The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-001377

On the agenda: La Verne meeting — data center (Apr 6)

Past ⚠ Agenda Watch La Verne, California · Monday, April 6, 2026 — 5 months ago

About this record

The published agenda for this April 6 meeting contains: "data center". The meeting has passed; the record and its outcome live here permanently.

WhenMonday, April 6, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.

WhereLa Verne, California

Money$2,147,648.67 was at stake

On the record“data center”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived August 26, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

173 pages · scroll to read

Page 1 of 173

1. 2026-04-06 Council Agenda
Documents:
AGENDA - 040626.PDF
1.I. 2026-04-06 Council Agenda Packet
Documents:
CC PACKET - 040626.PDF

Page 2 of 173

COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tim Hepburn, Mayor
Wendy Lau, Council Member
Steven Frank Johnson, Council Member

Rick Crosby, Council Member
Meshal "Kash" Kashifalghita, Mayor Pro Tem

Monday, April 6, 2026
Closed Session at 5:30 PM
Regular Meeting at 6:30 PM
La Verne City Hall - Council Chambers,
3660 D Street, La Verne, CA 91750
In compliance with the American Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a
modification or accommodation to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Office at
(909) 596-8726 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Regular Meetings are held on the 1st and 3rd
Monday of every month.
Individuals can email their comments to the City Clerk's Office at [email protected] up to
noon on the day of the meeting. Those comments will be shared with City Council in advance of the
City Council meeting and included as part of the permanent record. Please be advised that public
comments submitted by emails or any other format to the City are public records that will be
made available for public viewing.
Individuals who wish to share their comments with Council during the meeting may do so in a variety
of ways:
• Attend the City Council Meeting in person and fill out a comment card or raise your hand to request
to comment on the current agenda item(s).
• Participate via Zoom, by visiting www.LaVerneCA.gov/zoom where you will be automatically
redirected to the meeting or call into the meeting via phone 1-669-900-6833 and enter ID 812 2237
1403 when prompted. Public comments via Zoom may be accepted for the agenda items listed within
the Consent Calendar, Public Hearing and Discussion Calendar sections of the agenda. Zoom
participants who violate decorum protocols will be called to order by the presiding officer and if a
violation continues, will be muted by direction of the presiding officer.
• Once items are considered by the City Council, no further public comment on that matter will be
accepted. A time limit of 3-minutes is set for all public comments.
Council Meeting Decorum: Per the City’s Rules for Decorum, all Speakers and Members of the
Audience are to conduct themselves with decorum and not engage in willful conduct which interrupts
the meeting or with the orderly conduct of the meeting.
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA - 5:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council
Member Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and
Mayor Tim Hepburn.

Page 3 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 2

CLOSED SESSION TOPIC
Conference with Labor Negotiators, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
Negotiators: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and City Attorney.
Employee Organization(s): La Verne City Employees Association, La Verne Firefighters Association,
La Verne Fire Middle Management Association, La Verne Police Middle Management Association,
and all Unrepresented Employees.
Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(d)(1) Workmen’s Comp Case - Case # ADJ 22309982
Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to California Government Code
Section 54956.9(d)(1). (1 case) - Gonzalez, J. v. City of La Verne, La Verne Police Dept. Case No.
24STCV34625.
Existing litigation Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation - Associated Pharmacies, Inc (and
American Associated Pharmacies); J M Smith Corporation; Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.;
Morris and Dickson Co.; North Carolina Mutual Wholesale Drug Company, Inc.; and United Natural
Foods, Inc. (Remnant Defendants)
USDC, Northern District of Ohio, MDL No. 2804
Rubris Reference Number: CL-1763034
The City Council will recess and reconvene at 6:30 PM for the regularly scheduled City Council
meeting.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 6:30 PM
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - ARMY VETERAN THEODORE LENGEL
ROLL CALL

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council
Member Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and
Mayor Tim Hepburn.

PRESENTATIONS
Outstanding Older American - Jack Mansell - The Senior Advisory Committee (SAC) has
nominated one senior citizen for the Older American Recognition Award. This recognition is part of
the Los Angeles County Commission for Older Adults (LACCOA) Annual Older Americans
Recognition Day (OARD) Awards Program, which honors a senior citizen from each city in Los
Angeles County. The Senior Advisory Committee nominated Jack Mansell as the City's Outstanding
Older American.
Recognition of Dr. Henderson for Service as Medical Director for LVFD - Dr. Henderson served
the City of La Verne and the La Verne Fire Department for many years as the EMS Medical Director,
generously volunteering his time and expertise without compensation. His leadership and medical
oversight were instrumental in shaping the EMS program, supporting personnel, and ensuring highquality patient care for the community. We would like to formally recognize his lasting contributions,
mentorship, and the positive impact he has had on the department.

Page 4 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 3

ANNOUNCEMENTS OF UPCOMING COMMUNITY EVENTS
(Any person who wishes to make a brief announcement of a future community event that is open to
the public may do so at this time.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of
the Council or member of the audience requests separate discussion.)
1.

City Council Minutes of the Closed Session & Regular meeting of March 16, 2026.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the minutes.

Registers of Audited Demands in the amount of $2,147,648.67, dated 03/11/26, and in the
amount of $937,536.84, dated 03/04/26, and in the amount of $394,086.76, dated
03/18/26.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the audited demands.

Senior Advisory Committee Appointment. Following an unexpected vacancy on the Senior
Advisory Committee (SAC), the City solicited applications to fill the role. Upon the close of the
application period, two applications were received. The SAC recommends that Mary Smith be
appointed to serve a term through June 30, 2027.
Recommendation: That the City Council accept the Senior Advisory Committee's
recommendation to appoint Mary Smith to serve a term through June 30, 2027.

Resolution Accepting the Fire Department's 2025 Report on Compliance with State
Inspection Mandates. In accordance with Senate Bill 1205 (SB1205), all fire departments in
California must annually inspect specified buildings and report compliance to their administering
authority.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a Resolution titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT
OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE CHIEF OF THE LA VERNE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S
REQUIREMENT TO INSPECT CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2
AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.”

Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Claremont Police Department. This agreement
allows authorized Claremont Police Department personnel to utilize the La Verne Police
Department's shooting range for training and qualification purposes.
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement
for Use of the La Verne Police Department's Shooting Range with the Claremont Police
Department.

Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Glendora Police Department. This agreement
allows authorized Glendora Police Department personnel to utilize the La Verne Police
Department's shooting range for training and qualification purposes.
Recommendation: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement
for Use of the La Verne Police Department's shooting range with the Glendora Police
Department.

Page 5 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 4

Approval of a Salary Range for Utilities Manager. Consideration of a resolution approving a
revised salary range for the Utilities Manager position to align with current market conditions.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution titled, “A RESOLUTION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SALARY
RANGE FOR UTILITIES MANAGER.”

Second reading and adoption of "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY
HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE DESIGNATION FROM “PR4.5D” TO
“INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033,
AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN: 8381-012-013." The second reading and adoption of an
Ordinance to change the zone designation from “PR4.5D” to “INSTITUTIONAL” for the sites
located within the Brethren Hillcrest Homes facility.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an Ordinance, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO.
114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE DESIGNATION
FROM “PR4.5D” TO “INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT AIN: 8381-010-028,
AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN: 8381-012-013."

PUBLIC HEARING
9.

First Reading of Ordinance Updates to the La Verne Municipal Code Relating to
Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, Senate Bill 9 Two-Unit
Developments, Urban Lot Splits, and the Definition of Emergency Shelter (Case Numbers
13-26ZA & 14-26ZA) and making California Environmental Quality Act Determinations.
First Reading for updates to the La Verne Municipal Code to ensure compliance with State law
related to ADUs, JADUs, and SB 9 provisions and finding that the ordinances are exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act.
Recommendation: That the City Council should conduct a Public Hearing, introducing by title
only and waiving further reading of the following Ordinances:
1. “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “EMERGENCY SHELTER” TO IMPLEMENT STATE
LAW AND AMENDING CHAPTER 18.22 AND SECTION 16.12.060 OF THE LA VERNE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT STATE LAWS CHANGES RELATING TO TWOUNIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND URBAN LOT SPLITS AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21 AND 66411.7 AND CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3),” and
2. “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING THE ZONING PROVISIONS OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.17.”

Page 6 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 5

DISCUSSION CALENDAR
10. Update on Route 66 Centennial and America 250 Programming and Approval of Public Art
Fund Appropriation for Banner Program. To celebrate the Route 66 Centennial and America
250 milestones, the City has developed a series of programming initiatives in collaboration with
community groups. Implementation of the Banner Program will require the appropriation of
$25,000 from the General Capital Improvement Fund, which holds the Public Art Funds.
Recommendation: That the City Council:
1. Receive and file this report;
2. Provide direction on the proposed programming efforts; and
3. Adopt a Resolution appropriating $25,000 of Public Art Funds from the General Capital
Improvement Fund to support the Banner Program.
11. Bonita Unified School District Measure A - June 2026 Election. The Bonita Unified School
District has placed Measure A on the June 2, 2026, ballot to authorize $256 million in bonds for
school facility repairs and upgrades, subject to Proposition 39 accountability requirements and a
projected tax rate of $59 per $100,000 of assessed value. At the March 2, 2026, City Council
meeting, Mayor Tim Hepburn and Council Member Rick Crosby requested the measure be
brought forward for Council discussion and consideration of support.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution in support for the Bonita Unified
School District Measure A Bond Measure.
12. SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design. The San
Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) and City of Pomona are proposing
improvements on Arrow Highway that include the addition of a Class IV bikeway among other
features, with impacts to the City of La Verne. Based on feedback from the January 20, 2026,
Council Meeting, SGVCOG staff have conducted further study of the proposed improvements
and are submitting the findings for the review and consideration of the City Council.
Recommendation: That the City Council:
1. Support coordination with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of
Pomona to advance the Class IV bikeway along Arrow Highway consistent with Pomona
City Council approved Alternative 4;
2. Confirm the preferred bikeway terminus at the White Avenue/Arrow Highway intersection
within the City of La Verne;
3. Direct staff to work with partner agencies to incorporate traffic signal modifications and
pavement rehabilitation within the City’s segment, as appropriate; and
4. Authorize staff to continue design coordination and return to the City Council with any
required agreements, cost-sharing arrangements, or approvals necessary for project
implementation.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time set aside for anyone wishing to address the City Council on items not listed in any
other place on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Under the
provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from talking or engaging in discussion

Page 7 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 6

on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or
set for discussion later. Please email your public comment to the City Clerk's Office at
[email protected]. Your public comment will be shared with the City Council and included as
part of the permanent record. There is a 3-minute time limit on public comments.
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND CONFERENCE/MEETING REPORTS
Each Council Member may address the Council and public on matters of general information and/or
concern. This is also the time for Council Members to report on conferences and/or meetings they
have attended per Assembly Bill 1234.
ADJOURNMENT

THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE LA VERNE CITY COUNCIL IS SCHEDULED
FOR MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2026, AT 5:30 P.M.

Posting Statement: A true copy of this Agenda was posted on March 31, 2026, on the bulletin
board at La Verne City Hall, 3660 D Street, La Verne, and on the City’s website
at www.LaVerneCA.gov.

Page 8 of 173

AGENDA

City Council 4/6/2026

Page 7

RESIDENT INFORMATION
UPCOMING EVENTS AND MEETINGS
Tuesday, April 7 - Development Review Committee meeting, City Hall, 9:00 am
Wednesday, April 8 - Planning Commission meeting, City Hall, 6:30 pm
Saturday, April 11 - Craft Fair, Mainiero Square, 9:00 am
Monday, April 13 - Senior Movie Matinee, LV Community Center, 12:30 pm
Wednesday, April 15 - Senior Advisory Committee meeting, Community Center, 10:00 am
Wednesday, April 15 - Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, City Hall, 5:30 pm
Saturday, April 18 - Sip of La Verne Wine Walk, Mainiero Square, 5:00 pm
Monday, April 20 - City Council meeting-Closed or Study Session, City Hall, 5:30 pm
Monday, April 20 - City Council meeting-Regular meeting, City Hall, 6:30 pm
Wednesday, April 22 - Transportation & Infrastructure Commission meeting, City Hall, 4:00
pm

Page 9 of 173

Table of Contents
City Council Agenda Packet, Monday, April 6, 2026
Agenda
Agenda Items
PRESENTATIONS

Outstanding Older American - Jack Mansell
Recognition of Dr. Henderson for Service as Medical Director for LVFD
CONSENT CALENDAR
1.
2.
3.
4.

Council Minutes of the 03/16/26 Closed Session and Regular meeting
Registers of Audited Demands
Senior Advisory Committee Appointment
RESO Accepting the Fire Department's 2025 Report on Compliance with State Inspection Mandates

8
15
25
31

5.
6.
7.
8.

Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Claremont Police Department
Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Glendora Police Department
Approval of a Salary Range for Utilities Manager
ORD Second Reading/Adoption Approving request by Hillcrest homes to Change the Zone Designation

36
43
50
57

PUBLIC HEARING
9. ORD First Reading for Updates to the LV Municipal Code Relating to Accessory Dwelling Units & Junior ADU's
DISCUSSION CALENDAR
10. Update on Route 66 Centennial & America 250 Programming & Public Art Fund Appropriation for the Banner Program
11. Bonita Unified School District Measure A - June 2026 Election
12. SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design

64
94
109
125

Page 10 of 173

CITY Of LA VERNE
COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tim Hepburn, Mayor
Wendy Lau, Council Member
Steven Frank Johnson, Council Member

Rick Crosby, Council Member
Meshal "Kash" Kashifalghita, Mayor Pro Tem

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council
Member Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and
Mayor Tim Hepburn.

Page 1 of 164

Page 11 of 173

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council
Member Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and
Mayor Tim Hepburn.

Page 2 of 164

Page 12 of 173

City Council Minutes of the Closed Session & Regular meeting of March 16, 2026.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the minutes.

Page 3 of 164

Page 13 of 173

PUBLIC HEARING
9.

Page 4 of 164

Page 14 of 173

PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time set aside for anyone wishing to address the City Council on items not listed in any
other place on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Under the
provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from talking or engaging in discussion

Page 5 of 164

Page 15 of 173

THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING OF THE LA VERNE CITY COUNCIL IS SCHEDULED
FOR MONDAY, APRIL 20, 2026, AT 5:30 P.M.

Posting Statement: A true copy of this Agenda was posted on March 31, 2026, on the bulletin
board at La Verne City Hall, 3660 D Street, La Verne, and on the City’s website
at www.LaVerneCA.gov.

Page 6 of 164

Page 16 of 173

Page 7 of 164

Page 17 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY oi LA VERNE

MINUTES OF THE CLOSED SESSION & REGULAR
MEETING OF MARCH 16, 2026
ACTION MINUTES
“SEE ITALICS”
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER - meeting called to order at 5:31 PM.
ROLL CALL

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council Member
Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and Mayor Tim Hepburn.

City Attorney Hall Barlow read the closed session items for the record. It is anticipated there will be
no report out.
Conference with Labor Negotiators, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6:
Negotiators: City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and City Attorney.
Employee Organization(s): La Verne City Employees Association, La Verne Firefighters Association,
La Verne Fire Middle Management Association, La Verne Police Middle Management Association,
and all Unrepresented Employees.
Conference with Real Property Negotiators pursuant to Cal. Gov't Code Section 54956.8:
Property: APN 8378-015-009 [approx. 30,657 square feet]
Negotiators: Ken Domer: Negotiating Parties: Arrow White Corner, LLC.
Under Negotiation: Price and terms of payment.

Mayor Hepburn called for Public Comment: There was none.
The City Council recessed at 5:33 PM into Closed Session.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 6:30 PM - meeting was called to order at 6:34 PM.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - RONALD LEWIS, AIR FORCE, TECHNICAL SERGEANT (E-6)

Mayor Pro Tem Kashifalghita, on behalf of the City Council, presented Sergeant Lewis with a Pride
of La Verne certificate.

Page 8 of 164

Page 18 of 173

Minutes

ROLL CALL

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 2
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Council Member Steven F. Johnson, Council Member Wendy Lau, Council Member
Rick Crosby, Mayor Pro Tem Meshal “Kash” Kashifalghita, and Mayor Tim Hepburn.

Council Members Present: Crosby, Johnson, Lau, Kashifalghita, and Hepburn.
Council Members Absent: None
Advisory Staff Present: City Manager Domer, Assistant City Manager Ranells, and City Attorney
Hall Barlow.
PRESENTATIONS
Bonita High School Girls' Water Polo 2026 - The Bonita Girl’s Water Polo team finished the 2026
season with an overall record of 26-6 and were the undefeated League Champions in the Palomares
League. The team advanced to the CIF playoffs where they had the number 3 seed and after 4
rounds of play, BHS girls water polo fell 16-15 in overtime to the eventual Division 2 champion La
Serna High School in the Semi-Final game. The team was coached by Dillon Unsoeld and assisted by
John Ashby and Cody Lehotsky.
Natalie Rosen
McKenzie Allred
Isla Romero
Eva Hanke
Joy Peoples

Maddie Rosen
Charlotte Cruz
Rosanna Jimenez
Jocilyn Ortega
Abbie Noyes

Ava Wu
Giselle Rappa
Sophia Quezada
Juliet Perez

Peyton Ashby
Kennedy O'Connell
Vivianna Velasquez
Charlotte Scholefield

City Council presented each player with a Pride of La Verne certificate and an In-N-Out gift card.
Red Cross Month Proclamation - American Red Cross Month recognizes the everyday heroes who
support their communities through the American Red Cross. The San Gabriel Pomona Valley Chapter
of the American Red Cross provided essential aid during the natural disasters, providing meals,
overnight shelter, comfort kits, recovery assistance through local resource centers, and more.

City Council presented SGV/Pomona Chapter Board member Omar Houari with the Proclamation.
Recognition and Presentation of "Pride of La Verne Awards" - Annually, the City Council
presents the "Jack Huntington Award" and the "Jim Scranton Award" to recognize volunteers who
have made outstanding contributions and performed exemplary service to the City and the
community. Each recipient receives an individual Pride of La Verne plaque and their names are
placed on perpetual plaques displayed in City Hall.
The "Jack Huntington Award" was named after S. Jack Huntington, who moved to La Verne in 1970.
Despite heavy professional obligations and time commitments to the U.S. Naval Reserve, Jack
became actively involved in the community as a volunteer. He was active in various local
organizations, including the La Verne Jaycees, Little League and the Youth Basketball program. Jack
also served as a City of La Verne Commissioner for more than 15 years, completing two terms on the
Parks & Recreation Commission as well as two terms on the Planning Commission. Jack Huntington
was a citizen volunteer who exemplified the “Pride of La Verne” through selfless service to the
community. This year, the City Council has nominated Raymond Swain.
Raymond Swain has been a dedicated member of the La Verne community since moving to the city in
1989. Over the years, he has generously contributed his time and leadership to numerous local and
regional organizations. Raymond volunteered for four years with Boy Scouts of America Troop 411,

Page 9 of 164

Page 19 of 173

Minutes

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 3
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

attending weekday meetings and participating in overnight camping trips to support youth
development. He also spent three years as a parent volunteer with La Verne Little League, regularly
attending games and workouts while assisting coaches and encouraging young athletes. For six
years, Raymond was active with International Toastmasters, serving as both Club President and Area
Governor, where he helped members achieve their communication goals and supported clubs in
reaching their membership and growth objectives. In addition, he served as Chairman of the City’s Ad
Hoc Water and Sewer Rate Study Committee, providing valuable input on a key community issue. He
also served on the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Steering Committee, providing input on the
City’s update to its’ Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Raymond also dedicated hundreds of hours leading
the effort to establish La Verne’s first Firewise community, helping neighbors reduce wildfire risk and
strengthen local preparedness. A frequent attendee of City Council meetings, Raymond continues to
demonstrate a strong commitment to civic engagement and the well-being of the La Verne
community.

City Council presented Raymond with a Pride of La Verne plaque.
The “Jim Scranton Award” was named after long-time resident Jim Scranton who was a member of
the Youth Sports Committee since its inception. In 1986, he formed the La Verne Lazers Soccer Club
organization which provides youngsters an opportunity to play soccer at a highly competitive level.
Jim also spent five years on the City Sports Park Committee, which resulted in the development of 35
acres of sports fields for the community. He also participated in the City women’s soccer program as a
coach. Jim is survived by his wife Susan and their children. The Youth Sports Committee
recommended that a Pride of La Verne Youth Sports Volunteer Award be named in honor of Jim
Scranton. This year’s award recipient is Ray Ortiz.
Ray has been in the region for over 25 years and on the Board for over 10 years. He has coached
players in AYSO from their earliest days (6U) to their last days (19U). He has been a positive
influence on many players that have come through the region and today can be found helping our
referees perform their duties. In the last three years, he has been our referee administrator and has
worked tirelessly to bring volunteer referees out on the fields, he has performed the necessary training
and mentoring with them so that they could be confident in their duties and enjoy their time on the
field. In the past year alone, Ray has invested his time and effort to help over a dozen referees
achieve the Intermediate and Advanced referee badge levels. These badge levels allow the referees
to officiate with more confidence in the older age groups. Ray was also involved in bring back the
Great Western Shootout this past year. Congratulations, Ray!

City Council presented Ray with a Pride of La Verne plaque.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF UPCOMING COMMUNITY EVENTS
(Any person who wishes to make a brief announcement of a future community event that is open to
the public may do so at this time.)

Public Announcements received from: Adrian Romero Library Manager
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All items on the Consent Calendar are routine and will be enacted by one motion unless a member of
the Council or member of the audience requests separate discussion.)

Page 10 of 164

Page 20 of 173

Minutes

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 4
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

After confirming no items were pulled, it was moved by Kashifalghita, seconded by Johnson and
approved by a vote of 5-0 to approve the Consent calendar items with the following amendment to
the minutes, “Council presented the proclamation to Richard Bowen from LVC3, who then took a
moment to remember LVC3 member Lois Jo Witten, who passed away recently.”
1.

City Council Minutes of the Closed Session and Regular meeting of March 2, 2026, and the
State of the City Special meeting on February 18, 2026.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the minutes. Approved

Register of Audited Demands in the amount of $1,752,325.26, dated 02/26/26.
Recommendation: That City Council approved the audited demands. Approved

Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Angeles County for Communications and Dispatch Services. Approve Amendment No. 1 to
the Agreement for Communications and Dispatch Services with the Consolidated Fire Protection
District of Los Angeles County to revise the per-incident cost calculation and authorize
reimbursement for Tablet Command software subscription licenses following the expiration of
grant funding.
Recommendation: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for
Communications and Dispatch Services with the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Angeles County and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. Approved

Annual Housing Progress Report 2025. The City is required by the state to prepare an Annual
Progress Report on the status and progress in implementing the Housing Element of the General
Plan. This report is required to be presented to the City Council as an informational item to
update the City Council on the previous year’s Housing Element status. The attachment contains
the reportable progress that will be provided to the state.
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Housing Element Annual Progress
Report for 2025. Approved

Metro A-Line (formerly Gold Line) Transit Oriented Development Bridge, Grant of
Easement Acceptance. The proposed pedestrian bridge crossing over Arrow Highway providing
a connection between the La Verne A-Line Station and the Fairplex Campus will require
easements for the portion of the facilities that land on the adjoining properties. Discussions with
Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority and Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (Metro)
staff are nearing conclusion.
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a Resolution accepting the permanent easement
from the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority associated with the Transit Oriented
Development Pedestrian Bridge Project, in a form approved by the City Attorney Approved

PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.

Brethren Hillcrest Gateway Project – General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and
Mitigated Negative Declaration. Consideration of the Brethren Hillcrest Gateway Project,
including a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Mitigated Negative Declaration for
redevelopment of the North and South Gateway sites within the Hillcrest continuing care
retirement community.

Page 11 of 164

Page 21 of 173

Minutes

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 5
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Recommendation: That the City Council adopt:
1. The resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
VERNE, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR
PORTIONS OF THE BRETHREN HILLCREST GATEWAY PROJECT AND
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE SAME FOR THE GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT (113-25GPA) AND ZONE CHANGE (114-25ZC) PORTIONS OF THE
BRETHREN HILLCREST GATEWAY PROJECT."
2. The resolution titled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 113-25GPA, A REQUEST BY HILLCREST
HOMES TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION OF THE SITES AT AIN: 8381010-006, AIN: 8381-010-028, AND AIN: 8381-010-033 FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TO COMMUNITY FACILITY."
3. Introduce by title only and waive further reading of an Ordinance titled: "AN ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE
NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE
DESIGNATION FROM “PR4.5D” TO “INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT AIN:
8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN: 8381-012-013."

Mayor Hepburn opened the Public Hearing and Principal Planner Bowcock reported on this
item.
Council Comments: Council had several clarifying questions and are very supportive of the
project.
Public Comments received from: Christine Carrasco, Hillcrest Director of Project
Management, Matthew Neeley, and Dale Stanley.
It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Lau, and approved by a vote of 5-0.
DISCUSSION CALENDAR
7.

Adoption of the 2026 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update and finding of Exemption
from Environmental Review. Adoption of the 2026 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the 2026 Parks & Recreation Master Plan
Update and find that it is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 (Feasibility and Planning
Studies).

Management Analyst Houston introduced this item and KUTA Project Team Lead Leon,
presented the report.
Council Discussion/Comments: Council discussed the different aspects of the Parks &
Recreation Master Plan and are happy and supportive of it.
Public Comments: Bill Aguirre
It was moved by Crosby, seconded by Lau and approved 5-0.

Page 12 of 164

Page 22 of 173

Minutes

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 6
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Fiscal Year 26-27 Preliminary Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts No. 6, 7, and
8 Budget Outlook. The City of La Verne has three active Landscape & Lighting Maintenance
Districts serving the communities that benefit from ongoing maintenance. Annually, the City is
required to consider the budget for each District. Fiscal Year 2026-27 is expected to continue to
see increased costs for utilities and operations. Per previous City Council direction, Staff is
presenting options to address the maintenance of these districts with an emphasis on cost
control.
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the update on Landscape and Lighting
Maintenance Districts.

City Engineer Howing reported on this item.
Council Discussion/Comments: Council discussed communicating and educating the public on
the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts going forward.
Public Comments: None
Council approved the receiving and filing of the update.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time set aside for anyone wishing to address the City Council on items not listed in any
other place on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Under the
provisions of the Brown Act, the legislative body is prohibited from talking or engaging in discussion
on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. However, your concerns may be referred to staff or
set for discussion later. Please email your public comment to the City Clerk's Office at
[email protected]. Your public comment will be shared with the City Council and included as
part of the permanent record. There is a 3-minute time limit on public comments.

Public Comments received from: Rebekah Hong
COUNCIL COMMENTS AND CONFERENCE/MEETING REPORTS
Each Council Member may address the Council and public on matters of general information and/or
concern. This is also the time for Council Members to report on conferences and/or meetings they
have attended per Assembly Bill 1234.

Council Comments: Council Member Lau announced the Tri City meeting on Wednesday at 5:00
PM, information can be found on their website. They are still looking for Mental Health
Commissioners.
Council Member Crosby represented La Verne at the Casa Colina event this past Saturday,
celebrating their 90th Year. This week he will be visiting Foothill Terrace with Fire Chief Coatney
and requested the mobile food vendors be checked into.
Council Member Johnson wished his wife a happy anniversary.
Mayor Pro Tem Kashifalghita announced the recent receipt of a $500,000 check from Senator
Susan Rubios’s office to support the district in the vital work of responding to the aftermath of the

Page 13 of 164

Page 23 of 173

Minutes

City Council 3/16/2026

Page 7
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

fires. Preparations are underway for the spring swimming pool condition efforts to identify and
address neglected swimming pools, and mosquito season is upon us as the weather heats up after all
the rain.
Mayor Hepburn attended the Little League opening day along with Mayor Pro Tem Kashifalghita,
and numerous city staff, Police Chief Gonzalez threw out the first pitch. Opening Day was a big
success, followed by a visit to the Spring Squeeze event and followed by the Women of the Year
event in Covina where two La Verne Women were honored. As a reminder be prepared as the
weather heats up, have your exit plans in place, check your smoke detectors, and clear brush away
from your house.
ADJOURNMENT - meeting adjourned at 8:40 PM.

Respectfully submitted,

Debra Fritz, CMC
Deputy City Clerk

Page 14 of 164

Page 24 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026
CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
3/4/2026
FY 25-26
DEMANDS PRESENTED HA VE BEEN APPROVED CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S PURCHASING/ FUNDING POLICY AND HA VE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DIR.ECTOR FOR
ACCURACY AND PROPER APPROVAL.
SUMMARY Of DEMANDS
LARGEST 10 CITY DEMAND PAYMENTS OTHER THAN PAYROLL AND RELATED BENEFITS.

I.
2.
J.
4.
5.

6.
7
8.
9,

10,

AMOUNT
J 15,384,41
235,334.66
48,226.11
46,540.93
38,695,44
37,669.28
32,385.16
28,765.00
27,326.14
15,329.09
102,494. I 8
928,150.40

ISSUED TO
WASTE MANAGEMENT
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
GREENSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES INC
FONTANA CHRYSLER DODGE RAM JEEP
GRANITE DATA SOLUTIONS, I11:C.
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS
L. BARRIOS & ASSOCIATES INC.
SDI PRESENCE LLC
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS. INC.
OTHER DEMANDS

DESCRI PTION
FEBRUARY 2026 REFUSE SERVICE
JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2025 PAYROLL (LA CLEAR)
JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 2026 MAINTENANCE VARIOUS LOCATIONS
2024 RAM 5500 CHASSIS CAB
TRAINING LAB WORKSTATIONS (L.A. CLEAR)
CITY CR.EDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS FOR OCTOBER 2025
CITY CREDIT CARD TRANSACTIONS FOR NOVEMBER 2026
LASER GRADING 2 ON EACH FIELDS AT SPORTS PARK AND LAS FLORES PARK
JANUARY 2026 LICENSE PAYMENTS AND 1T SUPPORT
FEBRUARY 2026 PARKING ENFORCEMENT

DEMANDS OF S9,386.44 WERE PAID ON BEHALF OF LA IMPACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE OPERATIONS.

IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37202, I HER.EBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS.

