meeting
included 11 community members with a variety of perspectives, experiences, and interests.
Meeting facilitators opened the meeting with a welcome and land acknowledgement, ice breaker,
and reviewed the agenda.
The focus for this meeting was to:
•
•
•
•
•

Learn about the process, next steps, and timeline for the policies and actions that panelists
have informed over the year, including how to influence decision-making.
Discuss strategies for sharing progress and opportunities with panelists as the UGS project
progresses.
Provide feedback to staff and facilitators on the panel experience and recommend
improvements for future panels and community engagement.
Clarify and confirm each panel member’s relationship with public information sharing.
Discuss a description of the panel the City will share with decision makers and the public.

The meeting included a presentation from City staff and a group discussion.
Meeting materials, including the meeting agenda, are available here.

Key Takeaways
Full meeting notes are provided in the notes section below. Key takeaways as interpreted by City
staff include:
Panelist Experience:
•

•
•
•

Many panelists expressed that their overall experience was positive. Positive aspects noted
were a comfortable and safe environment, adequate compensation and meals,
accommodation of individual needs, grounding the panel in Eugene’s history, and the
diversity of identities, perspectives, and experiences on the panel.
A few panel members indicated that they would have liked to dive deeper into specific panel
topics like the Comprehensive Plan.
Some panel members mentioned that they enjoyed being part of a diverse group of people.
A few panel members indicated that they were able to build community through their panel
experience.
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 1 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 68 of 104

•

A few panel members expressed concern that their contributions would not make a
difference in the outcomes of the Urban Growth Strategies project. One panel member said
“I hope our purpose wasn’t to rubber stamp things you [referring to City staff] already knew;
I was hoping we could get more into the details. But also recognize there are a lot of
tradeoffs and costs that we probably didn’t get to fully realize/discuss.” Another panel
member wondered if the City of Eugene was ever going to change.

Panel Description:
City staff asked panel members to review a short description of the panel itself, to include in future
public information. Panel members generally supported staff’s written description of the panel with
the following suggestions for improvements:
•

•

Describe the panel as being compensated for their time. Some panel members indicated
that being compensated made them feel valued and enabled them to participate on the
panel.
Highlight that there were other identities and differences on the panel other than
race/ethnicity, including ability, gender, age, transportation modes, income/socioeconomic
status, and that panel members lived in different areas of Eugene.

Closing the Loop:
The panel discussed ways that they could stay connected with each other, as well as with the
Urban Growth Strategies project as it progresses.
•
•
•

Some panel members expressed that they were interested in staying connected with other
panel members.
Some panel members indicated they were interested in receiving project updates.
A few panel members expressed interest in communications in advance of public meetings
that were related to Urban Growth Strategies.

Next Steps
City staff will hold work sessions with the Eugene Planning Commission and City Council, as well
as the Lane County Board of Commissioners and Planning Commission this fall to provide updates
on Urban Growth Strategies policy work and discuss proposed actions to reduce barriers to housing
and jobs, encourage compact development, and increase capacity for housing. Those work
sessions will include discussions on actions the panel has weighed in on, including micro village
housing, new incentives for housing, and code changes such as revisions to the multi-unit design
standards.
After the work sessions, staff will ask City Council to initiate the adoption of code changes and new
chapters of the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan that the panel has reviewed – this is a formal
step in the land use planning process. In 2026, there will be additional work sessions, public
hearings, and opportunities to weigh in before City Council makes any final decisions.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 2 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 69 of 104

Tentative dates for these meetings are:
•
•
•
•
•
•

October 28, 2025 at 5:30pm – Planning Commission work session
November 12, 2025 at 12:00pm – City Council work session
November 24, 2025 at 7:30pm – City Council meeting (initiation of plan and code changes)
December 2, 2025 – Lane County Board of Commissioners work session
December 9, 2025 at 5:30pm – Planning Commission work session
December 16, 2025 – Lane County Planning Commission work session

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 3 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 70 of 104

Meeting Notes
This section contains the notes from the eighth panel meeting. It has been lightly edited for clarity.
Rose, Bud, Thorn Icebreaker- Consider your experience on this panel. Take a moment to share one
rose, bud and thorn. (Rose: a positive aspect or success; Bud: a potential opportunity or idea for
future; Thorn: a challenge or negative aspect that needs improvement)
•

•

•

•

•

Panel member:
o Rose – great group with great perspectives, experiences, connections, appreciated
learning from you all
o Thorn – comprehensive plan is comprehensive! Don’t feel like we got deep enough
into anything.
o Bud – how to engage with such a large document, hard balancing act, excited for the
possibilities
Panel member:
o Rose – nice to learn about what’s happening, session on the Atlas was very
enlightening, brought the conversation to a deeper and more personal level
o Thorn – hard to get into the details, multi-unit design was fun… getting into the
details of setbacks, but it would be cool to do more… case studies of specific
development sites
o Bud – connecting to other things that are happening in the City… could have come in
person to present the content to the Council
Panel member:
o Rose – meaningful to learn about the City’s history
o Bud – continuing to engage with different people, age, demographics from across
the city would be beneficial
o Thorn – sometimes a few voices were dominating
Panel member:
o Rose – being connected to the city’s outcomes for the future
o Bud – shared with Stuart some frameworks to use, different perspectives, open up a
flow of ideas across the state
o Thorn – need to move slow, calculating, sometimes wading through the weeds
Panel member:
o Rose – dream of being an urban planner was somewhat realized, felt like the space
was crafted to make sure people felt comfortable sharing their opinions,
accommodating, meeting people’s needs
o Bud – impressed on acknowledgement of issues in planning
o Thorn – hope our purpose wasn’t to rubber stamp things you (staff) already knew;
was hoping we could get more into the details. But also recognize there are a lot of
tradeoffs and costs that we probably didn’t get to fully realize/discuss.

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 4 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 71 of 104

•

•

•

•

•

•

Panel member:
o Rose – hoped to learn from other people’s perspectives, didn’t know much about
urban planning coming in. People’s willingness to share their lived experiences.
o Bud – hope to be able to share with people around me, things I’ve learned, bring to
other panels, bring to college.
o Thorn – can’t find a thorn, wish I would have voiced my opinions a little more
Panel member:
o Thorn – too short, lacking how to plug in more fully into other aspects, needs more
diversity (e.g., more people who have a disability)
o Bud – so much more to learn
o Rose – learned more about Eugene and urban planning and contributing to Eugene
as a City.
Panel member:
o Rose – learn about different parts of the city, different perspectives
o Bud – cool to see diversity, more people with disabilities could be represented
especially when we talk about housing
o Thorn – sometimes it's hard on Zoom to jump in, not enough time to chat responses
Panel member:
o Rose – did a good job creating a hybrid experience
o Bud – hope for a secondary UGS committee… hope that the work doesn’t start and
get dropped
o Thorn – nothing yet! An in-depth summary of housing in Eugene would be a helpful
resource, could benefit from understanding systemic factors
Panel member:
o My opportunity to make a commitment, helped me get to know other people, helped
me to listen to everyone’s perspectives – value that part
o Being in community, it’s been a while since I’ve done engagement like this
o Felt like it was making a difference, felt a little lost in the beginning
o Doing the reading, tried to be prepared for each meeting, but struggled to read some
of the prep materials
o Liked doing the hands on work, not just talking, more fun a visual
o Hope we can all stay connected in other things we do in the community
Panel member:
o Rose – favorite week was when Genevieve joined us, all the posters on the wall, felt
like she was probing us to think outside the box, creative solutions to the housing
challenge
o Bud – giving us the space, especially folks from diverse backgrounds, to feel like we
can advocate and speak on topics, safe container helps people feel comfortable
enough to speak, allow this to grow – other panels, advisory groups, other ways to
stay engaged
o Thorn – is anything going to change with City of Eugene? My existential crisis.
URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 5 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 72 of 104

Staff Presentation/Clarifying Questions/Discussion
Draft Description of Panel: To align with the City’s goal and the state’s mandate to center the
voices and experiences of people from underserved community groups in decision-making,
Planning staff formed a Community Advisory Panel composed of 13 community members who
represent Black, Indigenous, Latino/Latina, Asian, Pacific Islander, and other communities of color.
Each panel member brings a diverse perspective to the group. Their lived experiences range from
personal to professional, housing insecure to homeowner, and from high-school student to retiree.
The panel met seven times between March and September 2025, with a final planned meeting in
October.
•

•
•
•

•

Compensated for time – worth our time, perspective was valued, how the city is
prioritizing different perspectives, helping to overcome barriers to participation (and
food!)
Add other descriptors that relate to this group – ability, age, gender, transportation
users, income/socioeconomic status, geography
Because of the experience on this panel, felt more comfortable speaking at the
Neighborhood Association space, feels foundational
Neighborhood Association space is all white, homeowner, older – people with time,
resources, information to participate without compensation, can show up for a
prolonged period
Capacity to create a space for people who are in positions of power… landowners,
developers… create convos between those groups and this type of panel, bridge a gap,
get some answers

