The Docket · Government Meeting · DKT-2026-003644

On the agenda: Basalt meeting — data center (Mar 17)

Past ⚠ Agenda Watch Basalt, Colorado · Tuesday, March 17, 2026 — 7 months ago

About this record

The published agenda for the March 17, 2026 meeting contains: "data center". The meeting has passed. The agenda stays here as a permanent public record.

WhenTuesday, March 17, 2026
Check the agenda document for the meeting time.

WhereBasalt, Colorado

Money$944 was at stake

On the record“data center”

The agenda, word for word

Government public record — the full text of the published document, archived October 5, 2026. Gold highlighting of key terms is ours, not the original’s. Read the original document ↗

182 pages · scroll to read

Page 1 of 182

See separate instructions on how to access the meeting
TOWN OF BASALT MEETINGS
Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Basalt Town Hall

101 Midland Avenue

5:15 PM

P&Z Site Visit at 540 Basalt Avenue- Meet at the Site (Parking available at
adjacent 530 Basalt Avenue Property)

5:45

Commissioner Light Dinner at Town Hall

6:00

6:03

2A Approve Minutes
2B February 17, 2026
2C March 3, 2026

6:05

3A Public Hearing- 540 Basalt Avenue Special Review and Associated
Development Review Requests: for the purpose of constructing one (1)
deed-restricted residential unit at 540 Basalt Avenue, Lot X, of the Basalt
Business Center South PUD

Call to Order

3B Recommended Action: Staff Comments, Applicant Comments, Public
Comments, P&Z Discussion, and Potential Motion
6:45

Commissioner Comments and Staff Updates

6:55

Adjourn

Items on the agenda are approximate and intended as a guide for the Commission. Times are subject to change, as is
the order of the agenda. For deadlines and information required to schedule an item on the agenda, please contact
Basalt Town Hall at 927-4701.
Page 1 of 182

Page 2 of 182

TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO
P&Z MEETING - TUESDAY, MARCH 17, 2026
PUBLIC COMMENT ACCESS INSTRUCTIONS

The Basalt Planning & Zoning Commission will meet in person. The P&Z will conduct a hybrid meeting
where the public may attend the meeting to make their comments in person or may join the meeting
and make their comments via Zoom.
Directions for viewing and accessing the meeting to provide comment during public the public comment
portion of the agenda, or during public hearings is provided below.

Zoom Webinar: Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Topic: P&Z - 03/17/2026
Join from PC, Mac, iPad, or Android:
Phone one-tap:

06:00 PM Mountain Time (US and Canada)

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87647634994

+17193594580,,87647634994# US

Join via audio:
+1 719 359 4580 US
+1 360 209 5623 US
+1 564 217 2000 US
+1 305 224 1968 US

+1 669 444 9171 US
+1 386 347 5053 US
+1 646 931 3860 US
+1 309 205 3325 US

+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)

+12532158782,,87647634994# US
(Tacoma)

+1 253 205 0468 US
+1 507 473 4847 US
+1 689 278 1000 US

+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)

Webinar ID: 876 4763 4994
International numbers available: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kcm1EEfM7I

If you are unable to access the meeting using the link or call-in numbers above, please e-mail your
name, and phone number and item you wish to comment on to [email protected]. We will contact
you at the appropriate time in the meeting and make other arrangements for you to make your
comments.

Page 2 of 182

Page 3 of 182

PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION MINUTES
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Vozick, Bill Maron, Mike Horvath, Rob Leavitt, Ben Fierstein, Cindy
Hirschfeld
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Kyle Oberkoetter, Bob Kaplan
STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Thibeault, James Lindt, Carlton Henry, Gloria Kaasch-Buerger
OTHERS PRESENT: Mareike Blodgett, Justin Fries, Curtis Rowe, Jim Charlier, Eric Krohngold, Christian
Weber
DATE: 2/17/2026
MEETING SCHEDULED AT 6:00 PM
AGENDA ITEMS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

Call to Order
Meeting Minutes – February 3, 2026
Public Hearing - 72 Sunset Drive – PUD Amendment
Public Hearing - 555 Basalt Avenue – Special Review
Midland Design Guidelines
Commissioner Comments and Staff Updates
Adjourn

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:08PM
M/S MARON/LEAVITT TO APPROVE MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 3, 2026, MOTION PASSES 6-0,
UNANIMOUSLY.

PUBLIC HEARING – 72 SUNSET DRIVE PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION
M/S LEAVITT/HORVATH TO CONTINUE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR 72 SUNSET DRIVE PUD AMENDMENT.
MOTION PASSES 6-0, UNANIMOUSLY.

555 BASALT AVENUE SPECIAL REVIEW
FIERSTEIN RECUSED. QUORUM REMAINS, 5 PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBERS PRESENT.
Lindt gave a background of the proposed development application, and introduced Mareike Blodgett and
Justin Fries from the development team representing the Applicant, MREH LLC. This is a continued public

Page 3 of 182

Page 4 of 182

hearing. Staff has identified that in addition to a special review application for the proposed development,
an amendment to the Master Plan, specifically the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the Typology
Designation would be required. The 4.8 acre site is located in the Basalt Business Center (BBC) South
Planned Unit Development. The proposal includes 54 storage spaces and 48 multi-family residential units
across 3 multi-family buildings.
Staff has included draft language for a resolution for the associated Master Plan amendments. The draft
resolution would amend the FLUM to accommodate the new proposed uses on the site and amend the
Typology Designation on the property to permit the residential to be separate from the commercial
component.
Planning and Zoning Commission requested additional materials at the February 3rd meeting, the applicant
has provided updated elevations, an updated traffic report, and additional analysis around East Cody Lane,
the applicant has received a conceptual approval from CDOT for an increase in the number of permitted
trips to East Cody Lane.
Staff has provided a list of review items for consideration 1) Consistency with the Master Plan; 2) Level
and Mix of Affordable Housing Mitigation; 3) Exterior Storage Waiver; 4) Compatibility of Proposed Use;
5) Building Height; 6) Pedestrian Connectivity; 7) Fiou Lane; 8) Access Road to East Cody Lane; 9) Traffic;
10) Southside Floodplain; 11) Green Building/Wildfire Mitigation.
Lindt reviewed consistency with the Master Plan and FLUM (Future Land Use Map). The proposed use
was not envisioned with the previous Master Plan and requires the Master Plan Amendment as proposed
in the resolution in the packet..
Lindt reviewed consistency with the affordable housing standards. Lindt reviewed requests as presented
to BACH. BACH encouraged the applicant to accommodate larger units, and did not support the storage
waiver that was requested. It was discussed that the Applicant amended the proposal to combine units
to create a two-bedroom deed restricted units. Lindt noted that the Applicant changed the proposal such
that the affordable housing units are now proposed to be for-sale units. BACH was supportive of the forsale product and suggested increasing the category for deed-restrictions to Category 3, on average. BACH
reviewed and recommended approval of the housing development program.
A second traffic count was conducted since the February 3rd meeting of the Planning Commission. The
second traffic count was higher than the initial traffic count conducted, further substantiating the traffic
conclusions made by the applicant team. Additionally, the applicant’s traffic consultant joined the call to
provide additional detail related to queuing for the traffic created on East Cody Lane.
Staff has suggested that a third party traffic consultant be engaged to create a recommendation for Fiou
Lane, as well as a condition that the Applicant provide a 10’ easement along Fiou for potential future
construction.
Lindt noted that residential and storage are supported uses with residential being a special review use
that requires review at P&Z and approval at Town Council. Lindt reiterated P&Z comments from the
January 20th meeting, which noted that storage shall remain as storage, and shared that Staff has included
a condition to this effect.

2
Page 4 of 182

Page 5 of 182

Lindt suggested the Commission 1) consider applicant comments; 2) hear traffic comments from Jim
Charlier; 3) take public comment; 4) provide Commissioner discussion; 5) respond to the provided
conditions.
Staff has provided several options for the P&Z, including approving with the draft conditions, approving
with changes to the draft conditions, denying the application, or referring the application back to Staff for
further development.
The applicant team began their presentation and response. Justin Fries from Studio DH introduced
himself and the application.
Fries responded to the concerns from the January 20th and February 3rd meetings, and shared colored
renderings with consideration given to materiality. Fries noted that the traffic concerns have been further
researched and considered since the last meeting.
Fries showed the FEMA floodplain and reviewed the site plan’s accommodation of floodwater in a 100year event.
Fries reviewed the updated PUD amendment language and table of uses.
Fries shared the changes to the unit mix and sizes, to accommodate the BACH Committee’s suggested
changes. Fries also showed the storage added in the site plan.
Fries presented the cross-sections of the multi-family building showing the 35’ height with the 3’ parapet
and sloping roof height and noted the Code allowance for the height including the elevator overrun.
Fries presented the proposed traffic flow as designed on Cody Lane. Fries presented photographs of the
space along Cody Lane where the pedestrian improvements could be considered, Fries also noted the
existing utilities and drainage concerns in the area.
Fries reviewed the concerns with the Fiou Lane expansion. The applicant is willing to consider either
expansion or limiting the roadway to a one-way.
Fries shared that CDOT was in support of the traffic engineer’s assessment, which would allow an increase
in vehicle trips by allowing egress for the residential use to Cody Lane. CDOT approved the conceptual
design.
Fries presented some precedent imagery for the architectural design in regard to architecture, color, and
materiality. Fries compared and contrasted the new renderings with the precedent imagery, noting the
changes to the fascia, and the use of exposed steel on the residential product.

COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS
Hirschfeld asked whether the storage units would be for sale or for rent. Fries responded that the storage
units would be sold.
Leavitt asked what the FTE created would be from the storage portion of the site. Fries responded that 9
FTE were identified.

3
Page 5 of 182

Page 6 of 182

Horvath asked whether the project would pay into the roundabout project and what would initiate the
construction of the roundabout. Lindt responded that the Applicant would be required to pay toward the
fund and there is no specific trigger, but rather the fund will grow until Staff is directed to begin design.
Vozick asked whether any of the existing infrastructure could be reused.
Vozick asked whether there would be any issues with meeting the SBRs/green building regulations.
Leavitt asked staff if this was a mixed unit development as imagined in the Master Plan what the project
may look like. Thibeault responded that the Master Plan is not that prescriptive.
Vozick clarified that the discount for mixed-use mitigation results in three fewer affordable housing units
than if they were required to mitigate for both the commercial and residential components of the
development. Lindt confirmed.
Horvath asked for the traffic engineer to respond to the traffic design whereby traffic is directed away
from Fiou but increased on Cody. Curtis Rowe responded that the shift of the residential traffic to Cody
Lane, provides a benefit by queuing vehicles at an intersection that includes a stop sign, additionally the
reduction of traffic on Fiou Lane will improve the functionality of Fiou and the Fiou/Basalt Avenue
intersection. Horvath asked how many vehicles could be accommodated in the left turn lane. Rowe
responded that 4-5 cars could be accommodated right now, however the design for this intersection is
envisioned to change with the addition of a roundabout.

PUBLIC COMMENT opened at 6:48pm
Andy Rothchild at 409 Meadow View Lane
Rothchild was not aware of the application until recently. He added that the current 8’ privacy fence has
been a benefit to the neighborhood, he would support a retention or replacement of the privacy fence.
He additionally noted that Fiou Lane is an important access to the Southside neighborhood, and would
support two-way traffic without increasing the traffic on Fiou.

Stacey Stokes at 221 East Fiou
Lives on the corner of Fiou Lane and Alexander. Stokes supports a one way for Fiou Lane beyond the
daycare, and doesn’t support a two way. Stokes believes that a 6 foot wide hard surface path would an
ideal way to create the ability for wider vehicle travel ways in an emergency. Feeling that two lane road
would increase traffic in the area. Stokes supports a stop sign and a further developed one way with
emergency infrastructure to accommodate for emergencies.

John Fitzpatrick
John Fitzpatrick of BBC East shared that he feels the traffic study does not address the additional trips
onto Cody Lane. Fitzpatrick wished that the traffic engineer respond to the number of trips created by

4
Page 6 of 182

Page 7 of 182

the residential use. Fitzpatrick shared concerns with ped/bike conflict at the Cody Lane intersection with
Basalt Avenue, and shared that he believed that another form of egress is needed for Southside Basalt.
PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED AT 6:57PM
Rowe responded that the current volume for Cody Lane is 132 trips per hour and would increase by 26
trips per hour to 158 trips per hour, or a little under 3 trips/min. The intersection with Basalt Avenue
would still perform at a service level A, and the access to Cody for residential vehicle users would improve
system efficiency.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
Horvath supported the construction of residential units proximate to the RFTA station. Horvath asked
what the desired outcome would be for a third-party traffic study on Fiou Lane. Lindt responded that the
goal would be to analyze the alternatives between one-way and two-way traffic, while also
accommodating pedestrian and multi-modal traffic. Thibeault added that the Town is trying to add some
scientific support for a recommendation in order to not pit the wishes of the neighbors against the design
directives of the Public Works Design Manual. Horvath supported a hard surface path along Fiou Lane to
accommodate multi-modal travel and use in the case of an emergency.
Maron thanked the applicant for the revised elevations and care that the team gave to updating the
design. Maron acknowledged and supported the increased livability of the units especially with regard to
size and storage. Maron supports a third party study, but would like to see the condition updated to note
AASHTO Green Book best practices and better acknowledge multi-modal transport. Maron has no issues
with height accommodation. Maron supports the draft conditions including the Master Plan amendments.
Leavitt is stuck on the Master Plan amendments, and has a concern with not including commercial space
to new residential. Leavitt would like to see the storage reconsidered and commercial included.
Hirschfeld believes that the Fiou Lane issue is legitimate but an aside from this review. Hirschfeld is in
support of a one-way for Fiou. Hirschfeld believes that the amount of deed-restricted affordable housing
should be 50% at a minimum.
Vozick stated that a third party study would be great. Vozick does not support storage or the need in the
community, and questions whether storage is the best usage for the site.
Horvath stated that he supports additional affordable housing.
Maron noted that the application meets the review criteria. Leavitt clarified that the Master Plan
amendment is not by right at the moment.
Hirschfeld responded that there may not be the demand for industrial uses in this town. Maron
responded.
Vozick further emphasized his disapproval for a storage use.
Maron noted that the disapproval of the storage use could be included as a draft condition.

5
Page 7 of 182

Page 8 of 182

Thibeault noted that the value of the housing, the will to see Fiou Lane studied should be included for the
benefit of Council.
Horvath asked the applicant why the HOA did not support the storage to be used as a primary place of
business. Fries responded that the HOA was not willing to support primary place of business as it may
increase traffic.
Hirschfeld asked whether the applicant explored additional deed restricted housing. Fries responded that
the applicant did not explore additional deed restricted housing as part of the pro forma.
Thibeault noted that Staff needs two motions, one for the special review and PUD amendment and a
separate motion for the Master Plan amendment.

M/S MARON AND HORVATH TO RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL REVIEW AND PUD
AMENDMENT TO COUNCIL WITH THE CONDITIONS PRESENTED AND CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION AND THE NEED FOR A THIRD PARTY EVALUATION FOR FIOU LANE. MOTION
PASSES 3-2.
M/S HIRSCHFELD TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION FOR THE MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT TO AMEND THE
MASTER PLAN TO RESIDENTIAL ON THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE SITE WITH THE CONDITION THAT
THE RESIDENTIAL USE INCLUDE A GREATER PERCENTAGE OF DEED-RESTRICTED HOUSING (UP TO 50%)
AND A PREFERENCE FOR MIXED-USE ON THE NORTHERN PARCEL. MOTION PASSES 4-1, MARON IN
OPPOSITION.

PUBLIC HEARING – MIDLAND AVENUE DESIGN GUIDELINES
Henry provided an introduction to the Midland Avenue District Design Guidelines. Staff requested that
Planning and Zoning Commission provide constructive feedback on the design guidelines and provide a
recommendation to Town Council.
The design guidelines include a number of design and architectural considerations in the proposed
Midland Avenue District.
Hubbard introduced the GMSHAY team and their experience in historic preservation and design guidelines
for historic districts. Hubbard reviewed the concept of design guidelines with the Commission, and
reviewed their application in the Town of Basalt. Hubbard also reviewed the outline of the guidelines
including the chapters: 1) Introduction; 2) History & Character of Midland Avenue; 3) Treatment of Existing
Buildings; 4) Site Development – New Construction; 5) Architecture – New Construction; 6) Sustainable
Design; 7) Review Processes.
Hubbard reviewed the revisions and additions to the design guidelines since the January 6, 2026 P&Z
meeting, updates to Sections 4.1, 4.3, 4.5, 4.6, and 4.8. Updates included the addition of a checklist,
removal of the open space maximum, revision of language around building placement, open space, active
frontages and compatible infill, revisions to overhang and awning design requirements, the addition of
landscaping guidelines with input from the Town Arborist, and revisions to sidewalks, including language
regarding water mitigation.
6
Page 8 of 182

Page 9 of 182

COMMISSIONER QUESTIONS
Maron shared support for the document.
Fierstein asked whether the WUI regulations were discussed. Henry added that any State regulations
would still be required. Thibeault added that tree removal permits are still required, and noted that the
Town Arborist reviewed the landscaping standards and requirements included.
Hirschfeld shared that she doesn’t remember all of the items suggested at the work session, but believes
that the draft looks good.
M/S MARON AND LEAVITT TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MIDLAND AVENUE DISTRICT DESIGN
GUIDELINES. MOTION PASSES 6-0, UNANIMOUSLY.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES
Thibeault noted that the Cliff’s Hillside Park Renovation RFP submittal period ends on Friday, 2/27. Henry
noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission would be reviewing a land use application for 540 Basalt
Avenue in the coming weeks for a proposed deed-restricted dwelling unit. Lindt updated the Commission
regarding the Land Use Code update and associated working group meetings. Leavitt asked for an update
on the Black Mountain (Jadwin) project; Lindt shared that he had heard from the development team,
which is preparing for Final Plan submittal, which will be heard by Planning and Zoning again. Lindt shared
that the next P&Z meeting is scheduled for March 3, 2026.
M/S MARON AND HIRSCHFELD TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:06 PM. MOTION PASSES 6 to 0.
TOWN OF BASALT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

By_______________________________
Eric Vozick, Chair

Attest___________________________________
Michelle Bonfils Thibeault, Planning Director

7
Page 9 of 182

Page 10 of 182

PLANNING AND ZONING ACTION MINUTES
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Eric Vozick, Bill Maron, Mike Horvath, Rob Leavitt, Cindy Hirschfeld
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Kyle Oberkoetter, Ben Fierstein, Bob Kaplan
STAFF PRESENT: Michelle Thibeault, James Lindt, Carlton Henry, Gloria Kaasch-Buerger
OTHERS PRESENT: Jessica Garrow, Christian Weber
DATE: 3/3/2026
MEETING SCHEDULED AT 6:00 PM
AGENDA ITEMS
1.
2.
3.
4.