CHRISTY LOPEZ
FINANCE DIRECTOR

Page I of3

Page 15 of 164

Page 25 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
FY 25-26
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHIBIT A
CHECK NO,
176360
176361
176362
176363
176364
176365
176366
176367
176368
176369
176370
176371
176372
176373
176374
176375
176376
176377
176378
176379
176380
176381
176382
176383
176384
176385
176386
176387
176388
176389
176390
176391
176392
176393
176394
176395
176396
176397
176398
176399
176400
176401
176402
176403
176404
176405
176406
176407
176408
176409
176410
176411
176413
176414
1764 15
176416

AMOUNT
349.39
72.49
1,500.00
388.72
446.09
28,765.00
850.00
80.00
908.70
40.00
94.00
339.98
846,00
3,272.50
86.83
170.00
400.00
120.00
384.93
373 .21
10.83
46,540.93
83.98
2,600.00
416.00
368.90
2, 145.00
625.00
2,603.25
946.39
36.5S
207.48
20.00
S9.94
702.00
2,977.26
137.82
650.00
2,017.31
2;050.00
106.00
3,535.00
I 15.88
108,00
2, 167.55
448.55
3,200.00
185.20
4,730.00
S5.6S
285.10
369.00
478. 14
132.74
9, 121.68
235,334.66

03/04/26

ISSUED TO
AIRGAS USA, LLC.
ALBERTSONS/SAFEWA Y
JUSTIN ANDREWS
AQUATIC SERVICE, INC.
BAB STEERJNG HYDRAULTCS, TNC.
L. BARR10S & ASSOCIATES INC.
BEN'S LOCK & KEY
BILL'S AUTO UPHOLSTERY
BREAK TIME YOGA, LLC
BURRO CANYON SHOOTING PARK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
RETIRED SENJOR VOLUNTEER PATROL
CITY OF MONROVIA
COLLEY FORD
CPRS
D.F. POLYGRAPH
DEBORAH POPOVICH
THE EMBLEM AUTHOR1TY
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
FLUID TECH
FONTANA CHRYSLER DODGE RAM JEEP
FOOTHILL BUILDTNG MATERIALS
FRANC1SCO JAUREGUI
FRESHMOBILECA LLC
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
GARCIA'S FENCE CORP.
GOVERNMENT TRAINING AGENCY
HOLLIDAY ROCK CO.
HOME DEPOT CREDJT SERVICES
HOSE-MAN, fNC.
YWCA SAN GABRIEL VALLEY
JM POOL AND SPA
KTMBALL-MIDWEST
LA VERNE HER1TAGE FOUNDATION
LIFELOC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
LOWE'S
MCLAY SERVICES, INC.
O.F. WOLFINBARGER
RAMONA BOWL AMPHJTHEATRE
REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY
SMART & FINAL TRIS CO.
SOLAR TECH ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC
STOTZ EQUIPMENT
T-MOBILE
TIDY DIESEL TANKS
TK PRINT MANAGEMENT, TNC.
UCLA CENTER FOR PREHOSPITAL CARE
LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS, LLC
WAGEWORKS, fNC.
WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.
24 ROOTER & PLUMBING, INC.
TANYA CARTER
CELL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Page 2 of 3
Page 16 of 164

Page 26 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

ClTY OF LA VERNE
FY 25-26
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHlBIT A
CHECK NO.
176417
176418
176419
176420
176421
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
BANK DRAWN
BANK DRAWN
BANK DRAWN

Total Demand

AMOUNT
38,695.44
676.05
2,699.34
320.00
l,3 72.24
379.50
241.41
49.71
1,840.00
719.60
1,193.63
550.73
1,268.31
375.90
48,226.11
27.00
I5,329.09
1,250.05
10,270.00
725.00
4,273.07
1,041.31
6,988.89
212.71
27,326.14
1,335.00
1,397.27
432.24
315,384.41
3,971.28
1,930.00
2,534.90
37,669.28
32,385.16
928,150.40

03/04/26

ISSUED TO
GRANITE DATA SOLUTIONS, TNC.
!MPEX TECHNOLOGIES, TNC.
MASERGY CLOUD COMMUNICATIONS, lNC
CHRISTOPHER PAUL PERNEVI
VERIZON WIRELESS
AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY JNC.
CARDER, ROBIN
COLLBGJATE PRESS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES / LA-RICS
EKMAN, ROBBIN
EWING TRRJGATlON PRODUCTS
FIGUEROA, STEVE
FIRST-CITIZENS BANK & TRUST CO.
GRAINGER
GREENSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES TNC
GUZMAN, !SABELLA
lNTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
KTU&A
LA VERNE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
LAW ENFORCEMENT MEDICAL SERV1CES
LIPE-ASSIST, TNC.
LINE GEAR FIRE & RESCUE EQUIPMENT
SALT WORKS, INC.
SANDERS LOCK & KEY
SDJ PRESENCE LLC
SOUTHLAND MECHANICAL, TNC.
U.S. POSTMASTER
ULINE
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WAXIE SANTTARY SUPPLY
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES
CINTAS
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS
U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT SYSTEMS

9,386.44
937,536.84

LA IMPACT Law Enforcement Task Force Demands
176422
357.83
ROTORCRAFT SUPPORT, INC.
176423
1,062.49
STAPLES
176424
200.12
T-MOBILE
176425
1,131.00
TOTAL NETWORK SOLUTIONS
176426
2,500.00
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFF'AIRS, INC
176427
200.00
VISTA AVTATION INC.
176428
3,825.00
VfT AL RECORDS CONTROL
176429
110.00
SOUTHLAND SHREDDING, INC.
Total
9,386.44
LA IMPACT demands are paid from federal asset forfeiture dollars allocated to LA IMPACT crime prevention activities. These funds
are not City funds and are not available for City use outside of LAIMPACT activities.

Page3 of J
Page 17 of 164

Page 27 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
3/11/2026
FY 2025-2026
DEMANDS PRESENTED HA VE BEEN APPROVED CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S PURCHASING/FUNDING POLICY AND HA VE BEEN REVlEWED BY THE DIRECTOR FOR ACCURACY AND
PROPER APPROVAL.

SUMMARY OF DEMANDS
LARGEST 10 CITY DEMAND PAYMENTS OTHER THAN PAYROLL AND RELATED BENEFITS

2.
3.
4
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

AMOUNT
202,168.76
142,712.22
109,587.05
54,835.79
44,410.43
39.907.37
18,632,00
17,449.00
16,897.60
13,926.0 I
179.446.24
839,972.47

ISSUED TO
OPPENHEIMER NATIONAL
STRATEGIC CONTRACTING SERVlCES
TANGRAM
DAVID WILSON'S VILLA FORD
ISES CORPORAT!ON
DOOLEY ENTERPRISES
INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
CALIFORNIA JPIA - EXCESS LIABILITY
HPS WEST, INC.
ATHENS SERVICES
OTHER DEMANDS

DESCRIPTION
ARROW HWY URBAN GREEN PROJECT
PAYROLL 02/ 15/2025 TO 02/28/2026 (L.A. CLEAR)
FINANCE AND IT FURNITURE (L.A. CLEAR)
2026 FORD TRANSIT MID ROOF CARGO VAN
SERVICE 1/27/2026 TO 02/26/2026 ASSESSMENT FACILITY ASSESTS
AMMUNITION FOR DEPARTMENT TRAINING
FEBRUARY 2026 ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL SERVICES
TRUSTACCOUNTREPLENlSHMENT
AMR/A.Ml METER PURCHASES
FEBRUARY 2026 SWEEPER SERVICES CITY AND FOOTHILL/RTE 66

DEMANDS OF SIS,613,21 WERE PAID ON BEHALF OF LA IMPACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE OPERATIONS.
DEMANDS OF S1,292.062,99 WERE PAID FOR PAYROLL AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT RELATED ITEMS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37202, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS,

;;;~~~~ *

Page I of4

Page 18 of 164

Page 28 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHIBIT A
CHECK NO,
]76430
176431
176432
176433
176434
176435
176436
176437
176438
176439
176440
176441
176442
176443
176444
176445
176446
176447
176448
176449
176450
176451
176453
176454
176455
176456
176457
176458
176459
176460
176461
176462
176463
176464
176465
176466
176467
176468
176469
176470
176471
176472
176473
!76474
176475
176476
176477
176478
176479
176480
176481
176482
176483
176484
176485
176486
176487
176488

AMOUNT
429.19
11 ,753.20
225.00
716.00
I 3,926.0 I
26.80
2,716.17
1,553.34
1,842.11
508.89
500.00
11,698.43
107.00
39,907.37
8,483.40
68.36
105.99
2,000.00
364.00
2,277.01
1.5 75.00
2,008.92
16,897.60
2,160.56
18,632.00
118.58
44,410.43
27.13
821 .60
3,095,07
174.65
94.90
504.10
343.79
250.00
150,08
202,168.76
383.25
747.14
24.00
4,863.47
8,833.94
100.00
239.95
218.37
959.S0

16.81
SI 7.08
1,181.25
28.72
815.07
4,983.20
1,819.94
555.97
3,612.39
700.00
2,657.99
300.00

FY 2025-2026
3/11/2026

ISSUED TO
ACTION AW ARDS, INC.
AlR-EX AIR CONDITIONING
AMERICAN TANK TESTING
ANGELS BASEBALL L.P.
ATHENS SERVICES
CA THERJNE GARCIA
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
JARVINEN, CLAY
CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICES
D & H WATER SYSTEMS
DANA ROMERO
DARTCO TRANSMISSION SALES & SERVfCE
DIRECTV
DOOLEY ENTERPRJSES
ECONOLITE- SYSTEMS, LNC.
EVERSOFT
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
FLYING DEUCES
FRESHMOBILECA LLC
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
FRONTIER COMM UNICATIONS
HOLUDA Y ROCK CO.
HPS WEST, INC.
INLAND EMPIRE STAGES, LTD.
INLAND VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY
INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY DEPT.
!SES CORPORATION
K & M TOOLS, INC.
KOSMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES
KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS WEST
LA VERNE CAR WASH
LA VERNE PETTY CASH
MALLORY SAFETY AND SUPPLY LLC
MICHAEL SEFFlNGER
NADIA NEAL
O.F. WOLFINBARGER
OPPENHEIMER NATIONAL
PARADISE EMBROIDERY & SCREEN PRINT.
PERMITFLOW, INC.
PORAC
RINGCENTRAL INC.
S & J SUPPLY CO., lNC.
SAFESHRED COMPANY, INC.
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY TRfBUNE
CONNECTA SATELLITE SOLUTIONS LLC
SIERRA PACIFIC ELEC. CONTRACTrNG
SO CAL GAS CO
SO CAL INDUSTRIES
SOUTHERN CALIF. REG. RAIL AUTH.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
STAPLES
SUPERIOR COURT OF CA,COUNTY OF L.A.
T-MOBILE
T-MOBILE
TENNIS ANYONE INC.
THE DOMINGUEZ GROUP
TPX COMMUNICATIONS
TRANSUNlON RISK & AL TERNA TIYE DATA
Page 2 of 4

Page 19 of 164

Page 29 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS • EXHIBIT A
CHECK NO.
176489
176490
17649.1
176492
176493
176494
176495
176496
[76497
176498
176499
[76500

AMOUNT
488.46
89.34
4,222.70
80.00
54,835.79
5,460.00
34.83
165.29

75.00

EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
TOTAL

132.03
109,587.05
425.00
17,449.00
33.14
6,561.00
9,681.00
1.345.00
300.00
66.30
8,404.98
5,238.27
4,311.68
406.90
9,300.00
2,752.72
3.485.37
607.00
7,315.92
4.97
465.00
3,251 .49
785.00
1,012.46
1,200.00
364.59
4,650.00
5,749,30
142,94
581.25
142,712.22
839,972.47

Total Demands

1,292,062.99
15,613.21
2,147,648.67

EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT

EFT
EFT

FY 2025-2026
3/1 ]>/2026

~JS~S~U~E~D~T~O:..__ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
TURF STAR, INC.
VER!ZON WJRELESS
VORTEX INDUSTRJES, LLC
XIMENA TOLEDO
DA vro WILSON'S VILLA FORD
ENYlRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH INST
F'EDEX
ANTOINETTE NUNEZ
SOCAL SHRED LLC
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TROPHY COMPANY
TANGRAM
TOWERSTREAM CORPORATION
CALIFORNIA IPIA • EXCESS LlABILITY
COLLEGIATE PRESS
COMMERCIAL DOOR COMPANY, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL PUENTE HILLS
GENERAL CODE LLC
GREGORY A MILES
HAAKER EQU IPMENT CO.
HACK COMPANY
HARRINGTON INDUTRIAL PLASTICS
HI-WAY SAFETYlNC
INTERSTATE BATTERY INLAND VALLEY
JONES MA YER
L.N. CURTIS AND SONS
LA VERNE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC
RKA CONSlJLTING GROUJ>
SALT WORKS, INC.
SANDERS LOCK & KEY
SEAL BEACH COUNSELING INC
SOUTHLAND MECHANICAL INC
SPRAGUE PEST SOLUTIONS
SUN BADGE CO.
THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL
UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY
WA TERTALENT LLC
WESTERN WATER WORKS
AMAZON CAPITAL SRVC - LA CLEAR
MICHAEL W. TYNES
STRATEGIC CONTRAC1'[NG SERVfCES

Total Payroll and Employee Benefit Payments
Total LAIMPACT Demands
1335234.48

Page 3 of 4

Page 20 of 164

Page 30 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHlBlT A
CHECK NO.
AMOUNT
PayrolJ and Employee Benefit Payments:
176507
2,714.12
176508
12,877.24
176509
600.00
176510
J 50.00
17651 I
9,911.06
176512
137,675.73
176513
108,917.84
176514
1,859.47
17651S
42.37
EFT
4.00
BANK DRAWN
631,586.10
BANK DRAWN
112,516.81
BANK DRAWN
38,842.70
BANK DRAWN
571.46
BANK DRAWN
195,366.25
BANK DRAWN
20,401.60
BANK DRAWN
7,189.34
EFT
3,366.10
EFT
2,516.38
EFT
3,504.42
EFT
,1.350.00
EFT
]00.00
Total
1,292,062.99

PY 2025-2026
3/11/2026

ISSUED TO
DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY
DELTA DENTAL(0020785555)
CITY OF LAVERNE EMPLOYEE FUND
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS #P07S4
THE HARTFORD-PRIORlTY ACCOUNTS
HEALTH NET
KAISER FOUNDATlON HEALTH PLAN
METLfFE • GROUP BENEFITS
HEATHER REYES
UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN
PAYROLL
UNITED STATES TREASURY
STATE OP CALIFORNIA
STATE DISBURSEMENT BD0005689
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
EMPOWER TRUST COMPANY, LLC-457
EMPOWER TRUST COMPANY, LLC-ROTH
LA VERNE POLICE FIRE ASSOCIATION'
LA VERNE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOC,
CHARLES SCHWAB BANK
MISSION SQUARE
WAGEWORKS-ADMIN FEE

Break down of standard providers and the benefits they provide
Provider
A.C. Newman Co.
Delta Dental
The Hartford
Health Net
!(aiser
Wage Works
US Treasury
Staie of California
Mass Mutual A
Mass Murual B
Mass Mutual Roth
Lincoln National
Fire/Police/La Verne Employee FUnd

Benefits Description
Employee dental insurance coverage
Life lnsurance Policy
Employee health insurance
Employee health insurance
Flexible Saving.~ Account (FSA) deductions
Employee federal tax withholdings
Employee slate income tax, unemployment insurance and child support/garnishments
401A plan
457B plan
Roth plan
Replacement Social Security plan
Employee Group Dues

LAJMPACT Law Enforcement Task Force Demands
176501
792.98
BPS TACTICAL, INC.
CITYOPPASADENA
176502
6,109.15
CODE 5 GROUP, LLC.
176503
2,350.00
176504
5,000.00
DA VIS FARR LLP
l 76505
839.53
FLEXTG, LLC
176506
321.55
TRANSUNION RISK & ALTERNATIVE DATA
EFT
200.00
FOOTHILL COMMUN ICATlONS INC
Total
15,613.21
LAI ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS
LAJMPACT demands are paid from fe<leral asset forfeiture dollars allocated to LAI MPACT crime prevention activities. These
funds are not City funds nnd are not available for City use outside ofLAIMPACTactivities.

Page4 of 4

Page 21 of 164

Page 31 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
3/18/2026
FY 25-26
DEMANDS PRESENTED HAVE BEEN APPROVED CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S PURCHASING/FUNDING POLICY AND HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DIRECTOR FOR
ACCURACY AND PROPER APPROVAL.

SUMMARY PE DEMANDS
LARGEST 10 CITY DEMAND PAYMENTS OTHER THAN PAYROLL AND RELATED BENEFITS.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

AMOUNT
231,260.97
46,650.00
9,196.92
4,900.00
4,162.08
3,949.00
3,3 I 5.00
3,164.20
3,068.75
2,332.93
21,046.87
333,046.72

ISSUED TO
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
GLADIATOR FORENSICS LLC
ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC.
SWEBS
ACUATIVE CORPORATION
GRANJCUS LLC
D. HAUPTMAN CO., INC.
CELL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLERK/REGISTRAR
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
OTHER DEMANDS

DESCRIPTION
NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2025 PAYROLL AND JULY AND SEPTEMBER 2025 LEASE (L.A CLEAR)
AMC RENEWAL 02101/2026-02/01/2027 (L,A. CLEAR)
29 YELLOW NOMEX BRUSH COAT PER ORANGE COUNTY SPECS.
DATABASE-MODULE UPDATES (L.A. CLEAR)
ANNUAL SERV ICE 04/0S/2026-04/04/2027 (L.A. CLEAR)
FEBRUARY ANO MARCH 2026 AVIOR SRVC
AEROSOL FIELD MARKING PAINT
SERVICE 2/19/2026-04/l 8/2026 (L.A. CLEAR)
NOD FOR HILLCREST GATEWAY PROJECT

SERVICE 3/12/2026-04/12/2026 (L.A. CLEAR)

DEMANDS OF61,040.04 WERE PAID ON BEHALF OF LA IMPACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE OPERATIONS.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 37202, l HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND ACCURATE REG ISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS.

Page I of3

Page 22 of 164

Page 32 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
FY 25-26
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHIBIT A
CHECK NO.
176516
176517
176518
176519
176520
176521
176522
176523
176524
176525
176526
176527
176528
176S29
176530
176531
176532
176533
176534
176535
176536
176537
176538
176539
176540
176541
176S42
176543
176544
176545
176546
176547
176548
176549
176550
176551
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT
EFT

AMOUNT
1,262.94
228.76
40.00
958.00
122.89
1,325.56
1,02 1,00
3,315,00
20,00
46.00
146.63
1,077.49
311.S5
316,82
345,71
1,465.10
3,068.75
600.00
500.00
100.00
86.02
718.44
320.00
79.89
50.00
364.90
87.77
1,318.28
4,162.08
3,164.20
2,332.93
349.99
79.22
231,260.97
25.87
4,900.00
140.00
9,196.92
134.70
80.13
455.92
3,949.00
249.86
1,604.93
873.79
385.88
91,64
56,52
126.99
320.00
l78.12
2,186.46
698.14
94.96
46,650.00
333,046.72

03/18/26

ISSUED TO
AT&T MOBILITY
BAB STEERING HYDRAULICS, TNC.
BURRO CANYON SHOOTING PARK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DAVID CHAVIRA
COLLEY FORD
CPAC, INC.
D. HAUPTMAN CO., rNC.
DAVID RIVERA
ECKS, JEREMY
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS
FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS
FRONTIER COMMUNfCATIONS
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
GONZALEZ, CLAUDIA
KOSMONT PTNANClAL SERVICES
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CLERK/REGISTRAR
MIND BLOWING BALLOONS LLC
OLIVIA NAVARRO
OLIVIA NAVARRO
ROJAS, MAXIMO
SAM'S CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK
SANDERS TOWING, INC.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
STEVEN STEGURA
VAN VELDHUIZEN, BRANDON
WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO.
WELLS FARGO VENDOR FINANCIAL SVCS
ACUATIVE CORPORATION
CELL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
KENNETH CORDRAY
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDEX
SWEBS
ALL PURPOSE DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
ALL STAR FIRE EQUIPMENT JNC.
BIEDERMANN, REBEKAH
CANU, EUZABETH
FTGUEROA, STEVE
GRANICUS LLC
HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO.
HASA, lNC.
LfFE-ASSIST, rNC.
LINE GEAR FIRE & RESCUE EQUIPMENT
PULIDO, DAISY
RUSH TR'UCK CENTERS
SAVAGE, HOLLIE
SHADES TINTfNG
TRILOGY MEDWASTE WEST, LLC
TURBO DATA SYSTEMS INC.
UL!NE
UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY
GLADIATOR FORENSICS LLC

Page2 of 3
Page 23 of 164

Page 33 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA VERNE
FY 25-26
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS - EXHIBIT A
CHECK NO.
Total Demand

AMOUNT
61,040.04
394,086.76

03/ 18/26

ISSUED TO

LAIMPACT Law Enforcement Task Force Demands
176552
1,099.00
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
176553
4,900.00
DA VIS FARR LLP
l76554
390.00
NUWA Y JANITORIAL SERVICES
176555
50,415.60
SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION
J76556
4,235.44
YERJZON WIRELESS
Total
61 ,040.04
LA IMPACT demands are paid from federal asset forfeiture dollars allocated to LAJMPACT crime prevention activities. These funds
are not City funds and are not available for City use outside of LA IMPACT activities.

Page 3 of 3
Page 24 of 164

Page 34 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Yvonne Duran, Parks & Recreation Director

SUBJECT:

SENIOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT.

SUMMARY
Following an unexpected vacancy on the Senior Advisory Committee (SAC), the City solicited
applications to fill the role. Upon the close of the application period, two applications were
received. The SAC recommends that Mary Smith be appointed to serve a term through June
30, 2027.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council accept the Senior Advisory Committee's recommendation to appoint Mary
Smith to serve a term through June 30, 2027.
DISCUSSION
In late February 2026, it was identified that Valarie Ortiz is not available to attend the regularly
scheduled Senior Advisory Committee meetings due to conflicts with work, resulting in an
unexpected vacancy to the committee. The City posted the position as vacant, allowing for
applications through March 12. The solicitation was advertised in the City Manager's
Newsletter, emailed to City website subscribers, and incorporated in the Senior Newsletter.
Upon the close of the application period, two applications were received from the following
individuals:
• Bonnie Lesley
• Mary Smith
The Senior Advisory Committee recommends the appointment of Mary Smith to serve on the
Senior Advisory Committee, to complete Valarie's term through June 30, 2027.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.
ATTACHMENTS

Page 25 of 164

Page 35 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Senior Advisory Committee Appointment., Page 2

Senior Advisory Committee Applications

Report Prepared By:
Andrea Blockinger, Management Analyst

Page 26 of 164

Page 36 of 173

"~ COMMITTEE, COMMISSION,
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AND BOARD APPLICAIIAN
MAR 11 2026

Date:

LA VERNE CITY HALL
ADMINISTRATION

Please check the appropriate Board, Commission, or Committee:
__ Active Transportation & Infrastrucrure
Finance Commission
__ Planning Commission
__ Public Finance Authority (EIFD)
__ Tri-City Mental Health Authority Governing Board Representative
l. PERSONAL DATA
Name (last, first, middle)

\PA J. I TI---f

Home Address (number & street)

rn~ '-':Ju (..CE

Home Phone (

)

F /ll.1.. IT 5f: •

Work Phone

)

Work Phone

)

Business Address (if applicable) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

LA \/P()__;J E:.

C1ty,S1ate,Zip

Parks & Recreation Commission
\.,/Sr. Citizen Advisory Committee

CA- 0 / ] '$:O

Cell Phone

. -

)_'_

Email address

3. EDUCATlO

AND TRAINING

Please comment on education and training as it may relate to your application for community service: _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ __

_ _ __

4. ADO!TlONAL INFORMATION
Use this space to provide additional information as required or to describe in greater detail any aspects of your experience or activities that are pertinent: _ _

Wtt::'12..E, I LJV 6

Uf :t::u--) '" eµ

I'm
0

p..

eA/1.T oe- A Vow,,,rcT:-J7- ~ D.-oUP (LG"A.()\

bl Nq:1,) ~ §. J motJ Tit c.....1 .
,J

$E,N10,.,_ b-At=- , ,.) l,A Vef½)G

Jff.:-7,J~u

Address
2.

1J
[(yn/}7 ¥'.l-~-2"

¥~

072..6,;WJ l.t

vu..o y )(.e;J WQ)A.J!N,
fc:-0~ H- IL.( 17=Y2£-.A,c.G MH P -

JJ.l:Ar: H-6J_j>~ sq
p_ \26t; I i ) ~fr I WfCA/<.G A

~ET uP.,., ITI>UC>'.V<f &lln {i)ltb

5. REFERENCES
1'amc

I J

Phone number (

LA Ye)f-Nc

✓ I J / AN f<.1 GI-/-Al'::-P> ~o;.J
Phone number
Address
furli /LI.- Tc--YY...ACE MHP- LIi ,/~E
Phone number
Name CkrH--y flA:,z,e.A
Address _ __
54m 6ei ~ A \JE IM u bl b A Ct\ qt Jl../: V,

Name

Page 27 of 164

Page 37 of 173

6 , COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Since moving to La Verne, please list current activities and work experience. Include all special projects and positions you held in organizations, for example,
lc;JG,~
President, Secretary, Treasurer, etc.

/h)o

Name or Organization fuGTH:1 <...L,
Offices Held

~ f&r:._. Cu, ~ \.,: Gx JS7S-t<ow long with this organization

/ "t

I/<-- '1 f-,S

1J-.er:l, S U. 6Eft-.-

~C.C..C=~U~tA.J~iL.___..l.l:..!::...---"~ ~ ~ ~ _ : : = - = = = ~
Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments. ~..l..4-"'"-~/.nL:~J!=:~t:::.IL=-1-LA

Fo1--

Pt ~ i DTlf-B?- k.tl\)Cf7b}J-t M
(NDr

F0o71h l.L- ~
/?:Ji NC-o \f-DJ~"iS€)':))
How long with this organization Go// ( P/z..c:\E;VJ
Offices Held
/ A J'YI
I ,J Cl+-4¼ ~
Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments. 5 €'fT7 /U<'.s, ll f
{qA-fntj +- (}ll:j-cJ,..,{, I ..S.
Name or Organization

hrJ t::>,rJ (; ,&,.Jo ~ , ,J ,nl s

Name or Organization LA VE)l_;j €

t±a.,p

I cl~".)

S!Av l/-J G AFffi/?4 )Mc
F-og_ fYl°'rvi ' I ~

N G)D

~ I o p_

Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments.