How can the City close the loop with panelists and/or community members on project
progress and decision-making? How can panelists continue to connect with one another?
•

•
•
•
•

Communicate in advance of the elected process – meet-up at meetings… January
meeting is a good example, get discussion questions, meet up outside, open invitation
to meet-up. Staying in the loop.
EUG Planning Newsletter, Instagram, quarterly project updates
Bi-annual zoom call, personal touch
Diversity, micro villages
Affordable Housing as a whole – new projects in the pipeline

URBAN GROW TH STRATEGIES | MEETING SUMMARY | PAGE 6 OF 6

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 73 of 104

"UUBDINFOU
%

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 74 of 104

B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B




   

   



B
B
B

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 75 of 104

))

$$$
,,#.),#&B
%()1&!'(.BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB9


%()1&!'(.-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

*),.B
/."),-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

)''/(#.3B
0#-),3B(&B ',-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

#&#..),-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

,)$.B.5BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

2/.#0B/'',3BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB:

(.,)/.#)(B(B%!,)/(BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB<

.")-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB=

)''/(#.#)(-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB=

.#(!B
**,)"BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB>

/#&#(-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB>

/,03B
'#(#-.,.#)(BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB>

/'',3B) B#(#(!-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB@


**(#2B
EB
0#-),3B(&B, .B/#&#(-BCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCB9<B

**(#2BEB/,03B/-.#)(-GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGC::B
B

B

 


 

 
B

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


  

 

Page 76 of 104

 $
!$
#(B.#'B#'''),#&DB."B &*/3B"0B(B."B (#!()/-B-.1,-B.)B."#-B&(DB/#&#(!B
3('#B)''/(#.#-DB'#(.#(#(!B&(B1#."B1#&&# DB(B(.#(!B-/-.#(&B&(B*,.#-CB
)&&)1#(!B.,.#-B.1(B9@=9B(B9@==DB &*/3B*)*&B1,B#-*)----B) B."#,B (#!()/-B
")'&(B3B."B(#.B..-B!)0,('(.B(B ),#&3B,')0B.)B."B)-.B-,0.#)(B#(B
-.,(B,!)(CB)3DB &*/3B-((.-B,B#.#4(-B) B."B)( ,.B,#-B) B,(B
)(B)''/(#.3B) B,!)(B(B."B)( ,.B,#-B) B."B#&.4B (#(-B) B,!)(CB"3B
)(.#(/B.)B'%B)(.,#/.#)(-B#(B."#,B)''/(#.#-B",B(B,)--B."B&(-CB .B#-B#'*),.(.B.)B
,)!(#4B1B,B&&B&#0#(!B)(B&(B-.)&(B ,)'B."B (#!()/-B*)*&-B3B."B(#.B..-B
!)0,('(.B.",)/!"B'*#!(-B) B),#)(B(B!()#CB .B#-B)/,B)&&.#0B,-*)(-##&#.3B-B
(6#,#-B) B."-B.,)#.#-B.)B,B1#.(--B.)B."B"#-.),#B(B)(!)#(!B)**,--#)(B) B
(#!()/-B*)*&CB
%()1&!'(.B#-B)(&3B."B!#((#(!CBB/,!B0,3)(B.)B&,(B)/.B."#-B
"#-.),3DB)(.B3)/,B.#'B(B')(3B.)B (#!()/-K&B),!(#4.#)(-DB-.(B#(B-)&#,#.3B1#."B&(B
*,)..),-DB0).B ),B'#--#(!B(B'/,,B (#!()/-B1)'(DB(B,./,(B&(B.)B#.-B),#!#(&B
-.1,-CB#(&&3DB1B&-)B%()1&!B."B
,#(DB
-#(DB(B .#()JB&),B)(B1"#"B."#-B)/(.,3B
#-B/#&.CBB,-*.B&&B-.1,-B) B."#-B&(BMB*-.DB*,-(.DB(B /./,BMB(B."B%()1&!B) B
.")-B1")B'B ),B/-CBB)5,B!,.#./B ),B."B&(B(B."B)**),./(#.3B.)B&,(DB1),%DB&)0B
(BB#(B)''/(#.3B",CB
B
,(B'),B)/.B (#!()/-B.,,#.),#-B.EB"..*-EJJ(.#0K&(CJBB

B

 


 

 
B

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 77 of 104

!$
%$'):
*)$'(:

#'B%).#K3%(DB
#3B)&&),.#0BB
/&#B#-",DB#-",B/&#B (0)&0'(.:
:
$""*#).:
+($'.: #!: "'(:
,!),3B&%B

",#-.#B/--&&B
,&B"B

,3B #&.)(B

4#,B,)%B

,#&3(B#&&B0&B

0B ,/%)1-%#B

#(!B #B

4"(B "'B

&##B,)1(B

)/-"B"#%B

#')."3B,,,B

:
!))$'(:

#'B%).#K3%(DB
#3B)&&),.#0BB
/&#B#-",DB#-",B/&#B (0)&0'(.B
:
'$):)/:

,'B*#DB#.3B) B/!(B

"B/-"DB#.3B) B/!(B

&(B)'#(!)DB#.3B) B/!(B

B,-")1DB#.3B) B/!(B

(0#0B #&.)(DB#.3B) B/!(BB

./,.B,,(DB#.3B) B/!(B

.",BS)((&&DB#.3B) B/!(B

,,#B,#(!DB#.3B) B/!(B

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 78 of 104

" $  #$
,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B#-BB*,)$.B#(.# 3#(!B."B.))&-DB.#)(-DB*)&##-DB(B&(B(B ),B."B
(2.B:8B3,-B.)B-/**),.B")/-#(!B(B&#0#(!B1!B$)-B#(B/!(DB,!)(CB)B*,)B1#."B."#-B
#(#.#.#0B.",)/!"BB&(-B.".B(.,-B."B0)#-B) B)''/(#.#-B) .(B2&/B ,)'B*&((#(!B
*,)---DB."B#.3B) B/!(DB1#."B."B-/**),.B) B&)&B)(-/&.(.-DB)(0(B(B,(B,)1."B
.,.!#-B)''/(#.3B
0#-),3B(&B)'*)-B) B."#,.(B&)&B)''/(#.3B'',-B) B)&),B
,)'BB#0,-B-*.,/'B) B%!,)/(-B(B&#0B2*,#(-CBBB

.,B#!".B0#-),3B*(&B)(0(#(!-B)0,B."B)/,-B) BB3,DB."B*,)--B#&&/'#(.B."B
)&&)1#(!B)/.)'-B) B-/--B(B-/-+/(.B,-B ),B#'*,)0'(.B.)B#( ),'B /./,B#.3K&B
)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B5),.-EB

 )) !))
•
"B*(&B2'*&#6B-/-- /&B,,/#.'(.B) BB#0,-DB1&)'#(!DB#(.&&#!(.DB(B
)&&),.#0B*(&CB
•
")/!". /&&3B*&((B&)!#-.#-B-/"B-B#(.(.#)(&B)''/(#.#)(DB.,B ))B(B,#(%DB
#( ),'&B-)#&#4#(!B.#'DB(B&(B%()1&!'(.B!# .-B-/**),.B*(&B'',-B#(B
&#(!B(!!B(B0&/CB
•
"B*(&B*,)--B-/-- /&&3B&(B/.#(!B."B*(&DB",#(!B#0,-B
*,-*.#0-DB(B'#( /&&3B'(!#(!B&#'#.B'.#(!B.#'DB,-/&.#(!B#(B(B)0,&&B#(,-B
#(B0,!B*(&B'',B/(,-.(#(!B) B&(B/-DB")/-#(!DB(B)''/(#.3B*&((#(!B#(B
/!(B3B."B)(&/-#)(B) B."B(!!'(.B*,)--CB
•
(&#-.-B1#-"B.)B,'#(B(!!B#(B."B*,)$.B#(B-)'B*#.3B(B2*,--B#(.,-.B#(B
)(.#(/#(!B.)B/#&B,&.#)(-"#*-B1#."B."B*(&B'',-B(B-.5CB
•
"(B!#0(B."B)*.#)(B.)B)*.B)/.B) B*/&#&3B%()1&!#(!B."#,B#(0)&0'(.B#(B."B
(!!'(.B*,)--DB9:B*(&B'',-B")-B.)BB%()1&!B(B)(B)*.B ),B
()(3'#.3CB
•
"B.).&B(/',B) B*(&B*,.##*(.B'.#(!B")/,-B,)--B."B#!".B0#-),3B)''#..B
'.#(!-B.).&B9?>CB"B*(&B)(-#-.B) B9;B'',-DB1#."B(B0,!B..((B) B
99B*(&B'',-B*,B'.#(!DBB'#(#'/'B) B@B(B'2#'/'B) B9;B*(&B'',-B
..(#(!CBB

