On the agenda: meeting — data center (Jan 28)

Agenda
Board of Supervisors
Wednesday, January 28, 2026, at 6:00 PM
Administration Building Auditorium
414 North Main Street, Madison, Virginia 22727
Call to Order, Pledge of Allegiance & Moment of Silence
Determine Presence of a Quorum/Adoption of Agenda
Public Comment
Consent Agenda
1. Approve Minutes: 01/02/2026 & 01/07/2026
Special Appearances
Public Hearing
Old Business
2. E-Summons Fee Ordinance – County Administrator
3. RSA Update – Planning & Zoning Administrator
4. Planning Commission Appointments – Chairman Yowell
New Business
5. Ratification of Declaration of a Local Emergency – Deputy County Administrator
6. Economic Development Committee (EDC) 2025 Report – Vice-Chairman Jewett
7. Industrial Development Authority (IDA) Vacancy – Deputy Clerk
Discussion
8. General Assembly Update – Vice-Chairman Jewett
9. R3 Committee Update – Vice-Chairman Jewett
Information/Correspondence
10. Speed Camera Enforcement Program Update – County Administrator
11. ECC APCO P33 Accreditation – Director of Emergency Communications Center
12. EMS & ECC Commendation – Deputy County Administrator
13. VDOT Follow-Up – County Administrator
Public Comment
Closed Session
Adjourn
The Board of Supervisors’ meeting was originally scheduled for Tuesday, January 27th and was
rescheduled to Wednesday, January 28th due to inclement weather.

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
Meeting Date: 01/27/26

Subject: Consent Agenda
Summary of Information:
Approve Minutes: 01/02/2026 & 01/07/2026

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING
Date:
9:00 AM — Friday, January 2nd, 2026
Location:
Admin. Building Auditorium, 414 N. Main Street
MEETING #1 — January 2nd
At the Organizational Meeting for the Board of Supervisors on Friday, January 2, 2026, at 9:00
AM in the Admin. Building Auditorium:
PRESENT:

Carty Yowell, Chairman
James Jewett, Vice-Chairman
Jud Buchanan, Member
Mike Snider, Member
Nancy Sharman, Member
Jonathon Weakley, County Administrator
Brian Gordon, Deputy County Administrator
Hannon Wright, County Attorney
Kim Turner, Deputy Clerk

ABSENT:

None.

CALL TO ORDER, DETERMINE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM
The County Attorney, serving as the Parliamentarian, called the 2026 Organizational Meeting of
the Madison County Board of Supervisors to order. A quorum was established.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE & MOMENT OF SILENCE
The Parliamentarian stated he would like to start with the Pledge of Allegiance and follow with a
moment of silence.
DESCRIPTION OF MEETING & ELECTION PROCEDURES
The Parliamentarian provided a brief overview of the meeting and the election procedures that
will be utilized for today’s session.
ELECTION OF THE CHAIRMAN
The Parliamentarian opened the floor for nominations for the office of Chairman of the Madison
County Board of Supervisors.
Supervisor Jewett made a motion to nominate Supervisor Yowell as the Chairman of the
Madison County Board of Supervisors.
No further nominations were received, and the nominations were formally closed.
Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
Chairman Yowell thanked the Board for their confidence.

Return To Agenda

ELECTION OF THE VICE-CHAIRMAN
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for nominations for the office of Vice-Chairman of the
Madison County Board of Supervisors.
Supervisor Snider made a motion to nominate Supervisor Jewett as the Vice-Chairman of the
Madison County Board of Supervisors.
No further nominations received.
Supervisor Snider made a motion to close the nominations, seconded by Supervisor Buchanan.
Supervisor Buchanan made a motion to appoint Supervisor Jewett as the Vice-Chairman of the
Madison County Board of Supervisors as nominated, seconded by Supervisor Sharman. Aye:
Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
Vice-Chairman Jewett thanked the Board for their confidence and stated he was here to serve the
County and to support the Board individually and collectively.
ADOPTION OF AN AGENDA
Chairman Yowell inquired if there were any additions or changes to the agenda.
The County Administrator provided a technical clarification regarding the resolution, explaining
that once the Board took action, the remaining details—such as the appointment of the Chairman
and Vice-Chairman—would be completed accordingly, noting that these items were left blank to
avoid making assumptions prior to Board action. Additionally, it was explained that the
appointment of a Clerk of the Board was not included on the agenda because, under the bylaws,
the County Administrator automatically serves in that role.
Supervisor Jewett made a motion to approve the agenda as presented, seconded by Supervisor
Buchanan. Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent:
(0).
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chairman Yowell opened the floor to public comment.
Kim Smith: Mrs. Kim Smith stated she had faith in Chairman Yowell.
With there being no public comment brought forth, the public comment opportunity was closed.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
1. Consideration of Resolution #2026-1 for Calendar Year 2026 – Chairman Yowell
a. Bylaws
b. Code of Ethics

Return To Agenda

The Board reviewed Resolution #2026-1 for Calendar Year 2026 concerning the adoption of the
Board’s Bylaws and Code of Ethics.
***
RESOLUTION #2026-1
A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT AND EFFECT AN ORGANIZATIONAL PLAN FOR
THE MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR THE JANUARY 1, 2026 –
DECEMBER 31, 2026 CALENDAR YEAR
WHEREAS, various provisions of Code of Virginia and Madison County ordinances and
policies as well as tradition indicate that the Madison County Board of Supervisors should take
certain actions following the election and/or during its first meeting every calendar year,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Madison County Board of Supervisors that
the following organizational plan shall apply for the January 1, 2026 – December 31, 2026
calendar year:
I. Bylaws
The Madison County Board of Supervisors Bylaws and Rules of Procedure for 2026 are hereby
adopted by reference.
II. Code of Ethics
The Madison County Board of Supervisors Code of Ethics for 2026 is hereby adopted by
reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it is the intent of the Madison County Board of
Supervisors that each of the elements above is to be in effect until replaced, amended, or
repealed.
***
Chairman Yowell noted that the resolution was straightforward and highlighted Section 7.1 of
the bylaws regarding interactions with county employees, noting that supervisors may maintain
contact with staff but may not direct the County Administrator or county employees except to
convey official Board action, a principle also reflected in the Code of Ethics.
Vice-Chairman Jewett concurred with the Chairman, noting that they should follow the chain of
command by directing inquiries through the County Administrator and limiting direct contact
with staff to information requests. Vice-Chairman Jewett stated that this approach supports
effective operations and commended the County Administrator and staff for their transparency
and handling of personnel matters.

Return To Agenda

Supervisor Buchanan made a motion to approve Resolution #2026-1, applying from January 1,
2026, to December 31, 2026, seconded by Supervisor Jewett. Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan,
Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
2. Committee, Liaison, and Other Appointments – Deputy Clerk
Chairman Yowell stated that proposed assignments had been distributed and prepared in
accordance with the bylaws. The Deputy Clerk was asked to read the assignments line by line,
and the Chairman requested Board concurrence as each was presented.
The following changes were requested:
Board Appointed Committees:
Blue Ridge Cigarette Tax Board

Currently Serves:
Brian Daniel
Jonathon Weakley
Blue Ridge Committee for Shenandoah
Bruce Bowman
National Park Relations
James Ballard
Jud Buchanan
Central Virginia Economic Development
Jonathon Weakley
Central Virginia Regional Jail
Erik Weaver
Jud Buchanan
Community Policy Management Team
Dustin Dawson
Economic Development Committee
James Jewett
Jud Buchanan
Committee would like to retain current members Jim Smith
and add the Planning & Zoning Administrator to Molly Wilshere
membership.
Tracey Gardner
Jonathon Weakley
Brian Gordon
Encompass Community Supports
Brittany Shankle
Joint Capital Improvement Plan Committee
R. Clay Jackson
Carty Yowell
Madison Extension Council
R. Clay Jackson
Parks & Recreation Authority
R. Clay Jackson
Carty Yowell
Piedmont Workforce Development
Annette Hyde
James Jewett
Preliminary Development Review Committee Zachary Whitman
Jamie Wilks
Allen Nicholls
Stephen Carpenter

Board Decisions:
Brian Daniel
Jonathon Weakley
Bruce Bowman
John M. Powell
Jud Buchanan
Jonathon Weakley
Erik Weaver
Jud Buchanan
Mike Snider
James Jewett
Jud Buchanan
Jim Smith
Molly Wilshere
Tracey Gardner
Allen Nicholls
Jonathon Weakley
Brian Gordon
Brittany Shankle
Mike Snider
Carty Yowell
James Jewett
Jud Buchanan
Mike Snider
Annette Hyde
James Jewett
Zachary Whitman
Jamie Wilks
Allen Nicholls
Stephen Carpenter

Return To Agenda

Rapidan Service Authority
Rappahannock Juvenile Detention
Commission
Rappahannock River Basin

Rappahannock Rapidan Regional
Commission
Regional Preparedness Advisory Committee
for Interoperability
Skyline Community Action Partnership
Social Services Board
Thomas Jefferson EMS Council

Topping Fund Committee

Tourism Committee

Circuit Court Appointed Committees:
Board of Zoning Appeals
BZA recommended proceeding with the
reappointment of their Alternate, Jessica Davis.
Board Liaisons:
Director of Emergency Management
Deputy Director of Emergency Management
Coordinator of Emergency Management

Brian Gordon
Jonathon Weakley
Tracey Gardner
Carty Yowell
Dustin Dawson
R. Clay Jackson
(Alternate)
Nancy Coppedge
(Alternate)
Jonathon Weakley
Carty Yowell
Jonathon Weakley
(Alternate)
Jonathon Weakley
Dustin Dawson
Brian Gordon
Gavin Helme
Peter Work
James Jewett
Jud Buchanan
Dustin Dawson
Carty Yowell
(Alternate)
Annette Dodson
Greg Cave
Jonathon Weakley
R. Clay Jackson
Dustin Dawson
Cheryl Yowell
Janine JensonOakerson
Brent Lohr
Currently Serves:
Jessica Davis
(Alternate)
Currently Serves:
R. Clay Jackson
(Chairman)
Jonathon Weakley
Gavin Helme