CA.u.... ~

Sa.c._

How long with this organization

PA1?ex

Fl:>{2.._ '.?te

~~~~ A..Jf) J: ~IS

WhatwerethemajorreasonsthatcauscdyoutomovetoLaVemc?

/UJ D Ws b€c£ pS)J m n<-nv E
/:) 1-J Tlfta JJ DA

y tJ IGHJ ro ~'1

CJ\Lt;.,.. t.;.J 4

Y{ {2.,S

BA<-¥--:

ik.JJ ~ uJ.

V'ez>t. AT _R:.c:1Tlf K.L TT,~C6 'fC.
7. ESSAY {Please use add1t1onal sheds o paper if necessary.)
~fl.rzAJ':,c

2..

Rc~E\1.J@~ t°A.A<:£~ /J/0 me lf71iorJlu.i.
P..1D (= ,~ u.~ ,J (, 7liejl,... (S OLP CA tt-r-s'

HJ'( / + u s ~ 1 ) {JOl2..JG~ A:f' ~HLU- "fE-J~ /vt-rt-f
D:tetE . I 1--0 Ja Cortu Al <si 11> LA etz.AJ r;.
r;uJ q'D A.,- OJ_~ Th,2. K.- .

If you could change anything in the City, what would it be? _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

What can you contribute to and why are you interested in serving on the Commission/Committee designated?

' / Vj

_ _ __

NOT !> y g €

t J l:(hI

J1+E <~~ I tree I ,S i2E"scb)~ ,e-.c,g: F6 Ct- 6-tr f Ar(} /l\ &:,'t,) 1·oi2- A,J P { fEe L
I1±AT 1 1WE: b.J l.t:t.:::::A w•tf:AT 6€~ 10P. l.d k e , A~1) I :e, tiN E;I=t M 6:S H:A.1liE
\Jome;, Groo ,
h>~ Jl.c,nA.11~=

APP½f klP- IT - A Wlc..E i'\,{l\~ NNn§D -rby.p..y 'i A •-IH:>'=( ,JAmei) &~
What is your availability to serve on a Committee? j Jl\rY) Y-\ Jf\l L-,A..l'Q Le 6J·e tLt ~
- ffl) TH.L AJ<ll1i) D~AIJ4.,J
Si-kuL.l)

A"'-rc-ii-NO<).J.5,_ ~ ~ o~ LJtt-A:,~ ,J~c.cscAR-y
Applications can be submitted in the following ways:
In-person or through the mail

Via Email

City Clerk's Office
3660 "D" Street
La Verne, CA 91750

[email protected]

Upd41ed Deocmber 202S

Page 28 of 164

Page 38 of 173

COMMITTEE, COMMISSION,
AND BOARD APPLKAllON
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY oi

VE RNE
1

,,cA(j= ·91 ,dLO ;;?__(;:

MAR d9\·2026

Please check the appropriate Board, Commission, or Committee:

LAVERNE CITY HAU.

Date,/J7e!.,A

_
_
_

ADt,,11:NJSiRATION

Active Transportation & Infrastructure
Finance Commission
Planning Commission
_
Public Finance Authority (EIFD)
Tri-City Mental Health Authority Governing Board Representative

Parks & Recreation Commission
sr. Citizen Advisory Committee

Home Phone

~-~)

Work Phone

______

_ _,) _ _ _ _ __

Email address

3. EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Please ~omment on education and train~g as it may r~late to your application for community service:

tt.. s . ro &i { ~Te/

oo I Ie.3£ ( Vo e..q±1/Jflq l,) se e -Re.±a r , o I e..o u:ESe,s

4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Use this space to provide additional information as required or to describe in greater detail any aspects of your experience or activities that are pertinent _ __

~J)"'v 10(:\ ~ Dvnm Club C:c 6mrd1'+tee f'Qef'Y\b-e✓ft mc/R_ql SI rlj~· N:$~.r-vlflf'161'12,

;~~ ~ fV\:~'.t:1- ;;z~l:~:r~
~:=~rn:>.=: ==="s.v;;+\ic==~==~=1m
;~5¼~
Jb ¢ p ~ ~ ~ ~ R !

==t)==

Name

•

G-r \ , · I tL.

3.
Addres

Page 29 of 164

Page 39 of 173

• 6. COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES

Council Packet - April 6, 2026
Since moving to La Verne, please list current activities and work experience. Include all special projects and positions you held in organizations, for example,
President, Secretary, Treasurer. etc.
l.

NameorOrganization _ __ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ __

How long with this organization _ _ _ __ __

Offices Held _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __
Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments. - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - --

Name or Organization_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

- - - - -- - -- - -

How long with this organization _ _ _ _ _ __

Offices Held _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _
Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --

Name or Organization_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

How long with this organization _ _ _ _ _ __

Offices Held _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ __
Describe your responsibilities and accomplishments. - - - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - --

7. ESSAY (Please use additional sheets of paper ifnecessary.)
I.

r:~r-_t_e~J~_ct~n~d~b. . . .o.;....,..u\,-3""\--'h~+~:~Ff'o~
.......b~,~
-~
t~f__.D·....,..1
l_ ....m.......

What were the major reasons that caused you to move to La Verne? -~M)"-r'a
........

'l\'') <'.{

_:e...=,.._

r e..o rDmcuf!t-y

5en LC

What can you contribute to and why are you interested in serving on the Commission/Committee designated? _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ __ __

What is your availability to serve on a Committee? ~O\...-$~....,n'-+-e=-,e=--C-1, .....e.,.-,..;4f---------- - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -

Applications can be submitted in the following ways:
In- person or through the mail

Via Email

City Clerk's Office
3660 "D" Street
La Verne, CA 91750

[email protected]

Upd.lted December 2025

Page 30 of 164

Page 40 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Fred St. Ange , Fire Marshal

SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S 2025 REPORT ON
COMPLIANCE WITH STATE INSPECTION MANDATES.

SUMMARY
In accordance with Senate Bill 1205 (SB1205), all fire departments in California are required to
inspect both public and private buildings used as schools, hotels, motels, lodging houses,
apartment houses, and certain residential care facilities annually, and to report compliance to
their administering authority.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt a Resolution titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT
MADE BY THE FIRE CHIEF OF THE LA VERNE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S REQUIREMENT TO
INSPECT CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF
THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE.”
DISCUSSION
In accordance with Senate Bill 1205 (SB1205), the California Health and Safety Code Section
13146.4 was added in 2018, and became effective on September 27, 2018. The California
Health and Safety Code Section 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments in
California, to annually inspect both public and private buildings that are utilized as a school,
hotel, motel, lodging house, apartment house, and certain residential care facilities. California
Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 requires all fire departments to report annually to its
administering authority its compliance with Section 13146.2 & 13146.3.
The La Verne Fire Department’s (LVFD) Community Risk Reduction (CRR) Division is
responsible for fire and life safety prevention and risk reducing programs throughout the City of
La Verne. One of these programs is the California State Fire Marshal mandated annual
inspection program. The City’s Fire Marshal has historically been solely responsible for
conducting the annual inspections. In doing so, correction notices are issued for violations as
necessary. The amount of time and level of enforcement required for correcting violations
depends upon the severity of the violation(s) identified. Violations that pose an immediate
health and safety hazard require an expedient response and possibly even a complete
cessation of operations by order of the Fire Marshal. Less dangerous or more complicated
cases are given a defined time frame to become California Fire Code Compliant.
As the result of high fatality fire rates and increased potential for injury or death, the California
State Fire Marshal, through the California Health & Safety Code and California Fire Code have

Page 31 of 164

Page 41 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Resolution Accepting the Fire Department's 2025 Report on Compliance with State Inspection Mandates., Page 2

identified certain building occupational classifications which are required to be inspected by law.
Those classifications are:
• Organized Camps
• Day Care Facilities
• Public and Private Schools
• Health Care Facilities
• Detention Facilities
• Multi-Family Housing
• Residential Care Facilities
• High Rise Buildings
It was also the intent of the legislature to provide mechanisms to ensure jurisdictions had the
corresponding resources to complete the inspections. As such, SB 1205 requires the CCR,
under the direction of the Fire Chief, to submit an annual report to the City Council indicating its
compliance with the educational, multi-family, and residential care facility categories of the
mandated annual inspection program. If the division is found to be deficient in completing its
mandated inspections, local governing bodies are to be made aware of such with the purpose
of providing the financial resources to hire personnel to complete the inspections.
The results of that compliance are below.
Occupancy
E (Educational) Public and Private
Schools
R-2 (Multi-Family) Apartmenta
R-2.1 (Residential Care Facilities)
B (Health Care Facilities)
TOTAL COMPLETED (Per
Year)12/02/2025

Total
2025
14

Inspected
2025
14

133
2
2
151

The Community Risk Reduction Division is excited to highlight key accomplishments over the
past year. Despite challenges, our fully staffed CRR team has successfully met all 148 SB 1205
requirements for the third consecutive year. This achievement reinforces compliance with
essential state fire regulations, enhancing safety for residents and businesses.These
accomplishments are a testament to the dedication and hard work of the CRR team. By
leveraging our full staffing, we’ve streamlined inspection processes, identified areas requiring
additional attention, and exceeded expectations.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The recommended action has no financial impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicale.
LEGAL REVIEW

Page 32 of 164

Page 42 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Resolution Accepting the Fire Department's 2025 Report on Compliance with State Inspection Mandates., Page 3

This report was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
SB 1205 Reso 2026
Coordinated with:
Brandon Coatney, Fire Chief

Page 33 of 164

Page 43 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA, ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY
THE FIRE CHIEF OF THE LA VERNE FIRE DEPARTMENT’S
REQUIREMENT TO INSPECT CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT
TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH
AND SAFETY CODE
WHEREAS, the California Health and Safety Code requires fire departments within the state of
California to annually inspect buildings, public or private, that are utilized as a school, hotel, motel,
lodging house, apartment house, and certain residential care facilities.
WHEREAS, the Fire Marshal focuses on compliance with building standards and other
regulations imposed by the State Fire Marshal, and on public safety and fire prevention; and
WHEREAS, section 13146.4 was added to the Health and Safety Code in 2018 to require local
fire departments to perform annual inspections and pursuant to Senate Bill 1205, report compliance
information annually to its administering authority; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Senate Bill 1205, the Fire Department hereby submits this report
on its compliance with the state inspection mandates to the City Council for review and approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Verne intends this Resolution to fulfill the
requirements of the Health and Safety Code regarding acknowledgment of the La Verne Fire
Department’s compliance with sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA,
HEREBY RESOLVES, DETERMINES, AND APPROVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
A.
The City Council acknowledges and accepts the Fire Department’s submission of an annual
report regarding the inspection of certain occupancies, including schools, multi-family housing and
residential care facilities pursuant to Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety
Code.
B.
The City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary documents associated with the
compliance report.
C.
This action is not a “Project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
because it involves organization or administrative activities of the government that will not result in direct
or indirect physical changes in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15378(a).
Section 2. The Mayor shall sign and the Assistant City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take be in force.

Page 34 of 164

Page 44 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th of April, 2026.

ATTEST:

________________________________
Tim Hepburn, Mayor

_________________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the
City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the 6th day of April, 2026, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk

Page 35 of 164

Page 45 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Sam Gonzalez, Police Chief

SUBJECT:

POLICE SHOOTING RANGE USE AGREEMENT WITH CLAREMONT POLICE
DEPARTMENT.

SUMMARY
The City Council is requested to authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement for Use of
the La Verne Police Department's Shooting Range between the City of Claremont and the City
of La Verne. This agreement allows authorized Claremont Police Department personnel to
utilize the La Verne Police Department's shooting range for training and qualification purposes.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement for Use of the La
Verne Police Department's Shooting Range with the Claremont Police Department.
DISCUSSION
The City of Claremont Police Department does not maintain its own shooting range and relies
on partnerships with neighboring agencies to meet training and qualification requirements. The
Agreement with the City of La Verne provides access to a nearby, suitable range facility,
ensuring that officers maintain the required firearms proficiency. The agreement outlines terms
of use, including authorized personnel, supervision requirements, safety compliance,
maintenance responsibilities, indemnification, and insurance provisions. The term of the
agreement is two years, and it may be terminated by either party with 30 days' written notice.
Continuing this agreement supports officer readiness and operational effectiveness while
maintaining interagency collaboration.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agreement. The City of Claremont provides its
own supplies and materials and allows the City of La Verne to retain spent brass casings as
compensation for range use.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed action is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it involves administrative activities that will not
result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement.
ATTACHMENTS

Page 36 of 164

Page 46 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Claremont Police Department., Page 2

Claremont - La Verne Range Agreement 2026

Report Prepared By:
Travis Tibbetts, Police Captain

Page 37 of 164

Page 47 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LA VERNE POLICE SHOOTING RANGE
THIS AGREEMENT FOR USE OF THE LA VERNE POLICE SHOOTING RANGE
(“Agreement”) is entered into this __ day of ________ 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between
the CITY OF LA VERNE, a municipal corporation (“LA VERNE”), and the CITY OF
CLAREMONT, a municipal corporation (“CLAREMONT”).
WHEREAS, CLAREMONT desires to use the LA VERNE Police Department’s
Shooting Range located at 2061 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750 (“Range”), owned and
operated by LA VERNE; and
WHEREAS, LA VERNE desires to allow the use of its Range by CLAREMONT on the
terms and conditions agreed to herein.
NOW THEREFORE, and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and
stipulations expressed here, LA VERNE and CLAREMONT agree as follows:
1.

LA VERNE agrees that certain individuals authorized by CLAREMONT as set
forth herein shall have the use of the Range.

The use of the Range by CLAREMONT shall be limited to those sworn members
of CLAREMONT’S Police Department and any former sworn members of the
CLAREMONT Police Department who have signed a waiver under the
institutional supervision of a NRA/ FBI / CA POST certified, qualified,
competent range master acceptable to the LA VERNE Chief of Police or his
designated representative.

The individuals authorized by the CLAREMONT Police Department to use the
Range shall have their name(s), address(es) and telephone number(s) on file in the
Office of the Chief of Police of LA VERNE (the “Qualified Persons”).
CLAREMONT agrees to advise the Chief of Police of LA VERNE of any and all
changes in such information within seven (7) days of such change.

LA VERNE and CLAREMONT agree the Range shall be open and usable by
Qualified Persons, at such times as are mutually agreeable to both parties.

CLAREMONT agrees that, while exercising the privileges of this Agreement, it
will be subject to all provisions of this Agreement and to the Range safety rules
established by LA VERNE and/or its Chief of Police or designated representative.

Page 38 of 164

Page 48 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CLAREMONT shall furnish all necessary cardboard, targets, associated target
materials, ammunition, and use only brass encased ammunition used pursuant to
this Agreement.

CLAREMONT shall be responsible for the general policing and clean-up of the
Range, to the extent of CLAREMONT’s use of the Range and associated
facilities, subject to the terms of this Agreement.

No Qualified Persons, shall bring and/or consume alcoholic beverages on the
Range, nor shall any such Qualified Person be on the Range while under the
influence of alcoholic beverages.

CLAREMONT agrees to compensate LA VERNE for the use of the Range by
supplying their own targets, cardboard, and cleaning supplies, and allowing LA
VERNE to retain all spent brass casings used in the Range.

10.

CLAREMONT agrees to repair damage to any and all property on the Range and
its facilities resulting from the negligence of its Qualified Persons.

11.

CLAREMONT agrees to indemnify, defend with attorneys and legal counsel
acceptable to LA VERNE, hold, and save harmless LA VERNE, its officers,
agents, and employees, from any and all claims, demands, suits, judgments,
expenses, and costs of any and all kinds, in the event of injury to or death of
persons or loss of or damage to property, and from penalties, obligations or
liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, or corporation
arising out of or related to the use of the Range by CLAREMONT, including its
officers, agents, employees and/or any Qualified Person’s negligent or willful
acts, errors or omissions. CLAREMONT will share the cost to clean backstop
when removing lead after CLAREMONT’s use of the Range. Such costs shall be
calculated by average use of CLAREMONT’s Qualified Person’s and their shots
per year in comparison to all other parties’ use of the Range. Such cleaning shall
be completed every 2-3 years. LA VERNE will provide in writing, a notice of
cleaning and invoice to CLAREMONT.

12.

CLAREMONT shall furnish LA VERNE a Certificate of Insurance, insuring on
an “occurrence” basis for public liability and property damage in the limits of no
less than $1,000,000 plus $50,000 property damage endorsed to name the City of
La Verne as an additional insured insofar as such liability or damage relates to use
of the Range, and to insure each and every member of LA VERNE, its agents and

Page 39 of 164

Page 49 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

employees from liability for bodily injury and /or property damage to the La
Verne Police Range and for any other LA VERNE property resulting from the use
and operations of the insured CLAREMONT. The policy underlying the
Certificate of Insurance, and all endorsements, shall conform to the above terms.
The Certificate of Insurance shall contain the provision that the City Clerk of LA
VERNE shall be notified of any cancellation, changes of limits, or changes of
conditions affecting the policy of insurance.
13.

If CLAREMONT is deemed to be self-insured, CLAREMONT is subject to
sections 989 – 992 of the California Government Code. In the event
CLAREMONT is self- insured, a letter from an authorized official stating
compliance with the above terms and conditions of coverage shall be submitted
for the Certificate of Insurance.

14.

Any claim or cause of action arising out of CLAREMONT’S use of the Range
may be brought under the provisions of California Government Code Section 810
et seq., the Government Tort Claims Act. All claims or causes of action for
damages sustained to the Range and associated facilities or for personal injury to
others caused as a direct result of the negligent use of the Range and associated
facilities shall also be subject to the provisions of the Government Tort Claims
Act.

15.

In the event that any dispute should arise concerning the application or
interpretation of the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any such
dispute shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs.

16.

This Agreement shall become effective as of the Effective Date set forth above
and shall remain in effect for a period of two years unless canceled or terminated
by either party hereto. Use of the Range according to the terms of this Agreement
will correspond to the term and duration of this Agreement.

17.

This Agreement may be terminated either by mutual agreement of the parties or
by written notice by either of the parties to the other party of an intention to
terminate the Agreement. Any such written notice shall serve to automatically to
terminate this Agreement as of the date that is thirty (30) days after the date such
notice is sent to the other party via certified mail.

The parties addresses are:

Page 40 of 164

Page 50 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

La Verne Police Department
Attention: Chief of Police
2061 Third Street
La Verne, CA 91750

Claremont Police Department
Attention: Chief of Police
570 W. Bonita Avenue
Claremont, CA 91742

18.

This Agreement embodies the entire Agreement of the parties. There are no
promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained in or
attached to this Agreement. This Agreement shall supersede all previous
communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between
the parties. No alteration of or amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless
made in writing and signed by the parties to this Agreement.

19.

This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
to be an original, and all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same
instrument. Delivery of a signed counterpart in electronic form (i.e., PDF) by
email shall constitute good and sufficient delivery. The parties are aware that the
other party will rely on the telecopied, .pdf or other electronically delivered
signatures, and hereby wave any defenses to the enforcement of the terms of this
Agreement based on the form of signature.

[ SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE ]

Page 41 of 164

Page 51 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AGREED TO BY:
CITY OF CLAREMONT

Dated:
Adam Pirrie
City Manager
CITY OF LA VERNE

Dated:
Ken Domer
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________
Alisha A. Patterson
CLAREMONT City Attorney

Dated:

Dated:
Kimberly Hall Barlow
La Verne City Attorney

Page 42 of 164

Page 52 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Sam Gonzalez, Police Chief

SUBJECT:

POLICE SHOOTING RANGE USE AGREEMENT WITH GLENDORA POLICE
DEPARTMENT.

SUMMARY
The City Council is requested to authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement for Use of
the La Verne Police Department's Shooting Range between the City of Glendora and the City of
La Verne. This agreement allows authorized Glendora Police Department personnel to utilize
the La Verne Police Department's shooting range for training and qualification purposes.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council authorize the City Manager to renew the Agreement for Use of the La
Verne Police Department's shooting range with the Glendora Police Department.
DISCUSSION
The City of Glendora Police Department does not maintain its own shooting range and relies on
partnerships with neighboring agencies to meet training and qualification requirements. The
Agreement with the City of La Verne provides access to a nearby, suitable range facility,
ensuring that officers maintain the required firearms proficiency. The agreement outlines terms
of use, including authorized personnel, supervision requirements, safety compliance,
maintenance responsibilities, indemnification, and insurance provisions. The term of the
agreement is two years, and it may be terminated by either party with 30 days' written notice.
Continuing this agreement supports officer readiness and operational effectiveness while
maintaining interagency collaboration.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this agreement. The City of Glendora provides its own
supplies and materials and allows the City of La Verne to retain spent brass casings as
compensation for range use.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The proposed action is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it involves administrative activities that will not
result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement.
ATTACHMENTS

Page 43 of 164

Page 53 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Police Shooting Range Use Agreement with Glendora Police Department., Page 2

Glendora - La Verne Range Agreement 2026

Report Prepared By:
Travis Tibbetts, Police Captain

Page 44 of 164

Page 54 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LA VERNE POLICE SHOOTING RANGE
THIS AGREEMENT FOR USE OF THE LA VERNE POLICE SHOOTING RANGE
(“Agreement”) is entered into this _ _ day of ________ 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between
the CITY OF LA VERNE, a municipal corporation (“LA VERNE”), and the CITY OF
GLENDORA, a municipal corporation (“GLENDORA”).
WHEREAS, GLENDORA desires to use the LA VERNE Police Department’s Shooting Range
located at 2061 Third Street, La Verne, CA 91750 (“Range”), owned and operated by LA
VERNE; and
WHEREAS, LA VERNE desires to allow the use of its Range by GLENDORA on the terms and
conditions set agreed to herein
NOW THEREFORE, and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and
stipulations expressed here, LA VERNE and GLENDORA agree as follows:
1.

LA VERNE agrees that certain individuals authorized by GLENDORA as set
forth herein shall have the use of the Range.

The use of the Range by GLENDORA shall be limited to those sworn members of
GLENDORA’S Police Department and any former sworn members of the
GLENDORA Police Department who have signed a waiver under the institutional
supervision of a NRA/ FBI / CA POST certified, qualified, competent range
master acceptable to the LA VERNE Chief of Police or his designated
representative.

The individuals authorized by the GLENDORA Police Department to use the
Range shall have their name(s), address(es) and telephone number(s) on file in the
Office of the Chief of Police of LA VERNE (the “Qualified Persons”).
GLENDORA agrees to advise the Chief of Police of LA VERNE of any and all
changes in such information within seven (7) days of such change.

LA VERNE and GLENDORA agree the Range shall be open and usable by
Qualified Persons, at such times as are mutually agreeable to both parties.

GLENDORA agrees that, while exercising the privileges of this Agreement, it
will be subject to all provisions of this Agreement and to the Range safety rules
established by LA VERNE and/or its Chief of Police or designated representative.

Page 45 of 164

Page 55 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

GLENDORA shall furnish all necessary cardboard, targets, associated target
materials, ammunition, and use only brass encased ammunition used pursuant to
this Agreement.

GLENDORA shall be responsible for the general policing and clean-up of the
Range, to the extent of GLENDORA’s use of the Range and associated facilities,
subject to the terms of this Agreement.

No Qualified Persons, shall bring and/or consume alcoholic beverages on the
Range, nor shall any such Qualified Person be on the Range while under the
influence of alcoholic beverages.

GLENDORA agrees to compensate LA VERNE for the use of the Range by
supplying their own targets, cardboard, and cleaning supplies, and allowing LA
VERNE to retain all spent brass casings used in the Range.

10.

GLENDORA agrees to repair damage to any and all property on the Range and its
facilities resulting from the negligence of its Qualified Persons.

11.

GLENDORA agrees to indemnify, defend with attorneys and legal counsel
acceptable to LA VERNE, hold, and save harmless LA VERNE, its officers,
agents, and employees, from any and all claims, demands, suits, judgments,
expenses, and costs of any and all kinds, in the event of injury to or death of
persons or loss of or damage to property, and from penalties, obligations or
liabilities that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm, or corporation
arising out of or related to the use of the Range by GLENDORA, including its
officers, agents, employees and/or any Qualified Person’s negligent or willful
acts, errors or omissions. GLENDORA will share the cost to clean backstop when
removing lead after GLENDORA’s use of the Range. Such costs shall be
calculated by average use of GLENDORA’s Qualified Person’s and their shots
per
year in comparison to all other parties’ use of the Range. Such cleaning shall be
completed every 2-3 years. LA VERNE will provide in writing, a notice of
cleaning and invoice to GLENDORA.

12.

GLENDORA shall furnish LA VERNE a Certificate of Insurance, insuring on an
“occurrence” basis for public liability and property damage in the limits of no less
than $1,000,000 plus $50,000 property damage endorsed to name the City of La
Verne as an additional insured insofar as such liability or damage relates to use of
the Range, and to insure each and every member of LA VERNE, its agents and

Page 46 of 164

Page 56 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

employees from liability for bodily injury and /or property damage to the La
Verne Police Range and for any other LA VERNE property resulting from the use
and operations of the insured GLENDORA. The policy underlying the Certificate
of Insurance, and all endorsements, shall conform to the above terms. The
Certificate of Insurance shall contain the provision that the City Clerk of LA
VERNE shall be notified of any cancellation, changes of limits, or changes of
conditions affecting the policy of insurance.
13.

If GLENDORA is deemed to be self-insured, GLENDORA is subject to sections
989 – 992 of the California Government Code. In the event GLENDORA is selfinsured, a letter from an authorized official stating compliance with the above
terms and conditions of coverage shall be submitted for the Certificate of
Insurance.

14.

Any claim or cause of action arising out of GLENDORA’S use of the Range may
be brought under the provisions of California Government Code Section 810 et
seq., the Government Tort Claims Act. All claims or causes of action for damages
sustained to the Range and associated facilities or for personal injury to others
caused as a direct result of the negligent use of the Range and associated facilities
shall also be subject to the provisions of the Government Tort Claims Act.

15.

16.

17.

Page 47 of 164

Page 57 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

La Verne Police Department
Attention: Chief of Police
2061 Third Street
La Verne, CA 91750

Glendora Police Department
Attention: Chief of Police
150 S. Glendora Avenue
Glendora, CA 91741

18.

19.

[ SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE ]

Page 48 of 164

Page 58 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AGREED TO BY:
CITY OF GLENDORA
Dated:
Adam Raymond
City Manager
CITY OF LA VERNE
Dated:
Ken Domer
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dated:
Danny Aleshire
Glendora City Attorney
Dated:
Kimberly Hall Barlow
La Verne City Attorney

Page 49 of 164

Page 59 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

JR Ranells, Assistant City Manager

SUBJECT:

APPROVAL OF A SALARY RANGE FOR UTILITIES MANAGER.

SUMMARY
With a recent vacancy in the City’s Utilities Manager position, a compensation and job analysis
has been completed. The review found that the existing job classification remains current and
does not require updates; however, an adjustment to the salary range is recommended to better
align with the market.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the attached Resolution titled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SALARY RANGE FOR
UTILITIES MANAGER.”
DISCUSSION
With the recent vacancy in the Utilities Manager position, Staff conducted a comprehensive
review of both the job classification and the associated salary range. The classification was
determined to be current and reflective of the duties and responsibilities of the position, so no
changes to the class specification are recommended.
However, the compensation analysis indicated that the current salary range, which previously
topped out at $144,088, is below market when compared to similar positions in comparable
agencies. The Utilities Manager role carries significant responsibilities, including oversight of the
City’s water system and requires significant state water certifications and licenses. Given the
technical complexity and regulatory requirements of the position, it is essential to offer a
competitive salary to attract highly qualified and competent candidates.
In addition, within the past few years, the City has recruited for this position and received a
limited applicant pool, suggesting that the existing salary may have contributed to challenges in
recruitment. The recommended salary adjustment is intended to address this market deficiency
and strengthen the City’s ability to recruit and retain a skilled Utilities Manager.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The adoption of a new salary range will have a minimal impact on the Fiscal Year 2025–2026
Budget, if any, due to the process to select a new candidate and the potential placement within
the range due to qualifications. The previous top of the salary range for the Utilities Manager
position was $144,088. Depending on the salary step at which a selected candidate is
appointed, the adjustment could result in a minimal impact on the approved budget. Negative
impacts are not anticipated, as there are budgetary savings resulting from the vacancy. It

Page 50 of 164

Page 60 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Approval of a Salary Range for Utilities Manager., Page 2
should be noted that the Utilities Manager position is funded through the City’s enterprise funds
and is not supported by the General Fund. Any future impacts will be addressed through the
Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Budget process, as appropriate.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
LEGAL REVIEW
This report was reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Resolution 26-XX Utilities Manager
2.
Utilities Manager - Class Specification

Page 51 of 164

Page 61 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SALARY RANGE FOR UTILITIES MANAGER
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Verne as follows:
Section 1. The City of La Verne Salary Schedule for Full-Time Employees
adopted on January 11, 2026, by the La Verne City Council is hereby amended as
follows effective April 6, 2026:
Step 1 = $127,067
Step 2 = $133,420
Step 3 = $140,091
Step 4 = $147,095
Step 5 = $154,450
Section 2. The Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to
the passage and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect
and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th of April, 2026.
________________________________
Mayor Tim Hepburn

ATTEST:

_________________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-XX was duly and regularly
adopted by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the
6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:

________________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk

Page 52 of 164

Page 62 of 173

3/30/26, 8:53 AM

City of La Verne - Class Specification Bulletin

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne

Utilities Manager
CLASS CODE

168

SALARY

$9,684.75 - $11,771.83 Monthly
$116,217.00 - $141,262.00
Annually

REVISION DATE

September 20, 2022

Class Concept
Directs, manages, supervises and coordinates the activities and operations of the water and sewer utility
divisions within the Public Works Department including the production, treatment, and distribution of water,
meter reading, sewer system operations and maintenance, coordinates assigned activities with other divisions,
departments and outside agencies; and provides highly responsible and complex administrative and technical
support to the Director of Public Works.
Administrative direction is supports by the Director of Public Works. Responsibilities include direct and indirect
supervision of water and sewer division personnel. This position may also assume the duties of the Director of
Public Works during an absence of the Director.
Examples of Duties
Essential duties and responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Assume management responsibility for assigned services and activities of the water and sewer divisions
including operation and maintenance of the water production and distribution systems, meter reading;
ensure adequate water supply for the City.

• Manage and participate in the development and implementation of objectives, policies and priorities for
assigned programs; recommend and administer policies and procedures.

• Monitor and evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery methods and procedures;
recommend, within departmental policy, appropriate service and staffing levels.

• Plan, direct, coordinate and review the work plan for operations and maintenance staff; assign work

activities, projects and programs; review and evaluate work products, methods and procedures; meet with
staff to identify and resolve problems.

• Oversee the daily operations of meter reading services.
• Review plans for development and capital improvement projects; evaluate the location of water tanks, fire
hydrants and water meters.

• Attend preconstruction meetings to discuss technical issues and ensure city standards are enforced;
coordinate with public works and associated inspectors to review construction projects daily.

• Develop bid specifications for projects and the purchase of equipment.
• Select, train, motivate and evaluate operations and maintenance personnel; provide or coordinate staff

training; work with employees to correct deficiencies; implement discipline and termination procedures.

https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/cityoflaverne/classspecs/newprint/1501722

Page 53 of 1/4
164

Page 63 of 173

3/30/26, 8:53 AM

City of La Verne - Class Specification Bulletin

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

• Oversee and participate in the development and administration of the divisions' annual budgets; participate
in the forecast of funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials and supplies; monitor and approve
expenditures; implement adjustments.

• Develops and negotiates contracts and agreements with outside agencies relative to water and/or
wastewater resources and compliance.

• Serve as the liaison for the water and sewer divisions with other divisions, departments and outside
agencies; negotiate and resolve sensitive and controversial issues.

• Serve as staff on a variety of boards, commissions and committees; prepare and present staff reports and
other necessary correspondence.

• Provide responsible staff assistance to the Director of Public Works.
• Conduct a variety of organizational studies, investigations and operational studies; recommend
modifications to water and sewer division programs, policies and procedures as appropriate.

• Attend and participate in professional group meetings; stay abreast of new trends and innovations in the
field of water distribution system operations; maintenance and development.

• Respond to and resolve difficult and sensitive citizen inquiries and complaints.
• Perform related duties as required.
Typical Qualifications
Knowledge of:

• Principles of water and wastewater utility organization and management.
• Principles and practices of water and sewer system development, operation and maintenance and
construction.

• Operation and maintenance methods/techniques as applied to municipal water supply and distribution and
wastewater collections.

• Laboratory procedures used in conducting water quality tests.
• Principles and practices of program development and administration.
• Principles and practices of municipal budget preparation and administration.
• Principles of supervision, training and performance evaluation.
• Office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and applicable software applications.
• Pertinent federal, state and local laws, codes and regulations.
• Methods and techniques of bid specification writing for projects and equipment.
Ability to:

• Oversee and participate in the management of a comprehensive water and sewer systems.
• Plan, organize and direct the work of water and sewer systems operations.
• Oversee, direct and coordinate the work of subordinate staff.
• Select, supervise, train and evaluate staff.
• Participate in the development and administration of divisions' objectives and procedures and develop
related policies.

• Ensure adequate water supply for the City.
• Maintain complex infrastructure mapping systems.
• Prepare compliance reports for local, state and federal agencies.
• Develop bid specifications for projects and the purchase of equipment.
• Read and review engineering plans and specifications.
• Prepare and administer large program budgets.
• Prepare clear and concise administrative and financial reports.
https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/cityoflaverne/classspecs/newprint/1501722

Page 54 of 2/4
164

Page 64 of 173

3/30/26, 8:53 AM

City of La Verne - Class Specification Bulletin

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

• Analyze problems, identify alternative solutions, and project consequences of proposed actions and
implement recommendations in support of goals.

• Research, analyze and evaluate new service delivery methods and techniques.
• Interpret and apply federal, state and local policies, laws and regulations.