 ))" )
•
(&#-.-B,+/-.B'),B'.#(!B.#'B.)B-*(B)(B#(K*."B#-/--#)(CB
•
"B"3,#B ),'.B(-B#'*,)0'(.-B.)B-/**),.B'),B#(&/-#0B*,.##*.#)(DB-/"B-B
0#-#&B*.#)(-DB4))'B',B!,#B)2-DB),B-*,.B)'*/.,B(B-,(B ),B"3,#B
*,.##*(.-CB"B B."()&)!3B#B().B1),%B!,.B ),BB&,!,B,))'CB
•
)''/(#.#)(B)/&BB#'*,)0B.)B'%B'#&-B'),B-/#(.B(B.)B(-/,B&&B
*(&#-.-B,#0B(--,3B'.#(!B#( ),'.#)(CB #(.#(#(!BB-.(#(!B--#&B1B
*!B1#."B&&B'.#(!B.#&-B(B-/**),.B#--'#(.#(!B#'*),.(.B'.#(!B#( ),'.#)(CB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 79 of 104

•
)(-#,B2*,#'(.#(!B1#."B0,3#(!B'.#(!B ),'.-DB&).#)(-DB&,!B0-CB-'&&B!,)/*B
#-/--#)(DB(B(-/,#(!B.".B."B-'B0)#-B,B().B)'#(.#(!B."B-*CB
•
%B,B.)B,'#(B)(-#,.B) B#(#0#/&B(-B-/"B-B",#(!B&0&-B(B ))B
*, ,(-CB
"#-B,*),.B-/'',#4-B."B )/(.#)(-B/(,*#((#(!B."B,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B)''/(#.3B

0#-),3B(&B ),'.#)(DB."B**,)"B(B'."))&)!3B) B."B0#-),3B*(&B*,)--DB(B."B
,-/&.-B) B(B2#.B-/,03B'#(#-.,B.)B."B*(&B/*)(B)'*&.#)(B) B."B(!!'(.B*,)--CB
),B.#&B#( ),'.#)(B)/.B."B*(&B*,)--B(B."B-/,03B,-/&.-B(BB )/(B#(B
**(#2B

EB
0#-),3B(&B/#&#(-DB(B
**(#2BEB,#(.B/,03CB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 80 of 104

$ $ $
#."B!/#(B ,)'B,!)(S-B-..1#B&(B/-B*&((#(!B,+/#,'(.-DB*&((#(!B*,)---B#(B
/!(B,B,#-#(!B.)B."B"&&(!B) B )-.,#(!B.",#0#(!B(B&#'.K,-#&#(.B)''/(#.#-B1"#&B
,--#(!B."B(-B) B')-.K0/&(,&B*)*/&.#)(-CB/#&#(!B)5B3,-B) B*&((#(!B(B
)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B.",)/!"B."B(0#-#)(B/!(B)'*,"(-#0B&(DB,(B,)1."B
.,.!#-B#-BB*,)$.B#(.# 3#(!B."B.))&-DB.#)(-DB*)&##-DB(B&(B(B ),B."B(2.B:8B3,-B
.)B-/**),.B")/-#(!B(B&#0#(!B1!B$)-B#(B/!(CB"#-B1),%B1#&&B,-/&.B#(B-./#-B) B1".B&(B#-B
0#&&B ),B /./,B0&)*'(.B#(B/!(DB/*.-B.)B."B(0#-#)(B/!(B)'*,"(-#0B&(B
O)'*,"(-#0B&(PDB).",B)*.B#.3B*&(-B(B&(B/-B,!/&.#)(-DBB*,&K-*#6B&(B
/-B-#!(.#)(B'*DB(B(B0&/.#)(B) B1".",B.",B#-BB(B.)B2*(B."B/,(B!,)1."B
)/(,3CB
!#((#(!B#(B:8:=DB."B#.3B) B/!(B)(0(BB9;K'',B,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B)''/(#.3B

0#-),3B(&B.)B(-/,B.")-B1")-B0)#-B"0B"#-.),#&&3B!)(B/(,,*,-(.B#(B(B
/(,-,0B3B ),'&B*&((#(!B*,)---B1,B#(&/B#(B-"*#(!B/!(S-B/#&.B(0#,)('(.B
/./,-CB"#-B*(&DB,*,-(.#(!B&%B(B (#!()/-B)''/(#.#-B(B)''/(#.#-B) B)&),B
,)'BB#0,-B,)--K-.#)(B) B!-DB*,) --#)(&B%!,)/(-DB(B&# B2*,#(-DB1),%B
)&&),.#0&3B1#."B-.5B)(B."B )&&)1#(!B)$.#0-EB
•
-.&#-"#(!BB-&#(:*#'()##:$:'#:'$,):)')(DB#(&/#(!B,,#,-B.)B
")/-#(!B.".B1#&&B-,0B."B,(!B) B(-B#(B/!(B ),B."B(2.B:8B3,-DB(B."B,."B) B
*)&#3B.)*#-B.)BB,--B#(B)'*,"(-#0B*&(B/*.-DB#(&/#(!B)''/(#.3B"&."DB
")/-#(!DB)''/(#.3B(!!'(.DB(B)'*.B0&)*'(.CB
•
'*&)3#(!B(B&*).:!#(:)$:+(:()/:.",)/!"B."B(2.B3,B) B."B*,)$.DB#(&/#(!B
0#-#(!B)(B")1B*,)$.-B(B*)&##-B'3B(6.B(B/,(B*)*&B ,)'B/(,-,0B
)''/(#.#-B(B")1B.)B'%B."(#&B#( ),'.#)(B--#&B.)B."B,),B)''/(#.3CB
•
$##)#:,):$""*#).:#),$' (B.)B2*(B."B,"B) B."B*,)$.B#(.)B
/(,-,0B)''/(#.#-CB
•
,.#(!B13-B ),B)''/(#.3B'',-B.)B"%):%'$):$*)$"(B-B."B1),%B,"-B
#-#)(B'%,-B#(B:8:>K:8:?CB
•
/**),.#(!B$#$#:$""*#)$#:),#:): #!:#:()/:,!,#(!B*,)*)-&-B
(B/*)'#(!B#-#)(-B3B."B#.3B) B/!(B&((#(!B)''#--#)(B(B#.3B)/(#&CB

.B."B)(&/-#)(B) B."B,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B)''/(#.3B
0#-),3B(&DB #&#..),-B1#."B."B
-/**),.B) B#.3B-.5B'#(#-.,BB-/,03B.)B,#0B %B)/.B*(&#-.-SB2*,#(-B/,#(!B
."B*,)--B(B#( ),'B /./,B#.3B) B/!(B)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B5),.-CB"B,'#(,B) B."#-B
,*),.B-/'',#4-B."B**,)"B(B'."))&)!3B) B."B0#-),3B*(&B*,)--B(B."B6(#(!-B
) B."B2#.B-/,03CBB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 81 of 104

$$
#&#..),-B,,/#.B ,)'BB&#-.B) B(!!B)''/(#.3B'',-B,*,-(.#(!B&)&B)''/(#.3B
&,-DB,.#-.DB/&./,&B,,-DB)''/(#.3K-B0)3B!,)/*-B(B&)&B/-#(--B)1(,-CB
,/#.'(.B1-B)(/.B0#B*")(DB#(K*,-)(DB(B0#)B)( ,(#(!B#(.,0#1-B.)B-",B
(&B!)&-DB(-1,B+/-.#)(-DB(B)(6,'B*,.##*.#)(CB"B*,&#'#(,3B&#-.B1-B9=B*,.##*(.-DB
/.B.1)B#(#0#/&-B1,B/(&B.)B..(B(B")-B.)B().B*,.##*.CB(&B*,.##*(.-B#(&/B
."B )&&)1#(!B#(#0#/&-DB1#."B-,#*.),-B1,#..(B3B"B*(&#-.CB(B*(&#-.B")-B.)B,'#(B
()(3')/-CBB
•
",#-.#B/--&&B-#.-B)(B."B&%B/&./,&B (#.#.#0B),B) B#,.),-B-BB0).#(!B'',B
(B#-BBQ#&&!RB
/(.#B1")B--#-.-B-BB)/&B(B(((3B.)B1),%#(!B '#&#-B(B."#,B
"#&,(CBB
•
4B,)%B#-BB /&&K.#'B&)&B*, ),'(B,.#-.DB1")B#-B*--#)(.B)/.B+/#.3B#(B&&B&0&-B
) B#.3B*&((#(!B(B")*-B.)B-B")/-#(!B)'B'),B--#&B ),B&&HBB
•
0B ,/%)1-%#B#-BB/!(J*,#(!6&B,-#(.DB#.#4(B) B."B",)%B.#)(DB(./,&B
,-)/,B)(-,0.#)(B*&((,DB(B)''/(#.3B),!(#4,B
•
4"(B "'B#-B."B*,-#(.B) B."B