Brian Gordon
Jonathon Weakley
Tracey Gardner
Nancy Sharman
Mike Snider
Carty Yowell
(Alternate)
Nancy Coppedge
(Alternate)
Jonathon Weakley
Mike Snider
Jonathon Weakley
(Alternate)
Jonathon Weakley
Carty Yowell
Brian Gordon
Ashley Richards
Peter Work
Nancy Sharman
Nancy Sharman
Jud Buchanan
Carty Yowell
(Alternate)
Annette Dodson
Greg Cave
Jonathon Weakley
Carty Yowell
Jud Buchanan
Cheryl Yowell
Janine Jenson-Oakerson
Brent Lohr
Board Decision:
Making recommendation
to Circuit Court: Jessica
Davis (Alternate)
Board Decisions:
Carty Yowell
(Chairman)
Jonathon Weakley
Brian Gordon

Return To Agenda

Deputy Coordinator of Emergency
Management
Historical Society Liaison
Madison County Fire Department Liaison
Madison Town Council Liaison
Madison County School Board Liaison
Madison County Library Board Liaison
Planning Commission Liaison
Tourism Committee Liaison
Virginia Association of Counties (VACo)

Brian Gordon

Jamie Wilks

Jud Buchanan
Jud Buchanan
R. Clay Jackson
Dustin Dawson
R. Clay Jackson
Carty Yowell
James Jewett
R. Clay Jackson
Carty Yowell
Jud Buchanan
Jim Jewett
Jonathon Weakley
(Alternate)

Jud Buchanan
Jud Buchanan
Mike Snider
Nancy Sharman
James Jewett
Nancy Sharman
Nancy Sharman
Mike Snider
Carty Yowell
Jud Buchanan
Jim Jewett
Jonathon Weakley
(Alternate)

Supervisor Snider made a motion to approve the 2026 committees, liaisons, and other
appointments as discussed, seconded by Supervisor Sharman.
Vice-Chairman Jewett agreed that these appointments were excellent selections and would
effectively leverage the skills and interests of both current and newly appointed supervisors.
Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
3. COIA Filing Requirements – Deputy Clerk
The Deputy Clerk advised that annual Conflict of Interest Act disclosure forms would be emailed
and were due by February 2nd. Forms may be completed electronically or by hand, with a
handwritten signature required.
4. FOIA, COIA, & ADA Compliance Training Date - County Administrator
The County Administrator discussed the need for FOIA, COIA, and ADA compliance training,
recommending a joint meeting with the Planning Commission on February 4, 2026.
The Board agreed to the joint meeting date and discussed the importance of proper training for
Board members.
There was further discussion regarding the FOIA process.
DISCUSSION
Supervisor Buchanan welcomed Supervisor Sharman and Supervisor Snider to the Board of
Supervisors.

Return To Agenda

Supervisor Sharman thanked the County Employees and the Board.
INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE
Chairman Yowell reminded the Board of the upcoming joint meeting with the Planning
Commission on January 7, 2026, at 7:00 pm.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chairman Yowell opened the floor to public comment.
Stephanie Murray: Mrs. Stephanie Murray, attended online, congratulated Chairman Yowell
and Vice-Chairman Jewett.
With no public comment being brought forth, the public comment opportunity was closed.
CLOSED SESSION
None.
ADJOURN
With there being no further business to conduct, Supervisor Snider made a motion to adjourn,
seconded by Supervisor Jewett. Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
______________________________________
Carty Yowell, Chairman
Madison County Board of Supervisors
_____________________________________
Jonathon Weakley, Clerk
Adopted on: January 27, 2025.
Attached for the record:
Resolution #2026-1
(Org. Meeting).pdf

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ MEETING
Date:
7:00PM — Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Location:
Admin. Building Auditorium, 414 N. Main Street
MEETING #02 — January 7th
At a Joint Meeting between the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission on
Wednesday, January 7, 2026, at 7:00PM in the Admin. Building Auditorium:
PRESENT:

Carty Yowell, Chairman
James Jewett, Vice-Chairman
Jud Buchanan, Member
Mike Snider, Member
Nancy Sharman, Member
Jonathon Weakley, County Administrator (Present Online)
Brian Gordon, Deputy County Administrator
Hannon Wright, County Attorney
Allen Nicholls, Planning & Zoning Administrator

ABSENT:

Kim Turner, Deputy Clerk

The Board of Supervisors came to order following the adjournment of the
Planning Commission’s portion of the meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Yowell called the Board to order.
DETERMINE PRESENCE OF A QUORUM/ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Chairman Yowell advised that a quorum was present.
Supervisor Jewett made a motion to approve the agenda as presented, seconded by Supervisor
Snider. Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for public comment. With there being no public comment
being brought forward; the public comment opportunity was closed.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. (Case No. RZ-11-25-01) John Wright – Rezoning Request (Public Hearing)
Mr. John Wright has applied to rezone the parcel identified as Madison County tax map 46-39A
from (split-zoned) A-1/C-1 to A-1. The purpose of this rezoning is to allow a future boundary line
adjustment with an adjacent parcel.
The Planning & Zoning Administrator had no additional comments.
The Board did not have questions for the Planning & Zoning Administrator.

Return To Agenda

Mr. John Wright, the applicant, explained the rezoning was necessary to resolve a split-zoning
issue and facilitate a boundary adjustment. Mr. John Wright described his intent to maintain a 3acre parcel with an existing mobile home and combine the remaining acreage to create one
additional lot. No major development was proposed.
The Board did not have questions for the applicant.
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for public comment. With there being no public comment
being brought forward; the public comment opportunity was closed.
Supervisor Snider made a motion to approve Case RZ-11-25-01 as submitted and recommended
by the Planning Commission, seconded by Supervisor Sharman. Aye: Yowell, Jewett,
Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
B. (Case No. ZOA-05-25-01) Al Esh – Zoning Text Amendment (Public Hearing)
Mr. Al Esh has proposed changes to Article 7 (residential multiple family R-3) in order to facilitate
more orderly development of housing projects.
***
Ordinance Amendment # 2025-ZOA-05-25-01
ORDINANCE TO AMEND A PORTION OF APPENDIX 1 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF
THE MADISON COUNTY, VIRGINIA CODE
WHEREAS, by Ordinance duly adopted, the Board of Supervisors of Madison County, Virginia,
adopted Appendix 1, Zoning Ordinance of the Madison County Code, which has been amended
from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Madison County, Virginia, finds that the following
amendments to the Zoning Ordinances of Madison County, Virginia, would promote the health,
safety, and general welfare of Madison County, Virginia, and be in accord with the declarations of
legislative intent set forth in Virginia Code Section 15.2-2200 (1950, as amended) and the Madison
County Comprehensive Plan adopted, as amended, on May 7, 2025;
WHEREAS, the advertisement and notice requirements of Virginia Code Section 15.2-2204 have
been complied with;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Madison County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance of Madison County, Virginia, be, and is
hereby amended to read as follows:
7-3. Area Regulations.
7-3-1.
The minimum lot area shall be 10,000 square feet plus 2,000 square feet for each
additional dwelling unit. The Administrator may require a greater area if considered
necessary by the Health Official.

Return To Agenda

No development within this district shall have a density greater than eight dwelling
units per gross acre of site area nor shall buildings on any parcel within this district
cover more than 35 percent of the total lot area.
7-3-1.1 Single-family dwellings shall require a minimum lot area of eight thousand
(8,000) square feet.
7-3-1.2. Townhouse dwellings shall require a minimum lot area of two thousand
(2,000) square feet or more per dwelling unit.
7-3-1.3. Multifamily dwelling may be constructed at a density of eight (8) units per
acre.
7-3-2.
Open Space Requirements. The site for any multiple family or single family
attached dwellings, shall provide 40 percent of the lot area as open space. When
individual ownership of dwelling units exist, this space may be privately owned by the
homeowners.
7-3-3.
Maximum Building Grouping. Not more than eight townhouses or attached
dwelling units shall be included in any one grouping, and no more than eight dwelling
units shall be included within any multiple-family dwelling, except affordable housing
and/or senior housing not exceeding 60 dwelling units may be included within a
multiple-family dwelling. The maximum frontal length of any building or structure in
this zone shall not exceed 200 feet, except such maximum frontal length shall not
apply to a multiple-family dwelling used as affordable housing and/or senior housing
not exceeding 60 dwelling units.
(Ord. No. 2020-16, 10-7-2020)
7-4. Setback Regulations.
7-4-1.
Structures shall be located 35 feet or more from any street right-of-way which is
50 feet or greater in width, or 60 feet or more from the center line of any street rightof-way less than 50 feet in width.
7-4-2.
All accessory buildings must be located ten feet or more from any property line
except that no accessory building may be located closer to the front of a lot than the
main structure.
7-5. Lot Width Requirements.
The minimum frontage for permitted uses shall be 150 feet measured at the setback
line or measured at the location of the foundation of the subject parcel's principal
dwelling or accessory building. The minimum distance which the building is required
to be located from the street right-of-way or center line shall be known as the setback
line.
7-5-1. All Single-family lots shall have a minimum width of 65 feet.
7-5-2 All Townhouse lots shall have a minimum width of 16 feet.
7-5-3. Multifamily lots shall have a minimum width of 150 feet.