• Operate office equipment including computers and supporting software applications.
• Communicate clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing.
• Establish and maintain effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
Experience and Education
Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely provide the required knowledge and
abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Experience
Five years of increasingly responsible water system operation, maintenance and development experience
including two years of administrative and supervisory responsibility.
Education
Equivalent to a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university with major coursework in civil
engineering, public administration or a related field.
License or Certification
Possession of, and ability to maintain, a valid California State Class C driver's license.
Possession of, and ability to maintain, certification as a California Department of Health Services Grade 4
Water Distribution Operator.
Possession of, and ability to maintain, certification as a California Department of Health Services Grade 3
Water Treatment Operator.
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS

• Ability to operate a computer, calculator, telephone, and portable radio.
• Ability to move from one point to another in the course of doing business.
• Ability to hear in the normal audio range with or without correction.
• Ability to see in the normal visual range with or without correction; vision sufficient to read computer
screens and printed documents.

• Ability to understand and verbally respond to public and staff requests for assistance, both on the
telephone and in person.

• Ability to sit for up to two hours at a time.
• Ability to lift up to 50 pounds.
• Have the stamina to work in severe weather during regular work schedules and beyond in the event of
emergencies.
Supplemental Information
THE CITY
The City of La Verne strives to maintain a full range of efficient municipal services to preserve our hometown
charm and quality of life while being responsive to the community's current and emerging needs. La Verne is a
city of more than 30,000 residents and a well-balanced community with a good mix of residential, commercial,
and industrial features. La Verne maintains a council-manager form of government. Residents in five districts
https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/cityoflaverne/classspecs/newprint/1501722

Page 55 of 3/4
164

Page 65 of 173

3/30/26, 8:53 AM

City of La Verne - Class Specification Bulletin

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

elect their district council member to represent them and oversee a total annual budget of over $71 million. The
five council members select a mayor amongst themselves. La Verne is a close-knit community that is home to
many fine institutions and facilities which include the University of La Verne (founded in 1891), Brackett Field
Airport, and public and private schools. As one of the more desirable communities in metropolitan Southern
California, La Verne is a progressive city that has retained much of its small town charm. The City is interested in
hiring an individual who exemplifies the values that make La Verne a safe, desirable, and engaged place to live.
SELECTION PROCESS
The City reserves the right to select applicants for further consideration who demonstrate the best qualifications
match for the position. Meeting the required minimum qualifications does not guarantee an applicant an
invitation to the next step(s) in the selection process. Those candidates whose experience and training most
closely match the City's needs may be invited to participate in the selection process, which may include a
combination of written exercise, panel interview, or other testing deemed appropriate.
Prior to hire, successful candidates will also be required to undergo a medical examination (including drug
screen), and credit and criminal reviews. Appointments are subject to a 12-month probationary period.
Primary communication regarding applicant status relative to this recruitment will be by e-mail; applicants are
solely responsible for monitoring their e-mail communication messages and systems. Applicants are solely
responsible for informing the City of changes in contact information, including but not limited to e-mail
addresses, mailing addresses, post office boxes, and telephone numbers.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
As required by state law, the City provides consideration for veterans who served during military actions. Eligible
veterans should notify Personnel in writing at the time of application.
Under Federal law, employees must contribute 1.45% of their gross monthly earnings for Medicare coverage.
The City will match the employee's contribution.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if special assistance to participate in this
recruitment is needed, contact the Personnel Office.
The City recruits and hires without regard to race, color, religion, physical ability or condition, sexual orientation,
gender, age, or national origin, except in those specific instances whereby a bona fide occupational qualification
demands otherwise.
The City of La Verne hires only United States citizens or lawfully authorized aliens.
The provisions of this bulletin do not constitute an express or implied contract. Any provision contained in this
bulletin may be modified or revoked without further notice.

https://www.governmentjobs.com/careers/cityoflaverne/classspecs/newprint/1501722

Page 56 of 4/4
164

Page 66 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Eric Scherer, Community Development Director

SUBJECT:

SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE
NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE
DESIGNATION FROM “PR4.5D” TO “INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES
LOCATED AT AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006,
AND AIN: 8381-012-013."

SUMMARY
City Council is asked to adopt an ordinance that changes the zone designation from “PR4.5D”
to “INSTITUTIONAL” for the sites located within the Brethren Hillcrest Homes facility located at
AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006, and AIN: 8381-012-013.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt an Ordinance, entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST
BY HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE DESIGNATION FROM “PR4.5D” TO
“INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033,
AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN: 8381-012-013."
DISCUSSION
As presented at the last meeting, the Brethren Hillcrest Gateway Project, is a proposed
expansion and update to the Hillcrest continuing care retirement community located in southern
La Verne. The project includes redevelopment of the North and South Gateway sites through
the demolition of four existing residential units, construction of seven new single-family homes,
and renovation of three existing homes. The overall project includes two additional sites, a Zone
Change site and a Master Plan Change site, which will formally integrate these properties into
Neighborhood 5 of the Hillcrest Master Plan. The proposed Gateway Project will be consistent
with the objectives of the Hillcrest Master Plan, enhance connectivity between the East and
West campuses, and provide modern, marketable homes for older adult residents. This
ordinance will adopt the rezoning of the North (2730 and 2712 Park Avenue) and South
Gateway (2681 A Street) sites and the Zone Change Site (2715, 2717, and 2719 Park Avenue),
from PR4.5D to Institutional. This zoning is consistent with the Community Facility land use
designation and the intended use as part of the Hillcrest Master Plan community.
This item was introduced for first reading at the March 16, 2026, meeting and approved by a
vote of 5-0.
FISCAL ANALYSIS

Page 57 of 164

Page 67 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Approval of this item will have no direct financial impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), finding no significant environmental impacts resulting from the project
proposal with the proposed mitigation measures, and unanimously approved by Resolution on
March 16, 2026.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
City Council Ordinance Zone Change (1)
2.
Ordinance Zone Change - Exhibit A (1)
Report Prepared By:
Candice Bowcock, Principal Planner

Page 58 of 164

Page 68 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

ORDINANCE XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CASE NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY
HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE DESIGNATION FROM
“PR4.5D” TO “INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT
AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN:
8381-012-013
WHEREAS, Brethen Hillcrest Homes has submitted an application to make
changes to the Brethren Hillcrest community by incorporating new properties into the
Master Plan community, merging parcels, and also demolishing and rebuilding
residential units (the “Brethren Hillcrest Gateway Project” or “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the overall Project involves four separate sites which need different
approvals; and
WHEREAS, these sites are referred to as the North Gateway Site, the South
Gateway Site, the Zone Change Site, and the Master Plan Site; and
WHEREAS, the North and South Gateway Sites which has seven residential
units on site will be incorporated into the Master Plan, four of these units will be
demolished and seven new units will be constructed;
WHEREAS, the approvals required for the North and South Gateway Sites are: a
General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Community Facility; a zone
change from Planned Residential to Institutional; a conditional use permit for the Master
Plan Amendment to incorporate this into Neighborhood 5 of the Master Plan; a parcel
merger for two parcels on the North Gateway Site into one parcel; and a precise plan
review to facilitate the proposed development on the North and South Gateway Sites;
and
WHEREAS, the Zone Change Site involves three existing dwelling units which
will be added to Neighborhood 5 of the Hillcrest Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the approvals required for the Zone Change Site are: a zone change
from Planned Residential to Institutional; a conditional use permit for the Master Plan
Amendment to incorporate this into Neighborhood 5 of the Master Plan; a parcel merger
for two parcels into one parcel; and
WHEREAS, the Master Plan Change Site will redesignate approximately 0.95
acres of Neighborhood 10 of the Master Plan to Neighborhood 5; and
WHEREAS, on December 9, 2025, the Development Review Committee held a
noticed, public hearing after which it approved the precise plan of design for the seven

Page 59 of 164

Page 69 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

new homes and the parcels mergers subject to all of the other approvals becoming
effective and recommended that the additional required entitlements be approved; and
WHEREAS, Sections 2.48.020 through 2.48.165 of the La Verne Municipal Code
empower the Planning Commission to recommend appropriate legislation to the City
Council regarding the orderly growth, development, and environmental character of the
community; and
WHEREAS, Sections 65453 et seq. of the California Government Code authorize
the Planning Commission to consider and recommend action to the City Council
concerning general plan changes; and
WHEREAS, a notice of a public hearing was published for the Planning
Commission meeting of February 11, 2026, on the General Plan Amendment; Zone
Change, Conditional Use Permit for the Master Plan Amendment as well as the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program; and
WHEREAS, due to a lack of quorum, the Planning Commission meeting and the
public hearing scheduled for February 11, 2026 were continued to an adjourned regular
meeting on February 24, 2026;
WHEREAS, on February 24, 2026, the Planning Commission held the public
hearing at which time it took into account all evidence presented, both written and oral;
WHEREAS, after considering all evidence presented, both oral and written, the
Planning Commission adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Master Plan Amendment and recommended
that the City Council do the same for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change;
and
WHEREAS, after considering all evidence presented, both oral and written, the
Planning Commission also approved the Master Plan Amendment subject to City
Council approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change which the Planning
Commission also recommended be adopted; and
WHEREAS, a notice of public hearing for the City Council meeting was published
in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and mailed to all owners of properties within 300 feet
of the property; and
WHEREAS, on March 16, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing on the
Zone Change and General Plan Amendment as well as the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, at which time it
considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and

Page 60 of 164

Page 70 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WHEREAS, prior to adopting this Ordinance the City Council adopted Resolution
No. 26-12 adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program and also adopted Resolution No. 26-13 amending the General Plan
land use designation for the North and South Gateway Sites;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of the City of La Verne does
hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1. WHEREAS clauses. The City Council hereby finds each of the
WHEREAS clauses stated above to be true and correct and incorporates them as
findings of fact.
Section 2. Approval. The City Council hereby approves the Zoning Change
from Planned Residential to Institutional for the following three sites as shown on Exhibit
A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference:
A.
B.
C.

North Gateway Site – AINs 8381-010-028, and 8381-010-033.
South Gateway Site – AIN 8381-010-006.
Zone Change Site – AIN 8381-012-013

Section 3. Findings. In approving these changes to Institutional the City Council
HEREBY FINDS AND DETERMINES that Case No. 114-25ZC satisfies California
Government Code Sec. 65358 and the findings of Sections 18.112.060 and 18.112.070
of the La Verne Municipal Code in that:
1. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation of the
General Plan and implements the policies of the City’s Housing Element.
2. The Zone Change serve the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare
in that it provides a foundation for allowing the development of additional senior
housing units in the Hillcrest community, thereby allowing the development of
seven new, low-impact senior residential units that will bring high quality housing
to the La Verne community.
3. The Zone Change is consistent with good city planning practices in that it
designate Hillcrest Homes property as Institutional, to be consistent with the rest
of the facility.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on the 31st
day after passage.
Section 5. Attestation. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to
the passage of this ordinance.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
-following vote:

day of ________ 2026, by the

Page 61 of 164

Page 71 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:

___________________________________
Mayor, City of La Verne

ATTEST:
_______________________________
Debra Fritz, Deputy City Clerk
Attachment:
Exhibit A – Map showing Zoning changes

Page 62 of 164

Page 72 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Exhibit A
ORDINANCE XXX
CASE NO. 114-25ZC, A REQUEST BY HILLCREST HOMES TO CHANGE THE ZONE
DESIGNATION FROM “PR4.5D” TO “INSTITUTIONAL” FOR THE SITES LOCATED AT
AIN: 8381-010-028, AIN: 8381-010-033, AIN: 8381-010-006, AND AIN: 8381-012-013

□ zc

D
D

PR4.5D
Institutional

PR4.5D

'
Page 63 of 164

Page 73 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Eric Scherer, Community Development Director

SUBJECT:

FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE UPDATES TO THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, SENATE BILL 9 TWO-UNIT
DEVELOPMENTS, URBAN LOT SPLITS, AND THE DEFINITION OF
EMERGENCY SHELTER (CASE NUMBERS 13-26ZA & 14-26ZA) AND
MAKING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
DETERMINATIONS.

SUMMARY
The proposed ordinances are presented to the City Council to update the La Verne Municipal
Code (LVMC) to ensure compliance with current State law. The updates address requirements
related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs), as well
as Senate Bill 9 (SB9) provisions governing two-unit developments, urban lot splits, and related
definitions.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council should conduct a Public Hearing, introducing by title only and waiving
further reading of the following Ordinances:
1. “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “EMERGENCY SHELTER” TO IMPLEMENT STATE
LAW AND AMENDING CHAPTER 18.22 AND SECTION 16.12.060 OF THE LA VERNE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO IMPLEMENT STATE LAWS CHANGES RELATING TO TWOUNIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND URBAN LOT SPLITS AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21 AND 66411.7 AND CEQA GUIDELINES
SECTION 15061(b)(3),” and
2. “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING THE ZONING PROVISIONS OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.17.”

DISCUSSION

Page 64 of 164

Page 74 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

These ordinances introduce minor but important updates to the La Verne Municipal Code to
ensure compliance with State mandates. The changes are outlined in the attached ordinances
(attachments 1 and 2).
SB9 Updates
• “Emergency shelter” definition revised (removed “minimal” services)
• Two-unit projects & lot splits not allowed on historic/landmark properties
• Removed prior demolition/alteration language, clarified limits in historic districts
ADU/JADU Updates
• Applications: 15-day completeness review; auto-complete if no response; appeals go to
Council (60 days)
• Standards: Square footage applies only to interior livable space
• Approvals: No combining ADUs/JADUs with other unit allowances; updated/cleaned
language
• JADUs: Owner-occupancy required if sharing facilities; no new sprinkler requirements
• Regulations: Can be rented independently (min. 31 days)
The draft ordinances were presented to the Planning Commission during a public hearing on
March 11, 2026, with the Planning Commission voting 4-0 (Commissioner Ramos was absent)
to recommend that the City Council adopt the ordinances.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The fees for processing development applications for proposed ADU and SB9 projects will be
the same as currently required for similar residential or land division projects as indicated by the
2025-26 Comprehensive Fee Schedule. The recommended action has no financial impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The ADU Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code section
21080.17 which provides CEQA does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance to implement
ADU law.
The SB9 Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the provisions of the authorizing statute,
SB9, as set forth in Government Code sections 65852.21 and 66411.7 relating to two-unit
developments and the entire Ordinance is exempt pursuant to the common sense exemption of
CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it can be seen with certainty that these changes will
have no environmental impacts as they merely incorporate what is required by state law.
No further environmental review is required at this time.
LEGAL REVIEW

Page 65 of 164

Page 75 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

The attached draft ordinances were prepared under the supervision of and reviewed by City
legal counsel for compliance with state law.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
DRAFT City Council Ordinance No. XXXX - SB9
2.
DRAFT City Council Ordinance No. XXXX - ADU
Report Prepared By:
Valerie Chin, Assistant Planner

Page 66 of 164

Page 76 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

ORDINANCE NO. 26-XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF “EMERGENCY
SHELTER” TO IMPLEMENT STATE LAW AND AMENDING CHAPTER
18.22 AND SECTION 16.12.060 OF THE LA VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE
TO IMPLEMENT STATE LAWS CHANGES RELATING TO TWO-UNIT
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS AND URBAN LOT SPLITS AND MAKING A
DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65852.21 AND
66411.7 AND CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(b)(3)
WHEREAS, State law continues to be amended relating to housing within
California, including special types of housing; and
WHEREAS, the City of La Verne wishes to amend the provisions of its Municipal
Code to be compliant with State law including AB 1061 which amended the provisions of
law relating to two-unit housing developments and urban lot splits and SB 340 which
amended the definition of an “emergency shelter”; and
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed
public hearing at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral;
and
WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted
a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing
at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, amending the La Verne Municipal Code is in the public necessity,
convenience, general welfare and required by good zoning practices as it keeps the La
Verne Municipal Code consistent with the requirements of state law;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as
substantive findings of the City Council.
SECTION 2. The definition of “emergency shelter” set forth in Section 18.08.015 of the
La Verne Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Page 67 of 164

Page 77 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

“Emergency shelter” means housing with minimal supportive services for homeless
persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person. No
individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay
(per Health and Safety Code Section 50801).
SECTION 3. Chapter 18.122 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.122 TWO-UNIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
§ 18.122.010. Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
"Housing development" means no more than two primary residential units within a singlefamily zone that meets the requirements of this chapter. The two units may consist of
two new units or one new unit and one existing unit.
“Primary unit” shall mean a residential unit that is not otherwise classified as an
accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit in accordance with Chapter
17.33.
"Unit" means any dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, a primary dwelling unit or
any unit created pursuant to this chapter, as well as an accessory dwelling unit or a
junior accessory dwelling unit, which is allowed as provided for in Chapter 18.120 of
this code.
"Urban lot split" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 16.12.060.
§ 18.122.015. Time for action on application.
A.

The city shall approve or deny an application for a housing development within
sixty days from the date of receipts of a complete application. Failure to approve
or deny within this time period shall mean the application is deemed approved.

If the city denies the application, it shall, within the sixty-day period, return in writing
a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or
deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the
applicant.

§ 18.122.020. Approval requirements.
The city shall ministerially approve a housing development containing no more than two
primary units if it meets the following requirements and those of section 18.122.030:
A.

The parcel or development is not located in any of the following areas and does
not fall within any of the following categories:
1.

As to historical properties:
a.

The development is not located in a contributing structure within a

Page 68 of 164

Page 78 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources
Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public Resources Code, or
within a site that is designated or listed as a city landmark or historic
property or district pursuant to a city ordinance; or
a.b. A parcel individually listed as a historical resource included in the State
Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public
Resources Code, or within a property individually designated or listed as a
city landmark under a city ordinance.
2.

A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic
Substances Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356,
unless the State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control
Board, or Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site for
residential use or residential mixed uses.

A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in
any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development
complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted
by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building
Standards Law and by the city's building department.

A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the one percent annual
chance flood (one-hundred-year flood) as determined by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in any official maps published by
FEMA. If an applicant is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying criteria
in order to provide that the site satisfies this subsection and is otherwise
eligible for streamlined approval under this section, the city shall not deny the
application on the basis that the applicant did not comply with any additional
permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by the city that is applicable
to that site. A development may be located on a site described in this
subsection if either of the following are met:
a. The site has been subject to a letter of map revision prepared by FEMA
and issued to the city; or
b.

The site meets FEMA requirements necessary to meet minimum
floodplain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance Program
pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and Part 60
(commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter 1 of Title 44
of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A regulatory floodway as determined by FEMA in any of its official maps,
published by FEMA unless the development has received a no-rise certification
in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. If an applicant is able to satisfy all applicable federal qualifying
criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this subsection and is
otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this section, the city shall not

Page 69 of 164

Page 79 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

deny the application on the basis that the applicant did not comply with any
additional permit requirement, standard, or action adopted by the city that is
applicable to that site.

Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community
conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation Planning
Ac (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3 of the Fish and
Game Code), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the federal Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.), or other adopted natural
resource protection plan.

Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species of
special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or species
protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Section
1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act (Chapter 1.5
(commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish and Game Code),
or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section
1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code).

Lands under conservation easement.

The proposed housing development would not require demolition or alteration of
any of the following types of housing:
1.

Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance or law that restricts
rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low, or very low
income;

Housing on a parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real property
exercised rights under Government Code Section 7060 et seq. to withdraw
accommodations from rent or lease within fifteen years before the date of the
application; or

Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

Unless demolition or alternation is prohibited pursuant to subsection B above, a
housing unit may be demolished.
C.

If a lot has not been divided as an urban lot split pursuant to section 16.12.060,
two additional units consisting of an accessory dwelling unit and junior accessory
dwelling unit may be permitted for a total of four units.

§ 18.122.030. Standards and requirements.
A.

The following objective standards for residential development currently applicable
in La Verne will be prioritized in ascending order (with subsection (A)(7), regarding
front yard setback, being of the highest priority, and subsection (A)(1), regarding
frontage, being the lowest priority) if, and only if those standards preclude two
eight-hundred-square-foot residential units from existing/being constructed as a
part of an SB 9 project:

Page 70 of 164

Page 80 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Minimum ten-foot lot frontage to street or alleyway for urban lot splits.

2.
3.
4.

Residential driveway standards as set forth in Section 18.76.060.
Minimum ten-foot building separation.
Outdoor Living. For SB 9 units in single-family zones, there must be outdoor
living spaces that meet the following requirements:
a.

Each unit shall have a separate useable outdoor living area of four
hundred square feet, with fifteen feet minimum in any direction.

Outdoor living areas and the immediate surroundings shall be landscaped.

Outdoor living areas do not include parking areas, driveways, or front and
rear yard setback areas.

Maximum lot coverage allowed by the underlying zone.

Maximum building height allowed by the underlying zone.

Front yard setback required by the underlying zone.

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the municipal code to the contrary, the
following requirements shall apply in addition to all other objective standards
applicable to the underlying zone:
1.

Setbacks.
a.

No setback shall be required for an existing structure, or a structure
constructed in the same location and within the same dimensions as an
existing structure.

Except for those circumstances described in subsection (B)(1)(a) above,
the setback for side and rear lot lines shall be four feet.

The front setback shall be that required by the underlying zone, provided
the setback does not preclude two eight-hundred-square-foot residential
units from existing on each lot.

For landlocked parcels, side yard setbacks shall apply to all property lines.

The applicant shall provide easements for the provision of public services and
facilities as required.

One parking space per unit shall be required on the lot unless the parcel is
located within one-half mile walking distance of either a high-quality transit
corridor as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21155(b) or a major
transit stop as defined in Public Resources Code Section 21064.3. The
parking space need not be covered, but tandem parking between units shall
not be allowed.
a.

If a parking space is not required, then the owner shall be required to

Page 71 of 164

Page 81 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

disclose that fact in any sales or rental agreement.
§ 18.122.040. Limitations on city actions.
A. The City may impose objective zoning, subdivision, and design review standards
that do not conflict with this chapter. However, no objective standard shall be
imposed that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of two
units on a lot or that would result in a unit size of less than eight hundred square
feet.
B. The city shall not deny an application solely because it proposes adjacent or
connected structures provided that that all building code safety standards are met,
and they are sufficient to allow a separate conveyance.
§ 18.122.050. Affidavit—Form—Contents.
An applicant for a second house on a lot shall be required to sign an affidavit in a form
approved by the city attorney to be recorded against the property stating the following:
A.

That the uses shall be limited to residential uses.

That the rental of any unit created pursuant to this chapter shall be for a minimum
of thirty- one days.

That the maximum number of primary units, as defined in Section 18.122.010, to
be allowed on the parcels is two and the maximum number of units is four.

§ 18.122.060. Denial grounds.
The city may deny the housing development on any grounds in addition to that set forth
in Section 18.122.020(A)(6) above, if the building official makes a written finding, based
upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project
would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in Government Code
Section 65589.5(d)(2), upon the public health and safety for which there is no feasible
method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact.
SECTION 4. Section 16.12.060 of the La Verne Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
§ 16.12.060. Parcel maps for urban lot splits.
A.

Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:
"Urban lot split" means a lot split of a single-family residential lot into two parcels
that meet the requirements of this section.
"Unit" for purposes of this section means any dwelling unit, including, but not
limited to, a unit created pursuant to Chapter 18.122, an accessory dwelling unit
or a junior accessory dwelling unit.

Page 72 of 164

Page 82 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Time for action on application.
1.

The city shall approve or deny an application for a lot split within sixty days
from the date of receipt of a complete application. Failure to approve or deny
within this time period shall mean that the application is deemed approved.

If the city denies the application, it shall, within the sixty-day time period, return
in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are
defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied
by the applicant.

The city shall ministerially approve a parcel map for a lot split that meets the
following requirements:
1.

The parcel is located within a single-family residential zone.

The parcel map divides an existing parcel to create no more than two new
parcels of approximately equal lot area, provided that one parcel shall not be
smaller than forty percent of the lot area of the original parcel.

Both newly created parcels are no smaller than one thousand two hundred
square feet.

The parcel is not located in any of the following areas and does not fall within
any of the following categories:
a.

A historical landmark district or property included on the State Historic
Resources Inventory, as defined in Section 5020.1 of the Public
Resources Code, or within a site that is designated or listed as a city
landmark or historic property or district pursuant to a city ordinance.

A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 or a
hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances
Control pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25356, unless the
State Department of Public Health, State Water Resources Control
Board, or Department of Toxic Substances Control has cleared the site
for residential use or residential mixed uses.

A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist
in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the
development complies with applicable seismic protection building code
standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission
under the California Building Standards Law and by the city's building
department.

Page 73 of 164

Page 83 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

paragraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this
section, the city shall not deny the application on the basis that the
applicant did not comply with any additional permit requirement,
standard, or action adopted by the city that is applicable to that site. A
development may be located on a site described in this paragraph if
either of the following are met:
i.
The site has been subject to a letter of map revision prepared by
FEMA and issued to the city; or
ii.

The site meets FEMA requirements necessary to meet minimum
floodplain management criteria of the National Flood Insurance
Program pursuant to Part 59 (commencing with Section 59.1) and
Part 60 (commencing with Section 60.1) of Subchapter B of Chapter
1 of Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

A regulatory floodway as determined by FEMA in any of its official maps,
published by FEMA unless the development has received a no-rise
certification in accordance with Section 60.3(d)(3) of Title 44 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. If an applicant is able to satisfy all applicable
federal qualifying criteria in order to provide that the site satisfies this
paragraph and is otherwise eligible for streamlined approval under this
section, the city shall not deny the application on the basis that the
applicant did not comply with any additional permit requirement, standard,
or action adopted by the city that is applicable to that site.

Lands identified for conservation in an adopted natural community
conservation plan pursuant to the Natural Community Conservation
Planning Ac (Chapter 10 (commencing with Section 2800) of Division 3
of the Fish and Game Code), habitat conservation plan pursuant to the
federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.),
or other adopted natural resource protection plan.

Habitat for protected species identified as candidate, sensitive, or species
of special status by state or federal agencies, fully protected species, or
species protected by the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. Section 1531 et seq.), the California Endangered Species Act
(Chapter 1.5 (commencing with Section 2050) of Division 3 of the Fish
and Game Code), or the Native Plant Protection Act (Chapter 10
(commencing with Section 1900) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game
Code).

Lands under a conservation easement.

The proposed lot split would not require demolition or alteration of any of the
following types of housing:
a.

Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance or law that
restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate,
low, or very low income;

Page 74 of 164

Page 84 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Housing on a parcel or parcels on which an owner of residential real
property exercised rights under Government Code Section 7060 et seq.
to withdraw accommodations from rent or lease within fifteen years before
the date of the application; or

Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years;

A contributing structure located within either a historic district that is included
on the California Register of Historical Resources or within a historic district
listed or designated pursuant to a city ordinance; or

c.e. An existing exterior structural wall of a structure located within either a
historic district that is included on the California Register of Historical
Resources or within a historic district listed or designated pursuant to a city
ordinance.
6.
D.

The lot split does not result in more than two units on a parcel.

Standards and Requirements. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
municipal code to the contrary, the following requirements shall apply:
1.

The lot split conforms to all applicable objective requirements of the
Subdivision Map Act, Title 16 (Subdivisions) and Title 18 (Zoning) of the
municipal code, except as the same are modified by this section.

No setback shall be required for an existing structure, or a structure
constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing
structure.
Except for circumstances described in subsection (C)(2) above, the setback
for side and rear lot lines shall be four feet.
The applicant shall provide easements for the provision of public services and
facilities as required.

3.
4.
5.

Landlocked parcels created by an urban lot split shall have a frontage to the
public right- of-way that is no less than ten feet in width resulting in the creation
of a flag lot, provided that requiring the frontage does not preclude two eighthundred-square-foot residential units from existing on each lot. Where a flag
lot is not possible, an access easement over the other parcel on the same map
shall be required. The easement shall be not less than ten feet in width and
must connect to the same curb cut and apron as the other parcel on the same
map.

Residential units developed on a lot created pursuant to this section shall be
subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.122.

The split of the lot will not result in less than one parking space per unit.
a.

This does not apply in either of the following instances:
i.

The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either

Page 75 of 164

Page 85 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

a high- quality transit corridor as defined in Public Resources Code
Section 21155 or a major transit stop as defined in Public Resources
Code Section 21064.3; or
ii.
b.
E.

There is a car share vehicle located within one block of the parcel.

If a parking space is not required, then the owner shall be required to
disclose that fact in any sales or rental agreement.

The city shall not require or deny an application based on any of the following:
1.

The city shall not require dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of
offsite improvements for the parcels being created as a condition of issuing a
parcel map.

The city shall not impose any subdivision standards that would have the effect
of physically precluding the construction of two units on either of the resulting
parcels or that would result in a unit size of less than eight hundred square
feet.

The city shall not require the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions
as a condition for the lot split.

The city shall not deny an application solely because it proposes adjacent or
connected structures provided that all building code safety standards are met,
and they are sufficient to allow a separate conveyance.

An applicant for an urban lot split shall be required to sign an affidavit in a form
approved by the city attorney to be recorded against the property stating the
following:
1.

That applicant intends to occupy one of the housing units as their principal
residence for a minimum of three years from the date of approval. This
requirement does not apply when the applicant is a "community land trust" or
a "qualified nonprofit corporation" as the same are defined in the Revenue and
Taxation Code.

That the uses shall be limited to residential uses.

That any rental of any unit created by the lot split shall be for a minimum of
thirty-one days.

That the maximum number of units to be allowed on each parcel is two,
including units otherwise allowed pursuant to density bonus provisions,
accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, or units allowed
pursuant to Chapter 18.122.

G. The city may deny the lot split if the building official makes a written finding, based
upon a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development
project would have a specific, adverse impact, as defined and determined in
Government Code Section 65589.5(d)(2), upon the public health and safety for

Page 76 of 164

Page 86 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific,
adverse impact.
H. This section shall not apply to:
1.

Any parcel which has been established pursuant to a lot split in accordance
with this section; or

Any parcel where the owner of the parcel being subdivided or any person
acting in concert with the owner has previously subdivided an adjacent parcel
in accordance with this section. For purposes of this section, "acting in concert"
shall include, but not be limited to, where the owner of a property proposed for
an urban lot split is the same, related to, or connected by partnership to the
owner, buyer or seller (if transferred within the previous three years) of an
adjacent lot.

SECTION 5. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the provisions
of the authorizing statute, SB 9, as set forth in Government Code sections 65852.21
and 66411.7 relating to two-unit developments and the entire Ordinance is exempt
pursuant to the common sense exemption of CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) as it
can be seen with certainty that these changes will have no environmental impacts as
they merely incorporate what is required by state law.
SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision,
paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after
adoption.
SECTION 8. Certification. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify the passage of this
ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of
said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the meeting
at which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15) days after
the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be published as required by law, in
a publication of general circulation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _____day of ______________, 2026.

______________________________________

Page 77 of 164

Page 87 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Mayor Tim Hepburn
_______________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance 26-XXX was duly and regularly adopted
by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the Xth day of
XXX, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 78 of 164

Page 88 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

ORDINANCE NO. 26-XXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ZONING PROVISIONS OF THE LA
VERNE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW AND MAKING A DETERMINATION
THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21080.17
WHEREAS, the California State legislature has continued to amend state
legislation relating to Accessory Dwelling Units (“ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling
Units (“JADUs”); and
WHEREAS, these amendments necessitate revisions in the City’s Zoning
Ordinance relating to ADUs and JADUs in order to be in compliance with the new
provisions or the state law relating to these units prevail and the City loses local control;
and
WHEREAS, on XXX, 2026, the Planning Commission of the City of La Verne held
a duly noticed public hearing at which time it considered all evidence presented, both
written and oral; and
WHEREAS, at the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted
a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to amend its regulations to comply with the current
state law; and
WHEREAS, on XXX 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at
which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral; and
WHEREAS, amending the La Verne Municipal Code is in the public necessity,
convenience, general welfare and required by good zoning practices as it keeps the La
Verne Municipal Code consistent with the requirements of state law;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated as
substantive findings of the City Council.
SECTION 2. Chapter 18.120 of the La Verne Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:

Page 79 of 164

Page 89 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

§ 18.120.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide for accessory dwelling units and junior
accessory dwelling units in accordance with the provisions of state law in order to assist
with the housing crisis.
§ 18.120.020 Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply in addition to those
definitions set forth in Government Code sections 66313 through 66342.
"Accessory dwelling unit" means an attached or detached residential dwelling unit that
provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located
on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence which includes permanent
provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation facilities on the same
parcel of land as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated. An
accessory dwelling unit also includes the following: an efficiency unit; and a
manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code.
"Detached" means where there is a physical separation between the accessory dwelling
unit and the primary unit or an accessory structure.
"Junior accessory dwelling unit" means a unit that is no more than five hundred square
feet of interior livable space in size and contained entirely within a single-family
residence or an attached structure, including a garage.
"Junior or accessory dwelling units" means that the section refers to both a junior and
accessory dwelling unit.
“Livable space” means a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including
living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation.
"Primary unit" means an existing single-family dwelling, or the larger of two proposed
units or an existing or proposed multi-family dwelling.
§ 18.120.030 Applications.

A.
The City shall determine whether an application for a junior or accessory dwelling
unit is complete within 15 business days after receipt of the application.
1.
If the City determines the application is incomplete, it shall provide the
applicant with a list of incomplete items and a description of how the application may be
made complete within the 15 business day time period.
2.
If a determination is not made within the 15 business days, the application
or any resubmitted application shall be deemed to be complete.

Page 80 of 164

Page 90 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

B.
An application for a junior or accessory dwelling unit shall be ministerially
approved or denied within sixty days of receipt of a complete application and approved
if it meets the requirements of this chapter.
1.
Notwithstanding subsection A above, if the application is submitted in
conjunction with an application for a new single-family or multifamily dwelling, the
application for the junior or accessory dwelling unit shall not be approved or denied
upon until the application for the new dwelling is acted upon.
2.

The city shall grant a delay if requested by the applicant.

3.
If the construction of an accessory dwelling unit requires demolition of a
detached garage, the demolition application shall be reviewed and issued at the same
time as the accessory dwelling unit.
4.
If the application is denied, the city shall detail in writing all items that are
defective or deficient and how the applicant can remedy the application within the same
time period as set forth above.
5.
Notwithstanding the above, if the applicant uses a plan for an accessory
dwelling unit that has been preapproved by the city or a plan that is identical to a plan
used in an application for a detached accessory dwelling unit approved by the city within
the current triennial California Building Standards Code cycle, the application shall be
approved or denied within 30 days from the date of a complete application.
CB. The city shall impose application, permit and inspection fees on accessory
dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in amounts set by resolution of the
city council.
DC. A permit application may not be denied due to the need to correct a
nonconforming zoning condition, building code violation, or unpermitted structures that
do not present a threat to the public health and safety and are not affected by the
construction of the accessory dwelling unit.
E.
Appeals. Notwithstanding anything in Title 18 to the contrary, the applicant may
appeal a denial of an application or a determination that an application is incomplete
directly to the City Council. A final written determination shall be provided to the
applicant no later than 60 business days after the receipt of the written appeal.
§ 18.120.040 Allowed zones.
A.
An application for a junior orn accessory dwelling unit shall be approved by the
community development director or the director's designee upon the director's or
designee's determination that the application meets all the requirements set out in
Section 18.120.050 in the zoning districts listed below and in specific plan areas where
residential or mixed-use development is allowed.

Page 81 of 164

Page 91 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

A-1 limited agricultural;

PR-1/5 planned residential, one detached dwelling unit/five acres;

PR-1D planned residential, one detached dwelling unit/acre;

PR-2D planned residential, two detached dwelling units/acre;

PR-3D planned residential, three detached dwelling units/acre;

6.
units/acre;

PR-4.5D planned residential, four and one-half detached dwelling

PR-5D planned residential, five detached dwelling units/acre;

PR-6A planned residential, six attached dwelling units/acre;

PR-7A planned residential, seven attached dwelling units/acre;

10.
units/acre;

PR-7.5A planned residential, seven and one-half attached dwelling

11.

PR-8A planned residential, eight attached dwelling units/acre;

12.

PR-10A planned residential, ten attached dwelling units/acre;

13.

PR-15A planned residential, fifteen attached dwelling units/acre;

C-P-D commercial-professional mixed development, where residential has
14.
been allowed by Section 18.120.060.
B.
An accessory dwelling unit may only be constructed on a lot which contains an
existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling.
C.
Accessory dwelling units shall not count in determining density or lot coverage
and are considered a residential use consistent with the existing general plan and
zoning designation for the lot.
§ 18.120.045 Location/Number.
A.

Location/Number.

Page 82 of 164

Page 92 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

requirement shall not apply if the accessory dwelling unit is being converted from a
legally existing accessory structure, including a garage, or constructed in the exact
same location and to the exact same dimensions as a legal, previously existing
accessory structure.
B.
Number.4
Only one accessory dwelling unit or one junior accessory dwelling
unit shall be allowed on a residentially zoned lot, unless otherwise permitted in
accordance with Section 18.120.060 below.
§ 18.120.050 Development standards/requirements—Accessory dwelling units.
A.

Location/Number.

1.
Accessory dwelling units shall be located only on lots with an existing or
proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling. Junior accessory dwelling units shall be
located only on lots in a single-family zone.
2.
Accessory dwelling units may be interior conversions, attached or
detached and may be located in an attached or detached garage or in an existing
accessory structure.
3
Attached and detached accessory dwelling units shall be located behind
the rear building line of the primary residence in a single-family zone. However, this
requirement shall not apply if the accessory dwelling unit is being converted from a
legally existing accessory structure, including a garage, or constructed in the exact
same location and to the exact same dimensions as a legal, previously existing
accessory structure.
4
Only one accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed on a residentially zoned
lot, unless otherwise permitted in accordance with Section 18.120.060 below.
AB. Type of Building. An attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall be a
permanent structure on a permanent foundation with permanent provisions for living,
sleeping, food preparation, sanitation, and bathing. A manufactured home as defined in
California Health and Safety Code Section 18007 shall qualify.
BC. Height. The height of an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit shall not
exceed the following limits.
1.
A detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed a maximum height of
eighteen feet if the accessory dwelling unit is on a lot with an existing or proposed
single-family or multifamily dwelling unit if located within one-half mile walking distance
of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor as those terms are defined in
Public Resources Code Section 21155. An additional two feet in height shall be allowed
to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof
pitch of the primary dwelling unit.

Page 83 of 164

Page 93 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

2.
A detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed
multifamily, multistory dwelling shall not exceed eighteen feet.
3.
An attached accessory dwelling unit shall have a maximum height of
twenty-five feet, or the height allowed for the primary dwelling, whichever is lower.
4.
An accessory dwelling unit may be built on top of a detached garage;
provided that the garage is maintained for parking and the total height of the structure
does not exceed twenty-five feet. If an accessory dwelling unit is built pursuant to this
provision, a declaration shall be recorded that the garage must be maintained for
parking.
5.
In all other cases not described in subsections 1-4, the maximum height
for an accessory dwelling unit shall be sixteen feet.
6.

No accessory dwelling unit shall exceed two stories.

C.D. Size.
1.
The maximum size of an attached or detached accessory dwelling unit is
eight hundred fifty square feet if it has zero or one bedrooms, and one thousand square
feet if it has two or more bedrooms.
2.
The minimum square footage for an attached or detached accessory
dwelling unit shall not be less than the size allowed for an efficiency unit as defined in
Health and Safety Code Section 17958.1.
3.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, development
standards shall be waived to allow an applicant to build an eight hundred square foot
accessory dwelling unit provided that the height requirements do not exceed those set
forth in subsection C above with at least four-foot side and rear yard setbacks.
4.

Junior accessory dwelling units shall not exceed 500 square feet.

E. D. Setbacks.
1.
Attached and detached accessory dwelling units shall be located behind
the rear building line of the primary residence.
2.
An accessory dwelling unit, including a unit constructed above a permitted
garage, shall have rear and side yard setbacks of at least four feet.
3.
The setback requirements in subsections E.1 and E.2 above shall not
apply if the accessory dwelling unit is being converted from an approved accessory
structure, including a garage, or being constructed in the same location and to the same
dimensions as an approved existing accessory structure, including a garage.
4.
Accessory dwelling units shall be required to comply with the requirements
of the California Building Standards Code as set forth in Chapter 15.04 of this code,
including relating to the distance between buildings. Notwithstanding the above, the

Page 84 of 164

Page 94 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

construction of an ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change unless the
building official makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that
the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and
safety.
5.
Detached accessory dwelling units shall be a minimum of ten feet from
other buildings on the same property.
6.
No portion of an accessory dwelling unit may encroach into any public or
private easement such as a utility easement unless the easement holder has provided
written permission to construct the accessory dwelling unit in the manner proposed. To
establish a rebuttable presumption of compliance with this requirement, the applicant
may provide a written declaration under penalty of perjury affirming compliance with this
requirement. The declaration shall be in a form acceptable to the city attorney.
EF. Lot Coverage. The lot coverage standards of the underlying zoning district or
specific plan area where the unit is located shall control.
FG. Outdoor Living. For accessory dwelling units in single-family zones, there must
be outdoor living spaces that meet the following requirements:
1.
Each unit shall have a separate usable outdoor living area of four hundred
square feet, with fifteen feet minimum in any direction.
2.

Outdoor living areas shall be landscaped.

3.
Outdoor living areas do not include parking areas, driveways, or front and
rear yard setback areas of the primary residence.
GH.

Parking.

1.
Parking shall be required at the rate of one space for each accessory
dwelling unit that is at least one bedroom. No parking spaces shall be required for an
accessory dwelling unit created within an existing livable space.
2.
Parking spaces may be provided through tandem parking on an existing
driveway provided that such parking does not encroach into the public sidewalk.
3.
Parking spaces for accessory dwelling units may be provided in paved
portions of setback areas provided that the amount of paving does not exceed the total
amount of paving and hardscaped areas that are otherwise allowed by this title.
4.
When a garage, carport, uncovered parking space, or covered parking
structure is demolished or converted in conjunction with the construction of an
accessory dwelling unit, such parking spaces need not be replaced.
5.
Tandem parking and parking in setback areas shall not be allowed if the
community development director makes specific findings that such parking is not

Page 85 of 164

Page 95 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical, or fire and life safety
conditions.
6.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, no parking shall be
required for the accessory dwelling unit if any of the following conditions apply:
a.
The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile walking
distance of public transit;
b.
The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and
historically significant historic district or the property is subject to the Mills Act;
c.
The accessory dwelling unit is part of a proposed or existing
primary residence or an accessory structure;
d.
When on-street parking permits are required, but not offered to the
occupant of the accessory dwelling unit;
e.
When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the
accessory dwelling unit; or
f.
When a permit application for an accessory dwelling unit is
submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling
on the same lot provided that the accessory dwelling unit or the parcel satisfies any
other criteria listed in this subsection H.6.
g.
If a parking space is not required, then the owner shall be required
to disclose that fact in any rental agreement.
IH.

Design.

1.
The accessory dwelling unit shall be of the exact same architectural style,
including roof design, windows, doors, wall treatment materials, and color as the
primary unit.
2.
The accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate entrance from the
primary dwelling unit.
3.
The accessory dwelling unit shall not alter the appearance of the primary
single-family dwelling unit.
I.J
Fire sprinklers shall only be required in any accessory dwelling unit if they were
required in the primary unit. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not
trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling.
J.K

Utilities—Connections, Fees and Capacity Charges.
1.

Attached/Interior Accessory Dwelling Units.

Page 86 of 164

Page 96 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

a.
The unit shall be connected to utilities, but a separate utility
connection shall not be required unless the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed
in connection with a proposed residential dwelling.
b.
For an accessory dwelling unit contained within a proposed or
existing single-family dwelling meeting the requirements of Section 18.20.060.A, the city
shall not impose a connection fee or capacity charge, unless the unit is being
constructed with a new single-family dwelling. For all other accessory dwelling units,
the city shall charge a connection fee or capacity charge that is proportionate to the
burden of the proposed accessory dwelling unit based on the size of the unit or number
of plumbing fixtures.
c.
No connection fees or capacity charges shall be imposed on a
homeowner applying for a permit for a previously unpermitted junior or accessory
dwelling units built before January 1, 2020, except when the utility infrastructure is
required to comply with Health and Safety Code Section 17920.3 and authorized by
Government Code Section 66324(e).
2.
Detached Accessory Dwelling Units. The unit shall be connected to
utilities, but a direct connection between the utility at the unit shall not be required
unless the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed in connection with a proposed
residential dwelling.
3.
No connection fee or capacity charge shall be imposed on a homeowner
applying for a permit for a previously unpermitted junior or accessory dwelling units built
before January 1, 2020, except when the utility infrastructure is required to comply with
Health and Safety Code section 17920.3 and authorized by Government Code section
66324(e).
K.L

Impact Fees.

1.
No impact fee shall be imposed on any accessory dwelling unit less than
seven hundred fifty square feet in size.
2.
For accessory dwelling units seven hundred fifty square feet or greater,
impact fees shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the
primary dwelling.
3.
All applicable public service and recreation impact fees shall be paid prior
to occupancy in accordance with Government Code Section 66000 et seq. and 66012 et
seq.
4.
No impact fees shall be imposed on a homeowner applying for a permit for
a previously unpermitted junior or accessory dwelling units built before January 1, 2020,
except when the utility infrastructure is required to comply with Health and Safety Code
section 17920.3 and authorized by Government Code section 66324(e).
LM.

Historic Properties.

Page 87 of 164

Page 97 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

If a primary structure is subject to a Mills Act contract with the City, construction shall
comply with the contract’s standards, including design conformance with the Secretary
of Interior Standards. Additionally, the Mills Act contract shall be amended to authorize
the accessory dwelling unit on the site.
M.
Square Footage. All references to square footage in this Chapter are based on
the square footage of interior livable space.
§ 18.120.060 Mandatory approvals.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the city shall ministerially approve
an application for any combination of the following accessory dwelling units within a
residential or mixed-use zone:
A.
One accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot within
the existing or proposed space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure.
1.
An expansion of up to one hundred fifty square feet shall be allowed in an
accessory structure solely for the purposes of accommodating ingress and egress.
2.
The junior or accessory dwelling unit shall have exterior access separate
from the existing or proposed single-family dwelling.
3.

The side and rear setbacks shall be sufficient for fire and safety.

4.
If the unit is a junior accessory dwelling unit, it shall comply with the
requirements of Sections 18.120.070 and 18.120.080 below.
B.
One detached accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot side and
rear yard setbacks on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family dwelling, provided
that the unit shall not be more than eight hundred square feet and shall not exceed the
height specified in Section 18.120.050.BC.1, C.2, , or sixteen feet in any other case.
1.
A junior accessory dwelling unit may be developed with this type of
detached accessory dwelling unit and shall comply with all requirements of
Sections 18.120.070 and 18.120.080 below.
C.
On a lot with a multifamily dwelling structure, up to twenty-five percent of the
existing multifamily dwelling units, but no less than one unit, shall be allowed within the
portions of the existing structure that are not used as livable space, including, but not
limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages,
provided that each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings.
D.
On a lot with an existing multifamily dwelling structure, up to eight detached units,
but in no event more than the number of existing units on the lot, , provided that they
meet the height requirements of Section 18.120.050.BC.1 through C.3, above, or not
exceed sixteen feet in all other cases, and have at least four-foot side and rear yard
setbacks.

Page 88 of 164

Page 98 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

E.
On a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, up to two detached units, provided
that they meet the height requirements of Section 18.120.050BC.1, C.2, or not exceed
sixteen feet in any other case, and have at least four-foot side and rear yard setbacks.
F.
The junior and accessory dwelling units authorized under this section may not be
combined with any other junior or accessory dwelling unit otherwise authorized by this
Chapter.
G.
A permit application may not be denied due to the need to correct a
nonconforming zoning condition.
HG. Fire sprinklers shall only be required in a junior or ny accessory dwelling unit if
they were required in the primary unit. The construction of a junior or n accessory
dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the
existing primary dwelling.
IH.
Rentals of a junior or n accessory dwelling unit created pursuant to this section
shall be for a minimum of thirty-one term longer than 30 days.
§ 18.120.070 Junior accessory dwelling units.
A.
One junior accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed on each lot in the singlefamily residential zone within an existing or proposed single-family dwelling, including
an attached garage. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed in conjunction with
an accessory dwelling unit as specified in Section 18.120.060.
B.
The junior accessory dwelling unit shall contain at least an efficiency kitchen
which includes cooking appliances and a food preparation counter and storage cabinets
that are of reasonable size in relation to the junior accessory dwelling unit.
C.
The junior accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate entrance from the
primary residence.
D.
The junior accessory dwelling unit may, but is not required to, include separate
sanitation facilities.
If separate sanitation facilities are not provided, the junior accessory
1.
dwelling unit shall share sanitation facilities with the single-family residence and must
have an interior entry to the main living area of the single-family residence.
1.2. If sanitation facilities are shared, the owner must reside in either the
primary unit or the junior accessory dwelling unit, unless the owner is another
governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.
E.
Fire sprinklers shall not be required in a junior accessory dwelling unit if they are
not required for the primary dwelling and the construction of a junior accessory dwelling
unit shall not trigger a requirement for sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary
unit.

Page 89 of 164

Page 99 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

No additional parking shall be required for a junior accessory dwelling unit.

G.F. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall be required to comply with applicable
building standards.
H.G. The owner of property on which a junior accessory dwelling unit is constructed
shall abide by the following and record a deed restriction which shall run with the land
and shall provide for the following:
1.
A prohibition on the sale of the junior accessory dwelling unit separate
from the sale of the single-family residence;
A prohibition from enlarging the junior accessory dwelling unit from being
2.
enlarged beyond five hundred square feet;
3.
A prohibition from renting the property for less than thirty-one consecutive,
calendar days;
A statement that the deed restrictions may be enforced against future
45.
purchasers; and
56.
A copy of the deed restriction shall be filed with the community
development department after recordation.
I.H. For the purposes of any fire or life protection ordinance or regulation, or for
providing service for water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior
accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered to be a separate or new dwelling unit.

§ 18.120.080 Regulations.
A.

Sales.

1.
Accessory dwelling units shall not be sold separately from the primary unit
unless the sale is to a qualified nonprofit corporation in accordance with the provisions
of Government Code Section 66341.
2.
Junior accessory dwelling units shall not be sold separately from the
primary unit.
B.
Rental. All junior or and accessory dwelling units may be rented separate from
the primary rented and shall be rented for a minimum of thirty-one days.
C.

Owner/Occupancy.

1.
The city shall not enforce any owner/occupancy requirement previously
imposed on an accessory dwelling unit.
2.
No accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to an owner-occupancy
requirement.

Page 90 of 164

Page 100 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

3.
All jJunior accessory dwelling units shall only have an owner/occupancy
requirement as specified in section 18.120.070.DG.4.
D.
This chapter shall in no way validate any existing illegal accessory dwelling unit
nor shall it change a legal nonconforming unit to a conforming unit.
E.

Unpermitted Accessory Dwelling Units.

1.
An application for an accessory dwelling unit to convert an illegal and/or
nonconforming accessory dwelling unit to a legal conforming accessory dwelling unit
shall be subject to the same standards and requirements as for a newly proposed unit.
2.
Notwithstanding subsection E.1 above, the city shall not deny a permit for
an unpermitted accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit constructed
before January 1, 2020 on the grounds that it is in violation of the California Building
Standards (Health and Safety Code Section 17960 et seq.) or that it does not comply
with this chapter unless the city makes a finding that correcting the violation is
necessary to comply with the standards specified in Health and Safety Code section
17920.3 or if the building is deemed substandard pursuant to Health and Safety Code
section 17920.3.
3.
The city shall inform the applicant that before submitting an application for
a permit, the homeowner may obtain a confidential third-party code inspection from a
licensed contractor to determine the unit’s existing condition or potential scope of
building improvements before submitting an application for a permit.
4.
Upon receiving an application to permit a previously unpermitted ADU or
JADU constructed before January 1, 2020, an inspector from the city may inspect the
unit for compliance with health and safety standards and provide recommendations to
comply with such standards in order to obtain a permit. The city shall not penalize an
applicant for having the unpermitted ADU or JADU and shall approve necessary permits
to correct noncompliance with health and safety standards.
F.
Guesthouses that were previously approved and which have a valid building
permit on file shall not be affected by this chapter. However, an application to convert a
guesthouse to an accessory dwelling unit shall be subject to this chapter.
G
Enforcement. Until January 1, 2030, the city shall issue a statement with a notice
to correct a violation of any building standard relating to an accessory dwelling unit that
provides substantially as follows:
You have been issued an order to correct violations or abate nuisances relating
to your accessory dwelling unit. If you believe that this correction or abatement is
not necessary to protect public health and safety, you may file an application with
the Community Development Department. If the City determines that
enforcement is not required to protect the health and safety, enforcement shall
be delayed for a period of five years from the date of the original notice.

Page 91 of 164

Page 101 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

H.
Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units shall be required to
obtain a separate address for the unit from the department of building and safety.
I.
When an accessory dwelling unit is being proposed with a new primary dwelling
unit, the city shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for an accessory dwelling unit
before it issues a certificate of occupancy for the primary dwelling unit.
SECTION 3. CEQA. This Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public
Resources Code section 21080.17 which provides CEQA does not apply to the
adoption of an ordinance to implement ADU law.
SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 31st day after
passage.
SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof is for any reason held to be
unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of
this ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have
passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision,
paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase be declared unconstitutional.
SECTION 6. Certification. The Deputy City Clerk shall certify the passage of this
ordinance and shall cause the same to be entered in the book of original ordinances of
said City; shall make a minute passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
meeting at which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within fifteen (15)
days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the same to be processed as
required by law.
SECTION 7. Transmission to HCD. The Deputy City Clerk shall send a copy of this
Ordinance to the Department of Housing and Community Development as required by
State law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _____day of __________, 2026,
by the City Council at La Verne, California.

______________________________________
Mayor Tim Hepburn
_______________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 92 of 164

Page 102 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance 26-XXX was duly and regularly adopted
by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the ____ day of
____________, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:

____________________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 93 of 164

Page 103 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Ken Domer, City Manager

SUBJECT:

UPDATE ON ROUTE 66 CENTENNIAL AND AMERICA 250 PROGRAMMING
AND APPROVAL OF PUBLIC ART FUND APPROPRIATION FOR BANNER
PROGRAM.

SUMMARY
To celebrate the Route 66 Centennial and America 250 milestones, the City has developed a
series of programming initiatives in collaboration with community groups. Implementation of the
Banner Program will require the appropriation of $25,000 from the Public Art Fund.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Receive and file this report;
2. Provide direction on the proposed programming efforts; and
3. Adopt a Resolution appropriating $25,000 of Public Art Funds from the General Capital
Improvement Fund to support the Banner Program.
DISCUSSION
Following City Council direction at the March 2 meeting, staff has advanced planning efforts for
the Route 66 Centennial and America 250 celebrations with a focus on developing costeffective, community-driven programming. As part of this effort, staff conducted outreach and
coordination meetings with key community partners, including the La Verne Historical Society,
La Verne Chamber of Commerce, La Verne Daily, and VFW Post 12034. These discussions
helped shape the programming approach, with an emphasis on local storytelling, youth and
community participation, and activities that activate both the Foothill Boulevard corridor and the
broader community.
In addition, the City has launched a dedicated web page at LaVerneCA.gov/HistoricEvents to
serve as a centralized hub for event updates, program information, and opportunities for
residents and organizations to participate or partner with the City throughout the year. Staff is
also working to finalize programming details in the near term so that information can be
included in the City’s Recreation Guide and distributed through school newsletters prior to the
end of the academic year, maximizing awareness and participation.
Route 66 Centennial Programming
Route 66 Centennial programming is centered on enhancing the Foothill Boulevard corridor and

Page 94 of 164

Page 104 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Update on Route 66 Centennial and America 250 Programming and Approval of Public Art Fund Appropriation for
Banner Program., Page 2

supporting local economic activity. Planned efforts include the installation of approximately a
dozen Route 66-branded street sign elements along Foothill Boulevard. To remain costeffective, these improvements will consist of durable, weather-resistant decals placed over
existing street signage, designed to last the life of the sign. The selected design reflects the
recognizable black-and-white Route 66 shield consistent with historic and landmark wayfinding,
creating a cohesive and authentic visual identity along the corridor.
In partnership with the La Verne Chamber of Commerce, staff is also developing a Route 66
Passport Program intended to encourage visitation to local businesses. The program is
anticipated to include approximately 20 participating businesses, where participants will visit
locations to complete their passport. Incentives, including goodie bags for the first participants
to complete the program, will be used to drive early engagement. In addition, the City plans to
collaborate with the promoter of the car shows in Old Town La Verne, Flying Deuces, to rebrand
the existing Cruisin La Verne car show event, scheduled for November 2026, to align with the
Route 66 Centennial theme and further activate the area.
America 250 Programming
America 250 programming is focused on community storytelling and local history. Planned
initiatives include an essay contest and a photo contest in partnership with La Verne Daily, with
student participation across elementary, middle, and high school levels. Winners will be formally
recognized at a City Council meeting, featured on City social media platforms, and displayed at
Veterans Hall. In addition, staff will coordinate a monthly “Highlighting La Verne History”
campaign in partnership with the La Verne Historical Society and La Verne Daily, utilizing social
media and e-newsletters to share stories of notable people and places that have shaped the
community.
To further activate community spaces and events, staff has identified opportunities to utilize the
City’s Liberty Bell as a mobile feature at multiple events throughout the year, including the
Fourth of July celebration. City staff will coordinate the safe transport of the bell using a trailer
system, allowing it to serve as a unique and interactive historical element across multiple
programs. The La Verne Historical Society will also lead a series of free community events,
including walking tours, cemetery tours, and Mills Act home tours, with the City supporting these
efforts through promotion and staffing assistance as needed.
Banner Program
The Banner Program serves as a central visual component of the City’s Route 66 Centennial
and America 250 celebrations, designed to create a cohesive identity across key corridors while
showcasing local creativity. Through a formal “Call for Artists,” the City will invite professional,
community or emerging, and youth artists to submit original artwork that reflects the themes of
Route 66 and America 250 while incorporating elements of La Verne’s history, landmarks, and
character. This approach not only enhances the visual environment of the City but also provides
a meaningful opportunity to engage local artists and students in a highly visible civic initiative.
The Banner Program is structured to ensure both artistic quality and broad community
representation. The attached draft RFP covers the program details. Staff anticipates selecting at

Page 95 of 164

Page 105 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Update on Route 66 Centennial and America 250 Programming and Approval of Public Art Fund Appropriation for
Banner Program., Page 3

least one artist from each category, professional, community or emerging, and youth, with the
flexibility to select additional designs based on the volume and quality of submissions received.