B)/."B)/(#&CBS-B0,3B#(.,-.B#(B
")/-#(!B*)&##-B(B0&)*'(.B(B-.,#0-B.)B'%B"#-B)''/(#.3BB..,B*&CBB
•
)/-"B"#%B#-B(B0#B/&.#'.B ,#-B*&3,DB,-,",B.B."BT-B (#!".B'*/-B
,-,"#(!B",#.,3B3B#---DB(B#-B*--#)(.B)/.B#0#B(!!'(.M-*#&&3B
1"(B#.B)'-B.)B3)/."B0)#-CB
•
,!B&%B#-B(B&.,#&B)(.,.),B(B,.#-.CBB#-B#(.,-.B#(B."B /./,B) B/!(T-B
")/-#(!B(B)'',#&B0&)*'(.DB(B"B1)/&B&#%B.)B-B(B*,.##*.B#(B'),B,.DB
'/-#B(B6&'B*,-(..#)(-CB
•

,3B #&.)(B#-BB.#0B
',#(B)''/(#.3B'',B(B0)&/(.,B1#."B-0,&B
)''/(#.3B!,)/*-DB-*#&&3B."B/!(B.#0B
',#(B
,.-BUB, .-B %,-B ,%.CB
•

,#&3(B#&&B1),%-B#(B (B (!'(.B ),B (B)/(.3B(B,)!(#4-B."B#'*),.(B
) B)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B(B,*,-(.#(!B',!#(&#4B'',-B) B."B)''/(#.3CB
•

#(!B #B#-BB,'/&./,#-.DB!#-.,B/,-DB.#0#-.DB'#DB(B5),&B")/-#(!B
0).CB
•
&##B,)1(B#-B."B )/(,B(B2/.#0B#,.),B) B."B&%B/&./,&B (#.#.#0DB#.B
.)B/&.#0.#(!BB.",#0#(!B(B#(.,)((.B&%B)''/(#.3B#(B (B)/(.3CBB
•
#')."3B,,,B"CCB#-BB/&./,&B(.",)*)&)!#-.BUB*,)$.B'(!,DB(B"T-B*--#)(.B
)/.B)''/(#.3B(B(0#,)('(.&B"&."B(B#-B(!!B#(B."-B#--/-B.",)/!")/.B."B
-..B) B,!)(CB
$""*#)$#(:
#&#..),-B-",B'.#(!B*,*,.#)(B'.,#&-B(B).",B&)!#-.#-B1#."B."B0#-),3B*(&B0#B
'#&BB1%B*,#),B.)B-"/&B'.#(!-B&)(!B1#."B,!/&,B.2.B'--!B,'#(,-CB#&#..),-B
*,)0#B )&&)1B/*B'.,#&-DB#(&/#(!B6(&B'.#(!B'.,#&-B(B'.#(!B-/'',#-B ),B,0#1B

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 82 of 104

.)B."B*(&B0#B'#&B#(B."B1%-B )&&)1#(!B"B'.#(!CB
&&B'.#(!B'.,#&-B1,B#!#.&&3B
0#&&B)(B."B#.3B) B/!(S-B)(&#(B)/'(.B&#,,3CB#.3B-.5B, .BB:8:=BB)''/(#.3B
(!!'(.B/'',3DB#(&/#(!B."B(&B)(B*!B=DB-B1&&B-B#(#0#/&B'.#(!B-/'',#-CBB
)#:
%%'$::
"B
0#-),3B(&B'.BB.).&B) B#!".B.#'-B.1(B ,"B(B.),B:8:=CB .#(!-B1,B"&B
,)'B=E;8K?E;8*'BB)."B#(B*,-)(B(B)(&#(B0#B))'B1B)( ,(#(!B/-#(!B B'.#(!B
."()&)!3CB .#(!-B)/&BB2.(B3B9=B'#(/.-B .,BB(&B)(-(-/-B0).CB .#(!-B
#(&/B#((,DB1#."B?B) B."B@B.,B3B&)&B*)*&B) B)&),K)1(B,-./,(.-CB"B6,-.B9=B
'#(/.-B) B"B'.#(!B#(&/B.#'B ),B*(&#-.-B.)B,,#0DB-)#&#4B(B.B#((,CB .#(!-B
)*(B1#."B."B #&#..),-B&#(!B#(.,)/.#)(-DBB&(B%()1&!'(.DBB!#013B)(.#(#(!B
(B#.'B)((.B.)B (#!()/-B)''/(#.#-DB-/"B-BB))%B ,)'B (#!()/-K)1(B#,",%B
))%-B),B,.B ,)'B."B&)&B.#0B
',#(B
,.-B(B, .-B ,%.DB(B#,%,DB(B(B
)**),./(#.3B.)B-",B&)&B)''/(#.3B(()/('(.-CB"B(2.B'.#(!B-!'(.B)(-#-.B) B#.3B
-.5B*,-(.#(!B%3B6(#(!-B ,)'B*,0#)/-B'.#(!-B(B&#(!B."B-.5B*,-(..#)(CB"B
,'#(,B) B."B'.#(!B)(-#-.B) B+/-.#)(-B(B&,!J-'&&B!,)/*B#-/--#)(-B-#!(B.)B
-)&##.B*(&B'',B#(*/.B)(B."B)(.(.B.".B1-B*,-(.B3B#.3B.5CB"B'.#(!B)(&/B
1#."B,'#(,-B) B."B.B(B&).#)(B) B."B(2.B*(&B'.#(!B(B(3B6(&B&)!#-.#&B.)*#-B
(B.)BB)0,CBB

(B#(#0#/&B-.#*(B) BV:88B1-B#--/B ),B"B'.#(!B.".B(&#-.-B..(CB"B-.#*(-B
%()1&!B.".B*,.##*(.-B1,B2*.B.)B*,*,B ),B"B'.#(!B(B..(B."B.1)K
")/,B0(.CB.#*(-B1,B#--/B.1#B)0,B."B)/,-B) B."B@K'.#(!B-,#-CBB

(B#'*),.(.B().B)(B'.#(!B&).#)(EB(B#(#.#&B!,)/*B*)&&B#(#.B.".B-&#!".&3B'),B."(B"& B
."B*(&B'',-B1(.BB-#(!&B&).#)(DB(.,&&3B&).DB1#."B*,%#(!B(B-3B--B.)B
.,(-#.CB.",-B*, ,,B0#-#.#(!B0,#)/-B&).#)(-B")-.B3B&)&B()(K*,)6.-CB (B."B(DB."B*(&B
'.B.B."B-)'K3%-)(B,))'B.B."B/!(B/&#B #,,3B ),B<B'.#(!-DB."B/(-.)(B,))'B.B
."B/!(B/&#B #,,3B ),B9B'.#(!DB."B'*&&B)''/(#.3B(.,B)(B#!"B.,.B ),B9B
'.#(!DB(B."B&%B/&./,&B (#.#.#0B)(B 5,-)(B.,.B ),B:B'.#(!-CB"B-)'K3%-)(B
,))'B*,)0B.))B&,!B ),B!))B/#)B ),B."B9K:B"3,#B*,.##*(.-DB/.B#.B1-BB&,!B()/!"B,))'B
),B,%)/.B---#)(-CB"B@B B #,,3B&)-/,B.#'B1-BB*,)&'B1"(B*(&#-.-B,+/-.B.)B
'.B3)(B?E;8CB(B*,.##*(.B-",B.".B."3B &.B/(- B)1(.)1(CB"B#&B-#./.#)(B
1)/&BB.",B-'&&,B,))'-DB&&B#(B."B-'B&).#)(DB(.,&&3B&).DB1#."B.,(-#.B--B(BB
72#&B(B.#'CB
*!#(:
#&#..),-B, .B(B!.",B-.5B(B(&#-.B#(*/.B)(BB/#&#(-B)/'(.B.".B#(&/B
(&B)$.#0-DB.)*#-DB&)!#-.#-B(B,)&-CBB
**(#2B
B ),B.#&-DB#(&/#(!BB&#-.B) B(&B
'.#(!B.)*#-CBB
*'+.:
"#()')$#:

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 83 of 104

"B;:K+/-.#)(B2#.B-/,03B1-B, .B3B #&#..),-DB,0#1B3B-.5DB(B'#(#-.,B
&.,)(#&&3B.",)/!"B/,03B )(%3CB/-.#)(B ),'.-B)(-#-.B) B#(,3B3-J()DB)*(B,-*)(-DB
'/&.#*&B"%)2DB(B),#(&B-&CB"B-/,03B&#(%B1-B-",B&.,)(#&&3B0#B'#&B(B.2.B
'--!B1#."B*,#)#B,'#(,-CB(&#-.-B1,B!#0(B9>B3-B.)B)'*&.B."B-/,03CB 3B6(#(!-B
1,B+/&#..#0&3B-/'',#4B#(.)B"#!"K&0&B/&&.B*)#(.-B(B+/(.#..#0&3B-/'',#4B#(.)B,B
!,*"-B(B",.-B.",)/!"B."B-/,03B')(%3B(&3-#-B /(.#)(B(B #,)-) .B2&CB/-B) B(B
,,),B#(B-)'B) B."B),#(&B-&B+/-.#)(-B.".B,-/&.B#(B."'B#(!B-.B.)BB-&B) B9K988DB
-)'B,-*)(--B"B.)BB#0#B3B:8B-)B.".B&&B),#(&B,-*)(--B1)/&BB)(BB-&B) B9K=CB
"B0,!B,(%#(!B1-B&/&.B ),B"B),#(&B-&B+/-.#)(CBB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 84 of 104