Call to Order
Work Session: Land Use Code Update – Design Workshop
Commissioner Comments and Staff Updates
Adjourn

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER AT 6:08PM
LAND USE CODE UPDATE – DESIGN WORKSHOP
Lindt provided a brief background on the Land Use Code Update Project. Staff contracted Design
Workshop in 2025 to undertake a full-scale Land Use Code review and amendments suggested through
the update.
Jessica Garrow from Design Workshop introduced herself and the impetus for the Land Use Code update.
Garrow introduced Design Workshop and their planning practice. Garrow noted that Weber is also
supporting the Design Workshop team on the ADU Code and Housing Mitigation project.
Weber shared the project scope and schedule. The project began in June and the team is presenting the
50% draft at this meeting. The team will return with a 90% draft at a future meeting for review by the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
Weber presented the guiding principles for the project:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Creating a code that is clear and does not require further interpretation
Articulate the “why” in regulations
Provide clear processes that do not over-complicate reviews
Include clear language and enforcement options
Reinforce the ideas of sustainability that are in the Master Plan and coordinate with other ongoing Town efforts

Page 10 of 182

Page 11 of 182

6) Build off the Master Plan process and engagement; do not duplicate those efforts

Weber covered the high priority topics for the project including 1) code organization & usability; 2)
integration of ongoing amendments (housing and historic preservation related; 3) community character
& design; 4) annexation, PUD, and subdivision standards; 5) zoning map and district alignment
The 50% draft is broken into three parts, simple & structural, administrative processes & enforcement,
and new policy concepts.
These code updates align with goals and objectives found in the 2020 Master Plan including affordable &
inclusive living goals.
Weber showed the updated table of contents with the movement of Annexations from Chapter 15 to
Chapter 14 (currently reserved), and the addition of a ‘Development’ related chapter as Chapter 16.
Weber also showed how the proposed update consolidated and simplified the existing chapter structure
for the Land Use Code related chapters Chapter 14-17.
Garrow reviewed the changes to the Annexation chapter, including relevant state statute changes.
Additionally, Design Workshop added applicability standards and review criteria; the team hopes to
provide flow charts and graphics at the 90% draft stage.
Garrow reviewed the changes to Chapter 15 Zoning. The major change includes relocating all district
related standards and definitions into a singular location. Additionally, cannabis and natural medicine
sections have been moved to Chapter 6. Garrow also reviewed new policy concepts added to the Zoning
chapter including categorization of land uses, the process of conditional uses in residential, commercial,
and industrial districts. Garrow reviewed changes to adult businesses and the consolidation of adult
businesses, the addition of language related to formula businesses, and the transition away from the
developing resource district to a legacy zone district.
Garrow reviewed the addition of Chapter 16 Developments. The Development chapter aims to establish
a uniform location for standards, processes, etc. related to development proposals or applications.
Garrow made note of the inclusion of language to bring the Town into compliance with Prop. 123 related
to incentives for affordable housing. The update also includes changes to the approval of insubstantial
PUD amendments, the inclusion of parking reduction criteria for mixed-use development, administrative
approval for parking reductions, and more. The team has also added new approval standards and criteria
for PUDs. Additionally, Chapter 16 includes the new ADU language, the relocated natural and
environmental hazards language, new processes related to conditional uses and special use reviews, and
Prop. 123 language.
Garrow reviewed the changes to Chapter 17 Subdivisions. Definitions have been relocated to Chapter 15,
Technical Review Committee standards have been relocated to Chapter 2, and common development
procedures have been relocated to Chapter 16.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
Hirschfeld asked whether the Midland Design Guidelines are included in the Code update. Lindt responded
that the two projects are separate. Garrow noted that the team aims to incorporate.
2
Page 11 of 182

Page 12 of 182

Maron commented that he’s uncomfortable with discouraging affordable housing. Maron clarified that
his comment comes from support for parking reductions for affordable housing regardless of proximity to
transit. Garrow noted that the guidance for this item comes from the Master Plan.
Maron further elaborated that the Code should include more prescriptive language such as “shall/must”
and not just a nod to the Master Plan at the beginning of land use related chapters.
Maron also shared his opposition to approving ADUs without residency requirements.
Vozick asked whether residency requirements are included in the Code anywhere. Lindt answered that
Town Council has elected not to add additional requirements on top of the initial deed-restriction.
Leavitt asked whether this is the appropriate place to discuss residency requirements. Maron, Vozick, and
Hirschfeld shared a similar concern. Garrow responded that the Code is the appropriate place to include
those requirements and further expressed the tools available through the land use code to regulate
residency standards.
Maron noted that data center land use should be included and considered in this Code update. Garrow
noted that the team could include that land use as an industrial use, and add special review requirements
such as a Council approval.
Maron also shared his desire for the inclusion of historic preservation demolition standards.
Maron also stated that he supports parking reductions for proximity to transit.
Hirschfeld noted that the Town does not have local historic preservation like Telluride or Aspen.
Lindt noted the voluntary nature of the residential historic designation.
Vozick agrees that historic preservation and demolition should be included.
Leavitt asked whether affordable housing and workforce housing are used interchangeably. Garrow
answered that without deed-restrictions, she does not professionally believe that workforce housing is
the same or interchangeable with affordable housing. Lindt added that our guidelines consider housing
with deed restrictions to be interpreted as community housing. Leavitt specified his concerns with
units/developments pitched to the Town as workforce or attainable housing.
Leavitt asked whether there is a standard for the frequency of Land Use Code updates. Thibeault
responded.
Hirschfeld questioned the whole data center designation and noted the concern with water usage.
Hirschfeld stated that the update should discourage the use of data centers.
Vozick responded to the discussion item related to formula businesses. Thibeault responded that the C2
Zone District would prohibit formula businesses. Garrow noted that Telluride prohibits formula
businesses of which there are three or more and that Aspen prohibits formula businesses with 10 or more.
Aspen allows for a conditional use review. Garrow asked whether there was a preference for defining
formula businesses. Vozick expressed support for a prohibition on Midland or in the C2.
Garrow asked for further clarification on the parking reductions piece. Garrow stated that as written a
parking reduction of up to 25% could be considered for proximity to transit, and reviewed several other
3
Page 12 of 182

Page 13 of 182

opportunities to reduce parking minimums. Maron shared support for reducing parking minimums.
Hirschfeld asked what defines proximity; Garrow answered that ¼ to ½ mile is generally considered.
Garrow reviewed the next steps between the 50% draft and the 90% draft for adoption of the Land Use
Code.

COMMISSIONER COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES
Thibeault shared that the Town Council candidates forums was held on March 2, 2026, and a video of the
forum was recorded by Grassroots TV.
Lindt noted that the next meeting would be March 17th, which would a public hearing on 540 Basalt
Avenue, and no meeting will be held on April 7th.
Henry added that 72 Sunset Drive would be required to notice for public hearing should it return to
Planning and Zoning Commission. Henry also shared that the Town received 5 proposals for the Cliff’s
Hillside Park Renovation Project, with interviews upcoming.
Thibeault added that 18 grant applications were submitted for Town of Basalt (BPAC) grants for 2026.
Additionally, the Town has posted a call to artists for art installations in Willits, as a follow-up to the
Midland Avenue installations in 2025.
Thibeault also noted that Council would be hearing a work session on the State Wildfire Urban Interface
Code.
Leavitt asked whether there was an update on the non-compliant exterior lighting at FedEx along Willits
Lane. Lindt responded that Town staff had sent a compliance letter as of March 3, 2026.
M/S MARON AND LEAVITT TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:03 PM. MOTION PASSES 4 to 0.
TOWN OF BASALT
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

By_______________________________
Eric Vozick, Chair

Attest___________________________________
Michelle Bonfils Thibeault, Planning Director

4
Page 13 of 182

Page 14 of 182

MEMORANDUM
To:

Chairman Vozick and Basalt Planning and Zoning Commission

Thru:

Michelle Bonfils Thibeault, AICP Planning Director
James Lindt, AICP Assistant Planning Director

From:

Carlton Henry, Planner II

Date:

March 17, 2026

RE:

Public Hearing – 540 Basalt Ave. Application – Site Plan Review,
Special Review, PUD Amendment, Housing Mitigation Report, and
associated development review

Purpose

PC Development, LLC (Applicant) has applied (application excerpts attached as
Exhibit A) for a Site Plan Review, Special Review, PUD Amendment, Housing
Mitigation Report and associated development review actions to construct one
deed-restricted residential unit at 540 Basalt Avenue. A vicinity map is shown
below for context.
Figure 1: Vicinity Map

1
Page 14 of 182

Page 15 of 182

II.

Background

The property contains 7,838 sf and is located at the northwest corner of Basalt
Avenue and Fiou Lane in the Industrial Zone District and the Basalt Business
Center South (BBCS) PUD. The property is bordered by mixed-use properties to
the north and to the west, with commercial, residential, and industrial uses in the
general vicinity. The Southside Floodplain runs through the site, however no
changes to the building envelope or footprint are proposed as part of this
application.
Currently, the site is mixed-use in nature, with the Rug Wash on the ground floor,
and an existing residential unit. The Applicant has proposed the addition of a 659
sf two-bedroom residential unit to be deed-restricted at Category 5. The property
currently contains one 758 sf two-bedroom residential unit, which is proposed to
remain.
III.

Review Process

The review process requires a review from the Basalt Affordable and Community
Housing (BACH) Commission. BACH is a referral agency on land use
applications that provide deed-restricted housing, tasked with producing a
recommendation to Council regarding compliance with the Housing Guidelines
and the land use code requirements. On February 26, 2026, BACH reviewed the
application with consideration given to 1) consistency with the Master Plan; 2) the
level of affordable housing mitigation; 3) the proposed unit mix; 4) compliance
with the minimum livability requirements found in the Community Housing
Guidelines; 5) the proposed occupancy priorities; and 6) storage and bicycle
storage.
The proposed PUD Amendment requires review by the Planning and Zoning
Commission, and a recommendation to the Town Council for decision pursuant
to Town Code Section 16-65(d)(6), Planned Unit Development; Approval
Procedures; Effect of Approvals. In the event of a denial by the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the Applicant could appeal the denial by the Planning and
Zoning Commission to the Town Council. The Special Review and Site Plan
Review also require the Planning and Zoning Commission’s review and
recommendation to the Town Council. Staff has provided a draft conditions for
the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration and discussion.
IV.

Discussion Items

Consistency with the Master Plan:
The site is located completely within the Town’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB).
The site has been amended to accommodate the existing residential use. The
2020 Basalt Master Plan includes a designation of “existing land use” on the site
on the Future Land Use Map.
2
Page 15 of 182

Page 16 of 182

Staff believes that the following goals and objectives in the Master Plan may be
applicable to the proposed development:
Goals:
2.1: Provide housing that services residents
demographics, incomes and collective needs.

across a range of

2.3: Promote the development of innovative and diverse housing types
close to existing and planned commercial and transit centers.
4.2: Place high value on mixed use and live/work arrangements.
Objectives:
2.B Promote affordability of living and diversity of housing types including
market rate housing.
2.Z. Ensure that development projects approved or recommended for
approval by the Town incorporate walkability, access to services and parks
and reduce dependencies on personal vehicles.
3.J. Promote housing development to have bicycle- and pedestrian
orientation by encouraging housing development at high connectivity areas
(e.g. near the regional trail system or RFTA stops that have safe pedestrian
and bicycle crossings).
4.E. Encourage projects that incorporate mixed use and live/work concepts,
provided these projects are consistent with the other community goals
outlined in this document.
7.L. Strongly support workforce housing that accommodates lifestyles for
the next generation of workers, and that is near or incorporated into
workplaces.
Level of AH Mitigation: The Applicant proposes one (1) residential unit, proposed
to be a deed-restricted Category 5 unit. The two-bedroom deed-restricted unit is
proposed to be 659 sf. No additional commercial, industrial, or market-rate
residential square footage is proposed as part of this application.
Unit Mix: The Applicant proposes one (1) residential unit, proposed to be a
deed-restricted Category 5 unit. The 2024 Housing Needs Assessment indicates
a need for deed-restricted units in all income categories and sizes. As the unit is
not proposed as mitigation for any new free-market residential or commercial
development, it is not subject to the requirement to average Category 2.

3
Page 16 of 182

Page 17 of 182

Compliance with the Minimum Livability Requirements in Community Housing
Guidelines: The proposed units meet the Town’s Community Housing Guideline
requirements in regard to:
• unit size
• kitchen size,
• facility requirements,
• livability requirements,
• kitchen and bathroom amenities (i.e. bathtubs in the units),
• private open space is proposed to be provided in a shared deck space of
564 sf. The Applicant has not provided detailed information regarding
exterior storage for the proposed residential unit. As the property is in the
floodplain, it is noted that the Town Code requires any development not
increase the base flood elevation; the Applicant has not proposed any
change to the building footprint.
Alternatives for providing storage may include:
•
•

removing or reducing the size of some of the units and incorporating
exterior storage on the upper floors; and/or
incorporating additional outdoor bicycle parking to help alleviate the need
for the required exterior storage.

BACH finds the proposed unit to meet the Community Housing livability
requirements as proposed.
It should be noted that there is additional flexibility in requiring community benefit
in PUDs in exchange for an Applicant requesting variation in PUD requirements.
Parking and Vehicular Circulation: The Applicant is requesting a 25% reduction in
parking as made available in the land use code; and a variation from the
intersection spacing requirements in the PUD. The Applicant has proposed the
addition of one parking space on-site for the proposed unit and to reconfigure the
vehicular access to the site by eliminating one of the two vehicular entrances to
the site. Staff has discussed the potential for the Applicant to dedicate a parking
space on the adjacent Cathers Home Property through a parking sharing
agreement to respond to the Public Works concerns regarding overflow parking.
Combined Private Open Space: The Applicant has also proposed shared
outdoor amenity space with a 564 sf deck accessible by the tenants of each of
the two respective residential units. Staff finds the combined private open space
proposal to be consistent with other multi-family development approvals in
Basalt. It is also noted that the 564 sf deck is considerably larger than the 100 sf
of private open space that would be required per Town Code. BACH was
supportive of the proposed amenity space.

4
Page 17 of 182

Page 18 of 182

Occupancy Priorities: The Applicant has requested priority for employees of the
property owner; the Applicant has not otherwise requested adjustments to the
occupancy priorities as set forth in the Town’s Community Housing Guidelines
which are as follows:
1. Essential Employees working in Basalt,
2. Non-Essential Employees working full-time in Basalt,
3. Essential Employees working outside Basalt but in the Roaring Fork
Valley,
4. Non-Essential Employees working outside Basalt but in the Roaring Fork
Valley.
BACH expressed support for the Applicant’s proposed occupancy priorities.
V.

Recommendation

Planning and Zoning Commission has the following recommendation options to
Town Council:
1) Recommend approval as presented; or,
2) Recommend conditional approval; or,
3) Recommend denial.
Staff recommends Planning and Zoning Commission hear presentations from
Staff and the Applicant, hear public comment, provide discussion and provide a
recommendation for the Town Council’s consideration, including consideration of
the following conditions:
Representations:
1. The Applicant shall comply with all representations set forth in the
Application.
2. The Applicant shall comply with all material representations made in
hearings before the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town
Council.
Community Housing:
3. The Applicant shall be allowed to consider occupancy priority for
employees of the property owner in the deed-restriction on the
proposed residential unit. The proposed unit shall be deed-restricted
to Category 5 and follow the occupancy priorities as follows:

5
Page 18 of 182

Page 19 of 182

1. Employees of the Property Owner
2. Essential Employees working in Basalt,
3. Non-Essential Employees working full-time in Basalt,
4. Essential Employees working outside Basalt but in the Roaring
Fork Valley,
5. Non-Essential Employees working outside Basalt but in the
Roaring Fork Valley.
Industrial Use:
4.

The existing industrial use on the site shall remain. Acknowledgment
of the industrial uses and standards of operation shall be included in
the lease agreement for future tenants of the proposed residential unit.
The language to be included in the lease agreements shall be
reviewed for approval by the Town Attorney.

Engineering and Related Technical Issues:
5. The Applicant shall comply with the Roaring Fork Fire Rescue
Authority’s comments in the letter provided by Brooke Stott dated
February 17, 2026.
6. The Applicant shall comply with comments from the Town Engineer
and Public Works Department dated March 3, 2026.
7. The Applicant shall obtain an additional EQR, as stated in the referral
letter from the Basalt Sanitation District dated January 28, 2026.
Fees and Surcharges:
8. The Town will exempt the Applicant from part or all the School Land
Dedication Fee if the Applicant submits a letter to the TRC from the
RE-1 School District recommending that part or all of the school land
dedication fees should be exempted prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy on the proposed dwelling unit.
9. The Applicant shall be required to pay the following fees and
assessments as part of building permit submittal:
a. All building permit fees as determined by the Town’s Building
Official; and,
b. All fees, penalties, and assessments as required by Basalt
Sanitation District for sanitary sewer services; and,

6
Page 19 of 182

Page 20 of 182

c. All fees, penalties, and assessments as required by Basalt Water
Department; and,
d. All fees, penalties, and assessments as required by the Roaring
Fork Fire Rescue Authority.
e. Parkland Dedication Fees as calculated by the Town Planner.
10. Project Transportation Fee: The Applicant shall participate in or
contribute on a proportional basis to the future cost of making the
transportation improvements that will be necessary to mitigate the
cumulative impacts of traffic growth from this and other expected
projects. The Applicant shall pay a transportation fee at the time of
building permit issuance based on the following schedule:
Unit Type
Community Housing
Attached

Fee (per total square foot)
$.44

11. Basalt Avenue/State Highway 82 Intersection Improvements: The
Applicant shall pay its fair share of the traffic improvements selected
by the Town to increase traffic flow out of Southside based on the
Applicant’s fair-share of the trips identified in the Southside Traffic
Study conducted by SGM on 10/14/2016 as further described below.
The Applicant shall pay a fee in the amount of $944 at the time of
building permit toward the Cody Lane and Basalt Avenue traffic
improvement (“Mini Roundabout Improvement”). This is in addition to
the impact fees included in Condition No. 10, above.
Sustainable Building and Wildfire Mitigation Regulations:
12. The Applicant shall comply with the Town’s Sustainable Building
Regulations in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance to the
extent applicable to the Applicant’s remodel.
13. The Applicant shall comply with the Town’s Wildfire Mitigation
Regulation in effect that the time of Building Permit issuance to the
extent applicable.
Approval Documents:
14. The Applicant shall prepare a final site plan for review and approval by
the Town Planner within 180 days of this approval. The site plan shall
be executed and recorded prior to the issuance of any Certificates of
Occupancy for the one (1) residential unit.