Return To Agenda

Except as amended above, Appendix 1, Zoning Ordinance, remains in full force and
effect.
***
The Planning & Zoning Administrator indicated the proposal had been thoroughly reviewed and
he was available for questions.
Supervisor Buchanan asked whether VDOT was aware of all current and planned development
in the area and how cumulative traffic impacts are evaluated, including the applicant’s proposed
units, nearby developments, and the Madison Hills project. Supervisor Buchanan also asked how
VDOT accounts for this growth when reviewing and approving projects.
The Planning and Zoning Administrator explained that all projects must submit engineered site
plans for county approval and undergo review by VDOT and other agencies, including the health
department and DEQ, to meet regulatory standards. Project designs and densities often change
based on these reviews, and some proposals may not move forward due to regulatory, traffic, or
financial constraints.
Mr. Al Esh, the applicant, stated that the proposed text amendment is intended to create more
orderly and manageable lot sizes, support clustered housing, and reduce land disturbance,
without changing overall density or yield per acre. The proposal restructures lot layouts to
function better within subdivisions, setting minimum standards while allowing for larger lots
where feasible. The applicant clarified that proffers do not apply to the existing by-right R3zoned 30-acre parcel but would be required for any future rezoning and expressed willingness to
answer questions.
Chairman Yowell questioned the applicant’s density calculations, stating that he calculated
approximately seventy-three single-family dwellings at 10,000-square-foot lots and about ninetyone at 8,000-square-foot lots, and asked what factor keeps the total at 73 units, such as larger
setbacks or deeper lots.
Mr. Al Esh clarified that the text amendment retains the existing yield-per-acre standard. Mr. Al
Esh noted that the county expressed a preference for single-family homes over multifamily or
townhomes, and this amendment supports that goal by encouraging single-family development
rather than higher-density alternatives.
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for public comment.
Jennifer Meszaros: Ms. Jennifer Meszaros expressed concerns about rapid development in the
area, noting ongoing land clearing, changing project plans, and potential overuse of
infrastructure, including roads, water, sewer, emergency services, schools, and staffing. While
supporting single-family homes, Ms. Jennifer Meszaros emphasized preserving the community’s
rural character, urged caution and thoughtful planning, and encouraged the board to slow the
process to ensure development aligns with long-term community needs.

Return To Agenda

With there being no further public comment being brought forward; the public comment
opportunity was closed.
Supervisor Buchanan shared his perspective as a “devil’s advocate,” citing a visit to a similar
development where residents were primarily working, double-income households without
children who contribute positively to the local economy. Supervisor Buchanan noted that such
homeowners typically generate fewer service calls, contribute more in taxes, and help support
local businesses. While acknowledging concerns about traffic and infrastructure, Supervisor
Buchanan emphasized that those impacts are addressed through agency review and stated that
the county needs to attract new residents, families, and economic activity to remain vibrant and
financially stable.
Supervisor Snider stated he had been undecided but, after eight months of discussion with no
proposed changes, was inclined to support the amendment as written. Supervisor Snider
explained that due to the county’s 40% open space requirement and infrastructure constraints,
only about seventeen acres of a 35-acre site would be buildable, resulting in an increase from
approximately three to five homes per acre, or about thirty-four additional units overall.
Supervisor Snider noted this approach would encourage single-family homes instead of higherdensity multifamily development, which could otherwise result in significantly more units.
Supervisor Snider also cited declining student enrollment and phased development timelines as
factors reducing immediate strain on schools and infrastructure and expressed confidence that the
amendment strikes a reasonable balance.
Supervisor Sharman stated that the proposal does not align with her campaign focus on
“preparing the future and preserving the past,” emphasizing the need for sufficient business
development and infrastructure to support housing growth. Supervisor Sharman acknowledged
the applicant’s business acumen but expressed hope that the county’s long-term success would
take priority.
Supervisor Jewett expressed opposition to the amendment, citing concerns about unclear and
contradictory R3 zoning language, particularly regarding open space and affordable/senior
housing provisions, which he said could allow significantly higher densities by right. Supervisor
Jewett emphasized the need for a comprehensive, data-driven housing and economic
development strategy rather than incremental changes driven by individual projects. Supervisor
Jewett presented scenarios showing that current zoning already allows substantial development
in the area, potentially resulting in hundreds of additional housing units, which could strain
infrastructure, schools, EMS, and sewer capacity while limiting resources for economic
development. Supervisor Jewett stressed the importance of balancing property rights with
community impacts, warned against cumulative growth without strategic planning, and
concluded that he could not support the amendment without broader zoning reform and a longterm countywide plan.
Chairman Yowell stated that while he acknowledged broader concerns about R3 zoning, those
issues were not the subject of the current vote. Chairman Yowell emphasized that the
amendment would result in only an incremental increase over what is already allowed by right,
estimating an increase from approximately seventy-three to ninety-one homes on a thirty-five-

Return To Agenda

acre example parcel, or about eighteen additional homes. Chairman Yowell noted that similar
modest increases would apply across other R3 parcels and that infrastructure capacity, including
sewer availability, would not be immediately impacted. Citing the comprehensive plan’s support
for higher-density housing near town and villages, property rights, and the benefits of more
compact development with greater open space and fewer roads, Chairman Yowell expressed
support for the text amendment, concluding that its impacts would be limited and that it would
result in a more attractive and efficient development pattern.
Supervisor Snider made a motion to approve Case No. ZOA-05-25-01, seconded by Supervisor
Buchanan.
Supervisor Sharman stated that even if the amendment is approved, the County still needed to
address and revise the broader R3 zoning regulations, and that work should be undertaken as
soon as possible.
Chairman Yowell agreed and recommended tasking the Planning Commission with this at a
future meeting.
The Planning & Zoning Administrator agreed that progress needed to be made.
Aye: Yowell, Buchanan, Snider. Nay: Jewett, Sharman. Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).
C. (Case No. ZOA-05-25-03) Ordinance Amendment (Public Hearing)
The Board of Supervisors has directed the Planning Commission to consider removal,
modification, or retention of Madison County Zoning Ordinance 5-2-1, and 5-1-1.
***
Ordinance Amendment # 2025-ZOA-05-25-03
ORDINANCE TO AMEND A PORTION OF APPENDIX 1 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF
THE MADISON COUNTY, VIRGINIA CODE
WHEREAS, by Ordinance duly adopted, the Board of Supervisors of Madison County, Virginia,
adopted Appendix 1, Zoning Ordinance of the Madison County Code, which has been amended
from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Madison County, Virginia, finds that the following
amendments to the Zoning Ordinances of Madison County, Virginia, would promote the health,
safety, and general welfare of Madison County, Virginia, and be in accord with the declarations of
legislative intent set forth in Virginia Code Section 15.2-2200 (1950, as amended) and the Madison
County Comprehensive Plan adopted, as amended, on May 7, 2025;
WHEREAS, the advertisement and notice requirements of Virginia Code Section 15.2-2204 have
been complied with;

Return To Agenda

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of
Madison County, Virginia, that the Zoning Ordinance of Madison County, Virginia, be, and is
hereby amended to read as follows:
5-2-1.
Livestock on lots less than two acres. However, if such livestock is for the
purpose of a child’s education or participation in 4-H, Future Farmers of America,
Scouting America, or similar group, activity, or curriculum, then it is by right but only
after approval by the zoning administrator. The zoning administrator shall provide the
livestock application form and require qualifying documentation such as from the
child’s faculty advisor or counselor or sworn statement from the child’s parent or
guardian. The fee for the application shall be set by the Board of Supervisors.
Except as amended above, Appendix 1, Zoning Ordinance, remains in full force and
effect.
***
The Planning & Zoning Administrator mentioned he was available for questions.
The Board did not have questions for the Planning & Zoning Administrator.
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for public comment. With there being no public comment
being brought forward; the public comment opportunity was closed.
Supervisor Snider stated that he favored leaving the amendment as written, supported the revised
5-2-1 language, and preferred keeping the final sentence in the text, noting that the board would
establish a minimal application fee.
Chairman Yowell stated that application fees were not included in the amendment because the
Board of Supervisors sets all county fees annually, and he anticipated the fee would be minimal.
Chairman Yowell also noted that completing the application process can serve as a valuable
civics lesson. Chairman Yowell then asked whether the application includes language regarding
animal care, as previously discussed.
The Planning and Zoning Administrator stated that the application language can be handled
administratively rather than by ordinance and can be tailored as needed and expressed
willingness to include the recommended language guiding students to appropriate information on
animal care.
Supervisor Jewett stated that, for consistency with policy, there should be a nominal application
fee, even as low as $1, noting that having a fee reinforces the value of the process and helps educate
applicants about government procedures.
Supervisor Buchanan asked about the duration of approvals, referencing the “4-H youth”
timeframe, and questioned whether an animal could remain on a one-acre property for several
years.
The Planning & Zoning Administrator clarified that approvals were envisioned as valid for 12

Return To Agenda

months at a time, allowing for annual renewal cycles, and noted uncertainty about animal-raising
timelines across seasons.
After further Board discussion, the Board agreed to set the approval period at 24 months, with the
option for renewal, and supported a nominal fee to accompany the process.
Supervisor Buchanan made a motion to approve Case No. ZOA-05-25-03 as presented, seconded
by Supervisor Snider. Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0) Abstain: (0)
Absent: (0).
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
INFORMATION/CORRESPONDENCE
The Planning and Zoning Administrator announced that REC would host an informational
meeting the following morning from 8:30 to 10:00 a.m. at the Daniel Technology Center on
Technology Drive in Culpeper to discuss power needs and future plans.
The County Attorney advised that the Board members could all attend for information-gathering
purposes as long as they did not sit together or discuss county business.
There was a brief discussion about a balloon test that would occur during daylight hours.
DISCUSSION
None.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chairman Yowell opened the floor for public comment. With there being no public comment
being brought forward; the public comment opportunity was closed.
Supervisor Snider announced that local farmer, Mr. Mike Coates, placed first in the state and
second in the nation for corn production in the non-irrigated category and will receive an award
in Texas next month, and the community was encouraged to take pride in his achievement.
CLOSED SESSION
None.
ADJOURN
With there being no further business to conduct, Supervisor Snider made a motion to adjourn,
seconded by Supervisor Sharman Aye: Yowell, Jewett, Buchanan, Snider, Sharman. Nay: (0)
Abstain: (0) Absent: (0).