 #$$$$
/.B) B."#,.(B*(&#-.-DB.1&0B-/'#..B,-*)(--B.)B."B-/,03CBB
**(#2BB ),BB*,#(.B
0,-#)(B) B."B-/,03CBB
)!"%) )  )#) ) ))!+)!,))
•
"B*(&B2'*&#6B-/-- /&B,,/#.'(.B) BB#0,-DB1&)'#(!DB#(.&&#!(.DB(B
)&&),.#0B*(&CB
•
")/!". /&&3B*&((B&)!#-.#-B-/"B-B#(.(.#)(&B)''/(#.#)(DB.,B ))B(B,#(%DB
#( ),'&B-)#&#4.#)(B.#'DB(B&(B%()1&!'(.B!# .-B-/**),.B*(&B'',-B#(B
&#(!B(!!B(B0&/CB
•
"B*(&B*,)--B-/-- /&&3B&(B/.#(!B."B*(&DB",#(!B#0,-B
*,-*.#0-DB(B'#( /&&3B'(!#(!B&#'#.B'.#(!B.#'DB)-.#(!B(B)0,&&B#(,-B#(B
0,!B*(&B'',B/(,-.(#(!B) B&(B/-DB")/-#(!DB(B)''/(#.3B*&((#(!B#(B
/!(B3B."B)(&/-#)(B) B."B(!!'(.B*,)--CB
•
(&#-.-B1#-"B.)B,'#(B(!!B#(B."B*,)$.B#(B-)'B*#.3B(B2*,--B#(.,-.B#(B
)(.#(/#(!B.)B/#&B,&.#)(-"#*-B1#."B."B*(&B'',-B(B-.5CB
•
"(B!#0(B."B)*.#)(B.)B)*.B)/.B) B*/&#&3B%()1&!#(!B."#,B#(0)&0'(.B#(B."B
(!!'(.B*,)--DB')-.B*(&B'',-B")-B.)BB*/&#&3B%()1&!CB
)!"%) )#)

 ) )%)  ))" +)!,))

•
(&#-.-B,+/-.B'),B'.#(!B.#'B.)B-*(B)(B#(K*."B#-/--#)(CB
•
"B"3,#B ),'.B(-B#'*,)0'(.-B.)B-/**),.B'),B#(&/-#0B*,.##*.#)(DB-/"B-B
0#-#&B*.#)(-DB4))'B',B!,#B)2-DB),B-*,.B)'*/.,B(B-,(B ),B"3,#B
*,.##*(.-CB"B B."()&)!3B#B().B1),%B!,.B ),BB&,!,B,))'CB
•
)''/(#.#)(B)/&BB#'*,)0B.)B'%B'#&-B'),B-/#(.B(B.)B(-/,B&&B
*(&#-.-B,#0B(--,3B'.#(!B#( ),'.#)(CB #(.#(#(!BB-.(#(!B--#&B1B
*!B1#."B&&B'.#(!B.#&-B(B-/**),.B#--'#(.#(!B#'*),.(.B'.#(!B#( ),'.#)(CB
•
)(-#,B2*,#'(.#(!B1#."B0,3#(!B'.#(!B ),'.-DB&).#)(-DB&,!B0-CB-'&&B!,)/*B
#-/--#)(DB(B(-/,#(!B-'B0)#-B,B().B)'#(.#(!B."B-*CB
•
%B,B.)B,'#(B)(-#,.B) B#(#0#/&B(-B-/"B-B",#(!B&0&-B(B ))B
*, ,(-CB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


  

Page 85 of 104

2=:':".:"!:#:)-):,):$)':%#!:""'(:
$






/+2

**



.2

*

 

*+

.) )) ) )  ))#!)))  ))  )+) ) #)
") ) )!))") ") ) )# */)-) )))




3=:':".:"!:#:)-):,):):).:$:*#:%!###:()/=:)*')<: <:'':
D"#'=::(':,):()/<:$#)):#$'")$#:$"(:%*!:'$'E:
$






.,2

*)



*-2

+

 

*+

4=: !(:#)::.$*:,$*!:! :.$*':#"<:%$)$<:#::($'):$#B:(#)#:('%)$#:
(':%*!!.:.:):).:$:*#:(::""':$:): #!;:
$






/+2

**



.2

*

 

B

*+

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


  

Page 86 of 104

 )) ))""*)0))  )%)"" ) ) )'/)-  )


7=: !(:(':,):*)*':)+)(A$""*#)$#(:.$*F:! :)$:%')%):#=:D :!!:
)):%%!.E

8B9:):,(:.$*':#'!:$"%)#.:#:*#'()##:$:!#:*(<:$*(#<:#:
$""*#).:%!###:#:*#;;;;:D$#::(!:$:1B5<:1=:!$,>:5=:E

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 




Page 87 of 104

.) )"!) )) )  )) ) )) ) )"%) )#)) )!+)!+)
)! %) )#)) )  ) !) ) ))# ) %) ) ) ) ) ))
! */)-  )

10B14:$,:"%$')#):,':):)$%(:%'(#):*'#:):%#!?:D(!:$:1B5<:1=:#$):
"%$')#):)$:):$""*#).>:5=:+'.:"%$')#):)$:):$""*#).E

. ") ) ) )! %) ) ) )") )) %) )%)
! )) )!) )#) %)"*/)-  )

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 




Page 88 of 104

16B19:)'*)*':G:$'")=: !(:'# :):$!!$,#:$#::(!:$:1B5:D1=:#(:"%'$+"#)>:
5=:-!!#)E

.") ))) %+))!) ) ) *) )#)#))) )
 ) +)! ) )) ) )) ) ))0))# ) ) */)-  )


21B27: $()(=: !(:'# :):$!!$,#:$#::(!:$:1B5:D1=:#(:"%'$+"#)>:5=:
-!!#)E

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 




Page 89 of 104

.) )"% )  %)# )  &) ) )! )) )  ) )
 )#) # %)"%) !*))%)#)  ) ) )#) ) )))  )#)
!) %) ) ) ) %) %) ) ! )"% */)-   

29B30:!)$#(%B*!#:#:$""*#).:$##)$#=:$,:,!!::):%#!:%'$((:
$()':#:*!:'!)$#(%(?:D1B5<:1=:#$):,!!:):!!>:5=:+'.:,!!E

. )#) # %) #) )) )  ) ) ) ) )# )#")#)#  *)
) #)) ) )  ) )) ) )) ) %) '*) ))) )
)) )$)( %))# )) ))" */)-  ))

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 




Page 90 of 104

"$
&$
 #$

$

'$): *'%$(
,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B#-BB*,)$.B.)B#(.# 3B."B.))&-DB
.#)(-DB*)&##-DB(B&(B(B ),B."B(2.B:8B3,-B.)B
-/**),.B")/-#(!B(B&#0#(!B1!B$)-B ),B/!(B)''/(#.3B
'',-CB,(B,)1."B.,.!#-B#(&/-B )/,B%3B*"--E
•
•
•
•

(,-.(B."B#(:#:%'$')( ) B)''/(#.3B'',-B,&.B.)B")/-#(!DB$)-DB(B
--B.)B)''/(#.3B-,0#-DB,-)/,-DB(B #&#.#-B.".B(6.B,-#(.-CB
 :)$#( .)B,--B#(.#6B(-DB-*#&&3B,&.B.)B")/-#(!B*,)/.#)(DB
5),#&#.3DB(B")#C
./3B." !#:# ),B$)-DB")/-#(!DB(B).",B/,(B/--BO-/"B-B*,%-DB-"))&-DB(B
#( ,-.,/./,PCB
(.!,.B."B,-/&.-B) B)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B(B."(#&B(&3-#-B.) ,.B(B
/*. ." %$!(:#:"%(:)):*:!#:*(:*&((#(!B#(B/!(C

),B'),B#( ),'.#)(B)/.B,(B,)1."B.,.!#-DB0#-#.B."B*,)$.B1*! (B(!!B/!(B
"..*-EJJ(!!C/!(K),C!)0J/,(K!,)1."K-.,.!#-C

#!: )+(:
"B
0#-),3B(&B1),%-B)&&),.#0&3B1#."B-.5B)(B."B )&&)1#(!B)$.#0-E
•

•

•
•
•

-.&#-"BB-&#( *#'()##:$:'#:'$,):)')(DB#(&/#(!B,,#,-B.)B
")/-#(!B.".B1#&&B-,0B."B,(!B) B(-B#(B/!(B ),B."B(2.B:8B3,-DB(B."B,."B) B
*)&#3B.)*#-B.)BB,--B#(B)'*,"(-#0B*&(B/*.-DB#(&/#(!B)''/(#.3B"&."DB
")/-#(!DB)''/(#.3B(!!'(.DB(B)'*.B0&)*'(.C
'*&)3B(B&*).:!#(:)$:+(:()/:.",)/!"B."B(2.B3,B) B."B*,)$.DB#(&/#(!B
0#-#(!B)(B")1B*,)$.-B(B*)&##-B'3B(6.B(B/,(B*)*&B ,)'B/(,-,0B
)''/(#.#-B(B")1B.)B'%B."(#&B#( ),'.#)(B--#&B.)B."B,),B)''/(#.3C
$##):,):$""*#).:#),$' ( .)B2*(B."B,"B) B."B*,)$.B#(.)B/(,-,0B
)''/(#.#-C
,.B13-B ),B)''/(#.3B'',-B.)B"%):%'$):$*)$"( -B."B1),%B,"-B
#-#)(B'%,-B#(B:8:>K:8:?C
/**),.B$#$#:$""*#)$#:),#:): #!:#:()/:,!,#(!B*,)*)-&-B(B
/*)'#(!B#-#)(-B3B."B#.3B) B/!(B&((#(!B)''#--#)(B(B#.3B)/(#&C