7
Page 20 of 182

Page 21 of 182

15. The Applicant shall provide a draft deed-restriction for review by the
Town Attorney within 180 days of this approval and before Building
Permit issuance.
Vested Rights and Amendments:
16.The Applicant shall obtain a building permit within three (3) years of the
effective date of this approval or the vested rights granted herein shall
be null and void unless extended pursuant to the extension of vested
rights process in the Town Code.
17. The Town Planner may review and approve minor amendments to this
approval to effectuate the intent of the final development approvals.
The Applicant shall have the ability to appeal a Town Planner’s
decision on a minor amendment to the Town Council at a public
meeting in which (15) days written notice of the public meeting has
been provided to the Applicant.
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Application
Exhibit B - Public Noticing Materials
Exhibit C - Referral Comments

8
Page 21 of 182

Page 22 of 182

EXHIBIT A
LAND USE APPLICATION

PC Development, LLC
540 Basalt Ave
Basalt, Colorado
PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

An application for PUD Amendment and associated development review actions to
construct a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building.
Represented by:

Page 22 of 182

Page 23 of 182

TABLE OF CONTENTS
•

Project Overview and Code Response

•

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map and Parcel Description

•

Attachment 2 – Improvement Survey

•

Attachment 3 – Documentation Evidencing Ownership

•

Attachment 4 - Previous Approvals and PUD Documents

•

Attachment 5 – Architectural Plans and Renderings

•

Attachment 6 – Site and Landscape Plan

•

Attachment 7 - Civil Engineering Report

•

Attachment 8 – Traffic Analysis

•

Attachment 9 – Construction Management Plan

•

Attachment 10 – Property Owners within 300’ (BBCS and Property)

•

Attachment 11 – Letter of Authorization and Statement of Authority

•

Attachment 12 – Application Form

•

Attachment 13 – Pre-Application Conference Summary

PC Development, LLC
PUD Amendment – construction of a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building
540 Basalt Avenue, Basalt, Colorado / PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

2
Page 23 of 182

Page 24 of 182

Project Overview
PC Development, LLC (the “Applicant”) submits this land use application for PUD
Amendment, Site Plan Review, Special Review, and Housing Mitigation Report to
construct a new deed-restricted residential unit on the third floor of an existing two-story
structure located at 540 Basalt Avenue, PID # 246718102010 (the “Property”). This
application is submitted in conformance with the Pre-application Conference conducted
with the Town of Basalt, dated 17 January 2025.
Property Overview
The Property is located in the Industrial Zone District (IN) of the Town of Basalt and in
the Basalt Business Center South Subdivision (BBCS). The Property contains 7,838 SF
of gross lot area and is bounded by Basalt Avenue to the east and south. A mixed-use
commercial and residential building that is part of the BBCS Subdivision borders the
Property to the north. A mixed-use commercial and residential building that is part of
the Basalt Business Center West Subdivision borders the Property to the west.
Existing Site Condition
The existing two-story building contains a 2,038 SF commercial space with 272 SF
storage area on the first floor and a 758 SF two-bedroom residential unit on the second
floor. Currently, the commercial space is used as a rug wash. There is a 230 SF deck
connected to the residential unit, and a 100 SF shed is located on the rear of the
Property. Onsite parking is accessed from Basalt Avenue. There are three (3)
coniferous trees on the Property which line the eastern border of the Property along
Basalt Avenue. Several additional broadleaf trees border the Property to the west.
There are currently two curb cuts that access the Property.
Proposed Development
The Applicant proposes adding a third-floor deed-restricted two-bedroom residential unit
to the existing structure. The proposed unit, which the Applicant proposes as a
Category 5 unit, will contain 659 SF of interior space. Materials included in this
application provide information on compliance with community housing livability
requirements. All applicable requirements have been met. The Applicant requests that
this unit occupancy is prioritized for the Applicant’s employees. The deck is proposed to
be expanded to contain 564 SF and will feature a planted edge that will act as a codecompliant guardrail. The expanded deck will be accessible to both residential units.
Two exterior “Rug Wash” signs are proposed to be added to aid in identifying the
commercial use. Two (2) additional parking spaces are to be provided at the northeast
portion of the Property, located between the building and Basalt Avenue. Total onsite
parking will be six (6) spaces. The Applicant requests the 25% reduction of parking
available in the land use code. Site constraints do not allow additional parking to be
added. Moreover, the close proximity to transit and other amenities and the fact that the
unit will be for employees of the Applicant support the reduction of parking. The 1,712
SF of proposed landscaping will include waterwise and indigenous deciduous and
coniferous plants while maintaining existing trees.
One of the existing curb cuts, located under the existing conifer trees, will be removed.
The remaining curb cut will be widened to provide improved access. A requirement of
PC Development, LLC
PUD Amendment – construction of a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building
540 Basalt Avenue, Basalt, Colorado / PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

3
Page 24 of 182

Page 25 of 182

the BBCS PUD Control Document states that driveways must be located more than 75
feet from an intersection. Due to the existing trees, the access cannot be located
farther north than proposed to meet this requirement. It is believed that adequate sight
lines are present to ensure safe traffic movements to and from the Property. The
existing dumpster, which is unattractively located to the south of the building, is
proposed to be relocated adjacent to the existing shed on the rear of the Property. This
location has been preliminarily reviewed with the trash hauler and accepted. He
Applicant has also coordinated with the adjoining property owner and they, too, have
preliminary accepted this location for a shared dumpster.
We look forward to working with Town of Basalt staff, the Basalt Affordable Community
Housing Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council in
connection with this application.

4
Page 25 of 182

Page 26 of 182

Land Use Code Response
Special Review
Sec. 16-112. - Site plan submission.
The site plan shall be drawn to scale in a form acceptable to the Town Manager, showing the
following:
(1) The location of all buildings.
(2) Parking areas.
(3) Ingress and egress points to and from the public street.
(4) Signs.
(5) Lighting.
(6) Landscaping.
(7) Tabulations showing the area of the site, number of dwelling units, number of parking
spaces and percentage of open space provided.

The site plan included as part of this application contains all the requested and
required features. Please see Attachment 6.
Sec. 16-113. - Standards for review.
(a) Lights and signs shall be located in a manner that will not be distracting to adjoining
properties or passing motorists.

The two proposed signs to be included in this development will not be distracting to
adjoining properties or passing motorists. The signs are not intended to draw
attention beyond aiding those looking to identify the location of the commercial rug
wash. The sign code and the requirements of the BBCS associated with signage
have been carefully considered.
(b) Landscaping shall be provided in areas near the public right-of-way and located with
consideration for energy conservation. An acceptable plan must be provided for the
maintenance of the required landscaped areas.

As shown in the landscape plan, the Applicant intends to provide landscaping near
rights-of-way and has considered energy conservation as part of this plan in the form
of maintaining mature vegetation that creates meaningful shading to the existing and
proposed structures. Proposed landscaping has also considered the presence of
existing easements and the governing documents of the BBCS. Please see
Attachment 6.
(c) Control of storm drainage shall be provided so as to not damage adjoining properties. The
plan must be approved by the Town Engineer.

Stormwater drainage upgrades are proposed as part of the proposed development.
These upgrades will not damage adjoining properties. These upgrades are detailed
in Sopris Engineering’s civil engineering report. Please see Attachment 8.

5
Page 26 of 182

Page 27 of 182

(d) Site design and building plans shall include provisions of or the need of the handicapped
individuals as required by the building code adopted in Chapter 18 of this Code or other
ordinances of the Town.

Site design and building plans are compliant with the requirements for handicap
accessibility as required by the adopted building code.
(e) Approved landscaping or solid fencing capable of screening adjacent properties shall be
provided when commercial uses abut residential uses.

Not Applicable. The existing ground floor commercial use does not abut any
residential uses. Adjacent ground-floor uses are also commercial in nature. The
existing second and proposed third-floor residential units are adjacent to other
second-floor residential uses found on adjacent properties.
(f) Commercial and industrial uses shall conform to the following performance standards:

The existing commercial use will not be altered as part of the application.
Sec. 16-43. - Site plan and supporting documents.
(a) There shall be filed with each special review application a site plan drawn to scale and an
appropriate number of copies as determined by the Town Planner.

A site plan has been included as part of this application. Additional copies will be
provided, following the request of the Town Planner. Please see Attachment 6.
(b) Following approval by the Town Council, the applicant shall submit a reproducible copy of
the approved site plan to the Town for the Town's permanent records suitable for recording
in the public records in such formats as may be required by the Town Planner.

The Applicant will submit a reproducible copy of the site plan as required to the
Town Planner.
(c) The special review site plan and other information submitted with the application shall
show or include the following:
(1) The location of all existing and proposed structures and other improvements on the real
property.

Existing buildings, proposed structures, and all improvements have been
included on the architectural and landscape architectural plans. Please see
Attachments 5 and 6.
(2) A legal description of the property.

6
Page 27 of 182

Page 28 of 182

LOT X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 IN BOOK 38 AT PAGE 1,
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
(3) A list of all property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the property.

A list of property owners within 300 feet of the Property has been included as
Attachment 10.
(4) All off-street parking and loading areas.

Off-street parking and loading areas have been shown on the Site and
Landscape Plan included as Attachment 6.
(5) The location of all ways for ingress and egress to all buildings and parking areas.

Ingress and egress have been shown on the Site and Landscape Plan included
as Attachment 6. The existing access will be utilized as there are no other
alternatives due to existing site conditions.
(6) Service and refuse collection areas.

Service and refuse collection areas have been shown on the Site and Landscape
Plan included as Attachment 6. The existing location is awkwardly located,
essentially occupying a parking space. Moreover, the dumpster is highly visible
from the public right-of-way. The new proposed location of the dumpster is
located away from parking, is not readily visible from the street, and is
accessible. The location has been reviewed with the trash hauling company and
adjacent property owner. Both parties have provided preliminary approval for the
relocation and shared use of the dumpster.
(7) Major screening proposals.

No major screening is proposed.
(8) The size, shape, height and character of all signs.

Proposed signage has been indicated on the Architectural Plans included as
Attachment 5. Signage will comply with applicable Town and BBCS guidelines.
PC Development, LLC
PUD Amendment – construction of a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building
540 Basalt Avenue, Basalt, Colorado / PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

7
Page 28 of 182

Page 29 of 182

(9) The area and location of all open space and recreation areas.

The site and landscape plan included in Attachment 6 show the area and location
of all open space. Existing areas of open space, along with the associated
landscaping, will be maintained.
(10) The location and type of outdoor lighting.

Outdoor lighting has been indicated on the Architectural Plans included as
Attachment 5.
(11) A comprehensive landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted satisfying the
requirements of Paragraphs 16-73(d)(2), (3), (5) and (9).

A Site and Landscape Plan is included as Attachment 6. There are limited
opportunities to enhance at grade landscaping given parking requirements and
areas of easements. Existing vegetation will be maintained. The expanded
rooftop deck will feature a planted guard railing that will provide interest from the
public right-of-way as well as provide a meaningful amenity to the residents of
the existing and proposed residential units. The existing irrigation system will be
maintained.
(12) The anticipated timetable for completion. If the project is to be completed in phases,
then the data for completion of each phase shall be indicated.

No phasing is anticipated for the completion of the project. The project will be
pursued immediately following land use approval and the issuance of a building
permit. It is estimated that construction will take approximately six (6) to eight (8)
months.
(13) All owners and lienholders of the property shall sign the following agreement that will
be placed on the original special review site plan:

The Applicant is the sole owner of the Property. Any lienholders will sign an
agreement stating the real property described on the site plan will be developed
only in accordance with the approved Special Review Site Plan and other
provisions of the applicable zoning regulations of the Town of Basalt.
(14) In addition to the site plan, a title policy shall be provided to the Town indicating that
the property is free and clear of all ownership disputes, liens or encumbrances
PC Development, LLC
PUD Amendment – construction of a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building
540 Basalt Avenue, Basalt, Colorado / PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

8
Page 29 of 182

Page 30 of 182

whatsoever, which would impair the property to be utilized for the uses approved. The
title policy shall provide verification that all owners and lienholders have signed the
special review site plan. The title policy shall be effective within twenty-four (24) hours
after the date of approval by the Town Council. If the title policy is not provided to the
Town Clerk within seven (7) days after action by the Town Council, the action by the
Town Council may be voided.

A title policy has been included with the application. Please see Atachment 2.
To the best of the knowledge of the Applicant, there are no disputes, liens, or
encumbrances that would prevent utilizing the Property for the existing residential
and commercial use as well as the proposed residential use.
(15) Other information as needed by the Town to analyze the feasibility and impacts of the
special review use, which may include but not be limited to traffic analyses, soils or
geological reports or drainage and engineering studies.

The Applicant provides a traffic conformance letter prepared by a registered
transportation engineer as Attachment 9 and a civil engineering report prepared
by a registered civil engineer as Attachment 8.
(16) A drawing or statement if determined adequate by the Town Planner regarding the
building character, including height, square footage, number of bedrooms and floor
area ratio or lot coverage.

Please see the Architectural Plan attached to this application, which includes
information on the building's character, height, square footage, number of
bedrooms, floor area ratio, and lot coverage.
(17) Drawings, computer visualization or models accurately depicting the proposed new
construction in relation to existing and proposed buildings on the lot and adjacent
properties and typography.

Please see Architectural Plan made a part of this application as Attachment 5.

Housing Mitigation Report
Sec. 16-413. - Employee Impact and Housing Mitigation Report.
Unless waived in part or whole by the Town Planner, in order for the Town to be able to
assess the need for housing mitigation generated by new nonresidential development, any
application for site plan review (Sections 16-111 through 16-113), planned unit development
(Section 16-65), subdivision (Sections 17-83 and 17-84), rezoning (Section 16-267), Community
Priorities Scoring System (Section 16-481) or special review (Section 16-43) containing
nonresidential development shall include an Employee Impact and Housing Mitigation Report
prepared by a professional qualified to prepare such report and approved by the Town using
recognized standards which provide, at a minimum, the following items:

9
Page 30 of 182

Page 31 of 182

(1) An analysis of the number of full-time equivalent employees which will be added to the
Town as a result of the applicant's proposed nonresidential development, including
employees during and necessary for construction of the project, as well as employees
necessary after complete build-out of the project;
(2) An analysis of the number, size, type and configuration of all housing on the property as
of January 1, 1999, which was generally attainable by households having low and median
incomes (household income less than fifty thousand dollars [$50,000.00] in 1999) paying
not more than twenty-eight percent (28%) to thirty-six percent (36%) of their household
income for total housing expense, including debt service or rental payments, homeowner's
or renter's insurance, real estate taxes and utilities;
(3) A description of the manner in which the applicant proposes that employees will be
housed, including any on-site or off-site housing the applicant will provide;
(4) A description of the methodology by which the applicant will ensure that the housing to be
provided by the applicant will be maintained as housing available for employees of the
Town;
(5) A written statement verifying that the proposed development is in compliance with the thenexisting master plan; and
(6) A written statement describing how the proposed development is consistent with the
adopted Community Housing Guidelines and community housing requirements established
in this Article.

Not applicable. No additional commercial use is proposed as part of this land
use application. The Applicant proposes adding a third-floor deed-restricted
two-bedroom residential unit to the existing structure. The proposed unit, which
the Applicant proposes as a Category 5 unit, will contain 659 SF of interior
space. Materials included in this application provide information on compliance
with community housing livability requirements. All applicable requirements
have been met. The Applicant requests that this unit occupancy is prioritized for
the Applicant’s employees.
Sec. 16-414. - Waiver or additional information.
The Town Planner may waive the requirement of preparing and submitting the Employee Impact
and Housing Mitigation Report in instances when the Town Planner finds that the preparation and
filing of the report for a particular application is unduly burdensome, duplicative or unnecessary
because the applicant conclusively demonstrates there will be no impacts on the employees of the
community or the availability of housing in the Town generated by the proposed development; or
the Town Planner conclusively finds that the applicant has proposed a plan for community housing
that satisfies all of the requirements of Sections 16-416, 16-417 and 16-418 below. The Technical
Review Committee, Planning and Zoning Commission and Town Council may require the
applicant to provide additional or supplemental information not provided in such report prior to
granting any approval, denial or approval with conditions for the application.
(1) A written statement as to whether the proposed community housing units are to be sale or
rental units.
(2) A written statement as to the categories of the proposed Community Housing units.

10
Page 31 of 182

Page 32 of 182

(3) A written statement as to the percentage of the proposed development's square footage that
would consist of deed-restricted Community Housing units (category, price-capped
housing).
(5) Floor plans demonstrating that the proposed community housing units meet the size
requirements for community housing units.
(6) If for-sale units, a draft HOA budget demonstrating compliance with the limitations on
HOA Dues and Assessments established in the Community Housing Guidelines. If the units
are for rent, include an estimate of how much of the site maintenance costs would be passed
on to the renters on monthly basis.
(7) A comparison between the· amount of currently approved community housing and the
amount of proposed community housing (in terms of square footage and number and type
of units).

Not applicable. The proposed residential dwelling unit is less than 1,400 SF of
gross area. The Applicant proposes adding a third-floor deed-restricted twobedroom residential unit to the existing structure. The proposed unit, which the
Applicant proposes as a Category 5 unit, will contain 659 SF of interior space.
Materials included in this application provide information on compliance with
community housing livability requirements. All applicable requirements have
been met. The Applicant requests that this unit occupancy is prioritized for the
Applicant’s employees.
PUD Amendment
Sec. 16-66. Application requirements.
(2) PUD Amendment. A PUD amendment application comprised of written materials and site
plans as provided below shall be required for amendments to approved PUD plans:
a. Written information:
1. A legal description of the property

The legal description of the Property has been included as Attachment 1. A legal
description has also been included on the Improvement Survey. Pursuant to
these sources, the legal description is as follows:
LOT X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 IN BOOK 38 AT PAGE 1,
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
2. A description of the existing and proposed PUD and the objectives of the PUD,
including a spreadsheet outlining requested variations from the underlying
PUD schedule of requirements, the PUD design standards and other applicable
sections of Chapters 16 and 17 of this Code. The statement should also include
a listing of all enhancements offered by the proposal which are not required by
this Code, to allow an objective analysis and comparison of the benefits and
code variations.

11
Page 32 of 182

Page 33 of 182

The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions of BBCS have been
included as part of this application. See Attachment 4. The purpose of
the BBCS is to allow light industrial buildings and permitted accessory
uses together with employee housing (accessory residential is proposed
to be utilized by employees of the Applicant) as well as those uses
allowed after special review approval is granted by the Town of Basalt.
No variations are requested.
3. A list of the names and addresses of all property owners and lien holders, the
planner, architect, engineer and surveyor. Authorization from the property
owners to file and process the application.

A list of property owners within 300 feet of the Property as well as within
the BBCS has been included as part of this application. See Attachment
10. The included title commitment provides the names of any lien
holders. See Attachment 3. Finally, a letter of authorization from the
manager of PC Development, LLC has been included as Attachment 12.
4. A statement of how the proposal relates to the Master Plan, Three Mile Plan,
and any other long-range planning documents deemed appropriate by the
Town.

This proposed development would increase density by providing an
additional two-bedroom residential unit on the third story of an existing
building. This would help to discourage the construction of such a unit on
an undeveloped parcel of land, thus preserving undeveloped portions of
Town.
The proposed location for this residential unit is approximately a 5-minute
walk to a RFTA park and ride. This adjacency and accessibility would be
in keeping with the intentions of this master plan objectives of creating a
walkable Town, discouraging single-occupancy vehicle use, and living
adjacent to where you work.
6. A development schedule indicating the estimated timing and phasing of
construction activities. The schedule shall include the estimated area allocations
for each land use in each phase of development. The total area of common open
space provided at any phase of the development shall be provided.

12
Page 33 of 182

Page 34 of 182

7. Quantitative data shall be provided for the following:
a) The total number and type of dwelling units in the PUD.

This application is not amending the overall BBCS PUD. This
application proposed to add one (1) additional dwelling unit to the
BBCS PUD.
c) The maximum area and estimated building square footage of proposed
nonresidential construction on the subject property.

This application does not propose nonresidential construction.
d) The development intensity expressed as the ratio of the floor area to the
gross area of each tract or the subject parcel.

The proposed floor area ration will be .47 : 1.0.
e) The area of open space and the percentage of the open space to the gross site
area.

Open space is estimated to be 5,528 SF or 70% of the site.
f)

The amount of off-street parking to be provided for each use within the PUD,
including the number of spaces for residents and guests for residential use
and for employees and customers for business or industrial uses.

The proposed off-street parking for the Property is six (6) spaces.
Two (2) spaces are reserved for residential use and four (4) for the
existing commercial space.
The required parking, with the allowable 25% reduction would be 6
spaces (the existing industrial rug wash requires 4 spaces (2038/500
= 4); the existing and proposed residential would require 4 spaces).
The proposed residential unit is intended for employee housing of the
adjacent commercial business and is within 5 minutes’ walking
distance of the Basalt Park and Ride. These conditions merit the
further reduction of parking requirements.
8. A description of the means by which all open space and recreational areas,
walkways and private streets are to be maintained.
PC Development, LLC
PUD Amendment – construction of a deed-restricted dwelling unit over an existing building
540 Basalt Avenue, Basalt, Colorado / PID: 246718102010
29 July 2025 (updated 25 August 2025)

13
Page 34 of 182

Page 35 of 182

The existing BBCS PUD guide provides for the maintenance of open
space, recreation areas, walkways, and private streets.

b. Site plans and supporting data. Site plans and supporting maps or data are required to
show the details of the PUD plan, including:
1. A vicinity map drawn to scale showing the site and the surrounding area within a
distance of at least one (1) mile, existing zoning, traffic circulation patterns, public
facilities, density and types of adjacent residential areas, the Town limits, the
Town street system, major inter- sections and points of access, transit stops,
irrigation ditches, major utility transmission lines, adjoining subdivisions and
property lines and density and types of nonresidential land uses on adjoining
properties.
2. The existing site conditions, including topography, significant vegetation and
unique natural features.
3. A site plan drawn at one (1) inch equals one hundred (100) feet on a twenty-four
(24) by thirty-six (36) inch sheet, or alternate formats approved by Town staff,
illustrating the general location and proposed zoning for all existing and proposed
land uses, including maximum of dwelling units, density, floor area ratios and
types of nonresidential uses.
4. An eleven (11) inch by seventeen (17) inch photo reduction of the site plan.
6. The existing and proposed vehicular circulation system, including arterial,
collector and local streets, off-street parking areas, service and loading areas,
major points of access to public rights-of-way, extension of existing Town street
systems, including gridded streets, and demonstration of compliance with the
Three Mile Street Plan.
7. The existing and proposed pedestrian circulation system, including the
relationship with the vehicular traffic system, indicating proposed treatment at
points of intersection.
8. Information and descriptions of the land areas adjacent to the proposed
development with respect to land uses, zoning and traffic patterns.
9. Preliminary plans for storm drainage and water and sewer service prepared by a
licensed professional engineer, for the proposed development.
10. Additional material, data or studies, as required by the Planning and Zoning
Commission or Town Council Board of Trustees, which will facilitate an
understanding of the PUD master plan and the planning objectives of the
proposed amendment unit development. These may include but are not limited
to additional fiscal impact evaluations, market studies and transportation studies.