Selected designs will be reproduced and installed across multiple locations throughout the City,
including Foothill Boulevard and other prominent corridors, resulting in a consistent and
recognizable visual presence tied to both celebrations. By repeating selected designs across
multiple banners, the program maximizes visibility while maintaining cost efficiency.
To support implementation of the Banner Program, staff is requesting an appropriation of
$25,000 from the Public Art Fund. This program represents an initial activation of the City’s
broader public art efforts. Staff is currently developing a Public Art Fund Ordinance and
accompanying policy, which will be presented to the City Council in the coming months to
establish a formal framework for the use of public art funds moving forward.
Timelines
Implementation of the Banner Program and associated initiatives is structured to align with key
seasonal engagement opportunities throughout 2026. While certain efforts, such as the
“Highlighting La Verne History” campaign, will occur on a recurring monthly basis, the majority
of programming is being intentionally front-loaded in the spring and early summer. This
approach allows the City to establish early visibility, build community awareness, and ensure
that major elements are in place ahead of peak participation periods.
The Call for Artists for the Banner Program is anticipated to be released in April, with submittals
due in early May. Following review and artist selection in June, final artwork will be prepared for
production, with banner fabrication and installation targeted for early summer. Concurrently,
additional initiatives, including the essay and photo contests, Route 66 Passport Program, and
corridor enhancements, will be launched or finalized during this same timeframe.
This coordinated timeline is designed to ensure that the majority of visible and participatory
programming is fully implemented by the City’s Fourth of July celebrations, which serve as a
key milestone and high-attendance event. By establishing a strong presence by early summer,
the City is positioned to maintain momentum through the remainder of the year, with continued
programming, community events, and promotional efforts leading into the Route 66 Centennial
in November 2026. Historical Society programming will be integrated throughout the year in
alignment with their existing schedule, with specific event dates to be announced in the coming
weeks. Following the summer rollout, the City will continue to build momentum through ongoing
programming and promotions, culminating in the rebranded car show event in November 2026,
aligning with the Route 66 Centennial anniversary month.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
The proposed programming efforts have been developed with a focus on cost-effectiveness and
leveraging community partnerships. All staff time associated with the planning and
implementation of these initiatives will be absorbed within existing departmental budgets, with
priorities adjusted as needed to ensure appropriate attention is given to this programming.
Costs associated with Route 66 corridor enhancements are minimal, with approximately $750

Page 96 of 164

Page 106 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Update on Route 66 Centennial and America 250 Programming and Approval of Public Art Fund Appropriation for
Banner Program., Page 4

allocated for the installation of Route 66-branded street sign decals along Foothill Boulevard. An
additional $1,000 is anticipated to support prizes and incentives for the Route 66 Passport
Program, as well as essay and photo contest winners.
The primary cost associated with the overall programming effort is the Banner Program, a total
of $25,000. Estimated costs include approximately $12,000 for banner fabrication (based on 60
banners at approximately $200 each) and approximately $9,000 for artist stipends across
professional, community or emerging, and youth categories. Additional costs related to
installation, materials, and contingencies are anticipated. These funds will need to be
appropriated from the Public Art Fund as this is an unbudgeted expense.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Resolution Route 66 & America 250 Public Art
2.
DRAFT Banner Program RFP - Call for Artists
3.
Route 66 Centennial Passport
4.
DRAFT Essay Contest Flyer
5.
DRAFT America 250 City of La Verne Photo Contest
Report Prepared By:
Andrea Blockinger, Management Analyst

Page 97 of 164

Page 107 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 ADOPTED BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF
$25,000 WITHIN THE GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (405) FOR THE
ROUTE 66 CENTENNIAL AND AMERICA 250 PUBLIC ART PROGRAM.
WHEREAS, the City of La Verne is planning and implementing programming to
commemorate the Route 66 Centennial and America 250 milestones; and
WHEREAS, as part of these efforts, the City has developed a Banner Program to
serve as a visual and placemaking component that enhances key corridors and
showcases local creativity; and
WHEREAS, the Banner Program includes a Call for Artists, artist stipends, banner
fabrication, and installation throughout the City, including Foothill Boulevard and other
prominent locations; and
WHEREAS, the cost of the Banner Program is estimated at $25,000 and
represents an unbudgeted expense requiring appropriation; and
WHEREAS, Public Art Funds are held within the General Capital Improvement
Fund and are available for appropriation for eligible public art purposes consistent with
City objectives.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Verne
as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby amends the Fiscal Year 2025–26 Adopted
Budget to appropriate $25,000 of Public Art Funds held within the General Capital
Improvement Fund to support the Banner Program associated with the Route 66
Centennial and America 250 programming efforts.
Section 2. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to take all actions
necessary to implement the Banner Program, including execution of agreements,
selection of artists, and procurement of materials and services.
Section 3. The Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same shall take effect and be
in force.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2026.
______________________________________
Mayor Tim Hepburn

Page 98 of 164

Page 108 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

_______________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing [Resolution No. XX-XX] was duly and regularly
adopted by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting thereof held on the
6th day of April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Debra Fritz, CMC Deputy City Clerk

Page 99 of 164

Page 109 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY Of

LAVERNE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP)
CALL FOR ARTISTS – BANNER
PROGRAM FOR AMERICA 250 AND
ROUTE 66 CENTENNIAL CELEBRATIONS
PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED BY
5:00 PM ON TUESDAY, MAY 5, 2026

Page 100 of 164

Page 110 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Project Overview
The City of La Verne invites artists to submit original artwork for its 2026 Street Banner
Program in celebration of two historic milestones: the Route 66 Centennial and America
250.
This banner program reflects the City’s commitment to celebrating its past while
embracing its future.
Artists are encouraged to create designs that:
•
•
•

Celebrate the spirit and legacy of Route 66 and/or America 250
Incorporate elements of La Verne’s history, landmarks, and community character
Reflect themes of connection, identity, and shared experience

Banner artwork will be displayed along Foothill Boulevard for the Route 66 Centennial
and along Foothill Boulevard, D Street, and Bonita Avenue for the America 250
celebration. All banners will be vertically oriented at 34 inches by 72 inches and must be
designed as double-sided. The City will provide a branding guide, including approved
colors, fonts, and logos, which could be utilized in the final designs.
The City will provide a stipends in the following amounts to selected artists:
•
•
•

Professional Artists - $2,500
Community or Emerging Artists - $1,500
Youth Artists - $500

This opportunity is open to Professional Artists, Youth Artists, and Community or
Emerging Artists, with separate selections made within each category. Preference will
be given to artists residing in La Verne and the greater San Gabriel Valley. Artists may
submit up to three original design concepts; however, no more than one design per
artist will be selected. Selected designs will be reproduced and installed at multiple
locations throughout the City.
Artistic Direction
The City of La Verne’s 2026 Street Banner Program is a creative placemaking initiative
designed to celebrate two significant national milestones, the Route 66 Centennial and
America 250, while highlighting the unique character and history of La Verne.
This project invites artists to contribute designs that not only commemorate these
historic milestones, but also capture the spirit of La Verne. Artwork should reflect
themes of connection, movement, and shared history, while reinforcing the City’s smalltown charm, historic roots, and evolving culture.
Artists may submit designs under one or both of the following themes. The Route 66
Centennial theme should celebrate the legacy of one of America’s most iconic

Page 101 of 164

Page 111 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

roadways, recognizing its role in shaping travel, commerce, and cultural identity across
generations. Designs may draw inspiration from transportation, roadside culture,
Americana, and the historical significance of Route 66, particularly as it relates to
Foothill Boulevard and its role within the region.
The America 250 theme should reflect the nation’s 250th anniversary, with an emphasis
on community, identity, and shared values. Artists are encouraged to interpret this
theme broadly, incorporating ideas such as freedom, innovation, diversity, and the
evolving American story. Submissions should consider how national themes can be
expressed through a local lens, highlighting the people, places, and experiences that
define La Verne.
Across both themes, strong preference will be given to designs that incorporate
elements of La Verne’s history and identity. This may include recognizable landmarks,
local architecture, natural landscapes, historic references, or other unique features that
distinguish the community. Artwork that successfully blends national themes with local
storytelling will be especially competitive.
Designs should be bold, visually clear, and legible from a distance, recognizing that
banners will be viewed by both pedestrians and motorists. Highly detailed or intricate
compositions that may not translate well to large-scale banner format should be
avoided. Artists are encouraged to consider color, contrast, and composition carefully to
ensure the artwork is impactful within the streetscape environment.
All submitted artwork must be original and created solely by the artist.
Submittal Requirements
All application materials must be submitted electronically to the City of La Verne by the
stated deadline. Applicants shall compile all required materials into a single PDF
document and submit via email to [email protected] no later than Tuesday,
May 5, 2026, at 5:00 PM (PST). The subject line of the email should read “2026 Street
Banner Program Submission – [Artist Name]” to ensure proper routing and tracking.
Documents required for submittal include:
•
•
•

Application Form
Banner Designs (in PDF format)
Narrative for artworks

Applicants are responsible for confirming that their submission has been successfully
delivered. Late submissions or incomplete application packages will not be considered.
The City of La Verne is not responsible for technical issues, file delivery errors, or
submissions that are not received by the deadline.

Page 102 of 164

Page 112 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Questions regarding this Call for Artists may be directed to the same email address. City
staff will make reasonable efforts to respond to inquiries in a timely manner; however,
applicants are encouraged to submit questions well in advance of the deadline.
City Role
The City of La Verne will be responsible for all aspects of banner fabrication, printing,
and installation. Selected artists will be required to coordinate with the City, and if
necessary, the City’s printing vendor, to ensure that final files meet all technical
requirements and are delivered in the appropriate format and timeline.
Eligibility
The City of La Verne’s 2026 Street Banner Program is open to artists of varying
experience levels, including Professional Artists, Youth Artists, and Community or
Emerging Artists.
For the purposes of this program, artist categories are defined as follows.
•

•
•

Professional Artists are individuals with demonstrated experience in public art,
graphic design, illustration, or related creative fields, and who have a portfolio of
completed work.
Youth Artists are individuals under the age of 18 at the time of submission and
may include students or young creatives exploring artistic expression.
Community or Emerging Artists are individuals who may not have formal
professional experience but have an interest in contributing to public art and
demonstrating creativity within their community.

Selections will be made separately within each category. Multiple artists may be
selected within each category depending on the number and quality of submissions
received.
Artists may apply as individuals or as part of a team. Teams must designate a single lead
artist who will serve as the primary point of contact and will be responsible for all
communication, coordination, and receipt of stipend funds. An artist or team may submit
up to three design concepts; however, only one design per artist or team will be
selected.
Individuals who are directly involved in the administration or evaluation of this program,
including City staff and their immediate family members, are not eligible to apply. Any
potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed, and individuals with a conflict may be
disqualified from participation.

Page 103 of 164

Page 113 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

The City encourages broad participation while also prioritizing opportunities for local
creatives. Preference will be given to artists residing in La Verne and the greater San
Gabriel Valley; however, the opportunity remains open to all qualified applicants.
Through this inclusive approach, the City of La Verne seeks to elevate a diverse range
of artistic voices while ensuring a fair, transparent, and high-quality selection process.
Selection Process
Following the submission deadline, City staff will review of all applications to ensure
completeness and compliance with the requirements outlined in this Call for Artists.
Applications that are incomplete, submitted after the deadline, or do not meet the
eligibility or submission criteria may be removed from further consideration.
City staff will review and score submissions using the guidance of the following
evaluation criteria:
Artistic Quality
and Creativity
Alignment with
Theme
Connection to
La Verne
Readability and
Functionality
Feasibility and
Technical
Readiness
Local Preference

Considers the overall visual impact, originality, and composition
of the design, including effective use of color, form, and layout.
Evaluates how clearly the design reflects either the Route 66
Centennial or America 250 theme and demonstrates an
understanding of the subject matter.
Assesses how well the design incorporates elements of
La Verne’s history, landmarks, landscapes, or unique
community identity.
Measures the clarity and legibility of the design at a distance,
ensuring it is appropriate for large-scale banner display and
visible to both pedestrians and motorists.
Considers whether the design can be successfully produced
within the required specifications and constraints.
Provides additional consideration for artists residing in La Verne
or the San Gabriel Valley.

Based on scoring and overall evaluation, the City may select multiple artists within each
category, depending on the number, quality of submissions received, and available
budget. Final selections will reflect a balance of artistic styles, themes, and community
representation.
The City of La Verne reserves the right to reject any or all submissions, to waive any
informalities or irregularities in the application process, and to make selections in the
best interest of the program.
Timeline & Key Dates

Page 104 of 164

Page 114 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RFP Posting Date
Submittal Deadline
Internal Review of Submittals
Selected Artists Notified
Banners Installed

April 7, 2026
May 5 @ 6:00 PM
May 2026
June 2026
Summer 2026

Terms & Conditions
By submitting an application, artists acknowledge and agree to the terms and conditions
outlined in this Call for Artists. All submitted artwork must be original and created solely
by the applicant. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the creation of artwork is not
permitted. Artists are responsible for ensuring that their submissions do not infringe
upon any copyright, trademark, or intellectual property rights.
Selected artists will be required to provide final, production-ready artwork files that meet
all City specifications and deadlines. The City of La Verne reserves the right to request
reasonable revisions to selected designs to ensure alignment with branding guidelines,
production requirements, and overall program objectives.
The artist shall retain ownership of the original artwork; however, by participating in this
program, the artist grants the City of La Verne a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to
reproduce, display, and distribute the artwork for purposes related to the Street Banner
Program, including fabrication, installation, marketing, and promotional use.
The City of La Verne reserves the right to reject any or all submissions, to cancel or
modify the Call for Artists at any time, and to make all final decisions regarding artist
selection, design approval, and banner placement. Selection does not guarantee
installation if final artwork does not meet required specifications or program needs.
The City reserves the right to relocate, remove, or deaccession the banners when
necessary due to public safety concerns, deterioration, site redevelopment, or other
circumstances determined to be in the best interest of the City.
Participation in this program does not create an employment relationship with the City.
Selected artists may be required to enter into a formal agreement with the City prior to
receiving stipend funds.

Page 105 of 164

Page 115 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

ROUTE 66
ROUTE
66 CENTENNIAL
CENTENNIAL
PASSPORT
PASSPORT
AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
E ES
H
ER S
E

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
BU

SI
BU

N
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
BU
AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E
N

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
SI
BU

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
BU
AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E
N

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

N
BU

N
BU
AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E
N

BU
AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

AM SIN
E ES
H
ER S
E

Name:

AR
RT
PA
TIIC
CIIP
OP
TO
PA
AT
WT
TE
OW
E
HO
H

Visit participating businesses along Route 66 in La Verne and look for the hidden classic car icon
displayed inside each location. Once you find the icon, ask a staff member to stamp your
passport card. Continue exploring and collecting stamps from each participating business. Each
location will have one unique stamp. This program is designed to be fun for all ages. Take your
time, support local businesses, and enjoy exploring the community!
After collecting all required stamps, submit your completed passport to the City of La Verne to
receive a prize. Details on prize pickup locations and deadlines will be provided on the official
program materials. Complete by [date here].
Page 106 of 164

Page 116 of 173

Essay contest
Essay contest
Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY

AMERICA’S 250 ANNIVERSARY
LAVERNE

TH
AMERICA’S 250 ANNIVERSARY
TH

To celebrate, America’s 250th Anniversary, students are asked to submit
an original writing in response to the contest’s prompt:

“If Someone Visited My Neighborhood, What Would
They Learn About America?”
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
Elementary Students: Up to 100 words
Middle School: Up to 250 words
High School: Up to 500 words

SUBMISSION DEADLINE:
MAY 28, 2026 AT 5 PM
Email submissions to:
[email protected]
Submissions may also be
dropped of at City Hall, 3660
D Street
Call (909) 596-8726
for further questions

W inning
l
l
i
w
s
t
n
e
d
u
t
s
receive a gift '
e
b
d
n
a
t
e
k
s
a
b
a
t
a
d
e
z
i
n
g
reco
C ity Counci l
l
l
e
w
s
a
,
g
n
i
t
mee
n
o
d
e
r
u
t
a
e
f
as
l
a
i
c
o
s
s
’
y
t
i
C
the
.
s
m
r
o
f
t
a
l
p
a
i
d
me

Page 107 of 164

Page 117 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CITY OF LA
VERNE
TH
TH

AMERICA’S 250 ANNIVERSARY
AMERICA’S 250 ANNIVERSARY

PHOTO CONTEST

t of
e hear
h
t
e
r
u
Capt La Verne!

Show
us a
that yreas of La
V
ou en
joy! erne

Looking for something to do this summer? Explore La Verne, take
pictures of the highlights of La Verne, and submit for the City’s
photo contest!
Timeline: Open from April 13 through May 28
Categories: La Verne Landmarks & Legacy, Faces of La Verne,
La Verne Patriotic Moments, and La Verne Community
Prize: Winners will receive a gift bag, be featured on the City’s
social media accounts and newsletter, and be recognized at a
City Council Meeting.
To learn more about the contest requirements and submit your
picture, please visit laverneca.gov/historicevents.
Page 108 of 164

Page 118 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Ken Domer, City Manager

SUBJECT:

BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEASURE A - JUNE 2026 ELECTION.

SUMMARY
The Bonita Unified School District has placed Measure A on the June 2, 2026, ballot to
authorize $256 million in bonds for school facility repairs and upgrades, subject to Proposition
39 accountability requirements and a projected tax rate of $59 per $100,000 of assessed value.
At the March 2, 2026, City Council meeting, Mayor Tim Hepburn and Council Member Rick
Crosby requested the measure be brought forward for Council discussion and consideration of
support.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt a resolution in support for the Bonita Unified School District
Measure A Bond Measure.
DISCUSSION
The Bonita Unified School District Board of Education has adopted a resolution calling for a
bond measure (Measure A) to be placed before voters on June 2, 2026, seeking authorization
to issue up to $256 million in general obligation bonds to fund school facility improvements.
The measure proposes to levy an estimated tax rate of $59 per $100,000 of assessed property
value, generating approximately $16 million annually within the District boundaries
encompassing San Dimas and La Verne, while the bonds are outstanding. Bond proceeds
would be used for capital projects such as repairing and modernizing aging school facilities,
replacing outdated heating and cooling systems, addressing health and safety issues (including
removal of hazardous materials), upgrading classrooms and infrastructure, and enhancing
career technical education and science facilities.
The measure includes accountability provisions required under Proposition 39, such as
independent annual financial and performance audits, public disclosure of expenditures, and
the establishment of a citizens’ oversight committee, and limits the use of funds to facilityrelated purposes only, excluding salaries and operational expenses. At the March 2, 2026, City
Council meeting, Mayor Tim Hepburn and Council Member Rick Crosby discussed potential
support for the Bonita Unified School District’s Bond Measure A and requested that the item be
brought forward for City Council consideration. A draft resolution in support of the bond
measure is attached.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.

Page 109 of 164

Page 119 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Bonita Unified School District Measure A - June 2026 Election., Page 2

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Not applicable.
LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Resolution to Support BUSD Measure A
2.
BUSD Resolution 2026-22 Ordering an Election
Report Prepared By:
Andrea Blockinger, Management Analyst

Page 110 of 164

Page 120 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RESOLUTION NO. 26-xx
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA VERNE,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
MEASURE A.
WHEREAS, the Bonita Unified School District has called for the
placement of Measure A on the June 2, 2026 ballot, seeking voter authorization
to issue up to $256,000,000 in general obligation bonds to fund school facility
improvements; and,
WHEREAS, Measure A proposes to fund capital improvements including
the repair, modernization, and upgrading of aging school facilities, replacement
of outdated heating and cooling systems, removal of hazardous materials, and
enhancement of science, technology, and career technical education
classrooms and facilities; and,
WHEREAS, Measure A includes accountability safeguards required
under Proposition 39, including independent annual financial and performance
audits, public disclosure of expenditures, and the establishment of a citizens’
oversight committee to ensure funds are spent as intended; and,
WHEREAS, the quality of local schools contributes to the overall vitality
of the community, supports student success, and helps maintain property
values and economic stability; and
WHEREAS, the City of La Verne and Bonita Unified School District share
a commitment to serving the community and supporting educational
opportunities for residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of La Verne as follows:
Section 1. The City Council expresses its support for Bonita Unified
School District Measure A, which will appear on the June 2, 2026 ballot.
Section 2. The City Council encourages residents of the community
to review the information provided by the Bonita Unified School District
regarding Measure A and to participate in the upcoming election.
Section 3. That the Mayor shall sign and the Deputy City Clerk shall
certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and thereupon the same
shall take effect and be in force.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of April, 2026.

Page 111 of 164

Page 121 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Mayor Tim Hepburn

ATTEST:
____________________________
Debra Fritz CMC, Deputy City Clerk

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-XX was duly and
regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of La Verne at a meeting
thereof held on the 6th day of April 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:

x.
x.
x.
x.

____________________________________
Debra Fritz CMC, Deputy City Clerk

Page 112 of 164

Page 122 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-22
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE
BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ORDERING AN
ELECTION, AND ESTABLISHING SPECIFICATIONS OF
THE ELECTION ORDER
WHEREAS, the Board of Education of the Bonita Unified School District (the "District") is
devoted to improving the quality of education in our local public schools by providing classrooms
that are clean and safe by removing hazardous materials, like asbestos and lead paint from older
schools, and by upgrading electrical systems and wiring; and
WHEREAS, since many District schools were built more than 55 years ago, with some that
are 80 to 125 years old, additional resources are necessary to make urgent and basic improvements,
such as replacing 40-year-old heating and air conditioning systems that are expensive to repair,
repairing leaky roofs, and upgrading· more than 55-year-old plumbing· systems; so that students can
learn in a healthy and safe environment; and
WHEREAS, the Board has detennined that schools within the District need to be upgraded,
repaired, expanded, improved, modernized and better equipped in a fiscally prudent manner, to
enable the District to improve accessibility for students with disabilities, retain and attract quality
teachers, and enhance classes that introduce students to skilled trades; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide modem science labs and skilled trade facilities and
equipment so students are prepared for college, in-demand careers in fields like health sciences,
engineering, and technology; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to improve student safety, campus security systems
including security fencing, cameras, emergency communications systems, smoke detectors, fire
alarms, and sprinklers; and
WHEREAS, even if community members do not have school-age children, supporting a
local bond measure is a wise investment, as good schools improve the quality of life in our
community and protect the value of our homes; and
WHEREAS, the State of California (the "State") has been unable to provide the District with
enough money for the District to adequately repair schools and upgrade classrooms to provide an
optimal learning environment for all students and District students deserve to have the same
educational opportunities as others in the region; and
WHEREAS, the District has identified the most pressing needs in each of the District's
schools to provide safe and modern classroom environments for all students; and
WHEREAS, the Board has received information regarding the possibility of a local bond
measure and its bonding capacity; and
WHEREAS, a local measure will help provide funds, that are locally controlled and cannot
be redirected by the State, to upgrade aging schools and protect student safety; and .

4915-3573-1591v4/024288-0016

Page 113 of 164

Page 123 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WHEREAS, such measure will allow local schools to upgrade and expand
career-technical education classrooms, to offer pathways to careers such as healthcare,
public safety, digital media, and hospitality, among others which will help more students be ready for
college or a career and give them an opportunity to learn the skills they will need to compete in the
work force;
WHEREAS, such measure will include public disclosure of all spending, independent
annual financial and perfonnance audits, and the fonnation of a committee of
local citizens and business owners to ensure funds are spent as promised; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2000, the voters of California approved the Smaller Classes,
Safer Schools and Financial Accountability Act ("Proposition 39") which reduced the voter threshold
for ad valorem property tax levies used to pay for debt service on bonded indebtedness to 55% of the
votes cast on a school district general obligation bond measure; and
WHEREAS, concurrent with the passage of Proposition 39, Chapter 1.5, Part 10, Division 1,
Title 1 (commencing with Section 15264) of the Education Code (the "Act") became operative and
established requirements associated with the implementation of Proposition 39; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to make certain findings herein to be applicable to this
election order and to establish certain performance audits, standards of financial accountability and
citizen oversight that are contained in Proposition 39 and the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Board and District have solicited stakeholder and community input on
school priorities from parents, teachers, staff, the community and civic leaders; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to authorize the submission of a proposition to the District's
voters at an election to authorize the issuance of bonds to pay for certain necessary improvements
and enhancements to District educational facilities which will improve the safety, health, and quality
of education for students in the District; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby determines that, in accordance with Opinion No. 04-110 of
the Attorney General of the State of California, the restrictions in Proposition 39 which prohibit any
bond money from being wasted or used for inappropriate administrative salaries or other operating
expenses of the District shall be strictly monitored by the District's Citizens' Oversight Committee;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Education Code Section 15270, based upon a projection of assessed
property valuation, the Board has determined that, if approved by voters, the tax rate levied to meet
the debt service requirements of the bonds proposed to be issued for school facilities will not exceed
the Proposition 39 limits per year per$ I 00,000 of assessed valuation of taxable property; and
WHEREAS, Elections Code Section 9400 et seq. requires that a tax rate statement be
contained in all official materials relating to the election, including any ballot pamphlet prepared,
sponsored, or distributed by the District; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to authorize the filing of a tax rate statement and a ballot
argument in favor of the proposition to be submitted to the voters at the election; and

4915-3573-l59lv4/024288-0016

Page 114 of 164

Page 124 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Elections Code, it is appropriate for the Board to request
consolidation of the election with any and all other elections to be held on Tuesday, June 2, 2026,
and to request the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters to perform certain election services for
the District.
NOW THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BONITA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS
FOLLOWS:
That the Board, pursuant to Education Code Sections 15100 et seq., 15264 et
Section 1.
seq., and Government Code Section 53506, hereby requests the Los Angeles County Registrar of
Voter to conduct an election under the provisions of Proposition 39 and the Act and submit to the
electors of the District the question of whether bonds 9f the District in the aggregate principal
amount of $256,000,000 (the "Bonds") shall be issued and sold for the purpose of raising money for
the projects described in Exhibits "A" and "B" hereto. Both exhibits are directed to be printed in the
voter pamphlet. The District's Superintendent, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to
make any changes to the text of the measure, or to the abbreviated form of the measure, as may be
convenient or necessary to comply with the intent of this Resolution, the requirements of election
officials, and requirements of law.
Section 2.

That the date of the election shall be June 2, 2026.

Section 3.
That the purpose of the election shall be for the voters in the District to vote
on a proposition, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit "A," incorporated by
reference herein, and containing the question of whether the District shall issue the Bonds to pay for
improvements to the extent permitted by such proposition. In compliance with Proposition 39
policies of the Board and the Act, the ballot propositions in Exhibits "A" and "B" are subject to the
following requirements and determinations:
(a)
that the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds shall be used only for the purposes set forth
in the ballot measure and not for any other purpose, including teacher or administrator salaries or
other school operating expenses;
(b)
that the Board, in establishing the projects set forth in Exhibit "B," evaluated the
safety, class size reduction, classroom, educational and information technology needs of the District;
(c)
that the Boar.d shall cause an annual, independent performance audit to be conducted
to ensure that the Bond monies get spent only for the projects identified in Exhibit "B" hereto;
(d)
that the Board shall cause an annual, independent financial audit of the proceeds from
the sale of Bonds to be conducted until all of the Bond proceeds have been expended;
(e)
that the Board shall appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee in compliance with
Education Code Section 15278 no later than 60 days after the Board enters the election results in its
minutes pursuant to Education Code Section 15274; and

(t)
that the tax levy authorized to secure the Bonds of this election shall not exceed the
Proposition 39 limits per $ I 00,000 of taxable property in the District when assessed valuation is
projected by the District to increase in accordance with Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

4915-3573-159lv4/024288-00J6

Page 115 of 164

Page 125 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Section 4.
That the authority for ordering the election is contained in Education Code
Sections 15100 et seq., 15264 et seq., and Government Code Section 53506.
Section S.
That the authority for the specifications of this election order is contained in
Education Code Section 5322. In connection with ordering the election pursuant to the provisions
cited above, the District has obtained reasonable and informed projections of assessed property
valuations that take into consideration projections of assessed property valuations made by the Los
Angeles County Assessor that are available to the District.
Section 6.
That the Los Angeles Registrar of Voters and the Los Angeles County Board
of Supervisors are hereby requested to consolidate the election ordered hereby with any and all other
elections to be held on June 2, 2026 within the District. As provided in Elections Code Section
l 0403, the District acknowledges that the consolidation election will be conducted in the manner
described in Elections Code Section 10418.
Section 7.
That the Secretary of the Board is hereby directed to deliver a certified copy
of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters no later than March 6, 2026.
Section 8.
That Bonds may be issued pursuant to Education Code Section 15264 et seq.
or Government Code Section 53506. The maximum rate of interest on any Bond shall not exceed the
maximum rate aJlowed by Education Code Sections 15140 to 15143, as modified by Government
Code Section 53531.
Section 9.
That the Board requests the governing body of any such other political
subdivision, or any officer otherwise authorized by law, to partially or completely consolidate such
election and to further provide that the canvass of the returns of the election be made by any body or
official authorized by law to canvass such returns, and that the Board consents to such consolidation.
The Board further authorizes the submission of a tax rate statement and primary and rebuttal
arguments, as appropriate, to be filed with the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters by the
established deadlines.

4
4915-3573-159lv4/024288-0016

Page 116 of 164

Page 126 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Section 10.
Pursuant to Education Code Section 5303 and Elections Code Section I0002,
the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County are requested to permit their Registrar of Voters to
render all services specified by Elections Code Section 10418 relating to the election, for which
services the District agrees to reimburse Los Angeles County, such services to include the
publication of a Formal Notice of School Bond Election and the mailing of the sample ballot and tax
rate statement (described in Elections Code Section 9401) pursuant to the terms of Education Code
Section 5363 and Elections Code Section 12112.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 4th day of March, 2026.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BONITA
1

157~
•

4915-3573-1591v4/024288-0016

Derek Bahmanou, President

Page 117 of 164

Page 127 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY

)
)ss
)

I, Matt Wien, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.
2026-22, which was duly adopted by the Board of Education of the Bonita Unified School District at
the meeting thereof held on the 4th day of March, 2026, and that it was so adopted by the foJlowing
vote: .
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT: /
ABSTENTIONS: /

Matt Wien, Secretary

4915-3573-159lv4/024288-0016

Page 118 of 164

Page 128 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

EXHIBIT A

Bonds-No

Bonds-Yes

A-1
4915-3573-1591v4/024288-0016

Page 119 of 164

Page 129 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

EXHIBITB
FULL TEXT BALLOT PROPOSITION
OF THE BONITA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
BOND MEASURE ELECTION JUNE 2, 2026
The following is the full proposition presented to the voters by the Bonita Unified School
District.

"Bonita Unified School District Classroom Repair, Safety, Upgrade Measure. To upgrade fire
safety, science/career training classrooms; replace 40-year old air conditioning/heating/ventilation
systems; remove hazardous materials; repair leaky roofs; repair, construct, acquire
classrooms/sites/facilities/equipment helping recruit/retain teachers, shall Bonita Unified School
District's measure authorizing $256,000,000 in bonds, at legal rates, levying $59 per $100,000 of
assessed valuation raising $16,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding be adopted, requiring
oversight/audits/spending disclosure, funds for local schools?"
PROJECT LIST
The Board of Education of the Bonita Unified School District is committed to improving the
quality of education in our local public schools by upgrading aging classrooms and improving
student safety providing safe, secure, modem classrooms, labs and technology needed to support
high quality instruction in math, science, engineering, technology and the skilled trades. To that end,
the Board evaluated the District's urgent and critical facility needs, including safety issues, class size
reduction, basic repairs, computer and information technology in developing the types of projects to
be funded by this measure as described below.

This bond includes strict accountability requirements to make sure public funds are
used appropriately. These requirements include public disclosure of all spending, independent
annual financial and performance audits, and the formation of a committee of