Return To Agenda

______________________________________
Carty Yowell, Chairman
Madison County Board of Supervisors
_____________________________________
Jonathon Weakley, Clerk
Adopted on: January 27, 2025
Attached for the record:
Case ZOA-05-25-01
Jim Smith Public
BoS Letter Dawson.pdf Comment.pdf

Ordinance
Ordinance
#2025-ZOA-05-25-01 #2025-ZOA-05-25-03
(#2026-1)(Zoning 7-3 (#2026-2)
(Livestock in R1).pdf
- 7-5, R3 Zoned).pdf

Return To Agenda

Madison County Board of Supervisors
Madison County Planning Commission
414 N. Main Street, Madison, VA 22727

7 January 2026

Subject: Case ZOA-05-25-01 RSZoningText Amendment Application
Dear Members of the Madison County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission,
I am writing to request you deny the request to amend the R3 Zoning Ordinance, which is now
before you for a second public hearing.

At the first hearing, the Board of Supervisors raised concerns and suggested potential changes and
compromises, and the request was returned to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
However, no substantive changes were made. The proposal before you today is virtually identical to
the original request.
This outcome reflects a fundamental limitation of the Zon/ng Text Amenc/ment application process:

the Planning Commission was asked to evaluate a single, developer-driven amendment rather than
examine the county’s housing and zoning ordinances as a whole. As a result, the broader impacts
on property taxes, infrastructure, and other stakeholders were not meaningfully addressed.

Planning Commission member Jim Smith has submitted a proposal that offers a constructive path
forward—one that would initiate a comprehensive review of the county’s zoning ordinances and
allow for a thoughtful update to the overall zoning framework. Such a process would ensure that
any changes to housing density are carefully considered, equitable, and aligned with the county’s
long-term goals.

We respectfully urge the Board not to approve this request. Approving ordinance changes tailored
to a single project without a comprehensive review, risks unintended and long-lasting
consequences. Decisions of this magnitude should be made through a deliberate, county-wide

review process—not through piecemeal amendments designed to accommodate one development
proposal.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Lynn M. Dawson
240 Riding Trail Ln
Madison, VA 22727

Return To Agenda

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:

[email protected]
Carty Yowell; James W. Jewett; Jonathon Weakley; Judson Buchanan; Michael Snider; Nancy Sharman
Jim Smith; Allen Nicholls; Steve Carpenter; Kimberly Turner
JHS Comments for 7 January 2026 Joint Meeting
Tuesday, January 6, 2026 6:39:12 PM
20260107 JHS Public Comment Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Al Esh.pdf
20260107 Comments of James H Smith before the Joint Meeting of the Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors.pdf

Good evening and Congratulations on beginning a new year of work for our fellow
citizens.
I have attached comments that I would like for you to consider as you act on the
proposal(s):
1. to increase the density for property zoned R-3 (I oppose for the plethora of
reasons given) and

2. to act on Article 5-2-1 regarding residential livestock (I also oppose staff’s
recommendation to void the provision but agree to the amendment at discussed).
Thank you and I look forward to seeing you Wednesday evening and working with you
this year.
Best,
Jim

James H. Smith, CPC
Madison County Planning Commission
414 N. Main St
PO Box 267
Madison, VA 22727
Cell (703) 626-9863
Jim Smith <[email protected]>

Return To Agenda

Joint Meeting Madison County Board of Supervisors / Madison County Planning
Commission
Wednesday, October 1 2025 at 7:00 PM – 7 January 2026
Statement of James H Smith, CPC
IN RE: ZOA-05-25-01, Al Esh – Zoning Text Amendment. Mr. Esh proposes changes
to Article 7 (residential multiple family R-3) “in order to facilitate more
orderly development of housing projects.”
The applicant comes before us requesting an amendment to Article 7. Residential
Multiple Family R-3, which would allow even greater density than what is currently
allowed by Madison County’s highest residential density zone.
These comments have nothing to do with being pro-development or antidevelopment and they do not address the efficacy of lot sizes, setbacks or open
spaces; they have everything to do with our statutory responsibility to perform due
diligence and be fiscally responsible to our County in advising our Board of
Supervisors. § 15.2-2221
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
A vote in favor of this proposal is a vote in favor of a tax increase to those property
owners other than the ones purchasing the R-3 development as the capital and
operating burden contributed by the R-3 property owners will be inequitably
transferred to the existing property owners, creating a cross subsidy that should be
against public policy. The ONLY beneficiaries would be
1) the developer who would not be required to recognize and pay for the
financial impact on the county and
2) the new purchasers who would not only get a “free ride” for a significant
portion of the county services but also diminish the existing capacity which
places the county nearer to the need to expand those capabilities (e.g.,
schools, fire, public safety, emergency management, etc.)
While the proffer system is sidestepped by the developer friendly SB 974, proffers
are allowed under the Code of Virginia in rezonings. Therefore, the prudent
recommendation would be for the Board of Supervisors to consider
a) Downzoning the current R-3 (See: Turner v. Board of County Supervisors of
Prince William County 263 VA 283 (2000)
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/va-supreme-court/1197325.html
b) Create new intensive zoning classifications and

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 2 of 8
Incorporate a template for zoning requests that incorporates provisions, tailored for
Madison County, found in Loudoun County’s Capital Intensity Factor approach. The
Capital Intensity Factor (CIF) is the dollar amount of the estimated capital facilities
impact of a new residential unit that is calculated using county capital facility
standards and demographic inputs. The CIF is used to assess the capital facilities
impacts of new residential development and provide a guideline for proffer
negotiations during residential rezonings. https://www.loudoun.gov/2530/CapitalIntensity-Factor
DISCUSSION
My rationale for the recommendation to reject the proposal and embark on the
downzoning and rezoning is to reset the adverse action of SB 974 by allowing for
proffers in the rezoning process. In support of this recommendation is the following
examination of what is “Known” and what are the “Known Unknowns” in the
landscape.
KNOWN AND KNOWN UNKNOWNS
What we know includes but is not limited to:
1) SB 974 essentially precludes the ability for the citizens of Madison to directly
voice their concerns regarding a development and further eliminates their
appointed commissioners on the Planning Commission from evaluating a
proposal and their elected representatives on the Board of Supervisors from
approving or denying a proposed development. In so doing, the General
Assembly has eliminated the ability of the locality to collect proffers to offset
costs to the locality.
2) The acreage under review fails to satisfy some of the fundamental requirements
for its existing zoning under ARTICLE 7. RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE FAMILY R-3,
viz,
i) this zone shall be located adjacent to R-2 zones and it is not;
ii) an R-3 zone shall only be established where public water and sewer
facilities are available and they are not;
iii) the zone shall be located adjacent to a major transportation route or traffic
collector of the County and it is not (furthermore, the recently approved
event venue is being evaluated for traffic and will have priority).
iv) R-3 Statistics:
(a) In Madison County, water and sewer service is available primarily
within the Town limits and its immediate surroundings

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 3 of 8
(b) Other systems near the Town limits that are failing should receive

priority
(c) There are 44 parcels with (at least some) R-3 zoning.

(d) Total area of R-3 is estimated at 154.41 acres (could be 15-20 acres
more).
(e) In discussions with planning and zoning and my own research, it
would appear that only one parcel zoned R-3 has public
water/sewer (48-19A).
(f) Furthermore, it would appear that of the 44 parcels with R-3 zoning,
31 contain residences.
3) RSA is currently in the planning stage for increasing the capacity of its
wastewater system, but we know absolutely nothing about the details. We have
been informed (heard rumors) that RSA has secured financing and is obtaining
rights-of-way in the county, but we have no knowledge.
a) RSA Board members and personnel attended a recent Madison County BoS
meeting to “open dialogue” with the county regarding its plans.
b) Is the financing structured as a mortgage or an indenture?
c) What security is provided for the financing?
d) Does RSA have the ability to secure land under eminent domain within the
County or must rights-of-way be obtained? The RSA is a not-for-Profit
corporation that provides water and sewer services to areas of Orange and
Madison counties in Virginia. RSA operates under the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia and is responsible for regional water supply and
sewer services, but it does not operate under public utility regulations. In
Virginia, a service authority is a public body formed to provide public water
and wastewater services to residents, as established under the Virginia Water
and Waste Authorities Act, (Code of Virginia Title 15.2, Chapter 51). This act
provides the authority for localities in Virginia to create water and waste
authorities, which are instrumental in managing public health and welfare
through effective water supply and waste disposal systems While a service
authority operates as a public entity, it is not classified as a public utility in the
traditional sense, as it does not own or operate facilities for the generation or
distribution of electric energy or natural gas. Instead, it focuses on providing
essential public services, which distinguishes it from a public utility. Since the
RSA is neither a public utility nor a public service corporation; it does not have
power of eminent domain and cannot condemn land as accorded those
entities. However, it is unclear whether the provisions of paragraph 6 of §

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 4 of 8
15.2-5114. Powers of authority grants the power of eminent domain to RSA
OR whether they must obtain rights of way through negotiation.
e) Rapidan Service Authority Posted Connection & Availability Fees provides
that
i) New connections to Rapidan Service Authority’s water or sewer systems
are subject to review by RSA and other local authorities [emphasis
supplied]. Availability Charges will be assessed per EDU, if not already
collected for the property in question. Once these charges have been
collected and formal plans for connecting to RSA’s infrastructure have
been approved, additional Connection Costs will apply to cover the cost of
making the connection.
ii) Availability Fee: $10,000 per EDU (water) and $10,000 per EDU (sewer)
See: https://rapidan.org/connection-and-availability-fees
iii) “Equivalent Dwelling Unit” (EDU) is a specific volume of water or sewer
usage set by RSA, from time to time, based on actual usage experience or
other appropriate data. An EDU generally represents the volume of water
or sewer used by a single family. EDU calculations are made at the sole
discretion of RSA management
iv) Is there any requirement on when, to whom and under what conditions
RSA can/will transfer EDUs?
v) The term “other local authority” is not defined nor is the power of the
locality in decision-making addressed.
vi) While the developer will pay RSA $20,000 per dwelling unit for water and
sewer connections, nothing is being paid to the county for the $ 9,689.42
annual fiscal impact per household or $16,644.30 total annual expenditure
per public school student. (see detail in note at end)
4) Our Economic Development Committee has demonstrated that our property
taxes will increase over 50 percent in the near future if the tax base is not
expanded, and it is working toward seeking appropriate development of the Rt
29 corridor. Given the fact that counties in the Commonwealth are
administrative divisions and not sovereign entities, what rights/powers does
county government have regarding the following?
a) Development of commercial sites on the corridor will require adequate water,
wastewater and sewer.
b) Exactly who is making the determination as to what entity will benefit from
the Madison expansion of the RSA facilities—RSA, Residential Real Estate
Developers or the locality government
c) What say does Madison County have regarding the placement of
infrastructure along Rt. 29?