The site plan which has been included as part of this application, contains all
the requested and required features. See Attachment 6a.

14
Page 35 of 182

Page 36 of 182

c. Additional information. Any additional information reasonably required by the Town
staff to review the application and to verify compliance with the provisions of this
Code.

Should the Town of Basalt require any additional information, it will be
provided by the Applicant.
d. Necessary consent to submit the PUD Amendment Application from the HOA (Need to
submit this item is dependent on language in the Declaration of Covenants for the
subdivision).

Not Applicable. Plans must be submitted to the Architectural Control
Committee prior to application of the building permit, which will be done.
e. Completed Town of Basalt Development Review Application and Reimbursement
Agreement.

A completed Reimbursement Agreement has been included as part of this
Application. See Attachment 11.
f.

Payment of required review fees and deposits.

Payment will be made in a timely manner with the submission of this
application.
g. Site plan, floor plans, and perspective drawings.

The site plan, floor plans, and perspective drawings will be submitted to the
Town of Basalt as part of this application.
h. Traffic Study comparing the development incorporated to SGM's traffic study for the
site vs. the anticipated trip generation of the proposed development.

A traffic impact study was conducted and the conformance letter from this
study has been included as part of this application as Attachment 9.

15
Page 36 of 182

Page 37 of 182

2020 Town of Basalt Master Plan Response
G.1 | PEOPLE & COMMUNITY CHARACTER
GOAL 1.3: Balance the natural and recreational attractions of the area with accommodation
for a diverse spectrum of residents, workers, and visitors.
1.M. Encourage projects that would promote density so as to conserve other nearby
lands for open space, recreation or other uses to preserve existing character.

This proposed development would increase density by providing an additional twobedroom residential unit on the third story of an existing building. This would help to
discourage the construction of such a unit on an undeveloped parcel of land, thus
preserving that land.
G.2 | AFFORDABLE & INCLUSIVE LIVING
GOAL 2.1: Provide housing that serves residents across a range of demographics, incomes and
collective needs.
2.G. Discourage affordable housing projects and residential developments that are not
connected to the transit system or which do not have a well-lighted, safe, protected
pedestrian access to and from transit stops.

The proposed location for this residential unit is approximately a 5-minute walk to a
RFTA park and ride. Therefore, this nearness and accessibility would be in keeping
with the intentions of this master plan objective.
G.4 | AUTHENTIC PLACES & DESTINATIONS
GOAL 4.2: Place high value on mixed use and live/work arrangements.
4.E. Encourage projects that incorporate mixed use and live/work concepts, provided
these projects are consistent with the other community goals outlined in this
document.

As the Property is the site of a commercial operation and is within the Basalt Business
Center, the addition of another residential unit would improve housing diversity in the
area.

16
Page 37 of 182

Page 38 of 182

Description of Consistency with the Basalt Business Center South
The purpose of the BBCS is to allow light industrial buildings and permitted accessory
uses, together with employee housing, as well as those uses allowed after special
review approval is granted by the Town of Basalt. All uses permitted in the Town’s IN
zone district as well as uses specifically granted through special review approval by the
Town.
The proposed additional residential use, which will be utilized for employee housing, is
consistent with this purpose statement. The project will comply with the dimensional
requirements outlined in the BBCS PUD Control Document. To the extent possible, all
landscaping standards are met. The design of the proposed residential unit also meets
all Building Design and Architectural Guidelines of the BBCS.

17
Page 38 of 182

Page 39 of 182

Community Housing Guidelines and Requirements
TOWN OF BASALT COMMUNITY HOUSING GUIDELINES
Updated with Amendments Made as of 6/25/25
All new residential developments will integrate community housing into the development… methods
will be developed to maintain the affordability of existing housing in Basalt.

The creation of this deed-restricted housing unit would satisfy the requirement for the
development of affordable housing and help to maintain overall affordability in the Town.
The Applicant proposes adding a third-floor deed-restricted two-bedroom residential unit
to the existing structure. The proposed unit, which the Applicant proposes as a
Category 5 unit, will contain 659 SF of interior space. Materials included in this
application provide information on compliance with community housing livability
requirements. All applicable requirements have been met. The Applicant requests that
this unit occupancy is prioritized for the Applicant’s employees.
Community housing should be disbursed throughout the community and, where possible, integrated
into the existing community fabric.

The proposed development utilizes an integrated design that takes advantage of vertical
space to improve density of housing over an existing commercial space.
The Town will emphasize programs that will result in the creation of community housing units -- by
units being constructed or by existing units being permanently restricted for community housing,
either through deed restrictions or other methods.

The proposed development is proposed as a Category 5 deed-restricted unit and would
therefore be beneficial to the overall goal of the Town to created more permanently
affordable housing.
Community Housing will be transit friendly, integrate with intermodal transportation connections, and
perpetuate the Town's history of pedestrian walkability and ease of mass transit use.

The proposed location for this residential unit is approximately a 5-minute walk to an
RFTA park and ride.

18
Page 39 of 182

Page 40 of 182

Attachment 1

Pitkin Maps & More
Map Created on 3:08 PM 03/20/25 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com

Legend
State Highway
Road Centerline 4K
Primary Road
Secondary Road
Service Road
Rivers and Creeks
Continuous
Intermittent
River, Lake or Pond
County Line
Wilderness Area
Peaks and Passes
Town Boundary
Federal Land Boundary
BLM
State of Colorado
USFS

Notes

752.3

1: 4,514
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere

376.17

752.3

Feet

THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee
concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability
of the content represented.

Page 40 of 182

Page 41 of 182

Page 42 of 182

2/13/25, 11:13 AM

qPublic.net - Pitkin County Assessor - Report: R014147

Pitkin County Assessor
Summary
Account
Parcel
Property Address
Legal Description
Property Type
Acres
Land SqFt
Tax Area
Mill Levy
Subdivision
Neighborhood
Super Neighborhood

R014147
246718102010
540 BASALT AVE, BASALT, CO 81621
Subdivision: BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH Lot: X
COMM/RES
0
7,835
028M
87.710
BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH
BASALT BYPASS
BASALT COMM

View Map

Owners
PC DEVELOPMENT LLC
530 BASALT AVE
BASALT CO 81621

Land
Unit Type
Land Size Acres
Land Size SqFt

SPEC. PURPOSE LAND
0
5,249

Unit Type
Land Size Acres
Land Size SqFt

SINGLE FAM. RES. - LAND
0
2,586

Buildings
Building #
Building Type
Property Class
Architectural Style
Stories
Frame
Actual Year Built
Effective Year Built
Total Heated SqFt
Office Basalt
Special Purpose First Floor
Warehouse Heated Second Floor
Bedrooms
Baths
Heating Fuel
Heating Type
Air Conditioning
Roof Type
Roof Cover
Construction Quality
Exterior Wall
Interior Wall
Floor
Neighborhood
Super Neighborhood

1
SPEC BASALT
SPEC. PURPOSE-IMPROVEMENT
AVERAGE
2
BLOCK
1996
1996
2,291
168
1,365
758
0
0
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
NONE-BASE
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
BASALT BYPASS
BASALT COMM

Building #
Building Type
Property Class
Architectural Style
Stories
Frame
Actual Year Built
Effective Year Built
Second Floor
Total Heated SqFt

1
BASALT fair/avg (DEP 03)
SINGLE FAM RES-IMPROVEMEN
2 STORY
1
MASONRY
1996
1996
777
777

Page 42 of 182
https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1071&LayerID=26013&PageTypeID=4&PageID=10533&Q=75616204&KeyValue=R014147

1/3

Page 43 of 182

2/13/25, 11:13 AM

qPublic.net - Pitkin County Assessor - Report: R014147

Bedrooms
Baths
Heating Fuel
Heating Type
Air Conditioning
Roof Type
Roof Cover
Construction Quality
Exterior Wall
Interior Wall
Floor
Neighborhood
Super Neighborhood

2
1
GAS
FORCED AIR
NONE
FLAT
BUILT-UP
AVERAGE
CONC BLOCK
DRYWALL
CARPET
BASALT BYPASS
BASALT COMMERCIAL

Actual Values
Assessed Year
Land Actual

2024

2023

2022

2021

$349,700.00

$164,600.00

Improvement Actual

$526,700.00

$615,000.00

$571,800.00

Total Actual

$876,400.00

$779,600.00

$736,400.00

Assessed Values
Assessed Year

2024

2023

2022

2021

Land Assessed

$47,910.00

$36,910.00

$37,010.00

Improvement Assessed

$84,640.00

$149,800.00

$146,970.00

Total Assessed

$132,550.00

$186,710.00

$183,980.00

Sales
Sale Date

Deed Type

9/1/2021

SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED

Reception Number
680071

Book - Page

Sale Price

8/17/1995

GENERAL WARRANTY DEED

384477

791-77

$125,000

9/17/1993

WARRANTY DEED

361176

724-334

$243,710

$965,000

Photos

Map View

Page 43 of 182
https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1071&LayerID=26013&PageTypeID=4&PageID=10533&Q=75616204&KeyValue=R014147

2/3

Page 44 of 182

2/13/25, 11:13 AM

qPublic.net - Pitkin County Assessor - Report: R014147

No data available for the following modules: Extra Features.

Pitkin County presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every
effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Pitkin County makes no warranty or guarantee
concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites
to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole
responsibility of the user.
| User Privacy Policy | GDPR Privacy Notice
Last Data Upload: 2/13/2025, 4:33:04 AM

Developed by

Page 44 of 182
https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID=1071&LayerID=26013&PageTypeID=4&PageID=10533&Q=75616204&KeyValue=R014147

3/3

Page 45 of 182

Attachment 2

6553

R- 86W

T - 8S

4
655

S - 18

LOT X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH
SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 86 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
TOWN OF BASALT, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO

C- Pitkin

IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT

9.87'

(N00°51'48"W

10.00')

46.76'
19.0

655

SITE

5
65

REVISION

N01°00'11"W

46.73')

12.7

6555

(S89°08'12"W

S88°44'23"W
17.0

4
B
N6 ASIS
4
(N °32 OF B
64
°2 '23" EAR
2'0
W
IN
5"
W
72 GS
72 .36
.36 '

2.7'

S88°53'24"W

18.97'

(S89°08'12"W

19.05')

VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE

.1
10.3'

LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7002514-C

Broadleaf

SCO

Broadleaf

THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE BOUNDARY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON
TO DETERMINE:
A) OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND
B) COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS
C) RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL.

0'
139.0 ')

138.9

7.5' SMALL SPECIES LANDSCAPE,
PEDESTRIAN & UTILITY EASEMENT
RECEPTION NO. 384336

FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.
RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 7002514-C ISSUED BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY, EFFECTIVE DATE: NOVEMBER 10,
2023. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.

22.6

10.3'

THE CLIENT DID NOT REQUEST ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS BE RESEARCHED OR
SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.

6555

ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESES, WHICH DENOTE THE
BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE MINOR SUBDIVISION/AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS R & X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH
RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 384336 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO.

ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS UTILIZING THE CONTINUOUS OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS
(CORS) THROUGH THE MESA COUNTY RTVRN NETWORK BROAD CASTING NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM (NAVD88) YIELDING
AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 6554.90' AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT X, BEING A NO. 5 REBAR AND RED PLASTIC CAP LS #33638
AS SHOWN HEREON.

655

Broadleaf

12.0

7.5' LARGE SPECIES LANDSCAPE,
PEDESTRIAN & UTILITY EASEMENT
RECEPTION NO. 384336

Conifer

24.6'

(N11

DUE TO INSUFFICIENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SURVEY MONUMENTATION CONTROLLING THE BOUNDARY LOCATIONS OF THE
SUBJECT PARCEL OF LAND, A GRANT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WAS UTILIZED CONFORMING TO THE EXISTING RECOVERED AND
VALIDATED SURVEY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON AND PRESERVING THE GEOMETRY OF THE ORIGINAL LOTTED PARCEL.

11.8

"W
18'40
N11° 04'46"W

25' BUILDING SETBACK
RECEPTION NO. 384336

10. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.

0
1') '

11. BUILDING MEASUREMENTS ARE AT LOWEST PRACTICABLE POINT ON VENEER.

HYD
WV

3.5

13. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSE
BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS
CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART
OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED, REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR
WRITTEN PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS
EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE BOUNDARY
DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. THIS PLAT IS RESTRICTED TO THE INTENT OF TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101,
5 (a) AND (b) C.R.S.

6555

5°

'36
HYD

(S2

DOWNSPOUT

5°

SANITARY CLEAN-OUT

LEGEND
SCO

12. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY
WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS
SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.

'55 "W
"W

3.5

FIRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE

ELECTRICAL METER

ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER

www.hceng.com

THE ASSUMED BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N64°32'23"W ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE
BETWEEN "A" THE NORTHEAST CORNER A FOUND NO. 5 REBAR AND 1.25" RED PLASTIC CAP LS 33638 AND "B" A FOUND NO. 5
REBAR AND 1.25" RED PLASTIC CAP LS 33638 (5.0' WITNESS CORNER) AS SHOWN HEREON.

01.08.24

file:

G
G

LOT X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH
PITKIN COUNTY

Broadleaf

date:

IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT

DATES OF FIELD SURVEY: DECEMBER 12 & 19, 2023. AT THE TIME OF SURVEY THERE WERE 3-5 INCHES OF SNOW ON THE GROUND.

checked by:

Broadleaf

1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101,
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
PHONE (970) 945-8676 - FAX (970) 945-2555

NO.

JPS

NOTES

drawn by:

Conifer

HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.

PC DEVELOPMENT LLC
540 BASALT AVE, BASALT, CO 81621

6555

Conifer

655

0.4'

TYPE

655

DRIP RADIUS (FT)

TRUNK DIA (IN)

TREE ID

73.9

TREE TABLE

DATE

LOT X, MINOR SUBDIVISION/AMENDED PLAT OF LOTS R AND X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH, RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 IN
PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 1 AS RECEPTION NO. 384336.

5
65

CATV PEDESTAL
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL

LAND SURVEY PLAT DEPOSIT
CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE

G GAS METER
STREET SIGN
BOUNDARY OR LOT LINE

THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND
RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 202_, PLAT BOOK _____, PAGE
______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________.

ADJOINER LINE

EASEMENT LINE
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
8020

MAJOR CONTOUR LINE

NORTHERLY EDGE 30'
WATERLINE EASEMENT
RECEPTION NO. 384336

TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101 C.R.S. (5)(a) PLATS SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
SECTION FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RECORDING INFORMATION ON SURVEYING MONUMENTATION IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE SURVEY DATA FOR SUBSEQUENT LAND SURVEYS AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED
TO AFFECT, IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, THE DESCRIPTION OF A SUBDIVISION, LINE, OR CORNER
CONTAINED IN THE OFFICIAL PLATS AND FIELD NOTES FILED AND OF RECORD OR TO SUBDIVIDE
BOUNDARY. (b) NO PLAT DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION SHALL CONSTITUTE NOTICE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 38-35-109 CRS.
IN THE EVENT THIS SURVEY CANNOT BE DEPOSITED, THIS IS YOUR NOTICE THAT
ALL RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS STATED ABOVE APPLY.

MINOR CONTOUR LINE
CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE
BUILDING
WOOD DECK
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
GRAVEL

______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER
BY:____________________________________

DEPUTY

6556

N16°06'00"W

14.40'

(N15°59'39"W

14.47')

SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
I, SAWYER CALLAHAN, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO (#38785) DO BY
THESE PRESENTS CERTIFY THAT THE DRAWING SHOWN HEREON, WITH NOTES ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A
PART HEREOF, REPRESENTS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF SAID SURVEY IS RENDERED
BY THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, IS
NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH TITLE
38-51-102, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.
SAWYER CALLAHAN,

GRAPHIC SCALE
10
20

COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #38785

PROJECT NO.

2231639
(IN U.S. SURVEY FEET)
1 inch = 10 ft.

SHEET NUMBER

1 of 1
Page 45 of 182

Page 46 of 182

Attachment 3

Customer Distribution

Prevent fraud - Please call a member of our closing team for wire transfer
instructions or to initiate a wire transfer. Note that our wiring instructions will
never change.
Order Number: BAR64007187

Date: 03/11/2025

Property Address: 540 BASALT AVE, BASALT, CO 81621

For Closing Assistance

For Title Assistance
Land Title Roaring Fork Valley
Title Team
200 BASALT CENTER CIRCLE
BASALT, CO 81621
PO BOX 3440
(970) 927-0405 (Work)
(970) 925-0610 (Work Fax)
[email protected]

Seller/Owner
PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery

Page 46 of 182

Page 47 of 182

Estimate of Title Fees
Order Number: BAR64007187

Date: 03/11/2025

Property Address: 540 BASALT AVE, BASALT, CO 81621
Seller(s): PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Buyer(s): A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED

Thank you for putting your trust in Land Title. Below is the estimate of title fees for the
transaction. The final fees will be collected at closing. Visit ltgc.com to learn more about
Land Title.

Estimate of Title Insurance Fees
"TBD" Commitment

$279.00
TOTAL

$279.00

Note: The documents linked in this commitment should be reviewed carefully. These
documents, such as covenants conditions and restrictions, may aﬀect the title, ownership and
use of the property. You may wish to engage legal assistance in order to fully understand and
be aware of the implications of the documents on your property.

Chain of Title Documents:
Pitkin county recorded 09/01/2021 under reception no. 680071

Plat Map(s):
Pitkin county recorded 05/04/1993 at book 31 page 80
Pitkin county recorded 08/11/1995 at book 38 page 1

Page 47 of 182

Page 48 of 182

ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Order Number: BAR64007187

Property Address:
540 BASALT AVE, BASALT, CO 81621
1. Effective Date:
02/28/2025 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be Issued and Proposed Insured:
"TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED

$0.00

3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
FEE SIMPLE
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
LOT X, BASALT BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AUGUST
11, 1995 IN BOOK 38 AT PAGE 1,
COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.

Copyright 2006-2025 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing
as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the
American Land Title Association.

Page 48 of 182

Page 49 of 182

ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part I
(Requirements)
Order Number: BAR64007187
All of the following Requirements must be met:
This proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company
may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or
both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
1.

RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED AUGUST 31, 2021 FROM PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY FOR THE USE OF BANK OF
COLORADO TO SECURE THE SUM OF $637,504.59 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 01, 2021, UNDER
RECEPTION NO. 680072.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED NOVEMBER
16, 2021, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 682670.

RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED OCTOBER 04, 2024 FROM PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY FOR THE USE OF BANK OF
COLORADO TO SECURE THE SUM OF $100,000.00 RECORDED OCTOBER 08, 2024, UNDER RECEPTION
NO. 705282 AND RE-RECORDED JANUARY 7, 2025 AS RECEPTION NO. 707076.
NOTE: THE ABOVE DEED OF TRUST SECURES A LINE OF CREDIT.
SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED IN ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS RECORDED OCTOBER 08,
2024, UNDER RECEPTION NO. 705281.

WRITTEN CONFIRMATION THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY FOR PC
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 01, 2021
UNDER RECEPTION NO. 680069 IS CURRENT.
NOTE: SAID INSTRUMENT DISCLOSES PAUL CATHERS AS THE MANAGER AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE
INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY
ON BEHALF OF SAID ENTITY. IF THIS INFORMATION IS NOT ACCURATE, A CURRENT STATEMENT OF
AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED.

GOOD AND SUFFICIENT DEED FROM PC DEVELOPMENT, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY
COMPANY TO A BUYER TO BE DETERMINED CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY.
NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OR EXCEPTIONS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN THE BUYERS
NAMES ARE ADDED TO THIS COMMITMENT. COVERAGES AND/OR CHARGES REFLECTED HEREIN, IF
ANY, ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF THE CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE
AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO.
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT HERETO.

Page 49 of 182

Page 50 of 182

ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: BAR64007187

This commitment does not republish any covenants, condition, restriction, or limitation contained in any
document referred to in this commitment to the extent that the specific covenant, conditions, restriction,
or limitation violates state or federal law based on race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, handicap, familial status, or national origin.
1.

Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be
ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.

Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records.

Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that
would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.

Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by
law and not shown by the Public Records.

Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the
public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date of the proposed
insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this
Commitment.

(a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that
levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public
agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.

(a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the
issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water.

EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES.

RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM
SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN
UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JULY 27, 1897, IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 77.

10.

EASEMENTS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AS SET FORTH IN DEEDS RECORDED OCTOBER 29, 1969 IN
BOOK 244 AT PAGE 189, RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 1972 IN BOOK 261 AT PAGE 567, AND RECORDED
MAY 31, 1972 IN BOOK 264 AT PAGE 18, IN WHICH INSTRUMENTS THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF SAID
EASEMENTS ARE NOT DEFINED.

11.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE
RECORDED DECEMBER 13, 1985 IN BOOK 501 AT PAGE 467.

12.

EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED TO HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. IN
INSTRUMENTS RECORDED MAY 30, 1986 IN BOOK 511 AT PAGE 782, RECORDED MAY 30, 1986 IN
BOOK 511 AT PAGE 784, AND RECORDED MAY 3, 1993 IN BOOK 711 AT PAGE 1, AND RECORDED MAY
4, 1993 IN BOOK 711 AY PAGE 266..

13.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND
GRANTED IN HOLY CROSS ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE RECORDED
NOVEMBER 06, 1986 IN BOOK 522 AT PAGE 158.

14.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN BASALT
SANITATION DISTRICT PRE-INCLUSION AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1992 IN BOOK 689
AT PAGE 101.
Page 50 of 182

Page 51 of 182

ALTA COMMITMENT
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
Schedule B, Part II
(Exceptions)
Order Number: BAR64007187

15.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ORDINANCE NO.
21, SERIES OF 1992 RECORDED MAY 04, 1993 IN BOOK 711 AT PAGE 262.

16.

TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 28, 1993 IN BOOK 725 AT PAGE 243.

17.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ADDENDUM TO
AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 384298.

18.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO.
23, SERIES OF 1995 RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 384337.

19.

EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR WATER LINE PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO THE TOWN OF BASALT
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 27, 1992 IN BOOK 678 AT PAGE 801.

20.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 7
RECORDED MAY 20, 1992 IN BOOK 678 AT PAGE 447, ORDINANCE NO. 20 RECORDED MAY 4, 1993 IN
BOOK 711 AT PAGE 259, ORDINANCE NO. 21 RECORDED MAY 4, 1993 IN BOOK 711 AT PAGE 262, AND
ORDINANCE NO. 22 RECORDED MAY 4, 1993 IN BOOK 711 AT PAGE 266, AND ADDENDUM THERETO
RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 837, AND ORDINANCE NO. 16 RECORDED
DECEMBER 13, 1985 IN BOOK 501 AT PAGE 467.

21.

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS
CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 04, 1993, IN BOOK 711 AT PAGE 285 AND AS AMENDED
IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 07, 1994, IN BOOK 741 AT PAGE 117.

22.

EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF BASALT
BUSINESS CENTER SOUTH RECORDED MAY 4, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 31 AT PAGE 80 AND AMENDED
PLAT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1995 IN BOOK 38 AT PAGE 1.

23.

TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN COMMON WALL
AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 02, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 514306.

24.

MATTERS DISCLOSED ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PREPARED BY JEFFREY ALLEN TUTTLE ON
BEHALF OF TUTTLE SURVEYING SERVICES, CERTIFIED AUGUST 20, 2021, JOB NO. N/A
SAID DOCUMENT STORED AS OUR IMAGE 38070280
A: EXCEPTION FOR ENCROACHMENT OF WOOD SHED ONTO NEIGHBORING PARCEL WITHOUT THE
BENEFIT OF A RECORDED AGREEMENT.

Page 51 of 182

Page 52 of 182

Land Title Guarantee Company
Disclosure Statements

Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that:
(A) The Subject real property may be located in a special taxing district.
(B) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction will be obtained from the county treasurer of the county in
which the real property is located or that county treasurer's authorized agent unless the proposed insured provides
written instructions to the contrary. (for an Owner's Policy of Title Insurance pertaining to a sale of residential real
property).
(C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of
County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10-406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing in the
clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least
one half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that does not conform, except that,
the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms on which space is provided for recording or
filing information at the top margin of the document.
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that "Every title entity shall be responsible for all matters
which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title entity conducts the closing and is responsible for
recording or filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title
Guarantee Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents
from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Title Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of
Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the Owner's Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following
conditions:
(A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
(B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the land
described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
(C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic's and
material-men's liens.
(D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
(E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased within
six months prior to the Date of Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded liens will include:
disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor;
payment of the appropriate premium fully executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any
additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.

No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
Page 52 of 182

Page 53 of 182

This notice applies to owner's policy commitments disclosing that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface
estate, in Schedule B-2.
(A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other
minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
(B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's
permission.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may
include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance, and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance
company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for
the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award
payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado Division of Insurance within the Department of
Regulatory Agencies.
Note: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of a closing
protection letter for the lender, purchaser, lessee or seller in connection with this transaction.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 24-21-514.5, Colorado notaries may remotely notarize real estate deeds and other documents
using real-time audio-video communication technology. You may choose not to use remote notarization for any
document.

Page 53 of 182

Page 54 of 182

Joint Notice of Privacy Policy of
Land Title Guarantee Company
Land Title Insurance Corporation and
Old Republic National Title Insurancy Company
This Statement is provided to you as a customer of Land Title Guarantee Company as agent for Land Title Insurance
Corporation and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company.
We want you to know that we recognize and respect your privacy expectations and the requirements of federal and state
privacy laws. Information security is one of our highest priorities. We recognize that maintaining your trust and confidence
is the bedrock of our business. We maintain and regularly review internal and external safeguards against unauthorized
access to your non-public personal information ("Personal Information").
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from:
applications or other forms we receive from you, including communications sent through TMX, our web-based
transaction management system;
your transactions with, or from the services being performed by us, our affiliates, or others;
a consumer reporting agency, if such information is provided to us in connection with your transaction;
and
The public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain either directly from those entities, or from
our affiliates and non-affiliates.
Our policies regarding the protection of the confidentiality and security of your Personal Information are as follows:
We restrict access to all Personal Information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products and services to you.
We may share your Personal Information with affiliated contractors or service providers who provide services in the
course of our business, but only to the extent necessary for these providers to perform their services and to
provide these services to you as may be required by your transaction.
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards that comply with federal standards to protect your
Personal Information from unauthorized access or intrusion.
Employees who violate our strict policies and procedures regarding privacy are subject to disciplinary action.
We regularly assess security standards and procedures to protect against unauthorized access to Personal
Information.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT
IS NOT STATED ABOVE OR PERMITTED BY LAW.
Consistent with applicable privacy laws, there are some situations in which Personal Information may be disclosed. We
may disclose your Personal Information when you direct or give us permission; when we are required by law to do so, for
example, if we are served a subpoena; or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your
Personal Information when otherwise permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is
needed to enforce our rights arising out of any agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
Our policy regarding dispute resolution is as follows: Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to our privacy
policy, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration
Page 54 of 182

Page 55 of 182

Association, and judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction
thereof.

Page 55 of 182

Page 56 of 182

Commitment For Title Insurance
Issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE
POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS
COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION
OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF
THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF
THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. .
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, Old Republic National Title Insurance
Company, a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is
effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the
specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met
within 6 months after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1. DEFINITIONS
(a) “Knowledge” or “Known”: Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records.
(b) “Land”: The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The term “Land” does not include any
property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues,
alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(c) “Mortgage”: A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law.
(d) “Policy”: Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company
pursuant to this Commitment.
(e) “Proposed Insured”: Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.
(f) “Proposed Policy Amount”: Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this
Commitment.
(g) “Public Records”: Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters
relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(h) “Title”: The estate or interest described in Schedule A.
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, Commitment terminates
and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
(a) the Notice;
(b) the Commitment to Issue Policy;
(c) the Commitment Conditions;
(d) Schedule A;
(e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and
(f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and
(g) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
4. COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or
other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The
Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment.
5. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
(a) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in the interval between the
Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed
Insured’s good faith reliance to:
i. comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
ii. eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
iii. acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
(b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the
matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the
Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured.
(d) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment
Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.
(f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements
have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(g) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.
6. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
(a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment.
(b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.
(c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject
matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral,
express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment.

Page 56 of 182

Page 57 of 182

(d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the
terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company.
(f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only liability will be under the Policy.
7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and policies. The issuing agent is not the
Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8. PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro-forma
policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9. ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of
either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at
http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Land Title Insurance Corporation has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown
in Schedule A to be valid when countersigned by a validating officer or other authorized signatory.

Issued by:
Land Title Guarantee Company
3033 East First Avenue Suite 600
Denver, Colorado 80206
303-321-1880

Craig B. Rants, Senior Vice President
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and Schedule B, Part II
—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.

Page 57 of 182

Page 58 of 182

Attachment 4

Page 58 of 182

Page 59 of 182

Page 60 of 182

Page 61 of 182

Page 62 of 182

Page 63 of 182

Page 64 of 182

Page 65 of 182

Page 66 of 182

Page 67 of 182

Page 68 of 182

Page 69 of 182

Page 70 of 182

Page 71 of 182

Page 72 of 182

Page 73 of 182

Page 74 of 182

Page 75 of 182

Page 76 of 182

Page 77 of 182

Page 78 of 182

Page 79 of 182

Page 80 of 182

Page 81 of 182

Page 82 of 182

Page 83 of 182

Page 84 of 182

Page 85 of 182

Page 86 of 182

Page 87 of 182

Page 88 of 182

Page 89 of 182

Page 90 of 182

Page 91 of 182

Page 92 of 182

Page 93 of 182

Page 94 of 182

Page 95 of 182

Page 96 of 182

Page 97 of 182

Page 98 of 182

Page 99 of 182

Page 100 of 182

Page 101 of 182

Page 102 of 182

Page 103 of 182

Page 104 of 182

Page 105 of 182

Page 106 of 182

Page 107 of 182

Page 108 of 182

Page 109 of 182

BASALT AVENUE
CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE

143.51'
S25°37'55"W

OWNER

20'-0"
15'-0"

HYDRANT, BFD

19'-0"

PAUL CATHERS

DRIVEWAY

19'-0"

EXIST. TREE TYP.

CONSULTANTS
19

PARKING

ARCHITECT

'-0

9'-111 4"

EASEMENT LINE

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

SETBACK LINE

IN
YL

E
OP

40.1

BASIS OF BEARINGS
N64°32'23"W 72.36'
(N64°22'05"W 72.36')

BUILDING
W
0"
'4 6"W
8
1 '4
1° 04
N1 11°
(N

'
00 )
9. .95'
3
1 38
1

3
4'2
8°4
S8
'
.76

46
"W
'24
°53 2"W
S88 °08'1
9
(S8
97'
18. 05')
19.

ISSUE

SITE PLAN

REVIEW
REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE 6-17-25

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

SITE PLAN
N

S C A L E = 1/8" = 1'-0"

3-19-24
11-5-24

A1.1
Page 109 of 182

Page 110 of 182

F
17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

5'-4"

12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

5
27
'-

53
8"

OWNER

16'-5"

PAUL CATHERS

'-7 7
8"

RECEPTION

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

RESTROOM
MECH.

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

INSPECTION
UP

3
4'-4"

C
A3.5

EXIST. STAIR TO BE REPLACED

DRY ROOM

18'-4"

GARAGE

WASH AREA

B
A3.5

NEW DRAIN & OVERFLOW
LEADER
2'-8"

3'-4"

1
3'-6"

BIKE STORAGE ENCLOSURE
(2 BIKES)

WALL LEGEND

ISSUE
3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

EXIST. WALL TO REMAIN
1
A3.2

NEW WALL

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

AS-BUILT MAIN LEVEL PLAN

MAIN LEVEL PLAN

A2.1
Page 110 of 182

Page 111 of 182

B
12'-4"

17'-6"

6'-10"

16'-8"

J
5'-4"

K
12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER

16'-5"

PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT
WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

FLAT ROOF

3
4'-4"

C
A3.5

BEDROOM #1

BEDROOM #2

15'-7" STAIR

NEW GUARDRAIL

LIVING ROOM

18'-4"

DECK
REPLACE EXIST DECKING & W.P.
MEMBRANE

OPEN TO BELOW
KITCHEN
CL.

W/D

STORAGE

B
A3.5

BATH

DN.

3'-4"

1
ISSUE

A
A3.4

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

1
A3.2

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

AS-BUILT SECOND LEVEL PLAN

AS-BUILT SECOND
LEVEL PLAN

A2.2
Page 111 of 182

Page 112 of 182

F
17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

5'-4"

12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER

16'-5"

PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

FLAT ROOF

3
4'-4"

C
A3.5

FLAT ROOF

EXIST. DECK

MECH. INTAKE

FLAT ROOF

18'-4"

VENT

15'-7" NEW STAIR

3'-4"

MECH EXHAUST

B
A3.5

1
ISSUE

A
A3.4

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

1
A3.2

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

AS-BUILT ROOF PLAN

AS-BUILT ROOF
PLAN

A2.2A
Page 112 of 182

Page 113 of 182

B
12'-4"

17'-6"

6'-10"

16'-8"

J
5'-4"

K
12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER
NEW PLANTER - SEE LANDSCAPE
DWGS. FOR ADD'L INFO.

PAUL CATHERS
16'-5"

NEW DECKING ON PEDESTALS OVER
EXIST. FLAT ROOF MEMBRANE

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

NEW ROOF DECK

3
4'-4"

REMOVE AND REPLACE
EXIST STAIR AND LANDING
AS SHOWN - SEE SHT. A2.1

C
A3.5

2
RE-ROUTE EXIST. VENT AS
SHOWN

BEDROOM #1

BEDROOM #2

15'-7" NEW STAIR

NEW GUARDRAIL

RE-ROUTE EXIST. DUCT AS
SHOWN

LIVING ROOM

18'-4"

DECK
REPLACE EXIST DECKING & W.P.
MEMBRANE

OPEN TO BELOW
KITCHEN
CL.

W/D

B
A3.5

BATH

DN.

3'-4"

STORAGE

1
DUCT & VENT UP

NEW DRAIN & OVERFLOW
LEADER

A
A3.4

ISSUE

UP
NEW WALKWAY

1
A3.2

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

NEW STAIRWAY & WALKWAY
TO PROPOSED 3RD LEVEL

PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL PLAN
N

PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL PLAN
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED
SECOND LEVEL
PLAN

A2.2B
Page 113 of 182

Page 114 of 182

3'-4"

17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

5'-4"

12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

16'-5"

OWNER
PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

11'-10"

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

3
4'-4"

C
A3.5

BEDROOM #2

BEDROOM #1

11'-3" X 9'-6"

DECK BELOW

LIVING ROOM
15'-1" X 13'-2"

DECK

KITCHEN

BATH

DRAIN & OVERFLOW
LEADER

15'-0" X 8'-0"

7'-9" X 5'-0"
C
A3.5

POWDER

2'-8"

STORAGE
REF

50.0 S.F.

OVEN

PANTRY

2'-6" X 6'-4"

W/D

1
8"
EXIST. RELOCATED 4" VENT TO ROOF
EXIST. RELOCATED EXHAUST AIR VENT

10'-0" MIN.
19'-4"

DN.

EXIST. RELOCATED 4"X16" +/- INTAKE
DUCT TO ROOF

ISSUE
3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

COMMUNITY HOUSING LIVABILITY STANDARDS PER TOWN OF BASALT GUIDELINES
3RD STORY LIVING UNIT: REQUIRED PLAN ELEMENTS & AREAS PROVIDED
1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

DINING AREA PER TOWN APPROVAL
N.A.
1.5 BATHROOMS INCLUDING TUB
N.A.
N.A.
ONE OFF STREET PARKING SPACE
50.0 S.F. MIN. OF STORAGE AREA
ENCLOSED BICYCLE STORAGE

PROVIDED
24"

10.0 C.F.

10.0 S.F.

120.0 S.F. 120.0 S.F.

PROPOSED THIRD LEVEL PLAN

PROPOSED
THIRD LEVEL PLAN
N

A. FOUR BURNER STOVE
B. OVEN
C. HOODED VENT TO EXTERIOR
D. REFRIGERATOR
E. DISHWAHER
F. KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE
G. N.A.
H. KITCHEN AREA

REQ'D.
24"

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

A2.3
Page 114 of 182

Page 115 of 182

F
17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

J
5'-4"

K
12'-0"

H
E

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER

16'-5"

PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

FLAT ROOF BELOW

3
4'-4"

C
A3.5

ROOF SLOPE 1/4"/FT. MIN. TO DRAIN

DECK BELOW

FLAT ROOF

EXIST. RELOCATED 4" VENT TERMINATION

DECK BELOW

18'-4"

3'-4"

10'-0" MIN.

EXIST. RELOCATED 12" +/- INTAKE
TERMINATION
INTEGRAL ROOF DRAIN &
OVERFLOW

B
A3.5

WEATHER PROOF OVERHANG

1
ISSUE
3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

A
A3.4

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN

PROPOSED ROOF
PLAN

A2.4
Page 115 of 182

Page 116 of 182

SCUPPER

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER
F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT
WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

AS-BUILT EAST
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

F
SCUPPERS

K
GUTTER
DOWNSPOUT

SCUPPER

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

ISSUE
3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

AS-BUILT
ELEVATIONS

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

AS-BUILT WEST
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

A3.1
Page 116 of 182

Page 117 of 182

45.0

0°

33'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

OWNER
F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

PAUL CATHERS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT
WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

AS-BUILT SOUTH

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

45.0

0°

33'-0"

T. PLY. 120'-8 3/4"

LIVING ROOM

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

ISSUE

RECEPTION

INSPECTION

WASH AREA

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

F.F. 100'-0"

AS-BUILT SECTION

AS-BUILT
ELEVATION &
SECTION

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

A3.2
Page 117 of 182

Page 118 of 182

9'-0"

18" OVERHANG TYP.