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 




Page 91 of 104

$"")"#):
"B2*.B(&B.#'B)''#.'(.B#-B-0(B:K")/,B'.#(!-B1#."B@K9=B*,.##*(.-B*,B'.#(!B
.1(B ,"B(B.),B) B:8:=DB(B)/.B-0(B")/,-B ),B'.#(!B*,*,.#)(J )&&)1B/*CB"B
(&B'.-B#(K*,-)(DB1#."B(B)(&#(B)*.#)(B ),B*)*&B1")B,B/(&B.)B..(B/B.)B*"3-#&B
&#'#..#)(-B),B).",B .),-CB .#(!-B,B-#!(B.)BB1&)'#(!B(B--#&DB(B#(&/B
'&-DB"#&,DB(B.,(-*),..#)(B-B,+/-.CB
"B#.3B) B/!(B5#B) B+/#.3B(B)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B-,#-B."B )&&)1#(!B(6.-B) B
(B
0#-),3B(&EB
•
/#&#(!B.,/-.B(B,&.#)(-"#*-B.1(B#.3B-.5B(B)''/(#.3B'',-B(B*,)0##(!B
)**),./(#.#-B ),B(1B&,-B.)B',!CB
•
",#(!B#( ),'.#)(B.)B"#0B'/./&B+/#.3B!)&-B(B&#!(#(!B)''/(#.3B0#-#)(-CB
•
(.!,.#(!B*(&B %B#(.)B#.3B*,)!,'-B(B*,)$.-DB-.,(!."(#(!B(.1),%-DB(B
,.#(!BB-*B ),B)''/(#.3B-.),#-B.)B6&&B#(B'#--#(!B.CB
•
5,#(!B.,(-*,(3B#(B&)&B!)0,('(.B*,)---B(B/.#(!B)''/(#.#-B)(B
5.#0B(!!'(.CB
•
/**),.#(!B/(,-,0B)''/(#.#-DB1"#"B B-#!(#6(.B&#'.DB-)#&DB(B)()'#B
"&&(!-DB3B/-#(!B."#,B#(-#!".-B.)B!/#B'),B+/#.&B)/.)'-CB
•
)-.,#(!B&)(!K.,'B,&.#)(-"#*-DB*,)0##(!B0&/&B&#0B2*,#(-DB(B/#&#(!B
)''/(#.3B*#.3B.",)/!"B#( ),'.#)(B-",#(!CB
'$((:#:*!:D :"$#)!.:$':*%)(:)$:)A)"A!$)$#A)$%(E:
$)$#::
$%:
)::
D.'<:$$":
%)$#E:

B

)#:@1:C: '#))$#<: '$):#)'$*)$#:#:'$*%:
/#&#(-EB"#-B'.#(!B1#&&B )/-B)(B#(.,)/.#)(-B) B
*(&#-.-DB #&#..),-DB(B-.5DB-B1&&B-B-.&#-"#(!B!,)/*B
!/#&#(-B(B#-/--#(!B."B*(&B*,)--B(B)/.)'-CB

;J9AJ:=DB
=E;8K?E;8*'B

&%B/&./,&B
(#.#.#0DB9>A=B
5,-)(B.CB
/!(B

)#:@2:C:()$':#:*''#):$#)-):$:('"#)$#:
#:$*(#:#: #:(=B/,#(!B."#-B'.#(!DB."B*(&B1#&&B
,0#1B(B*,)0#B %B)(BB, .B#(0(.),3B) B
#-,#'#(.),3B.#)(-B,&.B.)B")/-#(!B(B&(B/-DB(B
")1B."B&!3B) B."-B.#)(-B-")1-B/*B#(B/!(S-B/,,(.B
)(.2.BO*)*/&.#)(B(B/#&.B(0#,)('(.PCB

<JAJ:=DB

/!(B/&#B
#,,3DB

)#:@3:C:).:$!(:#: $!(=:$""*#).:
#"#):#:$""*#).:!)=:"#-B'.#(!B1#&&B
#(.,)/B/!(S-B)'*,"(-#0B&(DB1"#"B!/#-B."B
#.3S-B&(B/-B*&((#(!B ),B /./,B!,)1."B#(-#B."B/,(B

=J9<J:=DB
=E;8K?E;8*'B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

=E;8K?E;8*'B

988BB98."B

0DB/!(B

/!(B/&#B
#,,3DB


 

Page 92 of 104

!,)1."B)/(,3CB"B*(&B1#&&B*,)0#B %B)(B, .B!)&-B
(B*)&##-B#(B."B)''/(#.3B(!!'(.B(B)''/(#.3B
"&."B"*.,-CB

988BB98."B

0DB/!(B

)#:@4:C:).:$!(:#: $!(=:$*(#:#:$"%):
+!$%"#)=:"#-B'.#(!B1#&&B)(.#(/B."B#-/--#)(B)(B
/!(S-B)'*,"(-#0B&(CB"B*(&B1#&&B*,)0#B %B
)(B, .B!)&-B(B*)&##-B#(B."B")/-#(!B(B)'*.B
0&)*'(.B"*.,-CB

=J:9J:=DB
'*&&B
=E;8K?E;8B*'B )''/(#.3B
(.,DB9==B
#!"B.,.DB
/!(B

)#:@5:C:':$*(#:((*(=B-B)(B*-.B.#)(-DB
>J99J:=DB
/!(B/&#B
/,,(.B)(.2.DB(B)''/(#.3B(-B(B*,#),#.#-DB."B*(&B =E;8K?E;8B*'B #,,3DB
1#&&B#-/--B."B')-.B*,--#(!B&)&B #,B")/-#(!B#--/-CB
988BB98."B

0DB/!(B
     
  
  
)#:@6:B:&*).:
)!(=:
B'),B#(K*."B*,-(..#)(B(B
#-/--#)(B) B."B+/#.3B
.&-EB&.B.),#-B ,)'B/!(S-B
#-.),3B) B#-*&'(.B)(&#(B.),3 *CB

?J;8J:=DB
=E;8K?E;8B

&%B/&./,&B
(#.#.#0DB9>A=B
5,-)(B.CB
/!(B

)#:@7:C:$*(#:
)$#(=B.5B1#&&B*,)0#BB-"),.B
)0,0#1B) B/!(S-B/,,(.B*,)!,'-B(B*)&##-B.)B,--B
&)&B")/-#(!B(-CB"B*(&B1#&&B#-/--B(B*,)0#B
%B)(B(1B.#)(-B.)B,--B #,B")/-#(!B#--/-B(B
/!(S-B&)&B")/-#(!B(-CB

AJ98J:=DB
/!(B/&#B
=E;8K?E;8B*'B #,,3DB

)#:@8:C:'%B*%:#:!$(#:): : $$%=:"#-B
'.#(!B1#&&B )/-B)(B&,.#(!B(B&)-#(!B."B1),%B) B."B

0#-),3B(&DB#(&/#(!B,#6(!B."B*,)--DB*,)0##(!B
%B.)B."B#.3B(B #&#..),-B)(B."B*,)--DB(B
#-/--#(!B /./,B(!!'(.B#(B."B*,)$.DB#(&/#(!B."B#.3B
)/(#&B)*.#)(B*,)--CB

98J@J:=DB
/!(B/&#B
=E;8K?E;8B*'B #,,3DB

988BB98."B

0DB/!(B

988BB98."B

0DB/!(B

')%#)(::
(&B*,.##*(.-B*,)0#B#(-#!".-B#(.)B&#0B2*,#(DB0)3B*,#),#.#-DB(B()(K
*,)6.J-,0#J*/&#B-.),B!)&-DB.#0#.#-B(B*&(-CBB,.##*(.-B,B()/,!B.)B..(B&&B?B
'.#(!-CB"B)0,&&B!)&B#-B)(-#-.(3DB-)B."B*,)$.B.'B)-B().B*&(B.)BB(1B'',-B
/(&--B..((B#-B,!/&,&3B&)1B#!".B*,.##*(.-B),B."B!,)/*B#-B'#--#(!B%3B0)#-CBB
B