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 5 of 8
d) Should there be a requirement imposed by the County to reserve water and
sewer EDU connects for existing and future commercial development on the
Rt 29 Corridor?
5) In the workshop meetings and prelude to the Joint Hearing of April 3, 2023, CASE
NO. SP-0-24-02, Madison Holdings LLC, there were significant discussions of the
overall plan of the subject parcel. That discussion included the construction of
the storage facility which was apparently to support an apartment building of
single bedroom (plus a bonus room). Concept sketches of the apartments, a
convenience store, and storage units were provided by the Planning and Zoning
Administrator. Is the construction of an apartment building currently under
consideration? Did the application and permit granted for the site include an
apartment building? How many units were proposed for the apartment building?
Is there documented evidence regarding the sewerage requirements of the
apartments and convenience store?
6) During the workshops regarding the instant proposal, raw figures regarding the
Fiscal Impact of housing units as presented during the recent Economic
Development Committee / Board of Supervisors Town Hall were presented and
discussed. The concerns were summarily dismissed as it has not been
addressed, notwithstanding the provisions of Code of Virginia § 15.2-2296,
(Conditional zoning; declaration of legislative policy and findings; purpose) which
specifically addresses the offering of proffers by applicants in such a
conditional rezoning request. No proffers have been offered.
a) Ignoring taxes from other than Residential taxes, the Fiscal Impact of each
housing unit in Madison is $ 9,689.42 and the total Fiscal Impact limited to
local taxes is $ 5,256.62
b) The total annual expenditure per public school student is $16,644.30 and the
tax per proposed unit will not begin to cover that cost. Moreover, a project
this size, represented to be “starter homes” which suggests “starter families”
will result in a population of school age children that will seriously threaten
the capacity of the current school system, thus requiring significant capital
expenditures.
c) Attempts to gain specific data has been akin to playing whack-a-mole, e.g.,
i) During the first hearing on the application, I presented the Fiscal Impact of
housing units based on the county’s 2026 budget to address the tone of
applicant which was to provide “affordable starter homes”
ii) During the next hearing, “starter homes” with school aged children
somehow became retirement homes with a reduced fiscal impact;
iii) During the last hearing, I asked for a “guestimate” of the likely selling price
per dwelling unit and the number of dwelling units to enable me to

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 6 of 8
estimate the revenue portion of a fiscal impact analysis and the applicant
indicated he had “no earthly idea.”
iv) That strains credulity. According to my notes, the applicant’s conceptual
plan that was submitted to accompany his text amendment proposed 162
single-family detached dwellings, 50 multi-family units, and 50
townhouses if both the text amendment and an anticipated rezoning
application of the balance of his acreage were to be approved. This contrasts
sharply with the 61 single-family units that could be constructed with a
future rezoning, but no text amendment.
v) By adding 262 new dwelling units, the inventory of units increased by 4.85
percent as does the population from this proposal alone. Given the recent
work of the Weldon Cooper Center, If the units are not occupied by pent
up demand in Madison, the units will most likely be filled by in-migrants
from Northern Virginia (Lombard, H. (2024, January 29). Amid slow
population growth, Virginia’s demographic landscape is being
transformed. Weldon Cooper Center for Public Policy. Retrieved January 5,
2026, from https://www.coopercenter.org/research/amid-slowpopulation-growth-virginias-demographic-landscape-being-transformed)
vi) I have no problem whatsoever for a person to be incentivized to or
successful in making a profit. HOWEVER, our job is to serve the public
need and that does not include adding a tax burden to those existing
taxpayers who are not benefiting from our actions or giving a free ride to
new taxpayers who will not be bearing their share of the costs of
government. The only beneficiaries in this model are the developer and
the new dwelling purchasers.
7) Goal 3.5 (page 55) of our current Comprehensive Plan provides that we shall:
“Avoid initiatives that would result in the need to expand unreimbursed service
capacity of county services.” This initiative would, without proffers, fail the
established goal.
KNOWN UNKNOWNS
1) Initiatives are underway to appeal or amend SB 974 to restore the rights of
citizens that were summarily stripped by the General Assembly but the success
of that initiative is uncertain.
2) Staff suggests that we should anticipate initiatives from the General Assembly to
require “affordable housing.” Given other initiatives of the statists in the General
Assembly, we can anticipate other diminution of citizen rights in zoning matters,

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 7 of 8
viz, solar farms, affordable housing, data centers, etc. It should be noted that
housing is a regional effort and this region appears to have ample “affordable”
housing as a trip from Charlottesville to Culpeper on Rt. 29 will demonstrate.
3) Initiatives are underway in Madison to recruit candidates for economic
development. We know that water and sewerage will be necessary on the Rt 29
Commercial Corridor but the unknown is how taps and EDUs can be set aside for
economic development.
4) Black Swans.
FISCAL IMPACT BASED ON MADISON COUNTY 2026 ADOPTED BUDGET
STANDARD CATEGORIES
General Govt Administration
Judicial Administration
Public Safety
Public Works
Health and welfare
Education
Parks, Recreation, Cultural
Economic & Community
Development
Non-Departmental
(Contingency)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Revenue from the Feds
Revenue from the State
LOCAL CONTRIBUTION
TOTAL REVENUE

2026 BUDGETED
$
2,848,211
$
1,473,248
$
10,335,828
$
1,507,816
$
6,782,772
$
26,397,863
$
622,933
$

746,342

$

1,530,321

$

52,245,334

$
$
$
$

4,440,885
19,460,753
28,343,696
52,245,334

Should you want to look at the cost on a per capita basis:
Census data: ACS
2023 5-year unless
noted*

Population

13,931

square miles

320.6

FISCAL
IMPACT
TOTAL

FISCAL
IMPACT
LOCAL

$ 3,750.29 $ 2,034.58
.

people per square
43.4
mile
Number of
5,392
$ 9,689.42 $ 5,256.62
households
People per
2.58
household
*The 2019-2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates

Return To Agenda
IN RE: Case No. ZOA-05-25-01 Ordinance Amendment
Comments of James H. Smith, CPC
1 October 2025 -- 7 January 2026
Page 8 of 8
https://www.census.gov/data/developers/data-sets/acs-5year.html

Return To Agenda

Comments of James H Smith before the Joint Meeting of the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors, 7 January 2026
In re Striking Ordinance Appendix 1, Article 5-2-1 which requires a special use
permit for livestock on lots less than two acres and Amending Ordinance
Appendix 1, Article 5-1-1 by striking the exclusion of livestock on lots less than
two acres as by-right use.
As has been stated, this proposal began through complaints from one neighbor of a
less than 2-acre parcel against another neighbor who lived on a 2-acre parcel and, in
violation of the ordinance has, over time, had a flock of chickens, cattle, and most
recently, goats and never requested a special use permit. After several hearings, a
special use permit was granted the landowner on November 5, 2025.
I have objected to both the special use permit and the proposal to strike the
provisions of Article 5-2-1. The reasons were, I thought, clearly stated in earlier
hearings as contained in the packet for tonight’s meeting. Simply stated, allowing
such a change is violative of the underpinning of our system of laws and the notion
of the social contract.
As a society we as individuals consent to be subject to rules and laws and thereby
give them legitimacy. That agreement is the underpinning of our legal system and is
called the Social Contract. Born in the Age of Enlightenment, it proffers that
legitimate political authority arises from a social contract agreed upon by the
people. and we are actually discussing the efficacy of tossing it and its proponents,
Locke, Kant, Hobbes and Rousseau under the bus.
In Madison, we advanced the social contract regarding Zoning on March 29, 1974
and in so doing, we landowners and land users agreed to abide by the use of our land
as provided in the ordinance. Unbridled property rights were restricted when the
Board of Supervisors adopted a zoning ordinance “for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, and general welfare of the public and of further accomplishing the
objectives of Code of Virginia, § 15.1-427. “Among other things, the ordinance was
designed “to protect against over-crowding of land, undue density of population in
relation to the community facilities existing or available, obstruction of light and air,
danger and congestion in travel and transportation, or loss of life, health, or
property from fire, flood, panic or other dangers.” (Madison County, Virginia - Code
of Ordinances, Appendix 1 – ZONING, Article I (6))
The proposal of abandoning our citizens who purchased their residences with the
expectation of not having a food lot or goat yard next door on a small residential lot
in the midst of small residential lots is an afront to the social contract. Abandoning
that restriction and suggesting that their only (legal) redress is limited to an animal
welfare violation (and not a violation of their quiet enjoyment of their property) and