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO
F.F. 122-6 7/8"

CEMENT BOARD ON RAINSCREEN

OWNER

11'-218"

PAUL CATHERS

3'-6"

33'-0"

EXIST. TOP OF PARAPET

CONSULTANTS

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

ARCHITECT

11'-43 4"

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

FUTURE SIGN LOCATIONS

PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

INTERNAL DRAIN LEADER

WEATHER PROOF OVERHANG

7'-0"

EXIST. SCUPPERS TO REMAIN

F.F. 122-6 7/8"

EXIST. SCUPPER TO REMAIN

3'-6"

ISSUE

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

PROPOSED
ELEVATIONS
F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'
INTERNAL DRAIN LEADER - SEE C-1.0
FOR ADD'L INFO.

PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

A3.3
Page 118 of 182

Page 119 of 182

7'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

F.F. 122-6 7/8"

0°

45.0

CEMENT BOARD ON RAINSCREEN

OWNER

EXIST. TOP OF PARAPET

PAUL CATHERS

3'-6"

33'-0"

CEMENT BOARD ON RAINSCREEN

CONSULTANTS

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

ARCHITECT
WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

FUTURE SIGN LOCATION

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

1
ROOF DRAIN & INTEGRAL
OVERFLOW

18" OVERHANG TYP.

9'-0"

DRAIN LEADER
& OVERFLOW

BEDROOM #2

HALL

F.F. 122-6 7/8"

NEW DECKING ON PEDESTALS OVER
EXIST. FLAT ROOF MEMBRANE
EXIST. TOP OF PARAPET

NEW FLOOR FRAMING

NEW PLANTER

EXIST. ROOF FRAMING TO REMAIN

LIVING ROOM
3'-6"

ISSUE

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

RECEPTION

INSPECTION

WASH AREA

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

PROPOSED SECTION A

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

PROPOSED
ELEVATIONS &
SECTIONS

A3.4

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"
Page 119 of 182

Page 120 of 182

7'-0"

9'-0"

BEDROOM #1

BEDROOM #2

LIVING ROOM

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

DECK

F.F. 122-6 7/8"

11'-218"

32'-85 8"

OWNER
PAUL CATHERS

DECK

BEDROOM #2

LIVING ROOM

BEDROOM #1

CONSULTANTS

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

ARCHITECT

11'-43 4"

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727
BIKE STOR.

GARAGE

DRY ROOM

WASH AREA

F.F. 100'-0" = 6554.8'

PROPOSED SECTION B

7'-0"

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

STOR.

DECK

EXIST. SCUPPERS TO REMAIN

F.F. 122-6 7/8"

CEMENT BOARD ON RAINSCREEN
EXIST. TOP OF PARAPET

3'-6"

ISSUE

F.F. 111'-4 3/4"

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

8-18-25

DD ISSUE REV.

PROPOSED
SECTIONS

DRY ROOM

F.F.100'-0"

PROPOSED SECTION C

A3.5

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"
Page 120 of 182

Page 121 of 182

B
3'-4"

17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

J
5'-4"

K
12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

EXTERIOR LIGHTING KEY
5

A- SIGN LIGHTS - 2-4 PER SIGN
B- WALL MOUNT DECK LIGHTS
C.- DOOR LIGHT-RESIDENCES
D.- STEPLIGHTS

OWNER
NEW PLANTER - SEE LANDSCAPE
DWGS. FOR ADD'L INFO.

PAUL CATHERS

16'-5"

NEW DECKING ON PEDESTALS OVER
EXIST. FLAT ROOF MEMBRANE

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT

NEW ROOF DECK

11'-10"

A
B

BEDROOM #1

BEDROOM #2

LIVING ROOM

OPEN TO BELOW

DECK
REPLACE EXIST DECKING & W.P.
MEMBRANE

KITCHEN
W/D

DN.

CL.

B
A3.5

BATH

18'-4"

NEW GUARDRAIL

RE-ROUTE EXIST. DUCT AS
SHOWN

15'-7" NEW STAIR

D
A
D

4'-4"

REMOVE AND REPLACE
EXIST STAIR AND LANDING
AS SHOWN - SEE SHT. A2.1

C
A3.5

RE-ROUTE EXIST. VENT AS
SHOWN

STORAGE

1
DUCT & VENT UP

NEW DRAIN & OVERFLOW
LEADER

A
A3.4

WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

ELECTRICAL PLAN
ISSUE

UP
NEW WALKWAY

1
A3.2

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

NEW STAIRWAY & WALKWAY
TO PROPOSED 3RD LEVEL

PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL PLAN
N

PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL PLAN
S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED
SECOND LEVEL
PLAN

A2.2B
Page 121 of 182

Page 122 of 182

3'-4"

17'-6"

12'-4"

6'-10"

16'-8"

5'-4"

K
12'-0"

CATHERS RUG WASH
ADDITION
BASALT, CO

EXTERIOR LIGHTING KEY

OWNER
PAUL CATHERS
16'-5"

A- BACKLIT SIGN LIGHTS - 2-4 PER SIGN
B- WALL MOUNT DECK LIGHTS
C- DOOR LIGHT-RESIDENCES
D- STEPLIGHTS

CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT
WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS, INC.
412 N. MILL ST., STE B1
ASPEN, CO
W (970) 920 1727

11'-10"

4'-4"

BEDROOM #2

BEDROOM #1

11'-3" X 9'-6"

DECK BELOW

LIVING ROOM

DECK

15'-1" X 13'-2"

KITCHEN

7'-9" X 5'-0"

UTILITY/STORAGE
OVEN

W/D

PANTRY

C
A3.5

REF

BATH

DRAIN & OVERFLOW
LEADER

W.H.

1
EXIST. RELOCATED 4" VENT TO ROOF
10'-0" MIN.

EXIST. RELOCATED EXHAUST AIR VENT

ISSUE

DN.

EXIST. RELOCATED 4"X16" +/- INTAKE
DUCT TO ROOF

ELECTRCIAL PLAN

S C A L E = 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED THIRD LEVEL PLAN

3-19-24

REVIEW

11-5-24

REVIEW

6-17-25

DD ISSUE

PROPOSED
THIRD LEVEL PLAN

A2.3
Page 122 of 182

Page 123 of 182

Landscape Lighting

LED MiniDisc Light

DIMMABLE

A robust LED marker light ideal for public or
residential applications, indoor or outdoor.

Now available with
Amber LED, that meets
FWC requirements

TYPE 'A'
SIGN LIGHT
Features

Specifications

•

Now dimmable on the primary power supply side with our
new dimmable LED Drivers!

•

Long life – 50,000 hours

•

Low power consumption of 0.24 watts per fixture

•

Safe 12 volt, Class 2 power supply (not included)

•

Up to 100 fixtures per power supply

•

Electrical

12V DC, 20mA, 0.24W

Wiring Options

Each LED Driver can power up to 200 LED MiniDisc
Lights by parallel wiring (“daisy chain”) between
fixtures. NOTE: Use LW-18G-CL2 for all in-wall
applications. Use LW-18G-BUR for all
burial applications.

cETLus listed for in-wall, IC ceiling, in-floor, outdoor wet,
and outdoor burial applications

LED Life

50,000 hours

•

Fits in any 1” diameter hole, 3 1/2” long

LED Colors

•

2 year limited warranty, 3 years on stainless steel

White 5400K, Warm White 2900K, Blue, Green,
Amber, Red

Construction

Both cover and barrel are die cast aluminum or
stainless steel for corrosion protection, strength,
weight and consistency of finish.

Cover Finish

Aluminum, White, Bronze, Black, Stainless Steel

Barrel Finish

Aluminum, White, Bronze, Black, Stainless Steel

Lens

Frosted Tempered Glass

Approvals

cETLus listed and labeled for wet, IC, ceiling, wall
and direct burial applications.

Applications
•

Steps

•

Aisles

•

Paths

•

Driveways

•

Direction lighting

•

Information lighting

•

Decorative lighting

•

Merchandising

•

Landscape accents

Product Codes
LEDMD - XX - YY

Replacement LED Modules

LED MiniDisc Light

LCL-LEDMOD-WH
LED Mini Disc Light module, 12V, white LED 5400K
LCL-LEDMOD-WW
LED Mini Disc Light module, 12V, warm white LED 2900K

Product Codes (Square)

Installation Wire

LEDMD - XX - SS - SQ

LW-18G-BUR
For outdoor burial connections
LW-18G-CL2
For indoor through wall connections

LED MiniDisc Light

NOTE: One of the above wires MUST be used in order to
maintain product warranty.

Color of LED
Finish
AM - Amber
AL- Aluminum
BL - Blue
BK - Black
GR - Green
BZ - Bronze
RD - Red
WH - White
CW - White 5400K
SS - Stainless Steel
WW - Warm White 2900K

NATIONAL SPECIALTY LIGHTING

•

Color of LED
Finish
AM - Amber
SS - Stainless Steel
BL - Blue
GR - Green
RD - Red
CW - White 5400K
WW - Warm White 2900K

www.nslusa.com

Page 123 of 182

Page 124 of 182

.13"
3.3mm

Landscape Lighting

2"
50.8mm

.17"
4.3mm

1.63"
41.4mm

2"
50.8mm

1.97"
50.0mm

7/8"
22.2mm

3 1/4"
82.6mm

3 1/4"
82.6mm
1.18"
30.0mm
1.97"
50.0mm

1"
25.4mm

100% LED Light Output Chart

Total distance from LED Driver per lead (m)

With every foot of lead wire and every light fixture, there is voltage loss. With too much voltage loss all
light fixtures will not develop 100% of their potential output. Below is a chart of acceptable voltage loss
which will maintain 100% of the potential light output of the LED MiniDisc Light. Simply plot the number
of LED MiniDiscs you wish to place on one lead on the horizontal axis, with the total distance from the
LED Driver to the last LED MiniDisc on the vertical axis. If the resulting plot is at or below the line shown,
you will have acceptable voltage loss and your LED MiniDisc will output 100% of their potential.
550
525 1700’
518m
500
475
450
425
400
375
350
325
300
275
850’
259.1m
250
225
200
560’
175
170.7m
150
425’
129.5m
125
100
340’
103.6m
75
50
25
0
10 20 30 40
50

283’
86.3m
240’
73.2m
60

212’
64.6m

170’
141’
51.8m
120’
106’
43m
94’
89’ 85’
36.6m
188’
32.3m
28.7m 27.1m 25.9m
154’
57.3m
130’
113’
100’
47m
39.6m
34.5m
30.5m
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200

Number of LED MiniDisc per lead
NOTE: No more than 200 LED MiniDisc Lights per LEDDR-12-60W.

Indoor/Outdoor Dimmable Drivers

Non Dimmable Drivers

TRE12L20DC
20 Watts
Max. recommended load 18 W or 75 LED MiniDisc Lights
Min. recommended load 8 W or 34 LED MiniDisc Lights
6.77” x 2.67” x 1.26” (171 x 68 x 32mm)

LEDDR-12-60W
Indoor/Outdoor driver
60W hardwire
Input: 100 - 240V AC
Output: 12V DC
Max. 200 MiniDisc Lights
9 11/16” x 2 9/16” x 2 1/16” (246 x 65 x 52mm)

TRE12L60DC
60 Watts
Max. recommended load 54 W or 200 LED MiniDisc Lights
Min. recommended load 8 W or 34 LED MiniDisc Lights
6.77” x 2.67” x 1.26” (171 x 68 x 32mm)
NOTE: For outdoor installations, please add E-KO-SR strain relief.

NATIONAL SPECIALTY LIGHTING

•

www.nslusa.com

Page 124 of 182

Page 125 of 182

EXAMPLE: BACK LIT SIGN

MAX SIGN AREA
8.0 SF. PER TOB
SIGN CODE

RUG WASH SIGN DESIGN_OPTION 1

RUG WASH SIGN DESIGN_OPTION 2

Page 125 of 182

Page 126 of 182

TYPE 'B'
Product Type: Integrated LED – Step Light
Product Code(s): MISL11
DECK LIGHT

Product Details
Type: Integrated LED - Step Light
Usage: Outdoor, IP65 Rated
Mounting: Indoor/Outdoor Wall
Materials: Die cast Aluminum casing
Finish: Black
Power: 10 W
Voltage: 120V AC
Light Source: LED
LED working hours: 30,000
Lumen Output: 400 Lumens
CRI>80
LED Colour Temperature: 3000K
Dimming: 0-10V
Dimensions(inch): 5.5 (H) X 12 (W) X 3 (D)

Warranty

Certification

36 Months from shipment

Disclaimer:
* Product details are subject to change without prior notice
* Please contact nearest Meomi Lighting team/representative for all engineered
solutions requirements
* Products may vary from the picture(s) provided in this data sheet
Copyright (2019-2021) Meomi Lighting
Inc.126
/ www.meomilighting.com
Page
of 182

Page 127 of 182

PROJECT INFORMATION
JOB NAME

TYPE

ORDERING CODE

OUTDOOR ECLIPSE

ELIPTICAL 115° X 75° BEAM
(Note: Specifications are subject to change without notice)

9mm COB PERFORMANCE DATA
LED LIGHT
ENGINE

Down IP65 Wall

NOMINAL DELIVERED SYSTEM
LUMENS
WATTAGE

05LM

600LM @30K/90CRI

10W

Notes

10W, 600 lm . Delivered lumens
based on Eliptical optic(see
page 2)

TYPE 'C'
DOOR LIGHT

FEATURES
• Pre finish anodizing process for corrosive-inhibiting protection
• Anthracite finish
• ADA Compliant
• IP65 Rated

DIMMING AND CONTROLS
• 0-10V dimming to 10%

CONSTRUCTION
• Extruded aluminum housing
• Anodized and powder coat finish
• Mount to 3-1/2" to 4" octagonal or 4" square recessed junction box

LED
• LED: Zigen ZG6BGE34W0S
• SDCM: 3-step MacAdam Ellipse
• Lumen Maintenance: L70 > 50,000 hrs

LISTING
• ETLus Listed to UL1598 (suitable for wet locations)
• cETL Listed to CSA C22.2 #250.0
• Warranty: 5 year limited warranty

ELECTRICAL
• 120V-277V
• Ambient operating temperature -20°C/-4°F to +40°C/+104°F

WALL

7-1/8"

5-1/8"

3-7/8"

1-1/2"

88 Maxwell Irvine, CA 92618

PH: 714.259.9959 FAX: 714.259.9969

www.brucklighting.com

In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product.

v.5.23.24

Page 127 of 182
Outdoor Eclipse Down

100542

Bruck By Ledra Brands Inc.

Page 1 of 3

Page 128 of 182

PROJECT INFORMATION
JOB NAME

TYPE

ORDERING CODE

SERIES
TYPE
LED
DELIVERED
LUMENS
CCT
CRI
FINISH

EXT
ED
SW
05LM

BEAM ORDERING CODE
exterior
eclipse down, 10W, 600 lm
standard white
600 lm

BEAM ORDERING CODE
wall mount

MOUNTING
OPTIONS

VOLTAGE

UNV-10V 120V-277V integrated driver, flicker free 0-10V dimming
to 10%

Standard Configuration: 3000K

30K
90
BK

3000K
90 CRI
anthracite

YOUR COMPLETED ORDERING CODE

Follow the steps to specify your fixture, example:

EXT - ED - SW - 05LM - 30K - 90 - BK - W - UNV - 10V

115º

88 Maxwell Irvine, CA 92618

PH: 714.259.9959 FAX: 714.259.9969

www.brucklighting.com

In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product.

v.5.23.24

Page 128 of 182
Outdoor Eclipse Down

100542

Bruck By Ledra Brands Inc.

Page 2 of 3

Page 129 of 182

PROJECT INFORMATION
JOB NAME

TYPE

ORDERING CODE

PHOTOMETRIC DATA

05LM

ED
ELIPTICAL 115°X75°
Throw
Distance (ft)

Beam
Diameter (ft)

3.8

7.6

11.4

15.2

18.9

Illuminance
at Center (fc)

WATTS: 9.8

LPW: 61.3

LUMENS: 601

CCT: 3000

DEGREE
0
5
15
25
35
45

INTENSITY
CANDELA
313
313
304
285
216
146

88 Maxwell Irvine, CA 92618

PH: 714.259.9959 FAX: 714.259.9969

www.brucklighting.com

In a continuing effort to offer the best product possible we reserve the right to change, without notice, specifications or materials that in our opinion will not alter the function of the product.

v.5.23.24

Page 129 of 182
Outdoor Eclipse Down

100542

Bruck By Ledra Brands Inc.

Page 3 of 3

Page 130 of 182

Recessed wall luminaire · Directed light · 24V DC

Application
Designed for low mounting heights for interior and exterior locations, the
asymmetric distribution provides light in a forward orientation and is suitable
for lighting ground surfaces, building entrances, and stairways.
Materials
Clear safety glass
Die-cast aluminum
High temperature silicone gasket
Mechanically captive stainless steel fasteners
Stainless steel screw clamps
Aluminum installation housing
Pure anodized aluminum reflector
NRTL listed to North American Standards, suitable for wet locations
Protection class IP 65
Weight: 0.6 lbs.
Electrical
LED module wattage
2.1 W
System wattage
3.1 W
Color rendering index
Ra > 80
Luminaire lumens
43 lm
LED service life (L70)
60000 hrs
LED color temperature
4000K (K4)
3500K (K35)
3000K (K3)
2700K (K27)
BEGA can supply you with suitable LED replacement modules for up to 20
years after the purchase of LED luminaires - see website for details
Finish
All BEGA standard finishes are matte, textured powder coat with minimum
3 mil thickness. BEGA Unidure® finish provides superior fade protection
in Black, Bronze, and Silver. BEGA standard White is a super durable
polyester powder. Optionally available RAL, custom, and premium colors
provided in polyester powder and/or liquid paint.
Available colors
Black (BLK)
Bronze (BRZ)
Silver (SLV)
White (WHT)
Natural Bronze (NTB)
RAL:
CUS:

TYPE 'D'
STEP LIGHT

Type:
BEGA Product:
Project:
Modified:

Available options
CUS
Custom finish
MGU
Marine grade undercoat
NTB
Natural bronze (premium finish)
RAL
RAL finish

Available accessories
B19580
Remote driver box · Static white
B19591
Remote driver box · Static white
See individual accessory spec sheet for details.
Included (available for pre-shipment)
BB2002LED Installation housing

Recessed wall luminaire · Directed light · 24V DC
B22230

ADA

LED
2.1 W

A
3 1/ 8

B
4

BEGA 1000 BEGA Way, Carpinteria, CA 93013 ( 805 ) 684-0533 [email protected]
Due to the dynamic nature of lighting products and the associated technologies, luminaire data on this sheet is subject to change at the discretion of BEGA North America. For the most current technical data, please refer to bega-us . com
Updated 05/23/25
© copyright BEGA 2025

Page 130 of 182

Page 131 of 182

Page 132 of 182

Page 133 of 182

Page 134 of 182

RUG WASH pr
oposal
540BASALTAVENUE BBCS
CATHERS HOME
6.
13.
25

Page 134 of 182

Page 135 of 182

Attachment 6

DUMPSTER LOCATION, TBD UPON DISCUSSION WITH MOUNTAIN WASTE
EXISTING SHED
PROPOSED DECK PLANTERS
PROPOSED ROOFTOP DECK
PROPOSED PARKING
PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SHRUB, TYP.
PROPOSED CONIFER SHRUB, TYP.
EXISTING CONIFER, TYP.

CATHER'S RUG
STORE
ADDRESS:
540 BASALT AVENUE
BASALT, CO 81621
PARCEL #
24671802010
DATE:
03.25.2025
ISSUE:
FOR PLANNING
PURPOSES ONLY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
CHECKED BY: PSR

DRAWN BY: BAJ

___________

AND
SCA

INE
TY
L

PRO
PER

EDE
&P
PE

&P
PE
LAN
DSC
A

CIE

IES

7.5'

ALL

SPE

PEC
GE
S
LAR
7.5'

00.00.2025

IAN
STR

IAN
EDE
STR

NG
LDI
BUI
25'

ISSUE

BAS

ENT
EAS

EM
EAS

K
BAC
SET

EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE, TYP.