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 93 of 104

$!(::
•

#!()(=:,*,B ),B(B.#0&3B*,.##*.B#(B'.#(!-B.)B0#-B(B'%B
,)''(.#)(-B.)B-.5CB),%B#(&/-B*,)0##(!B,)''(.#)(-B)(B)(.(.B(B
,0#1#(!B'.#(!B-/'',#-CB(&#-.-B'3B)''/(#.B1#."B."#,B(.1),%-B.)B!.",B
0#1-B)(B,&0(.B.)*#-B(B,#(!B#-B%B.)B."B!,)/*CB(&#-.-B,B'*)1,B.)B
-",B."#,B#(#0#/&B0#1-B*/&#&3B(B(B-*%B)(B"& B) B."B!,)/*B1#."B /&&B!,)/*B
/(,-.(#(!DB)''/(#.#)(DB(B)(-(-/-CBB
•

": $)B . #:#: *!:('=B,)0#B'.#(!B!(-DB&)!#-.#-DB
)''/(#.#)(-B(B #&#..#)(CB /&#B(B
#'B1#&&EB
o
,)0#B.,(-*,(.B)''/(#.#)(B.1(B."B*(&B'',-B(B."B#.3B
o
,.BB1,'DB1&)'#(!DB(B- B)(.#(,B ),B)(0,-.#)(B
o
.#&#4B#(0)&0'(.B.))&-B(B-.,.!#-B.".B,B+/#.&DB--#&DB(B
#'*. /&B
o
,)0#B'*.".#B(B&,B #&#..#)(B
•
:*(<:)*'):''#<:'':'#<:#:$)':).:$:*#:()/=:,)0#B
)(.(.B.)B."B(&B(B,-*)(B.)B(&B#(*/.DB0#DB(B,)''(.#)(-CB.5B
*,)0#B')-.B'.#(!B'.,#&-DB*,-(..#)(-DB(B)''/(#.B(&B)/.)'-B.)B#.3B
) B/!(B&.B(B**)#(.B)5##&-B(B-.5B.BB,(!B) B),!(#4.#)(&B&0&-B
#(&/#(!B&,-"#*DB-B1&&B-B."B*,--B(B'#CB.5B)''#.'(.-B#(&/EB
o
(.!,.B*(&#-.B0)#-B(B*,-*.#0-B#(.)B#.3B)/(#&B*,)*)-&-B
o
/'',#4B."B."'-B(B*,#),#.#-B",B/,#(!B'.#(!-B
o
,).#0B)''/(#.#)(B(B&#-.(#(!B
o
)&&)1K/*B .,B."B(&B
o
**),./(#.#-B ),B'),B(!!'(.DB-",#(!B1#."B(.1),%-B
o

--#&B(B-#&3B/(,-.(&B'.,#&-B
o
3('#B(B*.&B.)B"(!#(!B(-B(B*,#),#.#-B




"B(&B#-B0#-),3B.)B#.3B-.5DB*,)0##(!B,)''(.#)(-B)(B."B)(.(.B*,-(.B.B"B
'.#(!CB#.3B-.5B, .B(B-/'#.B,*),.-B(B,)''(.#)(-B.)B."B**)#(.B(B&.B
)#-DB#(&/#(!B."B/-.#(#&#.3B)''#--#)(DB&((#(!B)''#--#)(DB#.3B)/(#&DB(B),B) B
)/(.3B)''#--#)(,-CB B-*#6B,)''(.#)(-B ,)'B."B(&B,B(DB."B(&B-.,#0-B
.)B'%B!,)/*B#-#)(-B/-#(!B)(-(-/-CB),B."B*/,*)-B) B."#-B!,)/*DB)(-(-/-B#-B6(B-BB
#-#)(B.".B0,3)(B(B&#0B1#."CB,)/*B'',-B1")B)B().B!,B1#."BB*,)*)-&B1#&&B-",B
."#,B)(,(-B(B1),%B.)B*,)0#B-)&/.#)(-B.)B,--B."#,B)(,(-CB B."B!,)/*B(().B,"B
)(-(-/-DB."B!,)/*B1#&&B!(,.BBQ'#(),#.3RB,*),.B1"#"B1#&&B,.#/&.B."B'$),#.3B*,)*)-B
!,'(.B(B."B'#(),#.3S-B*)#(.-B) B#-!,'(.B#(B),,B.)B#( ),'B#-#)(K'%,-CBB

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 94 of 104

!

  




 

 

•
(B'#DB)(B0)#CB
•
B1,B) B.#'CB
•
,.#B*B(B.#0B&#-.(#(!CB





  

  


•
)!.",DB1B%()1BB&).CB
&)(B1B)(S.B%()1B0,3."#(!CB
•
B)*(DB/,#)/-B(B,-*. /&B
•
(B#(.)B#-)' ),.J)(7#.CB .S-B")1B1B!,)1CBB
•
&,.B'/&.#*&B13-B) B%()1#(!FB'/&.#*&B.,/."-B(B2#-.B.B)(CB
•
*%B ,)'B3)/,B)1(B2*,#(BKKB-B B-..'(.-B(B0)#B!(,&#4.#)(-CBB





 


•
&#(+/#-"B*, .#)(CB
&&)1B ),B'#-.%-B(B!#0B!,CB
•
..B3)/,B(-DB*,.#B-& K,DB-.&#-"B"&."3B)/(,#-CBB
•

%B#( ),'.#)(B--#&B.)B&&FB0)#B$,!)(B(B,)(3'-B1"(B*)--#&CB
•
*")&B1".S-B)(6(.#&EB1".B1B&,(B&0-B",DB1".B1-B-#B-.3-B",CB


#!
#

•
! ) ,BB.%B,-*)(-##&#.3B ),B#(!B)''/(#.#)(B)((.),-B
.1(B."B'(3B),!(#4.#)(-B(B#(#0#/&-B1B,B)((.B.)CB
•
%) ) )")!,)B**,)"B"B).",B6,-.B.)B0,# 3B#( ),'.#)(B),B
,-)&0B#--/-B ),B*--#(!B)(B#( ),'.#)(B),B)(,(-B.)B).",-CB
•
) ) ,)B,B-B.,(-*,(.B(B(#B-B*)--#&B1#."B"B).",B(B'#(.#(B
,-*. /&B)''/(#.#)(CB
•
(   %,B,-)(&B-.),#-B-.3B1#."#(B."B!,)/*B/(&--B."3B,B)/'(.B#(BB
'.#(!B-/'',3B.".B#-B**,)0B3B."B!,)/*CB"(B1),%#(!B1#."B#( ),'.#)(B.".B#-B().B
3.B0&)*B()/!"B.)BB-",B)/.B,)&3DB1B0)#B-",#(!B-(-#.#0B#( ),'.#)(B
)/.-#B) B."B!,)/*B(J),B().# 3B."B!,)/*B1"(B-",#(!B-(-#.#0B#( ),'.#)(CB


!

# 


B-.#*(B) B/*B.)BV:88B*,B'.#(!B#-B0#&&B.)B"B*,.##*(.B1")B..(-DB%()1&!#(!B(B
0,!B) B9B")/,B*,*J )&&)1B/*B(B:B")/,-B) B..((B*,B'.#(!CBB.,%B*,.##*.#)(B(B

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


  

Page 95 of 104

#--/B-.#*(-B0#B"%B .,B .#(!BI=BO(B) B /(B:8:=PDB(B!#(B .,B."B&-.B'.#(!B#(B
.),B) B:8:=CB (B#.#)(DB,"B)/.B.)B /&#B#-",B),B
#'B%).#K3%(B# B3)/B*&(B.)B
-/'#.B2*(--B ),B.,(-*),..#)(BLB."#-B(B&-)BB,#'/,-B&)(!B1#."B."B-.#*(CBB
! %

#


-B0#-),-B.)B#.3B-.5DB*(&B*,.##*(.-B,B().B,+/#,B.)B#-&)-B*,-)(&B#( ),'.#)(B.)B."B
*/&#CB(&B'.#(!-B,B().B*/&#B'.#(!-DB(B-B-/"B*,.##*(.-B'3B"))-B.)B-",B."#,B
('-B(B5#&#.#)(-B),B%*B."'B*,#0.CB.5B'.#(!B-/'',#-B1#&&B().B#-&)-B*,.##*(.-SB
*,-)(&B.#&-CBB
!
'
 

#

"B*,)$.B.'B0&)*-B."B!(B(B*,.##*(.-B,#0B#.BB1%B ),B."B'.#(!CB"#&B
-)'B'.,#&-B,B-",B"DB).",B#( ),'.#)(B#-B*,-(.B.B."B'.#(!CB .#(!-B,B().B
,),B),B*/&#&3B*)-.FB-.5B.%B().-DB-",B, .B-/'',#-B1#."B*,.##*(.-DB(B."B
!,)/*B*,)0#-B#(*/.B(B**,)0-B6(&B-/'',#-CB
!(-B#(&/B.#'B ),B.#(!B#((,DB
)((.#(!DB(B-",#(!B0(.-J.#0#.#-J#-B-B1&&B-B-.,/./,B*,)$.B#(*/.CBB
'$):":$#))(:
 
'
#

 
!