Return To Agenda
Comments of James H Smith before the Joint Meeting of the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors, 7 January 2026
Page 2 of 3
that their claim must pass through the local animal control or the state Veterinarian
is the highest order of duplicity. We all understand that the “self-regulation” we
employ in Madison can result in an added burden on our administrative staff but the
enforcement function of the government is the price of dealing with individuals who
are violative of the contract. If scofflaws persist, we should consider enforcement
through dedicated staff or significant penalties or both.
As an aside, a month after being granted a special use permit, the applicant, in his
felony conviction sentencing on a related matter, was explained the foundational
concept in political philosophy and sociology, referring to an implicit agreement
among individuals within a society to abide by certain rules and laws for mutual
benefit and protection. The presiding judge explained that individuals consent,
either explicitly or implicitly, to form a society and accept its rules in exchange for
safety and communal benefits and the judge admonished him to abide by those
rules if not for himself, then as an example for his sons.
Our zoning ordinance provides for “[t]he use of land, buildings, structures, and other
premises for agricultural, commercial, industrial, residential, and other specific
uses.” The vast majority of land in Madison falls within Agricultural Zoning. As
students may find an interest in animal husbandry but find themselves on a small
acreage Residential property, citizens have proposed an acceptable exception has
been proposed, viz, change the ordinance to allow poultry (2 or 3 hens per occupant)
and allow livestock when it is the subject of an active 4-H, FFA or Scouting project.
Special Use Permits would be required for such projects but there would be no
application fee and the appropriate certification of the faculty sponsor of the
student regarding the project would result in its being granted administratively.
Thereby, students would gain not only a skillset in animal husbandry but also an
appreciation for civic responsibility. I would agree with Supervisor Jewett’s
suggestion that adherence to USDA guidelines for stocking in addition to VDACS
regulations be included in the ordinance.
PROPOSAL:
5-2. Special Permit Uses. The following uses may also be permitted subject to
securing a special use permit as
provided for in Article 14-3:
5-2-1.
5-2-2.
Livestock on lots less than two acres. However, if such livestock is for the purpose of
a child’s education or participation in 4-H, Future Farmers of America, Scouting

Return To Agenda
Comments of James H Smith before the Joint Meeting of the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors, 7 January 2026
Page 3 of 3
America, or similar group, activity, or curriculum, then it is by right but only after
approval by the zoning administrator. The zoning administrator shall provide the
livestock application form and require qualifying documentation such as from the
child’s faculty advisor or counselor or sworn statement from the child’s parent or
guardian. The fee for the application shall be set by the Board of Supervisors.
In keeping with the spirit of Supervisor Yowell’s and Supervisor Jewett’s
comments in the recent SUP request, the proposed “Application For Livestock On
R-1 Zoned Properties Less Than Two Acres” should contain a statement to the
effect that the applicant understands that the care of the animals must satisfy the
requirements of the US Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Virginia
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (“VDACS”) regarding the welfare
of farm animals.

This proposal to tweak the ordinance is well within the parameter of the Social
Contract; the proposal to abandon it is not.
Thank you for your consideration.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 01/27/26

Subject: Old Business
Summary of Information:
E-Summons Fee Ordinance – County Administrator
RSA Update – Planning & Zoning Administrator
Planning Commission Appointments – Chairman Yowell

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 1/27/26
Item Number: 2

Subject: E-ticket summons
Background: Over a year ago, the Sheriff’s Office moved to implement citation of speeding tickets
through a new e-ticket system. This allows for a more streamlined approach for traffic stops and
enforcement.
Summary of Information: Upon the arrival of our new Clerk of the Combined Court, County
Administration was asked if the County would implement a not to exceed $5 fee for each e-summons.
Madison doesn’t currently collect an e-summons fee. The fee would be beneficial to help offset some of
the costs associated with the e-ticketing system. In conversation with the Clerk of the Combined Court,
she has provided the ordinance used by Greene County for the Madison County Board of Supervisor
review and consideration to potentially adopting a similar ordinance. The County Aministrator has
discussed the e-summons suggestion with Sheriff Weaver. Sheriff Weaver supports the ordinance to allow
for the e-summons fee assessment as the e-ticket program has been a benefit to his department for
enforcing traffic stops and administering summons.
Recommended Action: Consider the recommendation of implementing the e-summons fee via ordinance
and review the Greene County Ordinance for reference in deciding if the Board wishes to move forward
with adopting a similar ordinance.
Attachments:
Yes
No
•

Greene County E-summons Ordinance

Legal Review:

Complete

Pending

N/A

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

January 27, 2026
To: Madison County Board of Supervisors
From: Allen Nicholls, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Re: Requested Board Actions Regarding Rapidan Service Authority (RSA) Water and Sewer Planning Priorities
Dear Members of the Board,
County staff respectfully requests Board direction on a set of focused priorities intended to improve coordination,
transparency, and long-term planning related to Rapidan Service Authority (RSA) water and sewer infrastructure. These
actions are necessary to support public health, redevelopment, and economic development, and to provide a clear
planning framework for both the County and RSA.
Outlined below are five specific priorities and the associated actions requested of the Board.
Priority 1
Adopt water and sewer service area maps. Without them, neither the County nor RSA can plan infrastructure or justify
investments.
This board would:
• Direct staff to finalize draft service area maps. I assume that we would then need to amend the Comprehensive
Plan to incorporate the maps
• Request RSA’s formal adoption and publication of the maps.
Priority 2
Establish an EDU Management Policy to include sunset provisions
This board would:
• Endorse a method for allocating EDUs to
o Failing septic areas
o Redevelopment in town
o Public utilities
o Commercial development
o Residential
• Endorse a reserve
• Support sunset provisions and non-user fees to prevent warehousing
Page 1 of 2

Return To Agenda
Priority 3
Complete updated hydraulic modeling
This board would:
• Request RSA to initiate modeling with a defined timeline.
• Ensure that the modeling incorporates GIS parcel data and growth areas.

Priority 4
Improve transparency through publication of RSA policies and infrastructure maps
The board would:
• Request RSA to publish policies, procedures, and maps on its website.
• Encourage quarterly updates during this process, then annual updates.
Priority 5
Maintain GIS layers for service areas, failing systems, and priority parcels
This board would:
• Direct staff to maintain GIS layers for service areas, failing systems, and priority parcels.
• Ensure RSA uses the same shared datasets.
These priorities represent targeted, achievable steps that will significantly improve infrastructure planning and
coordination between Madison County and RSA. Board direction on these actions will provide the clarity necessary for
staff to proceed and for RSA to align its planning efforts with County goals.
County staff also requests Board support for continued coordination with the Rapidan Service Authority to pursue
funding for proposed water and sewer capital improvements within Madison County. This support may include
collaboration on state and federal grant applications, provision of County data and planning documentation, and
consideration of direct County participation where appropriate. Active County involvement in funding efforts will
strengthen grant competitiveness, accelerate needed infrastructure investments, and help ensure that improvements
align with adopted service areas, public health priorities, and long-term redevelopment and economic development
goals.
Sincerely,
Allen Nicholls
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Madison Co. Building & Zoning Department
410 N Main St/PO Box 1206
Madison, VA 22727
(P): 540-948-6102 EXT: 1200
(email): [email protected]
(website): www.madisonco.virginia.gov

Page 2 of 2

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

New wastewater EDUs
Reserve for Town
Reserve for Resettlement
Reserve for in-distrct Health Emergency
Non-Residential Use
School/Government
No Reserve

400
20
40
20
100
10
210

total reserved edus
reserves as a % of total

190
48%

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 01/27/26
Item Number: 4

Subject: Planning Commission Appointments
Background: Mr. Mike Snider served on the Planning Commission and was elected to the
Board of Supervisors effective January 1, 2026. As a result, his Planning Commission seat
became vacant, leaving an unexpired term ending January 31, 2028. In addition, Mr. James
Graves’ term on the Planning Commission expired on January 31, 2026.
Summary of Information: On November 12, 2025, the Board of Supervisors was informed of
the two upcoming vacancies and directed staff to advertise the positions. Staff presented all
received applications to the Board on December 9, 2025, and the Board agreed to conduct
interviews in closed session on January 13, 2026.
It was decided that the appointments would be announced at the January 27, 2026 Board of
Supervisors meeting.
Recommended Action: The Board make a motion to appoint applicants to fill the vacant
Planning Commission positions at its discretion.
Attachments:
•

Yes

No

Planning Commission Application’s Reviewed

Legal Review:

Complete

Pending

N/A

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda
Name of Primary Employer:*
General Atomics

Address of Primary Employer:*
323 2nd Street Charlottesville, Va

Occupation / Title:*
Program Manager

Education (Please List Degrees & Graduation Dates):*
BA History, The College of William and Mary, May 2001
MS International Relations, Troy University, Jan 2007
Emergency Management Institute, multiple certificates
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church, or Social Groups:
Member of Crisis Lab - International Consortium focused on Response, Resiliency, and Emergency Management in all
Disaster Cycles
Memberships in Civic & Charitable Organizations, and Other Activities or Interests:
Volunteer at MESA and Orange Free Clinic
I am interested in opportunities to support emergency management processes and operations in Madison. Additionally, I
am committed to supporting the most vulnerable in our community, region, state, and abroad.
Reasons for Desiring to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee:*
I want to formally support my community while upholding the laws, authorities and our values. I also want to be a clear and
supportive influence in the growth of our county.
Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will be available for review by members of the public under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda
Name of Primary Employer:*
Phillips C&C, LLC

Address of Primary Employer:*
1287 N. Seminole Trail, Madison Va

Occupation / Title:*
President

Education (Please List Degrees & Graduation Dates):*
High School 1993
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church, or Social Groups:
Freemason
Memberships in Civic & Charitable Organizations, and Other Activities or Interests:
Former Culpeper Town Council 2010-2014
Reasons for Desiring to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee:*
To keep Madison’s rural roots while encouraging smart growth.
Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will be available for review by members of the public under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda
Name of Primary Employer:*
Amazon Web Services

Address of Primary Employer:*
1770 Crystal Dr Arlington VA

Occupation / Title:*
Security Engineer

Education (Please List Degrees & Graduation Dates):*
UVA-Wise - Bachelor of Software Engineering (2020)
Auburn University - MBA (2026)
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church, or Social Groups:
E2 Management team, Board of Directors @ CTEC, 3rd Thursdays Chairman for Culpeper CRI
Memberships in Civic & Charitable Organizations, and Other Activities or Interests:
CUMC methodist church member
Reasons for Desiring to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee:*
Moved to Madison, lived in Culpeper all of my life. Looking to get involved and serve my community in any way I can. If
this committee is not right for me, please keep me in mind for any other opportunities that I can provide any help. Thanks!
Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will be available for review by members of the public under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda
Name of Primary Employer:*
Senterfitt Farms

Address of Primary Employer:*
P.O. Box 711 Madison Va 22727

Occupation / Title:*
Owner operator

Education (Please List Degrees & Graduation Dates):*
Bachelor of Agricultural Business WVU,
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church, or Social Groups:
Madison young farmers, Madison farm bureau board vice president and treasurer
Memberships in Civic & Charitable Organizations, and Other Activities or Interests:
4 years Madison planning commission, 12 years Board of supervisors (10 years chairman), many committees previous
years on bos
Reasons for Desiring to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee:*
I have experience on zoning and planning, understand Madison county ordinances, comp plan, and advisory role of
planning commission to the board of supervisors. Also understand both commercial and residential challenges of Madison
county moving forward. I love this community, hope my experience could be helpful without biases and it would be a
pleasure to serve.
Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will be available for review by members of the public under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda

Education (Please List
Degrees & Graduation
Dates):

Graduate of Madison County High School, AS Business courses.