ENT

PROPOSED PARKING

DATE

ALT

AVE

HISTORY:

30' WATERLINE EASEMENT

DRAFT
STAMP PER DISCIPLINE

PITKIN COUNTY STAMPS

SHEET TITLE:

SCHEMATIC
LANDSCAPE
PLAN

0'
NORTH

SCALE: 1"= 10'-0"

10'

20'

L2.00
Page 135 of 182

Page 136 of 182

Attachment 7
June 4, 2025
Willis Pember AIA, Principal
Willis Pember Architects
412 North Mill Street
Aspen, CO
[email protected]
[email protected]
RE:

Attachment 8

Engineering Report, Rug Wash improvements – Proposed Top Floor Dwelling, Utilities and Drainage
Design Evaluation, 540 Basalt Ave, Lot x Basalt Business Center South
SE Job #34125.01, Parcel ID #:246718102010

Dear Willis,
Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) has prepared the following report in support of the proposed vertical expansion
development of a new apartment dwelling structure at the Existing Rug Wash facility. The subject site address is
540 Basalt Ave located at the southeast corner of the Basalt Ave and Fiou Lane intersection situated on Lot X in the
Basalt Business Center South subdivision. The proposed 768 S.F. third floor dwelling addition will be constructed
over the existing 768 S.F. second floor dwelling matching the existing exterior perimeter structural walls. Proposed
site Improvements associated with this dwelling addition include a slight expansion of the parking area, drainage
upgrades for onsite roof and paved areas, conversion of a portion of roof area to deck and upgrade of utilities as
required to serve the new 2-bedroom apartment dwelling. The information presented in this report is for a
preliminary Site Plan Review in support of an application for PUD Amendment.
This report addresses the existing and proposed utility service improvements and plan to support the facility with
factual information regarding potential additional waste water flow impacts and service capacity to the Basalt
Sanitation District sanitary sewer system. This report provides drainage plan information and recommendations
regarding stormwater management and drainage improvements to insure no adverse effects to adjoining
properties.
This narrative and attached preliminary site plan delineates the existing and proposed conditions with notations
and details associated with the above referenced issues, prepared with respect to the Town’s Unified Development
Code (UDC) development plan criteria and requirements. The preliminary site plan was prepared based on the
Rawley Design Planning, Schematic Landscape Plan, dated 03-25-2025, High Country Engineering, Inc., ISP, dated
01-08-24, Willis Pember Architects, Inc., Architectural plans, dated 11-05-24 and Previous SE existing conditions and
utility survey base information.
Existing/Proposed Conditons and Project Summary
The subject property is planned to be re developed with the addition of a 768 S.F. third floor dwelling unit
constructed over the existing second floor dwelling unit of the same dimensions. The expansion will result in a
facility comprised of two 768 S.F. -2-bedroom residential units, and the existing ground floor commercial rug wash
facility. Currently the site has 4-5 parking spaces and a paved surface with existing flow path to the north that
routes storm drainage toward Basalt avenue. Based on site observations runoff pools on the surface. The existing
concrete driveway access and parking areas (2588 S.F.) will be reworked to provide for 6 parking spaces with a
single access from Basalt Avenue. Concrete paved surfaces will be added, sawcut and replaced and some area will
be removed to be reclaimed as landscape areas resulting in a decreased 2393 S.F. area. Therefore the reworked site
will result in a 195 S.F. net decrease of impervious pavement. The Associated site improvements will include the
installation of drainage inlets, drainage conveyance piping and installation of a new strorm water management
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313

S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC

civil consultants
Page 136 of 182

Page 137 of 182

540 Basalt Avenue– Engineering Report,
SE Job #35036.01
June 4, 2025
Page 2
detention system to attenuate and infiltrate onsite runoff. There will be an elevated walkway and new stairway
constructed to access the proposed 3rd story apartment from the reconstructed ground level to second story
stairway and landing. Currently all roof drainage is routed to the Westerly side of the building to a 10” wide grass
vegetated area via gutters, downspouts and scuppers. It appears that the runoff effectively infiltrates into the
pervious grass landscape area. No evidence of runoff to the adjacent property to the west was observed or is
indcated by existing flat grading. The existing roof and deck drainage collection components will be reworked to
accommodate the new third floor structure and deck areas with minor grading improvements to the pervious
landscape area. The existing 2nd floor roof gutter on the westerly dripline edge will be removed. A new 3rd floor roof
drain will be installed for collection of new roof runoff and conveyance via an internal integral roof drain/overflow
pipe system routed down to a new pipe outlet penetration at the base of the westerly wall. Storm drainage
discharge to a new 4” subsurface drainage collection pipe routed to new infiltration gallery components to be
installed. The existing scuppers on the existing westrly wall that discharge runoff from the southerly 1st floor roof
deck and the northerly 2nd floor level roof will be maintained. The northerly 2nd floor roof will be retrofitted to serve
as a 3rd floor dwelling deck.
The existing sanitary sewer service will be maintained and has effective capacity to accept and convey the
increased waste loading from the additional dwelling unit.
Vehicle Access
The existing site currently has two entrance access driveways from Basalt Avenue. The northerly drive access will
be removed and reclaimed as lanscaped area. The southerly driveway access will be widened to 20’ to allow for
two-way vehicular movement to the expanded paved parking areas.
Drainage
The subject site will be decreasing impervious area from the existing condition however to alleviate onsite ponding
in the paved area new stormwater collection, conveyance and infiltrative detention component will be installed.
Direct stormwater runoff on the paved drive/parking surface will be directed to a series of drain inlets along the
existing graded flowline for routing via drain pipe to the drywell/infiltration gallery. The new development is
proposing to collect roof drainage in roof drains and to pipe that water to an on-site drywell/ infiltration gallery
structure located off the southwest corner of the building in a small portion of the parking and grass strip area. The
existing first floor roof, second floor deck, proposed third floor roof/deck and walkway will shed runoff to the
westerly landscape area strip graded to a new yard inlet that will be piped into the infiltrative detention gallery. If
the infiltration gallery reaches capacity during an extreme storm event water will overflow out of a terminal drain
inlet at the northeastly corner to the property to flow to the curb and gutter on Basalt Avenue. Due to new
drainage collection/infiltration improvements, existing grades on the westerly and southerly boundaries no storm
water runoff will flow or be routed to adjacent properties.
The proposed drainage BMP (Best Management Practice) incorporates a small shallow 24” diameter drywell
structures with perforations at depth and lateral infiltration gallery piping with screened rock bedding and backfill
installed around the exteriors of the storage/infiltration components. The onsite sub-soils are capable of moderate
to high infiltration rates, therefore drywell/infiltration gallery system are considered to be a viable BMP. The BMP
will dramatically reduce the onsite runoff flow and volume of stormwater generated from tributary impervious
areas and provide for stormwater runoff recovery by infiltration into the pervious subsurface soils. The system
design will insure that no adverse impacts to the subject property or surrounding properties will result from the
proposed development.
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313

S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC

Page 137 of 182

civil consultants

Page 138 of 182

540 Basalt Avenue– Engineering Report,
SE Job #35036.01
June 4, 2025
Page 3
Construction Erosion Control
Temporary erosion control will be addressed at Building Permit. During construction site specific erosion control
including best management practices (BMPs) such as silt fence, log wattles, and truck tracking control onsite will be
installed and maintained as necessary.
Utilities
Domestic Water System
The subject site falls within the Town of Basalt’s water service area. Prior to proposed development, the site
existed as a single-residential unit and shop ½ bath with 1-EQR usage. Proposed development will most likely have
total usage equivalent to 2.2-EQR per Basalt’s EQR Schedule. The existing water service tap is adequate for the
additional potable water usage in the new 2-bedroom apartment unit.
Sanitary Sewer System
The subject site falls within the Town of Basalt’s sanitary sewer service area. Similar to the domestic water system,
the existing site has 1-EQR for sewer from the existing single-residential unit and shop ½ bath prior to
redevelopment. Proposed development will most likely have usage equivalent to 2.2-EQR per Basalt’s EQR
Schedule.
Single
Cmmrl/residential
Classification Usage
Apt-shop (2-bedrm
min)
Shop Bathroom
Proposed Sub-Total

No.
Units
#
2
1
3

Capita/Unit
#/unit

EQR/Unit
#/unit

UNIT Q
gal/EQR

EQR's
#

AVG Q
gal/day

Peak
Q
gal/min

4.0
3.0

1
0.2

300
300

2
0.2
2

600
60
660

10.00
0.13
10.13

There is an existing 4” PVC sanitary sewer service from the existing building to the sewer main along Basalt Avenue
that has effective capacity to accept and convey the increased waste loading from the additional dwelling unit.
Based on invert elevations of existing sewer service pipe and main the sewer servic pipe slope is assumed to be
approximately 2% that will convey up to 170 gpm in a 4” PVC pipe. Assuming a conservative 1 hr peak time for
residential use and 8 hour usage time for the commercial unit half bath, the total expected peak flow in the
sanitary sewice is expected to be approximately 10-11 gpm. Therefore the existing 4” sanitary service pipe has
adequate capacity for the two appartment and commercial uses.

SLOPE
%
1%
2%
3%
4%

4" DIAMETER PIPE
DEPTH
VEL
Q
IN PIPE
(FT/S)
(CFS)
(FT)
MAX.
0.27
3.56
0.263
0.27
5.04
0.378
0.27
6.17
0.463
0.27
7.13
0.535

Q (GPM)
MAX
118.0344
169.6464
207.7944
240.108

The existing sanitary service cleanout will be retrofitted with a new traffic bearing iron ring and cover. To install the
cleanout retrofit the concrete will be sawcut, in coordination with the installation of drain inlets and patched at the
existing sewer service location and along the entire drainage pan flow line. See utility design drawings for more
details. Final details will be addressed at Building Permit.
502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970)704-0311• Fax (970)704-0313

S OPRIS E NGINEERING • LLC

Page 138 of 182

civil consultants

Page 139 of 182

Page 140 of 182

Page 141 of 182

EXTERIOR BACKFILL SHOULD BE ADJUSTED TO NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD
PROCTOR IN PAVEMENT AND SLAB AREAS AND TO AT LEAST 80% STANDARD PROCTOR IN LANDSCAPED AREAS.

EMBANKMENT FILLS SHOULD BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL THE
SUBGRADE SHOULD BE CAREFULLY PREPARED BY REMOVING ALL VEGETATION AND TOPSOIL AND COMPACTING TO AT LEAST
95% STANDARD PROCTOR.

ENSURE THAT DRAINAGE IS AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES IN ALL DIRECTIONS, MIN OF 6" IN THE FIRST 10' FOR LANDSCAPE
AREAS AND 3" IN THE FIRST 10' IN PAVED OR HARDSCAPE AREAS.

GRADE ALL PERVIOUS AND SEMI-IMPERVIOUS AREAS TO VEGETATIVE AREAS AND DRAINAGE SWALES. IF NECESSARY INSTALL
YARD DRAINS TO MITIGATE DRAINAGE IN LOW OR FLAT AREAS AND ROUTE TO DRAINAGE SWALES AS FEASIBLE. EXTEND ROOF
DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS TO SOLID 4" DRAIN CONVEYANCE PIPES TO SWALES OR DAYLIGHT TO STABLE UNDISTURBED NATIVE
AREAS.

USE TEMPORARY MEASURES DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT DRAINAGE SWALES FROM CONVEYING SILT, SEDIMENT AND
ANY OTHER DEBRIS. PREVENT ANY DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS TO DOWN GRADIENT UNDISTURBED AREAS.

XSA

XW
L

THE DRAINAGE PATTERNS DELINEATED ARE BASED ON EXISTING AND PROPOSED PHYSICAL CONDITIONS. THE ONSITE
DRAINAGE CONDITIONS INCLUDE EXISTING PHYSICAL FEATURES IN WHICH STORM WATER IS PASSIVELY MANAGED IN BY DIRECT
SHEET FLOW OR SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW TO EXISTING VEGETATED NATIVE LANDS AND ACROSS BROAD NATIVE
VEGETATED PERVIOUS AREAS.

SELECT AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY AND CERTAIN ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS ARE ACTIVELY
MANAGED WITH STORMWATER COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS CONSISTING OF YARD DRAINS, DOWNSPOUT DRAINS
WITH COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE PIPING TO DISCHARGE AND SHALLOW INFILTRATION/ SUFACE DISCHARGE STRUCTURES.

XSA
XW
L

XW
L

655
3

XSA

655

6555

XSA

ROOF DOWNSPOUTS SHOULD DISCHARGE WELL BEYOND THE LIMITS OF ALL BACKFILL OR BE TIED INTO THE ACTIVE DRAIN
INLETS WITH COLLECTION/ CONVEYANCE PIPES AS APPLICABLE.

INUNDATION OF THE FOUNDATION EXCAVATIONS AND UNDERSLAB AREAS SHOULD BE AVOIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION.

XSA
L

L
XW

ASSUMED EXISTING ELECTRIC UTILITIES

XSA

6555

w
XSA

12'

113 SF

ASSUMED EXISTING SEWER SERVICE

xsa

XSA

12'

655

ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE COMPONENTS TO MANAGE RUNOFF ON INTERNAL LANDSCAPED AND HARD SURFACES TO BE
DETERMINED AND INSTALLED AS NECESSARY. ROUTE ALL ADDITIONAL SURFACE DRAINAGE FOR DISCHARGE TO THE
LANDSCAPE AREAS AND/OR DRAINAGE SWALES. GRADE DRIVEWAY SURFACES AT A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2%.

6" DRAIN INLET

xsa

33 SF

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT WILL CONSIST OF RETENTION AND INFILTRATION OF STORM WATER RUNOFF ROUTED TO
IMPROVED DRAINAGE SWALES, SHALLOW DRAINAGE RETENTION/INFILTRATION SWALES, AND LANDSCAPED AREAS AROUND THE
STRUCTURE. FLOW PATHS TERMINATE IN BROAD VEGETATED AREAS WITHIN THE DOWNGRADIENT AREAS WITHIN THE
PERIMETER OF THE SITE SITUATED ON A BROAD LAND FORM RIDGE. THE MAJORITY OF STORM WATER WILL SHEET FLOW
ACROSS BROAD LANDSCAPED AREAS OR NATIVE MEADOWS AND FORESTED AREAS. RUNOFF BE DIRECTED TO ACTIVE SITE
DRAINAGE SYSTEM, SHALLOW CONCENTRATED SWALES COLLECTED FROM THE ROOF, PATIOS, HARD SURFACE AREAS AND
LANDSCAPED SURFACE AREAS TO NATIVE LANDSCAPED AREAS.

24" DIA NDS FLOWELL
8" GRATE
4" INV-I/O

ute

>
>

MINOR STORM RUNOFF FROM THE ENTIRE SITE IMPROVEMENT ENVELOPE OF THE PARCEL IS GENERALLY RETAINED ON SITE. A
PORTION OF THE MAJOR STORM RUNOFF WILL DISCHARGE FROM THE LANDSCAPE AREAS AND SHALLOW
DISCHARGE/RETENTION STRUCTURES TO THE NATIVE VEGETATED AREA SURROUNDING THE SITE.

XSA

>
>

EXISTING GUTTER TO BE RAISED TO THIRD
FLOOR
xsa
SHOP SUMP PUMP DRAIN
284 SF
ROOF DOWNSPOUT
EXISTING
xsa
2ND FLOOR
DECK
4" STORM CONVEYANCE PIPE

XW
L

6" DRAIN INLET

6555

EXISTING FLOWPATH

655

>
15.0

THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY WILL HAVE AN ALL WEATHER SURFACE GRADED TO ALLOW FOR DIRECT SHEET FLOW RUNOFF AND FOR
DIRECT INFILTRATION OF STORMWATER TO ADJACENT DRAINAGE SWALES AND NATIVE VEGETATED AREAS. THE DRIVEWAY
ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED DWELLING AND ATTACHED GARAGE WILL BE PAVED AND INCLUDE DRAINAGE INLETS AND
GRADING TO LANDSCAPE SWALES TO MANAGE RUNOFF FROM THE DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREAS.

XSA

XW
L

XIRR

3.0

XW
L

>
>

MAINTAIN ROOF/DECK SCUPPERS

6" OVERFLOW OUTLET

105 SF

PROPOSED TWO BEDROOM 768
S.F. 3RD FLOOR APARTMENT
OVERTOP OF EXISTING 768 S.F.
2ND FLOOR APARTMENT
STORM DRAINAGE SHALLOW
RETENTION SWALE W/ SUB SURFACE
DRAINAGE INFILTRATION GALLERY
G

6555

XIRR

EXISTING RUG WASH BUSINESS ON THE FIRST FLOOR
AND SECOND FLOOR APARTMENT

EXISTING SPRINKLER LINE

655
6

XW
L

PROPOSED EXISTING 2ND FLOOR
3RD FLOOR ROOF TO BE CONVERTED
DECK 325 S.F. TO DECK SPACE

655
655

XSA

SITE GRADING IS LIMITED TO THE EXISTING LAND FORMS AND EXISTING CONDITIONS. STORM MANAGEMENT IS GENERALLY
PASSIVE, EXCEPT WERE ACTIVE SYSTEMS ARE DELINEATED, IN PROVIDING ATTENUATION OF RUNOFF FROM THE 25-YEAR
EVENT. THE POST DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF FROM THE SITE WILL NOT EXCEED THE PRE DEVELOPMENT RUNOFF RATE DUE TO
THE EXTREMELY LIMITED WORK PROPOSED AND ESSENTIALLY NO INCREASE OF IMPERVIOUS AREAS. NO ADJACENT
DEVELOPED PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED DOWN GRADIENT OF THE SITE IMPROVEMENT OR DEVELOPMENT AREAS.

XSA
L

ut
uc

XSA

12''W

ue ut
ut

WJB

05/12/25

DRAWN BY

WJB

05/12/25

CHECKED BY

( IN FEET )
1 inch = 20 ft.

XSA

35036.01

XSA

JOB NO.

NORTH

GRAPHIC SCALE

05-12-25

XSA

12''W

6556

12''W

XSA

12'

ut ue

12''W

ut
uc

t
ue u

ue ut

L
XW

DATE:

BASALT RUG WASH ADDITION
540 BASALT AVENUE
BASALT, COLORADO

XW
L

XS A

XW
L

DRAINAGE NOTES:

AMENDED PUD SUBMITTAL APPLICATION DOCUMENT

SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC

>
>

GRADE LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE SURFACES AROUND HOUSE PERIMETER AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE
AWAY FROM EXTERIOR WALL OF HOUSE TO MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE.

XSA

XW
L

502 MAIN STREET SUITE A3 CARBONDALE CO 81623
(970) 704 0311 soprisengineering.com

XW
L

GRADING NOTES:

DRAIN PLAN

DRAINAGE PLAN LEGEND
>

G:\2025\35036-RUG WASH BASALT\CIVIL\CIVIL DWGS\DE\35036-DRAINAGE.DWG - May 13, 2025 - 6:13pm

PROPOSED CONTOUR
PROPOSED SWALE OR DITCH
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED UNDERDRAIN
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT

USE 6" DROP IN INLET &
GRATE

RISER

DATE

USE 4" SDR-26 ADAPTORS

REVISION

EXISTING CONTOUR

4" SDR-26 RISER

TEE

6" MIN.

4" SDR-26 DRAINAGE
CONVEYANCE PIPE

SELECT MATERIAL COMPACTED
TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR

4" MIN.
12"

TITLE

BEDDING OF CLASS 6 AGGREGATE BASE
COURSE OR SUITABLE ONSITE MATERIAL
R

12"

DRAFT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT ONLY

SITE & DRAINAGE
PLAN

Know what's below.

Callbefore you dig. DRAWING NO.