,'
7'5&8

,':,"6#&4#-

-&
$&#(
#"("(

"#&
""&2
(/
#
,"

7BA>8
CE?6BADC

#,'"
#"("(

(,&(
&&"
75!8

&&":,"6#&4#-

#!$&"'-
"
#"("(

''#(
""&2
(/
#
,"

7BA>8
CE?6BBC>

&&
&"
7'5&8

&":,"6#&4#-

&"$
""&2
(/
#
,"

7BA>8
CE?6BC@B

!
#)6 /"
7'5(/8

!:/# #&)-4#!
 ()#"2
#!!,")#"'2

"
#')'


7DD=8
F>?6C=@F

"-&#"!"( 2
#!!,"(/

"""
"
&)-
#"', )"

, 
'&
7'5&8

, :#(#$&("&'4#!

'&
, 
"-# -!"(

7BA>8
BBC6CCBA


&#(
"&
9

&'$
'#"

&#''2
',$$#&(
#&
 ()#"2

#!!,")#"2
"
#')'

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


  

Page 96 of 104





+/#.3EB"B.,'BQ+/#.3RB, ,-B.)B #,(--B(B$/-.#DB(BQ+/&#.3RB'(-B*,)0##(!B."B-'B.)B
&&CB+/#.3B'(-B,)!(#4#(!B.".B1B)B().B&&B-.,.B ,)'B."B-'B*&B(B1B%()1&!B(B
'%B$/-.'(.-B.)B#'&(-CB"B*,)--B#-B)(!)#(!DB,+/#,#(!B/-B.)B#(.# 3B(B)0,)'B
#(.(.#)(&B(B/(#(.(.#)(&B,,#,-B,#-#(!B ,)'B#-B),B-3-.'#B-.,/./,-CBO-)/,E

+$'355...4".4#&5#,(6,'5%,(/6")#"8

(,-,0B)''/(#.#-EB(,-,0B(B/(,,*,-(.B!,)/*-B#(&/EB
•
&%DB (#!()/-DB.#0B
',#(DB .#()J .#(DB
-#(DB#6B -&(,B(B).",B
."(##.#-J)''/(#.#-B) B)&),B
•
 /!-DB#''#!,(.-DB(B()(K(!&#-"B-*%,-B
•

WEB&-#(DB!3DB#-2/&DB.,(-!(,DB+/,DB+/-.#)(#(!DB#(.,-2DB-2/&DB(B
."BWB#(&/-B).",B#(.#.#-B
•
)1K#()'B)''/(#.#-B(B/(")/-B#(#0#/&-B
•
)*&B2*,#(#(!B#-#&#.#-B
•
)/."B
•
(#),-B1")B&-)B'.B)(B),B'),B) B."B)0B.!),#-B


&((#(!BKB&((#(!B#-B&.B&,-TB')-.B5.#0B.))&B ),B'(!#(!B!,)1."DB(0#!.#(!B"(!DB
(B'%#(!B.)/!"B#-#)(-B #(!B)''/(#.#-DB&#%B1",B.)B#(0-.B#(B.,(-*),..#)(DB")/-#(!DB
(B*,%-CB)1,B3B)''/(#.3B*&((,-TB.K,#0(B#(-#!".-DB2*,.#-DB(B-(-B) B,-#(.-TB
(-DB."B*&((#(!B*,)--B"&*-B)''/(#.#-B6(B."#,B!)&-B(BB*."B.)B"#0#(!B."'CB
B
*&(B#-BB,)'*B.".B"&*-B&,-B'%B#( ),'B#-#)(-B)/.B1".B,-#(.-BMB(B."B
&)&B)()'3BMB(B.)B.",#0CBBO-)/,E
"..*-EJJ111C*&((#(!C),!J)/.*&((#(!J8




)'*,"(-#0B&(BKB
B)/'(.B.".B!/#-BB#.3B#(B#.-B&(B/-B*&((#(!B ),B /./,B!,)1."B
1#."#(B."B#.3S-B/,(B!,)1."B)/(,3BO-)/,E
"..*-EJJ111C/!(K
),C!)0J)/'(.(.,J#1J?9;=<J(0#-#)(K/!(K)'*K&(KKK
/!/-.K:8:;8

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026



 

Page 97 of 104

,(B,)1."B)/(,3BOPBKBB&#(B,1(B)(B*&((#(!B'*-B-/,,)/(#(!B"B,!)(B#.3B.)B
-#!(.B1",BB#.3B2*.-B.)B!,)1B)0,BB:8K3,B*,#)CB"#-B!,)1."B(B)/,B1#."B(1B
")/--DB#(/-.,#&B #&#.#-DB/-#(---DB),B*/&#B #&#.#-B-/"B-B*,%-B(B/.#&#.#-CB-.,#.#)(-B
#(B,-B)/.-#B) BBB*,)..B ,'B(B ),-.B,-)/,B&(B(B*,)"##.B/,(B0&)*'(.CB
(,&&3B-*%#(!DB#.S-B1",B."B#.3B(-B(B."B ,'-B(B ),-.-B!#(CBO-)/,EB
"..*-EJJ111C),!)(C!)0J&JJ!-J-K(K,(/,&K-,0-C-*28




&#'.B,#(&3B
,BKB
B&#'.K ,#(&3B,BO
PB#-BB(#!"),"))B1",B*)*&B(B'.B
')-.B) B."#,B#&3B(-B1#.")/.B"0#(!B.)B,#0CB"3B,B/,(B'#2K/-B,-B.".B)(.#(DB),B
,B*&((B.)B)(.#(DBB'#2./,B) B")/-#(!DB$)-DB/-#(---DB(B-,0#-CB"-B,-B,B
-,0DB),B*&((B ),B-,0#DB3B"#!"B+/&#.3B*-.,#(DB#3&DB(B.,(-#.B#( ,-.,/./,B.)B
*,)0#B ,+/(.B(B)(0(#(.B)((.#)(-B.)B%3B-.#(.#)(-B1#."#(B."B#.3B(B,!#)(BO-)/,E

"..*-EJJ111C),!)(C!)0J&J J)/'(.-J-#!(.#)(N) N&#'.N,#(&3N
,-N0,0#1C*
8

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 98 of 104

"$&$  #$ $

B

 


 

 

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026


 

Page 99 of 104

 

 

 

                 

                !"  #$#%



  &      '    
 

 &
 



             

 

  
   
   
       
 

 !   

  

 

    

     

    "  #

$


% !   
    &   '(  " 
( ) !* +* ,
-
     )*     # "#   
$


.   
   
  * "* 
   /      " 
 "#   #  &   '(    #     
$


0 1      2   .*  "     #   3 
  4  5    4 
 67#%7* 8    #  (
 " ( 9  #  ( 9 

  " 
 * 


: 1      2   .* "   "   "   #  (   5 *  
 * ;   (  
    

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

Page 100 of 104

<        5   3  

8

  "  "

  

 "" 
  "

" (  

( &

=3( 9      #

  (
 

- 5   "    >?! "
- 5 ># ? !(  "   2 
- 5 '(  
=   & /

(     
  "     

           
 #5

(

   5

# " 

(

   

    5  



                         
       
              

  

@   (  "  
    
/0*
 A 0  (

'( 

B   #(



 

(  

 * 

(* 

  " 

(

(   "  C

7

0

6         "  C
7

0

D "    "  "  
5 "     

7 '2    3D   
= (

:

 (  "  C    
/0*
  "     A 0

     

(



 

   

7

 &"

0

5    &  ' ((  

7

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

D  = ( %
0

Page 101 of 104

 &"

5    D

(

&" E5 "  = ( .

7

% D

0

(  

 4  D

(1

 

0 F ( 1  = ( 0

7

. D

0

(  

 =  /  E ( !



= ( <

7

0

0        (  5 #     
   
 5  "  *    "  " 
 "
G     
( 

 *  (* 
  " 
(
'( 

                            
                       !"

        (     
/0 
 

: = ( "   #* 

"5 A 0   

   ( 

7

0

<    
7

B  

0



 3  

7

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

0

Page 102 of 104

6 D#

 



/"  

7

0

7 @   &   '(  

 ((   



)    

   ((    5  "  C

#

            
    !"

           

        (     
/0 
 

 

   



"5 A 0   

 = (  (   
7

0

 = (   0%7/<%7"
7

0

% = (  

 

7

. 4 

0

 

7

0

0 ,  (
7

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

0

Page 103 of 104

: D



7

0

< &  

 3 # 

  ( 

7

0

B      #  (  ( #  (      5  " 

$  %                    %     
       &    

D 

 "  "

  

#

  

 " C 
/0*
     A 0 5  

6 F "  # C
7

%7 F "  # 

0

 &   '(  )C

7

0

%
      ( # "" (     "/#
(
 
   #  "   
 &   '(  @   "     
 &          "    3   #  "; "(

  / (C

%       
"     
   ( *  #*  
#  "      5  "  

Planning Commission Agenda 01/27/2026

 

Page 104 of 104