Memberships in
Fraternal, Business,
Church, or Social
Groups:

Field not completed.

Memberships in Civic &
Charitable
Organizations, and
Other Activities or
Interests:

Past Chairman Madison Planning Commision, Past Chairman
Madison Parks and Rec., Past Scoutmaster Madison Boy
Scouts, Past President Madison Youth Sports, Past Director
Madison Jaycees, Past member Madison Fire Dept.

Reasons for Desiring to
Serve on this Board /
Commission /
Committee:

Serve the community

Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will
be available for review by members of the public under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Return To Agenda

Return To Agenda
Name of Primary Employer:*

Address of Primary Employer:*

Occupation / Title:*

Education (Please List Degrees & Graduation Dates):*
HS diploma
Memberships in Fraternal, Business, Church, or Social Groups:
Novum Baptist Church
Memberships in Civic & Charitable Organizations, and Other Activities or Interests:
Reasons for Desiring to Serve on this Board / Commission / Committee:*
Contribute to Madison, Virginia
Please be aware that this submission and all information provided will be available for review by members of the public under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Please direct any questions to Kimberly Turner.

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
Meeting Date: 01/27/26

Subject: New Business
Summary of Information:
Ratification of Declaration of a Local Emergency – Deputy County Administrator
Economic Development Committee 2025 Report – Vice-Chairman Jewett
Industrial Development Authority (IDA) Vacancy – Deputy Clerk

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: January 27, 2026
Item Number: 5

Subject: Ratification of Declaration of Local Emergency
Background: On January 22, 2026, the County issued a Declaration of Local Emergency due to
impending severe winter weather to include significant snow fall, icing, and extreme
temperatures.
Summary of Information: Based on forecasted weather and extreme temperatures the County
issued a Declaration of Local Emergency to assist response efforts should they be needed.
Recommended Action: Move to approve and ratify the Declaration of Local Emergency dated
January 22, 2026 via Resolution #2026-2.

Attachments:
•
•

Yes

No

Declaration of Local Emergency Dated January 22, 2026
Resolution #2026-2

Legal Review:

Complete

Pending

N/A

Return To Agenda

DECLARATION OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, upon advice of qualified individuals, I have found that:
1. Due to the potential widespread impacts and severity of Winter Storm Fern;
2. Due to the National Weather Service issuing a Winter Storm Watch for Madison County;
3. Due to the extreme cold temperatures that will follow Winter Storm Fern;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED that an emergency now exists throughout said
County and
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said emergency the
powers, functions, and duties of the Director of Emergency Management and the organization
of Madison County shall be those prescribed by state law and the ordinances, resolutions, and
approved plans of Madison County to mitigate the effects of said emergency.
FURTHER, I hereby direct the County Administrator to present this proclamation at the next
meeting of the Board of Supervisors for ratification.

:tt •ts;

2--,s.

,
Brian Gordon, ™dminist�

Return To Agenda

Chairman
Carty Yowell

County Administrator
Jonathon Weakley

Vice-Chairman
James Jewett

County Attorney
Hannon Wright

Board Members
Jud Buchanan
Mike Snider
Nancy Sharman

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

414 N Main Street
P.O. Box 705
Madison, Virginia 22727
PH: (540) 948-7500
FAX: (540) 948-3843

RESOLUTION #2026-2
RESOLUTION TO RATIFY THE DECLARATION OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, upon advice of qualified individuals, the Board of Supervisors of Madison County, Virginia,
found that:
1. Due to the potential widespread impacts and severity of Winter Storm Fern;
2. Due to the National Weather Service issuing a Winter Storm Watch for Madison County;
3. Due to the extreme cold temperatures that will follow Winter Storm Fern;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY PROCLAIMED by the Board of Supervisors of Madison County,
Virginia, that a local emergency now exists throughout said County; and
IT IS FURTHER PROCLAIMED AND ORDERED that during the existence of said emergency the powers,
functions, and duties of the Director of Emergency Management and the organization of Madison County shall
be those prescribed by state law and the ordinances, resolutions, and approved plans of Madison County to
mitigate the effects of said emergency.
FURTHER, I hereby direct the County Administrator to present this proclamation at the next meeting of the
Board of Supervisors for ratification.
Adopted this 27th day of January 2026 on motion of Supervisor _______________________, seconded by
Supervisor ________________________.

Return To Agenda

__________________________________
Carty Yowell, Chairman
Madison County Board of Supervisors
__________________________________
Jonathon Weakley
County Administrator
Motion
C. Yowell
J. Jewett
J. Buchanan
M. Snider
N. Sharman

Second

Aye

Nay

Absent

Abstain

Return To Agenda

Madison County Economic Development Committee Annual Report
2025
The Economic Development Committee (EDC) had an active year in 2025. The committee
researched and assessed several possible businesses for Madison County. The committee also
analyzed the revenue and spending projections for the Madison County Government for the
years 2026-2030. The first annual EDC town hall meeting was held in August 2025 to present
the results of the research and analysis activities to the public. A summary of the results is
presented below:
1. Perspective Industries/Businesses Researched for location in Madison County
a. Data Centers – extensive research that included interviews with industry
personnel and a site visit to a data center in Prince William County.
i. Preliminary county policies regarding zoning and planning were
discussed in relation to possible future data center development.
ii. While several data center companies spoke with our committee, there
was no serious interest in locating a data center in Madison. The primary
impediment was the lack of electrical power infrastructure. The
committee will continue to pursue this project.
b. Warehouses – contacted several potential parties regarding the old Plow and
Hearth warehouse.
i. Ultimately, no company decided to locate to the P&H facility. The
current tenant Box in Box Out operates in approximately one half of the
building and may expand.
c. Tourism continues to provide significant business activity and tax revenue for
the county – reviewed current strategies to promote tourism in the county
i. Tourism continues to be a major industry in Madison County. The
challenge is to have businesses that tourists can spend money on such
as restaurants/shops/entertainment.
ii. The committee is exploring ways to tie into the VA250 initiative for 2026
d. County ordinances review:
i. Consideration of proposed Fiscal Impact Fees for new housing
developments – legislation is planned to be introduced in the 2026
General Assembly by Delegate Karen Hamilton on behalf of Madison
County that would permit localities to assess impact fees on the
conversion of agriculture land into housing developments.
ii. Home based businesses – this ordinance redevelopment is continuing
into 2026.

Return To Agenda

2. Analyzed current revenue and spending trends for the county government from 2026 –
2030
a. The rate of spending is outpacing the rate of tax revenues
b. County residents could face significant property tax increases within the next
five years without significant growth in the business tax base.
c. The committee worked closely with the Commissioner of Revenue to evaluate
the potential tax revenue from different categories of businesses.

3. Improved communication with the Madison community by hosting a Town Hall meeting
in August
a. Covered the projected budget situation (from section 2 above)
b. Reviewed the economic development initiatives from above (from section 1
above)
The EDC was very active in 2025 and did extensive research and communications with
perspective businesses. Although success was mostly elusive, the county now has an
organized and dedicated working group to pursue economic development. The EDC is currently
developing a strategic plan for 2026 and will consult with the Board of Supervisors on the
development of the plan. The committee is targeting February 2026 to have the plan completed.

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 01/27/26
Item Number: 7

Subject: Industrial Development Authority (IDA) Vacancy
Background: On January 12, 2026, Mr. Steve Hoffman, Chairman of the Industrial
Development Authority (IDA), submitted his letter of resignation.
Additionally, two IDA directors’ terms are set to expire on April 11, 2026. Staff are currently
awaiting confirmation on whether these individuals are interested in being reappointed for
another term.
Summary of Information: The Board of Supervisors must address the vacancy created by Mr.
Hoffmans’ resignation and prepare for the upcoming term expirations. Timely action will ensure
continuity of leadership and operations within the IDA
Recommended Action: The Board to provide direction regarding the appointment process for the
vacancy and potential reappointments.
Attachments:

Yes

No

Legal Review:

Complete

Pending

N/A

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 01/27/26

Subject: Discussion
Summary of Information:
General Assembly Update – Vice-Chairman Jewett
R3 Committee Update – Vice-Chairman Jewett

Return To Agenda

R3 Committee Report to the Madison County Board of Supervisors
January 28, 2026
Summary from Allen Nichols
We set goals to achieve during the rewrite.
• Preserve and clearly define open space.
• Add ingress/egress requirements.
• Clarify/lower density.
• Split off multi-family for 5+ unit properties into a new district.
Action taken during meeting.
• Agreed to move multi-family greater than 4 units to new district.
• Determined a rewrite of the Statement of Intent is necessary.
• Revised the proposed qualifying open space to exclude medians.
• Removed a recorded conservation easement as an option (suggestion?) for open
space protection.
• Specified criteria that could constitute an appropriate future public use of an open
space area.
Action taken after the meeting
• New Statement of Intent drafted (updated working draft attached).
• Entrance Regulations significantly modified.
• Minor grammatical changes.
• Name of district updated to Residential, Medium Density R-3
Follow-up required
• Analysis to compare our open space requirements to other localities.
• Draft R-4 ordinance.
• Schedule meeting date for follow up.
• Review current draft for other changes/revisions