N.T.S.

CALL 2-BUSINESS DAYS IN ADVANCE
BEFORE YOU DIG, GRADE, OR EXCAVATE
FOR THE MARKING OF UNDERGROUND
MEMBER UTILITIES

C-1.0
Page 141 of 182

Page 142 of 182

Attachment 8

March 17, 2025
Mr. Paul Cathers
Managing Member
PC Development, LLC
530 Basalt Avenue
Basalt, CO 81621
RE:

540 Basalt Avenue – Traffic Conformance
FHU Project No. 124108-01

Dear Mr. Cathers:
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) has been asked to analyze an addition to 540 Basalt Avenue in Basalt, CO.
The current proposal is to add an additional accessory dwelling unit (ADU) to the existing building by
adding a third story. The site plan is illustrated in Figure 1 which also eliminates one of the two existing
curb cuts from the site onto Basalt Avenue. A prior traffic study, Town of Basalt Southside Traffic Impact
Study, was prepared by SGM in October 2016 with existing data collection occurring in October of 2015.
This TIS explored several planned developments south of CO 82 including Cathers West which includes
the 540 Basalt Avenue site. The TIS did not address which trip generation was directly associated with each
parcel, but the building on the 540 Basalt Avenue site was operational in October of 2015 as The Rug Wash
Company, which occupies the roughly 2,300 square foot first floor, and an ADU, which occupies the
roughly 750 square foot second story. This remains unchanged over the last decade and remains what is in
place on site today. As a result, we believe that any trip generation related to the current 540 Basalt
Avenue site would have been captured in the existing conditions of the Town of Basalt Southside Traffic
Impact Study.
The currently proposed site, as mentioned previously, plans to add a third story to the building which
would provide one additional ADU of approximately 650 square feet. Since it is unclear as to what
development trip generation for the Town of Basalt Southside Traffic Impact Study is associated with, we
have elected to add the trip generation for that ADU as new trips that wouldn’t have been accounted for in
that prior study to present a conservative estimate. The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition (2021) is
the most current publication of trip generation rates and equations for the traffic engineering industry.
Table 1 shows the equation and rates utilized in this analysis. Table 2 shows the estimated trip generation
for the current proposed site above what would have been captured in counts collected for the Town of
Basalt Southside Traffic Impact Study.
Table 1.

ITE Trip Generation Rates and Equations

Land Use
Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise)
DU = Dwelling Units

ITE
Code

Unit

Daily

Peak

Equations & Rates

220

T=6.74*X

AM
PM

T=0.40*X
T=0.51*X

Distributions
In
Out
24%
76%
63%
37%

Page 142 of 182

Page 143 of 182

BASALT AVENUE

CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
widen existing curb cut

eliminate curb cut

PROPERTY LINE

143.51'
S25°37'55"W

20'-0"
15'-0"

HYDRANT, BFD

19'-0"

DRIVEWAY

19'-0"

EXIST. TREE TYP.

new parking space 2

"
'-0
19

new parking space 1

9'-111 4"

EASEMENT LINE

PARKING
SETBACK LINE

LIN

BASIS OF BEARINGS
N64°32'23"W 72.36'
(N64°22'05"W 72.36')

P
RO

40.1

existing parking spaces to remain

BUILDING
W
0"
'4 "W
18 '46
1° 04
N1 11°
(N

0'
9.0 5')
13 38.9
1

3"W

4'2

8°4

S8
'

.76

46
"W
'24
°53 2"W
S88 °08'1
9
(S8
7'
18.9 5')
19.0

NORTH

FIGURE 1
NOTE: Drawing Not to Scale

Site Plan

540 Basalt
125108-01 3/17/25
Page
143Avenue
of 182

Page 144 of 182

March 17, 2025
Mr. Paul Cathers
Page 3
Table 2.

540 Basalt Avenue Trip Generation

Land Use
(Trip Generation
Category)

Quantity

Daily
Vehicle
Trips

AM Peak Hour Trips

PM Peak Hour Trips

Out

Total

Out

Total

Current 540 Basalt Avenue 3rd Story ADU Proposal
Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise)

1 DUs

Subtotal

The trip generation indicates the additional ADU at 540 Basalt Avenue is anticipated to generate 7 daily
trips with 1 outbound trip occurring in the AM peak hour and 1 inbound trip occurring in the PM Peak
hour. While it is possible that this additional ADU was accounted for in the Town of Basalt Southside
Traffic Impact Study, we have chosen to assume it was not previously accounted for to ensure a
conservative representation of this project. Based upon the 2035 peak hour projections from the Town of
Basalt Southside Traffic Impact Study the outbound AM peak hour trips along the south leg at the
intersection of CO 82 and Basalt Avenue were anticipated to be 346 and inbound PM peak hour trips along
the south leg at the intersection of CO 82 and Basalt Avenue were anticipated to be 319. The anticipated
additional traffic would represent a 0.3 percent increase in AM outbound traffic and a 0.3 percent increase
in PM inbound traffic. Of note, these percentage increases are well below the 20 percent threshold that
would require an update to the CDOT access permit for the intersection of CO 82 and Basalt Avenue.

Conclusions
The study resulted in the following conclusions:
▪

▪

The newly proposed 3rd story ADU unit at 540 Basalt Avenue would generate a marginal increase
in traffic which is anticipated to be less than half of a percent during peak hours to potential
impacted movements. We do not believe that a single additional trip in those peak hours
generated by the 540 Basalt Avenue site would change the results or recommendations of the
Town of Basalt Southside Traffic Impact Study.
The planned closure of one of the two existing curb cuts along Basalt Avenue should be supported
as we believe the consolidation of access points should be encouraged to eliminate additional
conflict points which has tangible safety benefits.

Please let me know if you have any questions about this letter or need any additional information.

Philip Dunham, PE, PTOE
Transportation Engineer

Page 144 of 182

Page 145 of 182

Attachment 9
Construction Managment Plan - 540 Basalt Avenue

Page 145 of 182

Page 146 of 182

Attachment 10

Pitkin County Mailing List of 0 Feet Radius
From Subdivision: Basalt Business Center South on 03/26/2025

Instructions:
This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be
printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to
page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the
margins such that they no longer line up on the labels
sheet. Print actual size.

Disclaimer:
Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web
site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to
ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. The
information maintained by the County may not be complete as to
mineral estate ownership and that information should be
determined by separate legal and property analysis.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning
the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this
site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and
reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the
user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and
liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or
data obtained on this web site.
http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com

Page 146 of 182

Page 147 of 182

CO DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION

JO NET INC

2829 W HOWARD PL

PO BOX 5555

DENVER, CO 80204

LIGHTHOUSE PT, FL 33064

LIGHTHOUSE POINT, FL 33074

LAAM 525 LLC

MYERS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC

PC DEVELOPMENT LLC

204 PARK AVE #1K

555 BASALT AVE

530 BASALT AVE

BASALT, CO 81621

RFTA

SCHLUMBERGER J MARTIN

TOWN OF BASALT

1340 MAIN ST

23286 TWO RIVER RD #21

101 MIDLAND AVE

CARBONDALE, CO 81623

BASALT, CO 81621

VALLEY COMMERCIAL FUELING
PO BOX 2003
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602

Page 147 of 182

Page 148 of 182

Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius
From Parcel: 246718102010 on 03/20/2025

Page 148 of 182

Page 149 of 182

160 SOUTHSIDE LLC

180 SOUTHSIDE LLC

BASALT TRADE ASSOC LLC

206 HOLLAND THOMPSON DR

956 COUNTY RD 112

PO BOX SS

CARBONDALE, CO 81623

BASALT, CO 81621

DAVIDCO LLC

DD BUILDINGS LLC

JENKINS JEFFRY CHADRACH

PO BOX 710

617 W MAIN ST

258 BASALT AVE

BASALT, CO 81621

ASPEN, CO 81611

BASALT, CO 81621

JO NET INC

LAAM 525 LLC

PO BOX 5555

204 PARK AVE #1K

LIGHTHOUSE PT, FL 33064

LIGHTHOUSE POINT, FL 33074

BASALT, CO 81621

MYERS REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC

PACCO LLC

RFTA

555 BASALT AVE

PO BOX 573

1340 MAIN ST

BASALT, CO 81621

ASPEN, CO 81612

CARBONDALE, CO 81623

RIVERDOWN PROPERTIES LLC

SCHLUMBERGER J MARTIN

SOUTH SIDE DRIVE LLC

PO BOX 1827

23286 TWO RIVER RD #21

PO BOX J

ASPEN, CO 81612

BASALT, CO 81621

ASPEN, CO 81612

SOUTHSIDE COMMERCIAL LLC

SOUTHSIDE TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION

TOWN OF BASALT

300 RIVERSIDE DR

206 CODY LN

101 MIDLAND AVE

BASALT, CO 81621

VALLEY COMMERCIAL FUELING

WESTERN BUILDING PARTNERSHIP

WOLFER MARY ELIZABETH

PO BOX 2003

PO BOX 289

258 BASALT AVE

GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602

BASALT, CO 81621

Page 149 of 182

Page 150 of 182

Attachment 11

Paul Cathers, Manager
PC Development, LLC
530 Basalt Avenue
Basalt, CO 81621
pcathers@cathershome com
21 July 2025
James Lindt
Assistant Planning Director
Town of Basalt Planning Department
101 Midland Avenue
Basalt, CO 81621
Re: Authorization to Submit Land Use Application
Dear Mr. Lindt:
This letter is to certify that PC Development, LLC, Paul Cathers, Manager, is the owner
of 540 Basalt Ave, PIO# 246718102010 ("the Property"). We give authorization to
Rawley Design Planning and its staff to file an application with the Town of Basalt
Planning Department for a Site Plan Review, Special Review, Community Housing
Review, Mixed Use Parking Reduction, and PUD Amendment. We have retained
Rawley Design Planning LLC to represent us in the application for this project
Their contact information is as follows:
Patrick Rawley, AICP, ASLA
Rawley Design Planning LLC
227 Midland Avenue, Ste. C5
Basalt, CO 81621
T: (970) 306-5669
E: [email protected]
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Very Truly Yours,

Paul Cathers, Manager
PC Development, LLC

Page 150 of 182

Page 151 of 182

Page 152 of 182

Attachment 12

Page 152 of 182

Page 153 of 182

Page 154 of 182

Page 155 of 182

Page 156 of 182

Attachment 13

Page 156 of 182

Page 157 of 182

Page 158 of 182

Page 159 of 182

Page 160 of 182

Page 161 of 182

Page 162 of 182

Page 163 of 182

Page 164 of 182

Page 165 of 182

Page 166 of 182

Page 167 of 182

Page 168 of 182

REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
The undersigned (hereinafter “Applicant”) has applied to the Town of Basalt for a
development permit for _________________________________________________
for the
PUD Amendment
property known as ____________________________________
(the “Property”) pursuant to the
540 Basalt Avenue
requirements of the Town Code. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that in consideration of the
Town of Basalt processing and reviewing Applicant’s request for a development permit, Applicant
shall make the following payments to the Town and agrees as follows.
1.
NON-REFUNDABLE Application Fee. Simultaneous with execution hereof,
Applicant has paid a non-refundable Application Fee pursuant to Sections 16-292(a) and 1761(a), Town Code, in the amount of $________.
1,500
2.
Review Deposit. Simultaneous with execution hereof, Applicant has paid a
review deposit as required by Sections 16-292(c) and 17-61(c), Town Code, in the amount of
$_____________
against and to secure payment of a portion of the Town’s review expense in
2,500
accordance with Sections 16-292(b) and 17-61(b), Town Code. Any amount by which the
Applicant’s deposit exceeds the costs incurred by the Town with regard to development of the
Property shall be refunded to Applicant within a reasonable time after final action has been taken
with regard to development of the Property or upon withdrawal of the application by the Applicant.
3.
Review Expenses. Pursuant to Sections 16-292(b) and 17-61(b), Town Code,
the Applicant agrees to reimburse the Town for any and all Costs, Staff Fees, and Consultant
Fees described herein incurred by the Town during and after the review process associated with
the Property. Costs include but are not limited to publication fees, recording fees, and any other
actual out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Town with regard to the Property (“Costs”). Inspection
and review by town employees shall include reimbursement for time spent by the Town
Administrator, Town Planning staff and the Town Public Works staff in compliance with the
Town’s rate schedule in affect at the time that the work was completed (“Staff Fees”). These rates
currently range from $85.00 to $100 per hour. Applicant shall also reimburse the Town for all
actual out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Town in connection with Applicant’s development
review application for consultants, including but not limited to, legal, engineering and planning
review and advice from persons or entities not on town staff at the rate of the amount actually
paid by the Town for such review and advice (“Consultant Fees”). Additionally, to partially defray
administrative, handling and review costs incurred by the Town with regard to the Property,
Applicant shall additionally pay to the Town an amount equal to 15% of all of the Costs and
Consultant Fees.
4.
Payment. Any and all bills for these costs are due and payable to the Town as
follows: All accounts are due net in 15 days from the date of the bill. Interest on any overdue
amounts shall be accessed and paid by Applicant at the rate of 2% per month (24% APR) from
the date due until paid.
5.
Binding Obligation.
Applicant agrees and acknowledges that this
Reimbursement Agreement shall be a continuing obligation which will run with the land and be
binding on Applicant and any future owners of the land, and will include the obligation to
reimburse the Town for any and all costs associated with the Property incurred by the Town for
counseling and advice including, but not limited to monitoring compliance with any development
approval including any Annexation Agreement, Subdivision Improvements Agreement or other
agreements between the Town and the owner of the Property; enforcement of any development
permits or approvals granted associated with the Property; participation in any litigation or
depositions, whether the Town is a party or not associated with the Property or development
approvals granted with regard to the Property; counseling and advice associated with any
potential amendments to development approvals or compliance or lack of compliance with any

Page 168 of 182

Page 169 of 182

Page 170 of 182

Page 171 of 182

EXHIBIT B

Page 171 of 182

Page 172 of 182

Page 173 of 182

Page 174 of 182

Page 175 of 182

Page 176 of 182

Page 177 of 182

Page 178 of 182

EXHIBIT C

MEMORANDUM
TO: Michelle Bonfils Thibeault, Planning Director and Carlton Henry, Planner
FROM: Catherine Christoff, Town Engineer and Justin Forman, Public Works Director
DATE: March 3, 2026
RE: 540 Basalt Ave
Please consider the following comments from engineering and public works:
1. The applicant should demonstrate that all improvements are outside the mapped 100-year
floodplain, and should show the floodplain boundary on the site plan.
2. How will the additional vehicles be accommodated? Historically overflow traffic has spilled into the
ROW during rug washing. Even the past few weeks, vehicles have been parked in the drive
entrances for rug washing operations and blocking egress/ingress. As it exists today it appears that
not enough parking onsite all throughout the year, the plan only increases the parking by one
space, will this be sufficient to accommodate the new development?
3. Will the driveway be graded in a way that directs all runoff from rug washing to the stormwater
system?
4. The applicant should provide a detailed drainage plan at building permit submission that shows the
development’s compliance with the Basalt Public Works Manual.
5. The applicant should verify that the 6” drain inlets in the driveway are traffic rated.
6. The specs for the Flo-Well dry well system say it needs to be placed 10’ from structures or
foundations, it appears to be placed closer than 10’.
7. The plans do not clearly identify the origin of the water service line or its point of entry into the
building. The plan set appears to show the water service originating from a hydrant service lateral.
Standard practice does not allow taps from a hydrant lateral for multiple reasons. The Water
Department did not locate a valve in the grass area as shown on the plans. The entire water
service line, including the curb stop, must be positively located. A private utility locator will be
required. Additional coordination with the Water Department is necessary.
8. Project is placing driveway and parking closer to hydrant. At least two bollards will be required to
prevent vehicle damage to existing hydrant.
9. Please confirm irrigation system tap and layout. Water Department has records of a backflow for
the system.
10. Please ensure additional EQRs are captured in permitting application process as outlined within
packet.
11. Several Aspen trees have been removed from the turf area near the stop sign without following the
proper procedure. Per the Towns' tree ordinance, trees 6 inches or greater DBH (dead or alive)
require a permit from the town to remove. This is to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures
are followed and the Town maintains an appropriate canopy cover. I counted four (4) stumps that I
have no permit for, although two (2) are questionably small enough to not need a permit. The
design will need to incorporate an additional one (1) tree on the property, preferably in this unused
turf space. The species should be a narrow or upright cultivar that don't impede sight lines at the
intersection. Avoid planting within proximity to the fire hydrant, and do not plant Spruce due to
space constraints.

101 Midland Ave.
Basalt, CO • 81621

basalt.net
facebook.com/townofbasalt

P: 970-927-4701
F: 970-927-4703

[email protected]
Page 178 of 182

Page 179 of 182

12. The design shows the two (2) existing Colorado Blue Spruce on the property. They need to be
pruned to meet clearance guidelines noted in Town code. There should be a minimum of 14 ft
clearance for the road/curb, and 8 ft clearance for any adjacent sidewalks.

2
Page 179 of 182

Page 180 of 182

1|P ag e

February 17th, 2026
Carlton Henry
Town of Basalt Planning Development
Carlton,
The Roaring Fork Fire Rescue Authority has received the Special Review for 540 Basalt Avenue
for a proposed residential unit on the third level of an existing two-story structure. I offer the
following comments;
Site Plan and Landscaping:
•
•
•

Proposed enclosed bike storage located off the first level garage, is an acceptable
location. Recommend drywalled enclosed storage for lithium-ion battery bicycles or
other devices.
Schematic Landscape Plan L2.00:
*Proposed deck planters, or planter’s edge, shall be made of non-combustible material.
*Rooftop sunshade- fire-retardant or fire-resistant material.
Missing snow removal area. I want to confirm that snow storage will not bury the fire
hydrant.

Access/Parking:
•

•
•

The fire hydrant located on Basalt Avenue is critical to keep unobstructed at all times.
The reduction of parking spaces is a concern for the space. Two units with four bedrooms
has a potential for more than two vehicles. On page 13 of the application under letter f, it
states “…proposed residential unit is intended for employee housing of the adjacent
commercial business and within 5 minutes’ walking distance of the Basalt Park and
Ride” Does this mean the adjacent commercial business (Cather’s Home?) is storing that
employee’s vehicle?
What about guest parking?
Recommend bollards to protect fire hydrant.

540 BASALT AVENUE APPLICATION | Review
Comments 2-17-26 B. Stott
Page 180 of 182

Page 181 of 182

2|P ag e

Portable Fire Extinguishers:
•

Portable fire extinguishers shall be on-site during the duration of construction.

Premise identification for Building
•

The address numbers and locations proposed are acceptable to RFFR.

Fire Inspection
•

In a multi-use building, it’s important that commercial space is inspected annually. Our
records show we have not conducted a fire and life safety inspection of the Rug Wash in
the last five years. A fire inspection will be done prior to occupancy.

Sincerely,
Brooke Stott, Fire Marshal

540 BASALT AVENUE APPLICATION | Review
Comments 2-17-26 B. Stott
Page 181 of 182

Page 182 of 182

Read the agenda documentPrimary source ↗

The government’s own published record — read it yourself, then decide what to do about it.

Data centers in BasaltLocal report →

The facilities, the coverage, and the local record for this community.

Outcome

Not yet recorded. The record stays open — outcomes are added as minutes and vote results are published.

Provenance

Where this record came from. Every source is listed, permanently.

Agenda Watch · Oct 5, 2026

Permanent ID DKT-2026-003644 — this record is never deleted.

Record history

Every change to this record, logged as it happened.

Oct 5, 2026 Filed on the Docket
Oct 5, 2026 Full document archived — public record

← The full Docket · every meeting, vote, and action on the permanent record · also in the National Record Index.

On the agenda: Basalt meeting — data center (Mar 17)

The agenda, word for word

Provenance

Record history

More on the Docket in Colorado