local citizens and business owners to ensure all spending is in line with the promises made in
the measure. What's more, by law, all funds must be used to improve our local schools and
cannot be taken by Sacramento, the County or anyone else.
In approving this Project List, the Board of Education determines that the District must:
(i)

REMOVE hazardous materials; and

(ii)

RETAIN AND ATTRACT quality teachers; and

(iii)

ENHANCE classes and equipment that introduce students to skilled

(iv)

REP AIR and upgrade leaky roofs; and

trades; and

(v) REQUIRE a transparent system of accountability, including a Project
List detailing how money will be used, a citizens' oversight committee and
public disclosure of how all funds are spent.
8-1
4915-3573-1591v4/024288-0016

Page 120 of 164

Page 130 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

The Project List includes the following types of upgrades and improvements at District
schools, facilities and sites:

LOCAL STUDENT SAFETY AND CLASSROOM REPAIR PROJECTS TO RETAIN
QUALITY TEACHERS AND IMPROVE EDUCATION

School Repair, Safety and Upgrade Proiects
Goals and Purposes:

Bonita USD schools are still relying on air conditioning and heating systems that are
more than 40 years old. During just the first week of school this year, 11 of the district's 13
air conditioning systems failed, leaving students to learn in classroom temperatures in the
80s. These outdated HVAC units break down frequently and are increasingly costly to
repair. Replacing them now is a cost-effective investment that will help ensure students
and teachers can focus on learning in safe, comfortable classrooms.
Many local schools look fme from the outside but need basic health and safety
improvements inside because they were built more than 55 years ago. Funds from this
measure will address the most urgent and basic improvements, such as replacing 40-yearold heating and air conditioning systems, repairing leaky roofs, and upgrading more than
55-year-old plumbing systems; so that students can learn in a healthy and safe environment
•

Repair and upgrade fire safety.

•

Upgrading electric sys_tems and wiring.

•

Repairing and upgrading leaky roofs.

•

Repairing gas and sewer lines.

•

Repairing deteriorating classrooms.

•

Removing hazardous materials like asbestos and lead paint.

•

Replacing 40-year old air conditioning, heating, and ventilation systems.

•

Repairing and upgrading plumbing.

•

Improving emergency communication systems.

•

Repair and upgrade school security.

B-2
491 S-3573-1 S91v4/024288-0016

Page 121 of 164

Page 131 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

UPGRADE SCIENCE/CAREER TRAINING CLASSROOMS AND LABS TO SUPPORT
HIGH QUALITY INSTRUCTION
Proiects That Improve Student Success
Goals and Purposes:
This measure will allow local schools to upgrade and expand science/career technical education
classrooms, to offer pathways to careers such as healthcare, public safety, digital media, and
hospitality, among others. This will help more students be ready for college or a career and
give them an opportunity to learn the skills they will need to compete in the work force

•

Helping ensure all high schools have modem science classrooms.

•

Enhancing classes and equipment that introduce students to skilled trades.

•

Updating career training classrooms and labs.

•

Improving accessibility for students with disabilities.

In addition to the projects listed above, the repair and renovation of each of the existing school
and District support facilities may include, but not be limited to, some or all of the following: add or
renovate student and staff restrooms; repair and upgrade electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation and
air conditioning systems; upgrade of facilities for energy efficiencies, electrical generation and
financial savings, including solar panels; improve accessibility for students, staff and the public with
disabilities; repair and replace worn-out and deteriorated roofs, windows, walls, tackboards, floors,
sinks, doors and drinking fountains/hydration stations; construct or renovate offices and facilities for
multipurpose and indoor/outdoor learning spaces, more efficient areas for professional development
and administration and for the safety of students on campuses; install wiring and electrical systems to
safely accommodate computers, technology and other electrical devices; upgrade or construct
support facilities including administrative, central kitchens, physical education, music, art, and
perfonning and fine arts classrooms or facilities, science, robotics, computer labs/classrooms, career
technical facilities, media centers/libraries and buildings, covered eating areas, shade and rain shelter,
playgrounds, administrative, transportation and maintenance facilities and yards; acquire
modular/portable classrooms; repair and replace fire alarms, emergency communications, public
address, speaker, and security systems; improve facilities to satisfy ADA and seismic requirements;
as needed, removal of hazardous materials like asbestos and lead paint from older schools, as needed;
improve/resurface or replace asphalt, broken concrete and improve hard courts, turf, tracks, athletic
fields, irrigation, and downspout drainage systems and campus landscaping; install signage,
flagpoles, solar electric systems and fencing; expand parking and improve pick-up and drop-off areas
and crosswalks; improve all site utilities; acquire land; construct new school buildings; upgrade or
replace interior and exterior painting, floor covering, including carpets, and school facades;
demolition; upgrade kitchens, food service and school cafeterias; construct various forms of storage
and support spaces and classrooms; improve quads; repair, upgrade and install interior and exterior
lighting systems and back-up power generators; improve or replace playgrounds, play structures,
athletic fields/stadiums, lockers, gymnasiums, and facilities to support student health, fitness and
safety; construct or upgrade aquatic facilities, pools, including pool filtration systems, plaster and
decking; replace outdated fences, including security fences and security systems (including access
control systems and cameras), provide lunch shelters, indoor space for assemblies or for rainy day
B-3
491S-3573-IS91v4/024288-0016

Page 122 of 164

Page 132 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

lunch; upgrade music labs, multi-purpose rooms, learning centers and media centers; add or upgrade
parking lots including solar systems and electric vehicle charging stations. In addition to the listed
projects stated above, the Project List also includes the acquisition of a variety of instructional,
maintenance and operational equipment, including the reduction or retirement of outstanding lease
obligations and interim funding incurred to advance fund projects from the Project List; payment of
the costs of preparation of all facility planning, facility studies, assessment reviews, facility master
plan preparation and updates, environmental studies (including environmental investigation,
remediation and monitoring), design and construction documentation, DSA oversight, and temporary
housing of dislocated District activities caused by construction projects.
The upgrading of technology infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, network rewiring,
cabling, computers, portable interface devices, servers, switches, routers, modules, sound projection
systems, laser printers, scanners and copiers, digital white boards and smart boards, document
projectors, upgrade voice-over-IP, clock/telephone/ intercom systems, call manager and network
security/firewall, wireless technology systems, refresh classroom technology, miscellaneous IT and
instructional equipment, data storage, archiving and preservation, phones, identity cards and the
construction and installation of a data center in the cloud for the District's enterprise systems, such as
resource planning, websites, domain name systems, cloud applications and information security.
The budget for each project is an estimate and may be affected by factors beyond the
District's control. Some projects throughout the District may be undertaken as joint use projects in
cooperation with other local public or non-profit agencies. The final cost of each project will be
determined as plans and construction documents are finalized, construction bids are received,
construction contracts are awarded and projects are completed. Based on the final costs of each
project, certain of the projects described above may be delayed or may not be completed.
Demolition of portable classrooms and existing facilities and reconstruction of facilities scheduled
for repair and upgrade may occur, if the Board detennines that such an approach would be more costeffective in creating more enhanced and operationally efficient campuses. Necessary site
preparation/restoration may occur in connection with new construction, renovation or remodeling, or
installation or removal of relocatable or modular classrooms, including ingress and egress, removing,
replacing, or installing irrigation or drainage systems, traffic signals, sewer or utility lines, trees and
landscaping, relocating fire access roads, and acquiring any necessary easements, licenses, permits,
or rights of way to the property. The listed projects will be completed as needed. Each project is
assumed to include its share of furniture, equipment, architectural, engineering, legal fees and similar
planning costs, connection fees, program and project management, staff training expenses and a
customary contingency for unforeseen design and construction costs. Proceeds of the bonds may be
used to pay or reimburse the District for the cost of District bond audits and staff when performing
work on or necessary and incidental to bond projects. Bond proceeds shal I only be expended for the
types of projects and purposes identified herein. The District shall create an account into which
proceeds of the bonds shall be deposited and comply with the reporting requirements of Government
Code § 53410.
********

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY
TIIlS MEASURE REQUIRES A CLEAR SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTABILITY,
INCLUDING A PROJECT LIST DETAILING HOW THE MONEY WILL BE USED, A
CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, AND INDEPENDENT AUDITS TO ENSURE
MONEY IS SPENT PROPERLY.
B-4
4915-3573-l 591v4/024288-0016

Page 123 of 164

Page 133 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

In accordance with Education Code Section 15272, the Board of Education will appoint a
citizens' oversight committee and conduct annual independent audits to assure that funds are spent
only on District projects and for no other purpose. The expenditure of bond money on these projects
is subject to stringent financial accountability requirements. By law, performance and financial
audits will be performed annually, and all bond expenditures will be monitored by an independent
citizens' oversight committee to ensure that funds are spent as promised and specified. The citizens'
oversight committee must include, among others, representation of a bona fide taxpayers association,
a business organization and a senior citizens organization. No District employees or vendors are
allowed to serve on the citizens' oversight committee.
No Administrator Salaries: Proceeds from the sale of the bonds authorized by this
proposition shall be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or
replacement of school facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of school facilities, and not
for any other purpose, including teacher and school administrator salaries and other operating
expenses.

8-5
4915-3573-1591v4/024288-0016

Page 124 of 164

Page 134 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

City of La Verne,City Council
Agenda Report
DATE:

April 6, 2026

TO:

Honorable Mayor and City Council

FROM:

Cody Howing, City Engineer

SUBJECT:

SGVCOG & CITY OF POMONA PROPOSED ARROW HIGHWAY CLASS IV
BIKEWAY DESIGN.

SUMMARY
The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) and the City of Pomona are
proposing improvements on Arrow Highway that include the addition of a Class IV bikeway
among other features. At the January 20, 2026, Council Meeting, SGVCOG staff presented
conceptual details of the project with a focus on the proposed terminus for the facility in the
vicinity of the Arrow Highway and White Avenue intersection located in the City of La
Verne. Based on feedback received from City Council at that meeting, SGVCOG staff have
conducted further study of the proposed improvements and have submitted the findings for the
review and consideration of the City Council in order to complete final design.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:
1. Support coordination with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments and the City of
Pomona to advance the Class IV bikeway along Arrow Highway consistent with Pomona
City Council approved Alternative 4;
2. Confirm the preferred bikeway terminus at the White Avenue/Arrow Highway intersection
within the City of La Verne;
3. Direct staff to work with partner agencies to incorporate traffic signal modifications and
pavement rehabilitation within the City’s segment, as appropriate; and
4. Authorize staff to continue design coordination and return to the City Council with any
required agreements, cost-sharing arrangements, or approvals necessary for project
implementation.
DISCUSSION
The East San Gabriel Valley Sustainable Multimodal Improvements Project is a regional effort
led by the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) to enhance First/Last Mile
connectivity to the Metro A-Line. The project includes protected bikeways, pedestrian
improvements, ADA upgrades, and other active transportation features across multiple cities,
including Pomona, La Verne, Claremont, San Dimas, Covina, and Azusa. These improvements
support regional mobility goals by improving access to transit, neighborhoods, schools, and
commercial areas, and are consistent with Metro’s First/Last Mile Plan and the Arrow Highway
Multimodal Corridor Plan.

Page 125 of 164

Page 135 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design. , Page 2

As part of this effort, SGVCOG, in partnership with the City of Pomona, proposes to construct a
continuous two-way Class IV separated bikeway along the south side of Arrow Highway from
White Avenue in La Verne to Mountain Avenue near the Pomona/Claremont border, along with
related pedestrian improvements. The project leverages regional funding sources, including
Measure M Multi-Year Subregional Program funds and Metro Active Transportation grants,
reducing the financial burden on participating jurisdictions while enhancing connectivity to the
Pomona North A-Line station.
On November 17, 2025, the Pomona City Council approved Alternative 4 as the preferred
design concept, which shifts vehicular lanes north to accommodate a fully separated, two-way
Class IV bikeway on the south side of Arrow Highway. This design improves safety by providing
physical separation between bicyclists and vehicle traffic.
Following feedback from the January 20, 2026, La Verne City Council meeting, SGVCOG and
its consultant prepared a traffic operations analysis to evaluate the impact of the proposed lane
configuration on intersection performance, roadway capacity, and vehicle queuing. This
evaluation also considered the current traffic issues arising from the reduction of lanes from
three to two east of White Avenue shortly after the Lordsburg Court intersection and the ingress
and egress from the development. At present time during peak hours, traffic is heavier
eastbound due to the reduction of lanes, poor road conditions and lack of visible signage, and
traffic movements of vehicles entering and exiting Lordsburg Court. As such, staff wanted to
make sure that any improvements also factored in the current conditions to relieve congestion
and to propose improvement for current conditions as well as the proposed bikeway.
Project Coordination in City of La Verne
An approximately 850 linear foot portion of the proposed bikeway lies within La Verne’s right-ofway, between White Avenue and Lordsburg Court, with the proposed termination point at the
southeasterly corner of White Avenue and Arrow Highway. This location is intended to provide
connectivity to the La Verne/Fairplex station-area circulation network and support future mobility
needs associated with the planned Fairplex redevelopment.
To accommodate the proposed Class IV bikeway on the south side of Arrow Highway, portions
of the roadway will require reconfiguration. The existing eastbound merge lane east of White
Avenue would be replaced with the bikeway facility, maintaining the current curb-to-curb width.
As part of this change, the eastbound approach west of White Avenue would be modified from
three through lanes to two through lanes and one right-turn-only lane. No changes are
proposed to the existing left-turn pockets or westbound travel lanes.
Following direction from the January 20, 2026, City Council meeting, SGVCOG and its
consultant prepared a traffic operations analysis to evaluate the impact of the proposed lane
configuration on intersection performance, roadway capacity, and vehicle queuing.
The City has previously partnered with the City of Pomona on street improvement projects to
achieve cost efficiencies. In 2024, the City incorporated a portion of White Avenue south of
Arrow Highway into a Pomona-led project, allowing needed improvements to be completed at a
reduced cost through economies of scale. Similarly, the Arrow Highway segment within La
Verne currently has a pavement condition index ranging from very poor to fair, indicating that
rehabilitation will be needed in the near term to restore the roadway to a “very good” condition.

Page 126 of 164

Page 136 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design. , Page 3

By participating in this regional bikeway project and coordinating improvements beyond the
immediate project limits east of White Avenue, the City can leverage grant-funded design and
construction efficiencies, resulting in lower overall costs compared to delivering the
improvements independently. While a comprehensive rehabilitation of the entire Arrow Highway
corridor would yield additional efficiencies, the City currently has insufficient funds to implement
a full pavement rehabilitation project for the entire length of Arrow Highway. Accordingly, staff
finds that advancing pavement rehabilitation in coordination with this effort is a cost-effective
opportunity. Funding for this work can be supported through non-General funds already
appropriated for Arrow Highway improvements, making participation in this joint project both
appropriate and fiscally prudent.
Methodology
The analysis utilized 2022 traffic counts provided by City of La Verne staff and applied a
conservative 2% percent annual growth rate to forecast 2026 conditions, ensuring impacts were
not underestimated and potential impacts from the proposed changes would be magnified. As
noted in the attached traffic study, an annualized growth factor for the area is 0.6% based on
regional traffic data.
The means for assessing impacts of traffic relies on a metric known as Level of Service
(LOS). Similar to academic grades, facilities with a LOS of A indicate positive traffic conditions
while a LOS of F indicates traffic conditions that result in delays. Each LOS rating reflects a
range of values that describe the relationship between the number of peak traffic hour vehicles
and the capacity of a roadway feature. The City of La Verne has adopted guidelines for
transportation studies with the most recent update in 2020.
Arrow Highway and White Avenue Intersection Analysis
The proposed project intersection modifications affect the eastbound approach lanes. The
conversion to two through lanes and one right turn only lane at the intersection of Arrow
Highway and White Avenue have been evaluated for projected 2026 traffic conditions. The
resulting LOS in both the “build” and “no build” conditions yielded AM and PM peak traffic LOS
ratings of “B” and “D” respectively. Based on the City’s adopted guidelines, LOS “D” is
acceptable operating range for a signalized intersection.
The City’s transportation study guidelines are generally focused on development-related
impacts. While the LOS “D” rating is acceptable, the impact from the “no build” to the “build” did
increase the vehicle to capacity ratio by a factor of 0.03. Based on the guidelines, signals that
have an LOS of “D” and sustain an increase of the vehicle to capacity ratio by a factor of 0.02
will require improvements.
Notably, the traffic growth factor used in the analysis was inflated to be conservative. However,
the values noted in the study do trigger details of the City’s guidelines. Improvements resulting
from the County of Los Angeles’ upcoming Arrow Highway corridor signal coordination project
might serve as acceptable capacity enhancements without extending the SGVCOG project
scope.
Arrow Highway from White Avenue to Lordsburg Court Road Capacity Analysis
The LOS rating for the roadway segment between White Avenue and Lordsburg Court is

Page 127 of 164

Page 137 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design. , Page 4

expected to remain unchanged with the proposed reduction of one eastbound lane. The 2026
“build” operation is at LOS A, indicating conditions will remain well above the acceptable
threshold established by the City traffic study guidelines.
Elimination of the existing merge lane is also expected to enhance safety. As part of the
analysis for this area, traffic collision data was reviewed in both Pomona and La Verne. While
none of the recorded collisions in the previous five years appeared to have a correlation with
the merge, the proposed conditions streamline traffic flow for eastbound traffic on Arrow
Highway.
Lordsburg Court Residential Community Access Analysis
Inclusive of the traffic study document is a review of the queuing capacity for access to the
Lordsburg Court. Trip generation rates derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE) were used in conjunction with the observed existing conditions to evaluate the proposed
changes and potential impacts to stacking capacity at the community vehicle access
gates. Based on the analysis, it’s expected that the storage capacity outside the gates is
adequate to accommodate peak hour traffic entering and exiting the neighborhood.
Recent Arrow Highway Median Improvements
Recent median landscape improvements along Arrow Highway were designed to accommodate
potential future modifications associated with this project. Key infrastructure, including irrigation
mainlines and valves, have been positioned on the north side of the medians to minimize
potential impacts from proposed curb changes. Similarly, most planting materials were placed
to avoid conflict areas. Approximately six 15-gallon trees are located within areas that may be
affected; however, these trees are expected to be suitable for relocation to planned median
expansion areas. While some impacts to ground cover and portions of the irrigation system may
occur, the project has been designed to minimize these effects while maintaining the overall
aesthetic and compliance with grant requirements.
Traffic Analysis Findings
Based on the traffic analysis and coordination with SGVCOG and the City of Pomona, the
proposed reconfiguration of the eastbound approach at White Avenue from three through lanes
to two through lanes and one right-turn-only lane is not expected to result in unacceptable traffic
operations. Although the analysis reflects a minor increase in the vehicle-to-capacity ratio that
exceeds the City’s guideline threshold, overall intersection and corridor performance would
remain within acceptable standards. Accordingly, the key considerations for the City Council
include confirming the bikeway terminus at White Avenue, participating in limited cost-sharing
for associated improvements, and accepting long-term maintenance responsibility for the City’s
segment.
From a safety perspective, the proposed design improves conditions by eliminating an existing
merge conflict where the third eastbound lane currently drops east of the intersection. The
addition of a protected bikeway separates bicyclists from vehicular traffic on a high-speed
corridor and is expected to enhance overall safety, supported by recommended pavement
markings and visibility treatments at conflict points. Overall, the project balances multimodal
improvements with maintained traffic efficiency, resulting in no significant operational impacts
while improving safety for both motorists and bicyclists.
FISCAL ANALYSIS

Page 128 of 164

Page 138 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

SGVCOG & City of Pomona Proposed Arrow Highway Class IV Bikeway Design. , Page 5

There is no impact to the City’s General Fund for project design, permitting, or construction, as
these phases will be fully funded by SGVCOG. However, because a portion of the bikeway is
located within La Verne, the City may incur limited cost-sharing for traffic signal modifications
and will be responsible for ongoing operations and maintenance of its segment upon project
completion.
The overall First/Last Mile project is estimated at $16.1 million, with $13.9 million secured
through SGVCOG and the City of Pomona. The remaining $2.2 million funding gap associated
with Alternative 4 has been committed by the City of Pomona to ensure project delivery.
If the City elects to incorporate street improvements within its limits as part of this coordinated
effort, the estimated cost is approximately $528,100. This represents a cost savings compared
to an estimated $775,000 if the City were to complete the improvements independently. While
final costs may vary based on construction quantities, staff finds the cost estimates and
methodology provided by SGVCOG and the City of Pomona to be reasonable.
Sufficient funding is available within the Arrow Highway Rehabilitation Project (CIP No. ST2402)
to support the City’s participation in this joint regional bikeway project.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the SGVCOG is serving as the
Lead Agency for the Arrow Highway Class-IV Bikeway Project and will prepare the applicable
CEQA environmental document for the overall corridor. The cities of Pomona and La Verne are
each acting as Responsible Agencies under CEQA for the portions of the project located within
their respective city limits, as each city has discretionary approval authority over improvements
within its public right-of-way. The City’s role as a Responsible Agency will be limited to
considering the adequacy of the Lead Agency’s CEQA document as it relates to improvements
within La Verne.
LEGAL REVIEW
Not applicable.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Level of Service Analysis - Arrow Highway Bikeway Conceptual Improvements
2.
Exhibit - Large Scale Project Improvements
3.
Exhibit - Detail Scale Project Improvements
Coordinated with:
Danny Wu, Director of Public Works

Page 129 of 164

Page 139 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

1111

HRGreen.
PACIFIC

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To:

San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments

From:

Chase Keys, P.E., Project Manager

Subject:

LOS Analysis – White Avenue and Arrow Highway

Project Number:

2303225.01

Date:

March 12, 2026

PURPOSE
As part of the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) East San Gabriel Valley Sustainable
Multimodal Improvement Project (SMIP), the City of Pomona in coordination with City of La Verne will be
constructing a two-way Class-IV bikeway (also known as a two-way cycle track) along the south side of Arrow
Highway from White Avenue to Cambridge Avenue/Mountain Avenue. Currently, Arrow Highway is a six-lane
roadway with a raised median between White Avenue and Lordsburg Court within the City of La Verne. East of
Lordsburg Court, the eastbound lanes merge from three-to-two lanes. Implementation of the bikeway will require
the removal of the third travel lane on Arrow Highway in the eastbound direction between White Avenue and
Lordsburg Court.
The purpose of this memorandum is to assess the operational and safety impacts of converting the third eastbound
through/right-turn lane at the intersection of White Avenue to a right-turn only lane. This change would facilitate the
removal of the eastbound number three lane along Arrow Highway east of White Avenue.

ANALYSIS
The City of La Verne provided an approved traffic study for a mixed use project on the northwest corner of White
Avenue and Arrow Highway. Typically, counts are collected within a year of an analysis; however, at the request of
the SGVOG, counts collected from 2022 for the mixed-use project were used. Although the regional growth factor
is approximately 0.6% per year (per the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program, as referenced in
the 1941 N. White Avenue Traffic Study), a conservative 2% annual growth rate was applied to develop 2026
volumes. This higher growth rate was intentionally used to avoid underestimating potential traffic impacts and to
conservatively evaluate delay associated with the proposed lane reconfiguration. The following scenarios were
analyzed:
1. 2022 AM and PM Peak Hour
a. Existing Lane Configuration
b. Proposed Lane Reconfiguration
2. 2026 AM and PM Peak Hour
a. Existing Lane Configuration
b. Proposed Lane Reconfiguration

Page 130 of 164

Page 140 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

HRGreen.,
PACIFIC

Arrow Highway is classified as a Major Arterial in the City of La Verne General Plan and consists of:
•
•
•
•
•

Almost entirely three lanes in each direction, with a raised center median with left-turn pockets,
including the segment between White Avenue and Lordsburg Court
A transition to two eastbound lanes approximately 150 east of Lordsburg Court
Almost entirely two lanes in each direction in the City of Pomona, east of Lordsburg Court
Posted speed limits of 45 mph, west of White Avenue and 40 mph, east of White Avenue
Sidewalks on both sides and no on-street parking near the intersection of Arrow Highway and White
Avenue; east of the Lordsburg Court, on-street parking is provided by permit-only

Intersection Analysis
Existing lane geometrics at the intersection of White Avenue and Arrow Highway are shown in Figure 1 along with
volumes collected in 2022. Counts from 2022 are in Attachment A. While the regional growth factor is about 0.6%
per year (Section 3.5.2 of the 1941 White Avenue Traffic Study), 2026 volumes were calculated by applying a
conservative annual 2% growth factor to 2022 volumes. Figure 2 shows the lane geometrics with the conversion
of the shared through/right-turn lane to a right turn only lane. No counts were collected at Lordsburg Court. Trip
generation rates from the Institute of Traffic Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation Manual were used to estimate the
peak hour trips at the intersection of Arrow Highway and Lordsburg Court.

45(32)
269(360)
72(107)

Figure 1: Existing Lane Geometrics and Volumes
Existing Lane Geometrics
2022 Volumes
102(94)
502(396)
146(153)

21(100)
519(1110)
225(272)

213(171)
235(340)
167(174)

XX(YY) = AM(PM)
S = Signalized

49(35)
291(389)
78(116)

Figure 2: Future Lane Geometrics and Volumes
RTOL Lane Geometrics
2026 Volumes
110(102)
542(428)
158(165)

23(108)
561(1199)
243(294)

230(185)
254(367)
180(188)

XX(YY) = AM(PM)
S = Signalized
RTOL = Right-Turn Lane Only

Page 131 of 164

Page 141 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

HRGreen.,
PACIFIC

Based on the City of La Verne General Plan, signalized intersections that are part of the Congestion Management
Plan (CMP) network are evaluated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method of analysis. The ICU
method determines the volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios. The overall intersection v/c ratio is described as Level of
Service (LOS). LOS is presented in the form of a letter grade (A-F) that provides a qualitative estimate of the
operational efficiency or effectiveness of the intersection. Much like an academic report card, LOS A represents
the best range of operating conditions (i.e., motorists experiencing little delay or congestion) and LOS F represents
the worst (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion).
LOS D is the maximum acceptable level of service for intersections in La Verne, as established by the La Verne
Transportation Study Guidelines; however, since White Avenue and Arrow Highway is a CMP intersection the
acceptable level of service under the ICU methodology is E.
Table 1 shows the LOS corresponding to the v/c ratio for intersections and roadway segments. The ICU rating
ranges for intersections are established by Synchro versus the ranges for roadways are established by the 2010
Los Angeles County CMP Report.
Table 1: LOS and V/C Ratio
Intersection
Roadway Segment
V/C Ratio
V/C Ratio
<0.55
<0.61
0.55-0.63
0.61-0.70
0.64-0.72
0.71-0.80
0.73-0.81
0.81-0.90
0.82-0.90
0.91-1.00
0.91-1.00
>1.00

LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F

Detailed intersection LOS worksheets for 2022 Conditions are included in Attachment B. Table 2 shows the LOS
of the study intersections using 2022 volumes under both scenarios: with and without the right-turn only lane. Table
3 provides the LOS using 2026 volumes. The intersection operates at an acceptable LOS under all scenarios.
Table 2: 2022 Level of Service
2022 Without RTOL
No.

Intersection

White Avenue
and Arrow
Highway

Control
Type
Signal

AM Peak

2022 With RTOL

PM Peak

AM Peak

PM Peak

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

0.57

0.70

0.57

0.74

RTOL = Right-Turn Only Lane

Table 3: 2026 Level of Service
2026 Without RTOL
No.

Intersection

White Avenue
and Arrow
Highway

Control
Type
Signal

AM Peak

2026 With RTOL

PM Peak

AM Peak

PM Peak

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

V/C

LOS

0.61

0.75

0.60

0.78

RTOL = Right-Turn Only Lane

Page 132 of 164

Page 142 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

HRGreen.,
PACIFIC

Queuing at Lordsburg Court
At the Lordsburg Court driveway, the anticipated traffic volumes are approximately 22 trips during the morning peak
hour and 29 trips during the evening peak hour. This equates to roughly one vehicle every two minutes entering or
exiting the driveway, which is not expected to result in spillback onto Arrow Highway. A queuing analysis was
performed at the gated entrance on Lordsburg Court and Arrow Highway to determine the required storage length
to prevent vehicles from queuing and backing up onto Arrow Highway while waiting for the gate. The queuing reports
are included in Attachment C.
Table 4 summarizes the available storage length and 95th percentile queues to the gated community on Lordsburg
Court. A 22-ft car length was assumed. As shown below, all queues can be accommodated with the existing storage
lengths.
Table 4: Lordsburg Court Peak Hour Queuing Analysis
Intersection

Movement

Available Storage
Length (Feet)

AM Peak Hour
(Feet)

PM Peak Hour
(Feet)

Gated Entrance at
Lordsburg Court

Inbound Traffic
(SBT)

SBT = Southbound Through Lane

Roadway Segment Analysis
The roadway was also analyzed to determine the impact of the removal of the outer lane to accommodate the bike
way. It was analyzed using a volume to capacity ratio with a LOS assigned per Table 1. As previously discussed,
LOS D is an acceptable LOS. The daily volume of 17,108 VPD, which was collected in 2024, was used and a
conservative 2% annual growth rate was applied to obtain the 2026 daily volume. Table 4 provides a comparison
between the capacity of a 6-lane roadway versus a 4-lane roadway. As shown, the roadway would operate at an
acceptable LOS A in 2026 with a 4-lane configuration.
Table 4: Roadway Segment Capacity
Roadway
Segment

From

2024
Volume
(VPD)

Capacity
(# of
Lanes /
VPD)

2026
Volume
(VPD)

Capacity (#
of Lanes /
VPD)

2024
V/C
/LOS

2026
V/C
/LOS

Arrow
Highway

White
Avenue

Lordsburg
Court

17,108

6 / 48,000

17,792

4 / 32,000

0.35 /
A

0.56 /
A

VPD = Vehicle Per Day

Safety Analysis
Under existing conditions, the third eastbound lane terminates at Lordsburg Court, approximately 560-ft easterly
from a signalized intersection of Arrow Highway and White Avenue. East of Lordsburg, there are only two travel
lanes. There is an existing warning sign upstream of the traffic signal that indicates that through traffic must merge
left. As per the proposed improvement, converting the third eastbound through lane at Arrow Highway and White
Avenue into RTOL removes the existing unsafe merge conditions between the signal and Lordsburg Court.
Bicyclists are currently required to travel with vehicular traffic. The project will create a separate bikeway that offers
more protection from vehicular traffic in a 40-mph roadway. At intersections such as Lordsburg Court, it is

Page 133 of 164

Page 143 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

HRGreen.,
PACIFIC

recommended that green pavement markings be installed to enhance visibility of the bicyclist crossing the
intersection. Across the driveway, it’s proposed that a dashed line is painted to warn both motorists and bicyclists
that they are entering an area where paths will conflict.
Traffic collision data from the previous five years furnished by the La Verne and Pomona Police Departments
indicated there were no events of collisions that may be attributed to the merge condition. However, eliminating the
merge is expected to only improve safety in this roadway segment.

CONCLUSION
This analysis evaluated the impacts of modifying lane configurations of Arrow Highway between White Avenue and
Lordsburg Court in the City of La Verne. As part of the project, the SGVCOG, in partnership with the City of Pomona,
is proposing to construct a two-way Class-IV bikeway along the south side of Arrow Highway, necessitating the
removal of the existing third eastbound lane. To address lane transitions at the project’s western limit, the existing
eastbound shared through/right-turn lane at White Avenue will be converted to a right-turn-only lane. The analysis
indicates that, with these improvements, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service
under both existing and proposed conditions. Additionally, the project will enhance safety for bicycle users and
eliminates weaving as a result of the existing merge condition. The analysis indicates that the LOS A will continue
to be maintained in the roadway segment.
The removal of the eastbound number three lane to accommodate the bike lane is not expected to significantly
affect vehicles entering or exiting the Lordsburg community. The existing storage outside of the gates will continue
to satisfy queuing demand should the number three lane be eliminated to allow the Class-IV bikeway. To maintain
safe access, enhance pavement markings across the full-access driveway are recommended, improving visibility
for exiting drivers and aiding in gap selection. Although “Keep Clear” markings have not historically been used at
this driveway, they will be considered in the design process as part of the project along with supplemental signage
to reduce Vehicle-Bike conflicts. This approach effectively balances the addition of safe multimodal facilities while
protecting the existing flow of traffic with similar level of service and efficient residential access.

Page 134 of 164

Page 144 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Attachment A
2022 Counts (retrieved from the 1941 N. White Mixed Used Residential Project TIS)

Page 135 of 164

Page 145 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No : 1
Grouos Printed- Vehicles
Arrow Highway
White Avenue
Westbound
Northbound

White Avenue
Southbound

Arrow Highway
Eastbound

Start Time
07:00AM
07:15 AM
07:30AM
07:45AM
Total

Left I
9
11
18
9
47

Thru I
39
62
67
76
244

Riaht
3
11
14
8
36

Left I
29
26
34
49
138

Thru I
108
115
144
138
505

Riaht
19
39
29
38
125

Left I
39
42
65
54
200

Thru I
33
62
55
61
211

Riaht
15
13
31
51
110

Left I
2
2
5
2
11

Thru I
53
76
108
133
370

Riaht
21
39
56
66
182

Int. Total I
370
498
626
685
2179

08:00AM
08:15AM
08:30AM
08:45AM
Total

20
25
14
21
80

69
57
56
29
211

110
110
87
92
399

24
11
10
18
63

59
35
50
188

73
46
50
47
216

53
32
22
27
134

8
6
6
4

25
38
31
28
122

154
124
63
83
424

60
43
30
44
177

670
535
427
444
2076

04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total

25
28
29
22
104

98
81
89
90
358

10
5
8
9
32

26
27
44
41
138

98
114
106
92
410

35
19
23
24
101

51
37
36
59
183

80
92
98
70
340

39
44
53
38
174

9
22
14
21
66

253
240
280
264
1037

54
66
69
63
252

778
775
849
793
3195

05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total

30
26
19
46
121

98
83
61
66
308

8
7
13
3
31

41
27
32
20
120

96
102
87
70
355

23
24
17
20
84

43
33
46
46
168

94
78
98
76
346

48
35
43
38
164

11
54
16
12
93

302
264
256
169
991

77
63
70
74
284

871
796
758
640
3065

Grand Total I
Apprch %
Total%

352
21.9
3.3

1121
69.6
10.7

1371
8.5
1.3

518
20.2
4.9

1669
65.2
15.9

3731
14.6
3.5

739
30.4
7

1113
45.7
10.6

5821
23.9
5.5

194
5
1.8

2822
72.2
26.8

8951
22.9
8.5

8
8
7

10515

Page 136 of 164

Page 146 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No :2
White Avenue
Southbound

Arrow Highway
Westbound

Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
144
99
34
07:30AM
18
67
14
76
49
07:45AM
138
9
8
93
15
104
08:00AM
20
69
25
110
25
08:15AM
57
110
8
90
38
Total Volume
386
72
269
45
146
502
%Aoo. Total
18.7
69.7
11.7
19.5
66.9
.928
PHF
.720
.885
.750
.745
.872

White Avenue
Northbound

207

225

24
11
102
13.6
.671

159
159
750

54
59
35
213
34.6
.819

.833

Arrow Highway
Eastbound

55
61

31
51

151
166

5
2

108
133

185

154

46
235
38.2
.805

32
167
27.2
.788

113
615

6
21
2.7
.656

124
519
67.8
.843

60
43
225
29.4
.852

.831

169
201

626

222
173
765

670
535
2516

.861

.918

685

Out

72
Left

Peak Hour Data

North
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
LO-

N .c

"'n

Vehicles

Left
213

LMO]
Out

Ri ht
167

12551
Total

Page 137 of 164

Page 147 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No :3
White Avenue
Southbound

Arrow Highway
Westbound

White Avenue
Northbound
Left

Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
44
106
04:30 PM
29
126
89
8
9
04:45 PM
22
90
121
41
92
136
05:00 PM
30
98
41
8
96
05:15 PM
26
83
7
116
27
102
Total Volume
107
32
499
153
360
396
%Ann. Total
21.4
72.1
6.4
23.8
61.6
.892
.918