Future Considerations: (Jim Jewett)
HB816/SB454
Zoning; by-right multifamily development. Requires a locality to include provisions in
its zoning ordinance allowing for the by-right development and construction of
multifamily residential uses on at least 75 percent of all land contained in commercial
or business zoning district classifications, including any land contained in commercial
or business zoning district classifications that allow for the by-right development and

Return To Agenda

construction of single-family residential uses. The bill provides that such provisions
shall not apply in underdeveloped areas that are covered by a tree canopy of at least 60
percent, impose more stringent land use requirements for such development than
would otherwise be required, or require that a special exception, special use, or
conditional use permit be obtained for such development. The bill also (i) stipulates
that the review and approval of such development shall be done administratively by the
locality's staff; (ii) requires that the zoning ordinance provisions must exempt any
proposed development that converts an existing building to a multifamily residential
use from any setback, height, or frontage requirements; (iii) permits the zoning
ordinance provisions to require any proposed development to dedicate some or all of
its ground floor space to commercial uses; and (iv) provides that any proposed
residential development that dedicates a minimum of 10 percent of the total number of
housing units to affordable housing may be offered application incentives by the
locality. The bill also prohibits localities from approving any commercial or business
use on a property adjacent to the approved multifamily residential development that is
different from the use that had been established at the time the multifamily residential
development was approved.

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA

Meeting Date: 01/27/26

Subject: Information/Correspondence

Summary of Information:
Speed Camera Enforcement Program Update – County Administrator
ECC APCO P33 Accreditation – Director of Emergency Communications Center
EMS & ECC Commendation – Deputy County Administrator
VDOT Follow-Up – County Administrator

Return To Agenda

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:

Jonathon Weakley
Carty Yowell; James W. Jewett; Judson Buchanan; Nancy Sharman; Michael Snider
Brian Gordon; Kimberly Turner; Hannon Wright; Erik Weaver
Blueline Solutions Speed Camera Update
Friday, January 16, 2026 2:19:16 PM

Dear Board,
Today I spoke with Blueline Solutions about the approved speed camera program. They have
begun installing some of the pedestals along Route 29 in the school zone. They now must
order the beacon lights and have additional signage to install. We anticipate the program going
live maybe in April. As some of you may recall, this program was recommended and supported
by the sheriff as an effort to slow people down on Route 29, especially during school hours.
Please feel free to reach out if you have questions.
Thanks,
Jonathon Weakley
County Administrator
Madison County
PO Box 705
Madison, VA 22727
540-948-7500

Return To Agenda

MADISON COUNTY EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
P. O. Box 705
107 Church Street
Madison, Virginia 22727

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CONTACT:

January 21, 2026

Ashley Richards, Director
(540) 948-5144
[email protected]

Madison County Emergency Communications Receives APCO Agency Training Program Accreditation
Madison, Virginia – Madison County Emergency Communications has received Agency Training Program
Accreditation, a Project 33® Initiative, from the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials
(APCO) International.
To obtain accreditation, Madison County Emergency Communications submitted its training curriculum
to APCO International, who conducted a review of the materials and documents provided. The review
evaluated the training curriculum to ensure it provides trainees with the required content and
documents the demonstration of decision and psychomotor skills cited within the standard.
Public safety agencies use the APCO International Agency Training Program Accreditation as a formal
mechanism to ensure their training programs meet APCO American National Standards (ANS). Initial and
continuing training for public safety telecommunicators is important as they provide essential services
to the public in an expanding and rapidly changing environment.
“Achieving accreditation affirms our commitment to accountability, continuous improvement, and
public trust. Our community deserves a training program that meets the highest standards, and we
are proud to deliver that.” -Jennifer Shifflett, Assistant Director
For more information about the Agency Training Program Accreditation process, visit apcointl.org/atpa.

Madison County Emergency Communications | madisonco.virginia.gov
The Madison County Emergency Communications Center provides 24/7 public safety communications
services for Madison County, supporting law enforcement, fire, and emergency medical services.

Return To Agenda

To the Madison County Board of Supervisors
I am privileged and humbled to acknowledge the Madison County EMS employees and
county dispatchers.
On Friday December 11th. 2025 I placed a 911 call requesting urgent medical assistance
for an individual who was suffering a heart attack.
The following employees saved a life that afternoon and deserve the highest recognition.
EMS personal Jordan Peachey, Haley Robles, Chris Turner.
County Dispatcher Peautrice Ware, without her none of this could have happened.
These employees represented the county in the highest and most professional form
possible, I am honored to acknowledge them.
They did exactly what they trained for and saved a life that day!
The lifelong Madison county resident is doing well and is most grateful and expresses their
utmost gratitude.
Best Regards,
Jeff Green
813 Hidden Vale Ct
Madison Va 22727

Return To Agenda

From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:

Jonathon Weakley
Kimberly Turner
FW: Route 29 Signal Timing at Oak Park
Friday, January 23, 2026 10:04:32 AM
Outlook-k2sxpi13.png

VDOT additional packet information regarding ADA request.
Jonathon Weakley
County Administrator
Madison County
PO Box 705
Madison, VA 22727
540-948-7500

From: Shepheard, Carrie (VDOT) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2026 1:10 PM
To: Jonathon Weakley <[email protected]>
Subject: Route 29 Signal Timing at Oak Park

Jonathon,
In response to the question about providing more time at the intersection of 29 and Oak
Park for a bicyclist to cross 29, we currently have a consultant reviewing the timing and
signal coordination for the signals in Madison County. We made sure the consultant
takes this request into consideration as they review the corridor. We are considering a
few different options at this point, but we need the results from the consultant to
determine any impacts. The task order is scheduled to complete by mid-Spring, so I'll
provide an update as that date approaches.
Thanks,
Carrie
Carrie Shepheard, P.E.
Resident Engineer / Charlottesville
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9779
[email protected]

Return To Agenda

From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:

Shepheard, Carrie (VDOT)
Jonathon Weakley
Kimberly Turner
Re: VDOT Inquiries.1.16.26
Thursday, January 22, 2026 1:31:50 PM
Outlook-rsbdoxuk.png

Jonathon,
Happy New Year to you as well! Please see my responses below:

I had a resident mention that traffic counters were placed on Route 29 in
November 2025. They wanted to know the outcome. Was this for updated traffic
counting or speed analysis?
These traffic counters were for the on-going signal coordination project in the County
that I mentioned in my last email. We should have more information on that analysis in
late spring.
Another resident spoke at a BOS meeting and asked if there was any update on
concerns of the intersection of Route 29 and Route 230 Orange Road. I asked the
citizen to provide more detail. They stated their concerns of that intersection is the
big trucks or people in RV’s headed north and turning south on Route 29, that the
u-turns are dangerous. I know Supervisor Yowell had made a comment that he
thought maybe that intersection be closed off and traffic utilize Gibbs Road to
access Orange Road or Blue Ridge Turnpike. I believe when I spoke to VDOT at the
Pratts Round-about public meeting, I was informed any changes to Gibbs Road, or
the intersection of Route 29 and Orange Road would maybe need to be considered
for SMART Scale funding. Would you review the intersection for any suggestions or
feedback to the BOS on large vehicle u-turns and the overall safety of that
intersection.
I will bring this up in the next monthly Traffic Engineering coordination meeting.
However, since the issue is those larger vehicles going to the RV Resort, I'm not sure
closing the access point at 29/230 or at the crossover will help. The vehicles will just
have to travel farther north to make the U-turn and will likely just shift the problem.
Another consideration to closing the access point here, is the potential loss of access
for the business on the corner. We'll brainstorm and see if we can come up with any
suggestions.

Return To Agenda

Also, in advance of the storm this weekend, please feel free to reach out if you need
anything. Mark Shifflett and I will be working daytime, and Josh Smoot, the Assistant
Resident Administrator, will be working nights. You have mine and Mark's contact, and
Josh can be reached at 540-739-5663.
Thanks,
Carrie
Carrie Shepheard, P.E.
Resident Engineer / Charlottesville
Virginia Department of Transportation
434-422-9779
[email protected]

From: Jonathon Weakley <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2026 12:41 PM
To: Shepheard, Carrie (VDOT) <[email protected]>
Cc: Kimberly Turner <[email protected]>
Subject: VDOT Inquiries.1.16.26
Hello Carrie,
Happy New Year! I am reaching out as I have a few items I wish to inquire about.
I had a resident mention that traffic counters were placed on Route 29 in November
2025. They wanted to know the outcome. Was this for updated traffic counting or speed
analysis?
Another resident spoke at a BOS meeting and asked if there was any update on
concerns of the intersection of Route 29 and Route 230 Orange Road. I asked the citizen
to provide more detail. They stated their concerns of that intersection is the big trucks or
people in RV’s headed north and turning south on Route 29, that the u-turns are
dangerous. I know Supervisor Yowell had made a comment that he thought maybe that
intersection be closed off and traffic utilize Gibbs Road to access Orange Road or Blue
Ridge Turnpike. I believe when I spoke to VDOT at the Pratts Round-about public
meeting, I was informed any changes to Gibbs Road, or the intersection of Route 29 and
Orange Road would maybe need to be considered for SMART Scale funding. Would you
review the intersection for any suggestions or feedback to the BOS on large vehicle uturns and the overall safety of that intersection.
Also, we are tracking you to be on a quarterly meeting schedule at our board meetings. Do you

Return To Agenda

have your 2026 quarterly appearance schedule? Thank you for considering the inquiries above.
I look forward to updates as they are available.
Warm regards,
Jonathon Weakley
County Administrator
Madison County
PO Box 705
Madison, VA 22727
540-948-7500