.889
.917
.869
.934
PHF

Thru

Arrow Highway
Eastbound

Ri ht A . Total

173

187

157
160
153
643

70
94
78
340
49.6
.867

38
48
35
174
25.4
.821

167
185
146
685

23
24
94
14.6
.979

.929

43
33
171
25
.725

14
21
11

280
264

302

390

871

264
1110
74.9
.919

63
272
18.4
.883

381
1482

796
3309

.950

100
6.7
.463

.916

69
63

363
348

849
793

White Avenue
In
Total
~
499 I 10331
Out

107
Left

Peak Hour Data

§~_t

u .!:'.f

North

...J

io
C:

:;;
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P
.... .c
"'-

Vehicles

+ gJ
CD-

"'h

::I!

Left
171

c:::zll5l
Out

Ri ht
174

14101
Total

Page 138 of 164

Page 148 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No : 1
White Avenue
Southbound
Bikes I
Peds

Start Time
07:15 AM
07:30AM
07:45AM
Total

0
0
0
0

Grouos Printed- Pedestrians and Bikes
Arrow Highway
White Avenue
Westbound
Northbound
Bikes I
Peds
Bikes I
Peds

0
1
0
1

Arrow Highway
Eastbound
Bikes I
Peds

Int. Total I

6
0
0
6

0
0
0
0

0
0
1
1

6
1
1
8

08:00AM I

o I

Total I

o I

0
0
0

2
0
1

5
3
3

04:00 PM
04:15 PM
04:30 PM

Total I
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
Grand Total
Apprch %
Total%

1
0
1

0
0
0

o I

0
0
0
0

0
1
0
1

0
0
0
0

1
0
0
1

0
0
1
1

0
0
6
6

2
1
7
10

3
30
9.7

70
71
22.6

1
50
3.2

501
3.2

4
25
12.9

121
75
38.7

3
100
9.7

Page 139 of 164

Page 149 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No :2
White Avenue
Arrow Highway
Southbound
Westbound
Peds I App. Total
Peds I App. Total
Bikes I
Start Time
Bikes I
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07: 15 AM
6
6
07:15AM
0
0
0
0
1
07:30AM
1
0
0
0
0
07:45AM
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
08:00AM
0
0
Total Volume
1
0
1
2
6
8
% APo. Total
100
0
25
75
PHF
.250
.000
.250
.500
.250
.333

Out

White Avenue
Northbound
Peds I App. Total
Bikes I

Arrow Highway
Eastbound
Peds I App. Total
Bikes I

0
0
0
0
0
0
.000

0
0
0
0
0
.000

0
0
1
0
1
100
.250

Int. Total I

0
0
1
0
1

6
1
1
2
10

.250

.417

White Avenue
In
Total

c:::]J~c=JJ
1
0
Thru Peds

Peak Hour Data

-I~□~~

North

.i:-----.
'6>c:
....
j~
: -( ~ : : : ,
~

T""

<C -:::,

rf.

+--::r

Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AMII

Out

-~
:::, -·

a,
C)

rg.
::e

II)

□{~

Peds

c=JJ

~
C.

I Pedestrians and Bikes

Thru

2"'

c=JJ
Total

\Al~I+- Ao,__ ,,_

Page 140 of 164

Page 150 of 173

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

File Name : WhiteAve_ArrowHwy_BP
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/4/2022
Page No :3
White Avenue
Southbound

Arrow Highway
Westbound

App.
Bikes I Peds I
Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
1
1
04:00 PM
0
0
0
04:15 PM
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
04:30 PM
0
0
0
04:45 PM
0
0
0
0
0
Total Volume
2
2
1
0
0
% Aoo. Total
100
0
0
100
.500
.000
.500
.000
.250
PHF
Start Time

Bikes I

App.
Total

Peds I

Out

White Avenue
Northbound

0
1
0
0
1
.250

Bikes I

Peds I

0
0
0
0
0
0
.000

Arrow Highway
Eastbound

App.
Total

Bikes I

Peds I

2
0
1
0
3
37.5
.375

2
2
1
0
5
62.5
.625

0
0
0
0
0
.000

App.
Total

Int. Total I

4
2
2
0
8

5
3
3
0
11

.500

.550

White Avenue
In
Total

c:Jil~c::::2l
2
0
Thru Peds

Peak Hour Data

]in
~
1

~~
a:,

C) C:

5::it
>,

<C "5

North
t-

-I

U~\

+--~

~_____.

Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 P'i

::,

-·

cg.

~~ □ ~

I Pedestrians and Bikes

--1 '<

,I>.![

Thru

c::::2l
Out

Peds

lAIL.:4--

c::::2l
Total

A••--116

Page 141 of 164

Page 151 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Attachment B
Level of Service Worksheets

Page 142 of 164

Page 152 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

Movement
Lane Configurations
Volume (vph)
Pedestrians
Ped Button
Pedestrian Timing (s)
Free Right
Ideal Flow
Lost Time (s)
Minimum Green (s)
Refr Cycle Length (s)
Volume Combined (vph)
Lane Utilization Factor
Turning Factor (vph)
Saturated Flow (vph)
Ped Intf Time (s)
Pedestrian Frequency (%)
Protected Option Allowed
Reference Time (s)
Adj Reference Time (s)
Permitted Option
Adj Saturation A (vph)
Reference Time A (s)
Adj Saturation B (vph
Reference Time B (s)
Reference Time (s)
Adj Reference Time (s)
Split Option
Ref Time Combined (s)
Ref Time Seperate (s)
Reference Time (s)
Adj Reference Time (s)
Summary
Protected Option (s)
Permitted Option (s)
Split Option (s)
Minimum (s)
Right Turns
Adj Reference Time (s)
Cross Thru Ref Time (s)
Oncoming Left Ref Time (s)
Combined (s)

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

213

235

167

tt
269

519

225

146

tt
502

102

1900
4.5
5.0
120
213
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
235
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
7.8
12.3

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
167
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
72
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
45
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
21
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
146
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

4.8
9.5

3.3
9.5

1.4
9.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
744
0.91
0.95
4941
0.0
0.00
Yes
18.1
22.6

No
1900
4.0
4.0
120
0
1.00
0.85
0
0.0

12.4
16.9

1900
4.5
5.0
120
269
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
8.9
13.4

0.0
0.0

9.7
14.2

1900
4.5
5.0
120
502
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
16.7
21.2

14.2
18.7
120
212.4
NA
NA

1809
7.8
NA
NA
212.4
216.9

120
71.8
NA
NA

1809
8.9
NA
NA
71.8
76.3

120
20.9
NA
NA

1647
18.1
NA
NA
20.9
25.4

120
145.6
NA
NA

1809
16.7
NA
NA
145.6
150.1

14.2
14.2
14.2
18.7

7.8
7.8
14.2
18.7

4.8
4.8
8.9
13.4

8.9
8.9
8.9
13.4

1.4
1.4
18.1
22.6

18.1
12.6
18.1
22.6

9.7
9.7
16.7
21.2

16.7
16.7
16.7
21.2

NB SB
32.1
216.9
32.1
32.1
NBR
16.9
22.6
9.5
49.0

NW SE
36.8
150.1
43.7
36.8
SBR
9.5
21.2
18.7
49.3

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
102
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

7.6
12.1

Combined

68.9

NWR
12.1
12.3
9.5
33.9

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
57.4%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

Existing AM Peak Hour

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 143 of 164

Page 153 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

171

340

174

107

tt
360

100

1110

272

153

tt
396

1900
4.5
5.0
120
171
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
340
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
11.3
15.8

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
174
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
107
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
32
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
100
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
153
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

7.1
11.6

2.4
9.5

6.6
11.1

1900
4.5
5.0
120
1382
0.91
0.97
5023
0.0
0.00
Yes
33.0
37.5

No
1900
4.0
4.0
120
0
1.00
0.85
0
0.0

12.9
17.4

1900
4.5
5.0
120
360
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
11.9
16.4

0.0
0.0

10.2
14.7

1900
4.5
5.0
120
396
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
13.1
17.6

11.4
15.9
120
170.5
NA
NA

1809
11.3
NA
NA
170.5
175.0

120
106.7
NA
NA

1809
11.9
NA
NA
106.7
111.2

120
99.7
NA
NA

1674
33.0
NA
NA
99.7
104.2

120
152.6
NA
NA

1809
13.1
NA
NA
152.6
157.1

11.4
11.4
11.4
15.9

11.3
11.3
11.4
15.9

7.1
7.1
11.9
16.4

11.9
11.9
11.9
16.4

6.6
6.6
33.0
37.5

33.0
26.5
33.0
37.5

10.2
10.2
13.1
17.6

13.1
13.1
13.1
17.6

NB SB
32.3
175.0
32.3
32.3
NBR
17.4
37.5
11.6
66.6

NW SE
52.2
157.1
55.2
52.2
SBR
9.5
17.6
15.9
43.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
94
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

7.0
11.5

Combined

84.5

NWR
11.5
15.8
11.1
38.4

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
70.4%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

Existing PM Peak Hour

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 144 of 164

Page 154 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

213

235

167

269

519

225

146

502

102

1900
4.5
5.0
120
213
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
235
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
7.8
12.3

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
167
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
72
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
45
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
21
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
146
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

4.8
9.5

3.3
9.5

1.4
9.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
519
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
17.2
21.7

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
225
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

12.4
16.9

1900
4.5
5.0
120
269
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
8.9
13.4

16.7
21.2

9.7
14.2

1900
4.5
5.0
120
502
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
16.7
21.2

14.2
18.7
120
212.4
NA
NA

1809
7.8
NA
NA
212.4
216.9

120
71.8
NA
NA

1809
8.9
NA
NA
71.8
76.3

120
20.9
NA
NA

1809
17.2
NA
NA
20.9
25.4

120
145.6
NA
NA

1809
16.7
NA
NA
145.6
150.1

14.2
14.2
14.2
18.7

7.8
7.8
14.2
18.7

4.8
4.8
8.9
13.4

8.9
8.9
8.9
13.4

1.4
1.4
17.2
21.7

17.2
17.2
17.2
21.7

9.7
9.7
16.7
21.2

16.7
16.7
16.7
21.2

NB SB
32.1
216.9
32.1
32.1
NBR
16.9
21.7
9.5
48.1

NW SE
35.9
150.1
42.9
35.9
SBR
9.5
21.2
18.7
49.3

SER
21.2
13.4
14.2
48.8

7.6
12.1

Combined

68.0
NWR
12.1
12.3
9.5
33.9

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
56.7%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

Existing AM Peak Hour (RTOL)

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
102
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 145 of 164

Page 155 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

171

340

174

107

360

100

1110

272

153

396

1900
4.5
5.0
120
171
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
340
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
11.3
15.8

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
174
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
107
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
32
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
100
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
153
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

7.1
11.6

2.4
9.5

6.6
11.1

1900
4.5
5.0
120
1110
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
36.8
41.3

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
272
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

12.9
17.4

1900
4.5
5.0
120
360
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
11.9
16.4

20.2
24.7

10.2
14.7

1900
4.5
5.0
120
396
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
13.1
17.6

11.4
15.9
120
170.5
NA
NA

1809
11.3
NA
NA
170.5
175.0

120
106.7
NA
NA

1809
11.9
NA
NA
106.7
111.2

120
99.7
NA
NA

1809
36.8
NA
NA
99.7
104.2

120
152.6
NA
NA

1809
13.1
NA
NA
152.6
157.1

11.4
11.4
11.4
15.9

11.3
11.3
11.4
15.9

7.1
7.1
11.9
16.4

11.9
11.9
11.9
16.4

6.6
6.6
36.8
41.3

36.8
36.8
36.8
41.3

10.2
10.2
13.1
17.6

13.1
13.1
13.1
17.6

NB SB
32.3
175.0
32.3
32.3
NBR
17.4
41.3
11.6
70.4

NW SE
56.0
157.1
59.0
56.0
SBR
9.5
17.6
15.9
43.0

SER
24.7
16.4
14.7
55.8

7.0
11.5

Combined

88.3
NWR
11.5
15.8
11.1
38.4

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
73.6%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

Existing PM Peak Hour (RTOL)

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
94
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 146 of 164

Page 156 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

230

254

180

tt
291

561

243

158

tt
542

110

1900
4.5
5.0
120
230
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
254
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
8.4
12.9

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
180
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
78
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
49
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
23
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
158
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

5.2
9.7

3.6
9.5

1.5
9.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
804
0.91
0.95
4941
0.0
0.00
Yes
19.5
24.0

No
1900
4.0
4.0
120
0
1.00
0.85
0
0.0

13.4
17.9

1900
4.5
5.0
120
291
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
9.6
14.1

0.0
0.0

10.5
15.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
542
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
18.0
22.5

15.3
19.8
120
229.4
NA
NA

1809
8.4
NA
NA
229.4
233.9

120
77.5
NA
NA

1809
9.6
NA
NA
77.5
82.0

120
22.6
NA
NA

1647
19.5
NA
NA
22.6
27.1

120
157.2
NA
NA

1809
18.0
NA
NA
157.2
161.7

15.3
15.3
15.3
19.8

8.4
8.4
15.3
19.8

5.2
5.2
9.6
14.1

9.6
9.6
9.6
14.1

1.5
1.5
19.5
24.0

19.5
13.6
19.5
24.0

10.5
10.5
18.0
22.5

18.0
18.0
18.0
22.5

NB SB
33.9
233.9
33.9
33.9
NBR
17.9
24.0
9.7
51.6

NW SE
39.0
161.7
46.5
39.0
SBR
9.5
22.5
19.8
51.8

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
110
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

8.2
12.7

Combined

72.9

NWR
12.7
12.9
9.5
35.1

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
60.8%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

2026 AM Peak Hour (No RTOL)

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 147 of 164

Page 157 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

185

367

188

116

tt
389

108

1199

294

165

tt
428

102

1900
4.5
5.0
120
185
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
367
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
12.2
16.7

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
188
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
116
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
35
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
108
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
165
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

7.7
12.2

2.6
9.5

7.2
11.7

1900
4.5
5.0
120
1493
0.91
0.97
5023
0.0
0.00
Yes
35.7
40.2

No
1900
4.0
4.0
120
0
1.00
0.85
0
0.0

14.0
18.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
389
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
12.9
17.4

0.0
0.0

11.0
15.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
428
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
14.2
18.7

12.3
16.8
120
184.2
NA
NA

1809
12.2
NA
NA
184.2
188.7

120
115.2
NA
NA

1809
12.9
NA
NA
115.2
119.7

120
107.7
NA
NA

1674
35.7
NA
NA
107.7
112.2

120
164.8
NA
NA

1809
14.2
NA
NA
164.8
169.3

12.3
12.3
12.3
16.8

12.2
12.2
12.3
16.8

7.7
7.7
12.9
17.4

12.9
12.9
12.9
17.4

7.2
7.2
35.7
40.2

35.7
28.6
35.7
40.2

11.0
11.0
14.2
18.7

14.2
14.2
14.2
18.7

NB SB
34.2
188.7
34.2
34.2
NBR
18.5
40.2
12.2
70.8

NW SE
55.6
169.3
58.8
55.6
SBR
9.5
18.7
16.8
45.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
102
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

7.5
12.0

Combined

89.8

NWR
12.0
16.7
11.7
40.4

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
74.8%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

2026 PM Peak Hour (No RTOL)

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 148 of 164

Page 158 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

230

254

180

291

561

243

158

542

110

1900
4.5
5.0
120
230
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
254
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
8.4
12.9

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
180
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
78
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
49
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
23
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
158
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

5.2
9.7

3.6
9.5

1.5
9.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
561
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
18.6
23.1

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
243
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

13.4
17.9

1900
4.5
5.0
120
291
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
9.6
14.1

18.1
22.6

10.5
15.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
542
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
18.0
22.5

15.3
19.8
120
229.4
NA
NA

1809
8.4
NA
NA
229.4
233.9

120
77.5
NA
NA

1809
9.6
NA
NA
77.5
82.0

120
22.6
NA
NA

1809
18.6
NA
NA
22.6
27.1

120
157.2
NA
NA

1809
18.0
NA
NA
157.2
161.7

15.3
15.3
15.3
19.8

8.4
8.4
15.3
19.8

5.2
5.2
9.6
14.1

9.6
9.6
9.6
14.1

1.5
1.5
18.6
23.1

18.6
18.6
18.6
23.1

10.5
10.5
18.0
22.5

18.0
18.0
18.0
22.5

NB SB
33.9
233.9
33.9
33.9
NBR
17.9
23.1
9.7
50.7

NW SE
38.1
161.7
45.6
38.1
SBR
9.5
22.5
19.8
51.8

SER
22.6
14.1
15.0
51.7

8.2
12.7

Combined

72.0
NWR
12.7
12.9
9.5
35.1

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
60.0%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

2026 AM Peak Hour (RTOL)

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
110
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 149 of 164

Page 159 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Intersection Capacity Utilization
3: White Ave & Arrow Hwy

02/06/2026

NBL

NBT

NBR

SBL

SBT

SBR

SEL

SET

SER

NWL

NWT

NWR

185

367

188

116

389

108

1199

294

165

428

102

1900
4.5
5.0
120
185
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
367
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
12.2
16.7

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
188
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
116
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
35
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
108
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

1900
4.5
5.0
120
165
1.00
0.95
1805
0.0

7.7
12.2

2.6
9.5

7.2
11.7

1900
4.5
5.0
120
1199
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
39.8
44.3

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
294
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

14.0
18.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
389
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
12.9
17.4

21.8
26.3

11.0
15.5

1900
4.5
5.0
120
428
0.95
1.00
3618
0.0
0.00
Yes
14.2
18.7

12.3
16.8
120
184.2
NA
NA

1809
12.2
NA
NA
184.2
188.7

120
115.2
NA
NA

1809
12.9
NA
NA
115.2
119.7

120
107.7
NA
NA

1809
39.8
NA
NA
107.7
112.2

120
164.8
NA
NA

1809
14.2
NA
NA
164.8
169.3

12.3
12.3
12.3
16.8

12.2
12.2
12.3
16.8

7.7
7.7
12.9
17.4

12.9
12.9
12.9
17.4

7.2
7.2
39.8
44.3

39.8
39.8
39.8
44.3

11.0
11.0
14.2
18.7

14.2
14.2
14.2
18.7

NB SB
34.2
188.7
34.2
34.2
NBR
18.5
44.3
12.2
74.9

NW SE
59.8
169.3
63.0
59.8
SBR
9.5
18.7
16.8
45.0

SER
26.3
17.4
15.5
59.2

7.5
12.0

Combined

93.9
NWR
12.0
16.7
11.7
40.4

Intersection Summary
Intersection Capacity Utilization
78.3%
ICU Level of Service
Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan.

2026 PM Peak Hour (RTOL)

No
1900
4.5
5.0
120
102
1.00
0.85
1615
0.0

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 150 of 164

Page 160 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

Attachment C
Queuing Analysis at Gated Community

Page 151 of 164

Page 161 of 173

Queues
9: Lordsburg Ct & Gated Entrances

Lane Group
Lane Group Flow (vph)
v/c Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
Queue Length 50th (ft)
Queue Length 95th (ft)
Internal Link Dist (ft)
Turn Bay Length (ft)
Base Capacity (vph)
Starvation Cap Reductn
Spillback Cap Reductn
Storage Cap Reductn
Reduced v/c Ratio

NBT
17
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
188

SBT
7
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
32

1863
0
0
0
0.01

1863
0
0
0
0.00

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

03/11/2026

Intersection Summary

2026 AM Peak Hour (RTOL)

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 152 of 164

Page 162 of 173

Queues
9: Lordsburg Ct & Gated Entrance

NBT
13
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
239

SBT
20
0.01
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
0
1

1863
0
0
0
0.01

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

03/11/2026

Intersection Summary

2026 PM Peak Hour (RTOL)

Synchro 12 Report
Page 1

Page 153 of 164

Page 163 of 173

TTiE

E9BF

I]
Eo

f; lll
*m 4r

D[9O{ED 8Y:

ORAN,INC |{AME:

RE\rEtrED 8Y: CttX

DRA$NC LAST UPDATED:2025-03-31

Illt

h
o

itilt
:i :I

IIFF

iEiSEI
tSlEsE

=51
-'ltl

il;

:l
tE
.;

I
rl

c E
s I

r-1 6

It=
trt

l3
lo
l=

-,*4

I
I

HWY (segmen

.<.

il=

Page 164 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

WHITE A VE.

MIRAMONTE DR.
,.--.,.
+-'
C

E
CJ)
Q)
(/)

'--"

3
:r:
3
0

0:::
0:::
<(

(/)

::t:'.

..c
X

0
<C
(_)

N
N

I")

N
0
N

+-'

LORDSBURG CT.

ARROW HIGHWAY

C)
0:::

:r:

E
0
u
C
Q)
Q)
L
CJ)
L

..c

/
/

CJ
~

:z
<.!)

ACCEPTED

:z
§:

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
_ _P_UB_L_lc_wo_R_K_S_D_IR_E_CT_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RECOMMENDED

U
0
..
!"")>I ClJ

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

100

200

~I_1-1_ _~1
100 FT

~~A=R~NO~L=D~D=IC=H=O=~~P~.E=·•~R=C=E~N~O=·~B=6=03=8~,~C~l~~E=NG=IN=E=E~R--~~8

I 3:

CITY OF POMONA
Pll:IUC WOFlKS OEPARll.ENT/ENOtEaNl CM810N

ow
N o:::

1----------------------ci

POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT

r - - -_________
-Dil
B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_______________________________________________________....,._ _ _+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ s l ]
•
•

lHE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON lHE CALIFORNIA COORDINAlE
SYSlEM OF 19B3 (NADB3), ZONE 5 □AlUM, BASED LOCALLY ON A LINE BETWEEN NGS CONTROL
POINlS EV3794 AND EV3841, BEING N84"35'29"W, 1991.35 EPOCH.

BENCHMARK:
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. .K;2172. DESCRIPTION: RIJBM TAG IN S
ce 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARR□w HWY & GAREY AVE seFT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INT.
ELEVATI□N = 1041.094

1111 ~~5f\~~~I~42

SIGNING AND STRIPING EXHIBIT

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen,
p Ac I r I c

FAX: (855) 641-5877

ARROW HIGHWAY

~ ::,..:

WHITE AVE. TO LORDSBURG CT.

t - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - t - - - - 1 1 - - - -......- - - - - - - - - - - - - - , . - - - . . . , . . . . - _ J m
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT.
<.!) 8
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z
CHECKED:
oF
:s:: c..:i
REVIEWED:
~

..--------------------------------------------------------------------------C■HAS■E■W-.KEY-s 9.05.93-------□-~-EIMillllll
••
~.E.N0••

::::> --::,
1-

_2___

7
4

REVI-Sl.□N_S_ _ _ _ _ _ _M_~_IN_rr~.L-AS_S.HO■W■N----------------MilClO

______

Page 155 of 164

Page 165 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

MIRAMONTE DR.
,.--.,.
+-'
C

E
CJ)
Q)
(/)

'--"

3
:r:
3
0

0:::
0:::
<(

(/)

::t:'.

..c
X

0
<C
(_)

N
N

I")

N
0
N

+-'

LORDSBURG CT.

FAIR A VE.

C)
0:::

ARROW HIGHWAY

:r:

E
0
u
C
Q)
Q)
L
CJ)
L

..c

/
/

CJ
~

:z
<.!)

ACCEPTED

:z
§:

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
_ _P_UB_L_lc_wo_R_K_S_D_IR_E_CT_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RECOMMENDED

U
0
..
!"")>I ClJ

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

100

200

~I_1-1_ _~1
IN

100 FT

~~A=R~NO~L=D~D=IC=H=O=~~P~.E=·•~R=C=E~N~O=·~B=6=03=8~,~C~l~~E=NG=IN=E=E~R--~~8

I 3:

CITY OF POMONA
P\alC WOFlKS OEPARllENT/ENQtEEFINQ CM810N

ow
N o:::

1---------------------ci

POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT

r - - -_________
-Dil
B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_______________________________________________________....,._ _ _+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ s l ]
•
•

BENCHMARK:
Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. .K;2172. DESCRIPTION: RIJBM TAG IN S
ce 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARR□w HWY & GAREY AVE seFT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INT.
ELEVATI□N = 1041.094

1111 ~~5f\~~~I~42

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen,
p Ac I r I c

SIGNING AND STRIPING EXHIBIT
ARROW HIGHWAY

~ ::,..:
LORDSBURG CT. TO FAIR AVE
t - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - t - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , . - - - . . , , . . . - _J m

FAX: (855) 641-5877

..--------------------------------------------------------------------------C■HAS■E■W-.KEY-s 9.05.93-------□-~-EIMillllll
••
~.E.N0••

::::> --::,
1-

SCALE

DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
REVIEWED:

PVT. ENGR.
PVT. ENGR.

SHT.

_a__

<.!) 8
~ Z
:s:: c..:i

~ 8J
7
4
REVI-Sl.□N_S_ _ _ _ _ _ _M_~_IN_rr~.L-AS_S.HO■W■N----------------MilClO

______

Page 156 of 164

Page 166 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

O'l
3::
"'O
,....:,,,
.....

C
Q)

O'l

en
~

:r:

0:::
0:::
<(

~
_c
X

I{)
N
N

I")

N
0
N

.....
0

c..,
0:::

:r:

FAIR A VE.

E
0

ARROW HIGHWAY

()

O'l
I...

::::!E
<C

__A_C_C_E_P-TE_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.

z:
~

§:
BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
_ _P_u_su_c_w_o_R_KS_D_IR_EC_T_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RECOMMENDED

200

100

U
0
..
l"'l>I m

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
~_A_R_N_O_LD_D_IC_HO_~~-P_.E~••_R_C_E_N_0_._8_6_03_8~,_C_l~_E_N_G_IN_E_ER_ _~~8

CITY OF POMONA
IN

100 FT

I 3:

P\.alC WOAK8 CEPARTMENT/ENGINl:ERNG CM810N
N o:::
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

r--_________
-'il
B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . . . , . _ . . , . . . _ + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~
SIGNING AND STRIPING EXHIBIT

•
•

THE BEARINGS AND COORDINAlES SHOYIN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINAlE
SYSlEM OF 1963 (NAD83), ZONE 5 DAlUM, BASED LOCALLY ON A LINE BEnti:N NGS CONlROL
POINTS EV3794- AND EV3841, BEING N84-"35'29"W, 1991.35 EPOCH.

BENCHMARK:

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. JG2172. DESCRIPTION: RDBM TAG IN S
cs 1FT E/o scR o sE coR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/□ 1t 39.4FT s;o cfL INT.
ELEVATION = 10.1,1.094

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen. ~
p Ac 1,

ras5f'\~~~~~42

FAX: (855) 641-5B77

CHASEW.KEYS RCENO.90593

::::> -::,
1\.:117H
I-~ -;;.:_
FAIR AVE. TO FULTON DR.
1 - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _J m
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT. _4__
<..'.)
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z:
CHECKED,
oF
0
REVIEWED:
~ ~
4
DATE
DATE INITIAL AS SHOWN
Cl Cl
ARROW H ~ j / A Y

:s::

Page 157 of 164

Page 167 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

O'l

3:
"'O

0
,,......._
;:::'.

,Q
_c
X
Q)

----------;--:-";'.:---=~==--::-':~:""- - - - ~ ------------

I...

()

c.c

:s:

u:..:

:r:

:s:

-------------------------

.......

0:::
0:::
<(

;r-~

--=---:---:::-------= (:_ =
- -,-----:,----

-;==-==-==:.........:;

--,----:::----=-, - - - - - , - - --=---=-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - '

~
_c

:----. r======~:::::::::=::========= =======::.:..____:_--===~='....,_---+===='----F-------=======-~::;::.:...C'-J

a
.......

/========= '-':==::::::;;;===============
:----.

IV)

I{)
N
N
I")

I")
N

TURN

0
N

ONLY

MUST

0
.....

c..,

TURN RIGHT

0:::

PROPOSED RfLOCA TION OF BUS STOP

:r:

GATE 15 FAIRPLEX

E
0

()

ARROW HIGHWAY

O'l
I...

::::!E
<C

--AC_C_E_P-TE_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

z:
~

§:
BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
__
Pu_s_u_c_w_oR_K_S_D_IR_E_CT_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RECOMMENDED

U
0

40 FT

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
~_A_RN_O_LD_DI_CH_O_~~P_.E~••_R_CE_N0_._8_6_03_8~,_Cl~_E_N_GI_NE_E_R_ _ _

CITY OF POMONA

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING

•
R

BENCHMARK:

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen. ~

Call

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. JG2172. DESCRIPTION: RDBM TAG IN S
cs 1FT E/o scR o sE coR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/□ 1t 39.',FT s;o cfL INr.
ELEVATION = 10.1,1.094

ras5f'\~~~~~42

FAX: (855) 641-5B77

::::> -::,

ARROW H ~ j / A Y

1\.:117H
STA 4+00 TO STA 9+00

I--

~ -;;.:_

- - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - - - - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _J m

_1_ (.'.) 8

DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT.
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z:
CHECKED,
oF
0
before you dig.
REVIEWED:
~ ~
. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _IIIIIIICHASiiiiEiiiWiiii.KIIIIEYllilSRiiicE N o. so59ii3IIIIIII_ _ _ _ _IIIIDIIATIIIE.w.iW..-----iilili-------DJ;IIJE-INliiiTIAIILlilASlillliSIIIHll0W·N·--------------lliililill Cl Cl

Know what's below.

p A c 1,

P\.alC WOAK8 CEPARTMENT/ENGINl:ERNG CM810N
N o:::
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

.-----'il-------"""TB_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'T"""_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _T " ' " " . , . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - . . , . . . . - - - , , - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

•

l"'l>I m

111111111

SCALE

:s::

Page 158 of 164

Page 168 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

O'>
~

-0

WHITE AVE.

,.-...
:'::'
;Q
..i:::::
X
Q)

u
.__..,

:r:

0
I.()

N
N

I")

WIDEN SIDEWALK TO
ACCOMMODATE SHARED USE

RIGHT LANE
MUST

I")

N
0
N

FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS @
TERM/NATION OF CLASS IV TBD

WHITE AVE.

TURN RIGHT

BIKE ROUTE

C)
O:'.'.
:r:

BIKE ROUTE

~ rn
~

0
+-'
0

E
0

u
C

ARROW HIGHWAY

Q)
Q)
L

O'>

..i:::::

/
/

[I BEGIN I]

CJ
:::E
<C

_A_C_C-EP_T_E_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~

§:

USE
PED
SIGNAL

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
~ §:
1--R-E_C_O_M-ME_N_D_E_D______________
U

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

~I_1-1_ _~1
IN

40 FT

!"")>I m

1--~AR=NO=L=D~D=IC=HO=~P=.E~-•~RC=E~N=O~·=B6=03=8~Cl~~E=NG=IN=E=ER~---~8
I 3:

CITY OF POMONA

P\alC WORKS DEPAfffl.ENT/ENCltEEFlt«l DM810N

ow
N o:::

1----------------------ci

POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~
_ _ _D
___
i_
l _ _ _ _B A _ S _ I S _ O _ F _ B _ ~ - R - 1 - N G - : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~
•
•

lHE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON lHE CALIFORNIA COORDINAlE
SYSlEM OF 1983 (NADB3), ZONE 5 □AlUM, BASED LOCALLY ON A LINE BETWEEN NGS CONTROL
POINTS EV3794- AND EV3841, BEING N84-"35'29"W, 1991.35 EPOCH.

1111

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING

HR GREEN PACIFIC. INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE :505

ARROW HIGHWAY

::::> --:,
I-~ ::,..:

STA 9+00 TO STA 15+00
t - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - + - - t - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . - - - - - - _J (D
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT. _2___
0 8
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z
CHECKED,
oF
:s: c...::,
REVIEWED:
~
905-93------□-~-E~------R-~-SI-ON_S_ _ _ _ _o_~_IN·rr-~L-~.s.H.OW_N_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

HRGreen. ~~5r\~~~l~42

Know what's below.

BENCHMARK:
LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. J;2172. DESCRIPTI(lol: RDBM TAG IN S
ca 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INr.
ELEVATION = 1041.094

p Ac I r

FAX: (855) 641-5877

Call before you dig.
~---------------------------------------------------------------c·=-E.w
.•=.s.•~.EN-0.•

ooBJ

Page 159 of 164

Page 169 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

MIRAMONTE DR.
,.-.,.
::t:'.

..c
X

Q)
L

'--"

:r:

3
0

0:::
0:::
<(
/

(/)

::t:'.

..c
X

w
/

<C
(_)

LO
N
N

I")

I")
N
/

LORDSBURG CT.

I")
N

0
N
/

0
+-'

0
/
C)

0:::
:r:
/

E
0

u
C

ARROW HIGHWAY

Q)
Q)
L

CJ)
L

..c
/
/
CJ
~

--A-CC_E_P_T_E_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

:z
~

§:
<C

BY:, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
---------------------

~ ::,,::
~

RECOMMENDED

0
..
!"")>-

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

~I_l....l_ _~I
IN

40 FT

ClJ

~~A=RN=O=L~D~D=IC~HO=~~~P-=E'L•~R=CE~NO~-~B~6=03~8L•~Cl~~~EN~G~IN~EE~R~-~~8

CITY OF POMONA

ow
Pll:IUC WOFlKS OEPARll.ENT/ENOtEaNl CM810N

o:::

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

r----Dil--------r'."'BA..S...IS.......O~F""""""B"""'EA'""R"""I..
NG""':_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _T"'""_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.....,....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,._.,....__1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 ~ 5]
•
•

BENCHMARK:

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. .K;2172. DESCRIPTION: RIJBM TAG IN S
ce 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE seFT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INT.
ELEVATION = 1041.094

1111

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen, ~~5f\~~~I~42
p Ac I r I c

FAX: (855) 641-5877

::::> --:,
ARROW HIGHWAY

STA 15+00 TO STA 21+00

(.l)<C ::,..:

i - - 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a _J m
SCALE

DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
REVIEWED:

PVT. ENGR.
PVT. ENGR.

SHT.

_a__

:s:: c..:i

~ ~

<C c7i
7
90.593-------□-ATIIIEMlilli._ _ _ _ _a;REVliililSIO~NliS------□A-JE-IN.ITIA•LiWliASWS.llHO~W~N---------------iiilililiill
~~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C · H A S · E · W - . K E Y - S , R · C - E N . 0••

Page 160 of 164

Page 170 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

..........
:!:'.

J - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - ·-· -

..c
X
Q)

L...

.__..,

3
:r:
3
0

0:::
0:::
<(

:!:'.

..c

I.()
N
N

I")

FAIR AVE.

I")

N
0
N

+-'

ARROW HIGHWAY

0:::

:r:

E
0
u
C

Q)
Q)

L...

CJ')

L...
..c

/
/

:::E
<C

--AC_C_E_P_T_ED
__________________

:z
~

§:
BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
t---R-EC_O_M_M_E_N_D_E_D_______________
U

~ §:
0

!"")>-

I m

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

t--~A~RN=O=LD~D=IC~HO=~P-=E·~•~RC=E~NO=·~B=60=3=8~Cl~~~EN=G=IN=EE=R~--~8

~I_1-1_ _~1
IN

I 3:

CITY OF POMONA

ow
N o:::

P\alC WORKS DEPAfffl.ENT/ENCltEEFlt«l DM810N
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

40 FT

____
D
___
i_
l_ _ _ _T"B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____,,....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . . , . . _ . , . . . . - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •
•

1111

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING

ARROW HIGHWAY

HR GREEN PACIFIC. INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE :505

::::> --:,
I--

~ ::,..:

STA 21+00 TO STA 27+00

HRGreen. ~~5r\~~~l~42

t - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -........- - - - - _J (D

_4___

BENCHMARK:
p Ac I r c FAX: (855) 641-5877
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT.
0 8
LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. J;2172. DESCRIPTI(lol: RDBM TAG IN S
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z
cs 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INr.
CHECKED,
oF
c...::,
. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _IIIIIIICiiHASiiEiiiWiii.KEYIIIISll,RiiCIIIIENii0.90
• 593lllllll_ _ _ _ _ _
□ATEiiiljillill_ _ _ _ _ _
REVI-SI0 NS_ _ _ _ _ _
DAJEiiliiilN 1TIAiiLiliiiiASIIIIIIIISHiii0iiiiWiiiN. . .REVIEWED:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _iilillliill Cl
before you dig.
ELEVATION = 1041.094
~ Cl

Know what's below.

Call

1111

11111

111

:s:

Page 161 of 164

Page 171 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

CJ')

~
-0
I.()

..........
:!:'.

..c
X
Q)

L...

u
.__..,

:r:

3
0

0:::
0:::
<(

:!:'.

..c
X

0
<(

0
I.()

N
N

I")

N
0
N

0
+-'
0

ARROW HIGHWAY

0:::
:r:

E
0

u
C
Q)
Q)
L...

CJ')
L...

..c

/
/

:::E
<C

--AC_C_E_P_T_ED
__________________

:z
~

§:

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
~ §:
t---R-EC_O_M_M_E_N_D_E_D_______________
U
0
..
!"")>-

I m

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

t--~A~RN=O=LD~D=IC~HO=~P-=E·~•~RC=E~NO=·~B=60=3=8~Cl~~~EN=G=IN=EE=R~--~8

~I_1-1_ _~1
IN

I 3:

CITY OF POMONA

P\alC WORKS DEPAfffl.ENT/ENCltEEFlt«l DM810N
N o:::
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

40 FT

lHE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON lHE CALIFORNIA COORDINAlE
SYSlEM OF 1983 (NADB3), ZONE 5 □AlUM, BASED LOCALLY ON A LINE BETWEEN NGS CONlROL
POINTS EV3794- AND EV3841, BEING N84-"35'29"W, 1991.35 EPOCH.

1111

ARROW HIGHWAY

HRGreen. ~~5r\~~~l~42

BENCHMARK:
p A c I r c FAX: (855) 641-5877
LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. J;2172. DESCRIPTI(lol: RDBM TAG IN S
Know what's
cs 1FT E/o BcR o SE cOR ARRow HWY & GAREY Avr. s9FT E/o & 39.4FT s;o cfl INr.
. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _before
___
____
_ _=_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _IIIIIIICiiHASiiEiiiWiii.KEYIIIISll,RiiCIIIIENii0.•
90sa3
______
you_
dig.
ELEVATION
1041.094

Call

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING

HR GREEN PACIFIC. INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE :505

I--

~ ::,..:
STA 27+00 TO STA 33+00
t - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - + - - t - - - -.......- - - - - - - - - - - -........-------- _J (D
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT.
0
8
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z
CHECKED,
oF
:s: c...::,
...REVIEWED:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _iilillliill Cl
~ Cl

_§_

below.

□ ATEiiiljillill------REVI-SI0 N S------OAJEiiliiilN 1TIAiiLiliiiiASIIIIIIIISHiii0iiiiWiiiN

111111111

::::> --:,

1111

11111

111

Page 162 of 164

Page 172 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

,,......_
;:::'.

,Q
_c
X
Q)

I...

()

:s:

:r:

:s:
0

0:::
0:::
<(

~
_c
X

I{)
N
N

I")

N
0
N

.....
0

c..,
0:::

:r:

E
0

()

LA VERNE AVE.

O'l
I...

40 FT

::::!E
<C

ARROW HIGHWAY

__
A_C_C-EP_T_E_D_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,.

z:
~

§:
BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
<C
__
P_us_u_c_wo_R_K_S_D_IR_E_CT_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RECOMMENDED

U
0
..
l"'l>I m

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
~_A_R_NO_L_D_D_IC_H_O_~~P_.E~-•~R_C_E_N_0_._8_6_03_8~,_C_l~_E_NG_IN_E_E_R_ _ _

CITY OF POMONA

I 3:

P\.alC WOAK8 CEPARTMENT/ENGINl:ERNG CM810N
N o:::
~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ci
POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT
~

r----'il--------""'T"B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _""'T"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. . . . , . _ . . , . . . _ + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~
•
•

BENCHMARK:

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

HRGreen. ~
p Ac 1,

SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING
ARROW H ~ j / A Y
1\.:117H
STA 33+00 TO STA 38+00

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305
c

ras5f'\~~~~~42

~ -;;.:_

1 - - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i - - t - - - - - - 1 - - -.......- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _J

FAX: (855) 641-5B77

SCALE

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. JG2172. DESCRIPTION: RDBM TAG IN S
cs 1FT E/o scR o sE coR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/□ 1t 39.4FT s;o cfL INT.
ELEVATION = 10.1,1.094
CHASEW.KEYS RCENO.90593

::::> -::,
I--

DATE

DATE INITIAL AS SHOWN

DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED,
REVIEWED:

PVT. ENGR.
PVT. ENGR.

SHT.

_§__

<..'.)

:s:: 0

~ Z:

~ ~

Cl Cl

Page 163 of 164

Page 173 of 173

Council Packet - April 6, 2026

FULTON RD.

,,......_
;:::'.

_c
X
Q)
L

:r:
S

0:::
0:::
<(

CIJ

.....

~
_c
X

I{)
N
N

I")

FULTON RD.

I")

N
0
N

.....
0

ARROW HIGHWAY

(_'.)
0:::

:r:

E
0
0

c::

Q)
Q)
L

01
L

w
~

<..'.)

ACCEPTED

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:
~
,___P_UB_u_c_wo_R_K_S_D_IR_E_CT_O_R_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Cl

U
0
..
1"'1>-

BY: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DATE:

I m

~~A=R~NO=L=D~D=IC=H~O=~~P~.E=·•~R~C=E~N~0=·~8=6=03~8~,~C~l~~E=NG=IN=E=E=R--~~8

I 3:

CITY OF POMONA
IN

PlaJC WOAKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINl:EFING OMSION

40 FT

RECOMMENDED

1----------------------

ow
N o:::

POMONA SMIP PHASE 1 PROJECT

r--__________
-'il
B_A_S_IS_O_F_B_EA_R_IN_G_:_________________________________________...,..._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _....,._ _ _+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ 5 )
SIGNINGAND
ANDSTRIPING
STRIPINGEXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
SIGNING
•
•

THE BEARINGS AND COORDINATES SHOYIN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE
SYSTEW OF 19B3 (NA□83), ZONE 5 □AlUM, BASED LOCAl.l.Y ON A LINE BETtiN NGS CONlROL
POINTS EV3794- AND EV3841, BEING N84-"35'29"W, 1991.35 EPOCH.

HR GREEN PACIFIC, INC.
1260 CORONA POINTE COURT
SUITE 305

HRGreen . ~
BENCHMARK:

Know what's below.

Call before you dig.

LOS ANGELES COINTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO. JG2172. DESCRIPTION: R□BM TAG IN S
cs 1FT E/o scR o sE coR ARRow HWY & GAREY AVE s9FT E/o 11t 39.4FT s;o cfL INT.
ELIEVATION = 1041.094

p ACI F

0
; ;5;\~~~~42

FAX: (855) 641-5877

ARROW H ~ j / A Y
1\.:117YI

::::> -::,
I--

~ ;;,..:
STA 38+00 TO STA 41+00
t - - t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t - - t - - - - 1 1 - - - - . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - = - - - - _J m
SCALE
DESIGNED:
PVT. ENGR.
SHT.
<..'.> 8
DRAWN:
PVT. ENGR.
~ Z:
CHECKED:
oF
3: 0
REVIEWED:
~ ~

. .--------------------------------------------------------------------------CHASiiiE■W••K.EY■S-,R-CE.N0••9.05.93_ _ _ _ _ _ _D_Af_E. . .. __ _ _ _ _ _
R~.1.s1.oN■S------■
M-JE-IN.ITIA■LiliiiASiiiliS■
HO■W■N----------------lillllllllClCl

Page 164 of 164

Read the agenda documentPrimary source ↗

The government’s own published record — read it yourself, then decide what to do about it.

Data centers in La VerneLocal report →

The facilities, the coverage, and the local record for this community.

Outcome

Not yet recorded. The record stays open — outcomes are added as minutes and vote results are published.

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

Agenda Watch · Aug 26, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-001377 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

Aug 26, 2026 Filed on the Docket
Aug 26, 2026 Full document archived — public record

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.

On the agenda: La Verne meeting — data center (Apr 6)

The agenda, word for word

Provenance

Record history

More on the Docket in California